JP7353701B2 - Method for providing information based on predicted result values and arithmetic device using the same - Google Patents

Description

Various embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a method of providing information based on expected result values and an arithmetic device using the same.

Search results for various items may be derived by the developer's working code. Developers can quickly introduce new working code to the actual service server and automate it, while consumers and other users can quickly access update status.

A logistics management system can include a management system for selling various goods. For example, a logistics management system may include the name of the product, the price of the product, the image of the product, the type of delivery of the product, promotional information based on the product and time, which may be included in the data regarding the product on sale (e.g. basic data of the product), Various data related to product attributes, real-time inventory of the product, distribution center where the product is located, real-time delivery information of the product, compensation of the product, etc. can be managed.

For example, a logistics management system may require quick updates to inventory quantities, locations, order status, etc. in real time. Such a logistics management system may require a method of providing information based on expected result values that can confirm whether a developer's working code is correctly applied, and a computing device using the method.

It may be necessary to confirm whether the result value of the developer's work code is derived from the desired result value through the management of various items and the operation of the system. If new working code is to be generated, immediately deploying the generated code to the service server may output unexpected result values. Since logistics management systems require quick processing, it is necessary to confirm that they can operate without problems even when new work codes are applied.

The present disclosure provides an information provision method that allows users to check whether the intended result value is output through a test before applying changes and inputs to a developer's working code to an actual service server, and a computing device using the method. The purpose can be to

A method for providing information to a computing device according to various embodiments includes the steps of: confirming an input information set; receiving a first result information set corresponding to the input information set at a first server; and receiving the input information at a second server. The method may include receiving a second set of result information corresponding to the set, and providing a third set of result information including information regarding a difference between the first set of result information and the second set of result information.

A computing device according to various embodiments includes a transceiver for receiving and transmitting data, a database for storing data, and a processor, wherein the processor verifies a set of input information received through the transceiver and receives the input information from a first server. receiving a first result information set corresponding to the information set; receiving a second result information set corresponding to the input information set from a second server; and determining the difference between the first result information set and the second result information set. A third information set including information can be provided.

The method of providing information related to various embodiments is to reflect the update status of the logistics management system and provide the results compared with the intended result values after testing in response to changes and inputs of the developer's work code. This can reduce errors when applied on a real server.

The computing device according to various embodiments can prevent errors by comparing the result value on the actual server and the result value on the test server for the same input value, and can prevent errors through efficient logistics management. It is possible to prevent work overload.

1 is a schematic structural block diagram illustrating the performance of a method for providing information according to various embodiments of the present disclosure; FIG. FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating components of a computing device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 3 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a process of providing information according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. 1 is a schematic flowchart of a method of providing information according to various embodiments of the present disclosure; 3 is a flowchart illustrating the execution of an information providing method of an arithmetic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 3 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a process of performing a method of providing information between a computing device and a peripheral device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 3 is an exemplary diagram illustrating the performance of a method of providing information between a computing device and a peripheral device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 6 is an exemplary diagram related to applying rules of a method of providing information according to various embodiments of the present disclosure; FIG. 6 is an exemplary diagram related to a third result information set including information regarding differences in output values by code according to various embodiments of the present disclosure; FIG. 6 is an exemplary diagram related to a third result information set including information regarding a web UI that displays information regarding a code according to various embodiments of the present disclosure;

The terminology used in the examples has been selected from common terms that are currently widely used as much as possible, taking into account their function in this disclosure, but this may be due to the intention of those skilled in the art, precedents, new This may change as technology emerges. Furthermore, in certain cases, there may be terms arbitrarily selected by the applicant, in which case the meaning will be described in detail in the relevant explanation section. Therefore, the terms used in this disclosure should be defined based on the meanings of the terms and the overall content of this disclosure, not just their names.

Throughout the specification, when a part is said to "include" a certain component, it does not mean that it excludes other components, unless there is a specific statement to the contrary, but it does not mean that the component may further include other components. . In addition, terms such as "...unit" and "...module" described in the specification mean a unit that processes at least one function or operation, and this is realized by hardware or software, and is a combination of hardware and software. It can be realized by a combination.

The expression "at least one of a, b, and c" described throughout the specification includes "a alone," "b alone," "c alone," "a and b," and "a and c." , "b and c", or "all a, b, c".

The "terminal" referred to below may be implemented as a computer or a portable terminal that can be connected to a server or other terminals through a network. Here, the computer includes, for example, a notebook computer, desktop, laptop, etc. equipped with a web browser (WEB Browser), and the portable terminal includes, for example, a wireless terminal that guarantees portability and mobility. It is a communication device that supports IMT (International Mobile Telecommunication), CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access), W-CDMA (W-Code Division Multiple Access). ss), LTE (Long Term Evolution), communication infrastructure terminals, smartphones, tablet PCs, etc. The wireless communication device may include all kinds of handheld-based wireless communication devices.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings so that those skilled in the art to which the present disclosure pertains can easily implement them. However, the present disclosure may be embodied in a variety of different forms and is not limited to the embodiments described herein.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

In the description of the embodiments, descriptions of technical contents that are widely known in the technical field to which the present invention pertains and are not directly related to the present invention will be omitted. This is in order to more clearly convey the gist of the present invention without obscuring it by omitting unnecessary explanations.

For similar reasons, some components are exaggerated or omitted or schematically illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Further, the size of each component does not completely reflect the actual size. Identical or corresponding components in the drawings have been given the same reference numerals.

The advantages and features of the invention, and the manner in which they are achieved, will become clearer with reference to the examples described below in detail in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed below, and may be embodied in various forms different from each other. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed below. It is provided so that those skilled in the art will be fully informed of the scope of the invention, and the invention is to be defined only by the scope of the claims that follow. Like reference numbers refer to like elements throughout the specification.

It will now be understood that each block of the process flowchart figures and combinations of flowchart figures can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be implemented in a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing equipped processor, such that the instructions executed through the computer or other programmable data processing equipped processor block the flowcharts. (or blocks) to perform the functions described. These computer program instructions can also be stored in a computer-usable or computer-readable memory capable of directing a computer or other programmable data processing equipment to implement functions in a particular manner, so that the computer program instructions can The instructions stored in the computer-readable memory may also be used to produce an item of manufacture that includes instruction means for performing the functions described in the block (or blocks) of the flowchart. The computer program instructions can also be implemented on a computer or other programmable data processing equipment such that a sequence of operating steps is performed on the computer or other programmable data processing equipment to create a computer-executed process. The instructions for generating and executing a computer or other programmable data processing equipment may provide steps for performing the functions described in the block (or blocks) of the flowcharts.

Additionally, each block may represent a module, segment, or portion of code that includes one or more executable instructions for performing the specified logical function (or logical functions). It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations the functions mentioned in each block may occur out of order. For example, two subsequently illustrated blocks may be performed substantially simultaneously, or the blocks may sometimes be performed in reverse order depending on the functionality involved.

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram illustrating the performance of a method for providing information according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

According to various embodiments, the method of providing information may be performed through the computing device 110, the first server 120, the second server 130, and the distributed messaging system 140.

The arithmetic device 110 is a device in which a system for processing various arithmetic operations is constructed, for example, arithmetic processing through a language containing processing instructions of a developer, receiving result information sets, and the like for thematic comparison. A rule can be applied to the calculation process or at least part of the changed input information set to process the calculation.

The computing device 110 may include multiple computer systems or computer software implemented in a network server, and may provide various information in conjunction with web pages or control tools. For example, the computing device 110 may refer to a computer system and computer software that can communicate with other network servers through a network, are connected to external devices, receive requests to perform tasks, perform the requested tasks, and provide results.

The first server 120 is connected to the computing device 110 via a network and can transmit and receive data. For example, the first server 120 may be a server where service information regarding products is stored and processed. Service information regarding products includes product inventory, product quantity, product arrival time, location of the distribution center where the product is located, product seller, product category, product sales ranking, product sales volume, and product advertisement. It can include information about whether the product is accompanied by a product, the condition of the product, etc. The first server 120 may include a production build, and may transmit a result information set (eg, a first result information set) corresponding to the input information set to the computing device 110. The first server may be the server on which the reference code operates.

The second server 130 is connected to the computing device 110 via a network and can transmit and receive data. The second server 130 may be a server that runs development code that corresponds to the standard code that is to be provided by the service server. For example, the second server 130 may be a server in which information related to the operation of confirming the predicted result value through the computing device 110 is stored and processed. Information related to work can include work such as restricting some themes when listing products, changing some themes when changing the name of a product, deleting cache, etc. It may contain development code that a developer wishes to apply to the service server. The second server 130 may include a stage build, and may send a result information set (eg, a second result information set) corresponding to the input information set to the computing device 110. The second server may be a server on which development code runs.

The distributed messaging system 140 is connected to the computing device 110 and the second server 130 via a network to transmit and receive data. For example, distributed messaging system 140 may receive a deployment message from second server 130 . The distributed messaging system 140 may send a request message to the computing device 110 to provide the third result information set. The distributed messaging system 140 may request processing for testing the computing device 110 based on the received configuration message. For example, distributed messaging system 140 may send a message to initiate a test for computing device 110 to provide a third set of result information.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating components of a computing device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

Referring to FIG. 2, the computing device 110 may include at least one of a processor 111, a transceiver 112, and a database 113.

Processor 111 may process a series of steps to perform the method of providing information according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. Processor 111 may control other components of computing device 110.

Processor 111 may verify the input information set for testing. For example, processor 111 may receive and verify input information sets through a control system and/or programmatically with developer tools. As another example, processor 111 may receive an input information set through transceiver 112, and the input information set may be transmitted to computing device 110 through a distributed messaging system.

Processor 111 may receive a first resultant information set corresponding to the input information set at a first server (eg, first server 120 of FIG. 1). For example, processor 111 may receive the first set of result information via transceiver 112. The first result information set may refer to result values (or output values) corresponding to the input information set, and may be referred to as expected result values, such as intended result values or desired result values. The first result information set may include output values for each code corresponding to the input information set to be tested through the arithmetic device 110. As another example, the first result information set may vary depending on the operation and combination of reference codes applied to the first server. The first result information set may change depending on the time when the code is applied, the combination of applied codes, etc.

Processor 111 may receive a second resultant information set corresponding to the input information set at a second server (eg, second server 130 of FIG. 1). For example, processor 111 may receive the second set of result information via transceiver 112. The second result information set may mean a result value (or output value) corresponding to the input information set, and may be referred to as a result value or test value tested with a test result value. The second result information set may include output values for each code corresponding to the input information set to be tested through the arithmetic device 110. As another example, the second resultant information set may vary depending on the operation and combination of development code applied to the second server. The second result information set may change depending on the time when the code is applied, the combination of applied codes, etc.

Processor 111 may provide a third result information set that includes information about a difference between the first result information set and the second result information set. The first result information set may include code-specific output values corresponding to the input information set. The second result information set may include code-specific output values corresponding to the input information set. For example, the processor 111 may calculate the difference between output values for each code driven by the first server and the second server. Output values for each reference code driven by the first server may be included in the first result information set, and output values for each development code driven by the second server may be included in the second result information set. The code-specific difference between the first result information set and the second result information set may mean a difference in code-specific output values. For example, the difference between output values for each code driven by the first server and the second server may mean the difference between the first result information set and the second result information set. The processor 111 may determine whether there is a code-based difference between the first result information set and the second result information set corresponding to the input information set.

The processor 111 may provide a third result information set including information regarding whether there is a difference in output values for each code driven by the first server and the second server. For example, the processor 111 determines that there is a difference between the output values of a first result information set obtained by applying a standard code to the same input information set and a second result information set obtained by applying a developed code. Information on whether or not can be provided can be provided.

The third result information set may include information regarding a web UI (web UI) in which names of the codes of the first server and the second server, explanations for the codes, and names of developers who set the codes are displayed. For example, the third result information set is information that displays the name of the code that has been applied to the first result information set and the second result information set, an explanation for the code, and the name of the developer who set the code through the web UI. can include.

The third result information set may include information that allows confirmation of differences in output values for each code. The processor 111 may receive a selection input for checking the difference in output values that exist for each code. For example, providing the third result information set by the processor 111 means that, in response to a selection input for confirming a difference, the processor 111 provides comparison information for a difference in a selected portion of the output values of the code to the first result information set. and providing based on the second set of result information. The comparison information may include at least a portion of the first result information set, at least a portion of the second result information set, and information indicating where a difference exists.

Processor 111 may provide a third set of result information corresponding to the modified development code. For example, the second server may receive modified development code that reflects developer input through the control system and/or developer tools. If the developer who set the code confirms that the difference between the first result information set and the second result information set is large through the third result information set provided, the developer sets up a second server to reduce the confirmed difference. You can change the development code applied to Modifying the development code may be to reduce or eliminate differences in output values included in the first result information set and the second result information set. The processor 111 provides a third result information set corresponding to the changed development code by using a changed second result information set that is output by applying the changed development code to the existing input information set. can do. The third result information set corresponding to the modified development code may include information regarding the difference between the first result information set and the modified second result information set corresponding to the input information set by the modified development code. . Processor 111 may again test whether differences exist between result information sets corresponding to the same input information set after changes to the development code.

Regardless of changes in the development code, the processor 111 can obtain setting information (eg, an ignorance rule) that excludes a portion where the third result information set is changed from the difference information. For example, the processor 111 can obtain configuration information that configures comparison target portions of the first result information set and the second result information set. A third result information set may be displayed based on the configuration information. As an example, the configuration information is applied to exclude from the difference information a portion of the output values included in the first result information set and the second result information set that is unrelated to changes in the development code. It can be something that is done. The developer can input setting information so as to exclude portions that are changed regardless of changes in the development code from the difference information included in the third result information set. As another example, the configuration information may be applied to align the first result information set and the second result information set before comparing the first result information set and the second result information set. In order to compare the first result information set and the second result information set, it may be necessary to arrange the output values by code in the order in which they are mapped. As another example, the setting information may be applied to compare output values that have the same value in a specific portion of the first result information set and the second result information set. The processor may apply the configuration information to remove output values that are not identical in a particular portion from the first and second sets of result information, thereby providing the third set of result information more quickly.

Processor 111 may transmit a request message through the transceiver to provide the third result information set through the distributed messaging system. For example, before applying the service code for providing a service at the service server, the processor 111 may test whether there is an error in the service code for providing the service via a test server. The processor 111 may receive the first result information set and the second result information set in response to the request message.

Processor 111 may obtain selection information when a developer inputs selection information that selects at least a portion of the input information set. By obtaining the selection information, the processor 111 may send a request message requesting the first server and the second server to perform the test. Processor 111 may verify the input information set based on the selection information.

Processor 111 may also perform various functions related to methods of providing information according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

The transceiver 112 may perform the functions of transmitting information stored in the database 113 of the computing device 110 or information processed by the processor 111 to other devices, and receiving information from other devices to the computing device 110. For example, transceiver 112 can receive a set of result information (eg, a first set of result information, a second set of result information) from a first server and/or a second server. As another example, transceiver 112 can receive information from and transmit information to a distributed messaging system (eg, distributed messaging system 140 of FIG. 1) or development control system.

The database 113 is a data structure implemented in a predetermined storage space of the computing device 110, and functions such as storing, searching, deleting, editing, and adding data can be performed freely. For example, database 113 may include fields or components for handling functions such as storing, retrieving, deleting, editing, or adding data. Database 113 may store data related to computing device 110 performing the method of providing information. For example, database 113 may store instructions or data for execution of processor 111.

FIG. 3 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a process of providing information according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

Referring to FIG. 3, a computing device 310 (eg, computing device 110 of FIG. 1) may perform functions by providing information based on expected result values through testing. For example, the computing device 310 can receive a result information set a311 (eg, a first result information set, a second result information set) and provide a result information set b313 (eg, a third result information set).

The computing device 310 receives a first result information set and a second result information set corresponding to the input information set 312 from the first server 320 (e.g., the first server 120 in FIG. 1) and the second server 330 (e.g., the second server 130 in FIG. 1). 2 result information sets can be received. Referring to FIG. 3, the result information set a311 is received by the computing device 310 from the first server 320 and the second server 330, and is received from the first server 320 and the second server 330, which are individual servers. The resulting information sets may have different output values. For example, the first result information set that the computing device 310 receives from the first server 320 may be included in the result information set a311. As another example, the second result information set that the computing device 310 receives from the second server 330 may be included in the result information set a311. As an example, the computing device 310 may apply a reference code from the first server 320 to the same input information set and receive at least a portion (e.g., the first result information set) of the result information set a311. can. As another example, the computing device 310 applies the development code from the second server 330 to the same input information set as the input information set in the first server 320, and at least part of the result information set a311 ( Example: second result information set). Referring to FIG. 3, result information set a311 may be received from the first server 320 and the second server 330. Although input information set 312 is not shown in FIG. 3 as being sent to first server 320 and second server 330, input information set 312 is transmitted to first server 320 by direct and/or indirect methods. and may be transmitted to and provided to the second server 330. Input information set 312 may be stored in at least one developer's database and may be transmitted over a wired and/or wireless network environment. Input information set 312 may be transmitted to computing device 310, first server 320, and/or second server 330 by a distributed messaging system.

For cases in which a problem has occurred so far, the arithmetic unit 310 stores an information set of input values for the relevant cases and desired result values for the input values in a database (for example, the database 113 in FIG. 2), and directly and/or or may be received by indirect methods. Based on the constructed database, the computing device 310 tests the case corresponding to the work code to be distributed before distributing the work code (e.g., service code, distribution code) to the service server (e.g., first server). be able to. The computing device 310 can monitor whether the output value corresponding to the distributed working code indicates the same result as the result information set of the database or a different result. The desired result value may mean an output value corresponding to the input information set by applying a reference code to the input information set at the service server. For example, the input information set 312 input to the service server and the test server may mean the same thing. The computing device 310 calculates the difference between the result information sets in the service server and the test server for the same input information set 312 (for example, the difference between the result information sets a 311 or the difference between the first result information set and the second result information set, or the difference in output values for each code for the same input information set) can be provided to the result information set b313 (eg, third result information set). For example, the computing device 310 may provide the result information set b313 with the difference between the first result information set and the second result information set that may be included in the result information set a311.

Referring to FIG. 3, the first server 320 may include a server running reference code, and the second server 330 may include a test server or a server running development code. The first server 320 and the second server 330 can transmit a result information set a311 (eg, a first result information set, a second result information set) corresponding to the input information set 312 to the computing device 310.

Referring to FIG. 3, the second server 330 may include a server in which information related to the operation of confirming the predicted result value through the computing device 310 is stored and processed. For example, second server 330 may include a test server or a server on which development code runs. The second server 330 may send a deployment message to a distributed messaging system 340 (eg, distributed messaging system 140 of FIG. 1). For example, the second server 330 can send the placement message to a distributed messaging system 340 (eg, Kafka) that can utilize a distributed message queue (que). Although configuration messages sent to distributed messaging system 340 are illustrated as second server 330 in FIG. 3, they may be sent through computing device 310, first server 320, and/or control system 350.

Referring to FIG. 3, distributed messaging system 340 may not be a memory or database-stored structure. For example, a producer can send data to the distributed messaging system 340 and a consumer can receive data stored in the distributed messaging system 340. Distributed messaging system 340 may provide APIs to producers and consumers and may work together. Distributed messaging system 340 may include at least one server, and may not wait until all data is sent from one server and may send data from another server if more than a certain number of consumers receive it. can. For example, when the distributed messaging system 340 receives a configuration message, it can distributedly transmit a message queue that triggers the computing device 310 to perform the information providing method. As an example, distributed messaging system 340 may transmit input information set 312 to computing device 310. As another example, distributed messaging system 340 may transmit input information set 312 to computing device 310, first server 320, and/or second server 330.

Referring to FIG. 3, control system 350 may send data to computing device 310, first server 320, second server 330, and/or distributed messaging system 340. For example, control system 350 may transmit data due to changes to a developer's development code, changes to data stored on first server 320, or changes to data stored on second server 330. Control system 350 may transmit data including a set of input information necessary to perform the method of providing information through computing device 310 . The control system 350 may be provided with the result information set b (eg, the third result information set) from the computing device 310 through a web UI.

FIG. 4 is a schematic flowchart of a method of providing information according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

Referring to FIG. 4, a processor (eg, processor 111 of FIG. 2) may identify an input information set (eg, input information set 312 of FIG. 3) at step 410. For example, the input information set may be sent to a computing device (eg, computing device 110 of FIG. 1, computing device 310 of FIG. 3) through a control system (eg, control system 350 of FIG. 3). As another example, the input information set is passed through the control system to a first server (e.g., first server 120 in FIG. 1, first server 320 in FIG. 3) and/or a second server (e.g., second server 130 in FIG. 1). , the second server 330 of FIG. 3). As another example, the input information set may be sent to a computing device, a first server, and/or a second server through a distributed messaging system. The input information set may refer to a set of input values for performing a test through a computing device.

Referring to FIG. 4, the processor may receive a resultant information set corresponding to the input information set at step 420. The first server applies the reference code to derive a first result information set (eg, result information set a311 in FIG. 3) corresponding to the input information set, and transmits the derived first result information set to the computing device. I can do it. The second server applies the development code to derive a second result information set (eg, result information set a311 in FIG. 3) corresponding to the input information set, and transmits the derived second result information set to the computing device. I can do it.

Referring to FIG. 4, in step 430, the processor may provide information regarding the difference in output values for each code of the result information set. The difference between the code-specific output values of the result information set may mean the difference between the code-specific output values of the first result information set and the second result information set. The result information set can have the same output value for each code corresponding to the individual code applied to the input information set, and the first result information set and the second result information set may have the same or different output values for each individual code. can have a value. The difference in code-specific output values between result information sets may indicate a third result information set (eg, result information set b313 in FIG. 3).

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the execution of an information providing method of an arithmetic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

Referring to FIG. 5, a processor (e.g., processor 111 of FIG. 2) may receive a first result information set and a second result information set (e.g., result information set a311 of FIG. 3) at step 510. For example, the processor can receive a first set of resultant information corresponding to the set of input information at a first server and a second set of resultant information corresponding to the set of input information at a second server.

Referring to FIG. 5, in step 520, the processor may determine whether there is a difference in output values for each code between the first result information set and the second result information set. For example, the processor may determine the difference between the first result information set and the second information set as a difference between code-specific output values of the input information set. The processor determines the existence of a difference in the output value of each code, and if the difference exceeds a certain number, it can be determined that the code is a code in which an error may occur.

Referring to FIG. 5, in step 520, the processor may proceed to step 530 if the difference between the output values for each code exceeds a predetermined number. The developer can modify the development code based on the provided third result information set. The processor may obtain the modified development code at step 530. For example, the processor may obtain modified development code based on the difference information included in the third result information set. If the difference between the output values determined for each code is greater than a certain number, it may be necessary to change the corresponding code. The processor may receive a modified second resultant information set through changes to the development code applied to the input information set at the second server. Development code may be modified by the developer. The standard code and the development code are codes applied to the first server and the second server, respectively, and may be stored in the database of each individual server. The reference code and the development code may be sent to the first server and the second server through the computing device, and may be sent to the first server and the second server through the control system or developer tools. The modified development code may be transmitted to the second server via the computing device through the control system or developer tools, and immediately transmitted to the second server. The processor can provide a third result information set that includes information about a difference between the first result information set and the second result information set corresponding to the changed development code. For example, if the difference in the output values for each code of the third result information set newly provided corresponding to the changed development code is less than a predetermined number, the process may proceed to step 540.

Referring to FIG. 5, in step 520, the processor may proceed to step 540 if the difference between the output values for each code is less than a predetermined number. The processor may provide a third result information set that includes information regarding a difference between the first result information set and the second result information set. If the difference between the output values for each code is less than a certain number based on the provided third result information set, the processor may distribute the developed code to the service server and apply the developed code in step 540. The processor can determine whether to distribute and apply the development code based on the third result information set that includes the difference in output values for each code between the first result information set and the second result information set. The processor can determine that the service server can operate without error if there is less information about the difference than a predetermined number. For example, the processor may determine that the result of applying a reference code to an input information set at a first server (e.g., a first result information set) is the result of applying a development code to an input information set at a second server (e.g., a second result information set). ) and the output value for each code is less than a certain number, the service server can also determine that the reference code can operate without error. A fixed number of differences, which is a criterion for determining whether or not an error has occurred in a code, can be set by the developer and can vary depending on the code.

FIG. 6 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a method of providing information between a computing device and a peripheral device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

Referring to FIG. 6, a computing device 310 (eg, computing device 110 of FIG. 1) may receive a set of input information from a control system (eg, an administrator tool) 350. As another example, the input information set may refer to input values for performing a test that provides a third result information set. Before distributing and applying the developed code to the service server, the computing device 310 may perform a test on the developed code to determine whether the difference between the test result value and the expected result value is within an error range.

Referring to FIG. 6, control system 350 can send the test set to the computing device. A test set may refer to an input information set. The first server 320 and the second server 330 may receive input information sets from the computing device 310 or the control system 350. The first server 320 may transmit a first result information set corresponding to the received input information set to the computing device 310. The second server 330 may transmit a second result information set corresponding to the received input information set to the computing device 310. The first result information set may include output values for each code for the input information set to be tested through the arithmetic device 310. The second result information set may include output values for each code for the input information set to be tested through the arithmetic device 310.

Referring to FIG. 6, the second server 330 may send a deployment message to the distributed messaging system 340. The distributed messaging system 340 may transmit a request message requesting the computing device 310 to perform the information providing method based on the received configuration message. Although not shown in FIG. 6, the computing device 310 may send a request message to provide the third result information set through the distributed messaging system 340. The request message may be for receiving the first result information set and the second result information set at the first server 320 and the second server 330, and may be for starting execution of the test. .

Referring to FIG. 6, the computing device 310 may receive a first result information set and a second result information set from the first server 320 and the second server 330. The arithmetic unit 310 may compare the difference in output values for each code between the first result information set and the second result information set. The arithmetic device 310 may provide the control system 350 with a third result information set including information regarding the difference between the code-based output values of the first result information set and the second result information set. The computing device 310 may store the third result information set in a database. The information regarding the difference may include information regarding the number of differences between output values for each code. The number of differences may be counted by the computing device 310.

FIG. 7 is an exemplary diagram illustrating the performance of a method for providing information between a computing device and a peripheral device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

Referring to FIG. 7, a computing device 310 (eg, computing device 110 in FIG. 1) includes a first server 320 (eg, first server 120 in FIG. 1) and a second server 330 (eg, second server 130 in FIG. 1). ) can receive a first set of result information and a second set of result information. The computing device 310 may receive a message from a distributed messaging system 340 (eg, the distributed messaging system 140 of FIG. 1) that triggers the performance of the information providing method.

Referring to FIG. 7, the computing device 310 may provide a third result information set including information regarding a difference between the first result information set and the second result information set. The third result information set may be accumulated and stored in a database as test results. The control system and/or developer may be provided with test results through a web UI. The third result information set may include information displayed on the web UI, setting information for setting a comparison target portion, and may also include the web UI.

FIG. 8 is an exemplary diagram related to applying rules of a method of providing information according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

Referring to FIG. 8, setting information 810 (e.g., ignorerence rule) is input through a control system (e.g., control system 350 in FIG. 3) to control the arithmetic device (e.g., arithmetic device 110 in FIG. 1, arithmetic device 310 in FIG. 3). ) can be sent to. The processor (eg, the processor 111 in FIG. 2) can obtain setting information that excludes the portion where the third result information set is changed from the difference information, regardless of changes in the development code. For example, the processor can obtain configuration information that configures comparison target portions of the first result information set and the second result information set. A third result information set may be displayed based on the configuration information. The setting information is applied to exclude parts of the output values included in the first result information set and the second result information set that are changed regardless of changes in the development code from the difference information. could be. The developer can input setting information through the control system so that a portion that is changed regardless of a change in the development code can be excluded from the difference information included in the third result information set. For example, the processor may receive configuration information through a program with a control system and/or developer tools, and may obtain configuration information from a database (eg, database 113 of FIG. 2).

The processor can determine whether the difference between the code-specific output values of the first result information set and the second result information set deviates from a certain number. The processor can count the number of differences in output values for each individual code according to preset rules, and if the number is less than a certain number, it can be determined that there is no problem with the code. For example, as a result of the test, the processor determines that the difference between the output values of the first result information set and the second result information set for the first code is greater than 10 (e.g., the fixed number for the difference in output values for the first code is 10). If it is less, it can be determined that there is no problem with the first code. The one for the first code is merely an example, and a certain number of codes for the nth code may exist individually.

Referring to FIG. 8, setting information 811 applied to the cache of products related to the promotion, setting information 812 applied to the products that have already been searched, and information 812 applied to the payload of the products related to the promotion. There may be configuration information 813 applied to the vendor, configuration information 814 applied to results related to the vendor's last month's sales, and so on. A result information set containing output values output by applying the developed code (e.g. second result information set) and a result information set containing output values output by applying the standard code (e.g. first result information set) ) is not limited to the example shown in FIG. 8.

FIG. 9 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a third result information set including information regarding differences in output values for each code according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

Referring to FIG. 9, the developer can check the difference between the result information sets corresponding to the third code 910 (eg, code 3) among the input information sets. For example, the developer can check the difference in output values between the first result information set and the second result information set corresponding to the third code 910 based on the number of tests and the number of differences 920. The processor can count the number of tests and the number of differences 920 and can provide a third result information set that includes the information illustrated in FIG.

Referring to FIG. 9, the developer can confirm the developer name 930 that set the third code 910 through the provided third result information set. The developer can check the item 940 indicating the difference between the output value of the third code 910 and the detailed item information for the difference (Diff Detail).

Referring to FIG. 9, the processor may provide a third result information set including information regarding whether there is a difference in output values for each of the first to nth codes. For example, in the example of FIG. 9, when an input is made to select the third code 910 for checking the difference in the output values existing in the third code 910, the difference in the output values of the selected third code 910 is A third resultant information set may be provided that includes the existing information. 920 to 940 illustrated in FIG. 9 may refer to a third result information set including information regarding the third code 910. Although an example of the third code 910 is illustrated at 900 in FIG. 9, this is not limited to the third code 910, and can be extended to the first to nth codes without limitation. .

Referring to FIG. 9, the illustrated information may refer to comparison information. The processor receives a selection input for checking the difference between the output values that exists for each code, and converts the comparison information regarding the difference in the part selected corresponding to the selection input among the output values of the codes into the first result information. and the second result information set, and the comparison information includes at least a portion of the first result information set, at least a portion of the second result information set, and information indicating a portion where a difference exists. can include. The selection input can be entered by the developer and the processor can receive the selection input.

FIG. 10 is an exemplary diagram related to a third result information set including information about a web UI that displays information about codes according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

Referring to FIG. 10, an example screen for the web UI regarding some of the information that may be included in the third result information set can be seen. For example, code name 1020 may include a name for a code that may be included in the input information set. Code 1 (1021) may mean a first code, code 2 (1022) may mean a second code, and code 3 (1023) may mean a third code. A rectangular display to the left of the code name 1020 may mean a selection window 1010 for an individual code. For example, the rectangle on the left side of code 1 (1021) is displayed in the selection window 1011 for code 1, the rectangle on the left side of code 2 (1022) is displayed in the selection window 1012 for code 2, and the left side of code 3 (1023) is displayed in the selection window 1011 for code 1. The square display may mean a selection window 1013 for code 3.

Referring to FIG. 10, a description 1030 for a code may refer to a space for explaining the function of an individual code. For example, explanation 1 (1031) is a functional description for code 1 (1021), explanation 2 (1032) is a functional description for code 2 (1022), and explanation 3 (1033) is a functional description for code 3 (1023). can mean The developer name 1040 may mean the name of the developer who set the individual code. For example, developer 1 (1041) is the name of the developer who set code 1 (1021), developer 2 (1042) is the name of the developer who set code 2 (1022), and developer 3 (1043) is the name of the developer who set code 2 (1022). It can mean the name of the developer who set code 3 (1023).

Referring to FIG. 10, the web UI that can be checked programmatically by the control system and/or developer tools displays the third result information set so that it can be visually checked, and the information contained in the third result information set is may be provided. Although FIG. 10 shows three codes, the number of codes does not have to be limited to this.

A method for providing information to a computing device according to various embodiments includes the steps of: confirming an input information set; receiving a first result information set corresponding to the input information set at a first server; and receiving the input information at a second server. The method may include receiving a second set of result information corresponding to the set, and providing a third set of result information including information regarding a difference between the first set of result information and the second set of result information.

In the information providing method for an arithmetic device according to various embodiments, the first server is a server on which a standard code operates, the second server is a server on which a developed code operates, and the developed code corresponds to the standard code. The reference code may correspond to a code of a service server provided to a user.

In the information providing method for an arithmetic device according to various embodiments, the step of providing the third result information set includes determining whether there is a difference in output values for each code driven by the first server and the second server. The method may include providing the third result information set including information.

The information providing method for an arithmetic device according to various embodiments includes the step of receiving a selection input for confirming the difference in output values between the codes, and the step of providing the third result information set includes the steps of: providing comparison information for a difference between a portion of the output value selected in response to the selection input based on the first result information set and the second result information set, the comparison information being The information may include at least a portion of the first result information set, at least a portion of the second result information set, and information indicating a portion where a difference exists.

In the information providing method for an arithmetic device according to various embodiments, the third result information set includes names of codes driven by the first server and the second server, explanations for the codes, and names of developers who set the codes. can include information about the web UI that is displayed.

The development code of the method for providing information for an arithmetic device according to various embodiments is changed in accordance with the provided third result information set, and provides a third result information set corresponding to the changed development code. Further steps may be included.

A third result information set corresponding to the changed development code of the information providing method for an arithmetic device according to various embodiments corresponds to the input information set by the first result information set and the changed development code. Information regarding the difference in the changed second result information set may be included.

The information providing method for an arithmetic device according to various embodiments further includes the step of acquiring setting information for setting comparison target portions of the first result information set and the second result information set, and the third result information set may be displayed based on the setting information.

A method for providing information in a computing device according to various embodiments includes transmitting a request message for providing the third result information set through a distributed messaging system, and transmitting a request message for providing the third result information set in response to the request message. and the second result information set.

The information providing method for an arithmetic device according to various embodiments further includes the step of obtaining selection information for selecting at least a part of the input information set, and the input information set may be confirmed based on the selection information. can.

A computing device according to various embodiments includes a transceiver for receiving and transmitting data, a database for storing data, and a processor, wherein the processor verifies a set of input information received through the transceiver and receives the input information from a first server. receiving a first result information set corresponding to the information set; receiving a second result information set corresponding to the input information set from a second server; and determining the difference between the first result information set and the second result information set. A third information set including information can be provided.

The first server of the computing device according to various embodiments is a server on which a reference code operates, and the second server is a server on which a developed code operates, and the developed code includes code corresponding to the reference code. , the reference code may correspond to a code of a service server provided to the user.

The processor of the arithmetic device according to various embodiments provides the third result information set including information regarding whether there is a difference in output values for each code driven by the first server and the second server. be able to.

The processor of the arithmetic device according to various embodiments receives a selection input for checking the difference between output values for each code, and selects a portion of the output value of the code selected corresponding to the selection input. providing comparison information for a difference based on the first result information set and the second result information set, the comparison information comprising at least a portion of the first result information set, at least a portion of the second result information set; and information indicating where the difference exists.

In the arithmetic device according to various embodiments, the third result information set displays names of codes driven by the first server and the second server, explanations for the codes, and names of developers who set the codes. Information regarding the web UI may be included.

The development code of the arithmetic device according to various embodiments is modified in response to the provided third result information set, and the processor provides a third result information set corresponding to the modified development code. I can do it.

In the computing device according to various embodiments, a third result information set corresponding to the modified development code is a modified third result information set corresponding to the input information set according to the first result information set and the modified development code. Information regarding the difference between the two result information sets may be included.

The processor of the arithmetic device according to various embodiments obtains configuration information for setting comparison target portions of the first result information set and the second result information set, and the third result information set is configured based on the configuration information. may be displayed.

The processor of the computing device according to various embodiments transmits a request message for providing the third result information set through a distributed messaging system, and responds to the request message by providing the first result information set and the second result information set. A result information set can be received.

The processor of the computing device according to various embodiments may obtain selection information for selecting at least a portion of the input information set, and the input information set may be verified based on the selection information.

On the other hand, preferred embodiments of the present invention are disclosed in this specification and drawings, and even if specific terms are used, they are merely for the purpose of easily explaining the technical content of the present invention and aiding understanding of the invention. It is used in a general sense and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention. It will be obvious to those having ordinary knowledge in the technical field to which the present invention pertains that other modifications based on the technical idea of the present invention can be implemented in addition to the embodiments disclosed herein.

The electronic device or terminal according to the above embodiments includes a processor, a memory for storing and executing program data, a permanent storage such as a disk drive, a communication port for communicating with an external device, a touch panel, and keys. , user interface devices such as buttons, etc. A method embodied in a software module or algorithm may be computer readable code or program instructions executable on the processor and stored on a computer readable storage medium. Here, computer-readable recording media include magnetic storage media (for example, ROM (read-only memory), RAM (random-access memory), floppy disks, hard disks, etc.) and optical readable media (for example, CD-ROM (CD-ROM)). CD-ROM), DVD (Digital Versatile Disc)), etc. The computer-readable recording medium can be distributed over a network coupled computer systems so that the computer-readable code is stored and executed in a distributed manner. The medium may be readable by a computer, stored in memory, and executed by a processor.

The embodiments may be presented in functional block configurations and various processing stages. Such functional blocks may be implemented with various numbers of hardware and/or software configurations that perform specific functions. For example, embodiments include direct circuitry, such as memory, processing, logic, look-up tables, etc., that can perform various functions under the control of one or more microprocessors or other control devices. configuration can be adopted. Just as the components may be implemented in software programming or software elements, the present embodiments include a variety of algorithms implemented in combinations of data structures, processes, routines, or other programming constructs, such as C, C++, Java ( It may be implemented using a programming or scripting language such as Java, assembler, or the like. Functional aspects may be implemented in algorithms running on one or more processors. Additionally, this embodiment may employ conventional techniques for electronic configuration, signal processing, and/or data processing, etc. Terms such as "mechanism," "element," "means," and "configuration" may be used broadly and are not limited to mechanical, physical configurations. The term may include a series of software processes (routines) in conjunction with a processor or the like.

The embodiments described above are merely illustrative, and other embodiments may be implemented within the scope of the claims below.

Claims (12)

In a method for providing information on a computing device,
A step of confirming the input information set;
receiving a first result information set corresponding to the input information set from a first server on which a reference code operates;
receiving a second result information set corresponding to the input information set from a second server on which development code operates;
acquiring configuration information for setting a portion where differences between the first result information set and the second result information set are ignored, the configuration information including the first result information set and the second result information set; applied to compare output values that have the same value in a specific part, and output values that are not the same in the specific part are removed from the first result information set and the second result information set; stages and
Among the differences between the first result information set and the second result information set caused by the developed code that has been changed to differ at least in part from the reference code , a portion in which the setting information is set is excluded. An information providing method, the method comprising the step of providing a third result information set including information on a difference, wherein the portion where the setting information is set has an output value that is not the same in the specific portion. The development code includes code corresponding to the reference code,
The information providing method according to claim 1, wherein the reference code corresponds to a code of a service server provided to the user. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of providing information regarding whether there is a difference in output values for each code driven by the first server and the second server. receiving a selection input for ascertaining differences in output values that exist for each code;
The step of providing the third result information set is based on the first result information set and the second result information set, and provides comparison information for a difference between a portion of the output value of the code selected corresponding to the selection input. including the step of providing;
4. The information providing method according to claim 3, wherein the comparison information includes at least a portion of the first result information set, at least a portion of the second result information set, and information indicating a portion where a difference exists. The third result information set includes information regarding a web UI on which names of codes driven by the first server and the second server, explanations for the codes, and names of developers who set the codes are displayed. The information provision method described in 3. the development code is modified in response to the provided third result information set;
The information providing method according to claim 2, further comprising the step of providing a third result information set corresponding to the changed development code. A third result information set corresponding to the changed development code includes information regarding a difference between the first result information set and a second result information set changed corresponding to the input information set by the changed development code. The information providing method according to claim 6, comprising: The information providing method according to claim 1, wherein the third result information set is displayed based on the setting information. transmitting a request message for providing the third result information set through a distributed messaging system;
The information providing method according to claim 1, wherein the first result information set and the second result information set are received in response to the request message. further comprising obtaining selection information for selecting at least a portion of the input information set;
The information providing method according to claim 1, wherein the input information set is confirmed based on the selection information. The configuration information includes configuration information applied to a cache of products related to promotions, configuration information applied to products that have already been searched, and configuration information applied to payloads of products related to promotions. 2. The information providing method according to claim 1, further comprising at least one of setting information applied to results related to vendor sales, and setting information applied to results related to vendor sales. In a computing device,
transceiver;
a database; and a processor;
the processor verifies a set of input information received through the transceiver;
receiving a first result information set corresponding to the input information set from a first server on which a reference code operates;
receiving a second result information set corresponding to the input information set from a second server on which a development code operates;
Setting information for setting a portion for which differences between the first result information set and the second result information set are ignored is acquired, and the setting information is configured to set a specific portion of the first result information set and the second result information set. is applied to compare output values having the same value in the specific part, and output values that are not the same in the specific part are removed from the first result information set and the second result information set,
Among the differences between the first result information set and the second result information set caused by the developed code that has been changed to differ at least in part from the reference code , a portion in which the setting information is set is excluded. The arithmetic device provides a third result information set including information regarding a difference , and the portion where the setting information is set has an output value that is not the same in the specific portion .

Images