Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7690977B2 - Intermediate slag removal method in metal refining - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7690977B2 - Intermediate slag removal method in metal refining - Google Patents

Intermediate slag removal method in metal refining Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7690977B2
JP7690977B2 JP2023174956A JP2023174956A JP7690977B2 JP 7690977 B2 JP7690977 B2 JP 7690977B2 JP 2023174956 A JP2023174956 A JP 2023174956A JP 2023174956 A JP2023174956 A JP 2023174956A JP 7690977 B2 JP7690977 B2 JP 7690977B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
slag
furnace
shape
refractory
converter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2023174956A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2024059093A (en
Inventor
新吾 佐藤
寛人 加瀬
祐輔 島田
瑛 吉泉
典子 小澤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Publication of JP2024059093A publication Critical patent/JP2024059093A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7690977B2 publication Critical patent/JP7690977B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20Recycling

Landscapes

  • Carbon Steel Or Casting Steel Manufacturing (AREA)
  • Refinement Of Pig-Iron, Manufacture Of Cast Iron, And Steel Manufacture Other Than In Revolving Furnaces (AREA)

Description

本発明は、転炉型精錬炉を用いた金属精錬において、溶融スラグの少なくとも一部を炉から排出する中間排滓方法に関するものである。 The present invention relates to an intermediate slag removal method for discharging at least a portion of the molten slag from a converter-type refining furnace during metal refining.

近年、鋼材に対する要求品質は益々厳格化しており、珪素や燐といった不純物元素の低減が求められている。このような要求に対応するため、製鉄所の製鋼工程では、溶銑の段階で予め予備処理を実施し、溶銑中の珪素や燐をある程度除去することが一般的になっている。このプロセスでは、転炉型精錬炉(以下、転炉という)内の溶銑に脱珪処理を実施した後、炉体を傾動させて炉内の溶融スラグ(脱珪スラグ)の少なくとも一部を排出する中間排滓を行い、その後、炉内にCaO系媒溶剤を投入して溶銑に脱燐処理を実施する。このプロセスでは、脱珪処理後の中間排滓において、如何に短時間で多くの脱珪スラグを排出できるかが、操業上の重要なポイントとなる。 In recent years, the quality requirements for steel products have become increasingly stringent, and there is a demand to reduce impurity elements such as silicon and phosphorus. To meet these requirements, in the steelmaking process at steelworks, it has become common to carry out pretreatment at the molten pig iron stage in advance to remove some of the silicon and phosphorus in the molten pig iron. In this process, after desiliconization of the molten pig iron in a converter-type refining furnace (hereinafter referred to as a converter), intermediate slag draining is performed by tilting the furnace body to drain at least a portion of the molten slag (desiliconization slag) in the furnace, and then a CaO-based flux is poured into the furnace to dephosphorize the molten pig iron. In this process, the key point in operation is how much desiliconization slag can be discharged in a short time in the intermediate slag draining after the desiliconization process.

中間排滓において、脱珪スラグの排滓量を高めるために、例えば、炉体の傾動角度を大きくすると、脱珪スラグは多く排出されるが、脱珪スラグとともに溶銑も炉口から流出することになる。溶銑が流出することによって鉄の歩留りが低下してしまうため、むやみに炉体の傾動角度を大きくして中間排滓率を向上させることは好ましくない。
また、脱珪処理で発生する脱珪スラグの量が同じであっても、転炉内の耐火物形状(炉の使用によって損耗した耐火物の形状)によって脱珪スラグの湯面レベルが異なるため、脱珪スラグの排滓が開始される排滓開始角や排滓終了角(いずれも炉体の傾動角度)についても耐火物形状によって大きな違いを生じる。このため耐火物形状を考慮した中間排滓を行う必要がある。
従来技術として、例えば、特許文献1、2には、転炉炉回数で転炉の傾動角度を補正する方法が提案されている。また、特許文献3には、スラグの排滓が開始される傾動角度やスラグの全排出過程における精錬容器の最大傾動角度を用いて排出スラグの質量の推定を行う方法が提案されている。
In intermediate slag disposal, for example, if the tilting angle of the furnace body is increased in order to increase the amount of desiliconization slag discharged, a large amount of desiliconization slag is discharged, but the molten pig iron also flows out of the furnace throat together with the desiliconization slag. Since the iron yield decreases due to the outflow of the molten pig iron, it is not preferable to increase the intermediate slag disposal rate by simply increasing the tilting angle of the furnace body.
In addition, even if the amount of desiliconization slag generated in the desiliconization process is the same, the melt level of the desiliconization slag varies depending on the shape of the refractory in the converter (the shape of the refractory worn down by the use of the furnace), so the slag discharge start angle and slag discharge end angle (both are the tilting angles of the furnace body) at which the desiliconization slag starts to be discharged also vary greatly depending on the shape of the refractory. For this reason, it is necessary to perform intermediate slag discharge taking into account the shape of the refractory.
As prior art, for example, Patent Documents 1 and 2 propose a method of correcting the tilting angle of a converter furnace based on the number of times the converter furnace is used. Patent Document 3 also proposes a method of estimating the mass of discharged slag using the tilting angle at which slag discharge starts and the maximum tilting angle of the refining vessel during the entire slag discharge process.

特開2007-308773号公報JP 2007-308773 A 特開2017-106110号公報JP 2017-106110 A 特開2018-119195号公報JP 2018-119195 A

しかしながら、特許文献1、2では、転炉炉回数による耐火物形状については言及されているものの、炉代ごとや転炉の部位ごとの耐火物形状については言及されていない。実際の転炉操業では、炉代や部位ごとに損耗挙動は大きく異なっており、これらの影響を無視することはできない。また、特許文献3の方法では、操業時の耐火物の形状を考慮できるものの、排滓挙動に大きな影響を及ぼす炉口近傍の耐火物形状については考慮しておらず、大きな誤差を生じる可能性がある。
以上のことから特許文献1、2や特許文献3などの従来技術を用いても、鉄の歩留りを低下させることなく、所定の量の脱珪スラグを転炉から短時間で速やかに排出することは難しい。
However, Patent Documents 1 and 2 refer to the refractory shape depending on the number of converter furnace runs, but do not refer to the refractory shape for each furnace run or for each part of the converter. In actual converter operation, wear behavior varies greatly depending on the furnace run and each part, and the influence of these factors cannot be ignored. In addition, the method of Patent Document 3 can take into account the shape of the refractory during operation, but does not take into account the shape of the refractory near the furnace throat, which has a significant effect on the slag discharge behavior, and this may result in a large error.
For the above reasons, even if conventional techniques such as those described in Patent Documents 1, 2, and 3 are used, it is difficult to quickly discharge a predetermined amount of desiliconization slag from a converter in a short period of time without reducing the iron yield.

したがって本発明の目的は、以上のような従来技術の課題を解決し、転炉型精錬炉を用いた金属精錬における中間排滓工程において、炉を傾動させることで溶融スラグの少なくとも一部を炉から排出するに際し、溶融金属の歩留りを低下させることなく、所定の量の溶融スラグを炉から短時間で速やかに排出することができる中間排滓方法を提供することにある。 The object of the present invention is therefore to solve the problems of the prior art as described above, and to provide an intermediate slag removal method in the intermediate slag removal process in metal refining using a converter-type refining furnace, which allows a predetermined amount of molten slag to be quickly removed from the furnace in a short time without reducing the yield of molten metal when at least a portion of the molten slag is removed from the furnace by tilting the furnace.

本発明者らは、転炉型精錬炉における中間排滓工程おいて、転炉型精錬炉の耐火物形状が溶融スラグの排滓挙動に及ぼす影響について鋭意研究を行った結果、実測した耐火物形状を基に炉体の傾動角度を制御することで、溶融金属の歩留りを低下させることなく、所定の量の溶融スラグを炉から短時間で速やかに排出することが可能となることを見出した。
本発明は、このような知見に基づきなされたもので、以下を要旨とするものである。
The inventors conducted intensive research into the effect of the refractory shape of a converter-type refining furnace on the slag removal behavior of molten slag in the intermediate slag removal process in the converter-type refining furnace, and as a result, they discovered that by controlling the tilting angle of the furnace body based on the measured refractory shape, it is possible to quickly remove a predetermined amount of molten slag from the furnace in a short period of time without reducing the yield of molten metal.
The present invention has been made based on these findings, and has the following gist.

[1]転炉型精錬炉(A)を用いた金属精錬における中間排滓工程において、炉体を傾動させることで溶融スラグの少なくとも一部を炉から排出するに際し、
実測した転炉型精錬炉(A)の耐火物形状(但し、付着地金がある場合の耐火物形状を含む。)を基に炉体の傾動角度を制御することを特徴とする金属精錬における中間排滓方法。
[2]上記[1]の中間排滓方法において、実測した転炉型精錬炉(A)の耐火物形状が、炉内形状または/および炉口形状であることを特徴とする金属精錬における中間排滓方法。
[3]上記[2]の中間排滓方法において、炉口形状は、付着地金を含む炉口形状であることを特徴とする金属精錬における中間排滓方法。
[4]上記[2]または[3]の中間排滓方法において、転炉型精錬炉(A)の耐火物形状を実測するにあたっては、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定と炉口形状のみの測定をそれぞれ行うとともに、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定頻度を炉口形状のみの測定頻度よりも少なくすることを特徴とする金属精錬における中間排滓方法。
[1] In an intermediate slag removal process in metal refining using a converter-type refining furnace (A), when at least a portion of the molten slag is removed from the furnace by tilting the furnace body,
A method for intermediate slag removal in metal refining, characterized in that the tilting angle of the furnace body is controlled based on the actually measured refractory shape of a converter-type refining furnace (A) (including the refractory shape when there is attached bullion).
[2] The intermediate slag removal method in metal refining according to the above [1], characterized in that the refractory shape of the converter-type refining furnace (A) measured actually is the shape of the furnace interior and/or the shape of the furnace throat.
[3] The intermediate slag removal method in metal refining, wherein the furnace throat shape is a furnace throat shape that includes adhering metal, in the intermediate slag removal method in the above [2].
[4] In the intermediate slag removal method according to the above [2] or [3], when actually measuring the refractory shape of the converter-type refining furnace (A), the refractory shape including the furnace interior shape and only the furnace throat shape are measured, respectively, and the measurement frequency of the refractory shape including the furnace interior shape is made less than the measurement frequency of only the furnace throat shape.

[5]上記[1]~[4]のいずれかの中間排滓方法において、転炉型精錬炉(A)の耐火物形状を実測する際に、非接触型距離計による計測値または/および撮像装置による画像によりプロファイル測定を行うことを特徴とする金属精錬における中間排滓方法。
[6]上記[1]~[5]のいずれかの中間排滓方法において、転炉型精錬炉(A)に投入した被精錬溶融物量および精錬剤量などに基づいて中間排滓時における炉内の溶融金属量と溶融スラグ量を算出し、この溶融金属量および溶融スラグ量と実測した耐火物形状に基づき、中間排滓の際に排滓が終了するときの炉体傾動角度である排滓終了角を求め、
中間排滓時には、前記排滓終了角に応じて炉体の傾動角度を制御することを特徴とする金属精錬における中間排滓方法。
[5] In any one of the intermediate slag removal methods according to the above [1] to [4], when actually measuring the shape of the refractory material of the converter-type refining furnace (A), a profile measurement is performed using a measurement value by a non-contact distance meter and/or an image by an imaging device.
[6] In any of the intermediate slag draining methods [1] to [5] above, the amount of molten metal and the amount of molten slag in the furnace at the time of intermediate slag draining are calculated based on the amount of molten material to be refined and the amount of refining agent charged into the converter-type refining furnace (A), and based on the amount of molten metal and the amount of molten slag and the measured shape of the refractory material, a slag draining completion angle, which is the furnace body tilting angle at which slag draining is completed during intermediate slag draining, is calculated;
A method for intermediate slag removal in metal refining, characterized in that, during intermediate slag removal, the tilting angle of the furnace body is controlled according to the slag removal end angle.

[7]上記[1]~[5]のいずれかの中間排滓方法において、転炉型精錬炉(A)に投入した被精錬溶融物量および精錬剤量などに基づいて中間排滓時における炉内の溶融金属量と溶融スラグ量を算出し、この溶融金属量および溶融スラグ量と実測した耐火物形状に基づき、中間排滓の際に排滓が開始するときの炉体傾動角度である排滓開始角と、排滓が終了するときの炉体傾動角度である排滓終了角を求め、
中間排滓時には、前記排滓開始角と排滓終了角に応じて炉体の傾動角度と傾動速度を制御することを特徴とする金属精錬における中間排滓方法。
[8]上記[7]の中間排滓方法において、中間排滓時には、炉体の傾動開始から排滓開始角に至るまでの傾動速度に較べて、排滓開始後の傾動速度を低くするとともに、排滓開始後は排滓終了角に近くなるにしたがって傾動速度を低下させ、排滓終了角にて一定時間保持することを特徴とする金属精錬における中間排滓方法。
[7] In any of the intermediate slag draining methods [1] to [5] above, the amount of molten metal and the amount of molten slag in the furnace at the time of intermediate slag draining are calculated based on the amount of molten material to be refined and the amount of refining agent charged into the converter-type refining furnace (A), and based on the amount of molten metal and the amount of molten slag and the measured shape of the refractory material, a slag draining start angle, which is the angle of tilting the furnace body when slag draining starts during intermediate slag draining, and a slag draining end angle, which is the angle of tilting the furnace body when slag draining ends, are calculated;
A method for intermediate slag-draining in metal refining, characterized in that, during intermediate slag-draining, the tilting angle and tilting speed of the furnace body are controlled according to the slag-draining start angle and the slag-draining end angle.
[8] A method for intermediate slag discharging in metal refining according to the above item [7], characterized in that, during intermediate slag discharging, the tilting speed after the start of slag discharging is slower than the tilting speed from the start of tilting of the furnace body until the slag discharging start angle is reached, and the tilting speed is slowed down as the slag discharging completion angle is approached after the start of slag discharging, and the slag discharging completion angle is maintained for a certain period of time.

[9]1つの転炉型精錬炉(A)を用い、中間排滓を挟んで脱珪処理と脱燐処理をこの順序で行う溶銑予備処理方法において、
上記[1]~[8]のいずれかの中間排滓方法により前記中間排滓を行うことを特徴とする溶銑予備処理方法。
[10]上記[9]の溶銑予備処理方法による溶銑予備処理を経て溶鋼を得ることを特徴とする溶鋼の製造方法。
[11]1つの転炉型精錬炉(A)を用い、中間排滓を挟んで脱珪・脱燐処理と脱炭処理をこの順序で行う製鋼方法において、
上記[1]~[8]のいずれかの中間排滓方法により前記中間排滓を行うことを特徴とする製鋼方法。
[9] A molten iron pretreatment method in which desiliconization and dephosphorization are performed in this order using one converter-type refining furnace (A) with intermediate slag removal in between,
A molten iron pretreatment method, comprising carrying out the intermediate slag removal by any one of the intermediate slag removal methods [1] to [8] above.
[10] A method for producing molten steel, comprising obtaining molten steel through the molten metal pretreatment method according to the above [9].
[11] A steelmaking method in which a single converter-type refining furnace (A) is used to carry out desiliconization, dephosphorization and decarburization in this order with intermediate slag disposal in between,
A steelmaking method, comprising the steps of: carrying out the intermediate slag removal by any one of the intermediate slag removal methods according to the above [1] to [8].

本発明によれば、転炉型精錬炉を用いた金属精錬における中間排滓工程において、炉体を傾動させることで溶融スラグの少なくとも一部を炉から排出するに際し、溶融金属の歩留りを低下させることなく、所定の量の溶融スラグを炉から短時間で速やかに排出することが可能となる。 According to the present invention, in the intermediate slag removal process in metal refining using a converter-type refining furnace, when discharging at least a portion of the molten slag from the furnace by tilting the furnace body, it is possible to quickly discharge a predetermined amount of molten slag from the furnace in a short time without reducing the yield of molten metal.

溶銑予備処理における中間排滓工程において脱珪スラグを転炉から排出している様子を表した説明図An explanatory diagram showing desiliconization slag being discharged from a converter during the intermediate slag removal process in hot metal pretreatment. 転炉の使用回数による耐火物形状の変化を模式的に示した説明図A schematic diagram showing the change in refractory shape depending on the number of times a converter is used 本発明法において、転炉の耐火物形状のプロファイル測定の実施状況の一例を模式的に示した説明図FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing a schematic example of a state in which a profile measurement of the refractory shape of a converter is carried out in the method of the present invention. 所定の使用回数の転炉におけるスラグ高さに応じたスラグ体積(スラグ量)であって、耐火物の一様損耗を仮定した既存の算出法によるスラグ体積と、耐火物形状のプロフィルを実測し、そのプロフィルに基づいて算出されるスラグ体積を比較して示したグラフThis is a graph showing the slag volume (amount of slag) according to the slag height in a converter after a certain number of uses, comparing the slag volume calculated by the existing calculation method assuming uniform wear of the refractory with the slag volume calculated based on the profile of the refractory shape that was actually measured. 所定の使用回数の転炉において、耐火物の一様損耗を仮定した耐火物形状と実測の耐火物形状における炉体の傾動角度ごとの排滓挙動を示した説明図An explanatory diagram showing the behavior of slag removal at each furnace body tilting angle for a refractory shape assuming uniform wear of the refractory and an actually measured refractory shape in a converter after a certain number of uses. 転炉の使用回数による炉口を含む耐火物形状の変化を模式的に示した説明図A schematic diagram showing the change in the shape of the refractory, including the throat, depending on the number of times the converter is used. 仮想実験における炉口を含む耐火物形状を示す説明図An explanatory diagram showing the refractory shape including the furnace throat in the virtual experiment 本発明法において、転炉の炉口形状のプロファイル測定の実施状況の一例を模式的に示した説明図FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing a schematic example of a state in which a profile measurement of the converter throat shape is carried out in the method of the present invention. 炉口画像の輝度分布を模式的に示した説明図A schematic diagram showing the brightness distribution of the furnace port image 炉内形状の計測結果に炉口形状の計測結果を合成して炉全体の耐火物形状を得る場合の一合成例を模式的に示す説明図FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing a schematic example of a synthesis process in which the measurement results of the furnace interior shape and the measurement results of the furnace throat shape are synthesized to obtain the refractory shape of the entire furnace. 炉内形状の計測結果に炉口形状の計測結果を合成して炉全体の耐火物形状を得る場合の他の合成例を模式的に示す説明図FIG. 13 is an explanatory diagram showing a schematic example of another synthesis example in which the measurement results of the furnace interior shape and the measurement results of the furnace throat shape are synthesized to obtain the refractory shape of the entire furnace. 実施例1において、本発明例および比較例の平均の中間排滓率と中間排滓率のバラツキの幅を示したグラフGraph showing the average intermediate slag discharge rate and the range of variation in the intermediate slag discharge rate for the present invention and the comparative example in Example 1.

図1は、溶銑予備処理における中間排滓工程において脱珪スラグを転炉から排出している様子を示している。図において、Aは転炉(転炉型精錬炉)、1は溶鉄(溶銑)、2は脱珪スラグ、3は転滓鍋、4は転滓台車である。
脱珪処理工程が終了した時点で、転炉A内の脱珪スラグ2は、上吹きランスから供給された酸素含有ガスと溶銑中の炭素との反応により発生したCOガス気泡が内包され、その見掛けの体積が気泡を含まない場合の数倍以上にも増大する、所謂、フォーミング状態となっている。この後、転炉Aを傾動させて炉口から脱珪スラグ2を炉下に設置した転滓鍋3に向けて排出する。
Fig. 1 shows the process of discharging desiliconization slag from a converter in the intermediate slag removal process of hot metal pretreatment. In the figure, A is a converter (converter-type refining furnace), 1 is molten iron (hot metal), 2 is desiliconization slag, 3 is a slag ladle, and 4 is a slag cart.
At the end of the desiliconization process, the desiliconization slag 2 in the converter A contains CO gas bubbles generated by the reaction between the oxygen-containing gas supplied from the top blowing lance and the carbon in the molten iron, and its apparent volume increases to several times that of the case without the bubbles, in a so-called foaming state. After this, the converter A is tilted to discharge the desiliconization slag 2 from the throat toward the slag ladle 3 installed below the furnace.

転炉Aの炉体は、吹錬を繰り返すことで耐火物の損耗が生じ、形状が次第に変化していく。図2(a)~(c)は、転炉Aの使用回数による耐火物形状(炉内形状および炉口形状)の変化を模式的に示したものである。図において、10は炉体を構成する耐火物であり、実線が各転炉使用回数での耐火物形状を示し、破線(図2(b)、(c)の破線)が使用回数0回(新炉)での耐火物形状を示している。転炉Aの使用回数が比較的少ない場合には、新炉に近い耐火物形状を示しているのに対し、転炉Aの使用回数が多くなると、局所的に耐火物の損耗が進み、不均一な損耗状態となる。この損耗状態は、転炉Aの炉代が変わるごとに変化し、また日々の操業状態によっても変化することになる。 The refractory wear of the converter A furnace body occurs as a result of repeated blowing, and the shape gradually changes. Figures 2(a) to (c) show schematic diagrams of the change in refractory shape (furnace interior shape and furnace throat shape) depending on the number of times converter A is used. In the figures, 10 is the refractory that makes up the furnace body, the solid lines show the refractory shape at each converter use count, and the dashed lines (dashed lines in Figures 2(b) and (c)) show the refractory shape at zero uses (new furnace). When converter A is used relatively few times, the refractory shape is close to that of a new furnace, but when converter A is used many times, the refractory wear progresses locally, resulting in an uneven wear state. This wear state changes every time the furnace price of converter A changes, and also changes depending on the daily operating conditions.

そこで、本発明では、定期的に転炉Aの耐火物形状(但し、付着地金がある場合の耐火物形状を含む。)を実測し、炉体を傾動させて中間排滓を行う際に、その実測した耐火物形状を基に炉体の傾動角度の制御を行う。具体的には、上述したような日々変化する損耗状態を把握するために、非接触型距離計や撮像装置などの手段を用いて定期的(例えば毎日)に耐火物形状のプロファイル測定を行い、この測定で得られた耐火物形状の実測値に基づき、中間排滓時の炉体の傾動角度(排滓開始角、排滓終了角)を求め、これに基づき炉体の傾動角度の制御を行う。また、さらに必要に応じて、後述するように傾動速度の制御を行ってもよい。
図3は、耐火物形状のプロファイル測定の実施状況の一例を模式的に示すものであり、転炉Aの炉口aに向けて配置された非接触型距離計5(例えば、レーザ距離計など)を用いて耐火物形状のプロファイル測定を行う場合を示している。この場合には、転炉Aでの処理終了後に溶鉄の出鋼およびスラグの排滓を行い、しかる後、転炉Aの近くに配置された非接触型距離計5(図中、6は三脚)に炉口aが向くように転炉Aを傾動させる。図3に示すように、炉口aから炉内が観察できるまで炉体を傾動させた状態で、非接触型距離計5により炉内や炉口の複数の測定点までの距離を計測し、その計測値からプロファイル測定装置7で耐火物形状の実測データを取得する。
Therefore, in the present invention, the shape of the refractory of the converter A (including the shape of the refractory when there is attached metal) is measured periodically, and when the furnace body is tilted to perform intermediate slag discharge, the tilting angle of the furnace body is controlled based on the measured refractory shape. Specifically, in order to grasp the daily changing wear state as described above, the profile of the refractory shape is measured periodically (for example, every day) using a means such as a non-contact type distance meter or an image pickup device, and the tilting angle of the furnace body during intermediate slag discharge (slag discharge start angle, slag discharge end angle) is obtained based on the actual value of the refractory shape obtained by this measurement, and the tilting angle of the furnace body is controlled based on this. Furthermore, if necessary, the tilting speed may be controlled as described later.
Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a state in which a profile measurement of a refractory shape is carried out, and shows a case in which the profile measurement of the refractory shape is carried out using a non-contact type distance meter 5 (e.g., a laser distance meter, etc.) arranged toward the throat a of the converter A. In this case, after the treatment in the converter A is completed, the molten iron is tapped and the slag is removed, and then the converter A is tilted so that the throat a faces the non-contact type distance meter 5 (in the figure, 6 is a tripod) arranged near the converter A. As shown in Fig. 3, in a state in which the furnace body is tilted until the inside of the furnace can be observed from the throat a, the non-contact type distance meter 5 measures distances to a plurality of measurement points in the furnace and at the throat, and the profile measurement device 7 obtains actual measurement data of the refractory shape from the measured values.

ここで、中間排滓時の炉体の傾動角度と排滓量との関係に影響を与える耐火物形状としては、炉内形状(炉内プロファイル)と炉口形状(炉口プロファイル)がある。転炉Aの炉口aは、耐火物の損耗が生じる一方で、地金(固化した溶鉄)が付着しやすく、この地金付着によっても形状や大きさが変化し、炉体の傾動角度と排滓量との関係に影響を与える。したがって、図3のような転炉Aの耐火物形状のプロファイル測定では、耐火物形状として、炉内形状または/および炉口形状が測定される。また、炉口aに地金が付着している場合には、測定される炉口形状は付着地金を含む炉口形状である。
また、耐火物形状のプロファイル測定を行う手段としては撮像装置を用いてもよく、例えば、図3における非接触型距離計5に代えて撮像装置を配置し、撮像装置により耐火物形状(炉内形状または/および炉口形状)のプロファイル測定を行い、耐火物形状の実測データを取得する。撮像装置で撮像された画像から耐火物形状の実測データを得る手法については、後述する。
Here, the refractory shape that affects the relationship between the tilting angle of the furnace body and the amount of slag discharged during intermediate slag discharge includes the furnace interior shape (furnace interior profile) and the furnace throat shape (furnace throat profile). The furnace throat a of the converter A is subject to refractory wear, but is also prone to adhesion of metal (solidified molten iron), and this adhesion of metal also changes the shape and size, affecting the relationship between the tilting angle of the furnace body and the amount of slag discharged. Therefore, in the profile measurement of the refractory shape of the converter A as shown in Figure 3, the furnace interior shape and/or the furnace throat shape are measured as the refractory shape. Furthermore, when metal is attached to the furnace throat a, the measured furnace throat shape is the furnace throat shape including the attached metal.
An imaging device may be used as a means for measuring the profile of the refractory shape, for example, an imaging device is provided instead of the non-contact type distance meter 5 in Fig. 3, and the imaging device is used to measure the profile of the refractory shape (furnace interior shape and/or furnace opening shape) and obtain measured data of the refractory shape. A method for obtaining measured data of the refractory shape from an image captured by the imaging device will be described later.

本発明では、上記のようにして実測した耐火物形状を基に、中間排滓時の炉体の傾動角度を求め、その制御を行うものであるが、具体的には、例えば、次のような制御を行う。転炉に投入した溶銑量(被精錬溶融物量)、精錬剤量などから中間排滓時における炉内の溶鉄量とスラグ量が算出できる。この溶鉄量・スラグ量と実測された耐火物形状に基づき、転炉を傾動させていった際に排滓(スラグ排出)が開始するときの炉体傾動角度(排滓開始角)と排滓が終了するとき(溶鉄排出が開始する直前)の炉体傾動角度(排滓終了角)が求まる。したがって、中間排滓時には、この排滓終了角に至るまで転炉を徐々に傾動させるように炉体の傾動角度を制御する。このように、実測された耐火物形状に基づいて求められた排滓終了角に応じて炉体の傾動角度を制御することにより、できるだけ溶鉄を排出させずに多くのスラグを速やかに排出する(排滓する)ことができる。
また、好ましくは、中間排滓時に、排滓開始角と排滓終了角に応じて炉体の傾動角度と傾動速度を制御する。例えば、中間排滓時には、排滓終了角に至るまで転炉を徐々に傾動させるように炉体の傾動角度を制御するが、前期吹錬終了後の炉体の傾動開始(傾動角度0度の直立状態からの傾動開始)から排滓開始角に至るまでの傾動速度に較べて、排滓開始後の傾動速度を低くするとともに、排滓開始後は排滓終了角に近くなるにしたがって傾動速度を低下させ、排滓終了角にて一定時間保持する。これにより、できるだけ溶鉄を排出させずに、できるだけ多くのスラグを速やかに排出する(排滓する)という目的をより高度に達成することができる。
In the present invention, the tilting angle of the furnace body during intermediate slag draining is calculated based on the shape of the refractory measured as described above, and the angle is controlled. Specifically, for example, the following control is performed. The amount of molten iron and slag in the furnace during intermediate slag draining can be calculated from the amount of molten iron (amount of molten material to be refined) and the amount of refining agent charged into the converter. Based on the amount of molten iron and slag and the measured shape of the refractory, the tilting angle of the furnace body when slag draining (slag discharge) starts as the converter is tilted (slag discharge start angle) and the tilting angle of the furnace body when slag discharge ends (just before molten iron discharge starts) are calculated. Therefore, during intermediate slag draining, the tilting angle of the furnace body is controlled so that the converter is gradually tilted until it reaches this slag discharge end angle. In this way, by controlling the tilting angle of the furnace body in accordance with the slag discharge end angle obtained based on the actually measured shape of the refractory, it is possible to quickly discharge (discharge) as much slag as possible while minimizing the discharge of molten iron.
Also, preferably, during intermediate slag dumping, the tilting angle and tilting speed of the furnace body are controlled according to the slag dumping start angle and the slag dumping end angle. For example, during intermediate slag dumping, the tilting angle of the furnace body is controlled so that the converter is gradually tilted until the slag dumping end angle is reached. However, the tilting speed after the start of slag dumping is slower than the tilting speed from the start of tilting of the furnace body after the end of the early blowing (tilting start from an upright state with a tilting angle of 0 degrees) until the slag dumping start angle, and after the start of slag dumping, the tilting speed is slowed as the slag dumping end angle is approached, and the slag dumping end angle is held for a certain period of time. This makes it possible to more highly achieve the objective of quickly discharging (discharging) as much slag as possible without discharging as much molten iron as possible.

本発明法が既存の方法(耐火物が使用回数に応じて一様に損耗すると仮定して炉の傾動角度を決める方法)に較べて転炉内のスラグの状況を正確に把握でき、中間排滓時に転炉を適正な傾動角度で傾動させることができることを確認すべく、以下のような試験を行った。
さきに挙げた特許文献1、2の技術は、耐火物が使用回数に応じて一様に損耗するとの仮定にたつものである。このような仮定のもとに算出されるスラグ体積(一様損耗を仮定した既存の算出法によるスラグ体積)と、本発明のように耐火物形状(炉内形状を含む耐火物形状)のプロフィルを実測し、そのプロフィルに基づいて算出されるスラグ体積を比較した結果を表1に示す。図4は、その結果をグラフにしたものである。この試験では、使用回数が1844回の転炉において、種々のスラグ高さに対応したスラグ体積を求めた。なお、表1および図4において、一様損耗を仮定した既存の算出法によるスラグ体積を「一様損耗」、本発明のように耐火物形状のプロフィルを実測し、そのプロフィルに基づいて算出されるスラグ体積を「実測値」と表記した。
In order to confirm that the method of the present invention can accurately grasp the state of slag in a converter and tilt the converter at an appropriate tilting angle during intermediate slag removal, as compared with the existing method (a method in which the tilting angle of the furnace is determined on the assumption that the refractories wear uniformly depending on the number of times they are used), the following tests were carried out.
The techniques of Patent Documents 1 and 2 cited above are based on the assumption that the refractory wears uniformly depending on the number of uses. Table 1 shows a comparison of the slag volume calculated based on such an assumption (slag volume calculated by the existing calculation method assuming uniform wear) with the slag volume calculated based on the profile of the refractory shape (including the shape inside the furnace) measured as in the present invention. FIG. 4 is a graph showing the results. In this test, slag volumes corresponding to various slag heights were obtained in a converter that had been used 1,844 times. In Table 1 and FIG. 4, the slag volume calculated based on the existing calculation method assuming uniform wear is indicated as "uniform wear", and the slag volume calculated based on the profile of the refractory shape measured as in the present invention is indicated as "actual measurement value".

Figure 0007690977000001
Figure 0007690977000001

表1および図4によると、スラグ高さが小さい場合には、両者のスラグ体積に差異は見られないが、スラグ高さが大きい場合には、一様損耗を仮定した既存の算出法はスラグ体積を過大に評価していることが判明した。すなわち、実際の転炉耐火物の損耗は、一様損耗すると仮定した場合と較べて少なかったことになる。ここでは使用回数が1844回での差異を示したが、他の使用回数や炉代では、一様損耗を仮定した既存の算出法は、必ずしも常にスラグ体積を過大に評価するという訳ではなく、過小評価する場合も見られた。以上の結果から、一様損耗を仮定した既存の算出法では、転炉内のスラグの状況を正確に把握することが困難であり、これに対して実測した耐火物形状に基づく算出法は、転炉内のスラグの状況を正確に把握できることが判る。 According to Table 1 and Figure 4, when the slag height is small, there is no difference in the slag volume between the two, but when the slag height is large, it was found that the existing calculation method assuming uniform wear overestimates the slag volume. In other words, the actual wear of the converter refractory was less than when uniform wear was assumed. Here, the difference at 1,844 uses is shown, but for other uses and furnace costs, the existing calculation method assuming uniform wear does not necessarily always overestimate the slag volume, and there were also cases where it was underestimated. From the above results, it is clear that the existing calculation method assuming uniform wear makes it difficult to accurately grasp the condition of the slag in the converter, while the calculation method based on the actually measured refractory shape can accurately grasp the condition of the slag in the converter.

また、既存法による一様損耗を仮定した耐火物形状と実測された耐火物形状が排滓挙動に及ぼす影響についても検討を行った。図5に、使用回数が2749回の転炉において、一様損耗を仮定した耐火物形状と実測の耐火物形状(炉内形状を含む耐火物形状)における傾動角度ごとの排滓挙動を示した。ここで、両者は溶鉄体積とスラグ体積を同一としてある。なお、図5において、一様損耗を仮定した耐火物形状を「一様損耗」、実測された耐火物形状を「実測値」と表記した。
図5によれば、既存法による一様損耗を仮定した耐火物形状の場合には、傾動角度が50度となった際にスラグの排滓が開始されるのに対し、実測された耐火物形状の場合には、傾動角度が60度となった際にスラグの排滓が開始された。すなわち、既存法による一様損耗を仮定した耐火物形状の場合では、スラグの体積を過小評価していることが判明した。ここでは使用回数が2749回での差異を示したが、他の使用回数や炉代では、一様損耗を仮定した算出法は、必ずしも常にスラグ体積を過小に評価するという訳ではなく、さきに示した使用回数が1844回の転炉の場合ように過大評価する場合も見られた。すなわち、一様損耗を仮定した既存の算出法においても、転炉内のスラグの状況を正確に再現することが困難であることが判る。
We also investigated the influence of the refractory shape assuming uniform wear according to the existing method and the actually measured refractory shape on the slag discharge behavior. Figure 5 shows the slag discharge behavior for each tilting angle for the refractory shape assuming uniform wear and the actually measured refractory shape (including the furnace interior shape) in a converter that had been used 2,749 times. Here, the molten iron volume and slag volume are the same for both. In Figure 5, the refractory shape assuming uniform wear is denoted as "uniform wear" and the actually measured refractory shape is denoted as "actual value".
According to Fig. 5, in the case of the refractory shape assuming uniform wear according to the existing method, slag discharge starts when the tilting angle reaches 50 degrees, whereas in the case of the measured refractory shape, slag discharge starts when the tilting angle reaches 60 degrees. That is, in the case of the refractory shape assuming uniform wear according to the existing method, it was found that the slag volume was underestimated. Here, the difference at 2749 uses was shown, but in other uses and furnace costs, the calculation method assuming uniform wear did not always underestimate the slag volume, and there were also cases where the slag volume was overestimated, as in the case of the converter with 1844 uses shown above. That is, it is found that even with the existing calculation method assuming uniform wear, it is difficult to accurately reproduce the state of the slag in the converter.

次に、本発明の好ましい実施形態である、実測される耐火物形状が炉内形状と炉口形状(付着地金を含む炉口形状)である場合について説明する。
転炉の形状変化は、耐火物の損耗以外でも生じ、特に炉口では地金などが付着して形状が常に変化する。地金付着が過大になると、酸素吹きなどによって地金を除去する作業が行われる。図6は、転炉の使用回数による炉口を含む耐火物形状の変化を模式的に示すもの(例示したもの)である。図において、10は炉体を構成する耐火物、11は炉口に付着した地金であり、実線が各転炉使用回数での耐火物形状を示し、破線が使用回数0回(新炉)での耐火物形状を示している。この図6は、使用307回目(図6(a))では炉口近傍の地金の付着はほとんどないが、使用337回目(図6(b))では炉口近傍の地金11の付着が過大になったため、酸素吹きにて除去した事例を示している。この場合、使用307回目(図6(a))と338回目(図6(c))は比較的炉体形状が類似しているものの、337回目(図6(b))の炉体形状は大きく異なっている。したがって、中間排滓時の炉体の傾動角度の制御は、損耗による耐火物形状の変化のみならず、炉口の地金付着などによる一時的な炉体形状の変化についても考慮されることが望ましい。
Next, a preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described in which the refractory shape to be actually measured is the furnace interior shape and the furnace throat shape (furnace throat shape including the deposited metal).
The shape of the converter changes due to reasons other than the wear of the refractory. In particular, the shape of the throat is constantly changing due to the adhesion of metals and the like. When the adhesion of metals becomes excessive, the work of removing the metals is carried out by blowing oxygen or the like. Figure 6 is a schematic (illustrative) diagram showing the change in the shape of the refractory, including the throat, depending on the number of times the converter is used. In the figure, 10 is the refractory constituting the furnace body, 11 is the metals attached to the throat, the solid lines show the refractory shapes at each number of times the converter is used, and the dashed lines show the refractory shapes at 0 times of use (new furnace). This Figure 6 shows an example in which there is almost no adhesion of metals near the throat in the 307th use (Figure 6(a)), but the adhesion of metals 11 near the throat became excessive in the 337th use (Figure 6(b)), so the metals were removed by blowing oxygen. In this case, the furnace body shapes for the 307th use (Fig. 6(a)) and the 338th use (Fig. 6(c)) are relatively similar, but the shape of the furnace body for the 337th use (Fig. 6(b)) is significantly different. Therefore, when controlling the tilting angle of the furnace body during intermediate slag draining, it is desirable to take into consideration not only the change in the refractory shape due to wear, but also the temporary change in the furnace body shape due to the adhesion of base metal to the throat.

本発明者らは、炉全体の耐火物形状のなかで、炉内形状(炉内の耐火物形状)だけでなく、炉口形状も排滓性に大きく影響することを、数値解析による排滓の仮想実験により明らかにした。この実験では、実機の1/20スケールを想定し、炉高さ500mm、炉径(胴直径)300mmの転炉容器を用い、この転炉容器内に、深さが炉底から約100mm(3.4kg)の液体1(仮想溶鉄)と、その上層約235mm(2.1kg)の液体2(仮想スラグ)を保持した。炉口を含む耐火物形状は、図7(a)~(d)に示す4種類とした。実験では、まず、開始30秒までを2度/sの速度で、その後は0.35度/sの速度でそれぞれ炉体を傾動させ、排滓開始角を調べた。また、傾動を開始して傾動角度が115度となった時点での排滓率を調べた。ここで、排滓率とは、排滓前のスラグ重量に対し、排滓により転炉外へ排出されたスラグ重量の割合を示す。 The inventors have clarified through a virtual experiment of slag removal using numerical analysis that not only the furnace interior shape (the refractory shape in the furnace) but also the furnace opening shape has a large effect on slag removal performance among the refractory shapes of the entire furnace. In this experiment, a converter vessel with a furnace height of 500 mm and a furnace diameter (body diameter) of 300 mm was used, assuming a scale of 1/20 of the actual machine, and liquid 1 (virtual molten iron) with a depth of about 100 mm (3.4 kg) from the bottom of the furnace and liquid 2 (virtual slag) with a depth of about 235 mm (2.1 kg) above it were held in the converter vessel. The refractory shapes including the furnace opening were four types shown in Figures 7 (a) to (d). In the experiment, the furnace body was tilted at a speed of 2 degrees/s for the first 30 seconds and then at a speed of 0.35 degrees/s to examine the slag removal start angle. In addition, the slag removal rate was examined when the tilting angle reached 115 degrees after the start of tilting. Here, the slag discharge rate refers to the ratio of the weight of slag discharged outside the converter by slag discharge to the weight of slag before slag discharge.

排滓開始角を調べた結果を表2に、排滓率を調べた結果を表3にそれぞれ示す。これらによると、排滓開始角や排滓率は炉口形状に大きく依存し、かつ炉口に段差があるなしなどの詳細形状よりも開口寸法に大きく依存している。このように排滓性を評価するには、炉全体の耐火物形状のなかで炉口形状も重要な要素となり、炉口形状を精度よく把握することも重要であることが判る。

Figure 0007690977000002
Figure 0007690977000003
The results of the investigation of the slag discharge start angle are shown in Table 2, and the results of the investigation of the slag discharge rate are shown in Table 3. According to these, the slag discharge start angle and the slag discharge rate are greatly dependent on the furnace throat shape, and are more dependent on the opening dimensions than on the detailed shape such as whether the throat has a step or not. Thus, in order to evaluate the slag discharge performance, the throat shape is also an important factor among the refractory shapes of the entire furnace, and it is clear that it is also important to accurately grasp the throat shape.
Figure 0007690977000002
Figure 0007690977000003

炉口形状(付着地金を含む炉口形状)や炉内形状の測定は、さきに説明した方法(図3)で測定することができる。例えば、図3に示すように非接触型距離計5を用いて炉口形状のプロファイル測定を行う場合、計測の走査範囲を炉口に限定することで計測時間の短縮を図ることができる。
また、撮像装置を用いる場合には、図8に示すように異なる位置に設置した2台以上の撮像装置9(カメラ)で撮影された2枚以上の画像から、フォトグラメトリー、すなわち複数の画像に共通する点の各画素を選び、三角測量の原理で各画素の対応関係を求め、対象点の3次元座標を算出し、対象点までの距離を取得することにより、炉口形状のプロファイル測定を行うことができる。また、他の方法としては、図9に示すように、炉口を撮影した画像の輝度情報から地金が存在する輝度領域(図中ではグレーの部分)を抽出して炉口の地金領域を求め、炉口形状のプロファイル測定を行うことができる。ここで、図9において、100は炉口周辺を示す輝度領域、101は炉口地金付着を示す輝度領域、102は炉底耐火物を示す輝度領域である。
The throat shape (thrust shape including the deposited metal) and the shape inside the furnace can be measured by the method described above (FIG. 3). For example, when measuring the profile of the throat shape using a non-contact distance meter 5 as shown in FIG. 3, the measurement time can be reduced by limiting the measurement scanning range to the throat.
In addition, when an imaging device is used, as shown in Fig. 8, from two or more images taken by two or more imaging devices 9 (cameras) installed at different positions, photogrammetry, i.e., selecting pixels of points common to a plurality of images, determining the correspondence of each pixel by the principle of triangulation, calculating the three-dimensional coordinates of the target point, and acquiring the distance to the target point, can be used to perform profile measurement of the throat shape. As another method, as shown in Fig. 9, a brightness area where bare metal exists (gray area in the figure) can be extracted from brightness information of an image taken of the throat to determine the bare metal area of the throat, and the throat shape profile can be measured. Here, in Fig. 9, 100 is a brightness area indicating the vicinity of the throat, 101 is a brightness area indicating the attachment of bare metal to the throat, and 102 is a brightness area indicating the hearth refractory.

本発明において、実測される耐火物形状が炉内形状と炉口形状(付着地金を含む炉口形状)である場合も、その実測された耐火物形状を基に炉体の傾動角度を制御することに変わりはない。その具体例は、上述した通りであり、実測された耐火物形状に基づいて求められた排滓開始角や排滓終了角に応じて炉体の傾動角度(さらには傾動速度)を制御する。これにより、できるだけ溶鉄を排出させずに、できるだけ多くのスラグを速やかに排出する(排滓する)ことができる。 In the present invention, even when the measured refractory shape is the furnace interior shape and the furnace mouth shape (furnace mouth shape including the attached base metal), the tilting angle of the furnace body is still controlled based on the measured refractory shape. Specific examples are as described above, and the tilting angle of the furnace body (and the tilting speed) is controlled according to the slag discharge start angle and slag discharge end angle determined based on the measured refractory shape. This makes it possible to discharge (discharge) as much slag as possible quickly while minimizing the discharge of molten iron.

本発明を実施するに当たり耐火物形状の計測が実施されるが、耐火物形状の計測は、操業間に実施されるため、計測頻度が高いと生産効率(炉稼働率)に影響する。一方、炉口の形状変化に比べ、炉内の耐火物損耗による形状変化は比較的緩やかであるため、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定頻度を炉口形状のみの測定頻度よりも少なくしても、耐火物形状の実測値を逐次取得する上では大きな問題はない。したがって、本発明において耐火物形状を実測するにあたっては、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状(通常、炉内形状を含む炉全体の耐火物形状。以下同様。)の測定と炉口形状のみの測定をそれぞれ行うとともに、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定頻度を炉口形状のみの測定頻度よりも少なくすることができる。これにより、生産効率への影響を抑えつつ、実測した耐火物形状に基づく中間排滓での炉体の傾動角制御を行うことができる。
炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定頻度と炉口形状のみの測定頻度は特に制限はなく、生産効率への影響や測定に要する作業負荷などを考慮して決めればよいが、例えば、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定を300~700ch毎に、炉口形状のみの測定を10~30ch毎にそれぞれ行うような測定頻度とすることができる。
In carrying out the present invention, the refractory shape is measured. However, since the measurement of the refractory shape is carried out between operations, if the measurement frequency is high, it will affect the production efficiency (furnace operating rate). On the other hand, since the shape change due to wear of the refractory in the furnace is relatively gradual compared to the shape change of the furnace throat, even if the measurement frequency of the refractory shape including the furnace inner shape is made less than the measurement frequency of only the furnace throat shape, there is no big problem in sequentially obtaining the actual value of the refractory shape. Therefore, when actually measuring the refractory shape in the present invention, the measurement of the refractory shape including the furnace inner shape (usually the refractory shape of the entire furnace including the furnace inner shape; the same applies below) and the measurement of only the furnace throat shape are performed, and the measurement frequency of the refractory shape including the furnace inner shape can be made less than the measurement frequency of only the furnace throat shape. This makes it possible to control the tilt angle of the furnace body at intermediate slag discharge based on the measured refractory shape while suppressing the influence on the production efficiency.
There is no particular restriction on the frequency of measurement of the refractory shape including the furnace interior shape and the frequency of measurement of only the furnace opening shape, and these may be determined taking into consideration the impact on production efficiency and the workload required for the measurements. For example, the measurement frequency can be set so that the measurement of the refractory shape including the furnace interior shape is performed every 300 to 700 ch, and the measurement of only the furnace opening shape is performed every 10 to 30 ch.

また、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定頻度を炉口形状のみの測定頻度よりも少なくする場合、測定頻度が少ない炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の計測結果に、測定頻度が多い炉口形状のみの測定結果を合成して、当該チャージの中間排滓に利用する耐火物形状を得ることができる。そして、この合成された耐火物形状に基づき、各チャージ毎の炉体の傾動角度制御を行う。
図10、図11は、そのような合成例をそれぞれ模式的に示したものであり、各図(a)に示す測定頻度が少ない炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の計測結果に、各図(b)に示す測定頻度が多い炉口形状のみの計測結果を合成して、各図(c)に示す耐火物形状を得るものである。この場合、各図(a)の計測時から現在の操業チャージまでの炉内形状の経時変化の予測を各図(a)に加える補正を行ってもよい。例えば、耐火物損耗が一定の速度で起こると仮定し、図(a)の計測値からチャージ数に応じた一定値(損耗量)を差し引く補正を行う。
In addition, when the measurement frequency of the refractory shape including the furnace interior shape is set lower than the measurement frequency of only the furnace opening shape, the measurement results of the refractory shape including the furnace interior shape that is measured less frequently can be combined with the measurement results of only the furnace opening shape that is measured more frequently to obtain the refractory shape to be used for intermediate slag removal of the charge. Then, the tilting angle of the furnace body for each charge is controlled based on this combined refractory shape.
Figures 10 and 11 are schematic diagrams showing such synthesis examples, in which the measurement results of the refractory shape including the furnace interior shape, which is measured less frequently, shown in each figure (a), are synthesized with the measurement results of only the furnace opening shape, which is measured more frequently, shown in each figure (b), to obtain the refractory shape shown in each figure (c). In this case, a correction may be made by adding a prediction of the change in the furnace interior shape over time from the measurement time of each figure (a) to the current operational charge to each figure (a). For example, a correction is made by assuming that the refractory wear occurs at a constant rate and subtracting a constant value (amount of wear) according to the number of charges from the measurement value in figure (a).

また、地金の除去作業が行われる際に炉口形状のみの計測を行うことが望ましいが、直近で地金除去が行われた際に計測した炉口形状を利用することもできる。その場合には、計測した炉口形状からチャージ数に応じた一定値(損耗量)を差し引くなどの補正を加えてもよい。
炉口形状のみの測定頻度は、生産効率に影響しない程度に高頻度で実施することが望ましいが、地金除去の頻度以上の高頻度であることが好ましい。例えば、30チャージ毎に地金除去作業を実施する場合は、その間に炉口形状のみの計測を1回以上実施するのが好ましい。
Although it is desirable to measure only the throat shape when the metal removal work is performed, the throat shape measured when the metal removal work was performed most recently can be used. In that case, a correction such as subtracting a fixed value (loss amount) according to the number of charges from the measured throat shape may be performed.
The frequency of measurement of only the throat shape is desirably performed as frequently as possible without affecting production efficiency, but is preferably higher than the frequency of metal removal. For example, when metal removal is performed every 30 charges, it is preferable to measure only the throat shape at least once during that time.

上述した実施形態(図1など)では、本発明法を溶銑予備処理における中間排滓に適用した例を示したが、本発明法は転炉型精錬炉を用いた金属精錬に広く適用でき、例えば、転炉製鋼、電気炉製鋼、銅精錬等の非鉄金属精錬などにも適用可能である。
本発明法が適用される溶銑予備処理では、例えば、中間排滓を挟んで脱珪処理と脱燐処理をこの順序で行う際に、上述した方法で中間排滓を行う。このような溶銑予備処理を経た溶銑は脱炭処理されて溶鋼となる。
また、本発明法が転炉製鋼に適用される場合、例えば、中間排滓を挟んで脱珪・脱燐処理と脱炭処理をこの順序で行う際に、上述した方法で中間排滓を行う。このような転炉製鋼により溶銑から溶鋼が得られる。
In the above-described embodiment (FIG. 1, etc.), an example has been shown in which the method of the present invention is applied to intermediate slag removal in molten iron pretreatment. However, the method of the present invention can be widely applied to metal refining using a converter-type refining furnace, and can also be applied to, for example, converter steelmaking, electric furnace steelmaking, copper refining, and other non-ferrous metal refining processes.
In the hot metal pretreatment to which the present invention is applied, for example, when desiliconization and dephosphorization are performed in this order with intermediate slag removal in between, the intermediate slag removal is performed by the above-mentioned method. After such hot metal pretreatment, the hot metal is decarburized to become molten steel.
When the method of the present invention is applied to converter steelmaking, for example, when desiliconization/dephosphorization and decarburization are performed in this order with intermediate slag removal in between, the intermediate slag removal is performed by the above-mentioned method. Molten steel is obtained from molten pig iron by such converter steelmaking.

[実施例1]
300ton転炉を用いた溶銑予備処理において、本発明法(本発明例)と従来法(比較例)をN=100chずつ実施し、中間排滓における排滓率(中間排滓率)を比較した。排滓率を求めるに当たり、中間排滓前のスラグ重量は、吹錬モデルの計算によって求めたスラグ生成量とした。また、中間排滓にて転炉外へ排出されたスラグ重量については、排出されたスラグを運搬する転滓台車にロ-ドセル方式の秤量器を設置し、台車上の転滓鍋の風袋引き等の前処理を行った後、スラグ排出完了時の重量から排出されたスラグ重量を求めた。
本発明例では、試験開始時(0ch)と50ch経過後にレーザ距離計により炉内耐火物の形状を計測した。耐火物形状を計測していないチャージでは、炉体耐火物の損耗量を0.2mm/ch一定とし、直近に計測された炉内形状を補正した。
[Example 1]
In the hot metal pretreatment using a 300 ton converter, the present invention (example) and the conventional method (comparison example) were carried out with N=100ch each, and the slag removal rate at intermediate slag removal (intermediate slag removal rate) was compared. In calculating the slag removal rate, the weight of slag before intermediate slag removal was taken as the amount of slag generated calculated by the blowing model. In addition, the weight of slag discharged from the converter in intermediate slag removal was calculated by installing a load cell type weighing device on the slag transfer cart that transports the discharged slag, and after pretreatment such as taring the slag ladle on the cart, the weight of the discharged slag was calculated from the weight at the time of completion of slag discharge.
In the present invention, the shape of the refractory inside the furnace was measured by a laser distance meter at the start of the test (0 ch) and after 50 ch. In the charge in which the refractory shape was not measured, the wear rate of the furnace body refractory was set constant at 0.2 mm/ch, and the most recently measured shape inside the furnace was corrected.

転炉に投入した溶銑量、精錬剤量などから中間排滓時における炉内の溶鉄量とスラグ量を算出し、この溶鉄量・スラグ量と実測された耐火物形状に基づき排滓開始角と排滓終了角を求めた。そして、中間排滓時には、排滓終了角に至るまで転炉を徐々に傾動させるように炉体の傾動角度を制御するとともに、炉体の傾動開始から排滓開始角に至るまでの傾動速度を高くし、これに対して排滓開始後は傾動速度を低くした。さらに、排滓終了角に近くなるにしたがって傾動速度を低下させ、排滓終了角にて一定時間保持するようにした。
比較例では、炉体耐火物の損耗量を0.2mm/ch一定とし、オペレータの目視にて転炉の傾動を行う中間排滓を行った。
図12に、本発明例および比較例における平均の中間排滓率と中間排滓率のバラツキの幅を示す。比較例の中間排滓率は約45%であるのに対し、本発明例の中間排滓率は約64%となった。また、本発明例では、比較例に較べて各chにおける排滓量のバラツキも低減できた。
The amount of molten iron and slag in the converter during intermediate slag draining was calculated from the amount of molten iron and refining agents charged into the converter, and the start and end angles of slag draining were calculated based on the amount of molten iron and slag and the measured shape of the refractories. During intermediate slag draining, the tilting angle of the converter was controlled so that the converter was gradually tilted until it reached the end angle of slag draining, and the tilting speed was increased from the start of tilting the converter until it reached the start angle of slag draining, while the tilting speed was decreased after slag draining had started. Furthermore, the tilting speed was decreased as the end angle of slag draining was approached, and the end angle of slag draining was maintained for a certain period of time.
In the comparative example, the wear rate of the furnace body refractory was set constant at 0.2 mm/ch, and intermediate slag removal was performed by tilting the converter under visual inspection by an operator.
Figure 12 shows the average intermediate slag discharge rate and the range of variation in the intermediate slag discharge rate in the present invention example and the comparative example. The intermediate slag discharge rate in the comparative example was about 45%, while the intermediate slag discharge rate in the present invention example was about 64%. In addition, the present invention example was able to reduce the variation in the amount of slag discharged in each channel compared to the comparative example.

[実施例2]
300ton転炉を用いた溶銑予備処理において、2水準の本発明法(本発明例1,2)と従来法(比較例)をN=100chずつ実施し、中間排滓における排滓率(中間排滓率)を比較した。中間排滓率は実施例1と同様に求めた。なお、従来法(比較例)は[実施例1]と同じである。
本発明例1では、50ch毎に図3の方法で炉内形状を含む耐火物形状(炉内形状を含む炉全体の耐火物形状)を計測し、10ch毎に図9で説明した手法で炉口形状のみを計測した。本発明例2では、50ch毎に図3の方法で炉内形状を含む耐火物形状(炉内形状を含む炉全体の耐火物形状)を計測し、1ch毎に図9で説明した手法で炉口形状のみを計測した。本発明例1,2ともに、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状を計測していないチャージでは、炉体耐火物の損耗量を0.2mm/ch一定とし、直近に計測された炉内形状を補正した。
[Example 2]
In the hot metal pretreatment using a 300 ton converter, two levels of the present invention (Invention Examples 1 and 2) and a conventional method (Comparative Example) were carried out with N = 100 ch each, and the slag removal rate in intermediate slag removal (intermediate slag removal rate) was compared. The intermediate slag removal rate was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1. The conventional method (Comparative Example) was the same as [Example 1].
In Example 1 of the present invention, the refractory shape including the furnace internal shape (the refractory shape of the entire furnace including the furnace internal shape) was measured every 50 channels using the method of Fig. 3, and only the furnace throat shape was measured every 10 channels using the method described in Fig. 9. In Example 2 of the present invention, the refractory shape including the furnace internal shape (the refractory shape of the entire furnace including the furnace internal shape) was measured every 50 channels using the method of Fig. 3, and only the furnace throat shape was measured every 1 channel using the method described in Fig. 9. In both Examples 1 and 2 of the present invention, in charges in which the refractory shape including the furnace internal shape was not measured, the wear amount of the furnace body refractory was set constant at 0.2 mm/ch, and the furnace internal shape measured most recently was corrected.

転炉に投入した溶銑量、精錬剤量などから中間排滓時における炉内の溶鉄量とスラグ量を算出し、この溶鉄量・スラグ量と実測された耐火物形状に基づき排滓開始角と排滓終了角を求めた。そして、中間排滓時には、排滓終了角に至るまで転炉を徐々に傾動させるように炉体の傾動角度を制御するとともに、炉体の傾動開始から排滓開始角に至るまでの傾動速度を高くし、これに対して排滓開始後は傾動速度を低くした。さらに、排滓終了角に近くなるにしたがって傾動速度を低下させ、排滓終了角にて一定時間保持するようにした。
この実施例において、比較例では中間排滓率が約45%、各chにおける中間排滓率のバラツキの幅が約30%であったのに対し、本発明例1では中間排滓率が約65%、各chにおけるバラツキの幅が約10%となり、本発明例2では中間排滓率が約69%、各chにおけるバラツキの幅が約7%となった。すなわち、本発明例1,2では、比較例に較べて中間排滓率が向上するとともに、中間排滓率のバラツキも低減できた。また、本発明例1と本発明例2とを比較すると、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定頻度が同じでも、炉口形状のみの測定頻度が多い方が、中間排滓率が向上し、中間排滓率のバラツキも低減することがわかる。
The amount of molten iron and slag in the converter during intermediate slag draining was calculated from the amount of molten iron and refining agents charged into the converter, and the start and end angles of slag draining were calculated based on the amount of molten iron and slag and the measured shape of the refractories. During intermediate slag draining, the tilting angle of the converter was controlled so that the converter was gradually tilted until it reached the end angle of slag draining, and the tilting speed was increased from the start of tilting the converter until it reached the start angle of slag draining, while the tilting speed was decreased after slag draining had started. Furthermore, the tilting speed was decreased as the end angle of slag draining was approached, and the end angle of slag draining was maintained for a certain period of time.
In this embodiment, the intermediate slag discharge rate in the comparative example was about 45%, and the variation in the intermediate slag discharge rate in each channel was about 30%, while the intermediate slag discharge rate in the present invention example 1 was about 65%, and the variation in the intermediate slag discharge rate in each channel was about 10%, and the intermediate slag discharge rate in the present invention example 2 was about 69%, and the variation in the intermediate slag discharge rate in each channel was about 7%. That is, the intermediate slag discharge rate in the present invention examples 1 and 2 was improved and the variation in the intermediate slag discharge rate was reduced compared to the comparative example. In addition, when the present invention example 1 and the present invention example 2 are compared, it can be seen that the intermediate slag discharge rate is improved and the variation in the intermediate slag discharge rate is reduced when the measurement frequency of only the furnace opening shape is higher, even if the measurement frequency of the refractory shape including the furnace interior shape is the same.

[実施例3]
300ton転炉を用いた溶銑予備処理において、2水準の本発明法(本発明例A,B)をN=100chずつ実施し、中間排滓における排滓率(中間排滓率)と生産効率を比較した。中間排滓率は実施例1と同様に求めた。
本発明例Aでは、10ch毎に図3の方法で炉内形状を含む耐火物形状(炉内形状を含む炉全体の耐火物形状)を計測し、同じく10ch毎に図9で説明した手法で炉口形状のみを計測した。本発明例Bでは、50ch毎に図3の方法で炉内形状を含む耐火物形状(炉内形状を含む炉全体の耐火物形状)を計測し、10ch毎に図9で説明した手法で炉口形状のみを計測した。本発明例A,Bともに、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状を計測していないチャージでは、炉体耐火物の損耗量を0.2mm/ch一定とし、直近に計測された炉内形状を補正した。
[Example 3]
In the hot metal pretreatment using a 300 ton converter, two levels of the method of the present invention (Invention Examples A and B) were carried out with N = 100 ch each, and the slag removal rate at intermediate slag removal (intermediate slag removal rate) and production efficiency were compared. The intermediate slag removal rate was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1.
In Example A, the refractory shape including the furnace internal shape (the refractory shape of the entire furnace including the furnace internal shape) was measured every 10 ch using the method of Fig. 3, and only the furnace throat shape was measured every 10 ch using the method described in Fig. 9. In Example B, the refractory shape including the furnace internal shape (the refractory shape of the entire furnace including the furnace internal shape) was measured every 50 ch using the method of Fig. 3, and only the furnace throat shape was measured every 10 ch using the method described in Fig. 9. In both Examples A and B, in charges where the refractory shape including the furnace internal shape was not measured, the wear amount of the furnace body refractory was set constant at 0.2 mm/ch, and the furnace internal shape measured most recently was corrected.

転炉に投入した溶銑量、精錬剤量などから中間排滓時における炉内の溶鉄量とスラグ量を算出し、この溶鉄量・スラグ量と実測された耐火物形状に基づき排滓開始角と排滓終了角を求めた。そして、中間排滓時には、排滓終了角に至るまで転炉を徐々に傾動させるように炉体の傾動角度を制御するとともに、炉体の傾動開始から排滓開始角に至るまでの傾動速度を高くし、これに対して排滓開始後は傾動速度を低くした。さらに、排滓終了角に近くなるにしたがって傾動速度を低下させ、排滓終了角にて一定時間保持するようにした。
この実施例において、本発明例A,Bともに中間排滓率が約62%、各chにおける中間排滓率のバラツキの幅は約11%で、ほとんど変わらなかった。一方、生産効率については、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定頻度と炉口形状のみの測定頻度が同じである本発明例Aは、1日の平均処理が45chであったのに対して、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定頻度を炉口形状のみの測定頻度よりも少なくした本発明例Bは、1日の平均処理が50chであり、本発明例Aに較べて高い生産効率が得られた。
The amount of molten iron and slag in the converter during intermediate slag draining was calculated from the amount of molten iron and refining agents charged into the converter, and the start and end angles of slag draining were calculated based on the amount of molten iron and slag and the measured shape of the refractories. During intermediate slag draining, the tilting angle of the converter was controlled so that the converter was gradually tilted until it reached the end angle of slag draining, and the tilting speed was increased from the start of tilting the converter until it reached the start angle of slag draining, while the tilting speed was decreased after slag draining had started. Furthermore, the tilting speed was decreased as the end angle of slag draining was approached, and the end angle of slag draining was maintained for a certain period of time.
In this example, the intermediate slag discharge rate was about 62% for both Invention Examples A and B, and the variation in the intermediate slag discharge rate for each channel was about 11%, which was almost the same. On the other hand, with regard to production efficiency, Invention Example A, in which the measurement frequency of the refractory shape including the furnace inner shape was the same as the measurement frequency of only the furnace opening shape, had an average daily processing rate of 45 channels, whereas Invention Example B, in which the measurement frequency of the refractory shape including the furnace inner shape was less than the measurement frequency of only the furnace opening shape, had an average daily processing rate of 50 channels, and thus achieved a higher production efficiency than Invention Example A.

1 溶鉄
2 脱珪スラグ
3 転滓鍋
4 転滓台車
5 非接触型距離計
6 三脚
7 プロファイル測定装置
8 演算装置
9 撮像装置
10 耐火物
11 地金
100 炉口周辺を示す輝度領域
101 炉口地金付着を示す輝度領域
102 炉底耐火物を示す輝度領域
A 転炉(転炉型精錬炉)
a 炉口
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 1 molten iron 2 desiliconization slag 3 slag ladle 4 slag trolley 5 non-contact distance meter 6 tripod 7 profile measuring device 8 computing device 9 imaging device 10 refractory 11 ingot 100 brightness area showing vicinity of furnace throat 101 brightness area showing ingot adhesion to furnace throat 102 brightness area showing hearth refractory A converter (converter-type refining furnace)
a Hearth mouth

Claims (9)

転炉型精錬炉(A)を用いた金属精錬における中間排滓工程において、炉体を傾動させることで溶融スラグの少なくとも一部を炉から排出するに際し、
実測した転炉型精錬炉(A)の耐火物形状(但し、付着地金がある場合の耐火物形状を含む。)を基に炉体の傾動角度を制御し、
転炉型精錬炉(A)の耐火物形状を実測するにあたっては、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定と炉口形状のみの測定をそれぞれ行うとともに、炉内形状を含む耐火物形状の測定頻度を炉口形状のみの測定頻度よりも少なくすることを特徴とする金属精錬における中間排滓方法。
In an intermediate slag removal process in metal refining using a converter-type refining furnace (A), when at least a portion of the molten slag is removed from the furnace by tilting the furnace body,
The tilting angle of the furnace body is controlled based on the measured refractory shape of the converter-type refining furnace (A) (including the refractory shape when there is attached metal);
This method for intermediate slag removal in metal refining is characterized in that, when measuring the refractory shape of a converter-type refining furnace (A), the refractory shape including the furnace interior shape and only the furnace opening shape are measured, and the measurement frequency of the refractory shape including the furnace interior shape is made less than the measurement frequency of only the furnace opening shape.
炉口形状は、付着地金を含む炉口形状であることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の金属精錬における中間排滓方法。 The method for intermediate slag removal in metal refining according to claim 1 , characterized in that the furnace throat shape is a furnace throat shape that includes adherent bullion. 転炉型精錬炉(A)の耐火物形状を実測する際に、非接触型距離計による計測値または/および撮像装置による画像によりプロファイル測定を行うことを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の金属精錬における中間排滓方法。 The intermediate slag removal method in metal refining according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that when measuring the refractory shape of the converter-type refining furnace (A), profile measurement is performed using measurement values from a non-contact distance meter and/or an image from an imaging device. 転炉型精錬炉(A)に投入した被精錬溶融物量および精錬剤量に基づいて中間排滓時における炉内の溶融金属量と溶融スラグ量を算出し、この溶融金属量および溶融スラグ量と実測した耐火物形状に基づき、中間排滓の際に排滓が終了するときの炉体傾動角度である排滓終了角を求め、
中間排滓時には、前記排滓終了角に応じて炉体の傾動角度を制御することを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の金属精錬における中間排滓方法。
The amount of molten metal and the amount of molten slag in the furnace at the time of intermediate slag draining are calculated based on the amount of molten material to be refined and the amount of refining agent charged into the converter-type refining furnace (A), and the amount of molten metal and the amount of molten slag in the furnace at the time of intermediate slag draining is calculated based on the amount of molten metal and the amount of molten slag and the measured shape of the refractory material, and the slag draining completion angle, which is the furnace body tilting angle at which slag draining is completed during intermediate slag draining, is calculated.
3. The method for intermediate slag removal in metal refining according to claim 1 , wherein the tilting angle of the furnace body is controlled according to the end angle of the intermediate slag removal.
転炉型精錬炉(A)に投入した被精錬溶融物量および精錬剤量に基づいて中間排滓時における炉内の溶融金属量と溶融スラグ量を算出し、この溶融金属量および溶融スラグ量と実測した耐火物形状に基づき、中間排滓の際に排滓が開始するときの炉体傾動角度である排滓開始角と、排滓が終了するときの炉体傾動角度である排滓終了角を求め、
中間排滓時には、前記排滓開始角と排滓終了角に応じて炉体の傾動角度と傾動速度を制御することを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の金属精錬における中間排滓方法。
The amount of molten metal and the amount of molten slag in the furnace at the time of intermediate slag discharge are calculated based on the amount of molten material to be refined and the amount of refining agent charged into the converter-type refining furnace (A), and based on the amount of molten metal and the amount of molten slag and the measured shape of the refractory material, the slag discharge start angle, which is the angle of tilting the furnace body when slag discharge starts during intermediate slag discharge, and the slag discharge end angle, which is the angle of tilting the furnace body when slag discharge ends, are calculated;
3. The method for intermediate slag removal in metal refining according to claim 1 or 2 , characterized in that, during intermediate slag removal, the tilting angle and the tilting speed of the furnace body are controlled according to the slag removal start angle and the slag removal end angle.
中間排滓時には、炉体の傾動開始から排滓開始角に至るまでの傾動速度に較べて、排滓開始後の傾動速度を低くするとともに、排滓開始後は排滓終了角に近くなるにしたがって傾動速度を低下させ、排滓終了角にて一定時間保持することを特徴とする請求項5に記載の金属精錬における中間排滓方法。 6. The method for intermediate slag discharging in metal refining according to claim 5, characterized in that, during intermediate slag discharging, the tilting speed after the start of slag discharging is slower than the tilting speed from the start of tilting the furnace body until the slag discharging start angle is reached, and the tilting speed is slowed down as the slag discharging end angle is approached after the start of slag discharging, and the slag discharging end angle is held for a certain period of time. 1つの転炉型精錬炉(A)を用い、中間排滓を挟んで脱珪処理と脱燐処理をこの順序で行う溶銑予備処理方法において、
請求項1または2に記載の中間排滓方法により前記中間排滓を行うことを特徴とする溶銑予備処理方法。
A molten iron pretreatment method using one converter-type refining furnace (A) and carrying out desiliconization and dephosphorization in this order with intermediate slag removal in between, comprising:
A molten iron pretreatment method, comprising the steps of: carrying out the intermediate slag removal by the intermediate slag removal method according to claim 1 or 2 .
請求項7に記載の溶銑予備処理方法による溶銑予備処理を経て溶鋼を得ることを特徴とする溶鋼の製造方法。 A method for producing molten steel, comprising obtaining molten steel through a molten metal pretreatment method according to claim 7 . 1つの転炉型精錬炉(A)を用い、中間排滓を挟んで脱珪・脱燐処理と脱炭処理をこの順序で行う製鋼方法において、
請求項1または2に記載の中間排滓方法により前記中間排滓を行うことを特徴とする製鋼方法。
A steelmaking method using one converter-type refining furnace (A) and carrying out desiliconization, dephosphorization and decarburization in this order with intermediate slag disposal in between,
A steelmaking method, comprising the steps of: carrying out the intermediate slag removal by the intermediate slag removal method according to claim 1 or 2 .
JP2023174956A 2022-10-17 2023-10-10 Intermediate slag removal method in metal refining Active JP7690977B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022166095 2022-10-17
JP2022166095 2022-10-17

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2024059093A JP2024059093A (en) 2024-04-30
JP7690977B2 true JP7690977B2 (en) 2025-06-11

Family

ID=90826832

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2023174956A Active JP7690977B2 (en) 2022-10-17 2023-10-10 Intermediate slag removal method in metal refining

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7690977B2 (en)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005015849A (en) 2003-06-26 2005-01-20 Nippon Steel Corp Converter furnace mouth metal cutting method
JP2005264210A (en) 2004-03-17 2005-09-29 Nippon Steel Corp Converter discharge method
JP2007077481A (en) 2005-09-16 2007-03-29 Nippon Steel Corp Converter discharge method
CN103397134A (en) 2013-07-15 2013-11-20 江苏省沙钢钢铁研究院有限公司 A Method of Calculating the Residual Slag Amount of Converter According to the Tilting Angle of Converter
JP2016519751A (en) 2013-04-12 2016-07-07 リフラクトリー・インテレクチュアル・プロパティー・ゲーエムベーハー・ウント・コンパニ・カーゲー Method for determining the state of refractory lining of metallurgical vessels, especially for molten metal
JP2018178209A (en) 2017-04-17 2018-11-15 新日鐵住金株式会社 Tilting type refining device and tilting displacement method
JP2018185253A (en) 2017-04-27 2018-11-22 新日鐵住金株式会社 Converter refractory profile measuring apparatus and converter refractory profile measuring method
WO2019117200A1 (en) 2017-12-15 2019-06-20 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for refining molten iron

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005015849A (en) 2003-06-26 2005-01-20 Nippon Steel Corp Converter furnace mouth metal cutting method
JP2005264210A (en) 2004-03-17 2005-09-29 Nippon Steel Corp Converter discharge method
JP2007077481A (en) 2005-09-16 2007-03-29 Nippon Steel Corp Converter discharge method
JP2016519751A (en) 2013-04-12 2016-07-07 リフラクトリー・インテレクチュアル・プロパティー・ゲーエムベーハー・ウント・コンパニ・カーゲー Method for determining the state of refractory lining of metallurgical vessels, especially for molten metal
CN103397134A (en) 2013-07-15 2013-11-20 江苏省沙钢钢铁研究院有限公司 A Method of Calculating the Residual Slag Amount of Converter According to the Tilting Angle of Converter
JP2018178209A (en) 2017-04-17 2018-11-15 新日鐵住金株式会社 Tilting type refining device and tilting displacement method
JP2018185253A (en) 2017-04-27 2018-11-22 新日鐵住金株式会社 Converter refractory profile measuring apparatus and converter refractory profile measuring method
WO2019117200A1 (en) 2017-12-15 2019-06-20 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for refining molten iron

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2024059093A (en) 2024-04-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6702420B2 (en) Dust weight estimation method and waste weight estimation device
US10859316B1 (en) Predictive refractory performance measurement system
JP6601631B2 (en) Method for estimating amount of waste from molten metal refining vessel and method for refining molten metal
JP7662115B1 (en) Apparatus for estimating amount of slag in furnace, method for estimating amount of slag in furnace, and method for producing molten steel
JP7690977B2 (en) Intermediate slag removal method in metal refining
JP7694616B2 (en) Method for removing slag from converter-type refining furnace and method for operating converter
JP2012136767A (en) Method for estimating phosphorus concentration in converter
CN110938727B (en) Method for weighing converter slag remaining amount
EP4656741A1 (en) Molten iron constituent estimation device, constituent estimation method, and desulfurization method
JP7380908B2 (en) Cold iron source dissolution rate estimation device, converter type smelting furnace control device, cold iron source dissolution rate estimation method, and molten iron refining processing method
JP7211553B1 (en) Method for operating converter and method for producing molten steel
JP2007308773A (en) Converter steelmaking
JPH09316514A (en) Method for estimating carbon and chromium contents in molten steel in converter process of chromium-containing steel and device therefor and method for tapping molten steel thereof
RU2768084C1 (en) Method for metal melting in oxygen converter
JP3232922B2 (en) Hot metal desiliconization method
CN114787394A (en) Operating method for ladle refining treatment
JP4667284B2 (en) Converter operation method
CN118895404B (en) A method, system, control terminal and storage medium for efficient slag splash control in a top-and-bottom combined blowing converter.
JP7758214B2 (en) Apparatus for estimating the amount of slag in a furnace, method for estimating the amount of slag in a furnace, and method for producing molten steel
KR100518320B1 (en) A method of weighing the Slag coating method of the basic oxyzen converter by using the retained slag weighing system
JP6720453B2 (en) How to control the tare weight of a ladle
JP3740914B2 (en) Hot metal temperature estimation method
JP2000178628A (en) Apparatus and method for switching blast furnace gutter and recording medium
JP2026047802A (en) Method for detecting metal outflow, system for detecting metal outflow, and refining method
CN119410864A (en) A method for smelting molten steel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20240528

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20250226

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20250304

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20250417

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20250430

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20250513

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7690977

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150