JP7793838B2 - How to remove makeup - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a makeup removal method and a makeup remover.

As mask-wearing continues in recent years, an increasing number of people are choosing long-lasting makeup cosmetics that are said to be resistant to rubbing and other factors. Long-lasting makeup cosmetics include waterproof mascaras that use solid fats as fixatives, and foundations, makeup bases, and UV care products that use silicone resins such as trimethylsiloxysilicate as film-forming agents. Meanwhile, with increasing consumer awareness of taking care of skin without rubbing, there is a demand for makeup removers that are gentle on the skin. To remove makeup, makeup removers are taken in the hands, spread over the face, and rubbed in a circular motion to thoroughly mix the makeup remover and makeup, and then wiped or rinsed off (Non-Patent Document 1).

J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. Japan, vol3, 193-201 (1991)

However, based on the belief that leaving makeup on the skin is bad for the skin, most consumers tend to rub makeup and makeup removers together for long periods of time and with strong force, making it a challenge to achieve both cleansing power and the ability to remove makeup without rubbing.
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a makeup removal method and a makeup remover that can minimize the physical burden on the skin during makeup removal and remove highly lasting makeup in a short period of time.

The present inventors conducted research to solve the above-mentioned problems, and discovered that by using a makeup remover in which a low-viscosity oily composition is filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser, and by discharging the oily composition from the container directly onto makeup cosmetics on the skin, the oily composition dispensed in mist form adheres evenly to a predetermined area of the makeup cosmetics, blends quickly with the makeup cosmetics, and can lift the makeup cosmetics from the skin, making it possible to remove makeup cosmetics with less stress on the skin than conventional methods and with a smaller amount of makeup remover, and thus completed the present invention.
Here, the makeup remover filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser (also referred to as a "makeup removal product") in the present invention refers to a makeup remover in which an oily composition is filled in a non-aerosol mist dispenser, and does not include aerosol types. This is because aerosol types are formulations that consumers are reluctant to use due to issues such as not being able to see the remaining amount and the hassle of disposal. On the other hand, if a water-based composition is added to the contents, makeup cosmetics that claim to be waterproof, water-resistant, and long-lasting contain high-melting-point waxes and oil-soluble film-forming agents, and therefore cannot be sufficiently removed, thereby failing to achieve the intended purpose.

That is, the present invention provides a method for removing makeup cosmetics using a makeup remover in which (A) an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C is filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser, the method comprising:
The method for removing makeup cosmetics comprises spraying the mist of the oily composition discharged from the container onto the makeup cosmetics on the skin, and then removing the makeup cosmetics.
The present invention also provides a makeup remover comprising (A) an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa·s or less at 25°C, filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser,
The mist of the oily composition discharged from the container is sprayed onto makeup cosmetics on the skin, and then a makeup remover is provided which is used to remove the makeup cosmetics.

The mist dispenser of the present invention generally refers to a spray dispenser equipped with an extrusion mechanism such as a piston and cylinder, preferably a pump mechanism, and a flow path that uses the extrusion mechanism to pump the oily composition filled in a container to a discharge outlet of the mist dispenser, and the oily composition pumped to the discharge outlet is discharged from the discharge outlet in the form of a mist. Note that "mist" refers to multiple fine droplets sprayed from the discharge outlet.

According to the makeup removal method and makeup remover of the present invention, a low-viscosity oily composition is ejected as a mist directly onto the makeup on the skin from a container equipped with a mist dispenser, and adheres evenly to a predetermined area of the makeup without the need for hands, blending easily with the makeup on the skin and allowing it to quickly float away. Therefore, makeup can be removed in a short time while minimizing the burden of friction on the skin. Furthermore, because there is no need to use hands or cotton during application, makeup can be removed using a small amount of makeup remover.

FIG. 1 is a graph showing the influence of the relationship between the viscosity of an oily composition and the diameter of the outlet of a mist dispenser container on the state of mist.

Unless otherwise specified, terms used in this specification are used in the sense commonly used in the relevant field.

In this specification, the term "makeup cosmetics" refers to a concept that includes base makeup cosmetics and point makeup cosmetics. Base makeup cosmetics include makeup bases, UV care cosmetics, face powders, dusting powders, and foundations. Point makeup cosmetics include lipsticks, blushers, eyeliners, mascaras, eye shadows, eyebrow pencils, etc.

In this specification, makeup remover refers to a cleanser known as a makeup remover, which is used to remove oily dirt such as makeup cosmetics. There are two types of makeup remover: one that is applied to makeup cosmetics on the skin and then wiped off, and one that is applied to makeup cosmetics and then rinsed off with water; both types are included in this specification.

One aspect of the present invention is a method for removing makeup cosmetics using a makeup remover comprising (A) an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser, the method comprising:
This is a method for removing makeup cosmetics, which comprises spraying the mist of the oily composition discharged from the container onto makeup cosmetics on the skin, and then removing the makeup cosmetics.
Another aspect of the present invention is a makeup remover comprising (A) an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C, filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser,
The mist of the oily composition discharged from the container is sprayed onto makeup cosmetics on the skin, and then the makeup remover is used to remove the makeup cosmetics.

The makeup remover used in the makeup cosmetic removal method of the present invention is a makeup remover obtained by filling an oily composition (A) having a viscosity of 40 mPa·s or less at 25°C into a container equipped with a mist dispenser.
The oily composition (A) filled in the container preferably has a viscosity at 25°C of 40 mPa·s or less, more preferably 35 mPa·s or less, even more preferably 28 mPa·s or less, and even more preferably 20 mPa·s or less, from the viewpoint of being discharged as a mist from a container equipped with a mist dispenser, of quickly blending easily with the makeup cosmetic on the skin after being discharged as a mist, of quickly dissolving and dispersing the makeup cosmetic and lifting it off the skin, of being gentle on the skin, and of being able to recognize that the mist has adhered to the makeup cosmetic. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of being able to recognize that the mist has adhered to the makeup cosmetic, the viscosity at 25°C is preferably 2 mPa·s or more, more preferably 5 mPa·s or more, and even more preferably 8 mPa·s or more. Furthermore, the viscosity at 25°C is preferably 2 mPa·s or more and 40 mPa·s or less, more preferably 5 mPa·s or more and 35 mPa·s or less, even more preferably 8 mPa·s or more and 28 mPa·s or less, and even more preferably 8 mPa·s or more and 20 mPa·s or less.
Here, the viscosity is measured at 25°C using a Brookfield viscometer (TVB-10 viscometer, manufactured by Toki Sangyo Co., Ltd.). Viscosities less than 100 mPa·s are measured with rotor No. 1 (rotational speed) at 60 rpm for a measurement time of 1 minute. Viscosities of 100 mPa·s or more are measured with rotor No. 1 (rotational speed) at 30 rpm for a measurement time of 1 minute.

The oil (A1) used in the oily composition (A) may be any oil that is commonly used in makeup removers, and examples thereof include hydrocarbon oils, ester oils, ether oils, and silicone oils.
More specifically, examples of hydrocarbon oils include isododecane, isohexadecane, light liquid isoparaffin, liquid isoparaffin, liquid paraffin, and hydrogenated polyisobutene.
Among these, from the viewpoints of rapid makeup dissolution and increasing compatibility with nonionic surfactants to easily obtain a low-viscosity composition, isododecane, isohexadecane, light liquid isoparaffin, and liquid paraffin having a viscosity of 10 mPa s or less are preferred, and isododecane and isohexadecane are more preferred.

Examples of ester oils include monoesters of aliphatic or aromatic monocarboxylic or dicarboxylic acids having 2 to 24 carbon atoms. Specific examples include cetyl 2-ethylhexanoate, cetyl octanoate, isononyl isononanoate, isotridecyl isononanoate, hexyl laurate, isopropyl myristate, octyldodecyl myristate, myristyl myristate, 2-hexyldecyl myristate, isopropyl palmitate, octyl palmitate, propylene glycol dicaprylate, neopentyl glycol dicaprate, caprylic/capric triglyceride, glycerin trioleate, glycerin tri-2-ethylhexanoate, olive oil, jojoba oil, and the like.
Of these, from the viewpoint of quickly dissolving and dispersing makeup cosmetics and lifting them from the skin, and from the viewpoint of increasing the compatibility of nonionic surfactants to easily obtain a low-viscosity composition, isononyl isononanoate, isotridecyl isononanoate, isopropyl myristate, and isopropyl palmitate are preferred, and isononyl isononanoate and isopropyl myristate are more preferred.

The ether oils include dialkyl ethers, specifically dihexyl ether, dicaprylyl ether, cetyl-1,3-dimethylbutyl ether, and the like.
Of these, dicaprylyl ether is preferred from the viewpoint of quickly dissolving and dispersing makeup cosmetics and lifting them from the skin.

Examples of silicone oils include volatile and non-volatile linear dimethylpolysiloxanes such as dimethylpolysiloxane (1 cs), dimethylpolysiloxane (1.5 cs), dimethylpolysiloxane (2 cs), dimethylpolysiloxane (6 cs), and dimethylpolysiloxane (10 cs). Of these, dimethylpolysiloxane (1.5 cs) and dimethylpolysiloxane (2 cs) are preferred from the standpoint of quickly dissolving and dispersing makeup cosmetics and lifting them from the skin, and from the standpoint of increasing compatibility with nonionic surfactants to easily obtain a low-viscosity composition.

The oil (A1) used in the oily composition (A) may be used alone or in combination of two or more. When two or more oils are used in combination, it is possible to use a combination of oils with a viscosity of more than 40 mPa·s in order to adjust the feel during use. In such cases, the mist quality tends to deteriorate due to the influence of the high viscosity oil. Therefore, from the perspective of discharging the mist as a mist from a container equipped with a mist dispenser, the viscosity of the entire oil (A1) is preferably 40 mPa·s or less, more preferably 25 mPa·s or less, and even more preferably 15 mPa·s or less.

The content of the oily agent (A1) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 60% by mass or more, and more preferably 65% by mass or more, from the viewpoint of rapid compatibility with the makeup cosmetic on the skin after being ejected as a mist, and from the viewpoint of quickly dissolving and dispersing the makeup cosmetic and lifting it from the skin. From the same viewpoint, the content of the oily agent (A1) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 100% by mass or less. The content of the oily agent (A1) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 60% by mass or more and 100% by mass or less, and more preferably 65% by mass or more and 100% by mass or less.
When components other than the oily agent (A1) are combined, the content of the oily agent (A1) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 60% by mass or more, and more preferably 65% by mass or more, from the viewpoint of rapid compatibility with the makeup cosmetic on the skin after being ejected as a mist, and from the viewpoint of quickly dissolving and dispersing the makeup cosmetic and lifting it from the skin. Furthermore, the content of the oily agent (A1) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 60% by mass or more and 98% by mass or less, more preferably 65% by mass or more and 97% by mass or less, and more preferably 65% by mass or more and 95% by mass or less.

In addition to the oil (A1), the oily composition (A) may contain a nonionic surfactant (B) to improve compatibility between the oily composition and the makeup cosmetic, to lift the makeup cosmetic from the skin, and because the makeup cosmetic may be washed off with water before use.

In the makeup removal method of the present invention, when makeup cosmetics floated on the skin are removed by rinsing them off with water, the HLB value of the nonionic surfactant is preferably 9.0 or higher from the viewpoint of rinsing ease, more preferably 10.5 or higher, and even more preferably 11.5 or higher. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of mist-like ejection, it is preferably 15.0 or lower, and even more preferably 13.5 or lower. Furthermore, the HLB value of the nonionic surfactant is preferably 9.0 or higher and 15.0 or lower, more preferably 10.5 or higher and 13.5 or lower, and even more preferably 11.5 or higher and 13.5 or lower. Nonionic surfactants may be used alone or in combination of two or more types. When two or more types are used in combination, the combined HLB value is used.

Here, the HLB value is an index showing the hydrophilic-lipophilic balance, and in this specification is calculated using the following Griffin formula:

When two or more types of nonionic surfactants are contained, the HLB value of the mixed surfactant is the arithmetic average of the HLB values of the individual nonionic surfactants based on their mass ratios.
Mixed HLB=Σ(HLBx×Wx)/ΣWx
HLBx indicates the HLB value of nonionic surfactant X.
Wx represents the mass (g) of the nonionic surfactant X having the value of HLBx.

The content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 0.05% by mass or more, more preferably 0.1% by mass or more, more preferably 6% by mass or more, and even more preferably 22% by mass or more, from the viewpoints of compatibility with the oil (A1), ease of blending with the makeup cosmetic, and rapid lifting of the makeup cosmetic from the skin. Furthermore, the content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition (A) is preferably 35% by mass or less, more preferably 28% by mass or less, from the viewpoint of atomized discharge. Furthermore, the content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition (A) is preferably 0.05% by mass or more and 35% by mass or less, and more preferably 0.1% by mass or more and 28% by mass or less.
When this makeup remover is used by wiping, the content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition (A) is preferably 0.05% by mass or more, more preferably 0.1% by mass or more, and even more preferably 0.2% by mass or more, from the viewpoint of compatibility with makeup cosmetics, compatibility with the carrier used for wiping, and suppressing the influence on the subsequent foam disappearance of face washing. Also, from the same viewpoint, the content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition (A) is preferably 10% by mass or less, more preferably 7% by mass or less, and even more preferably 5% by mass or less. Also, the content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition (A) is preferably 0.05% by mass or more and 10% by mass or less, more preferably 0.1% by mass or more and 7% by mass or less, and even more preferably 0.2% by mass or more and 5% by mass or less.
For use by rinsing, the content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 1% by mass or more, more preferably 3% by mass or more, even more preferably 7% by mass or more, and even more preferably 18% by mass or more, from the viewpoint of efficiently emulsifying and rinsing off the oil (A1). The content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 35% by mass or less, more preferably 28% by mass or less, from the viewpoint of atomized discharge. The content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 1% by mass or more and 35% by mass or less, more preferably 3% by mass or more and 28% by mass or less, even more preferably 7% by mass or more and 28% by mass or less, and even more preferably 18% by mass or more and 28% by mass or less.
Furthermore, when the oil composition (A) contains a nonionic surfactant (B), the composition of the oil agent (A1) preferably contains an oil agent having a viscosity of 10 mPa s or less in an amount of 50 mass % or more, more preferably 60 mass % or more, and even more preferably 70 mass % or more, based on the entire oil agent (A1), from the viewpoints of atomized discharge and compatibility with the nonionic surfactant (B).

Examples of the nonionic surfactant (B) include POE fatty acid esters, POE alkyl ethers, POE sorbitol fatty acid esters, POE glycerin fatty acid esters, polyglycerin fatty acid esters, POE sorbitan fatty acid esters, alkyl glucosides, glycerin fatty acid esters, polyglycerin fatty acid esters, alkyl glyceryl ethers, and sorbitan fatty acid esters.
Among these, from the viewpoints of compatibility with the oil (A1) and temperature stability, it is preferable to use or combine a multi-chain nonionic surfactant having multiple chain hydrocarbons. The chain hydrocarbon is preferably lauric acid, myristic acid, coconut oil fatty acid, oleic acid, or isostearic acid, and a nonionic surfactant selected from POE sorbitan fatty acid esters having 2 to 4 chain hydrocarbon groups, POE sorbit fatty acid esters having 2 to 4 chain hydrocarbon groups, POE glyceryl ether fatty acid esters having 2 to 3 chain hydrocarbon groups, and polyglycerin fatty acid esters having 2 to 4 chain hydrocarbon groups is more preferable.
Furthermore, when considering rinsing, it is preferable to use a combination of a single-chain nonionic surfactant and a multi-chain nonionic surfactant from the viewpoint of rinsing property. Furthermore, the mass ratio of the single-chain type/multi-chain type is preferably 0.1 or more, more preferably 0.5 or more, from the viewpoint of rinsing property. Furthermore, the mass ratio of the single-chain type/multi-chain type is preferably 5.0 or less, from the viewpoint of compatibility with the oil agent. Furthermore, the mass ratio of the single-chain type/multi-chain type is preferably 0.1 or more and 5.0 or less, more preferably 0.5 or more and 5.0 or less.
Examples of short-chain nonionic surfactants include POE fatty acid esters, POE alkyl ethers, POE sorbitol fatty acid esters, POE glycerin fatty acid esters, polyglycerin fatty acid esters, POE sorbitan fatty acid esters, alkyl glucosides, glycerin fatty acid esters, polyglycerin fatty acid esters, alkyl glyceryl ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, etc. Among these, from the viewpoint of temperature stability, it is preferable to select nonionic surfactants having a chain hydrocarbon selected from lauric acid, myristic acid, coconut oil fatty acid, oleic acid, and isostearic acid.

In addition to the oil agent (A1) and the nonionic surfactant (B), the oil composition (A) may contain a small amount of water (C) to improve the compatibility of the nonionic surfactant with the oil agent and to improve stability.
The content of water (C) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 6% by mass or less, more preferably 5% by mass or less, even more preferably 3.5% by mass or less, even more preferably 1.5% by mass or less, and even more preferably 1% by mass or less, from the viewpoint of preventing an increase in viscosity of the oily composition and atomized discharge, and it is preferable that the oily composition (A) contains substantially no water (C). On the other hand, the content of water (C) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 0.01% by mass or more, more preferably 0.08% by mass or more, and even more preferably 0.1% by mass or more, from the viewpoint of improving the compatibility and stability of the nonionic surfactant (B) and the oil (A1).

Furthermore, in addition to the oil (A1) and nonionic surfactant (B), small amounts of amphoteric surfactants, anionic surfactants, alcohols having 2 to 3 carbon atoms, and polyols can be added to the oil composition (A). However, from the viewpoints of preventing an increase in the viscosity of the oil composition and of atomized discharge, the content of these surfactants is preferably less than 5% by mass, preferably 3% by mass or less, more preferably 1% by mass or less, and even more preferably substantially 0% by mass.

Furthermore, the oily composition (A) may contain ultraviolet absorbers, antioxidants, fragrances, disinfectants, preservatives, antifouling agents, etc.

The oily composition (A) can be produced by a conventional method. If a component that is solid at room temperature is to be added, it can be produced by heating the composition to dissolve it, and then mixing and stirring the components.

The oily composition (A) can be filled into a container equipped with a mist dispenser to form the makeup remover used in the present invention.
Furthermore, as a means for operation using a finger, either a finger-type mist dispenser or a trigger-type mist dispenser may be used, but considering the strength of contact with the skin and the sense of resistance when the user sprays it toward their face, a container equipped with a finger-type mist dispenser is preferred. Note that the finger-type mist dispenser in this invention is a dispenser that can be sprayed by pressing the head of the dispenser with a finger. Furthermore, the mist dispenser in this invention is preferably one equipped with a pump, i.e., an extrusion mechanism, and from the viewpoint of usability, a normal pressure type that does not use compressed gas is preferred.
Since the oily composition can be applied uniformly in mist form to the makeup cosmetic on the skin, the oily composition can be applied directly and uniformly in mist form to the makeup cosmetic on the skin without causing friction with the palm of the hand, etc., compared to when the liquid oily composition is taken from a liquid-discharge-type pump, spread on the palm of the hand, and then applied to the makeup cosmetic by touching the face, so that a predetermined amount (required amount) of makeup cosmetic can be applied to the desired area of the skin in a short time and without hassle. Note that the liquid-discharge-type pump dispenser in the present invention refers to a dispenser that does not have a spray structure at the discharge port and that discharges the amount to be applied in one go as a continuous liquid or a single lump of liquid.

Assuming that the mist is sprayed in a circular pattern, avoiding the front of the face, the container is preferably designed so that when sprayed 10 cm away from the face, the mist will adhere in a circular shape with a diameter of 10 cm or less, more preferably 9 cm or less, and even more preferably 7 cm or less, from the viewpoint of efficient and accurate application to dirt. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of effortlessness in avoiding excessive spraying, it is preferable that the mist adhere in a circular shape of 2 cm or more. Furthermore, 2 cm to 10 cm is preferable, 2 cm to 9 cm is more preferable, and 2 cm to 7 cm is even more preferable.
The size of the circle here refers to the diameter of the area where the mist droplets spread in a gradation and are concentrated without escaping. This area can be confirmed by spraying the mist onto a piece of paper from a distance of 10 cm and observing the traces.

Next, from the perspective of applying the oil to the face with an appropriate number of sprays, it is preferable that 0.05g or more be sprayed per spray, with 0.10g or more being more preferable. Furthermore, from the perspective of the oil's gentleness on the skin, it is preferable that 0.70g or less be sprayed per spray, with 0.60g or less being more preferable. Furthermore, 0.05g to 0.70g are preferable, and 0.10g to 0.60g are more preferable.

To prevent the agent from dripping and staining clothes or the surrounding area while being sprayed over the entire face, the amount of the agent that adheres to the skin per spray when sprayed from a distance of 10 cm is preferably 10 mg/ ^cm2 or less, more preferably 8 mg/ ^cm2 or less (same as above), and from the viewpoint of ease of use, preferably 3 mg/ ^cm2 or more. Also, the amount is preferably 3 mg/ ^cm2 or more but 10 mg/ ^cm2 or less, more preferably 3 mg/cm2 or ^more but 8 mg/ ^cm2 or less.

The spray structure used in pumps used in mist dispensers can be either standard (also known as direct pressure) or pressure-accumulator type, and from the perspective of being able to dispense oral liquids with a wide range of viscosities, it is preferable to use a pump with a pressure-accumulator type spray structure.

Furthermore, the pressure to push the mist containing the internal liquid is preferably 5 kgf or more and 35 kgf or less, more preferably 10 kgf or more and 30 kgf or less, from the viewpoint of ease of pushing in actual use situations.
The pressing pressure can be determined by measuring the maximum load applied when a container fixed on a balance is mechanically pressed from above at a speed of 40 mm/s.

The diameter of the outlet of the mist dispenser is preferably 0.8 mm or less from the viewpoint of discharging the appropriate amount of the oily composition. Also, 0.2 mm or more is more preferable, 0.24 mm or more is even more preferable, and 0.4 mm or more is even more preferable from the viewpoint of improving the mist state regardless of environmental conditions such as temperature. From the viewpoint of ensuring the mist state, the diameter of the outlet is preferably 0.8 mm or less, more preferably 0.7 mm or less, and even more preferably 0.6 mm or less. Specifically, 0.8 mm or less is preferable, more preferably 0.2 mm or more to 0.8 mm or less, more preferably 0.24 mm or more to 0.7 mm or less, and even more preferably 0.4 mm or more to 0.6 mm or less.
Furthermore, it is preferable that the relationship between the viscosity (mPa s) of the oily composition at 25°C and the outlet diameter (mm) of the mist dispenser satisfies the following formula (1):
Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.23×loge (mPa・s)-0.4...(1)
It is more preferable that the following formula (2) be satisfied.
Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.25×loge (mPa・s)-0.37...(2)
The outlet diameter of a mist dispenser refers to the inner diameter of the outlet, which is usually circular, and means the diameter.

The makeup removal method of the present invention is a method of removing makeup cosmetics by spraying a mist of the oily composition (A) discharged from the container onto the makeup cosmetics on the skin, and then removing the makeup cosmetics.
The makeup remover of the present invention is a makeup remover that is used to remove makeup cosmetics after spraying a mist of the oily composition (A) ejected from the container onto the makeup cosmetics on the skin.
Since the container is equipped with a mist dispenser, for example, by operating a trigger or finger-type head with a finger to activate the pump mechanism of the dispenser attached to the container (pulling the trigger or pressing the head), the oily composition becomes a mist and can be sprayed in a fixed amount onto the makeup cosmetic on the skin. By spraying the oily composition as a mist onto the makeup cosmetic in this way, the oily composition in a mist form adheres uniformly to the surface of the makeup cosmetic. Furthermore, because the oily composition has a low viscosity, it quickly penetrates into the makeup.
Thus, the makeup cosmetic can be lifted from the skin in a short time by simply pressing the area where the oily composition has adhered with an extremely light load to blend it in. "Simply pressing with an extremely light load to blend it in" means, for example, "not including rubbing the skin," and specifically, after spraying the makeup cosmetic, preferably the action of sliding or rubbing the skin with a finger or the like for 30 seconds or less, more preferably 10 seconds or less, and even more preferably 5 seconds or less, and especially preferably only pressing, without any sliding (or rubbing) action.
Therefore, by wiping off or rinsing off the makeup cosmetic that has floated to the skin with water, the makeup cosmetic can be removed in an extremely short time, and the burden of friction on the skin can be reduced.
Furthermore, this makeup remover can also be used to remove makeup applied to areas other than the face. For example, when UV care cosmetics that are advertised as being resistant to sweat and water are applied to the neck or body during outdoor sports, they are difficult to remove with ordinary body shampoos or soaps. By applying this makeup removal method and makeup remover to such stains, they can be easily applied to a wide area and easily removed without rubbing.
In addition to spraying directly onto the skin and then wiping and rinsing, the makeup removal composition of the present invention can also be used by wiping off the makeup and then rinsing it off to refresh the skin. In this case, it is preferable to use a makeup removal composition with a composition that is optimal for rinsing.
Furthermore, according to the operation of the present invention, by spraying the makeup remover directly onto the face, a mist of the oily composition can be created that is uniformly adhered to the surface of the makeup cosmetic, which makes it possible to save makeup remover that is used not only for wetting the face but also for wetting the hands and fingers, and also allows for a significant reduction in the amount of makeup remover used.

By further reducing the viscosity of the oil (A1) contained in the oily composition (A), the solubility of the makeup film after spraying the mist is improved, and the nonionic surfactant (B) contained in the composition can be rapidly delivered to the skin surface. Preferably, by using a specific combination of nonionic surfactants (B), it becomes possible to remove makeup from the skin by simply rinsing it off after spraying without applying any physical force.
In the oily composition (A) that enables such removal, the viscosity of the oil (A1) is preferably 10 mPa s or less, and more preferably 8 mPa s or less, from the viewpoint of increasing the penetration into makeup. Furthermore, from the viewpoints of reducing the viscosity of the oil phase, improving the solubility of the makeup film after mist spraying, and enabling it to reach the skin surface quickly, the oil having a viscosity of 10 mPa s or less preferably accounts for 80 mass % or more, and more preferably 90 mass % or more, of the total oil (A1).

As for the nonionic surfactant (B), it is preferable to use the following nonionic surfactants b1 to b3 in combination.
b1: one or more surfactants selected from multi-chain nonionic surfactants having oleic acid or isostearic acid as the alkyl group and having an HLB value of 10 to 12; b2: one or more surfactants selected from short-chain alkyl glucosides, POE fatty acid esters, POE glyceryl ether fatty acid esters, and POE sorbitan fatty acid esters having an HLB value of 11 to 19; and b3: one or more surfactants selected from nonionic surfactants having short-chain oleic acid or isostearic acid and having an HLB value of 3 to 10. The HLB value of the mixture of b1 to b3 is adjusted to 9.5 to 12.5, and the mixing ratio (b2+b3)/b1 is preferably 5.0 or less, more preferably 4.0 or less, from the viewpoints of atomized discharge and makeup removal ability. Also, it is preferably 1.0 or more from the viewpoint of rinsing ability. The mixing ratio (b2+b3)/b1 is preferably 1.0 or more and 5.0 or less, and more preferably 1.0 or more and 4.0 or less.

In relation to the above-described embodiment, the present invention further discloses the following makeup removal method and makeup remover.

<1> (A) A method for removing makeup cosmetics using a makeup remover in which an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa·s or less at 25°C is filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser,
The makeup removal method comprises spraying the mist of the oily composition discharged from the container onto the makeup on the skin, and then removing the makeup.
<2> (A) A method for removing makeup cosmetics using an oily composition,
(A) The oily composition has a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C,
A method for removing makeup cosmetics, comprising spraying (A) an oily composition filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser onto makeup cosmetics on the skin from the outlet of the mist dispenser, thereby allowing (A) the oily composition to penetrate into the makeup cosmetics.
<3> The makeup removal method according to <1> or <2>, wherein the viscosity of the oily composition at 25°C is preferably from 3 mPa·s to 40 mPa·s, more preferably from 3 mPa·s to 35 mPa·s, even more preferably from 5 mPa·s to 35 mPa·s, still more preferably from 8 mPa·s to 28 mPa·s, and even more preferably from 8 mPa·s to 20 mPa·s.
<4> The makeup removal method according to any one of <1> to <3>, wherein the oily composition contains one or more oils selected from hydrocarbon oils, ester oils, ether oils, and silicone oils.
<5> The method for removing makeup cosmetics according to <4>, wherein the hydrocarbon oil is one or more selected from the group consisting of isododecane, isohexadecane, light liquid isoparaffin, liquid isoparaffin, and liquid paraffin.
<6> The method for removing makeup cosmetics according to <4>, wherein the ester oil is a monoester of an aliphatic or aromatic monocarboxylic acid or dicarboxylic acid having 2 to 24 carbon atoms.
<7> The method for removing makeup cosmetics according to <4>, wherein the ether oil is a dialkyl ether.
<8> The method for removing makeup cosmetics according to <4>, wherein the silicone oil is a volatile or non-volatile linear dimethylpolysiloxane.
<9> The makeup removal method according to any one of <4> to <8>, wherein the content of the oil in the oily composition is preferably 60% by mass or more and 100% by mass or less, and more preferably 65% by mass or more and 100% by mass or less.
<10> The makeup removal method according to any one of <1> to <9>, wherein the oily composition further contains (B) a nonionic surfactant.
<11> The makeup removal method according to <10>, wherein the HLB of the nonionic surfactant is 9.0 or more and 15.0 or less, preferably 10.5 or more and 13.5 or less, and more preferably 11.5 or more and 13.5 or less.
<12> The makeup removal method according to <10> or <11>, wherein the nonionic surfactant comprises a multi-chain nonionic surfactant, preferably a multi-chain nonionic surfactant and a single-chain nonionic surfactant, more preferably a single-chain nonionic surfactant and a multi-chain nonionic surfactant, in a mass ratio of single-chain/multi-chain nonionic surfactants of 0.1 or more and 5.0 or less, preferably 0.5 or more and 5.0 or less.
<13> The makeup removal method according to any one of <10> to <12>, wherein the content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition is preferably 0.05% by mass or more and 35% by mass or less, and more preferably 0.1% by mass or more and 28% by mass or less.
<14> The makeup removal method according to any one of <10> to <13>, wherein the oily composition contains 6% by mass or less of water (C), preferably 5% by mass or less, more preferably 3.5% by mass or less, and even more preferably 1.5% by mass or less.
<15> The makeup removal method according to any one of <1> to <14>, wherein the container is designed so that the mist will adhere to a circular shape having a diameter of 10 cm or less when the container is held 10 cm away from the face.
<16> The makeup removal method according to any one of <1> to <15>, wherein the diameter of the outlet of the mist dispenser is preferably 0.8 mm or less, more preferably 0.2 mm or more and 0.8 mm or less, even more preferably 0.24 mm or more and 0.7 mm or less, and still more preferably 0.4 mm or more and 0.6 mm or less.
<17> It is preferable that the relationship between the viscosity (mPa s) of the oily composition at 25°C and the diameter (mm) of the discharge opening of the container satisfies the following formula (1):
Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.23×loge (mPa・s)-0.4...(1)
It is more preferable that the following formula (2) is satisfied:
Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.25×loge (mPa・s)-0.37...(2)
<16> The makeup cosmetic removal method according to any one of <1> to <16>.
<18> The method for removing makeup according to any one of <1> to <17>, wherein the makeup is removed by spraying the mist onto the face and then wiping it off or rinsing it off with water.
<19> The makeup removal method according to any one of <1> to <18>, wherein the mist dispenser has a pressure-accumulation type spray structure.

<20> (A) A makeup remover containing an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa·s or less at 25°C, the oily composition being filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser,
The makeup remover is used to remove makeup cosmetics after spraying the mist of the oily composition discharged from the container onto the makeup cosmetics on the skin.
<21> A makeup removal product comprising: (A) an oily composition; and a container equipped with a mist dispenser, wherein the (A) oily composition has a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C, the (A) oily composition is filled in the container, and the mist dispenser is a pump type.
<22> The makeup removal product according to <20> or <21>, wherein the viscosity of the oily composition at 25°C is preferably from 2 mPa·s to 40 mPa·s, more preferably from 3 mPa·s to 35 mPa·s, even more preferably from 5 mPa·s to 35 mPa·s, still more preferably from 8 mPa·s to 28 mPa·s, and still more preferably from 8 mPa·s to 20 mPa·s.
<23> The makeup removal product according to any one of <20> to <22>, wherein the oily composition contains one or more oils selected from hydrocarbon oils, ester oils, ether oils, and silicone oils.
<24> The makeup removal product according to <23>, wherein the hydrocarbon oil is one or more selected from the group consisting of isododecane, isohexadecane, light liquid isoparaffin, liquid isoparaffin, and liquid paraffin.
<25> The makeup removal product according to <23>, wherein the ester oil is a monoester of an aliphatic or aromatic monocarboxylic or dicarboxylic acid having 2 to 24 carbon atoms.
<26> The makeup remover according to <23>, wherein the ether oil is a dialkyl ether.
<27> The makeup removal product according to <23>, wherein the silicone oil is a volatile or non-volatile linear dimethylpolysiloxane.
<28> The makeup removal product according to any one of <23> to <27>, wherein the content of the oil in the oily composition is preferably 60% by mass or more and 100% by mass or less, and more preferably 65% by mass or more and 100% by mass or less.
<29> The makeup removal product according to any one of <23> to <28>, wherein the oily composition contains an oil agent with a viscosity of 10 mPa s or less in an amount of preferably 80% by mass or more, and more preferably 90% by mass or more, of the oil phase.
<30> The makeup removal product according to any one of <23> to <29>, wherein the oily composition further contains (B) a nonionic surfactant.
<31> The makeup removal product according to <30>, wherein the HLB of the nonionic surfactant is 9.0 or more and 15.0 or less, preferably 10.5 or more and 13.5 or less, and more preferably 11.5 or more and 13.5 or less.
<32> The makeup removal product according to <30> or <31>, wherein the nonionic surfactant comprises a multi-chain nonionic surfactant, preferably a multi-chain nonionic surfactant and a single-chain nonionic surfactant, more preferably a single-chain nonionic surfactant and a multi-chain nonionic surfactant in a mass ratio of single-chain/multi-chain nonionic surfactants of 0.1 or more and 5.0 or less, preferably 0.5 or more and 5.0 or less.
<33> The makeup removal product according to any one of <30> to <32>, wherein the content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition is preferably from 0.05% by mass to 35% by mass, and more preferably from 0.1% by mass to 28% by mass.
<34> The makeup removal product according to any one of <30> to <33>, wherein the oily composition contains 6% by mass or less of water (C), preferably 5% by mass or less, more preferably 3.5% by mass or less, and even more preferably 1.5% by mass or less.
<35> The makeup removal product according to any one of <20> to <34>, wherein the mist dispenser has a discharge port diameter of preferably 0.8 mm or less, more preferably 0.2 mm or more and 0.8 mm or less, even more preferably 0.24 mm or more and 0.7 mm or less, and still more preferably 0.4 mm or more and 0.6 mm or less.
<36> It is preferable that the relationship between the viscosity (mPa s) of the oily composition at 25°C and the diameter (mm) of the discharge opening of the container satisfies the following formula (1):
Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.23×loge (mPa・s)-0.4...(1)
It is more preferable that the following formula (2) is satisfied:
Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.25×loge (mPa・s)-0.37...(2)
<35> A makeup removal product according to <35>.
<37> The makeup removal product according to any one of <20> to <36>, wherein the mist dispenser has a pressure-accumulation type spray structure.

The present invention will now be described in further detail with reference to examples, but the present invention is not limited to these examples. Percentages in the examples are by mass. Viscosity was measured at 25°C using a Brookfield viscometer (TVB-10 viscometer, manufactured by Toki Sangyo Co., Ltd.). Viscosities of less than 100 mPa·s were measured at 60 rpm with rotor No. 1 (rotation speed) for 1 minute. Viscosities of 100 mPa·s or greater were measured at 30 rpm with rotor No. 1 (rotation speed) for 1 minute. All values given in the examples represent values for the active component.

Test Example 1 (Study of the effect of wiping off the oily composition by discharging it as a mist)
Isododecane (Marukasol R, Maruzen Petrochemical Co., Ltd., viscosity 3 mPa·s at 25°C) was filled into a container fitted with a finger-type mist dispenser (Y-150, manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho; dispensing 0.15 mL per spray), and the test mascara was removed under the following conditions, and the mascara removability was evaluated visually.
Preparation of test mascara plate: 30 mg of test mascara (Volume Express Magnum Waterproof N, manufactured by Maybelline New York, Inc.) was applied to a glass plate in a circle with a diameter of 1 cm and left overnight.

(Mascara removal test method)
Condition (1): 0.12 g of oil (oil composition) was sprayed directly onto the test mascara once, left to stand for 10 seconds, and then slowly wiped off once with cotton. Condition (2): 0.12 g of oil (oil composition) was impregnated into cotton, which was pressed against the test mascara for 10 seconds and then slowly wiped off once. Condition (3): 0.6 g of oil (oil composition) was impregnated into cotton, which was pressed against the test mascara for 10 seconds and then slowly wiped off once. Condition (4): 1.2 g of oil (oil composition) was impregnated into cotton, which was pressed against the test mascara for 10 seconds and then slowly wiped off once. (Evaluation criteria for mascara removability score)
5: completely removed 4: almost completely removed 3: about half removed 2: hardly removed at all 1: not removed at all A score of 3 or more for mascara removability was considered to be pass, and a score of 2 or less was considered to be fail.

Test Example 2 (Study of the effect of rinsing off oily composition by discharging it as a mist)
(Test Example 2-1)
The oily compositions shown in Table 2 were filled into containers with a liquid-discharging pump dispenser or a mist-type dispenser, and three expert panelists conducted a practical use test. Here, the container with a liquid-discharging pump dispenser is a container from which the oily composition is discharged in liquid form, and the oily composition discharged from the pump was picked up by hand and applied to the skin, while the container with a mist-type dispenser is a container from which the oily composition is discharged as a mist, and the mist was sprayed directly onto the skin.
After applying the oily composition filled in the dispenser to the skin, the amount of composition on the hands and the amount of composition on the face were each measured by wiping them off with a paper towel (Kimtowel, manufactured by Nippon Paper Crecia), and the amounts used were compared.
The liquid-dispensing pump dispenser (Yoshino Seisakusho SP-700) used dispenses 0.7 mL of liquid with each press, and the mist dispenser (Yoshino Seisakusho Y-150) dispenses 0.15 mL of mist with each spray, and it was confirmed that when sprayed from a distance of 10 cm, it formed a circular shape of approximately 5 cm, and applied 60 mg/ ^cm2 of liquid. The results are shown in Table 3.
Condition (1): An appropriate amount of the oily composition shown in Table 2, which was filled in a mist-type dispenser, was sprayed directly onto the face, and then gently pressed with the hand to remove it. Condition (2): An appropriate amount of the oily composition shown in Table 2, which was filled in a liquid-discharging pump-type dispenser, was taken in the hand, spread over the face, and rubbed in a circular motion.

(Test Example 2-2)
The oily composition shown in Table 2, filled in a mist dispenser, and a common oil makeup remover (Kao Biore Perfect Oil, viscosity 51 mPa·s) filled in a liquid-dispensing pump dispenser, were used to measure the time it took for the composition to blend into the makeup (time spent rubbing against the skin) under the following conditions. The mist dispenser used (Y-150, manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho) dispensed a mist of 0.15 mL per spray, and it was confirmed that when sprayed from a distance of 10 cm, the mist formed a circle of approximately 5 cm in diameter, depositing 60 mg/ ^cm2 of liquid. The results are shown in Table 4.
Condition (1): An appropriate amount of the oily composition shown in Table 2, which was filled in a mist dispenser, was sprayed directly onto the face and gently pressed with the hand to remove it. Condition (2): An appropriate amount of a general oil makeup remover (Kao, Biore Perfect Oil, viscosity 51 mPa s) filled in a liquid-discharging pump dispenser was taken in the hand, spread over the face, and rubbed in a circular motion.

Test Example 3 (Evaluation of the relationship between viscosity of oily composition, ejection property, and mist state)
The oil solutions with different viscosities shown in Table 5 were placed in a finger-type mist dispenser container (Y-150 manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho) with a discharge volume of 0.15 mL per dispense, and the sample was dispensed 2-3 times onto a piece of paper held 10 cm away, and the state of dispensing was observed. The results are shown in Table 5.
Fog condition score evaluation criteria;
5s: very fine mist-like discharge 5; mist-like discharge 4; somewhat coarse granular discharge 3; shower-like linear discharge split into multiple streams 2; linear discharge split into 2-3 streams 1; single line discharge like a water gun. A mist condition score of 3 or above was considered a pass, and 2 or below was considered a fail.

Test Example 4 (Viscosity of the entire oil agent (oil-based composition) and mist ejection properties when a high-viscosity oil agent with a viscosity of more than 40 mPa·s at 25°C is mixed)
The single oil agent and the two-component mixture oil agent (oil-based composition) shown in Table 6 were placed in a finger-type mist dispenser container (Y-150 manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho) that dispenses 0.15 mL per spray, and sprayed once, and the mist state was evaluated according to the same criteria as in Test Example 3. The results are shown in Table 6.

Test Example 5 (Evaluation of desirable discharge properties of mist dispenser containers)
The oily compositions shown in Table 7 were filled into various mist dispenser containers shown in Table 8 or 9, and the oily agent (oily composition) was ejected toward paper (commercially available graph paper) from a distance of 10 cm, and the diameter of the circular portion of the oily agent (oily composition) applied to the paper was measured (the diameter of the wetted portion without gaps was measured, ignoring the thin spread that occurs around the edges), and then dripping of the oily composition was observed. The results are shown in Table 8.
Dripping evaluation criteria;
A: No dripping B: No dripping immediately but starts after a few seconds C: Dripping immediately Dripping evaluation: A and B were considered pass scores, and C was considered fail scores.

Test Example 6 (Example of optimal HLB value for obtaining good rinsing properties)
The makeup remover of the present invention was evaluated for its washability when the oily composition shown in Table 10 was applied and then washed off with water.
Three pumps of the oily composition were applied to the forearm using a 0.15 mL finger-type mist dispenser container (Y-150, manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho), and the composition was washed off with water by hand. The ease of rinsing the oily composition and the feeling of residue on the skin were evaluated. The mist state was evaluated in the same manner as in Test Example 3.
The results are shown in Table 10.
Rinseability evaluation criteria:
5: Rinses easily and leaves no residue; 4: Rinses easily but leaves a slight residue; 3: Rinses easily but leaves a residue; 2: Difficult to rinse and leaves a clear residue; 1: Cannot be rinsed at all. A rinsability score of 3 or more was considered a pass, and 2 or less was considered a fail.

Test Example 7 (Example showing optimal surfactant concentration for rinsing)
The mist state and washability of the makeup remover of the present invention, in which the oily composition shown in Table 11 was applied and then rinsed off with water, were evaluated. The test methods were the same as those used in Test Examples 3 and 6. The results are shown in Table 11.

Test Example 8 (Example of Mixing Ratio of Multi-Chain and Single-Chain Nonionic Surfactants Effective for Rinse-Off)
The mist state and washability of the makeup remover of the present invention, in which the oily composition shown in Table 12 was applied and then rinsed off with water, were evaluated. The test methods were the same as those used in Test Examples 3 and 6. The results are shown in Table 12.

Test Example 9 (Illustration of the optimum amount of water contained in the composition)
The mist state and washability of the makeup remover of the present invention, in which the oily composition shown in Table 13 was applied and then rinsed off with water, were evaluated. The test methods were the same as those used in Test Examples 3 and 6. The results are shown in Table 13.

Test Example 10 (Example of a composition that spontaneously removes makeup by simply spraying it on without applying physical force, using a combination of a low-viscosity oil and a specific surfactant, and its cleaning effect)
0.045 g of long-lasting foundation (Revlon, Color Stay Makeup Foundation) was applied to an area of 10 x 5 ^cm2 on a model sheet (Okamoto Chemicals, artificial leather, Laforet White) with fine pore-like depressions, and allowed to dry for at least 1 hour.
Next, various oily compositions (Table 14) and oily compositions containing nonionic surfactants (Table 15) were filled into a finger-type mist dispenser container (Y-150 manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho), and three sprays were sprayed onto the area where the foundation was to be applied from a distance of 10 cm, and the container was left to stand for one minute.
After rinsing with a shower and drying, the removability of the foundation from the applied area was evaluated visually according to the following criteria.

Evaluation criteria for foundation removal:
A: Completely removed B: A small amount remains in the recessed areas C: Remains in the recessed areas D: Remains entirely (including recesses and areas other than recesses) E: Not removed at all Note that if the evaluation was A, B, or C, it was considered to be pass, and if it was D or E, it was considered to be fail. The mist state and rinsability were evaluated in the same manner as in Test Examples 3 and 6.
The results are shown in Table 15.

Test Example 11 (Evaluation of the effect of the relationship between the viscosity of the oily composition and the outlet diameter of the mist dispenser container on the mist state)
Oil solutions with different viscosities as shown in Tables 16 and 17 were placed in a trigger-type mist dispenser A (PT-500, manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho), a finger-type mist dispenser B (Y152, manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho), a finger-type mist dispenser A (Y-150, manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho), or a trigger-type mist dispenser D (PT-300, manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho), and the sample was ejected two to three times toward a piece of paper held 10 cm away, and the state of the mist was observed.
The results are shown in Tables 16 and 17.

The results in Tables 16 and 17 are shown in Figure 1.

Claims (14)

(A) A method for removing makeup cosmetics using an oily composition, comprising:
The oil-based composition (A) further contains a nonionic surfactant (B), and has a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C.
(A) an oily composition filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser is sprayed onto the makeup cosmetic on the skin from the discharge port of the mist dispenser;
(A) A method for removing makeup cosmetics, comprising penetrating an oily composition into the makeup cosmetics. The makeup removal method according to claim 1, wherein after spraying the oily composition (A) onto the face from the outlet of the mist dispenser, the makeup is removed by wiping it off or rinsing it off with water, without including a step of rubbing the skin. The makeup removal method according to claim 1, wherein the mist dispenser has an outlet diameter of 0.8 mm or less. 4. The makeup removal method according to claim 3, wherein the relationship between the viscosity (mPa·s) of the oily composition at 25° C. and the diameter (mm) of the discharge opening of the container satisfies the following formula (1):
Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.23×loge (mPa・s)-0.4...(1) The makeup removal method according to claim 1, wherein the combined HLB of the nonionic surfactant (B) is 9.0 or more and 15.0 or less. 2. The makeup removal method according to claim 1 , wherein the content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition is 0.05% by mass or more and 35% by mass or less. 2. The method for removing makeup according to claim 1 , wherein the oily composition further contains (C) water in an amount of 6% by mass or less. The makeup removal method according to claim 1, wherein the container is a mist dispenser designed to deposit mist in a circular shape of 10 cm or less in diameter when dispensed 10 cm away from the face. A makeup removal product comprising: (A) an oily composition; and a container equipped with a mist dispenser, wherein the (A) oily composition further contains (B) a nonionic surfactant and has a viscosity of 40 mPa·s or less at 25°C, the (A) oily composition is filled in the container, and the mist dispenser is a pump type. The makeup removal product according to claim 9, wherein the combined HLB of the nonionic surfactant (B) is 9.0 or more and 15.0 or less. The makeup removal product according to claim 9, wherein the content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition is 0.05% by mass or more and 35% by mass or less. The makeup removal product according to claim 9, wherein the oily composition further contains (C) water in an amount of 6% by mass or less. The makeup removal product according to claim 9, wherein the mist dispenser has an outlet diameter of 0.8 mm or less. 14. The makeup removal product according to claim 13 , wherein the relationship between the viscosity (mPa·s) of the oily composition at 25°C and the outlet diameter (mm) of the mist dispenser satisfies the following formula (1):
Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.23×loge (mPa・s)-0.4...(1)