Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7653099B2 - How to detect the risk of malfunctions in incinerators - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7653099B2 - How to detect the risk of malfunctions in incinerators - Google Patents

How to detect the risk of malfunctions in incinerators Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7653099B2
JP7653099B2 JP2021061487A JP2021061487A JP7653099B2 JP 7653099 B2 JP7653099 B2 JP 7653099B2 JP 2021061487 A JP2021061487 A JP 2021061487A JP 2021061487 A JP2021061487 A JP 2021061487A JP 7653099 B2 JP7653099 B2 JP 7653099B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
incinerator
risk
adhesion
incineration ash
concentration
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2021061487A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2022157332A (en
Inventor
賢洋 伊東
康一郎 刀根
多賀美 小関
均 廣瀬
邦彦 古閑
秀博 神谷
洋平 岡田
元規 堀口
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sanki Engineering Co Ltd
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology NUC
Original Assignee
Sanki Engineering Co Ltd
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology NUC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sanki Engineering Co Ltd, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology NUC filed Critical Sanki Engineering Co Ltd
Priority to JP2021061487A priority Critical patent/JP7653099B2/en
Publication of JP2022157332A publication Critical patent/JP2022157332A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7653099B2 publication Critical patent/JP7653099B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Incineration Of Waste (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)

Description

本発明は、下水汚泥を焼却する下水汚泥焼却炉で発生する焼却灰の付着性に起因する排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の発生リスクを察知する焼却炉の不具合発生危険性察知方法に関する。
また、廃棄物を焼却する廃棄物焼却炉で発生する焼却灰の付着性に起因する排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の発生リスクを察知する焼却炉の不具合発生危険性察知方法に関する
The present invention relates to a method for detecting the risk of malfunction in an incinerator, which detects the risk of exhaust gas duct blockage and poor fluidization of a fluidized bed caused by the adhesiveness of incineration ash generated in a sewage sludge incinerator that incinerates sewage sludge.
The present invention also relates to a method for detecting the risk of incinerator malfunctions, which detects the risk of exhaust gas duct blockage and poor fluidization of a fluidized bed caused by adhesion of incineration ash generated in a waste incinerator that incinerates waste.

下水処理場において下水を浄化する際に発生する下水汚泥は、脱水後、下水汚泥焼却炉で焼却処理される。下水汚泥を焼却する焼却炉において、焼却炉の排気ガスダクトや熱交換器等に焼却灰が付着することがある。
また、流動焼却炉においては、焼却場の流動床をなす流動砂に焼却灰が付着する。
この焼却灰の付着により、排気ガスダクトや熱交換器等を閉塞させてしまったり、流動床の流動砂同士が固着して肥大化するクリンカに起因する流動不良現象による不完全燃焼を引き起こしてしまったりする場合があり、焼却炉の運転に大きな支障をきたすことがある。
Sewage sludge generated during purification of sewage in sewage treatment plants is dehydrated and then incinerated in a sewage sludge incinerator. In the incinerator that incinerates sewage sludge, incineration ash may adhere to the exhaust gas duct, heat exchanger, etc. of the incinerator.
In addition, in a fluidized incinerator, the incineration ash adheres to the fluidized sand that forms the fluidized bed of the incineration plant.
The adhesion of this incineration ash can cause blockages in exhaust gas ducts and heat exchangers, or can cause incomplete combustion due to poor fluidity caused by clinker, which is formed when the fluidized sand in the fluidized bed adheres to each other and swells, causing serious problems in the operation of the incinerator.

近年は、下水汚泥焼却炉において発生する焼却灰の付着性に起因する排気ガスダクトの閉塞や流動床における流動不良といった不具合(以下、不具合)の発生が多くなっている。
その原因として、下水の高度処理により汚泥に含まれるリンの濃度が高くなり、当該リンが焼却灰の付着性を助長したためと考えられている。
その不具合対策として、汚泥中に無機系薬品(消石灰、炭酸カルシウム、ポリ硫酸第二鉄、ポリ塩化アルミニウムなど)を添加して、焼却灰の付着性を抑制している下水汚泥焼却炉もある。
In recent years, there has been an increase in problems (hereinafter, problems) occurring in sewage sludge incinerators, such as clogging of exhaust gas ducts and poor fluidization in fluidized beds, caused by the adhesiveness of incineration ash.
The cause of this is thought to be that the advanced treatment of sewage increases the concentration of phosphorus in the sludge, which in turn promotes the adhesion of incineration ash.
To address this problem, some sewage sludge incinerators add inorganic chemicals (such as hydrated lime, calcium carbonate, polyferric sulfate, polyaluminum chloride, etc.) to the sludge to suppress the adhesion of the incineration ash.

前記不具合が発生するのは、灰が高温場で付着性が高まることが主要因である。これは、灰に含まれる成分が高温場において部分溶融して液相を生成し、それが灰粒子間で液架橋することで灰が付着性を増すためである。
したがって、高温場で付着性が増す灰は、不具合発生リスクも高いといえる。
The main cause of the above problem is that ash becomes more adhesive at high temperatures. This is because components contained in ash partially melt at high temperatures to generate a liquid phase, which forms liquid bridges between ash particles, increasing the adhesiveness of the ash.
Therefore, ash, which becomes more adhesive at high temperatures, is at high risk of causing problems.

また、不具合対策として、下水汚泥焼却炉における焼却灰の付着を予測する方法が開示されている。
例えば、特開2010-12425号公報では、酸化雰囲気下で焼却して得られる焼却灰中のFe23、CaO、Na2O、K2O、MgO、SiO2、Al23、TiO2、及びP25の成分について、それぞれの含有量を特定し、特定された各焼却灰成分の元素組成に基づき、特定の式により指標を算出する技術が開示されている(特許文献1参照)。
しかし、算出される指標(数値)には明確な意味はなく、本発明のように明確な意味(単位)を持つ指標である付着力(引張強度/kPa)」を用いて焼却灰の付着を予測する方法は開示されていない。また焼却灰の粒子径を要因として付着性(付着力)を算出する技術は開示されていない。
As a countermeasure against defects, a method for predicting adhesion of incineration ash in a sewage sludge incinerator has also been disclosed.
For example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2010-12425 discloses a technology in which the content of each of the components Fe2O3 , CaO, Na2O , K2O , MgO, SiO2 , Al2O3 , TiO2 , and P2O5 in incineration ash obtained by incineration in an oxidizing atmosphere is identified, and an index is calculated using a specific formula based on the elemental composition of each identified incineration ash component (see Patent Document 1).
However, the calculated index (numerical value) does not have a clear meaning, and no method is disclosed for predicting adhesion of incineration ash using "adhesive strength (tensile strength/kPa)," an index with a clear meaning (unit) as in the present invention. Also, no technology is disclosed for calculating adhesiveness (adhesive strength) using the particle size of incineration ash as a factor.

特開2010-12425号公報JP 2010-12425 A

従来より粉体層の付着力を測定する装置はいくつかあるが、いずれも粉体サンプルを採取して室温環境下(10~30℃付近)において分析装置で測定する手法が採られ、焼却設備の排気ガスダクトや流動焼却炉の流動床等の高温場での粉体層の付着力を直接測定することはできなかった。
また、特許文献1の技術は、焼却灰の付着を予測する方法の1つに用いられる指標ではあるが、〔0027〕に記述されているように、ブリケット試験は1100度で行われ、ブリケットの灰表面の溶融軟化性を評価して灰付着性を評価している。通常800度付近の温度域である下水汚泥焼却炉の灰付着性の環境とはかけ離れており、下水汚泥焼却炉での灰付着性の予測には不向きであると考えられる。
There are several conventional devices for measuring the adhesive strength of a powder layer, but all of them employ a method in which a powder sample is collected and measured using an analytical device at room temperature (around 10 to 30°C), and it has not been possible to directly measure the adhesive strength of a powder layer in a high-temperature environment such as the exhaust gas duct of an incineration facility or the fluidized bed of a fluidized incinerator.
In addition, although the technology of Patent Document 1 is an index used as one of the methods for predicting the adhesion of incineration ash, as described in [0027], the briquette test is performed at 1100 degrees, and the ash adhesion is evaluated by evaluating the melting and softening property of the ash surface of the briquette. This is far from the ash adhesion environment of a sewage sludge incinerator, which is usually in the temperature range of around 800 degrees, and is considered to be unsuitable for predicting ash adhesion in a sewage sludge incinerator.

本発明は、上記課題に鑑みなされたものであり、その目的は、下水汚泥焼却炉の高温場において灰の付着性を評価できる焼却炉の排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の発生リスクを察知する焼却炉の不具合発生危険性察知方法を提供する。
また、下水汚泥焼却炉で発生した焼却灰の付着力に影響を与えるリン濃度、カリウム濃度、鉄濃度及び粒子径の4つの因子を用いて重回帰分析により導出した付着力予測式により下水汚泥焼却炉の排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の危険性を察知する技術を提供する。
なお、本発明における排気ガスダクトは、燃焼ガス(排気ガス)が煙突から
排出されるまでの通路を意味し、焼却設備中の熱交換器等、各種設備中の燃焼
ガスの通路部分を含んでいる。
The present invention has been made in consideration of the above problems, and its object is to provide a method for detecting the risk of malfunction in an incinerator, capable of evaluating the adhesion of ash in the high-temperature environment of a sewage sludge incinerator, and detecting the risk of blockage of the incinerator's exhaust gas duct and poor fluidization of the fluidized bed.
In addition, the present invention provides a technology for detecting the risk of blockage of exhaust gas ducts and poor fluidization of the fluidized bed of sewage sludge incinerators using an adhesion prediction formula derived by multiple regression analysis using four factors that affect the adhesion of incineration ash generated in sewage sludge incinerators: phosphorus concentration, potassium concentration, iron concentration, and particle size.
In the present invention, the exhaust gas duct means a passage through which the combustion gas (exhaust gas) is discharged from the chimney, and includes passages for the combustion gas in various facilities, such as heat exchangers in incineration facilities.

上記目的達成のため、本発明者らは上記課題を下記の手段により解決した。
〕下水汚泥焼却炉で発生した焼却灰の付着力に影響を与えるリン濃度、カリウム濃度、鉄濃度及び粒子径の4つの因子を用いて、重回帰分析により導出した付着力予測式(式1)により焼却灰の付着性に起因した下水汚泥焼却炉の排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の危険性を察知することを特徴とする焼却炉の不具合発生危険性察知方法。

Figure 0007653099000001
〕前記付着力予測式が、複数の異なる焼却灰に基づいて導出した付着力予測式(式2)であることを特徴とする〔1〕に記載の焼却炉の不具合発生危険性察知方法。
Figure 0007653099000002
〕廃棄物焼却炉で発生した焼却灰の付着力に影響を与えるリン濃度、カリウム濃度、鉄濃度及び粒子径の4つの因子を用いて、重回帰分析により導出した付着力予測式(式1)により焼却灰の付着性に起因した廃棄物焼却炉の排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の危険性を察知することを特徴とする焼却炉の不具合発生危険性察知方法。
Figure 0007653099000003
In order to achieve the above object, the present inventors have solved the above problems by the following means.
[ 1 ] A method for detecting the risk of malfunction in an incinerator, comprising the steps of: detecting the risk of blockage of the exhaust gas duct of a sewage sludge incinerator and poor fluidization of the fluidized bed caused by the adhesiveness of incineration ash by using an adhesive force prediction formula (Formula 1) derived by multiple regression analysis using four factors that affect the adhesive force of incineration ash generated in a sewage sludge incinerator, namely phosphorus concentration, potassium concentration, iron concentration, and particle size.
Figure 0007653099000001
[ 2 ] The method for detecting the risk of malfunction in an incinerator described in [1] , characterized in that the adhesion prediction formula is an adhesion prediction formula (Formula 2) derived based on a plurality of different incineration ashes.
Figure 0007653099000002
[ 3 ] A method for detecting the risk of malfunction in an incinerator, characterized in that the method detects the risk of blockage of the exhaust gas duct of a waste incinerator and poor fluidization of the fluidized bed caused by the adhesiveness of incineration ash by using an adhesive force prediction formula (Formula 1) derived by multiple regression analysis using four factors that affect the adhesive force of incineration ash generated in a waste incinerator, namely phosphorus concentration, potassium concentration, iron concentration, and particle size.
Figure 0007653099000003

本発明によれば、下水汚泥焼却炉での高温場での灰の付着性を直接評価することができるので、下水汚泥を焼却する際における下水汚泥焼却炉の排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の危険性を有効に察知することができる。
また、下水汚泥焼却炉で発生した焼却灰に含まれるリン濃度、カリウム濃度、鉄濃度及び粒子径の4つの因子を測定し付着力予測式を用いることで下水汚泥焼却炉の排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の危険性を有効に察知することができる。
さらにまた、本発明によれば下水汚泥焼却炉より高い燃焼温度域の廃棄物焼却炉の排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の危険性を有効に察知することができる。
According to the present invention, it is possible to directly evaluate the adhesion of ash in a high-temperature environment in a sewage sludge incinerator, and therefore it is possible to effectively detect the risk of blockage of the exhaust gas duct of the sewage sludge incinerator and poor fluidization of the fluidized bed when incinerating sewage sludge.
In addition, by measuring the four factors of phosphorus concentration, potassium concentration, iron concentration and particle size contained in the incineration ash generated in a sewage sludge incinerator and using an adhesion force prediction equation, it is possible to effectively detect the risk of blockage of the exhaust gas duct of the sewage sludge incinerator and poor fluidization of the fluidized bed.
Furthermore, according to the present invention, the risk of clogging of the exhaust gas duct and poor fluidization of the fluidized bed of a waste incinerator having a higher combustion temperature range than that of a sewage sludge incinerator can be effectively detected.

試料の焼却灰の付着力測定結果を表す図Figure showing the adhesive strength measurement results of the incineration ash of the sample 試料に含まれる成分の成分濃度と付着力の関係を表す図A diagram showing the relationship between the concentration of components contained in the sample and adhesive strength 焼却灰の粒子径と付着力に関係を表す図A diagram showing the relationship between particle size and adhesive strength of incineration ash 試料の付着力の実測値と付着力予測式による付着予測値との関係を表す図A graph showing the relationship between the measured adhesion value of the sample and the adhesion predicted value based on the adhesion prediction formula.

図1~図4に基づいて本発明の付着性評価方法について説明する。
図1は、試料の焼却灰の付着力測定結果を表す図、図2は試料に含まれる成分の成分濃度(試料の乾燥重量に占める百分率、単位はwt%)と付着力(引張強度)の関係を表す図、図3は焼却灰の粒子径と付着力の関係を表す図、図4は試料の付着力の実測値と付着力予測式による付着力予測値との関係を表す図である。
The adhesion evaluation method of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS.
Figure 1 shows the results of measuring the adhesive force of a sample incineration ash, Figure 2 shows the relationship between the concentration of components contained in the sample (percentage of the dry weight of the sample, in wt%) and adhesive force (tensile strength), Figure 3 shows the relationship between the particle size of the incineration ash and adhesive force, and Figure 4 shows the relationship between the actual adhesive force of the sample and the predicted adhesive force value based on the adhesive force prediction formula.

本発明者は、下水汚泥焼却炉で下水汚泥を焼却する際に発生する焼却灰が、下水汚泥焼却炉の排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床における流動不良に与える要素を特定するため、複数個所の汚泥焼却炉から発生した焼却灰40試料にJISの試験粉体を加えた43試料について、高温吊り下げ式付着力測定装置(ホソカワミクロン株式会社製、ARF1110-300-特KHC)を用いて各試料の焼却灰の付着力を測定した。 In order to identify factors that contribute to the clogging of exhaust gas ducts and poor fluidity in fluidized beds caused by incineration ash generated when sewage sludge is incinerated in a sewage sludge incinerator, the inventors measured the adhesion of the incineration ash of each sample using a high-temperature hanging adhesion measuring device (Hosokawa Micron Corporation, ARF1110-300-Toku KHC) for 43 samples, which were made by adding JIS test powder to 40 samples of incineration ash generated from sludge incinerators at multiple locations.

図1は、前記43試料の焼却灰の付着力測定結果を表す図であり、横軸に試料名、縦軸に引張強度(kPa)を表す。
前記43試料の付着性評価に関しては、下水汚泥焼却灰の化学的特性および物理的特性から、高温場における灰粉体層の付着力を以下の手順で導出した。
付着力は、引張強度(kPa)で表し、付着力測定時の温度は800℃であり、これは実際の汚泥焼却炉の一般的な炉内温度をもとに決定した。また各試料の元素組成は株式会社リガク社の蛍光X線分析装置(RIX3100)で粒子径(メディアン径)は株式会社堀場製作所のレーザ回析/散乱式粒子径分布測定装置(LA-950ND)で測定した。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the results of measuring the adhesive strength of the incineration ash of the 43 samples, with the horizontal axis showing the sample name and the vertical axis showing the tensile strength (kPa).
Regarding the evaluation of the adhesion of the 43 samples, the adhesive strength of the ash powder layer at high temperatures was derived from the chemical and physical properties of the sewage sludge incineration ash by the following procedure.
The adhesive strength is expressed as tensile strength (kPa), and the temperature at which the adhesive strength was measured was 800°C, which was determined based on the general temperature inside an actual sludge incinerator. The elemental composition of each sample was measured using a fluorescent X-ray analyzer (RIX3100) manufactured by Rigaku Corporation, and the particle size (median size) was measured using a laser diffraction/scattering particle size distribution analyzer (LA-950ND) manufactured by Horiba, Ltd.

灰粒子は高温場において粒子表面の低融点共晶物が溶融して、液相を生成し、それが粒子間で液架橋する。この液架橋(力)が灰粉体層の付着力増加の要因のひとつであり、この溶融温度は個々の成分及び成分割合によって異なる。 In high-temperature environments, the low-melting-point eutectic on the surface of ash particles melts, generating a liquid phase that forms liquid bridges between particles. This liquid bridge (force) is one of the factors that increases the adhesive strength of the ash powder layer, and the melting temperature varies depending on the individual components and their proportions.

一方で、Na、K等のアルカリ金属は、微粉炭火力発電、バイオマス発電等の分野において、焼却灰の付着因子となることが知られている。
そこで付着性に影響する成分を確認するため、各試料に含まれるP,K,Fe,Al,Na,Cu,Zn,Ba,Ca,Mg等20数種の付着力の成分濃度依存性の有無を検証した。
具体的には横軸に各試料の成分濃度、縦軸には各試料の付着力(引張強度)をプロットしたグラフを作成して検証を行った。
On the other hand, alkali metals such as Na and K are known to be adhesion factors of incineration ash in the fields of pulverized coal-fired power generation, biomass power generation, and the like.
In order to identify the components that affect adhesion, we verified whether the adhesion of more than 20 types of elements, such as P, K, Fe, Al, Na, Cu, Zn, Ba, Ca, and Mg, contained in each sample depended on the concentration of the components.
Specifically, a graph was created in which the component concentration of each sample was plotted on the horizontal axis and the adhesive strength (tensile strength) of each sample was plotted on the vertical axis, and the verification was performed.

図2は、付着力に関するリンとカリウムと鉄の濃度依存性を表したものである。
同図は、横軸に各試料の成分濃度、縦軸には各試料の付着力(引張強度)をプロットした図で、リンとカリウムおよび鉄の付着力の濃度依存性を表す。
同図(A)がリン、同図(B)がカリウム、同図(C)が鉄である。
同図(A)及び(B)から明らかなようにリン及びカリウムについては成分の濃度が高いほど付着力も高い傾向が見られる。
この結果から、リン及びカリウムの両成分は灰の付着力増加因子であると考えられる。
FIG. 2 shows the concentration dependence of adhesion on phosphorus, potassium and iron.
The figure plots the component concentration of each sample on the horizontal axis and the adhesive strength (tensile strength) of each sample on the vertical axis, and shows the concentration dependence of the adhesive strength of phosphorus, potassium, and iron.
(A) in the figure shows phosphorus, (B) shows potassium, and (C) shows iron.
As is clear from (A) and (B) of the same figure, there is a tendency for the adhesive strength of phosphorus and potassium to increase as the concentration of the components increases.
From these results, it is considered that both phosphorus and potassium are factors that increase the adhesive strength of ash.

また同図(C)から明らかなように、鉄については成分濃度が高いほど付着力は低い傾向が見られる。
この結果から、鉄は灰の付着力抑制因子であると考えられる。
なお、付着性に影響を与えるリンとカリウムと鉄を除いて、Al、Na、Cu等他の成分は焼却灰の付着力に影響を与えないことが確認できたので、これらの図については記載を省略した。
As is clear from FIG. 1C, there is a tendency for the adhesive strength of iron to decrease as the component concentration increases.
From these results, it is considered that iron is a factor that inhibits the adhesion of ash.
In addition, except for phosphorus, potassium, and iron, which affect adhesion, it was confirmed that other components such as Al, Na, and Cu do not affect the adhesive strength of incineration ash, so these figures have been omitted.

灰粉体層の場合、付着力化学的要素(元素組成)だけでなく物理的要素(粒子径や空隙率)にも影響される可能性がある。
そのため灰の付着力と粒子径及び空隙率についても同様にグラフ化して解析し、物理的要素の影響も検証した。
In the case of ash powder layers, adhesion can be influenced not only by chemical factors (elemental composition) but also by physical factors (particle size and porosity).
Therefore, the adhesion strength of the ash, particle size, and porosity were also graphed and analyzed to verify the influence of physical factors.

図3は、灰粉体層の付着性の影響因子であると考えられる焼却灰の粒子径による付着力を表した図である。
同図は焼却灰の粒子径(メディアン径)の依存性を示したものである。
同図から粒子径増大に伴い付着力は低下する傾向が見られる。なお、空隙率についても同様の検証を行ったが、明らかな傾向は認められなかった。
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the adhesive force depending on the particle size of incineration ash, which is thought to be an influencing factor of the adhesiveness of the ash powder layer.
The figure shows the dependence of particle size (median size) of incineration ash.
The figure shows that the adhesive strength tends to decrease as the particle size increases. A similar verification was also conducted for the porosity, but no clear tendency was observed.

上記から、灰の付着性に影響する要素は、リン、カリウム、鉄および粒子径であると考えられる。
このことから、重回帰分析を用いて焼却灰の付着力予測式を導出した。
付着力予測式に関しては、重回帰分析の機能を有する表計算ソフト(マイクロソフト社のエクセル)を用い、目的変数を43試料の付着力(引張強度)とし、説明変数を同じく43試料のリン、カリウム及び鉄の濃度(wt%)と焼却灰の粒子径(メディアン径)とした。
具体的には、表1の各欄に示すように試料No(1~43)毎の説明変数(リン濃度、カリウム濃度、鉄濃度および粒子径)を整理し、表1の数値を用いて図2及び図3のグラフの横軸プロットを決定し、縦軸の付着力の測定値との関係性を整理したうえで、次に記述する付着力予測を行った。

Figure 0007653099000004
From the above, it appears that the factors affecting ash adhesion are phosphorus, potassium, iron and particle size.
Based on this, a formula for predicting the adhesive force of incineration ash was derived using multiple regression analysis.
Regarding the adhesive strength prediction formula, a spreadsheet software with multiple regression analysis function (Microsoft Excel) was used, and the objective variable was the adhesive strength (tensile strength) of the 43 samples, and the explanatory variables were the phosphorus, potassium, and iron concentrations (wt%) of the 43 samples and the particle diameter (median diameter) of the incineration ash.
Specifically, the explanatory variables (phosphorus concentration, potassium concentration, iron concentration, and particle size) for each sample No. (1 to 43) were organized as shown in each column of Table 1, and the values in Table 1 were used to determine the horizontal axis plots of the graphs in Figures 2 and 3. The relationship with the measured adhesive force values on the vertical axis was then organized, and the adhesive force predictions described below were performed.
Figure 0007653099000004

表1のように概念的に示されるリン、カリウム及び鉄成分濃度値と粒子径の説明変数を用いて重回帰分析の計算を行った。
これにより得られた重回帰式、すなわち付着力予測式(式2)を得た。

Figure 0007653099000005
A multiple regression analysis was performed using the phosphorus, potassium, and iron component concentrations conceptually shown in Table 1 and the explanatory variables of particle size.
As a result, a multiple regression equation, that is, an adhesive force prediction equation (Equation 2) was obtained.
Figure 0007653099000005

図4は、高温吊り下げ式付着力測定装置を用いて、43試料の付着力を測定した実測値を横軸に、付着力予測式より算出した予測値を縦軸にとったグラフである。
同図に示すように両者の相関係数は、0.82であり高い相関性が見られたことから、上記付着力予測式は妥当であることを示す。
FIG. 4 is a graph in which the horizontal axis represents the actual values of adhesion measured for 43 samples using a high-temperature hanging adhesion measuring device, and the vertical axis represents the predicted values calculated from the adhesion prediction formula.
As shown in the figure, the correlation coefficient between the two was 0.82, which indicates a high correlation, and therefore the above adhesion prediction formula is valid.

以上説明したように、本発明によれば、下水汚泥焼却炉での800度付近の高温場での灰の付着性を評価することができるので、下水汚泥を焼却する際における下水汚泥焼却炉の排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の危険性を有効に察知することができる。また、下水汚泥焼却炉よりも高い燃焼温度域の廃棄物焼却炉等においても、高温吊り下げ式付着力測定装置の測定温度域をより高い温度域に変更して灰付着性を評価すれば本発明を適用することができる。更に、バイオマス発電施設などへの適用も可能である。

As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to evaluate the adhesion of ash in a high-temperature field of about 800 degrees in a sewage sludge incinerator, and therefore it is possible to effectively detect the risk of clogging of the exhaust gas duct of the sewage sludge incinerator and poor fluidization of the fluidized bed when incinerating sewage sludge. Furthermore, the present invention can be applied to waste incinerators and the like that have a higher combustion temperature range than sewage sludge incinerators by changing the measurement temperature range of the high-temperature hanging adhesion measuring device to a higher temperature range and evaluating the ash adhesion. Furthermore, it is also possible to apply the present invention to biomass power generation facilities and the like.

Claims (3)

下水汚泥焼却炉で発生した焼却灰の付着力に影響を与えるリン濃度、カリウム濃度、鉄濃度及び粒子径の4つの因子を用いて、重回帰分析により導出した付着力予測式(式1)により焼却灰の付着性に起因した下水汚泥焼却炉の排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の危険性を察知することを特徴とする焼却炉の不具合発生危険性察知方法。
Figure 0007653099000006
A method for detecting the risk of malfunctions in an incinerator, characterized by detecting the risk of blockage of the exhaust gas duct and poor fluidization of the fluidized bed of a sewage sludge incinerator caused by the adhesiveness of incineration ash using an adhesive force prediction formula (Formula 1) derived by multiple regression analysis using four factors that affect the adhesive force of incineration ash generated in a sewage sludge incinerator: phosphorus concentration, potassium concentration, iron concentration, and particle size.
Figure 0007653099000006
前記付着力予測式が、複数の異なる焼却灰に基づいて導出した付着力予測式(式2)であることを特徴とする請求項に記載の焼却炉の不具合発生危険性察知方法。
Figure 0007653099000007
The method for detecting the risk of malfunction in an incinerator according to claim 1 , characterized in that the adhesion prediction formula is an adhesion prediction formula (Formula 2) derived based on a plurality of different incineration ashes.
Figure 0007653099000007
廃棄物焼却炉で発生した焼却灰の付着力に影響を与えるリン濃度、カリウム濃度、鉄濃度及び粒子径の4つの因子を用いて、重回帰分析により導出した付着力予測式(式1)により焼却灰の付着性に起因した廃棄物焼却炉の排気ガスダクトの閉塞及び流動床の流動不良の危険性を察知することを特徴とする焼却炉の不具合発生危険性察知方法。
Figure 0007653099000008
A method for detecting the risk of malfunction in an incinerator, characterized by detecting the risk of blockage of the exhaust gas duct of a waste incinerator and poor fluidization of the fluidized bed caused by the adhesiveness of incineration ash using an adhesive force prediction formula (Formula 1) derived by multiple regression analysis using four factors that affect the adhesive force of incineration ash generated in a waste incinerator, namely phosphorus concentration, potassium concentration, iron concentration, and particle size.
Figure 0007653099000008
JP2021061487A 2021-03-31 2021-03-31 How to detect the risk of malfunctions in incinerators Active JP7653099B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2021061487A JP7653099B2 (en) 2021-03-31 2021-03-31 How to detect the risk of malfunctions in incinerators

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2021061487A JP7653099B2 (en) 2021-03-31 2021-03-31 How to detect the risk of malfunctions in incinerators

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2022157332A JP2022157332A (en) 2022-10-14
JP7653099B2 true JP7653099B2 (en) 2025-03-28

Family

ID=83558629

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2021061487A Active JP7653099B2 (en) 2021-03-31 2021-03-31 How to detect the risk of malfunctions in incinerators

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7653099B2 (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010012425A (en) 2008-07-04 2010-01-21 Kobelco Eco-Solutions Co Ltd Ash adherence estimating method to sewage sludge incineration treatment device, and sewage sludge incineration method using the method
JP2019171303A (en) 2018-03-28 2019-10-10 三機工業株式会社 Sludge incineration equipment and sludge incineration method
JP2019171302A (en) 2018-03-28 2019-10-10 三機工業株式会社 Sludge incineration equipment and sludge incineration method
JP2019177377A (en) 2018-03-30 2019-10-17 三機工業株式会社 Sludge incineration apparatus and sludge incineration method
JP2019178857A (en) 2018-03-30 2019-10-17 三機工業株式会社 Sludge incineration facility and sludge incineration method

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010012425A (en) 2008-07-04 2010-01-21 Kobelco Eco-Solutions Co Ltd Ash adherence estimating method to sewage sludge incineration treatment device, and sewage sludge incineration method using the method
JP2019171303A (en) 2018-03-28 2019-10-10 三機工業株式会社 Sludge incineration equipment and sludge incineration method
JP2019171302A (en) 2018-03-28 2019-10-10 三機工業株式会社 Sludge incineration equipment and sludge incineration method
JP2019177377A (en) 2018-03-30 2019-10-17 三機工業株式会社 Sludge incineration apparatus and sludge incineration method
JP2019178857A (en) 2018-03-30 2019-10-17 三機工業株式会社 Sludge incineration facility and sludge incineration method

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Hiroshi Naganuma et al.,Reduction mechanisms of ash deposition in coal and/or biomass combustion boilers,Fuel,Elsevier,2012年12月10日,Volume 106, April 2013,Pages 303-309,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.017

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2022157332A (en) 2022-10-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Lith et al. Lab-scale investigation of deposit-induced chlorine corrosion of superheater materials under simulated biomass-firing conditions. Part 1: Exposure at 560 C
Boström et al. Influence of kaolin and calcite additives on ash transformations in small-scale combustion of oat
Niu et al. Investigations on biomass slagging in utility boiler: Criterion numbers and slagging growth mechanisms
Syed et al. Fireside corrosion of superheaters: Effects of air and oxy-firing of coal and biomass
Coda et al. Behavior of chlorine and enrichment of risky elements in bubbling fluidized bed combustion of biomass and waste assisted by additives
Frandsen Utilizing biomass and waste for power production—a decade of contributing to the understanding, interpretation and analysis of deposits and corrosion products
Beck et al. Effects of sewage sludge and meat and bone meal co-combustion on SCR catalysts
Niu et al. Slagging characteristics on the superheaters of a 12 MW biomass-fired boiler
Billen et al. Predicting melt formation and agglomeration in fluidized bed combustors by equilibrium calculations
Verbinnen et al. Theory and practice of corrosion related to ashes and deposits in a WtE boiler
Zhou et al. Behavior of fouling deposits formed on a probe with different surface temperatures
Sengeløv et al. Sulfation of condensed potassium chloride by SO2
Shimogori et al. Effects of fine ash particles and alkali metals on ash deposition characteristics at the initial stage of ash deposition determined in 1.5 MWth pilot plant tests
TWI881073B (en) Method for predictively evaluating combustion ash adhesion in mixed coal combustion boiler
Ma et al. Full-scale experimental investigation of deposition and corrosion of pre-protector and 3rd superheater in a waste incineration plant
Anthony et al. Agglomeration and fouling in three industrial petroleum coke-fired CFBC boilers due to carbonation and sulfation
Ninomiya et al. Effect of additives on the reduction of PM2. 5 emissions during pulverized coal combustion
Hagman et al. Co-combustion of animal waste, peat, waste wood, forest residues, and industrial sludge in a 50 MWth circulating fluidized-bed boiler: ash transformation, ash/deposit characteristics, and boiler failures
JP7653099B2 (en) How to detect the risk of malfunctions in incinerators
Åmand et al. Ash deposition on heat transfer tubes during combustion of demolition wood
Sharobem Mitigation of high temperature corrosion in waste-to-energy power plants
Plaza et al. Use of a predictive model for the impact of cofiring coal/biomass blends on slagging and fouling propensity
Khalil et al. Experimental investigation on corrosion abatement in straw combustion by fuel mixing
Viklund et al. Deposit chemistry and initial corrosion during biomass combustion–The influence of excess O2 and sulphate injection
Moradian et al. Thermodynamic equilibrium model applied to predict the fouling tendency in a commercial fluidized-bed boiler, combusting solid waste

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20240209

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20240930

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20241018

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20241128

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20250107

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20250213

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20250305

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20250307

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7653099

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150