JPS5932144B2 - cleaning agent - Google Patents

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a novel cleaning agent for preventing foul odors generated by human or livestock excrement in storage, circulation or porta-pull toilets.

Storage-type, circulation-type, or portaple-type toilets can be used in situations such as when the concentration of human waste becomes concentrated, when it is stored for a long time, or when the temperature rises even if the concentration of human waste is high or it is stored for a short period of time. The putrefaction of human waste produces a terrible odor.

The bad odor that comes from human waste is caused by undigested protein, undigested starch, undigested fatty acids, or uric acid in the human urine, and microorganisms in the human waste (
For example, it is decomposed by intestinal bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Vibrio bacteria, and ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, mercaptan, indole, skatole, etc. are generated.

Vehicles such as buses and trains, ships (passenger ships, cargo ships, ships, etc.), airplanes, toilets in houses, livestock sheds, and the like are sources of such bad odors, and there is a strong desire to take measures to prevent them.

To date, various deodorants and deodorants have been developed and used to deal with this problem.

Many of these drugs are powdered products that are mixed with masking fragrances, ingredients that react with malodorous components to eliminate the malodor, and bactericidal agents that inhibit the growth of microorganisms that cause malodors. It is a liquid agent made by solubilizing it in water or a solvent.

However, these agents generally have a weak bactericidal effect and cannot sufficiently suppress the putrefaction of human waste and cannot eliminate the source of the foul odor.

As a result, a lot of bad odor is generated, and the chemicals that react with the malodorous components are quickly consumed, so that deodorizing effects can only be expected for a short period of time.

Therefore, there is a strong desire to develop a deodorant that has a strong bactericidal effect in place of these chemicals.

In view of the current situation, the present inventors conducted extensive research to develop an excellent deodorant that eliminates the drawbacks of conventional drugs.

As a result, the present invention was completed. In other words, the present invention uses a mixture of one selected from compounds (1) to (5) and one selected from compounds (A) to (E) as an active ingredient. It is a floor cleaner.

Compound (1) Tetramethylthiuram disulfide compound (2) Zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate compound (3)
Zinc ethylene bis(dithiocarbamate) Compound (4) Disodium ethylene bis(dithiocarbamate) Compound (5) Ferric dimethyl dithiocarbamate compound (A,) N-dichlorofluoromethylthio-
N'IN'-Dimethyl N-phenylsulfamide compound (B) N-(dichlorofluoromethylthio)phthalimide compound (Ci N-(1-IJ dichlorotylthio) phthalimide compound (D) N-(1-lichloro Methylthio)tetrahydrophthalimide Compound (E)N-(1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethylthio)-4-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximide The compound number is also referred to in the following leprosy examples and test examples. Ru.

All of the active ingredient compounds according to the present invention are compounds known as agricultural and horticultural fungicides.

The object of the present invention is to provide a novel floor cleaner made by mixing such known compounds.

As revealed in the test examples described later, when the cleaning agent according to the present invention is treated with human waste, it exhibits an extremely high cleaning effect, and the effect is greater than that when each of the active ingredient compounds is used alone. The effects are much more than additive and are expressed synergistically.

In addition, its effect lasts for a long time, making it a drug of extremely high practical value.

When treating human waste with the cleaning agent according to the present invention, the amount of active ingredient compounds to be added is a mixture of one of the compounds (1) to (5) and one of the compounds (A) to (E). 20p in total
pm or more, especially 200 to 500 p
It is desirable to use it within the pm range from the viewpoint of effectiveness and sustainability.

The active ingredients may be mixed at any weight ratio, but preferably 9.9:0.1 to 0.1:
The ratio is 9.9, more preferably 8:2 to 2:8.

In the present invention, in order to produce a cleaning agent using the above compound as an active ingredient, a chemical agent that reacts with the malodorous component, such as glyoxal, organic acids (malic acid, citric acid, etc.), inorganic acids (sulfamic acid, hydrochloric acid, etc.), etc. Flavors that mask malodorous components, colorants (such as dyes and pigments) that hide primary colors, surfactants, and the like are added as necessary, and the formulation is formulated together with the active ingredient compounds.

Next, practical examples of the present invention and comparative examples will be given, but the present invention is not limited to the following practical examples.

Note that all references to "actual flame example middle part" refer to parts by weight.

Leprosy example 1 10 parts of glyoxal, 3 parts of compound (1), compound (A
), 20 parts of malic acid, 2 parts of fragrance, 5 parts of surfactant, and 57 parts of water were uniformly mixed to prepare a cleaning agent of the present invention.

Practical example 2 5 parts of powdered glyoxal, 2 parts of compound (2), compound (
3 parts of B), 20 parts of malic acid, 3 parts of fragrance, 1 part of colorant, 5 parts of surfactant and 60 parts of sodium sulfate were uniformly mixed to produce a powdered cleaning agent of the present invention.

In addition, various detergents containing other active ingredients were also produced according to Leprosy Examples 1 and 2.

Comparative Example 1 10 parts of glyoxal, 3 parts of compound (1), 2 parts of malic acid
0 parts, 2 parts of fragrance, 5 parts of surfactant, and 60 parts of water were uniformly mixed to prepare a comparative cleaning agent.

Comparative Example 2 10 parts of glyoxal, 6 parts of amphoteric active agent, 20 parts of malic acid
A comparative detergent was prepared by mixing 1 part, 2 parts of fragrance, 5 parts of surfactant, and 57 parts of water.

Comparative Example 3 5 parts of powdered glyoxal, 2 parts of compound (1), 20 parts of malic acid, 3 parts of fragrance, 1 part of colorant, 5 parts of surfactant and 63 parts of sodium sulfate were blended to produce a powdered comparative cleaning agent. was manufactured.

Comparative Example 4 A comparative cleaning agent in powder form was prepared by blending 5 parts of powdered glyoxal, 20 parts of malic acid, 5 parts of an amphoteric active agent, 3 parts of fragrance, 1 part of colorant, 5 parts of surfactant, and 60 parts of sodium sulfate. did.

In addition, according to Comparative Examples 1 and 3, compounds (2) to (5:
Comparative detergents containing single components of Compounds (A) to (E) were also produced.

Next, test examples of the cleaning agent of the present invention will be given and specifically explained.

Test Example 1 40 g of the cleaning agent prepared according to Example 1 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3 was sprinkled on human waste (1.2 kg of stool, 4.8 kg of urine), and the deodorizing effect was measured.

-The ammonia concentration, hydrogen sulfide concentration, and coliform bacteria count were measured by the following methods.

(1) Ammonia concentration and hydrogen sulfide concentration at 10C above the floor
The gas concentration was measured at rrL using a north type gas detector (vacuum type B).

(2) Number of coliform bacteria was measured using the JIS K0102 factory wastewater test method and bacterial test.

The results are shown in Table 1 below.

The invention plot was prepared according to Example 1, and the single-use plot among the comparative plots was prepared according to Comparative Example 1 and used as a test drug.

Test Example 2 60g of each cleaning agent prepared according to Examples and Comparative Examples was poured into a single-person circulating toilet bowl (initial water 12kg) and dispersed and dissolved (initial total active ingredient concentration was 250ppm). 5 kg (0.3 kg of feces, 1.21 y of urine) was added, and the deodorizing effect for 7 days was 1.3 kg.
Measurement was carried out in the same manner as in Test Example 1 for 5.7 days.

The results are shown in Table 2.

In addition, the present invention plot was prepared according to Example 2, and the single-use plot among the comparison plots was prepared according to Comparative Example 3 and used as a test drug.

In addition, mixed use of compound (2) and compound (B) (Example 2
) to fil? That means 1 day, 3rd white, 5th white and 7th.
When the active ingredient concentration of each mouth weight was measured, it was 222.
21) pm, 181.8pIl1m, 153.8p
pm, 133.3 ppm.

As is clear from the above test examples, the deodorizing effect of the cleaning agent of the present invention was found to be extremely high and highly practical.

Claims (1)

[Claims] 1 One of the compounds selected from tetramethylthiuram disulfide, zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate, zinc ethylene bis(dithiocarbamate), disodium ethylene bis(dithiocarbamate), or ferric dimethyldithiocarbamate, and N-dichlorofluoromethylthio- N'IN'-dimethyl N-phenylsulfamide, N-(dichlorofluoromethylthio)phthalimide, N-(trichloromethylthio)phthalimide, N
-(trichloromethylthio)tetrahydrophthalimide or N-(1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethyl f,
t) -4-Cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximide.