Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPS6310228B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPS6310228B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPS6310228B2
JPS6310228B2 JP12419885A JP12419885A JPS6310228B2 JP S6310228 B2 JPS6310228 B2 JP S6310228B2 JP 12419885 A JP12419885 A JP 12419885A JP 12419885 A JP12419885 A JP 12419885A JP S6310228 B2 JPS6310228 B2 JP S6310228B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
concrete
less
reinforcing bars
salt
amount
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP12419885A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS61284552A (en
Inventor
Haruo Shimada
Yoshiaki Sakakibara
Takashi Waseda
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP12419885A priority Critical patent/JPS61284552A/en
Priority to US06/803,284 priority patent/US4915901A/en
Priority to AU50703/85A priority patent/AU556118B2/en
Priority to CA000496811A priority patent/CA1273511A/en
Priority to GB8531039A priority patent/GB2168380B/en
Priority to GB8611945A priority patent/GB2174407B/en
Priority to AU61174/86A priority patent/AU605465B2/en
Publication of JPS61284552A publication Critical patent/JPS61284552A/en
Publication of JPS6310228B2 publication Critical patent/JPS6310228B2/ja
Priority to CA000615704A priority patent/CA1285402C/en
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Reinforcement Elements For Buildings (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 (産業上の利用分野) 本発明は海浜地帯に設置されるコンクリート建
造物、海洋に設置されるコンクリート構造物等、
海塩粒子、海水の飛沫に曝らされる鉄筋コンクリ
ート構造物、コンクリート橋などの劣化防止作用
の著しく優れた耐塩鉄筋に関するものである。 (従来の技術) 最近、海砂を使用した鉄筋コンクリート建築物
や、海浜地帯に設置されたコンクリート建造物、
コンクリート橋のヒビ割れ劣化が各方面で問題に
なつており、種々の防止法が提案されたり実施に
移されている。 このコンクリート劣化の最大の原因は海砂中に
含まれている塩分や海浜地帯でコンクリート壁を
浸透してくる海塩粒子の塩分によつてコンクリー
ト中に埋設された鉄筋が腐食し、その体積が約
2.2倍になるため、その膨張力に耐え切れなくな
つて埋設鉄筋に沿つたコンクリートに亀裂が発生
する。その亀裂が0.2mm以上になると外部の腐食
因子たる酸素や塩分、空気中の炭酸ガスがこの亀
裂を通してより容易に内部の埋設鉄筋付近に浸透
し、さらに一層鉄筋の腐食を助長したり、コンク
リートの中性化を促進してコンクリートの劣化を
早めることになる。 本発明者らはこのようなコンクリートの劣化を
防止するために鉄筋自体の化学組成を制御し、
Niを1〜5.5%添加することによつて鉄筋自体の
耐塩性を向上する研究を実施し、その成果として
耐塩性を著しく向上したコンクリート用鉄筋(特
開昭57−48054号、特開昭59−44457号)を開発
し、これらの内容はすでに他の各方面でも公表さ
れている。(“OFFSHORE GOTEBORG′81”
paper No.42Goteborg SWEDEN 1981年、“セ
ンメントコンクリートNo.434(1983)P.23/31、
“Corrosion of Rein forcement in Concrete
Construction”P.419、1983年、“建築の技術施
工”1985年 No229号1月号 P155/164、彰国
社)。 又鉄筋自体の耐塩性向上に寄与する鉄筋の鋼成
分の初期の段階での耐塩機構についても、これら
の公表論文の中に詳細に記されており、現在実用
化が進んでいるものである。 (発明が解決しようとする問題点) 本発明は従来の本発明者等の開発を軸にして最
近、とくに問題となつてきたコンクリート壁を浸
透してくる海塩粒子や海水飛沫等のフリーなClの
状態で存在する塩分による鉄筋の腐食をそれに伴
なうコンクリートの亀裂発生を殆んど完全に停止
することにある。 現在各方面で問題となつている10年以上経過し
たコンクリート構造物中の埋設鉄筋近傍のフリー
塩分は、NaCl換算で0.15〜0.25%にも達して鉄筋
の著しい腐食と、それに伴うコンクリートの亀裂
発生、成長をひき起こしている。又、30年近く経
過したものではフリー塩分がNaCl換算で0.25%
を超える事例も極端な例として存在する。したが
つてフリー塩分0.25%の状態でコンクリートの亀
裂発生を殆んど完全に停止でき、フリー塩分0.25
%を超えた高濃度の塩分でもコンクリートの亀裂
発生を著しく遅延させることが望ましい。 (問題点を解決するための手段) 本発明の前記の目的は、重量%で、C:0.01〜
1.0%、Mn:0.05〜1.0%、Si:0.05%以下、P:
0.015%未満、S:0.005%未満、Ni:1.0〜4.5%、
W:0.001〜0.2%未満、Al:0.01〜0.07%、残部
鉄および不可避的不純物よりなることを特徴とす
るコンクリート用鉄筋によつて達成される。 本発明の最大の特徴は、鋼中のSi、S量を下
げ、かつNi、W添加により耐塩効果を向上させ、
高濃度の塩分に曝らされるコンクリートの劣化を
防止するものである。 この原因としてはSi量を下げることによつて、
錆の生成、成長を抑制すると同時に、高濃度のフ
リー塩分に曝らされたコンクリート中埋設鉄筋表
面でかなり錆が進行した後でも、錆層中にSiが殆
んど濃縮せずNiが濃縮し、鉄筋自体から移行し
たWが錆層に均等に存在するために、微量のWで
も錆成長を有効に抑制するものと推定される。又
S量の著しい低下はその低下にともない、錆発生
点となるMnS量が著しく低下することにより、
耐食性が飛躍的に向上するものと考えられる。 以下に本発明で各成分を限定した理由を説明す
る。C量を0.01〜1.0%に限定した理由は、C量
0.01%未満では必要強度が得られず、C量1.0%
超では脆化をひき起こすためである。又、Mn量
を0.05〜1.0%に限定した理由は、Mn量0.05%未
満では必要強度が得られず、1.0%超では脆化を
ひき起こすためである。Si量を0.05%以下とした
理由は、Si量を下げれば下げるほど錆生成量を飛
躍的に低下させ、錆層中にWを均等に分布し、
Fe2O3、Fe3O4からなる錆層中のFe3+をFe2+に還
元させる効果をひき起こし、錆層の生成を抑制す
るためである。 Niは本発明のカギを握る重要な元素で、とく
に高濃度の塩分で鉄筋の錆化が進行した場合、錆
層中にNiが濃縮し、錆層の成長を著しく抑制す
るものである。この効果はNi量1.0%未満では期
待できず、4.5%超ではその効果に変動がない。
したがつて下限を1.0%、上限を4.5%とした。 Wも又本発明の重要な元素である。錆層中に鉄
筋自体から起因したWが均等に存在することによ
り、錆層のFe2O3、Fe3O4のFe3+をFe2+に変える
ことにより錆層の成長を遅らせる。この効果はW
が0.001%を超えた微量でも顕著に現われ、Niと
の共存で錆層の増大を著しく抑制する効果が現わ
れる。この効果はW量0.001%未満では期待でき
ず、0.2%以上ではその効果が変らない。したが
つて範囲を0.001%〜0.2%未満とした。 Pを0.015%未満とした理由は、P0.015%以上
ではコンクリートのようなアルカリ性雰囲気で錆
成長を抑制する効果がなく、むしろ助長する傾向
があるためである。Alを0.01〜0.07%と限定した
理由は、Al0.01%未満では鋼中に存在する酸素を
安定なAlの酸化物として固定できず、Al0.07%
超では大型の介在物が生成し鋼の脆化をひき起こ
すので、脱酸効果に必要な量と強度の点から上記
成分範囲に限定した。 又S量を0.005%未満と限定した理由は、錆の
発生起源であるMnS量を減らすことにあり、こ
のS量低下のために脱硫剤として使用されるCa
化合物、希土類元素によりMnSが(Mn、Ca)S
等に変化することによる耐食性向上効果も期待で
きる。また鋼中のS量を低下するために上記のよ
うな操業を行なうことは常識となつているので、
0.0002%以下程度のCaが混入してくることがある
が、これらの元素は耐食性などに悪影響を及ぼす
ものではないのでCaは規定しなかつた。 又、必要に応じてNb、Vを添加するが、鉄筋
の強度、靭性向上のための公知の元素として添加
したもので1種で0.01〜0.2%添加するが、上記
の目的としてはすでに一般によく知られているも
のである。 又、必要に応じてコンクリートに埋設するまで
の耐候性向上にCuを0.01〜0.3%添加するが、こ
の目的としてはすでに一般によく知られているも
のである。 本発明に従い前記の化学成分で構成された鋼は
転炉、電気炉等で溶製され、次いで造塊、分塊の
工程を通るか、あるいは連続鋳造後、圧延された
後に必要に応じてパテンテイング等の熱処理が施
され、線引きされて鉄筋として供される。又、必
要に応じて表面に亜鉛メツキ、有機被覆を施すこ
ともできる。 (実施例) 転炉で本発明の成分範囲の鋼を溶製し、造塊、
分塊後、線引きした鉄筋と、比較鋼の鉄筋、従来
からの電炉鋼からなる鉄筋の成分、およびこれら
の鉄筋を埋設したコンクリートの劣化状況、埋設
鉄筋の腐食状況の経時変化を表に示した。 表の各種鉄筋は9mmφの熱延鉄筋で表面を機械
研磨後、脱脂し、水セメント比0.60、砂中の全塩
分量をNaCl換算で1.0%のコンクリートモルタル
中に埋設し、第1図のようなコンクリート供試体
を作製し、28日間養生後、コンクリート供試体を
恒温恒湿槽に挿入し、湿潤48hrs、乾燥24hrs、湿
潤48hrs、乾燥48hrsで1週間(2サイクル)経過
するサイクルで56日間、70日間曝露してコンクリ
ートの亀裂発生を観察した。なお、曝露条件を第
2図のように設定したのは、水蒸気中に酸素が最
大に固溶している80℃の高温で乾湿くり返しを実
施するという、きわめて苛酷な環境条件で埋設鉄
筋の腐食を促進するためである。又同時にこれら
コンクリート供試体の空気中の炭酸ガスによる中
性化深さの経時変化、埋設鉄筋の腐食量の経時変
化を調べた。コンクリート供試体の亀裂は、クラ
ツクゲージでその巾の最大値を測定した。炭酸ガ
スによる中性化深さはフエノールフタレイン溶液
をコンクリートに散布し、コンクリート供試体で
赤色から無色に変化したコンクリート供試体の表
層からの深さを測定した。 埋設鉄筋の腐食量は、コンクリートを破砕して
とり出した鉄筋の錆を化学的にとり除いた後重量
を測定し、腐食前の重量から差し引いて鉄筋長さ
28cm当りの腐食減量として求めた。 又、この表の鉄筋試料No.1、No.2、No.3、No.
4、No.5をそれぞれ埋設したコンクリート供試体
を56日間、70日間前記の恒温恒湿槽中に曝露後、
鉄筋近傍の全塩分量と冷水で抽出されてくるフリ
ー塩分量を化学分析して砂中換算NaCl(%)とし
て求めたところ、全塩分量はいずれも約1.0%、
フリー塩分量は約0.6%であつた。 したがつて本発明の鉄筋は鉄筋近傍のフリー塩
分が砂中換算で0.6%に達しても、従来の鉄筋と
比較して腐食速度が著しく小さく、コンクリート
の劣化を著しく遅延させることが判つた。したが
つて最終的に砂中換算でフリー塩分0.6%と蓄積
されてくるような苛酷な環境でも、コンクリート
の劣化に抑止効果のあることが推定される。 (発明の効果) 本発明は今後ますます問題になる塩害にさらさ
れるコンクリート構造物の耐久性を維持するのに
画期的に有効なコンクリート用鉄筋として役立つ
たものである。 本発明のコンクリート用鉄筋を使用することに
より、コンクリート構造物の長寿命化、安定性の
向上に資するもので、各種用途向に使用すること
ができる。 【表】
Detailed Description of the Invention (Industrial Application Field) The present invention is applicable to concrete structures installed in seaside areas, concrete structures installed in the ocean, etc.
This invention relates to salt-resistant reinforcing bars that are extremely effective in preventing deterioration of reinforced concrete structures, concrete bridges, etc. that are exposed to sea salt particles and seawater spray. (Prior art) Recently, reinforced concrete buildings using sea sand, concrete buildings installed in seaside areas,
Cracking and deterioration of concrete bridges has become a problem in various fields, and various prevention methods have been proposed and put into practice. The biggest cause of this concrete deterioration is that the reinforcing bars embedded in the concrete corrode due to the salt contained in the sea sand and the salt from the sea salt particles that permeate through the concrete walls in beach areas, causing the volume to decrease. about
Since the expansion force increases by 2.2 times, the concrete along the buried reinforcing bars can no longer withstand the expansion force and cracks occur. If the crack is 0.2 mm or more, external corrosion factors such as oxygen, salt, and carbon dioxide in the air will more easily penetrate through the crack to the area around the buried reinforcing steel, further promoting corrosion of the reinforcing steel and damaging the concrete. This will promote carbonation and accelerate the deterioration of concrete. In order to prevent such concrete deterioration, the present inventors controlled the chemical composition of the reinforcing bars themselves,
Research was conducted to improve the salt resistance of reinforcing bars themselves by adding 1 to 5.5% Ni, and the result was a reinforcing bar for concrete that had significantly improved salt resistance (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 57-48054, JP-A-59 -44457), and these contents have already been published in various other areas. (“OFFSHORE GOTEBORG′81”
paper No.42Goteborg SWEDEN 1981, “Cement Concrete No.434 (1983) P.23/31,
“Corrosion of Rein forcement in Concrete
Construction” P. 419, 1983, “Architectural Technology and Construction” 1985 No. 229, January issue, P. 155/164, Shokokusha). Also, in the early stages of the steel composition of reinforcing bars, which contributes to improving the salt resistance of the reinforcing bars themselves. The salt resistance mechanism of the present invention is also described in detail in these published papers, and is currently being put into practical use. (Problems to be solved by the invention) The present invention Recently, with the development of chloride, corrosion of reinforcing bars due to salt existing in a free Cl state such as sea salt particles and sea water spray that permeate concrete walls and cracks in concrete have become a particular problem. The goal is to almost completely stop the generation of salt.The free salt content near the buried reinforcing bars in concrete structures that are more than 10 years old, which is currently a problem in various fields, reaches 0.15 to 0.25% in terms of NaCl. This causes severe corrosion of reinforcing bars and the accompanying cracking and growth of concrete.In addition, free salt content is 0.25% in terms of NaCl in concrete that has been used for nearly 30 years.
There are extreme cases in which the amount exceeds . Therefore, cracking in concrete can be almost completely stopped with a free salt content of 0.25%;
It is desirable to significantly retard cracking in concrete even at high concentrations of salt exceeding %. (Means for Solving the Problems) The above-mentioned object of the present invention is to provide C: 0.01 to 0.01 in weight%.
1.0%, Mn: 0.05-1.0%, Si: 0.05% or less, P:
Less than 0.015%, S: less than 0.005%, Ni: 1.0 to 4.5%,
This is achieved by a concrete reinforcing bar characterized by having W: 0.001% to less than 0.2%, Al: 0.01% to 0.07%, and the balance being iron and unavoidable impurities. The greatest feature of the present invention is that it lowers the amount of Si and S in the steel, and improves the salt resistance effect by adding Ni and W.
This prevents the deterioration of concrete exposed to high concentrations of salt. The reason for this is that by lowering the amount of Si,
At the same time, it suppresses the formation and growth of rust, and even after rust has progressed considerably on the surface of reinforcing bars buried in concrete exposed to high concentrations of free salt, Si is hardly concentrated in the rust layer and Ni is concentrated. Since W transferred from the reinforcing bars themselves is evenly present in the rust layer, it is presumed that even a small amount of W effectively suppresses rust growth. In addition, the significant decrease in the amount of S is due to the decrease in the amount of MnS, which is the point where rust occurs.
It is thought that corrosion resistance will be dramatically improved. The reason why each component is limited in the present invention will be explained below. The reason for limiting the amount of C to 0.01 to 1.0% is that the amount of C
If the C content is less than 0.01%, the required strength cannot be obtained, and the C content is 1.0%.
This is because excessively high temperatures cause embrittlement. Further, the reason why the Mn content is limited to 0.05 to 1.0% is that if the Mn content is less than 0.05%, the necessary strength cannot be obtained, and if it exceeds 1.0%, embrittlement will occur. The reason why the amount of Si is set to 0.05% or less is that the lower the amount of Si, the more the amount of rust generated will be dramatically reduced, and the more evenly distributed W in the rust layer,
This is to bring about the effect of reducing Fe 3+ in the rust layer consisting of Fe 2 O 3 and Fe 3 O 4 to Fe 2+ and suppress the formation of the rust layer. Ni is an important element that holds the key to the present invention. In particular, when rusting of reinforcing bars progresses due to high concentrations of salt, Ni concentrates in the rust layer and significantly suppresses the growth of the rust layer. This effect cannot be expected when the Ni content is less than 1.0%, and there is no change in the effect when the Ni content exceeds 4.5%.
Therefore, the lower limit was set at 1.0% and the upper limit was set at 4.5%. W is also an important element in the present invention. The uniform presence of W originating from the reinforcing steel itself in the rust layer retards the growth of the rust layer by changing Fe 3+ of Fe 2 O 3 and Fe 3 O 4 in the rust layer to Fe 2+ . This effect is W
It is noticeable even in minute amounts exceeding 0.001%, and its coexistence with Ni has the effect of significantly suppressing the growth of the rust layer. This effect cannot be expected when the W content is less than 0.001%, and the effect remains unchanged when the W content is 0.2% or more. Therefore, the range was set to 0.001% to less than 0.2%. The reason why P is set to be less than 0.015% is that P of 0.015% or more has no effect of suppressing rust growth in an alkaline atmosphere such as concrete, but rather tends to promote it. The reason for limiting Al to 0.01 to 0.07% is that if Al is less than 0.01%, the oxygen present in the steel cannot be fixed as a stable Al oxide.
If the content is too high, large inclusions will form and cause embrittlement of the steel, so the composition was limited to the above range in terms of the amount and strength necessary for the deoxidizing effect. The reason for limiting the amount of S to less than 0.005% is to reduce the amount of MnS, which is the source of rust.
MnS becomes (Mn, Ca)S due to compounds and rare earth elements.
It is also possible to expect the effect of improving corrosion resistance by changing to In addition, it is common knowledge to carry out the operations described above in order to reduce the amount of S in steel.
Ca may be mixed in at an amount of 0.0002% or less, but these elements do not have a negative effect on corrosion resistance, so Ca is not specified. In addition, Nb and V are added as necessary, but they are added as well-known elements to improve the strength and toughness of reinforcing bars, and they are added at 0.01 to 0.2% as a single type, but they are already commonly used for the above purposes. It is known. Further, if necessary, 0.01 to 0.3% Cu is added to improve weather resistance before being buried in concrete, but this purpose is already well known. According to the present invention, the steel composed of the above chemical components is melted in a converter, electric furnace, etc., and then passed through the steps of ingot making and blooming, or after continuous casting and rolling, if necessary, it is patented. It is subjected to heat treatments such as, etc., and then drawn into wire and used as reinforcing bars. Further, the surface may be galvanized or coated with an organic coating, if necessary. (Example) Steel having the composition range of the present invention was melted in a converter, and ingots were formed.
After blooming, the composition of drawn reinforcing bars, comparative steel reinforcing bars, and conventional electric furnace steel reinforcing bars, the deterioration status of the concrete in which these reinforcing bars are buried, and the changes over time in the corrosion status of the buried reinforcing bars are shown in the table. . The various reinforcing bars in the table are hot-rolled reinforcing bars with a diameter of 9 mm, the surface of which is mechanically polished, degreased, and buried in concrete mortar with a water-cement ratio of 0.60 and a total salt content in the sand of 1.0% in terms of NaCl, as shown in Figure 1. After curing for 28 days, the concrete specimen was placed in a constant temperature and humidity chamber, and was heated for 56 days in a cycle of 48 hrs wet, 24 hrs dry, 48 hrs wet, 48 hrs dry for 1 week (2 cycles). The occurrence of cracks in the concrete was observed after 70 days of exposure. The exposure conditions shown in Figure 2 were set to prevent corrosion of buried reinforcing bars under extremely harsh environmental conditions, including repeated wet and dry cycles at a high temperature of 80°C, where maximum oxygen is dissolved in water vapor. This is to promote At the same time, we investigated the changes over time in the depth of carbonation of these concrete specimens due to carbon dioxide gas in the air, and the changes over time in the amount of corrosion of the buried reinforcing bars. The maximum width of cracks in the concrete specimen was measured using a crack gauge. The depth of neutralization by carbon dioxide gas was determined by spraying a phenolphthalein solution on concrete and measuring the depth from the surface of the concrete specimen, which changed from red to colorless. The amount of corrosion of buried reinforcing bars can be determined by crushing the concrete, chemically removing rust from the reinforcing bars, weighing them, and subtracting the weight from the weight before corrosion to determine the length of the reinforcing bars.
It was calculated as corrosion loss per 28 cm. Also, reinforcing bar samples No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, and No. in this table.
4. After exposing the concrete specimens in which No. 5 was buried in the above-mentioned constant temperature and humidity chamber for 56 days and 70 days,
When the total salt content near the reinforcing bars and the free salt content extracted by cold water were chemically analyzed and calculated as NaCl (%) in sand, the total salt content was approximately 1.0%.
The free salt content was approximately 0.6%. Therefore, it was found that the reinforcing bars of the present invention have a significantly lower corrosion rate than conventional reinforcing bars, and significantly retard the deterioration of concrete, even if the free salt near the reinforcing bars reaches 0.6% in terms of sand. Therefore, it is estimated that even in a harsh environment where free salt content ultimately accumulates to 0.6% in sand, it is effective in inhibiting the deterioration of concrete. (Effects of the Invention) The present invention is useful as a groundbreakingly effective reinforcing bar for concrete in maintaining the durability of concrete structures exposed to salt damage, which will become an increasingly problematic problem in the future. By using the reinforcing bars for concrete of the present invention, it contributes to extending the lifespan and improving the stability of concrete structures, and can be used for various purposes. 【table】

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は鉄筋を埋設したコンクリート供試体の
形状、寸法と配筋状況を示す説明図である。第2
図は鉄筋を埋設したコンクリート供試体の発錆促
進試験における試験条件を示すものである。
FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing the shape, dimensions, and reinforcement arrangement of a concrete specimen in which reinforcing bars are embedded. Second
The figure shows the test conditions for a rust acceleration test on concrete specimens with embedded reinforcing bars.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 重量%で C:0.01〜1.0%、 Si:0.05%以下、 Mn:0.05〜1.0%、 P:0.015%未満、 S:0.005%未満、 Ni:1.0〜4.5%、 W:0.001〜0.2%未満、 Al:0.01〜0.07% を含有し、残部鉄および不可避的不純物からなる
コンクリート劣化防止用鉄筋棒鋼。 2 重量%で C:0.01〜1.0%、 Si:0.05%以下、 Mn:0.05〜1.0%、 P:0.015%未満、 S:0.005%未満、 Ni:1.0〜4.5%、 W:0.001〜0.2%未満、 Al:0.01〜0.07% を含有し、さらにNb、Vの1種を0.01〜0.2%含
有し、残部鉄および不可避的不純物からなるコン
クリート劣化防止用鉄筋棒鋼。 3 重量%で C:0.01〜1.0%、 Si:0.05%以下、 Mn:0.05〜1.0%、 P:0.015%未満、 S:0.005%未満、 Ni:1.0〜4.5%、 W:0.001〜0.2%未満、 Al:0.01〜0.07% を含有し、Nb、Vの1種を0.01〜0.2%含有し、
さらにCuを0.01〜0.3%含有し、残部鉄および不
可避的不純物からなるコンクリート劣化防止用鉄
筋棒鋼。
[Claims] 1% by weight: C: 0.01 to 1.0%, Si: 0.05% or less, Mn: 0.05 to 1.0%, P: less than 0.015%, S: less than 0.005%, Ni: 1.0 to 4.5%, W A reinforcing steel bar for preventing concrete deterioration, containing: 0.001% to less than 0.2%, Al: 0.01% to 0.07%, and the remainder consisting of iron and unavoidable impurities. 2 C: 0.01 to 1.0% by weight, Si: 0.05% or less, Mn: 0.05 to 1.0%, P: less than 0.015%, S: less than 0.005%, Ni: 1.0 to 4.5%, W: 0.001 to less than 0.2%. , Al: 0.01 to 0.07%, and further contains one of Nb and V at 0.01 to 0.2%, with the balance being iron and inevitable impurities, for preventing concrete deterioration. 3 C: 0.01 to 1.0% by weight, Si: 0.05% or less, Mn: 0.05 to 1.0%, P: less than 0.015%, S: less than 0.005%, Ni: 1.0 to 4.5%, W: 0.001 to less than 0.2%. , Al: 0.01 to 0.07%, and one of Nb and V 0.01 to 0.2%,
A reinforcing steel bar for preventing concrete deterioration that further contains 0.01 to 0.3% Cu, with the balance consisting of iron and unavoidable impurities.
JP12419885A 1984-12-18 1985-06-10 Salt resistant steel bar for iron reinforcing rod preventing deterioration of concrete Granted JPS61284552A (en)

Priority Applications (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP12419885A JPS61284552A (en) 1985-06-10 1985-06-10 Salt resistant steel bar for iron reinforcing rod preventing deterioration of concrete
US06/803,284 US4915901A (en) 1984-12-18 1985-12-02 Reinforcing steel having resistance to salt and capable of preventing deterioration of concrete
AU50703/85A AU556118B2 (en) 1984-12-18 1985-12-03 Salt resistant reinforcing steel capable of preventing deterioration of concrete
CA000496811A CA1273511A (en) 1984-12-18 1985-12-04 Reinforcing steel having resistance to salt and capable of preventing deterioration of concrete
GB8531039A GB2168380B (en) 1984-12-18 1985-12-17 A reinforcing steel
GB8611945A GB2174407B (en) 1984-12-18 1986-05-16 A reinforcing steel
AU61174/86A AU605465B2 (en) 1984-12-18 1986-08-14 Reinforcing steel having resistance to salt and capable of preventing deterioration of concrete
CA000615704A CA1285402C (en) 1984-12-18 1990-04-17 Reinforcing steel having resistance to salt and capable of preventing deterioration of concrete

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP12419885A JPS61284552A (en) 1985-06-10 1985-06-10 Salt resistant steel bar for iron reinforcing rod preventing deterioration of concrete

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS61284552A JPS61284552A (en) 1986-12-15
JPS6310228B2 true JPS6310228B2 (en) 1988-03-04

Family

ID=14879411

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP12419885A Granted JPS61284552A (en) 1984-12-18 1985-06-10 Salt resistant steel bar for iron reinforcing rod preventing deterioration of concrete

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS61284552A (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS61284552A (en) 1986-12-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Mindess Resistance of concrete to destructive agencies
Mohammed et al. Concrete after 30 years of exposure—Part II: Chloride ingress and corrosion of steel bars
Houston et al. Corrosion of reinforcing steel embedded in structural concrete
JP2745066B2 (en) Salt rebar for concrete deterioration prevention
US6810634B1 (en) Method of resisting corrosion in metal reinforcing elements contained in concrete and related compounds and structures
JPS6310228B2 (en)
JPH03183740A (en) Salt-resistant reinforcing bar for preventing deterioration of concrete
JPS61279657A (en) Salt resistant iron reinforcing rod for preventing deterioration of concrete
JPH02170945A (en) Salt-resistant reinforcing bar steel for prevention of deterioration in concrete
Cady¹ —Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel
CA1285402C (en) Reinforcing steel having resistance to salt and capable of preventing deterioration of concrete
Abosrra et al. Effectiveness of calcium nitrite in retarding corrosion of steel in concrete
Justnes Calcium nitrate as corrosion inhibitor for reinforced concrete
JPS62199748A (en) Steel bar for reinforcing bar seawater resistant
McDonald Corrosion protection for concrete structures in marine environments
Everett et al. Steel in concrete with blastfurnace slag aggregate
Berke et al. Calcium nitrite corrosion inhibitor in concrete
JPH0430464B2 (en)
JPH06100991A (en) Seawater resistant rebar
JPH0372149B2 (en)
JP4882259B2 (en) Hydrated hardened body with rebar having excellent salt resistance
JPH02138440A (en) Seawater corrosion resisting steel excellent in rust resistance
GB2174407A (en) A reinforcing steel
JPH03111540A (en) Salt resisting reinforcing bar for concrete for reducing deterioration in concrete
Batis et al. Effects of Migrating Corrosion Inhibitors on Reinforced Lightweight and Common Mortars