JP7256648B2 - Cement composition evaluation method and manufacturing method - Google Patents
Cement composition evaluation method and manufacturing method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP7256648B2 JP7256648B2 JP2019015744A JP2019015744A JP7256648B2 JP 7256648 B2 JP7256648 B2 JP 7256648B2 JP 2019015744 A JP2019015744 A JP 2019015744A JP 2019015744 A JP2019015744 A JP 2019015744A JP 7256648 B2 JP7256648 B2 JP 7256648B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- container
- powder
- caking
- caking property
- property
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
- Y02W30/50—Reuse, recycling or recovery technologies
- Y02W30/91—Use of waste materials as fillers for mortars or concrete
Landscapes
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Description
本発明は、セメント組成物等について、貯蔵や輸送における固結状態を容易にかつ短時間で推測することができる固結性の評価方法とその評価工程を備えたセメント組成物等の製造方法に関する。 TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a method for evaluating caking property that enables easy and quick estimation of caking state during storage and transportation of a cement composition, etc., and a method for producing a cement composition, etc., comprising the evaluation process. .
一般にセメント組成物は吸湿等による風化が懸念される材料であるため、製造出荷から使用までの日数は短く設定される。しかし、出荷環境や輸送環境などの都合によって計画通りの出荷ができない場合、サイロやタンクの構造、およびサイロ内での積載高さによっては貯蔵期間中に固結が懸念されるような場合がある。また、海上輸送では、季節や経路によっては、輸送距離が長い場合には輸送時間が長くなり、輸送船のタンク内は高温、高湿度になることがある。このような長期間の貯蔵では貯蔵場所の温度や湿度などによってセメント組成物が固結する場合がある。 Since cement compositions are generally concerned about weathering due to moisture absorption, etc., the number of days from manufacture and shipment to use is set short. However, if it is not possible to ship as planned due to circumstances such as the shipping environment or transportation environment, there may be concerns about caking during the storage period depending on the structure of the silo or tank and the loading height in the silo. . In addition, in marine transportation, depending on the season and route, if the transportation distance is long, the transportation time will be long, and the inside of the tank of the transportation ship may become hot and humid. In such long-term storage, the cement composition may solidify depending on the temperature and humidity of the storage location.
セメント組成物だけではなく、高炉スラグ微粉末やフライアッシュなどの粉体は、空気中の湿分によって固結する性質があり、固結状態によっては使用に支障をきたす場合がある。セメント組成物や高炉スラグ微粉末などのように空気中の湿分によって固結する性質を有する粉体を固結性粉体と云う。固結状態によっては搬出や抜き出し不良になり、多大な運送コストが掛かるばかりでなく、廃棄処分するにしても解砕などの処理コストが必要になる。また、貯蔵施設の使用効率を著しく低下させる場合があるなどの問題を招く。 Powders such as granulated blast furnace slag and fly ash, as well as cement compositions, have the property of caking due to moisture in the air, and depending on the caking state, they may be difficult to use. Powders such as cement compositions and ground granulated blast furnace slag, which have the property of being hardened by moisture in the air, are called hardening powders. Depending on the state of solidification, it may be difficult to carry out or extract the product, which not only requires a large transportation cost, but also requires processing costs such as crushing even if it is disposed of. In addition, there is a problem that the usage efficiency of the storage facility may be remarkably lowered.
上記固結現象は、単純に外部環境の湿分を吸湿することによって生じるだけではなく、セメント組成物や上記粉体の成分によっても異なる。例えば、これらの固結性粉体に少量含まれる遊離酸化カルシウムや硫酸アルカリなどの可溶性成分が粒子表面に多く分布する場合は、吸湿による粒子間架橋が生じやすい。また、サイロや船舶のホールドのように固結性粉体が多量に貯蔵される環境では、固結性粉体の重量によって貯蔵庫底部の圧力が高くなり、固結性が強くなることに起因して一定量以上の貯蔵が困難なになる場合がある。 The above caking phenomenon is caused not only by simply absorbing moisture from the external environment, but also varies depending on the cement composition and the powder components. For example, when a small amount of soluble components such as free calcium oxide and alkali sulfate contained in these cohesive powders are distributed on the particle surface, cross-linking between particles is likely to occur due to moisture absorption. In addition, in environments where large amounts of caking powder are stored, such as silos and ship holds, the weight of the caking powder increases the pressure at the bottom of the storage container, resulting in stronger caking properties. It may become difficult to store more than a certain amount.
セメント組成物や上記粉体などの固結性粉体において、その固結性は個々の粉体の種類によって異なり、また同じ種類の粉体であっても粉体のキャラクターやプロパティ等によって異なり一定ではない。そのため、貯蔵庫や船舶等に搬入する前にこれらの固結性粉体の固結性を予め評価しておき、固結性の高い材料については、保管や輸送の期間を短くすること、サイロやタンクの積載高さを低くすること、温度や湿度などを固結し難い範囲に管理することなどの対策が検討される。 In cement compositions and caking powders such as the above powders, the caking ability varies depending on the type of individual powder, and even for the same type of powder, it varies depending on the character and properties of the powder, etc. isn't it. Therefore, the caking properties of these caking powders should be evaluated in advance before they are brought into a storage facility or ship. Countermeasures such as lowering the loading height of the tank and controlling the temperature and humidity within a range where caking is difficult are being considered.
セメント組成物等の固結性を判断する方法として以下の方法が知られている。
(イ)特許第2950331号公報には、セメントの凝結試験に使用する標準棒が特定の深さに差し込まれるようにフライアッシュを容器に詰め、この容器を相対湿度100%(RH=100%)に近い湿気箱に入れてフライアッシュを吸湿させ、上記標準棒の侵入深さを測定してその経時変化によって粉体の固結性を判断する方法が記載されている。
(ロ)特開2011-144070号公報には、フライアッシュを、相対湿度66%および温度32℃の恒温恒湿槽に18時間静置して吸湿させた後に、パクセットインデックス(Pack Set Index)を測定して固結性を判断する方法が記載されている。
(ハ)特開2002-286220号公報には、容器内にフライアッシュを充填し、この容器を相対湿度100%および温度30℃の恒温恒湿環境下に24時間静置し、この吸湿前後のフライアッシュのせん断強度をベーン法によって測定し、該せん断強度の増加幅によってその固結性を判断する方法が記載されている。
The following methods are known as methods for judging the setting properties of cement compositions and the like.
(B) In Japanese Patent No. 2950331, fly ash is packed in a container so that a standard rod used for a cement setting test is inserted to a specific depth, and the container is placed at a relative humidity of 100% (RH = 100%). A method is described in which the fly ash is allowed to absorb moisture by placing it in a humidity chamber close to 100°C, measuring the penetration depth of the above standard rod, and judging the caking property of the powder from the change over time.
(B) Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2011-144070 discloses that fly ash is allowed to stand for 18 hours in a constant temperature and humidity chamber at a relative humidity of 66% and a temperature of 32 ° C., and then the pack set index is A method for determining caking by measuring is described.
(C) Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2002-286220 discloses that a container is filled with fly ash, and the container is allowed to stand in a constant temperature and humidity environment with a relative humidity of 100% and a temperature of 30° C. for 24 hours. A method of measuring the shear strength of fly ash by the vane method and judging the caking property from the increase in the shear strength is described.
(ホ)特許第6069119号公報には、フライアッシュを温度0℃以上~30℃以下、および相対湿度50%以上の環境下に、4時間以上~10時間以下静置する高湿工程の後に、温度40~80℃、相対湿度0~40%の環境下に恒量になるまで静置する低湿工程を行い、これらの工程の前後で固結性を観測し、その値の比較によって固結性を判断する方法が記載されている。
(へ)非特許文献1には、フライアッシュを対湿度90%および温度20℃に放置し、これにビカー針標準棒を差し込み、その貫入量を1~5dまで測定して固結性を判断する方法が記載されている。
(ト)非特許文献2には、フライアッシュを相対湿度100%および温度20℃の環境下に24時間静置し、静置前後の貫入抵抗値を比較して固結性を判断する方法が記載されている。
(E) In Japanese Patent No. 6069119, after a high-humidity step of leaving fly ash to stand for 4 to 10 hours in an environment with a temperature of 0 to 30°C and a relative humidity of 50% or more, Perform a low-humidity process in which the product is left to stand in an environment with a temperature of 40 to 80 ° C and a relative humidity of 0 to 40% until it reaches a constant weight, observe the caking property before and after these steps, and compare the values to determine the caking property It describes how to judge.
(F) In Non-Patent Document 1, fly ash is left at a humidity of 90% and a temperature of 20 ° C., a Vicat needle standard rod is inserted into it, and the amount of penetration is measured from 1 to 5 d to determine the caking property. It describes how to do it.
(G) Non-Patent Document 2 describes a method in which fly ash is left for 24 hours in an environment with a relative humidity of 100% and a temperature of 20 ° C., and the caking property is determined by comparing the penetration resistance values before and after the standing. Are listed.
従来の上記判断方法は、いずれも一定の温度湿度条件下に吸湿させた粉体について測定する方法であり、貯蔵時や輸送時に粉体に加わる圧力の影響が考慮されていない。このため湿度が低い環境下において主として加圧により生じる固結性に関して適正に評価できない問題がある。 All of the conventional determination methods described above are methods for measuring powder that has been made to absorb moisture under constant temperature and humidity conditions, and do not consider the effects of pressure applied to powder during storage or transportation. For this reason, there is a problem that the caking property caused mainly by pressurization cannot be properly evaluated in an environment of low humidity.
本発明は、従来の固結性判断方法における上記問題を解決したものであり、セメント組成物等の固結性粉体について、貯蔵時の粉体重量による加圧を考慮した固結性の評価方法を提供する。また、本発明は上記固結性の評価工程を含むセメント組成物の製造方法を提供する。 The present invention solves the above-mentioned problems in the conventional method for judging the caking property, and evaluates the caking property of caking powder such as a cement composition in consideration of the pressure due to the weight of the powder during storage. provide a way. The present invention also provides a method for producing a cement composition, which includes the step of evaluating caking properties.
本発明は以下の構成を有する固結性の評価方法と該固結性評価方法を有するセメント組成物の製造方法に関する。
〔1〕下記工程(イ)、(ロ)および(ハ)を有することを特徴とする固結する性質を有する固結性粉体の固結性評価方法。
(イ)固結性粉体を容器内に充填する工程、
(ロ)該容器に充填した固結性粉体を圧力0.1~2.0MPaおよび温度30℃以上~90℃以下の環境下に一定期間静置する加圧加温工程、
(ハ)加圧加温工程の後に、容器に衝撃を加えて衝撃回数と粉体の崩落状態によって固結性を評価し、または容器内の粉体に始発針を一定圧力で差し込み、該始発針の貫入深さによって粉体の固結性を評価する評価工程。
〔2〕評価工程において、下記(イ)、(ロ)、または(ハ)の方法によって容器に衝撃を加え、容器内の粉体の半量以上が容器外に崩落する落下回数によって粉体の固結性を評価する上記[1]に記載する固結性評価方法。
(イ)容器の開口部を下向きにして該容器を所定の高さから落下させることによって衝撃を加える方法、
(ロ)規格(JIS R 5201)に示されているフローテーブルに容器を載せて該フローテーブルを所定の振幅で落下運動を繰り返して衝撃を加える方法、
(ハ)規格(JISR5201)に規定されているモルタルの型詰に使用するテーブルバイブレータに容器を固定して所定の振幅と振動数で振動させて衝撃を加える方法、
〔3〕下記工程(イ)、(ロ)および(ハ)によって粉体の固結性を評価する工程を有するセメント組成物の製造方法。
(イ)固結性粉体を容器内に充填する工程、
(ロ)該容器に充填した固結性粉体を圧力0.1~2.0MPaおよび温度30℃以上~90℃以下の環境下に一定期間静置する加圧加温工程、
(ハ)加圧加温工程の後に、容器に衝撃を加えて衝撃回数と粉体の崩落状態によって固結性を評価し、または容器内の粉体に始発針を差し込み、その貫入状態によって粉体の固結性を評価する評価工程。
〔4〕上記[3]に記載する製造方法において、上記工程(イ)、(ロ)および(ハ)による粉体の固結性評価工程を原料の粉砕工程または分級工程の後に有し、または該固結性評価工程によって得られた固結性の指標をセメント組成物の製造工程の前処理工程にフィードバックするセメント組成物の製造方法。
The present invention relates to a method for evaluating caking property having the following constitution and a method for producing a cement composition having the method for evaluating caking property.
[1] A method for evaluating the caking property of a caking powder having the property of caking, characterized by comprising the following steps (a), (b) and (c).
(a) a step of filling the caking powder into a container;
(b) a pressure heating step of leaving the caking powder filled in the container under pressure of 0.1 to 2.0 MPa and a temperature of 30° C. to 90° C. for a certain period of time;
(c) After the pressurization and heating process, the container is impacted and the caking property is evaluated by the number of impacts and the collapse state of the powder, or the first needle is inserted into the powder in the container at a constant pressure, and the first An evaluation process that evaluates the caking properties of the powder by the penetration depth of the needle.
[2] In the evaluation process, the container is impacted by the following (a), (b), or (c) method, and the solidification of the powder is determined by the number of times that more than half of the powder in the container falls out of the container. The method for evaluating caking property described in [1] above for evaluating caking property.
(b) a method of applying impact by dropping the container from a predetermined height with the opening of the container facing downward;
(b) A method of placing a container on a flow table specified in the standard (JIS R 5201) and repeatedly dropping the flow table with a predetermined amplitude to apply an impact.
(C) A method of applying shock by fixing the container to a table vibrator used for filling mortar molds specified in the standard (JISR5201) and vibrating it with a predetermined amplitude and frequency.
[3] A method for producing a cement composition, comprising evaluating the caking properties of the powder by the following steps (a), (b) and (c).
(a) a step of filling the caking powder into a container;
(b) a pressure heating step of leaving the caking powder filled in the container under pressure of 0.1 to 2.0 MPa and a temperature of 30° C. to 90° C. for a certain period of time;
(c) After the pressurization and heating process, impact the container and evaluate the caking property based on the number of impacts and the collapse state of the powder, or insert the first needle into the powder in the container and Evaluation process for assessing body consolidation.
[4] In the production method described in [3] above, the powder caking property evaluation step by the above steps (a), (b) and (c) is provided after the raw material pulverization step or classification step, or A method for producing a cement composition, wherein the index of caking property obtained by the caking property evaluation step is fed back to the pretreatment step of the cement composition producing step.
以下、本発明の方法を具体的に説明する。
本発明の固結性評価方法は、セメント組成物、高炉スラグ微粉末、フライアッシュなどのように空気中の湿分や粉体の自重による圧密によって固結する性質を有する粉体(固結性粉体)の固結性を評価する方法である。
The method of the present invention will be specifically described below.
The caking property evaluation method of the present invention uses powders (caking property It is a method for evaluating the caking property of powder).
本発明の固結性評価方法は、具体的には、下記(イ)(ロ)(ハ)の各工程を有することを特徴とする固結性評価方法である。
(イ)固結性粉体を容器内に充填する工程、
(ロ)該容器に充填した固結性粉体を圧力0.1~2.0MPaおよび温度30℃以上~90℃以下の環境下に置く加圧加温工程、
(ハ)加圧加温工程の後に、容器に衝撃を加えて衝撃回数と粉体の崩落状態によって固結性を評価し、または容器内の粉体に始発針を一定圧力で差し込み、該始発針の貫入深さによって粉体の固結性を評価する評価工程。
Specifically, the caking property evaluation method of the present invention is a caking property evaluation method characterized by having the following steps (a), (b), and (c).
(a) a step of filling the caking powder into a container;
(b) a pressure heating step of placing the caking powder filled in the container in an environment of pressure 0.1 to 2.0 MPa and temperature of 30° C. to 90° C .;
(c) After the pressurization and heating process, the container is impacted and the caking property is evaluated by the number of impacts and the collapse state of the powder, or the first needle is inserted into the powder in the container at a constant pressure, and the first An evaluation process that evaluates the caking properties of the powder by the penetration depth of the needle.
〔充填工程〕
充填工程では容器に固結性粉体を充填する。容器は、例えば、内径50mm、高さ100mmのシリンダー型容器などを用いると良い。開口部が加圧用のステムによって塞がれるシリンダー型容器を用いれば、次工程の加圧が容易になる。この容器に固結性粉体を例えばタッピングしながら数回に分けて、高さ50mm~60mm(容器の半分ほどの高さ)に充填し、上面を平らに均す。充填工程の環境は常温下(25℃前後)、相対湿度40%前後が好ましい。
[Filling process]
In the filling step, the container is filled with the caking powder. The container may be, for example, a cylindrical container having an inner diameter of 50 mm and a height of 100 mm. Using a cylindrical container whose opening is closed by a pressurizing stem facilitates pressurization in the next step. The caking powder is filled into the container to a height of 50 mm to 60 mm (approximately half the height of the container) by, for example, tapping several times, and the top surface is flattened. The environment of the filling process is preferably normal temperature (around 25° C.) and relative humidity around 40%.
〔加圧加温工程〕
充填工程の後に、容器に充填した固結性粉体の上面に上記ステムを押し当て、0.1~2.0MPaの圧力を固結性粉体に静置期間を通じて継続的に加え、温度30℃以上~90℃以下の環境下に1週間静置する。加温方法は容器の外周にヒータを設けて温度30℃以上~90℃以下に加熱してもよい。圧力の大きさ、加温する温度、および静置期間は、例えば、輸送期間や貯蔵条件および貯蔵期間に応じて定めてもよい。なお、圧力が0.1MPa未満では固結状態を十分に再現することができず、2MPaを超えると容器内の粉体が固くなりすぎて評価に差が生じ難くなる。また、温度が30℃未満では固結状態を十分に再現することができず、90℃を超えると容器内の粉体が固くなりすぎて評価に差が生じ難くなる。
[Pressure heating process]
After the filling step, the above stem is pressed against the upper surface of the caking powder filled in the container, and a pressure of 0.1 to 2.0 MPa is continuously applied to the caking powder throughout the stationary period, and the temperature is 30. C. to 90.degree. C. for one week. As a heating method, a heater may be provided on the outer circumference of the container to heat the container to a temperature of 30° C. or higher and 90° C. or lower. The magnitude of the pressure, the heating temperature, and the standing period may be determined according to, for example, the transportation period, the storage conditions, and the storage period. If the pressure is less than 0.1 MPa, the solidified state cannot be sufficiently reproduced, and if the pressure exceeds 2 MPa, the powder in the container becomes too hard, making it difficult to produce a difference in evaluation. Also, if the temperature is less than 30°C, the solidified state cannot be sufficiently reproduced, and if it exceeds 90°C, the powder in the container becomes too hard, making it difficult to produce a difference in evaluation.
上記加圧範囲(0.1~2.0MPa)、温度範囲(30℃以上~90℃以下)、および静置期間(1週間)を基準条件とすれば、試料の粉体について一般的な固結性を評価することができる。また、静置期間を輸送期間や貯蔵期間に応じて定めれば、試料の粉体について具体的な実施状況での固結性を評価することができる。
If the pressure range (0.1 to 2.0 MPa), temperature range ( 30°C to 90°C ), and standing period (1 week) are taken as the standard conditions, the powder of the sample will be a general solid state. Connectivity can be evaluated. Further, if the standing period is determined according to the transportation period and the storage period, it is possible to evaluate the caking property of the sample powder under specific implementation conditions.
〔評価工程〕
加圧加温工程の後に、容器に衝撃を加えて衝撃回数と粉体の崩落状態によって固結性を評価する。具体的には、例えば、容器の開口部を下向きにして該容器を所定の高さ、例えば30mmの高さから落下させることによって衝撃を加え、容器内の粉体の半量以上が容器外に崩落する落下回数によって粉体の固結性を評価する。
例えば、5回の落下回数を基準にし、落下回数が5回未満で容器内の粉体の半量以上が容器外に崩落するものを固結性なしとし、一方、容器内の粉体の半量以上が容器外に崩落するまでに5回以上かかるものを固結性ありとする。
また、この落下回数によって粉体の固結性を相対的に評価することができる。例えば、7回の落下によって容器内の粉体の半量以上が容器外に崩落する粉体Xと、12回の落下によって容器内の粉体の半量以上が容器外に崩落する粉体Yについて、粉体Xは粉体Yよりも固結性が低いことが分かる。
[Evaluation process]
After the pressurization and heating step, impacts are applied to the container, and the caking property is evaluated based on the number of impacts and the collapsed state of the powder. Specifically, for example, by dropping the container from a predetermined height, for example, 30 mm, with the opening of the container facing downward, an impact is applied, and more than half of the powder in the container collapses out of the container. The caking property of the powder is evaluated by the number of drops.
For example, based on the number of drops of 5 times, if the number of drops is less than 5 times and more than half of the powder in the container collapses out of the container, it is considered to be non-caking, while more than half of the powder in the container is considered to be non-caking. If it takes 5 times or more to collapse out of the container, it is considered to have caking properties.
In addition, it is possible to relatively evaluate the solidification property of the powder based on the number of drops. For example, for powder X in which more than half of the powder in the container collapses out of the container by falling seven times, and powder Y in which more than half of the powder in the container collapses out of the container by falling 12 times, It can be seen that the powder X has a lower caking property than the powder Y.
落下の衝撃方法は、規格(JIS R 5201 「セメントの物理試験方法」)に示されているフローテーブルを用いた方法でもよい。具体的には、加圧加温工程を経た容器をその開口部を下向きにして上記フローテーブルに載せ、所定の振幅で落下運動を繰り返して衝撃を加える。具体的には、該フローテーブルを所定の高さ、例えば10mmの高さで落下運動を繰り返し、容器をテーブルから持ち上げたときに、容器内の粉体の半量以上が容器外に崩落する回数によって粉体の固結性を評価する。 The drop impact method may be a method using a flow table shown in the standard (JIS R 5201 "Physical Test Method for Cement"). Specifically, the container that has undergone the pressurization and heating process is placed on the flow table with its opening facing downward, and is repeatedly dropped with a predetermined amplitude to apply impact. Specifically, the flow table is repeatedly dropped at a predetermined height, for example, 10 mm, and when the container is lifted from the table, the number of times more than half of the powder in the container collapses out of the container. Evaluate the caking properties of the powder.
フローテーブルを用いた落下試験によれば人為的な試験誤差を出来るだけ排除することができる。なお、フローテーブルを用いない落下試験(直接落下試験)は高さ30mmからの落下であるのに対して、フローテーブルを用いた試験は振幅10mmでの落下運動を繰り返すので、テストピースに加わる衝撃力が直接落下試験よりも減少するため、容器内の粉体の半量以上が落下する回数は直接落下試験よりも増加する傾向になる。 A drop test using a flow table can eliminate artificial test errors as much as possible. In the drop test without a flow table (direct drop test), the test piece is dropped from a height of 30 mm. Since the force is less than in the direct drop test, the number of times more than half of the powder in the container is dropped tends to be greater than in the direct drop test.
また、振動バイブレータを用いた評価を行うこともできる。具体的には、例えば、規格(JISR5201)に規定されているモルタルの型詰に使用するテーブルバイブレータを使用し、これに容器を固定して所定の振幅と振動数で一定時間振動させて、落下の有無を確認する評価方法を利用することができる。例えば、バイブレータの振幅は0.80±0.05mm、バイブレータの振動数は2800±50回/分にすればよい。また、固結性の基準は容器に加えた振動時間などによって評価すれば良い。 In addition, evaluation using a vibrating vibrator can also be performed. Specifically, for example, using a table vibrator used for filling mortar molds stipulated in the standard (JISR5201), fix the container to this, vibrate it for a certain period of time at a predetermined amplitude and frequency, and drop it. Evaluation methods can be used to check for the presence or absence of For example, the amplitude of the vibrator should be 0.80±0.05 mm and the frequency of the vibrator should be 2800±50 times/minute. Moreover, the caking standard may be evaluated based on the vibration time applied to the container.
粉体の固結性の評価方法は、容器内の粉体に一定圧力で始発針を差し込み、その貫入状態によって評価する方法でも良い。規格(JIS R 5201「セメントの物理試験方法」)に示されている凝結試験装置を用い、その始発針を、加圧加温工程を経た容器内の粉体上面に差し込み、その貫入深さによって該粉体の固結性を評価する。
具体的には、例えば、始発針の貫入深さが1mm未満の粉体は固結性ありと評価し、1mm以上の粉体は固結性なしと評価する。なお、始発針の形状や差し込み圧力などの測定条件は上記規格(JIS R 5201「セメントの物理試験方法」)に従えば良い。
この始発針の貫入試験によっても、上記落下試験と同様に粉体の固結性を判断することができる。
As a method for evaluating the caking property of the powder, a method of inserting a first needle into the powder in the container under a constant pressure and evaluating by the state of penetration thereof may be used. Using the coagulation test equipment specified in the standard (JIS R 5201 "Physical test method for cement"), insert the initial needle into the upper surface of the powder in the container that has undergone the pressure heating process, and depending on the penetration depth The caking properties of the powder are evaluated.
Specifically, for example, powder with a penetration depth of less than 1 mm is evaluated as having caking properties, and powder with a penetration depth of 1 mm or more is evaluated as having no caking properties. The measurement conditions such as the shape of the starting needle and the insertion pressure should be in accordance with the above standard (JIS R 5201 "Physical test method for cement").
The caking property of the powder can be judged by the penetration test of the first needle as well as the drop test.
本発明は、上記(イ)(ロ)および(ハ)の工程によって固結性を評価する工程を有するセメント組成物の製造方法を含む。 The present invention includes a method for producing a cement composition having a step of evaluating caking properties by the above steps (a), (b) and (c).
本発明の評価方法によれば、セメント組成物、高炉スラグ微粉末、フライアッシュなどのように空気中の湿分や粉体の自重による圧密によって固結する性質を有する固結性粉体について、粉体の積み込みや貯蔵中ないし移送中に粉体に加わる圧力を考慮した固結性を評価することができる。 According to the evaluation method of the present invention, for caking powders such as cement compositions, ground granulated blast furnace slag, fly ash, etc., which have the property of caking by compaction due to moisture in the air or powder's own weight, The caking property can be evaluated considering the pressure exerted on the powder during loading, storage or transport.
また、本発明の評価方法をセメント組成物等の製造工程に導入すれば、セメント組成物等の製造時にその固結を防止することができる。例えば、セメント組成物等の製造において、本発明の評価方法を粉砕工程や分級工程の後に導入すれば、原料粉体などの固結を防止することができる。また、本発明の評価方法によって得られた固結性の指標を、セメント組成物等の製造工程またはその前処理工程にフィードバックしても良い。 Further, by introducing the evaluation method of the present invention into the production process of cement compositions, etc., caking can be prevented during the production of cement compositions, etc. For example, in the production of a cement composition or the like, if the evaluation method of the present invention is introduced after the pulverization step or the classification step, caking of raw material powder can be prevented. In addition, the caking property index obtained by the evaluation method of the present invention may be fed back to the manufacturing process of the cement composition or the like or its pretreatment process.
以下、本発明の実施例を比較例と共に示す。
使用したセメント組成物A~Dの物性を表1に示す。表1の圧縮度は次式で定義される。圧縮度が大きいほど粉体の流動性が低く、一般的なセメントの圧縮度は概ね50%前後である。
圧縮度(%)=100×(固め嵩密度-緩め嵩密度)/固め嵩密度
固め嵩密度:粉体を容器に入れて締固めを行ったときの嵩密度
緩め嵩密度:粉体を容器に入れて締固めないときの嵩密度
Examples of the present invention are shown below together with comparative examples.
Table 1 shows the physical properties of cement compositions A to D used. The degree of compression in Table 1 is defined by the following equation. The higher the degree of compaction, the lower the fluidity of the powder, and the degree of compaction of general cement is approximately 50%.
Compression degree (%) = 100 × (solidified bulk density - loosened bulk density) / consolidated bulk density Solidified bulk density: bulk density when powder is put in a container and compacted Loose bulk density: powder is put into a container Bulk density when filled and not compacted
〔実施例1〕
表1に示すセメント組成物A~Dをおのおのアクリル製シリンダー型の容器(内径50mm、高さ100mm)に高さ50~60mmになるまで、タッピングしながら2層にわけて充填した。次いで、加圧面が平滑なアクリル製のシリンダーを上記容器に挿入して粉体上面を軽く加圧して平らに均した。セメント組成物A~Dは各々3個の容器に充填した。充填時の温度は25℃、RH40%であった(充填工程)。
次に、上記シリンダーを押し込んで容器内の粉体に0.1MPa、0.5MPa、1.6MPaの圧力を加えて該圧力を保持し、さらに該容器を30℃(常温)~90℃の範囲で継続的に加熱し、1週間保持した(加圧加温工程)。
上記充填工程および加圧加温工程の後に、セメント組成物A~Dが各々入った容器を逆さまにして開口部を下向きにし、規格(JIS R 5201「セメントの物理試験方法」)に記載されるフローテーブル上に設置し、フローテーブルを振幅10mmで落下運動させて容器内の粉体に衝撃を加えることを繰り返し、容器内の粉体の半量以上が容器外に崩落するまでの落下回数を計測した(評価工程)。この結果を表2に示した。
[Example 1]
Each of the cement compositions A to D shown in Table 1 was filled in two layers in an acrylic cylindrical container (inner diameter: 50 mm, height: 100 mm) to a height of 50 to 60 mm while tapping. Next, an acrylic cylinder having a smooth pressing surface was inserted into the container, and the upper surface of the powder was lightly pressed to level it. Cement compositions A to D were filled in three containers each. The temperature during filling was 25° C. and RH 40% (filling process).
Next, the cylinder is pushed in to apply pressure of 0.1 MPa, 0.5 MPa, and 1.6 MPa to the powder in the container, and the pressure is maintained, and the container is further heated to a temperature range of 30 ° C. (normal temperature) to 90 ° C. and held for one week (pressure heating step).
After the filling step and pressure heating step, the containers containing the cement compositions A to D are turned upside down with the opening facing downward, and the standard (JIS R 5201 “Physical test method for cement”) is described. Installed on a flow table, the flow table is dropped with an amplitude of 10 mm, repeatedly impacting the powder in the container, and measuring the number of drops until more than half of the powder in the container collapses outside the container. (evaluation process). The results are shown in Table 2.
〔実施例2〕
実施例1で用いたセメント組成物A~Dについて、実施例1と同様にしてシリンダー型の容器に充填して同様に加圧加温で1週間保持した後に、該容器を逆さまにして開口部を下向きにし、30mmの高さから落下して、容器内の粉体の半量以上が容器外に崩落するまでの落下回数を計測した。この結果を表2に示した。
[Example 2]
Cement compositions A to D used in Example 1 were filled in a cylindrical container in the same manner as in Example 1, and after similarly holding for one week under pressure and heating, the container was turned upside down and the opening was exposed. was turned downward and dropped from a height of 30 mm, and the number of drops until more than half of the powder in the container collapsed out of the container was counted. The results are shown in Table 2.
フローテーブル落下試験(実施例1)において落下回数12回以上、直接落下試験(実施例2)において落下回数5回以上を固結性ありと評価した。この結果を表2に示した。 Twelve or more drops in the flow table drop test (Example 1) and five or more drops in the direct drop test (Example 2) were evaluated as having caking properties. The results are shown in Table 2.
〔実施例3〕
上記セメント組成物A~Dをそれぞれ、輸送船の船内の温度および湿度を調整せずに、3週間輸送した後に、船倉内から排出する時に粉体が固結しているかどうかを確認した。この結果を表3に示した。フローテーブル落下試験において落下回数が12回以上であったセメント組成物A、B、および直接落下試験で落下回数が5回以上であったセメント組成物A、Bは何れもこの輸送中に固結が発生しており、一方、フローテーブル落下試験および直接落下試験において「固結性なし」と判断したセメント組成物C、Dは実際の輸送においても固結が発生しておらず、実施例1、2の落下試験は何れも実際の長期輸送と良く一致する結果が得られた。
[Example 3]
After each of the above cement compositions A to D was transported for three weeks without adjusting the temperature and humidity inside the transport ship, it was confirmed whether the powder was solidified when discharged from the hold. The results are shown in Table 3. Cement compositions A and B that were dropped 12 or more times in the flow table drop test, and cement compositions A and B that were dropped 5 or more times in the direct drop test, both solidified during transportation. On the other hand, the cement compositions C and D, which were judged to be "no caking" in the flow table drop test and the direct drop test, did not caking even during actual transportation. , 2 gave results in good agreement with actual long-term transportation.
Claims (4)
(イ)固結性粉体を容器内に充填する工程、
(ロ)該容器に充填した固結性粉体を圧力0.1~2.0MPaおよび温度30℃以上~90℃以下の環境下に一定期間静置する加圧加温工程、
(ハ)加圧加温工程の後に、容器に衝撃を加えて衝撃回数と粉体の崩落状態によって固結性を評価し、または容器内の粉体に始発針を一定圧力で差し込み、該始発針の貫入深さによって粉体の固結性を評価する評価工程。 A method for evaluating the caking property of a caking powder having the property of caking, characterized by comprising the following steps (a), (b) and (c).
(a) a step of filling the caking powder into a container;
(b) a pressure heating step of leaving the caking powder filled in the container under pressure of 0.1 to 2.0 MPa and a temperature of 30° C. to 90° C. for a certain period of time;
(c) After the pressurization and heating process, the container is impacted and the caking property is evaluated by the number of impacts and the collapse state of the powder, or the first needle is inserted into the powder in the container at a constant pressure, and the first An evaluation process that evaluates the caking properties of the powder by the penetration depth of the needle.
(イ)容器の開口部を下向きにして該容器を所定の高さから落下させることによって衝撃を加える方法、
(ロ)規格(JIS R 5201)に示されているフローテーブルに容器を載せて該フローテーブルを所定の振幅で落下運動を繰り返して衝撃を加える方法、
(ハ)規格(JISR5201)に規定されているモルタルの型詰に使用するテーブルバイブレータに容器を固定して所定の振幅と振動数で振動させて衝撃を加える方法、 In the evaluation process, impact is applied to the container by the following (a), (b), or (c) method, and the caking property of the powder is evaluated by the number of times that more than half of the powder in the container collapses out of the container. The method for evaluating caking property according to claim 1.
(b) a method of applying impact by dropping the container from a predetermined height with the opening of the container facing downward;
(b) A method of placing a container on a flow table specified in the standard (JIS R 5201) and repeatedly dropping the flow table with a predetermined amplitude to apply an impact.
(C) A method of applying shock by fixing the container to a table vibrator used for filling mortar molds specified in the standard (JISR5201) and vibrating it with a predetermined amplitude and frequency.
(イ)固結性粉体を容器内に充填する工程、
(ロ)該容器に充填した固結性粉体を圧力0.1~2.0MPaおよび温度30℃以上~90℃以下の環境下に一定期間静置する加圧加温工程、
(ハ)加圧加温工程の後に、容器に衝撃を加えて衝撃回数と粉体の崩落状態によって固結性を評価し、または容器内の粉体に始発針を差し込み、その貫入状態によって粉体の固結性を評価する評価工程。 A method for producing a cement composition comprising a step of evaluating the caking property of powder by the following steps (a), (b) and (c).
(a) a step of filling the caking powder into a container;
(b) a pressure heating step of leaving the caking powder filled in the container under pressure of 0.1 to 2.0 MPa and a temperature of 30° C. to 90° C. for a certain period of time;
(c) After the pressurization and heating process, impact the container and evaluate the caking property based on the number of impacts and the collapse state of the powder, or insert the first needle into the powder in the container and Evaluation process for assessing body consolidation.
In the production method according to claim 3, the powder caking property evaluation step by the above steps (a), (b) and (c) is provided after the raw material pulverization step or classification step, or the caking property A method for producing a cement composition in which the caking property index obtained in the evaluation step is fed back to the pretreatment step of the cement composition production process.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2019015744A JP7256648B2 (en) | 2019-01-31 | 2019-01-31 | Cement composition evaluation method and manufacturing method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2019015744A JP7256648B2 (en) | 2019-01-31 | 2019-01-31 | Cement composition evaluation method and manufacturing method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2020122750A JP2020122750A (en) | 2020-08-13 |
| JP7256648B2 true JP7256648B2 (en) | 2023-04-12 |
Family
ID=71993566
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2019015744A Active JP7256648B2 (en) | 2019-01-31 | 2019-01-31 | Cement composition evaluation method and manufacturing method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP7256648B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113820211B (en) * | 2021-09-16 | 2024-01-30 | 马鞍山钢铁股份有限公司 | Method for measuring hardening period of coal under silo process condition |
Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2950331B1 (en) | 1998-07-31 | 1999-09-20 | 株式会社電発コール・テックアンドマリーン | Prevention of flocculation due to moisture absorption of fly ash |
| JP2002286220A (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2002-10-03 | Taiheiyo Cement Corp | Method and device for preventing coal ash from caking |
| JP2008030961A (en) | 2006-06-26 | 2008-02-14 | Construction Research & Technology Gmbh | Anti-caking agent for granulated blast furnace slag and additive for granulated blast furnace slag |
| JP2009536141A (en) | 2006-05-05 | 2009-10-08 | エボニック デグサ ゲーエムベーハー | Powdered composition comprising hydraulic binder and pyrogenic metal oxide |
| JP2011144070A (en) | 2010-01-14 | 2011-07-28 | Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc | Flocculating-caking resistant fly ash, method for deciding the flocculating-caking resistant fly ash, and method for mixing the flocculating-caking resistant fly ash |
| JP2012240874A (en) | 2011-05-18 | 2012-12-10 | Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co Ltd | Cement composition |
| JP6069119B2 (en) | 2013-07-09 | 2017-02-01 | 住友大阪セメント株式会社 | Determination method of fly ash consolidation |
| JP2017160061A (en) | 2016-03-07 | 2017-09-14 | 太平洋セメント株式会社 | Method for inhibiting consolidation of water-containing fly ash |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2686458B2 (en) * | 1988-12-27 | 1997-12-08 | 日本セメント株式会社 | Cement powder composition |
-
2019
- 2019-01-31 JP JP2019015744A patent/JP7256648B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2950331B1 (en) | 1998-07-31 | 1999-09-20 | 株式会社電発コール・テックアンドマリーン | Prevention of flocculation due to moisture absorption of fly ash |
| JP2002286220A (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2002-10-03 | Taiheiyo Cement Corp | Method and device for preventing coal ash from caking |
| JP2009536141A (en) | 2006-05-05 | 2009-10-08 | エボニック デグサ ゲーエムベーハー | Powdered composition comprising hydraulic binder and pyrogenic metal oxide |
| JP2008030961A (en) | 2006-06-26 | 2008-02-14 | Construction Research & Technology Gmbh | Anti-caking agent for granulated blast furnace slag and additive for granulated blast furnace slag |
| JP2011144070A (en) | 2010-01-14 | 2011-07-28 | Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc | Flocculating-caking resistant fly ash, method for deciding the flocculating-caking resistant fly ash, and method for mixing the flocculating-caking resistant fly ash |
| JP2012240874A (en) | 2011-05-18 | 2012-12-10 | Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co Ltd | Cement composition |
| JP6069119B2 (en) | 2013-07-09 | 2017-02-01 | 住友大阪セメント株式会社 | Determination method of fly ash consolidation |
| JP2017160061A (en) | 2016-03-07 | 2017-09-14 | 太平洋セメント株式会社 | Method for inhibiting consolidation of water-containing fly ash |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 内田俊一郎 ほか,石灰岩の固生成メカニズムの解明 その1,無機マテリアル学会第110回学術講演会講演要旨集,2005年,pp.46-47 |
| 岸吉宏 ほか,加湿および添加物混合による石炭灰の固化防止方法の検討,粉体工学会誌,2005年,Vol.42,pp.460-466 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2020122750A (en) | 2020-08-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Abdullahi | Effect of aggregate type on compressive strength of concrete | |
| JP7256648B2 (en) | Cement composition evaluation method and manufacturing method | |
| CN104291762B (en) | Chemically bonded cementing agent for curing radioactive spent resin and curing method of chemically bonded cementing agent | |
| CN110462070B (en) | Method for producing granulated sintering material and method for producing sintered ore | |
| Ming et al. | Quality Evaluation of RDX Crystalline Particles by Confined Quasi‐Static Compression Method | |
| Ademoh et al. | Determination of the suitability of river Figurara bed sand bonded with clay for foundry casting moulds | |
| JP5074821B2 (en) | Resin pellet blocking evaluation method | |
| Rajendran et al. | Mechanical properties of concrete containing coconut shells as coarse aggregate partial replacement | |
| Zeng et al. | Shear Behavior of Wheat‐Concrete Interface during Monotonic and Cyclic Loading | |
| RU2238255C2 (en) | Inert composition for testing press molds and preparing model charges | |
| Abolarin et al. | Effect of Moisture Content on the Moulding Properties of River Niger Sand Using Tudun-Wada Clay as a Binder. | |
| KR20090080713A (en) | Radioactive waste granulation method and processing device | |
| JP6069119B2 (en) | Determination method of fly ash consolidation | |
| JP6004428B2 (en) | Sodium aluminate for quick set and quick set | |
| Safronov et al. | The use of SHS-process slag for the preparation of foundry sand | |
| CN115060758B (en) | Storage stability detection method for granulated asphalt mixture additive | |
| JPS61154731A (en) | Mold and curing core | |
| Mehos et al. | Prevent caking and unintended agglomeration | |
| Bates | Characterisation of bulk materials–industrial practice | |
| RU1793322C (en) | Method of testing briquettes for collapsibility | |
| Koohestani et al. | Investigation of natural fibres reinforced cemented paste backfill (NFR-CPB) | |
| Raj | MELIORATE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE BY USING FLY ASH | |
| Guyoncourt et al. | Powder Pressing: Powder Flow with Back Pressure | |
| MARUTHI | PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF FINE AGGREGATE WITH WELDING SLAG AND CEMENT REPLACE WITH FURNACE SLAG IN CONCRETE | |
| TWI498418B (en) | A method for producing a raw material for producing coke and a raw material for coke production produced by the production method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20210930 |
|
| A711 | Notification of change in applicant |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A712 Effective date: 20220628 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20220822 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20220905 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20221026 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20230124 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20230210 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20230322 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20230331 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 7256648 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |