Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7622667B2 - Defect measurement device, defect measurement method, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing equipment, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing method, and zinc-based coated steel sheet quality control method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7622667B2 - Defect measurement device, defect measurement method, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing equipment, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing method, and zinc-based coated steel sheet quality control method - Google Patents

Defect measurement device, defect measurement method, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing equipment, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing method, and zinc-based coated steel sheet quality control method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7622667B2
JP7622667B2 JP2022027379A JP2022027379A JP7622667B2 JP 7622667 B2 JP7622667 B2 JP 7622667B2 JP 2022027379 A JP2022027379 A JP 2022027379A JP 2022027379 A JP2022027379 A JP 2022027379A JP 7622667 B2 JP7622667 B2 JP 7622667B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
zinc
steel sheet
plated steel
line
defect
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2022027379A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2023123908A (en
Inventor
紘明 大野
正貴 木庭
克弥 星野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2022027379A priority Critical patent/JP7622667B2/en
Publication of JP2023123908A publication Critical patent/JP2023123908A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7622667B2 publication Critical patent/JP7622667B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)

Description

本発明は、欠陥計測装置、欠陥計測方法、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造設備、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造方法、及び亜鉛系めっき鋼板の品質管理方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a defect measurement device, a defect measurement method, a manufacturing facility for zinc-based plated steel sheets, a manufacturing method for zinc-based plated steel sheets, and a quality control method for zinc-based plated steel sheets.

鉄鋼製品の表面性状は鉄鋼製品の外観上重要な要素であり、特に外観を損ねる表面性状は鉄鋼製品の価値を大きく低下させる。表面性状による外観特性の変化は、鉄鋼製品表面の表面粗さ等の微小な形状、化学的組成、及び皮膜膜厚の偏り等によって発生することが多い。例えば亜鉛系めっき鋼板では、筋状欠陥状の微小(数100nm~数μm程度)な凹凸が表面に発生し、後工程の塗装処理によって凹凸が顕在化することにより外観が損なわれる場合がある。この凹凸は、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造工程において表面成分の僅かな偏析によって鉄と亜鉛の合金化度の進み易さに偏りが生じることによって発生する。また、合金化度の進み易さの偏りは圧延工程によって鋼板の圧延方向に延ばされるため、この凹凸は鋼板の圧延方向に幅数100μm~数10mmの筋となって発生することが多い。 The surface quality of steel products is an important factor in the appearance of steel products, and surface quality that impairs the appearance significantly reduces the value of the steel product. Changes in appearance characteristics due to surface quality are often caused by minute shapes such as the surface roughness of the steel product surface, chemical composition, and unevenness in coating thickness. For example, in zinc-plated steel sheets, minute (several hundred nm to several μm) irregularities in the form of line defects may occur on the surface, and the unevenness may become apparent during the subsequent painting process, impairing the appearance. These irregularities occur when slight segregation of surface components occurs during the manufacturing process of zinc-plated steel sheets, causing an unevenness in the ease of alloying between iron and zinc. In addition, the unevenness in the ease of alloying is stretched in the rolling direction of the steel sheet during the rolling process, and these irregularities often occur as lines several hundred μm to several tens of mm wide in the rolling direction of the steel sheet.

ところが、筋状欠陥状の微小な凹凸(以下、筋状欠陥と呼ぶ)に起因する亜鉛系めっき鋼板の外観特性の変化は、目視で観察するとうっすらと筋状の模様が確認される程度である。また、凹凸量が小さいこと及び発生面に対する微小な凹凸の割合が小さいことから、凹凸を直接計測して定量化することは困難である。このような背景から、過去の研究開発では、外観をいかに良くするかに焦点が置かれ、外観の評価は専ら目視に依存していた。具体的には、特許文献1,2には、溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板の外観を目視で判断する方法が記載されている。一方、このような外観特性の定量化に対し、めっき表面にパルスレーザ光を照射し、各分析点に対してパルス毎に発光スペクトルを分光分析する方法(特許文献3参照)や、めっき表面に光を照射することによって得られた画像の明部と暗部の面積からスパングルと呼ばれる模様を検査する方法(特許文献4参照)が提案されている。 However, the change in the appearance characteristics of zinc-based plated steel sheets caused by minute irregularities in the form of line defects (hereinafter referred to as line defects) is only a faint line-like pattern when observed visually. In addition, since the amount of irregularities is small and the ratio of minute irregularities to the surface on which they occur is small, it is difficult to directly measure and quantify the irregularities. In light of this background, past research and development focused on how to improve the appearance, and the evaluation of the appearance relied exclusively on visual inspection. Specifically, Patent Documents 1 and 2 describe methods for visually judging the appearance of hot-dip galvanized steel sheets. On the other hand, for quantifying such appearance characteristics, a method has been proposed in which a pulsed laser beam is irradiated onto the plated surface and the emission spectrum is spectroscopically analyzed for each pulse for each analysis point (see Patent Document 3), and a method has been proposed in which a pattern called spangle is inspected from the area of light and dark areas in an image obtained by irradiating light onto the plated surface (see Patent Document 4).

特開2020-153004号公報JP 2020-153004 A 特開2018-44190号公報JP 2018-44190 A 特開2006-317379号公報JP 2006-317379 A 特開平11-72317号公報Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 11-72317

しかしながら、特許文献1,2に記載の方法は、属人的な亜鉛系めっき鋼板の外観特性に対する判断のばらつきを生むだけでなく、外観特性の基準が曖昧となるため真に外観が改善されたかどうかに説得力を持たせることができない。一方、特許文献3に記載の方法は、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の外観特性の定量化方法というよりはめっき構造の分析方法であり、分析結果が外観に与える影響をさらに評価しなければならず、外観特性の判断という観点からは間接的である。また、パルスレーザ光の照射点のみの評価であることから、外観を面的に評価するにはパルスレーザ光を走査させる必要があり、装置が大がかりとなる。また、パルスレーザ光のスポット径より小さい幅の筋状欠陥の計測は困難である。また、特許文献4に記載の方法は、エリアセンサを用いているため、視野内で光学系がばらつくことがある。また、スパングルのみを評価対象としており、筋状欠陥の微小な凹凸までを評価可能であるかどうかが定かではない。 However, the methods described in Patent Documents 1 and 2 not only cause variation in judgments of the appearance characteristics of zinc-based plated steel sheets based on personal factors, but also make it difficult to persuade people that the appearance has truly been improved because the standards for the appearance characteristics are unclear. On the other hand, the method described in Patent Document 3 is a method for analyzing the plating structure rather than a method for quantifying the appearance characteristics of zinc-based plated steel sheets, and the impact of the analysis results on the appearance must be further evaluated, so it is indirect from the perspective of judging the appearance characteristics. In addition, since the evaluation is only performed on the irradiation points of the pulsed laser light, it is necessary to scan the pulsed laser light to evaluate the appearance in a planar manner, which requires a large-scale device. In addition, it is difficult to measure line defects with a width smaller than the spot diameter of the pulsed laser light. In addition, the method described in Patent Document 4 uses an area sensor, so the optical system may vary within the field of view. In addition, only spangles are evaluated, and it is unclear whether it is possible to evaluate even minute irregularities in line defects.

本発明は、上記課題に鑑みてなされたものであって、その目的は、簡素な光学系で筋状欠陥状の微小な凹凸(以下、筋状欠陥と呼ぶ)に起因する亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面の外観特性を直接的に短時間で計測可能な欠陥計測装置及び欠陥計測方法を提供することにある。また、本発明の他の目的は、亜鉛系めっき鋼板を歩留まりよく製造可能な亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造設備及び製造方法を提供することにある。また、本発明の他の目的は、高品質な亜鉛系めっき鋼板を提供可能な亜鉛系めっき鋼板の品質管理方法を提供することにある。 The present invention has been made in consideration of the above problems, and its object is to provide a defect measurement device and defect measurement method that can directly measure the appearance characteristics of the surface of a zinc-based plated steel sheet caused by minute irregularities in the form of line defects (hereinafter referred to as line defects) in a short time using a simple optical system. Another object of the present invention is to provide a zinc-based plated steel sheet manufacturing facility and manufacturing method that can manufacture zinc-based plated steel sheets with a high yield. Another object of the present invention is to provide a quality control method for zinc-based plated steel sheets that can provide high-quality zinc-based plated steel sheets.

本発明に係る欠陥計測装置は、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面の筋状欠陥を計測する欠陥計測装置であって、前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面にライン照明光を照射する照射手段と、前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面で反射された前記ライン照明光を受光することによって、前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面画像を撮影する撮像手段と、を備え、前記照射手段及び前記撮像手段は、前記ライン照明光の照射角と受光角との差が20度以上40度以下の範囲内になるように配置されている。 The defect measuring device according to the present invention is a defect measuring device for measuring line defects on the surface of a zinc-based plated steel sheet, and includes an illumination means for illuminating the surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet with line illumination light, and an imaging means for capturing an image of the surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet by receiving the line illumination light reflected by the surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet, and the illumination means and the imaging means are arranged so that the difference between the illumination angle and reception angle of the line illumination light is within a range of 20 degrees or more and 40 degrees or less.

前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面画像から、前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の圧延方向に対して平行な方向における前記筋状欠陥の特徴量を前記筋状欠陥の指標として算出する演算手段を備え、前記照射手段は、前記ライン照明光の延伸方向が前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の圧延方向に対して垂直な方向になるように配置されているとよい。 The apparatus includes a calculation means for calculating, from a surface image of the zinc-based plated steel sheet, a feature amount of the line defect in a direction parallel to the rolling direction of the zinc-based plated steel sheet as an index of the line defect, and the irradiation means is preferably arranged so that the extension direction of the line illumination light is perpendicular to the rolling direction of the zinc-based plated steel sheet.

前記演算手段は、前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面画像から前記垂直な方向の輝度むらを補正した補正画像を生成し、前記補正画像から筋状欠陥を含んだ領域の画像を選択し、選択した前記筋状欠陥の画像から前記指標を算出するとよい。 The calculation means may generate a corrected image by correcting the brightness unevenness in the vertical direction from the surface image of the zinc-based plated steel sheet, select an image of an area including a line defect from the corrected image, and calculate the index from the selected image of the line defect.

本発明に係る欠陥計測方法は、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面の筋状欠陥を計測する欠陥計測方法であって、照射手段が前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面にライン照明光を照射する照射ステップと、撮像手段が前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面で反射された前記ライン照明光を受光することによって、前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面画像を撮影する撮像ステップと、を含み、前記照射手段及び前記撮像手段は、前記ライン照明光の照射角と受光角との差が20度以上40度以下の範囲内になるように配置されている。 The defect measurement method according to the present invention is a defect measurement method for measuring line defects on the surface of a zinc-based plated steel sheet, and includes an irradiation step in which an irradiation means irradiates the surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet with line illumination light, and an imaging step in which an imaging means receives the line illumination light reflected by the surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet to capture a surface image of the zinc-based plated steel sheet, and the irradiation means and the imaging means are arranged so that the difference between the irradiation angle and the reception angle of the line illumination light is within a range of 20 degrees to 40 degrees.

本発明に係る亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造設備は、亜鉛系めっき鋼板を製造する製造設備と、前記製造設備により製造された亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面を計測する本発明に係る欠陥計測装置と、を備える。 The manufacturing equipment for zinc-based plated steel sheets according to the present invention includes manufacturing equipment for manufacturing zinc-based plated steel sheets, and a defect measurement device according to the present invention for measuring the surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheets manufactured by the manufacturing equipment.

本発明に係る亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造方法は、亜鉛系めっき鋼板を製造する製造ステップと、本発明に係る欠陥計測方法を用いて前記製造ステップにおいて製造された亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面を計測する計測ステップと、を含む。 The manufacturing method of the zinc-based plated steel sheet according to the present invention includes a manufacturing step of manufacturing a zinc-based plated steel sheet, and a measurement step of measuring the surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet manufactured in the manufacturing step using the defect measurement method according to the present invention.

本発明に係る亜鉛系めっき鋼板の品質管理方法は、本発明に係る欠陥計測方法を用いて亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面を計測する計測ステップと、前記計測ステップにおける筋状欠陥の計測結果から前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の品質管理を行う品質管理ステップと、を含む。 The quality control method for zinc-based plated steel sheet according to the present invention includes a measurement step of measuring the surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet using the defect measurement method according to the present invention, and a quality control step of performing quality control of the zinc-based plated steel sheet based on the measurement results of the line defects in the measurement step.

本発明に係る欠陥計測装置及び欠陥計測方法によれば、簡素な光学系で筋状欠陥に起因する亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面の外観特性を直接的に短時間で計測することができる。また、本発明に係る亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造設備及び製造方法によれば、亜鉛系めっき鋼板を歩留まりよく製造することができる。また、本発明に係る亜鉛系めっき鋼板の品質管理方法によれば、高品質な亜鉛系めっき鋼板を提供することができる。 The defect measurement device and defect measurement method according to the present invention can directly measure the appearance characteristics of the surface of a zinc-based plated steel sheet caused by a line defect in a short time using a simple optical system. Furthermore, the zinc-based plated steel sheet manufacturing equipment and manufacturing method according to the present invention can manufacture zinc-based plated steel sheets with a high yield. Furthermore, the quality control method for zinc-based plated steel sheets according to the present invention can provide high-quality zinc-based plated steel sheets.

図1は、本発明の一実施形態である欠陥計測装置の構成を示す側面図及び正面図である。FIG. 1 is a side view and a front view showing the configuration of a defect measuring device according to an embodiment of the present invention. 図2は、ライン光源の照射角及びラインセンサの受光角の定義を示す図である。FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the definitions of the illumination angle of a line light source and the light receiving angle of a line sensor. 図3は、本発明の一実施形態である定量化処理の流れを示すフローチャートである。FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the flow of the quantification process according to an embodiment of the present invention. 図4は、溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板の表面画像の一例を示す図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of a surface image of a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet. 図5は、図4に示す表面画像の補正画像を示す図である。FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a corrected image of the surface image shown in FIG. 図6は、筋状欠陥画像及びプロファイルの一例を示す図である。FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a line defect image and a profile. 図7は、筋状欠陥がある場合と筋状欠陥がない場合における筋状欠陥画像及びプロファイルの一例を示す図である。FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of a line defect image and a profile when a line defect is present and when no line defect is present. 図8は、筋状欠陥がある場合と筋状欠陥がない場合における指標の推移の一例を示す図である。FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of the transition of the index when there is a line defect and when there is no line defect. 図9は、本発明の一実施形態である欠陥計測装置の変形例の構成を示す側面図及び正面図である。FIG. 9 is a side view and a front view showing the configuration of a modified example of a defect measuring device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

以下、図面を参照して、本発明の一実施形態である欠陥計測装置、欠陥計測方法、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造設備、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造方法、及び亜鉛系めっき鋼板の品質管理方法について説明する。 Below, an embodiment of the present invention, a defect measurement device, a defect measurement method, a manufacturing facility for zinc-based plated steel sheets, a manufacturing method for zinc-based plated steel sheets, and a quality control method for zinc-based plated steel sheets, will be described with reference to the drawings.

なお、本明細書中において、「亜鉛系めっき鋼板」とは、めっき層中に亜鉛を含有するめっき鋼板を意味する。具体的には、亜鉛系めっき鋼板としては、溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板(GI)、溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板を合金化した合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板(GA)、電気亜鉛めっき鋼板(EG)、Zn-Niめっき鋼板、Zn-Mgめっき鋼板、Zn-Al-Mgめっき鋼板(例えばZn-6質量%Al-3質量%Mg合金めっき鋼板、Zn-11質量%Al-3質量%Mg合金めっき鋼板等)、Zn-Alめっき鋼板(例えば、Zn-5質量%Al合金めっき鋼板、Zn-55質量%Al合金めっき鋼板等)等を例示することができる。また、めっき層中に少量の異種金属元素又は不純物として、ニッケル、コバルト、マンガン、鉄、モリブデン、タングステン、チタン、クロム、アルミニウム、マグネシウム、鉛、アンチモン、錫、銅、ケイ素のうちの一種又は二種以上を含有してもよい。また、めっき層は、同種又は異種のめっき層を2層以上形成してなるものであってもよい。 In this specification, the term "zinc-based plated steel sheet" refers to a plated steel sheet containing zinc in the plated layer. Specifically, examples of zinc-based plated steel sheets include hot-dip galvanized steel sheets (GI), alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheets (GA) obtained by alloying hot-dip galvanized steel sheets, electrolytic galvanized steel sheets (EG), Zn-Ni plated steel sheets, Zn-Mg plated steel sheets, Zn-Al-Mg plated steel sheets (e.g., Zn-6% by mass Al-3% by mass Mg alloy plated steel sheets, Zn-11% by mass Al-3% by mass Mg alloy plated steel sheets, etc.), and Zn-Al plated steel sheets (e.g., Zn-5% by mass Al alloy plated steel sheets, Zn-55% by mass Al alloy plated steel sheets, etc.). In addition, the plated layer may contain a small amount of one or more of nickel, cobalt, manganese, iron, molybdenum, tungsten, titanium, chromium, aluminum, magnesium, lead, antimony, tin, copper, and silicon as a different metal element or impurity. The plating layer may also be formed by forming two or more plating layers of the same or different types.

また、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の下地となる鋼板の鋼種としては、鋼組成が質量%で、C:0.0001%以上0.25%以下、Si:0.001%以上2.0%以下、Mn:0.01%以上3.0%以下、P:0.001以上0.02%以下、S:0.0001以上0.02%以下、Al:0.001%以上0.10%以下、N:0.0001%以上0.007%以下を含有し、残部がFe及び不可避的不純物からなる鋼種を例示できる。また、上記必須元素に加え選択元素として、Cr:0%超え2.0%以下、Nb:0.001%以上1.0%以下、V:0.001%以上1.0%以下、W:0%超え0.3%以下、Ni:0%超え2.0%以下、Cu:0%超え2.0%以下、Mo:0%超え1.0%以下、B:0%超え0.01%以下Ti:0.001%以上0.1%以下、Ca:0%超え0.03%以下、Mg:0%超え0.03%以下から選ばれる1種又は2種以上の元素を必要に応じて含有してもよい。さらに、上記鋼種に加え、冷間圧延による鋼板であれば、本発明はより効果的に作用する。 In addition, examples of the steel type of the steel sheet that serves as the base for the zinc-based plated steel sheet include steel types whose steel composition contains, in mass %, C: 0.0001% or more and 0.25% or less, Si: 0.001% or more and 2.0% or less, Mn: 0.01% or more and 3.0% or less, P: 0.001% or more and 0.02% or less, S: 0.0001% or more and 0.02% or less, Al: 0.001% or more and 0.10% or less, N: 0.0001% or more and 0.007% or less, with the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities. In addition to the above essential elements, the steel sheet may contain one or more optional elements selected from the following: Cr: more than 0% and up to 2.0%, Nb: 0.001% to 1.0%, V: 0.001% to 1.0%, W: more than 0.3%, Ni: more than 0% and up to 2.0%, Cu: more than 0% and up to 2.0%, Mo: more than 0% and up to 1.0%, B: more than 0% and up to 0.01%, Ti: 0.001% to 0.1%, Ca: more than 0% and up to 0.03%, Mg: more than 0% and up to 0.03%. Furthermore, in addition to the above steel types, the steel sheet may be cold-rolled, and the present invention will function more effectively.

〔欠陥計測装置の構成〕
まず、図1,図2を参照して、本発明の一実施形態である欠陥計測装置の構成について説明する。
[Configuration of defect measurement device]
First, the configuration of a defect measuring apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS.

図1(a),(b)は、本発明の一実施形態である欠陥計測装置の構成を示す側面図及び正面図である。図1(a),(b)に示すように、本発明の一実施形態である欠陥計測装置1は、亜鉛系めっき鋼板(以下、鋼板と略記)から部分的に切り取った切板サンプルSの外観特性を、切板サンプルSの表面における筋状欠陥の指標として定量化するオフライン型の欠陥計測装置である。欠陥計測装置1は、リニアステージ2、ライン光源3、ラインセンサ4、及び演算装置5を備えている。なお、切板サンプルSはできだけ平坦なものであることが望ましい。 Figures 1(a) and (b) are a side view and a front view showing the configuration of a defect measurement device according to one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in Figures 1(a) and (b), the defect measurement device 1 according to one embodiment of the present invention is an offline defect measurement device that quantifies the appearance characteristics of a cut sheet sample S partially cut from a zinc-based plated steel sheet (hereinafter abbreviated as steel sheet) as an index of a line defect on the surface of the cut sheet sample S. The defect measurement device 1 includes a linear stage 2, a line light source 3, a line sensor 4, and a calculation device 5. It is preferable that the cut sheet sample S is as flat as possible.

リニアステージ2は、上部に切板サンプルSを載置し、鋼板の圧延方向に沿って切板サンプルSを搬送する搬送装置である。 The linear stage 2 is a transport device that places a cut sheet sample S on its upper portion and transports the cut sheet sample S along the rolling direction of the steel sheet.

ライン光源3は、鋼板の圧延方向に対して垂直な方向に延伸するライン照明光を切板サンプルSの表面に照射する。なお、ライン照明光の照射方向と切板サンプルSの搬送方向は鋼板の圧延方向に対して平行な方向であることが好ましいが、鋼板の圧延方向に対して垂直な方向や斜め方向にライン照明光を照射してもよい。また、本実施形態では、筋状欠陥の延伸方向が鋼板の圧延方向と一致することが多いために、鋼板の圧延方向に対して平行な方向にライン照明光を照射した。一方、筋状欠陥の延伸方向が鋼板の圧延方向と一致しない場合には、筋状欠陥の延伸方向に対して平行な方向にライン照明光を照射するとよい。ライン光源3は、本発明に係る照射手段として機能する。 The line light source 3 irradiates the surface of the cut sheet sample S with line illumination light extending in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction of the steel sheet. It is preferable that the irradiation direction of the line illumination light and the conveying direction of the cut sheet sample S are parallel to the rolling direction of the steel sheet, but the line illumination light may be irradiated in a direction perpendicular or oblique to the rolling direction of the steel sheet. In this embodiment, the extension direction of the line defect often coincides with the rolling direction of the steel sheet, so the line illumination light is irradiated in a direction parallel to the rolling direction of the steel sheet. On the other hand, when the extension direction of the line defect does not coincide with the rolling direction of the steel sheet, it is preferable to irradiate the line illumination light in a direction parallel to the extension direction of the line defect. The line light source 3 functions as an irradiation means according to the present invention.

ラインセンサ4は、鋼板の圧延方向に対して垂直な方向に配列された1ライン以上の撮像素子を有する撮像装置により構成されている。ラインセンサ4は、切板サンプルSの表面から反射されたライン照明光を受光することにより、リニアステージ2によって搬送される切板サンプルSの画像を連続的に撮影し、撮影された画像のデータを演算装置5に出力する。一般的なデジタルカメラとスポット光源を用いて切板サンプルSの画像を撮影すると、撮像位置によって照明光の照射角や受光角が異なるために、筋状欠陥の見え方が変化する。そこで、本実施形態の欠陥計測装置1では、鋼板の圧延方向に対して平行な方向に照明光の照射方向及び撮像方向を限定し、リニアステージ2を用いて切板サンプルSをスキャンした。このような態様では、切板サンプルS全体を均一な光学条件で撮像することができ、非常に好ましい。ラインセンサ4は、本発明に係る撮像手段として機能する。 The line sensor 4 is composed of an imaging device having one or more lines of imaging elements arranged in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction of the steel plate. The line sensor 4 receives the line illumination light reflected from the surface of the cut sheet sample S, and continuously captures images of the cut sheet sample S transported by the linear stage 2, and outputs the captured image data to the calculation device 5. When an image of the cut sheet sample S is captured using a general digital camera and a spot light source, the illumination angle and reception angle of the illumination light differ depending on the imaging position, so the appearance of the line defect changes. Therefore, in the defect measurement device 1 of this embodiment, the illumination direction and imaging direction of the illumination light are limited to a direction parallel to the rolling direction of the steel plate, and the cut sheet sample S is scanned using the linear stage 2. In this embodiment, the entire cut sheet sample S can be imaged under uniform optical conditions, which is very preferable. The line sensor 4 functions as an imaging means according to the present invention.

なお、図2に示す切板サンプルSの表面垂直方向に対するライン光源3の照射角とラインセンサ4の受光角が等しい場合には、光学条件は正反射条件となり、切板サンプルSの鏡面反射成分の画像を取得することができる。そして、鏡面反射成分はライン光源3の照射角とラインセンサ4の受光角の差が大きくなるのに応じて減少し、逆に拡散反射成分が増加する。本発明の発明者らは、切板サンプルSの表面を詳細に観察した結果、光学条件が正反射条件に近づくと鏡面反射成分がノイズとなる一方、光学条件が正反射条件から遠ざかり過ぎると、切板サンプルSの地合いそのものが持つ表面粗さが強調され、筋状欠陥の信号が埋もれてしまうことを知見した。このため、ライン光源3の照射角とラインセンサ4の受光角の差は20度以上40度以下の範囲内に設定されている。なお、この角度範囲は、後述する筋状欠陥の指標の差が筋状欠陥の有無により最も大きくなる角度範囲を例えば機械学習手法により学習することによって求めることができる。 When the illumination angle of the line light source 3 relative to the surface perpendicular direction of the cut sheet sample S shown in FIG. 2 is equal to the light receiving angle of the line sensor 4, the optical condition becomes a regular reflection condition, and an image of the specular reflection component of the cut sheet sample S can be obtained. The specular reflection component decreases as the difference between the illumination angle of the line light source 3 and the light receiving angle of the line sensor 4 increases, and conversely, the diffuse reflection component increases. As a result of detailed observation of the surface of the cut sheet sample S, the inventors of the present invention found that when the optical conditions approach the regular reflection condition, the specular reflection component becomes noise, while when the optical conditions are too far from the regular reflection condition, the surface roughness of the texture of the cut sheet sample S itself is emphasized, and the signal of the line defect is buried. For this reason, the difference between the illumination angle of the line light source 3 and the light receiving angle of the line sensor 4 is set to a range of 20 degrees or more and 40 degrees or less. This angle range can be obtained by learning, for example, by a machine learning method, the angle range in which the difference in the index of the line defect, which will be described later, is the largest depending on the presence or absence of the line defect.

また、ラインセンサ4の受光輝度は暗すぎずかつ飽和しない条件であることが好ましい。また、切板サンプルSの画像の幅方向(鋼板の圧延方向に対して垂直な方向)分解能は、評価したい筋状欠陥の幅方向ピッチに対し十分小さいことが好ましい。例えば最小0.5mm幅の筋状欠陥を評価したい場合には、幅方向分解能は0.25mm以下とすることが好ましい。一方、切板サンプルSの画像の長手方向(鋼板の圧延方向)分解能は特に制限はないが、切板サンプルSの搬送時に変化しないことが好ましい。そのためには、リニアステージ2を用いて切板サンプルSを一定速度で搬送したり、切板サンプルSの搬送量に応じたパルス信号をトリガー信号として切板サンプルSの画像を撮影したりするとよい。 It is also preferable that the light receiving brightness of the line sensor 4 is not too dark and not saturated. It is also preferable that the resolution in the width direction (perpendicular to the rolling direction of the steel plate) of the image of the cut sheet sample S is sufficiently small compared to the width direction pitch of the line defect to be evaluated. For example, if a line defect with a minimum width of 0.5 mm is to be evaluated, the resolution in the width direction is preferably 0.25 mm or less. On the other hand, there is no particular limit to the resolution in the length direction (rolling direction of the steel plate) of the image of the cut sheet sample S, but it is preferable that it does not change when the cut sheet sample S is transported. To achieve this, it is preferable to transport the cut sheet sample S at a constant speed using the linear stage 2, or to capture an image of the cut sheet sample S using a pulse signal corresponding to the transport amount of the cut sheet sample S as a trigger signal.

また、ライン照明光の波長及びラインセンサ4の受光波長としては、本実施形態の目的が目視での亜鉛系めっき鋼板の外観特性に対する判断を、筋状欠陥の指標として定量化することであることから、可視光領域の波長を用いることが好ましい。また、通常可視光用カメラに用いられるSi素子の感度特性は近赤外光を含むことから、赤外光カットフィルターを入れることによって赤外光領域の波長を除去するとよい。さらに、ライン照明光の波長は目視に合わせてブロードであることが好ましく、この場合、ライン光源3としてキセノン光源やハロゲン光源、メタルハライド光源等を用いるとよい。 In addition, since the purpose of this embodiment is to quantify the visual judgment of the appearance characteristics of zinc-based plated steel sheet as an index of line defects, it is preferable to use wavelengths in the visible light range for the wavelength of the line illumination light and the receiving wavelength of the line sensor 4. In addition, since the sensitivity characteristics of Si elements normally used in visible light cameras include near-infrared light, it is preferable to remove wavelengths in the infrared range by inserting an infrared light cut filter. Furthermore, it is preferable that the wavelength of the line illumination light is broad to match the visual observation, and in this case, it is preferable to use a xenon light source, halogen light source, metal halide light source, etc. as the line light source 3.

演算装置5は、情報処理装置によって構成されている。演算装置5は、ラインセンサ4によって連続的に撮影された幅方向の画像のデータを長手方向に繋ぎ合わせることにより切板サンプルSの表面画像を生成する。そして、演算装置5は、生成された切板サンプルSの表面画像に対して後述する定量化処理を実行ことにより筋状欠陥の指標を定量化する。演算装置5は、本発明に係る演算手段として機能する。 The calculation device 5 is composed of an information processing device. The calculation device 5 generates a surface image of the cut sheet sample S by stitching together in the longitudinal direction the data of the images in the width direction continuously captured by the line sensor 4. The calculation device 5 then quantifies the indicator of the line defect by performing a quantification process described later on the generated surface image of the cut sheet sample S. The calculation device 5 functions as a calculation means according to the present invention.

〔定量化処理〕
次に、図3を参照して、本発明の一実施形態である定量化処理について説明する。
[Quantification Processing]
Next, the quantification process according to one embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG.

図3は、本発明の一実施形態である定量化処理の流れを示すフローチャートである。図3に示すフローチャートは、演算装置5が、切板サンプルSの表面画像を生成したタイミングで開始となり、定量化処理はステップS1の処理に進む。 Figure 3 is a flowchart showing the flow of the quantification process according to one embodiment of the present invention. The flowchart shown in Figure 3 starts when the calculation device 5 generates a surface image of the cut sheet sample S, and the quantification process proceeds to step S1.

ステップS1の処理では、演算装置5が、切板サンプルSの表面画像の幅方向(鋼板の圧延方向に対して垂直な方向)の輝度むらを補正(除去)することにより、筋状欠陥が表面画像内のどの位置で発生したとしても同一の計測値が得られるようにする。具体的には、光学系は幅方向に均一な輝度が得られるように設計されているが、それでも鋼板自体が持つ面的になだらかな反射特性の変化等の影響によって幅方向に輝度むらが発生する。そこで、演算装置5は、まず、切板サンプルSの表面画像に含まれる低周波成分を除去する。そして、演算装置5は、低周波成分のみを抽出した表面画像の輝度と低周波成分を除去した画像の輝度との比をとった画像を補正画像として生成する。 In the process of step S1, the calculation device 5 corrects (removes) the brightness unevenness in the width direction (direction perpendicular to the rolling direction of the steel plate) of the surface image of the cut sheet sample S, so that the same measurement value can be obtained regardless of where the line defect occurs in the surface image. Specifically, the optical system is designed to obtain uniform brightness in the width direction, but brightness unevenness in the width direction still occurs due to the influence of the gradual change in the reflection characteristics of the steel plate itself. Therefore, the calculation device 5 first removes the low-frequency components contained in the surface image of the cut sheet sample S. The calculation device 5 then generates a corrected image by taking the ratio between the brightness of the surface image from which only the low-frequency components have been extracted and the brightness of the image from which the low-frequency components have been removed.

単純に低周波成分を除去しただけでは、同じ筋状欠陥でも周辺部の輝度値が高ければコントラストが強くなり、低ければコントラストが弱くなるので、後工程で行われる筋状欠陥の計測値が表面画像内の位置に依存してしまう。これに対して、低周波成分のみを抽出した表面画像と低周波成分を除去した画像との輝度比をとった画像を補正画像として生成することにより、周辺部の輝度値が高い部分と低い部分に発生した筋状欠陥のコントラストの差を平均化することができる。ライン光源3の照射角を10度、ラインセンサ4の受光角を40度、幅方向分解能を0.11mm、長手方向分解能を0.08mmとして筋状欠陥が発生した溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板の表面を撮影した画像を図4に示す。また、図4に示す表面画像の補正画像を図5に示す。これにより、ステップS1の処理は完了し、定量化処理はステップS2の処理に進む。 If the low-frequency components are simply removed, the contrast of the same line defect will be strong if the brightness value of the peripheral area is high, and weak if the brightness value is low, so the measurement value of the line defect performed in the subsequent process will depend on the position in the surface image. In contrast, by generating a correction image that is the brightness ratio between the surface image in which only the low-frequency components are extracted and the image in which the low-frequency components are removed, the contrast difference of the line defect occurring in the high brightness area and the low brightness area of the peripheral area can be averaged. Figure 4 shows an image of the surface of a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet in which a line defect has occurred, with the irradiation angle of the line light source 3 set to 10 degrees, the receiving angle of the line sensor 4 set to 40 degrees, the width resolution set to 0.11 mm, and the length resolution set to 0.08 mm. Also, a correction image of the surface image shown in Figure 4 is shown in Figure 5. With this, the processing of step S1 is completed, and the quantification processing proceeds to the processing of step S2.

ステップS2の処理では、演算装置5が、ステップS1の処理によって生成された補正画像から、筋状欠陥を含んだある範囲の領域の画像を選択し、選択された筋状欠陥を含んだ領域の画像を筋状欠陥画像と設定することにより筋状欠陥画像を生成する。筋状欠陥を含んだ領域を選択した例を図6(a)に示す。領域選択後の画像はわかりやすいように色調補正している。本例では、外観不良となる縦筋である白い筋と黒い筋の安定した領域を含むように十分な長手方向の長さを選択している。なお、筋状欠陥画像において筋状欠陥は場所によって薄まっていることがあるので、できるだけ安定して発生している領域を選択することが好ましい。また、筋状欠陥の周辺に、汚れや欠陥等の筋状欠陥以外の異物がある場合、異物の画像が筋状欠陥画像におけるノイズ要因となるので、画像を選択する範囲から異物の画像を外すことが好ましい。これにより、ステップS2の処理は完了し、定量化処理はステップS3の処理に進む。 In the process of step S2, the calculation device 5 selects an image of a certain range of an area including a line defect from the corrected image generated by the process of step S1, and generates a line defect image by setting the image of the selected area including the line defect as a line defect image. An example of a selected area including a line defect is shown in FIG. 6(a). The image after the area selection is color-toned for easy understanding. In this example, a sufficient longitudinal length is selected to include a stable area of white and black lines, which are vertical lines that cause appearance defects. Since the line defect may be faint in some places in the line defect image, it is preferable to select an area that occurs as stably as possible. In addition, if there is a foreign object other than the line defect, such as a stain or a defect, around the line defect, the image of the foreign object becomes a noise factor in the line defect image, so it is preferable to remove the image of the foreign object from the range of image selection. This completes the process of step S2, and the quantification process proceeds to the process of step S3.

ステップS3の処理では、演算装置5が、ステップS2の処理によって生成された筋状欠陥画像に対して長手方向における輝度の平均化処理等を実施する。具体的には、ステップS2の処理によって生成された筋状欠陥画像における筋状欠陥部の輝度と周辺部の輝度をそのまま単純に比較してしまうと、鋼板そのものが持つ表面粗さ等の表面性状によってばらつきが大きくなる。そこで、筋状欠陥が長手方向に延伸する特徴を考慮して、演算装置5は、筋状欠陥画像に対して長手方向における輝度の平均化処理等を実施する。言い換えると、演算装置5は、2次元の筋状欠陥画像を幅方向は1次元のままで長手方向は0次元に圧縮した1次元(線状)プロファイルを生成する。詳しくは、演算装置5は、長手方向に対しては2次元の筋状欠陥画像における長手方向の特徴を反映した代表値が得られるように処理を行う。例えば筋状欠陥画像は2次元の行列であるので、筋状欠陥画像はI(p,q)(1≦p≦P、1≦q≦Q、P×Qの解像度)と表現できる(図6(a)参照)。従って、平均化処理の場合には、1次元プロファイルL(p)(1≦p≦P)は以下に示す数式(1)により算出することができる。図6(a)に示す筋状欠陥画像から算出された1次元プロファイルL(p)を図6(b)に示す。 In the process of step S3, the calculation device 5 performs a process of averaging brightness in the longitudinal direction on the line defect image generated by the process of step S2. Specifically, if the brightness of the line defect part and the brightness of the surrounding part in the line defect image generated by the process of step S2 are simply compared as they are, the variation will be large depending on the surface properties such as the surface roughness of the steel plate itself. Therefore, taking into account the characteristic that the line defect extends in the longitudinal direction, the calculation device 5 performs a process of averaging brightness in the longitudinal direction on the line defect image. In other words, the calculation device 5 generates a one-dimensional (linear) profile in which the two-dimensional line defect image remains one-dimensional in the width direction and is compressed to zero dimensions in the longitudinal direction. In detail, the calculation device 5 performs a process in the longitudinal direction so that a representative value that reflects the longitudinal characteristics of the two-dimensional line defect image is obtained. For example, since the line defect image is a two-dimensional matrix, the line defect image can be expressed as I(p, q) (1≦p≦P, 1≦q≦Q, P×Q resolution) (see FIG. 6(a)). Therefore, in the case of averaging processing, the one-dimensional profile L(p) (1≦p≦P) can be calculated by the following formula (1). The one-dimensional profile L(p) calculated from the line defect image shown in FIG. 6(a) is shown in FIG. 6(b).

Figure 0007622667000001
Figure 0007622667000001

なお、平均化処理以外の処理としては、最大値処理(長手方向の輝度の最大値を代表値とする処理)、最小値処理(長手方向の輝度の最小値を代表値とする処理)、中央値処理(長手方向の輝度の中央値を代表値とする処理)、及びパーセンタイル処理(大きい順に並び変えて決まった順位の輝度値を採用する処理)等を例示することができる。但し、長手方向に対して安定して筋状欠陥部の代表値が得られるのであれば、どのような処理であってもよい。また、筋状欠陥画像の長手方向の長さは、表面粗さによるばらつきを低減できるように十分長いことが好ましい。例えば平均値処理を採用する場合、表面粗さ起因のノイズがランダムに発生し、ノイズが正規分布であると仮定すると、Q点の平均化によってノイズは√Q倍される。従って、筋状欠陥画像の長手方向の長さ、すなわち長手方向の平均化する点数をQ、筋状欠陥の代表点の信号をS、健全部のノイズをN、必要なSN比をρと置くと、ρは以下に示す数式(2)を満たすとよい。 Examples of processing other than the averaging process include maximum processing (processing in which the maximum value of the luminance in the longitudinal direction is the representative value), minimum processing (processing in which the minimum value of the luminance in the longitudinal direction is the representative value), median processing (processing in which the median value of the luminance in the longitudinal direction is the representative value), and percentile processing (processing in which the luminance value in the determined order after rearranging in descending order is adopted). However, any processing may be used as long as it can stably obtain a representative value of the line defect portion in the longitudinal direction. In addition, it is preferable that the longitudinal length of the line defect image is sufficiently long so that the variation due to the surface roughness can be reduced. For example, when the average processing is adopted, if it is assumed that the noise caused by the surface roughness occurs randomly and the noise is normally distributed, the noise is multiplied by √Q by averaging Q points. Therefore, if the longitudinal length of the line defect image, i.e., the number of points to be averaged in the longitudinal direction, is Q, the signal of the representative point of the line defect is S, the noise of the healthy part is N, and the required S/N ratio is ρ, then ρ should satisfy the following formula (2).

Figure 0007622667000002
Figure 0007622667000002

ステップS4の処理では、演算装置5が、ステップS3の処理によって得られた1次元プロファイルから筋状欠陥に対応する位置の数値を抽出し、その数値を筋状欠陥の指標とする。なお、周辺部と比較し筋状欠陥が明るい場合は正側、暗い場合は負側に信号強度が出るので、絶対値を筋状欠陥の指標としてもよいし、最大値から最小値を引いた値を筋状欠陥の指標としてもよい。ここで、図7(a),(b)に筋状欠陥がある場合と筋状欠陥がない場合における筋状欠陥画像及び1次元プロファイルを示す。図7(a)の黒矢印及び白矢印は目視によって確認された筋状欠陥の位置を示し、数値-6.8及び+3,4は筋状欠陥の位置における1次元プロファイルの数値を示す。得られた数値は目視の直感的な判定とよく一致していることがわかる。また、ライン光源3の照射角を10度に固定し、ラインセンサ4の受光角を変化させたときの筋状欠陥があるサンプルと筋状欠陥のないサンプルにおける指標の推移を図8に示す。なお、図8に示す例では、抽出した数値を筋状欠陥の指標とするために、指標は最大値と最小値の差とした。抽出した数値の最大値と最小値の差が大きければ大きいほど、筋状欠陥の程度が酷く亜鉛系めっき鋼板の外観特性は悪化することが明らかであるためである。また、図8中の「欠陥ありの指標と欠陥なしの指標との差」は、各受光角(単位は度)における、筋状欠陥ありの場合の指標から筋状欠陥なしの場合の指標を引いた値である。筋状欠陥なしの場合の指標(図8の場合、筋状欠陥がない領域における最大値と最小値の差)は、計測対象である亜鉛系めっき鋼板が元々持っている指標、例えば背景ノイズに相当すると考えられる。そこで、筋状欠陥ありの場合の指標(図8の場合、筋状欠陥がある領域における最大値と最小値の差)からさらに背景ノイズに相当する筋状欠陥なしの場合の指標を引けば、筋状欠陥ありの場合における指標の変化をより強調できる。 In the process of step S4, the calculation device 5 extracts a numerical value at a position corresponding to the line defect from the one-dimensional profile obtained by the process of step S3, and uses the numerical value as an index of the line defect. In addition, since the signal intensity appears on the positive side when the line defect is brighter than the surrounding area, and on the negative side when the line defect is darker, the absolute value may be used as the index of the line defect, or the value obtained by subtracting the minimum value from the maximum value may be used as the index of the line defect. Here, FIG. 7(a) and (b) show line defect images and one-dimensional profiles when a line defect is present and when a line defect is not present. The black arrow and the white arrow in FIG. 7(a) indicate the position of the line defect confirmed by visual inspection, and the numerical values -6.8 and +3, 4 indicate the numerical values of the one-dimensional profile at the position of the line defect. It can be seen that the obtained numerical value is in good agreement with the intuitive judgment of the visual inspection. FIG. 8 also shows the change in the index in the sample with a line defect and the sample without a line defect when the irradiation angle of the line light source 3 is fixed at 10 degrees and the light receiving angle of the line sensor 4 is changed. In the example shown in FIG. 8, the index is the difference between the maximum and minimum values so that the extracted numerical value is an index of the line defect. This is because it is clear that the greater the difference between the maximum and minimum values of the extracted numerical value, the more severe the line defect is and the worse the appearance characteristics of the zinc-based plated steel sheet are. In addition, the "difference between the index with defect and the index without defect" in FIG. 8 is the value obtained by subtracting the index without the line defect from the index with the line defect at each light receiving angle (unit: degree). The index without the line defect (in the case of FIG. 8, the difference between the maximum and minimum values in the area without the line defect) is considered to correspond to an index that the zinc-based plated steel sheet to be measured originally has, for example, background noise. Therefore, if the index without the line defect, which corresponds to background noise, is further subtracted from the index with the line defect (in the case of FIG. 8, the difference between the maximum and minimum values in the area with the line defect), the change in the index when the line defect is present can be further emphasized.

図8に示すように、ラインセンサ4の受光角が10度付近と正反射領域に近い場合、ミクロな鏡面反射がまばらに存在し、筋状欠陥の有無にかかわらず指標の値は大きくなった。これに対して、ラインセンサ4の受光角を大きくしていくと、筋状欠陥そのものの信号値が弱まり、筋状欠陥の有無にかかわらず指標の値は低下した。そして、ラインセンサ4の受光角が40度と正反射方向から30度離れたとき(ライン光源3の照射角との差が30度になったとき)に、筋状欠陥の有無による指標の差が最も大きくなった。詳しくは、ラインセンサ4の受光角を正反射方向である10度から大きくしていくと、30度で指標が上がり始め40度でピークとなり、その後50度まで低下した。これにより、ライン光源3の照射角が10度である場合、ラインセンサ4の受光角が30度から50度の範囲内で上述の指標の差を大きくできることが確認された。従って、本例では、ライン光源3の照射角を10度に固定しているため、ラインセンサ4の受光角を正反射方向から20度以上40度以下の範囲で異なるようにラインセンサ4を配置するとよく、30度異なる条件が最もよいと言える。また、このことから、ライン光源3の照射角とラインセンサ4の受光角の差は20度以上40度以下の範囲内に設定するとよい。これにより、ステップS4の処理は完了し、一連の定量化処理は終了する。 As shown in FIG. 8, when the light receiving angle of the line sensor 4 is close to 10 degrees, which is close to the regular reflection region, microscopic specular reflections are present sparsely, and the index value increases regardless of the presence or absence of a line defect. In contrast, when the light receiving angle of the line sensor 4 is increased, the signal value of the line defect itself weakens, and the index value decreases regardless of the presence or absence of a line defect. Then, when the light receiving angle of the line sensor 4 is 40 degrees, which is 30 degrees away from the regular reflection direction (when the difference with the illumination angle of the line light source 3 becomes 30 degrees), the difference in the index due to the presence or absence of a line defect becomes the largest. In detail, when the light receiving angle of the line sensor 4 is increased from 10 degrees, which is the regular reflection direction, the index starts to increase at 30 degrees, peaks at 40 degrees, and then decreases to 50 degrees. This confirmed that when the illumination angle of the line light source 3 is 10 degrees, the difference in the above-mentioned index can be increased within the range of 30 degrees to 50 degrees for the light receiving angle of the line sensor 4. Therefore, in this example, since the illumination angle of the line light source 3 is fixed at 10 degrees, it is preferable to position the line sensor 4 so that the light receiving angle of the line sensor 4 varies from the specular reflection direction in a range of 20 degrees to 40 degrees, and it is best to have a difference of 30 degrees. For this reason, it is preferable to set the difference between the illumination angle of the line light source 3 and the light receiving angle of the line sensor 4 in a range of 20 degrees to 40 degrees. This completes the processing of step S4, and the series of quantification processes ends.

以上の説明から明らかなように、本発明の一実施形態である欠陥計測装置1は、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面にライン照明光を照射するライン光源3と、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面で反射されたライン照明光を受光することによって亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面画像を撮影するラインセンサ4と、を備え、ライン光源3及びラインセンサ4は、ライン照明光の照射角と受光角との差が20度以上40度以下の範囲内になるように配置されている。これにより、簡素な光学系で筋状欠陥を直接的に短時間で計測することができる。 As is clear from the above description, the defect measurement device 1, which is one embodiment of the present invention, comprises a line light source 3 that irradiates a line illumination light onto the surface of a zinc-based plated steel sheet, and a line sensor 4 that captures a surface image of the zinc-based plated steel sheet by receiving the line illumination light reflected by the surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet, and the line light source 3 and the line sensor 4 are arranged so that the difference between the illumination angle and reception angle of the line illumination light is within a range of 20 degrees or more and 40 degrees or less. This makes it possible to directly measure line defects in a short time using a simple optical system.

また、本指標を用いて製品毎に筋状欠陥の発生状況(例えば、筋状欠陥の外観程度、発生頻度および大きさ等)を等級化することにより様々な効果を得ることができる。例えば、指標を製品の合否判定に用いる、製品の製造工程のオペレーションに指標をフィードバックして筋状欠陥の発生を抑制する、指標をほかの様々な操業データと合わせて大規模データとして取り扱い、多変量解析により筋状欠陥の発生要因や発生条件を特定する、他操業データから筋状欠陥の発生リスクを予測する、予測結果を操業現場に提示する、予測結果を用いて自動操業する等が挙げられる。 In addition, various effects can be obtained by using this index to grade the occurrence of line defects for each product (e.g., the degree of appearance, frequency of occurrence, and size of line defects). For example, the index can be used to judge the pass/fail of a product, the index can be fed back into the operations of the product manufacturing process to suppress the occurrence of line defects, the index can be treated as large-scale data in combination with various other operational data and the causes and conditions of occurrence of line defects can be identified through multivariate analysis, the risk of line defects occurring can be predicted from other operational data, the predicted results can be presented at the operation site, and the predicted results can be used to perform automatic operations.

また、本発明を亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造設備を構成する欠陥計測装置に適用し、本発明に係る欠陥計測装置によって公知又は既存の製造設備によって製造された亜鉛系めっき鋼板を計測し、当該亜鉛系めっき鋼板の筋状欠陥を計測するようにしてもよい。また、本発明を亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造方法に含まれる欠陥計測方法に適用し、公知又は既存の製造ステップで製造された亜鉛系めっき鋼板を計測する計測ステップを備えることで、当該亜鉛系めっき鋼板において筋状欠陥を計測するようにしてもよい。このような亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造設備及び金属帯の製造方法によれば、亜鉛系めっき鋼板を歩留りよく製造することができる。さらに、本発明を亜鉛系めっき鋼板の品質管理方法に適用し、亜鉛系めっき鋼板を計測する計測ステップを備えることにより、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の筋状欠陥の計測結果から、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の品質管理を行うようにしてもよい。このような亜鉛系めっき鋼板の品質管理方法によれば、高品質の亜鉛系めっき鋼板を提供することができる。 The present invention may also be applied to a defect measurement device constituting a manufacturing facility for zinc-based plated steel sheets, and the defect measurement device according to the present invention may be used to measure a zinc-based plated steel sheet manufactured by known or existing manufacturing facilities, and measure line-shaped defects in the zinc-based plated steel sheet. The present invention may also be applied to a defect measurement method included in a manufacturing method for zinc-based plated steel sheets, and a measurement step may be included to measure a zinc-based plated steel sheet manufactured by known or existing manufacturing steps, thereby measuring line-shaped defects in the zinc-based plated steel sheet. According to such manufacturing facility for zinc-based plated steel sheets and a manufacturing method for metal strips, zinc-based plated steel sheets can be manufactured with a high yield. Furthermore, the present invention may also be applied to a quality control method for zinc-based plated steel sheets, and a measurement step may be included to measure the zinc-based plated steel sheet, thereby performing quality control of the zinc-based plated steel sheet based on the measurement results of line-shaped defects in the zinc-based plated steel sheet. According to such a quality control method for zinc-based plated steel sheets, a high-quality zinc-based plated steel sheet can be provided.

以上、本発明者らによってなされた発明を適用した実施の形態について説明したが、本実施形態による本発明の開示の一部をなす記述及び図面により本発明は限定されることはない。 The above describes an embodiment of the invention made by the inventors, but the present invention is not limited to the description and drawings that form part of the disclosure of the present invention according to this embodiment.

例えば、上記実施形態は切板サンプルを用いた例であるが、オンラインで搬送中の亜鉛系めっき鋼板に本発明を適用することにより、製品の全長全幅に発生する筋状欠陥の指標、すなわち亜鉛系めっき鋼板の外観特性の定量化をオンラインで実施することもできる。オンラインでの本発明の適用例を図9に示す。図9に示す例では、搬送中の亜鉛系めっき鋼板STに対して切板サンプルSと同様にライン光源3とラインセンサ4を設置し、ロールRの回転に合わせてエンコーダ6によりパルス信号を発生させ、パルス信号をトリガーとして亜鉛系めっき鋼板STの表面画像を撮影する。このとき、エンコーダ6のパルス値をカウントして筋状欠陥の発生位置を突合せできるようにしておくことが好ましい。そして、演算装置5は、撮影された表面画像から筋状欠陥の指標をリアルタイムで算出する。また、演算装置5は、上位PC7から亜鉛系めっき鋼板STの情報を得て指標の有害度を判定し、上位PC7に指標を伝送することによって筋状欠陥の指標を管理する。また、演算装置5は、亜鉛系めっき鋼板STの全長全幅において筋状欠陥の指標を算出して指標マップを作成する。この時、閾値を設けることにより実際に筋状欠陥が発生した部位の画像のみを保存し、その後筋状欠陥の強度や幅、発生範囲等でより詳細に筋状欠陥の特徴を分析し、品質保証や要因解析に役立てても良い。このように、本実施形態に基づいて当業者等によりなされる他の実施の形態、実施例、及び運用技術等は全て本発明の範疇に含まれる。 For example, the above embodiment is an example using a cut sheet sample, but by applying the present invention to a zinc-based plated steel sheet being transported online, it is also possible to perform online quantification of the index of line defects occurring over the entire length and width of the product, i.e., the appearance characteristics of the zinc-based plated steel sheet. An example of the application of the present invention online is shown in FIG. 9. In the example shown in FIG. 9, a line light source 3 and a line sensor 4 are installed on the zinc-based plated steel sheet ST being transported in the same manner as the cut sheet sample S, a pulse signal is generated by the encoder 6 in accordance with the rotation of the roll R, and the pulse signal is used as a trigger to photograph the surface image of the zinc-based plated steel sheet ST. At this time, it is preferable to count the pulse value of the encoder 6 so that the position where the line defect occurs can be matched. Then, the calculation device 5 calculates the index of line defects in real time from the photographed surface image. In addition, the calculation device 5 obtains information on the zinc-based plated steel sheet ST from the upper PC 7, determines the harmfulness of the index, and manages the index of line defects by transmitting the index to the upper PC 7. In addition, the calculation device 5 calculates the index of line defects over the entire length and width of the zinc-based plated steel sheet ST to create an index map. At this time, a threshold value may be set to store only images of areas where line defects have actually occurred, and then the characteristics of the line defects may be analyzed in more detail based on the strength, width, and occurrence range of the line defects, which may be useful for quality assurance and causal analysis. In this manner, all other embodiments, examples, and operational techniques made by those skilled in the art based on this embodiment are included in the scope of the present invention.

1 欠陥計測装置
2 リニアステージ
3 ライン光源
4 ラインセンサ
5 演算装置
S 切板サンプル
ST 亜鉛系めっき鋼板
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 1 Defect measurement device 2 Linear stage 3 Line light source 4 Line sensor 5 Calculation device S Cut sheet sample ST Zinc-based plated steel sheet

Claims (7)

亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面の筋状欠陥を計測する欠陥計測装置であって、
前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面にライン照明光を照射する照射手段と、
前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面で反射された前記ライン照明光を受光することによって、前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面画像を撮影する撮像手段と、
前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面画像から前記筋状欠陥の指標を算出する演算手段と、を備え、
前記演算手段は、2次元の筋状欠陥の画像を前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の圧延方向に対して垂直な方向は1次元のままで前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の圧延方向に対して平行な方向は0次元に圧縮することにより生成した1次元プロファイルの最大値と最小値を抽出し、最大値から最小値を引いた値を前記筋状欠陥の指標として算出し、
前記照射手段及び前記撮像手段は、前記ライン照明光の照射角と受光角との差が前記筋状欠陥の指標の差が筋状欠陥の有無により比較的大きくなる角度の範囲である20度以上40度以下の範囲内になるように配置されている、
欠陥計測装置。
A defect measuring device for measuring a line-like defect on a surface of a zinc-based plated steel sheet, comprising:
an illumination means for irradiating a surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet with a line illumination light;
an imaging means for capturing an image of a surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet by receiving the line illumination light reflected by the surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet;
a calculation means for calculating an index of the line defect from a surface image of the zinc-based plated steel sheet,
the computing means extracts maximum and minimum values of a one-dimensional profile generated by compressing a two-dimensional image of a line defect into zero dimensions in a direction parallel to the rolling direction of the zinc-based plated steel sheet while keeping the image one-dimensional in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction of the zinc-based plated steel sheet, and calculates a value obtained by subtracting the minimum value from the maximum value as an index of the line defect;
the illumination means and the imaging means are arranged so that a difference between an illumination angle and a receiving angle of the line illumination light is within a range of 20 degrees to 40 degrees, which is an angle range in which a difference in the index of the line defect becomes relatively large depending on the presence or absence of the line defect.
Defect measurement equipment.
前記照射手段は、前記ライン照明光の延伸方向が前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の圧延方向に対して垂直な方向になるように配置されている、請求項1に記載の欠陥計測装置。 2. The defect measuring device according to claim 1, wherein the irradiating means is disposed so that an extension direction of the line illumination light is perpendicular to a rolling direction of the zinc-based plated steel sheet. 前記演算手段は、前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面画像から前記垂直な方向の輝度むらを補正した補正画像を生成し、前記補正画像から筋状欠陥を含んだ領域の画像を選択し、選択した前記筋状欠陥の画像から前記指標を算出する、請求項2に記載の欠陥計測装置。 The defect measurement device according to claim 2, wherein the calculation means generates a corrected image by correcting the brightness unevenness in the vertical direction from the surface image of the zinc-based plated steel sheet, selects an image of an area including a line defect from the corrected image, and calculates the index from the selected image of the line defect. 亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面の筋状欠陥を計測する欠陥計測方法であって、
照射手段が前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面にライン照明光を照射する照射ステップと、
撮像手段が前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面で反射された前記ライン照明光を受光することによって、前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面画像を撮影する撮像ステップと、
前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面画像から前記筋状欠陥の指標を算出する演算ステップと、を含み、
前記演算ステップは、2次元の筋状欠陥の画像を前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の圧延方向に対して垂直な方向は1次元のままで前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の圧延方向に対して平行な方向は0次元に圧縮することにより生成した1次元プロファイルの最大値と最小値を抽出し、最大値から最小値を引いた値を前記筋状欠陥の指標として算出し、
前記照射手段及び前記撮像手段は、前記ライン照明光の照射角と受光角との差が前記筋状欠陥の指標の差が筋状欠陥の有無により比較的大きくなる角度の範囲である20度以上40度以下の範囲内になるように配置されている、
欠陥計測方法。
A defect measurement method for measuring a line-like defect on a surface of a zinc-based plated steel sheet, comprising:
an illumination step in which an illumination means illuminates a surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet with line illumination light;
an imaging step of capturing an image of a surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet by receiving the line illumination light reflected by the surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet with an imaging means;
A calculation step of calculating an index of the line defect from a surface image of the zinc-based plated steel sheet,
the computing step extracts maximum and minimum values of a one-dimensional profile generated by compressing a two-dimensional image of a line defect into zero dimensions in a direction parallel to the rolling direction of the zinc-based plated steel sheet while keeping the image one-dimensional in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction of the zinc-based plated steel sheet, and calculates a value obtained by subtracting the minimum value from the maximum value as an index of the line defect;
the illumination means and the imaging means are arranged so that a difference between an illumination angle and a receiving angle of the line illumination light is within a range of 20 degrees to 40 degrees, which is an angle range in which a difference in the index of the line defect becomes relatively large depending on the presence or absence of the line defect.
Defect measurement methods.
亜鉛系めっき鋼板を製造する製造設備と、
前記製造設備により製造された亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面を計測する請求項1~3のうち、いずれか1項に記載の欠陥計測装置と、
を備える、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造設備。
A manufacturing facility for manufacturing zinc-based plated steel sheets;
The defect measuring device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, which measures a surface of a zinc-based plated steel sheet manufactured by the manufacturing facility;
A zinc-based plated steel sheet manufacturing facility equipped with the following:
亜鉛系めっき鋼板を製造する製造ステップと、
請求項4に記載の欠陥計測方法を用いて前記製造ステップにおいて製造された亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面を計測する計測ステップと、
を含む、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の製造方法。
A manufacturing step of manufacturing a zinc-based coated steel sheet;
a measuring step of measuring a surface of the zinc-based plated steel sheet produced in the manufacturing step by using the defect measuring method according to claim 4;
A method for producing a zinc-based plated steel sheet, comprising:
請求項4に記載の欠陥計測方法を用いて亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面を計測する計測ステップと、
前記計測ステップにおける筋状欠陥の計測結果から前記亜鉛系めっき鋼板の品質管理を行う品質管理ステップと、
を含む、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の品質管理方法。
a measuring step of measuring a surface of a zinc-based plated steel sheet using the defect measuring method according to claim 4;
a quality control step of performing quality control of the zinc-based plated steel sheet based on a measurement result of the line defect in the measurement step;
A quality control method for zinc-based coated steel sheet, including:
JP2022027379A 2022-02-25 2022-02-25 Defect measurement device, defect measurement method, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing equipment, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing method, and zinc-based coated steel sheet quality control method Active JP7622667B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022027379A JP7622667B2 (en) 2022-02-25 2022-02-25 Defect measurement device, defect measurement method, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing equipment, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing method, and zinc-based coated steel sheet quality control method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022027379A JP7622667B2 (en) 2022-02-25 2022-02-25 Defect measurement device, defect measurement method, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing equipment, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing method, and zinc-based coated steel sheet quality control method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2023123908A JP2023123908A (en) 2023-09-06
JP7622667B2 true JP7622667B2 (en) 2025-01-28

Family

ID=87886295

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2022027379A Active JP7622667B2 (en) 2022-02-25 2022-02-25 Defect measurement device, defect measurement method, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing equipment, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing method, and zinc-based coated steel sheet quality control method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7622667B2 (en)

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000065755A (en) 1998-08-24 2000-03-03 Nkk Corp Surface inspection equipment
JP2002148203A (en) 2000-11-08 2002-05-22 Kawasaki Steel Corp A Simple Method for Determining Surface Defects of Hot Dip Galvanized Steel Sheet
JP2004151006A (en) 2002-10-31 2004-05-27 Jfe Steel Kk Quality control method for hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and quality control device for hot-dip galvanized steel sheet
JP2007285753A (en) 2006-04-13 2007-11-01 Seiko Epson Corp Defect detection method and defect detection apparatus
JP2011169782A (en) 2010-02-19 2011-09-01 Futec Inc Defect inspection device
JP2014081319A (en) 2012-10-18 2014-05-08 Toppan Printing Co Ltd Periodic pattern inspection device, and periodic pattern inspection method
JP2017067462A (en) 2015-09-28 2017-04-06 アイシン精機株式会社 Inspection device
JP2018155690A (en) 2017-03-21 2018-10-04 Jfeスチール株式会社 Surface defect inspection method and surface defect inspection device
JP2020158875A (en) 2019-03-28 2020-10-01 Jfeスチール株式会社 Manufacturing equipment for alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheets and manufacturing method for alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheets

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0743317A (en) * 1993-07-28 1995-02-14 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd Sheet inspection system

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000065755A (en) 1998-08-24 2000-03-03 Nkk Corp Surface inspection equipment
JP2002148203A (en) 2000-11-08 2002-05-22 Kawasaki Steel Corp A Simple Method for Determining Surface Defects of Hot Dip Galvanized Steel Sheet
JP2004151006A (en) 2002-10-31 2004-05-27 Jfe Steel Kk Quality control method for hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and quality control device for hot-dip galvanized steel sheet
JP2007285753A (en) 2006-04-13 2007-11-01 Seiko Epson Corp Defect detection method and defect detection apparatus
JP2011169782A (en) 2010-02-19 2011-09-01 Futec Inc Defect inspection device
JP2014081319A (en) 2012-10-18 2014-05-08 Toppan Printing Co Ltd Periodic pattern inspection device, and periodic pattern inspection method
JP2017067462A (en) 2015-09-28 2017-04-06 アイシン精機株式会社 Inspection device
JP2018155690A (en) 2017-03-21 2018-10-04 Jfeスチール株式会社 Surface defect inspection method and surface defect inspection device
JP2020158875A (en) 2019-03-28 2020-10-01 Jfeスチール株式会社 Manufacturing equipment for alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheets and manufacturing method for alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheets

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2023123908A (en) 2023-09-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10267747B2 (en) Surface defect inspecting device and method for steel sheets
JP3764890B2 (en) Method for on-line characterization of a moving surface and apparatus for implementing it
US10041888B2 (en) Surface defect inspecting device and method for hot-dip coated steel sheets
JP4345930B2 (en) Appearance inspection equipment for articles
JP5264995B2 (en) How to measure the cleanliness of steel strips
JP2022522348A (en) Equipment and methods for inspecting membranes on substrates
JP2012251983A (en) Wrap film wrinkle inspection method and device
JP3511881B2 (en) Crystal grain size measuring device
JP7622667B2 (en) Defect measurement device, defect measurement method, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing equipment, zinc-based coated steel sheet manufacturing method, and zinc-based coated steel sheet quality control method
JP4705277B2 (en) Oil amount distribution measuring device and oil amount distribution measuring method
CN117907337A (en) A strip steel surface cleanliness detection device and method
JP6275248B2 (en) Method and apparatus for determining the wear characteristics of a coated flat product
JP5949690B2 (en) Evaluation method and evaluation apparatus
KR102148062B1 (en) Method and device for determining the abrasive-wear properties of galvannealed flat steel products
Tout et al. Automatic vision system for wheel surface inspection and monitoring
JP2007506072A (en) Sheet surface analyzer and analysis method
JP4411918B2 (en) Quality control method and manufacturing method of steel sheet having oxide film on surface
JP3580137B2 (en) Method and apparatus for measuring crystal grain size
JP2001116693A (en) Surface glossiness inspection method and device
JPWO2020183958A1 (en) Chemical conversion film inspection method, chemical conversion film inspection equipment, surface treatment steel sheet manufacturing method, surface treatment steel sheet quality control method and surface treatment steel sheet manufacturing equipment
JP2011149699A (en) Method and device for determining surface quality of steel plate
JP2025003303A (en) Method for detecting surface defects on metal plates
JPH05172752A (en) Method and device for measuring distribution state of metallic particle contributing to weldability of composite steel plate
JP2026013172A (en) Surface defect detection device and surface defect detection method for continuous steel sheet production line
JP2008076827A (en) Illumination angle setting method in defect inspection apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20230926

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20240517

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20240521

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20240717

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20240910

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20241022

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20241217

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20241230

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7622667

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150