JPS6134499B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPS6134499B2 JPS6134499B2 JP16240881A JP16240881A JPS6134499B2 JP S6134499 B2 JPS6134499 B2 JP S6134499B2 JP 16240881 A JP16240881 A JP 16240881A JP 16240881 A JP16240881 A JP 16240881A JP S6134499 B2 JPS6134499 B2 JP S6134499B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- bearing
- alloy
- alloys
- hardness
- temperature
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Sliding-Contact Bearings (AREA)
Description
本発明は、高温状態におけるSn(スズ)粒子
の成長および硬さの低下が少なく、耐疲労性に優
れかつ耐摩耗性に優れたアルミニウム(Al)軸
受合金からなる軸受を備えた内燃機関の軸受装置
に関するものである。
従来のアルミニウム軸受合金としては、主とし
てAl―Sn系合金、たとえばAl―Sn(20%)―Cu
(銅)1%、Al―Sn(20%)―Pb(鉛)3%―
Cu(1%)―Si(ケイ素)3%等が使用されて
いるが、この合金を自動車内燃機関の軸受を使用
した場合、内燃機関の高負荷運転が継続したとき
等に短時間で疲労破壊の起ることがあつた。これ
は内燃機関内のオイルが高負荷連続運転時に特に
高温となり、たとえばオイルパン内のオイルの温
度は130℃〜150℃にも達するため、軸受はそのす
べり面においてかなり高温度になることが予想さ
れ、この結果従来のAl―Sn系合金では高温下で
硬さが急激に低下してSnの溶融や移動がおこ
り、このことが疲労強度も低下することの原因で
あると考えられる。本発明の発明者等が高温下で
硬さの高い合金やSnの動きにくい合金を内燃機
関軸受の形状に加工し、高温油下で動荷重疲労試
験を行なつた結果、疲労強度の向上が認められた
ことは上記考察を裏付けている。
また、以上の高温硬さの低下に基く疲労強度の
低下とは別に、従来のAl―Sn系合金では合金組
織におけるSn粒子の粗大化も疲労強度の低下の
原因となつている。すなわち、アルミニウム軸受
合金は、Al―Sn系合金を裏金鋼板に圧接して形
成するものであるが、両金属の接着強度を増すた
めに圧接後これを焼鈍する工程が不可欠であり、
一般的にはこの焼鈍は、Al―Feの金属間化合物
の析出する温度(約475℃)以下で、温度が高く
時間が長い程接着強度が大となる。ところが、従
来のAl―Sn系合金は焼鈍によつて高温下におか
れると、合金組織中でAl粒界およびSn粒子の移
動が起り、この結果時間の経過とともにSn粒子
の粗大化が進行してしまうという欠点があつた。
つまり従来のアルミニウム軸受合金では、裏金鋼
板との接着強度を増すために焼鈍すれば、Sn粒
子の粗大化を招き、この粗大化はAl―Sn系合金
の疲労強度を低下させる原因となつている。
本発明の発明者等は、Al―Sn系合金に種々の
添加元素を加えてその高温硬さ、疲労強度につい
ての改良を進めた結果、既にAlにSnの他所要量
のCr(クロム)またはZr(ジルコニウム)、およ
びCu等を加えた合金を開発し、特許出願(特願
昭52−2690号)している。さらにSn,Crおよび
Cu等の他、PbまたはIn(インジウム)を加え、
耐疲労性を同等に維持したまま特になじみ性を向
上させた合金を開発し、特許出願(特願昭52−
18255)している。
本発明は、さらに研究を進めた結果、Al―Sn
系合金に特にCrの含有量を増すことにより相手
材質を選ばずに耐摩耗性を著しく向上させること
ができる材料を見出してなされたものである。
本発明に係る軸受装置を構成する軸受のAl―
Sn系合金は、基本的には重量%で3.5%〜35%の
Snと1.0%を越え7.0%のCrとからAl―Sn系合金
を基本とし、これにCuおよび(または)Mg(マ
グネシウム)3.0%以下(0を含まず)、9%以下
(0を含まず)のPb,In,Bi(ビスマス)の少な
くとも1種とから構成され、かつ、Sn量は添加
元素中最大となるようにしたことを特徴とするも
ので、従来のAl―Sn系合金に比べCr,Pb,Bi,
Inを加えたことによつてSnが微細化されるとと
もになじみ性が向上し、加えて硬さが上昇し、特
に高温状態におけるSnの移動と成長がほとんど
ないことが認められた。また高温硬さの低下も少
ない。さらに動荷重疲労試験を行なつたところ、
高油温下での疲労強度の向上が確認された。ま
た、特に軸受の摺動性能に大きな影響を及ぼす相
手材質、すなわち軸材質を選ばず、例えば球状黒
鉛鋳鉄等どんな材料であつても充分な耐摩耗性を
持つことも確認された。
Snの含有量を重量%で3.5〜35%に限定した理
由は、Snは潤滑を主目的として添加される元素
であるが、これを35%以上添加するとなじみ性、
潤滑性は向上するが硬さが低下し、これが3.5%
以下では逆に軸受合金としてはなじみ性等に劣る
からである。なお、このSnの添加量はSnを孤立
分散させるために、従来のAl―Sn系合金では15
%程度が上限とされており、その理由はこれを15
%以上添加すると合金中のSn粒子がAl中に孤立
して分散できなくなり連続状態で存在し始めるた
め、硬さが低下するからとされていたが、本発明
では後述する他の元素の添加効果によつてこれら
を35%迄添加した場合でもSn粒子が孤立分散し
実用上支障がなくなつた。また、Snの添加量を
3.5〜35%の範囲でどのように定めるかは、用途
にに応じ適宜決定されるべきものであるが、一般
的には軸受に加わる荷重(負荷)の大なるときは
Sn量を少なく、荷重の小なるときSn量が多くす
ると良い。また別の観点からは、焼付きが懸念さ
れる状態で使用されるときはSn量を多く、この
心配のないときはSn量を少なくするのが良い。
しかし最近は高油温により軸受が高温になり、こ
れが原因で軸受が変形し焼付、疲労を起すことが
問題であるので、高温での変形が少ないという点
からSn量を定める必要もある。
Crは硬さの上昇と高温時の軟化を防ぐ点、お
よび焼鈍によつてもSn粒子の粗大化を招かない
という点、また相手材質を選ばずに充分な耐摩耗
性を持つという点について特に添加効果が高い。
まず硬さの上昇と高温時の軟化防止について述べ
ると、このCrの添加量が重量で1.0%以下では高
温硬さの改良は期待できるが耐摩耗性の向上が望
めない。7.0%以上添加するとCr、Al等のAl―Cr
金属間化合物が析出し過ぎ、軸受合金としては硬
くなり過ぎ、耐摩耗性は向上してもなじみ性が極
端に低下し過ぎることからその添加量を1.0を越
え7.0%に限定したものである。この高温硬さの
向上についてさらに詳述すると、CrはAl中に固
溶することによつてAlの再結晶温度を上げ、か
つ固溶すること自体でAl地の硬さを上昇させる
が、これと同時に数回の圧延によつても鋳造時に
比して硬さが上昇する。再結晶温度を上げること
は内燃機関の軸受がさらされる高温領域でも安定
した機械的性質を維持させるために効果があり、
特に硬さについては、高温下での硬さの低下を少
なくして高温領域での軸受の軟化を防ぐことがで
き、ひいては疲労強度の向上をもたらす。また固
溶限を過ぎて析出するAl―Crの金属間化合物
は、ヴイツカース硬さで約370を示しこのためこ
の化合物が分散析出することは高温硬さの維持を
助け、これが適量分散することは良い効果を生ず
る。
次にCr添加によるSn粒子の粗大化阻止効果に
ついて述べる。Sn粒子の粗大化はAl―Sn系合金
が高温下におかれた場合Al粒界およびSn粒子の
移動が起るために生ずる現象であるが、Crは上
記のようにAl―Crの金属間化合物の析出物を作
り、この析出物がAl地金中に細かく分散して存
在するため、この金属間化合物が直接的にはAl
粒界の移動を妨げ、同時にAl結晶粒の成長を妨
げてSn粒子の移動、つまりSn粒子の粗大化を防
ぐからであると考えられる。このことは、圧延、
焼鈍等により微細化されたSn粒子を、そのまま
保つことにつながり、前記種々の効果を持つので
ある。そしてこのような現象は比較的Sn量の多
い場合(約10%以上)において、またより顕著な
効果はSnが連続して存在しはじめる約15%前後
以上において効果がある。しかし、Sn量が10%
以下であつてもその使用条件、用途によつては上
記Crの添加による効果が充分必要とされること
はもちろんである。また、Sn粒子が微細のまま
保持されてAl地金中に存在するということは、
同時に232℃という低い融点をもつSn粒子の高温
下での溶出現象を防止するためにも効果的である
と考えられ、この観点からしても硬さの低下防止
の効果が背首される。
なお、以上は焼鈍に関してSn粒子の粗大化阻
止効果を述べたものであるが、以上の効果は本装
置の使用環境が焼鈍に匹敵する高温下である場合
にもそのまま妥当し、したがつて軟化の防止を通
じ、疲労強度の向上を図ることができる。
次に、Cr添加による耐摩耗性向上効果につい
て述べる。CrはAl地金中において上記のように
Al―Crの金属間化合物の析出物を作るが、この
化合物は、ヴイツカース硬さで約370を示し、非
常に硬い析出物であるので軸との摩擦による軸受
の摩耗をこの析出物により著しく減少させること
ができ、これが適量分散することは良い効果を生
ずる。ここに適量の範囲は、前述のようにCrが
7.0%以下を意味し、この範囲であれば上記析出
物は均一に分散し、なじみ性等他に亜影響を与え
ることなく耐摩耗性を向上させる効果が得られ
る。加えてAl―Cr析出物は次のような効果を持
つ。すなわち軸受にとつて相手材質は軸受性能を
大きく左右し、たとえば従来のAl―Sn系軸受と
球状黒鉛鋳鉄軸と組合せて使用すると焼付性、耐
摩耗性等についての軸受性能を著しく阻害する。
そしてまた昨今、鋼軸に替わり加工上安価な球状
黒鉛鋳鉄軸が多く使われるようになつてきた。と
ころが球状黒鉛鋳鉄は軟質な黒鉛が鉄地の中に点
在していて、このためこの軸を研削するとその黒
鉛の周囲に鋭い刃物を持つた研摩バリが発生す
る。このような研摩バリの発生した軸を相手に油
膜厚さと軸および軸受表面粗さとが同じになる程
度の高荷重下で軸受を摺動させると、このパリに
より軸より軟かい軸受面は切削されることにな
り、この状況が進行すると軸受表面精度が粗くな
つたり軸と軸受とのクリアランスが増大したり
し、しいては油膜圧力が構成されなくなつたり、
油膜破断により油膜が構成されなくなつたりし
て、その結果軸と軸受との直接接触つまり金属接
触がより多く起り焼付に至る。ところが本発明に
係る軸受装置を構成する軸受合金は球状黒鉛鋳鉄
軸のバリよりも硬いAl―Crの析出物をAl地中に
分散存在させ、このAl―Cr析出物により球状黒
鉛鋳鉄軸の研摩バリを取り去る効果およびAl―
Crの析出物が移着、疑着現象を起しにくくする
効果をも持たせてあり、これにより軸受表面の摩
耗の進行は比較的短時間で抑えられ安定した油膜
が構成されるようになり、この結果球状黒鉛鋳鉄
軸に対して特に耐摩耗性、耐焼付性を向上させ
る。
次に本発明は、上記組成に加えてCuまたは
(および)Mgを重量%で3%以下加えたものであ
る。このうちCuを用いる場合にはその添加量を
3%以下とする。3%以上添加すると硬さは向上
するがCuの増加と共に圧延性、耐蝕性が低下し
好ましくないからである。ここでより好ましい添
加割合は2.0以下である。またMgについては、こ
れを3%以上添加すると、硬さは向上するが圧延
による硬さ上昇が大きくなり過ぎて充分な圧延が
できなくなり、このため微細なSn組織を得るこ
とが困難になる。また焼鈍時にAlに固溶してい
たMgが析出しやすく余分に添加された量は析出
してしまうため、固溶によるAl地の強化は期待
できない。ここでより好ましい添加割合は2.0以
下である。このCuとMgの上記効果はCrと同時に
添加して生ずるもので、CuまたはMg単独では高
温下での硬さの上昇の効果が期待できない。すな
わちCuまたはMgはAl中に添加した場合に圧延時
の硬さの上昇が大きく同一圧延率でも他の元素を
添加したAl材料に比し、硬さの上昇は顕著であ
るが、200℃近く迄加熱すると容易に軟化し、高
温硬さの維持は期待できない。これに対してCr
とCuまたはMgを同時に添加すると、Cuまたは
Mgの効果によつて圧延時に高くなつた硬さが、
焼鈍をしてもCrの添加効果、すなわち再結晶温
度の上昇によりあまり低下しない。この硬さは高
温時においても保たれ、従来合金に比べて高温強
度のある合金となり、ひいては疲労強度の向上に
もつながる。なおCuとMgを同時に添加する場合
は、その合計量を3%以内とし、その内Cuは2
%以内とすることが好ましい。次にPb,Bi,In
のうち少なくとも1種添加することはSnの潤滑
金属としての性質を改良するためであり、Crと
一緒に添加したときに効果が認められる。従来
Al―Sn系合金の中にこれらの元素を添加するこ
とは考えられ、また一部行なわれているが、これ
らの添加元素を単独で加えるとAl―Sn系合金の
中へ合金化されてしまうためSnの融点が低くな
つてしまうという欠点が避けられない。このため
従来のAl―Sn系合金は低温でSnの溶融と移動が
起こり易くなる結果、粗大なSn粒に成長しやす
く、これを軸受として使用すると、高負荷運転が
連続したとき部分的に溶融し、ハクリすることも
ありうる。これに対し、本発明のようにCrを加
えることによつてSn粒を微細化し、かつその組
織を高温でも維持できるようにしておくと、
Pb,Bi,Inのうち少なくとも1種を加えても上
記のような弊害は生せずにSnの潤滑性を改善す
ることができ、高い疲労強度の必要とされる軸受
にも使用可能となり、さらに耐疲労性に加えてな
じみ性の向上も図ることができる。またさらに析
出したAl―Cr金属間化合物の軸受表面に露出し
た表層に、Pb,Bi,Inの添加によつて潤滑性能
が改善されたSn系低融点金属が薄く被膜を形成
することにより、摩擦特性が改善される。
このような効果を得ることのできるPb,Bi,
Inのうち少なくとも1種の添加量は9%以下(0
を含まず)であり、好ましくは含有Sn量に対し
約15%以下程度がよい。なおPbとBiとInを合わ
せて9%以下としてもよい。さらにSnとPb,
Bi,Inのうち少なくとも1種との合計添加量は35
%以内がよい。なおAl中に潤滑金属を微細に存
在させるためにSn量は添加元素の中では最も多
くなければならない。
上記組織のAl軸受合金を内燃機関の軸受装置
を構成する軸受として使用する場合裏金鋼板に圧
接して用いるのが普通であり、この圧接後には接
着強度を増すために焼鈍を行なつている。ところ
が前述のように従来のAl―Sn系合金では圧延後
の数回に渡る焼鈍によつて合金組織中のAl粒界
およびSn粒子の移動が生じ、Sn粒子が粗大化す
るため、硬さの低下、Sn粒子の溶出等の欠点が
生じていた。これに対し本発明では、圧延、焼鈍
の工程から生じるAl―Cr金属間化合物の析出物
がAl粒界の移動を妨げるとともにAl結晶粒の成
長を阻止するので、焼鈍による上記悪影響の生ず
ることがなく、このため焼鈍温度を上げてAl―
Sn系合金と裏金鋼板との接着強度を増すことが
できる。なおこのことは、本合金が焼鈍に匹敵す
る高温下に置かれる場合にも、そのまま妥当する
から、軟化の防止を通じ疲労強度の向上に寄与で
きることも同時に意味している。
次に実施例によつて本発明を説明する。次表は
本発明に係る内燃機関の軸受装置を構成する軸受
の軸材として合金1〜17、比較材として合金1
8〜21の化学成分値を示すものである。
The present invention provides a bearing for an internal combustion engine equipped with a bearing made of an aluminum (Al) bearing alloy that exhibits less growth of Sn (tin) particles and less decrease in hardness in high-temperature conditions, has excellent fatigue resistance, and has excellent wear resistance. It is related to the device. Conventional aluminum bearing alloys are mainly Al-Sn alloys, such as Al-Sn (20%)-Cu.
(Copper) 1%, Al-Sn (20%) - Pb (Lead) 3% -
Cu (1%) - Si (silicon) 3%, etc. are used, but when this alloy is used in bearings for automobile internal combustion engines, fatigue failure occurs in a short period of time when the internal combustion engine continues to operate under high load. Sometimes something happened. This is because the oil in an internal combustion engine becomes particularly hot during continuous high-load operation, for example, the temperature of the oil in the oil pan reaches 130℃ to 150℃, so it is expected that the bearing will reach a considerably high temperature on its sliding surface. As a result, in conventional Al-Sn alloys, the hardness rapidly decreases at high temperatures, causing melting and movement of Sn, which is thought to be the cause of the decrease in fatigue strength. The inventors of the present invention fabricated an alloy with high hardness or an alloy in which Sn does not easily move under high temperatures into the shape of an internal combustion engine bearing, and conducted a dynamic load fatigue test under high temperature oil. As a result, the fatigue strength was improved. This recognition supports the above consideration. Furthermore, in addition to the above-mentioned decrease in fatigue strength due to the decrease in high-temperature hardness, in conventional Al-Sn alloys, coarsening of Sn particles in the alloy structure is also a cause of decrease in fatigue strength. In other words, aluminum bearing alloys are formed by press-welding an Al-Sn alloy to a backing steel plate, but in order to increase the adhesive strength of both metals, it is essential to anneal the alloy after press-welding.
Generally, this annealing is performed at a temperature below the temperature at which Al--Fe intermetallic compounds precipitate (approximately 475°C), and the higher the temperature and the longer the time, the greater the adhesive strength. However, when conventional Al-Sn alloys are subjected to high temperatures during annealing, Al grain boundaries and Sn particles move within the alloy structure, and as a result, the Sn particles become coarser over time. There was a drawback that it was difficult to use.
In other words, when conventional aluminum bearing alloys are annealed to increase the adhesive strength with the backing steel plate, the Sn particles become coarser, and this coarsening is the cause of lowering the fatigue strength of Al-Sn alloys. . The inventors of the present invention have added various additive elements to Al-Sn alloys to improve their high-temperature hardness and fatigue strength. We have developed an alloy containing Zr (zirconium), Cu, etc., and have filed a patent application (Japanese Patent Application No. 52-2690). Furthermore, Sn, Cr and
In addition to Cu, Pb or In (indium) is added,
We developed an alloy with particularly improved conformability while maintaining the same fatigue resistance, and applied for a patent (patent application 1972-
18255). As a result of further research, the present invention has revealed that Al-Sn
This was achieved by discovering a material whose wear resistance can be significantly improved regardless of the mating material by increasing the Cr content in the alloy. Al of the bearing constituting the bearing device according to the present invention
Sn-based alloys basically have a content of 3.5% to 35% by weight.
Based on Al-Sn alloy made of Sn and more than 1.0% and 7.0% Cr, Cu and/or Mg (magnesium) up to 3.0% (not including 0) and up to 9% (not including 0). ) and at least one of Pb, In, and Bi (bismuth), and the amount of Sn is the largest among the added elements, and compared to conventional Al-Sn alloys. Cr, Pb, Bi,
By adding In, Sn became finer and its conformability improved, and in addition, the hardness increased, and it was observed that there was almost no movement or growth of Sn, especially at high temperatures. Also, there is little decrease in high temperature hardness. Furthermore, when we conducted a dynamic load fatigue test,
Improvement in fatigue strength under high oil temperature was confirmed. It has also been confirmed that the bearing material has sufficient wear resistance regardless of the material of the bearing, that is, the material of the shaft, which has a particularly large effect on the sliding performance of the bearing, such as spheroidal graphite cast iron. The reason for limiting the Sn content to 3.5 to 35% by weight is that Sn is an element added primarily for the purpose of lubrication, but adding more than 35% of Sn increases compatibility.
Lubricity improves but hardness decreases, which is 3.5%
This is because, on the contrary, the conformability and the like as a bearing alloy are inferior. The amount of Sn added is 15% in conventional Al-Sn alloys in order to isolate and disperse Sn.
The upper limit is set at around 15%.
It was believed that if more than % is added, the Sn particles in the alloy become isolated in Al and cannot be dispersed and begin to exist in a continuous state, resulting in a decrease in hardness. However, in the present invention, the effect of adding other elements as described later Even when these were added up to 35%, the Sn particles were isolated and dispersed, and there was no practical problem. In addition, the amount of Sn added
How to set it within the range of 3.5 to 35% should be determined appropriately depending on the application, but in general, when the load applied to the bearing is large,
It is better to reduce the amount of Sn, and increase the amount of Sn when the load is small. From another point of view, it is better to increase the amount of Sn when used in a state where there is a concern about seizure, and to decrease the amount of Sn when there is no concern.
However, recently, bearings have become hot due to high oil temperatures, and this has caused problems such as deformation, seizure, and fatigue of bearings, so it is also necessary to determine the amount of Sn from the point of view of minimizing deformation at high temperatures. Cr is particularly effective in that it prevents increases in hardness and softening at high temperatures, does not cause coarsening of Sn particles even during annealing, and has sufficient wear resistance regardless of the material used. Additive effect is high.
First, speaking of increasing hardness and preventing softening at high temperatures, if the amount of Cr added is less than 1.0% by weight, improvement in high temperature hardness can be expected, but no improvement in wear resistance can be expected. When 7.0% or more is added, Al-Cr such as Cr and Al
Too much intermetallic compound precipitates, making it too hard as a bearing alloy, and even if the wear resistance is improved, the conformability is too low, so the amount added is limited to more than 1.0% and 7.0%. To explain this improvement in high-temperature hardness in more detail, Cr increases the recrystallization temperature of Al by forming a solid solution in Al, and the solid solution itself increases the hardness of the Al base. At the same time, rolling several times also increases the hardness compared to when casting. Increasing the recrystallization temperature is effective in maintaining stable mechanical properties even in the high temperature range to which internal combustion engine bearings are exposed.
In particular, with regard to hardness, it is possible to reduce the decrease in hardness at high temperatures, thereby preventing the bearing from softening in the high temperature range, which in turn leads to an improvement in fatigue strength. In addition, the Al-Cr intermetallic compound that precipitates past the solid solubility limit has a Witzkars hardness of approximately 370. Therefore, the dispersed precipitation of this compound helps maintain high-temperature hardness, and dispersion of this compound in an appropriate amount is essential. produces good effects. Next, we will discuss the effect of Cr addition on inhibiting the coarsening of Sn particles. The coarsening of Sn particles is a phenomenon that occurs due to the movement of Al grain boundaries and Sn particles when Al-Sn alloys are exposed to high temperatures. Precipitates of compounds are formed, and these precipitates are finely dispersed in the Al base metal, so these intermetallic compounds are not directly linked to Al.
This is thought to be because it prevents the movement of grain boundaries and at the same time prevents the growth of Al crystal grains, thereby preventing the movement of Sn particles, that is, the coarsening of Sn particles. This means that rolling,
This leads to keeping the Sn particles that have been made fine by annealing, etc., and has the various effects mentioned above. This phenomenon occurs when the amount of Sn is relatively large (approximately 10% or more), and a more significant effect occurs when Sn begins to exist continuously at approximately 15% or more. However, the amount of Sn is 10%
It goes without saying that even if it is below, the above-mentioned effect of adding Cr may be required depending on the usage conditions and applications. In addition, the fact that Sn particles remain fine and exist in the Al base metal means that
At the same time, it is thought to be effective in preventing the elution phenomenon of Sn particles, which have a low melting point of 232°C, at high temperatures, and from this point of view, the effect of preventing a decrease in hardness is significant. The above is a description of the effect of inhibiting the coarsening of Sn particles in relation to annealing, but the above effect is also valid even when the usage environment of this device is at a high temperature comparable to that of annealing. By preventing this, fatigue strength can be improved. Next, the effect of improving wear resistance by adding Cr will be described. As mentioned above, Cr is present in Al ingots.
This precipitate is an intermetallic compound of Al-Cr, which has a Witzkars hardness of about 370, and is a very hard precipitate, so this precipitate significantly reduces the wear of the bearing due to friction with the shaft. Dispersion of this in an appropriate amount produces good effects. Here, the appropriate amount range is Cr as mentioned above.
This means 7.0% or less, and within this range, the above-mentioned precipitates are uniformly dispersed, and the effect of improving wear resistance can be obtained without affecting other properties such as conformability. In addition, Al-Cr precipitates have the following effects. In other words, the mating material of a bearing greatly influences the bearing performance. For example, if a conventional Al-Sn bearing is used in combination with a spheroidal graphite cast iron shaft, the bearing performance in terms of seizure resistance, wear resistance, etc. will be significantly impaired.
Recently, spheroidal graphite cast iron shafts, which are cheaper to process, have been increasingly used in place of steel shafts. However, in spheroidal graphite cast iron, soft graphite is scattered within the iron base, and for this reason, when this shaft is ground, grinding burrs with sharp edges are generated around the graphite. When a bearing is slid against a shaft with such abrasive burrs under such a high load that the oil film thickness is the same as the surface roughness of the shaft and bearing, the burrs will cut the bearing surface that is softer than the shaft. As this situation progresses, the bearing surface accuracy becomes rougher, the clearance between the shaft and the bearing increases, and oil film pressure is no longer formed.
When the oil film breaks, the oil film is no longer formed, and as a result, more direct contact, that is, metal contact, occurs between the shaft and the bearing, leading to seizure. However, the bearing alloy constituting the bearing device according to the present invention has Al-Cr precipitates that are harder than the burrs of the spheroidal graphite cast iron shaft dispersed in the Al ground, and these Al-Cr precipitates cause the grinding of the spheroidal graphite cast iron shaft. Effect of removing burr and Al-
It also has the effect of making it difficult for Cr precipitates to migrate and stick together, thereby suppressing the progress of wear on the bearing surface in a relatively short period of time and creating a stable oil film. As a result, wear resistance and seizure resistance are particularly improved for spheroidal graphite cast iron shafts. Next, in the present invention, Cu or (and) Mg is added in an amount of 3% or less by weight in addition to the above composition. Among these, when Cu is used, the amount added is 3% or less. This is because adding 3% or more of Cu improves hardness, but as Cu increases, rollability and corrosion resistance decrease, which is not preferable. Here, a more preferable addition ratio is 2.0 or less. As for Mg, if it is added in an amount of 3% or more, the hardness will improve, but the increase in hardness due to rolling will be too large and sufficient rolling will not be possible, making it difficult to obtain a fine Sn structure. Furthermore, Mg that was dissolved in Al during annealing is likely to precipitate, and the excess amount added will precipitate, so it cannot be expected that the solid solution will strengthen the Al base. Here, a more preferable addition ratio is 2.0 or less. The above-mentioned effects of Cu and Mg occur when Cr is added at the same time, and Cu or Mg alone cannot be expected to have the effect of increasing hardness at high temperatures. In other words, when Cu or Mg is added to Al, the hardness increases significantly during rolling. Even at the same rolling rate, the increase in hardness is remarkable compared to Al materials with other elements added, but at temperatures near 200℃ When heated to a high temperature, it easily softens and cannot be expected to maintain its hardness at high temperatures. On the other hand, Cr
When Cu or Mg is added at the same time, Cu or
The hardness increased during rolling due to the effect of Mg,
Even after annealing, the effect of adding Cr, that is, the increase in the recrystallization temperature, does not cause much decrease. This hardness is maintained even at high temperatures, resulting in an alloy with higher high-temperature strength than conventional alloys, which in turn leads to improved fatigue strength. If Cu and Mg are added at the same time, the total amount should be within 3%, of which Cu is 2%.
It is preferable to set it within %. Next, Pb, Bi, In
The purpose of adding at least one of these is to improve the properties of Sn as a lubricating metal, and the effect is observed when it is added together with Cr. Conventional
It is possible to add these elements to Al-Sn alloys, and some have done so, but if these elements are added alone, they will be alloyed into Al-Sn alloys. Therefore, the disadvantage that the melting point of Sn becomes low cannot be avoided. For this reason, in conventional Al-Sn alloys, Sn easily melts and moves at low temperatures, and as a result, it tends to grow into coarse Sn grains, and when used as a bearing, it partially melts during continuous high-load operation. However, it may peel off. On the other hand, if the Sn grains are made finer by adding Cr as in the present invention, and the structure is maintained even at high temperatures,
Adding at least one of Pb, Bi, and In can improve the lubricity of Sn without causing the above-mentioned adverse effects, and it can also be used in bearings that require high fatigue strength. Furthermore, in addition to fatigue resistance, conformability can also be improved. In addition, a thin film of Sn-based low melting point metal, whose lubricating performance has been improved by adding Pb, Bi, and In, is formed on the surface layer of the precipitated Al-Cr intermetallic compound exposed on the bearing surface, which reduces friction. Characteristics are improved. Pb, Bi, and
The amount of at least one type of In added is 9% or less (0
), and preferably about 15% or less based on the amount of Sn contained. Note that the total amount of Pb, Bi, and In may be 9% or less. Furthermore, Sn and Pb,
The total amount of addition of at least one of Bi and In is 35
It is better to be within %. Note that the amount of Sn must be the largest among the additive elements in order to allow the lubricating metal to exist finely in Al. When an Al bearing alloy with the above structure is used as a bearing constituting a bearing device for an internal combustion engine, it is normally used by being pressure-bonded to a backing steel plate, and after this pressure-bonding, it is annealed to increase the adhesive strength. However, as mentioned above, in conventional Al-Sn alloys, the Al grain boundaries and Sn particles in the alloy structure move due to several rounds of annealing after rolling, causing the Sn particles to become coarser, resulting in a decrease in hardness. There were drawbacks such as a decrease in the amount of water and elution of Sn particles. In contrast, in the present invention, the precipitates of Al-Cr intermetallic compounds generated from the rolling and annealing processes impede the movement of Al grain boundaries and inhibit the growth of Al crystal grains, so the above-mentioned adverse effects due to annealing are avoided. Therefore, the annealing temperature was increased to
The adhesive strength between the Sn-based alloy and the backing steel plate can be increased. This also means that this alloy remains valid even when it is placed under high temperatures comparable to annealing, so it can contribute to improving fatigue strength by preventing softening. Next, the present invention will be explained with reference to Examples. The following table shows alloys 1 to 17 as shaft materials of the bearing constituting the bearing device for an internal combustion engine according to the present invention, and alloy 1 as a comparative material.
It shows chemical component values from 8 to 21.
【表】【table】
【表】
合金1から17迄は、ガス炉においてAl地金
を溶解し、次にAl―Cr母合金やAl―Cu母合金Al
―Mg母合金を目的成分に応じて溶解し最後にSn
およびPb等を添加したのち脱ガス処理をし、湯
温720℃で金型に鋳造を行なつたものでその後圧
延と焼鈍(350℃)を繰り返して試料を作り、高
温硬さ測定を行なつた。次にこの試料をさらに圧
延し、その後これらの合金と裏金鋼板とを圧接し
てバイメタル材とし、これを焼鈍(380℃)した
後平面軸受に加工して動荷重疲労試験を行なつ
た。また合金18〜21は、比較の便宜のために
従来の組成の合金を上記合金と同一の製造法で作
製して試料とし、同一の試験を行なつた。
前頁に記載した表は、上記合金1ないし21の
高温下での硬さをヴイツカース硬度で測定した結
果を示すものである。これらの結果から明らかな
ように、本発明に係る軸受装置の軸受合金1〜1
7は従来の合金18〜20に比してほぼ全ての温
度領域において硬度が高く、また従来の合金21
との比較では、合金21の方が低温度領域におい
て硬度の高い場合も存在するが合金21は温度の
上昇と共に急激にその硬度が低下するのに対し、
本発明装置の合金1ないし17は温度上昇に伴う
硬度低下の程度がゆるやかであり、したがつて温
度の変化に伴う軸受状態の変化を少なくできると
いう効果がある。このことは、比較合金21が温
度上昇につれてヴイツカース硬さを著しく低下さ
せるに対して本発明に係る合金1〜17は温度上
昇に対して比較的安定しており、200℃の高温下
にあつても高い硬度を維持していることが第18頁
に記載した表からも明らかである。また合金組織
の上からは、本発明に係る軸受装置の合金1ない
し17は、裏金鋼板との接合後の焼鈍を経ても、
Sn粒子の粗大化は認められなかつた。
第1図は、本発明装置の合金9,16と従来の
合金18,19についての動力荷重軸受疲労試験
を行なつた結果を示す。この試験は、軸回転数
3000r.p.m.、軸材として球状黒鉛鋳鉄焼入れ材を
使用し、一定油温の強制潤滑下において、鉄鋼材
料の疲労状況を知る107回応力繰り返し条件で油
温を異ならせて耐疲労面圧を測定したものであ
る。このグラフから明らかなように合金9,1
6,18,19とも温度が高い程耐疲労面圧が低
下するが、本発明に係る軸受装置の合金9,16
は耐疲労面圧の低下の程度が従来の合金18,1
9程大きくなく、かつ合金9,16と合金18,
19は低温側の耐疲労面圧での差はそれ程大きく
ないが、高温側の耐疲労面圧は合金9,16が合
金18,19を凌駕していることが明瞭に認めら
れる。なお、第1図は本発明に係る軸受装置に用
いられる合金を代表させて合金9,16従来の合
金を代表させて18,19を挙げたものである
が、他の合金も同様の傾向を示す結果が得られて
いる。また第4図は本発明に係る軸受装置を構成
する軸受材料としての合金14,15と従来の合
金18,19について焼付試験を行なつたときの
焼付荷重を示すものである。[Table] For Alloys 1 to 17, Al base metal is melted in a gas furnace, and then Al-Cr mother alloy or Al-Cu mother alloy Al
- Mg master alloy is melted according to the target components, and finally Sn
After adding Pb, etc., degassing treatment was performed, and casting was performed in a mold at a hot water temperature of 720℃.Then, the sample was made by repeating rolling and annealing (350℃), and high-temperature hardness measurement was performed. Ta. Next, this sample was further rolled, and then these alloys and a backing steel plate were pressure-welded to form a bimetallic material, which was annealed (380°C) and then processed into a flat bearing and subjected to a dynamic load fatigue test. For convenience of comparison, Alloys 18 to 21 were prepared using conventional compositions using the same manufacturing method as the above-mentioned alloys, and were subjected to the same tests. The table shown on the previous page shows the results of measuring the hardness of Alloys 1 to 21 at high temperatures using Witzkers hardness. As is clear from these results, bearing alloys 1 to 1 of the bearing device according to the present invention
7 has higher hardness in almost all temperature ranges than conventional alloys 18 to 20, and has higher hardness than conventional alloys 21 to 20.
In comparison with Alloy 21, there are cases where the hardness is higher in the low temperature range, but the hardness of Alloy 21 decreases rapidly as the temperature rises.
Alloys 1 to 17 of the device of the present invention have a gradual decrease in hardness as the temperature rises, and therefore have the effect of reducing changes in the bearing condition due to changes in temperature. This means that while Comparative Alloy 21 significantly decreases its Witzkars hardness as the temperature rises, Alloys 1 to 17 according to the present invention are relatively stable against temperature rises, and are stable at high temperatures of 200°C. It is also clear from the table listed on page 18 that the hardness of these materials is maintained high. In addition, from the alloy structure, Alloys 1 to 17 of the bearing device according to the present invention have
No coarsening of Sn particles was observed. FIG. 1 shows the results of a power load bearing fatigue test on alloys 9 and 16 of the device of the present invention and conventional alloys 18 and 19. This test is based on the shaft rotation speed
3000r.pm, using hardened spheroidal graphite cast iron as the shaft material, and under forced lubrication at a constant oil temperature, to understand the fatigue status of steel materials.10 7 stress repetition conditions with different oil temperatures to improve fatigue resistance surface pressure. This is what was measured. As is clear from this graph, alloy 9,1
Alloys 9, 18 and 19 of the bearing device according to the present invention have lower fatigue resistance surface pressure as the temperature increases.
The degree of decrease in fatigue resistance surface pressure is lower than that of conventional alloy 18,1.
Not as large as 9, and alloy 9, 16 and alloy 18,
Although the difference in fatigue resistance surface pressure on the low temperature side of No. 19 is not so large, it is clearly recognized that Alloys 9 and 16 exceed Alloys 18 and 19 in the fatigue resistance surface pressure on the high temperature side. Note that although FIG. 1 shows alloys 9 and 19 as representative alloys used in the bearing device according to the present invention, and alloys 18 and 19 as representative conventional alloys, other alloys also show similar trends. The results shown are obtained. Further, FIG. 4 shows the seizure load when a seizure test was conducted on Alloys 14 and 15 as bearing materials constituting the bearing device according to the present invention and conventional Alloys 18 and 19.
【表】
この実験は、軸回転数1000r.p.m.、軸材として
S55C焼入れ材を使用し、一定油温(140℃)の強
制潤滑下において、焼付に至る迄の荷重(静荷
重)を測定したものであつて、本発明に係る軸受
合金14,15は従来の合金18,19に比べて
優れた耐焼付荷重を示しており、このことはなじ
み性を向上させる添加剤であるPbによる効果で
あることが認められる。
さらに第2図は、本発明に係る軸受装置の軸受
合金9と従来の合金18について、荷重を増加さ
せた場合の摩擦トルクの変化の状態を測定した結
果を示すグラフである。この実験は、上記焼付試
験の際、荷重を増加させる途中の状況をオシログ
ラフで測定している。このグラフによれば、従来
の合金18では荷重を増加させる度に摩擦トルク
はピークの発生を伴つて大きく変動しつつ増加し
ている。これに対し本発明装置の合金9では、荷
重の増加に対して極めて滑らかに追従して摩擦ト
ルクを増加しており、有害な摩擦トルク変動は生
じていない。これは本発明装置の合金がなじみ性
に優れ、かつ焼付の生じにくいことを示してい
る。すなわち従来の合金18にみられる変動の大
きなピーク波形は、摺動面の油膜が部分的に破壊
され、固体接触が生じこれが繰り返されると全体
破壊(焼付)を生じることを意味しており、この
ような波形を生じない本発明装置の合金9はなじ
み性および耐焼付荷重が高い。
なお、本発明に係る軸受装置の合金組成におい
て、Al中には通常の精練技術ではどうしても避
けられない不純物が含まれることは勿論である。
次に第3図は、耐摩耗性についての実験結果を
示したもので、本発明に係る軸受装置の合金1
4,15は、従来の合金である18と摩耗量にお
いて大きな差が認められる。
しかし、第3図の結果では、本発明装置を構成
する軸受材料の合金14,15と従来合金19と
では耐焼付荷重においてほぼ同様の効果を示して
いるものの、耐疲労面圧特性において従来合金1
9は本発明合金9,16よりも劣る欠点を有して
いることが第1図からも明らかである。したがつ
て合金14,15は従来合金の耐疲労面圧特性の
欠点を補完する効果を有していると言える。
次に第4図は本発明に係る軸受装置の合金1
4,15と従来の合金18,19について焼付試
験を相手材質として球状黒鉛鋳鉄軸を使用して行
なつたときの、焼付に至つたときの面圧を示すグ
ラフである。このグラフによれば従来の合金18
と比較し、Crを添加した合金14,15は焼付
面圧が高いことが認められる。またCrを添加し
た合金でもCr含有料の差によつて焼付荷重に差
が認められる。すなわちCr添加量の多い合金1
5の方が14より耐焼付性に優れている。また従
来の合金19は、その化学成分中のSiによると思
われる耐焼付性の向上が認められる。ただし前述
した如く、これら従来材は本発明装置の合金の特
徴の一つである高温硬さの低下防止、耐疲労性の
向上等は認められない。
以上の通り本発明に係る内燃機関の軸受装置
は、軸受材質としてアルミニウム―スズ系軸受合
金にCrを添加したことによる硬さの向上、高温
硬さの低下防止、Sn粒子の粗大化阻止効果、こ
れらを通じての耐疲労性の向上、および耐摩耗性
の向上に加え、相手軸として球状黒鉛鋳鉄軸を使
用する場合においての耐摩耗性、耐焼付性の向
上、またCrとともに添加して効果のあるPb,
Bi,Inによりなじみ性の向上、耐焼付の向上を図
ることができ、さらにCu,Mgを加えることによ
つて高温強度がより向上する。[Table] In this experiment, the shaft rotation speed was 1000 r.pm, and the shaft material was
The load (static load) up to seizure was measured using S55C hardened material under forced lubrication at a constant oil temperature (140°C). It shows superior seizure load resistance compared to Alloys 18 and 19, and it is recognized that this is due to the effect of Pb, an additive that improves conformability. Further, FIG. 2 is a graph showing the results of measuring changes in friction torque when the load is increased for bearing alloy 9 of the bearing device according to the present invention and conventional alloy 18. In this experiment, the situation during the load increase during the seizure test was measured using an oscillograph. According to this graph, in the conventional alloy 18, the friction torque increases while greatly fluctuating with a peak occurring each time the load is increased. On the other hand, in Alloy 9 of the device of the present invention, the friction torque increases extremely smoothly following the increase in load, and no harmful friction torque fluctuations occur. This shows that the alloy of the device of the present invention has excellent conformability and is less prone to seizure. In other words, the peak waveform with large fluctuations seen in conventional Alloy 18 means that the oil film on the sliding surface is partially destroyed, solid contact occurs, and if this is repeated, total destruction (seizure) will occur. Alloy 9 of the device of the present invention, which does not produce such waveforms, has high conformability and seizure load resistance. In addition, in the alloy composition of the bearing device according to the present invention, it goes without saying that Al contains impurities that cannot be avoided by ordinary scouring techniques. Next, FIG. 3 shows the experimental results regarding the wear resistance of alloy 1 of the bearing device according to the present invention.
4 and 15 have a large difference in wear amount from the conventional alloy 18. However, the results shown in FIG. 3 show that alloys 14 and 15, which are the bearing materials of the device of the present invention, and conventional alloy 19 have almost the same effect in terms of anti-seizure load; 1
It is clear from FIG. 1 that alloy No. 9 has disadvantages that are inferior to alloys 9 and 16 of the present invention. Therefore, it can be said that Alloys 14 and 15 have the effect of compensating for the deficiencies in fatigue resistance and surface pressure properties of conventional alloys. Next, FIG. 4 shows alloy 1 of the bearing device according to the present invention.
3 is a graph showing the surface pressure at the time of seizure when a seizure test was conducted for Alloys 4 and 15 and conventional alloys 18 and 19 using a spheroidal graphite cast iron shaft as the mating material. According to this graph, conventional alloy 18
It is observed that Alloys 14 and 15 with Cr added have higher seizure surface pressures. Furthermore, even in alloys containing Cr, differences in seizure load are observed depending on the Cr content. In other words, alloy 1 with a large amount of Cr added
No. 5 has better seizure resistance than No. 14. Furthermore, conventional Alloy 19 has improved seizure resistance, which is thought to be due to Si in its chemical components. However, as mentioned above, these conventional materials do not exhibit the prevention of reduction in high temperature hardness, improvement in fatigue resistance, etc., which are one of the characteristics of the alloy of the present invention device. As described above, the bearing device for an internal combustion engine according to the present invention improves hardness by adding Cr to an aluminum-tin bearing alloy as a bearing material, prevents a decrease in high-temperature hardness, and prevents coarsening of Sn particles. In addition to improving fatigue resistance and wear resistance through these, it also improves wear resistance and seizure resistance when using a spheroidal graphite cast iron shaft as a mating shaft, and is also effective when added with Cr. Pb,
Bi and In can improve conformability and seizure resistance, and addition of Cu and Mg further improves high-temperature strength.
第1図は本発明に係る内燃機関の軸受装置を構
成するアルミニウム軸受合金と従来の同軸受合金
との温度変化に対する変化の様子をプロツトした
グラフ、第2図は同じく荷重を増加させた場合の
摩擦トルクの変化の状態を示すグラフ、第3図は
球状黒鉛鋳鉄軸に対しての摩耗量を示すグラフ、
第4図は球状黒鉛鋳鉄軸に対しての焼付面圧を示
すグラフである。
Figure 1 is a graph plotting changes in the aluminum bearing alloy constituting the bearing device for an internal combustion engine according to the present invention and a conventional bearing alloy with respect to temperature changes, and Figure 2 is a graph plotting the change in temperature when the load is increased. A graph showing the state of change in friction torque, Figure 3 is a graph showing the amount of wear on the spheroidal graphite cast iron shaft,
FIG. 4 is a graph showing the seizure pressure against the spheroidal graphite cast iron shaft.
Claims (1)
黒鉛鋳鉄とし、軸受材質として重量でスズ3.5〜
35%、クロム1.0を越え7.0%、銅および(また
は)マグネシウム3.0%以下(0を含まず)、Pb,
Bi,Inの少なくとも1種を9.0%以下(0を含ま
ず)、および残部が本質的にアルミニウムからな
るアルミニウム―スズ系軸受合金でなる軸受で構
成された内燃機関の軸受装置。1 In a bearing device for an internal combustion engine, the shaft material is spheroidal graphite cast iron, and the bearing material is tin 3.5 to 3.5% by weight.
35%, over 1.0 chromium 7.0%, copper and/or magnesium 3.0% or less (not including 0), Pb,
A bearing device for an internal combustion engine, comprising a bearing made of an aluminum-tin bearing alloy containing at least 9.0% (excluding 0) of at least one of Bi and In, and the remainder being essentially aluminum.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP16240881A JPS57114634A (en) | 1981-10-12 | 1981-10-12 | Bearing device of internal combustion engine |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP16240881A JPS57114634A (en) | 1981-10-12 | 1981-10-12 | Bearing device of internal combustion engine |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP8423278A Division JPS582577B2 (en) | 1978-07-11 | 1978-07-11 | aluminum bearing alloy |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS57114634A JPS57114634A (en) | 1982-07-16 |
| JPS6134499B2 true JPS6134499B2 (en) | 1986-08-08 |
Family
ID=15754033
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP16240881A Granted JPS57114634A (en) | 1981-10-12 | 1981-10-12 | Bearing device of internal combustion engine |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS57114634A (en) |
-
1981
- 1981-10-12 JP JP16240881A patent/JPS57114634A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS57114634A (en) | 1982-07-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4278740A (en) | Aluminum-tin base bearing alloy and composite | |
| WO1981002025A1 (en) | Aluminum-based alloy bearing | |
| JP5111253B2 (en) | Copper-based sliding material | |
| JP3898619B2 (en) | Copper-based alloy for sliding | |
| GB2277935A (en) | Copper-lead based bearing material | |
| JPS6156305B2 (en) | ||
| JPS6160906B2 (en) | ||
| JPH0810012B2 (en) | Bearing material | |
| US4296183A (en) | Al-Sn Base bearing alloy and composite | |
| JPS582578B2 (en) | aluminum bearing alloy | |
| JPS6144140B2 (en) | ||
| JPS5867841A (en) | Aluminum alloy bearing | |
| JPS6134499B2 (en) | ||
| US2288655A (en) | Metal alloy | |
| GB2066846A (en) | Aluminum-tin base bearing alloy | |
| JPS5844140B2 (en) | Composite sliding material | |
| JPH0813072A (en) | Aluminum alloy bearing | |
| JPS6212298B2 (en) | ||
| JPS6045701B2 (en) | Composite aluminum-tin bearing alloy material | |
| GB2067220A (en) | Aluminium-tin base bearing alloy | |
| JPH0114990B2 (en) | ||
| JPS6254853B2 (en) | ||
| JPS582577B2 (en) | aluminum bearing alloy | |
| JPS6140297B2 (en) | ||
| JP2505632B2 (en) | Sliding material |