Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPS6010574B2 - Inspection method for resistance welds - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPS6010574B2 - Inspection method for resistance welds - Google Patents

Inspection method for resistance welds

Info

Publication number
JPS6010574B2
JPS6010574B2 JP11709278A JP11709278A JPS6010574B2 JP S6010574 B2 JPS6010574 B2 JP S6010574B2 JP 11709278 A JP11709278 A JP 11709278A JP 11709278 A JP11709278 A JP 11709278A JP S6010574 B2 JPS6010574 B2 JP S6010574B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
welded
materials
amount
electrodes
welding
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP11709278A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS5543454A (en
Inventor
滝夫 奥田
恵俊 山本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority to JP11709278A priority Critical patent/JPS6010574B2/en
Publication of JPS5543454A publication Critical patent/JPS5543454A/en
Publication of JPS6010574B2 publication Critical patent/JPS6010574B2/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials Using Thermal Means (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 この発明は抵抗溶接部の検査方法に関するものである。[Detailed description of the invention] This invention relates to a method for inspecting resistance welds.

第1図は一般的な抵抗溶接方法を示す概略図である。第
1の被溶接材1と第2の被溶接材2とはそれぞれの内面
が接合されそれぞれの外面に接合された1対の電極3,
4によって圧接されている。第1,第2の被溶接材日,
2が圧接した状態において、一対の電極3,4間に通電
すると、第1,第2の被溶接材1,2のそれぞれの内面
の点Pが抵抗溶接される。このような抵抗溶接において
、抵抗溶薮工程中に抵抗部の非破壊検査を行う従来の抵
抗溶接部の検査方法は、1対の電極3,4間の通電期間
中に生じる第1,第2の被溶接材1,2の少くとも何れ
か一方の熱膨張変化に従って変動する1対の電極3.4
の少くとも何れか‐一方の変化を測定し、この変位の最
大変位量(被溶接材の最大熱膨張量。
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a general resistance welding method. The first material to be welded 1 and the second material to be welded 2 have a pair of electrodes 3 joined to their respective inner surfaces, and a pair of electrodes 3 joined to their respective outer surfaces.
4. Days of the first and second materials to be welded,
When current is applied between the pair of electrodes 3 and 4 in a state in which the electrodes 2 are in pressure contact with each other, a point P on the inner surface of each of the first and second materials to be welded 1 and 2 is resistance welded. In such resistance welding, the conventional inspection method for resistance welds involves non-destructive inspection of the resistance part during the resistance welding process. a pair of electrodes 3.4 that vary according to changes in thermal expansion of at least one of the materials to be welded 1 and 2;
Measure the change in at least one of these displacements, and measure the maximum displacement (maximum thermal expansion of the material to be welded).

以下最大変位量と称する。)や、通電初期における1対
の電極3,4の少くとも何れか一方の変動率、即ち一定
時間(T,)の経過に対する変位量(日.)の変動率日
,/T,,により、次に説明するようにして第1,第2
の被溶接材1,2の溶接部の良否を判定するものであっ
た。第2図イは電極3,4間の変位パターンと1対の電
極3,4間に通電される溶接電流との関係を示す特性曲
線図である。
Hereinafter, this will be referred to as the maximum displacement amount. ), or the rate of change of at least one of the pair of electrodes 3 and 4 at the initial stage of energization, that is, the rate of change of the amount of displacement (days.) with respect to the passage of a certain time (T,), day, /T,, The first and second
The quality of the welded parts of the welded materials 1 and 2 was determined. FIG. 2A is a characteristic curve diagram showing the relationship between the displacement pattern between the electrodes 3 and 4 and the welding current applied between the pair of electrodes 3 and 4.

第2図における特性曲線Aは電極3,4間の変位パター
ンであり、第2図口の曲線Bは1対の電極3,4間に通
電される通電期間Tにおける溶接電流を示す。従来の抵
抗溶接部の検査方法は、第2図の特性曲線Aより求まる
通電期間T中の最大変位量Ho,または通電初期におけ
る電極3,4間の変動率ひ(T,時間経過時の変位量を
日,とするとQ=日./T,)値から第1,第2の被溶
接材1,2の溶接部の強度を推定し、その推定値から第
1,第2の被溶接材1,2の溶接状態の良否を判定して
いる。しかしながら、第1,第2の被熔接材1,2の少
くとも何れか一方が幅の狭に板状であれば、1対の電極
3,4の加圧条件及び1対の電極3,4間の通電条件に
よって、通電期間T中における板状の第1,第2の被溶
接材1,2の塑性変形が著しく、第3図Qに示す電極3
,4間の変位パターンである特性曲線Cで明らかなよう
に、通電途中で電極3,4間の最大変位量Hoが検出さ
れ、その後電極3,4間の変位量が収縮するため、従来
の検査方法では第1,第2の被溶接材1,2の溶接部の
良否を判定できない欠点があった。この欠点を第4図及
びに第5図によって説明する。なお第3図口の曲線Dは
1対の電極3,4間に通電される通電期間Tにおける溶
接電流の波形を示す。第4図は第1,第2の被熔接材1
92を示す斜視図である。
A characteristic curve A in FIG. 2 is a displacement pattern between the electrodes 3 and 4, and a curve B at the beginning of FIG. The conventional inspection method for resistance welds is based on the maximum displacement Ho during the energization period T determined from the characteristic curve A in FIG. The strength of the welded part of the first and second welded materials 1 and 2 is estimated from the value (Q=day./T,), and the strength of the welded part of the first and second welded materials is estimated from the estimated value. The quality of the welding conditions of 1 and 2 is determined. However, if at least one of the first and second materials to be welded 1 and 2 has a narrow plate shape, the pressure conditions for the pair of electrodes 3 and 4 and the pressure conditions for the pair of electrodes 3 and 4 Due to the energization conditions during the energization period, the plastic deformation of the plate-shaped first and second welded materials 1 and 2 during the energization period T is significant, and the electrode 3 shown in FIG.
, 4, the maximum displacement amount Ho between electrodes 3 and 4 is detected during energization, and then the displacement amount between electrodes 3 and 4 contracts. The inspection method has a drawback that it is not possible to determine the quality of the welded portions of the first and second materials to be welded 1 and 2. This drawback will be explained with reference to FIGS. 4 and 5. Note that the curve D at the beginning of FIG. 3 shows the waveform of the welding current during the energization period T during which the current is applied between the pair of electrodes 3 and 4. Figure 4 shows the first and second welding materials 1.
92. FIG.

すなわち、第1の被溶接材富として上下端幅5豚、中央
幅2肋、高さIQ■のレール形状のものを用い、第2の
被溶接材2として板厚0.8側の板状のものを用い、通
電期間Tは10サイクル「溶接電流は7.歌A〜10K
Aの溶接条件で溶接した場合、通電期間T中の第1,2
の被溶接材1,2の最大変位量Hoと、第1,第2の被
溶接材官,2の溶接部の引張破断荷重との関係は第蚤図
に示すようになる。第5図から明らかなように、点イの
最大変位量Hoは約50ム肌でありもこの時の溶接部の
引張破断荷重は約400kgである。また点口の最大変
位量Hoは点イと同じく約50〆肌であるが、この時の
溶接部の引張破断荷重は大変小さく約20k9である。
このように溶接部の良否にかかわらず、換言すれば溶接
部の引張破断荷重に余り関係なく、通電期間T中の最大
変位量Hoはほぼ一定であった。したがって最大変位量
Hoを求めて溶接部の良否を判定することができない欠
点があった。また通電初期における電極3,4間の変動
率Qを求めても、同様にして溶接部の良否の判定をする
ことはできなかった。上記の様に充分な判定が出来なか
った理由は、従来の検査法が、通電初期の溶接現象や最
大変位量Hoが生じる期間までの溶接現象のみを捉えて
いるにすぎなかったためである。
That is, the first material to be welded is a rail-shaped material with a width of 5 mm at the upper and lower ends, 2 ribs in the center, and a height of IQ ■, and the second material to be welded is a plate-shaped material with a thickness of 0.8 The energization period T is 10 cycles, and the welding current is 7.A to 10K.
When welding under welding conditions A, the first and second
The relationship between the maximum displacement amount Ho of the welded materials 1 and 2 and the tensile breaking load of the welded portion of the first and second welded materials 1 and 2 is as shown in Fig. As is clear from FIG. 5, although the maximum displacement Ho at point A is approximately 50 mm, the tensile breaking load of the welded portion at this time is approximately 400 kg. Also, the maximum displacement Ho of the point opening is about 50 degrees, same as point A, but the tensile breaking load of the welded part at this time is very small, about 20 k9.
In this way, regardless of the quality of the welded portion, in other words, regardless of the tensile breaking load of the welded portion, the maximum amount of displacement Ho during the energization period T was almost constant. Therefore, there is a drawback that it is not possible to determine the quality of the welded portion by determining the maximum amount of displacement Ho. Further, even if the fluctuation rate Q between the electrodes 3 and 4 at the initial stage of energization was determined, it was not possible to similarly determine the quality of the welded portion. The reason why sufficient judgment could not be made as described above is that the conventional inspection method only captures the welding phenomenon at the initial stage of energization and the welding phenomenon up to the period when the maximum displacement amount Ho occurs.

すなわち第3図イの特性曲線Cで示すように、通電途中
で最大変位量Hoが検出され、その後収縮する過程にお
ける溶接条件(溶接電流の変化、加圧力の変化)が、溶
接結果に重要な影響を及ぼす場合が多いが、それにもか
かわらず、従来の検査方法では、最大変位量Hoが検出
されて以降の通電期間Tにおける収縮過程の溶接現象を
把握していなかったため、溶接部の良否の判定精度が著
しく低い欠点があった。この発明は新たな知見にもとず
し、て従来の欠点を除去するためになされたもので、通
電期間T中に検出される最大変位量比及び最大変位量H
oが検出されてL汎洛における通電期間T中に生じる収
縮量日2をも測定し、全通電期間T中における第1.第
2の被溶接材1,2の熱膨張現象及び収縮現象を捉える
ことにより、溶接部の良否の判定精度を著しく向上させ
た抵抗溶接部の検査方法を提供するものである。
In other words, as shown by characteristic curve C in Figure 3A, the maximum displacement amount Ho is detected during energization, and the welding conditions (changes in welding current, changes in pressurizing force) during the subsequent contraction process are important for the welding result. However, in spite of this, conventional inspection methods do not grasp the welding phenomenon of the shrinkage process during the energization period T after the maximum displacement amount Ho is detected, so it is difficult to judge whether the weld is good or bad. The drawback was that the judgment accuracy was extremely low. This invention was made based on new knowledge and in order to eliminate the drawbacks of the conventional method.
o is detected and the amount of contraction occurring during the energization period T in the L pan-raku is also measured, and the first . By capturing the thermal expansion and contraction phenomena of the second materials 1 and 2 to be welded, a method for inspecting a resistance welded part is provided, which significantly improves the accuracy of determining the quality of the welded part.

以下図面によりこの発明を説明する。第6図はこの発明
に係る検査方法によって得られた第3図イに示す最大変
位量凡と収縮量日2との和に対する引張破断荷重の関係
を示す特性図である。
The present invention will be explained below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 6 is a characteristic diagram showing the relationship between the tensile breaking load and the sum of the maximum displacement amount shown in FIG. 3A and the shrinkage amount day 2 obtained by the inspection method according to the present invention.

即ち、第1,第2の被溶接材亀,2として第亀図に示す
形状のものを用いて、詳しくは第1の被溶接材1として
上下端幅5帆、中央幅2側〜高さ1仇岬のレール形状の
ものを用い、第2の被溶接材2として板厚0.8側の板
状のものを用いて〜遺留期間Tは10サイクル、溶接電
流は7.靴A〜1皿Aの溶接条件で溶接した場合、電極
3,4間の変位パターンは第3図イの特性曲線Cのよう
になる。この特性曲線Cにおいて通電期間T中に生じる
最大変位量Ho、及び収縮量日2を測定し、この最大変
位量瓜と収縮量日2との和を求めて、この和と溶接部の
引張破断荷重との関係を求めたものである。第6図にお
いて、点ハの最大変位量日と収縮量日2との和は約27
0山川であり、この時の溶接部の引張破断荷重は約40
0k9でる。また点二の最大変位量Hoと収縮量日2と
の和は約50ム肌であり、この時の溶接部の引張破断荷
量は約20k9である。このように、全通電期間T中に
生じる最大変位量Ho及び最大変位量Hoの検出以降に
おける通電期間中に生じる収縮量日2を求め、この最大
変位量Hoと収縮量日2との和から溶接部の良否を判定
する本発明の方法は、通電期間T中の最大変位量はの検
出までの溶接現象を把握するとともに、最大変位量Ho
の検出以降における通電期間中における収縮過程の溶接
現象をも把握できるので精度よく溶接部の良否を判定す
ることができる。
That is, the first and second welded materials to be welded 2 are of the shape shown in the diagram, and in detail, the first welded material 1 has a width of 5 at the upper and lower ends and a height of 2 from the center width. 1. Using a rail-shaped material with a thickness of 0.8 as the second material to be welded 2, the retention period T is 10 cycles, and the welding current is 7. When welding is performed under the welding conditions for shoes A to 1 plate A, the displacement pattern between the electrodes 3 and 4 is as shown by the characteristic curve C in FIG. 3A. In this characteristic curve C, measure the maximum displacement Ho and the contraction amount 2 that occur during the energization period T, calculate the sum of the maximum displacement 2 and the contraction amount 2, and add this sum to the tensile fracture of the weld. The relationship with load was determined. In Figure 6, the sum of the maximum displacement day and contraction day 2 at point C is approximately 27
0 Yamakawa, and the tensile breaking load of the weld at this time is approximately 40
0k9 appears. Furthermore, the sum of the maximum displacement Ho at point 2 and the shrinkage amount 2 is about 50 mm, and the tensile breaking load of the weld at this time is about 20 k9. In this way, the maximum displacement amount Ho that occurs during the entire energization period T and the contraction amount day 2 that occurs during the energization period after the detection of the maximum displacement amount Ho are determined, and from the sum of this maximum displacement amount Ho and the contraction amount day 2. The method of the present invention for determining the quality of a welded part is to grasp the welding phenomenon up to the detection of the maximum displacement Ho during the energization period T, and to determine the maximum displacement Ho.
Since the welding phenomenon of the shrinkage process during the energization period after the detection of can also be grasped, it is possible to accurately determine the quality of the welded part.

また第6図に示した特性図は最大変位量凡と収縮量比と
の和で溶接部の良否を判定する方法を示したが、第3図
の特性曲線Cに示すように通電途中で最大変位量Hoが
検出され、その後収縮する過程における溶接現象が熔接
結果に重要な影響を及ぼく場合には、第7図に示すよう
に収縮量比のみで溶接部の良否を判定してもよい。第7
図はこの発明に係る検査方法によって得られた収縮量日
2に対する引張破断荷重の関係を示す特性図である。
In addition, the characteristic diagram shown in Figure 6 shows a method for determining the quality of the welded part based on the sum of the maximum displacement and the shrinkage ratio, but as shown in characteristic curve C in Figure 3, the maximum displacement When the displacement Ho is detected and the welding phenomenon during the subsequent shrinkage process has an important effect on the welding result, the quality of the weld may be determined only by the shrinkage amount ratio, as shown in Fig. 7. . 7th
The figure is a characteristic diagram showing the relationship between the tensile breaking load and the shrinkage amount day 2 obtained by the inspection method according to the present invention.

即ち、第4図に示す形状の第1の被溶接材1として上下
端幅5欄、中央幅2柵、高さIQ舷のレール状のものを
用いて、通電期間Tは10サイクル、熔接電流は7.靴
A〜1狐Aの溶綾条件で溶接した場合、電極3の変位パ
ターンは第3図イの特性曲線Cのようになる。第7図は
この特性曲線Cにおいて通電期間T中に生じる収縮量&
を測定し、この収縮量日2に対する溶接部の引張破断荷
重との関係を求めたものである。この特性図から明らか
なようにこの場合においても精度よく溶接部の良否を判
定することができる。また上記実施例では、抵抗溶接の
場合について説明したが、通電期間T中において、第1
,第2の被溶接材1,2の熱膨張よりも、第8図に示す
ように第1,第2の被溶接材1,2の塑性変形のみが生
じる抵抗溶接の1種であるプロジェクション溶接につい
ても、上記実施例と同様な効果が得られることは明白で
ある。第8図はプロジェクション溶接方法を示す概略図
である。
That is, the first workpiece 1 having the shape shown in FIG. 4 is a rail-like material with a width of 5 columns at the upper and lower ends, a width of 2 bars at the center, and a height of IQ, the energization period T is 10 cycles, and the welding current is is 7. When shoes A to 1 are welded under the hot twill conditions of Fox A, the displacement pattern of the electrode 3 is as shown by the characteristic curve C in FIG. 3A. Figure 7 shows the amount of contraction &
was measured, and the relationship between the amount of shrinkage (day 2) and the tensile breaking load of the welded portion was determined. As is clear from this characteristic diagram, even in this case, it is possible to accurately determine the quality of the welded portion. Further, in the above embodiment, the case of resistance welding was explained, but during the energization period T, the first
, Projection welding is a type of resistance welding in which only plastic deformation of the first and second welded materials 1 and 2 occurs, as shown in FIG. 8, rather than thermal expansion of the second welded materials 1 and 2. It is clear that the same effects as in the above embodiment can also be obtained. FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram showing a projection welding method.

すなわちプロジェクション(突起)を有する第2の被溶
接材2と平板状の第1の溶接材1と接触させ、一対の電
極3,4で圧接し通電すると、一点Pにおいて溶接され
る。以上のように、この発明によれば、通電期間中に生
じる被溶接材の最大熱風酸張量、および最大熱膨張量以
降の通電期間中に生じる被溶接材の収縮量を求め、この
最大熱血彰張量と収縮量との和、あるいは収縮量によっ
て、溶接部の良否を判定するようにしたので、最大膨張
量L父蜂の通電時間における溶接現象をも把握でき、判
定精度の高いものが得られる効果を有する。
That is, when the second material to be welded 2 having a projection (protrusion) is brought into contact with the first welding material 1 in the form of a flat plate, and the pair of electrodes 3 and 4 are pressed against each other and energized, welding occurs at one point P. As described above, according to the present invention, the maximum amount of hot air acid tension of the material to be welded that occurs during the energization period and the amount of contraction of the material to be welded that occurs during the energization period after the maximum amount of thermal expansion are determined, and Since the quality of the weld is judged based on the sum of the expansion amount and the shrinkage amount, or the shrinkage amount, it is possible to grasp the welding phenomenon during the energization time of the father bee with the maximum expansion amount L, and it is possible to determine the quality of the welded part with high accuracy. It has the effect that can be obtained.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は一般的な抵抗溶接方法を示す概略図である。 第2図及び第3図は電極の変位パターンと溶接電流との
関係を示すタイムチャートである。第4図は被溶接材を
示す斜視図である。第5図は従釆の検査方法による電極
の最大変位量に対する引張破断荷重の特性図である。第
6図はこの発明の検査方法による電極の最大変位量と収
縮量との和に対する引張破断荷重の特・性図である。第
7図はこの発明の検査方法による電極の収縮量に対する
引張破断荷重の特性図である。第8図はこの発明による
他の溶接の例を示す側面図である。図において、1,2
は被溶接材、3,4は電極である。菱l図 第2図 第3図 第4図 第5図 第6図 第7図 第8図
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a general resistance welding method. FIGS. 2 and 3 are time charts showing the relationship between the displacement pattern of the electrode and the welding current. FIG. 4 is a perspective view showing the material to be welded. FIG. 5 is a characteristic diagram of the tensile breaking load with respect to the maximum displacement of the electrode according to the secondary inspection method. FIG. 6 is a characteristic diagram of the tensile breaking load with respect to the sum of the maximum displacement amount and the shrinkage amount of the electrode according to the inspection method of the present invention. FIG. 7 is a characteristic diagram of the tensile breaking load with respect to the shrinkage amount of the electrode according to the inspection method of the present invention. FIG. 8 is a side view showing another example of welding according to the present invention. In the figure, 1, 2
is a material to be welded, and 3 and 4 are electrodes. Diamond diagram Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 第1の被溶接材と第2の被溶接材との両内面を接合
させ、前記第1、第2の被溶接材の両外面を1対の電極
で挟み、前記1対の電極を前季第1,第2の被溶接材を
挟む方向に加圧し、前記1対の電極間に通電して、前記
第1,第2の被溶接材の両内面を溶接する抵抗溶接にお
いて、前記通電期間中に生じる前記第1,第2の被溶接
材の少くとも何れか一方の最大熱膨張量と、前記第1,
第2の被溶接材の少くとも何れか一方が最大熱膨張した
後の前記通電期間中に生じる前記第1,第2の被溶接材
の少くとも何れか一方の収縮量とを求め、前記最大膨張
量と前記収縮量との和の値から、前記第1,第2の被溶
接材の溶接部の状態を検査するようにしたことを特徴と
する抵抗溶接部の検査方法。 2 第1の被溶接材と第2の被溶接材との両内面を接合
させ、前記第1,第2の被溶接材の両外面を1対の電極
で挟み、前記1対の電極を前記第1,第2の被溶接材を
挟む方向に加圧し、前記1対の電極間に通電して、前記
第1,第2の被溶接材の両内面を溶接する抵抗溶接にお
いて、前記第1,第2の被溶接材の少くとも何れか一方
が最大熱膨張した後の前記通電期間中に生じる前記第1
,第2の被溶接材の少くとも何れか一方の収縮量を求め
、前記収縮量の値から、前記第1,第2の被溶接材の溶
接部の状態を検査するようにしたことを特徴とする抵抗
溶接部の検査方法。
[Claims] 1. Both inner surfaces of a first material to be welded and a second material to be welded are joined, both outer surfaces of the first and second materials to be welded are sandwiched between a pair of electrodes, and the Pressure is applied to a pair of electrodes in a direction sandwiching the first and second materials to be welded, and electricity is applied between the pair of electrodes to weld both inner surfaces of the first and second materials to be welded. In resistance welding, the amount of maximum thermal expansion of at least one of the first and second materials to be welded that occurs during the energization period;
The amount of contraction of at least one of the first and second materials to be welded that occurs during the energization period after at least one of the second materials to be welded has reached its maximum thermal expansion, and A method for inspecting a resistance welded part, characterized in that the state of the welded part of the first and second materials to be welded is tested based on the sum of the amount of expansion and the amount of contraction. 2 Both inner surfaces of the first and second materials to be welded are joined, both outer surfaces of the first and second materials to be welded are sandwiched between a pair of electrodes, and the pair of electrodes is connected to the In resistance welding, the first and second materials to be welded are pressurized in a direction in which they are sandwiched, and current is applied between the pair of electrodes to weld both inner surfaces of the first and second materials to be welded. , the first material that occurs during the energization period after at least one of the second materials to be welded has reached its maximum thermal expansion.
, the amount of shrinkage of at least one of the second materials to be welded is determined, and the state of the welded portion of the first and second materials to be welded is inspected from the value of the amount of shrinkage. Inspection method for resistance welds.
JP11709278A 1978-09-22 1978-09-22 Inspection method for resistance welds Expired JPS6010574B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP11709278A JPS6010574B2 (en) 1978-09-22 1978-09-22 Inspection method for resistance welds

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP11709278A JPS6010574B2 (en) 1978-09-22 1978-09-22 Inspection method for resistance welds

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS5543454A JPS5543454A (en) 1980-03-27
JPS6010574B2 true JPS6010574B2 (en) 1985-03-18

Family

ID=14703188

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP11709278A Expired JPS6010574B2 (en) 1978-09-22 1978-09-22 Inspection method for resistance welds

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS6010574B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0560358U (en) * 1992-01-28 1993-08-10 株式会社フォンタァジュ Mannequin joint

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0560358U (en) * 1992-01-28 1993-08-10 株式会社フォンタァジュ Mannequin joint

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS5543454A (en) 1980-03-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6520024B2 (en) Crack-type fatigue detecting sensor, method for fabricating crack-type fatigue detecting sensor, and method for estimating damage using crack-type fatigue detecting sensor
US12179290B2 (en) System for detecting poor weld in welded portion of battery module, and method thereof
US20130247672A1 (en) Method and apparatus for non-destructive weld testing
US4887025A (en) Method and apparatus for the non-destructive checking of spot welds between metal sheets produced by electric welding
US20140263197A1 (en) Method for single-sided resistance welding
KR101390385B1 (en) Method for evaluating welding quality of nut projection welding
JPS6010574B2 (en) Inspection method for resistance welds
US6986288B2 (en) Method for evaluating a welded part
JP5135694B2 (en) Bonding quality determination method and bonding apparatus
KR101328710B1 (en) Method for monitoring of spot welding
JPH01216246A (en) Quality deciding method for resistance welded article
SU853473A1 (en) Method of welded joint technical strength determination
JPS6160755B2 (en)
JP7818882B2 (en) One-side spot welding workpiece structure evaluation method
JPH11239886A (en) Non-destructive inspection method for projection welding
JP2003123729A (en) Battery inspection method and inspection jig
JP2001321959A (en) Non-destructive inspection method for projection welding
GB2027544A (en) Testing brazed metal joints
SU1280307A1 (en) Method of manufacturing weldable resistance strain gauges
JP2025008863A (en) Testing method
JPH07323376A (en) Resistance welding method of stud and device therefor
JPH05106076A (en) Method for inspecting electrolytic cell
JPH0320965A (en) Judging method of welded part in lead-acid battery
Abe et al. Development and investigation of a strain gauge for estimation of fatigue life of multi‐spot‐welded joints‐confirmation of validity using single spot‐welded joint specimens
Van Der Sluys et al. Elastic-plastic properties of submerged arc weld metal