JPS6337156B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPS6337156B2 JPS6337156B2 JP55059473A JP5947380A JPS6337156B2 JP S6337156 B2 JPS6337156 B2 JP S6337156B2 JP 55059473 A JP55059473 A JP 55059473A JP 5947380 A JP5947380 A JP 5947380A JP S6337156 B2 JPS6337156 B2 JP S6337156B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- catalyst
- magnetized
- particles
- oil
- catalyst particles
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Coke Industry (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
Description
本発明は蒸留残渣を実質的に含まない石油類の
流動接触分解法の改良に関するものである。
流動接触分解は石油系炭化水素を原料として触
媒と接触することによつて分解し、大部分がガソ
リン、液化石油ガス、アルキル化原料、中間留分
混合物の望ましい生成物を得るものである。
流動接触分解の原料油は、通常軽油が用いられ
る。ここで言う軽油とは常圧蒸留装置よりのヘビ
ーガスオイルと減圧蒸留装置のバキユーム・ガス
オイル等の留出油、および減圧あるいは常圧蒸留
によつて留出油を除去して得られる残渣油を溶剤
脱れき法、熱分解法、あるいは水素化精製法によ
り残渣油中のアスフアルテン成分を除去したも
の、又はこれらを必要に応じ水素化精製したもの
等を指し、沸点範囲220゜〜600℃、比重0.8〜1.0程
度のものである。
近年産出原油は重質化傾向にある一方、需要は
環境問題や利用の容易さなどにより軽油以下の沸
点留分をもつ炭化水素油類の需要が相対的に増加
しており、分解プロセスで分解処理される原料油
に対する需要が増大している。
さきに述べた原油の重質化および分解原料の需
要増加に対処する方法として分解原料の得率増加
すなわちより重質の留分をより多く分解原料とし
て使用する必要が生じている。すなわち具体的に
は減圧蒸留における留出油の得率増加および蒸留
残渣油中の重質留分を溶剤油出する溶剤脱れきに
おける脱れき油の収率増加などの方法が必要とな
つている。一方そのような分解原料油の重質化は
原料油に含まれる金属化合物濃度の増加を伴なう
ことが知られている。
そのような重質化した原料油したがつて接触分
解装置に供給される原料油中には蒸留残渣留分を
混入せしめないことが望ましいのであるが、一方
蒸留残渣留分中にはまだ多くの分解により軽質油
に転化できる成分が含まれており資源の有効利用
の見地からはそれらの利用が望ましい。
残渣油留分は、高分子量の樹脂質物質、アスフ
アルテン、および比較的分子量が低くプロパン、
ブタン、あるいはペンタンなどの軽質炭化水素で
抽出可能の炭化水素成分の混合物であり、通常残
渣油留分を上記の軽質炭化水素溶剤により処理し
て樹脂質およびアスフアルテン分を沈でんさせ、
それ以外の成分を抽出する方法が行なわれてい
る。このような精製方法は溶剤脱れき法と呼ばれ
ており、重金属化合物が抽残物である樹脂質およ
びアスフアルテン分の方に多く含まれているため
抽出物中の金属化合物量が低くなり、分解原料と
して用いることが可能となる。しかしながらその
ような抽出油は蒸留によつて得られる留出軽油よ
りは金属化合物をより多く含んでおり、その利用
範囲も制約されることとなり、分解原料油への混
入率を規制するかあるいは残渣油から抽出する場
合の収率を制限するなどの規制が必要である。
これら重質石油類の流動接触分解を行なう場
合、原料油中に含まれる鉄、ニツケル、バナジウ
ム、銅が触媒上に堆積する現象が、特に顕著に見
られる。
通常原油中には1〜100ppmの鉄、5〜500ppm
のニツケル、5〜1500ppmのバナジウム、0.1〜
10ppmの銅が含まれている。
この他に石油原料は輸送、貯蔵および処理装置
と接触することにより装置の鉄を溶解して含有す
る傾向があるので原料油中の鉄含有量は上記の値
を大巾に上回わる。
これらの金属は処理中に留出せずに残留する傾
向があるので残渣油は原料原油より2〜4倍ある
いはそれ以上の量の金属を含有する。たとえば蒸
留残渣油は1000〜2000ppmものバナジウムを含有
することがある。
これらの金属は通常ポリフイリン環構造をはじ
めとする有機金属化合物として存在しており触媒
と高温で接触すると分解して、金属は触媒上に付
着し堆積していく。
これらの金属は触媒の活性を低下させるばかり
でなく触媒の選択性をも低下させるものである。
即ち、これらの金属は水素化−脱水素化能を有し
ており、流動接触分解の反応条件では、炭化水素
の脱水素反応を促進し、その結果生成物として好
ましくない水素ガス、コークの生成量が増加し、
好ましいLPG、ガソリン、灯軽油の得率が減少
する。
上記のように反応に有害な作用を及ぼす金属が
触媒上に蓄積するという問題は、軽油の流動接触
分解においては、それ程重要な問題とはならない
ものである。何故なら、軽油は金属含有量が少な
いために、触媒上への金属堆積量は一般に少な
く、必要とされる触媒交換量も少なくてすむから
である。事実、軽油の流動接触分解において原料
として用いられる軽油中の金属の量が1ppm以下
のように低い場合は、装置から通常失なわれる触
媒量に相当する量の新触媒を単に補給するだけ
で、触媒上への金属蓄積によつてもたらされる悪
影響を回避することができる。
しかしながら、金属含有量の多い重質油の流動
接触分解においては、循環系内の金属蓄積量は莫
大な量となるため、触媒の活性及び選択性を維持
するために特別な手段が必要となる。通常このた
めの手段としては、触媒の一部を定期的あるいは
定常的に抜き出し、新触媒ないしは再生触媒(た
とえばイオン交換法または酸化還元法等により再
生する)と交換して活性を一定レベルに維持する
方法が採用されているが、触媒の抜き出し量を著
しく大きくすることが必要であり、これはコスト
的に非常な不利である。従つて、触媒上への金属
堆積の問題は、金属含有量の多い重質油の流動接
触分解においては、とりわけ深刻な問題となるの
である。
本発明者達は、上記の問題を解決するために鋭
意研究を行なつた結果、全く新しい手段によつ
て、メイクアツプの触媒媒を著しく節約すること
ができる、新規な接触分解方法を完成した。
すなわち、本発明によれば、溶剤脱瀝常圧又は
減圧蒸留残渣油、これらの水素化精製物及びこれ
らの脱瀝残渣油と減圧軽油等との混合物(通常、
ニツケル及びバナジウムの含有量が1ppm以上で
ある)を流動状態の触媒粒子の存在下で接触分解
を行なわせる方法であつて、触媒循環系内より触
媒粒子の一部を抜き出し、抜き出した触媒粒子
を、均一な1000ガウス以上の磁場強度を有する高
磁場空間内に強磁性の充填物を配置し、この充填
物表面に強磁性あるいは常磁性物質の微少粒子を
着磁させる能力のある高勾配磁気分離機を用い
て、乾式では粒子濃度0.01〜100g/、流体線
速度0.01〜100m/sec、湿式では粒子濃度0.01〜
1000g/、流体線像速度0.01〜10000m/hrの
範囲内で触媒の許容金属含有量に従つて選択され
る分離条件で処理し、該脱瀝油中に含有されてい
たニツケル、バナジウム、鉄、銅の堆積により着
磁性を帯びた該触媒粒子を、該処理条件下で着磁
する粒子と着磁しない粒子とに分離し、非着磁触
媒粒子を循環使用することを特徴とする上記方法
が提供される。
ここでいう着磁物とは、高勾配磁気分離機の磁
場空間内に置かれた充填物の表面に磁力により捕
集される触媒粒子をいう。また非着磁物とは充填
物の表面に捕集されずにそのまま高勾配磁気分離
機の系外に放出される触媒粒子をいう。
以下、本発明の方法をより詳細に説明する。
本発明者達は、重質石油類の流動接触分解にお
いて循環系内より抜き出した触媒を高勾配磁気分
離機により着磁物と非着磁物に分け、抜き出し触
媒、着磁物、非着磁物の3者の触媒活性を固定床
マイクロリアクターにより評価したところ非着磁
物>抜き出し触媒>着磁物の順で転化率が高く、
またLPG、ガソリン、灯軽油生成の選択性に優
れており、これら3者の間には、触媒能に著しい
差違があることを見出した。しかも非着磁物を循
環系内へ戻して用いたところ、転化率選択性に悪
影響をおよぼすことなく再使用できること、これ
によりメイクアツプの触媒量を著しく節約できる
ことを見出した。
本発明は、本発明者達により見出された上記の
ような新規な知見に基づいて完成されたものであ
る。即ち、本発明の方法は、重質石油類中に含ま
れるニツケル、鉄、バナジウム、銅が触媒上に堆
積することにより反応の転化率が低下し、生成物
中のガソリン、灯油軽油留分の得率が下がりコー
ク、水素の得率が増加して経済的な損失を与え、
装置運転上支障をきたすことを防ぐため、分解装
置内を流動する触媒の一部を抜き出し新触媒ある
いは再生触媒と交換する際に、抜き出した触媒を
高勾配磁気分離機により、着磁物と非着磁物に分
け、未だ高い活性と選択性を維持する非着磁物を
分解装置内に戻して再使用することにより生成物
中のコーク、水素の増加を抑制し、反応の転化率
の低下を防ぎながらメイクアツプの触媒量を節約
する方法である。
本発明で言う重質石油類とは、アスフアルテン
等の蒸留残渣分を実質量含まない重質石油類で、
常圧留出軽油、減圧留出軽油、溶剤脱れき油、お
よび熱処理あるいは水素化精製処理により脱アス
フアルテン処理した残渣油あるいはそれらの混合
物、およびこれらを水素化精製したものなどであ
る。
流動接触分解においては、反応温度480〜550
℃、圧力1〜3Kg/cm2G、触媒/油比1〜20で運
転され、触媒は、たとえば、アルミナ約15〜20重
量%を含むシリカ・アルミナ触媒または、ゼオラ
イト約5〜50%含むシリカ・アルミナ触媒などで
ある。
触媒は通常1〜1000μm、好ましくは20〜200μ
mの粒径を有する微小粒子である。
接触分解法による各製品の収率および性状は原
料油の組成、触媒の種類、反応条件の違いによつ
て変化するが、およその範囲で示せば主製品のガ
ソリンの収率は40〜60vol%、分解ガスは15〜
25vol%、分解軽油20〜40vol%、コークス3〜
8wt%である。
ここで言う流動接触分解は、前記した炭化水素
原料を流動状態に保持されている前記触媒と前記
温度、圧力条件で連続的に接触される。この接触
は触媒の流動ベツドで行なう場合と、触媒粒子と
原料が共に管中を上昇するいわゆるライザークラ
ツキングを採用する場合がある。このように接触
反応を受けた反応物、未反応原料および触媒の混
合物は一般的にストリツピング帯域に送入され、
生成物、未反応物等の炭化水素類の大部分が除去
される。炭素質および一部重質の炭化水素類が付
着した触媒は該ストリツピング帯域から連続的に
抜き出され、再生帯域に送入される。再生帯域
(再生塔)においては、該炭素質の付着した触媒
の酸化処理がほどこされる。この再生帯域におい
ても触媒は流動状態を保持され通常空気により温
度560〜650℃で燃焼処理がほどこされる。この酸
化処理を受けた触媒が再生触媒であり、触媒上に
沈着した炭素質および炭化水素類が減少されたも
のである。この再生触媒は前記反応帯域に連続的
に循環される。
本発明の蒸留残渣を含む重質石油類の流動接触
分解において、反応塔と再生塔の間を循環する流
動触媒の一部をストリツパー出口あるいは再生塔
出口あるいはその他の装置運転上支障を来たさな
い適当な場所より抜き出す。
この場合連続的に抜き出しても、製品に悪影響
を及ぼさない範囲で一定間隔をおいて非連続的に
抜き出しても良い。抜き出された触媒を、そのま
まかあるいは高勾配磁気分離機にかける前に、あ
らかじめなんらかの処理をすることもできる。
該高勾配磁気分離機とは均一な高磁場空間内に
強磁性の充填物を置き、充填物の周囲に通常2000
×103〜20000×103ガウス/cmもの高い磁場勾配
を生じさせることにより充填物の表面に強磁性あ
るいは常磁性微小粒子の着磁物を着磁させて、非
着磁物の弱常磁性微小粒子あるいは反磁性微小粒
子からそれらを分離することができるように設計
された磁気分離機である。上記の強磁性充填物と
しては、通常1〜1000μmの径をもつスチールウ
ールあるいはスチールネツトの如き強磁性細線の
集合体が用いられる。高勾配磁気分離機の例とし
ては、スエーデンSALA社により製作販売されて
いる高勾配磁気分離機をあげることができる。
一方、鉄鉱石の磁気選鉱などで強磁性の比較的
大きな粒子の分離に従来から使用されているドラ
ム型磁気分離機は、磁場強度が約500ガウス、磁
場勾配が約500ガウス/cm程度であつて、本発明
で言う高勾配磁気分離機の磁場強度、及び磁場勾
配に比べて著しく小さく、かかるドラム型磁気分
離機は、装置の腐蝕または摩耗により触媒中に挾
雑物として混入してくる鉄粉を除去することはで
きるが重質石油類の流動接触分解に使用した堆積
金属を含む触媒の分離に使用することはできな
い。
高勾配磁気分離機による固体微粒子の処理方法
には空気、窒素、スチームおよびこれらの混合物
をキヤリヤー流体として用いる乾式法と、水ある
いはその他の液体をキヤリヤー流体として用いる
湿式法とがある。本発明においては、乾式法、湿
式法どちらを用いても良い。
高勾配磁気分離機を運転する際のプロセス変数
としては、通常磁場強度、磁場勾配、線速度、粒
子濃度、処理温度があり触媒粒径、堆積金属の種
類と状態および量、目的とする分離レベル、分離
の選択性によりプロセス変数の最適値は大きく変
動する。
磁場強度とは充填物が置かれている空間内の磁
場の強さで乾式法、湿式法ともに通常1000〜
20000ガウスあるいはそれ以上が用いられる。
磁場勾配とは充填物の周囲に生じる磁場の強さ
のきよりによる変化量で、磁場強度を変えること
によりあるいは充填物の種類および径を変えるこ
とにより、変化させることが可能であり乾式法、
湿式法ともに通常2000×103〜20000×103ガウ
ス/cmが用いられる。
粒子濃度とは、ガスあるいは液よりなるキヤリ
ヤー流体中での磁気分離の対象である触媒粒子の
濃度を意味し、乾式法においては通常0.01〜100
g/の粒子濃度で運転される。
湿式法においては通常0.01〜1000g/の粒子
濃度で運転される。
処理温度に磁気分離の対象である触媒粒子の温
度をさし厳密には、触媒粒子に堆積する鉄、ニツ
ケル、バナジウム、銅の温度をいう。処理温度は
これらの金属のキユリー温度以下が好ましく通常
は常温が用いられる。
また、磁場内を通過する際の流体の線速度を変
化させることによつて、分離レベル、分離の選択
性を大きく変えることが可能であり、高い選択性
が要求されるときは線速度を上げて運転する。乾
式法においては通常0.01〜100m/secの線速度が
用いられる。湿式法においては通常0.01〜10000
m/hrの線速度が用いられる。
高勾配磁気分離機は、流動接触分解装置のライ
ンに組み込んで使用しても良いし、組み込まずに
バツチで稼動してもよい。抜き出された触媒は高
勾配磁気分離機により鉄、ニツケル、バナジウ
ム、銅が多量に堆積している触媒粒子である着磁
物とこれらの金属が多量に堆積していない触媒粒
子である非着磁物に分けられるが着磁物と非着磁
物の重量比は通常1対100から100対1であり、場
合により1対1000から1000対1の範囲に及ぶこと
がある。好ましくは1対10から10対1の範囲内で
分離することである。
着磁性触媒粒子の金属堆積量は、流動接触分解
反応における使用触媒の種類、目的とする製品、
反応条件等で大きく変わるが、ニツケル当量にし
て通常0.05〜20wt%、好ましくは0.1〜5wt%の範
囲にある。なおここで言うニツケル当量とは次式
で表わされる値である。
ニツケル当量=〔Ni〕+0.25×〔V〕+0.1×〔Fe〕
+0.1×〔Cu〕(〔Ni〕、〔V〕、〔Fe〕、〔Cu〕はお
の
おのニツケル、バナジウム、鉄、銅の濃度を表わ
す。
分離後の非着磁物は金属堆積量が比較的少なく
未だ高い活性と選択性を有しているため循環系へ
戻して再使用する。
この場合分離除去した着磁物と等量の新触媒あ
るいは再生触媒をメイクアツプして循環系内の触
媒量を抜き出し前と同じ量にして流動バランスが
崩れるのを防ぎ、触媒活性の低下を防ぐことが通
常行なわれる。
循環系へ触媒を張込む場所は再生塔入口、再生
塔出口トランスフアーラインあるいはその他熱バ
ランス、流動バランスに影響を及ぼし難い個所が
選ばれる。
次に磁気分離後の着磁物は廃棄しても良いし、
イオン交換、塩素化、硫化、CO化、酸化、還元
等の方法で堆積金属を触媒から脱離後、再使用し
ても良い。
再生を行なう場合、再生装置は高勾配磁気分離
機に連結されラインに組み込まれていても良い
し、切り離されてバツチで運転されても良い。
実施例 1
約5wt%のゼオライトを含有するシリカーアル
ミナ流動接触分解触媒を用い、流動接触分解パイ
ロツト装置により循環触媒の一部を新触媒と交換
しながら減圧残油の溶剤脱れき油と減圧留出軽油
との混合油を原料油として接触分解を行なつた。
抜き出された触媒を高勾配磁気分離機により処
理して、着磁物と非着磁物等量ずつに分け、抜き
出し触媒、着磁物、非着磁物の3者につき金属分
析および固定床マイクロリアクターによる活性評
価を行なつた。
これらの結果を表1に示す。
非着磁物は転化率、炭素生成率(CPF)、水素
発生量(H2/CH4vol比)ともに新触媒に近い値
を有しており、再使用に十分耐えうる活性と選択
性を保持していることがわかる。
The present invention relates to an improved method for fluid catalytic cracking of petroleum products that does not substantially contain distillation residues. Fluid catalytic cracking is a process in which petroleum-based hydrocarbons are cracked by contacting them with a catalyst to yield desirable products, mostly gasoline, liquefied petroleum gas, alkylation feedstock, and middle distillate mixtures. Light oil is usually used as the feedstock for fluid catalytic cracking. The term "light oil" here refers to heavy gas oil from atmospheric distillation equipment, distillate oil such as vacuum gas oil from vacuum distillation equipment, and residual oil obtained by removing distillate oil by vacuum or atmospheric distillation. Refers to residual oil from which the asphaltene component has been removed by solvent deasphalting, thermal decomposition, or hydrorefining, or which has been hydrorefined as necessary, and has a boiling point range of 220° to 600°C. It has a specific gravity of about 0.8 to 1.0. In recent years, produced crude oil has tended to become heavier, while demand for hydrocarbon oils with a boiling point fraction below light oil has increased relatively due to environmental issues and ease of use. There is an increasing demand for feedstocks to be processed. In order to cope with the above-mentioned heavier crude oil and increased demand for cracking raw materials, it has become necessary to increase the yield of cracked raw materials, that is, to use more of the heavier fractions as cracking raw materials. Specifically, there is a need for methods to increase the yield of distillate oil in vacuum distillation and to increase the yield of deasphalted oil in solvent deasphalting that removes heavy fractions from distillation residue oil. . On the other hand, it is known that such a heavier cracked feedstock oil is accompanied by an increase in the concentration of metal compounds contained in the feedstock oil. It is desirable not to mix the distillation residue fraction into such a heavy feedstock oil and therefore the feedstock oil supplied to the catalytic cracking unit. It contains components that can be converted into light oil through decomposition, and their use is desirable from the standpoint of effective resource utilization. The residual oil fraction contains high molecular weight resinous materials, asphaltenes, and relatively low molecular weight propane,
It is a mixture of hydrocarbon components that can be extracted with light hydrocarbons such as butane or pentane, and the residual oil fraction is usually treated with the above-mentioned light hydrocarbon solvent to precipitate resinous and asphaltene components.
Methods are being used to extract other components. This kind of purification method is called solvent deasphalting method, and since heavy metal compounds are contained more in the resinous and asphaltene components of the raffinate, the amount of metal compounds in the extract is low, and decomposition is difficult. It becomes possible to use it as a raw material. However, such extracted oil contains more metal compounds than distilled gas oil obtained by distillation, and its range of use is restricted, and the rate of contamination with cracked feedstock oil must be regulated or the residue Regulations such as limiting the yield when extracting from oil are necessary. When these heavy petroleum products are subjected to fluid catalytic cracking, a phenomenon in which iron, nickel, vanadium, and copper contained in the feedstock oil is deposited on the catalyst is particularly noticeable. Normally crude oil contains 1-100ppm iron, 5-500ppm
of nickel, 5-1500ppm vanadium, 0.1-
Contains 10ppm copper. In addition, petroleum feedstocks tend to contain dissolved iron in the equipment upon contact with transport, storage and processing equipment, so the iron content in the feedstock is much greater than the above values. Since these metals tend to remain undistilled during processing, the residual oil contains two to four times or more metals than the raw crude oil. For example, distillation residues can contain as much as 1000 to 2000 ppm vanadium. These metals usually exist as organometallic compounds including polyphyllin ring structures, and when they come into contact with the catalyst at high temperatures, they decompose, and the metals adhere and accumulate on the catalyst. These metals not only reduce the activity of the catalyst but also reduce the selectivity of the catalyst.
In other words, these metals have the ability to hydrogenate and dehydrogenate, and under the reaction conditions of fluid catalytic cracking, they promote the dehydrogenation reaction of hydrocarbons, resulting in the production of undesirable hydrogen gas and coke. The amount increases;
The yield of preferred LPG, gasoline, and kerosene will decrease. As mentioned above, the problem of accumulation of metals on the catalyst that have a detrimental effect on the reaction is not a very important problem in fluid catalytic cracking of gas oil. This is because gas oil has a low metal content, so the amount of metal deposited on the catalyst is generally small, and the amount of catalyst replacement required is also small. In fact, when the amount of metal in the gas oil used as feedstock in gas oil fluid catalytic cracking is low, such as 1 ppm or less, simply replenishing the amount of fresh catalyst equivalent to the amount of catalyst normally lost from the equipment can Negative effects caused by metal accumulation on the catalyst can be avoided. However, in fluid catalytic cracking of heavy oil with high metal content, the amount of metal accumulated in the circulation system is enormous, so special measures are required to maintain catalyst activity and selectivity. . The usual means for this is to periodically or constantly extract a portion of the catalyst and replace it with fresh or regenerated catalyst (e.g., regenerated by ion exchange or redox methods) to maintain activity at a constant level. However, it is necessary to significantly increase the amount of catalyst extracted, which is very disadvantageous in terms of cost. Therefore, the problem of metal deposition on the catalyst becomes a particularly serious problem in fluid catalytic cracking of heavy oil with a high metal content. The inventors of the present invention have conducted extensive research to solve the above problems, and as a result, have completed a new catalytic cracking method using completely new means that can significantly save the amount of make-up catalyst medium. That is, according to the present invention, solvent-deasphalted atmospheric or vacuum distillation residue oils, hydrorefined products thereof, and mixtures of these deasphalted residue oils and vacuum gas oil, etc. (usually,
A method in which catalytic cracking of nickel and vanadium (containing nickel and vanadium of 1 ppm or more) is carried out in the presence of catalyst particles in a fluidized state, in which a part of the catalyst particles are extracted from the catalyst circulation system, and the extracted catalyst particles are , a high-gradient magnetic separation system in which a ferromagnetic filling is placed in a high magnetic field space with a uniform magnetic field strength of 1000 Gauss or more, and has the ability to magnetize minute particles of ferromagnetic or paramagnetic substances on the surface of this filling. Using a dry method, particle concentration is 0.01 to 100 g/sec, fluid linear velocity is 0.01 to 100 m/sec, and wet method is particle concentration 0.01 to 100 m/sec.
The nickel, vanadium, iron, The above-mentioned method is characterized in that the catalyst particles that have become magnetized due to copper deposition are separated into particles that are magnetized and particles that are not magnetized under the treatment conditions, and that the non-magnetized catalyst particles are recycled. provided. The term "magnetized material" as used herein refers to catalyst particles that are collected by magnetic force on the surface of a packing placed in the magnetic field space of a high-gradient magnetic separator. In addition, non-magnetized substances refer to catalyst particles that are not collected on the surface of the packing and are discharged as they are outside the system of the high gradient magnetic separator. The method of the present invention will be explained in more detail below. The present inventors separated the catalyst extracted from the circulation system during fluid catalytic cracking of heavy petroleum into magnetized and non-magnetized substances using a high-gradient magnetic separator, and separated the extracted catalyst into magnetized and non-magnetized substances. When the catalytic activity of the three substances was evaluated using a fixed bed microreactor, the conversion rate was higher in the order of non-magnetized material>extracted catalyst>magnetized material;
It also has excellent selectivity for LPG, gasoline, and kerosene production, and it was found that there is a significant difference in catalytic ability among these three. Furthermore, when the non-magnetized material was returned to the circulation system, it was found that it could be reused without adversely affecting the conversion selectivity, and that the amount of make-up catalyst could be significantly saved. The present invention was completed based on the above-mentioned novel findings discovered by the inventors. That is, in the method of the present invention, nickel, iron, vanadium, and copper contained in heavy petroleum products are deposited on the catalyst, resulting in a decrease in the conversion rate of the reaction, and the reduction of gasoline and kerosene gas oil fractions in the product. The yield of coke and hydrogen decreases, and the yield of coke and hydrogen increases, causing economic losses.
To prevent problems with equipment operation, when a part of the catalyst flowing in the decomposition equipment is extracted and replaced with new or regenerated catalyst, the extracted catalyst is separated from magnetized substances and non-magnetic substances using a high gradient magnetic separator. By separating the magnetized materials and returning the non-magnetized materials, which still maintain high activity and selectivity, to the cracker for reuse, the increase in coke and hydrogen in the product is suppressed, and the conversion rate of the reaction is reduced. This is a method to save the amount of makeup catalyst while preventing. In the present invention, heavy petroleum refers to heavy petroleum containing no substantial amount of distillation residue such as asphaltenes,
These include atmospheric distillation gas oil, vacuum distillation gas oil, solvent-deasphalted oil, residual oil that has been deasphaltenized by heat treatment or hydrorefining treatment, or mixtures thereof, and those obtained by hydrorefining these. In fluid catalytic cracking, the reaction temperature is 480-550
℃, a pressure of 1 to 3 Kg/cm 2 G, a catalyst/oil ratio of 1 to 20, and the catalyst is, for example, a silica-alumina catalyst containing about 15 to 20% by weight of alumina or a silica containing about 5 to 50% of zeolite.・Alumina catalyst, etc. The catalyst usually has a thickness of 1 to 1000 μm, preferably 20 to 200 μm.
They are microparticles with a particle size of m. The yield and properties of each product produced by the catalytic cracking method vary depending on the composition of the feed oil, the type of catalyst, and differences in reaction conditions, but as a general range, the yield of the main product, gasoline, is 40 to 60 vol%. , decomposition gas is 15~
25vol%, cracked light oil 20~40vol%, coke 3~
It is 8wt%. In the fluid catalytic cracking referred to here, the hydrocarbon raw material described above is brought into continuous contact with the catalyst kept in a fluidized state under the temperature and pressure conditions described above. This contact may be carried out in the bed of the catalyst, or by so-called riser cracking, in which the catalyst particles and the raw material rise together in a tube. The mixture of reactants, unreacted raw materials, and catalyst thus catalyzed is generally fed into a stripping zone and
Most of the hydrocarbons such as products and unreacted products are removed. The catalyst loaded with carbonaceous and some heavy hydrocarbons is continuously removed from the stripping zone and sent to the regeneration zone. In the regeneration zone (regeneration tower), the carbonaceous catalyst is subjected to oxidation treatment. In this regeneration zone as well, the catalyst is maintained in a fluidized state and is subjected to combustion treatment at a temperature of 560 to 650°C using normal air. The catalyst that has undergone this oxidation treatment is a regenerated catalyst, in which carbonaceous substances and hydrocarbons deposited on the catalyst have been reduced. This regenerated catalyst is continuously recycled to the reaction zone. In the fluidized catalytic cracking of heavy petroleum products containing distillation residues of the present invention, a part of the fluidized catalyst circulating between the reaction tower and the regeneration tower is removed from the stripper outlet, the regeneration tower exit, or other equipment that may interfere with the operation of the equipment. Pull it out from a suitable place. In this case, it may be extracted continuously or discontinuously at regular intervals as long as it does not adversely affect the product. The removed catalyst may be treated as is or before being subjected to a high gradient magnetic separator. The high gradient magnetic separator is a ferromagnetic packing placed in a homogeneous high magnetic field space, and a ferromagnetic packing is placed around the packing.
By generating a magnetic field gradient as high as ×10 3 to 20,000 × 10 3 Gauss/cm, ferromagnetic or paramagnetic microparticles are magnetized on the surface of the filling, and the weak paramagnetism of non-magnetized objects is It is a magnetic separator designed to be able to separate microparticles or diamagnetic microparticles. As the above-mentioned ferromagnetic filler, an aggregate of fine ferromagnetic wires such as steel wool or steel net having a diameter of 1 to 1000 .mu.m is usually used. An example of a high gradient magnetic separator is the high gradient magnetic separator produced and sold by SALA of Sweden. On the other hand, drum-type magnetic separators, which have traditionally been used to separate relatively large ferromagnetic particles in magnetic beneficiation of iron ore, have a magnetic field strength of approximately 500 Gauss and a magnetic field gradient of approximately 500 Gauss/cm. Therefore, the magnetic field strength and magnetic field gradient of the high-gradient magnetic separator referred to in the present invention are significantly smaller than that of the high-gradient magnetic separator. Although it can remove powder, it cannot be used to separate catalysts containing deposited metals used in fluid catalytic cracking of heavy petroleum products. Methods for processing solid particles using high gradient magnetic separators include dry methods using air, nitrogen, steam, and mixtures thereof as carrier fluids, and wet methods using water or other liquids as carrier fluids. In the present invention, either a dry method or a wet method may be used. Process variables when operating a high gradient magnetic separator typically include magnetic field strength, magnetic field gradient, linear velocity, particle concentration, processing temperature, catalyst particle size, type, state and amount of deposited metal, and desired separation level. , the optimum values of process variables vary greatly depending on the selectivity of separation. Magnetic field strength is the strength of the magnetic field in the space where the filling is placed, and is usually 1000 ~ for both dry and wet methods.
20,000 Gauss or more is used. The magnetic field gradient is the amount of change in the strength of the magnetic field that occurs around the filling, and can be changed by changing the magnetic field strength or by changing the type and diameter of the filling.
In both wet methods, 2000×10 3 to 20000×10 3 Gauss/cm is usually used. Particle concentration refers to the concentration of catalyst particles that are subject to magnetic separation in a carrier fluid consisting of gas or liquid, and in dry methods it is usually between 0.01 and 100.
It is operated at a particle concentration of g/g/g. Wet processes are usually operated at particle concentrations of 0.01 to 1000 g/g/. Processing temperature refers to the temperature of the catalyst particles that are subject to magnetic separation, and more precisely, it refers to the temperature of iron, nickel, vanadium, and copper deposited on the catalyst particles. The treatment temperature is preferably below the Curie temperature of these metals, and usually room temperature is used. In addition, by changing the linear velocity of the fluid as it passes through the magnetic field, it is possible to greatly change the separation level and separation selectivity.When high selectivity is required, the linear velocity can be increased. drive. In the dry method, a linear velocity of 0.01 to 100 m/sec is usually used. Usually 0.01 to 10000 in wet method
A linear velocity of m/hr is used. The high gradient magnetic separator may be integrated into the fluid catalytic cracker line or may be operated in batches without integration. The extracted catalyst is separated by a high-gradient magnetic separator into magnetized catalyst particles, which have large amounts of iron, nickel, vanadium, and copper deposited, and non-magnetized catalyst particles, which do not have large amounts of these metals deposited. Although it is divided into magnetic materials, the weight ratio of magnetized materials to non-magnetized materials is usually 1:100 to 100:1, and may range from 1:1000 to 1000:1 in some cases. Preferably, the separation is within a range of 1:10 to 10:1. The amount of metal deposited on magnetized catalyst particles depends on the type of catalyst used in the fluid catalytic cracking reaction, the intended product,
Although it varies greatly depending on the reaction conditions, etc., it is usually in the range of 0.05 to 20 wt%, preferably 0.1 to 5 wt% in terms of nickel equivalent. Note that the nickel equivalent referred to here is a value expressed by the following formula. Nickel equivalent = [Ni] + 0.25 x [V] + 0.1 x [Fe]
+0.1×[Cu] ([Ni], [V], [Fe], and [Cu] represent the concentration of nickel, vanadium, iron, and copper, respectively. The amount of metal deposited in the non-magnetized material after separation is compared Since it still has high activity and selectivity, it is returned to the circulation system for reuse.In this case, make up a new or regenerated catalyst equal to the separated and removed magnetized material to reduce the amount of catalyst in the circulation system. It is usually done to prevent the fluid balance from being disrupted and the catalyst activity to decrease by keeping the same amount as before extraction.The catalyst is introduced into the circulation system at the regeneration tower inlet, regeneration tower exit transfer line, or other heat source. A location is selected that will not affect the balance or flow balance.Next, the magnetized material after magnetic separation can be discarded or
The deposited metal may be reused after being removed from the catalyst by methods such as ion exchange, chlorination, sulfidation, CO conversion, oxidation, and reduction. In the case of regeneration, the regenerator may be connected to the high gradient magnetic separator and integrated into the line, or it may be separated and operated in batches. Example 1 Using a silica-alumina fluid catalytic cracking catalyst containing approximately 5 wt% of zeolite, a part of the circulating catalyst was replaced with a new catalyst using a fluid catalytic cracking pilot device, and the solvent from the vacuum residue was removed from the deasphalted oil and distilled under reduced pressure. Catalytic cracking was carried out using the mixed oil with gas oil as the raw material. The extracted catalyst is treated with a high-gradient magnetic separator, separated into equal amounts of magnetized and non-magnetized materials, and subjected to metal analysis and fixed bed analysis for the extracted catalyst, magnetized materials, and non-magnetized materials. Activity evaluation was performed using a microreactor. These results are shown in Table 1. The non-magnetized material has values close to those of the new catalyst in terms of conversion rate, carbon production rate (CPF), and hydrogen generation amount (H 2 /CH 4 vol ratio), and has sufficient activity and selectivity to withstand reuse. You can see that it is retained.
【表】
実施例 2
約5wt%のゼオライトを含有するシリカーアル
ミナ流動接触分解触媒を用い、流動接触分解パイ
ロツト装置により循環触媒の一部を新触媒と交換
しながら溶剤脱れき油の接触分解を低転化率運転
条件下で行なつた。
この場合表2左欄の生成物を得るのに処理油1
バーレルあたり1.1ポンドの新触媒を必要とした。
次に流動接触分解パイロツト装置に高勾配磁気
分離機を組み込み、抜き出した触媒を高勾配磁気
分離機により着磁物と非着磁物に分け、非着磁物
を循環系内へ戻して再使用した。この場合、高勾
配磁気分離機を用いない時とほぼ同様の生成物を
得るのに、処理油1バーレルあたり0.6ポンドの
新触媒を必要とした。
したがつて高勾配磁気分離機を用いるとメイク
アツプの触媒量を大巾に節約できることがわか
る。なお原料油にはクエート減圧残留のペンタン
抽出物を用いた。
原料油性状は次のとおりである。
比 重 0.986
硫黄分(wt%) 4.70
残留炭素(wt%) 8.9
ニツケル(wt ppm) 12
バナジウム(wt ppm) 28 [Table] Example 2 Using a silica-alumina fluid catalytic cracking catalyst containing approximately 5 wt% of zeolite, catalytic cracking of solvent-deasphalted oil was performed using a fluid catalytic cracking pilot device while replacing a part of the circulating catalyst with a new catalyst. It was carried out under low conversion operating conditions. In this case, to obtain the products shown in the left column of Table 2, the treated oil 1
Required 1.1 pounds of new catalyst per barrel. Next, a high-gradient magnetic separator is installed in the fluid catalytic cracking pilot equipment, and the extracted catalyst is separated into magnetized and non-magnetized materials by the high-gradient magnetic separator, and the non-magnetized materials are returned to the circulation system for reuse. did. In this case, 0.6 pounds of new catalyst was required per barrel of treated oil to obtain approximately the same product as without the high gradient magnetic separator. Therefore, it can be seen that the amount of make-up catalyst can be greatly reduced by using a high gradient magnetic separator. Note that the pentane extract remaining from Kuwait vacuum was used as the raw material oil. The raw material oil properties are as follows. Specific gravity 0.986 Sulfur content (wt%) 4.70 Residual carbon (wt%) 8.9 Nickel (wt ppm) 12 Vanadium (wt ppm) 28
【表】
実施例 3
シリカアルミナ型接触分解触媒2Kgを保有する
流動接触分解パイロツト装置に、中近東系原油よ
り得た減圧軽油を26/日、同じく中近東系原油
の減圧残油を溶剤脱れきして得た脱れき油を10
/日の割合で混合した原料油を、1日36の供
給し、通常の高転化率運転条件下で接触分解実験
を行なつた。なお上記の原料油にいずれも使用す
る前に水素化脱硫処理を行なつた。
接触分解の実験条件は反応温度は492℃、反応
圧は常圧で、流動床型分解反応器に原料油を1時
間1.5の割合で装入して分離し、反応器から流
出する分解生成物を冷却液化して回収した。触媒
は反応器から1時間10Kgの速度で反応器から連続
的に抜き出し、触媒粒子に付着した炭素質を除去
するため再生器に装入し、空気で酸化し再生した
のち、再び反応器に連続的に装入し循環使用し
た。
実験に使用した原料油の性状は表3のようであ
つた。[Table] Example 3 A fluidized catalytic cracking pilot unit containing 2 kg of silica-alumina type catalytic cracking catalyst was charged with vacuum gas oil obtained from Middle Eastern crude oil 26 days a day, and vacuum residual oil obtained from Middle Eastern crude oil was deasphalted with solvent. 10% of the deasphalted oil obtained by
A catalytic cracking experiment was conducted under normal high conversion operating conditions by supplying 36 times a day of mixed feedstock oil at a rate of 1/day. Note that the above raw material oils were all subjected to hydrodesulfurization treatment before use. The experimental conditions for catalytic cracking were that the reaction temperature was 492°C, the reaction pressure was normal pressure, and the feedstock oil was charged into a fluidized bed cracking reactor at a rate of 1.5 hours per hour and separated, and the cracked products flowing out from the reactor were separated. was cooled and liquefied. The catalyst is continuously extracted from the reactor at a rate of 10 kg per hour, charged into a regenerator to remove carbonaceous substances attached to the catalyst particles, oxidized with air and regenerated, and then continuously returned to the reactor. It was charged and used repeatedly. The properties of the raw material oil used in the experiment were as shown in Table 3.
【表】
装置内を循環している触媒の一部を再生器より
1日1回約150gの割合で抜き出したのち、170g
の新触媒を再生器に補給しつつ21日間連続的に実
験を行なつた。1日150gの割合で抜き出した触
媒以外にも、反応器および再生器から少量の触媒
が分解生成物および再生器廃ガスとともに装置外
に失なわれたが、21日後の触媒保有量は2.1Kgで
あり、補給量と抜出量はほぼ平衡していたことが
確認された。21日経過後の装置内触媒を分析した
ところ、ニツケル252ppm、バナジウム608ppm、
および鉄120ppmを含んでいた。これにより1日
約170gの新触媒を補給しつつ装置内の触媒保有
量を2Kgに保てば、金属による触媒汚染度を約
980ppmに保てることが判明した。
上述の実験をさらに15日間断続して同一条件で
行なつた。ただし触媒の抜出し量を1日4回とし
毎回500gを抜き出し、高勾配磁気分離器で選別
し非着磁物として毎回約480gを回収し再び装置
内に装入した。
また1日1回100gの新触媒を再生器に補給し
た。15日後の装置内触媒を金属について分析した
ところ、ニツケル232ppm、バナジウム、620ppm
および鉄52ppmであり、合計904ppmの金属によ
り汚染されていることが判つた。
以上の結果から本発明の方法を適用する場合
は、適用しない場合の170gから100gに低下させ
うることが認められた。
なお高勾配磁気分離装置の運転条件、および運
転時に着磁物として分離された触媒の分析結果
は、表4、表5のようであつた。また生成物分布
については表6のようになり、高勾配磁気分離機
による触媒回収がある場合、無い場合ともほぼ同
一の生成物が得られた。[Table] After extracting a portion of the catalyst circulating in the equipment from the regenerator at a rate of approximately 150g once a day, 170g
The experiment was conducted continuously for 21 days while replenishing the regenerator with new catalyst. In addition to the catalyst extracted at a rate of 150g per day, a small amount of catalyst was lost from the reactor and regenerator together with decomposition products and regenerator waste gas, but the amount of catalyst retained after 21 days was 2.1Kg. It was confirmed that the replenishment amount and the withdrawal amount were almost in equilibrium. Analysis of the catalyst in the device after 21 days revealed that it contained 252 ppm of nickel, 608 ppm of vanadium,
and contained 120 ppm iron. As a result, if you keep the amount of catalyst in the equipment at 2 kg while replenishing approximately 170 g of new catalyst per day, the degree of catalyst contamination by metals can be reduced to approximately 2 kg.
It turned out that it could be kept at 980ppm. The above experiment was repeated for another 15 days under the same conditions. However, the amount of catalyst was withdrawn four times a day, and 500 g was withdrawn each time, separated by a high-gradient magnetic separator, and about 480 g each time was recovered as non-magnetized material and charged into the apparatus again. Additionally, 100g of new catalyst was supplied to the regenerator once a day. When the catalyst in the device was analyzed for metals after 15 days, it was found to be 232ppm of nickel and 620ppm of vanadium.
It was found that the soil was contaminated with 904 ppm of metals, including 52 ppm of iron and 52 ppm of iron. From the above results, it was confirmed that when the method of the present invention is applied, the weight can be reduced from 170 g when not applied to 100 g. The operating conditions of the high gradient magnetic separator and the analysis results of the catalyst separated as a magnetized substance during operation were as shown in Tables 4 and 5. The product distribution is as shown in Table 6, and almost the same products were obtained with and without catalyst recovery using a high gradient magnetic separator.
【表】【table】
【表】【table】
Claims (1)
の水素化精製物を含む脱瀝残渣油類を流動状態の
触媒粒子の存在下で接触分解を行なわせる方法で
あつて、 触媒循環系内より触媒粒子の一部を抜き出し、
抜き出した触媒粒子を、均一な1000ガウス以上の
磁場強度を有する高磁場空間内に強磁性の充填物
を配置し、この充填物表面に強磁性あるいは常磁
性物質の微少粒子を着磁させる能力のある高勾配
磁気分離機を用いて、乾式では粒子濃度0.01〜
100g/、流体線速度0.01〜100m/sec、湿式
では粒子濃度0.01〜1000g/、流体線速度0.01
〜10000m/hrの範囲内で触媒の許容金属含有量
に従つて選択される分離条件で処理し、該脱瀝油
中に含有されていたニツケル、バナジウム、鉄、
銅の堆積により着磁性を帯びた該触媒粒子を、該
処理条件下で着磁する粒子と着磁しない粒子とに
分離し、非着磁触媒粒子を循環使用することを特
徴とする脱瀝残渣油類の流動接触分解方法。[Scope of Claims] 1. A method for catalytically cracking solvent-deasphalted normal pressure or vacuum distillation residue oils or deasphalted residue oils containing hydrorefined products thereof in the presence of catalyst particles in a fluidized state. , Some of the catalyst particles are extracted from the catalyst circulation system,
The extracted catalyst particles are placed in a ferromagnetic packing in a high magnetic field space with a uniform magnetic field strength of 1000 Gauss or more, and the packing has the ability to magnetize minute particles of ferromagnetic or paramagnetic material on the surface of the packing. Using a certain high gradient magnetic separator, the particle concentration is 0.01 ~ 0.01 in the dry method.
100g/, fluid linear velocity 0.01-100m/sec, wet type particle concentration 0.01-1000g/, fluid linear velocity 0.01
The nickel, vanadium, iron, and
A deasphalting residue characterized in that the catalyst particles that have become magnetized due to copper deposition are separated into particles that are magnetized and particles that are not magnetized under the treatment conditions, and that the non-magnetized catalyst particles are recycled. Fluid catalytic cracking method for oils.
Priority Applications (9)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5947380A JPS56157486A (en) | 1980-05-07 | 1980-05-07 | Fluid catalytic cracking process |
| US06/217,129 US4359379A (en) | 1979-12-21 | 1980-12-16 | Process for fluid catalytic cracking of distillation residual oils |
| AU65473/80A AU544257B2 (en) | 1979-12-21 | 1980-12-17 | Catalytic cracking of oil |
| GB8040803A GB2067217B (en) | 1979-12-21 | 1980-12-19 | Treatment of fluid cracking catalyst |
| NL8006929A NL8006929A (en) | 1979-12-21 | 1980-12-19 | METHOD FOR CATALYTIC CRACKING IN A FLOWING BED. |
| CA000367150A CA1150177A (en) | 1979-12-21 | 1980-12-19 | Process for fluid catalytic cracking of distillation residual oils |
| FR8027198A FR2484439B1 (en) | 1979-12-21 | 1980-12-22 | CATALYTIC CRACKING IN FLUIDIZED PHASE OF DISTILLATION RESIDUAL OILS |
| DE19803048416 DE3048416A1 (en) | 1979-12-21 | 1980-12-22 | METHOD FOR FLUIDLY CATALYTIC CRACKING OF DISTILLATION RESIDUAL OILS |
| MX185439A MX157558A (en) | 1979-12-21 | 1981-01-05 | IMPROVED HYDROCARBON FLUID CATALYTIC DISINTEGRATION PROCEDURE |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5947380A JPS56157486A (en) | 1980-05-07 | 1980-05-07 | Fluid catalytic cracking process |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS56157486A JPS56157486A (en) | 1981-12-04 |
| JPS6337156B2 true JPS6337156B2 (en) | 1988-07-22 |
Family
ID=13114307
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5947380A Granted JPS56157486A (en) | 1979-12-21 | 1980-05-07 | Fluid catalytic cracking process |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS56157486A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2009073919A (en) * | 2007-09-20 | 2009-04-09 | Nippon Oil Corp | Fluid catalytic cracking method for heavy petroleum |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5426308B2 (en) * | 2009-10-05 | 2014-02-26 | 出光興産株式会社 | Fluid catalytic cracking method |
| JP7158230B2 (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2022-10-21 | コスモ石油株式会社 | Method for controlling deposit metal concentration in fluid catalytic cracking catalyst |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2471078A (en) * | 1946-06-12 | 1949-05-24 | Standard Oil Dev Co | Catalyst quality by magnetic separation |
| GB940958A (en) * | 1960-08-17 | 1963-11-06 | British Petroleum Co | Improvements relating to the treatment of catalysts |
-
1980
- 1980-05-07 JP JP5947380A patent/JPS56157486A/en active Granted
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2009073919A (en) * | 2007-09-20 | 2009-04-09 | Nippon Oil Corp | Fluid catalytic cracking method for heavy petroleum |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS56157486A (en) | 1981-12-04 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4359379A (en) | Process for fluid catalytic cracking of distillation residual oils | |
| EP0106052B1 (en) | Demetallizing and decarbonizing heavy residual oil feeds | |
| US4525267A (en) | Process for hydrocracking hydrocarbons with hydrotreatment-regeneration of spent catalyst | |
| JP4866351B2 (en) | Process for direct coal liquefaction | |
| US4331533A (en) | Method and apparatus for cracking residual oils | |
| US9567535B2 (en) | Slurry hydrocracking apparatus or process | |
| AU644755B2 (en) | Magnetic separation into low, intermediate and high metals and activity catalyst | |
| JPS5953591A (en) | Supplying oil converting method and device | |
| US4482450A (en) | Process for catalytic reaction of heavy oils | |
| US2908630A (en) | Process for cracking a plurality of hydrocarbon oils in a suspension of catalyst particles in a riser reactor | |
| JPH04227792A (en) | Purification of heavy slurry oil fraction | |
| US4244810A (en) | Fluidized catalytic cracking process for increased hydrogen production | |
| JPS63243196A (en) | Conversion f heavy oil to light oil | |
| WO2009113620A1 (en) | Method for selectively removing catalysts from fischer-tropsch synthetic crude oil and method for recycling removed catalysts | |
| US2472723A (en) | Method for removal of metal compounds from oil feed to fluid catalyst cracking | |
| US9777226B2 (en) | Methods and systems for slurry hydrocracking with reduced feed bypass | |
| JPS59108091A (en) | Hydrocracking method for heavy hydrocarbons | |
| KR0126111B1 (en) | Process for the fluid catalytic cracking of heavy fraction oils | |
| US2458870A (en) | Hydrogenation of an oxide of carbon | |
| JPS6337156B2 (en) | ||
| JPH0535754B2 (en) | ||
| JPH06313176A (en) | Fluid catalytic cracking of heavy oil | |
| JPS6024831B2 (en) | Catalytic cracking method for heavy petroleum containing distillation residue | |
| US2425532A (en) | Process for removing inorganic impurities from mineral oils preparatory to catalyticcracking | |
| JPS6337835B2 (en) |