JP7499093B2 - Liquefaction resistance evaluation method - Google Patents
Liquefaction resistance evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP7499093B2 JP7499093B2 JP2020114255A JP2020114255A JP7499093B2 JP 7499093 B2 JP7499093 B2 JP 7499093B2 JP 2020114255 A JP2020114255 A JP 2020114255A JP 2020114255 A JP2020114255 A JP 2020114255A JP 7499093 B2 JP7499093 B2 JP 7499093B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- liquefaction
- soil
- garbage
- ground
- liquefaction strength
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)
Description
本発明は、ゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度の評価方法に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the liquefaction resistance of ground containing garbage.
従来、湾岸の埋立地盤はゆるく堆積しており、地震時に液状化する可能性が高いことが知られている。このため、液状化の可能性とその影響を十分に検討した上で建物の設計を行うことが重要である(例えば、特許文献1を参照)。一方、ゴミを焼却せずにそのまま埋め立てた埋立地盤もあり、こういったゴミ混じりの地盤については、液状化強度の評価方法が確立されていない。 Traditionally, reclaimed land on the bay coast is loosely deposited and is known to have a high probability of liquefaction during an earthquake. For this reason, it is important to thoroughly consider the possibility of liquefaction and its effects when designing buildings (see, for example, Patent Document 1). On the other hand, there are also reclaimed land areas where waste is buried without being incinerated, and there is no established method for evaluating the liquefaction resistance of such waste-mixed ground.
地盤内のゴミが液状化強度に与える影響を模式的に図6に示す。図6(a)に示すように、ゴミが混じっていない地盤では、土粒子が地下水位以下にゆるく堆積しており、地震力を受けて水圧が上昇することで土粒子同士が離れて液状化に至る。一方、ゴミ混じりの地盤では、図6(b)に示すように、土に混じっているゴミが土粒子に対して拘束効果を発揮し、いわば繊維補強のような役目を果たして液状化を防止する効果があると考えられる。すなわち、地盤内のゴミの影響を正確に評価することによって、液状化強度が上昇し、地盤に建て込む杭の杭径を小さくできるなどコストダウン効果が見込める可能性がある。 Figure 6 shows a schematic diagram of the effect of garbage in the ground on liquefaction strength. As shown in Figure 6(a), in ground without garbage, soil particles are loosely piled below the groundwater level, and as water pressure increases due to earthquake force, the soil particles separate, leading to liquefaction. On the other hand, in ground containing garbage, as shown in Figure 6(b), the garbage mixed in the soil exerts a binding effect on the soil particles, acting like fiber reinforcement and preventing liquefaction. In other words, by accurately assessing the effect of garbage in the ground, it is possible to increase the liquefaction strength and reduce costs by making it possible to reduce the diameter of piles erected in the ground.
現地地盤の液状化強度を直接調べる方法として、土質サンプルを採取して供試体を作成し、繰返し三軸試験を行う方法が地盤工学会によって規定されている。しかしながら、この液状化強度試験は土単体を対象とすることを前提としており、異物が混じった土については試験方法が提供されていない。このため、現行の設計では、ゴミを取り除いた状態で粒度分析を行い、建築基礎構造設計指針に基づいてFL値(液状化に対する安全率)を算定するという簡易判定に頼っている。しかしながら、この方法では地盤内に混じっているゴミの影響を無視しており、液状化の影響を正確に評価できているとはいえない。 The Geotechnical Society has prescribed a method for directly investigating the liquefaction strength of on-site ground, in which soil samples are taken, specimens are prepared, and cyclic triaxial tests are performed. However, this liquefaction strength test is based on the premise that the soil itself is the subject, and no test method is provided for soil that contains foreign matter. For this reason, current designs rely on a simplified judgment in which a grain size analysis is performed after removing the debris, and the FL value (safety factor against liquefaction) is calculated based on the Building Foundation Design Guidelines. However, this method ignores the effect of debris mixed in the ground, and cannot be said to accurately evaluate the impact of liquefaction.
本発明は、上記に鑑みてなされたものであって、ゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度を評価するのに好適な液状化強度の評価方法を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in consideration of the above, and aims to provide a method for evaluating the liquefaction strength of ground that is suitable for evaluating the liquefaction strength of ground that contains garbage.
上記した課題を解決し、目的を達成するために、本発明に係る液状化強度の評価方法は、ゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度を評価する方法であって、評価対象地盤から地盤試料を採取するステップと、採取した地盤試料をふるい分けして、所定の大きさ以上のゴミを含有しない土単体の供試体と、ゴミを含有するゴミ混じりの供試体とを作成するステップと、各供試体について液状化試験を実施するステップと、液状化試験の結果に基づいて、評価対象地盤の液状化強度を評価するステップとを有することを特徴とする。 In order to solve the above problems and achieve the objectives, the liquefaction strength evaluation method of the present invention is a method for evaluating the liquefaction strength of garbage-mixed ground, and is characterized by having the steps of collecting soil samples from the ground to be evaluated, sifting the collected soil samples to prepare soil specimens that do not contain garbage of a predetermined size or larger, and garbage-mixed specimens that contain garbage, conducting liquefaction tests on each specimen, and evaluating the liquefaction strength of the ground to be evaluated based on the results of the liquefaction tests.
また、本発明に係る他の液状化強度の評価方法は、上述した発明において、40mmふるいを通過した地盤試料をゴミ混じりの供試体の作成に用いるとともに、9.5mmふるいを通過した地盤試料を土単体の供試体の作成に用いることを特徴とする。 Another method for evaluating liquefaction strength according to the present invention is characterized in that, in the above-mentioned invention, a soil sample that passed through a 40 mm sieve is used to prepare a test specimen containing rubbish, and a soil sample that passed through a 9.5 mm sieve is used to prepare a test specimen of soil alone.
また、本発明に係る他の液状化強度の評価方法は、上述した発明において、ゴミ混じりの供試体の液状化強度、ゴミ混じりの供試体と土単体の供試体の液状化強度の平均値、または、ゴミ混じりの供試体と土単体の供試体の液状化強度の比を液状化抵抗比で補正した液状化強度を、評価対象地盤の液状化強度として評価することを特徴とする。 In addition, another liquefaction strength evaluation method according to the present invention is characterized in that, in the above-mentioned invention, the liquefaction strength of the target ground is evaluated as the liquefaction strength of the garbage-mixed specimen, the average value of the liquefaction strengths of the garbage-mixed specimen and the soil specimen, or the ratio of the liquefaction strengths of the garbage-mixed specimen and the soil specimen corrected by the liquefaction resistance ratio.
本発明に係る液状化強度の評価方法によれば、ゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度を評価する方法であって、評価対象地盤から地盤試料を採取するステップと、採取した地盤試料をふるい分けして、所定の大きさ以上のゴミを含有しない土単体の供試体と、ゴミを含有するゴミ混じりの供試体とを作成するステップと、各供試体について液状化試験を実施するステップと、液状化試験の結果に基づいて、評価対象地盤の液状化強度を評価するステップとを有するので、ゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度を評価することができるという効果を奏する。 The liquefaction strength evaluation method according to the present invention is a method for evaluating the liquefaction strength of garbage-mixed ground, and includes the steps of collecting soil samples from the ground to be evaluated, sifting the collected soil samples to prepare soil specimens that do not contain garbage of a predetermined size or larger, and garbage-mixed specimens that contain garbage, conducting liquefaction tests on each specimen, and evaluating the liquefaction strength of the ground to be evaluated based on the results of the liquefaction tests, thereby achieving the effect of being able to evaluate the liquefaction strength of garbage-mixed ground.
また、本発明に係る他の液状化強度の評価方法によれば、40mmふるいを通過した地盤試料をゴミ混じりの供試体の作成に用いるとともに、9.5mmふるいを通過した地盤試料を土単体の供試体の作成に用いるので、各供試体について液状化試験を適切に実施することができるという効果を奏する。 In addition, according to another method for evaluating liquefaction strength according to the present invention, a soil sample that passed through a 40 mm sieve is used to create a test specimen containing rubbish, and a soil sample that passed through a 9.5 mm sieve is used to create a test specimen of soil alone, which has the effect of allowing appropriate liquefaction tests to be performed on each test specimen.
また、本発明に係る他の液状化強度の評価方法によれば、ゴミ混じりの供試体の液状化強度、ゴミ混じりの供試体と土単体の供試体の液状化強度の平均値、または、ゴミ混じりの供試体と土単体の供試体の液状化強度の比を液状化抵抗比で補正した液状化強度を、評価対象地盤の液状化強度として評価するので、評価対象地盤のゴミの混入状況等を考慮して液状化強度を評価することができるという効果を奏する。 In addition, according to another method of evaluating liquefaction strength of the present invention, the liquefaction strength of the test specimen containing garbage, the average value of the liquefaction strengths of the test specimen containing garbage and the test specimen containing only soil, or the ratio of the liquefaction strengths of the test specimen containing garbage and the test specimen containing only soil corrected by the liquefaction resistance ratio is evaluated as the liquefaction strength of the ground to be evaluated, which has the effect of making it possible to evaluate the liquefaction strength taking into account the garbage contamination status of the ground to be evaluated, etc.
以下に、本発明に係る液状化強度の評価方法の実施の形態を図面に基づいて詳細に説明する。なお、この実施の形態によりこの発明が限定されるものではない。 Below, an embodiment of the method for evaluating liquefaction strength according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. Note that the present invention is not limited to this embodiment.
図1に示すように、本発明の実施の形態に係る液状化強度の評価方法は、ゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度を評価する方法である。本方法では、まず、供試体作成の指標として、評価対象のゴミ混じり地盤において、現場密度測定を行う(ステップS1)。 As shown in FIG. 1, the method for evaluating liquefaction resistance according to an embodiment of the present invention is a method for evaluating the liquefaction resistance of garbage-mixed ground. In this method, first, an in-situ density measurement is performed on the garbage-mixed ground to be evaluated as an index for creating a test specimen (step S1).
続いて、このゴミ混じり地盤から地盤試料を採取する(ステップS21、S22)。
試料採取の過程を図2(1)~(5)に示す。まず、ふるい分け機械によって掘削した土を40mmのふるいにかけることで、過大なゴミを取り除く(図2(1)~(3))。40mmふるいを通過した試料はゴミ混じりの供試体作成に用いる(図2(2))。次に、40mmふるいを通過した試料を、さらに人力で9.5mmふるいにかける(図2(4))。9.5mmふるいを通過した試料は土単体の供試体作成に用いる(図2(5))。
Next, a ground sample is collected from the garbage-mixed ground (steps S21 and S22).
The process of sampling is shown in Figure 2 (1) to (5). First, the excavated soil is sieved through a 40 mm sieve using a sieving machine to remove excess debris (Figure 2 (1) to (3)). The sample that passes through the 40 mm sieve is used to prepare a test specimen containing debris (Figure 2 (2)). Next, the sample that passes through the 40 mm sieve is sieved manually through a 9.5 mm sieve (Figure 2 (4)). The sample that passes through the 9.5 mm sieve is used to prepare a soil specimen (Figure 2 (5)).
次に、供試体として、土単体の供試体とゴミ混じりの供試体の2種類を作成する(ステップS22、S32)。
供試体の仕様と必要土量を以下に示す。
Next, two types of specimens are prepared: a soil specimen and a soil-mixed specimen (steps S22 and S32).
The specifications of the specimen and the required soil volume are shown below.
a.土単体の供試体
・採取した試料を9.5mmのふるいにかけたものを使用。
・供試体寸法:直径φ5cm,高さh10cm
・供試体数:1試料4供試体+予備1供試体=5供試体分
・必要土量:2.5×2.5×10×π=200cc/体,200×5=1000cc=1リットル×2=2リットル程度
a. Soil specimen: Collected samples were sieved through a 9.5 mm sieve.
- Test piece dimensions: diameter φ5cm, height h10cm
Number of specimens: 4 specimens for 1 sample + 1 spare specimen = 5 specimens. Amount of soil required: 2.5 x 2.5 x 10 x π = 200 cc/body, 200 x 5 = 1000 cc = 1 liter x 2 = about 2 liters.
b.ゴミ混じりの供試体
・採取した試料から40mm以上の混入物を取り除いたものを使用。
・供試体寸法:直径φ30cm,高さh60cm
・供試体数:1試料4供試体+予備1供試体=5供試体分
・必要土量:15×15×60×π=42411cc/体=43リットル/体,43×5=215リットル×1.5=323リットル
b. Test specimens containing debris: Remove any debris larger than 40 mm from the collected sample.
・Test piece dimensions: diameter φ30cm, height h60cm
Number of specimens: 4 specimens for 1 sample + 1 spare specimen = 5 specimens. Required soil volume: 15 x 15 x 60 x π = 42411 cc/body = 43 liters/body, 43 x 5 = 215 liters x 1.5 = 323 liters.
土単体の供試体は、地盤工学会が規定する液状化強度試験と同じく、φ5cm、h10cmの小型供試体を用いる。ゴミ混じりの供試体は、通常と同じサイズの供試体では混入物の寸法比率が大きく、正常に試験できないと考えられることからφ30cm、h60cmの大型供試体を用いる。
作成した供試体の例を図3(1)、(2)に示す。
For the soil specimen, a small specimen with a diameter of 5 cm and a height of 10 cm is used, the same as for the liquefaction strength test specified by the Geotechnical Society. For the specimen containing garbage, a large specimen with a diameter of 30 cm and a height of 60 cm is used, since it is thought that a normal size specimen would not be able to perform a normal test due to the large dimensional ratio of the contaminants.
Examples of the test specimens prepared are shown in Figures 3 (1) and (2).
次に、各供試体について液状化試験を実施する(ステップS23、S33)。
液状化試験は、「土の繰返し非排水三軸試験」(地盤工学会基準JGS0541-2009)に基づいて実施する。試験には、1試料当たり4供試体を用いる。試験装置は、例えば図4(1)および(2)に示す応力制御方式の繰返し三軸試験装置を用い、土単体供試体では図4(1)の小型繰返し三軸試験装置を、ゴミ混じり供試体では図4(2)の大型繰返し三軸試験装置を用いる。
Next, a liquefaction test is carried out on each test specimen (steps S23, S33).
The liquefaction test is conducted based on the "Undrained Soil Cyclic Triaxial Test" (Geotechnical Society Standard JGS0541-2009). Four specimens are used per sample. The test equipment used is, for example, the stress-controlled cyclic triaxial test equipment shown in Figures 4 (1) and (2). For soil specimens, the small-scale cyclic triaxial test equipment shown in Figure 4 (1) is used, and for specimens containing rubbish, the large-scale cyclic triaxial test equipment shown in Figure 4 (2) is used.
試験結果の一例を図5に示す。図の液状化強度曲線の例では、繰返し載荷回数N=15における液状化強度比は、土単体でRL15,土単体=0.21、ゴミ混じりでRL15,ゴミ混じり=0.26となっており、ゴミが混入することで液状化強度が上がっていることが確認できる。 An example of the test results is shown in Figure 5. In the example of the liquefaction strength curve in the figure, the liquefaction strength ratio at N = 15 repeated loadings is R L15 for soil alone, 0.21 for soil alone , and R L15 for garbage mixed soil, 0.26 for garbage mixed soil , confirming that the inclusion of garbage increases the liquefaction strength.
次に、この試験結果に基づいて、ゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度を評価する(ステップS4)。ゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度は、例えば以下の方法1~3のいずれかで評価することができる。なお、本発明はこれらの方法に限るものではなく、試験結果に基づいて液状化強度を評価するものであればいかなる方法でもよい。
Next, the liquefaction strength of the garbage-mixed ground is evaluated based on the test results (step S4). The liquefaction strength of the garbage-mixed ground can be evaluated, for example, by any of the following
(方法1)
RL15,ゴミ混じりを直接使用する方法である。図5に示す例では0.26となる。
(Method 1)
R L15, a method of directly using dust mixed in. In the example shown in Figure 5, the value is 0.26.
(方法2)
ゴミが評価対象の敷地内で均一に混入していない可能性を考慮し、RL15,土単体とRL15,ゴミ混じりの平均値を用いる方法である。図5に示す例ではavg[0.21,0.26]=0.235となる。
(Method 2)
Considering the possibility that garbage may not be uniformly mixed within the site being evaluated, this method uses the average value of R L15, soil alone and R L15, garbage mixed in . In the example shown in Figure 5, avg[0.21, 0.26] = 0.235.
(方法3)
液状化試験に基づき、建築基礎構造設計指針の簡易判定で算定する液状化抵抗比R=τL/σz’の補正を行う方法である。補正式を式(1)に示す。
(Method 3)
This is a method for correcting the liquefaction resistance ratio R = τ L /σ z ' calculated by the simplified judgment in the Guidelines for Designing Foundation Structures, based on liquefaction tests. The correction formula is shown in Equation (1).
R’=(RL15,ゴミ混じり/RL15,土単体)・R ・・・(1)
ここで、R’はゴミ混じり地盤における補正液状化抵抗比、Rは建築基礎構造設計指針に基づいて補正N値Naより算定される液状化抵抗比である。
R' = (R L15, garbage mixed / R L15, soil only ) · R ... (1)
Here, R' is the corrected liquefaction resistance ratio for the garbage-mixed ground, and R is the liquefaction resistance ratio calculated from the corrected N-value Na based on the architectural foundation structure design guidelines.
図5に示す例では、R’=[0.26/0.21]・R=1.24Rとなり、1.24倍の液状化強度上昇効果が得られる。 In the example shown in Figure 5, R' = [0.26/0.21] R = 1.24R, resulting in a 1.24-fold increase in liquefaction strength.
本実施の形態によれば、上記の方法に基づいてゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度を評価することができる。 According to this embodiment, the liquefaction strength of garbage-mixed ground can be evaluated based on the above method.
なお、本発明の効果を検証するため、実際のゴミ混じり地盤において液状化試験を行う前の簡易判定法による液状化判定を適用したところ、レベル1の地震動でも地表10m以上の範囲にわたって液状化が発生し、杭を補強する必要があることが判明した。この地盤に対し、本実施の形態によって液状化強度を評価したところ、レベル1の地震動ではほどんど液状化が起きなくなることが予想され、杭の補強コストを削減できることが判明した。このように、ゴミ混じり地盤については、本実施の形態を適用して液状化強度を評価することにより、建て込む杭のコストダウンを図ることができる。
In order to verify the effects of this invention, a simplified liquefaction assessment method was used to assess liquefaction before conducting liquefaction tests on actual garbage-mixed ground. It was found that liquefaction occurred over an area of 10 m or more above the ground surface even with
以上説明したように、本発明に係る液状化強度の評価方法によれば、ゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度を評価する方法であって、評価対象地盤から地盤試料を採取するステップと、採取した地盤試料をふるい分けして、所定の大きさ以上のゴミを含有しない土単体の供試体と、ゴミを含有するゴミ混じりの供試体とを作成するステップと、各供試体について液状化試験を実施するステップと、液状化試験の結果に基づいて、評価対象地盤の液状化強度を評価するステップとを有するので、ゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度を評価することができる。 As explained above, the liquefaction strength evaluation method of the present invention is a method for evaluating the liquefaction strength of garbage-mixed ground, and includes the steps of collecting soil samples from the ground to be evaluated, sifting the collected soil samples to create soil specimens that do not contain garbage larger than a predetermined size, and garbage-mixed specimens that contain garbage, conducting liquefaction tests on each specimen, and evaluating the liquefaction strength of the ground to be evaluated based on the results of the liquefaction tests, thereby making it possible to evaluate the liquefaction strength of garbage-mixed ground.
また、本発明に係る他の液状化強度の評価方法によれば、40mmふるいを通過した地盤試料をゴミ混じりの供試体の作成に用いるとともに、9.5mmふるいを通過した地盤試料を土単体の供試体の作成に用いるので、各供試体について液状化試験を適切に実施することができる。 In addition, according to another method for evaluating liquefaction strength according to the present invention, a soil sample that passed through a 40 mm sieve is used to create a test specimen containing rubbish, and a soil sample that passed through a 9.5 mm sieve is used to create a test specimen of soil alone, so that a liquefaction test can be appropriately performed on each test specimen.
また、本発明に係る他の液状化強度の評価方法によれば、ゴミ混じりの供試体の液状化強度、ゴミ混じりの供試体と土単体の供試体の液状化強度の平均値、または、ゴミ混じりの供試体と土単体の供試体の液状化強度の比を液状化抵抗比で補正した液状化強度を、評価対象地盤の液状化強度として評価するので、評価対象地盤のゴミの混入状況等を考慮して液状化強度を評価することができる。 In addition, according to another method of evaluating liquefaction strength according to the present invention, the liquefaction strength of the test specimen containing garbage, the average value of the liquefaction strengths of the test specimen containing garbage and the test specimen containing only soil, or the ratio of the liquefaction strengths of the test specimen containing garbage and the test specimen containing only soil corrected by the liquefaction resistance ratio is evaluated as the liquefaction strength of the ground to be evaluated, so that the liquefaction strength can be evaluated taking into account the amount of garbage mixed into the ground to be evaluated, etc.
以上のように、本発明に係る液状化強度の評価方法は、建物の設計における地盤の液状化検討に有用であり、特に、ゴミ混じり地盤の液状化強度を評価するのに適している。 As described above, the liquefaction strength evaluation method of the present invention is useful for considering ground liquefaction in building design, and is particularly suitable for evaluating the liquefaction strength of ground containing garbage.
Claims (3)
評価対象地盤から地盤試料を採取するステップと、採取した地盤試料をふるい分けして、所定の大きさ以上のゴミを含有しない土単体の供試体と、ゴミを含有するゴミ混じりの供試体とを作成するステップと、各供試体について、土の繰返し非排水三軸試験を実施するステップと、前記試験により得られた液状化強度曲線に基づいて、評価対象地盤の液状化強度を評価するステップとを有することを特徴とする液状化強度の評価方法。 A method for evaluating the liquefaction strength of garbage-containing ground, comprising:
A method for evaluating liquefaction strength comprising the steps of: collecting soil samples from the ground to be evaluated; sifting the collected soil samples to prepare soil specimens that are simply soil and do not contain debris larger than a predetermined size; and soil-mixed specimens that contain debris; conducting cyclic undrained triaxial tests on the soil for each specimen; and evaluating the liquefaction strength of the ground to be evaluated based on the liquefaction strength curve obtained by the tests.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2020114255A JP7499093B2 (en) | 2020-07-01 | 2020-07-01 | Liquefaction resistance evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2020114255A JP7499093B2 (en) | 2020-07-01 | 2020-07-01 | Liquefaction resistance evaluation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2022012433A JP2022012433A (en) | 2022-01-17 |
| JP7499093B2 true JP7499093B2 (en) | 2024-06-13 |
Family
ID=80148715
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2020114255A Active JP7499093B2 (en) | 2020-07-01 | 2020-07-01 | Liquefaction resistance evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP7499093B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR102731462B1 (en) * | 2023-10-05 | 2024-11-18 | 한국건설기술연구원 | AI-based ground liquefaction preliminary evaluation system, method, and recording medium recording a computer-readable program for executing the method |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2001147188A (en) | 1999-11-19 | 2001-05-29 | Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd | Method of finding shearing rigidity lowering rate from fl value |
| JP2005248493A (en) | 2004-03-02 | 2005-09-15 | Ishizaka Sangyo Kk | Manufacturing method and apparatus for producing backfill material from earth and sand glass mixture |
| JP2016156209A (en) | 2015-02-25 | 2016-09-01 | 株式会社地盤試験所 | Foundation liquefaction determination method |
| JP2020069452A (en) | 2018-11-01 | 2020-05-07 | 株式会社小池建材 | Method for producing improved soil |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3678828B2 (en) * | 1996-01-18 | 2005-08-03 | 佐藤工業株式会社 | Prevention method of ground liquefaction directly under the structure |
| JPH1088557A (en) * | 1996-09-10 | 1998-04-07 | Ohbayashi Corp | Estimating method for execution quantity for each soil character using gravity prospecting |
-
2020
- 2020-07-01 JP JP2020114255A patent/JP7499093B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2001147188A (en) | 1999-11-19 | 2001-05-29 | Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd | Method of finding shearing rigidity lowering rate from fl value |
| JP2005248493A (en) | 2004-03-02 | 2005-09-15 | Ishizaka Sangyo Kk | Manufacturing method and apparatus for producing backfill material from earth and sand glass mixture |
| JP2016156209A (en) | 2015-02-25 | 2016-09-01 | 株式会社地盤試験所 | Foundation liquefaction determination method |
| JP2020069452A (en) | 2018-11-01 | 2020-05-07 | 株式会社小池建材 | Method for producing improved soil |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2022012433A (en) | 2022-01-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Poulos et al. | Liquefaction resistance of thickened tailings | |
| Rawat et al. | Experimental investigation on MSW fine mixed with fibers: fiber reinforced waste | |
| CN113820466B (en) | Post-remediation polluted site assessment method based on engineering safety assessment | |
| Rawat et al. | Parametric study on dynamic characterization of municipal solid waste fine fractions for geotechnical purpose | |
| JP7499093B2 (en) | Liquefaction resistance evaluation method | |
| Lucian | Geotechnical aspects of buildings on expansive soils in Kibaha, Tanzania: preliminary study | |
| CN118311195A (en) | Method for screening radionuclide uranium super-enriched plants through field observation method | |
| Robit et al. | Investigation moisture content effect on bearing capacity failure of strip footing rested on silty sand soil based on crack characteristics assessment using non-destructive test | |
| Janani et al. | Impact of solid waste dumping in Pallavaram Dumping site, India | |
| Brink et al. | Soil collapse from an effective stress perspective | |
| Radwan et al. | Industrial liquid wastes and the integrity of calcareous sand from Ain Helwan, Cairo | |
| KATSUMI et al. | Soils recovered from disaster debris–Characterization and utilization– | |
| Sarmah et al. | Mechanical and leaching characteristics of inert waste landfills | |
| JP2013068586A (en) | Method for removing radioactive contamination of soil | |
| O’Sullivan et al. | Geotechnical engineering and environmental aspects of clay liners for landfill projects | |
| Bonaparte et al. | Twenty-Year Performance of a Mixed LLRW/RCRA Waste Disposal Facility | |
| Yalçın et al. | Evaluation of the performance of geotextiles using finite element analysis in the settlement results: A case study in Kayseri, Turkey | |
| Gao et al. | Laterite as a potential seepage barrier from a karst-depression tailings impoundment | |
| Matsumaru et al. | Rainfall seepage analysis and dynamic response analysis for the railway embankments seriously damaged in the 2004 Niigata-ken Chuetsu earthquake | |
| Kavazanjian Jr et al. | Seismic design of mixed and hazardous waste landfills | |
| Uno | A study on geotechnical properties of recycled geomaterial from tsunami-related sediments | |
| Zekkos et al. | Recent findings on the static and dynamic properties of municipal solid waste | |
| Perera et al. | Shear Strength Characteristics of Municipal Solid Waste | |
| Weiksnar et al. | Influence of Blending Phosphogypsum to Mitigate Radium Leaching and Enhance Reuse As Road Base Material | |
| Bella et al. | On the compression behaviour of unsaturated silty tailings: an experimental investigation |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20230620 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20240208 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20240227 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20240422 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20240507 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20240603 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 7499093 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |