JPS6151009B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPS6151009B2 JPS6151009B2 JP55067864A JP6786480A JPS6151009B2 JP S6151009 B2 JPS6151009 B2 JP S6151009B2 JP 55067864 A JP55067864 A JP 55067864A JP 6786480 A JP6786480 A JP 6786480A JP S6151009 B2 JPS6151009 B2 JP S6151009B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- steel pipes
- strength
- temperature range
- steel pipe
- tempering
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D9/00—Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
- C21D9/08—Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for tubular bodies or pipes
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)
Description
本発明は200〜450℃の温度範囲で高強度を示す
蒸気輸送用シームレス鋼管の製造方法に係り、詳
しくは、重質油・オイルサンド開発や地熱開発な
どにおいて使用または生産される200〜450℃の蒸
気の温度領域(以下、中温域と称する)であつ
て、この中温域にさらされても軟化せずにかえつ
て高強度を示し、更に、溶接性も良好な蒸気輸送
用シームレス鋼管の製造方法に係る。
一般に、200〜450℃の中温域に使用されるシー
ムレス鋼管としては、その用途が新規である故に
それに適合するものが開発されていないが、通常
は、JIS、STPG 38〜42、JIS、STS 35〜49、
JIS、STPT 38〜49あるいはASTM、A 106
Grade A〜Cなどのいわゆる炭素鋼鋼管が用い
られている。これらの鋼管は加工性や耐酸化性よ
り主して経済的理由から用いられているのであつ
て、炭素含有量が高く、あまり溶接性が良好でな
い。更に、これら鋼管は主として小径かつ薄肉の
ものとして開発され、施工時の溶接には水素発生
量の少ない溶接棒を用いることとしており、とく
に、蒸気輸送用の如く、中温域での使用、水素発
生量の多い溶接棒の溶接等の条件を前提とする場
合に適用するには多くの問題がある。
すなわち、最近の新エネルギー開発に関連し、
蒸気輸送用鋼管の新しい需要が生じ、これに伴な
つて新しく中温域の強度が問題になり、伴せて厚
肉である故に溶接性が問題になつている。例え
ば、蒸気圧入方式のオイルサンド開発における蒸
気配管や、地熱開発における蒸気井と発電所を結
ぶ蒸気パイプラインなどでは、輸送蒸気温度にお
ける鋼管の高強度が必要であると同時に、その配
管は比較的肉厚を厚くかつ長く配管することが必
要となり、海外のパイプライン工事では水素発生
量の多いセルローズ系の溶接棒しか用いられない
ため、この条件に適合する溶接性が重要な問題に
なつている。しかしながら、この蒸気輸送の新用
途に上記の従来例の鋼管を使用すると、200〜450
℃の温度に長時間さらされるために軟化し、強度
が低下するため、使用圧力が高められなくとも、
管外径が2倍になればそれに応じて管の肉厚もほ
ぼ2倍にする如く相当肉厚化する必要がある。更
に、肉厚が増せば増すほど、円周溶接時にルート
パス後の冷却速度が大きくなり、水素割れの危険
性が増大する。この水素割れの危険をさけるため
には、溶接前の予熱温度を高くすることが必要で
あるが、配管長さが長い場合は、予熱温度を高め
ると著しく溶接能率を阻害して好ましくない。ま
た、厚肉管になればなるほど円周溶接は多層盛り
になり、この点でも、溶接能率は著しく低下す
る。
一方、通常の管材に代つて、許容応力の高い例
えば、STPA 12〜26合金鋼の高強度鋼管を使用
し、薄肉化することも考えられるが、これら合金
鋼は高温域において高い許容応力を持つが、中温
域においては高い許容応力がなく、施工時に溶接
するとその後に熱処理を必要とし、この溶接能率
の低下が加わり、元来が高価なものである故に鋼
材単価の上昇により建設コストは増大する。
以上のごとく、新用途に最適の鋼管はいまだ見
い出されておらず、従来の鋼管を使用した場合に
は、建設コストが上昇するため、新エネルギの経
済性が損なわれ、ひいては開発自体を遅らせてい
る1つの原因になつている。
本発明は上記の解決を目的とするものであつ
て、具体的には、蒸気輸送中にその蒸気により
200〜450℃の如く中温域に加熱されても軟化せず
に高強度が維持され、パイプライン施工時に良好
な溶接性を示すシームレス鋼管の製造方法を提案
する。すなわち、熱間圧延によりシームレス鋼管
造管後、直ちに焼入処理を施すことにより、中温
域において飛躍的に高い強度を付与し、管の薄肉
化を達成するとともに、良好な溶接性を付与し、
これらを通じて施工時の溶接性の良好な蒸気輸送
用鋼管を製造し、とくに、Mo0.01〜0.30%若し
くはV0.005〜0.10%のいずれか一方または両者を
添加すると、200〜450℃の中温域において高い降
伏強さならびに引張強さを示すことを知見して成
立したものである。
更に、本発明方法によつて鋼管を製造すると、
その鋼管の溶接時の水素割れ感受性の指標となる
Pcm値を著しく低下できるために、現地溶接性が
きわめて良好となり、しかも、成分中でC量が低
減されているにもかかわらず、上記知見にもとず
くため、350℃前後の中温領域において、従来例
の鋼管よりも著しく高い強度を得られる。このた
め、鋼管は薄肉化でき、したがつて、予熱温度が
低下するとともに、継手一つ当りに必要な溶接パ
ス数が減少し、これらを通じて溶接能率が向上す
る。
また、本発明方法によつてシームレス鋼管を製
造する場合は、熱間圧延直後に鋼管を焼入し、こ
れに続いて焼もどし処理をするため、低Pcm値の
成分でも、従来例の如くPcm値を高くしなくとも
高強度が維持でき、更に、Mo、Vが少量添加さ
れているため、このように熱処理しても、高い中
温域強度が維持できる。
すなわち、通常の焼入れ焼もどし処理は、熱間
圧延終了後の鋼管をAc3点以上に再加熱後焼入し
たうえで焼もどし処理するものである。このよう
な通常の焼入れ焼もどし処理によつても、中温域
鋼管としてはある程度の強度の上昇と溶接性の向
上が達成できる。しかしながら、例えば、オイル
サンド開発の蒸気パイプライン等の新用途では、
蒸気圧力は150Kg/cm2にも及び、例え、中温域に
おける強度をある程度高めても、管外径が大きく
なるにしたがつて肉厚はかなり厚くならざるを得
ない。このような厚肉鋼管では通常の再加熱後の
焼入れを施しても、肉厚全体にわたつて十分に焼
が入らず、とくに、高強度を確保するには、肉厚
が厚くなることもあつて、Pcm値を高くすること
になる。
この点、本発明方法の如く、熱間圧延後である
と、オーステナイト結晶粒は、再加熱後のオース
テナイト結晶粒に比べて大きく、この状態からの
焼入れは鋼管の肉厚全体にわたつて焼きがきわめ
て容易に入り、Pcm値を低くしているにも拘ら
ず、再加熱後の焼入れによつて得られる強度と同
じ程度の強度が得られる。このPcm値の低減によ
り溶接性も良好になる。また、中温域用鋼管を製
造する場合に、焼入れ焼もどし処理を適用した例
は過去にみられず、とくに、この点は本発明方法
が通常の焼入れ焼もどし処理を行なわずに、一歩
進んで、熱間圧延によりシームレス鋼管を造管し
た後に直接焼入れ焼もどし処理を行なうという、
過去にまつたく前例がない高度の技術的思想に基
づくところであるが、このように製造される鋼管
が蒸気等によつて再加熱されると、性質が変化
し、常温の強度が中温域で維持できず、軟化され
るという欠点がある。このため、本発明者らはこ
の点について種々検討を加えたところ、Mo若し
くはVの何れか一方または両者を少量添加する
と、上記の如く、直接焼入れ焼もどし処理によつ
て鋼管を製造しても、その鋼管は350℃前後の中
温域において十分に高強度が維持でき、むしろ、
常温のときより後記の実施例の如く高くなつたの
である。
以下、本発明方法について鋼管の組成から順に
詳しく説明する。
C:Cは300℃前後の引張強さを高めるのに有効
であり、また、焼もどし時に炭化物を微細析出
させ、降伏強さを高めるので、ある程度の量は
必要である。従つて、本発明においても0.03%
をその下限とする。しかしながら、多すぎると
溶接性の点では最も有害な元素であり、0.15%
を越えると水素割れの危険性が急激に増すの
で、これを上限とする。
Si:Siは脱酸上有用な元素であり、通常0.01%以
上は必要である。また、固溶強化作用があり、
耐酸化性の点でも有効であるが、0.80%を越え
ると靭性および溶接性が顕著に劣化するので、
Siの範囲は0.01〜0.80%とした。
Mn:Mnは固溶強化のみならず、焼入性の向上を
通じて強化に寄与するので、少なくとも0.50%
は必要である。また、Mnは偏析傾向が強く多
すぎると溶接割れの危険が増大することから
2.0%を上限とする。
Mo:Moは本発明方法において上記の如く重要な
役割を果たす元素であり、とくに、Cを低く、
その上で直接焼入れ焼もどしにより製造する場
合に、このMoの存在により焼入性の向上と共
に焼もどし時の析出強化を達成し、これらによ
つて中温域における高強度が実現する。この
際、Moは中温域のうち高温側の強度を維持す
るのに有効であつて、0.01%未満ではその効果
がないが、0.30%を越えると溶接性を損なうの
みならず、経済的にも高価な元素であることか
ら必要以上の添加は避け、上限を0.30%に定め
た。
V:VはMoと同様に中温域での高強度を実現す
る上で、欠くべからざる元素であり、少量の
Moとともに、複合添加されたときはとくに有
効である。しかし、Vが0.005%未満ではその
効果がない。また、0.10%を越えると、溶接性
を害するばかりか靭性を劣化させるので、範囲
を0.005〜0.10%とした。
Al:Alは脱酸上有用な元素であり、かつ鋼中不
純物窒素を固定し、靭性を向上するので、少な
くとも0.001%は必要である。また、Alは300℃
前後の青熱脆性による延性の低下を抑制する効
果があり、この意味でも添加することが好まし
い。しかし、多すぎると靭性の劣化を招くので
0.10%を上限とした。
以上の通りに各成分を含有し、残部がFeと不
純物によりなるシームレス鋼管を熱間圧延によつ
て造管してから、その後、直ちに直接焼入れし、
それに続いて、600℃以上Ac1点以下の温度で焼
もどし処理して中温域における強度に優れるシー
ムレス鋼管を製造する。
また、上記の通りに添加した各成分は次の式で
示されるPcm値が0.21%以下の組成になるよう限
定する。
Pcm=C+Si/30+Mn/20+Mo/15+V
/10≠(%)
すなわち、鋼管円周溶接時の水素割れ感受性と
Pcm値の間に良い相関があり、例えば溶接性をチ
エツクするためのセルローズ棒によるビード下割
れ試験においても、管材のPcm値が0.21%以下で
あれば、水素割れが発生しない。
なお、ビード下割れ試験において、割れが発生
しても円周溶接は可能であるが、Pcm値をこのよ
うに限定すると、寒冷地においてもほとんど予熱
なしに円周溶接が可能となり、オイルサイド開発
蒸気パイプ等の施工場所が寒冷地となりうること
を考慮すると、Pcm値は0.21%以下が必要であ
る。
また、焼もどし温度の範囲を600℃以上Ac1点
以下としたのは、600℃未満の不十分な焼もどし
では、再加熱を受けたときの強度変化が大きく、
また、Ac1点を越える2相域の焼もどしでは急激
な強度低下が起こり、所要の強度が得られないか
らである。
次に、実施例について説明する。
まず、第1表において、各種シームレス鋼管の
中で鋼管A〜Cは本発明法によつて製造されたも
のであり、鋼管X,Yは従来例によつて製造され
た中温域用鋼管である。
The present invention relates to a method for manufacturing seamless steel pipes for steam transportation that exhibit high strength in the temperature range of 200 to 450°C, and more specifically, to a method for manufacturing seamless steel pipes for steam transport that exhibit high strength in the temperature range of 200 to 450°C. Manufacturing a seamless steel pipe for steam transport that does not soften even when exposed to the steam temperature range (hereinafter referred to as the medium temperature range) and exhibits high strength and also has good weldability. Regarding the method. In general, seamless steel pipes used in the medium temperature range of 200 to 450°C have not been developed to suit the new application, but they are usually JIS, STPG 38 to 42, JIS, STS 35. ~49,
JIS, STPT 38-49 or ASTM, A 106
So-called carbon steel pipes such as grades A to C are used. These steel pipes are mainly used for economic reasons rather than workability and oxidation resistance, and they have a high carbon content and do not have very good weldability. Furthermore, these steel pipes were mainly developed to have small diameters and thin walls, and welding rods that generate a small amount of hydrogen are used for welding during construction. There are many problems when applying this method to conditions such as welding with a large amount of welding rods. In other words, in relation to recent new energy development,
New demands have arisen for steel pipes for steam transport, and along with this, strength in the medium temperature range has become a new issue, and weldability has also become an issue due to the thick walls. For example, steam piping in oil sand development using the steam injection method, or steam pipelines connecting steam wells and power plants in geothermal development, require high strength steel pipes at the transport steam temperature, and at the same time, the piping is relatively It is necessary to run thick and long pipes, and only cellulose-based welding rods, which generate a large amount of hydrogen, are used in overseas pipeline construction, so weldability that meets these conditions has become an important issue. . However, if the conventional steel pipes mentioned above are used for this new purpose of steam transportation,
Due to prolonged exposure to temperatures of °C, it softens and its strength decreases, so even if the working pressure is not increased,
If the outer diameter of the tube is doubled, the wall thickness of the tube must be increased to approximately double. Furthermore, as the wall thickness increases, the cooling rate after the root pass during circumferential welding increases, increasing the risk of hydrogen cracking. In order to avoid this risk of hydrogen cracking, it is necessary to increase the preheating temperature before welding, but if the length of the pipe is long, increasing the preheating temperature is not preferable as it will significantly impede welding efficiency. Furthermore, the thicker the pipe, the more multi-layered the circumferential welding, and in this respect as well, the welding efficiency is significantly reduced. On the other hand, instead of regular pipe materials, it is possible to use high-strength steel pipes with high allowable stress, such as STPA 12 to 26 alloy steel, and make the walls thinner, but these alloy steels have high allowable stress in high temperature ranges. However, it does not have a high allowable stress in the medium temperature range, and if welded during construction, it requires heat treatment afterwards, which reduces welding efficiency, and since it is originally expensive, construction costs increase due to the rise in the unit price of steel materials. . As mentioned above, the optimal steel pipe for new uses has not yet been found, and if conventional steel pipes are used, the construction cost will increase, which will impair the economic efficiency of new energy and even delay the development itself. This is one of the reasons why. The present invention aims to solve the above problem, and specifically, the present invention aims to solve the above problem, and specifically, it
We propose a method for manufacturing seamless steel pipes that maintain high strength without softening even when heated to a medium temperature range such as 200 to 450°C, and exhibit good weldability during pipeline construction. In other words, by applying quenching treatment immediately after forming seamless steel pipes by hot rolling, we are able to provide significantly higher strength in the medium temperature range, achieve thinner pipes, and provide good weldability.
Through these methods, steam transport steel pipes with good weldability during construction can be manufactured, and in particular, when one or both of Mo0.01~0.30% or V0.005~0.10% is added, the medium temperature range of 200~450℃ This was established based on the knowledge that it exhibits high yield strength and tensile strength. Furthermore, when a steel pipe is manufactured by the method of the present invention,
It is an indicator of the susceptibility to hydrogen cracking during welding of steel pipes.
Because the Pcm value can be significantly reduced, on-site weldability is extremely good, and even though the amount of C in the composition is reduced, based on the above knowledge, in the medium temperature range around 350℃, Significantly higher strength than conventional steel pipes can be obtained. Therefore, the steel pipe can be made thinner, the preheating temperature is lowered, and the number of welding passes required per joint is reduced, thereby improving welding efficiency. In addition, when producing seamless steel pipes by the method of the present invention, the steel pipes are quenched immediately after hot rolling and then tempered, so even if the components have low Pcm values, Pcm High strength can be maintained without increasing the value, and since small amounts of Mo and V are added, high strength in the medium temperature range can be maintained even when heat treated in this way. That is, in the normal quenching and tempering treatment, a steel pipe after hot rolling is reheated to an Ac point of 3 or higher, quenched, and then tempered. Even with such normal quenching and tempering treatment, it is possible to achieve a certain degree of increase in strength and weldability for medium temperature range steel pipes. However, for new applications such as steam pipelines in oil sands development,
The steam pressure is as high as 150 Kg/cm 2 , and even if the strength in the medium temperature range is increased to some extent, the wall thickness must become considerably thicker as the outer diameter of the tube increases. Even if such thick-walled steel pipes are subjected to normal quenching after reheating, the entire wall thickness will not be sufficiently quenched, and in particular, in order to ensure high strength, the wall thickness may need to be increased. Therefore, the Pcm value will be increased. In this respect, as in the method of the present invention, after hot rolling, the austenite crystal grains are larger than the austenite crystal grains after reheating, and quenching from this state results in quenching over the entire wall thickness of the steel pipe. It is extremely easy to penetrate, and despite the low Pcm value, the same strength as that obtained by quenching after reheating can be obtained. This reduction in Pcm value also improves weldability. In addition, when manufacturing steel pipes for medium temperature ranges, there has never been an example of applying quenching and tempering treatment, and this point in particular is that the method of the present invention goes one step further without performing the usual quenching and tempering treatment. , a seamless steel pipe is formed by hot rolling and then directly quenched and tempered.
This is based on a highly advanced technological idea that has never been seen before, but when the steel pipes manufactured in this way are reheated with steam, their properties change, and the strength at room temperature is maintained in the medium temperature range. It has the disadvantage that it cannot be made and becomes soft. Therefore, the present inventors conducted various studies on this point and found that if a small amount of either Mo or V or both is added, steel pipes can be produced by direct quenching and tempering as described above. , the steel pipe can maintain sufficiently high strength in the medium temperature range of around 350℃;
As shown in the examples below, the temperature was higher than that at room temperature. The method of the present invention will be explained in detail below, starting from the composition of the steel pipe. C: C is effective in increasing tensile strength at around 300°C, and also causes fine precipitation of carbides during tempering to increase yield strength, so a certain amount is necessary. Therefore, in the present invention, 0.03%
Let be its lower limit. However, if too much, it is the most harmful element in terms of weldability, and 0.15%
If this value is exceeded, the risk of hydrogen cracking increases rapidly, so this is set as the upper limit. Si: Si is a useful element for deoxidation, and usually 0.01% or more is required. It also has a solid solution strengthening effect,
It is also effective in terms of oxidation resistance, but if it exceeds 0.80%, toughness and weldability will deteriorate significantly.
The range of Si was 0.01% to 0.80%. Mn: Mn contributes to strengthening not only by solid solution strengthening but also by improving hardenability, so at least 0.50%
is necessary. In addition, Mn has a strong tendency to segregate, and too much Mn increases the risk of weld cracking.
The upper limit is 2.0%. Mo: Mo is an element that plays an important role as described above in the method of the present invention.
When the steel is then manufactured by direct quenching and tempering, the presence of this Mo improves hardenability and achieves precipitation strengthening during tempering, thereby achieving high strength in the medium temperature range. At this time, Mo is effective in maintaining strength on the high-temperature side of the medium temperature range, and if it is less than 0.01%, it has no effect, but if it exceeds 0.30%, it not only impairs weldability but also has an economical impact. Since it is an expensive element, adding more than necessary was avoided, and the upper limit was set at 0.30%. V: Similar to Mo, V is an indispensable element for achieving high strength in the medium temperature range.
It is particularly effective when added in combination with Mo. However, if V is less than 0.005%, there is no effect. Moreover, if it exceeds 0.10%, it not only impairs weldability but also deteriorates toughness, so the range was set to 0.005 to 0.10%. Al: Al is a useful element for deoxidation, fixes impurity nitrogen in steel, and improves toughness, so it is necessary to have at least 0.001%. Also, Al is at 300℃
It has the effect of suppressing a decrease in ductility due to blue brittleness before and after, and in this sense as well, it is preferable to add it. However, too much can lead to deterioration of toughness.
The upper limit was set at 0.10%. As described above, a seamless steel pipe containing each component with the remainder consisting of Fe and impurities is formed by hot rolling, and then immediately quenched,
Subsequently, it is tempered at a temperature of 600°C or higher and Ac 1 point or lower to produce a seamless steel pipe with excellent strength in the medium temperature range. Further, each component added as described above is limited so that the composition has a Pcm value expressed by the following formula of 0.21% or less. Pcm=C+Si/30+Mn/20+Mo/15+V
/10≠(%) In other words, hydrogen cracking susceptibility during circumferential welding of steel pipes
There is a good correlation between Pcm values; for example, even in under-bead cracking tests using cellulose rods to check weldability, if the Pcm value of the pipe material is 0.21% or less, hydrogen cracking will not occur. In addition, in the underbead cracking test, circumferential welding is possible even if cracking occurs, but if the Pcm value is limited in this way, circumferential welding can be performed with almost no preheating even in cold regions, and oil side development Considering that the construction site for steam pipes, etc. may be in a cold region, the Pcm value must be 0.21% or less. In addition, the tempering temperature range was set to 600℃ or higher and Ac 1 point or lower because insufficient tempering below 600℃ will cause a large change in strength when reheated.
Furthermore, tempering in the two-phase region exceeding Ac 1 point causes a rapid decrease in strength, making it impossible to obtain the required strength. Next, examples will be described. First, in Table 1, among the various seamless steel pipes, steel pipes A to C are manufactured by the method of the present invention, and steel pipes X and Y are medium-temperature range steel pipes manufactured by the conventional method. .
【表】
これらのうち鋼管A〜Cの製造は、シームレス
圧延ラインにおいて熱間圧延し、その終了後直ち
に水槽中に投入する直接焼入処理を施し、しかる
のち、630℃で焼もどして行なつた。これに対
し、鋼管XおよびYの製造は910℃で焼ならし処
理するか、または925℃で焼ならし後675℃で焼も
どし処理して行なつた。
また、鋼管A,B,Cと同一組成のものについ
ては比較のために、熱間圧延終了後室温付近まで
一旦空冷し、通常の工程にしたがつてAc3点以上
の温度まで再加熱してから焼入れ焼もどして、同
一寸法の鋼管を製造した。(ただし、これらは第
2表中に、それぞれ記号A′,B′,C′で示す)ま
た、比較例の再加熱焼入れ焼もどし条件は、熱処
理炉により900℃加熱焼入後、630℃で焼もどす
か、または誘導加熱方式で920〜940℃に加熱焼入
後、650〜670℃で焼もどすかのいずれかの方法を
採用した。
このようにして得られた各種鋼管について、常
温および350℃における各強度、更に、セルロー
ズ系溶接棒(E6010)によるバツテルタイプビー
ド下割れ試験の割れ率を求めたところ、第2表の
通りであつた。[Table] Of these, steel pipes A to C are manufactured by hot rolling on a seamless rolling line, followed by direct quenching treatment by putting them into a water tank immediately after completion, and then tempering at 630℃. Ta. On the other hand, steel pipes X and Y were manufactured by normalizing at 910°C or by normalizing at 925°C and then tempering at 675°C. In addition, for comparison purposes, steel pipes with the same composition as A, B, and C were air-cooled to around room temperature after hot rolling, and then reheated to a temperature above Ac 3 according to the normal process. A steel pipe of the same size was manufactured by quenching and tempering. (However, these are indicated by symbols A', B', and C', respectively, in Table 2.) In addition, the reheating and quenching and tempering conditions of the comparative example were as follows: After heating and quenching at 900℃ in a heat treatment furnace, One of two methods was adopted: tempering, or heating and quenching to 920-940°C using an induction heating method, followed by tempering at 650-670°C. For the various steel pipes obtained in this way, we determined the respective strengths at room temperature and 350°C, as well as the cracking rate in a buttel type under-bead cracking test using a cellulose welding rod (E6010), as shown in Table 2. It was hot.
【表】【table】
【表】
第2表から明らかな通り、本発明法によつて製
造する場合は、従来例による場合に比べて350℃
における強度が著しく高く、溶接性の点において
も、ビード下割れ試験における割れ率がほとんど
0%であつた。また、本発明法の如く、直接焼入
れ焼もどし処理して製造した鋼管は、通常の再加
熱焼入れ焼もどし処理した同じ成分の鋼管、つま
り、比較例と比較しても更に高い強度が得られ
た。すなわち、中温域において通常の焼入れ焼も
どし材と同じ強度を得るためであれば、本発明方
法により成分的にPcm値を更に低減できた。
次に、上記の通り各種の方法によつて製造した
鋼管のうちから、本発明法によつて製造した鋼管
の代表的なものとして鋼管Bを選び、従来例によ
つて製造した鋼管のうちで代表的なものとして鋼
管Yを選んで、これにつき常温から550℃の温度
範囲にわたつて強度を求め、これらを比較したと
ころ第1図の通りであつた。(ただし、実線は鋼
管B、点線は鋼管Yを示す)
なお、この高温引張試験は、平行部径6mmφ、
ゲージ長さ30mmの丸棒試験片を用い、JISGO567
にもとづいて行なつた。
第1図に示す結果から、本発明方法による場合
は常温から550℃の広い温度領域で著しく強度が
高く、とくに降伏強さ(σy)が高い。更に、従
来例の場合の引張強さ(σB)がピークを示す温
度は250℃付近であるのに対し、本発明方法で製
造された鋼管BのσBのピーク温度は300℃付近ま
で上昇し、この点でも本発明が優れていた。
以上のところから明らかな通り、本発明方法に
よつて製造すると、その鋼管は従来例の鋼管に比
べて中温域における高い強度と良好な溶接性が得
られることにとどまらず、直接焼入れ焼もどし処
理を施すことから、通常の焼入れ焼もどし処理し
た鋼管に比べても、同じ中温強度を得るに必要な
Pcm値が低減でき、更に優れた溶接性が実現でき
る。
すなわち、第2図は第2表においてほぼ同等の
強度を有する鋼管Bと鋼管A′について種々の入
熱で溶接最高硬さ試験を行なつた結果を示すグラ
フであつて、同図の縦軸は熱影響部(ボンド付
近)の最高硬さ(ビツカース硬度)を示し、下の
横軸は次式により計算される溶接後の冷却速度を
表わすパラメータである。
1/√=(E+1000N)/
{54T(1+T/1000)(N+0.5)}
R:300℃における冷却速度
E:入熱(J/in)
T:300−To
To:予熱温度(20℃)
N:8×肉厚(in)
また、上の横軸は肉厚14.3mmと25.4mmの場合に
ついて、上式により計算される冷却速度と溶接入
熱との対応を示すものである。
まず、第2表において、本発明法によつて直接
焼入れ焼もどしされた鋼管Bは、再加熱焼入れ焼
もどしされて製造された鋼管A′に比べて、強度
的には同等であるにもかかわらず、第2図を見る
と、溶接最高硬さは鋼管Bの方が著しく低く、こ
のことから円周溶接時の水素割れの危険性がさら
に一層小さいことがわかる。ちなみに、円周溶接
時のルートパスにおける入熱は通常8KJ/cm前後
であり、この入熱による熱影響部の最高硬さが
350Hv以下であれば、セルローズ系溶接棒を用い
ても、一応水素割れの危険性はないとされてい
る。第2図からわかるように、鋼管Aの場合肉厚
14.3mmであれば、この入熱でも最高硬さが350Hv
を越えることはないが、肉厚がこれ以上厚くなれ
ば割れの危険性が生じる。
一方、載管Bの場合には肉厚が25.4mmであつて
も8KJ/cm前後の入熱に対する最高硬さは300HV
以下であり、まつたく割れの危険性がないことが
わかる。要するに、本発明方法によつてとくに厚
肉の蒸気輸送用鋼管を製造すると、その効果は一
層発揮できる。
以上詳しく説明した通り、本発明方法による
と、中温域において、従来例よりも著しく高い強
度を有すると同時に溶接性のきわめて優れた鋼管
を経済的に安価に製造でき、工業の進歩や、代替
エネルギ開発の促進等に寄与するところ大のもの
である。[Table] As is clear from Table 2, when manufacturing by the method of the present invention, 350°C
In terms of weldability, the cracking rate in the under-bead cracking test was almost 0%. In addition, steel pipes manufactured by direct quenching and tempering as in the method of the present invention had even higher strength compared to steel pipes with the same composition that were subjected to normal reheating and quenching and tempering, that is, comparative examples. . That is, in order to obtain the same strength as a normal quenched and tempered material in the medium temperature range, the Pcm value could be further reduced component-wise by the method of the present invention. Next, from among the steel pipes manufactured by various methods as described above, steel pipe B was selected as a representative steel pipe manufactured by the method of the present invention, and steel pipe B was selected from among the steel pipes manufactured by the conventional method. Steel pipe Y was selected as a representative pipe, and its strength was determined over a temperature range from room temperature to 550°C, and the results were compared as shown in Figure 1. (However, the solid line indicates steel pipe B, and the dotted line indicates steel pipe Y.) In addition, this high temperature tensile test was conducted using a parallel part diameter of 6 mmφ,
Using a round bar test piece with a gauge length of 30 mm, JISGO567
It was based on this. From the results shown in FIG. 1, the method of the present invention has significantly high strength over a wide temperature range from room temperature to 550°C, and particularly high yield strength (σ y ). Furthermore, while the temperature at which the tensile strength (σ B ) peaks in the case of the conventional example is around 250°C, the peak temperature of σ B in steel pipe B manufactured by the method of the present invention increases to around 300°C. However, the present invention was also superior in this respect. As is clear from the above, when manufactured by the method of the present invention, the steel pipe not only has higher strength and better weldability in the medium temperature range than conventional steel pipes, but also can be directly quenched and tempered. Because of this process, the strength required to obtain the same medium temperature strength is higher than that of steel pipes that have been subjected to normal quenching and tempering treatment.
The Pcm value can be reduced and even better weldability can be achieved. In other words, Figure 2 is a graph showing the results of maximum welding hardness tests conducted at various heat inputs for steel pipes B and A', which have approximately the same strength in Table 2. represents the maximum hardness (Vickers hardness) of the heat-affected zone (near the bond), and the lower horizontal axis is a parameter representing the cooling rate after welding calculated by the following formula. 1/√=(E+1000N)/ {54T(1+T/1000)(N+0.5)} R: Cooling rate at 300℃ E: Heat input (J/in) T: 300−To To: Preheating temperature (20℃) N: 8 x wall thickness (in) The upper horizontal axis shows the correspondence between the cooling rate calculated by the above formula and the welding heat input for wall thicknesses of 14.3 mm and 25.4 mm. First, in Table 2, steel pipe B that was directly quenched and tempered by the method of the present invention has the same strength as steel pipe A' that was manufactured by reheating and quenching and tempering. First, looking at FIG. 2, the maximum welding hardness is significantly lower for steel pipe B, which indicates that the risk of hydrogen cracking during circumferential welding is even smaller. By the way, the heat input in the root pass during circumferential welding is usually around 8KJ/cm, and the maximum hardness of the heat affected zone due to this heat input is
It is said that if the temperature is 350Hv or less, there is no risk of hydrogen cracking even if a cellulose welding rod is used. As can be seen from Figure 2, in the case of steel pipe A, the wall thickness
If it is 14.3mm, the maximum hardness is 350Hv even with this heat input.
However, if the wall thickness becomes thicker than this, there is a risk of cracking. On the other hand, in the case of mounted pipe B, even if the wall thickness is 25.4 mm, the maximum hardness for a heat input of around 8 KJ/cm is 300 HV.
It can be seen that there is no risk of cracking. In short, if a particularly thick steel pipe for steam transport is manufactured by the method of the present invention, its effects can be further exhibited. As explained in detail above, according to the method of the present invention, it is possible to economically and inexpensively manufacture steel pipes that have significantly higher strength than conventional methods and excellent weldability in the medium temperature range, and are useful for industrial progress and alternative energy sources. This will greatly contribute to the promotion of development.
第1図は本発明方法により製造された代表的鋼
管と従来例によつて製造された鋼管とについて、
常温から550℃での強度を比較して示したグラフ
であり、第2図は本発明方法により製造された鋼
管の一例に対し、これと強度的に同等の鋼管を通
常の再加熱焼入れ焼もどし法により製造し、この
比較例の鋼管と本発明方法により製造された鋼管
とについて、溶接最高硬さ試験の結果を比較した
示したグラフである。
FIG. 1 shows typical steel pipes manufactured by the method of the present invention and steel pipes manufactured by the conventional method.
This is a graph showing a comparison of the strength from room temperature to 550°C. Figure 2 shows an example of a steel pipe produced by the method of the present invention, and a steel pipe with the same strength as that produced by ordinary reheating, quenching and tempering. 1 is a graph showing a comparison of the results of a maximum welding hardness test for a steel pipe of this comparative example manufactured by the method of the present invention and a steel pipe manufactured by the method of the present invention.
Claims (1)
〜0.80%、Mn:0.50〜2.00%、Al:0.001〜0.10
%を含むと共に、Mo若しくはVのうちいずれか
一方または両者をMo0.01〜0.30%ならびに
V0.005〜0.10%の範囲において含み、残部鉄およ
び不純物から成つて、Pcm=C+Si/30+Mn/2
0+Mo/15+ V/10(%)で与えらるPcm値が0.21%以下であるシ ームレス鋼管を熱間圧延により造管し、その後、
直ちに直接焼入し、しかるのち、600℃以上Ac1
変態点以下の温度で焼もどすことを特徴とする
200〜450℃の中温域で高強度を示す蒸気輸送用シ
ームレス鋼管の製造方法。[Claims] 1. In weight percentage, C: 0.03 to 0.15%, Si: 0.01
~0.80%, Mn: 0.50~2.00%, Al: 0.001~0.10
%, and one or both of Mo or V is included as Mo0.01 to 0.30% and
Contains in the range of V0.005 to 0.10%, with the balance consisting of iron and impurities, Pcm=C+Si/30+Mn/2
A seamless steel pipe whose Pcm value given by 0+Mo/15+V/10 (%) is 0.21% or less is formed by hot rolling, and then
Direct quenching immediately, then 600℃ or more Ac 1
Characterized by tempering at a temperature below the transformation point
A method for producing seamless steel pipes for steam transportation that exhibit high strength in the medium temperature range of 200 to 450°C.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP6786480A JPS56166324A (en) | 1980-05-23 | 1980-05-23 | Production of high-strength seamless steel pipe of good weldability for middle temperature region |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP6786480A JPS56166324A (en) | 1980-05-23 | 1980-05-23 | Production of high-strength seamless steel pipe of good weldability for middle temperature region |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS56166324A JPS56166324A (en) | 1981-12-21 |
| JPS6151009B2 true JPS6151009B2 (en) | 1986-11-07 |
Family
ID=13357211
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP6786480A Granted JPS56166324A (en) | 1980-05-23 | 1980-05-23 | Production of high-strength seamless steel pipe of good weldability for middle temperature region |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS56166324A (en) |
Families Citing this family (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR2525503B1 (en) * | 1982-04-22 | 1984-07-13 | Ugine Aciers | |
| US4533405A (en) * | 1982-10-07 | 1985-08-06 | Amax Inc. | Tubular high strength low alloy steel for oil and gas wells |
| US4453986A (en) * | 1982-10-07 | 1984-06-12 | Amax Inc. | Tubular high strength low alloy steel for oil and gas wells |
| WO1996012574A1 (en) * | 1994-10-20 | 1996-05-02 | Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. | Method of manufacturing seamless steel pipes and manufacturing equipment therefor |
| JP3855300B2 (en) * | 1996-04-19 | 2006-12-06 | 住友金属工業株式会社 | Manufacturing method and equipment for seamless steel pipe |
| JP4945946B2 (en) | 2005-07-26 | 2012-06-06 | 住友金属工業株式会社 | Seamless steel pipe and manufacturing method thereof |
| DE102008011856A1 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2009-09-10 | V&M Deutschland Gmbh | High strength low alloy steel for seamless tubes with excellent weldability and corrosion resistance |
| JP5447698B2 (en) * | 2011-02-10 | 2014-03-19 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | High-strength steel for steam piping and method for manufacturing the same |
| CN103498105A (en) * | 2013-09-26 | 2014-01-08 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | High-strength seamless steel tube for geological drilling and preparation method thereof |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS52152814A (en) * | 1976-06-14 | 1977-12-19 | Nippon Steel Corp | Thermo-mechanical treatment of seamless steel pipe |
-
1980
- 1980-05-23 JP JP6786480A patent/JPS56166324A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS56166324A (en) | 1981-12-21 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP5447698B2 (en) | High-strength steel for steam piping and method for manufacturing the same | |
| JP5055774B2 (en) | A steel plate for line pipe having high deformation performance and a method for producing the same. | |
| JP3534413B2 (en) | Ferritic heat-resistant steel excellent in high-temperature strength and method for producing the same | |
| JPS6151009B2 (en) | ||
| JP2867295B2 (en) | Method for producing martensitic stainless steel line pipe | |
| JPS619519A (en) | Manufacture of high strength steel superior in sulfide corrosion cracking resistance | |
| JPH11226738A (en) | Method for welding high Cr ferritic heat resistant steel and method for manufacturing welded steel pipe | |
| CN105088082B (en) | A kind of alitizing is modified P110 grades of oil annular tube steels and its tubing manufacture method | |
| JPS6027731B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing steel pipes for steam transport that exhibit high strength in the medium temperature range of 200 to 450°C | |
| JPS6254062A (en) | Low c-cr-mo steel used under damp steam | |
| JPH0387332A (en) | High strength-low alloy-heat resistant steel | |
| JPS5920423A (en) | Production of 80kgf/mm2 class seamless steel pipe having excellent low temperature toughness | |
| JPH08134585A (en) | Ferritic heat-resistant steel excellent in high-temperature strength and oxidation resistance and method for producing the same | |
| JPH04365838A (en) | Ferritic heat-resistant steel with excellent hot workability and high-temperature strength | |
| JPS6156310B2 (en) | ||
| JPH04268019A (en) | Production of martensitic stainless steel line pipe | |
| JP2659814B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of high strength low alloy heat resistant steel | |
| JPS6210240A (en) | Steel for seamless drawn oil well pipe excellent in corrosion resistance and collapsing strength | |
| JPH07113126B2 (en) | Method for producing stainless steel with excellent resistance to stress corrosion cracking | |
| JPH0499127A (en) | Production of high-strength martensitic stainless steel line pipe | |
| JPH0218380B2 (en) | ||
| JPH02290920A (en) | Production of high strength duplex stainless steel pipe | |
| JPH04268018A (en) | Production of high strength martensitic stainless steel line pipe | |
| JPH0377848B2 (en) | ||
| JP2004285432A (en) | Method for softening heat treatment of high strength 9Cr steel pipe |