Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7750428B2 - Method and device for diagnosing deterioration of exhaust purification catalyst - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7750428B2 - Method and device for diagnosing deterioration of exhaust purification catalyst - Google Patents

Method and device for diagnosing deterioration of exhaust purification catalyst

Info

Publication number
JP7750428B2
JP7750428B2 JP2024555574A JP2024555574A JP7750428B2 JP 7750428 B2 JP7750428 B2 JP 7750428B2 JP 2024555574 A JP2024555574 A JP 2024555574A JP 2024555574 A JP2024555574 A JP 2024555574A JP 7750428 B2 JP7750428 B2 JP 7750428B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
purification catalyst
ammonia
temperature range
exhaust
exhaust purification
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2024555574A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPWO2024075265A5 (en
JPWO2024075265A1 (en
Inventor
仁 横山
浩之 糸山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nissan Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Publication of JPWO2024075265A1 publication Critical patent/JPWO2024075265A1/ja
Publication of JPWO2024075265A5 publication Critical patent/JPWO2024075265A5/ja
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7750428B2 publication Critical patent/JP7750428B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N3/00Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
    • F01N3/08Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous
    • F01N3/10Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust
    • F01N3/18Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control
    • F01N3/20Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control specially adapted for catalytic conversion
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02DCONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/02Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
    • F02D41/04Introducing corrections for particular operating conditions

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas After Treatment (AREA)

Description

この発明は、内燃機関の排気通路に設けられる排気浄化触媒の劣化を、排気浄化触媒の下流側で検出されるアンモニア濃度に基づいて診断する、排気浄化触媒の劣化診断に関する。 This invention relates to a deterioration diagnosis of an exhaust purification catalyst, which diagnoses the deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst installed in the exhaust passage of an internal combustion engine based on the ammonia concentration detected downstream of the exhaust purification catalyst.

特許文献1には、三元触媒に流入する排気ガスの空燃比が理論空燃比よりもリッチであるときに、三元触媒から流出する排気ガス中のアンモニア濃度をアンモニアセンサによって検出し、検出したアンモニア濃度が機関運転状態に対応した基準アンモニア濃度よりも高い場合に、三元触媒が劣化していると判定する技術が開示されている。 Patent document 1 discloses a technology in which, when the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the three-way catalyst is richer than the theoretical air-fuel ratio, an ammonia sensor detects the ammonia concentration in the exhaust gas flowing out of the three-way catalyst, and if the detected ammonia concentration is higher than a reference ammonia concentration corresponding to the engine operating state, the three-way catalyst is determined to be degraded.

しかしながら、排気浄化触媒下流のアンモニアセンサによって検出されるアンモニア濃度は、排気浄化触媒の温度等の条件によって比較的大きく変動するので、上記のように単に基準アンモニア濃度と比較する方法では、診断の精度が低い。 However, the ammonia concentration detected by the ammonia sensor downstream of the exhaust purification catalyst fluctuates relatively greatly depending on conditions such as the temperature of the exhaust purification catalyst, so the method of simply comparing it with a reference ammonia concentration as described above has low diagnostic accuracy.

特開2018-141417号公報Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2018-141417

この発明は、内燃機関の排気通路における排気浄化触媒の下流側に、排気ガス中のアンモニア濃度に感度を有するアンモニアセンサを備え、このアンモニアセンサの検出信号を用いて排気浄化触媒の劣化診断を行う排気浄化触媒の劣化診断方法において、
新品排気浄化触媒に比較して劣化排気浄化触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に少ないものとなる第1の温度範囲と、新品排気浄化触媒に比較して劣化排気浄化触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に多くなる第2の温度範囲と、を予め設定し、
排気浄化触媒が第1の温度範囲内にあるときに上記アンモニアセンサが検出する第1のアンモニア濃度と、排気浄化触媒が第2の温度範囲内にあるときに上記アンモニアセンサが検出する第2のアンモニア濃度と、に基づいて排気浄化触媒の劣化を診断する。
The present invention provides a method for diagnosing deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst, which comprises providing an ammonia sensor that is sensitive to the ammonia concentration in exhaust gas downstream of the exhaust purification catalyst in an exhaust passage of an internal combustion engine, and diagnosing deterioration of the exhaust purification catalyst using a detection signal from this ammonia sensor,
a first temperature range in which the deteriorated exhaust gas purification catalyst emits relatively less ammonia than a new exhaust gas purification catalyst, and a second temperature range in which the deteriorated exhaust gas purification catalyst emits relatively more ammonia than a new exhaust gas purification catalyst are set in advance;
Deterioration of the exhaust purification catalyst is diagnosed based on a first ammonia concentration detected by the ammonia sensor when the exhaust purification catalyst is within a first temperature range, and a second ammonia concentration detected by the ammonia sensor when the exhaust purification catalyst is within a second temperature range.

排気浄化触媒の内部が理論空燃比よりもリッチな環境下では、触媒反応により、排気ガス中のNOxおよび水素によってアンモニアが生成され、さらに、生成されたアンモニアの一部が酸化反応により窒素等となり、残ったアンモニアが排気浄化触媒の下流へと流出する。 When the inside of the exhaust purification catalyst is in an environment richer than the theoretical air-fuel ratio, a catalytic reaction generates ammonia from the NOx and hydrogen in the exhaust gas.Furthermore, some of the generated ammonia is converted into nitrogen and other substances through oxidation reactions, and the remaining ammonia flows downstream of the exhaust purification catalyst.

排気浄化触媒におけるアンモニアの生成反応およびアンモニアの酸化反応の度合いは、排気浄化触媒の温度条件によって異なる。そして、いずれも、排気浄化触媒が劣化するほど低下してくるが、劣化に伴うアンモニア生成反応の低下とアンモニア酸化反応の低下とは互いに異なり、同等には低下しない。The rates of ammonia production and oxidation reactions in exhaust gas purification catalysts vary depending on the temperature conditions of the catalyst. Both rates decrease as the catalyst deteriorates, but the decline in ammonia production and oxidation reactions due to deterioration differs from one another and do not decrease equally.

そのため、新品排気浄化触媒に比較して劣化排気浄化触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に少ないものとなる排気浄化触媒の温度範囲(すなわち第1の温度範囲)と、逆に、新品排気浄化触媒に比較して劣化排気浄化触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に多くなる排気浄化触媒の温度範囲(すなわち第2の温度範囲)と、が存在し得る。 Therefore, there may be a temperature range of the exhaust purification catalyst (i.e., a first temperature range) in which a deteriorated exhaust purification catalyst emits relatively less ammonia than a new exhaust purification catalyst, and conversely, a temperature range of the exhaust purification catalyst (i.e., a second temperature range) in which a deteriorated exhaust purification catalyst emits relatively more ammonia than a new exhaust purification catalyst.

従って、排気浄化触媒が第1の温度範囲内にあるときにアンモニアセンサが検出する第1のアンモニア濃度と、排気浄化触媒が第2の温度範囲内にあるときにアンモニアセンサが検出する第2のアンモニア濃度と、に基づいて、例えば新品排気浄化触媒の特性と比較することで、排気浄化触媒の劣化を精度よく診断することができる。 Therefore, by comparing the first ammonia concentration detected by the ammonia sensor when the exhaust purification catalyst is within a first temperature range and the second ammonia concentration detected by the ammonia sensor when the exhaust purification catalyst is within a second temperature range with the characteristics of, for example, a new exhaust purification catalyst, it is possible to accurately diagnose the deterioration of the exhaust purification catalyst.

三元触媒を備えた一実施例の内燃機関の構成説明図。1 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of an internal combustion engine equipped with a three-way catalyst according to an embodiment of the present invention; 一実施例の触媒劣化診断の処理の流れを示すフローチャート。4 is a flowchart showing a process flow of a catalyst deterioration diagnosis according to an embodiment; 触媒温度とアンモニアの生成および酸化との関係を示した説明図。FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing the relationship between catalyst temperature and the generation and oxidation of ammonia.

以下、この発明の一実施例を図面に基づいて詳細に説明する。図1は、この発明が適用される一実施例の内燃機関1の概略的な構成を示した説明図である。一実施例の内燃機関1は、4ストロークサイクルの火花点火式内燃機関(いわゆるガソリン機関)であって、各気筒に、吸気弁2ならびに排気弁3および点火プラグ4を備えている。また図示例は、筒内直接噴射式機関として構成されており、筒内に向けて燃料を噴射する燃料噴射弁5が、例えば吸気弁2側に配置されている。なお、吸気ポート6へ向けて燃料を噴射するポート噴射型の構成であってもよい。 An embodiment of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings. Figure 1 is an explanatory diagram showing the general configuration of an internal combustion engine 1 according to one embodiment of the present invention. The internal combustion engine 1 according to one embodiment is a four-stroke, spark-ignition internal combustion engine (a so-called gasoline engine), with each cylinder equipped with an intake valve 2, an exhaust valve 3, and an ignition plug 4. The illustrated example is configured as a direct-injection engine, with a fuel injection valve 5 that injects fuel into the cylinder located, for example, on the intake valve 2 side. Note that a port-injection configuration in which fuel is injected toward an intake port 6 may also be used.

各気筒の吸気ポート6に接続された吸気通路7のコレクタ部8上流側には、エンジンコントローラ9からの制御信号によって開度が制御される電子制御型スロットルバルブ10が介装されている。スロットルバルブ10の上流側に、吸入空気量を検出するエアフロメータ11が配設されており、さらに上流側に、エアクリーナ12が配設されている。 An electronically controlled throttle valve 10, whose opening is controlled by a control signal from an engine controller 9, is installed upstream of the collector section 8 of the intake passage 7 connected to the intake port 6 of each cylinder. An air flow meter 11 that detects the amount of intake air is located upstream of the throttle valve 10, and an air cleaner 12 is located further upstream.

各気筒の排気ポート13は、1本の排気通路14として集合し、この排気通路14に、排気浄化のための排気浄化触媒例えば三元触媒15が設けられている。三元触媒15は、例えば、微細な通路が形成されたモノリスセラミックス体の表面に触媒金属を含む触媒層をコーティングした、いわゆるモノリスセラミックス触媒である。なお、三元触媒15は、直列に配置された下流側の触媒(いわゆる、床下触媒)をさらに含む構成であってもよい。The exhaust ports 13 of each cylinder are combined into a single exhaust passage 14, which is provided with an exhaust purification catalyst, such as a three-way catalyst 15, for purifying the exhaust gas. The three-way catalyst 15 is, for example, a monolithic ceramic catalyst in which a catalytic layer containing catalytic metal is coated on the surface of a monolithic ceramic body with fine passages formed therein. The three-way catalyst 15 may also be configured to include a downstream catalyst (a so-called underfloor catalyst) arranged in series.

排気通路14の三元触媒15の入口側つまり該三元触媒15よりも上流側の位置には、内燃機関1が排出する排気ガスの空燃比(換言すれば三元触媒15に流入する排気ガスの空燃比)を検出するための上流側空燃比センサ19が配置されている。この上流側空燃比センサ19は、排気空燃比に応じた出力が得られるいわゆる広域空燃比センサである。An upstream air-fuel ratio sensor 19 is disposed in the exhaust passage 14 on the inlet side of the three-way catalyst 15, i.e., upstream of the three-way catalyst 15, to detect the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas emitted by the internal combustion engine 1 (in other words, the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the three-way catalyst 15). This upstream air-fuel ratio sensor 19 is a so-called wide-range air-fuel ratio sensor that provides an output according to the exhaust air-fuel ratio.

また、三元触媒15の出口側ないし下流側に、三元触媒15から流出する排気ガス中のアンモニア濃度に感度を有するアンモニアセンサ20が配置されている。一実施例のアンモニアセンサ20は、排気ガス中のNOxの検出が可能ないわゆるNOxセンサと呼ばれる形式のセンサである。つまり、アンモニア濃度およびNOx濃度の双方に感度を有し、両者が1つの検出信号として出力される。また、好ましい一実施例においては、アンモニアセンサ20は、三元触媒15から流出する排気ガスの排気空燃比に応じた出力信号を、アンモニア・NOxの検出信号とは別に出力する構成となっている。つまり、アンモニアセンサ20は、三元触媒15から流出する排気ガスの排気空燃比を検出する下流側空燃比センサとしての機能を有している。この三元触媒15から流出する排気ガスの排気空燃比は、三元触媒15内部の空燃比環境に相当するものとみなされる。そして、三元触媒15から流出する排気ガスの排気空燃比がリーンであれば、アンモニアセンサ20が出力するアンモニア・NOx検出信号はNOx濃度を示すものとみなされ、三元触媒15から流出する排気ガスの排気空燃比がリッチであれば、アンモニアセンサ20が出力するアンモニア・NOx検出信号はアンモニア濃度を示すものとみなされる。An ammonia sensor 20 is located on the outlet side or downstream side of the three-way catalyst 15. The ammonia sensor 20 in one embodiment is a so-called NOx sensor, capable of detecting NOx in exhaust gas. That is, it is sensitive to both ammonia and NOx concentrations, outputting both as a single detection signal. In a preferred embodiment, the ammonia sensor 20 is configured to output an output signal corresponding to the exhaust air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing out of the three-way catalyst 15, separate from the ammonia/NOx detection signals. In other words, the ammonia sensor 20 functions as a downstream air-fuel ratio sensor that detects the exhaust air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing out of the three-way catalyst 15. The exhaust air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing out of the three-way catalyst 15 is considered to correspond to the air-fuel ratio environment within the three-way catalyst 15. If the exhaust air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing out from the three-way catalyst 15 is lean, the ammonia/NOx detection signal output by the ammonia sensor 20 is considered to indicate the NOx concentration, and if the exhaust air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing out from the three-way catalyst 15 is rich, the ammonia/NOx detection signal output by the ammonia sensor 20 is considered to indicate the ammonia concentration.

なお、アンモニアセンサ20とは別に独立した下流側空燃比センサを備える構成であってもよい。あるいは、三元触媒15の下流側での排気空燃比の検出を行わずに、三元触媒15に流入する排気ガスの排気空燃比(これは上流側空燃比センサ19によって検出される)に基づいて三元触媒15内部の空燃比環境を推定するようにしてもよい。 In addition, a downstream air-fuel ratio sensor may be provided separately from the ammonia sensor 20. Alternatively, the exhaust air-fuel ratio downstream of the three-way catalyst 15 may not be detected, and the air-fuel ratio environment inside the three-way catalyst 15 may be estimated based on the exhaust air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the three-way catalyst 15 (which is detected by the upstream air-fuel ratio sensor 19).

さらに、三元触媒15は、当該三元触媒15の温度を検出するための触媒温度センサ25を備えている。一実施例においては、触媒温度センサ25は、三元触媒15の担体(モノリスセラミックス体)の温度を検出している。なお、このような担体温度を直接に検出する触媒温度センサ25に代えて、三元触媒15の上流側および下流側の少なくとも一方に排気ガス温度を検出する排気温度センサを設け、排気ガス温度に基づいて三元触媒15の温度を推定する構成であってもよい。あるいは、内燃機関1から三元触媒15に与えられる投入熱量に基づいて三元触媒15の温度を推定することも可能である。 The three-way catalyst 15 is further equipped with a catalyst temperature sensor 25 for detecting the temperature of the three-way catalyst 15. In one embodiment, the catalyst temperature sensor 25 detects the temperature of the carrier (monolith ceramic body) of the three-way catalyst 15. Instead of a catalyst temperature sensor 25 that directly detects the carrier temperature, an exhaust temperature sensor that detects the exhaust gas temperature may be provided on at least one of the upstream and downstream sides of the three-way catalyst 15, and the temperature of the three-way catalyst 15 may be estimated based on the exhaust gas temperature. Alternatively, the temperature of the three-way catalyst 15 can be estimated based on the amount of heat input from the internal combustion engine 1 to the three-way catalyst 15.

上流側空燃比センサ19、アンモニアセンサ20、触媒温度センサ25、およびエアフロメータ11の検出信号は、エンジンコントローラ9に入力される。エンジンコントローラ9には、さらに、機関回転速度を検出するためのクランク角センサ21、冷却水温を検出する水温センサ22、運転者に操作されるアクセルペダルの踏込量を検出するアクセル開度センサ23、等の多数のセンサ類の検出信号が入力されている。エンジンコントローラ9は、これらの入力信号に基づき、燃料噴射弁5による燃料噴射量および噴射時期、点火プラグ4による点火時期、スロットルバルブ10の開度、等を最適に制御している。 Detection signals from the upstream air-fuel ratio sensor 19, ammonia sensor 20, catalyst temperature sensor 25, and air flow meter 11 are input to the engine controller 9. The engine controller 9 also receives detection signals from numerous sensors, including a crank angle sensor 21 for detecting engine speed, a water temperature sensor 22 for detecting coolant temperature, and an accelerator position sensor 23 for detecting the amount of accelerator pedal depression operated by the driver. Based on these input signals, the engine controller 9 optimally controls the amount and timing of fuel injection by the fuel injection valve 5, the ignition timing by the spark plug 4, the opening of the throttle valve 10, and so on.

エンジンコントローラ9は、内燃機関1の種々の制御の中の1つとして、三元触媒15による排気浄化性能を最適化するために三元触媒15の酸素ストレージ量を目標酸素ストレージ量(例えば40~60%付近に設定される)に保つための空燃比制御を行う。空燃比制御においては、上流側空燃比センサ19が検出する排気空燃比(以下、これを上流側排気空燃比と呼ぶ)が目標空燃比に沿うように燃料噴射量がフィードバック制御(例えばPID制御等)される。ここで、目標空燃比は、上流側排気空燃比から推定される三元触媒15の酸素ストレージ量が目標酸素ストレージ量に一致するように演算される。従って、基本的には、三元触媒15の酸素ストレージ量は目標酸素ストレージ量付近に維持される。酸素ストレージ量が目標酸素ストレージ量付近にあるときに、三元触媒15内部の空燃比環境は理論空燃比相当となる。これにより、排気中のCOならびにHCの酸化およびNOxの還元が効果的になされる。As one of the various controls for the internal combustion engine 1, the engine controller 9 performs air-fuel ratio control to maintain the oxygen storage capacity of the three-way catalyst 15 at a target oxygen storage capacity (e.g., set to approximately 40-60%) in order to optimize the exhaust purification performance of the three-way catalyst 15. In air-fuel ratio control, the fuel injection amount is feedback-controlled (e.g., PID control, etc.) so that the exhaust air-fuel ratio detected by the upstream air-fuel ratio sensor 19 (hereinafter referred to as the upstream exhaust air-fuel ratio) is aligned with the target air-fuel ratio. The target air-fuel ratio is calculated so that the oxygen storage capacity of the three-way catalyst 15, estimated from the upstream exhaust air-fuel ratio, matches the target oxygen storage capacity. Therefore, the oxygen storage capacity of the three-way catalyst 15 is basically maintained near the target oxygen storage capacity. When the oxygen storage capacity is near the target oxygen storage capacity, the air-fuel ratio environment inside the three-way catalyst 15 corresponds to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. This effectively oxidizes CO and HC in the exhaust and reduces NOx.

さらに、エンジンコントローラ9が行う制御の1つとして、三元触媒15が劣化しているか否かの診断がなされる。以下、この劣化診断を、図2のフローチャートを用いて説明する。一実施例の劣化診断は、内燃機関1の始動後、三元触媒15の温度上昇中(つまり三元触媒15の暖機途中)に行われる。Furthermore, one of the controls performed by the engine controller 9 is to diagnose whether the three-way catalyst 15 has deteriorated. This deterioration diagnosis will be explained below using the flowchart in Figure 2. In one embodiment, the deterioration diagnosis is performed after the internal combustion engine 1 has started, while the temperature of the three-way catalyst 15 is rising (i.e., while the three-way catalyst 15 is warming up).

まず、ステップ1として触媒温度を検出し、ステップ2において、触媒温度が第1の温度範囲内であるか否かを判定する。第1の温度範囲は、新品の三元触媒に比較して劣化した三元触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に少ないものとなる温度範囲として予め設定されているものであり、一実施例においては、200~300℃である。ステップ2において第1の温度範囲外であれば、ステップ1に戻り、触媒温度の検出を繰り返す。ステップ2において第1の温度範囲内であると判定したら、ステップ3へ進み、三元触媒15内部の空燃比環境が所定のリッチ側の空燃比相当となるように、空燃比制御を行う。そして、ステップ4として、三元触媒15内部の空燃比環境が所定のリッチ側の空燃比相当となっている下で、アンモニアセンサ20を介してアンモニア濃度の検出を行う。つまり、第1のアンモニア濃度を求める。前述したように、一実施例においては、アンモニアセンサ20が同時に検出する三元触媒15の下流における排気空燃比が、三元触媒15内部の空燃比であるとみなされる。あるいは上流側排気空燃比に基づいて三元触媒15内部の空燃比環境を推定するようにしてもよい。なお、このアンモニア濃度の検出のための三元触媒15内部におけるリッチ側の空燃比は、劣化診断に必要なアンモニア濃度の測定が可能な範囲で理論空燃比からの乖離ができるだけ小さいように設定することが望ましい。また、アンモニア濃度の測定後、リッチ化を終了して目標空燃比を理論空燃比に戻すことが望ましい。First, in step 1, the catalyst temperature is detected. In step 2, it is determined whether the catalyst temperature is within a first temperature range. The first temperature range is a preset temperature range within which a deteriorated three-way catalyst emits relatively less ammonia than a new three-way catalyst. In one embodiment, it is 200 to 300°C. If the catalyst temperature is outside the first temperature range in step 2, the process returns to step 1 and repeats the detection of the catalyst temperature. If it is determined in step 2 that the catalyst temperature is within the first temperature range, the process proceeds to step 3, where air-fuel ratio control is performed so that the air-fuel ratio environment within the three-way catalyst 15 corresponds to a predetermined rich air-fuel ratio. Then, in step 4, the ammonia concentration is detected via the ammonia sensor 20 while the air-fuel ratio environment within the three-way catalyst 15 corresponds to a predetermined rich air-fuel ratio. In other words, a first ammonia concentration is calculated. As described above, in one embodiment, the exhaust air-fuel ratio downstream of the three-way catalyst 15, which is simultaneously detected by the ammonia sensor 20, is considered to be the air-fuel ratio within the three-way catalyst 15. Alternatively, the air-fuel ratio environment inside the three-way catalyst 15 may be estimated based on the upstream exhaust air-fuel ratio. Note that the rich-side air-fuel ratio inside the three-way catalyst 15 for detecting the ammonia concentration is desirably set so that the deviation from the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio is as small as possible within a range where the ammonia concentration required for deterioration diagnosis can be measured. Also, after measuring the ammonia concentration, it is desirably to terminate enrichment and return the target air-fuel ratio to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.

ステップ5では、第1の温度範囲の下での第1のアンモニア濃度が所定の閾値♯Aよりも高いか否かを判定する。閾値♯Aは、第1の温度範囲内にあってかつ三元触媒内部の空燃比環境が同じリッチ側空燃比であることを条件として、新品の三元触媒であれば排出されるアンモニア濃度が閾値♯Aよりも高くなり、所定レベルまで劣化した三元触媒であれば排出されるアンモニア濃度が閾値♯A以下となるように、適当に設定される。例えば、新品の三元触媒である場合の多数のデータの平均値と所定レベルまで劣化した三元触媒の多数のデータの平均値とを仕切る値に閾値♯Aが設定される。In step 5, it is determined whether the first ammonia concentration within the first temperature range is higher than a predetermined threshold value #A. Threshold value #A is appropriately set so that, provided that the temperature is within the first temperature range and the air-fuel ratio environment inside the three-way catalyst is the same rich-side air-fuel ratio, the ammonia concentration emitted from a new three-way catalyst will be higher than threshold value #A, and the ammonia concentration emitted from a three-way catalyst that has deteriorated to a predetermined level will be equal to or lower than threshold value #A. For example, threshold value #A is set to a value that separates the average value of multiple data points for a new three-way catalyst from the average value of multiple data points for a three-way catalyst that has deteriorated to a predetermined level.

第1のアンモニア濃度が閾値♯Aよりも高ければ、所定レベルまで劣化していないものとして、診断処理を終了する。第1のアンモニア濃度が閾値♯A以下であれば、ステップ6へ進む。If the first ammonia concentration is higher than threshold #A, it is assumed that the ammonia has not deteriorated to the predetermined level and the diagnostic process is terminated. If the first ammonia concentration is lower than threshold #A, proceed to step 6.

ステップ6では、再び触媒温度を検出し、ステップ7において、触媒温度が第2の温度範囲内であるか否かを判定する。第2の温度範囲は、新品の三元触媒に比較して劣化した三元触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に多くなる温度範囲として予め設定されているものであり、一実施例においては、350~400℃である。ステップ7において第2の温度範囲外であれば、ステップ6に戻り、触媒温度の検出を繰り返す。ステップ7において第2の温度範囲内であると判定したら、ステップ8へ進み、三元触媒15内部の空燃比環境が所定のリッチ側の空燃比相当となるように、空燃比制御を行う。そして、ステップ9として、三元触媒15内部の空燃比環境が所定のリッチ側の空燃比相当となっている下で、アンモニアセンサ20を介してアンモニア濃度の検出を行う。つまり、第2のアンモニア濃度を求める。一実施例においては、第1の温度範囲内での第1のアンモニア濃度の測定の際のリッチ側の空燃比と、第2の温度範囲内での第2のアンモニア濃度の測定の際のリッチ側の空燃比とは、互いに等しく設定されている。アンモニア濃度の測定後は、リッチ化を終了して目標空燃比を理論空燃比に戻すことが望ましい。In step 6, the catalyst temperature is again detected, and in step 7, it is determined whether the catalyst temperature is within a second temperature range. The second temperature range is a preset temperature range in which a deteriorated three-way catalyst emits relatively more ammonia than a new three-way catalyst. In one embodiment, it is 350 to 400°C. If the catalyst temperature is outside the second temperature range in step 7, the process returns to step 6 and repeats the detection of the catalyst temperature. If it is determined in step 7 that the catalyst temperature is within the second temperature range, the process proceeds to step 8, where air-fuel ratio control is performed so that the air-fuel ratio environment inside the three-way catalyst 15 corresponds to a predetermined rich air-fuel ratio. Then, in step 9, the ammonia concentration is detected via the ammonia sensor 20 while the air-fuel ratio environment inside the three-way catalyst 15 corresponds to a predetermined rich air-fuel ratio. In other words, a second ammonia concentration is calculated. In one embodiment, the rich air-fuel ratio when measuring the first ammonia concentration within the first temperature range and the rich air-fuel ratio when measuring the second ammonia concentration within the second temperature range are set to be equal to each other. After measuring the ammonia concentration, it is desirable to terminate the enrichment and return the target air-fuel ratio to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.

次にステップ10において、第2の温度範囲の下での第2のアンモニア濃度が所定の閾値♯B未満であるか否かを判定する。閾値♯Bは、第2の温度範囲内にあってかつ三元触媒内部の空燃比環境が同じリッチ側空燃比であることを条件として、新品の三元触媒であれば排出されるアンモニア濃度が閾値♯B未満となり、所定レベルまで劣化した三元触媒であれば排出されるアンモニア濃度が閾値♯B以上となるように、適当に設定される。例えば、新品の三元触媒である場合の多数のデータの平均値と所定レベルまで劣化した三元触媒の多数のデータの平均値とを仕切る値に閾値♯Bが設定される。Next, in step 10, it is determined whether the second ammonia concentration within the second temperature range is less than a predetermined threshold value #B. Threshold value #B is appropriately set so that, provided that the temperature is within the second temperature range and the air-fuel ratio environment inside the three-way catalyst is the same rich-side air-fuel ratio, the ammonia concentration emitted from a new three-way catalyst will be less than threshold value #B, and the ammonia concentration emitted from a three-way catalyst that has deteriorated to a predetermined level will be greater than or equal to threshold value #B. For example, threshold value #B is set to a value that separates the average value of multiple data points for a new three-way catalyst from the average value of multiple data points for a three-way catalyst that has deteriorated to a predetermined level.

第2のアンモニア濃度が閾値♯B未満であれば、所定レベルまで劣化していないものとして、診断処理を終了する。第2のアンモニア濃度が閾値♯B以上であれば、ステップ11へ進み、三元触媒15が所定レベルまで劣化しているものと判定する。If the second ammonia concentration is less than threshold #B, it is determined that the catalyst has not deteriorated to the predetermined level and the diagnostic process is terminated. If the second ammonia concentration is greater than or equal to threshold #B, the process proceeds to step 11, where it is determined that the three-way catalyst 15 has deteriorated to the predetermined level.

このように、上記実施例では、「第1の温度範囲内での第1のアンモニア濃度が閾値♯A以下」と「第2の温度範囲内での第2のアンモニア濃度が閾値♯B以上」という2つの条件の組み合わせでもって三元触媒15が所定レベルまで劣化しているものと判定する。従って、より高い精度で劣化診断を行うことができる。In this way, in the above embodiment, the three-way catalyst 15 is determined to have deteriorated to a predetermined level based on a combination of two conditions: "the first ammonia concentration within the first temperature range is equal to or lower than threshold value #A" and "the second ammonia concentration within the second temperature range is equal to or higher than threshold value #B." This allows for more accurate deterioration diagnosis.

また上記実施例では、内燃機関1の始動後、三元触媒15の温度上昇中(つまり三元触媒15の暖機途中)に、相対的に低い第1の温度範囲となったときに第1の温度範囲の下での判定を行い、その後第2の温度範囲となったときに第2の温度範囲の下での判定を行うので、効率よく2つの条件の下での診断を行うことができる。 In addition, in the above embodiment, after the internal combustion engine 1 is started, while the temperature of the three-way catalyst 15 is rising (i.e., while the three-way catalyst 15 is warming up), a judgment is made under the first temperature range when the temperature reaches the relatively low first temperature range, and then a judgment is made under the second temperature range when the temperature reaches the second temperature range, thereby enabling efficient diagnosis under two conditions.

なお、図2のフローチャートの例では、第1の温度範囲(例えば200~300℃)内で測定した第1のアンモニア濃度が閾値♯Aよりも高い場合には第2の温度範囲(例えば350~400℃)内での第2のアンモニア濃度の測定ならびに閾値♯Bとの比較を行わないようになっているが、第1のアンモニア濃度が閾値♯Aよりも高い場合にも第2の温度範囲内での第2のアンモニア濃度の測定ならびに閾値♯Bとの比較を行うようにしてもよい。例えば、第1のアンモニア濃度が閾値♯Aよりも高くかつ第2のアンモニア濃度が閾値♯B未満である場合に、より確実に、劣化が進んでいないものと判断することができる。 In the example flowchart of FIG. 2, if the first ammonia concentration measured within the first temperature range (e.g., 200-300°C) is higher than threshold value #A, the second ammonia concentration within the second temperature range (e.g., 350-400°C) is not measured and compared with threshold value #B. However, it is also possible to measure the second ammonia concentration within the second temperature range and compare it with threshold value #B even when the first ammonia concentration is higher than threshold value #A. For example, if the first ammonia concentration is higher than threshold value #A and the second ammonia concentration is less than threshold value #B, it can be more reliably determined that deterioration has not progressed.

なお、閾値♯Aと閾値♯Bとは、三元触媒の特性や第1の温度範囲および第2の温度範囲の温度等にもよるが、通常は、閾値♯Aの方が大きな値となる。 Note that threshold values #A and #B depend on the characteristics of the three-way catalyst, the temperatures in the first temperature range and the second temperature range, etc., but threshold value #A is usually the larger value.

次に、図3の説明図を参照して、上記の劣化診断の診断原理を説明する。 Next, the diagnostic principle of the above-mentioned deterioration diagnosis will be explained with reference to the explanatory diagram in Figure 3.

三元触媒の内部が理論空燃比よりもリッチな環境下では、触媒反応により、排気ガス中のNOxおよび水素によってアンモニアが生成される。例えば、下記式のように反応が生じる。 When the air-fuel ratio inside a three-way catalyst is richer than the theoretical air-fuel ratio, a catalytic reaction occurs in which NOx and hydrogen in the exhaust gas produce ammonia. For example, the reaction occurs as shown in the following formula:

NO、CO、H2 → NH3、H2O、CO2
このようなアンモニア生成反応は、図3に「生成」とラベルを付した矢印で示したように、触媒温度が例えば200℃以上の比較的に低い温度で開始される。
NO, CO, H2 → NH3, H2O, CO2
Such an ammonia production reaction is initiated at a relatively low catalyst temperature of, for example, 200° C. or higher, as indicated by the arrow labeled "production" in FIG.

さらに、三元触媒においては、アンモニア生成と同時に、生成されたアンモニアが酸化反応により窒素等となる浄化作用が得られる。例えば、下記式のように酸化反応が生じる。 Furthermore, in a three-way catalyst, at the same time as ammonia is produced, a purification effect is achieved in which the produced ammonia is oxidized to nitrogen and other substances. For example, an oxidation reaction occurs as shown in the following formula:

NH3、O2 → N2、NO、H2O
このようなアンモニア酸化反応は、図3に「酸化」とラベルを付した矢印で示すように、触媒温度が例えば350℃以上の相対的に高い温度で開始される。
NH3, O2 → N2, NO, H2O
Such an ammonia oxidation reaction is initiated at a relatively high catalyst temperature of, for example, 350° C. or higher, as indicated by the arrow labeled "oxidation" in FIG.

三元触媒から流出するアンモニア濃度は、アンモニア生成とアンモニア酸化とのバランスに依存し、生成されたアンモニアの中で酸化されなかった部分が下流へと流出することになる。 The ammonia concentration flowing out of the three-way catalyst depends on the balance between ammonia production and ammonia oxidation, and the portion of the ammonia produced that is not oxidized will flow downstream.

ここで、図3から明らかなように、アンモニア生成反応は開始しているもののアンモニア酸化反応が生じ得ない触媒温度範囲が存在する。この温度範囲が第1の温度範囲となり得る温度範囲であり、上記実施例では、第1の温度範囲が200~300℃に設定されている。この温度範囲では、生成されたアンモニアが酸化作用を受けることなく三元触媒下流に流出する。そして、触媒が劣化すると、この第1の温度範囲のような比較的に低い触媒温度でのアンモニア生成能力が低下するため、新品の三元触媒に比較して劣化した三元触媒では、三元触媒下流に流出するアンモニア量が少なくなる。従って、閾値♯Aを適当に設定することで、検出したアンモニア濃度が閾値♯A未満であれば劣化しているとみなすことができる。As is clear from Figure 3, there is a catalyst temperature range in which the ammonia production reaction has begun but the ammonia oxidation reaction cannot occur. This temperature range can be the first temperature range, and in the above embodiment, the first temperature range is set to 200 to 300°C. In this temperature range, the produced ammonia flows downstream of the three-way catalyst without being oxidized. When the catalyst deteriorates, its ammonia production ability at relatively low catalyst temperatures such as this first temperature range decreases, so a deteriorated three-way catalyst will produce less ammonia downstream than a new three-way catalyst. Therefore, by appropriately setting threshold value #A, it is possible to determine that the catalyst is deteriorated if the detected ammonia concentration is below threshold value #A.

一方、比較的に高い触媒温度では、アンモニア生成反応と酸化反応との双方が活発に生じる。この温度範囲が第2の温度範囲となり得る温度範囲であり、上記実施例では、第2の温度範囲が350~400℃に設定されている。この温度範囲では、生成されたアンモニアの大部分が酸化されるため、三元触媒下流に流出するアンモニアは、新品の三元触媒であれば、比較的に少ない。そして、触媒が劣化すると、アンモニア生成反応と酸化反応の双方が弱まるものの、酸化反応の能力が相対的に大きく低下する結果、酸化されずに触媒下流に流出するアンモニア量が増える。従って、閾値♯Bを適当に設定することで、検出したアンモニア濃度が閾値♯B以上であれば劣化しているとみなすことができる。 On the other hand, at relatively high catalyst temperatures, both the ammonia production reaction and the oxidation reaction occur actively. This temperature range can be considered the second temperature range, and in the above example, the second temperature range is set to 350-400°C. In this temperature range, most of the produced ammonia is oxidized, so the amount of ammonia flowing downstream of the three-way catalyst is relatively small in a new three-way catalyst. When the catalyst deteriorates, both the ammonia production reaction and the oxidation reaction weaken, but the oxidation reaction capacity declines relatively significantly, resulting in an increase in the amount of ammonia that flows downstream of the catalyst without being oxidized. Therefore, by appropriately setting threshold value #B, it is possible to determine that the catalyst has deteriorated if the detected ammonia concentration is above threshold value #B.

ここで、第1の温度範囲の下では触媒劣化に伴ってアンモニア排出量が減少し、第2の温度範囲の下では触媒劣化に伴ってアンモニア排出量が増加する。本発明では、このような増減傾向が異なる2つの特性を組み合わせることで、劣化していない三元触媒を劣化と誤診断することが少なくなり、診断精度が高くなる。 Here, ammonia emissions decrease with catalyst degradation in the first temperature range, and ammonia emissions increase with catalyst degradation in the second temperature range. In this invention, by combining these two characteristics with different increase/decrease trends, it is possible to reduce the chance of misdiagnosing a non-degraded three-way catalyst as degraded, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy.

なお、上記実施例では、ステップ3およびステップ8におけるリッチ化を互いに同一の空燃比としているが、互いに異なるリッチ側の空燃比の設定であってもよい。 In the above embodiment, the enrichment in steps 3 and 8 is performed to the same air-fuel ratio, but different rich air-fuel ratios may also be set.

また、上記実施例では、第1の温度範囲を200~300℃とし、第2の温度範囲を350~400℃としたが、このような具体的な温度は、使用される排気浄化触媒の特性(図3に示したようなアンモニア生成反応と酸化反応の特性)に応じて設定されるものであり、触媒によっては異なる数値範囲になり得る。但し、制御を容易とするために、2つの温度範囲は、連続しておらず、つまり、適当に離れていることがことが望ましい。 In addition, in the above example, the first temperature range was set to 200-300°C and the second temperature range was set to 350-400°C, but these specific temperatures are set according to the characteristics of the exhaust purification catalyst used (the characteristics of the ammonia production reaction and oxidation reaction as shown in Figure 3), and the numerical ranges may differ depending on the catalyst. However, to facilitate control, it is desirable that the two temperature ranges are not continuous, that is, that they are appropriately separated.

本発明による触媒の劣化診断の結果をどのように利用するかは任意である。例えば、劣化と診断したときには、内燃機関の燃焼運転再開時に酸素ストレージ量の適正化のために実行されるリッチスパイクの空燃比を相対的に理論空燃比に近付くように変更することが望ましい。この場合、同時に、リッチスパイクを与える時間を長くすることが望ましい。つまり、劣化した触媒では、酸素の吸脱速度が遅くなるので、相対的に弱いリッチスパイクを長く与えることが望ましい。 The results of the catalyst deterioration diagnosis according to the present invention can be used in any way. For example, if deterioration is diagnosed, it is desirable to change the air-fuel ratio of the rich spike performed to optimize the oxygen storage amount when the internal combustion engine restarts combustion operation so that it is relatively closer to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. In this case, it is also desirable to extend the time for which the rich spike is applied. In other words, since the oxygen absorption and desorption rate is slow in a deteriorated catalyst, it is desirable to apply a relatively weak rich spike for a long period of time.

上記実施例では、2つの温度範囲と対応する2つの閾値とを用いて触媒を非劣化と劣化の2通りに分別するようにしているが、本発明においては、3つ以上の温度範囲と各々に対応する適当な閾値とを用いることで、触媒の劣化をさらに多数のレベルに分別することも可能である。例えば、図3において、アンモニア生成反応と酸化反応とが同時に生じる温度範囲の中でも、いくつかの異なる温度に着目すると、触媒の劣化に伴うアンモニア生成反応と酸化反応とのバランスの変化は、それぞれ異なるものとなり得る。従って、温度範囲と対応する閾値とを適当に設定することで、劣化の程度を複数レベルに分別することができる。In the above example, two temperature ranges and two corresponding thresholds are used to classify catalysts into two categories: non-degraded and degraded. However, in the present invention, it is possible to classify catalyst degradation into even more levels by using three or more temperature ranges and appropriate corresponding thresholds. For example, in Figure 3, even within the temperature range in which the ammonia production reaction and oxidation reaction occur simultaneously, if we focus on several different temperatures, the changes in the balance between the ammonia production reaction and the oxidation reaction due to catalyst degradation may be different for each. Therefore, by appropriately setting the temperature ranges and corresponding thresholds, it is possible to classify the degree of degradation into multiple levels.

Claims (9)

内燃機関の排気通路における排気浄化触媒の下流側に、排気ガス中のアンモニア濃度に感度を有するアンモニアセンサを備え、このアンモニアセンサの検出信号を用いて排気浄化触媒の劣化診断を行う排気浄化触媒の劣化診断方法において、
新品排気浄化触媒に比較して劣化排気浄化触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に少ないものとなる第1の温度範囲と、新品排気浄化触媒に比較して劣化排気浄化触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に多くなる第2の温度範囲と、を予め設定し、
排気浄化触媒が第1の温度範囲内にあるときに上記アンモニアセンサが検出する第1のアンモニア濃度と、排気浄化触媒が第2の温度範囲内にあるときに上記アンモニアセンサが検出する第2のアンモニア濃度と、に基づいて排気浄化触媒の劣化を診断し、
ここで、排気浄化触媒内部の空燃比がリッチ側の同一の空燃比の下で、第1のアンモニア濃度の検出と、第2のアンモニア濃度の検出と、を行う、
排気浄化触媒の劣化診断方法。
1. A method for diagnosing deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst, comprising: providing an ammonia sensor that is sensitive to the ammonia concentration in exhaust gas downstream of an exhaust purification catalyst in an exhaust passage of an internal combustion engine; and diagnosing deterioration of the exhaust purification catalyst using a detection signal of this ammonia sensor,
a first temperature range in which the deteriorated exhaust gas purification catalyst emits relatively less ammonia than a new exhaust gas purification catalyst, and a second temperature range in which the deteriorated exhaust gas purification catalyst emits relatively more ammonia than a new exhaust gas purification catalyst are set in advance;
diagnosing deterioration of the exhaust purification catalyst based on a first ammonia concentration detected by the ammonia sensor when the exhaust purification catalyst is within a first temperature range and a second ammonia concentration detected by the ammonia sensor when the exhaust purification catalyst is within a second temperature range ;
Here, the first ammonia concentration detection and the second ammonia concentration detection are performed under the same air-fuel ratio inside the exhaust purification catalyst that is on the rich side.
A method for diagnosing deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst.
第1のアンモニア濃度が第1の閾値以下であり、かつ、第2のアンモニア濃度が第2の閾値以上である、ときに劣化と診断する、
請求項に記載の排気浄化触媒の劣化診断方法。
When the first ammonia concentration is equal to or less than a first threshold and the second ammonia concentration is equal to or greater than a second threshold, a diagnosis of deterioration is made.
2. The method for diagnosing deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst according to claim 1 .
劣化と診断したときに、内燃機関の燃焼運転再開時に実行されるリッチスパイクの空燃比を相対的に理論空燃比に近付くように変更する、
請求項1に記載の排気浄化触媒の劣化診断方法。
When the deterioration is diagnosed, the air-fuel ratio of the rich spike executed when the combustion operation of the internal combustion engine is restarted is changed so as to be relatively closer to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.
2. The method for diagnosing deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst according to claim 1.
内燃機関の始動後の排気浄化触媒の温度上昇中に、第1のアンモニア濃度の検出と、第2のアンモニア濃度の検出と、を行う、
請求項1に記載の排気浄化触媒の劣化診断方法。
detecting a first ammonia concentration and a second ammonia concentration while the temperature of the exhaust gas purification catalyst is rising after the internal combustion engine is started;
2. The method for diagnosing deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst according to claim 1.
第1の温度範囲は第2の温度範囲よりも低温側にあり、かつ両者は連続していない、
請求項1に記載の排気浄化触媒の劣化診断方法。
The first temperature range is lower than the second temperature range, and the two are not continuous.
2. The method for diagnosing deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst according to claim 1.
第1の温度範囲は、200~300℃であり、第2の温度範囲は、350~400℃である、
請求項に記載の排気浄化触媒の劣化診断方法。
The first temperature range is 200 to 300°C, and the second temperature range is 350 to 400°C.
6. The method for diagnosing deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst according to claim 5 .
内燃機関の排気通路に設けられた排気浄化触媒と、
この排気浄化触媒の下流側に設けられ、排気ガス中のアンモニア濃度に感度を有するアンモニアセンサと、
このアンモニアセンサの検出信号を用いて排気浄化触媒の劣化診断を行うコントローラと、
を備え、
上記コントローラは、
新品排気浄化触媒に比較して劣化排気浄化触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に少ないものとなる第1の温度範囲と、新品排気浄化触媒に比較して劣化排気浄化触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に多くなる第2の温度範囲と、が予め設定されており、
排気浄化触媒が第1の温度範囲内にあるときに上記アンモニアセンサが検出する第1のアンモニア濃度と、排気浄化触媒が第2の温度範囲内にあるときに上記アンモニアセンサが検出する第2のアンモニア濃度と、に基づいて排気浄化触媒の劣化を診断し、
ここで、排気浄化触媒内部の空燃比がリッチ側の同一の空燃比の下で、第1のアンモニア濃度の検出と、第2のアンモニア濃度の検出と、を行う、
排気浄化触媒の劣化診断装置。
an exhaust purification catalyst provided in an exhaust passage of the internal combustion engine;
an ammonia sensor that is provided downstream of the exhaust purification catalyst and is sensitive to the ammonia concentration in the exhaust gas;
a controller that performs a deterioration diagnosis of an exhaust purification catalyst using a detection signal from the ammonia sensor;
Equipped with
The above controller is
a first temperature range in which the deteriorated exhaust gas purification catalyst emits relatively less ammonia than a new exhaust gas purification catalyst, and a second temperature range in which the deteriorated exhaust gas purification catalyst emits relatively more ammonia than a new exhaust gas purification catalyst are set in advance;
diagnosing deterioration of the exhaust purification catalyst based on a first ammonia concentration detected by the ammonia sensor when the exhaust purification catalyst is within a first temperature range and a second ammonia concentration detected by the ammonia sensor when the exhaust purification catalyst is within a second temperature range ;
Here, the first ammonia concentration detection and the second ammonia concentration detection are performed under the same air-fuel ratio inside the exhaust purification catalyst that is on the rich side.
A deterioration diagnosis device for exhaust purification catalysts.
内燃機関の排気通路における排気浄化触媒の下流側に、排気ガス中のアンモニア濃度に感度を有するアンモニアセンサを備え、このアンモニアセンサの検出信号を用いて排気浄化触媒の劣化診断を行う排気浄化触媒の劣化診断方法において、1. A method for diagnosing deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst, comprising: providing an ammonia sensor that is sensitive to the ammonia concentration in exhaust gas downstream of an exhaust purification catalyst in an exhaust passage of an internal combustion engine; and diagnosing deterioration of the exhaust purification catalyst using a detection signal of this ammonia sensor,
新品排気浄化触媒に比較して劣化排気浄化触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に少ないものとなる第1の温度範囲と、新品排気浄化触媒に比較して劣化排気浄化触媒の方がアンモニア排出量が相対的に多くなる第2の温度範囲と、を予め設定し、a first temperature range in which the deteriorated exhaust gas purification catalyst emits relatively less ammonia than a new exhaust gas purification catalyst, and a second temperature range in which the deteriorated exhaust gas purification catalyst emits relatively more ammonia than a new exhaust gas purification catalyst are set in advance;
排気浄化触媒が第1の温度範囲内にあるときに上記アンモニアセンサが検出する第1のアンモニア濃度と、排気浄化触媒が第2の温度範囲内にあるときに上記アンモニアセンサが検出する第2のアンモニア濃度と、に基づいて排気浄化触媒の劣化を診断し、diagnosing deterioration of the exhaust purification catalyst based on a first ammonia concentration detected by the ammonia sensor when the exhaust purification catalyst is within a first temperature range and a second ammonia concentration detected by the ammonia sensor when the exhaust purification catalyst is within a second temperature range;
ここで、第1の温度範囲は第2の温度範囲よりも低温側にあり、かつ両者は連続していない、Here, the first temperature range is lower than the second temperature range, and the two are not continuous.
排気浄化触媒の劣化診断方法。A method for diagnosing deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst.
第1の温度範囲は、200~300℃であり、第2の温度範囲は、350~400℃である、The first temperature range is 200 to 300°C, and the second temperature range is 350 to 400°C.
請求項8に記載の排気浄化触媒の劣化診断方法。9. The method for diagnosing deterioration of an exhaust purification catalyst according to claim 8.
JP2024555574A 2022-10-07 2022-10-07 Method and device for diagnosing deterioration of exhaust purification catalyst Active JP7750428B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2022/037530 WO2024075265A1 (en) 2022-10-07 2022-10-07 Method and device for diagnosing deterioration of exhaust gas purification catalyst

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPWO2024075265A1 JPWO2024075265A1 (en) 2024-04-11
JPWO2024075265A5 JPWO2024075265A5 (en) 2025-02-27
JP7750428B2 true JP7750428B2 (en) 2025-10-07

Family

ID=90607950

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2024555574A Active JP7750428B2 (en) 2022-10-07 2022-10-07 Method and device for diagnosing deterioration of exhaust purification catalyst

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7750428B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2024075265A1 (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2016121593A (en) 2014-12-24 2016-07-07 ダイハツ工業株式会社 Fuel injection control device
JP2020143631A (en) 2019-03-06 2020-09-10 株式会社Soken Exhaust purification device for internal combustion engine

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2020045814A (en) * 2018-09-19 2020-03-26 日立オートモティブシステムズ株式会社 Fuel injection control device for internal combustion engine

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2016121593A (en) 2014-12-24 2016-07-07 ダイハツ工業株式会社 Fuel injection control device
JP2020143631A (en) 2019-03-06 2020-09-10 株式会社Soken Exhaust purification device for internal combustion engine

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2024075265A1 (en) 2024-04-11
JPWO2024075265A1 (en) 2024-04-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9021789B2 (en) Degradation diagnostic apparatus for NOx catalyst
JP4665923B2 (en) Catalyst deterioration judgment device
US7204081B2 (en) Exhaust gas purifying apparatus and method for internal combustion engine, and engine control unit
JP4915256B2 (en) Catalyst degradation diagnosis apparatus and degradation diagnosis method
JP6287989B2 (en) Abnormality diagnosis device for NOx storage reduction catalyst
US20090199543A1 (en) Catalyst monitoring system and monitoring method
CN105247184A (en) Error diagnostic device for exhaust purification device
JP6123822B2 (en) Exhaust purification device deterioration diagnosis device
US10119446B2 (en) Deterioration diagnosis apparatus for exhaust gas purification apparatus
US10648391B2 (en) Abnormality diagnosis system for an exhaust gas purification apparatus
JP2004069457A (en) Deterioration detector for air-fuel ratio detector
JP5212826B2 (en) Catalyst abnormality diagnosis device
JP7750428B2 (en) Method and device for diagnosing deterioration of exhaust purification catalyst
KR100408757B1 (en) Exhaust gas cleaning device of internal combustion engine
JP2005240716A (en) Catalyst deterioration diagnosis device
JP2024055343A (en) Method and device for diagnosing deterioration of exhaust gas purification catalyst
JP4366976B2 (en) Exhaust gas sensor abnormality detection device
JP2018009492A (en) Deterioration diagnosis method and deterioration diagnosis apparatus for fuel reforming catalyst
CN118686689A (en) Method for evaluating a NOx exhaust gas sensor in an exhaust system of an internal combustion engine
JP2009097474A (en) Catalyst deterioration diagnosis device
JP4411755B2 (en) Exhaust purification catalyst deterioration state diagnosis device
JP2022100067A (en) Control device for internal combustion engine
KR102958040B1 (en) METHOD FOR EVALUATING A NOx EXHAUST GAS SENSOR IN THE EXHAUST SYSTEM OF A SPARK-IGNITED INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE
JP4779814B2 (en) Catalyst representative temperature acquisition device for internal combustion engine
US7458205B2 (en) Method for operating an internal combustion engine and device for implementing the method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20241216

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20241216

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20250722

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20250801

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20250826

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20250908

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7750428

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150