Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPS6147128B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPS6147128B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPS6147128B2
JPS6147128B2 JP53098680A JP9868078A JPS6147128B2 JP S6147128 B2 JPS6147128 B2 JP S6147128B2 JP 53098680 A JP53098680 A JP 53098680A JP 9868078 A JP9868078 A JP 9868078A JP S6147128 B2 JPS6147128 B2 JP S6147128B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
exhaust gas
oxide
catalyst
ammonia
nitrogen oxides
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP53098680A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS5527021A (en
Inventor
Akira Kato
Seiji Takeuchi
Juichi Kamo
Shigeo Uno
Jinichi Imahashi
Shinpei Matsuda
Fumito Nakajima
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Mitsubishi Power Ltd
Original Assignee
Babcock Hitachi KK
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Babcock Hitachi KK, Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Babcock Hitachi KK
Priority to JP9868078A priority Critical patent/JPS5527021A/en
Publication of JPS5527021A publication Critical patent/JPS5527021A/en
Publication of JPS6147128B2 publication Critical patent/JPS6147128B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas Treatment By Means Of Catalyst (AREA)
  • Solid-Sorbent Or Filter-Aiding Compositions (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

本発明は排ガスの処理方法に関し、詳しくは、
窒素酸化物及び硫黄酸化物を含有する排ガス中の
窒素酸化物を低温で効率良く除去ししかも触媒活
性を長時間維持しうる排ガスの処理方法に関す
る。 最近、窒素酸化物(NOx)を含有する排ガス
から窒素酸化物を除去する方法に関する研究、開
発は、急速な進歩を逐げ、多くの提案がなされて
いる。その中で主流を占めつつある方法は、触媒
を用いてアンモニアにより窒素酸化物を還元除去
する方法である。この方法は、通常200〜400℃の
反応温度で行なわれるが、処理すべき排ガス中に
高濃度の硫黄酸化物(SOx)含まれている場合に
は、使用する触媒の活性が低下する問題がある。
その原因としては、硫黄酸化物の中の三酸化硫黄
(SO3)又は硫黄ミストが触媒毒として作用するこ
と、あるいは又、これらの物質とアンモニアから
生成する硫酸アンモニウム又は酸性硫酸アンモニ
ウムが触媒の細孔内に凝縮して閉塞しあるいはこ
れらが触媒成分と反応して化合物を生成して触媒
の活性を低下させることが挙げられる。このた
め、一般に、高濃度の硫黄化合物を含有する排ガ
スにアンモニア接触還元法を適用する場合には、
350℃以上の比較的高温領域で反応を行なう必要
がある。したがつて、コークス炉又は焼結炉等か
ら排出される150〜250℃の比較的低温の排ガスを
処理するには、この反応温度まで昇温させなけれ
ばならず、経済的に極めて不利となる。そこで、
この問題を解決するためにいくつかの方法が提案
されている。 すなわち、その一つとして、反応温度領域を
200〜350℃及び400℃以上に交互に変えて脱硝反
応を行なう方法がある。(特開昭52−31970号公報
参照)そして又別の方法として、被毒された触媒
を350〜800℃で焼成して再成する方法も提案され
ている。(特開昭52−26394号公報参照)しかし、
前者の方法によれば、確かに熱経済の面からはか
なり節約になるが、短時間でも400℃以上に昇温
しなければならないこと及び低温で長時間運転を
行なうとどうしても脱硝率が少しづつ低下してい
くという欠点があり、又後者の方法では、再生前
には触媒の性能がかなり低下しているので、それ
を防ぐには再生を頻繁に行なう必要が生じてあま
り望ましくない。 本発明の目的は、前記従来技術の欠点を解決
し、硫黄酸化物を含有する排ガス中の窒素酸化物
を低温で効率良く除去し、しかも触媒活性を長時
間維持できる経済的な排ガスの処理方法を提供す
ることである。 本発明につき概説すれば、本発明の排ガスの処
理方法は、窒素酸化物及び硫黄酸化物を含有する
排ガスをアンモニアにより接触還元して窒素酸化
物を除去するに当り、予め排ガスを200〜350℃の
温度で酸化カルシウム、酸化ニツケル及び酸化コ
バルトよりなる群から選ばれた少なくとも1種と
酸化チタンとからなる三酸化硫黄を選択的に吸収
する吸収剤と接触させ次いで同温度範囲でアンモ
ニア接触還元を行なうことを特徴とするものであ
る。 前記のように、アンモニア接触還元において、
触媒の活性が低下する主な原因は、排ガス中に含
まれる硫黄酸化物(以下SOxという)のうち特に
三酸化硫黄(以下SO3という)にあることを本発
明者等は知得した。 本発明者等は、このことを確認するため、SO3
を含まず二酸化硫黄(以下SO2という)のみを含
むガス及びSO3をも含むガスが触媒の寿命に与え
る影響を実験によつて調べた。その結果を実施例
として以下に示す。 実施例 1 酸化チタン−酸化モリブデン−酸化バナジウム
(原子比・Ti:Mo:V=84:10:6)触媒を用
い、下記第1表に示す組成のガスA及びBを、空
間速度5000hr-1、反応温度250℃で条件下で200時
間通過させた。
The present invention relates to a method for treating exhaust gas, and in detail,
The present invention relates to a method for treating exhaust gas that can efficiently remove nitrogen oxides from exhaust gas containing nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides at low temperatures and maintain catalytic activity for a long time. Recently, research and development regarding methods for removing nitrogen oxides (NOx) from exhaust gas containing nitrogen oxides (NOx) have made rapid progress, and many proposals have been made. Among these, the method that is becoming mainstream is a method in which nitrogen oxides are reduced and removed using ammonia using a catalyst. This method is usually carried out at a reaction temperature of 200 to 400°C, but if the exhaust gas to be treated contains a high concentration of sulfur oxides (SOx), the activity of the catalyst used may decrease. be.
The cause of this is that sulfur trioxide (SO 3 ) in sulfur oxides or sulfur mist acts as a catalyst poison, or that ammonium sulfate or acidic ammonium sulfate produced from these substances and ammonia enters the pores of the catalyst. These substances may condense and become clogged, or they may react with catalyst components to produce compounds that reduce the activity of the catalyst. Therefore, in general, when applying the ammonia catalytic reduction method to exhaust gas containing a high concentration of sulfur compounds,
It is necessary to carry out the reaction at a relatively high temperature range of 350°C or higher. Therefore, in order to treat relatively low-temperature exhaust gas of 150 to 250°C discharged from a coke oven or sintering furnace, the temperature must be raised to this reaction temperature, which is extremely disadvantageous economically. . Therefore,
Several methods have been proposed to solve this problem. In other words, one of them is to determine the reaction temperature range.
There is a method in which the denitrification reaction is carried out by alternately changing the temperature from 200 to 350°C and above 400°C. (Refer to Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 52-31970.) Another method has been proposed in which the poisoned catalyst is fired at 350 to 800°C to regenerate it. (Refer to Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 52-26394) However,
According to the former method, it is true that there is considerable savings in terms of thermal economy, but the temperature must be raised to over 400°C even for a short period of time, and if the operation is performed at low temperatures for a long period of time, the denitrification rate will inevitably decrease little by little. In addition, in the latter method, the performance of the catalyst has considerably deteriorated before regeneration, and to prevent this, it is necessary to perform regeneration frequently, which is not very desirable. An object of the present invention is to solve the above-mentioned drawbacks of the prior art, to efficiently remove nitrogen oxides from exhaust gas containing sulfur oxides at low temperatures, and to maintain catalytic activity for a long period of time. The goal is to provide the following. To summarize the present invention, in the exhaust gas treatment method of the present invention, when exhaust gas containing nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides is catalytically reduced with ammonia to remove nitrogen oxides, the exhaust gas is heated to 200 to 350°C in advance. Contact with an absorbent that selectively absorbs sulfur trioxide, which is made of titanium oxide and at least one member selected from the group consisting of calcium oxide, nickel oxide, and cobalt oxide, at a temperature of It is characterized by doing. As mentioned above, in ammonia catalytic reduction,
The present inventors have learned that the main cause of the decrease in catalyst activity is particularly sulfur trioxide (hereinafter referred to as SO 3 ) among sulfur oxides (hereinafter referred to as SOx) contained in exhaust gas. In order to confirm this, the inventors investigated SO 3
The effects of gas containing only sulfur dioxide (hereinafter referred to as SO 2 ) and gas containing SO 3 on the life of the catalyst were investigated through experiments. The results are shown below as an example. Example 1 Using a titanium oxide-molybdenum oxide-vanadium oxide (atomic ratio Ti:Mo:V=84:10:6) catalyst, gases A and B having the compositions shown in Table 1 below were heated at a space velocity of 5000 hr -1 , and the reaction temperature was 250°C for 200 hours.

【表】 その結果得られたNOx除去率を下記第2表に
示す。
[Table] The resulting NOx removal rates are shown in Table 2 below.

【表】 第2表から、SO2及びSO3を含むガスAの場合
には時間の経過に伴い大巾なNOx除去率の低下
が生じるのに対し、SO3を含まないガスBの場合
にはNOx除去率の低下は殆んど生ぜず、触媒の
活性が長時間維持されることがわかる。 なお又、別の触媒として一般のバナジウム系触
媒である酸化バナジウム−酸化アルミニウム(原
子比・6:94)触媒(粒径5mm)を使用し、前記
実験におけるガスAにつき前記実験と同一条件で
触媒の寿命を調べた。その結果を下記第3表に示
す。
[Table] From Table 2, it can be seen that in the case of gas A containing SO 2 and SO 3 , the NOx removal rate decreases significantly over time, whereas in the case of gas B, which does not contain SO 3 , It can be seen that there is almost no decrease in the NOx removal rate, and the activity of the catalyst is maintained for a long time. Furthermore, a vanadium oxide-aluminum oxide (atomic ratio: 6:94) catalyst (particle size 5 mm), which is a general vanadium-based catalyst, was used as another catalyst, and the catalyst was heated under the same conditions as in the previous experiment for gas A in the above experiment. We investigated the lifespan of. The results are shown in Table 3 below.

【表】 第3表から明らかなように、バナジウム系触媒
についても、SO3を含むガスの場合には、時間の
経過に伴いNOx除去率が著しく低下する。 以上の実験により、ガス中にSO3が含まれてい
ると、一般のアンモニア接触還元法の触媒の活性
が著しく低下し、したがつて安定なNOx除去率
を維持することができず、これを防止するには、
予めガス中のSO3を除去することが必要であるこ
とが確認された。 本発明は前記知得に基づいてなされたものであ
る。すなわち、本発明によれば、酸化カルシウ
ム、酸化ニツケル及び酸化コバルトよりなる群か
ら選ばれた少なくとも1種と酸化チタンとからな
るSO3を選択的に吸収する吸収剤により予めガス
中のSO3を吸収除去してからアンモニア接触還元
を行なうことにより、比較的低温でNOxを除去
し、しかも触媒の活性及びNOx除去率を安定に
維持することができる。 燃焼炉等の排ガス中のSO3濃度は、通常SOx濃
度の1〜10%程度である。したがつて、SO3を選
択的に除去できる本発明における吸収剤を使用し
た場合には、SOx全体を吸収する場合に比較し
て、必要とする吸収剤の容量は1/10〜1/100程度
で足り、経済的に有利である。 本発明において酸化カルシウム、酸化ニツケル
又は酸化コバルトに酸化チタンを配合した吸収剤
は、SO3を吸収してもその細孔構造の変化が比較
的少なく、又、強度低下も少ないので、吸収性能
に変化が生じ難いという利点を有している。 又、酸化チタンと前記の他の成分を組み合わせ
て使用する場合、その組成比は、酸化チタン1モ
ルに対し他の成分0.1〜100モルの範囲が適当であ
る。 又、SO3の吸収は、200〜350℃、通常250〜300
℃程度の温度で行なわれ、又、ガス空間速度は
1000〜100000h-1で行なわれる。 吸収剤の形状は特に限定されず、ペレツト型、
リング型、球型及びハニカム型等を適宜用いるこ
とができる。 次に、本発明における前記吸収剤の数種につき
SO3除去性能実験を行なつた結果を示す。 実施例 2 下記組成のガスを用いて、下記第4表に示す7
種類の吸収剤(TiO2−NiO、TiO2−CoO、TiO2
−CaO:粒径3mm球状)により、吸収の反応温度
250℃、空間速度5000h-1でSO3吸収実験を行なつ
た。 ガス組成 SO3 100 ppm SO2 500 〃 O2 3 % H2O 12 〃 N2 残部 得られた結果を下記第4表に示す。なお、SO3
除去率は次式により算出した。 SO3 除去法(%) =吸収剤に吸収されたSO濃度/供給したSO
度×100
[Table] As is clear from Table 3, the NOx removal rate of vanadium-based catalysts also decreases significantly over time in the case of gas containing SO 3 . The above experiments have shown that when SO 3 is contained in the gas, the activity of the catalyst in the general ammonia catalytic reduction method decreases significantly, making it impossible to maintain a stable NOx removal rate. To prevent
It was confirmed that it was necessary to remove SO 3 from the gas in advance. The present invention has been made based on the above knowledge. That is, according to the present invention, SO 3 in the gas is removed in advance by an absorbent that selectively absorbs SO 3 and is made of at least one member selected from the group consisting of calcium oxide, nickel oxide, and cobalt oxide and titanium oxide . By performing ammonia catalytic reduction after absorption and removal, NOx can be removed at a relatively low temperature, and the catalyst activity and NOx removal rate can be stably maintained. The SO 3 concentration in exhaust gas from combustion furnaces, etc. is usually about 1 to 10% of the SOx concentration. Therefore, when using the absorbent of the present invention that can selectively remove SO3 , the required capacity of the absorbent is 1/10 to 1/100 compared to the case where the entire SOx is absorbed. It is sufficient and economically advantageous. In the present invention, the absorbent in which titanium oxide is blended with calcium oxide, nickel oxide, or cobalt oxide has relatively little change in its pore structure even when SO 3 is absorbed, and there is also little decrease in strength, so it has no effect on absorption performance. It has the advantage of being difficult to change. Further, when titanium oxide and the other components mentioned above are used in combination, the appropriate composition ratio is in the range of 0.1 to 100 moles of the other components per 1 mole of titanium oxide. Also, SO 3 absorption is 200-350℃, usually 250-300℃
It is carried out at a temperature of about ℃, and the gas space velocity is
It is carried out at 1000 to 100000h -1 . The shape of the absorbent is not particularly limited, and may be pellet type,
A ring shape, a spherical shape, a honeycomb shape, etc. can be used as appropriate. Next, regarding several types of absorbents in the present invention,
The results of an SO 3 removal performance experiment are shown. Example 2 Using a gas with the following composition, 7 as shown in Table 4 below
types of absorbents (TiO 2 −NiO, TiO 2 −CoO, TiO 2
-CaO: particle size 3mm spherical), the absorption reaction temperature
SO 3 absorption experiments were conducted at 250°C and a space velocity of 5000 h -1 . Gas composition SO 3 100 ppm SO 2 500 〃 O 2 3% H 2 O 12 〃 N 2 balance The results obtained are shown in Table 4 below. In addition, SO 3
The removal rate was calculated using the following formula. SO 3 removal method (%) = SO 3 concentration absorbed by absorbent / supplied SO 3 concentration × 100

【表】 第4表から、いずれの吸収剤もかなり長時間に
わたつて高いSO3除去率を示すことがわかる。な
お、SO2は、吸収剤に殆んど吸収されずそのまま
素通りしたことが確認された。 SO3を吸収除去されたガスは、アンモニア接触
還元により脱硝されるが、使用される触媒の活性
は長時間維持され、脱硝率の低下は少ない。しか
も、本発明によれば、アンモニア接触還元反応を
SO3吸収反応におけると同じ温度範囲すなわち、
200〜350℃程度の低温で行なうことができる。
又、脱硝反応に用いる触媒としては、従来のアン
モニア接触還元法に用いられているすべての触媒
を適用できるが、特に、低温度領域で活性が優
れ、しかも耐SOx性の良い触媒として、酸化チタ
ン及び(又は)酸化スズを主成分とする触媒を有
利に使用することができる。なお、これらの触媒
については、特公昭52−6953号公報、特公昭52−
6954号公報、特開昭50−89291号公報、特開昭50
−89288号公報、特開昭51−21569号公報、特開昭
51−52363号公報及び特開昭52−42463号公報等に
記載されているものを適宜選択できる。なお、
又、これらの脱硝触媒の形状は特に限定されず、
ペレツト型、リング型、球型及びハニカム型のい
ずれも採用することができる。 次に、本発明を実施例により説明するが、本発
明はこれらによりなんら限定されるものではな
い。 実施例 下記組成の重油ボイラ排ガスを、そして又、
SO3吸収剤としてTiO2−CaO(モル比・7:3)
100を使用した。 ガス組成 NOx 150〜210 ppm SO2 500〜700 〃 SO3 10〜 20 〃 O2 3〜 6 % CO2 10〜 12 〃 H2O 8〜 12 〃 はいじん 60〜 90mg/Nm3 N2 残部 上記ガス空間速度10000h-1、吸収反応温度260
±10℃で吸収剤に吸収させた。この際、SO3吸収
塔通過後(脱硝反応塔に入る前)のガス中のSO3
の濃度を分析したところ、反応初期には
SO31ppm以下であり、1000時間後でも2〜3ppm
と少なく、80%以上のSO3が吸収剤により除去さ
れていることが確認された。 SO3の除去されたガスを、次いで脱硝処理し
た。脱硝触媒としてTi−Mo−V(原子比84:
10:6)200使用し、空間速度5000h-1、脱硝酸
反応温度260±10℃、アンモニア/NOx1.0〜1.2
の条件で1000時間反応させた。その結果を下記第
5表に示す。
[Table] From Table 4, it can be seen that all absorbents exhibit high SO 3 removal rates over a fairly long period of time. In addition, it was confirmed that SO 2 was hardly absorbed by the absorbent and passed through as it was. The gas from which SO 3 has been absorbed and removed is denitrified by ammonia catalytic reduction, but the activity of the catalyst used is maintained for a long time, and the denitrification rate does not decrease much. Moreover, according to the present invention, the ammonia catalytic reduction reaction
Same temperature range as in SO 3 absorption reaction, i.e.
It can be carried out at a low temperature of about 200 to 350°C.
In addition, all catalysts used in conventional ammonia catalytic reduction methods can be used as catalysts for the denitrification reaction, but titanium oxide is particularly effective as a catalyst with excellent activity in the low temperature range and good SOx resistance. and/or catalysts based on tin oxide can be advantageously used. Regarding these catalysts, please refer to Japanese Patent Publication No. 52-6953 and Japanese Patent Publication No. 52-6953.
Publication No. 6954, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 1989-89291, Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 1973
-89288 Publication, JP-A-51-21569, JP-A-Sho
Those described in JP-A No. 51-52363, JP-A No. 52-42463, etc. can be appropriately selected. In addition,
Moreover, the shape of these denitrification catalysts is not particularly limited;
Any of pellet type, ring type, spherical type and honeycomb type can be adopted. Next, the present invention will be explained with reference to Examples, but the present invention is not limited to these in any way. Example A heavy oil boiler exhaust gas having the following composition, and also,
TiO 2 −CaO as SO 3 absorbent (molar ratio 7:3)
100 was used. Gas composition NOx 150-210 ppm SO 2 500-700 〃 SO 3 10-20 〃 O 2 3-6% CO 2 10-12 〃 H 2 O 8-12 〃 Dust 60-90 mg/Nm 3 N 2 balance above Gas space velocity 10000h -1 , absorption reaction temperature 260
It was absorbed into an absorbent at ±10°C. At this time, SO 3 in the gas after passing through the SO 3 absorption tower (before entering the denitrification reaction tower)
When we analyzed the concentration of
SO 3 less than 1ppm, 2-3ppm even after 1000 hours
It was confirmed that more than 80% of SO 3 was removed by the absorbent. The gas from which SO 3 was removed was then subjected to denitrification treatment. Ti-Mo-V (atomic ratio 84:
10:6) 200, space velocity 5000h -1 , denitrification reaction temperature 260±10℃, ammonia/NOx 1.0 to 1.2
The reaction was carried out for 1000 hours under the following conditions. The results are shown in Table 5 below.

【表】 第5表の結果から明らかなように、予めSO3
選択的に除去することにより、260℃程度の低温
において長時間安定ししたNOx除去率を維持す
ることができた。 以上説明したように、本発明によれば、窒素酸
化物及び硫黄酸化物を含有する排ガスから予め三
酸化硫黄を吸収除去した後にアンモニア接触還元
を行なうことにより、低温で効率良く窒素酸化物
を除去し、しかも触媒活性を長時間維持して安定
した反応を行なうことができる。
[Table] As is clear from the results in Table 5, by selectively removing SO 3 in advance, it was possible to maintain a stable NOx removal rate for a long time at a low temperature of about 260°C. As explained above, according to the present invention, nitrogen oxides are efficiently removed at low temperatures by performing ammonia catalytic reduction after previously absorbing and removing sulfur trioxide from exhaust gas containing nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides. Moreover, the catalytic activity can be maintained for a long time and stable reactions can be carried out.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1 窒素酸化物及び硫黄酸化物を含有する排ガス
をアンモニアにより接触還元して窒素酸化物を除
去するに当り、予め排ガスを200〜350℃の温度で
酸化カルシウム、酸化ニツケル及び酸化コバルト
よりなる群から選ばれた少なくとも1種と酸化チ
タンとからなる三酸化硫黄を選択的に吸収する吸
収剤と接触させ次いで同温度範囲でアンモニア接
触還元を行なうことを特徴とする排ガスの処理方
法。
1. When exhaust gas containing nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides is catalytically reduced with ammonia to remove nitrogen oxides, the exhaust gas is preliminarily treated at a temperature of 200 to 350°C from the group consisting of calcium oxide, nickel oxide, and cobalt oxide. A method for treating exhaust gas, which comprises bringing the mixture into contact with an absorbent that selectively absorbs sulfur trioxide, which is composed of at least one selected species and titanium oxide, and then performing catalytic reduction with ammonia in the same temperature range.
JP9868078A 1978-08-15 1978-08-15 Treatment of waste gas Granted JPS5527021A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP9868078A JPS5527021A (en) 1978-08-15 1978-08-15 Treatment of waste gas

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP9868078A JPS5527021A (en) 1978-08-15 1978-08-15 Treatment of waste gas

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS5527021A JPS5527021A (en) 1980-02-26
JPS6147128B2 true JPS6147128B2 (en) 1986-10-17

Family

ID=14226218

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP9868078A Granted JPS5527021A (en) 1978-08-15 1978-08-15 Treatment of waste gas

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS5527021A (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS60257821A (en) * 1984-06-04 1985-12-19 Babcock Hitachi Kk Denitration and desulfurization of exhaust gas
JP2010236877A (en) * 2009-03-30 2010-10-21 Chubu Electric Power Co Inc Apparatus and method for measuring ammonia concentration in exhaust gas

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS5527021A (en) 1980-02-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH0312927B2 (en)
KR100204257B1 (en) Heat-treated activated carbon for denitration, manufacturing method thereof, denitration method using same and denitration system using same
KR101098247B1 (en) Catalyst for removing NOx in the emission gases of lean burn engines and stationary sources
US12582973B2 (en) SCR catalyst having excellent sulfur tolerance
JPS5911329B2 (en) How to remove nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides from exhaust gas
US4070305A (en) Process for regenerating catalyst
US6106791A (en) Exhaust gas treating systems
JP4182325B2 (en) Low temperature denitration catalyst and exhaust gas low temperature denitration method
JPS6147128B2 (en)
US6800585B2 (en) Catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides and a method for preparing the same
KR20190049746A (en) DENOX catalyst regeneration method
US20040168433A1 (en) Exhaust gas treatment system and exhaust gas treatment method
KR20210049215A (en) Selective reduction catalyst for removing nitrogen oxide using ammonia, manufacturing method thereof and method for removing nitrogen oxide using the same
JP2638067B2 (en) Catalyst for catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides
JPS6333891B2 (en)
JPS6333894B2 (en)
KR100584988B1 (en) Selective Reduction Catalyst for Flue Gas Denitrification Using Waste Catalyst and Its Manufacturing Method
KR100325126B1 (en) Method of denitrificating exhaust gas
JPS5817644B2 (en) Treatment method for exhaust gas containing nitrogen oxides
JPH04197442A (en) Production of catalyst for removal of nitrogen oxide
JPH026819A (en) Pretreatment of denitrification catalyst
JPH04215848A (en) Catalyst for purifying exhaust gas
JPS6350052B2 (en)
JPS6333890B2 (en)
JPS62273040A (en) Removal of nitrogen oxide in exhaust gas