JPS5814845B2 - Direct reduction steelmaking operation method - Google Patents
Direct reduction steelmaking operation methodInfo
- Publication number
- JPS5814845B2 JPS5814845B2 JP52159601A JP15960177A JPS5814845B2 JP S5814845 B2 JPS5814845 B2 JP S5814845B2 JP 52159601 A JP52159601 A JP 52159601A JP 15960177 A JP15960177 A JP 15960177A JP S5814845 B2 JPS5814845 B2 JP S5814845B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- furnace
- pellets
- iron oxide
- raw material
- particle size
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P10/00—Technologies related to metal processing
- Y02P10/20—Recycling
Landscapes
- Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
本発明は、直接製鉄操業法、特にシャフト炉やシ固定層
レトルトに装入した酸化鉄ペレットに高温還元カスを導
入し、海綿鉄を製造する際に生ずる原料粒塊相互の融着
による棚つりの発生や、還元後の海綿鉄の炉外切り出し
が不可能となる等のトラブルを防止し、効率よくかつ円
滑に海綿鉄を製,造するための操業法に関する。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention is directed to a direct steelmaking operation method, in particular, to introduce high-temperature reduction scum into iron oxide pellets charged into a shaft furnace or fixed bed retort, thereby reducing raw material granules produced when producing sponge iron. This article relates to an operating method for efficiently and smoothly manufacturing sponge iron by preventing troubles such as the occurrence of shelving due to mutual fusion and the inability to cut out the sponge iron after reduction outside the furnace.
直接製鉄法は、シャフト炉等の炉内に酸化鉄原料を装入
し、炉の下部に設けた羽口より、主としてCOおよびH
2から成る高温の還元ガスを吹込み、炉内を上昇する還
元ガスと下降する原料との、間で、熱伝導および還元反
応を進行させるもので、還元ガスの利用効率が高く、エ
ネルギー消費料の少いことが特徴であり、最近、還元鉄
(海綿鉄)の大量生産を目的とした多くの商業規模のシ
ャフトプロセス(たとえば、Midrex法、Armc
o法、Puroter法など)や固定層レトルト法(た
とえばHyl法など)が稼動するに到っている。In the direct steelmaking method, iron oxide raw materials are charged into a furnace such as a shaft furnace, and CO and H are mainly extracted through tuyeres installed at the bottom of the furnace.
This method injects high-temperature reducing gas consisting of 2 into the furnace, and promotes heat conduction and reduction reaction between the reducing gas rising in the furnace and the raw materials falling.This method has high efficiency in reducing gas usage and reduces energy consumption. Recently, many commercial-scale shaft processes (for example, Midrex method, Armc
o method, Puroter method, etc.) and fixed bed retort methods (for example, Hyl method, etc.) have come into operation.
これらの直接製鉄法に用いられる原料は、爾後の製鋼工
程から鉄品位の高い原料が要求されることおよび還元鉄
製造工場までの輸送上の便宜を考慮し、ペレットに成形
されたものが一般的に使用されている。The raw materials used in these direct iron manufacturing methods are generally formed into pellets, taking into account the subsequent steel manufacturing process that requires high-quality raw materials and the convenience of transportation to reduced iron manufacturing plants. used in
しかして、シャフト炉操業において、羽口吹込み還元ガ
スの温度を上昇させることは、炉内における還元ガスと
酸化鉄原料との間の還元反応速度を高め、生産性の向上
に寄与するばかりでなく、成品(還元鉄)の再酸化防止
に対しても有利である。Therefore, in shaft furnace operation, increasing the temperature of the reducing gas injected into the tuyere increases the reduction reaction rate between the reducing gas and the iron oxide raw material in the furnace, which only contributes to improving productivity. It is also advantageous for preventing re-oxidation of finished products (reduced iron).
しかしながら、還元ガスの温度を高めると、炉内の還元
帯下部における装入物相互が融着する現象、所謂クラス
タリング(Clustering)が生起する。However, when the temperature of the reducing gas is increased, a so-called clustering phenomenon occurs in which the charges are fused to each other in the lower part of the reduction zone in the furnace.
このクラスタリングは、原料として前記ペレットを用い
る場合に特に発生し易い。This clustering is particularly likely to occur when the pellets are used as a raw material.
シャフト炉内で一旦クラスターが生成しはじめると、他
の部分の原料が圧縮されるのでクラスタリングは更に促
進され、著しい場合には、円滑な荷下りと還元ガスの流
通が妨げられ、棚吊り、あるいは成品の炉外切り出しが
不可能となり、操業停止のやむなきに到るなどの重大な
トラブルを引き起こす。Once clusters begin to form in the shaft furnace, the raw materials in other parts are compressed, further accelerating clustering, and in severe cases, smooth unloading and flow of reducing gas are hindered, resulting in shelving or It becomes impossible to cut the finished product outside the furnace, causing serious problems such as having to stop operations.
そのため、還元ガス温度を十分に高めることができず、
生差性の改善にも一定の強い制限を余義なくされている
。Therefore, the reducing gas temperature cannot be raised sufficiently,
There are certain strong restrictions that must be imposed on improving the quality of life.
本発明者等は、直接還元製鉄プロセスにおける上述の如
き問題点を克服し、効率良い円滑な操業法を確立するた
めに、かねてよりクラスターの生成機構の詳細を解明す
べく研究を続けてきた。The present inventors have been conducting research for some time to elucidate the details of the cluster generation mechanism in order to overcome the above-mentioned problems in the direct reduction ironmaking process and establish an efficient and smooth operating method.
第1図は、シャフト炉内におけるクラスクーの生成過程
を調べるための装置であり、電気炉1内に挿入された反
応管2内に原料(ペレット)3を入れ、その上部に、圧
荷手段4を配設し、シャフト炉内の荷重に見合った圧力
を原料にかける。FIG. 1 shows an apparatus for investigating the production process of Krasku in a shaft furnace. A raw material (pellet) 3 is put into a reaction tube 2 inserted into an electric furnace 1, and a pressure means 4 is placed on top of the reaction tube 2. A pressure commensurate with the load inside the shaft furnace is applied to the raw material.
この圧力は、支点5で支承されたバー6にかける重り7
で自在に調整される。This pressure is exerted by a weight 7 applied to a bar 6 supported at a fulcrum 5.
can be adjusted freely.
還元ガスは反応管2の下部の導入口8より供給され、反
応後の排カスは出口9より排出される。Reducing gas is supplied from an inlet 8 at the bottom of the reaction tube 2, and waste residue after the reaction is discharged from an outlet 9.
反応管内の雰囲気圧力はマノメーター10により、また
反応帯の温度はサーモカツプル11により測定し、制御
されるようになっている。The atmospheric pressure inside the reaction tube is measured and controlled by a manometer 10, and the temperature of the reaction zone is measured and controlled by a thermocouple 11.
更に12は原料が加熱・還元される際に生起する収縮量
の測定機器であり、前記圧荷手段4のロツドに直結する
ペン13の上下変位により連続的に記録されるようにな
っている。Furthermore, 12 is a measuring device for measuring the amount of shrinkage that occurs when the raw material is heated and reduced, and is continuously recorded by vertical displacement of a pen 13 that is directly connected to the rod of the pressing means 4.
上記装置において、還元ガスを流通させつつ所定の温度
に維持して還元を行なわせると、還元時間の進行と共に
金属鉄が生成し、それと共にペレット層は収縮していく
。In the above-mentioned apparatus, when reducing gas is maintained at a predetermined temperature while flowing, metallic iron is produced as the reduction time progresses, and the pellet layer contracts at the same time.
このようにして原料である酸化鉄の還元率が約95%に
達した時点で、炉外に取り出すと、同一種の原料では、
荷重が大なるほど、また還元温度が高いほど、収縮率は
高く、より強固なクラスターが出来やすいことが認めら
れる。In this way, when the reduction rate of the raw material iron oxide reaches approximately 95%, it is taken out of the furnace.
It is recognized that the larger the load and the higher the reduction temperature, the higher the shrinkage rate and the easier it is to form stronger clusters.
このようにして形成されるクラスターは相互の固着力が
、一定の強さ以下の剥離し易いものであることが望まし
い。It is desirable that the clusters thus formed have mutual adhesion strength below a certain level and are easily peelable.
第2図は、クラスター相互の固着力を測定するための装
置で、鋼製バレル14(l20mmφ×700mm)と
、これを軸15を中心に回転させる,駆動源16とから
成り、クラスターをハレル内に入れ一定の回転速度で一
定時間回転させた後、剥離せずに残存するクラスター量
を測定し、その量の多少により固着力の大小を比較する
ものである。Figure 2 shows a device for measuring the adhesion force between clusters, which consists of a steel barrel 14 (120mmφ x 700mm) and a drive source 16 that rotates this around a shaft 15. After the particles are placed in a container and rotated at a constant rotational speed for a certain period of time, the amount of clusters that remain without being peeled off is measured, and the adhesion strength is compared based on the amount.
本発明者等は、シャフト炉内での条件を考慮し、パレル
回転数を3 0 R/M,回転時間5分間の条件下にク
ラスターを剥離させ下式で舅出される値(CS)をクラ
スター強度と定義した。Considering the conditions in the shaft furnace, the present inventors peeled the clusters under the conditions of a parel rotation speed of 30 R/M and a rotation time of 5 minutes, and calculated the value (CS) obtained by the following formula into the cluster. Defined as strength.
CS=100−(A−B)/A
〔但し、A:回転試1験前のクラスター重量、B:回転
試験後、原料ペレット粒径に相当する網目の篩でふるい
分けした残存クラスター重量。CS=100-(A-B)/A [However, A: cluster weight before one rotation test, B: remaining cluster weight after sieving through a sieve with a mesh size corresponding to the raw material pellet particle size after the rotation test.
〕上述の装置を用い、鉄分68.4%を含む焼成ペレッ
ト(平均粒径12IIII/I.φ)を、温度および圧
荷重を神々変えて還元処理し、その最終収縮率とクラス
ター強度との関係を調べたところ第3図に示すごとき結
果が得られた。] Using the above-mentioned apparatus, calcined pellets containing 68.4% iron (average particle size 12III/I.φ) were reduced by varying the temperature and pressure load, and the relationship between the final shrinkage rate and cluster strength was investigated. When investigated, the results shown in Figure 3 were obtained.
すなわち、収縮率が15%を越えない範囲では上記回転
試験によりクラスターは剥離し、固着力の強固な(剥離
しにくい)クラスターは生成せず、収縮率が約15%を
越えると急激にクラスター強度が上昇することを示して
いる。In other words, as long as the shrinkage rate does not exceed 15%, the clusters will peel off in the rotation test described above, and clusters with strong adhesion (that are difficult to peel off) will not be formed, but when the shrinkage rate exceeds about 15%, the cluster strength will suddenly decrease. indicates that the value will rise.
なお、実機シャフト炉で生成したクラスタリングしたも
のについて上記回転試験によりクラスター強度を測定し
たところ、一般に約20〜30%であり、このことを考
慮するとクラスター強度が約15%以下であれば、クラ
スタリングは実質的に防止し得るものと判断される。In addition, when the cluster strength of the clustered products produced in an actual shaft furnace was measured by the above-mentioned rotation test, it was generally about 20 to 30%. Considering this, if the cluster strength is about 15% or less, clustering is not possible. It is judged that this can be substantially prevented.
上述の実験結果から、原料の収縮率を知ることによって
、クラスターが剥離しやすいものであるかまたは強固に
固着したものであるかの指標となるクラスター強度を推
定し得ることが明らかとなった。From the above experimental results, it has become clear that by knowing the shrinkage rate of the raw material, it is possible to estimate the cluster strength, which is an indicator of whether the clusters are easily peeled off or firmly adhered.
一方、クラスターの生成機構について考察するに、シャ
フト炉で採用される温度は一般に約700〜900゜C
であり、C含有量約1%のγ鉄が液相を生ずる温度が約
1350゜C(酸化鉄と珪酸の固溶体の存在を考慮して
も、その融点は約1190℃)であることから、クラス
ターの生成には液相焼結は考えられず、従って固体相互
の拡散焼結として扱うことが妥当と考える。On the other hand, when considering the cluster generation mechanism, the temperature employed in a shaft furnace is generally about 700 to 900°C.
Since the temperature at which γ iron with a C content of about 1% forms a liquid phase is about 1350°C (even considering the presence of a solid solution of iron oxide and silicic acid, its melting point is about 1190°C), Liquid phase sintering cannot be considered for cluster formation, and therefore it is appropriate to treat it as solid-state mutual diffusion sintering.
第4図はペレット粒相互の融着を説明する図で、還元前
のペレット(同図a)は点接触し、接触点の周囲は表面
張力の作用により、その周囲の凹部を充填する方向に原
子の移動が生ずる。Figure 4 is a diagram explaining the fusion of pellet grains. The pellets before reduction (a in the figure) are in point contact, and the area around the contact point is moved in the direction of filling the concave area around it due to the action of surface tension. Movement of atoms occurs.
この移動により接触部に空格子点ができ、さらにペレッ
ト内部または表面からの原子の移動で格子点を埋めるこ
とをくり返すことにより、接触面積は次第に増加し(同
図b)焼結が行なわれる。This movement creates vacancies in the contact area, and by repeating the process of filling the lattice points with the movement of atoms from inside the pellet or from the surface, the contact area gradually increases (Figure b), and sintering takes place. .
この場合、還元温度が幸い程原子の移動が活発なことは
Fickの拡散法則からも明らかで、かつ加圧力が犬な
るほどこの現象が促進される。In this case, it is clear from Fick's law of diffusion that the better the reduction temperature is, the more active the movement of atoms is, and the higher the applied pressure, the more this phenomenon is accelerated.
本発明者等による種々の原料のクラスタリング特性測定
結果によれば、一般に塊鉱石に比べ、ペレットの方がク
ラスターを生成し易いことが判明した。According to the results of measuring the clustering characteristics of various raw materials by the present inventors, it has been found that, in general, pellets are easier to form clusters than lump ores.
第5図は、ペレットがクラスターを形成し易い理由を説
明するためにペレット相互の荷重の伝達を模式的に示す
図であり、球形に近いペレット相互の接触は、点接触に
近いため、上部からかかる荷重(矢印)による接触点に
おける圧力は極めて高いものとなり、クラスタリングが
促進されると考えられる。FIG. 5 is a diagram schematically showing the transmission of load between pellets to explain why pellets tend to form clusters. Since the contact between pellets that are close to spherical is close to point contact, It is thought that the pressure at the contact point due to this load (arrow) becomes extremely high, promoting clustering.
ペレットのクラスタリングが上述の如き現象として説明
し得るとすれは、クラスター生成の一大要因と考えられ
るペレットへの集中荷重を分散させ、層内における圧力
分布を均一化することが、クラスターの生成防止に有力
な手段となりうると考えられる。If clustering of pellets can be explained as the phenomenon described above, it is possible to prevent cluster formation by dispersing the concentrated load on the pellets, which is considered to be a major factor in cluster formation, and by equalizing the pressure distribution within the layer. It is thought that this can be a powerful means.
本発明者等は、かかる観点より更に実験を重ねた結果、
球形固体(ペレット)相互間に形成される空隙に、ペレ
ット破片や鉱石破片等の酸化鉄固形物を介在せしめるこ
とにより、クラスタリングを有効に防止し得ることを見
出した。As a result of further experiments from this point of view, the present inventors found that
It has been found that clustering can be effectively prevented by interposing iron oxide solids such as pellet fragments and ore fragments into the voids formed between spherical solids (pellets).
第6図は、このペレット層内の圧力分布を模式的に示す
図であり、上部からの荷重はペレットの接触部へ集中す
ることなくべレソト相互間に介在する固形物により適当
に分散されているものと考えられる。Figure 6 is a diagram schematically showing the pressure distribution within this pellet layer, and shows that the load from above is not concentrated on the contact area of the pellets, but is appropriately dispersed by the solid matter interposed between the pellets. It is thought that there are.
このように、ペレット間に酸化鉄固形物を介在せしめる
場合、その小粒が余り細かすぎると却ってペレット表面
との接触面積が増大し、焼結し易くなるという逆効果を
生ずるから、クラスタリング防止の点から小粒混合率に
おのずと適正な一定の範囲が存すると考えられ、またシ
ャフト炉操業上、炉内圧損の増大あるいはダストロスの
増加等を伴うことなどを考慮し、固形物の粒径および混
合率を適切に設定しなけれはならない。In this way, when iron oxide solids are interposed between pellets, if the small particles are too small, the contact area with the pellet surface increases, which has the opposite effect of making sintering easier, so it is important to prevent clustering. Therefore, it is thought that there is a certain appropriate range for the small particle mixing ratio.Also, taking into account that shaft furnace operation is accompanied by an increase in pressure drop in the furnace or an increase in dust loss, the particle size and mixing ratio of solids should be adjusted accordingly. Must be set appropriately.
これらにつき詳細な実験を重ねた結果、原料に混合すべ
き小粒の粒径および混合率等が、還元処理における収縮
率およびクラスター強度におよぼす定量的関係を見出し
た。As a result of repeated detailed experiments, we found a quantitative relationship between the particle size and mixing ratio of the small particles to be mixed into the raw material and the shrinkage rate and cluster strength during reduction treatment.
本発明は以上の一連の研究結果にもとづいて完成された
ものである。The present invention was completed based on the above series of research results.
すなわち、本発明は、クラスタリングしやすい酸化鉄ペ
レットを原料としてシャフト炉や固定層レトルトに装入
し、高温の還元ガスを用いて海綿鉄を製造する方法にお
いて、平均粒径2〜5mmの酸化鉄固形物を混合して炉
内に装入することにより、装入原料のクラスタリングを
有効に防止し、円滑にして効率良い操業を維持すること
を可能としたものである。That is, the present invention provides a method for producing sponge iron by charging iron oxide pellets, which are easily clustered, into a shaft furnace or fixed bed retort as a raw material and using high-temperature reducing gas. By mixing the solid materials and charging them into the furnace, it is possible to effectively prevent clustering of the charged raw materials and maintain smooth and efficient operation.
以下、本発明について詳しく説明する。The present invention will be explained in detail below.
本発明方法によれば、原料である酸化鉄ペレットをシャ
フト炉あるいは固定層レトルト内に装入するに際し、該
原料粒径より細かい粒径の酸化鉄固形物を該原料と混合
して充填する。According to the method of the present invention, when iron oxide pellets as a raw material are charged into a shaft furnace or a fixed bed retort, iron oxide solids having a particle size finer than the raw material particle size are mixed with the raw material and filled.
酸化鉄固形物としては、原料ペレツ1・の製造時あるい
は酸化鉄鉱石の粒度調整に際して副生するそれらの小片
などが好ましく用いられる。As the iron oxide solids, small pieces thereof, which are produced as a by-product during the production of the raw material pellets 1 or during the particle size adjustment of the iron oxide ore, are preferably used.
これら酸化物固形物の形状は球形のもののほか、任意の
形状のものであってよい。The shape of these oxide solids may be spherical or any other shape.
第7図は、酸化鉄ペレットとしてロータリーキルンで焼
成されたべレソトを、通常採用される粒度である約10
,13mmに整粒したものを原料とし、更に同ペレット
を約34〜4.8mmに調整した固形物を種々の割合で
混合し、前記第1図に示す装置に装入した後(装入量5
00g)、還元温度910℃、荷重2 Ky /crl
lの条件下、還元カス(H2:55%,CO35%,C
H4%,CO25%)を4
用いて還元処理した場合の、原料収縮率に及ぼす固形物
の混合率の影響を示すグラフである。Figure 7 shows Beresotho calcined in a rotary kiln as iron oxide pellets at a particle size of about 10
, 13 mm as a raw material, and the same pellets were further adjusted to approximately 34 to 4.8 mm and mixed in various proportions and charged into the apparatus shown in Fig. 1 (charging amount). 5
00g), reduction temperature 910℃, load 2 Ky/crl
Reduced scum (H2: 55%, CO35%, C
It is a graph showing the influence of the mixing ratio of solids on the raw material shrinkage rate when reduction treatment is performed using 4% H4%, CO25%).
同図中、■,■,■および■はそれぞれ混合率20%,
40%,50%および0%の場合を示す曲線である(い
ずれも重量%)。In the same figure, ■, ■, ■ and ■ are respectively a mixture rate of 20%,
This is a curve showing cases of 40%, 50% and 0% (all weight %).
同図から認められるように、酸化鉄固形物を混合しない
場合(図中、■)は、還元処理時間と共に収縮率は急激
に増大するのに対し、混合率が20%(同図、〔I〕)
、40%(同図、〔■〕)の場合の収縮率はごくわずか
であり、50%(同図、〔■〕)でも収縮率は約10%
以下に抑制しうることが認められる。As can be seen from the figure, when iron oxide solids are not mixed (in the figure, 〕)
, the shrinkage rate at 40% (same figure, [■]) is very small, and even at 50% (same figure, [■]) the shrinkage rate is about 10%.
It is recognized that the following can be suppressed.
尚、前記第3図に示されるように、収縮率が約15%を
越えない範囲でのクラスター強度はほぼ零であることか
ら、酸化鉄固形物の混合率は約2〜50%の範囲が望ま
しい。As shown in Fig. 3, the cluster strength is almost zero in a range where the shrinkage rate does not exceed about 15%, so the mixing ratio of iron oxide solids should be in the range of about 2 to 50%. desirable.
次に原料ペレットに種々の粒径を有する酸化鉄固形物を
混合率20%の割合で配合した場合の、収縮率およびク
ラスター強度に及ぼす該固形物粒径の影響についてのべ
る。Next, we will discuss the influence of the solid particle size on the shrinkage rate and cluster strength when iron oxide solids having various particle sizes are blended into the raw material pellets at a mixing ratio of 20%.
・ 第8図は、粒径10〜13mmの酸化鉄ペレットに
、各種の粒径を有する酸化鉄固形物((a) 0. 4
2〜0.59wIt(平均粒径0. 5 7K111
)、(b) 1. 0 〜1... 1 97/IJ
l(平均粒径],. l g )、(c) 3. 4
〜4. 8 7tl;Ill (平均粒径4, 1 M
)および(d)4.7 〜5.6 6rtrta(平
均粒径5,27#!)の4種類〕を用い、いづれもそれ
ぞれ混合率20%で配合し、前記と同様の還元条件下に
処理した場合の収縮率(同図中、(1))およびクラス
ター強度(同図中、〔■〕)を示す。・ Figure 8 shows iron oxide pellets with a particle size of 10 to 13 mm and iron oxide solids with various particle sizes ((a) 0.4
2~0.59wIt (average particle size 0.5 7K111
), (b) 1. 0 to 1. .. .. 1 97/IJ
l (average particle size),. l g ), (c) 3. 4
~4. 8 7tl;Ill (average particle size 4, 1M
) and (d) 4.7 to 5.6 6 rtrta (average particle size 5.27#!)], each was blended at a mixing ratio of 20% and treated under the same reducing conditions as above. The shrinkage rate ((1) in the same figure) and the cluster strength ([■] in the same figure) in the case of this are shown.
同図から明らかなように、混合される酸化鉄固冫形物の
平均粒径が約1〜5wIlの範囲において、収縮率は約
15%以下であり、かつクラスター強度も非常に小さく
好適な状態に保たれることが認められる。As is clear from the figure, when the average particle size of the iron oxide solid particles to be mixed is in the range of about 1 to 5 wIl, the shrinkage rate is about 15% or less, and the cluster strength is also very small, which is a suitable state. It is recognized that the
該固形物の径が5′IIgIlを越えると収縮率および
クラスター強度が高まるのは、原料(ペレツト)相互の
接触点の集中荷重分散機能が急激に低下することによる
ものと考えられる。The reason why the shrinkage rate and cluster strength increase when the diameter of the solid particles exceeds 5'IIgIl is thought to be because the concentrated load distribution function of the contact points between the raw materials (pellets) decreases rapidly.
なお、クラスター強度の点からみれば、該固形物の粒径
下限を約l′IIgIlまで許容し得るように考えられ
るが、次に述べる炉内の還元ガスの圧損の観点から、粒
径下限は約2mmとすべきである。From the point of view of cluster strength, it seems that the lower limit of the particle size of the solid can be tolerated up to approximately l'IIgIl, but from the point of view of the pressure drop of the reducing gas in the furnace, which will be described next, the lower limit of the particle size is It should be approximately 2 mm.
第9図は、上記第8図を参照して述べた還元処理におけ
る炉内での還元ガスの圧力損失を示したグラフであり、
図中Iは初期圧損、■は処理の最終段階における圧損(
いづれも澗A q )である。FIG. 9 is a graph showing the pressure loss of the reducing gas in the furnace in the reduction treatment described with reference to FIG. 8 above,
In the figure, I is the initial pressure drop, and ■ is the pressure drop at the final stage of treatment (
All of them are 澈Aq).
酸化物固形物の粒径が約2wIlに満たない細粒の場合
には、該固形物が原料(ペレット)間隙を流下し著しい
圧損上昇を誘起することが認められる。When the particle size of the oxide solid is fine, less than about 2 wIl, it is recognized that the solid flows down through the gaps between the raw materials (pellets) and induces a significant increase in pressure drop.
このことは、炉内還元において羽口から吹込まれるべき
一定量の還元ガスの上昇を妨げ、還元効率の著しい低下
を招くことを意味する。This means that during in-furnace reduction, a certain amount of reducing gas that should be blown in from the tuyere is prevented from rising, leading to a significant reduction in reduction efficiency.
前記第8図において、約2wIlに満たない細粒を用い
た場合にクラスター強度は低く一見良好に見えるが、こ
れは還元が不十分だったことによるものに過ぎないと考
えられる。In FIG. 8, when fine particles of less than about 2 wIl are used, the cluster strength is low and appears to be good at first glance, but this is thought to be due to insufficient reduction.
これに対し、粒径約27#!以上では、圧損の著しい上
昇を回避し得ることが認められる。On the other hand, the particle size is about 27#! In the above, it is recognized that a significant increase in pressure loss can be avoided.
すなわち、約2〜5wIlの範囲の固形物を使用するこ
とにより、第8図に示されるごとく原料ペレットの強固
なクラスタリングを有効に防ぎ、かつ第9図に示される
ごとく炉内の圧力損失の増大を招くことなく、円滑にし
て安定な操業を確保することができる。That is, by using solids in the range of about 2 to 5 wIl, strong clustering of raw material pellets can be effectively prevented as shown in FIG. 8, and the pressure loss in the furnace can be increased as shown in FIG. It is possible to ensure smooth and stable operations without causing problems.
次に実施例を挙げて本発明を具体的に説明する。Next, the present invention will be specifically explained with reference to Examples.
実施例
ロータリーキルンで焼成したFe約70%を含む粒度1
0〜1 3mmに整粒したペレットを原料とし、これを
シャフト炉内に装入し、羽口より約900℃の還元カス
(H255%,CO35%,CH44%,CO25%)
を導入し、操業を行ったところ24時間操業において棚
吊りおよび炉外切り出し困難のトラブルが4回発生し、
その都合操業が中断された。Example Particle size 1 containing about 70% Fe fired in a rotary kiln
Pellets sized to 0 to 13 mm are used as raw materials, charged into a shaft furnace, and reduced scum (H255%, CO35%, CH44%, CO25%) at approximately 900°C is passed through the tuyeres.
When we introduced and started operation, troubles such as hanging on shelves and difficulty in cutting outside the furnace occurred four times during 24-hour operation.
The operation was suspended due to circumstances.
一方、上記と同一の焼成ペレットを原料とし、該焼成ペ
レットの整粒の際発生したペレット破片を2〜5wIl
に整粒して小粒塊となし、これを原料に対し約25%の
割合で混合して炉内に装入し、約950゜Cの還元ガス
(組成は上記と同じ)を用いて操業を行ったところ、還
元ガスの昇温にもかかわらず、48時間の操業中、棚吊
り等の事故は全くなく円滑な操業を行うことができた。On the other hand, the same fired pellets as above were used as raw materials, and 2 to 5 wIl of pellet fragments generated during sizing of the fired pellets were collected.
The particles are sized to form small agglomerates, mixed at a ratio of about 25% to the raw material, charged into the furnace, and operated using reducing gas at about 950°C (composition is the same as above). During the 48 hours of operation, there were no accidents such as hanging shelves, and the operation was smooth despite the temperature increase of the reducing gas.
またその生産効率も、前記の操業における中断時間を除
いた正味の実動時間当りの生産量に比し、約35%の向
上が認められた。Moreover, the production efficiency was also improved by about 35% compared to the production amount per net actual operating time excluding the interruption time in the operation.
以上の如く、本発明によれば、シャフト炉等におけるク
ラスタリング現象に伴う操業上のトラブルを確実に防ぎ
、円滑な操業を維持し得ると共にζ還元ガス温度の上限
を緩和し、還元効率を一段と高めることができる。As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to reliably prevent operational troubles associated with clustering phenomena in shaft furnaces, etc., maintain smooth operation, relax the upper limit of the ζ reducing gas temperature, and further improve reduction efficiency. be able to.
第1図は、還元過程における原料の収縮量を測定する装
置の縦断面概要図、第2図はクラスター強度測定装置を
示す外観斜視図、第3図は原料の収縮率とクラスター強
度の関係を示すグラフ、第4図a,bは粒子の融着状況
の説明図、第5図および第6図は、集合粒子相互に及ぶ
荷重分布を模式的に示す説明図、第7図は、酸化鉄固形
物の混合率の原料収縮率に及ぼす影響を示すグラフ、第
8図は酸化鉄固形物の平均粒径と原料の最終収縮率およ
びクラスター強度の関係を示すグラフ、第9図は炉内圧
損と酸化鉄固形物の平均粒径の関係を示すグラフである
。
1:電気炉、2:反応管、3:原刺、4:圧荷手段、8
:還元ガス導入口、9:排出口、12:収縮量測定機器
、14:バレル。Fig. 1 is a longitudinal cross-sectional schematic diagram of a device for measuring the amount of shrinkage of raw materials during the reduction process, Fig. 2 is an external perspective view showing the cluster strength measuring device, and Fig. 3 shows the relationship between shrinkage rate of raw materials and cluster strength. Figures 4a and 4b are explanatory diagrams of the state of fusion of particles, Figures 5 and 6 are explanatory diagrams schematically showing the load distribution between aggregated particles, and Figure 7 is an explanatory diagram of the fusion state of particles. A graph showing the influence of the mixing ratio of solids on the raw material shrinkage rate. Figure 8 is a graph showing the relationship between the average particle size of iron oxide solids and the final shrinkage rate and cluster strength of the raw material. Figure 9 is a graph showing the in-furnace pressure drop. It is a graph which shows the relationship between and the average particle diameter of iron oxide solids. 1: Electric furnace, 2: Reaction tube, 3: Original needle, 4: Pressure means, 8
: reducing gas inlet, 9: outlet, 12: shrinkage measuring device, 14: barrel.
Claims (1)
は固定層レトルトに装入し、高温の還元ガスを用いて海
綿鉄を製造する方法において、平均粒径2〜51の酸化
鉄固形物を混合して炉内に装入することを特徴とする直
接製鉄操業法。1. In a method of producing sponge iron using iron oxide pellets as a raw material, charging them into a shaft furnace or fixed bed retort, and using high-temperature reducing gas, iron oxide solids with an average particle size of 2 to 51 are mixed. A direct steelmaking operation method characterized by charging the steel into the furnace.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP52159601A JPS5814845B2 (en) | 1977-12-27 | 1977-12-27 | Direct reduction steelmaking operation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP52159601A JPS5814845B2 (en) | 1977-12-27 | 1977-12-27 | Direct reduction steelmaking operation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS5489915A JPS5489915A (en) | 1979-07-17 |
| JPS5814845B2 true JPS5814845B2 (en) | 1983-03-22 |
Family
ID=15697255
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP52159601A Expired JPS5814845B2 (en) | 1977-12-27 | 1977-12-27 | Direct reduction steelmaking operation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS5814845B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107354257A (en) * | 2017-07-10 | 2017-11-17 | 中冶南方工程技术有限公司 | A kind of production method of metallic iron |
-
1977
- 1977-12-27 JP JP52159601A patent/JPS5814845B2/en not_active Expired
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS5489915A (en) | 1979-07-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP0888462A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for making metallic iron | |
| US20210238710A1 (en) | Method for smelting oxide ore | |
| US3536475A (en) | Method of making pellets from a finely divided solid material | |
| JP3635256B2 (en) | Reduction method of iron oxide | |
| TW202239974A (en) | How to operate a reduction furnace | |
| JP6439828B2 (en) | Oxide ore smelting method | |
| JP2020056052A (en) | Smelting method for oxide ore | |
| EP1718775B1 (en) | Pre-treatment process for feed material for direct reduction process | |
| JP7533160B2 (en) | How to smelt oxide ores | |
| JP6900699B2 (en) | Nickel oxide ore smelting method | |
| JP6772526B2 (en) | Nickel oxide ore smelting method | |
| JPS5814845B2 (en) | Direct reduction steelmaking operation method | |
| JP2024110748A (en) | Method for smelting nickel oxide ore | |
| JP2023019428A (en) | Nickel oxide ore smelting method | |
| JP7172330B2 (en) | Method for smelting oxide ore | |
| JPH05339654A (en) | Pretreatment of sintered ore raw material and sintered ore raw material for iron making | |
| JP7552324B2 (en) | Method for smelting nickel oxide ore | |
| JP7552289B2 (en) | How to smelt oxide ores | |
| JP2022092451A (en) | Nickel oxide ore smelting method | |
| JP7547978B2 (en) | Method for smelting nickel oxide ore | |
| JPH05339653A (en) | Pretreatment of sintered ore raw material and sintered ore raw material for iron making | |
| WO2015137348A1 (en) | Method and facility for producing reduced iron | |
| JP2024122337A (en) | Method for smelting nickel oxide ore | |
| JP2000119722A (en) | Method for producing reduced iron pellets | |
| JP2018197384A (en) | Method for smelting oxide ore |