Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPS626180B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPS626180B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPS626180B2
JPS626180B2 JP53066207A JP6620778A JPS626180B2 JP S626180 B2 JPS626180 B2 JP S626180B2 JP 53066207 A JP53066207 A JP 53066207A JP 6620778 A JP6620778 A JP 6620778A JP S626180 B2 JPS626180 B2 JP S626180B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
defect
reflected light
amount
defects
diffraction pattern
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP53066207A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS54157686A (en
Inventor
Kenichi Sakamoto
Takeshi Katayama
Tadao Kawaguchi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP6620778A priority Critical patent/JPS54157686A/en
Publication of JPS54157686A publication Critical patent/JPS54157686A/en
Publication of JPS626180B2 publication Critical patent/JPS626180B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/88Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
    • G01N21/89Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination in moving material, e.g. running paper or textiles
    • G01N21/8901Optical details; Scanning details

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 本発明は冷間または熱間で圧延される鋼板の表
面における欠陥の自動検査方法、特にコヒーレン
トな光を被検査物体表面に投射することによつて
形成される回折パターンを用いて欠陥の種類の判
別を行なう方法に関するものである。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method for automatically inspecting defects on the surface of cold or hot rolled steel sheets, and in particular to a method for automatically inspecting defects on the surface of a cold- or hot-rolled steel plate, and in particular, a method for automatically inspecting defects on the surface of a cold-rolled or hot-rolled steel plate. The present invention relates to a method for determining the type of defect using the method.

ところで回折パターンを利用して表面欠陥を検
査する従来の装置としては第1図に示すものが代
表的である。本方式の原理を説明するとレーザー
光源1からの光線2を集光レンズ3によつて充分
に絞つて被検査表面4に投射する。その結果、結
像面6においてある回折パターン7が形成され
る。そしてもし投射視野5の位置に欠陥があつた
場合は回折パターン7の形状に乱れを生じる。こ
の回折パターン7を通常光強度の最高点並びにそ
の周辺数点に設置された受光部8で電気信号に変
換し、該受光部8の各光電検出器からの出力電気
信号を適当な前置増幅器により増幅したのち、そ
のままあるいは更に微分装置により出力変化分の
みを取り出して適当な閾値でレベル弁別すること
により、通常表面のノイズ成分と欠陥との区別及
び欠陥の光量反射率から欠陥の有害度の判定を行
うものである。即ち従来の表面欠陥検査法におい
ては情報の基礎を鋼板表面視野からの光量反射率
において欠陥の有害度の判定を行なつていた。
By the way, the one shown in FIG. 1 is a typical conventional apparatus for inspecting surface defects using a diffraction pattern. To explain the principle of this system, a beam 2 from a laser light source 1 is sufficiently focused by a condenser lens 3 and projected onto a surface 4 to be inspected. As a result, a certain diffraction pattern 7 is formed at the imaging plane 6. If there is a defect at the position of the projection field 5, the shape of the diffraction pattern 7 will be disturbed. This diffraction pattern 7 is normally converted into an electrical signal by a light receiving section 8 installed at the highest point of light intensity and several points around it, and the output electrical signals from each photoelectric detector of the light receiving section 8 are sent to an appropriate preamplifier. After amplification, it is possible to distinguish between normal surface noise components and defects, and to determine the degree of harmfulness of defects from the light intensity reflectance of defects, by extracting only the output change as it is or using a differentiator and level-discriminating it with an appropriate threshold value. It is for making judgments. That is, in the conventional surface defect inspection method, the degree of harmfulness of a defect is determined based on the light reflectance from the field of view of the steel plate surface as the basis of information.

しかし欠陥には多くの種類があり、欠陥の種類
が異なるとたとえ光量反射率が同じであつても欠
陥レベルは異なるものである。例えば同じ反射率
の表面汚れと、ヘゲ疵とではヘゲ疵の方が有害度
があきらかに大である。従つて欠陥の有害度の判
定を正確に行なうにはまず欠陥の種類の判別を行
なうことが必須の条件であるといえる。そして欠
陥の種類が判別できれば、その欠陥の形態が判る
からその形態の特徴を有害度判定のためのパラメ
ータとすれば欠陥レベルを適確に判定できること
になる。
However, there are many types of defects, and different types of defects have different defect levels even if the light intensity reflectance is the same. For example, between surface stains and sludge defects that have the same reflectance, sludge defects are clearly more harmful. Therefore, in order to accurately determine the degree of harmfulness of a defect, it is essential to first determine the type of defect. If the type of defect can be determined, the morphology of the defect can be determined, and if the characteristics of the morphology are used as parameters for determining the degree of harmfulness, the defect level can be determined accurately.

この発明は以上のような考え方に基づき、鋼板
表面欠陥の種類判別を行なうために欠陥を二次元
的な広がりをもつ欠陥像としてとらえ、この像か
ら欠陥の特徴パラメーターを算出することによ
り、欠陥の種類さらには欠陥の有害度の判定を行
う方法である。以下にこの発明の詳細について説
明する。
This invention is based on the above idea, and in order to identify the type of defects on the surface of steel sheets, defects are captured as a defect image with a two-dimensional spread, and characteristic parameters of the defects are calculated from this image. This method determines the type and degree of harmfulness of the defect. The details of this invention will be explained below.

欠陥の種類とは欠陥の形状成因等により経験的
に分類されたものである。従つて欠陥種類の判定
を行なう場合は類似の形状のものをまとめて数種
類の群に分けることが可能である。そこで検出さ
れた欠陥がこの群のうちのどれに属するものであ
るかを識別することにより欠陥の種類が判別でき
る。
The types of defects are empirically classified based on the shape factors of the defects. Therefore, when determining the type of defect, it is possible to group defects with similar shapes into several groups. The type of defect can be determined by identifying to which group the detected defect belongs.

又この欠陥種類の識別において目視では欠陥の
微小部分の光量反射特性だけでなく、欠陥を平面
的な集合として形状、色、発生部位等を経験的に
勘案して一瞬のうちに認識しており、この機能は
いわゆるパターン認識の分野に属する。すなわち
目視検査は欠陥を二次元的な広がりをもつ欠陥像
としてとらえている。
In addition, when identifying the defect type, visual inspection not only takes into account the light intensity reflection characteristics of minute parts of the defect, but also empirically considers the shape, color, location, etc. of the defect as a planar group, and instantly recognizes the defect. , this function belongs to the field of so-called pattern recognition. In other words, visual inspection treats defects as two-dimensionally spread defect images.

本発明は表面欠陥の検査において上記目視検査
に近い機能を保有させるため欠陥を従来の一次元
的なとらえ方から二次元的にとらえることを特徴
とし、二次元的にとらえた欠陥像の回折パターン
の特徴から欠陥の種類判別を行なうものであり、
その要旨とするところは被検査鋼板表面にコヒー
レントな光を欠陥の大きさに応じた視野に投射し
て、反射する光が形成する回折パターンに対して
光学的フイルタをかけて視野全体からの反射光量
と回折パターンにおける周波数軸上及びその近傍
における反射光量と更にその反射光量のうち高周
波帯域における反射光量とに分割、受光して各々
の反射光量に対応する信号の関数として欠陥の特
徴を表わす特徴パラメータ、すなわち欠陥視野全
体の光強度を表わすパラメータと欠陥の方向性を
表わすパラメータ及び欠陥の各方向における欠陥
の鋭さを表わすパラメータを算出し、これらのパ
ラメータを用いて欠陥の種類判別を行なうことを
特徴とするものである。
The present invention is characterized in that defects are captured two-dimensionally instead of the conventional one-dimensional method in order to have a function similar to the above-mentioned visual inspection in inspecting surface defects, and the diffraction pattern of the defect image captured two-dimensionally. The type of defect is determined based on the characteristics of
The gist of this method is to project coherent light onto the surface of the steel sheet to be inspected in a field of view that corresponds to the size of the defect, and then apply an optical filter to the diffraction pattern formed by the reflected light to detect the reflection from the entire field of view. A feature that expresses the characteristics of a defect as a function of the signal that is received and received by the amount of reflected light on and near the frequency axis in the light amount and diffraction pattern, and the amount of reflected light in the high frequency band of that amount of reflected light. The parameters are calculated, namely, a parameter representing the light intensity of the entire defect visual field, a parameter representing the directionality of the defect, and a parameter representing the sharpness of the defect in each direction of the defect, and these parameters are used to determine the type of defect. This is a characteristic feature.

本発明におけるコヒーレントな光はレーザー等
で代表されるものであり、投射された鋼板表面の
反射光の回折パターンが表面反射特性の二次元フ
ーリエ変換像であり、その光強度分布が二次元パ
ワースペクトル密度となることは周知である。し
たがつてコヒーレントな光を欠陥の大きさに応じ
た視野の画像に投射して形成された回折パターン
は、該画像視野の二次元パワースペクトル密度を
表わすわけである。
The coherent light used in the present invention is typified by a laser, etc., and the diffraction pattern of the projected light reflected from the surface of the steel plate is a two-dimensional Fourier transform image of the surface reflection characteristics, and the light intensity distribution is a two-dimensional power spectrum. It is well known that the density is Therefore, a diffraction pattern formed by projecting coherent light onto an image of a field of view corresponding to the size of the defect represents the two-dimensional power spectral density of the image field.

しかるに鋼板の表面欠陥像に対して二次元のフ
ーリエ変換を実行するとそのパワーがほとんどフ
ーリエ変換像における2つの周波数軸近傍に集中
する。本発明においては画像視野を鋼板の圧延方
向(長手方向)とそれと垂直な方向(以後巾方向
と呼ぶ)からとらえ、二次元パワースペクトル密
度の圧延方向の周波数軸近傍及び巾方向の周波数
軸近傍に集中的に着目し、回折パターンに対して
光学的フイルタをかけて特徴パラメータを抽出す
るものである。
However, when a two-dimensional Fourier transform is performed on a surface defect image of a steel plate, most of the power is concentrated near two frequency axes in the Fourier transform image. In the present invention, the image field of view is taken from the rolling direction (longitudinal direction) of the steel plate and the direction perpendicular thereto (hereinafter referred to as the width direction), and the two-dimensional power spectral density is located near the frequency axis in the rolling direction and near the frequency axis in the width direction. This method focuses intensively on the diffraction pattern and extracts characteristic parameters by applying an optical filter to the diffraction pattern.

第2図に回折パターンの一例を示す。欠陥が存
在しない視野の回折パターンにおいてはそのパワ
ーのほとんどが回折パターンの中心点近傍12に
集中するが、たとえば圧延方向に延びる線状欠陥
を視野にとらえるとその回折パターンは巾方向に
おける欠陥部分の高周波成分によつて乱れた回折
パターン9が形成される。すなわち、圧延方向周
波数軸上10においては欠陥の圧延方向での変化
が緩慢なためにパワースペクトル密度が低く反射
光量も弱い。逆に巾方向周波数軸においては欠陥
の巾方向での変化が激しいために低周波帯域から
高周波帯域にかけてパワースペクトル密度が高く
反射光量も強い。
FIG. 2 shows an example of a diffraction pattern. In a diffraction pattern in the field of view where no defects exist, most of the power is concentrated near the center point 12 of the diffraction pattern, but for example, when a linear defect extending in the rolling direction is captured in the field of view, the diffraction pattern is concentrated in the vicinity of the defect portion in the width direction. A diffraction pattern 9 disturbed by the high frequency components is formed. That is, on the frequency axis 10 in the rolling direction, the defect changes slowly in the rolling direction, so the power spectrum density is low and the amount of reflected light is weak. On the contrary, in the width direction frequency axis, since the defect changes rapidly in the width direction, the power spectrum density is high and the amount of reflected light is strong from the low frequency band to the high frequency band.

第3図はこうした各欠陥種類に対応した回折パ
ターン13″の特徴を抽出するための光学的フイ
ルターの例を示す(第3図13′)。いま光学的フ
イルターの分割されたアパーチヤー13,15,
17,19,21に対しそれぞれに対応させた光
電変換器14,16,18,20,22が受光し
た反射光量をそれぞれl1,l2,l3,l4,l5とする。
アパーチヤー15はそれぞれ二次元フーリエ変換
面における圧延方向周波数軸上及びその近傍にお
いてのみ、またアパーチヤー17は巾方向周波数
軸上及びその近傍においてのみ透過力を有する光
学的ウインドウであり、アパーチヤー15に対応
する光電変換器16と二次元パワースペクトル像
の該帯域における反射光量l2を電気信号に変換
し、アパーチヤー17に対応する光電変換器18
が同様に反射光量l3を電気信号に変換する。ここ
で、周波数軸上のパワースペクトル密度だけでな
くその近傍のパワースペクトル密度をも検出する
理由は各周波数軸方向における緩慢な変化に伴う
欠陥成分をもとらえるためである。またアパーチ
ヤー19は前記アパーチヤー15がとられた圧延
方向の周波数帯域に相当する反射光量のうちでそ
の高周波帯域においてのみ、同様にアパーチヤー
21は巾方向高周波帯域においてのみ透過力を有
する光学的ウインドウであり、アパーチヤー19
に対応する光電変換器20が二次元パワースペク
トル像の該帯域における反射光量l4を電気信号に
変換し、アパーチヤー21に対応する光量変換器
22が同様に反射光量l5を電気信号に変換する。
正常な表面を視野にとらえるとそのパワースペク
トル密度は圧延方向周波数軸上とその近傍及び巾
方向周波数軸上とその近傍の帯域のうちで比較的
低い帯域に集中するため、各帯域における反射光
量l2,l3のうちで、各帯域の高帯域における反射
光量l4,l5の占める割合は小さい。しかるに圧延
方向の線状欠陥とか点状欠陥を視野にとらえる
と、そのパワースペクトル密度分布は前記第2図
の回折パターンのように欠陥のもつ高周波成分に
よつて線状欠陥は巾方向における高帯域のパワー
スペクトル密度が増加し、また点状欠陥は巾方向
と圧延方向の両方における高帯域のパワースペク
トル密度が増加し、回折パターン上では反射光量
l2,l3のうちで反射光量l4,l5の占める割合が大き
くなる。
FIG. 3 shows an example of an optical filter for extracting the characteristics of the diffraction pattern 13'' corresponding to each defect type (FIG. 3 13'). Now, the divided apertures 13, 15,
Let the amounts of reflected light received by the photoelectric converters 14, 16, 18, 20, and 22 corresponding to the photoelectric converters 17, 19, and 21, respectively, be l 1 , l 2 , l 3 , l 4 , and l 5 .
The aperture 15 is an optical window that has a transmitting power only on and in the vicinity of the frequency axis in the rolling direction on the two-dimensional Fourier transform surface, and the aperture 17 is an optical window that has a transmitting power only on and in the vicinity of the frequency axis in the width direction, and corresponds to the aperture 15. A photoelectric converter 16 and a photoelectric converter 18 corresponding to the aperture 17 that converts the amount of reflected light l 2 in the band of the two-dimensional power spectrum image into an electrical signal.
similarly converts the amount of reflected light l 3 into an electrical signal. Here, the reason why not only the power spectral density on the frequency axis but also the power spectral density in the vicinity thereof is detected is to also capture defective components accompanying slow changes in each frequency axis direction. Further, the aperture 19 is an optical window that has a transmitting power only in a high frequency band of the amount of reflected light corresponding to the frequency band in the rolling direction in which the aperture 15 is taken, and similarly, the aperture 21 has a transmitting power only in a high frequency band in the width direction. , aperture 19
The photoelectric converter 20 corresponding to the aperture 21 converts the amount of reflected light l 4 in the band of the two-dimensional power spectrum image into an electrical signal, and the light amount converter 22 corresponding to the aperture 21 similarly converts the amount of reflected light l 5 into an electrical signal. .
When a normal surface is viewed, its power spectral density is concentrated in relatively low bands on and near the frequency axis in the rolling direction and on and near the frequency axis in the width direction, so the amount of reflected light in each band l 2 and l 3 , the ratio of the reflected light amounts l 4 and l 5 in the high band of each band is small. However, when looking at linear defects or point defects in the rolling direction, the power spectral density distribution is as shown in the diffraction pattern in Figure 2, and due to the high frequency components of the defects, linear defects have a high frequency band in the width direction. The power spectral density of point defects increases, and the power spectral density of high bands increases in both the width direction and the rolling direction, and the amount of reflected light increases on the diffraction pattern.
The ratio of reflected light amounts l 4 and l 5 to l 2 and l 3 increases.

この原理を用いて欠陥の圧延方向における鋭さ
を表わすパラメータPR、巾方向における鋭さを
表わすパラメータPWを下記(1)、(2)式により算出
することができる。
Using this principle, the parameter P R representing the sharpness of the defect in the rolling direction and the parameter P W representing the sharpness in the width direction can be calculated using the following equations (1) and (2).

R〓l4/l2 〓100〔%〕 (1) PW〓l5/l3 〓100〔%〕 (2) 次にアパーチヤー13は2次元フーリエ変換面
の第3象限においてのみ透過力を有する光学的ウ
インドウであり、これに対応する光電変換器14
が2次元パワースペクトル像の第3象限での全反
射光量l1を電気信号に変換するもので、ある種の
欠陥例えば汚れ欠陥の発生では視野全体の反射光
量l1が低下することがあり光学的フイルター13
はこれを抽出するものである。ここでl1を電気信
号に変換したものを視野全体の光強度を表わすパ
ラメータLとする。
P R 〓l 4 /l 2 〓100 [%] (1) P W 〓l 5 /l 3 〓100 [%] (2) Next, the aperture 13 has a penetrating power only in the third quadrant of the two-dimensional Fourier transform surface. an optical window with a corresponding photoelectric converter 14
converts the amount of total reflected light l 1 in the third quadrant of a two-dimensional power spectrum image into an electrical signal, and the occurrence of certain defects, such as dirt defects, may reduce the amount of reflected light l 1 in the entire field of view. target filter 13
is what extracts this. Here, l 1 is converted into an electrical signal and is defined as a parameter L representing the light intensity of the entire field of view.

前記のように圧延方向に延びる線状欠陥を視野
にとらえるとその回折パターンは欠陥のもつ方向
性によつて、全体の反射光量が巾方向の周波数軸
上とその近傍に集中することを説明したがこの原
理を用いて欠陥の圧延方向に対する方向性を表わ
すパラメータDR、巾方向に対する方向性を表わ
すパラメータDWを下記(3)、(4)式により算出する
ことができる。
As mentioned above, when a linear defect extending in the rolling direction is viewed, the diffraction pattern shows that the total amount of reflected light is concentrated on and near the frequency axis in the width direction, depending on the directionality of the defect. Using this principle, the parameter D R representing the directionality of the defect in the rolling direction and the parameter D W representing the directionality in the width direction can be calculated by the following equations (3) and (4).

R〓l2/l1 〓100〔%〕 (3) DW〓l3/l1 〓100〔%〕 (4) これらのパラメータL,DR,DW,PR,PW
用いて欠陥の種類判別を行なう手順を第4図に従
つて説明する。第4図において25〜29は論理
判断部であり、それぞれ予め定めておいた閾値θ
iと前記の各パラメータの値が比較されて真の場
合は左に偽の場合は右に分岐する。これらのブロ
ツクにおいて25は視野全体の光量反射率が大か
否か、26は圧延方向における欠陥成分(方向
性)が大か否か27は巾方向における欠陥成分
(方向性)が大か否か、28は圧延方向において
欠陥による高周波成分(反射光量)が大か否か、
29は巾方向において欠陥による高周波成分(反
射光量)が大か否かの論理判断を行うことによ
り、欠陥の有無及び欠陥の種類を判別することが
できる。
D R 〓l 2 /l 1 〓100 [%] (3) D W 〓l 3 /l 1 〓100 [%] (4) Using these parameters L, DR , D W , P R , P W The procedure for determining the type of defect will be explained with reference to FIG. In FIG. 4, numerals 25 to 29 are logical judgment units, each of which has a predetermined threshold value θ.
i and the values of each of the above parameters are compared, and if true, branch to the left; if false, branch to the right. In these blocks, 25 indicates whether the light intensity reflectance in the entire visual field is large or not, 26 indicates whether the defect component (directivity) in the rolling direction is large, and 27 indicates whether the defect component (directivity) in the width direction is large or not. , 28 is whether the high frequency component (reflected light amount) due to defects is large in the rolling direction;
29 can determine the presence or absence of a defect and the type of defect by making a logical judgment as to whether the high frequency component (reflected light amount) due to the defect is large in the width direction.

本発明において光学的フイルタをかける周波数
帯域及び論理判断を行なう基準である閾値の決定
が最も重要であることは言うまでもない。この点
についてはオフライン、オンラインでの基礎実験
を充分に実施して適切な帯域と閾値を決定する必
要がある。たとえば鋼板表面にノンコヒーレント
な光を投射して画像視野と同一の視野寸法で欠陥
をとらえて通常の欠陥検出信号を用いて画像処理
を施しデイジタル的に回折パターンを求める、即
ちパワースペクトラム密度を算出してその値から
各方向の周波数帯域及び各閾値を決定することが
できる。また各周波数帯域を決定するには視野寸
法と対象とする欠陥寸法から空間周波数を計算し
て決定することができる。即ちアパーチヤー15
と17の厚み(第3図23)に対応する空間周波
数については、たとえば圧延方向周波数軸上とそ
の近傍の周波数帯域を決定するには巾方向におけ
る緩慢な変化分の空間周波数を求めればよい。ま
たアパーチヤー19と21のカツト部分(第3図
24)に対応する空間周波数については、たとえ
ば巾方向周波数軸における高周波数帯域を決定す
るには、線状欠陥および点状欠陥の巾方向におけ
る変化分の空間周波数を求めればよい。
Needless to say, in the present invention, determining the frequency band to which the optical filter is applied and the threshold value, which is a criterion for making logical judgments, are most important. Regarding this point, it is necessary to conduct sufficient offline and online basic experiments to determine the appropriate bandwidth and threshold. For example, non-coherent light is projected onto the surface of a steel plate to capture defects with the same field of view as the image field, and the image is processed using a normal defect detection signal to digitally obtain the diffraction pattern, that is, calculate the power spectrum density. Then, the frequency band in each direction and each threshold value can be determined from the value. Further, each frequency band can be determined by calculating the spatial frequency from the field of view size and the target defect size. i.e. aperture 15
Regarding the spatial frequencies corresponding to the thicknesses of 1 and 17 (FIG. 3, 23), for example, in order to determine the frequency bands on and in the vicinity of the frequency axis in the rolling direction, it is sufficient to find the spatial frequencies of gradual changes in the width direction. Regarding the spatial frequency corresponding to the cut portions of the apertures 19 and 21 (Fig. 3, 24), for example, in order to determine the high frequency band on the width direction frequency axis, it is necessary to calculate the change in the width direction of linear defects and point defects. All you have to do is find the spatial frequency of .

閾値の決定については本発明者の実験によると
θi(i=2〜6)については30〜40が、θj(j
=7〜13)については35〜40が適当であるという
結果を得た。また第4図において欠陥の発生部位
(鋼板圧延方向のトツプ、中央、ボトム部また巾
方向のエツジ、中央部)に関する情報を付加して
判別精度を向上することも可能である。
Regarding the determination of the threshold value, according to the inventor's experiments, θ i (i = 2 to 6) is 30 to 40, and θ j (j
= 7 to 13), we found that 35 to 40 is appropriate. Further, in FIG. 4, it is possible to improve the discrimination accuracy by adding information regarding the location where the defect occurs (the top, center, and bottom in the rolling direction of the steel plate, or the edge and center in the width direction).

本発明はこのように構成することにより瞬時の
うちに鋼板の表面欠陥の種類を自動的に判別する
ことが可能であり、発明者が行なつたオフライン
テストでは第4図の判別フローを用いて目視との
識別一致率が通常発生する自然欠陥に対して85%
以上という結果を得た。ここでテストで用いた欠
陥の特徴は下記の通りである。
By configuring the present invention as described above, it is possible to automatically determine the type of surface defects on a steel plate in an instant, and in an offline test conducted by the inventor, the determination flow shown in Fig. 4 was used. Identification agreement rate with visual inspection is 85% for normally occurring natural defects
The above results were obtained. The characteristics of the defects used in this test are as follows.

欠陥A:巾方向に延びた線状欠陥 欠陥B:圧延方向に延びた線状欠陥 欠陥C:特殊な方向に延びた線状欠陥 欠陥D:点状の欠陥 欠陥E:圧延方向に延びる塊状の欠陥 欠陥F:広がりをもつ汚れのような欠陥 欠陥G:単発的に発生する塊状の欠陥 本発明に基づく表面欠陥検査装置の基本的な1
構成例を第5図に示す。図において30はレーザ
ー光源であり、31はコヒーレントな光、32は
被検査材である鋼板、33は鋼板表面に発生して
いる欠陥をとらえた視野である。34は回折パタ
ーンの結像面、35は回折パターンからの反射光
量を制限する光学的フイルタ、36は該回折パタ
ーンを前記光学的フイルタ35をかけて受光した
反射光量を電気信号に変換する光電変換部であ
る。37は光電変換部36から送られた電気信号
を処理して前記欠陥の特徴パラメータを算出する
信号処理部、38は算出された特徴パラメータ、
39は特徴パラメータを用いて例えば第4図の如
き判別フローに従つて欠陥の種類を判定する論理
判断部、40は判定結果を作業者に知らせる判別
結果出力部であり、欠陥検査情報を図示しない欠
陥検査情報処理装置にデイジタル出力Dθにて送
信することも可能である。
Defect A: Linear defect extending in the width direction Defect B: Linear defect extending in the rolling direction Defect C: Linear defect extending in a special direction Defect D: Point-like defect Defect E: Block-like defect extending in the rolling direction Defects Defect F: Spreading stain-like defect Defect G: Single-occurring lump-like defect Basic 1 of the surface defect inspection device based on the present invention
An example of the configuration is shown in FIG. In the figure, 30 is a laser light source, 31 is coherent light, 32 is a steel plate that is a material to be inspected, and 33 is a field of view that captures defects occurring on the surface of the steel plate. 34 is an imaging plane of the diffraction pattern, 35 is an optical filter that limits the amount of reflected light from the diffraction pattern, and 36 is a photoelectric conversion device that applies the diffraction pattern to the optical filter 35 and converts the amount of reflected light received into an electrical signal. Department. 37 is a signal processing unit that processes the electric signal sent from the photoelectric conversion unit 36 to calculate characteristic parameters of the defect; 38 is a calculated characteristic parameter;
Reference numeral 39 denotes a logical judgment unit that uses characteristic parameters to judge the type of defect according to the judgment flow shown in FIG. 4, and 40 denotes a judgment result output unit that notifies the operator of the judgment result, and defect inspection information is not shown. It is also possible to transmit the digital output Dθ to the defect inspection information processing device.

以上本発明によれば、従来の表面欠陥検査法に
おいては不可能であつた表面欠陥の種類判別が可
能となり、これにより欠陥レベル(有害度)の判
定精度が向上するとともに欠陥種類によりその発
生工程が判るから品質管理にも有効である等の効
果があり、従来の目視検査に代わる表面欠陥の完
全な自動化が可能となつた。
As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to determine the type of surface defects, which was impossible with conventional surface defect inspection methods.This improves the accuracy of determining the defect level (degree of harmfulness), and also improves the process by which the defect occurs based on the defect type. It has the effect of being effective in quality control because it can be seen, and it has become possible to completely automate surface defect inspection in place of conventional visual inspection.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は従来技術を用いた表面欠陥検査装置の
構成図、第2図は回折パターンの一例を示す図、
第3図は光学的フイルタの構成の一例を示す図、
第4図は欠陥種類の判定フローを示す図、第5図
は本発明に基づく表面欠陥検査装置を示す図であ
る。 図面で4,32は被検査表面、1,30はレー
ザー光源、7は回折パターン、35はフイルタで
ある。
Fig. 1 is a configuration diagram of a surface defect inspection device using conventional technology, Fig. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a diffraction pattern,
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration of an optical filter;
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a defect type determination flow, and FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a surface defect inspection apparatus based on the present invention. In the drawing, 4 and 32 are surfaces to be inspected, 1 and 30 are laser light sources, 7 is a diffraction pattern, and 35 is a filter.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1 被検査材表面にコヒーレントな光を投射し
て、反射する光が形成する回折パターンに対して
該パターンを複数の領域に分割する光学的フイル
タをかけて視野全体からの光量と回折パターンに
おける鋼板圧延方向並びに巾方向2つの周波数軸
上及びその近傍における反射光量と更にその反射
光量のうち前記それぞれの方向の高周波帯域の反
射光量を受光して、視野全体の光強度を表わすパ
ラメータL、視野全体の反射光量に対する圧延方
向並びに巾方向の周波数軸上及びその近傍におけ
る反射光量の比率から算出した欠陥の方向性を表
わすパラメータDW,DR、更に圧延方向並びに巾
方向の周波数軸上及びその近傍における全反射光
量に対するそれぞれの方向の高周波帯域における
反射光量の比率から算出した欠陥の前記各方向に
おける鋭さを表わすパラメータPW,PRを求め
て、これら5つのパラメータを用いて欠陥の種類
判別を行なうことを特徴とした鋼板の表面欠陥検
査方法。
1 Project coherent light onto the surface of the material to be inspected, and apply an optical filter to the diffraction pattern formed by the reflected light to divide the pattern into multiple regions to determine the amount of light from the entire field of view and the steel plate in the diffraction pattern. A parameter L representing the light intensity of the entire field of view by receiving the amount of reflected light on and near the two frequency axes in the rolling direction and the width direction, and furthermore, the amount of reflected light in the high frequency band in each of the above-mentioned directions. Parameters D W and D R representing the directionality of defects calculated from the ratio of the amount of reflected light on and in the vicinity of the frequency axis in the rolling direction and the width direction to the amount of reflected light in the rolling direction and on and in the vicinity of the frequency axis in the width direction. The parameters P W and P R representing the sharpness of the defect in each direction are calculated from the ratio of the amount of reflected light in the high frequency band in each direction to the amount of total reflected light at , and the type of defect is determined using these five parameters. A method for inspecting surface defects of steel sheets.
JP6620778A 1978-06-01 1978-06-01 Discriminating method of kinds for defects of steel plate surfaces Granted JPS54157686A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP6620778A JPS54157686A (en) 1978-06-01 1978-06-01 Discriminating method of kinds for defects of steel plate surfaces

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP6620778A JPS54157686A (en) 1978-06-01 1978-06-01 Discriminating method of kinds for defects of steel plate surfaces

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS54157686A JPS54157686A (en) 1979-12-12
JPS626180B2 true JPS626180B2 (en) 1987-02-09

Family

ID=13309151

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP6620778A Granted JPS54157686A (en) 1978-06-01 1978-06-01 Discriminating method of kinds for defects of steel plate surfaces

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS54157686A (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6080743A (en) * 1983-10-11 1985-05-08 Nippon Steel Corp Deciding method of flaw by using laser light
US5344236A (en) * 1992-01-23 1994-09-06 Fishman Iiya M Method for evaluation of quality of the interface between layer and substrate

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5219111A (en) * 1975-08-05 1977-02-14 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Heat treated high tensile steel plate cont. b
JPS5435792A (en) * 1977-08-26 1979-03-16 Automobile Antipollution Alignment mechanism for torque detector

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS54157686A (en) 1979-12-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111899215B (en) Method for extracting optical element body defect
US12467876B2 (en) Surface inspection device, surface inspection method, and manufacturing method of metal strip
CN110378902B (en) Scratch detection method under high noise background
CN120635071B (en) A circuit board metallographic slice image defect detection method
CN110618140A (en) Machine vision detection system and method for bearing ring grinding vibration lines
JPH08285780A (en) External pipe flaw inspection method for steel pipe
US5880844A (en) Hybrid confocal microscopy
JPS626180B2 (en)
CN114742768A (en) Steel rail shallow layer peeling damage detection method and detection system
CN119131025B (en) A pipeline weld identification method and system based on image processing and magnetic flux leakage detection
JP3218908B2 (en) Surface flaw inspection method and apparatus
JPH05261564A (en) Manufacture of electric resistance welded tube
Barker et al. A design study of an automatic system for on-line detection and classification of surface defects on cold-rolled steel strip
JP2861649B2 (en) Steel plate weld inspection method
KR100406399B1 (en) A method of detecting defect on surface of a steel sheet
JPH09138200A (en) Method for determining surface defects on strips
JPS6142221B2 (en)
JP3687441B2 (en) Surface flaw marking device and method of manufacturing metal band with marking
CN115761025A (en) Multi-target automatic focusing method for holographic imaging in complex environment
JP4821044B2 (en) Manufacturing method of metal strip with marking
JPH10185514A (en) Coil position detection device
EP0939294A1 (en) Determining topographical values
JPH08220018A (en) Surface flaw inspection method and device
CN109459451A (en) A kind of metal inside testing of small cracks method based on ray contrast
JPS6261899B2 (en)