Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7200722B2 - In-mold flow control method in curved continuous casting equipment - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7200722B2 - In-mold flow control method in curved continuous casting equipment - Google Patents

In-mold flow control method in curved continuous casting equipment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7200722B2
JP7200722B2 JP2019021263A JP2019021263A JP7200722B2 JP 7200722 B2 JP7200722 B2 JP 7200722B2 JP 2019021263 A JP2019021263 A JP 2019021263A JP 2019021263 A JP2019021263 A JP 2019021263A JP 7200722 B2 JP7200722 B2 JP 7200722B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
mold
flow
electromagnetic
discharge hole
electromagnetic brake
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2019021263A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2020127953A (en
Inventor
寛 原田
圭太 池田
悠衣 伊藤
拓也 高山
華乃子 山本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2019021263A priority Critical patent/JP7200722B2/en
Publication of JP2020127953A publication Critical patent/JP2020127953A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7200722B2 publication Critical patent/JP7200722B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Continuous Casting (AREA)

Description

本発明は、湾曲型連続鋳造装置における鋳型内流動制御方法および鋳型内流動制御装置に関するものである。 The present invention relates to an in-mold flow control method and an in-mold flow control device in a curved continuous casting apparatus.

最近のスラブ連続鋳造装置においては、鋳型直下に2ないし3mの垂直部を有する垂直曲げ型連続鋳造装置が多く採用されている。鋳型直下の垂直部で気泡及び非金属介在物を浮上分離させ、鋳片表皮下での気泡と非金属介在物問題を解決するためである(例えば非特許文献1第434頁参照)。鋳型直下の垂直部の下端において、鋳片を曲げて湾曲形状とする。湾曲部から水平部に移行する位置において鋳片を曲げ戻し、水平に引き抜く形式である。 In recent slab continuous casting apparatuses, vertical bending type continuous casting apparatuses having a vertical portion of 2 to 3 m directly below the mold are often used. This is to solve the problem of bubbles and non-metallic inclusions under the skin of the cast slab by floating and separating the bubbles and non-metallic inclusions in the vertical portion directly below the mold (see, for example, page 434 of Non-Patent Document 1). At the lower end of the vertical portion directly below the mold, the slab is bent into a curved shape. In this type, the slab is bent back at the position where the curved portion transitions to the horizontal portion, and then pulled out horizontally.

垂直曲げ型連続鋳造装置においては、垂直部の下端で鋳片を曲げ変形するため、鋳片の表面には曲げ変形が加えられる。曲げ変形量は、鋳片厚みが厚いほど大きくなる。そのため、割れ感受性の高い鋼種の鋳造を行う場合、あるいは300mm厚みをこえる鋳片の製造を行う場合には、垂直曲げ型ではなく、湾曲型連続鋳造装置が用いられる。湾曲型連続鋳造装置においては、鋳型の部分から湾曲形状であるため、鋳型直下において鋳片が曲げ変形を受けず、垂直曲げに起因するような鋳片表面疵が生成しないからである。 In the vertical bending type continuous casting apparatus, since the slab is bent at the lower end of the vertical portion, the surface of the slab is subjected to bending deformation. The amount of bending deformation increases as the slab thickness increases. Therefore, when casting a steel grade with high crack susceptibility or when manufacturing a slab with a thickness exceeding 300 mm, a curved continuous casting apparatus is used instead of a vertical bending type. This is because, in the curved continuous casting apparatus, the cast slab is not subjected to bending deformation immediately below the mold because the shape is curved from the mold portion, and no slab surface flaws caused by vertical bending are generated.

連続鋳造用の溶鋼は、取鍋からタンディッシュを経由し、タンディッシュ底部に設けた浸漬ノズルから鋳型内に供給される。浸漬ノズルの底部付近の側面には溶鋼を吐出する吐出孔が設けられ、吐出孔は吐出方向が鋳型長辺面に平行であり、吐出流は鋳型短辺に向けて吐出される。鋳型短辺に衝突した吐出流は、短辺に沿って上昇する上昇流と、下降する下降流を形成する。下降流は未凝固溶鋼の深い位置まで到達するため、下降流とともに運ばれる気泡や非金属介在物も未凝固溶鋼の深い位置まで到達する。特に湾曲型の連続鋳造装置においては、鋳型直下に垂直部を有していないため、未凝固溶鋼の深い位置に到達した気泡や非金属介在物がその後上昇するに際して、上面側の凝固シェルに捕獲され、そのまま鋳片内に留まって鋳片内質欠陥の原因となるため好ましくない。 Molten steel for continuous casting is fed from a ladle through a tundish into a mold from a submerged nozzle provided at the bottom of the tundish. A discharge hole for discharging molten steel is provided on a side surface near the bottom of the submerged nozzle. The discharge direction of the discharge hole is parallel to the long side of the mold, and the discharge flow is discharged toward the short side of the mold. The discharge flow that collides with the short side of the mold forms an upward flow that rises along the short side and a downward flow that descends. Since the downward flow reaches deep into the unsolidified molten steel, bubbles and non-metallic inclusions carried along with the downward flow also reach deep into the unsolidified molten steel. Especially in curved continuous casting equipment, since there is no vertical part directly below the mold, bubbles and non-metallic inclusions that have reached a deep position in the unsolidified molten steel rise and are captured by the solidified shell on the upper surface side. It is not preferable because it remains in the slab and causes quality defects in the slab.

鋳片表面品位を改善するために、鋳型部に電磁攪拌装置を設け、電磁攪拌装置を鋳片長辺背面に対向して設置する方法がよく行われる(例えば特許文献1、2参照)。鋳型内の長辺付近の未凝固溶鋼に互いに逆方向の推進力を付与することで、湯面位置の未凝固溶鋼中に水平断面内で旋回流を付与することができる。 In order to improve the surface quality of the cast slab, a method of providing an electromagnetic stirrer in the mold section and placing the electromagnetic stirrer facing the back of the long side of the cast slab is often used (see, for example, Patent Documents 1 and 2). By imparting propulsive forces in opposite directions to the unsolidified molten steel near the long sides in the mold, a swirl flow can be imparted in the horizontal section to the unsolidified molten steel at the molten steel surface position.

鋳片内質向上を図るため、浸漬ノズルの吐出孔から流出する吐出流の流速を低減する目的で、鋳型内に電磁ブレーキ(直流磁界発生装置)を配置する方法が知られている。特に、鋳型内の幅方向全体にわたって磁束密度が均一な電磁ブレーキを厚み方向に付与する方式が一般的であり、その際、電磁制動効果を有効に発揮するため、ノズル吐出流が磁場帯を横切る配置とする必要があることがよく知られている。なお、電磁ブレーキの一態様として、浸漬ノズル吐出孔を上下に挟むように2段の電磁石を配置し、下段の電磁ブレーキでノズル吐出流が短辺に衝突した後の下降流を、上段の電磁ブレーキで湯面位置溶鋼流速を制動する技術が知られている(非特許文献1第463頁参照)。 In order to improve the quality of the cast slab, there is known a method of disposing an electromagnetic brake (direct current magnetic field generator) in the mold for the purpose of reducing the flow velocity of the discharge flow that flows out from the discharge hole of the submerged nozzle. In particular, it is common to apply an electromagnetic brake in the thickness direction in which the magnetic flux density is uniform over the entire width of the mold. It is well known that it is necessary to place As one aspect of the electromagnetic brake, two electromagnets are arranged so as to sandwich the discharge hole of the submerged nozzle above and below. A technique of braking the molten steel flow velocity at the surface position with a brake is known (see page 463 of Non-Patent Document 1).

特開2006-043763号公報JP 2006-043763 A 特開2016-168603号公報JP 2016-168603 A

第5版鉄鋼便覧 第1巻 製銑・製鋼 第434、463頁Iron and Steel Handbook, 5th Edition, Vol. 1, Ironmaking and Steelmaking, pp. 434, 463

鋳型内で電磁攪拌装置と電磁ブレーキ(幅方向に一様な磁束密度分布を有する直流磁界を鋳型厚み方向に付与する直流磁界発生装置)を併用しようとする場合、電磁攪拌装置の下方に電磁ブレーキを配置する。浸漬ノズルの吐出孔を設置する位置としては、浸漬ノズルの吐出孔からの吐出流が電磁ブレーキが形成する磁場帯を横切るように、電磁攪拌装置よりも下方の電磁ブレーキ配置位置に吐出孔を配置することが必要となる。その結果、浸漬ノズルの吐出孔配置位置は、湯面位置から深い位置となる。一方、湾曲型連続鋳造装置においては、湯面位置から深くなるに従って鋳片が湾曲するため、浸漬ノズルと長辺凝固シェル間の距離が狭まることとなり、浸漬ノズルの浸漬深さを深くするにも限界がある。 When using an electromagnetic stirrer and an electromagnetic brake (a DC magnetic field generator that applies a DC magnetic field with a uniform magnetic flux density distribution in the width direction to the thickness direction of the mold) in the mold, an electromagnetic brake should be placed below the electromagnetic stirrer. to place. As for the position to install the discharge hole of the submerged nozzle, the discharge hole is arranged at the electromagnetic brake arrangement position below the electromagnetic stirrer so that the discharge flow from the discharge hole of the submerged nozzle crosses the magnetic field belt formed by the electromagnetic brake. It is necessary to As a result, the discharge hole arrangement position of the submerged nozzle becomes a position deep from the melt surface position. On the other hand, in a curved continuous casting apparatus, the slab curves as it becomes deeper from the surface of the molten steel, so the distance between the immersion nozzle and the solidified shell on the long side becomes narrower. There is a limit.

前述のように、電磁ブレーキの一態様として、浸漬ノズル吐出孔を上下に挟むように2段の電磁石を配置し、下段の電磁ブレーキでノズル吐出流が短辺に衝突した後の下降流を、上段の電磁ブレーキで湯面位置溶鋼流速を制動する技術が知られている。ところが、浸漬ノズル吐出孔と電磁ブレーキの配置を以上のような態様として連続鋳造を行ったところ、下段の電磁ブレーキでは、ノズル吐出流が短辺に衝突した後の下降流を十分に制動することができず、電磁ブレーキを配置したにもかかわらず、浸漬ノズルからの吐出流に起因する下降流により、鋳片の内質が十分に改善されないことが判明した。そのため、湾曲型連続鋳造装置において表面品位と内部品位の両立は難しいとされてきた。 As described above, as one aspect of the electromagnetic brake, two stages of electromagnets are arranged so as to sandwich the discharge hole of the submerged nozzle above and below. There is known a technique of braking the molten steel flow velocity at the surface position with an electromagnetic brake in the upper stage. However, when continuous casting was performed with the arrangement of the discharge holes of the submerged nozzle and the electromagnetic brake as described above, the electromagnetic brake at the lower stage could not sufficiently brake the downward flow after the nozzle discharge flow collided with the short side. It was found that the internal quality of the slab was not sufficiently improved due to the downward flow caused by the discharge flow from the submerged nozzle, even though the electromagnetic brake was installed. Therefore, it has been considered difficult to achieve both surface quality and internal quality in curved continuous casting equipment.

本発明は、湾曲型連続鋳造装置において表面品位と内部品位の両立を実現することのできる、鋳型内流動制御方法および鋳型内流動制御装置を提供することを目的とする。 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to provide an in-mold flow control method and an in-mold flow control device that can achieve both surface quality and internal quality in a curved continuous casting apparatus.

即ち、本発明の要旨とするところは以下のとおりである。
[1]湾曲型連続鋳造装置における鋳型内流動制御方法であって、
水平断面内で旋回流を形成する電磁攪拌装置を鋳型内湯面位置に設置し、さらにその下側に幅方向に一様な磁束密度分布を有する直流磁界を鋳型厚み方向に付与する直流磁界発生装置(以下「電磁ブレーキ」ともいう。)を併せて設置し、
鋳型短辺に向けて溶融金属を吐出する吐出孔を有する浸漬ノズルを設け、前記浸漬ノズルの吐出孔下端は前記直流磁界発生装置のコア上端よりも上方に位置し、
注入流量Q(kg/s)、浸漬ノズル吐出孔の浸漬深さL(m)、電磁攪拌装置のコア厚D(m)ならびに推力F(Pa/m)の関係が下記(1)式を満足するとともに、
電磁ブレーキの磁束密度B(T)、ノズル吐出孔平均流速V(m/s)、ノズル吐出孔内径X(m)の関係が下記(2)式を満足することを特徴とする湾曲型連続鋳造装置における鋳型内流動制御方法。ここで、σ:溶鋼の電気伝導度(S/m)、ρ:溶鋼密度(kg/m3)である。
F/(Q×D/L)≧80(Pa・s/kg/m) ・・・・・(1)
(σB2X)/(ρV) ≧ 0.4 (-) ・・・・・(2)
[2]さらに、電磁攪拌装置の推力F(Pa/m)及び電磁ブレーキの磁束密度Bが下記(3)式、(4)式を満足することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の湾曲型連続鋳造装置における鋳型内流動制御方法。
5000≦F≦15000 (Pa/m) ・・・・・(3)
B ≦ 1.0 (T) ・・・・(4)
That is, the gist of the present invention is as follows.
[1] A mold flow control method in a curved continuous casting apparatus, comprising:
An electromagnetic stirrer that forms a swirling flow in a horizontal cross section is installed at the mold surface position, and a DC magnetic field generator that applies a DC magnetic field with a uniform magnetic flux density distribution in the width direction to the mold thickness direction below it. (hereinafter also referred to as "electromagnetic brake").
An immersion nozzle having a discharge hole for discharging molten metal toward the short side of the mold is provided, and the lower end of the discharge hole of the immersion nozzle is positioned above the upper end of the core of the DC magnetic field generator,
The relationship between the injection flow rate Q (kg/s), the immersion depth L (m) of the immersion nozzle discharge hole, the core thickness D (m) of the electromagnetic stirrer and the thrust F (Pa/m) satisfies the following formula (1) and
Curved continuous casting characterized in that the relationship between the magnetic flux density B (T) of the electromagnetic brake, the nozzle discharge hole average flow velocity V (m/s), and the nozzle discharge hole inner diameter X (m) satisfies the following formula (2): In-mold flow control method in equipment. Here, σ: Electric conductivity of molten steel (S/m), ρ: Density of molten steel (kg/m 3 ).
F/(Q×D/L)≧80 (Pa·s/kg/m) (1)
(σB 2 X)/(ρV) ≧ 0.4 (-) (2)
[2] The curved type according to claim 1, wherein the thrust force F (Pa/m) of the electromagnetic stirrer and the magnetic flux density B of the electromagnetic brake satisfy the following equations (3) and (4). In-mold flow control method in continuous casting equipment.
5000≦F≦15000 (Pa/m) (3)
B ≤ 1.0 (T) (4)

本発明は湾曲型連続鋳造装置において鋳型内湯面位置に電磁攪拌を適用することで良好な表面品質を達成しながら、電磁ブレーキを適用することで内部品質が良好な鋳片を提供することができる。薄板用材料だけでなく厚板、鋼管用スラブ鋳造に適用することができる。 INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention can provide a slab with good internal quality by applying an electromagnetic brake while achieving good surface quality by applying electromagnetic stirring to the molten metal surface position in the mold in a curved continuous casting apparatus. . It can be applied not only to materials for thin plates, but also to slab casting for thick plates and steel pipes.

本発明の鋳型内流動制御装置を示す図であり、(A)は平面図、(B)は正面断面図である。BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS It is a figure which shows the in-mold flow control apparatus of this invention, (A) is a top view, (B) is front sectional drawing. 浸漬ノズル吐出流と電磁ブレーキの関係を示す図であり、(A)は正面断面図、(B)はB-B矢視断面図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the relationship between a flow discharged from a submerged nozzle and an electromagnetic brake, where (A) is a front cross-sectional view and (B) is a cross-sectional view taken along line BB. 浸漬ノズル吐出流と電磁ブレーキの関係を示す図であり、(A)は正面断面図、(B)はB-B矢視断面図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the relationship between a flow discharged from a submerged nozzle and an electromagnetic brake, where (A) is a front cross-sectional view and (B) is a cross-sectional view taken along line BB. 電磁攪拌推力に関する(1)式左辺と、吐出流が鋳型短辺に衝突する部位との関係を示す図であり、(A)は吐出流と鋳型短辺との関係を示す平面図、(B)はグラフである。FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the relationship between the left side of equation (1) relating to the electromagnetic stirring thrust and the portion where the discharge flow collides with the short side of the mold, (A) is a plan view showing the relationship between the discharge flow and the short side of the mold, ) is the graph. 電磁ブレーキの位置での下降流位置を示す鋳片断面図であり、(A)は電磁ブレーキのみ、(B)は電磁攪拌と電磁ブレーキを併用した場合を示す。It is a cast slab cross-sectional view showing the downward flow position at the position of the electromagnetic brake, (A) shows the case where only the electromagnetic brake is used, and (B) shows the case where the electromagnetic stirring and the electromagnetic brake are used together. 電磁攪拌推力に関する(1)式左辺と電磁ブレーキのコア中心高さ断面における最大電流密度との関係を示す図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the relationship between the left side of the equation (1) relating to the electromagnetic stirring thrust and the maximum current density in the core center height cross section of the electromagnetic brake. 電磁攪拌推力に関する(1)式左辺と流量比との関係を示す図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the relationship between the left side of the equation (1) and the flow rate ratio regarding the electromagnetic stirring thrust. 電磁ブレーキ制動力に関する(2)式左辺と流量比との関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the (2) Formula left side regarding electromagnetic brake braking force, and flow rate.

鋳型の湯面位置に電磁攪拌装置を配置し、その下方に電磁ブレーキ(幅方向に一様な磁束密度分布を有する直流磁界を鋳型厚み方向に付与する直流磁界発生装置)を配置した場合であって、浸漬ノズルの吐出孔を電磁ブレーキの静磁場範囲(コア範囲)に配置しようとすると、前述のように、鋳型内における浸漬ノズルの浸漬深さが非常に深くなる。湾曲型連続鋳造装置においては、長辺凝固シェルが鋳型内において湾曲していることから、浸漬ノズルの浸漬深さが深すぎると、浸漬ノズルと長辺凝固シェル間の距離が狭まることとなり、浸漬ノズルの浸漬深さを深くするにも限界がある。 This is the case where an electromagnetic stirrer is placed at the mold surface position, and an electromagnetic brake (a DC magnetic field generator that applies a DC magnetic field having a uniform magnetic flux density distribution in the width direction in the mold thickness direction) is placed below it. If an attempt is made to arrange the discharge hole of the immersion nozzle within the static magnetic field range (core range) of the electromagnetic brake, the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle in the mold becomes extremely deep as described above. In a curved continuous casting apparatus, since the solidified shell on the long side is curved in the mold, if the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle is too deep, the distance between the immersion nozzle and the solidified shell on the long side becomes narrow. There is a limit to increasing the immersion depth of the nozzle.

一方、浸漬ノズルの浸漬深さを浅くするため、浸漬ノズル吐出孔位置を電磁ブレーキの配置位置よりも上方に配置して連続鋳造を行ったところ、前述のとおり、ノズル吐出流が短辺に衝突した後の下降流を十分に制動することができず、電磁ブレーキを配置したにもかかわらず、浸漬ノズルからの吐出流に起因する下降流により、鋳片の内質が十分に改善されないことが判明した。 On the other hand, in order to make the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle shallower, continuous casting was performed with the position of the immersion nozzle discharge hole positioned above the arrangement position of the electromagnetic brake. In spite of installing an electromagnetic brake, the downward flow caused by the discharge flow from the submerged nozzle did not sufficiently improve the quality of the cast slab. found.

そこでまず、浸漬ノズル吐出孔位置を電磁ブレーキの配置位置よりも上方に配置したときに、下降流に対して電磁ブレーキが十分に作動しない原因について検討を行った。 Therefore, first, when the position of the discharge hole of the submerged nozzle is arranged above the arrangement position of the electromagnetic brake, the cause of the insufficient operation of the electromagnetic brake against the downward flow was investigated.

電磁ブレーキを用いる通常の連続鋳造においては、図2(A)に示すように、浸漬ノズル4の吐出孔5が電磁ブレーキ7の静磁場範囲8内に配置されているので、吐出孔5から吐出され短辺3へ向かう吐出流11は、その全体が静磁場範囲8内に位置している。吐出流11には、静磁場範囲8内の静磁場21を横切って導電性の溶融金属が移動することによって誘導起電力22が生成され、この誘導起電力22によって誘導電流23が流れるので、吐出流11に制動力が働き、電磁ブレーキが作動することとなる。誘導起電力22によって誘導電流23が流れるためには、電流が閉ループを形成できることが必要である。図2(B)の断面において、吐出流11の周囲に充填されている溶融金属が誘導電流の閉ループ形成場所となるので、誘導電流23が形成され、電磁ブレーキが作動できる。 In normal continuous casting using an electromagnetic brake, as shown in FIG. The entire discharge flow 11 directed to the short side 3 is located within the static magnetic field range 8 . In the discharge stream 11, an induced electromotive force 22 is generated by movement of the conductive molten metal across the static magnetic field 21 within the static magnetic field range 8, and an induced current 23 flows due to the induced electromotive force 22. A braking force acts on the flow 11, and the electromagnetic brake operates. In order for the induced current 23 to flow due to the induced electromotive force 22, the current must be able to form a closed loop. In the cross section of FIG. 2(B), the molten metal filled around the discharge flow 11 forms a closed loop of the induced current, so that the induced current 23 is formed and the electromagnetic brake can operate.

一方、図3(A)に示すように、浸漬ノズル4の吐出孔5位置が電磁ブレーキ7のコア上端9よりも上方に配置されている場合、吐出孔5から吐出した吐出流11は、短辺シェル16に衝突して下降流12を形成し、この下降流12がはじめて、電磁ブレーキ7の静磁場範囲8内に入ることとなる。静磁場範囲8内の下降流12は静磁場21を横切って導電性の溶融金属が移動するので、誘導起電力22が生成する。下降流12は短辺シェル16に沿って下降する。鋳型内の電磁ブレーキ配置位置においてはまだ凝固した短辺シェル16厚が薄い。そのため、下降流中の誘導起電力22によって誘導電流閉ループを形成しようとしても、下降流12に接する短辺シェル16には十分な電流が流れ得ないため、誘導電流23が十分に生成し得ないのではないかと着想した。そこで、この着想に基づき、電磁流体解析を行った。 On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 3A, when the position of the discharge hole 5 of the submerged nozzle 4 is arranged above the core upper end 9 of the electromagnetic brake 7, the discharge flow 11 discharged from the discharge hole 5 is short. It collides with the side shell 16 to form a descending flow 12 which enters the static magnetic field range 8 of the electromagnetic brake 7 for the first time. As the downward flow 12 within the static magnetic field region 8 moves the conductive molten metal across the static magnetic field 21, an induced electromotive force 22 is generated. Downstream 12 descends along short shell 16 . The thickness of the solidified short side shell 16 is still thin at the electromagnetic brake arrangement position in the mold. Therefore, even if an attempt is made to form an induced current closed loop by the induced electromotive force 22 in the downward flow, a sufficient current cannot flow through the short-side shell 16 in contact with the downward flow 12, so that a sufficient induced current 23 cannot be generated. I came up with the idea. Therefore, based on this idea, a magnetohydrodynamic analysis was performed.

電磁ブレーキ7と浸漬ノズル4の吐出孔5との位置関係が図3(A)に示すような関係にある場合について、電磁流体解析を行ったところ、誘導電流の発生が不十分であることが確認できた。 Electromagnetic fluid analysis was carried out for the case where the positional relationship between the electromagnetic brake 7 and the discharge hole 5 of the submerged nozzle 4 is as shown in FIG. It could be confirmed.

次に、図1に示すように、鋳型1内の湯面位置17に電磁攪拌装置6を配置し、電磁攪拌によって鋳型内の水平断面内で溶融金属の旋回流14を形成させたとき、浸漬ノズル4の吐出孔5からの吐出流11が旋回流14によってどのような影響を受けるかについて検討した。電磁攪拌装置のコア高さ範囲内に浸漬ノズル4の吐出孔5を配置すると、電磁攪拌による旋回流14と浸漬ノズル4からの吐出流11が直接干渉するため、電磁攪拌装置6の下方に浸漬ノズル4の吐出孔5を設置する。その条件でまず電磁流体解析を行い検討した。吐出孔5から短辺3に向かう吐出流11は、図1(A)に模式的に示すように、電磁攪拌装置6により水平断面内で形成される旋回流14の影響により、鋳片の厚み方向に偏向され、短辺3位置における吐出流11の衝突位置が、短辺厚み中央ではなく、ノズル吐出流が対角線上のコーナーに向かって吐出するようになることがわかった。 Next, as shown in FIG. 1, an electromagnetic stirrer 6 is placed at a molten metal surface position 17 in the mold 1, and when a swirling flow 14 of the molten metal is formed in the horizontal cross section of the mold by electromagnetic stirring, the immersion A study was made on how the swirl flow 14 affects the discharge flow 11 from the discharge hole 5 of the nozzle 4 . If the discharge hole 5 of the submerged nozzle 4 is arranged within the core height range of the electromagnetic stirrer, the swirling flow 14 generated by electromagnetic stirring and the discharge flow 11 from the submerged nozzle 4 directly interfere with each other. The discharge hole 5 of the nozzle 4 is installed. Under these conditions, we first performed a magnetohydrodynamic analysis. As schematically shown in FIG. 1A, the discharge flow 11 from the discharge hole 5 toward the short side 3 is affected by the swirl flow 14 formed in the horizontal section by the electromagnetic stirrer 6, and the thickness of the slab is increased. It has been found that the impact position of the discharge flow 11 at the 3 positions of the short side is not the center of the thickness of the short side, but the nozzle discharge flow is discharged toward the corner on the diagonal line.

攪拌流と注入流の関係に影響を与える条件について、特許文献1の記載が知られている。同文献によると、電磁攪拌装置の推力F(Pa/m)と浸漬ノズルの浸漬深さL(m)、電磁攪拌コイルのコア厚D(m)(高さ方向)、注入流量Q(kg/s)との関係が、
Z=F/(Q×D/L) (1)’
の値によって影響を受ける。ここで電磁攪拌装置6の推力Fについて具体的には、鋳型内壁面から15mmの位置に真鍮板を設置し、電磁攪拌装置6を駆動させ真鍮板に作用する力を歪みゲージ等を用いて測定した値を意味し、単位はPa/mである。コア厚Dは電磁攪拌コイルのコア厚(高さ方向)であり、浸漬深さLは電磁攪拌装置6のコア上端から吐出孔5の上端までの高さであり、いずれも図1に示した通りである。通常は、電磁攪拌装置6のコア上端を湯面位置17位置と一致させている。注入流量Qの単位はkg/sで表示している。
Regarding the conditions that affect the relationship between the stirring flow and the injection flow, the description in Patent Document 1 is known. According to the same document, the thrust F (Pa/m) of the electromagnetic stirrer, the immersion depth L (m) of the immersion nozzle, the core thickness D (m) of the electromagnetic stirring coil (height direction), the injection flow rate Q (kg/ s) is related to
Z=F/(Q×D/L) (1)'
is affected by the value of Specifically, regarding the thrust F of the electromagnetic stirrer 6, a brass plate is placed at a position 15 mm from the inner wall surface of the mold, the electromagnetic stirrer 6 is driven, and the force acting on the brass plate is measured using a strain gauge or the like. The unit is Pa/m. The core thickness D is the core thickness (height direction) of the electromagnetic stirring coil, and the immersion depth L is the height from the upper end of the core of the electromagnetic stirring device 6 to the upper end of the discharge hole 5, both of which are shown in FIG. Street. Normally, the upper end of the core of the electromagnetic stirrer 6 is aligned with the melt surface position 17 . The unit of the injection flow rate Q is kg/s.

そこで、種々の条件において電磁流体解析を行い、吐出流11が短辺3に衝突する位置について評価した。短辺衝突位置について、短辺3の長辺2側の端部を「0」とし、短辺3の厚み中央部を「0.5」としている。図4(A)に示すように、吐出流が吐出流11Aのように短辺厚み中央に衝突する場合は短辺衝突位置が0.5、吐出流11Bのように衝突する場合は短辺衝突位置が0.2、吐出流11C、吐出流11Dのように衝突する場合はいずれも短辺衝突位置が0となる。次に、上記式(1)’式を横軸とし、吐出流11が短辺3に衝突する短辺衝突位置を縦軸として、結果をプロットした。図4(B)に示すように、横軸の値(F/(Q×D/L))が0のときに吐出流は短辺の厚み中央に衝突し、横軸の値が大きくなるにつれて吐出流は短辺の中央から長辺の側へと移動する。そして、横軸の値が80となると、短辺衝突位置が0であって、吐出流11は短辺3と長辺2が接するコーナー位置に到達していることがわかる。以上より、以下の式(1)を満足することで、注入流量によらず浸漬ノズル4からの吐出流11を長辺側に偏向することができ、主流の衝突位置がコーナーから長辺側にシフトできることを知見した。
F/(Q×D/L)≧80(Pa・s/kg/m) ・・・・・・(1)
Therefore, electromagnetic fluid analysis was performed under various conditions, and the position at which the discharge flow 11 collided with the short side 3 was evaluated. Regarding the short-side collision position, the end portion of the short side 3 on the long side 2 side is set to "0", and the thickness central portion of the short side 3 is set to "0.5". As shown in FIG. 4A, when the discharge flow collides with the center of the thickness of the short side like the discharge flow 11A, the short side collision position is 0.5, and when it collides like the discharge flow 11B, the short side collision position is 0.5. The position is 0.2, and the short-side collision position is 0 in both cases of collision, such as discharge flow 11C and discharge flow 11D. Next, the results were plotted with the above equation (1)′ on the horizontal axis and the short side collision position at which the discharge flow 11 collided with the short side 3 on the vertical axis. As shown in FIG. 4B, when the value (F/(Q×D/L)) on the horizontal axis is 0, the discharge flow collides with the thickness center of the short side, and as the value on the horizontal axis increases, The discharge flow moves from the center of the short side to the long side. When the value of the horizontal axis is 80, the short side collision position is 0, and the discharge flow 11 reaches the corner position where the short side 3 and the long side 2 meet. From the above, by satisfying the following formula (1), the discharge flow 11 from the submerged nozzle 4 can be deflected to the long side regardless of the injection flow rate, and the collision position of the main stream can be shifted from the corner to the long side. I know I can shift.
F/(Q×D/L)≧80 (Pa·s/kg/m) (1)

上記式(1)左辺の分子は攪拌流の慣性力を示す指標である。一方、分母は電磁攪拌コイルのコア下端における吐出流11に起因した流れの程度を示すものである。D/L=1の場合、ノズル吐出孔上端とコア下端が一致する場合であり、D/L≧1の場合が攪拌流と吐出流が直接干渉することになる。逆に、D/Lが小さくなる、すなわち、吐出孔がコア下端から離れるに従い、電磁攪拌コイルのコア下端での吐出流の影響は小さくなる。本発明で好ましくは、吐出孔5の上端が電磁攪拌コイルのコア下端よりも下方に配置されるので、D/L<1となる。(1)式の左辺はノズル吐出流と攪拌流の流動の強さの比を示したものであり、この値が大きいほど攪拌流の影響が大であること、逆に小さければノズル吐出流の影響が大であることを示している。具体的には推力ならびに注入流量に応じて浸漬深さとコア厚の関係を調整し、左辺の数値を80Pa・s/kg/m以上とすることで注入流量によらず浸漬ノズルからの吐出流を長辺側に偏向することができ、主流の衝突位置がコーナーから長辺側にシフトできる(図4(B))。 The numerator on the left side of the above equation (1) is an index indicating the inertial force of the stirring flow. On the other hand, the denominator indicates the degree of flow caused by the discharge flow 11 at the lower end of the core of the electromagnetic stirring coil. When D/L=1, the upper end of the nozzle discharge hole and the lower end of the core coincide with each other, and when D/L≧1, the agitation flow and the discharge flow directly interfere with each other. Conversely, the smaller the D/L, that is, the farther the ejection hole is from the lower end of the core, the smaller the effect of the ejection flow at the lower end of the core of the electromagnetic stirring coil. In the present invention, preferably, the upper end of the discharge hole 5 is arranged below the lower end of the core of the electromagnetic stirring coil, so that D/L<1. The left-hand side of equation (1) indicates the ratio of the flow strengths of the nozzle discharge flow and the agitation flow. This indicates that the impact is large. Specifically, the relationship between the immersion depth and the core thickness is adjusted according to the thrust and the injection flow rate, and the numerical value on the left side is set to 80 Pa s/kg/m or more, so that the discharge flow from the immersion nozzle is increased regardless of the injection flow rate. It can be deflected to the long side, and the collision position of the mainstream can be shifted from the corner to the long side (FIG. 4(B)).

電磁攪拌装置6を設けない場合、吐出流11は短辺3の厚み中央に衝突するため、図5(A)(前述の図3(B)と同じ)に記載のように、下降流12は短辺シェル16に押し付けられ、誘導起電力22が生じても誘導電流の閉ループ形成が困難であり、十分な誘導電流が流れない。それに対して、電磁攪拌装置6を設け、吐出孔5の上方に電磁攪拌による旋回流14を付与した場合、下降流12の位置が、短辺の厚み中央から長辺側に移動して図5(B)に示すようになる。図5(B)の例では、鋳片の厚み方向で、下降流12が長辺シェル18と接する反対側は溶融金属19と接している。その結果として、下降流12中に生成する誘導起電力22による誘導電流23の閉ループが、下降流12の周囲の溶融金属19中に形成し得ることが期待される。 When the electromagnetic stirrer 6 is not provided, the discharge flow 11 collides with the center of the thickness of the short side 3, so as shown in FIG. Even if the induced electromotive force 22 is generated by being pressed against the short side shell 16, it is difficult to form a closed loop of the induced current, and a sufficient induced current does not flow. On the other hand, when the electromagnetic stirrer 6 is provided and the swirling flow 14 by electromagnetic stirring is applied above the discharge hole 5, the position of the descending flow 12 moves from the center of the thickness of the short side to the long side as shown in FIG. (B) shows. In the example of FIG. 5(B), the side opposite to the side where the downward flow 12 contacts the long-side shell 18 in the thickness direction of the slab contacts the molten metal 19 . As a result, it is expected that a closed loop of induced current 23 due to the induced electromotive force 22 generated in the downward flow 12 can form in the molten metal 19 around the downward flow 12 .

そこで、上記式(1)の左辺の値を種々変更したとき、吐出孔の下方に配置した電磁ブレーキ内を通過する下降流12に生成される誘導電流23の挙動と、その結果として下降流が制動される挙動がどのように変化するのかを検討した。 Therefore, when the value of the left side of the above equation (1) is changed variously, the behavior of the induced current 23 generated in the downward flow 12 passing through the electromagnetic brake arranged below the discharge hole, and the resulting downward flow. We examined how the braking behavior changes.

上記電磁流体解析に用いた諸元に加え、吐出孔5の下方に電磁ブレーキ7を配置した場合について、同じく電磁流体解析を行った。電磁ブレーキ7の磁束密度Bは0.4Tであり、電磁ブレーキ7のコア厚(高さ方向)は200mmである。一般的に用いられる電磁ブレーキのコア厚みは200~300mmであり、電磁ブレーキのコア厚みが長い方が制動効果が増すことになるが、上記範囲内であれば同等の制動効果が得られるため、本発明においては電磁ブレーキのコア厚は特段限定しない。横軸を図4(B)と同様に上記式(1)左辺とし、縦軸を最大電流密度とした図を図6に示す。最大電流密度とは、電磁ブレーキのコア厚み中心の水平断面内において最大の電流密度を意味している。図6から明らかなように、電磁攪拌を作動させていない、横軸の値(式(1)左辺)がゼロにおいて最大電流密度は極小であり、横軸の値(式(1)左辺)が大きくなるほど、最大電流密度が増大し、式(1)左辺が80でほぼ飽和することがわかった。即ち、前述の想定のとおり、電磁攪拌によって吐出孔5の上方に形成した旋回流14に起因して、吐出孔5からの吐出流11が短辺3の厚み中央から長辺2側に偏向した結果として、吐出孔5の下方に配置した電磁ブレーキ7内を下降流12が通過するに際して、誘導電流23による制動が十分に期待できることがわかった。 In addition to the specifications used for the electromagnetic fluid analysis, the same electromagnetic fluid analysis was performed for the case where the electromagnetic brake 7 was arranged below the discharge hole 5 . The magnetic flux density B of the electromagnetic brake 7 is 0.4 T, and the core thickness (height direction) of the electromagnetic brake 7 is 200 mm. Generally used electromagnetic brakes have a core thickness of 200 to 300 mm. In the present invention, the core thickness of the electromagnetic brake is not particularly limited. FIG. 6 shows a diagram in which the left side of the above equation (1) is plotted on the horizontal axis as in FIG. 4B and the maximum current density is plotted on the vertical axis. The maximum current density means the maximum current density within the horizontal cross section at the core thickness center of the electromagnetic brake. As is clear from FIG. 6, the maximum current density is minimal when the value on the horizontal axis (left side of formula (1)) is zero when electromagnetic stirring is not activated, and the value on the horizontal axis (left side of formula (1)) is It was found that the maximum current density increases as the value increases, and the left side of the equation (1) saturates at 80. That is, as assumed above, the discharge flow 11 from the discharge hole 5 is deflected from the thickness center of the short side 3 to the long side 2 side due to the swirl flow 14 formed above the discharge hole 5 by electromagnetic stirring. As a result, it was found that when the downward flow 12 passes through the electromagnetic brake 7 arranged below the discharge hole 5, braking by the induced current 23 can be sufficiently expected.

電磁ブレーキ7の下方に、均一なプラグ流が形成されていることを示す指標として、磁場帯から50mm下方の水平断面で下降流速の最大値13と鋳造速度15との比(以下「流速比」という。)を定義した(図3(A)参照)。流速比が小さく、1に近くなるほど、プラグ流に近い均一流れが形成されていることになる。 As an index indicating that a uniform plug flow is formed below the electromagnetic brake 7, the ratio of the maximum descending flow velocity 13 to the casting velocity 15 in a horizontal section 50 mm below the magnetic field zone (hereinafter referred to as "flow velocity ratio") ) was defined (see FIG. 3(A)). As the flow velocity ratio becomes smaller and closer to 1, a uniform flow close to a plug flow is formed.

同じく電磁流体解析の結果に基づいて、横軸を(1)式の左辺とし、縦軸を流速比として、関係を調査した。結果を図7に示すが、電磁攪拌装置の推力Fならびに注入流量Qに応じて浸漬深さLとコア厚Dの関係を調整し、(1)’式の数値を80以上として(1)式とすることで注入流量によらず流速比が1、すなわち、均一な下降流が得られていることがわかった。前述のとおり、流速分布について詳細に解析したところ、(1)式を満足することで、浸漬ノズル4の吐出孔5からの吐出流11を長辺側に偏向することができ、主流の衝突位置がコーナーから長辺側にシフトしていることがわかった。加えて前述のとおり、その際のコア高さ中心断面にみられ最大電流密度も、(1)式左辺の数値の増加とともに増加していることが確認でき、(1)式左辺の値を80以上とすることで約5倍の電流密度が得られることがわかっており、この作用により、電磁ブレーキ内を下降する下降流に電磁ブレーキが十分に作動し、電磁ブレーキ下方において均一な下降流が実現したものと考えられる。 Similarly, based on the results of the magnetohydrodynamic analysis, the relationship was investigated with the horizontal axis representing the left side of equation (1) and the vertical axis representing the flow velocity ratio. The results are shown in FIG. As a result, it was found that the flow velocity ratio was 1 regardless of the injection flow rate, that is, a uniform downward flow was obtained. As described above, when the flow velocity distribution was analyzed in detail, it was found that the discharge flow 11 from the discharge hole 5 of the submerged nozzle 4 can be deflected to the long side by satisfying the expression (1). is shifted from the corner to the long side. In addition, as described above, it can be confirmed that the maximum current density seen in the core height center cross section at that time also increases as the numerical value on the left side of equation (1) increases. It is known that about 5 times the current density can be obtained by doing the above, and due to this action, the electromagnetic brake fully operates on the downward flow that descends inside the electromagnetic brake, and a uniform downward flow is generated below the electromagnetic brake. It is considered to have been realized.

次に、本発明を実施する上での、電磁ブレーキの条件について説明する。 Next, conditions for the electromagnetic brake for carrying out the present invention will be described.

幅方向に一様な磁束密度分布を有する直流磁界を鋳型厚み方向に付与する直流磁界発生装置(電磁ブレーキ)(「均一電磁ブレーキ」ともいう。)の下方で下降流の断面内分布を一様化するための条件について、電磁流体解析によって検討した。均一電磁ブレーキの磁束密度B(T),ノズル吐出孔平均流速V(m/s)、ノズル吐出孔内径X(m)とし、横軸を下記(2)式左辺((σB2X)/(ρV))、縦軸を前記と同じ流速比として、結果を図8に示した。その結果、以下の(2)式を満足することで下降流の断面内分布が均一化することがわかった。ここで、σ:溶鋼の電気伝導度(S/m)、ρ:溶鋼密度(kg/m3)である。また、(1)式左辺の値が100となる条件を採用して評価を行っている。
(σB2X)/(ρV) ≧ 0.4 (-) ・・・・(2)
以上の結果に基づき、上記(2)式を採用することとした。
なお、前述の図7の評価において、上記(2)式左辺の値が0.7となる条件を採用して評価を行っている。
Under a DC magnetic field generator (electromagnetic brake) (also referred to as a "uniform electromagnetic brake") that applies a DC magnetic field with a uniform magnetic flux density distribution in the width direction in the mold thickness direction, the downward flow is uniformly distributed in the cross section. We investigated the conditions for the conversion by magnetohydrodynamic analysis. Assume that the magnetic flux density B (T) of the uniform electromagnetic brake, the nozzle discharge hole average flow velocity V (m/s), the nozzle discharge hole inner diameter X (m), and the horizontal axis is the left side of the following equation (2) ((σB 2 X)/( ρV)), and the vertical axis is the same flow velocity ratio as above, and the results are shown in FIG. As a result, it was found that the cross-sectional distribution of the downward flow can be made uniform by satisfying the following equation (2). Here, σ: Electric conductivity of molten steel (S/m), ρ: Density of molten steel (kg/m 3 ). Also, the evaluation is performed under the condition that the value of the left side of the equation (1) is 100.
(σB 2 X)/(ρV) ≧ 0.4 (-) (2)
Based on the above results, we decided to adopt the above formula (2).
In the evaluation of FIG. 7 described above, the evaluation is performed under the condition that the value of the left side of the above equation (2) is 0.7.

さらに、本発明の好ましい条件について説明する。 Further, preferred conditions of the present invention will be explained.

電磁攪拌装置6は、鋳型1内の湯面位置17に配置する。電磁攪拌装置6が「湯面位置17に配置する」とは、電磁攪拌装置の電磁攪拌コイルのコアの上端と下端との間に、湯面位置17が位置していることを意味する。
電磁攪拌装置6の攪拌推力Fに関しては、攪拌推力Fが5000Pa/m以上になると、攪拌流速が20cm/s以上の流速を付与することができる。そのため好ましくは、推力が5000Pa/m以上の攪拌推力を付与する。なお、攪拌推力の上限値については、電源装置やコイルの冷却装置が膨大となること、銅板や銅板変形のために銅板背面に設置するステンレス板内に誘導される電流によるロスも増大するため、常用としては攪拌推力15000Pa/m以下で用いる。即ち、下記(3)式を好ましい条件とした。
5000≦F(Pa/m)≦15000 ・・・・・・(3)
The electromagnetic stirrer 6 is arranged at a melt surface position 17 in the mold 1 . The electromagnetic stirrer 6 being "located at the melt surface position 17" means that the melt surface position 17 is positioned between the upper end and the lower end of the core of the electromagnetic stirring coil of the electromagnetic stirrer.
Regarding the stirring thrust F of the electromagnetic stirrer 6, when the stirring thrust F is 5000 Pa/m or more, a stirring flow velocity of 20 cm/s or more can be imparted. Therefore, preferably, a stirring thrust of 5000 Pa/m or more is applied. Regarding the upper limit of the stirring thrust, the power supply and coil cooling equipment will be enormous, and the loss due to the current induced in the copper plate and the stainless steel plate installed on the back of the copper plate due to deformation of the copper plate will also increase. For normal use, a stirring thrust of 15000 Pa/m or less is used. That is, the following formula (3) was used as a preferable condition.
5000≦F (Pa/m)≦15000 (3)

なお、均一電磁ブレーキの磁束密度Bとしては、高いほど好ましいが湾曲型連続鋳造装置において均一電磁ブレーキを適用するに際し、磁極間距離は300mm程度となるため、電磁石を用いる場合、最大1Tが上限とし、下記(4)式を好ましい条件とした。
B ≦ 1.0T ・・・・・・(4)
As for the magnetic flux density B of the uniform electromagnetic brake, the higher the better, but when applying the uniform electromagnetic brake to a curved continuous casting machine, the distance between the magnetic poles is about 300 mm. , and the following formula (4) are preferable conditions.
B ≤ 1.0T (4)

上記本発明の湾曲型連続鋳造装置における鋳型内流動制御方法を実現するための鋳型内流動制御装置は、水平断面内で旋回流を形成する電磁攪拌装置を鋳型内湯面近傍に設置し、さらにその下側に幅方向に一様な磁束密度分布を有する直流磁界を鋳型厚み方向に付与する直流磁界発生装置と併せて設置し、鋳型短辺に向けて溶融金属を吐出する吐出孔を有する浸漬ノズルを設け、前記浸漬ノズルの吐出孔下端は前記直流磁界発生装置のコア上端よりも上方に位置し、電磁攪拌装置の推力F(Pa/m)ならびに直流磁界発生装置の磁束密度Bが上記(3)式(4)式を満足することを特徴とする。 The in-mold flow control device for realizing the in-mold flow control method in the curved continuous casting apparatus of the present invention includes an electromagnetic stirrer that forms a swirling flow in a horizontal cross section, and is installed near the molten metal surface in the mold. An immersion nozzle having a discharge hole for discharging molten metal toward the short side of the mold. is provided, the lower end of the discharge hole of the submerged nozzle is located above the upper end of the core of the DC magnetic field generator, and the thrust F (Pa/m) of the electromagnetic stirrer and the magnetic flux density B of the DC magnetic field generator are the above (3 ) is characterized by satisfying the expression (4).

転炉での精錬と還流式真空脱ガス装置での処理ならびに合金添加により極低炭素鋼を溶製した。この溶鋼を湾曲半径10.5mの湾曲型連続鋳造装置にて厚み360mm、幅1800mmのスラブに鋳造した。鋳型1内に電磁攪拌装置6を設け、コア厚D(m)(高さ方向)や推力F(Pa/m)が異なる幾つかの電磁攪拌コイルを用意し、コア上端が鋳型内湯面位置となるように設置した。幅方向に一様な磁束密度分布を有する直流磁界を鋳型厚み方向に付与する直流磁界発生装置(電磁ブレーキ7)はコア厚(高さ方向)が0.2mであって、コア高さ中心を湯面位置下方0.5m位置にセットした。厚み中心の磁束密度Bは最大0.6Tの磁場が印加できる。 Ultra-low carbon steel was produced by refining in a converter, treatment in a reflux type vacuum degasser, and addition of alloys. This molten steel was cast into a slab having a thickness of 360 mm and a width of 1800 mm using a curved continuous casting apparatus with a radius of curvature of 10.5 m. An electromagnetic stirring device 6 is provided in the mold 1, and several electromagnetic stirring coils with different core thicknesses D (m) (height direction) and thrust F (Pa/m) are prepared, and the upper end of the core is aligned with the molten metal surface position in the mold. It was set up so that The DC magnetic field generator (electromagnetic brake 7) that applies a DC magnetic field having a uniform magnetic flux density distribution in the width direction in the thickness direction of the mold has a core thickness (height direction) of 0.2 m, and the center of the core height is 0.2 m. It was set at a position 0.5 m below the hot water level. A maximum magnetic field of 0.6 T can be applied to the magnetic flux density B at the center of the thickness.

鋳造速度は0.8~1.2m/minでノズル内にArガスを3Nl/min流した。浸漬ノズル4の吐出孔5は下向き25°一定として、吐出孔5の浸漬深さL(m)ならびにノズル吐出孔内径Xおよび吐出孔平均流速Vを変化させて鋳造した。ここで、吐出孔内径Xは、吐出孔面積と同じ面積を有する円の直径とし、ノズル吐出孔平均流速については、注入流量Qをノズル左右のノズル吐出孔面積の2倍(ななめ下向きに吐出するためその垂直断面積)で除した値を平均流速Vとした。電磁攪拌装置の推力Fは、鋳型内壁面から15mmの位置に真鍮板を設置し、電磁攪拌装置を駆動させ真鍮板に作用する力を歪みゲージ等を用いて測定した値を意味し、単位はPa/mである。 The casting speed was 0.8 to 1.2 m/min, and 3 Nl/min of Ar gas was flowed into the nozzle. The ejection hole 5 of the submerged nozzle 4 was fixed downward at 25°, and the immersion depth L (m) of the ejection hole 5, the nozzle ejection hole inner diameter X, and the ejection hole average flow velocity V were changed for casting. Here, the discharge hole inner diameter X is the diameter of a circle having the same area as the discharge hole area, and the injection flow rate Q is twice the nozzle discharge hole area on the left and right of the nozzle (discharged diagonally downward) for the nozzle discharge hole average flow velocity. Therefore, the value obtained by dividing by the vertical cross-sectional area was taken as the average flow velocity V. The thrust force F of the electromagnetic stirrer is a value obtained by setting a brass plate at a position 15 mm from the inner wall of the mold, driving the electromagnetic stirrer, and measuring the force acting on the brass plate using a strain gauge or the like. Pa/m.

鋳片の気泡・介在物個数については、全幅×鋳造方向長さ200mmのサンプルを鋳片から切り出し、評価を行った。
鋳片表面品質については、上面、下面それぞれ、全幅×長さ200mmの表面内における気泡・介在物を表面から10mm深さまで1mmおきに研削し、100μm以上の気泡・介在物個数を調査した。
鋳片内層については、上面側40mm~80mm(集積帯)について表面と同様に気泡・介在物個数を調査した。
表面、内層ともに、各実施例における欠陥個数を比較例3の欠陥個数で除することにより、表層欠陥個数指数、内層欠陥個数指数とした。
加えて、鋳造条件として、前記(1)式~(3)式で示したパラメータとの関係を調査し、結果を表1にまとめた。なお、電磁ブレーキの磁束密度Bは最大が0.6Tであるため、いずれの条件でも(4)式を満たしていることから、表1には記載していない。本発明から外れる数値に下線を付している。
The number of air bubbles/inclusions in the slab was evaluated by cutting out a sample of 200 mm in overall width×length in the casting direction from the slab.
Regarding the surface quality of the slab, the upper surface and the lower surface were each ground for bubbles/inclusions in the surface of 200 mm in total width x length to a depth of 10 mm from the surface at intervals of 1 mm, and the number of bubbles/inclusions of 100 μm or more was investigated.
As for the inner layer of the slab, the number of bubbles and inclusions was investigated in the same manner as the surface at 40 mm to 80 mm (accumulated zone) on the upper surface side.
By dividing the number of defects in each example by the number of defects in Comparative Example 3 for both the surface layer and the inner layer, the surface layer defect number index and the inner layer defect number index were obtained.
In addition, as casting conditions, the relationship with the parameters shown in the formulas (1) to (3) was investigated, and the results are summarized in Table 1. Note that since the maximum magnetic flux density B of the electromagnetic brake is 0.6 T, it is not listed in Table 1 because it satisfies the equation (4) under any conditions. Numerical values outside the scope of the present invention are underlined.

Figure 0007200722000001
Figure 0007200722000001

表1の結果から明らかなように、本発明で述べた装置ならびに方法によって、表層欠陥、内層欠陥のみられない良好な鋳片を製造できることがわかった。
それに対し、比較例1は電磁ブレーキを作動させておらず、電磁ブレーキの磁束密度B=0であって(2)式を満足せず、内層欠陥個数指数が不良である。比較例2は電磁攪拌を作動させておらず推力F=0であって(1)式を満足せず、表面欠陥個数指数、内層欠陥個数指数ともに不良である。比較例3は電磁ブレーキ、電磁攪拌ともに作動させていないため、表面欠陥個数指数、内層欠陥個数指数ともに不良である。
As is clear from the results in Table 1, it was found that the apparatus and method described in the present invention can produce good cast slabs free of surface layer defects and inner layer defects.
On the other hand, in Comparative Example 1, the electromagnetic brake was not operated, the magnetic flux density B of the electromagnetic brake was 0, the expression (2) was not satisfied, and the inner layer defect number index was unsatisfactory. In Comparative Example 2, the electromagnetic stirring was not operated and the thrust force F was 0, so the equation (1) was not satisfied, and both the surface defect number index and the inner layer defect number index were unsatisfactory. In Comparative Example 3, neither the electromagnetic brake nor the electromagnetic stirring was operated, so both the surface defect number index and the inner layer defect number index were unsatisfactory.

1 鋳型
2 長辺
3 短辺
4 浸漬ノズル
5 吐出孔
6 電磁攪拌装置
7 電磁ブレーキ
8 静磁場範囲
9 コア上端
11 吐出流
12 下降流
13 下降流速の最大値
14 旋回流
15 鋳造速度
16 短辺シェル
17 湯面位置
18 長辺シェル
19 溶融金属
21 静磁場
22 誘導起電力
23 誘導電流
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 1 mold 2 long side 3 short side 4 immersion nozzle 5 discharge hole 6 electromagnetic stirrer 7 electromagnetic brake 8 static magnetic field range 9 core upper end 11 discharge flow 12 downward flow 13 maximum downward flow velocity 14 swirling flow 15 casting speed 16 short side shell 17 Molten surface position 18 Long side shell 19 Molten metal 21 Static magnetic field 22 Induced electromotive force 23 Induced current

Claims (2)

湾曲型連続鋳造装置における鋳型内流動制御方法であって、
水平断面内で旋回流を形成する電磁攪拌装置を鋳型内湯面位置に設置し、さらにその下側に幅方向に一様な磁束密度分布を有する直流磁界を鋳型厚み方向に付与する直流磁界発生装置(以下「電磁ブレーキ」ともいう。)を併せて設置し、
鋳型短辺に向けて溶融金属を吐出する吐出孔を有する浸漬ノズルを設け、前記浸漬ノズルの吐出孔下端は前記直流磁界発生装置のコア上端よりも上方に位置し、
注入流量Q(kg/s)、浸漬ノズル吐出孔の浸漬深さL(m)、電磁攪拌装置のコア厚D(m)ならびに推力F(Pa/m)の関係が下記(1)式を満足するとともに、
電磁ブレーキの磁束密度B(T)、ノズル吐出孔平均流速V(m/s)、ノズル吐出孔内径X(m)の関係が下記(2)式を満足することを特徴とする湾曲型連続鋳造装置における鋳型内流動制御方法。ここで、σ:溶鋼の電気伝導度(S/m)、ρ:溶鋼密度(kg/m3)である。
F/(Q×D/L)≧80(Pa・s/kg/m) ・・・・・(1)
(σB2X)/(ρV) ≧ 0.4 (-) ・・・・・(2)
A mold flow control method in a curved continuous casting apparatus, comprising:
An electromagnetic stirrer that forms a swirling flow in a horizontal cross section is installed at the mold surface position, and a DC magnetic field generator that applies a DC magnetic field with a uniform magnetic flux density distribution in the width direction to the mold thickness direction below it. (hereinafter also referred to as "electromagnetic brake").
An immersion nozzle having a discharge hole for discharging molten metal toward the short side of the mold is provided, and the lower end of the discharge hole of the immersion nozzle is positioned above the upper end of the core of the DC magnetic field generator,
The relationship between the injection flow rate Q (kg/s), the immersion depth L (m) of the immersion nozzle discharge hole, the core thickness D (m) of the electromagnetic stirrer and the thrust F (Pa/m) satisfies the following formula (1) and
Curved continuous casting characterized in that the relationship between the magnetic flux density B (T) of the electromagnetic brake, the nozzle discharge hole average flow velocity V (m/s), and the nozzle discharge hole inner diameter X (m) satisfies the following formula (2): In-mold flow control method in equipment. Here, σ: Electric conductivity of molten steel (S/m), ρ: Density of molten steel (kg/m 3 ).
F/(Q×D/L)≧80 (Pa·s/kg/m) (1)
(σB 2 X)/(ρV) ≧ 0.4 (-) (2)
さらに、電磁攪拌装置の推力F(Pa/m)及び電磁ブレーキの磁束密度Bが下記(3)式、(4)式を満足することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の湾曲型連続鋳造装置における鋳型内流動制御方法。
5000≦F≦15000 (Pa/m) ・・・・・(3)
B ≦ 1.0 (T) ・・・・(4)
The curved continuous casting apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the thrust force F (Pa/m) of the electromagnetic stirrer and the magnetic flux density B of the electromagnetic brake satisfy the following equations (3) and (4). in-mold flow control method.
5000≦F≦15000 (Pa/m) (3)
B ≤ 1.0 (T) (4)
JP2019021263A 2019-02-08 2019-02-08 In-mold flow control method in curved continuous casting equipment Active JP7200722B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019021263A JP7200722B2 (en) 2019-02-08 2019-02-08 In-mold flow control method in curved continuous casting equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019021263A JP7200722B2 (en) 2019-02-08 2019-02-08 In-mold flow control method in curved continuous casting equipment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2020127953A JP2020127953A (en) 2020-08-27
JP7200722B2 true JP7200722B2 (en) 2023-01-10

Family

ID=72173967

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2019021263A Active JP7200722B2 (en) 2019-02-08 2019-02-08 In-mold flow control method in curved continuous casting equipment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7200722B2 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004042063A (en) 2002-07-09 2004-02-12 Nippon Steel Corp Continuous casting apparatus and continuous casting method
JP2006043763A (en) 2004-07-07 2006-02-16 Nippon Steel Corp Continuous casting method and flow control device in strand pool
JP2009066619A (en) 2007-09-13 2009-04-02 Nippon Steel Corp Steel continuous casting method and continuous casting apparatus

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6453749A (en) * 1987-08-24 1989-03-01 Nippon Steel Corp Method for controlling molten steel flow in continuous casting mold
JPH06182510A (en) * 1992-12-15 1994-07-05 Nippon Steel Corp Flow Control Method of Molten Steel in Mold in Continuous Casting Using Static Magnetic Field
JP3300619B2 (en) * 1996-12-24 2002-07-08 新日本製鐵株式会社 Continuous casting method of slab with few inclusions

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004042063A (en) 2002-07-09 2004-02-12 Nippon Steel Corp Continuous casting apparatus and continuous casting method
JP2006043763A (en) 2004-07-07 2006-02-16 Nippon Steel Corp Continuous casting method and flow control device in strand pool
JP2009066619A (en) 2007-09-13 2009-04-02 Nippon Steel Corp Steel continuous casting method and continuous casting apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2020127953A (en) 2020-08-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101220767B1 (en) Device for continuously casting steel
JP5014934B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
KR20140053279A (en) Continuous casting device for steel
JP5321528B2 (en) Equipment for continuous casting of steel
JPWO2013190799A1 (en) High cleanliness steel slab manufacturing method and tundish
JP6278168B1 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP5073531B2 (en) Slab continuous casting apparatus and method for continuous casting
JP6164040B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP5245800B2 (en) Continuous casting mold and steel continuous casting method
JP7200722B2 (en) In-mold flow control method in curved continuous casting equipment
JP7332885B2 (en) Molten metal continuous casting method and continuous casting apparatus
JP5556465B2 (en) Manufacturing method of high cleanliness steel slab by continuous casting
JP7256386B2 (en) Continuous casting method
KR101302526B1 (en) Method for controlling flow of moltensteen in mold and method for producing continuous castings
CN100531962C (en) Electromagnetic Stirring Coil
TW202003134A (en) Continuous casting facility and continuous casting method used for thin slab casting
JP5716440B2 (en) Slab manufacturing method and slab with excellent surface quality
JP5413277B2 (en) Continuous casting method for steel slabs
JP4591156B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP4427429B2 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling flow in strand pool
JP5791234B2 (en) Continuous casting method for steel slabs
JP2014046323A (en) Continuous casting method of steel
JP6287901B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP2011212723A (en) Continuous casting method of steel cast slab
JP5079663B2 (en) Continuous casting method of slab in which static magnetic field is applied to upward flow of mold narrow surface.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20211008

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20220908

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220920

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20221024

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20221122

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20221205

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 7200722

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151