JP7330709B2 - Systems, methods, and programs for determining livability scores - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a system, method, and program for determining a score indicative of ease of living.

According to the “Public Opinion Survey on Housing” (October 2015 survey) by the Cabinet Office, “Most important factors in housing, location, and surrounding environment” tend to emphasize items related to location rather than housing. It is in. Conventionally, there are systems/websites that provide real estate information (see, for example, Patent Document 1 below). .

JP 2018-156623 A

In the first place, residents themselves do not clearly recognize the “good location environment”, so it can be said that there is no correct answer and it is difficult to quantify. Therefore, presenting a score that indicates the goodness of the location environment based on a common calculation standard that has some basis is considered beneficial for real estate agents and customers.

An object of the present invention is to appropriately determine and present a score related to the goodness of the location environment.
one. Other objects of the present invention will become apparent by reference to the specification as a whole.

A score determination system according to an embodiment of the present invention is a score determination system for determining a score indicating ease of living, wherein a score determination request including a user attribute and a specific geographical location is a request receiving unit configured to receive a subscore setting information for setting a subscore for each of a predetermined number of evaluation items based at least on a geographical location; a sub-score setting unit configured to set a sub-score for each of the predetermined number of evaluation items based on at least sub-score setting information; and weighting for each of the predetermined number of evaluation items based on the attributes of the user. to each sub-score of the predetermined number of evaluation items to determine a score indicative of the ease of living of the user at the specific geographical location. .

According to this configuration, a score indicating ease of living in a specific location is assigned to subscores of evaluation items set based on geographical location (e.g., latitude and longitude), and user attributes (e.g., It can be determined by applying a weighting based on household structure and annual household income). As a result, the above system can appropriately determine and present a score regarding the goodness of the location environment (ease of living in a particular geographical location).

Further, in the above system, the score determination unit can be configured to modify the weighting for each of the predetermined number of evaluation items based on the attributes of the user in response to a request from the user. In this way, it is possible to determine the score customized by the user.

Further, in the above system, the subscore setting information is information for setting a subscore for each of the evaluation items of the first group included in the predetermined number of evaluation items, and the subscore is based on at least an administrative division. wherein the sub-score setting unit selects the first group based on at least the administrative division to which the specific geographical location belongs and the first setting information can also be configured to set sub-scores for each of the evaluation items. The evaluation items of the first group can also be said to be evaluation items set for each administrative division (for example, evaluation items based on statistical data for each administrative division, etc.). In this way, it is possible to determine a score applying evaluation items based on the administrative division to which a particular geographic location belongs.

Further, in the above system, the subscore setting information is information for setting a subscore for each of the evaluation items of the second group included in the predetermined number of evaluation items, and the evaluation of the second group including second setting information indicating the geographical distribution of specific facilities corresponding to each of the items, wherein the sub-score setting unit performs sub-score setting based on at least the specific geographical location and the second setting information determining the distribution of the specific facilities in a specific range based on the specific geographical location, and determining the distribution of the second group based at least on the distribution of the specific facilities in the specific range It can also be configured to set sub-scores for each of the evaluation items. The evaluation items of the second group can also be said to be evaluation items related to the adequacy of specific facilities. In this way, it is possible to determine scores by applying evaluation items based on the distribution of specific facilities.

Further, in the above system, the sub-score setting information is information for setting sub-scores for each of the evaluation items of the third group included in the predetermined number of evaluation items, and is based at least on a geographical division. and third setting information for setting a subscore for each of the evaluation items of the third group, wherein the subscore setting unit includes a geographical division to which the specific geographical location belongs and the third The sub-scores for each of the evaluation items of the third group may be set based on at least the setting information of . The evaluation items of the third group can also be said to be evaluation items (for example, evaluation items related to terrain) that are set for each geographical division (mesh, segment). In this way, it is possible to determine a score applying evaluation items based on the geographic division to which a particular geographic location belongs.

Also, in the above system, the subscores of each of the predetermined number of evaluation items can be configured as values to which the same scale is applied. For example, the subscore of each evaluation item is set as a value in the range of 0 to 100 (value out of 100 points). In this way, each evaluation item can be evaluated on the same scale.

A score determination method according to an embodiment of the present invention is a score determination method for determining a score that is executed by one or a plurality of computers and that indicates ease of living, and includes user attributes and a specific geographical location. obtaining sub-score setting information for setting a sub-score for each of a predetermined number of evaluation items based at least on the geographical location; setting a sub-score for each of the predetermined number of evaluation items based at least on the position and the sub-score setting information; and weighting each of the predetermined number of evaluation items based on the user attributes. and determining a score indicative of the user's livability in the particular geographic location by applying to each subscore of a number of criteria.

According to this configuration, a score indicating ease of living in a specific location is assigned to subscores of evaluation items set based on geographical location (e.g., latitude and longitude), and user attributes (e.g., It can be determined by applying a weighting based on household structure and annual household income). As a result, the above method can appropriately determine and present a score regarding the goodness of the location environment (ease of living in a particular geographical location).

A score determination program according to an embodiment of the present invention is a score determination program for determining a score indicating ease of living, wherein one or more computers are stored with user attributes, a specific geographical location, and obtaining subscore setting information for setting a subscore for each of a predetermined number of evaluation items at least based on a geographical location; and the sub-score setting information, a sub-score setting process for setting a sub-score for each of the predetermined number of evaluation items; and a score determination process for determining a score indicative of the ease of living of the user at the particular geographic location by applying it to each subscore of a number of criteria.

According to this configuration, a score indicating ease of living in a specific location is assigned to subscores of evaluation items set based on geographical location (e.g., latitude and longitude), and user attributes (e.g., It can be determined by applying a weighting based on household structure and annual household income). As a result, the program is able to properly determine and present a score for goodness of location (ease of living in a particular geographical location).

Various embodiments of the present invention adequately determine and present a location goodness score.

1 is a configuration diagram schematically showing the configuration of a network including a score determination server 10 according to one embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating processing executed by the score determination server 10; FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an initial screen 50 for making a request for determination of ease of living score. It is a figure which illustrates the list of evaluation items. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating income rankings of a plurality of administrative divisions belonging to Tokyo; It is a figure which illustrates the graph of the function f(L) used for calculation of the adequacy of a facility. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a determination result screen 60 displaying determination results of ease of living scores. The figure which shows the example of a display of the score according to category. FIG. 7 is a diagram exemplifying a weighting adjustment screen 70 for adjusting weighting for each evaluation item;

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram schematically showing the configuration of a network including a score determination server 10 according to one embodiment of the present invention. The score determination server 10 is communicably connected to the user terminal 30 via a communication network NW such as the Internet. The score determination server 10 gives the user who operates the user terminal 30 a score indicating the ease of living in a specific geographical location (hereinafter, sometimes referred to as a "living ease score"). Provide a score judgment service that judges The score determination server 10 is an example of a device implementing all or part of the score determination system of the present invention.

The score determination server 10 has a configuration as a general computer. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 1, the score determination server 10 includes a computer processor 11 configured as a CPU or GPU, a main memory 12 configured by DRAM or the like for temporarily storing data and programs, An input/output interface 13 for exchanging information with a user, etc., a communication interface 14 for controlling wired or wireless communication, and a storage consisting of a magnetic disk, flash memory, etc. for storing data and programs. 15. The computer processor 11 reads a program stored in the storage 15 or the like into the main memory 12 and executes instructions included in the program.

The input/output interface 13 includes, for example, an information input device such as a keyboard, mouse, and touch panel, an audio input device such as a microphone, an image input device such as a camera, an image output device such as a display, and an audio output device such as a speaker. . The communication I/F 14 is implemented as hardware such as a network adapter, various types of communication software, or a combination thereof.

The storage 15 stores various information for providing the score determination service, and
, it has an administrative division statistical information DB 151, a facility information DB 152, and a geographic mesh information DB 153. The administrative division statistical information DB 151 is used to set sub-scores of evaluation items (evaluation items of the first group) that are evaluated for each administrative division among multiple evaluation items for determining livability scores. information (first setting information). As administrative divisions, various divisions such as prefectures, municipalities, and bruises can be applied, but are not limited to these. The facility information DB 152 also stores information (second setting information) for setting subscores of evaluation items (evaluation items of the second group) related to the adequacy of specific facilities among these multiple evaluation items. ). Also, geographic mesh information DB
153 is the information (third setting information). At least part of these DBs 151 to 153 may be managed by a device other than the score determination server 10. FIG.

As shown in FIG. 1, the score determination server 10 includes a request reception unit 111, a sub-score setting unit 112, and a score determination unit as shown in FIG. 113.

The request receiving unit 111 executes processing related to receiving a request for determination of ease of living score. For example, the request accepting unit 111 is configured to accept (receive) a score determination request including user attributes and a specific geographical location (latitude, longitude, etc.) input via the user terminal 30. ing. The attributes of the user may be attributes of the user's household, such as household structure and annual household income, but are not limited to these.

The sub-score setting unit 112 executes processing for setting sub-scores for each of a predetermined number of evaluation items relating to ease of living. For example, the sub-score setting unit 112 stores the geographical position included in the received score determination request, the administrative division statistical information DB 151, the facility information D
B152 and the information stored in each of the geographic mesh information DB 153, the sub-score of each evaluation item is set.

The score determination unit 113 executes processing related to determination of the ease of living score. For example, the score determination unit 113 applies weighting to each evaluation item based on the attributes of the user included in the received score determination request to the subscore of each evaluation item set by the subscore setting unit 112, thereby specifying is configured to determine a score indicative of the user's livability at each geographic location.

The user terminal 30 has a configuration as a general computer. Specifically, as illustrated, the user terminal 30 includes a computer processor 31 configured as a CPU or GPU, a main memory 32 configured by a DRAM or the like for temporarily storing data and programs, and a user terminal 30 . input/output interface 33 for exchanging information with
, a communication interface 34 for controlling wired or wireless communication, and a storage 35 configured by a magnetic disk, flash memory, or the like and storing data and programs. The computer processor 31 loads a program stored in the storage 35 or the like into the main memory 32 and executes instructions included in the program.

The input/output interface 33 includes, for example, an information input device such as a keyboard, mouse, and touch panel, an audio input device such as a microphone, an image input device such as a camera, an image output device such as a display, and an audio output device such as a speaker. . The communication I/F 34 is implemented as hardware such as a network adapter, various types of communication software, or a combination thereof.

The user terminal 30 is configured as, for example, a smart phone, a tablet terminal, or a personal computer. The user terminal 30 accesses the score determination server 10 via a web browser or other applications installed in the storage 35 or the like.
Display various screens with communication between

Next, the operation of the score determination server 10 of this embodiment configured as described above will be described. FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the processing executed by the score determination server 10. As shown in FIG. The server 10 first receives a request for determination of the ease of living score as shown (ST100). The determination request is made via a screen displayed on the user terminal 30 .

FIG. 3 exemplifies an initial screen 50 for requesting determination of the ease of living score. The screen 50 is displayed via a web browser or other application installed on the user terminal 30, and as shown, an attribute selection area 51 for selecting attributes of the user and a living area. It has a position designation area 52 for designating a geographical position (latitude and longitude) to be evaluated for the ease score, and a score judgment request button 53 displaying "start calculation".

The attribute selection area 51 is configured so that a user's attribute can be selected and input from a plurality of predetermined options. This embodiment shows a case where the user's household structure is used as the user's attribute. In this embodiment, there are four options for the household structure, for example, "not specified", "single/couple", "family", and "elderly".

The position specifying area 52 displays the map in the entire area 52 and also displays the area 5
2 and a search area 522 located at the upper left corner of the area 52 . The extent of the map displayed in the entire locating area 52 can be changed by text search via the search area 522 or the area 52
is changed by an operation (drag operation, slide/flick operation, etc.). The user sets the range of the map displayed in the position specification area 52 so that the position on the map where the user wants to determine the ease of living score is the position of the position specification object 521 (that is, the center of the area 52). adjust. Note that the latitude and longitude values corresponding to the position of the position specifying object 521 are displayed above the position specifying area 52 . When the user selects the score determination request button 53, a score determination request is made.

Returning to the flowchart of FIG. 2, when receiving a request for determination of the ease of living score, the server 10 next sets a subscore for each of the plurality of evaluation items based on the specified location on the map ( ST102). FIG. 4 illustrates a list of evaluation items in this embodiment. As shown in the figure, evaluation items are classified into three categories: administrative division-related, facility-related, and geographic mesh-related, and the subscore setting/calculation method differs for each category.

As shown in Figure 4, administrative division-related evaluation items are “crime,” “birth,” “population inflow and outflow,” “financial capacity,” “tax revenue,” “income,” “voting,” and “labor force.” 8 items. For evaluation items related to administrative divisions, values corresponding to relative evaluations among multiple administrative divisions belonging to the same administrative area (eg, prefecture) are set as subscores. Specifically, for each evaluation item, the percentile value corresponding to the ranking of multiple administrative districts belonging to the same administrative area (the numerical value that indicates the rank from the smallest number when the total is 100) is assigned to each administrative district. , and the percentile value of the administrative division corresponding to the geographical location specified by the user is set as the subscore for each evaluation item. In this embodiment, the percentile value for each administrative division of each evaluation item is obtained from the administrative division statistical information D
It is managed by B151. For example, the percentile value of each administrative district based on the “income ranking of multiple administrative districts belonging to Tokyo” illustrated in Fig. 5 is managed in the DB 151 as the percentile value (subscore) of the evaluation item “income”. . In addition,
For example, evaluation items with negative connotations such as “crime” are adjusted so that the lower the crime rate, the closer to 100, and the higher the set sub-score value, the better from the viewpoint of ease of living. I can say.

In addition, as shown in Fig. 4, facility-related evaluation items are "convenience store", "supermarket", "
Complex Mall", "Gourmet", "Drugstore", "Hospital", "Library", "Kindergarten/
nursery school", "elementary school", "junior high school", "high school", "university/junior college", "park", "police"
, and 15 items of “station”. For facility-related evaluation items, a sub-score is set as a value corresponding to the degree of adequacy of a specific facility in the surrounding area. The adequacy is a value based on an absolute evaluation. Specifically, a predetermined distance range (
For example, a 2.4 km radius within a 30-minute walk), the degree of adequacy calculated based on the distribution of facilities corresponding to each evaluation item is set as a subscore for each evaluation item. The distribution of each facility on the map is managed in the facility information DB 152 .

The adequacy of each facility is calculated so that it increases as the number of facilities included in the range of a predetermined distance centered on the designated location increases. The contribution becomes smaller, and the contribution to the fullness becomes smaller exponentially as the order of arranging in the order of distance from the specified position becomes later. And the value range of the degree of fulfillment is 0 to 10
adjusted to be 0.

Here, the method of calculating the adequacy of each facility will be described in detail. Sufficiency S in this embodiment
is specifically calculated by the following formula.
Here, n is the number of facilities within a predetermined distance range centered on the position designated by the user, and k is the number of facilities within the predetermined distance range arranged in order of proximity from the designated position. is the order of cases, λ is a fixed value in the range of 0<λ<1, and the function f(L) is a function whose variable is the distance L from the position specified by the user, and the distance L The smaller the value, the larger the value, and the larger the distance L, the smaller the value. The function f(L) is 0<f(L
)≦1, and is configured as a function corresponding to the graph illustrated in FIG. 6, for example.

Note that the value of λ has a meaning corresponding to facility substitutability. For example, if the value of λ is made small, the contribution to the degree of adequacy S of the second and subsequent facilities of the same facility sharply decreases. for example,
Since there is no advantage in having a large number of “elementary schools” in the neighborhood, λ
It is preferable to reduce the value of On the contrary, for example, the greater the number of “restaurants”, the more advantageous it is. In this way, the value of λ can be set differently for each evaluation item (that is, for each facility).

The degree of adequacy S calculated by such a formula is in the range of 0 to 100, even if the number of facilities is large, according to the infinite geometric series formula and the like. For example, when the value of f(L) is fixed at the maximum value of "1" and the number of facilities n is infinite, the adequacy S converges to "100". It is also possible to use a range of required time (walking time, etc.) considering the route instead of the range of the predetermined distance centering on the specified position.

The evaluation items related to the geographic mesh are two items, “richness of greenery” and “ground (earthquake)”. In geographic mesh-related evaluation items, a value set for each predetermined geographic mesh is set as a subscore. Specifically, the evaluation item “richness of greenery” is based on the “NDVI” (Normalized Difference), which indicates the distribution and activity of vegetation.
Vegetation Index) is scaled in the range of 0 to 100, and the value is a geographic mesh with a predetermined size (for example, it has a rectangular shape).
The value corresponding to the mesh containing the position specified by the user is set as the subscore. In addition, for the evaluation item “ground (earthquake),” the index “surface layer ground amplification factor,” which indicates the vulnerability of the ground to earthquakes, is scaled to a range of 0 to 100. It is set for each mesh, and the value corresponding to the mesh that includes the position specified by the user is set as the subscore. These subscore values for each geographic mesh are managed in the geographic mesh information DB 153 . In addition, the size and shape of the geographic mesh in the evaluation items “rich greenery” and “ground (earthquake)” are
They may be the same or different.

Returning to the flowchart of FIG. 2, having set the subscores for each of the plurality of evaluation items, the server 10 then applies attribute-based weighting to the subscores of each evaluation item to determine the livability score ( ST104). Specifically, the livability score is obtained by adding up the values obtained by multiplying the subscores of each evaluation item by the corresponding weighting values. The weighting value for each attribute is set in advance based on the results of various surveys (for example, the Comprehensive Survey of Housing by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, etc.). Also, since the weightings are adjusted so that the sum of the weightings for all evaluation items is 1, the livability score is also 0.
~100 range.

FIG. 7 illustrates a determination result screen 60 that displays the determination result of the ease of living score. The screen 60 includes, as shown, a score display area 62 for displaying the ease of living score, a position display area 64 for displaying the position designated by the user, and a score display for each category for displaying the score for each category. It has an area 66 and a subscore display area 68 for displaying subscores.

The categorical score display area 66 displays, in a radar chart format, the sum of the sub-score values (values after weighting) of the evaluation items included in each category. The categories in this embodiment are four: "Safety/Safety", "Vitality/Economy", "Society/Environment", and "Convenience". Instead of the display on the determination result screen 60 of FIG. 7, a chart exemplified in FIG. 8 may be displayed. In the chart illustrated in FIG. 8, the subscore value (value after weighting) of each evaluation item and the total value for each category are represented by the thickness of the line.

The subscore display area 68 displays subscore values (values before weighting) of all evaluation items in a radar chart format. Also, in the area 68, a score customization button 681 labeled "customize score" is arranged. button 6
81 is a button for the user to adjust the weighting for each evaluation item.

When the score customization button 681 is selected, a weighting adjustment screen 70 exemplified in FIG. 9 is displayed. The screen 70 displays the weighting value set for each evaluation item via a slider object 72 . Specifically, the weighting, which is set in five stages, is displayed by the position of the knob of the slider. Further, the slider object 72 is configured so that the weighting value can be changed by changing the position of the knob.

When the weighting is changed via the weighting adjustment screen 70, a new livability score to which the changed weighting is applied is determined. Along with this, the displays of the score display area 62 and the category-by-category score display area 66 of the determination result screen 60 are also updated.

The livability score determined in this way is a scale of 100 out of 100 for the utility that the residents will derive from the surrounding environment (enoughness of surrounding facilities, security and vitality of the area, etc.) by living in that location. It can be said that it is digitized. Since the score is independent of the value of the property's top quality, it is useful for websites that provide information on land sales. In addition, even on ordinary real estate information sites, etc.
The livability score can also be applied as a condition corresponding to the location environment of the filtering condition.

The score determination server 10 according to the embodiment of the present invention described above assigns a score indicating ease of living in a specific location to sub-scores of evaluation items set based on geographical location (for example, latitude and longitude). can be determined by applying a weighting based on user attributes. In other words, the server 10 can appropriately determine and present a score regarding the goodness of the location environment (ease of living in a specific geographical location).

10... Score determination server, 11... Computer processor, 111... Request receiving unit, 1
12 Sub-score setting unit 113 Score determination unit 15 Storage 151 Administrative division statistical information DB 152 Facility information DB 153 Geographical mesh information DB 30 User terminal 50 Initial screen 60 Judgment result screen, 70... Weighting adjustment screen.

Claims (6)

A scoring system for determining a score indicative of a user's livability in a particular geographic location, comprising:
a request receiving unit configured to receive a score determination request including user attributes and a specific geographical location;
Obtaining subscore setting information for setting a subscore for each of a predetermined number of evaluation items based at least on a geographical location, and based on at least the specific geographical location and the subscore setting information, a subscore setting unit configured to set a subscore for each of a predetermined number of evaluation items;
by applying a weighting for each of said predetermined number of rating items based on said user's attributes to a sub-score of each of said predetermined number of rating items to determine the user's comfort level in said specific geographic location. a score determination unit configured to determine a score indicating
The sub-score setting information is information for setting a sub-score for each of the evaluation items of the first group included in the predetermined number of evaluation items, and is information for setting the sub-score based at least on administrative districts. 1 configuration information,
The subscore setting unit is configured to set a subscore for each evaluation item of the first group based on at least the administrative division to which the specific geographical location belongs and the first setting information. ,
The sub-score setting information is information for setting a sub-score for each of the second group evaluation items included in the predetermined number of evaluation items, and corresponds to each of the second group evaluation items. further comprising second configuration information indicating the geographic distribution of the particular facility;
The sub-score setting unit further distributes the specific facilities in a specific range centered on the specific geographical position based on at least the specific geographical position and the second setting information. setting a subscore for each evaluation item of the second group based at least on the adequacy of the specific facilities calculated based on the distribution of the specific facilities in the specific range; configured to
scoring system. The score determination unit is configured to modify the weighting for each of the predetermined number of evaluation items based on the attributes of the user in response to a request from the user.
The score determination system according to claim 1. The sub-score setting information is information for setting a sub-score for each of the evaluation items of the third group included in the predetermined number of evaluation items, wherein the third group is based on at least a geographical division. including third setting information for setting the subscore of each of the evaluation items of
The sub-score setting unit sets a sub-score for each evaluation item of the third group based on at least the geographical division to which the specific geographical location belongs and the third setting information. It is configured,
The score determination system according to claim 1 or 2 . The subscores of each of the predetermined number of evaluation items are configured as values to which the same scale is applied,
4. The score determination system according to any one of claims 1 to 3 . A score determination method, executed by one or more computers, for determining a score indicative of the livability of a user in a particular geographic location , comprising:
receiving a score determination request including user attributes and a specific geographic location;
Obtaining subscore setting information for setting a subscore for each of a predetermined number of evaluation items based at least on a geographical location, and based on at least the specific geographical location and the subscore setting information, setting a subscore for each of a predetermined number of endpoints;
by applying a weighting for each of said predetermined number of rating items based on said user's attributes to a sub-score of each of said predetermined number of rating items to determine the user's comfort level in said specific geographic location. and determining a score indicating
The sub-score setting information is information for setting a sub-score for each of the evaluation items of the first group included in the predetermined number of evaluation items, and is information for setting the sub-score based at least on administrative districts. 1 configuration information,
The step of setting the sub-scores includes setting sub-scores for each of the evaluation items of the first group based on at least the administrative division to which the specific geographical location belongs and the first setting information. configured,
The sub-score setting information is information for setting a sub-score for each of the second group evaluation items included in the predetermined number of evaluation items, and corresponds to each of the second group evaluation items. further comprising second configuration information indicating the geographic distribution of the particular facility;
The step of setting the sub-score may further include the specific facility in a specific range centered on the specific geographical position based on at least the specific geographical position and the second setting information. and set a subscore for each evaluation item of the second group based at least on the adequacy of the specific facility calculated based on the distribution of the specific facility in the specific range is configured to
Scoring method. A score determination program for determining a score indicating the ease of living of a user in a specific geographical location ,
on one or more computers,
a request acceptance process for accepting a score determination request containing a user attribute and a specific geographical location;
Obtaining subscore setting information for setting a subscore for each of a predetermined number of evaluation items based at least on a geographical location, and based on at least the specific geographical location and the subscore setting information, A subscore setting process for setting a subscore for each of a predetermined number of evaluation items;
by applying a weighting for each of said predetermined number of rating items based on said user's attributes to a sub-score of each of said predetermined number of rating items to determine the user's comfort level in said specific geographic location. Execute a score determination process for determining the score shown,
The sub-score setting information is information for setting a sub-score for each of the evaluation items of the first group included in the predetermined number of evaluation items, and is information for setting the sub-score based at least on administrative districts. 1 configuration information,
The subscore setting process is configured to set a subscore for each evaluation item of the first group based on at least the administrative division to which the specific geographical location belongs and the first setting information. ,
The sub-score setting information is information for setting a sub-score for each of the second group evaluation items included in the predetermined number of evaluation items, and corresponds to each of the second group evaluation items. further comprising second configuration information indicating the geographic distribution of the particular facility;
The sub-score setting process further includes, based on at least the specific geographical location and the second setting information, a distribution of the specific facilities in a specific range centered on the specific geographical location. setting a subscore for each evaluation item of the second group based at least on the adequacy of the specific facilities calculated based on the distribution of the specific facilities in the specific range; configured to
program.