Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7369673B2 - Seismically isolated buildings and their design methods - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7369673B2 - Seismically isolated buildings and their design methods - Google Patents

Seismically isolated buildings and their design methods Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7369673B2
JP7369673B2 JP2020117013A JP2020117013A JP7369673B2 JP 7369673 B2 JP7369673 B2 JP 7369673B2 JP 2020117013 A JP2020117013 A JP 2020117013A JP 2020117013 A JP2020117013 A JP 2020117013A JP 7369673 B2 JP7369673 B2 JP 7369673B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
laminated rubber
seismically isolated
seismic isolation
elastic sliding
bearing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2020117013A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2022014608A (en
Inventor
佳吾 金井
雄一 木村
涼平 鈴木
龍大 欄木
伸行 大和
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Taisei Corp
Original Assignee
Taisei Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Taisei Corp filed Critical Taisei Corp
Priority to JP2020117013A priority Critical patent/JP7369673B2/en
Publication of JP2022014608A publication Critical patent/JP2022014608A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7369673B2 publication Critical patent/JP7369673B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
  • Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
  • Springs (AREA)

Description

本発明は、積層ゴム支承や弾性すべり支承で支持される免震建物およびその設計方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a seismically isolated building supported by laminated rubber bearings or elastic sliding bearings, and a method for designing the same.

従来より、弾性すべり支承を免震支承として用いた免震建物がある。この弾性すべり支承は、すべり板の上を積層ゴムが水平方向に摺動する構造であり、柱の軸力によって生じる積層ゴムとすべり板との摩擦力により地震エネルギーを吸収する。この弾性すべり支承は、軸力変動の小さい中柱の直下に配置されることが多く、従来では、弾性すべり支承の浮き上がりは許容されていなかった。また、免震建物を設計する際、弾性すべり支承の積層ゴムの圧縮剛性(圧縮軸力と圧縮変位との関係)は、直線で近似して用いていた。
ところで、近年、板状のマンションのような平面視で所定方向に長い建物にも、弾性すべり支承を設ける場合がある。また、想定される地震力が増大傾向にあり、水平方向の揺れに加えて、上下方向の揺れが想定されている。このような場合、弾性すべり支承に大きな引き抜き力が作用して、実際の免震建物の挙動が設計と大きく異なるおそれがあった。
Conventionally, there are seismically isolated buildings that use elastic sliding bearings as seismic isolation bearings. This elastic sliding bearing has a structure in which laminated rubber slides horizontally on a sliding plate, and seismic energy is absorbed by the frictional force between the laminated rubber and the sliding plate caused by the axial force of the column. This elastic sliding bearing is often placed directly under the center column where the axial force fluctuation is small, and in the past, lifting of the elastic sliding bearing was not allowed. Furthermore, when designing seismically isolated buildings, the compressive rigidity (relationship between compressive axial force and compressive displacement) of the laminated rubber of elastic sliding bearings was approximated by a straight line.
Incidentally, in recent years, elastic sliding bearings are sometimes provided in buildings that are long in a predetermined direction when viewed from above, such as plate-shaped condominiums. In addition, the expected seismic force is increasing, and in addition to horizontal shaking, vertical shaking is also expected. In such a case, a large pull-out force would act on the elastic sliding bearing, potentially causing the actual behavior of the seismically isolated building to differ significantly from the design.

特許文献1には、建物に適用される免震構造を設計する方法が示されている。建物は、上部構造物、下部構造物、および免震構造を備えている。上部構造物は、第1の質量要素、第2の質量要素、および上部弾性要素を含んでいる。免震構造は、下部弾性要素、慣性質量要素、および粘弾性要素を含んでいる。この免震構造の設計方法は、下部弾性要素の弾性係数、連結弾性要素の弾性係数、および上部構造物の第1の質量要素の質量を含む第1の関数を利用して、連結減衰要素の減衰係数を得るステップと、下部弾性要素の弾性係数および連結弾性要素の弾性係数を利用して、第1の等価弾性係数を得るステップと、第1の質量要素の質量、第2の質量要素の質量、第1の等価弾性係数、および上部弾性要素の弾性係数を含む第2の関数を利用して、慣性質量要素の質量を得るステップと、を有する。
特許文献2には、上下部構造の一方に固定された帯板状のすべり板と、上下部構造の他方に固定された積層ゴム支承部材とを備えた免震装置が示されている。積層ゴム支承部材とすべり板との間には、すべり材が介装されている。
Patent Document 1 shows a method for designing a seismic isolation structure applied to a building. The building includes a superstructure, a substructure, and a seismic isolation structure. The upper structure includes a first mass element, a second mass element, and an upper resilient element. The seismic isolation structure includes a lower elastic element, an inertial mass element, and a viscoelastic element. This seismic isolation structure design method uses a first function including the elastic modulus of the lower elastic element, the elastic modulus of the connected elastic element, and the mass of the first mass element of the upper structure to generate the connected damping element. obtaining a damping coefficient; obtaining a first equivalent elastic coefficient by using the elastic coefficient of the lower elastic element and the elastic coefficient of the connected elastic element; obtaining the mass of the inertial mass element using a second function including the mass, the first equivalent elastic modulus, and the elastic modulus of the upper elastic element.
Patent Document 2 discloses a seismic isolation device including a strip-shaped sliding plate fixed to one of the upper and lower structures and a laminated rubber support member fixed to the other of the upper and lower structures. A sliding member is interposed between the laminated rubber support member and the sliding plate.

特開2017-203297号公報JP2017-203297A 特許第3941251号公報Patent No. 3941251

本発明は、信頼性の高い免震建物の設計方法、および、この設計方法で設計された免震建物を提供することを目的とする。 An object of the present invention is to provide a highly reliable seismically isolated building design method and a seismically isolated building designed using this design method.

本発明者らは、信頼性の高い免震建物の設計方法として、免震建物の解析モデルを生成する際、積層ゴム支承や弾性すべり支承を構成する積層ゴムの圧縮剛性を実大試験体の実験結果に基づいた非線形関数とし、この解析モデルを用いて振動解析を行って、建物および積層ゴムのそれぞれの応答値が閾値を下回るようにすることで、積層ゴム支承や弾性すべり支承の浮き上がりを許容した免震建物が構築可能となる点に着眼して、本発明に至った。
第1の発明の免震建物の設計方法は、積層ゴム(例えば、後述の積層ゴム22)を用いた積層ゴム支承(例えば、後述の積層ゴム支承20)および/または弾性すべり支承(例えば、後述の弾性すべり支承21)で支持される免震建物(例えば、後述の免震建物1)の設計方法であって、前記積層ゴムの圧縮軸力と圧縮変位との関係を非線形関数として前記免震建物の解析モデルを生成し、前記解析モデルを用いて振動解析を行うことで、前記免震建物を設計することを特徴とする。
As a design method for highly reliable seismically isolated buildings, the present inventors investigated the compressive stiffness of the laminated rubber that constitutes laminated rubber bearings and elastic sliding bearings on full-scale test specimens when generating an analytical model of seismically isolated buildings. By using a nonlinear function based on experimental results and performing vibration analysis using this analytical model, we can reduce the uplift of laminated rubber bearings and elastic sliding bearings by ensuring that the response values of the building and laminated rubber are below the thresholds. The present invention has been achieved by focusing on the point that it is possible to construct a seismically isolated building with acceptable seismic isolation.
A design method for a seismically isolated building according to the first invention includes a laminated rubber bearing (e.g., laminated rubber bearing 20 described later) using laminated rubber (e.g., laminated rubber 22 described later) and/or an elastic sliding bearing (e.g., laminated rubber bearing 20 described later). A method for designing a seismically isolated building (for example, seismically isolated building 1 described later) supported by an elastic sliding bearing 21), the seismically isolated The seismic isolation building is designed by generating an analytical model of the building and performing vibration analysis using the analytical model.

第2の発明の免震建物の設計方法は、積層ゴム(例えば、後述の積層ゴム22)を用いた積層ゴム支承(例えば、後述の積層ゴム支承20)および/または弾性すべり支承(例えば、後述の弾性すべり支承21)で支持される免震建物(例えば、後述の免震建物1)の設計方法であって、前記免震建物は、下部構造体(例えば、後述の下部構造体10)と、前記下部構造体の上に設けられた前記積層ゴム支承または前記弾性すべり支承を含む免震層(例えば、後述の免震層11)と、前記免震層の上に設けられた上部構造体(例えば、後述の上部構造体12)と、を備え、前記免震建物の解析モデル(多質点系モデル、立体骨組モデル)を生成し、前記積層ゴムの圧縮軸力と圧縮変位との関係を非線形関数として、前記解析モデルに水平方向および上下方向の地震力を入力して応答を求める解析工程(例えば、後述のステップS1、S2)と、前記下部構造体および前記上部構造体の応答加速度および応答変位量が、それぞれ、所定の閾値を下回るか否かを判定し、この判定が肯定的である場合には、次の工程に移り、否定的である場合には、前記免震建物の設計を変更して前記解析工程に戻る第1の検証工程(例えば、後述のステップS3、S5)と、前記免震層を構成する積層ゴムのせん断変形量、上下変形量、および免震支承の面圧のうち少なくとも1つの応答値が、それぞれ、所定の閾値を下回るか否かを判定し、この判定が肯定的である場合には、設計を終了し、否定的である場合には、前記免震建物の設計を変更して前記解析工程に戻る第2の検証工程(例えば、後述のステップS4、S6)と、を備えることを特徴とする。 A design method for a seismically isolated building according to the second invention includes a laminated rubber bearing (e.g., laminated rubber bearing 20 described later) using laminated rubber (e.g., laminated rubber 22 described later) and/or an elastic sliding bearing (e.g., laminated rubber bearing 20 described later). A design method for a seismically isolated building (e.g., seismic isolation building 1 described below) supported by elastic sliding bearings 21), the seismic isolated building comprising a lower structure (e.g., lower structure 10 described later). , a seismic isolation layer (for example, seismic isolation layer 11 described below) including the laminated rubber bearing or the elastic sliding bearing provided on the lower structure, and an upper structure provided on the seismic isolation layer. (for example, the upper structure 12 described later), generates an analytical model (multi-mass point system model, three-dimensional frame model) of the seismically isolated building, and calculates the relationship between the compressive axial force and compressive displacement of the laminated rubber. An analysis step (e.g., steps S1 and S2 described later) of inputting horizontal and vertical seismic forces into the analysis model as nonlinear functions to obtain a response, and a response acceleration of the lower structure and the upper structure. It is determined whether each response displacement amount is less than a predetermined threshold value, and if this determination is positive, the next step is performed, and if negative, the design of the seismically isolated building is determined. A first verification step (for example, steps S3 and S5 described later) that returns to the analysis step after changing the It is determined whether the response value of at least one of the pressures is below a predetermined threshold value, and if this determination is positive, the design is terminated; if the determination is negative, the above-mentioned exemption is completed. The present invention is characterized by comprising a second verification process (for example, steps S4 and S6 described later) in which the design of the earthquake building is changed and the process returns to the analysis process.

免震建物を設計する際には、この免震建物に設置される積層ゴム支承や弾性すべり支承などの免震支承をモデル化して、振動解析を行っている。従来では、この振動解析において、免震支承の積層ゴムの圧縮軸力と圧縮変位との関係を表わす圧縮剛性(勾配)を、積層ゴムの加力試験で得られる圧縮剛性よりも大きく設定していた(例えば、日本建築学会:免震構造設計指針、pp.25~pp.31、2001年9月10日、第3版)。つまり、実際の弾性すべり支承では、地震発生前の建物自重のみが作用している状態で、積層ゴムの圧縮変位量が従来の設計方法による想定値よりも大きく、一定量沈下した状態となっている(つまり、柱の軸力により大きく潰れている)。よって、実際は、弾性すべり支承に浮き上がりが作用した際、振動解析による想定値以上沈下しているため、浮き上がり現象は起きないが、振動解析上では大きく浮き上がることとなっている場合があった。そのため、従来では、免震支承が浮き上がる場合は、免震計画を検討し直す必要があった。具体的には、免震支承に引張力が作用する場合には、引き抜き力を緩和するために引き抜き対応型免震支承を設けていた。
そこで、第1および第2の発明によれば、振動解析において、免震層を構成する積層ゴムの圧縮剛性を非線形関数とした。これにより、地震時の免震支承の挙動について、浮き上がりも考慮した実態に近い解析を行うことができ、免震支承の個数を適正化して、信頼性の高い免震建物を設計できる。
When designing a seismically isolated building, the seismic isolation bearings such as laminated rubber bearings and elastic sliding bearings installed in the building are modeled and vibration analysis is performed. Conventionally, in this vibration analysis, the compressive stiffness (gradient), which represents the relationship between the compressive axial force and compressive displacement of the laminated rubber of the seismic isolation bearing, was set to be larger than the compressive rigidity obtained in the load test of the laminated rubber. (For example, Architectural Institute of Japan: Seismic Isolation Structure Design Guidelines, pp. 25-31, September 10, 2001, 3rd edition). In other words, in an actual elastic sliding bearing, with only the building's own weight acting before the earthquake, the amount of compressive displacement of the laminated rubber is greater than the value assumed by conventional design methods, and the bearing sinks by a certain amount. (In other words, it has been greatly crushed by the axial force of the column). Therefore, in reality, when uplift is applied to an elastic sliding bearing, the uplift phenomenon does not occur because the bearing sinks more than the expected value based on vibration analysis, but there have been cases in which the vibration analysis indicates that the bearing has lifted up significantly. Therefore, in the past, if the seismic isolation bearing was lifted, it was necessary to reconsider the seismic isolation plan. Specifically, when tensile force acts on the seismic isolation bearing, a pull-out type seismic isolation bearing is provided to alleviate the pulling force.
Therefore, according to the first and second inventions, in the vibration analysis, the compression stiffness of the laminated rubber constituting the seismic isolation layer is made into a nonlinear function. This makes it possible to perform a realistic analysis of the behavior of seismic isolation bearings during earthquakes, taking into account uplift, and to optimize the number of seismic isolation bearings to design highly reliable seismic isolation buildings.

第3の発明の免震建物の設計方法は、前記積層ゴムの圧縮軸力と圧縮変位との関係を示す非線形関数は、実大試験体を用いた試験結果あるいはシミュレーション解析の解析結果に近似した多折れ線または曲線であることを特徴とする。 The design method for a seismically isolated building according to the third invention is such that the nonlinear function indicating the relationship between the compressive axial force and the compressive displacement of the laminated rubber is approximated to test results using a full-scale test specimen or analysis results of simulation analysis. It is characterized by being a polygonal line or a curved line.

この発明によれば、積層ゴムの圧縮軸力と圧縮変位との関係を示す非線形関数を、積層ゴムの実大試験体の試験結果あるいはシミュレーション解析の解析結果に近似した多折れ線または曲線としたので、免震建物の設計における信頼性をより向上できる。 According to the present invention, the nonlinear function representing the relationship between the compressive axial force and the compressive displacement of the laminated rubber is made into a polygonal line or a curve that approximates the test results of the full-scale test specimen of the laminated rubber or the analysis results of the simulation analysis. , reliability in the design of seismic isolation buildings can be further improved.

第4の発明の免震建物は、上述の免震建物の設計方法により設計されたことを特徴とする。
この発明によれば、信頼性の高い免震建物を構築できる。
A seismically isolated building according to a fourth aspect of the present invention is designed by the above-described method for designing a seismically isolated building.
According to this invention, a highly reliable seismically isolated building can be constructed.

本発明によれば、信頼性の高い免震建物の設計方法、および、この設計方法で設計された免震建物を提供できる。 According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a highly reliable seismic isolation building design method and a seismic isolation building designed using this design method.

本発明の一実施形態に係る免震支承の設計方法により設計される免震建物の縦断面図である。1 is a longitudinal sectional view of a seismically isolated building designed by a seismic isolation bearing design method according to an embodiment of the present invention. 免震建物に用いられる積層ゴム支承および弾性すべり支承の側面図である。FIG. 2 is a side view of a laminated rubber bearing and an elastic sliding bearing used in a seismically isolated building. 免震建物の設計方法のフローチャートである。It is a flowchart of the design method of a seismic isolation building. 積層ゴム支承および弾性すべり支承を構成する積層ゴムの解析モデルに設定した圧縮剛性を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the compression rigidity set to the analytical model of the laminated rubber which comprises a laminated rubber bearing and an elastic sliding bearing. 本発明の実施例である免震建物の軸組および免震支承の配置を示す図である。1 is a diagram showing the arrangement of a framework and a seismic isolation support of a seismically isolated building that is an embodiment of the present invention. 実施例の弾性すべり支承をモデル化した図である。It is a diagram modeling an elastic sliding bearing of an example. 実施例の弾性すべり支承の解析モデルのせん断ばねに設定した面圧と摩擦係数との関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the surface pressure set to the shear spring of the analytical model of the elastic sliding bearing of an Example, and a friction coefficient. 実施例の弾性すべり支承の解析モデルのせん断ばねに設定した面圧とせん断力との関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the surface pressure set to the shear spring of the analytical model of the elastic sliding bearing of an Example, and shear force. 実施例の弾性すべり支承の解析モデルの非線形鉛直ばねに設定した圧縮剛性を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the compression rigidity set to the nonlinear vertical spring of the analytical model of the elastic sliding bearing of an Example. 実施例の積層ゴム支承(φ1200)の解析モデルに設定した圧縮剛性を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the compression rigidity set to the analytical model of the laminated rubber bearing (φ1200) of an Example. 実施例の積層ゴム支承(φ1100)の解析モデルに設定した圧縮剛性を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the compression rigidity set to the analytical model of the laminated rubber bearing (φ1100) of an Example. 実施例の弾性すべり支承および積層ゴム支承の圧縮剛性を比較した図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram comparing the compression rigidity of the elastic sliding bearing and the laminated rubber bearing of the example. 実施例の免震建物の振動解析結果(弾性すべり支承の圧縮変位および面圧の時刻歴応答結果)を示す図(その1)である。FIG. 2 is a diagram (part 1) showing vibration analysis results (time history response results of compressive displacement and surface pressure of elastic sliding bearings) of the base-isolated building of the example. 実施例の免震建物の振動解析結果(弾性すべり支承の圧縮変位および面圧の時刻歴応答結果)を示す図(その2)である。FIG. 2 is a diagram (part 2) showing vibration analysis results (time history response results of compressive displacement and surface pressure of elastic sliding bearings) of the base-isolated building of the example.

本発明は、積層ゴムの圧縮剛性を実大試験体の実験結果に基づいた非線形関数として、免震建物の解析モデルを生成し、この解析モデルを用いて振動解析を行う、免震建物の設計方法、およびその設計方法により設計した免震建物である。
以下、本発明の一実施形態について、図面を参照しながら説明する。
図1は、本発明の一実施形態に係る免震建物の設計方法により設計される免震建物1の縦断面図である。
免震建物1は、下部構造体10と、下部構造体10の上に設けられた積層ゴム支承20および弾性すべり支承21を含む免震層11と、免震層11の上に設けられた上部構造体12と、を備える。積層ゴム支承20は、免震建物1の外周部の柱13の直下に配置され、弾性すべり支承21は、免震建物1の内周部の柱13の直下に配置されている(図2(a)、(b)参照)。以降、積層ゴム支承20および弾性すべり支承21を、まとめて免震支承と呼ぶ。
図2(a)は、積層ゴム支承20の側面図であり、図2(b)は、弾性すべり支承21の側面図である。
積層ゴム支承20は、積層ゴム22単体で構成されている。積層ゴム22は、下部構造体10の上に固定された下フランジ30と、この下フランジ30の上に設けられてゴムと鋼板とを交互に積層して構成された積層ゴム本体31と、積層ゴム本体31の上に設けられて上部構造体12に固定された上フランジ32と、を備える。
弾性すべり支承21は、下部構造体10の上に固定されたすべり板23と、このすべり板23の上に摺動可能に設けられて上部構造体12を支持する積層ゴム22と、を備える。この弾性すべり支承21では、柱13の軸力を受ける積層ゴム22がすべり板23上を摺動することで、地震エネルギーを吸収する。
The present invention aims to design a seismically isolated building that generates an analytical model of a seismically isolated building using the compressive stiffness of laminated rubber as a nonlinear function based on experimental results of full-scale test specimens, and performs vibration analysis using this analytical model. This is a seismically isolated building designed using this method and its design method.
Hereinafter, one embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 is a longitudinal sectional view of a seismic isolation building 1 designed by a seismic isolation building design method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
The seismic isolation building 1 includes a lower structure 10, a seismic isolation layer 11 including a laminated rubber bearing 20 and an elastic sliding bearing 21 provided on the lower structure 10, and an upper portion provided on the seismic isolation layer 11. A structure 12 is provided. The laminated rubber bearings 20 are placed directly under the columns 13 on the outer periphery of the seismic isolation building 1, and the elastic sliding bearings 21 are placed directly under the columns 13 on the inner periphery of the seismic isolation building 1 (see FIG. 2). (see a), (b)). Hereinafter, the laminated rubber bearing 20 and the elastic sliding bearing 21 will be collectively referred to as a seismic isolation bearing.
2(a) is a side view of the laminated rubber bearing 20, and FIG. 2(b) is a side view of the elastic sliding bearing 21.
The laminated rubber support 20 is composed of a single layered rubber 22. The laminated rubber 22 includes a lower flange 30 fixed on the lower structure 10, a laminated rubber main body 31 provided on the lower flange 30, and configured by alternately laminating rubber and steel plates, An upper flange 32 provided on the rubber body 31 and fixed to the upper structure 12 is provided.
The elastic sliding support 21 includes a sliding plate 23 fixed on the lower structure 10 and a laminated rubber 22 that is slidably provided on the sliding plate 23 and supports the upper structure 12. In this elastic sliding bearing 21, the laminated rubber 22 that receives the axial force of the column 13 slides on the sliding plate 23, thereby absorbing seismic energy.

図3は、免震建物1の設計方法のフローチャートである。
ステップS1では、三次元仮想空間上に免震建物1の解析モデル(多質点系モデル、立体骨組モデル)を生成する。
ステップS2では、生成した解析モデルに水平方向および上下方向の地震力を入力して応答を求める。このとき、図4に示すように、従来の設計方法では、積層ゴム支承20および弾性すべり支承21の積層ゴム22の圧縮剛性(圧縮軸力と圧縮変位との関係)が線形であったが、本発明では非線形とする。
ステップS3では、下部構造体10および上部構造体12の応答加速度および応答変位量が、それぞれ、所定の閾値を下回るか否かを判定する。この判定がYes(肯定的)である場合には、次のステップS4に移り、No(否定的)である場合には、ステップS5に移る。
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the design method for the seismically isolated building 1.
In step S1, an analytical model (multi-material point system model, three-dimensional frame model) of the seismically isolated building 1 is generated in a three-dimensional virtual space.
In step S2, horizontal and vertical seismic forces are input to the generated analytical model to obtain a response. At this time, as shown in FIG. 4, in the conventional design method, the compressive rigidity (relationship between compressive axial force and compressive displacement) of the laminated rubber 22 of the laminated rubber bearing 20 and the elastic sliding bearing 21 was linear; In the present invention, it is assumed to be nonlinear.
In step S3, it is determined whether the response acceleration and response displacement amount of the lower structure 10 and the upper structure 12 are respectively lower than predetermined threshold values. If this determination is Yes (affirmative), the process moves to the next step S4, and if it is No (negative), the process moves to step S5.

ステップS5では、免震建物1の設計を変更して、ステップS1に戻る。
ステップS4では、積層ゴム支承20および弾性すべり支承21の積層ゴム22のせん断変形量、上下変形量、および免震支承(積層ゴム支承20および弾性すべり支承21)の面圧の応答値が、それぞれ、所定の閾値を下回るか否かを判定する。この判定がYes(肯定的)である場合には、設計を終了し、No(否定的)である場合には、ステップS6に移る。
ステップS6では、免震建物1の設計を変更して、ステップS1に戻る。
In step S5, the design of the seismic isolation building 1 is changed and the process returns to step S1.
In step S4, the amount of shear deformation and amount of vertical deformation of the laminated rubber 22 of the laminated rubber bearing 20 and the elastic sliding bearing 21, and the response value of the surface pressure of the seismic isolation bearing (the laminated rubber bearing 20 and the elastic sliding bearing 21) are calculated, respectively. , it is determined whether or not the value is below a predetermined threshold. When this determination is Yes (affirmative), the design is ended, and when this determination is No (negative), the process moves to step S6.
In step S6, the design of the seismic isolation building 1 is changed and the process returns to step S1.

〔実施例〕
以下、本発明の免震建物の設計方法を適用した実施例について説明する。本実施例では、免震建物をモデル化して振動解析(三次元有限要素解析)を行った。
〔1.免震建物の構造〕
図5(a)は、本実施例の設計対象となる免震建物の軸組を示す正面図および側面図である。図5(b)は、免震建物における免震支承の配置を示す平面図である。この免震建物の構造は、以下の通りである。
階数: 19階
建物高さ: 約60m
階高: 3.1m
構造種別: 基礎免震の鉄筋コンクリート造
架構形式: 桁方向がラーメン構造、梁間方向が連層耐震壁
アスペクト比:最高部分で4.9
〔Example〕
Hereinafter, embodiments to which the seismically isolated building design method of the present invention is applied will be described. In this example, a seismically isolated building was modeled and vibration analysis (three-dimensional finite element analysis) was performed.
[1. Structure of seismic isolation building]
FIG. 5(a) is a front view and a side view showing the framework of a seismically isolated building that is the design target of this example. FIG. 5(b) is a plan view showing the arrangement of seismic isolation bearings in a seismically isolated building. The structure of this seismic isolation building is as follows.
Number of floors: 19 floors Building height: Approx. 60m
Floor height: 3.1m
Structure type: Reinforced concrete structure with base isolation Frame type: Rigid-frame structure in the girder direction, continuous shear wall in the direction between the beams Aspect ratio: 4.9 at the highest point

ここで、免震建物の中央部(Y5~Y8通り)には、φ1200mmの弾性すべり支承(SA80-1200-8.0×3)が配置されている。一方、免震建物の端部(Y1~Y4通り、Y9~Y12通り)には、φ1200mmの積層ゴム支承(R40-1200-9.0×26)またはφ1100mmの積層ゴム支承(R40-1100-8.3×26)が配置されている。 Here, elastic sliding bearings (SA80-1200-8.0 x 3) with a diameter of 1200 mm are placed in the central part of the seismically isolated building (Y5 to Y8 streets). On the other hand, the ends of the seismic isolation building (Y1 to Y4 streets, Y9 to Y12 streets) are equipped with φ1200mm laminated rubber bearings (R40-1200-9.0×26) or φ1100mm laminated rubber bearings (R40-1100-8 .3×26) are arranged.

〔2.弾性すべり支承のモデル化〕
免震建物の下部構造体と上部構造体との間のギャップ要素である弾性すべり支承を、図6のようにモデル化した。すなわち、弾性すべり支承を、鉛直方向に直列に配置された2つの鉛直ばねと、せん断方向(水平方向)でかつ互いに交差するX方向およびY方向に伸縮する2つのせん断ばねと、を組み合わせて表わした。
せん断ばねについては、初期剛性および摩擦係数を設定することで、弾性すべり支承のスリップ特性を表わした。本実施例では、摩擦係数の面圧依存性を考慮することで、弾性すべり支承の水平方向の特性を高精度で解析できるようにした。
また、詳しくは後述するが、上側の弾性鉛直ばねは剛とし、下側の非線形鉛直ばねの圧縮剛性を非線形として浮き上がりを考慮できるようにした。本実施例では、このように2つの鉛直ばねを直列に配置することで、面圧依存性を保持したまま圧縮方向の変形特性を表現した。
[2. Modeling of elastic sliding bearings]
The elastic sliding bearing, which is the gap element between the lower structure and upper structure of a seismically isolated building, was modeled as shown in Figure 6. In other words, an elastic sliding bearing is expressed as a combination of two vertical springs arranged in series in the vertical direction and two shear springs that expand and contract in the X direction and Y direction that intersect with each other in the shear direction (horizontal direction). Ta.
For the shear spring, the slip characteristics of the elastic sliding bearing were expressed by setting the initial stiffness and friction coefficient. In this example, by considering the surface pressure dependence of the friction coefficient, it is possible to analyze the horizontal characteristics of an elastic sliding bearing with high accuracy.
Further, as will be described in detail later, the upper elastic vertical spring is made rigid, and the compression rigidity of the lower nonlinear vertical spring is made nonlinear so that lifting can be taken into account. In this example, by arranging two vertical springs in series in this way, deformation characteristics in the compression direction are expressed while maintaining surface pressure dependence.

せん断ばねの摩擦係数μは、一定値とすることなく、面圧に応じて変動するように設定する。具体的には、図7に示すように、10N/mmから30N/mmまでの範囲で、メーカーの評価式に近似した直線を設定する。すると、面圧とせん断力との関係は、図8に示すようになる。 The friction coefficient μ of the shear spring is not set to a constant value, but is set to vary depending on the surface pressure. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 7, a straight line that approximates the manufacturer's evaluation formula is set in the range from 10 N/mm 2 to 30 N/mm 2 . Then, the relationship between surface pressure and shear force becomes as shown in FIG.

下側の非線形鉛直ばねについて、引張剛性をゼロとすることで、弾性すべり支承の浮き上がりを表現した。
また、下側の非線形鉛直ばねの圧縮剛性を、図9に示すように、3本の直線からなるトリリニアの非線形関数で表わした。
従来では、弾性すべり支承をモデル化する際、ゴムの縦弾性係数、全ゴムの層厚さ、断面積に基づいて、圧縮剛性を線形としていた(例えば、日本建築学会:免震構造設計指針、pp.25~pp.31、2001年9月10日、第3版)。以下、この圧縮剛性を線形とした解析モデルを圧縮線形モデルと呼ぶ。
By setting the tensile stiffness of the lower nonlinear vertical spring to zero, we expressed the uplift of the elastic sliding bearing.
Furthermore, the compression stiffness of the lower nonlinear vertical spring was expressed by a trilinear nonlinear function consisting of three straight lines, as shown in FIG.
Conventionally, when modeling elastic sliding bearings, compressive stiffness was assumed to be linear based on the longitudinal elastic modulus of the rubber, the total rubber layer thickness, and the cross-sectional area (for example, Architectural Institute of Japan: Seismic Isolation Structure Design Guidelines, pp. 25-31, September 10, 2001, 3rd edition). Hereinafter, this analytical model in which the compression stiffness is linear will be referred to as a compression linear model.

これに対し、本発明では、弾性すべり支承をモデル化する際、圧縮剛性をトリリニア型の非線形とした。以下、この圧縮剛性を非線形とした解析モデルを圧縮非線形モデルと呼ぶ。具体的には、まず、弾性すべり支承の加力実験を行った。この加力実験では、基準面圧を20N/mmとし、基準面圧+30%まで載荷し(実験データP)、その後、基準面圧+30%から-30%の間で3サイクル載荷した後、除荷した(実験データQ)。実験データP、Qに示すように、最初に載荷したときは積層ゴムが硬いが、一度力を加えることによってゴム物性が馴染んで剛性が低下している。
次に、弾性すべり支承の実験データの面圧2.0N/mmの点を第1折れ点aとし、基準面圧-30%の点を第2折れ点bとし、基準面圧+30%となる点を終点cとする。次に、原点と第1折れ点aとを結ぶ直線を第1勾配Aとし、第1折れ点aと第2折れ点bとを結ぶ直線を第2勾配Bとし、第2折れ点bと終点cとを結ぶ直線を第3勾配Cとする。これら第1勾配A、第2勾配B、第3勾配Cの比率を求めて、第3勾配Cが従来の線形のデータと一致するように、非線形関数を設定した。
また、上側の弾性鉛直ばねの圧縮剛性を、第3勾配Cの1000倍とした。
On the other hand, in the present invention, when modeling the elastic sliding bearing, the compression rigidity is made trilinear and nonlinear. Hereinafter, this analytical model in which the compression stiffness is nonlinear will be referred to as a compression nonlinear model. Specifically, first, we conducted a force application experiment on an elastic sliding bearing. In this loading experiment, the reference surface pressure was set to 20 N/ mm2 , and the load was applied to the reference surface pressure +30% (experimental data P), and then, after 3 cycles of loading between the reference surface pressure +30% and -30%, Unloaded (experimental data Q). As shown in experimental data P and Q, the laminated rubber is hard when it is first loaded, but once force is applied, the physical properties of the rubber adapt and the rigidity decreases.
Next, in the experimental data of the elastic sliding bearing, the point at which the surface pressure is 2.0 N/mm 2 is set as the first bending point a, the point at which the reference surface pressure is -30% is set as the second bending point b, and the point at which the reference surface pressure is +30% is set as the first bending point a. Let the point be the end point c. Next, the straight line connecting the origin and the first bending point a is defined as a first slope A, the straight line connecting the first bending point a and the second bending point b is defined as a second slope B, and the second bending point b and the end point Let the straight line connecting c be the third gradient C. The ratios of the first slope A, second slope B, and third slope C were determined, and a nonlinear function was set so that the third slope C coincided with conventional linear data.
Further, the compression rigidity of the upper elastic vertical spring was set to be 1000 times the third slope C.

〔3.積層ゴム支承のモデル化〕
積層ゴム支承の圧縮剛性についても、支承の種類や径によって異なり、基準面圧も弾性すべり支承とは異なるものの、弾性すべり支承と同様に、加力実験の結果に基づいてモデル化した。すなわち、積層ゴム支承を単一の鉛直ばねでモデル化し、以下のように設定した。この積層ゴム支承の鉛直ばねについては、基準面圧を15N/mmとし、上述の弾性すべり支承と同様の手順で圧縮剛性を決定した。これにより、積層ゴム支承の鉛直ばねは、図10および図11に示すように、3本の直線からなるトリリニアの非線形関数となった。また、積層ゴム支承の鉛直ばねの引張剛性を、例えば第3勾配の1/10とした。
以上の実施例で用いた、φ1200mmの弾性すべり支承(SA80-1200-8.0×3)、φ1200mmの積層ゴム支承(R40-1200-9.0×26)、およびφ1100mmの積層ゴム支承(R40-1100-8.3×26)について、積層ゴムの圧縮剛性をまとめると、図12のようになった。
[3. Modeling of laminated rubber bearing]
Although the compression rigidity of laminated rubber bearings also differs depending on the type and diameter of the bearing, and the reference surface pressure is also different from that of elastic sliding bearings, it was modeled based on the results of loading experiments, similar to elastic sliding bearings. That is, the laminated rubber bearing was modeled using a single vertical spring, and the settings were made as follows. Regarding the vertical spring of this laminated rubber bearing, the reference surface pressure was set to 15 N/mm 2 , and the compression rigidity was determined in the same manner as for the elastic sliding bearing described above. As a result, the vertical spring of the laminated rubber support became a trilinear nonlinear function consisting of three straight lines, as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11. Further, the tensile rigidity of the vertical spring of the laminated rubber support was set to, for example, 1/10 of the third slope.
The elastic sliding bearings with a diameter of 1200 mm (SA80-1200-8.0×3), the laminated rubber bearings with a diameter of 1200 mm (R40-1200-9.0×26), and the laminated rubber bearings with a diameter of 1100 mm (R40 -1100-8.3×26), the compression stiffness of the laminated rubber is summarized as shown in FIG.

〔4.振動解析〕
以上の免震建物の解析モデルに、告示jMA-Kobe(レベル2)のNS位相およびUD位相に対して、所定の倍率をかけたものを入力し、免震建物の解析モデルでのX2通り、Y5通りにおける弾性すべり支承の鉛直変位および面圧の時刻歴応答を求めた。
図13は、入力地震動としてH1.5-V1.5(水平動1.5 倍、上下動1.5倍)を用いた場合であり、図14は、入力地震動としてH1.5-V3.0(水平動1.5 倍、上下動3.0倍)を用いた場合である。
図13に示すH1.5-V1.5の場合、圧縮線形モデルの最大浮き上がり量は0.071cmであるのに対し、圧縮非線形モデルの最大浮き上がり量は0.002cmである。どちらの圧縮モデルとも、極微量の浮き上がりが生じているものの、圧縮非線形モデルの方が全体的に浮き上がり量は抑制されていることが判る。
図14に示すH1.5-V3.0の場合、15~17秒付近ではH1.5-V1.5の場合と同様に、浮き上がりが顕著に生じている。鉛直変位については、圧縮線形モデルで最大0.230cm、圧縮非線形モデルでは0.119cmであり、図13に示すH1.5-V1.5と同様に、圧縮非線形モデルの方が圧縮線型モデルよりも抑えられている。これは、弾性すべり支承の圧縮剛性をトリリニア型で模擬したことで、長期軸力による圧縮方向のひずみが増大して、支承の浮き上がり量が減少したと考えられる。最大浮き上がり発生(16.6秒)後の支承着座時の最大面圧は、H1.5-V1.5で圧縮線形モデルの場合は16.8N/mmで、圧縮非線形の場合は17.5N/mmであり、 共に基準面圧相当である。H1.5-V3.0では圧縮線形で23.7N/mm、圧縮非線形では23.3N/mmであり、短期許容面圧以下である。圧縮剛性の線形、非線形特性の違いに関わらず、両モデル共に同程度の面圧を受けることから浮き上がり量の違いによる着座時面圧への影響は僅かであった。
上述のように、弾性すべり支承の鉛直加力試験に基づき、圧縮剛性の非線形特性を考慮し、上下動に対する支承の浮き上がり挙動を検討した。実施例では、従来に比べて、弾性すべり支承の浮き上がりが小さくなるか、あるいは、なくなることが確認された。
[4. Vibration analysis]
Input the NS phase and UD phase of the notification jMA-Kobe (level 2) multiplied by a predetermined multiplier into the above analysis model of a seismic isolation building, and The time history response of the vertical displacement and surface pressure of the elastic sliding bearing at Y5 street was determined.
Figure 13 shows the case where H1.5-V1.5 (horizontal motion 1.5 times, vertical motion 1.5 times) is used as the input earthquake motion, and Figure 14 shows the case where H1.5-V3.0 is used as the input earthquake motion. (Horizontal movement 1.5 times, vertical movement 3.0 times) is used.
In the case of H1.5-V1.5 shown in FIG. 13, the maximum lift amount of the compressed linear model is 0.071 cm, whereas the maximum lift amount of the compressed nonlinear model is 0.002 cm. Although a very small amount of lifting occurs in both compression models, it can be seen that the amount of lifting is suppressed overall in the compression nonlinear model.
In the case of H1.5-V3.0 shown in FIG. 14, significant lifting occurs around 15 to 17 seconds, similar to the case of H1.5-V1.5. Regarding the vertical displacement, the maximum displacement is 0.230 cm for the compression linear model and 0.119 cm for the compression nonlinear model, and as with H1.5-V1.5 shown in Figure 13, the compression nonlinear model is better than the compression linear model. It's suppressed. This is thought to be because the compressive stiffness of the elastic sliding bearing was simulated using a trilinear type, which increased the strain in the compressive direction due to long-term axial force and decreased the amount of uplift of the bearing. The maximum surface pressure when the bearing is seated after the maximum lifting occurs (16.6 seconds) is H1.5-V1.5, 16.8 N/mm 2 for the compression linear model, and 17.5 N for the compression nonlinear model. / mm2 , both of which correspond to the standard surface pressure. In H1.5-V3.0, the compression linearity is 23.7N/mm 2 and the compression nonlinearity is 23.3N/mm 2 , which is less than the short-term allowable surface pressure. Regardless of the difference in the linear and nonlinear characteristics of compression stiffness, both models received the same amount of surface pressure, so the difference in the amount of lift had little effect on the surface pressure when seated.
As mentioned above, based on the vertical loading test of the elastic sliding bearing, we considered the nonlinear characteristics of the compressive stiffness and investigated the uplift behavior of the bearing in response to vertical motion. In the example, it was confirmed that the uplift of the elastic sliding bearing was reduced or eliminated compared to the conventional case.

本実施形態によれば、以下のような効果がある。
(1)免震層11を構成する積層ゴム支承20および弾性すべり支承21の積層ゴム22について、圧縮軸力と圧縮変位との関係を非線形関数とした。これにより、地震時の免震支承の挙動について、浮き上がりも考慮した実態に近い解析を行うことができ、信頼性の高い免震建物1を設計できる。
(2)積層ゴム22の圧縮軸力と圧縮変位との関係を示す非線形関数を、シミュレーション解析の解析結果に近似したトリリニア(多折れ線)としたので、免震建物1の設計における信頼性をより向上できる。
According to this embodiment, there are the following effects.
(1) Regarding the laminated rubber bearing 20 and the laminated rubber 22 of the elastic sliding bearing 21 that constitute the seismic isolation layer 11, the relationship between the compressive axial force and the compressive displacement was made into a nonlinear function. As a result, it is possible to perform a realistic analysis of the behavior of the seismic isolation support during an earthquake, taking into account uplift, and to design a highly reliable seismic isolation building 1.
(2) The nonlinear function that indicates the relationship between the compressive axial force and the compressive displacement of the laminated rubber 22 is made trilinear (multiple polygonal lines) that approximates the analysis results of the simulation analysis, so the reliability in the design of the seismic isolation building 1 is improved. You can improve.

(3)本発明の免震建物の設計方法では、免震支承をモデル化する際、圧縮剛性を低剛性かつ非線形とした。これにより、地震発生前の長期軸力のみが作用した状態における沈下変位量を、実状と整合するように大きく評価することができ、沈み込みによるポテンシャルエネルギー量も大きくなるため、振動解析によっても、実際の観測記録のように浮き上がり現象が発生しなくなる。したがって、免震支承の解析モデルの圧縮剛性を、非線形かつ低く設定することで、実験結果を裏付けるように歪エネルギーを大きくモデル化できる。 (3) In the design method for a seismically isolated building of the present invention, when modeling the seismic isolation bearing, the compressive stiffness is set to be low and nonlinear. As a result, it is possible to greatly evaluate the amount of subsidence displacement in a state where only long-term axial force is applied before an earthquake occurs, consistent with the actual situation, and the amount of potential energy due to subsidence becomes large, so vibration analysis can also be performed. The floating phenomenon no longer occurs as in actual observation records. Therefore, by setting the compressive stiffness of the analysis model of the seismic isolation bearing to be nonlinear and low, it is possible to model large strain energy to support the experimental results.

なお、本発明は前記実施形態に限定されるものではなく、本発明の目的を達成できる範囲での変形、改良等は本発明に含まれるものである。 Note that the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and any modifications, improvements, etc. that can achieve the purpose of the present invention are included in the present invention.

1…免震建物 10…下部構造体 11…免震層 12…上部構造体 13…柱
20…積層ゴム支承 21…弾性すべり支承 22…積層ゴム 23…すべり板
30…下フランジ 31…積層ゴム本体 32…上フランジ
P、Q…実験データ a…第1折れ点 b…第2折れ点 c…終点
A…第1勾配 B…第2勾配 C…第3勾配
1... Seismic isolation building 10... Lower structure 11... Seismic isolation layer 12... Upper structure 13... Column 20... Laminated rubber bearing 21... Elastic sliding bearing 22... Laminated rubber 23... Sliding plate 30... Lower flange 31... Laminated rubber main body 32... Upper flange P, Q... Experimental data a... First bending point b... Second bending point c... End point A... First slope B... Second slope C... Third slope

Claims (3)

積層ゴムを用いた積層ゴム支承および/または弾性すべり支承で支持される免震建物の設計方法であって、
前記積層ゴムの圧縮軸力と圧縮変位との関係を非線形関数として前記免震建物の解析モデルを生成し、前記解析モデルを用いて振動解析を行うことで、前記免震建物を設計することを特徴とする免震建物の設計方法。
A method for designing a seismically isolated building supported by laminated rubber bearings and/or elastic sliding bearings using laminated rubber, comprising:
An analytical model of the seismically isolated building is generated using the relationship between compressive axial force and compressive displacement of the laminated rubber as a nonlinear function, and vibration analysis is performed using the analytical model to design the seismically isolated building. Characteristic design method for seismically isolated buildings.
積層ゴムを用いた積層ゴム支承および/または弾性すべり支承で支持される免震建物の設計方法であって、
前記免震建物は、下部構造体と、前記下部構造体の上に設けられた前記積層ゴム支承または前記弾性すべり支承を含む免震層と、前記免震層の上に設けられた上部構造体と、を備え、
前記免震建物の解析モデルを生成し、前記積層ゴムの圧縮軸力と圧縮変位との関係を非線形関数として、前記解析モデルに水平方向および上下方向の地震力を入力して応答を求める解析工程と、
前記下部構造体および前記上部構造体の応答加速度および応答変位量が、それぞれ、所定の閾値を下回るか否かを判定し、この判定が肯定的である場合には、次の工程に移り、否定的である場合には、前記免震建物の設計を変更して前記解析工程に戻る第1の検証工程と、
前記免震層を構成する積層ゴムのせん断変形量、上下変形量、および免震支承の面圧のうち少なくとも1つの応答値が、それぞれ、所定の閾値を下回るか否かを判定し、この判定が肯定的である場合には、設計を終了し、否定的である場合には、前記免震建物の設計を変更して前記解析工程に戻る第2の検証工程と、を備えることを特徴とする免震建物の設計方法。
A method for designing a seismically isolated building supported by laminated rubber bearings and/or elastic sliding bearings using laminated rubber, comprising:
The seismic isolation building includes a lower structure, a seismic isolation layer including the laminated rubber bearing or the elastic sliding bearing provided on the lower structure, and an upper structure provided on the seismic isolation layer. and,
An analysis step of generating an analytical model of the seismically isolated building, using the relationship between the compressive axial force and compressive displacement of the laminated rubber as a nonlinear function, and inputting horizontal and vertical seismic forces into the analytical model to obtain a response. and,
It is determined whether the response acceleration and the response displacement amount of the lower structure and the upper structure are respectively lower than predetermined threshold values, and if this determination is positive, the process moves to the next step and is negative. a first verification step of changing the design of the seismically isolated building and returning to the analysis step;
Determine whether at least one response value of the shear deformation amount, the vertical deformation amount, and the surface pressure of the seismic isolation support of the laminated rubber constituting the seismic isolation layer is each lower than a predetermined threshold, and make this determination. If the result is positive, the design is terminated; if the result is negative, the design of the seismically isolated building is changed and the process returns to the analysis process. A design method for seismically isolated buildings.
積層ゴムを用いた積層ゴム支承および/または弾性すべり支承で支持される免震建物であって、
前記積層ゴムの圧縮剛性が非線形関数で決定されて、前記積層ゴム支承および/または前記弾性すべり支承の浮き上がりが許容されていることを特徴とする免震建物。
A seismically isolated building supported by laminated rubber bearings and/or elastic sliding bearings using laminated rubber,
A seismically isolated building characterized in that the compression rigidity of the laminated rubber is determined by a non-linear function, and lifting of the laminated rubber bearing and/or the elastic sliding bearing is allowed.
JP2020117013A 2020-07-07 2020-07-07 Seismically isolated buildings and their design methods Active JP7369673B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020117013A JP7369673B2 (en) 2020-07-07 2020-07-07 Seismically isolated buildings and their design methods

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020117013A JP7369673B2 (en) 2020-07-07 2020-07-07 Seismically isolated buildings and their design methods

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2022014608A JP2022014608A (en) 2022-01-20
JP7369673B2 true JP7369673B2 (en) 2023-10-26

Family

ID=80120329

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2020117013A Active JP7369673B2 (en) 2020-07-07 2020-07-07 Seismically isolated buildings and their design methods

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7369673B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7807585B1 (en) * 2025-02-28 2026-01-27 株式会社ダイナミックデザイン seismic isolation building
CN121558284B (en) * 2026-01-26 2026-03-24 南昌航空大学 A method for determining the reference surface of elastic elements in high-temperature and high-pressure cavities based on stiffness abrupt changes.

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000310058A (en) 1999-04-26 2000-11-07 Toda Constr Co Ltd Vibration control system
JP2017009063A (en) 2015-06-24 2017-01-12 オイレス工業株式会社 Seismic isolator
JP2017203297A (en) 2016-05-11 2017-11-16 鹿島建設株式会社 Base-isolation construction and method of designing base-isolation construction
JP2017210308A (en) 2016-05-24 2017-11-30 三菱電機株式会社 Elevator sheave

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH08120973A (en) * 1994-10-19 1996-05-14 Hideyuki Tada Design method of base isolation building and special building constructed in the method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000310058A (en) 1999-04-26 2000-11-07 Toda Constr Co Ltd Vibration control system
JP2017009063A (en) 2015-06-24 2017-01-12 オイレス工業株式会社 Seismic isolator
JP2017203297A (en) 2016-05-11 2017-11-16 鹿島建設株式会社 Base-isolation construction and method of designing base-isolation construction
JP2017210308A (en) 2016-05-24 2017-11-30 三菱電機株式会社 Elevator sheave

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2022014608A (en) 2022-01-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Habieb et al. Base seismic isolation of a historical masonry church using fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators
Ma et al. Seismic performance upgrading for underground structures by introducing sliding isolation bearings
Mosleh et al. Seismic behavior of RC building structures designed according to current codes
Habieb et al. Two-step advanced numerical approach for the design of low-cost unbonded fiber reinforced elastomeric seismic isolation systems in new masonry buildings
Van Engelen et al. Structural and nonstructural performance of a seismically isolated building using stable unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators
Chou et al. Seismic design and shake table tests of a steel post‐tensioned self‐centering moment frame with a slab accommodating frame expansion
Das et al. Shake table testing of un‐reinforced brick masonry building test model isolated by U‐FREI
Bhagat et al. Seismic response evaluation of base-isolated reinforced concrete buildings under bidirectional excitation
Li et al. Comparison of static pushover and dynamic analyses using RC building shaking table experiment
Cardone et al. Critical load of slender elastomeric seismic isolators: an experimental perspective
Zhang et al. Behavior of steel plate shear walls with pre-compression from adjacent frame columns
Lu et al. A simplified Nonlinear Sway-Rocking model for evaluation of seismic response of structures on shallow foundations
Hashemi et al. Seismic responses of base-isolated flexible rectangular fluid containers under horizontal ground motion
Osgooei et al. Non-iterative computational model for fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators
JP7369673B2 (en) Seismically isolated buildings and their design methods
Farahani et al. Seismic impact between adjacent torsionally coupled buildings
Somwanshi et al. Seismic analysis of fixed based and base isolated building structures
JPH08120973A (en) Design method of base isolation building and special building constructed in the method
Lei et al. Shaking table tests of base-isolated reinforced concrete frame by double friction pendulum bearings
Mazza et al. Nonlinear modelling of HDRBs in the seismic analysis of retrofitted and new base-isolated rc buildings
Sow et al. Effect of recycle tire isolator as earthquake resistance system for low rise buildings in Malaysia
Williams Numerical Analysis of Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls Using the Nonlinear Truss Approach
Dorji Seismic performance of brick infilled RC frame structures in low and medium rise buildings in Bhutan
Zhou et al. Comparison study of two criteria for identification of structural dynamic stability
Ishii et al. Seismic response analysis of seismically isolated buildings with multilayered elastomeric bearings considering rocking behavior

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20220830

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20230621

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20230710

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20230901

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20230928

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20231016

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7369673

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150