Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7673695B2 - Method for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine, straightening method, manufacturing method, and method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7673695B2 - Method for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine, straightening method, manufacturing method, and method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine - Google Patents

Method for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine, straightening method, manufacturing method, and method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7673695B2
JP7673695B2 JP2022103161A JP2022103161A JP7673695B2 JP 7673695 B2 JP7673695 B2 JP 7673695B2 JP 2022103161 A JP2022103161 A JP 2022103161A JP 2022103161 A JP2022103161 A JP 2022103161A JP 7673695 B2 JP7673695 B2 JP 7673695B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
steel plate
straightening machine
steel sheet
warp
tip
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2022103161A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2024003856A (en
Inventor
慎也 山口
雅康 植野
和真 山内
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2022103161A priority Critical patent/JP7673695B2/en
Publication of JP2024003856A publication Critical patent/JP2024003856A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7673695B2 publication Critical patent/JP7673695B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Straightening Metal Sheet-Like Bodies (AREA)

Description

本発明は、鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法、矯正方法、製造方法、及び矯正機への通板可否判定モデルの生成方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine, a straightening method, a manufacturing method, and a method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine.

鋼板の製造工程において、熱間圧延後の鋼板を冷却する際に鋼板に冷却ムラが発生すると、鋼板製品の平坦度の悪化、残留応力に起因するキャンバーの発生、機械特性のばらつき等の原因となるため、可能な限り均一な冷却が行われるのが好ましい。そのため、熱間圧延後の鋼板を冷却する前に鋼板の平坦度を矯正する場合がある。例えば厚鋼板の製造工程で熱間圧延後の鋼板を加速冷却する場合、冷却ムラの発生を抑制するために、ローラーレベラ等の矯正機によって鋼板の平坦度を矯正してから加速冷却を行うことがある。また、熱延鋼板の製造工程においてラインパイプ素材等の比較的厚物材を製造する場合、粗圧延後の鋼板(シートバー)に反りが生じていると仕上圧延における通板が不安定となるため、粗圧延後の鋼板の平坦度を矯正してから仕上圧延を行うこともある。しかしながら、熱間圧延後の鋼板は、厚み方向の温度差によって先端部に反りを有することが多い。鋼板の先端部に大きな反りがあると、矯正機に鋼板が噛み込まないという問題が生じることがある。また、鋼板の先端部にフィッシュテール形状やタング形状といった不均一な平面形状が形成されている場合、鋼板が矯正機に通板される際、鋼板が矯正ロールと衝突し、鋼板の先端部に折れ曲がりが発生して通板不良となることがある。このような鋼板の矯正機への噛み込みの不具合や通板不良が発生すると、後続の冷却工程や仕上圧延工程の能率が阻害され、大きな機会損失が生じる。 In the manufacturing process of steel plates, if uneven cooling occurs in the steel plate when cooling the steel plate after hot rolling, it can cause deterioration of the flatness of the steel plate product, generation of camber due to residual stress, and variation in mechanical properties, so it is preferable to perform cooling as uniformly as possible. Therefore, the flatness of the steel plate may be corrected before cooling the steel plate after hot rolling. For example, when accelerating cooling of the steel plate after hot rolling in the manufacturing process of thick steel plate, the flatness of the steel plate may be corrected by a straightening machine such as a roller leveler before accelerated cooling in order to suppress the occurrence of uneven cooling. In addition, when manufacturing a relatively thick material such as a line pipe material in the manufacturing process of hot rolled steel plate, if the steel plate (sheet bar) after rough rolling has a warp, the passing of the plate in the finish rolling becomes unstable, so the flatness of the steel plate after rough rolling may be corrected before finish rolling. However, the steel plate after hot rolling often has a warp at the tip due to the temperature difference in the thickness direction. If there is a large warp at the tip of the steel plate, a problem may occur in which the steel plate does not bite into the straightening machine. Furthermore, if the leading edge of a steel sheet has an uneven planar shape such as a fishtail or tang shape, the steel sheet may collide with the straightening rolls when passing through the straightening machine, causing bending at the leading edge of the steel sheet and resulting in sheet passing defects. When such defects occur in the steel sheet's engagement with the straightening machine or in sheet passing defects, the efficiency of the subsequent cooling process and finish rolling process is hindered, resulting in significant opportunity loss.

これに対して、従来は鋼板が矯正機に通板される前に目視により先端部の反りが大きいと判断された場合、鋼板の矯正機への通板を中止し、鋼板を一旦熱間圧延機に逆送し、熱間圧延機により反りを矯正してから再び矯正機に通板するような操業がなされていた。また、矯正機の入側に配置されるノックダウンロールを用いて、鋼板の先端部に曲げ変形を付与してから鋼板を矯正機に通板する場合もあった。しかしながら、鋼板を矯正機に通板する前に追加的な工程が加えられると、その間に鋼板の温度が低下し、加速冷却における冷却開始温度を確保できない等、鋼板製品の材質不良の原因となる。そこで、特許文献1には、矯正機の入側に鋼板誘導ガイドを配置する方法が開示されている。これにより、鋼板の先端部に反りがあっても、安定的に鋼板を矯正機に噛み込ませることができるとされている。また、特許文献2には、鋼板の搬送方向に沿って分割された2つの誘導ガイドを矯正機の入側に備え、下流側の誘導ガイドの位置が矯正機の矯正ロールの昇降に同期する装置が開示されている。これにより、鋼板の先端部の反りや板厚が異なる場合であっても、鋼板の矯正機への噛み込みを安定的に行うことができるとされている。また、特許文献3には、鋼板の先端部が矯正機に噛み込まれる際は矯正機のロール押し込み量を所望のロール押し込み量よりも小さくした状態に維持し、その後、所望のロール押し込み量までロール押し込み量を増加させる方法が開示されている。これにより、矯正機への噛み込み時において鋼板に作用する抵抗力を低減し、鋼板の噛み止まりを抑制できるとされている。 In contrast, in the past, if the warp at the tip of a steel plate was judged to be large by visual inspection before it was passed through the straightener, the steel plate was stopped from passing through the straightener, and the steel plate was once reversed to the hot rolling mill, where the warp was straightened by the hot rolling mill, and then passed through the straightener again. In some cases, a knockdown roll arranged at the entry side of the straightener was used to give bending deformation to the tip of the steel plate before passing through the straightener. However, if an additional process is added before passing the steel plate through the straightener, the temperature of the steel plate will decrease during that time, and the cooling start temperature for accelerated cooling cannot be ensured, which will cause poor material quality of the steel plate product. Therefore, Patent Document 1 discloses a method of arranging a steel plate guide at the entry side of the straightener. It is said that this allows the steel plate to be stably inserted into the straightener even if the tip of the steel plate is warped. Patent Document 2 discloses an apparatus that has two guides divided along the conveying direction of the steel plate at the entry side of the straightener, and the position of the downstream guide is synchronized with the elevation of the straightening roll of the straightener. This is said to enable the steel plate to be stably engaged in the straightening machine even when the warp or thickness of the leading end of the steel plate varies. Patent Document 3 also discloses a method in which the roll thrust of the straightening machine is maintained in a state smaller than the desired roll thrust when the leading end of the steel plate is engaged in the straightening machine, and then the roll thrust is increased to the desired roll thrust. This is said to reduce the resistance acting on the steel plate when it is engaged in the straightening machine, and to prevent the steel plate from getting stuck.

特許第5007697号公報Patent No. 5007697 特許第5531772号公報Patent No. 5531772 特開2003-117606号公報JP 2003-117606 A

しかしながら、特許文献1に記載の方法は、鋼板の先端部に反りが発生している場合であっても矯正機への鋼板の噛み込みを可能にするためのものであり、鋼板の先端部の反りが過大になると通板不良の発生を抑制できない。また、特許文献1には、鋼板誘導ガイドの設置角度の好適な条件が記載されているものの、鋼板の先端部の通板不良を完全に防止することは困難である。また、特許文献2に記載の方法も同様であり、通板不良を防止するための誘導ガイドの設置角度の好適範囲の記載はあるものの、通板が可能な鋼板の反り量は開示されていない。また、鋼板の先端部に反りがある場合に鋼板の矯正機への通板可否を事前に判定することはできない。一方、特許文献3には、鋼板の先端部の噛み込みが可能な矯正機のロール押し込み量は、矯正機の設備仕様や鋼板の寸法等をパラメータとして用いて実験や操業実績データから設定することが記載されている。しかしながら、鋼板の先端部の反り量の大小によらず初期のロール押し込み量を設定するため、鋼板の先端部の通板不良を完全に防止することは困難である。また、通板が可能な鋼板の反り量は開示されておらず、鋼板の先端部に反りがある場合に鋼板の矯正機への通板可否を事前に判定することはできない。 However, the method described in Patent Document 1 is for enabling the steel plate to be bitten into the straightener even when warpage occurs at the tip of the steel plate, and if the warpage at the tip of the steel plate becomes excessive, the occurrence of sheet threading failure cannot be suppressed. In addition, although Patent Document 1 describes the preferable conditions for the installation angle of the steel plate guide, it is difficult to completely prevent sheet threading failure at the tip of the steel plate. The method described in Patent Document 2 is similar, and although the preferable range of the installation angle of the guide to prevent sheet threading failure is described, the amount of warpage of the steel plate that can be threaded is not disclosed. In addition, it is not possible to determine in advance whether the steel plate can be threaded through the straightener when there is warpage at the tip of the steel plate. On the other hand, Patent Document 3 describes that the roll push amount of the straightener that allows the tip of the steel plate to be bitten is set from experiments and operation record data using the equipment specifications of the straightener and the dimensions of the steel plate as parameters. However, since the initial roll push amount is set regardless of the amount of warpage at the tip of the steel plate, it is difficult to completely prevent sheet threading failure at the tip of the steel plate. In addition, the amount of warping of steel plates that can be threaded is not disclosed, and if there is warping at the tip of the steel plate, it is not possible to determine in advance whether the steel plate can be threaded through the straightening machine.

本発明は、上記課題を解決すべくなされたものであり、その目的は、鋼板の先端部における反り形状に応じて鋼板の矯正機への通板可否を判定可能な鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法を提供することにある。また、本発明の他の目的は、鋼板の矯正機への通板不良の発生を抑制可能な鋼板の矯正方法を提供することにある。さらに、本発明の他の目的は、材質の均一性に優れる鋼板を製造可能な鋼板の製造方法を提供することにある。また、本発明の他の目的は、鋼板の先端部における反り形状に応じて鋼板の矯正機への通板可否を判定する通板可否判定モデルを生成可能な鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定モデルの生成方法を提供することにある。 The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and its object is to provide a method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine, which is capable of determining whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine depending on the warped shape at the tip of the steel plate. Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for straightening a steel plate, which is capable of suppressing the occurrence of failures in passing the steel plate through the straightening machine. Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method for manufacturing a steel plate, which is capable of manufacturing a steel plate having excellent uniformity of material properties. Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine, which is capable of generating a model for determining whether the steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine depending on the warped shape at the tip of the steel plate.

本発明の第一の態様に係る鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法は、少なくとも1対のロールを備える矯正機と、鋼板を前記矯正機に装入する搬送装置と、前記鋼板の先端部の反り形状を測定する反り形状測定装置と、を含む鋼板の製造設備における鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法であって、前記反り形状測定装置を用いて、前記鋼板が矯正機に装入される前に前記鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率を測定する反り形状測定ステップと、前記反り形状測定ステップにおいて測定された鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率に基づいて、前記鋼板の前記矯正機への通板可否を判定する通板可否判定ステップと、を含む。 The method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine according to the first aspect of the present invention is a method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine in a steel plate manufacturing facility including a straightening machine having at least one pair of rolls, a conveying device for loading the steel plate into the straightening machine, and a warp shape measuring device for measuring the warp shape of the tip of the steel plate, and includes a warp shape measuring step for measuring the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel plate using the warp shape measuring device before the steel plate is loaded into the straightening machine, and a passability determining step for determining whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine based on the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel plate measured in the warp shape measuring step.

前記通板可否判定ステップは、前記反り形状測定ステップにおいて測定された鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率に加え、前記鋼板の板厚、板幅、板長さ、重量、及び前記搬送装置による前記矯正機への鋼板の装入速度の中から選択した1つ以上の操業パラメータに基づいて、前記鋼板の前記矯正機への通板可否を判定するステップを含むとよい。 The step of determining whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine may include a step of determining whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine based on one or more operational parameters selected from the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel plate measured in the warp shape measurement step, as well as the thickness, width, length, and weight of the steel plate, and the speed at which the steel plate is fed into the straightening machine by the conveying device.

前記鋼板の製造設備は、前記鋼板の先端部の平面形状を測定する平面形状測定装置を備え、前記通板可否判定ステップは、さらに前記平面形状測定装置を用いて前記鋼板が矯正機に装入される前に測定された前記鋼板の先端部の平面形状を用いて前記鋼板の矯正機への通板可否を判定するステップを含むとよい。 The steel plate manufacturing equipment may include a planar shape measuring device that measures the planar shape of the tip of the steel plate, and the step of determining whether the steel plate can be threaded may further include a step of determining whether the steel plate can be threaded through the straightening machine using the planar shape of the tip of the steel plate measured using the planar shape measuring device before the steel plate is loaded into the straightening machine.

本発明の第二の態様に係る鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法は、少なくとも1対のロールを備える矯正機と、鋼板を前記矯正機に装入する搬送装置と、前記鋼板の先端部の反り形状を測定する反り形状測定装置と、を含む製造設備における鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法であって、前記反り形状測定装置によって前記矯正機に装入される前に測定された鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率を入力データとして含み、前記鋼板の前記矯正機への通板可否情報を出力データとした、機械学習により学習された通板可否判定モデルを用いて、前記鋼板の前記矯正機への通板可否を判定するステップを含む。 The method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine according to a second aspect of the present invention is a method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine in a manufacturing facility including a straightening machine having at least one pair of rolls, a conveying device for loading the steel plate into the straightening machine, and a warp shape measuring device for measuring the warp shape of the tip of the steel plate, and includes a step of determining whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine using a passing possibility determination model learned by machine learning, which includes as input data the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel plate measured by the warp shape measuring device before being loaded into the straightening machine, and which uses as output data information on whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine.

本発明に係る鋼板の矯正方法は、本発明に係る鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法を用いて、鋼板が前記矯正機に装入される前に前記鋼板の通板可否を判定し、通板不可と判定された場合には、前記鋼板の製造設備の操業条件を再設定するステップを含む。 The method for straightening a steel plate according to the present invention includes a step of using the method for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine according to the present invention to determine whether the steel plate can be threaded through the straightening machine before the steel plate is loaded into the straightening machine, and if it is determined that the steel plate cannot be threaded, resetting the operating conditions of the manufacturing equipment for the steel plate.

本発明に係る鋼板の製造方法は、本発明に係る鋼板の矯正方法を用いて鋼板を製造するステップを含む。 The method for manufacturing a steel plate according to the present invention includes a step of manufacturing a steel plate using the method for straightening a steel plate according to the present invention.

本発明に係る鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定モデルの生成方法は、少なくとも1対のロールを備える矯正機と、鋼板を前記矯正機に装入する搬送装置と、前記鋼板の先端部の反り形状を測定する反り形状測定装置と、を含む鋼板の製造設備における鋼板の矯正機への通板可否を判定するために使用される通板可否判定モデルを生成する鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定モデルの生成方法であって、前記反り形状測定装置によって前記矯正機に装入される前に測定された鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率を入力実績データとして含み、該入力実績データに対応する前記矯正機への前記鋼板の通板可否情報を出力実績データとした、複数の学習用データを取得し、取得した複数の学習用データを用いた機械学習によって、前記通板可否判定モデルを生成するステップを含む。 The method for generating a judgment model for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine according to the present invention is a method for generating a judgment model for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine in a steel plate manufacturing facility including a straightening machine having at least one pair of rolls, a conveying device for loading the steel plate into the straightening machine, and a warp shape measuring device for measuring the warp shape of the tip of the steel plate, and includes the steps of acquiring a plurality of learning data including the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel plate measured by the warp shape measuring device before being loaded into the straightening machine as input actual data, and output actual data including information on whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine corresponding to the input actual data, and generating the judgment model for whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine by machine learning using the acquired plurality of learning data.

本発明に係る鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法によれば、鋼板の先端部における反り形状に応じて鋼板の矯正機への通板可否を判定することができる。また、本発明に係る鋼板の矯正方法によれば、鋼板の矯正機への通板不良の発生を抑制することができる。また、本発明に係る鋼板の製造方法によれば、材質の均一性に優れる鋼板を製造することができる。また、本発明に係る鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定モデルの生成方法によれば、鋼板の先端部における反り形状に応じて鋼板の矯正機への通板可否を判定する通板可否判定モデルを生成することができる。 According to the method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine of the present invention, it is possible to determine whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine depending on the warped shape at the tip of the steel plate. Furthermore, according to the method for straightening a steel plate of the present invention, it is possible to suppress the occurrence of failures in passing a steel plate through a straightening machine. Furthermore, according to the method for manufacturing a steel plate of the present invention, it is possible to manufacture a steel plate with excellent uniformity of material properties. Furthermore, according to the method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine of the present invention, it is possible to generate a model for determining whether the steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine depending on the warped shape at the tip of the steel plate.

図1は、本発明の一実施形態である鋼板の製造設備の構成を示す模式図である。FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing the configuration of a steel sheet manufacturing facility according to an embodiment of the present invention. 図2は、図1に示す反り形状測定装置の構成例を示す模式図である。FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the configuration of the warpage shape measuring device shown in FIG. 図3は、図2に示す反り形状解析部の機能を説明するための図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining the function of the warpage shape analysis unit shown in FIG. 図4は、図1に示す反り形状測定装置の他の構成例を示す模式図である。FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing another example of the configuration of the warp shape measuring device shown in FIG. 図5は、平面形状解析部の機能を説明するための図である。FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining the function of the planar shape analysis unit. 図6は、鋼板の先端部の通板不良を説明するための図である。FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining a sheet threading defect at the leading end of a steel sheet. 図7は、鋼板の矯正機への通板不良が発生する条件を調査した結果の一例を示す図である。FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of the results of investigating the conditions under which failure to pass a steel plate through a straightening machine occurs. 図8は、矯正機への鋼板の通板不良に対する搬送装置による鋼板の装入速度と鋼板の板長さの影響を調べた結果の一例を示す図である。FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of the results of investigating the influence of the charging speed of the steel plate by the conveying device and the plate length of the steel plate on the failure of the steel plate to pass through the straightener. 図9は、機械学習を用いた通板可否判定モデルの生成方法を説明するための図である。FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining a method for generating a model for determining whether or not a strip can be threaded using machine learning. 図10は、ニューラルネットワークの構成を示す模式図である。FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram showing the configuration of a neural network. 図11は、実施例及び従来例における誤判定率を示す図である。FIG. 11 is a diagram showing the erroneous determination rates in the embodiment and the conventional example. 図12は、実施例及び比較例における材質不良発生率を示す図である。FIG. 12 is a diagram showing the rate of occurrence of material defects in the examples and the comparative examples.

以下、図面を参照して、本発明の一実施形態である鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法、矯正方法、製造方法、及び矯正機への通板可否判定モデルの生成方法について詳しく説明する。 Below, with reference to the drawings, we will explain in detail one embodiment of the present invention, a method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine, a straightening method, a manufacturing method, and a method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine.

〔鋼板の製造設備〕
まず、図1~図5を参照して、本発明が適用される鋼板の製造設備の構成について説明する。
[Steel plate manufacturing equipment]
First, the configuration of a steel sheet manufacturing facility to which the present invention is applied will be described with reference to Figs.

図1は、本発明の一実施形態である鋼板の製造設備の構成を示す模式図である。図1に示すように、本発明の一実施形態である鋼板の製造設備は、上下方向に配置された少なくとも1対のロールを備える矯正機1、矯正機1に鋼板Sを装入する搬送装置2、及び鋼板Sの先端部の反り形状を測定する反り形状測定装置3を備えている。また、本実施形態の鋼板の製造設備は、鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状を測定する平面形状測定装置4を備えている。但し、平面形状測定装置4はなくてもよい。また、本実施形態の鋼板の製造設備は、鋼板の製造設備の操業条件を設定して制御するための制御用計算機5を備えている。本実施形態の鋼板の製造設備は熱間圧延ラインの一部として配置され、鋼板の製造設備の上流側に配置された1又は2基の圧延機によってリバース圧延が行われた鋼板Sが鋼板の製造設備に搬送される。鋼板の製造設備の下流側には鋼板Sを冷却する冷却設備が配置されてよい。圧延機によって熱間圧延が行われた鋼板Sに対して冷却設備を用いて加速冷却を行うことにより、優れた材質特性を有する厚鋼板を製造することができる。 1 is a schematic diagram showing the configuration of a steel plate manufacturing equipment according to one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the steel plate manufacturing equipment according to one embodiment of the present invention includes a straightener 1 having at least one pair of rolls arranged in the vertical direction, a conveying device 2 for feeding the steel plate S into the straightener 1, and a warp shape measuring device 3 for measuring the warp shape of the tip of the steel plate S. The steel plate manufacturing equipment of this embodiment also includes a planar shape measuring device 4 for measuring the planar shape of the tip of the steel plate S. However, the planar shape measuring device 4 may not be required. The steel plate manufacturing equipment of this embodiment also includes a control computer 5 for setting and controlling the operating conditions of the steel plate manufacturing equipment. The steel plate manufacturing equipment of this embodiment is arranged as a part of a hot rolling line, and the steel plate S that has been reverse-rolled by one or two rolling mills arranged upstream of the steel plate manufacturing equipment is transported to the steel plate manufacturing equipment. A cooling device for cooling the steel plate S may be arranged downstream of the steel plate manufacturing equipment. By using cooling equipment to accelerate cooling of steel plate S that has been hot rolled by a rolling mill, thick steel plate with excellent material properties can be produced.

矯正機1において矯正される鋼板Sは、例えば板厚6~30mm、板幅2000~4500mm、板長さ10~50m、重量8~25tonである。矯正機1に装入される鋼板Sの温度は限定されないが、熱間圧延ラインに配置される矯正機の場合には、650~950℃程度となる。矯正機1は、上下方向(鋼板Sの厚み方向)に配置された少なくとも1対のロールを備え、鋼板Sの形状を矯正する機能を有する。矯正機1は例えばローラーレベラである。ローラーレベラは、上下方向に千鳥状に配置された複数本の矯正ロールを用いて鋼板Sに対して繰り返し曲げ曲げ戻し変形を付与することによって、鋼板Sの形状を平坦化する。矯正ロールは、例えば上側に4~6本、下側に4~6本配置される。一般的なローラーレベラでは、上側の矯正ロールが上フレームに保持され、下側の矯正ロールが下フレームに保持される。そして、下フレームの位置を固定して上フレームを傾動させることにより、鋼板Sの搬送方向において順次異なる曲率の曲げ変形を鋼板Sに付与する。その場合、図1に示す例では、傾動圧下を行う上側の矯正ロールの中で最も上流側の矯正ロール6_1の押し込み量と最も下流側の矯正ロール6_i(i=4~6)の押し込み量が鋼板Sの材質や寸法に応じて予め設定される。但し、矯正ロールの押し込み方式は、傾動式の押し込み方式ではなく、個々の矯正ロールの押し込み量を任意に設定可能な方式としてもよい。また、矯正機1は上下方向に対向配置された1対のロールを備えるものであってよい。これはいわゆる圧延機と同様、上下方向に対向配置された1対のロールによって鋼板Sを押圧し、鋼板Sの形状を矯正するものである。本実施形態では、矯正機1の入側に鋼板誘導ガイド7が配置されている。鋼板誘導ガイド7により鋼板Sの先端部が矯正機1に装入される際の通板不良を低減できるからである。 The steel plate S to be straightened in the straightener 1 has, for example, a thickness of 6 to 30 mm, a width of 2000 to 4500 mm, a length of 10 to 50 m, and a weight of 8 to 25 tons. The temperature of the steel plate S to be loaded into the straightener 1 is not limited, but in the case of a straightener arranged in a hot rolling line, it is about 650 to 950 ° C. The straightener 1 has at least one pair of rolls arranged in the vertical direction (thickness direction of the steel plate S) and has the function of straightening the shape of the steel plate S. The straightener 1 is, for example, a roller leveler. The roller leveler flattens the shape of the steel plate S by repeatedly bending and unbending deformation to the steel plate S using multiple straightening rolls arranged in a staggered pattern in the vertical direction. For example, 4 to 6 straightening rolls are arranged on the upper side and 4 to 6 on the lower side. In a typical roller leveler, the upper straightening roll is held by an upper frame, and the lower straightening roll is held by a lower frame. Then, by fixing the position of the lower frame and tilting the upper frame, bending deformations of different curvatures are sequentially given to the steel sheet S in the conveying direction of the steel sheet S. In this case, in the example shown in FIG. 1, the pushing amount of the most upstream straightening roll 6_1 and the most downstream straightening roll 6_i (i = 4 to 6) among the upper straightening rolls performing the tilting reduction are set in advance according to the material and dimensions of the steel sheet S. However, the pushing method of the straightening rolls may be a method in which the pushing amount of each straightening roll can be arbitrarily set instead of a tilting pushing method. In addition, the straightening machine 1 may be equipped with a pair of rolls arranged opposite each other in the vertical direction. This is similar to a so-called rolling mill, in which the steel sheet S is pressed by a pair of rolls arranged opposite each other in the vertical direction to straighten the shape of the steel sheet S. In this embodiment, a steel sheet guide 7 is arranged on the entrance side of the straightening machine 1. This is because the steel sheet guide 7 can reduce sheet passing defects when the leading end of the steel sheet S is loaded into the straightening machine 1.

搬送装置2は、矯正機1の上流側から鋼板Sを搬送し、鋼板Sの先端部を矯正機1に装入するように動作する。搬送装置2は、鋼板の製造設備の搬送テーブルであってよい。その場合、搬送テーブルは複数のゾーンに分割され個別に制御されることがあるが、本実施形態では、矯正機1の上流側にあって、最も矯正機1に近いゾーンの搬送テーブルを搬送装置2という。搬送装置2による鋼板Sの矯正機1への装入速度は、制御用計算機5によって設定される。制御用計算機5は、矯正機1の矯正ロールの押し込み量の設定と共に、矯正ロールの回転速度を設定する。搬送装置2による鋼板Sの装入速度は、矯正ロールの回転速度VLに対して、0.5~0.8VL程度に設定されることが多い。搬送装置2による鋼板Sの装入速度を矯正ロールの回転速度VLよりも小さく設定することにより、鋼板Sが矯正機1に噛み込まれる際の衝撃力を緩和して設備破損を抑制するためである。 The conveying device 2 conveys the steel sheet S from the upstream side of the straightening machine 1 and operates to load the leading end of the steel sheet S into the straightening machine 1. The conveying device 2 may be a conveying table of a steel sheet manufacturing facility. In that case, the conveying table may be divided into multiple zones and controlled individually, but in this embodiment, the conveying table of the zone upstream of the straightening machine 1 and closest to the straightening machine 1 is referred to as the conveying device 2. The speed at which the steel sheet S is fed into the straightening machine 1 by the conveying device 2 is set by the control computer 5. The control computer 5 sets the pressing amount of the straightening roll of the straightening machine 1 and the rotation speed of the straightening roll. The speed at which the steel sheet S is fed by the conveying device 2 is often set to about 0.5 to 0.8 VL with respect to the rotation speed VL of the straightening roll. This is because the charging speed of the steel sheet S by the conveying device 2 is set to be smaller than the rotation speed VL of the straightening roll to reduce the impact force when the steel sheet S is bitten into the straightening machine 1 and suppress damage to the equipment.

反り形状測定装置3は、鋼板Sの先端部の反り形状を測定する。鋼板Sの先端部とは、鋼板Sの搬送方向の先端側となる部分をいう。鋼板Sの先端部は、例えば鋼板Sの先端から1~3mの範囲をいう。鋼板Sの先端部が矯正機1に装入される際に、矯正ロールとの間でスリップ等が発生して通板不良となる場合が多い。反り形状測定装置3は、鋼板Sの先端部の反り量を定量的に特定できる任意の測定装置でよい。例えば反り形状測定装置3は、鋼板Sの先端部を撮像した画像から鋼板Sの輪郭形状を抽出し、画像処理によって鋼板Sの先端部の反り量を特定する画像処理法を用いてよい。また、反り形状測定装置3は、鋼板Sの上方又は下方から所定距離離れた位置に距離計を設置し、鋼板Sの長手方向における高さ分布の情報から鋼板Sの先端部の反り量を特定する距離測定法を用いてもよい。 The warpage shape measuring device 3 measures the warpage shape of the tip of the steel sheet S. The tip of the steel sheet S refers to the part on the tip side of the steel sheet S in the conveying direction. The tip of the steel sheet S refers to, for example, a range of 1 to 3 m from the tip of the steel sheet S. When the tip of the steel sheet S is loaded into the straightening machine 1, slippage or the like often occurs between the steel sheet S and the straightening roll, resulting in poor sheet passing. The warpage shape measuring device 3 may be any measuring device that can quantitatively determine the amount of warpage at the tip of the steel sheet S. For example, the warpage shape measuring device 3 may use an image processing method that extracts the contour shape of the steel sheet S from an image of the tip of the steel sheet S and determines the amount of warpage at the tip of the steel sheet S by image processing. The warpage shape measuring device 3 may also use a distance measurement method in which a distance meter is installed at a position a predetermined distance above or below the steel sheet S and determines the amount of warpage at the tip of the steel sheet S from information on the height distribution in the longitudinal direction of the steel sheet S.

図2に示すように、画像処理法を用いる反り形状測定装置3は、鋼板Sの先端部の画像を撮像する撮像部(エリアカメラ)3aと、撮像部3aが撮像した画像データから鋼板Sの反り形状を特定する反り形状解析部3bと、を備えている。撮像部3aとして用いるエリアカメラは、カラー方式でも白黒方式でも構わない。撮像素子もCCDやCMOS等の任意の撮像素子を用いることができる。撮像部3aは、赤外線方式のエリアカメラ等、光の波長の中で特定の波長信号を選択的に画像に変換するものであってもよい。撮像部3aとしては、有効画素数が640×480ピクセルのものから4872×3248ピクセル程度のものまで、鋼板Sの先端部の反り形状を画像処理によって特定するために必要な解像度や撮像部3aと鋼板Sの先端部までの距離等に応じて適宜選択できる。本実施形態では、撮像部3aによる鋼板Sの撮像範囲(視野)V1は、鋼板Sの先端部(先端から1~3mの範囲)が1枚の画像に収まるように設定するとよい。撮像部3aは、鋼板Sの搬送方向の側方側から搬送装置2よりもやや上方の位置であって、斜め下に向いて鋼板Sの先端部を撮影するように配置するのが好ましい。但し、搬送装置2とほぼ同一の高さから鋼板Sの側面方向に向けて、概ね水平方向で鋼板Sの先端部を撮影するようにしてもよい。鋼板Sの一方の端面の輪郭を判別しやすいからである。 As shown in FIG. 2, the warpage shape measuring device 3 using the image processing method includes an imaging unit (area camera) 3a that captures an image of the tip of the steel sheet S, and a warpage shape analysis unit 3b that identifies the warpage shape of the steel sheet S from the image data captured by the imaging unit 3a. The area camera used as the imaging unit 3a may be a color or black-and-white type. Any imaging element such as a CCD or CMOS may be used as the imaging element. The imaging unit 3a may be an infrared area camera that selectively converts a specific wavelength signal among the wavelengths of light into an image. The imaging unit 3a can be appropriately selected from those with an effective pixel count of 640×480 pixels to those with an effective pixel count of about 4872×3248 pixels, depending on the resolution required to identify the warpage shape of the tip of the steel sheet S by image processing, the distance between the imaging unit 3a and the tip of the steel sheet S, etc. In this embodiment, the imaging range (field of view) V1 of the steel plate S by the imaging unit 3a is set so that the leading edge of the steel plate S (within a range of 1 to 3 m from the leading edge) fits into one image. The imaging unit 3a is preferably positioned slightly above the conveying device 2 from the lateral side of the conveying direction of the steel plate S, facing diagonally downward to capture the leading edge of the steel plate S. However, the leading edge of the steel plate S may also be captured in a generally horizontal direction from approximately the same height as the conveying device 2 toward the side of the steel plate S. This is because it is easier to distinguish the contour of one end face of the steel plate S.

反り形状解析部3bは、撮像部3aによって撮像された鋼板Sの先端部の画像データから鋼板Sの反り形状を特定する。図3は、反り形状解析部3bの機能を説明するための図である。反り形状解析部3bは、鋼板Sの先端部の画像データの範囲内で画像処理によって鋼板Sの幅方向端部の輪郭を検出(エッジ検出)する。そして、反り形状解析部3bは、鋼板Sの幅方向端部の輪郭から鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さと反り曲率を反り形状として算出する。具体的には、図3に示すように、反り形状解析部3bは、鋼板Sの先端から予め設定された距離Lの位置を基準位置として、基準位置における鋼板Sの高さHと先端の高さとの差を反り高さとして算出する。また、反り形状解析部3bは、基準位置と鋼板Sの先端とを結ぶ近似曲線上の座標を近似する近似円TLを最小二乗法等の近似手法により算出し、その半径の逆数を反り曲率として算出する。画像データの撮像倍率に従って画像データ上の高さや曲率を実際の高さや曲率に換算しておくとよい。鋼板Sの反りが上反りである場合に正、下反りである場合を負として、反り高さや反り曲率の方向を区別できるように算出してもよい。一方、距離測定法を用いて鋼板Sの先端部の反り形状を特定する場合には、図4に示すように、反り形状解析部3bは、鋼板Sの上方から所定距離離れた基準位置に配置された距離計3cを用いて、基準位置から鋼板Sの先端部の高さ情報を取得し、鋼板Sの先端部の高さ情報から鋼板Sの反り形状を特定する。距離計3cの高さ情報の取得方法としては、レーザー光やマイクロ波等の公知技術による手法を用いることができる。また、反り形状解析部3bは、速度計3dを用いて鋼板Sの搬送速度に関する情報を取得する。これにより、鋼板Sの先端からの距離と鋼板Sの先端部の高さ情報とが対応付けられ、上記と同様に、鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さと反り曲率を反り形状として算出することができる。 The warpage shape analysis unit 3b identifies the warpage shape of the steel sheet S from the image data of the tip of the steel sheet S captured by the imaging unit 3a. FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining the function of the warpage shape analysis unit 3b. The warpage shape analysis unit 3b detects the contour of the width direction end of the steel sheet S by image processing within the range of the image data of the tip of the steel sheet S (edge detection). Then, the warpage shape analysis unit 3b calculates the warpage height and warpage curvature of the tip of the steel sheet S as the warpage shape from the contour of the width direction end of the steel sheet S. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3, the warpage shape analysis unit 3b calculates the difference between the height H of the steel sheet S at the reference position and the height of the tip as the warpage height, using a position at a distance L preset from the tip of the steel sheet S as the reference position. In addition, the warpage shape analysis unit 3b calculates an approximation circle TL that approximates the coordinates on the approximation curve connecting the reference position and the tip of the steel sheet S by an approximation method such as the least squares method, and calculates the reciprocal of its radius as the warpage curvature. The height and curvature on the image data may be converted to the actual height and curvature according to the imaging magnification of the image data. The warp height and the warp curvature may be calculated so that the direction can be distinguished by assuming that the warp of the steel sheet S is an upward warp and a downward warp as a positive value and a negative value, respectively. On the other hand, when the warp shape of the tip of the steel sheet S is specified using the distance measurement method, as shown in FIG. 4, the warp shape analysis unit 3b acquires height information of the tip of the steel sheet S from the reference position using a distance meter 3c arranged at a reference position a predetermined distance from above the steel sheet S, and specifies the warp shape of the steel sheet S from the height information of the tip of the steel sheet S. As a method for acquiring the height information of the distance meter 3c, a method based on a publicly known technology such as laser light or microwaves can be used. In addition, the warp shape analysis unit 3b acquires information on the conveying speed of the steel sheet S using a speed meter 3d. As a result, the distance from the tip of the steel sheet S is associated with the height information of the tip of the steel sheet S, and the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel sheet S can be calculated as the warp shape in the same manner as described above.

平面形状測定装置4は、鋼板Sが矯正機1に装入される前に鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状を測定する。平面形状測定装置4としては、鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状を定量的に特定できる測定装置を用いる。例えば平面形状測定装置4は、鋼板Sの先端部を上面から撮像した画像に基づき鋼板Sの輪郭形状を抽出し、画像処理によって鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状を特定する画像処理法を用いてよい。平面形状測定装置4は、鋼板Sの搬送方向の上部から鋼板Sの先端部の上面を撮像する撮像部(エリアカメラ)4a(図1参照)と、撮像部4aが取得した画像データから鋼板Sの平面形状を特定する平面形状解析部4b(図5参照)と、を備えている。撮像部4aとして用いるエリアカメラは、反り形状測定装置3に用いられるものと同様のものを用いてよい。平面形状解析部4bは、撮像部4aによって撮像された鋼板Sの先端部上面の画像データから鋼板Sの平面形状を特定する。図5は、平面形状解析部4bの機能を説明するための図である。図5に示すように、平面形状解析部4bは、鋼板Sの先端部上面の画像データの範囲V2内で画像処理によって鋼板Sの輪郭を検出する。そして、平面形状解析部4bは、鋼板Sの幅方向で最も突出している位置と最も凹んでいる位置との間の長手方向の距離(先端クロップ長)を平面形状の測定値として取得する。この場合、鋼板Sの幅方向で最も突出している位置が、鋼板Sの幅方向の端部側にある場合を正、幅方向の中央部側にある場合を負として、先端クロップ長を定義してよい。 The planar shape measuring device 4 measures the planar shape of the tip of the steel plate S before the steel plate S is loaded into the straightening machine 1. As the planar shape measuring device 4, a measuring device capable of quantitatively identifying the planar shape of the tip of the steel plate S is used. For example, the planar shape measuring device 4 may use an image processing method in which the contour shape of the steel plate S is extracted based on an image of the tip of the steel plate S captured from the top, and the planar shape of the tip of the steel plate S is identified by image processing. The planar shape measuring device 4 includes an imaging unit (area camera) 4a (see FIG. 1) that images the top surface of the tip of the steel plate S from above in the conveying direction of the steel plate S, and a planar shape analysis unit 4b (see FIG. 5) that identifies the planar shape of the steel plate S from the image data acquired by the imaging unit 4a. The area camera used as the imaging unit 4a may be the same as that used in the warp shape measuring device 3. The planar shape analysis unit 4b identifies the planar shape of the steel plate S from the image data of the top surface of the tip of the steel plate S captured by the imaging unit 4a. FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining the function of the planar shape analysis unit 4b. As shown in FIG. 5, the planar shape analysis unit 4b detects the contour of the steel sheet S by image processing within the range V2 of image data of the top surface of the tip of the steel sheet S. Then, the planar shape analysis unit 4b acquires the longitudinal distance (tip crop length) between the most protruding position and the most recessed position in the width direction of the steel sheet S as a measurement value of the planar shape. In this case, the tip crop length may be defined as positive when the most protruding position in the width direction of the steel sheet S is on the end side of the steel sheet S in the width direction, and negative when it is on the center side of the width direction.

〔鋼板の先端部の通板不良〕
次に、図6~図8を参照して、鋼板の先端部の通板不良について説明する。
[Improper threading of the tip of the steel plate]
Next, threading defects at the leading end of a steel sheet will be described with reference to Figs.

鋼板Sの矯正機1への通板(噛み込み)とは、鋼板Sの先端部が矯正機1に到達し、鋼板Sの先端部が全ての矯正ロールの位置を通過する過程をいう。つまり、鋼板Sの先端部が上下方向に配置された矯正ロールの間を通過する前に、鋼板誘導ガイド7や矯正機1のハウジング等に衝突して鋼板Sが矯正ロールを通過しない場合だけでなく、鋼板Sの先端部が一部の矯正ロールの間を通過しているものの鋼板Sと矯正ロールとの間でスリップが生じ、鋼板Sが搬送されずに停止してしまう場合を含む。図6(a)~(c)は、鋼板誘導ガイド7を備える矯正機1に鋼板Sが装入される過程を模式的に示したものである。図6(a)に示すように、矯正機1に装入される際に鋼板Sの先端部の上反りが大きい場合、鋼板Sの先端部が鋼板誘導ガイド7に接触する。このとき、鋼板Sには搬送装置2によって慣性力(運動エネルギー)が付与されているので、鋼板Sが鋼板誘導ガイド7から受ける反力よりも鋼板Sが有する慣性力の方が大きい場合、図6(b)に示すように、鋼板Sの先端部が鋼板誘導ガイド7に誘導されて上下の矯正ロールの間に導かれる。そして、図6(c)に示すように、鋼板Sの先端部が上下の矯正ロールの間を通過する際には、鋼板Sに付与される曲げ仕事に対して、矯正ロールを回転させる駆動力のエネルギーが十分あれば、鋼板Sは矯正機1内を搬送方向に進行して、鋼板Sの先端部が全ての矯正ロールの位置を通過することになる。逆に、鋼板Sが鋼板誘導ガイド7から受ける反力よりも鋼板Sが有する慣性力の方が小さい場合や矯正ロールを回転させる駆動力のエネルギーが十分でない場合には、矯正機1内で鋼板Sの進行が停止して通板不良となる。 The passage (biting) of the steel sheet S into the straightening machine 1 refers to the process in which the leading end of the steel sheet S reaches the straightening machine 1 and passes through the positions of all the straightening rolls. In other words, it includes not only the case in which the leading end of the steel sheet S collides with the steel sheet guide 7 or the housing of the straightening machine 1 before passing between the straightening rolls arranged in the vertical direction and the steel sheet S does not pass through the straightening rolls, but also the case in which the leading end of the steel sheet S passes between some of the straightening rolls, but slip occurs between the steel sheet S and the straightening rolls, and the steel sheet S stops without being transported. Figures 6(a) to (c) are schematic diagrams showing the process in which the steel sheet S is loaded into the straightening machine 1 equipped with the steel sheet guide 7. As shown in Figure 6(a), if the leading end of the steel sheet S has a large upward camber when it is loaded into the straightening machine 1, the leading end of the steel sheet S comes into contact with the steel sheet guide 7. At this time, since the steel sheet S is given an inertial force (kinetic energy) by the conveying device 2, if the inertial force of the steel sheet S is greater than the reaction force that the steel sheet S receives from the steel sheet guide 7, the leading end of the steel sheet S is guided by the steel sheet guide 7 and guided between the upper and lower straightening rolls as shown in FIG. 6(b). Then, as shown in FIG. 6(c), when the leading end of the steel sheet S passes between the upper and lower straightening rolls, if the energy of the driving force that rotates the straightening rolls is sufficient for the bending work given to the steel sheet S, the steel sheet S advances in the conveying direction in the straightening machine 1, and the leading end of the steel sheet S passes through the positions of all the straightening rolls. On the other hand, if the inertial force of the steel sheet S is smaller than the reaction force that the steel sheet S receives from the steel sheet guide 7 or if the energy of the driving force that rotates the straightening rolls is insufficient, the progress of the steel sheet S stops in the straightening machine 1, resulting in a sheet passing failure.

本発明者らは、このような矯正機1への鋼板Sの通板不良が発生する条件を検討した結果、以下の知見を得た。まず、先端部の反り高さが大きく板厚が厚い鋼板では、矯正機1への通板不良が発生しやすいことがわかった。これは、反りが大きく、板厚も厚い場合には、鋼板Sの先端部が鋼板誘導ガイド7に衝突した際、鋼板Sの先端部を曲げて矯正ロールを通過させる際の鋼板Sの慣性力による運動エネルギーを大きく消費するためであると考えられる。図7は、鋼板Sの矯正機1への通板不良が発生する条件を調査した結果の一例を示す。図7は、鋼板Sの板厚が25~30mm、板長さが30~32m、搬送装置2による矯正機1への鋼板Sの装入速度(噛み込み速度)が50m/minの操業条件において取得された通板不良の発生条件を示したものである。図7からは、鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さが同一でも鋼板の先端部の反り曲率が小さい場合には通板不良が発生せず、反り曲率が大きい場合に通板不良が発生していることがわかる。一方、図8は、同一の反り高さ及び反り曲率を有する鋼板Sについて、矯正機1への鋼板Sの通板不良に対する、搬送装置2による鋼板の装入速度と鋼板Sの板長さの影響を調べた例である。この場合の鋼板の板厚は25~30mm、先端反り高さは100~120mmである。図8からは、搬送装置2による矯正機1への鋼板Sの装入速度と鋼板Sの板長さが大きいほど、矯正機1への鋼板Sの通板性が向上していることがわかる。これは、鋼板Sが矯正機1に装入される際の慣性力(運動エネルギー)が増加することにより、矯正機1への鋼板Sの噛み込み不良を抑制できたものと考えられる。さらに、本発明者らは、鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状も矯正機1への鋼板Sの通板不良の発生に影響していることを知得した。図5に示すように、鋼板Sの先端部が不均一な形状になると、噛み込み時に局所的に前方に突き出ている部分(先端クロップ部)が折れこみやすい。この先端クロップ部の長さ(先端クロップ長)が長く幅が細いほど、鋼板Sが折れこみやすく鋼板Sの通板不良が発生しやすくなる。例えば板厚30mm、先端反り高さ100mmの鋼板について、先端クロップ長と通板不良の発生有無を調査したところ、先端クロップ長が50mmである鋼板Sについては通板可能であったが、先端クロップ長が200mmの鋼板Sについては通板不良が生じていた。なお、鋼板Sが矯正機1に装入される際の鋼板Sの温度やその温度における鋼板Sの降伏応力が、矯正機1への噛み込み性に影響を与える場合がある。鋼板Sの温度や降伏応力と鋼板Sの先端部が鋼板誘導ガイド7を通過する際の抵抗力との間に相関関係がみられるからである。 The inventors have studied the conditions under which such a failure to pass the steel sheet S through the straightener 1 occurs, and have come to the following findings. First, it was found that a steel sheet with a large warp height at the tip and a large thickness is more likely to pass through the straightener 1 with a failure. This is thought to be because, when the tip of the steel sheet S collides with the steel sheet guide 7 and the thickness is large, a large amount of kinetic energy is consumed due to the inertial force of the steel sheet S when the tip of the steel sheet S is bent and passed through the straightening roll when the tip of the steel sheet S collides with the steel sheet guide 7. Figure 7 shows an example of the results of investigating the conditions under which a failure to pass the steel sheet S through the straightener 1 occurs. Figure 7 shows the conditions under which a failure to pass the steel sheet S occurs, obtained under operating conditions where the thickness of the steel sheet S is 25 to 30 mm, the length is 30 to 32 m, and the loading speed (biting speed) of the steel sheet S into the straightener 1 by the conveying device 2 is 50 m/min. From Fig. 7, it can be seen that even if the warpage height at the tip of the steel sheet S is the same, when the warpage curvature at the tip of the steel sheet S is small, no sheet passing failure occurs, and when the warpage curvature is large, sheet passing failure occurs. On the other hand, Fig. 8 shows an example in which the influence of the charging speed of the steel sheet S by the conveying device 2 and the plate length of the steel sheet S on the sheet passing failure of the steel sheet S into the straightener 1 was examined for steel sheets S having the same warpage height and warpage curvature. In this case, the plate thickness of the steel sheet S is 25 to 30 mm, and the tip warpage height is 100 to 120 mm. From Fig. 8, it can be seen that the sheet passing property of the steel sheet S into the straightener 1 is improved as the charging speed of the steel sheet S into the straightener 1 by the conveying device 2 and the plate length of the steel sheet S are larger. This is considered to be because the inertial force (kinetic energy) when the steel sheet S is charged into the straightener 1 is increased, thereby suppressing the biting failure of the steel sheet S into the straightener 1. Furthermore, the inventors have found that the planar shape of the tip of the steel sheet S also affects the occurrence of failure in threading the steel sheet S through the straightener 1. As shown in FIG. 5, when the tip of the steel sheet S has an uneven shape, the part (tip crop part) that locally protrudes forward when biting is likely to bend. The longer the length (tip crop length) of this tip crop part is and the narrower the width is, the more likely the steel sheet S is to bend and the more likely the failure in threading the steel sheet S is to occur. For example, when the tip crop length and the occurrence of failure in threading were investigated for a steel sheet having a thickness of 30 mm and a tip warp height of 100 mm, the steel sheet S with a tip crop length of 50 mm was able to be threaded, but the steel sheet S with a tip crop length of 200 mm had a failure in threading. Note that the temperature of the steel sheet S when the steel sheet S is charged into the straightener 1 and the yield stress of the steel sheet S at that temperature may affect the biting ability of the straightener 1. This is because there is a correlation between the temperature and yield stress of the steel plate S and the resistance force when the tip of the steel plate S passes through the steel plate guide 7.

〔通板可否判定テーブル〕
次に、本実施形態の鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法において用いる通板可否判定テーブルについて説明する。
[Table for determining whether or not strip can be threaded]
Next, a description will be given of a plate threading feasibility determination table used in the method of determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine according to this embodiment.

本実施形態の鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法では、鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率に基づいて矯正機1への鋼板Sの通板可否を判定するために、予め過去の操業実績データ等に基づき通板可否判定テーブルを生成する。具体的には、過去の操業実績を用いて、鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率についての実績データの区分毎に、鋼板の製造設備への鋼板Sの噛み込みが可能であったか否かについての実績データを収集して通板可否判定テーブルを生成する。鋼板の先端部の反り高さは4~10区分に分けることができる。例えば反り高さの区分は20~50mm毎に区分するようにしてよい。一方、鋼板の先端部の反り曲率は4~10区分に分けることができる。例えば反り曲率の区分は0.0001~0.0002/mm毎に区分するようにしてよい。それぞれの区分に対応する鋼板の製造設備への鋼板の通板可否に関する実績データについては、通板可否の確率を算出し、予め設定した確率の閾値により鋼板の通板可否情報(通板が可能か否かを判別する情報)を決定するようにしてよい。但し、同一の区分に属する鋼板の中で矯正機1への通板不良が1回でも発生した実績があれば「通板不可(噛み込み不良)」と判定し、全ての鋼板で通板不良が発生しなかった場合に「通板可(噛み込み良)」と判定するようにするのが好ましい。鋼板の製造設備における鋼板Sの通板不良が発生すると、鋼板の製造設備の破損や操業の長時間停止等が発生して操業への影響が大きいため、可能な限り通板不良が発生するリスクを低減するのが好ましいからである。 In the method of this embodiment for determining whether a steel sheet can be passed through a straightening machine, a table for determining whether a steel sheet S can be passed through a straightening machine 1 is generated in advance based on past operational performance data, etc., in order to determine whether a steel sheet S can be passed through a straightening machine 1 based on the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel sheet S. Specifically, using past operational performance, data on whether the steel sheet S could be inserted into the steel sheet manufacturing equipment is collected for each category of performance data on the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel sheet S, and a table for determining whether a steel sheet can be passed through is generated. The warp height of the tip of the steel sheet can be divided into 4 to 10 categories. For example, the warp height can be divided into categories every 20 to 50 mm. On the other hand, the warp curvature of the tip of the steel sheet can be divided into 4 to 10 categories. For example, the warp curvature can be divided into categories every 0.0001 to 0.0002/mm. For the past data on whether or not a steel plate can be threaded through the steel plate manufacturing equipment corresponding to each category, the probability of whether or not the steel plate can be threaded may be calculated, and the information on whether or not the steel plate can be threaded (information for determining whether or not the steel plate can be threaded) may be determined based on a preset probability threshold value. However, it is preferable to determine that if there is a history of even one occurrence of a threading failure on the straightener 1 among steel plates belonging to the same category, the steel plate is judged as "not threadable (biting failure)," and if no threading failure occurs for any steel plate, the steel plate is judged as "threadable (good biting)." This is because if a threading failure occurs in the steel plate manufacturing equipment, it can cause damage to the steel plate manufacturing equipment or a long-term stoppage of operations, which has a large impact on operations, and therefore it is preferable to reduce the risk of threading failure as much as possible.

鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率だけでなく、他のパラメータにより細分化された区分で、鋼板の製造設備への鋼板Sの通板性に関する実績データを収集するのが好ましい。例えば鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率に加え、鋼板の板厚、板幅、板長さ、重量、及び搬送装置2による鋼板Sの矯正機1への装入速度の中から選択した1つ以上の操業パラメータを用いて区分するのが好ましい。これらの操業パラメータは、鋼板Sが矯正機1に装入される際の鋼板Sの質量又は搬送速度に影響を与え、鋼板Sの慣性力(運動エネルギー)により矯正機1への噛み込み性が変化するからである。一方、鋼板の製造設備が、鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状を測定する平面形状測定装置4を備える場合には、平面形状測定装置4によって測定される鋼板Sが矯正機1に装入される前の鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状を上記区分に加えてもよい。鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状は、鋼板Sの矯正機への噛み込み性に影響を与えるからである。 It is preferable to collect data on the performance of the steel plate S in the steel plate manufacturing equipment, not only in terms of the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel plate S, but also in terms of other parameters. For example, in addition to the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel plate S, it is preferable to classify the steel plate S using one or more operation parameters selected from the plate thickness, plate width, plate length, weight, and the loading speed of the steel plate S into the straightening machine 1 by the conveying device 2. This is because these operation parameters affect the mass or conveying speed of the steel plate S when the steel plate S is loaded into the straightening machine 1, and the biteability of the steel plate S into the straightening machine 1 changes due to the inertial force (kinetic energy) of the steel plate S. On the other hand, if the steel plate manufacturing equipment is equipped with a planar shape measuring device 4 that measures the planar shape of the tip of the steel plate S, the planar shape of the tip of the steel plate S before the steel plate S is loaded into the straightening machine 1, measured by the planar shape measuring device 4, may be added to the above classification. This is because the planar shape of the tip of the steel plate S affects the biteability of the steel plate S into the straightening machine.

表1は、過去の操業実績に基づいて、鋼板の先端部の反り高さ、先端部の曲率、先端部の平面形状であるクロップ長さ(先端クロップ長)、鋼板の板長さ、搬送装置2による鋼板Sの矯正機1への装入速度(搬送速度)を区分として、鋼板の製造設備への鋼板Sの通板可否に関する実績データを収集して生成した通板可否テーブルを示す。通板可否を示す「〇」は「噛み込み可(噛み込み良)」を表し、「×」は「通板不可(通板不良)」を表す。そして通板不良が一度でも生じた区分は、通板不良との判定情報をラベリングする。通板可否に関する実績データは、同一区分内で通板不良が一度でも生じた場合に「×」としている。通板可否判定テーブルは、過去の操業実績データのみにより生成する必要はない。例えばそれぞれの区分に対応する操業条件に対して、有限要素法等の数値解析手法を用いて通板可否判定テーブルを生成してもよい。 Table 1 shows a table of whether or not a steel plate S can be threaded through a steel plate manufacturing facility, which is generated by collecting data on whether or not a steel plate S can be threaded through the steel plate manufacturing facility, based on past operational results. The table is divided into categories based on the warp height at the tip of the steel plate, the curvature at the tip, the crop length (tip crop length) which is the planar shape of the tip, the plate length of the steel plate, and the loading speed (transport speed) of the steel plate S into the straightener 1 by the transport device 2. The "o" indicating whether or not a steel plate can be threaded indicates "biting possible (good biting)," and the "x" indicates "not possible to thread (poor threading)." A category in which a threading failure has occurred even once is labeled with judgment information indicating that the steel plate is poorly threaded. The data on whether or not a steel plate can be threaded is marked with "x" if a threading failure has occurred even once within the same category. The table of whether or not a steel plate can be threaded does not need to be generated only from past operational results data. For example, a table of whether or not a steel plate can be threaded may be generated using a numerical analysis method such as the finite element method for the operational conditions corresponding to each category.

Figure 0007673695000001
Figure 0007673695000001

〔鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法〕
次に、本実施形態の鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法について説明する。
[Method for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine]
Next, a method for determining whether or not a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine according to this embodiment will be described.

通板可否判定テーブルは制御用計算機5の内部の記憶装置等に記憶しておく。そして、操業時には、図1に示すように、鋼板Sが矯正機1に装入される前に反り形状測定装置3を用いて鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率を測定する反り形状測定ステップを実行する。反り形状測定ステップは、上記の通り、例えば撮像部3aと反り形状解析部3bを備える反り形状測定装置3により行うことができる。反り形状測定ステップにより特定された鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率は、反り形状測定装置3から制御用計算機5に送られる。制御用計算機5は、反り形状測定装置3から取得した鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率の測定値に基づいて、通板可否判定テーブルの対応する区分における通板可否に関する情報を参照することにより、鋼板の製造設備における鋼板Sの通板可否を判定する(通板可否判定ステップ)。 The threading possibility determination table is stored in a storage device or the like inside the control computer 5. During operation, as shown in FIG. 1, a warp shape measurement step is performed in which the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel sheet S are measured using the warp shape measurement device 3 before the steel sheet S is loaded into the straightener 1. As described above, the warp shape measurement step can be performed by, for example, the warp shape measurement device 3 equipped with the imaging unit 3a and the warp shape analysis unit 3b. The warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel sheet S identified in the warp shape measurement step are sent from the warp shape measurement device 3 to the control computer 5. Based on the measured values of the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel sheet S acquired from the warp shape measurement device 3, the control computer 5 determines whether the steel sheet S can be threaded in the steel sheet manufacturing facility by referring to information on whether the steel sheet can be threaded in the corresponding section of the threading possibility determination table (threading possibility determination step).

鋼板Sの板厚、板幅、板長さ、重量、及び搬送装置2による矯正機1への鋼板Sの装入速度の中から選択した1つ以上の操業パラメータが通板可否判定テーブルに区分として含まれる場合には、これらの操業パラメータは、鋼板の製造設備の操業条件として制御用計算機5の内部に生成される情報であるため、鋼板Sに対する操業パラメータを取得できる。一方、鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状を測定する平面形状測定装置4を備え、鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状が通板可否判定テーブルに区分として含まれる場合には、平面形状測定装置4によって特定される鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状についてのデータを制御用計算機5に送る。これにより、制御用計算機5の内部において通板可否判定テーブルを参照して鋼板の製造設備における鋼板Sの通板可否を判定することができる。 When one or more operational parameters selected from the thickness, width, length, and weight of the steel plate S, and the speed at which the steel plate S is fed into the straightener 1 by the conveying device 2 are included as categories in the threading feasibility determination table, these operational parameters are information generated inside the control computer 5 as the operating conditions of the steel plate manufacturing equipment, so that the operational parameters for the steel plate S can be acquired. On the other hand, when a planar shape measuring device 4 is provided for measuring the planar shape of the leading end of the steel plate S, and the planar shape of the leading end of the steel plate S is included as a category in the threading feasibility determination table, data on the planar shape of the leading end of the steel plate S identified by the planar shape measuring device 4 is sent to the control computer 5. This makes it possible to refer to the threading feasibility determination table inside the control computer 5 and determine whether the steel plate S can be threaded in the steel plate manufacturing equipment.

上記の鋼板の通板可否判定方法を用いて、鋼板Sが矯正機1に装入される前に、鋼板の製造設備における鋼板Sの通板可否を判定し、通板可(通板不良なし)と判定された場合には、鋼板の製造設備に対して制御用計算機5が予め設定している操業条件のまま、矯正機1による鋼板Sの矯正を行えばよい。一方、鋼板Sが矯正機1に装入される前に、鋼板の製造設備における鋼板Sの通板可否を判定し、通板不可(通板不良あり)と判定された場合には、鋼板の製造設備の操業条件を再設定する(再設定ステップ)。例えば制御用計算機5が予め設定している矯正機1への鋼板Sの装入速度を増加するように搬送装置2の操業条件を再設定する。また、特許文献3に記載されているように、鋼板Sの先端部が矯正機1に装入される際の矯正ロールの押し込み量を低減するように再設定してもよい。このような鋼板の矯正方法は、厚板製造ラインの圧延機と冷却装置(加速冷却装置)との間に配置されるホットレベラ(熱間矯正機)に適用されるのが好ましい。鋼板の製造設備において鋼板Sが平坦な形状に矯正されるので、冷却装置において鋼板Sの冷却ムラの発生を抑制できる。また、鋼板Sを矯正機1に装入する際に、通板不良によって鋼板Sの処理時間が増加することによる鋼板Sの温度低下を抑制でき、冷却設備において適切な冷却開始温度を確保できるため、所期の材質を確保することができる。 Using the above-mentioned method for determining whether the steel sheet S can be passed through the steel sheet manufacturing equipment before the steel sheet S is loaded into the straightening machine 1, it is determined whether the steel sheet S can be passed through the steel sheet manufacturing equipment, and if it is determined that the steel sheet S can be passed through (no passing defects), the steel sheet S can be straightened by the straightening machine 1 under the operating conditions previously set by the control computer 5 for the steel sheet manufacturing equipment. On the other hand, before the steel sheet S is loaded into the straightening machine 1, it is determined whether the steel sheet S can be passed through the steel sheet manufacturing equipment, and if it is determined that the steel sheet S cannot be passed through (there is a passing defect), the operating conditions of the steel sheet manufacturing equipment are reset (resetting step). For example, the operating conditions of the conveying device 2 are reset so as to increase the loading speed of the steel sheet S into the straightening machine 1, which is previously set by the control computer 5. In addition, as described in Patent Document 3, it may be reset so as to reduce the amount of pressing of the straightening roll when the tip of the steel sheet S is loaded into the straightening machine 1. This method of straightening steel plates is preferably applied to a hot leveler (hot straightener) that is arranged between a rolling mill and a cooling device (accelerated cooling device) in a thick plate production line. Since the steel plate S is straightened to a flat shape in the steel plate production equipment, the occurrence of uneven cooling of the steel plate S in the cooling device can be suppressed. In addition, when the steel plate S is loaded into the straightener 1, the temperature drop of the steel plate S caused by an increase in the processing time of the steel plate S due to poor plate threading can be suppressed, and an appropriate cooling start temperature can be secured in the cooling equipment, so that the desired material properties can be secured.

〔通板可否判定モデル〕
次に、図9,図10を参照して、本発明の一実施形態である通板可否判定モデルについて説明する。
[Model for determining whether strip can be threaded]
Next, a model for determining whether or not a strip can be threaded according to one embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to Figs.

上記の通板可否判定テーブルに代えて機械学習により生成した通板可否判定モデルを用いて鋼板Sの通板可否を判定してもよい。具体的には、入力データとして反り形状測定装置3によって矯正機1に装入される前に測定された鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率を含み、矯正機1への鋼板Sの通板可否情報を出力データとした、機械学習により学習された通板可否判定モデルを用いて、矯正機1への鋼板Sの通板可否を判定してもよい。また、入力データとして、鋼板Sの板厚、板幅、板長さ、重量、及び搬送装置2による矯正機1への鋼板Sの装入速度の中からから選択した1つ以上の操業パラメータを含むのが好ましい。さらに、入力データとして、平面形状測定装置4を用いて鋼板Sが矯正機1に装入される前に測定した鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状を用いて矯正機1への鋼板Sの通板可否を判定するようにするのが好ましい。これらの入力データは、上記の通り、矯正機1における鋼板Sの通板性と相関関係がみられるからである。 Instead of the above-mentioned threading possibility judgment table, a threading possibility judgment model generated by machine learning may be used to judge whether the steel sheet S can be threaded. Specifically, the threading possibility judgment model learned by machine learning may be used to judge whether the steel sheet S can be threaded through the straightening machine 1, in which the input data includes the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel sheet S measured by the warp shape measuring device 3 before the steel sheet S is loaded into the straightening machine 1, and the output data is information on whether the steel sheet S can be threaded through the straightening machine 1. In addition, it is preferable that the input data includes one or more operation parameters selected from the thickness, width, length, and weight of the steel sheet S, and the loading speed of the steel sheet S into the straightening machine 1 by the conveying device 2. Furthermore, it is preferable to judge whether the steel sheet S can be threaded through the straightening machine 1 using the planar shape of the tip of the steel sheet S measured by the planar shape measuring device 4 before the steel sheet S is loaded into the straightening machine 1 as input data. This is because these input data are correlated with the threading ability of the steel sheet S in the straightening machine 1, as described above.

通板可否判定モデルは、過去の操業実績データを用いた機械学習により生成することができる。図9は、機械学習を用いた通板可否判定モデルの生成方法を説明するための図である。図9に示すように、本実施形態の通板可否判定モデル生成部11は、データベース部11aと機械学習部11bを備えている。 The strip threading feasibility determination model can be generated by machine learning using past operational performance data. Figure 9 is a diagram for explaining a method for generating a strip threading feasibility determination model using machine learning. As shown in Figure 9, the strip threading feasibility determination model generation unit 11 of this embodiment includes a database unit 11a and a machine learning unit 11b.

データベース部11aは、反り形状測定装置3によって測定された鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率の実績データと、鋼板の製造設備における鋼板Sの通板可否情報の実績データを蓄積する。データベース部11aは、必要に応じて、鋼板Sの板厚や板幅等の操業パラメータの実績データや平面形状測定装置4によって測定される鋼板Sの先端部の平面形状(先端クロップ長)の実績データを蓄積してもよい。この場合、通板可否判定モデルの入力実績データとして、鋼板の製造設備の動作を制御するための制御用計算機5に保存されている情報を適宜取得するようにするとよい。また、入力実績データを収集するためにデータ取得部12を設け、データ取得部12において実績データを一旦保存し、複数種の実績データを対応付けたデータセットを生成した後にデータベース部11aに蓄積するようにしてもよい。データベース部11aには、500個以上のデータセットが蓄積される。好ましくは2000個以上、より好ましくは10000個以上である。データベース部11aに蓄積されるデータについては、必要に応じてスクリーニングが行われる場合がある。反り形状測定装置3による反り高さや反り曲率の測定には測定誤差が生じる場合があり、信頼性の高いデータを蓄積することにより通板可否判定モデルの判定精度が向上するからである。一方、データベース部11aに蓄積されるデータセット数は、一定数を上限として、その上限内でデータベース部11aに蓄積されるデータセットを適宜更新してもよい。 The database unit 11a accumulates the actual data of the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel sheet S measured by the warp shape measuring device 3, and the actual data of the information on whether the steel sheet S can be threaded in the steel sheet manufacturing equipment. The database unit 11a may accumulate the actual data of the operation parameters such as the thickness and width of the steel sheet S, and the actual data of the planar shape (tip crop length) of the tip of the steel sheet S measured by the planar shape measuring device 4, as necessary. In this case, it is preferable to appropriately acquire information stored in the control computer 5 for controlling the operation of the steel sheet manufacturing equipment as the input actual data of the threading judgment model. In addition, a data acquisition unit 12 may be provided to collect the input actual data, and the actual data may be temporarily stored in the data acquisition unit 12, and a data set in which multiple types of actual data are associated may be generated and then accumulated in the database unit 11a. 500 or more data sets are accumulated in the database unit 11a. Preferably, 2000 or more, more preferably 10,000 or more. The data accumulated in the database unit 11a may be screened as necessary. This is because there may be measurement errors in the measurement of the warp height and warp curvature using the warp shape measuring device 3, and the accuracy of the judgment model for judging whether or not the plate can be threaded is improved by accumulating highly reliable data. On the other hand, the number of data sets accumulated in the database unit 11a may be limited to a certain number, and the data sets accumulated in the database unit 11a may be updated as appropriate within the upper limit.

機械学習部11bは、データベース部11aに蓄積されたデータセットを用いて、複数の学習用データを用いた機械学習により、鋼板の通板可否情報を予測する通板可否判定モデルMを生成する。学習用データは、鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率の実績データを入力実績データ、鋼板Sの通板可否情報の実績データを出力実績データとする。通板可否判定モデルMを生成するための機械学習モデルは、実用上十分な鋼板Sの通板可否情報の判定精度が得られれば、いずれの機械学習モデルでもよい。例えば一般的に用いられるニューラルネットワーク(深層学習や畳み込みニューラルネットワーク等を含む)、決定木学習、ランダムフォレスト、サポートベクター回帰等を用いればよい。また、複数のモデルを組み合わせたアンサンブルモデルを用いてもよい。また、k―近傍法やロジスティック回帰のような分類モデルを用いてもよい。例えば図10に示すような一般的なニューラルネットワークを用いた機械学習により通板可否判定モデルMを生成することができる。なお、図10中の符号L1,L2,L3はそれぞれ入力層、中間層、及び出力層を示す。特に深層学習を用いると、多重共線性の問題を考慮する必要なく、鋼板Sの通板可否情報と相関関係を有する他の操業パラメータも入力として自由に選択できるため、鋼板Sの通板可否判定の推定精度を高めることができる。例えばニューラルネットワークの中間層は2層、ノード数は3個ずつとし、活性化関数としてシグモイド関数を用いたものを用いることができる。出力層にはソフトマックス関数を用いて鋼板Sの通板可否情報を2値分類結果として出力するのが好ましい。 The machine learning unit 11b uses the data set accumulated in the database unit 11a to generate a threading possibility judgment model M that predicts the threading possibility information of the steel sheet by machine learning using multiple learning data. The learning data is the actual data of the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel sheet S as input actual data, and the actual data of the threading possibility information of the steel sheet S as output actual data. The machine learning model for generating the threading possibility judgment model M may be any machine learning model as long as it can obtain sufficient judgment accuracy of the threading possibility information of the steel sheet S for practical use. For example, a commonly used neural network (including deep learning and convolutional neural network, etc.), decision tree learning, random forest, support vector regression, etc. may be used. An ensemble model combining multiple models may also be used. A classification model such as the k-nearest neighbor method or logistic regression may also be used. For example, the threading possibility judgment model M can be generated by machine learning using a general neural network as shown in FIG. 10. In addition, the symbols L1, L2, and L3 in FIG. 10 respectively indicate the input layer, intermediate layer, and output layer. In particular, when deep learning is used, it is possible to freely select other operational parameters that are correlated with the threading suitability information of the steel sheet S as inputs without having to consider the problem of multicollinearity, thereby improving the estimation accuracy of the threading suitability judgment of the steel sheet S. For example, a neural network with two intermediate layers, each with three nodes, and using a sigmoid function as the activation function can be used. It is preferable to use a softmax function in the output layer to output the threading suitability information of the steel sheet S as a binary classification result.

機械学習部11bは、データベース部11aに蓄積されたデータセットを訓練データとテストデータに分けて学習を行うことにより鋼板Sの通板可否情報の推定精度を向上させてもよい。例えば機械学習部11bは、訓練データを用いてニューラルネットワークの重み係数の学習を行い、テストデータでの鋼板Sの通板可否情報の正解率が高くなるようにニューラルネットワークの構造(中間層の数やノード数)を適宜変更しながら通板可否判定モデルMを生成してもよい。重み係数の更新には、誤差伝播法を用いることができる。通板可否判定モデルMは、例えば6ヶ月毎又は1年毎に再学習により新たなモデルに更新してもよい。データベース部11aに保存されるデータ数が増えるほど、精度の高い鋼板Sの通板可否情報の予測が可能となるからである。最新のデータに基づいて通板可否判定モデルMを更新することにより、鋼板の製造設備に装入される鋼板Sの製造条件の変化等を反映した通板可否判定モデルMを生成できる。 The machine learning unit 11b may improve the estimation accuracy of the threading possibility information of the steel sheet S by dividing the data set accumulated in the database unit 11a into training data and test data and performing learning. For example, the machine learning unit 11b may use the training data to learn the weight coefficients of the neural network, and generate the threading possibility judgment model M while appropriately changing the structure of the neural network (the number of intermediate layers and the number of nodes) so that the accuracy rate of the threading possibility information of the steel sheet S in the test data is high. The error propagation method can be used to update the weight coefficients. The threading possibility judgment model M may be updated to a new model by re-learning, for example, every six months or every year. This is because the more data stored in the database unit 11a, the more accurate the prediction of the threading possibility information of the steel sheet S can be. By updating the threading possibility judgment model M based on the latest data, a threading possibility judgment model M that reflects changes in the manufacturing conditions of the steel sheet S to be charged into the steel sheet manufacturing equipment can be generated.

本発明の実施例として、図1に示す鋼板の製造設備を、厚板圧延ラインに配置されるリバース圧延機の下流側にローラーレベラとして配置した例について説明する。本実施例では、ローラーレベラの上流側に反り形状測定装置3及び平面形状測定装置4を配置した。これらはCCDカメラによって鋼板先端部の画像を撮影し、画像処理法により鋼板先端部の反り高さ、反り曲率、及び平面形状(先端クロップ長)を算出した。また、鋼板の製造設備の操業データとして、鋼板Sの板厚、板長さ、矯正機1に装入される際の鋼板温度及び装入速度を取得した。そして、約半年間の操業実績データを用いて通板可否判定テーブルを生成した。通板可否判定テーブルの区分は、鋼板Sの先端部の反り高さ、反り曲率、先端クロップ長、板厚、板長さ、鋼板温度、及び装入速度の7つのパラメータをそれぞれ10区分して、過去の操業において通板不良が発生したものがある区分を「×」、通板不良が発生しなかった区分を「〇」とした。そして、通板可否判定テーブルを制御用計算機5の記憶部に記憶させ、制御用計算機5の内部に通板可否判定部を備えるようにした。一方、図10に示すニューラルネットワークを用いた機械学習により、中間層を2層、出力層にソフトマックス関数を用いた通板可否判定モデルMを生成した。通板可否判定モデルMを生成する際の入力実績データには、通板可否判定テーブルの区分と同様、鋼板先端部の反り高さ、反り曲率、先端クロップ長さ、板厚、板長さ、鋼板温度、及び装入速度の7つのパラメータを用いた。また、過去の操業において通板不良が発生したものがある区分を「通板不良あり(×)」、通板不良が発生しなかった区分を「通板不良なし(〇)」とする出力実績データとした。そして、生成した通板可否判定モデルMも制御用計算機5の記憶部に記憶させ、制御用計算機5の内部に通板可否判定部を備えるようにした。 As an embodiment of the present invention, an example will be described in which the steel plate manufacturing equipment shown in FIG. 1 is arranged as a roller leveler downstream of a reverse rolling mill arranged in a thick plate rolling line. In this embodiment, a warp shape measuring device 3 and a planar shape measuring device 4 are arranged upstream of the roller leveler. These devices take images of the tip of the steel plate using a CCD camera, and calculate the warp height, warp curvature, and planar shape (tip crop length) of the tip of the steel plate using an image processing method. In addition, the plate thickness, plate length, steel plate temperature when being charged into the straightener 1, and charging speed of the steel plate S were obtained as operational data of the steel plate manufacturing equipment. Then, a plate threading feasibility judgment table was generated using operational performance data for about half a year. The classification of the plate threading possibility judgment table is divided into 10 categories for each of the seven parameters of the warp height at the front end of the steel plate S, the warp curvature, the front end crop length, the plate thickness, the plate length, the steel plate temperature, and the charging speed, and the category in which the plate threading defect occurred in the past operation is marked with "x", and the category in which the plate threading defect did not occur is marked with "o". The plate threading possibility judgment table is stored in the storage unit of the control computer 5, and the control computer 5 is provided with a plate threading possibility judgment unit inside. On the other hand, a plate threading possibility judgment model M was generated by machine learning using the neural network shown in FIG. 10, using two intermediate layers and a softmax function in the output layer. As in the classification of the plate threading possibility judgment table, seven parameters of the warp height at the front end of the steel plate, the warp curvature, the front end crop length, the plate thickness, the plate length, the steel plate temperature, and the charging speed were used for the input record data when generating the plate threading possibility judgment model M. In addition, the output data is classified as "threading failure (x)" for categories in which threading failures occurred in past operations, and "no threading failure (o)" for categories in which threading failures did not occur. The generated threading feasibility judgment model M is also stored in the memory unit of the control computer 5, and the control computer 5 is equipped with a threading feasibility judgment unit inside.

その後、操業時において、鋼板Sが矯正機1に装入される前に、鋼板の製造設備における鋼板Sの通板可否を判定した。但し、鋼板Sの通板可否についての判定結果にかかわらず、鋼板の製造設備の操業条件を再設定することなく、初期設定のまま矯正機1により鋼板Sの矯正を行った。実施例1では、予め生成した通板可否判定テーブルを用いて通板可(通板不良なし)と判定した場合であって、実際には鋼板Sの矯正機1への通板不良が発生したケースの割合を誤判定率とした。また、実施例2では、通板可否判定モデルMを用いた通板可否判定の結果についても同様に誤判定率を評価した。一方、従来例として、鋼板の製造設備の操業を担当するオペレータが目視により鋼板先端部の反り状態を確認し、オペレータが通板可と判定したものの実際には通板不良が発生した割合を評価した。図11は、板厚20~40mmである20000枚の鋼板に対して誤判定率を評価した結果である。図11に示すように、従来例に比べて、実施例1による誤判定率が低下していることがわかる。また、実施例2によれば、さらに誤判定率が低下することがわかった。 After that, during operation, before the steel sheet S was loaded into the straightening machine 1, it was determined whether the steel sheet S could be threaded in the steel sheet manufacturing equipment. However, regardless of the result of the determination as to whether the steel sheet S could be threaded, the operating conditions of the steel sheet manufacturing equipment were not reset, and the steel sheet S was straightened by the straightening machine 1 with the initial settings. In Example 1, the rate of cases in which the steel sheet S was judged to be threadable (no threading defects) using a previously generated threading determination table, but in which a threading defect actually occurred in the straightening machine 1, was determined as the erroneous determination rate. In Example 2, the erroneous determination rate was also evaluated for the results of the threading determination using the threading determination model M. On the other hand, as a conventional example, the rate of cases in which an operator in charge of the operation of the steel sheet manufacturing equipment visually confirmed the warping state of the steel sheet tip, and the operator judged that the steel sheet S could be threaded, but in fact a threading defect occurred, was evaluated. Figure 11 shows the results of evaluating the erroneous determination rate for 20,000 steel sheets with a thickness of 20 to 40 mm. As shown in FIG. 11, it can be seen that the misjudgment rate in Example 1 is lower than that in the conventional example. It was also found that the misjudgment rate is further reduced in Example 2.

次に、実施例2で作成した通板可否判定モデルMをオンラインで使用して鋼板Sが矯正機1に装入される前に通板可否判定ステップにおいて鋼板の通板可否を判定した。そして、「通板不良なし(〇)」と判定した場合には、制御用計算機5が予め設定した操業条件のまま矯正機1によって矯正を行った。一方、「通板不良あり(×)」と判定した場合には、矯正機1の操業条件の中で矯正機1への鋼板Sの装入速度を当初の設定値に対して増加させて操業を行った。その結果、図12に示すように、鋼板の製造設備の操業条件を再設定した場合(実施例)には、再設定しない場合(比較例)に比べて材質不良(鋼板の機械的性質が目標範囲外となる不良)の発生率が低下した。 Next, the threading feasibility determination model M created in Example 2 was used online to determine whether the steel sheet S could be threaded in a threading feasibility determination step before the steel sheet S was loaded into the straightening machine 1. If the determination was "no threading defects (◯)," straightening was performed by the straightening machine 1 under the operating conditions preset by the control computer 5. On the other hand, if the determination was "threading defects (×)," the operation was performed by increasing the loading speed of the steel sheet S into the straightening machine 1 from the initial setting value among the operating conditions of the straightening machine 1. As a result, as shown in FIG. 12, when the operating conditions of the steel sheet manufacturing equipment were reset (Example), the occurrence rate of material defects (defects in which the mechanical properties of the steel sheet are outside the target range) was lower than when they were not reset (Comparative Example).

以上、本発明者らによってなされた発明を適用した実施の形態について説明したが、本実施形態による本発明の開示の一部をなす記述及び図面により本発明が限定されることはない。すなわち、本実施形態に基づいて当業者等によりなされる他の実施の形態、実施例、及び運用技術等は全て本発明の範疇に含まれる。 The above describes an embodiment of the invention made by the inventors, but the present invention is not limited to the descriptions and drawings that form part of the disclosure of the present invention according to this embodiment. In other words, other embodiments, examples, and operational techniques made by those skilled in the art based on this embodiment are all included in the scope of the present invention.

1 矯正機
2 搬送装置
3 反り形状測定装置
3a,4a 撮像部(エリアカメラ)
3b 反り形状解析部
3c 距離計
3d 速度計
4 平面形状測定装置
4b 平面形状解析部
5 制御用計算機
11 通板可否判定モデル生成部
11a データベース部
11b 機械学習部
12 データ取得部
M 通板可否判定モデル
S 鋼板
1 Straightener 2 Conveyor 3 Warpage shape measuring device 3a, 4a Imaging unit (area camera)
3b Warp shape analysis unit 3c Distance meter 3d Speed meter 4 Plane shape measurement device 4b Plane shape analysis unit 5 Control computer 11 Strip threading suitability determination model generation unit 11a Database unit 11b Machine learning unit 12 Data acquisition unit M Strip threading suitability determination model S Steel strip

Claims (6)

少なくとも1対のロールを備える矯正機と、鋼板を前記矯正機に装入する搬送装置と、前記鋼板の先端部の反り形状を測定する反り形状測定装置と、を含む鋼板の製造設備における鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法であって、
前記反り形状測定装置を用いて、前記鋼板が矯正機に装入される前に前記鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率を測定する反り形状測定ステップと、
前記反り形状測定ステップにおいて測定された鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率に基づいて、前記鋼板の前記矯正機への通板可否を判定する通板可否判定ステップと、
を含
前記通板可否判定ステップは、前記反り形状測定ステップにおいて測定された鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率に加え、前記鋼板の板厚、板幅、板長さ、重量、及び前記搬送装置による前記矯正機への鋼板の装入速度の中から選択した1つ以上の鋼板が矯正機に装入される際の鋼板の質量又は搬送速度に影響を与える操業パラメータに基づいて、前記鋼板の前記矯正機への通板可否を判定するステップを含む、鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法。
A method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightener in a steel plate manufacturing facility including a straightener having at least one pair of rolls, a conveying device for feeding a steel plate into the straightener, and a warpage shape measuring device for measuring a warpage shape of a leading end of the steel plate, comprising:
a warpage shape measuring step of measuring a warpage height and a warpage curvature of a tip end portion of the steel plate using the warpage shape measuring device before the steel plate is loaded into a straightening machine;
a plate threading possibility determination step of determining whether the steel plate can be threaded through the straightener based on the warp height and the warp curvature of the tip portion of the steel plate measured in the warp shape measurement step;
Including ,
The method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine includes a step of determining whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine based on operational parameters that affect the mass or transport speed of the steel plate when the steel plate is loaded into the straightening machine, selected from the warp height and warp curvature of the tip of the steel plate measured in the warp shape measurement step, as well as the thickness, width, length, and weight of the steel plate, and the loading speed of the steel plate into the straightening machine by the transport device .
前記鋼板の製造設備は、前記鋼板の先端部の平面形状を測定する平面形状測定装置を備え、
前記通板可否判定ステップは、さらに前記平面形状測定装置を用いて前記鋼板が矯正機に装入される前に測定された前記鋼板の先端部の平面形状を用いて前記鋼板の矯正機への通板可否を判定するステップを含む、請求項に記載の鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法。
The steel plate manufacturing facility includes a planar shape measuring device that measures a planar shape of a tip end of the steel plate,
2. The method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine as described in claim 1, wherein the step of determining whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine further includes a step of determining whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine using the planar shape of the leading end of the steel plate measured using the planar shape measuring device before the steel plate is loaded into the straightening machine.
少なくとも1対のロールを備える矯正機と、鋼板を前記矯正機に装入する搬送装置と、前記鋼板の先端部の反り形状を測定する反り形状測定装置と、を含む製造設備における鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法であって、
前記反り形状測定装置によって前記矯正機に装入される前に測定された鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率を入力データとして含み、前記鋼板の前記矯正機への通板可否情報を出力データとした、機械学習により学習された通板可否判定モデルを用いて、前記鋼板の前記矯正機への通板可否を判定するステップを含
前記入力データは、鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率に加え、前記鋼板の板厚、板幅、板長さ、重量、及び前記搬送装置による前記矯正機への鋼板の装入速度の中から選択した1つ以上の鋼板が矯正機に装入される際の鋼板の質量又は搬送速度に影響を与える操業パラメータを含む、鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法。
A method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through the straightener in a manufacturing facility including a straightener having at least one pair of rolls, a conveying device for feeding a steel plate into the straightener, and a warpage shape measuring device for measuring a warpage shape of a leading end of the steel plate, comprising:
a step of judging whether the steel plate can be threaded through the straightening machine by using a threading possibility judgment model learned by machine learning, the model including, as input data, a warpage height and a warpage curvature of a front end portion of the steel plate measured by the warpage shape measuring device before the steel plate is loaded into the straightening machine, and output data, information on whether the steel plate can be threaded through the straightening machine;
The input data includes, in addition to the warp height and warp curvature at the tip of the steel plate, one or more operational parameters that affect the mass or transport speed of the steel plate when the steel plate is loaded into the straightening machine, selected from the plate thickness, plate width, plate length, and weight of the steel plate, and the loading speed of the steel plate into the straightening machine by the transport device .
請求項1又はに記載の鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定方法を用いて、鋼板が前記矯正機に装入される前に前記鋼板の通板可否を判定し、通板不可と判定された場合には、前記鋼板の製造設備の操業条件を再設定するステップを含む、鋼板の矯正方法。 4. A method for straightening a steel plate, comprising: using the method for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightening machine according to claim 1 or 3 , determining whether the steel plate can be passed through the straightening machine before the steel plate is loaded into the straightening machine; and, if it is determined that the steel plate cannot be passed through, resetting operating conditions of the steel plate manufacturing equipment. 請求項に記載の鋼板の矯正方法を用いて鋼板を製造するステップを含む、鋼板の製造方法。 A method for manufacturing a steel plate, comprising the step of manufacturing a steel plate using the method for straightening a steel plate according to claim 4 . 少なくとも1対のロールを備える矯正機と、鋼板を前記矯正機に装入する搬送装置と、前記鋼板の先端部の反り形状を測定する反り形状測定装置と、を含む鋼板の製造設備における鋼板の矯正機への通板可否を判定するために使用される通板可否判定モデルを生成する鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定モデルの生成方法であって、
前記反り形状測定装置によって前記矯正機に装入される前に測定された鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率を入力実績データとして含み、該入力実績データに対応する前記矯正機への前記鋼板の通板可否情報を出力実績データとした、複数の学習用データを取得し、取得した複数の学習用データを用いた機械学習によって、前記通板可否判定モデルを生成するステップを含
前記入力実績データは、鋼板の先端部の反り高さ及び反り曲率に加え、前記鋼板の板厚、板幅、板長さ、重量、及び前記搬送装置による前記矯正機への鋼板の装入速度の中から選択した1つ以上の鋼板が矯正機に装入される際の鋼板の質量又は搬送速度に影響を与える操業パラメータを含む、鋼板の矯正機への通板可否判定モデルの生成方法。
A method for generating a judgment model for determining whether a steel plate can be passed through a straightener in a steel plate manufacturing facility including a straightener having at least one pair of rolls, a conveying device for loading a steel plate into the straightener, and a warpage shape measuring device for measuring a warpage shape of a leading end of the steel plate, the method comprising:
a step of acquiring a plurality of learning data, the learning data including, as input record data, a warpage height and a warpage curvature of a front end portion of a steel plate measured by the warpage shape measuring device before the steel plate is loaded into the straightening machine, and output record data including information on whether the steel plate can be threaded through the straightening machine corresponding to the input record data, and generating the threading possibility judgment model by machine learning using the acquired plurality of learning data;
The input actual data includes, in addition to the warp height and warp curvature at the tip of the steel plate, one or more operational parameters that affect the mass or transport speed of the steel plate when the steel plate is loaded into the straightening machine, selected from the thickness, width, length, and weight of the steel plate, and the loading speed of the steel plate into the straightening machine by the transport device.
JP2022103161A 2022-06-28 2022-06-28 Method for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine, straightening method, manufacturing method, and method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine Active JP7673695B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022103161A JP7673695B2 (en) 2022-06-28 2022-06-28 Method for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine, straightening method, manufacturing method, and method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022103161A JP7673695B2 (en) 2022-06-28 2022-06-28 Method for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine, straightening method, manufacturing method, and method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2024003856A JP2024003856A (en) 2024-01-16
JP7673695B2 true JP7673695B2 (en) 2025-05-09

Family

ID=89537847

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2022103161A Active JP7673695B2 (en) 2022-06-28 2022-06-28 Method for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine, straightening method, manufacturing method, and method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7673695B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN119794083B (en) * 2025-01-24 2026-03-24 常熟市龙腾新能装备科技有限公司 Monitoring and restraining method for tilting heads of medium plate

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004243386A (en) 2003-02-14 2004-09-02 Nippon Steel Corp Roll position setting method in roller straightening
JP2004351484A (en) 2003-05-29 2004-12-16 Jfe Steel Kk Method and apparatus for manufacturing hot-rolled steel strip
JP2016131991A (en) 2015-01-19 2016-07-25 Jfeスチール株式会社 Steel plate shape correction device and shape correction method

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH02194307A (en) * 1989-01-23 1990-07-31 Kawasaki Steel Corp Curvature shape measuring instrument for plate-like body
JP3411145B2 (en) * 1996-01-12 2003-05-26 新日本製鐵株式会社 Control device for warpage correction machine

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004243386A (en) 2003-02-14 2004-09-02 Nippon Steel Corp Roll position setting method in roller straightening
JP2004351484A (en) 2003-05-29 2004-12-16 Jfe Steel Kk Method and apparatus for manufacturing hot-rolled steel strip
JP2016131991A (en) 2015-01-19 2016-07-25 Jfeスチール株式会社 Steel plate shape correction device and shape correction method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2024003856A (en) 2024-01-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP7176507B2 (en) Hot rolling warpage prediction method, warpage control method, hot rolled steel sheet manufacturing method, warpage prediction model generation method, and hot rolling equipment
JP6828730B2 (en) Warp amount measuring method and warp amount measuring device for rolled material
JP7428197B2 (en) Steel plate shape discrimination method, shape measurement method, shape control method, manufacturing method, shape discrimination model generation method, and shape discrimination device
JP6772756B2 (en) Steel plate shape straightening device, straightening method, and continuous pickling device for steel sheet
JP7673695B2 (en) Method for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine, straightening method, manufacturing method, and method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine
TWI749735B (en) Reduction generation prediction system
JP7616438B2 (en) Width control method for finish rolled material and manufacturing method for hot rolled steel sheet
JP5859845B2 (en) Threading plate abnormality detection device
KR100966545B1 (en) Apparatus and method for setting optimum target shape for improving cold rolling flatness quality
CN118321352B (en) Industrial production equipment control system
JP7405106B2 (en) Leveling control method, leveling control device, and hot rolling equipment in hot rolling
JP7298551B2 (en) Warpage prediction method, warpage suppression method, rolled material manufacturing method in hot rolling, warpage prediction apparatus, warpage suppression apparatus, and rolled material manufacturing equipment in hot rolling
CN112439795B (en) Snake control device
JP7658468B2 (en) Rough rolled material width prediction method, rough rolled material width control method, hot rolled steel sheet manufacturing method, and rough rolled material width prediction model generation method
JP7677371B2 (en) Method for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine, straightening method, manufacturing method, and method for generating a model for determining whether a steel plate can be threaded through a straightening machine
JP7222415B2 (en) Device for measuring meandering amount of hot-rolled steel strip and method for measuring meandering amount of hot-rolled steel strip
CN110753589A (en) Roll forming equipment with sensor roll forming stand
EP4609962A1 (en) Method for predicting width of rough-rolled material, method for controlling width of rough-rolled material, method for producing hot-rolled steel sheet, and method for generating width prediction model for rough-rolled material
US20250315019A1 (en) Cold rolling mill rolling condition setting method, cold rolling method, steel sheet manufacturing method, cold rolling mill rolling condition setting device, and cold rolling mill
JP7567847B2 (en) Leveling control method in hot rolling, leveling control device, hot rolling equipment, and method for manufacturing hot rolled steel strip
JP7736017B2 (en) Rolled material meandering amount prediction device, meandering amount control device, meandering amount prediction method, meandering amount control method, and metal strip manufacturing method
JP2025097357A (en) Steel plate rolling method, steel plate rolling system, warpage estimation device, and program
JP2006281286A (en) Method for determining the shape of material to be rolled on the sizing press delivery side in a hot rolling line

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20240126

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20241030

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20241112

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20241218

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20250325

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20250407

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7673695

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150