JPS642895B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPS642895B2 JPS642895B2 JP54083795A JP8379579A JPS642895B2 JP S642895 B2 JPS642895 B2 JP S642895B2 JP 54083795 A JP54083795 A JP 54083795A JP 8379579 A JP8379579 A JP 8379579A JP S642895 B2 JPS642895 B2 JP S642895B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- diffraction
- rays
- intensity
- texture
- rolled metal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 claims description 26
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 108010014172 Factor V Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 6
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001678 irradiating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910000859 α-Fe Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910000976 Electrical steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000002441 X-ray diffraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- JZQOJFLIJNRDHK-CMDGGOBGSA-N alpha-irone Chemical compound CC1CC=C(C)C(\C=C\C(C)=O)C1(C)C JZQOJFLIJNRDHK-CMDGGOBGSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002050 diffraction method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005315 distribution function Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005415 magnetization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000275 quality assurance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
- G01N23/20—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by using diffraction of the radiation by the materials, e.g. for investigating crystal structure; by using scattering of the radiation by the materials, e.g. for investigating non-crystalline materials; by using reflection of the radiation by the materials
- G01N23/207—Diffractometry using detectors, e.g. using a probe in a central position and one or more displaceable detectors in circumferential positions
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
Description
この発明は、金属圧延板の集合組織の測定方法
に関するものである。
一般に金属材料とくに鋼板の集合組織は、その
加工性や磁気的性質などを決定する重要な要素で
ある。
従来からこのような集合組織に基づく種々の特
性を積極的に活用すべく製造工程や成分などに工
夫を凝らして優れた製品が開発されているが、該
製品の品質管理やグレード分けを行なうには、集
合組織の正確な測定を行なう必要がある。
ところで集合組織の測定は、素材より採取した
小試験片を対象としてオフラインすなわち製造ラ
インを離れたところで行なうのが一般的である
が、従来の測定方法では長時間を要するため作業
能率の面に問題があつた。このため迅速かつ高精
度の測定方法の開発が要望されていたのである。
この発明は上記の要望に応えるもので、金属圧
延板に、その板面法線を含む面内に連続X線を一
定の入射角で照射し、該金属圧延板からの回折X
線を所定の回折角度位置に固定した半導体検出器
にて検出し、これを特にエネルギ分散法によつて
分析して各結晶格子面からの回折X線強度を求
め、この回折X線強度を、理論式から求めた各結
晶格子面ごとの標準回折X線強度と対比すること
により、迅速かつ簡便に静置下にある金属圧延板
の集合組織を測定する方法を新たに開発したもの
である。
一般の実用材料は多結晶体であり、多結晶試料
の各結晶粒はそれぞれ別個の方位をとつている。
しかし試料全体として統計的にみると、程度の差
はあるが特定の方位で試料方位を代表することが
可能である。従つて多結晶試料の集合組織を測定
するということは、その優先方位としての結晶方
位を決定することと、集合の程度の定量化とを行
なうことである。
まず結晶方位の決定は、試料に固定した座標系
と、結晶に固定した座標系との角度関係を求める
ことであり、ここに試料に固定した座標系は、板
状試料についてはその圧延方向(以下RDと略
す)、板幅方向(TDと略す)および板面法線方
向(NDと略す)に、直交座標を設定することが
多く、一方結晶に固定した座標系は、鉄の場合の
例で〔100〕、〔010〕および〔001〕の三つの結晶
軸方向に直交座標を設定するのが普通である。
次に優先方位への集合度は、通常試料の或る結
晶格子面からの回折強度と、同一結晶格子面から
のランダム強度との比の値によつて定量化するこ
とができる。
さて集合組織の表示方法としては、次の二通り
がある。すなわち、
(1) 試料座標系を固定し、或る結晶面たとえば
{hkl}の極つまり結晶面法線と投影球の交点
が、ステレオ投影図上でどの方向に、どのよう
な存在密度で分布しているかを示す方法、
(2) 結晶座標系を固定し、試料の任意の方向たと
えばNDに平行な結晶軸の存在密度をその座標
系に表示する方法
であり、前者(1)については{hkl}面(正)極点
図または極密度分布図、後者(2)は、ND//軸密
度分布図または逆もしくは反転極点図などと呼ば
れる。
さて集合組織の測定には、通常X線回折が利用
される。
一般に結晶は、原子が三次元空間に周期的に配
列し、空間格子を形成している固体として定義さ
れる。これらの空間格子のすべての格子点は、格
子面とよばれるお互いに平行で等間隔な一群の平
面上に配置することができ、空間における位置を
問わずに格子面の方位のみは、いわゆるミラー指
数(Miller index)で表示される。
ミラー指数表示で(hkl)面なる平面群の相隣
る面の間隔を格子面間隔とよびこれをdhKLとす
る。立方晶型の結晶(鉄もそうであるが)におい
ては、ミラー指数とdhKLとの間には
なる関係がある。
いま波長:λのX線がミラー指数(hkl)なる
格子面に対し、入射角:θ(面法線に対し90゜−
θ)で入射した場合について考える。原子による
散乱X線のうち入射X線に対し2θの角度をなす方
向すなわち回折角度方向に進むものが次の条件を
満足すれば回折が生じる。すなわち
nλ=2dhKL・Sinθ ……(2)
(2)式はブラツグの法則として知られているとお
り、nは反射次数で1以上の正整数、sinθ≦1の
範囲で順次大きな値をとる。
通常集合組織の測定は、特性X線を用いた回折
法で行われ、この特性X線はある波長位置に鋭い
強度を持つので、(2)式のλの値は一定の値とな
り、したがつて回折を得るためには、θを可変と
しなければならない。
実際には、X線分光器の一種であるデイフラク
トメータで回折X線を検出、計数するが、ゴニオ
メータを用いてデイフラクトメータを走査するこ
とにより、θを可変にして(2)式を満足する回折角
度位置:θhKLを定め、その位置での回折強度を測
定している。
これにより{hkl}面正極点図を作成する場合、
θhKLが一定であるからこの角度位置にデイフラク
トメータを固定するので角度走査は行なわれない
が、試料台はステレオ投影球上の各点の値を測定
するために複雑な回転動作を行なう必要があり、
一方逆極点図を作成する場合は、直接測定可能な
15個程度の結晶面を回折強度から作成される簡便
法、Jetterらによつて提唱された精密法、三次元
結晶方位分布関数から算出する方法などがあるが
通常は簡便法がもつともよく用いられ、実用上の
要求はこの方法で満足される。
ところで金属材料、なかでも鉄の結晶は、その
方位によつて種々の性質に関して異方性を示す。
磁気異方性としては<100>軸方向が磁化容易軸
であり、従つて一方向性けい素鋼板は、RDに関
してこの方位の集積度を高くするように製造され
る。また深絞り加工の尺度となるr値は、素材の
集合組織と密接な関係を持ちNDに関し<111>
方向の集積度が高い程、r値は高くなり深絞り性
は良好となる。
このように実用多結晶の製品としての鋼板に対
しても、積極的に異方性を活用するための製造法
が常識となつている。
従つて鋼板の集合組織を迅速かつ高精度で測定
することは、製品のグレード分け、品質管理およ
び品質保証に大きく寄与するものである。
しかしながら従来用いられてきた集合組織の測
定法は、前述の如く測定に長時間を要し、また回
折角が変化すると回折に寄与する体積部分が変化
するため精度が落ちるという欠点もあつた。
いま従来法に従い簡便法による逆極点図を作成
する場合について考察する。
たとえばα鉄(フエライト)について、結晶面
間隔の大きい順に(110)、(200)、……、(640)
まで13個の回折格子面(重複する格子は除く)の
軸密度を求める場合には、一片の試料について一
時間以上の測定時間を要していた。というのは、
X線管と検出器をブラツグの法則を満足する角度
位置に保持しながら走査するには、検出器を1゜/
minの角速度で約120゜の角度範囲にわたつて駆動
しなければならず、このとき回折線の存在しない
角度範囲を早送りしても2時間程度を要するのが
普通であつた。
またたとえばMo−Kα線を用いて(110)面お
よび(640)面からの回折X線を検出するには、
回折角はそれぞれθ=10.10゜、θ=63.0゜であり同
一スリツト系を用いた場合、照射面積、浸透深さ
が異なるので回折強度に寄与する体積部分が大幅
に変化する。
この発明は、上記のような従来の欠点を解消す
るもので、特性X線のかわりに連続X線を試料に
照射し、試料からの回折X線を一定回折角度位置
に固定した半導体検出器にて検出し、検出した回
折X線を以下に述べるエネルギ分散法に従いエネ
ルギ分析して各々の回折結晶格子面からの回折強
度を短時間に解析することを可能ならしめる。
このエネルギ分散法では、とくに連続(白色)
X線を用いて適当な回折角における結晶からの反
射X線のエネルギ値(hc/λ)を測定すること
により、結晶格子面間隔dhKLを求める。
すなわちエネルギ(E)と波長(λ)の間に
は、
λhc/E ……(3)
ここでh:プランクの定数
c:光速
なる関係があり、従つて前述の(2)式とこの(3)式よ
り、求める格子面間隔dhKLは
dhKL=hc/2sinθ・1/E ……(4)
となる。
ところで回折に利用されるX線のエネルギ領域
は、主として検出器の検出効率、エネルギ分解能
およびX線発生装置の最大電圧などによつてきま
るが、通常は5〜45KeV程度の範囲であり、測
定すべき主要なピークが10〜35KeV位の範囲に
なるように、測定試料の格子面間隔に応じて適当
な回折角を選んで目的に適う。
さてエネルギ分散法に従うこの発明の光学系を
具体的に第1図に示す。
図より明らかなように、入射角および回折角
(θ)が一定の、1つの光学系ですべての回折線
が同時に測定できるためヘツド部の構造が著しく
簡単になり、また測定しようとするすべての回折
面に対して目的に応じた回折角θが任意に選べる
ので、従来問題となつていたような一定幅スリツ
トを用いた際のX線入射角度(または回折角度)
の変化による試料面上の照射面積に違いが生じる
こともなく、従つて試料中のどのような微小領域
を狙つても試料位置に対応する回折X線強度が得
られるものである。
また入射角θが一定であることは、吸収効果、
浸透深さも各回折格子面に関して一定とみなして
よく、実用上各格子面について一定回折条件のも
とでの回折強度が得られる。
表1(a)および表2は上記の方法に従い、それぞ
れθ=30゜、θ=15゜とした場合のα−鉄の各回折
結晶格子面(hkl)に対応するエネルギ準位とそ
の分布(重なり)の程度を吟味したものである。
また表1(b)は表1(a)の各回折格子面とエネルギ値
Eとの関係を、エネルギ準位の尺度で表わしたも
のである。図中黒三角印は単独測定可能な回折面
であり、白丸印は多面が重複していることを表わ
す。
The present invention relates to a method for measuring the texture of a rolled metal plate. In general, the texture of metal materials, especially steel sheets, is an important element that determines its workability, magnetic properties, etc. In the past, excellent products have been developed by devising manufacturing processes and ingredients to actively utilize various properties based on the texture, but it is difficult to control the quality and grade the products. requires accurate measurements of texture. By the way, texture measurements are generally carried out off-line, in other words, away from the production line, using small test pieces taken from the material, but conventional measurement methods require a long time, which poses problems in terms of work efficiency. It was hot. For this reason, there was a demand for the development of a rapid and highly accurate measurement method. This invention meets the above-mentioned needs by irradiating a rolled metal plate with continuous X-rays at a constant angle of incidence in a plane including the normal to the plate surface, and detecting the diffracted X-rays from the rolled metal plate.
The rays are detected by a semiconductor detector fixed at a predetermined diffraction angle position, and this is analyzed especially by the energy dispersion method to determine the diffracted X-ray intensity from each crystal lattice plane. This method has been newly developed to quickly and easily measure the texture of a rolled metal plate that is left still by comparing it with the standard diffraction X-ray intensity for each crystal lattice plane determined from a theoretical formula. Common practical materials are polycrystalline, and each grain of a polycrystalline sample has a distinct orientation.
However, when looking at the sample as a whole statistically, it is possible to represent the sample orientation with a specific orientation, although there are differences in degree. Therefore, measuring the texture of a polycrystalline sample means determining its preferred crystal orientation and quantifying the degree of aggregation. First, determining the crystal orientation is to find the angular relationship between the coordinate system fixed to the sample and the coordinate system fixed to the crystal. Orthogonal coordinates are often set in the plate width direction (hereinafter abbreviated as RD), the plate width direction (abbreviated as TD), and the plate surface normal direction (abbreviated as ND), while a coordinate system fixed to the crystal is an example of iron. Usually, orthogonal coordinates are set in the three crystal axis directions of [100], [010], and [001]. Next, the degree of aggregation in the preferred orientation can be quantified by the ratio of the diffraction intensity from a certain crystal lattice plane of the sample to the random intensity from the same crystal lattice plane. Now, there are two ways to display the collective structure: In other words, (1) Fix the sample coordinate system, and determine in what directions and with what density the poles of a certain crystal plane, for example {hkl}, that is, the intersection of the crystal plane normal and the projection sphere, are distributed on the stereo projection diagram. (2) A method of fixing the crystal coordinate system and displaying the density of crystal axes parallel to the ND in any direction of the sample in that coordinate system.For the former (1), { hkl} plane (positive) pole figure or polar density distribution diagram, the latter (2) is called an ND//axis density distribution diagram or a reverse or inverted pole figure. Now, X-ray diffraction is usually used to measure texture. Generally, a crystal is defined as a solid in which atoms are arranged periodically in three-dimensional space to form a spatial lattice. All the lattice points of these spatial lattices can be arranged on a group of mutually parallel and equidistant planes called lattice planes, and regardless of their position in space, only the orientation of the lattice planes is a so-called mirror. Displayed as an index (Miller index). The interval between adjacent planes of a group of planes called (hkl) planes in Miller index representation is called the lattice spacing, and this is d hKL . In cubic crystals (such as iron), there is a relationship between the Miller index and d hKL . There is a relationship. Now, the X-ray with wavelength: λ is incident on the lattice surface with Miller index (hkl) at an angle of incidence of θ (90° to the normal to the surface).
Let us consider the case of incidence at angle θ). Diffraction occurs if X-rays scattered by atoms traveling in a direction forming an angle of 2θ with respect to the incident X-ray, that is, in the direction of the diffraction angle, satisfy the following conditions. That is, nλ=2d hKL・Sinθ... (2) As is known as Bragg's law, n is the reflection order, and takes successively larger values in the range of sinθ≦1. Normally, the texture is measured by a diffraction method using characteristic X-rays, and since these characteristic X-rays have a sharp intensity at a certain wavelength position, the value of λ in equation (2) is a constant value. In order to obtain diffraction, θ must be made variable. In reality, diffracted X-rays are detected and counted using a diffractometer, which is a type of X-ray spectrometer, but by scanning the diffractometer with a goniometer, θ can be varied to satisfy equation (2). The diffraction angle position: θ hKL is determined, and the diffraction intensity at that position is measured. With this, when creating a {hkl} plane positive pole figure,
Since θ hKL is constant, the diffractometer is fixed at this angular position and no angular scanning is performed, but the sample stage must perform complex rotational movements to measure the value at each point on the stereo projection sphere. There is,
On the other hand, when creating an inverse pole figure, it is possible to directly measure
There are a simple method in which about 15 crystal planes are created from diffraction intensity, a precise method proposed by Jetter et al., and a method in which calculation is performed from a three-dimensional crystal orientation distribution function, but the simple method is usually the most commonly used method. , the practical requirements are met in this way. By the way, metal materials, especially iron crystals, exhibit anisotropy in various properties depending on their orientation.
Regarding magnetic anisotropy, the <100> axis direction is the axis of easy magnetization, and therefore, unidirectional silicon steel sheets are manufactured so as to increase the degree of integration in this direction with respect to RD. In addition, the r value, which is a measure of deep drawing processing, has a close relationship with the texture of the material and is related to ND <111>
The higher the degree of integration in the direction, the higher the r value and the better the deep drawability. In this way, even for steel sheets as practical polycrystalline products, manufacturing methods that actively utilize anisotropy have become common knowledge. Therefore, rapid and highly accurate measurement of the texture of steel sheets greatly contributes to product grading, quality control, and quality assurance. However, conventionally used methods for measuring texture require a long time for measurement, as described above, and also have the disadvantage that accuracy decreases because the volume that contributes to diffraction changes as the diffraction angle changes. Now, let us consider the case of creating an inverse pole figure using the simple method according to the conventional method. For example, for α-iron (ferrite), in descending order of crystal plane spacing, (110), (200), ..., (640)
Until now, determining the axial density of 13 diffraction grating surfaces (excluding overlapping gratings) required more than an hour of measurement time for a single sample. I mean,
To scan while holding the x-ray tube and detector in an angular position that satisfies Bragg's law, move the detector 1°/
It had to be driven over an angular range of about 120° at an angular velocity of min. At this time, it usually took about 2 hours even if the angular range where no diffraction lines were present was fast-forwarded. For example, to detect diffracted X-rays from the (110) and (640) planes using Mo-Kα rays,
The diffraction angles are θ = 10.10° and θ = 63.0°, respectively, and when the same slit system is used, the irradiation area and penetration depth are different, so the volume that contributes to the diffraction intensity changes significantly. This invention solves the above-mentioned conventional drawbacks by irradiating a sample with continuous X-rays instead of characteristic This makes it possible to analyze the diffraction intensity from each diffraction crystal lattice plane in a short time by energy-analyzing the detected diffraction X-rays according to the energy dispersion method described below. In this energy dispersion method, especially continuous (white)
The crystal lattice spacing d hKL is determined by measuring the energy value (hc/λ) of reflected X-rays from the crystal at an appropriate diffraction angle using X-rays. In other words, there is a relationship between energy (E) and wavelength (λ): λhc/E...(3) where h: Planck's constant c: speed of light, so the above equation (2) and this (3) ), the required lattice spacing d hKL is d hKL = hc/2sinθ・1/E (4). By the way, the energy range of X-rays used for diffraction mainly depends on the detection efficiency and energy resolution of the detector, the maximum voltage of the X-ray generator, etc., but is usually in the range of about 5 to 45 KeV. An appropriate diffraction angle is selected according to the lattice spacing of the measurement sample so that the main peak to be measured is in the range of about 10 to 35 KeV. Now, FIG. 1 specifically shows an optical system of the present invention according to the energy dispersion method. As is clear from the figure, all the diffraction lines can be measured simultaneously with a single optical system with fixed incident angles and diffraction angles (θ), which greatly simplifies the structure of the head section, and also makes it possible to measure all the diffraction lines simultaneously. Since the diffraction angle θ can be arbitrarily selected for the diffraction surface according to the purpose, the X-ray incident angle (or diffraction angle) when using a constant width slit, which has been a problem in the past, can be
There is no difference in the irradiated area on the sample surface due to a change in the diffraction X-ray intensity, and therefore, no matter what minute region in the sample is targeted, a diffracted X-ray intensity corresponding to the sample position can be obtained. Also, the fact that the incident angle θ is constant means that the absorption effect,
The penetration depth may also be assumed to be constant for each diffraction grating surface, and in practice, the diffraction intensity can be obtained under constant diffraction conditions for each grating surface. Tables 1(a) and 2 are based on the above method and show the energy levels and their distributions ( The degree of overlap) was carefully examined.
Further, Table 1(b) shows the relationship between each diffraction grating surface in Table 1(a) and the energy value E using an energy level scale. In the figure, black triangles indicate diffraction surfaces that can be measured individually, and white circles indicate that multiple surfaces overlap.
【表】【table】
【表】 ▲【table】 ▲
Claims (1)
るに当り、連続X線を該圧延板に対し一定の入射
角で照射し、該金属圧延板からの回折X線を所定
の回折角度位置に固定した半導体検出器にて検出
し、その回折X線をエネルギ分散法によつて分析
して各結晶格子面ごとの回折X線強度を測定する
一方、得られた各回折X線強度を加算し、この加
算強度を、下記の理論式から求めた各結晶格子面
の相対強度比に従つて比例配分することによつ
て、各結晶格子面ごとの標準回折X線強度を求
め、各結晶格子面における該金属圧延板の回折X
線強度と標準回折X線強度とをそれぞれ対比して
該金属圧延板の集合組織を決定することを特徴と
する、金属圧延板の集合組織の測定方法。 記 RI(i)=I(i)/ΣI(i) I(i)=K・1/v2・F2・P・(L)・e-2M・V・
A(θ) ここでRI(i):相対強度比 I(i):任意の回折面の理論強度 K:試料の量および種類によらない定数 v:単位格子の体積 F:構造因子 P:多重度因子 (L):ローレンツかたより因子 e-2M:温度因子 V:X線を照射され回折に寄与した試料の体積 A(θ):吸収因子[Scope of Claims] 1. When measuring the texture of a rolled metal plate under static conditions, continuous X-rays are irradiated onto the rolled plate at a constant angle of incidence, and the diffracted X-rays from the rolled metal plate are measured. is detected by a semiconductor detector fixed at a predetermined diffraction angle position, and the diffracted X-rays are analyzed by the energy dispersion method to measure the diffracted X-ray intensity for each crystal lattice plane. By adding the diffraction X-ray intensities and proportionally distributing this added intensity according to the relative intensity ratio of each crystal lattice plane obtained from the following theoretical formula, the standard diffraction X-ray intensity for each crystal lattice plane is calculated. Find the diffraction X of the rolled metal plate in each crystal lattice plane.
1. A method for measuring the texture of a rolled metal sheet, comprising determining the texture of the rolled metal sheet by comparing line intensity and standard diffraction X-ray intensity. Note RI(i)=I(i)/ΣI(i) I(i)=K・1/v 2・F 2・P・(L)・e -2M・V・
A(θ) where RI(i): Relative intensity ratio I(i): Theoretical intensity of any diffraction surface K: Constant independent of the amount and type of sample v: Volume of unit cell F: Structure factor P: Multiply Severeness factor (L): Lorentzian bias factor e -2M : Temperature factor V: Volume of sample irradiated with X-rays and contributing to diffraction A(θ): Absorption factor
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP8379579A JPS568533A (en) | 1979-07-02 | 1979-07-02 | Static measuring method for metallic texture |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP8379579A JPS568533A (en) | 1979-07-02 | 1979-07-02 | Static measuring method for metallic texture |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS568533A JPS568533A (en) | 1981-01-28 |
| JPS642895B2 true JPS642895B2 (en) | 1989-01-19 |
Family
ID=13812576
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP8379579A Granted JPS568533A (en) | 1979-07-02 | 1979-07-02 | Static measuring method for metallic texture |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS568533A (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2025143797A (en) * | 2024-03-19 | 2025-10-02 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Manufacturing method for watch parts, manufacturing method for materials for watch parts, watch parts and materials for watch parts |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS5017695A (en) * | 1973-06-14 | 1975-02-25 | ||
| JPS55158544A (en) * | 1979-05-29 | 1980-12-10 | Kawasaki Steel Corp | On-line measuring method of and apparatus for aggregation structure |
-
1979
- 1979-07-02 JP JP8379579A patent/JPS568533A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS568533A (en) | 1981-01-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Allen et al. | Measurement of internal stress within bulk materials using neutron diffraction | |
| He | Introduction to two-dimensional X-ray diffraction | |
| US7885383B1 (en) | Method for measuring crystallite size with a two-dimensional X-ray diffractometer | |
| Allen et al. | Foil thickness measurements from convergent-beam diffraction patterns An experimental assessment of errors | |
| Budai et al. | The measurement of grain boundary thickness using X–ray diffraction techniques | |
| EP2941635B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for surface mapping using in-plane grazing incidence diffraction | |
| US7190762B2 (en) | Scanning line detector for two-dimensional x-ray diffractometer | |
| Ullemeyer et al. | Texture analysis of a muscovite-bearing quartzite: a comparison of some currently used techniques | |
| Bauch et al. | Innovative Analysis of X‐ray Microdiffraction Images on Selected Applications of the Kossel Technique | |
| JPS642895B2 (en) | ||
| Langer et al. | Lattice constant determination from Kossel patterns observed by CCD camera | |
| JPS649575B2 (en) | ||
| François et al. | The influence of cylindrical geometry on X-ray stress tensor analysis. I. General formulation | |
| JPS6259255B2 (en) | ||
| Ekstein et al. | Limits of accuracy in the determination of lattice parameters and stresses by the Debye–Scherrer method | |
| Fewster | Reciprocal space mapping | |
| Kirk | Experimental features of residual stress measurement by X‐ray diffractometry | |
| Evans Jr | X‐Ray Absorption Corrections for Single Crystals | |
| JP2006071449A (en) | Structure mapping method using neutron scattering | |
| JPH0237539B2 (en) | ||
| JPH02266249A (en) | Method for measuring x-ray diffraction of crystal plane | |
| JP2952284B2 (en) | X-ray optical system evaluation method | |
| SU718769A1 (en) | Three-crystal x-ray spectrometer | |
| JPS63139238A (en) | Simple one-dimensional scanning X-ray diffraction microscope | |
| Kranjc | Quantitative investigation of domain structures by Berg–Barrett X-ray diffraction microscopy. I. Determination of small tilt angles in various lattice planes of the crystal |