Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7779220B2 - Failure prediction system and failure prediction method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7779220B2 - Failure prediction system and failure prediction method - Google Patents

Failure prediction system and failure prediction method

Info

Publication number
JP7779220B2
JP7779220B2 JP2022145129A JP2022145129A JP7779220B2 JP 7779220 B2 JP7779220 B2 JP 7779220B2 JP 2022145129 A JP2022145129 A JP 2022145129A JP 2022145129 A JP2022145129 A JP 2022145129A JP 7779220 B2 JP7779220 B2 JP 7779220B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
transition information
time
failure
operation time
failure prediction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2022145129A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2024040655A (en
Inventor
克浩 長澤
裕介 山口
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toyota Auto Body Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Toyota Auto Body Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toyota Auto Body Co Ltd filed Critical Toyota Auto Body Co Ltd
Priority to JP2022145129A priority Critical patent/JP7779220B2/en
Publication of JP2024040655A publication Critical patent/JP2024040655A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7779220B2 publication Critical patent/JP7779220B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)

Description

本発明は、機器の故障を予測する技術に関する。 The present invention relates to technology for predicting equipment failures.

車両の生産設備では、繰り返し作動する多数の機器が使用されている。このため、各機器の故障は、生産設備の長時間停止の要因に成り得る。設備故障を管理するために、例えば、下記特許文献1には、設備故障診断方法が開示されている。この設備故障診断方法は、設備の1サイクルの動作状況に基づいて故障の発生を判定したときに、この設備故障に関与した機器を特定して表示する技術である。この設備故障診断方法によれば、故障の発見に要する労力を低減させることができる。 Vehicle production facilities use a large number of devices that operate repeatedly. As a result, failure of any of these devices can result in extended shutdowns of the production facilities. To manage equipment failures, for example, Patent Document 1 below discloses an equipment failure diagnosis method. This equipment failure diagnosis method is a technology that, when a failure is determined to have occurred based on the operating status of one cycle of the equipment, identifies and displays the device involved in the equipment failure. This equipment failure diagnosis method can reduce the effort required to discover failures.

特開平5-189026号公報Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 5-189026

生産設備の長時間停止を避けるためには、機器故障が発生する前に異常を把握して対処する技術が求められる。これに対して、上記の設備故障診断方法は、既に故障に至った機器を特定する技術であって機器が故障に至る前の異常を判定するものではないところ、上述の問題を解決するための対策として採用するのが難しい。また、各機器を事前にメンメンテナンスし、その後の累積作動時間の管理上限値を定めて稼働保証を実施するようにしても、各機器の故障は、累積作動時間の管理上限値に到達するまでの期間であっても関係なく発生し得るため、設備管理上の本質的な問題解決に成り得ない。 Avoiding prolonged shutdowns of production equipment requires technology that can identify and address abnormalities before equipment failure occurs. However, the equipment failure diagnosis methods described above are technologies that identify equipment that has already failed, and are not able to determine abnormalities before the equipment fails, making them difficult to adopt as a solution to the problems described above. Furthermore, even if maintenance is performed on each piece of equipment in advance and an upper limit on the subsequent cumulative operating time is set to ensure operation, equipment failures can occur regardless of the period up until the cumulative operating time reaches the upper limit, so this does not fundamentally solve the problem of equipment management.

本発明は、かかる課題に鑑みてなされたものであり、機器故障の予測精度に優れた故障予測技術を提供しようとするものである。 The present invention was made in consideration of these issues and aims to provide failure prediction technology with excellent accuracy in predicting equipment failures.

本発明の一態様は、
複数回の作動を繰り返す機器の故障予測を行う故障予測システムであって、
上記機器の起動から停止までに要した作動時間を1回毎に検出する作動時間検出部と、
上記作動時間検出部で検出された上記作動時間に基づいて上記機器の任意の第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの上記作動時間の推移情報を導出する推移情報導出部と、
上記推移情報導出部で導出された上記推移情報に基づいて上記作動時間が上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで連続して上昇したと判定したときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測する故障予測部と、
を備え、
上記推移情報導出部は、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出するように構成され、
上記故障予測部は、上記推移情報導出部で導出された上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測するように構成されている、故障予測システム、
にある。
本発明の別態様は、
複数回の作動を繰り返す機器の故障予測を行う故障予測システムであって、
上記機器の起動から停止までに要した作動時間を1回毎に検出する作動時間検出部と、
上記作動時間検出部で検出された上記作動時間に基づいて上記機器の任意の第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの上記作動時間の推移情報を導出する推移情報導出部と、
上記推移情報導出部で導出された上記推移情報に基づいて上記作動時間が上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで連続して上昇したと判定したときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測する故障予測部と、
を備え、
上記推移情報導出部は、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出するように構成され、
上記故障予測部は、上記推移情報導出部で導出された上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれ、且つ上記上昇曲線の延長線上にくると推定される上記第(n+3)回目の上記累積作動時間が予め定められた管理上限値を超えるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測するように構成されている、故障予測システム、
にある。
One aspect of the present invention is
A failure prediction system for predicting failures of equipment that repeats multiple operations,
an operation time detection unit that detects an operation time required from start to stop of the device for each operation;
a transition information deriving unit that derives transition information of the operation time of the device from an arbitrary nth operation to an (n+2)th operation based on the operation time detected by the operation time detecting unit;
a failure prediction unit that predicts that a failure of the device is imminent when it is determined that the operating time has increased continuously from the nth time to the (n+2)th time based on the transition information derived by the transition information derivation unit;
Equipped with
the transition information derivation unit is configured to derive, as the transition information, a scatter plot having a horizontal axis representing the number of times the device is operated and a vertical axis representing a cumulative operation time, which is a cumulative value of the operation time;
the failure prediction unit is configured to predict that a failure of the device is approaching when three points of data from the nth time to the (n+2)th time of the cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve in the scatter diagram derived by the transition information derivation unit.
is located.
Another aspect of the present invention is
A failure prediction system for predicting failures of equipment that repeats multiple operations,
an operation time detection unit that detects an operation time required from start to stop of the device for each operation;
a transition information deriving unit that derives transition information of the operation time of the device from an arbitrary nth operation to an (n+2)th operation based on the operation time detected by the operation time detecting unit;
a failure prediction unit that predicts that a failure of the device is imminent when it is determined that the operating time has increased continuously from the nth time to the (n+2)th time based on the transition information derived by the transition information derivation unit;
Equipped with
the transition information derivation unit is configured to derive, as the transition information, a scatter plot having a horizontal axis representing the number of times the device is operated and a vertical axis representing a cumulative operation time, which is a cumulative value of the operation time;
the failure prediction unit is configured to predict that a failure of the device is approaching when three points of data from the nth time to the (n+2)th time of the cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve in the scatter diagram derived by the transition information derivation unit, and when the (n+3)th time of the cumulative operating time, which is estimated to be on an extension of the ascending curve, exceeds a predetermined upper control limit value.
is located.

本発明の別の態様は、
複数回の作動を繰り返す機器の故障予測を行う故障予測方法であって、
上記機器の起動から停止までに要した作動時間を作動時間検出部によって1回毎に検出する作動時間検出ステップと、
上記作動時間検出ステップで検出した上記作動時間に基づいて上記機器の任意の第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの上記作動時間の推移情報を推移情報導出部によって導出する推移情報導出ステップと、
上記推移情報導出ステップで導出した上記推移情報に基づいて上記作動時間が上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで連続して上昇したと判定したときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと故障予測部によって予測する故障予測ステップと、
を有し、
上記推移情報導出ステップでは、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出し、
上記故障予測ステップでは、上記推移情報導出ステップで導出した上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測する、故障予測方法、
にある。
本発明の別の態様は、
複数回の作動を繰り返す機器の故障予測を行う故障予測方法であって、
上記機器の起動から停止までに要した作動時間を作動時間検出部によって1回毎に検出する作動時間検出ステップと、
上記作動時間検出ステップで検出した上記作動時間に基づいて上記機器の任意の第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの上記作動時間の推移情報を推移情報導出部によって導出する推移情報導出ステップと、
上記推移情報導出ステップで導出した上記推移情報に基づいて上記作動時間が上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで連続して上昇したと判定したときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと故障予測部によって予測する故障予測ステップと、
を有し、
上記推移情報導出ステップでは、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出し、
上記故障予測ステップでは、上記推移情報導出ステップで導出した上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれ、且つ上記上昇曲線の延長線上にくると推定される上記第(n+3)回目の上記累積作動時間が予め定められた管理上限値を超えるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測する、故障予測方法、
にある。
Another aspect of the present invention is a method for producing a semiconductor device comprising:
A failure prediction method for predicting failure of equipment that repeats multiple operations, comprising:
an operation time detection step of detecting an operation time required from start to stop of the device by an operation time detection unit every time;
a transition information deriving step of deriving transition information of the operation time of the device from an arbitrary nth operation to an (n+2)th operation by a transition information deriving unit based on the operation time detected in the operation time detecting step;
a failure prediction step of predicting, by a failure prediction unit, that a time when a failure of the device is imminent when it is determined that the operating time has increased continuously from the nth time to the (n+2)th time based on the transition information derived in the transition information derivation step;
and
In the transition information deriving step, a scatter plot is derived as the transition information, with the horizontal axis representing the number of times the device is operated and the vertical axis representing the cumulative operation time, which is the cumulative value of the operation time;
the failure prediction step predicts that a failure of the device is imminent when three points of data from the nth time to the (n+2)th time of the cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve in the scatter diagram derived in the transition information derivation step;
is located.
Another aspect of the present invention is a method for producing a semiconductor device comprising:
A failure prediction method for predicting failure of equipment that repeats multiple operations, comprising:
an operation time detection step of detecting an operation time required from start to stop of the device by an operation time detection unit every time;
a transition information deriving step of deriving transition information of the operation time of the device from an arbitrary nth operation to an (n+2)th operation by a transition information deriving unit based on the operation time detected in the operation time detecting step;
a failure prediction step of predicting, by a failure prediction unit, that a time when a failure of the device is imminent when it is determined that the operating time has increased continuously from the nth time to the (n+2)th time based on the transition information derived in the transition information derivation step;
and
In the transition information deriving step, a scatter plot is derived as the transition information, with the horizontal axis representing the number of times the device is operated and the vertical axis representing the cumulative operation time, which is the cumulative value of the operation time;
a failure prediction method in which, in the failure prediction step, three points of data from the nth time to the (n+2)th time of the cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve in the scatter diagram derived in the transition information derivation step, and it is predicted that a time when a failure of the device will occur is approaching when the cumulative operating time of the (n+3)th time, which is estimated to be on an extension of the ascending curve, exceeds a predetermined upper control limit value;
is located.

上述の各態様では、複数回の作動を繰り返す機器の作動時間が1回毎に検出される。また、検出された作動時間に基づいて機器の任意の第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの作動時間の推移情報が導出される。そして、導出した推移情報に基づいて作動時間が第n回目から第(n+2)回目まで3回連続して上昇したと判定したときに機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測する。これにより、機器の直近の連続3回分の作動時間の推移を比較して機器の故障発生を予測することができ、機器の仕様上の保証上限値や、機器のメンテナンス時に設定された保証上限値などに頼らない精度の高い故障予測を行うことが可能になる。その結果、機器の故障発生前に異常に対処することができ、複数の機器を備える生産設備の長時間停止の発生を抑制できる。 In each of the above-described aspects, the operating time of a device that repeats multiple operations is detected for each operation. Based on the detected operating time, transition information for the device's operating time from any nth to (n+2)th operation is derived. Then, based on the derived transition information, it is determined that the operating time has increased three consecutive times from the nth to (n+2)th operation, and a prediction is made that the device is nearing failure. This makes it possible to predict the occurrence of an equipment failure by comparing the transitions in the device's operating time for the most recent three consecutive operations, enabling highly accurate failure predictions that do not rely on guaranteed upper limits in the device's specifications or guaranteed upper limits set during equipment maintenance. As a result, anomalies can be addressed before a failure occurs, reducing the occurrence of long-term shutdowns of production facilities equipped with multiple devices.

以上のごとく、上述の各態様によれば、機器故障の予測精度に優れた故障予測技術を提供することができる。 As described above, each of the above aspects makes it possible to provide failure prediction technology with excellent accuracy in predicting equipment failures.

実施形態1の故障予測システムの構成図。FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of a failure prediction system according to a first embodiment. 図1中の故障予測部における故障予測処理の考え方について説明するための図。2 is a diagram for explaining the concept of failure prediction processing in the failure prediction unit in FIG. 1 ; 図2を部分的に拡大して示す図。FIG. 3 is a partially enlarged view of FIG. 2 . 実施形態1の故障予測方法のフローチャートを示す図。FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a failure prediction method according to the first embodiment. 実施形態2について図2に対応した図。FIG. 10 is a diagram corresponding to FIG. 2 according to a second embodiment.

上述の態様の好ましい実施形態について以下に説明する。 Preferred embodiments of the above aspects are described below.

上述の態様の故障予測システムにおいて、上記推移情報導出部は、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出するように構成され、上記故障予測部は、上記推移情報導出部で導出された上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測するように構成されているのが好ましい。 In the failure prediction system of the above aspect, the transition information derivation unit is preferably configured to derive, as the transition information, a scatter plot with the number of times the device is operated on the horizontal axis and the cumulative operating time, which is the cumulative value of the operation time, on the vertical axis, and the failure prediction unit is preferably configured to predict that a failure of the device is imminent when three points of data from the nth to the (n+2)th cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve in the scatter plot derived by the transition information derivation unit.

この故障予測システムによれば、機器の作動時間から導出された散布図を使用して累積作動時間の第n回目から第(n+2)回目まで3点データと上昇曲線との関係に基づいて機器の故障予測を行うことができる。 This failure prediction system uses a scatter diagram derived from the equipment's operating time to predict equipment failure based on the relationship between three-point data and an ascending curve from the nth to (n+2)th cumulative operating time.

上述の態様の故障予測システムにおいて、上記推移情報導出部は、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出するように構成され、上記故障予測部は、上記推移情報導出部で導出された上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれ、且つ上記上昇曲線の延長線上にくると推定される上記第(n+3)回目の上記累積作動時間が予め定められた管理上限値を超えるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測するように構成されているのが好ましい。 In the failure prediction system of the above aspect, the transition information derivation unit is preferably configured to derive, as the transition information, a scatter plot with the horizontal axis representing the number of times the device is operated and the vertical axis representing cumulative operation time, which is the cumulative value of the operation time; and the failure prediction unit is preferably configured to predict that a failure of the device is imminent when, in the scatter plot derived by the transition information derivation unit, three points of data for the cumulative operation time from the nth operation to the (n+2)th operation are connected by an ascending curve, and the cumulative operation time of the (n+3)th operation, which is estimated to be on an extension of the ascending curve, exceeds a predetermined upper control limit.

この故障予測システムによれば、機器の直近の連続3回分の作動状況に加えて、管理上限値をもその故障予測に反映させることができ、機器の直近の連続3回分の作動状況のみに基づいて分析する場合に比べて、故障予測精度を高めることができる。 This failure prediction system can reflect the upper management limit in its failure predictions, in addition to the last three consecutive operating conditions of the equipment, thereby improving the accuracy of failure predictions compared to analysis based only on the last three consecutive operating conditions of the equipment.

上述の態様の故障予測システムにおいて、上記上昇曲線は、二次曲線或いは二次曲線で近似される近似曲線を構成するものであるのが好ましい。 In the failure prediction system of the above aspect, the ascending curve preferably constitutes a quadratic curve or an approximation curve approximated by a quadratic curve.

この故障予測システムによれば、上昇曲線を比較的単純な二次曲線或いはその近似曲線とすることで、累積作動時間の第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれるか否かを判定する処理を簡素化することができる。 This failure prediction system simplifies the process of determining whether the three data points from the nth cumulative operating time to the (n+2)th cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve by using a relatively simple quadratic curve or an approximation thereof.

上述の態様の故障予測システムは、上記故障予測部による予測結果をユーザに対して報知出力する報知出力部を備えるのが好ましい。 The failure prediction system of the above aspect preferably includes a notification output unit that notifies the user of the prediction results by the failure prediction unit.

この故障予測システムによれば、機器の故障発生時期が近いことを生産設備の現場のユーザに速やかに知らせることができる。 This failure prediction system can quickly notify on-site users of production equipment that an equipment failure is imminent.

上述の態様の故障予測方法において、上記推移情報導出ステップでは、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出し、上記故障予測ステップでは、上記推移情報導出ステップで導出した上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測するのが好ましい。 In the failure prediction method of the above aspect, in the transition information derivation step, a scatter plot with the number of times the device is operated on the horizontal axis and the cumulative operating time, which is the cumulative value of the operation time, on the vertical axis is derived as the transition information, and in the failure prediction step, it is preferable to predict that a failure of the device is imminent when three points of data from the nth to the (n+2)th cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve in the scatter plot derived in the transition information derivation step.

この故障予測方法によれば、散布図において累積作動時間の第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データと上昇曲線との関係に基づいて機器の故障予測を行うことができる。 This failure prediction method makes it possible to predict equipment failures based on the relationship between three points of data and the ascending curve on a scatter plot from the nth cumulative operating time to the (n+2)th cumulative operating time.

上述の態様の故障予測方法において、上記推移情報導出ステップでは、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出し、上記故障予測ステップでは、上記推移情報導出ステップで導出した上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれ、且つ上記上昇曲線の延長線上にくると推定される上記第(n+3)回目の上記累積作動時間が予め定められた管理上限値を超えるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測するのが好ましい。 In the failure prediction method of the above aspect, in the transition information derivation step, a scatter plot with the horizontal axis representing the number of times the device is operated and the vertical axis representing the cumulative operating time, which is the cumulative value of the operating time, is derived as the transition information, and in the failure prediction step, it is preferable to predict that a failure of the device is imminent when, in the scatter plot derived in the transition information derivation step, three points of data for the cumulative operating time from the nth operation to the (n+2)th operation are connected by an ascending curve, and the cumulative operating time of the (n+3)th operation, which is estimated to be on an extension of the ascending curve, exceeds a predetermined upper control limit.

この故障予測方法によれば、機器の直近の連続3回分の作動状況に加えて、管理上限値をもその故障予測に反映させることができ、機器の直近の連続3回分の作動状況のみに基づいて分析する場合に比べて、故障予測精度を高めることができる。 This failure prediction method allows the failure prediction to reflect not only the most recent three consecutive operating conditions of the equipment, but also the upper management limit, thereby improving the accuracy of failure prediction compared to analysis based only on the most recent three consecutive operating conditions of the equipment.

上述の態様の故障予測方法において、上記上昇曲線は、二次曲線或いは二次曲線で近似される近似曲線を構成するものであるのが好ましい。 In the failure prediction method of the above aspect, the ascending curve preferably constitutes a quadratic curve or an approximation curve approximated by a quadratic curve.

この故障予測方法によれば、上昇曲線を比較的単純な二次曲線或いはその近似曲線とすることで、累積作動時間の第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれるか否かを判定する処理を簡素化することができる。 This failure prediction method simplifies the process of determining whether the three data points from the nth cumulative operating time to the (n+2)th cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve by using a relatively simple quadratic curve or an approximation thereof.

上述の態様の故障予測方法は、上記故障予測ステップによる予測結果を報知出力部によってユーザに対して報知出力する報知出力ステップを有するのが好ましい。 The failure prediction method of the above aspect preferably includes a notification output step in which the notification output unit notifies the user of the prediction result obtained by the failure prediction step.

この故障予測方法によれば、機器の故障発生時期が近いことを生産設備の現場のユーザに速やかに知らせることができる。 This failure prediction method allows on-site users of production equipment to be quickly notified that an equipment failure is imminent.

以下、複数回の作動を繰り返す機器の故障予測を行う技術を具現化するための実施形態について図面を参照しつつ説明する。 Below, we will explain an embodiment of a technology that predicts failures in equipment that repeatedly operates multiple times, with reference to the drawings.

(実施形態1)
図1に示されるように、実施形態1にかかる故障予測システム1は、車両の生産設備に設けられるものであり、制御盤11と、データサーバー14と、設備管理装置20と、を備えている。
(Embodiment 1)
As shown in FIG. 1 , the failure prediction system 1 according to the first embodiment is installed in a vehicle production facility, and includes a control panel 11 , a data server 14 , and a facility management device 20 .

各制御盤11は、制御対象である機器10に電気的に接続されている。機器10として典型的には、モータ、シリンダなどの作動機器が挙げられる。制御盤11には、機器10の起動及び停止を検知する複数のセンサ12が搭載されている。複数のセンサ12によるデータDは、入出力時間計測器13(以下、単に「計測器13」という。)で計測される。計測器13が計測したデータDは、データサーバー14に伝送されて蓄積される。このデータDには、機器10の実際の起動及び停止のタイミングを特定できるセンサ情報(例えば、センサ12から機器10への入力信号の出力時刻、機器10からセンサ12への出力信号の検出時刻、各センサ12のON時間及びOFF時間など)が含まれている。データサーバー14に蓄積されたデータDは、無線方式或いは有線方式の通信回線NTを介して設備管理装置20に伝送される。 Each control panel 11 is electrically connected to the equipment 10 to be controlled. Typical examples of the equipment 10 include motors, cylinders, and other operating devices. The control panel 11 is equipped with multiple sensors 12 that detect the start and stop of the equipment 10. Data D from the multiple sensors 12 is measured by an input/output time measuring instrument 13 (hereinafter simply referred to as "measuring instrument 13"). The data D measured by the measuring instrument 13 is transmitted to and stored in a data server 14. This data D includes sensor information that can identify the actual start and stop timing of the equipment 10 (e.g., the output time of an input signal from the sensor 12 to the equipment 10, the detection time of an output signal from the equipment 10 to the sensor 12, the ON and OFF times of each sensor 12, etc.). The data D stored in the data server 14 is transmitted to the equipment management device 20 via a wireless or wired communication line NT.

設備管理装置20は、既知のCPU(Central Processing Unit)、ROM、RAM、外部機器との間での入出力を行うインターフェース等を有するコンピュータ装置である。この設備管理装置20は、デスクトップ型若しくはノート型のパーソナルコンピュータ(PC)、タブレット端末、モバイル端末などによって構成されるのが好ましい。 The equipment management device 20 is a computer device having a known CPU (Central Processing Unit), ROM, RAM, an interface for input/output with external devices, etc. This equipment management device 20 is preferably configured as a desktop or notebook personal computer (PC), a tablet terminal, a mobile terminal, etc.

設備管理装置20は、計測器13が計測したデータDに基づいて、故障予測システム1の本質的な機能、すなわち複数回の作動を繰り返す機器10の故障予測を行う機能を果たすものである。この設備管理装置20は、作動時間検出部21と、推移情報導出部22と、故障予測部23と、報知出力部24と、を備えている。 The equipment management device 20 performs the essential function of the failure prediction system 1, namely, the function of predicting failures of equipment 10 that repeatedly operates multiple times, based on the data D measured by the measuring instrument 13. This equipment management device 20 includes an operation time detection unit 21, a transition information derivation unit 22, a failure prediction unit 23, and an alarm output unit 24.

計測器13によれば、機器10の起動から停止までに要した作動時間tに関する情報が作動1回毎に計測される。ここでいう「1回」を「1サイクル」ということもできる。このときの作動時間tは、作動時間検出部21が前述のデータDを用いて演算処理することによって検出される。すなわち、作動時間検出部21は、計測器13との協働によって、機器10の起動から停止までに要した作動時間tを1回毎に検出するように構成されている。推移情報導出部22は、作動時間tの推移情報It(後述の散布図S)を導出するように構成されている。故障予測部23は、後述の所定の判定結果に基づいて、機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測するように構成されている。報知出力部24は、故障予測部23による予測結果をユーザに対して報知出力するように構成されている。 The measuring instrument 13 measures information regarding the operating time t required from start-up to shutdown of the device 10 for each operation. Here, "one time" can also be referred to as "one cycle." The operating time t at this time is detected by the operating time detection unit 21 performing calculations using the aforementioned data D. That is, the operating time detection unit 21 is configured to detect the operating time t required from start-up to shutdown of the device 10 for each operation in cooperation with the measuring instrument 13. The transition information derivation unit 22 is configured to derive transition information It (scatter plot S described below) of the operating time t. The failure prediction unit 23 is configured to predict that a failure of the device 10 is imminent based on a predetermined determination result described below. The notification output unit 24 is configured to output a notification of the prediction result by the failure prediction unit 23 to the user.

次に、設備管理装置20による具体的な処理内容を、図2~図4を参照しつつ説明する。なお、実施形態1の故障予測方法は、機器10の故障予測を行う方法であり、図4の第1ステップS101から第4ステップS104までのステップを順次実行することによって可能になる。本形態では、これらのステップの全てを設備管理装置20が実行するのが好ましい。 Next, the specific processing performed by the equipment management device 20 will be described with reference to Figures 2 to 4. The failure prediction method of embodiment 1 is a method for predicting failures in equipment 10, and is made possible by sequentially executing the steps from the first step S101 to the fourth step S104 in Figure 4. In this embodiment, it is preferable that all of these steps be executed by the equipment management device 20.

作動時間検出部21は、図4中の第1ステップS101(作動時間検出ステップ)によって、機器10の作動時間tを検出する。推移情報導出部22は、引き続いて、図4中の第2ステップS102(推移情報導出ステップ)によって、作動時間検出部21で検出された作動時間tに基づいて連続した任意の3回分の作動時間tの推移情報Itを導出する。推移情報導出部22は、機器10の任意の第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの作動時間tの推移情報Itとして散布図S(図2を参照)を導出する。そして、故障予測部23は、図4中の第3ステップS103(故障予測ステップ)によって、散布図Sを用いて故障予測処理を行う。 The operation time detection unit 21 detects the operation time t of the device 10 in a first step S101 (operation time detection step) in FIG. 4. The transition information derivation unit 22 then derives transition information It of any three consecutive operation times t based on the operation time t detected by the operation time detection unit 21 in a second step S102 (transition information derivation step) in FIG. 4. The transition information derivation unit 22 derives a scatter diagram S (see FIG. 2) as the transition information It of any nth to (n+2)th operation of the device 10. Then, the failure prediction unit 23 performs failure prediction processing using the scatter diagram S in a third step S103 (failure prediction step) in FIG. 4.

ここで、図2中の散布図Sについて説明する。この散布図Sは、機器10の作動回数Nを横軸とし作動時間tの累積値である累積作動時間Tを縦軸とするものである。この散布図Sにおいて、横軸の作動回数Nの間隔は一定である。本形態では、機器10の第(n-1)回目から第(n+3)回目までの作動回数Nについて、作動回数Nと累積作動時間Tとの相関を示す散布図Sが例示されている。 Now, we will explain the scatter diagram S in Figure 2. This scatter diagram S has the number of activations N of the device 10 on the horizontal axis and the cumulative activation time T, which is the cumulative value of the activation time t, on the vertical axis. In this scatter diagram S, the intervals between the number of activations N on the horizontal axis are constant. In this embodiment, a scatter diagram S is shown that shows the correlation between the number of activations N and the cumulative activation time T for the number of activations N from the (n-1)th to the (n+3)th activation of the device 10.

この散布図Sにおいて、機器10が異常のない正常な状態で運転されているときには、その機器10の可動部分(図示省略)のあたりが付くまでの初期状態を除いて、各回の累積作動時間Tを結ぶと右肩上がりの直線である基準線Lrになる。すなわち、機器10の作動時間tが全ての回で概ね一定となる。ところが、機器10に異常が出始めると、次回までの累積作動時間Tの上昇分(すなわち、実際に要した作動時間t)が増える。この場合、累積作動時間Tの前回と次回との時間差が正常時の時間差ΔTを上回る。図2では、累積作動時間T(n+1)と累積作動時間T(n)の時間差Aと、累積作動時間T(n+2)と累積作動時間T(n+1)の時間差Bはいずれも、正常時の時間差ΔTを上回っている。 In this scatter plot S, when the device 10 is operating normally and without any abnormalities, the cumulative operating time T for each operation, excluding the initial state until the moving parts (not shown) of the device 10 are adjusted, forms a straight, upward-sloping reference line Lr. In other words, the operating time t of the device 10 remains roughly constant for all operations. However, when an abnormality begins to occur in the device 10, the increase in the cumulative operating time T until the next operation (i.e., the actual operating time t required) increases. In this case, the time difference between the previous and next cumulative operating times T exceeds the normal time difference ΔT. In Figure 2, the time difference A between the cumulative operating time T(n+1) and the cumulative operating time T(n), and the time difference B between the cumulative operating time T(n+2) and the cumulative operating time T(n+1) both exceed the normal time difference ΔT.

故障予測部23による故障予測処理は、図2の散布図Sに基づいて作動時間tが第n回目から第(n+2)回目まで3回連続して上昇したと判定したときに機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測する処理である。作動時間tが連続して上昇したことの判定は、具体的には、散布図Sにおいて累積作動時間Tの第n回目から第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線Lで結ばれるか否かによって行われる。そして、これら3点データが上昇曲線Lで結ばれるときに機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測し、そうでない場合には機器10がその後直ぐには故障に至らないと予測する。 The failure prediction process by the failure prediction unit 23 is a process that predicts that a failure of the device 10 is imminent when it is determined that the operating time t has increased three consecutive times, from the nth to the (n+2)th time, based on the scatter diagram S in Figure 2. A consecutive increase in the operating time t is determined, specifically, by whether or not three points of data from the nth to the (n+2)th time of the cumulative operating time T are connected by an ascending curve L in the scatter diagram S. If these three points of data are connected by an ascending curve L, it is predicted that a failure of the device 10 is imminent; if not, it is predicted that the device 10 will not fail immediately.

ここでいう「上昇曲線L」とは、第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの範囲で実質的に下に凸であり且つ微分係数(各プロット点における接線に傾きが)が常に正の曲線をいう。このとき、微分係数は一定でもあっても一定でなくてもよい。この上昇曲線Lは、典型的には、係数が正の二次曲線或いはこの二次曲線で近似される近似曲線を構成するものであるのが好ましい。上昇曲線Lを比較的単純な二次曲線或いはその近似曲線とすることで、上記3点データが上昇曲線Lで結ばれるか否かを判定する処理を簡素化することができる。一方で、上昇曲線Lは、二次曲線やその近似曲線のみに限定されるものではなく、必要に応じてその他の曲線を適用してもよい。 The "ascending curve L" referred to here is a curve that is substantially convex downward in the range from the nth to the (n+2)th plot and whose differential coefficient (the slope of the tangent at each plot point) is always positive. In this case, the differential coefficient may or may not be constant. This ascending curve L is typically preferably a quadratic curve with a positive coefficient or an approximation curve that is approximated by this quadratic curve. By making the ascending curve L a relatively simple quadratic curve or its approximation curve, the process of determining whether the above three data points are connected by the ascending curve L can be simplified. However, the ascending curve L is not limited to quadratic curves or their approximation curves, and other curves may be applied as needed.

上記3点データがこのような上昇曲線Lで結ばれるときには、この上昇曲線Lの延長線上(すなわち、図2中の二点鎖線で示される曲線上)に第(n+3)回目の累積作動時間T(n+3)がプロットされると推定される(図2中の□プロットを参照)。したがって、累積作動時間Tが第(n+3)回目に大幅に増えて、予め定められた管理上限値ULを超える可能性が高い。管理上限値ULとして、典型的には、機器10の仕様上の保証上限値、或いは機器10のメンテナンス時に設定された保証上限値が挙げられる。このため、累積作動時間Tが管理上限値ULを超えると機器10が実際に故障に至る可能性が高い。 When the above three data points are connected by an ascending curve L, it is estimated that the (n+3)th cumulative operating time T(n+3) is plotted on an extension of this ascending curve L (i.e., on the curve indicated by the two-dot chain line in Figure 2) (see the square plot in Figure 2). Therefore, there is a high possibility that the cumulative operating time T will increase significantly in the (n+3)th operation and exceed the predetermined upper limit control value UL. The upper limit control value UL is typically the guaranteed upper limit value in the specifications of the device 10, or the guaranteed upper limit value set during maintenance of the device 10. Therefore, if the cumulative operating time T exceeds the upper limit control value UL, there is a high possibility that the device 10 will actually malfunction.

そこで、本形態は、上記3点データと上昇曲線Lとの関係に基づいて機器10の故障予測を行うものであり、上記3点データが上昇曲線Lで結ばれるときに、機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測するようにしている。そして、直近の連続3回分の累積作動時間Tを1セットとして予測を継続する。これにより、管理上限値ULを使用することなく、機器10の直近の連続3回分の作動状況を常時に分析して、その分析結果を機器10の故障予測に反映させることができる。 In this embodiment, therefore, a failure prediction for the device 10 is made based on the relationship between the above three data points and the rising curve L, and when the above three data points are connected by the rising curve L, it is predicted that a failure of the device 10 is imminent. The cumulative operating time T of the most recent three consecutive times is used as one set for continued prediction. This allows the operating status of the device 10 for the most recent three consecutive times to be constantly analyzed without using the upper control limit value UL, and the results of this analysis to be reflected in the failure prediction for the device 10.

また、これに代えて、上記3点データが上昇曲線Lで結ばれ、且つ上昇曲線Lの延長線上にくると推定される第(n+3)回目の累積作動時間T(n+3)と第(n+2)回目の累積作動時間T(n+2)との時間差が時間差B(図2を参照)の2倍以上であるときに、機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測するようにしてもよい。これにより、機器10の故障予測の精度を高めるのに有効である。 Alternatively, the three data points are connected by an ascending curve L, and when the time difference between the (n+3)th cumulative operating time T(n+3) and the (n+2)th cumulative operating time T(n+2), which are estimated to be on an extension of the ascending curve L, is equal to or greater than twice the time difference B (see Figure 2), it may be possible to predict that a failure of the device 10 is imminent. This is effective in improving the accuracy of failure predictions for the device 10.

或いは、上記3点データが上昇曲線Lで結ばれ、且つ上昇曲線Lの延長線上にくると推定される第(n+3)回目の累積作動時間T(n+3)が管理上限値ULを超えるときに、機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測するようにしてもよい。これにより、機器10の直近の連続3回分の作動状況に加えて、管理上限値ULをもその故障予測に反映させることができる。この場合、機器10の直近の連続3回分の作動状況のみに基づいて分析する場合に比べて、故障予測精度を高めることができる。 Alternatively, when the three data points are connected by an ascending curve L and the (n+3) cumulative operating time T(n+3), which is estimated to be on an extension of the ascending curve L, exceeds the upper limit control value UL, it may be predicted that the device 10 is nearing a failure. This allows the upper limit control value UL to be reflected in the failure prediction in addition to the operating status of the device 10 for the most recent three consecutive times. In this case, the accuracy of the failure prediction can be improved compared to when analysis is based only on the operating status of the device 10 for the most recent three consecutive times.

これに対して、図2の一部である図3に示されるように、上記3点データが上昇曲線Lで結ばれない例として、例えば、直線Laで結ばれる第1比較例、曲線Lbで結ばれる第2比較例、曲線Lcで結ばれる第3比較例などが挙げられる。 In contrast, as shown in Figure 3, which is part of Figure 2, examples in which the above three data points are not connected by an ascending curve L include a first comparative example in which they are connected by a straight line La, a second comparative example in which they are connected by a curve Lb, and a third comparative example in which they are connected by a curve Lc.

第1比較例では、累積作動時間Tが第n回目から第(n+2)回目まで3回連続して上昇しているものの上記3点データが直線Laで結ばれるため、本形態の上昇曲線Lとは本質的に異なる。作動時間Tは第n回目から第(n+2)回目まで一定である。この場合、累積作動時間Tの上昇率は、第n回目の前後で変化しており、第n回目以降で大きくなってはいるが、第n回目から第(n+2)回目まで一定の上昇率で推移しているため、機器10が一義的に異常状態であるとはいえない。 In the first comparative example, although the cumulative operating time T increases three consecutive times from the nth to the (n+2)th operation, the three data points are connected by a straight line La, which is essentially different from the increasing curve L of this embodiment. The operating time T remains constant from the nth to the (n+2)th operation. In this case, the rate of increase of the cumulative operating time T changes around the nth operation, and although it increases after the nth operation, the rate of increase remains constant from the nth to the (n+2)th operation, so it cannot be said that the device 10 is unambiguously in an abnormal state.

第2比較例では、曲線Lbは、上に凸の曲線であり、本形態の上昇曲線Lに該当しない。また、第3比較例では、曲線Lcは、上昇曲線Lと同様に下に凸の曲線であるものの、第n回目から第(n+1)回目までの範囲で曲線Lc微分係数(各プロット点における接線に傾きが)が負であるため、本形態の上昇曲線Lと差別化される。 In the second comparative example, curve Lb is an upwardly convex curve and does not correspond to the ascending curve L of this embodiment. Furthermore, in the third comparative example, curve Lc is a downwardly convex curve like the ascending curve L, but the differential coefficient of curve Lc (the slope of the tangent at each plot point) is negative in the range from the nth to the (n+1)th time, and therefore it is differentiated from the ascending curve L of this embodiment.

なお、特に図示しないものの、散布図Sにおいて上記3点データが上昇曲線Lで結ばれるか否かの判定は、設備管理装置20に予め実装された既知のプログラムや人工知能によるAIモデル(学習済みモデル)などを使用して自動的に行うのが好ましい。また、これに代えて或いは加えて、ユーザが散布図Sを視認して直に判定するようにしてもよい。 Although not specifically shown, it is preferable that the determination of whether the above three data points are connected by an ascending curve L in the scatter diagram S be performed automatically using a known program pre-installed in the equipment management device 20 or an AI model (trained model) based on artificial intelligence. Alternatively or additionally, the user may visually view the scatter diagram S and make the determination directly.

報知出力部24は、図4中の第4ステップS104(報知出力ステップ)によって、故障予測部23による予測結果を報知出力する。ここでいう「報知出力」には、画面表示出力、音声出力、警報出力、印字出力などの各種の出力形態が広く包含される。これにより、機器10の故障発生時期が近いことを生産設備の現場のユーザに速やかに知らせることができる。 The notification output unit 24 outputs the prediction result by the failure prediction unit 23 as a notification in the fourth step S104 (notification output step) in Figure 4. The term "notification output" here broadly encompasses various output formats, such as screen display output, audio output, alarm output, and printout output. This allows on-site users of the production equipment to be promptly notified that a failure of the equipment 10 is imminent.

次に、上述の実施形態1の作用効果について説明する。 Next, we will explain the effects of the above-mentioned embodiment 1.

実施形態1では、複数回の作動を繰り返す機器10の作動時間tが1回毎に検出される。また、検出された作動時間tに基づいて機器10の任意の第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの作動時間tの推移情報Itが導出される。そして、導出した推移情報It(散布図S)に基づいて作動時間tが第n回目から第(n+2)回目まで3回連続して上昇したと判定したときに機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測する。これにより、機器10の直近の連続3回分の作動時間tの推移を比較して機器10の故障発生を予測することができ、機器10の仕様上の保証上限値ULや、機器のメンテナンス時に設定された保証上限値ULなどに頼らない精度の高い故障予測を行うことが可能になる。その結果、機器10の故障発生前に異常に対処することができ、複数の機器10を備える生産設備の長時間停止の発生を抑制できる。 In embodiment 1, the operation time t of the device 10, which repeats multiple operations, is detected for each operation. Furthermore, based on the detected operation time t, transition information It of the operation time t of the device 10 from any nth operation to the (n+2)th operation is derived. Then, based on the derived transition information It (scatter plot S), it is determined that the operation time t has increased three consecutive times from the nth operation to the (n+2)th operation, and it is predicted that the device 10 is about to malfunction. This allows the occurrence of a malfunction in the device 10 to be predicted by comparing the transitions of the operation time t of the device 10 for the most recent three consecutive operations, enabling highly accurate malfunction predictions that do not rely on the guaranteed upper limit UL in the device 10 specifications or the guaranteed upper limit UL set during device maintenance. As a result, an abnormality can be addressed before a malfunction occurs in the device 10, and long-term shutdowns of production facilities equipped with multiple devices 10 can be reduced.

なお、連続2回分の作動時間tの推移を比較するようにすると、異常であるか誤差変動であるかの判別が難しく、また連続4回分以上の作動時間tの推移を比較するようにすると、累積作動時間Tが大きく上昇して機器10が既に故障に至っている可能性が高い。このため、いずれも機器10の故障前に異常を把握する有効な対策に成り得ない。 Furthermore, if the trends in the operating time t for two consecutive times are compared, it is difficult to determine whether this is an abnormality or an error fluctuation, and if the trends in the operating time t for four or more consecutive times are compared, the cumulative operating time T will have risen significantly, making it highly likely that the device 10 has already reached a breakdown. For this reason, neither of these measures is effective in detecting an abnormality before the device 10 breaks down.

以上のように、実施形態1によれば、機器故障の予測精度に優れた故障予測システム1及び故障予測方法を提供することができる。 As described above, embodiment 1 provides a failure prediction system 1 and a failure prediction method that have excellent accuracy in predicting equipment failures.

以下、上述の実施形態1に関連する他の実施形態について図面を参照しつつ説明する。他の形態において、実施形態1の要素と同一の要素には同一の符号を付しており、当該同一の要素についての説明は省略する。 Other embodiments related to the above-described first embodiment will be described below with reference to the drawings. In these embodiments, elements that are the same as those in the first embodiment will be assigned the same reference numerals, and descriptions of these same elements will be omitted.

(実施形態2)
実施形態2の故障予測システム及び故障予測方法は、実施形態1のものと基本的に同じである。一方で、図5に示されるように、推移情報導出部22が推移情報It(図1を参照)として導出する散布図S’が実施形態1の散布図S(図2を参照)とは異なる。
(Embodiment 2)
The failure prediction system and the failure prediction method of the second embodiment are basically the same as those of the first embodiment. However, as shown in Fig. 5 , the scatter diagram S' derived by the transition information derivation unit 22 as the transition information It (see Fig. 1 ) is different from the scatter diagram S (see Fig. 2 ) of the first embodiment.

散布図S’は、機器10の作動回数Nを横軸とし作動時間tを縦軸とするものである。この散布図S’において、横軸の作動回数Nの間隔は一定である。本形態では、機器10の第(n-1)回目から第(n+3)回目までの作動回数Nについて、作動回数Nと累積作動tとの相関を示す散布図S’が例示されている。 The scatter diagram S' has the number of activations N of the device 10 on the horizontal axis and the activation time t on the vertical axis. In this scatter diagram S', the intervals between the number of activations N on the horizontal axis are constant. In this embodiment, the scatter diagram S' shows the correlation between the number of activations N and the cumulative activations t for the number of activations N of the device 10 from the (n-1)th to the (n+3)th activation.

この散布図S’において、機器10が異常のない正常な状態で運転されているときには、機器10の作動時間tが全ての回で概ね一定であり、各回の作動時間tを結ぶと水平な基準線Mrになる。ところが、機器10に異常が出始めると、実際に要した作動時間tが増える。この場合、作動時間tの前回と次回との時間差が正の値になる。図2では、作動時間t(n+1)と作動時間t(n)の時間差Aと、作動時t(n+2)と作動時間t(n+1)の時間差Bはいずれも、正の値になっている。 In this scatter plot S', when the device 10 is operating normally and without any abnormalities, the operating time t of the device 10 is roughly constant for all times, and connecting the operating times t of each time forms a horizontal reference line Mr. However, when abnormalities begin to occur in the device 10, the actual operating time t required increases. In this case, the time difference between the previous and next operating times t becomes a positive value. In Figure 2, the time difference A between operating times t(n+1) and t(n), and the time difference B between operating times t(n+2) and t(n+1) are both positive values.

故障予測部23(図1を参照)による故障予測処理は、図5の散布図S’に基づいて作動時間tが第n回目から第(n+2)回目まで3回連続して上昇したと判定したときに機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測する処理である。作動時間tが連続して上昇したことの判定は、具体的には、散布図S’において作動時間tの第n回目から第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線Mで結ばれるか否かによって行われる。そして、これら3点データが上昇曲線Mで結ばれるときに機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測し、そうでない場合には機器10がその後直ぐには故障に至らないと予測する。 The failure prediction process by the failure prediction unit 23 (see Figure 1) is a process that predicts that a failure of the device 10 is imminent when it is determined that the operating time t has increased three consecutive times, from the nth to the (n+2)th time, based on the scatter diagram S' in Figure 5. A consecutive increase in the operating time t is determined, specifically, by whether or not an ascending curve M connects three data points from the nth to the (n+2)th time of the operating time t in the scatter diagram S'. If these three data points are connected by an ascending curve M, it is predicted that a failure of the device 10 is imminent; if not, it is predicted that the device 10 will not fail immediately.

ここでいう「上昇曲線M」とは、実施形態1の上昇曲線Lと同様に、第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの範囲で実質的に下に凸であり且つ微分係数(各点における接線に傾きが)が常に正の曲線をいう。上記3点データがこのような上昇曲線Mで結ばれるときには、この上昇曲線Mの延長線上(すなわち、図5中の二点鎖線で示される曲線上)に第(n+3)回目の作動時間t(n+3)がプロットされると推定される(図5中の□プロットを参照)。 The "rising curve M" referred to here is a curve that, like the rising curve L in embodiment 1, is substantially convex downward in the range from the nth to the (n+2)th operation and whose differential coefficient (the slope of the tangent at each point) is always positive. When the above three data points are connected by such a rising curve M, it is estimated that the (n+3)th operation time t(n+3) is plotted on an extension of this rising curve M (i.e., on the curve indicated by the two-dot chain line in Figure 5) (see the square plot in Figure 5).

本形態では、実施形態1の場合と同様に、上記3点データが上昇曲線Mで結ばれるときに、機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測するようにしている。また、これに代えて、上記3点データが上昇曲線Mで結ばれ、且つ上昇曲線Mの延長線上にくると推定される第(n+3)回目の累積作動時間T(n+3)と第(n+2)回目の累積作動時間T(n+2)との時間差が時間差B(図5を参照)の2倍以上であるときに、機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測するようにしてもよい。或いは、上記3点データが上昇曲線Mで結ばれ、且つ上昇曲線Mの延長線上にくると推定される第(n+3)回目の累積作動時間T(n+3)が管理上限値ULを超えるときに、機器10の故障発生時期が近いと予測するようにしてもよい。 In this embodiment, as in the first embodiment, when the three data points are connected by an ascending curve M, it is predicted that the device 10 is about to fail. Alternatively, it may be predicted that the device 10 is about to fail when the three data points are connected by an ascending curve M and the time difference between the (n+3)th cumulative operating time T(n+3) and the (n+2)th cumulative operating time T(n+2), which are estimated to be on an extension of the ascending curve M, is equal to or greater than twice the time difference B (see FIG. 5). Alternatively, it may be predicted that the device 10 is about to fail when the three data points are connected by an ascending curve M and the (n+3)th cumulative operating time T(n+3), which is estimated to be on an extension of the ascending curve M, exceeds the upper limit management value UL.

その他の構成及び方法は、実施形態1と同様である。 Other configurations and methods are the same as in embodiment 1.

実施形態2によれば、機器10の作動時間から導出された散布図S’を使用して作動時間tの第n回目から第(n+2)回目まで3点データと上昇曲線Mとの関係に基づいて機器10の故障予測を行うことができる。 According to embodiment 2, a scatter plot S' derived from the operating time of the device 10 can be used to predict failures of the device 10 based on the relationship between the three-point data and the ascending curve M from the nth to the (n+2)th operating time t.

その他、実施形態1と同様の作用効果を奏する。 Other than that, it has the same effects as embodiment 1.

本発明は、上述の形態のみに限定されるものではなく、本発明の目的を逸脱しない限りにおいて種々の応用や変形が考えられる。例えば、上述の各形態を応用した次の各形態を実施することもできる。 The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and various applications and modifications are possible without departing from the purpose of the present invention. For example, the following embodiments can be implemented by applying the above-described embodiments.

上述の形態では、故障予測部23(故障予測ステップ)による予測結果を報知出力部24(報知出力ステップ)でユーザに報知出力する場合について例示したが、これに代えて、予測結果を単にデータ出力するようにしてもよい。 In the above embodiment, an example was given in which the prediction result by the failure prediction unit 23 (failure prediction step) is output to the user by the notification output unit 24 (notification output step), but instead, the prediction result may simply be output as data.

上述の形態では、車両の生産設備で用いる故障予測システム1及び故障予測について例示したが、生産設備の種類は特に限定されるものではなく、これらの技術を車両以外の生産設備における機器故障の予測技術に適用できることは勿論である。 In the above-described embodiment, an example was given of a failure prediction system 1 and failure prediction used in vehicle production facilities, but the type of production facilities is not particularly limited, and it goes without saying that these technologies can also be applied to equipment failure prediction technologies in production facilities other than vehicles.

1 故障予測システム
10 機器
21 作動時間検出部
22 推移情報導出部
23 故障予測部
24 報知出力部
t,t(n-1),t(n),t(n+1),t(n+2),t(n+3) 作動時間
It 作動時間の推移情報
L 上昇曲線
N 作動回
S,S’ 散布図(推移情報)
S101 作動時間検出ステップ
S102 推移情報導出ステップ
S103 故障予測ステップ
S104 報知出力ステップ
T,T(n-1),T(n),T(n+1),T(n+2),T(n+3) 累積作動時間
UL 管理上限値
1 Failure prediction system 10 Equipment 21 Operation time detection unit 22 Transition information derivation unit 23 Failure prediction unit 24 Notification output unit t, t(n-1), t(n), t(n+1), t(n+2), t(n+3) Operation time It Transition information of operation time L Rise curve N Number of operation S, S' Scatter diagram (transition information)
S101 Operation time detection step S102 Transition information derivation step S103 Failure prediction step S104 Notification output step T, T(n-1), T(n), T(n+1), T(n+2), T(n+3) Cumulative operation time UL Upper limit of control

Claims (8)

複数回の作動を繰り返す機器の故障予測を行う故障予測システムであって、
上記機器の起動から停止までに要した作動時間を1回毎に検出する作動時間検出部と、
上記作動時間検出部で検出された上記作動時間に基づいて上記機器の任意の第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの上記作動時間の推移情報を導出する推移情報導出部と、
上記推移情報導出部で導出された上記推移情報に基づいて上記作動時間が上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで連続して上昇したと判定したときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測する故障予測部と、
を備え、
上記推移情報導出部は、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出するように構成され、
上記故障予測部は、上記推移情報導出部で導出された上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測するように構成されている、故障予測システム。
A failure prediction system for predicting failures of equipment that repeats multiple operations,
an operation time detection unit that detects an operation time required from start to stop of the device for each operation;
a transition information deriving unit that derives transition information of the operation time of the device from an arbitrary nth operation to an (n+2)th operation based on the operation time detected by the operation time detecting unit;
a failure prediction unit that predicts that a failure of the device is imminent when it is determined that the operating time has increased continuously from the nth time to the (n+2)th time based on the transition information derived by the transition information derivation unit;
Equipped with
the transition information derivation unit is configured to derive, as the transition information, a scatter plot having a horizontal axis representing the number of times the device is operated and a vertical axis representing a cumulative operation time, which is a cumulative value of the operation time;
the failure prediction unit is configured to predict that a failure of the equipment is imminent when three points of data from the nth to the (n+2)th cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve in the scatter diagram derived by the transition information derivation unit.
複数回の作動を繰り返す機器の故障予測を行う故障予測システムであって、
上記機器の起動から停止までに要した作動時間を1回毎に検出する作動時間検出部と、
上記作動時間検出部で検出された上記作動時間に基づいて上記機器の任意の第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの上記作動時間の推移情報を導出する推移情報導出部と、
上記推移情報導出部で導出された上記推移情報に基づいて上記作動時間が上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで連続して上昇したと判定したときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測する故障予測部と、
を備え、
上記推移情報導出部は、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出するように構成され、
上記故障予測部は、上記推移情報導出部で導出された上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれ、且つ上記上昇曲線の延長線上にくると推定される上記第(n+3)回目の上記累積作動時間が予め定められた管理上限値を超えるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測するように構成されている、故障予測システム。
A failure prediction system for predicting failures of equipment that repeats multiple operations,
an operation time detection unit that detects an operation time required from start to stop of the device for each operation;
a transition information deriving unit that derives transition information of the operation time of the device from an arbitrary nth operation to an (n+2)th operation based on the operation time detected by the operation time detecting unit;
a failure prediction unit that predicts that a failure of the device is imminent when it is determined that the operating time has increased continuously from the nth time to the (n+2)th time based on the transition information derived by the transition information derivation unit;
Equipped with
the transition information derivation unit is configured to derive, as the transition information, a scatter plot having a horizontal axis representing the number of times the device is operated and a vertical axis representing a cumulative operation time, which is a cumulative value of the operation time;
the failure prediction unit is configured to predict that a failure of the equipment is approaching when three points of data from the nth to the (n+2)th cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve in the scatter diagram derived by the transition information derivation unit, and when the (n+3)th cumulative operating time, which is estimated to be on an extension of the ascending curve , exceeds a predetermined upper control limit value.
上記上昇曲線は、二次曲線或いは二次曲線で近似される近似曲線を構成するものである、請求項またはに記載の故障予測システム。 3. The failure prediction system according to claim 1 , wherein the ascending curve is a quadratic curve or an approximation curve that is approximated by a quadratic curve. 上記故障予測部による予測結果をユーザに対して報知出力する報知出力部を備える、請求項またはに記載の故障予測システム。 3. The failure prediction system according to claim 1 , further comprising a notification output unit that notifies a user of the prediction result by said failure prediction unit. 複数回の作動を繰り返す機器の故障予測を行う故障予測方法であって、
上記機器の起動から停止までに要した作動時間を作動時間検出部によって1回毎に検出する作動時間検出ステップと、
上記作動時間検出ステップで検出した上記作動時間に基づいて上記機器の任意の第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの上記作動時間の推移情報を推移情報導出部によって導出する推移情報導出ステップと、
上記推移情報導出ステップで導出した上記推移情報に基づいて上記作動時間が上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで連続して上昇したと判定したときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと故障予測部によって予測する故障予測ステップと、
を有し、
上記推移情報導出ステップでは、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出し、
上記故障予測ステップでは、上記推移情報導出ステップで導出した上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測する、故障予測方法。
A failure prediction method for predicting failure of equipment that repeats multiple operations, comprising:
an operation time detection step of detecting an operation time required from start to stop of the device by an operation time detection unit every time;
a transition information deriving step of deriving transition information of the operation time of the device from an arbitrary nth operation to an (n+2)th operation by a transition information deriving unit based on the operation time detected in the operation time detecting step;
a failure prediction step of predicting, by a failure prediction unit, that a time when a failure of the device is imminent when it is determined that the operating time has increased continuously from the nth time to the (n+2)th time based on the transition information derived in the transition information derivation step;
and
In the transition information deriving step, a scatter plot is derived as the transition information, with the horizontal axis representing the number of times the device is operated and the vertical axis representing the cumulative operation time, which is the cumulative value of the operation time;
In the failure prediction step, when three data points from the nth to the (n+2)th cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve in the scatter diagram derived in the transition information derivation step, it is predicted that a failure of the equipment is imminent .
複数回の作動を繰り返す機器の故障予測を行う故障予測方法であって、
上記機器の起動から停止までに要した作動時間を作動時間検出部によって1回毎に検出する作動時間検出ステップと、
上記作動時間検出ステップで検出した上記作動時間に基づいて上記機器の任意の第n回目から第(n+2)回目までの上記作動時間の推移情報を推移情報導出部によって導出する推移情報導出ステップと、
上記推移情報導出ステップで導出した上記推移情報に基づいて上記作動時間が上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで連続して上昇したと判定したときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと故障予測部によって予測する故障予測ステップと、
を有し、
上記推移情報導出ステップでは、上記機器の作動回数を横軸とし上記作動時間の累積値である累積作動時間を縦軸とする散布図を上記推移情報として導出し、
上記故障予測ステップでは、上記推移情報導出ステップで導出した上記散布図において上記累積作動時間の上記第n回目から上記第(n+2)回目まで3点データが上昇曲線で結ばれ、且つ上記上昇曲線の延長線上にくると推定される上記第(n+3)回目の上記累積作動時間が予め定められた管理上限値を超えるときに上記機器の故障発生時期が近いと予測する、故障予測方法。
A failure prediction method for predicting failure of equipment that repeats multiple operations, comprising:
an operation time detection step of detecting an operation time required from start to stop of the device by an operation time detection unit every time;
a transition information deriving step of deriving transition information of the operation time of the device from an arbitrary nth operation to an (n+2)th operation by a transition information deriving unit based on the operation time detected in the operation time detecting step;
a failure prediction step of predicting, by a failure prediction unit, that a time when a failure of the device is imminent when it is determined that the operating time has increased continuously from the nth time to the (n+2)th time based on the transition information derived in the transition information derivation step;
and
In the transition information deriving step, a scatter plot is derived as the transition information, with the horizontal axis representing the number of times the device is operated and the vertical axis representing the cumulative operation time, which is the cumulative value of the operation time;
In the failure prediction step, when three points of data from the nth to the (n+2)th cumulative operating time are connected by an ascending curve in the scatter diagram derived in the transition information derivation step, and the cumulative operating time of the (n+3)th cumulative operating time, which is estimated to be on an extension of the ascending curve, exceeds a predetermined upper control limit value , it is predicted that a failure of the equipment is imminent.
上記上昇曲線は、二次曲線或いは二次曲線で近似される近似曲線を構成するものである、請求項またはに記載の故障予測方法。 7. The failure prediction method according to claim 5 , wherein the ascending curve is a quadratic curve or an approximation curve that is approximated by a quadratic curve. 上記故障予測ステップによる予測結果を報知出力部によってユーザに対して報知出力する報知出力ステップを有する、請求項またはに記載の故障予測方法。
7. The failure prediction method according to claim 5 , further comprising a notification output step of outputting a notification of the prediction result from said failure prediction step to a user by a notification output unit.
JP2022145129A 2022-09-13 2022-09-13 Failure prediction system and failure prediction method Active JP7779220B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022145129A JP7779220B2 (en) 2022-09-13 2022-09-13 Failure prediction system and failure prediction method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022145129A JP7779220B2 (en) 2022-09-13 2022-09-13 Failure prediction system and failure prediction method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2024040655A JP2024040655A (en) 2024-03-26
JP7779220B2 true JP7779220B2 (en) 2025-12-03

Family

ID=90369161

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2022145129A Active JP7779220B2 (en) 2022-09-13 2022-09-13 Failure prediction system and failure prediction method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7779220B2 (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001290528A (en) 2000-04-07 2001-10-19 Sintokogio Ltd Equipment maintenance support method and system
WO2014073088A1 (en) 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 富士機械製造株式会社 Production monitoring system and production monitoring method for component mounting line
JP2017093058A (en) 2015-11-05 2017-05-25 Dmg森精機株式会社 Control device
JP2018205895A (en) 2017-05-31 2018-12-27 Dmg森精機株式会社 Movement precision monitoring system and rotation table provided with movement precision monitoring function, machine tool and nc apparatus
US20210048798A1 (en) 2019-08-16 2021-02-18 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Synchronization of industrial automation process subsystems
JP2022099520A (en) 2020-12-23 2022-07-05 株式会社ノーリツ Hot-water supply system, and method and program for diagnosing hot-water supply apparatus

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001290528A (en) 2000-04-07 2001-10-19 Sintokogio Ltd Equipment maintenance support method and system
WO2014073088A1 (en) 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 富士機械製造株式会社 Production monitoring system and production monitoring method for component mounting line
JP2017093058A (en) 2015-11-05 2017-05-25 Dmg森精機株式会社 Control device
JP2018205895A (en) 2017-05-31 2018-12-27 Dmg森精機株式会社 Movement precision monitoring system and rotation table provided with movement precision monitoring function, machine tool and nc apparatus
US20210048798A1 (en) 2019-08-16 2021-02-18 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Synchronization of industrial automation process subsystems
JP2022099520A (en) 2020-12-23 2022-07-05 株式会社ノーリツ Hot-water supply system, and method and program for diagnosing hot-water supply apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2024040655A (en) 2024-03-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2022519228A (en) Systems and methods for detecting and measuring signal anomalies generated by components used in industrial processes
KR102929147B1 (en) Information processing apparatus and monitoring method
JP6585482B2 (en) Device diagnostic apparatus and system and method
CN112673327B (en) Control device and computer-readable storage medium
RU2766106C1 (en) Detection of emergency situations
JP2017120649A (en) Machine learning method and machine learning device for learning failure conditions, and failure prediction device and failure prediction system provided with the machine learning device
US12103169B2 (en) Abnormality diagnosis device and abnormality diagnosis method
US10581665B2 (en) Content-aware anomaly detection and diagnosis
JP2018112903A (en) Plant operation support apparatus, plant operation support method, plant operation support program, and recording medium
JP7239022B2 (en) Time series data processing method
JP7846130B2 (en) Neural network-based anomaly detection for time-series data
EP4137815A1 (en) Failure prediction system
JP2018139085A (en) Method, device, system, and program for abnormality prediction
JP5193533B2 (en) Remote monitoring system and remote monitoring method
KR20150007913A (en) Failure Prediction Device
CN118963303A (en) Intelligent monitoring method and system for milk powder production line based on artificial intelligence
CN101657770A (en) Machine Condition Monitoring Using Discontinuity Detection
JP7779220B2 (en) Failure prediction system and failure prediction method
EP4071571B1 (en) Prediction apparatus, prediction method, and program
CN120493070A (en) Fault prediction and detection method, device, equipment and medium based on intelligent model
CN119982994A (en) A valve flow prediction method and system based on valve pressure difference
JP7232028B2 (en) Operation monitoring device and method
TWI869638B (en) Normal range determination system, normal range determination method, and normal range determination program product
JP2022155028A (en) Device state monitor, program and device state monitoring method
US20250315034A1 (en) Abnormality determination device, abnormality determination method, and recording medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20241128

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20250611

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20250624

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20250711

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20251021

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20251103

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7779220

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150