JPS649077B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPS649077B2 JPS649077B2 JP55017087A JP1708780A JPS649077B2 JP S649077 B2 JPS649077 B2 JP S649077B2 JP 55017087 A JP55017087 A JP 55017087A JP 1708780 A JP1708780 A JP 1708780A JP S649077 B2 JPS649077 B2 JP S649077B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- model
- concentration
- treatment facility
- sewage treatment
- water flow
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 239000010865 sewage Substances 0.000 claims description 34
- 239000010802 sludge Substances 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 27
- 238000005273 aeration Methods 0.000 claims description 26
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000001125 extrusion Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010206 sensitivity analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004062 sedimentation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036284 oxygen consumption Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W10/00—Technologies for wastewater treatment
- Y02W10/10—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
Landscapes
- Activated Sludge Processes (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
本発明は、いわゆる活性汚泥法を採用している
下水処理場のごとく曝気槽を処理施設の主要装置
とする。下水処理施設の運転等のための電子計算
機シミユレーシヨンに用いられる下水処理施設の
シミユレーシヨン方法に関するものである。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention uses an aeration tank as the main equipment of a treatment facility, such as a sewage treatment plant that employs the so-called activated sludge method. This invention relates to a method for simulating sewage treatment facilities, which is used in electronic computer simulation for operating sewage treatment facilities.
活性汚泥法による下水処理施設は第1図に示す
ように構成されている。すなわち活性汚泥法にお
ける主要装置は曝気槽1と沈殿池2であり、曝気
槽1において流入下水中の基質を微生物の作用に
より汚泥に変換し、次に沈殿池2において沈降に
よる固液分離を行ない、その上澄み液を処理水3
として河川に放流するものである。なお、第1図
で4は返送汚泥管路、5は余剰汚泥管路、6は流
入下水管路、7は曝気用空気管路をそれぞれ示し
ている。前記流入下水の時間変化特性は日間変動
が大きいことと処理水の水質は所定の値以下に保
持されることが本処理施設の運転上の特徴であ
る。本処理施設の運転方法は運転技術者の経験に
負うところが多いが、一方では計算機シミユレー
シヨンを用いて運転状態の検討が行なわれる場合
も多い。後者すなわちシミユレーシヨンを行なう
場合、曝気槽と沈殿池の数学モデルを必要とする
が、主体は曝気槽であり、この曝気槽の数学モデ
ルは精度の良いものでなければならない。 A sewage treatment facility using the activated sludge method is configured as shown in Figure 1. In other words, the main equipment in the activated sludge method is an aeration tank 1 and a settling tank 2. In the aeration tank 1, the substrate in the inflowing sewage is converted into sludge by the action of microorganisms, and then in the settling tank 2, solid-liquid separation is performed by sedimentation. , the supernatant liquid is treated water 3
The water is discharged into rivers as water. In FIG. 1, 4 indicates a return sludge pipe, 5 indicates an excess sludge pipe, 6 indicates an inflow sewage pipe, and 7 indicates an aeration air pipe. The operating characteristics of this treatment facility are that the time-varying characteristics of the inflowing sewage have large daily fluctuations and that the quality of the treated water is maintained below a predetermined value. The operation method of this treatment facility is largely dependent on the experience of operating engineers, but on the other hand, computer simulations are often used to examine operating conditions. In the case of the latter, that is, simulation, a mathematical model of the aeration tank and settling tank is required, but the main element is the aeration tank, and the mathematical model of this aeration tank must be highly accurate.
曝気槽内の主な反応要因は微生物を含む活性汚
泥と基質の混合状態であり、通常用いられる指標
は生物化学的酸素要求量(基質濃度)BOD、浮
遊物濃度(汚泥濃度)SS、溶存酸素濃度DOの3
つである。混合状態のモデルは槽列モデルが一般
に広く用いられており、その段数を最小の1とし
たときに完全混合モデル、段数を無限大としたと
きに押出流モデルとなる。実際の混合状態はこれ
ら両極限の中間状態であると考えられており、多
段完全混合モデルとすることもある。汚泥増殖過
程を表わすものとしては種々の提案がなされてい
るが、ここでは微生物化学反応式としてMonod
の式を基本とすれば、完全混合モデルおよび押出
流モデルは次の各式で表わすことができる。 The main reaction factor in the aeration tank is the mixed state of activated sludge containing microorganisms and substrate, and the indicators usually used are biochemical oxygen demand (substrate concentration) BOD, suspended solids concentration (sludge concentration) SS, and dissolved oxygen. Concentration DO 3
It is one. As a model of the mixing state, a tank array model is generally widely used, and when the number of stages is set to the minimum one, it becomes a complete mixing model, and when the number of stages is set to infinity, it becomes an extrusion flow model. The actual mixing state is considered to be an intermediate state between these two extremes, and a multi-stage complete mixing model is sometimes used. Various proposals have been made to express the sludge growth process, but here we will use the Monod as a microbial chemical reaction equation.
Based on the equation, the complete mixing model and extrusion flow model can be expressed by the following equations.
() 完全混合モデル
() 押出流モデル
ここに、Xc、XpとSc、Spはそれぞれ汚泥濃度
(SS)と基質濃度(BOD)で添字CとPは各々
完全混合モデル()と押出流モデル()の場
合の値を表わす。XIとSIはそれぞれ入力の汚泥濃
度(SS)と基質濃度(BOD)、μ^は最大増殖率、
Ksは飽和定数、Yは収率係数、Kdは自己酸化率、
TRは曝気槽滞留時間、tは任意時刻である。() Complete mixture model () Extrusion flow model Here, Xc, Xp, Sc, and Sp are the sludge concentration (SS) and substrate concentration (BOD), respectively, and the subscripts C and P represent the values for the complete mixing model () and the extrusion flow model (), respectively. X I and S I are the input sludge concentration (SS) and substrate concentration (BOD), respectively, μ^ is the maximum growth rate,
K s is the saturation constant, Y is the yield coefficient, K d is the autooxidation rate,
T R is the aeration tank residence time, and t is an arbitrary time.
また、溶存酸素(DO)モデルとしては、次式
が一般的である。 In addition, the following equation is generally used as a dissolved oxygen (DO) model.
ここで、Cは溶存酸素濃度、Csは飽和溶存酸素
濃度、CIは溶存酸素濃度の入力値、KLaは総括酸
素移動係数、Fは曝気風量、rrは酸素消費速度で
あり、K1〜K4は係数である。SとXは上記完全
混合モデル()および押出流モデル()にお
いて、それぞれScとXcおよびSpとXpとなる。 Here, C is the dissolved oxygen concentration, C s is the saturated dissolved oxygen concentration, C I is the input value of the dissolved oxygen concentration, K La is the overall oxygen transfer coefficient, F is the aeration air volume, r r is the oxygen consumption rate, and K 1 to K4 are coefficients. S and X become S c and X c and Sp and Xp, respectively, in the above perfect mixing model ( ) and extrusion flow model ( ).
沈殿池のモデルは曝気槽から流入する流量と汚
泥濃度の関数として沈殿池引抜汚泥濃度が計算さ
れるもので、物理現象のモデル化または統計的モ
デル化によつて得られる。 The settling tank model calculates the sludge concentration drawn from the settling tank as a function of the flow rate flowing from the aeration tank and the sludge concentration, and is obtained by modeling physical phenomena or statistical modeling.
以上のように下水処理場の流入下水特性の大き
な変動を考慮した非定常モデルすなわち(1)〜(3)式
で用いられている各係数(μ^、Ks、Y、Kd、K1
〜K4)を時変としたモデルを用いるシミユレー
シヨンは従来行なわれておらず、概略演算による
シミユレーシヨンしか行なわれていなかつた。こ
のため、従来はシミユレーシヨンにより精度の高
い指標値を得ることができず、対象システムの
種々の運転状態に対応する処置方法の充分な検討
を行なうことができなかつた。 As mentioned above, each coefficient (μ^, K s , Y, K d , K 1
~K 4 ) has not been previously performed using a time-varying model, and only simulations using rough calculations have been performed. For this reason, in the past, it was not possible to obtain highly accurate index values through simulation, and it was not possible to sufficiently examine treatment methods corresponding to various operating states of the target system.
本発明は、このような事情を背景としてなされ
たもので、曝気槽を処理施設の主要装置とする下
水処理施設のシミユレーシヨンを行なうに当り、
日間変動の大きな流入下水特性を考慮し合理的で
且つ高精度の指標値を得ることを可能とする下水
処理施設のシミユレーシヨン方法を提供すること
を目的としている。 The present invention was made against the background of the above, and in simulating a sewage treatment facility in which an aeration tank is the main equipment of the treatment facility,
The purpose of this paper is to provide a simulation method for sewage treatment facilities that takes into account the characteristics of inflowing sewage that vary greatly from day to day and makes it possible to obtain rational and highly accurate index values.
すなわち、本発明の特徴とするところは、日間
変動の大きな流入下水特性を考慮し、曝気槽の数
学モデルを、流入下水流量の範囲を複数分割し、
これら分割された互いに異なる水量の複数モード
に対して個別の混合モデルを対応させ、これらを
時系列的に連結する非定常モデルとすることにあ
る。 In other words, the present invention is characterized by dividing the mathematical model of the aeration tank into a plurality of ranges of inflow sewage flow rate, taking into account the characteristics of inflow sewage that vary greatly from day to day.
The aim is to create an unsteady model by making individual mixed models correspond to these divided modes of mutually different amounts of water and connecting them in time series.
以下、本発明の一実施例について詳細に説明す
る。 Hereinafter, one embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail.
流入下水特性を考慮した曝気槽の数学モデルを
構築しようとする場合、上記(1)〜(3)式における8
係数(μ^、Ks、Y、Kd、K1〜K4)を時変とする
非定常モデルが考えられるが、これは現状では理
論的にも実験的にも実現不可能である。そこで、
流入下水流量を高水量と低水量との2領域に分
け、それぞれの混合状態が異なるものと考えて
各々個別の混合モデルを対応させ、これらを時系
列的に連結させることにした。 When trying to construct a mathematical model of an aeration tank that takes into account the characteristics of inflowing sewage, 8 in equations (1) to (3) above
An unsteady model in which the coefficients (μ^, K s , Y, K d , K 1 to K 4 ) are time-varying can be considered, but this is currently impossible to realize both theoretically and experimentally. Therefore,
We decided to divide the inflow sewage flow rate into two regions, high water flow and low water flow, and consider that each region has a different mixing state, so we assigned separate mixing models to each region and connected these in chronological order.
基本的な混合モデルとしては、曝気槽の実際の
混合状態を上述の両極限状態モデルである単段完
全混合モデルと押出流モデルとを重み係数により
結合させたモデルによつて表わすことにする。 As a basic mixing model, the actual mixing state of the aeration tank will be expressed by a model in which the above-mentioned two extreme state models, the single-stage complete mixing model, and the extrusion flow model are combined by weight coefficients.
この場合、濃度Zは次式で表わされる。 In this case, the concentration Z is expressed by the following equation.
Z=α・Zc+(1−α)Zp ……(4)
ここで、濃度ZはXまたはSである。また、α
は重み係数であり、任意時刻tにおける重み係数
α(t)は次式で表わされる。 Z=α・Z c +(1−α) Z p (4) Here, the concentration Z is X or S. Also, α
is a weighting coefficient, and the weighting coefficient α(t) at any time t is expressed by the following equation.
α(t)=αH when Q(t)≧QM
αL when Q(t)<QM ……(5)
ここで、Q(t)は流入下水流量、QMは流水下
水流量の使用実績データ群Qの中央値である。α(t)=α H when Q(t)≧Q M α L when Q(t)<Q M ……(5) Here, Q(t) is the inflow sewage flow rate, and Q M is the use of the flowing sewage flow rate. This is the median value of the actual data group Q.
以上により、(1)〜(3)式の8係数は一定とし、こ
れらの時間変化分を、重み係数を導入しこの重み
係数を流量との関係で2値とすることによつて処
理する簡易形非定常モデルを得たことになる。こ
のモデルの利点は、多段完全混合モデルを用いた
場合には流量が高水量のときと低水量のときとで
異なる段数となつてしまい、時系列的に連結する
ときに各段における初期値の計算が必要となるの
に対し、単段であるためにこの初期値計算が不要
であり、演算時間が短縮されることになるという
点である。 As described above, the 8 coefficients in equations (1) to (3) are kept constant, and a simple method is used to process these time changes by introducing a weighting coefficient and making this weighting coefficient binary in relation to the flow rate. This means that we have obtained a non-stationary model. The advantage of this model is that when a multistage perfect mixing model is used, the number of stages will be different when the flow rate is high and when the flow rate is low, and when connected in time series, the initial value at each stage will be different. However, since it is a single stage, this initial value calculation is not necessary, and the calculation time is shortened.
次に、上述のモデルの構築のために、(1)〜(3)式
の8係数と重み係数の2値の合計10個の値を決定
しなければならない。 Next, in order to construct the above-mentioned model, a total of 10 values must be determined, including the eight coefficients of equations (1) to (3) and two weighting coefficients.
第2図は、これら係数の決定手順を示す流れ図
であり、以下この流れ図に沿つて説明する。 FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing the procedure for determining these coefficients, and the following description will be made along this flowchart.
最初は重み係数の組み合わせである。この場
合、(1)〜(3)式をそのまま用いたのでは予め8係数
の値の決定することが必要となるが、曝気槽にお
ける実機データが示すところによると、汚泥濃度
の増殖項と自己酸化項の差は汚泥濃度に比して1
桁以上も小さな値となつていることに着目し、重
み係数の決定に際してはこれらの項を省略して汚
泥濃度のみのデータを用いて決定する。この場
合、完全混合モデルおよび押出流モデルとしては
次式を用いる。 The first is a combination of weighting factors. In this case, if equations (1) to (3) were used as they were, it would be necessary to determine the value of the 8 coefficients in advance, but according to the actual data in the aeration tank, the growth term of the sludge concentration and the The difference in the oxidation term is 1 compared to the sludge concentration.
Taking note of the fact that the value is more than an order of magnitude smaller, when determining the weighting coefficient, these terms are omitted and the data of only the sludge concentration is used to determine the weighting coefficient. In this case, the following equations are used as the complete mixing model and extrusion flow model.
() 完全混合モデル
dXc/dt=−(Xc−XI)/TR ……(1a)
() 押出流モデル
Xp=XI(t−TR) ……(2a)
重み係数は0〜1の値をとるものであるから、0
〜1の範囲をN等分すれば(N+1)個の点が得
られる。2個の重み係数αH、αLの組合わせは(N
+1)2個となり、この全数について、(1a)式と
(2a)式を用いた計算値と実測値とが最も良く適
合する場合を列挙法によつて選定する。その結果
得られた2係数の組合わせが最適係数の組合わせ
α* Hとα* Lである。() Complete mixing model dX c / dt = − (X c − X I ) / T R ... (1a) () Extrusion flow model X p = X I (t - T R ) ... (2a) Since it takes a value between 0 and 1, 0
If the range from 1 to 1 is divided into N equal parts, (N+1) points are obtained. The combination of the two weighting coefficients α H and α L is (N
+1) 2 pieces, and for this total number, the case where the calculated value using formulas (1a) and (2a) and the measured value best match is selected by the enumeration method. The resulting combination of two coefficients is the optimal coefficient combination α * H and α * L .
次に、上記(1)式と(2)式を用いて基質濃度
(BOD)と汚泥濃度(SS)に関する4係数を決
定するが、1つの係数についてM個の値を考える
ものとすれば、全数列挙法ではM4個の場合数と
なり、多すぎるので、逐次決定してゆくことにす
る。この場合、順序決定しなければならないの
で、4係数と個々の適合度を示す指標との感度解
析を行ない、感度の高い順に係数を決定する。こ
のようにすれば、4M個の場合数で4係数が決定
できる。ここで、適合度を示す指標I1は次式のご
とく定義する。 Next, the four coefficients related to substrate concentration (BOD) and sludge concentration (SS) are determined using equations (1) and (2) above, but if M values are considered for one coefficient, In the exhaustive enumeration method, the number of cases is M 4 , which is too many, so we will decide one by one. In this case, since the order must be determined, a sensitivity analysis is performed between the four coefficients and the index indicating the individual degree of fitness, and the coefficients are determined in descending order of sensitivity. In this way, 4 coefficients can be determined using 4M cases. Here, the index I 1 indicating the goodness of fit is defined as shown in the following equation.
I1=D
〓
〓
{β(XA−XC/XA)2+(1−β)・(SA−SC/SA)2
}……(6)
ここで、XとSはそれぞれ汚泥濃度(SS)と
基質濃度(BOD)であり、添字AとCはそれぞ
れ実測値と計算値を示している。βは重み係数、
Dはここで用いるデータの離散時間数である。 I 1 = D 〓 〓 {β(X A −X C /X A ) 2 +(1−β)・(S A −S C /S A ) 2
}...(6) Here, X and S are the sludge concentration (SS) and substrate concentration (BOD), respectively, and the subscripts A and C indicate the measured value and calculated value, respectively. β is the weighting coefficient,
D is the number of discrete times of data used here.
引き続いて、(3)式の4係数を決定する。これは
(1)式、(2)式の場合と同様な取り扱いによつて行な
うが、この場合、適合度を示す指標I2は次式を用
いる。 Subsequently, the four coefficients of equation (3) are determined. this is
This is performed using the same handling as in the case of equations (1) and (2), but in this case, the following equation is used as the index I 2 indicating the goodness of fit.
I2=D
〓
(CA−CC/CA) ……(7)
ここで、Cは溶存酸素濃度であり、添字AとC
はそれぞれ実測値と計算値である。 I 2 = D 〓 (C A −C C /C A ) ...(7) Here, C is the dissolved oxygen concentration, and the subscripts A and C
are the measured value and calculated value, respectively.
上述の係数決定のアルゴリズムを図示したもの
が第2図に示す流れ図である。 The algorithm for determining the coefficients described above is illustrated in the flow chart shown in FIG.
このようにして、10個の係数が決定されれば、
基質濃度(BOD)、汚泥濃度(SS)、溶存酸素濃
度(DO)の3指標を計算することが可能な曝気
槽非定常モデルが得られたことになる。 In this way, once the 10 coefficients are determined,
This means that we have obtained an unsteady aeration tank model that can calculate three indicators: substrate concentration (BOD), sludge concentration (SS), and dissolved oxygen concentration (DO).
上述のようにして具体化された、下水処理場の
下水流入特性の大幅な変動を考慮した曝気槽の非
定常モデルを用い、第1図に示したシステムにお
ける流入下水6と返送汚泥4の時系列特性と曝気
用空気7量の時系列データを与えれば、曝気槽1
の出口における上記3指標値(BOD、SS、DO)
を逐次計算し、第3図a,b,cにそれぞれ
MLSS(曝気槽内混合液浮遊物濃度(SS))、DO
(溶存酸素濃度)、BOD(生物化学的酸素要求量)
の時系列データの実測値(実線)と本実施例によ
る計算値(破線)の一例を示すように、高精度の
時系列データが得られる。なお、第3図a〜cで
は、MLSSの計算値は実測値とよく適合している
ことがよくわかるのに対し、DOとBODについて
は計算値と実測値の適合度がやや低いように見え
るが、これはDOとBODはMLSSに比して著しく
小さい値であるためにこのようになるのであつ
て、変化の傾向としてはよく一致していることが
わかる。この場合、沈殿池2のモデルを用いれ
ば、返送汚泥4の時系列特性が計算可能となる。
この対象システムにおける可変要因としては流入
下水特性、操作電動機や調整弁、さらに流入流量
分配比などがあるが、実機では実行不可能なこれ
ら可変要因の各種組合わせについて数値実験を試
みることができるので、各要因の各指標に対する
影響について定量的に把握することができる。 Using the unsteady model of the aeration tank that takes into account large fluctuations in the sewage inflow characteristics of the sewage treatment plant, which was materialized as described above, when the inflow sewage 6 and return sludge 4 in the system shown in Fig. 1 are If the series characteristics and the time series data of the aeration air volume 7 are given, the aeration tank 1
The above three index values (BOD, SS, DO) at the exit of
are calculated sequentially, and shown in Figure 3 a, b, and c, respectively.
MLSS (mixed liquid suspended solids concentration (SS) in aeration tank), DO
(dissolved oxygen concentration), BOD (biochemical oxygen demand)
As shown in the example of the actually measured value (solid line) of the time series data and the calculated value (broken line) according to this embodiment, highly accurate time series data can be obtained. In addition, in Figures 3 a to c, it is clearly seen that the calculated values of MLSS fit well with the measured values, whereas the degree of fit between the calculated values and the measured values for DO and BOD appears to be somewhat low. However, this is because DO and BOD have significantly smaller values than MLSS, and it can be seen that the trends in change are in good agreement. In this case, if the model of the settling tank 2 is used, the time-series characteristics of the returned sludge 4 can be calculated.
Variable factors in this target system include inflow sewage characteristics, operating motors, regulating valves, and inflow flow rate distribution ratios, but numerical experiments can be attempted on various combinations of these variable factors that are not possible with actual equipment. , it is possible to quantitatively understand the influence of each factor on each index.
このように、上述の曝気槽非定常モデルを用い
てシミユレーシヨンを行なえば、精度の高い3指
標(BOD、SS、DO)の時系列データを得るこ
とが可能となるので、可変要因として流入下水特
性、操作電動機や調整弁、さらに流入流量配分比
などを種々の組合わせについて試行演算を行な
い、その結果を比較検討することによつて運転状
態として可能と思われるもの全てについて知るこ
とができる。これは設置されている処理施設の運
転において、指標的に問題となるような条件の場
合に対する処置方法も事前に検討することがで
き、長期間にわたつて安定な運転が可能となる。
また、実際に設置されている機器や装置について
も、数字上では容易に定格を変更することが可能
であるので、定格をこえる機器や装置の運転を試
行演算し、その結果から機器や装置の定格を改め
ること、すなわち機器や装置の新設計を行なうこ
とが可能となる。総じて、活性汚泥法の下水処理
施設の運転について、本シミユレーシヨンは実機
の運転に支障をきたすことなくその総合的把握を
するための極めて有用な一手段となる。 In this way, by performing simulations using the above-mentioned unsteady aeration tank model, it is possible to obtain time-series data of the three indicators (BOD, SS, DO) with high accuracy, so it is possible to obtain time-series data of the three indicators (BOD, SS, DO) with high accuracy. By performing trial calculations on various combinations of operating motors, regulating valves, inflow flow rate distribution ratios, etc., and comparing and examining the results, it is possible to learn about all possible operating conditions. This makes it possible to consider in advance how to deal with conditions that may pose an index problem during the operation of the installed treatment facility, allowing stable operation over a long period of time.
In addition, it is possible to easily change the numerical ratings of the equipment and equipment that are actually installed, so it is possible to perform trial calculations on the operation of equipment and equipment that exceed the ratings, and use the results to modify the equipment and equipment. It becomes possible to revise the ratings, that is, to design new equipment and equipment. Overall, this simulation is an extremely useful tool for comprehensively understanding the operation of activated sludge method sewage treatment facilities without interfering with the operation of the actual equipment.
なお、本発明は上述し且つ図面に示す実施例に
のみ限定されることなく、その要旨を変更しない
範囲内で種々変形して実施することができる。 It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above and shown in the drawings, but can be implemented with various modifications without changing the gist thereof.
例えば、上記実施例では、(5)式における重み係
数α(t)は2値としたが、これをk値(k≧
3;kは正整数)すなわち流入下水流量の範囲を
3以上に分割し各々異なる重み係数を割り当てる
ようにすることも可能である。この場合には、0
〜1の範囲をN等分すれば、場合数は(N+1)k
となり、kを大きくすればそれだけシミユレーシ
ヨン費用がかさむことになり実用上はこの費用に
制約が付されるので、あまり大きくすることは得
策でなくなる。 For example, in the above embodiment, the weighting coefficient α(t) in equation (5) was set to two values, but this was changed to the k value (k≧
3; k is a positive integer) In other words, it is also possible to divide the range of inflow sewage flow rate into three or more parts and assign different weighting coefficients to each part. In this case, 0
If the range of ~1 is divided into N equal parts, the number of cases is (N+1) k
Therefore, as k becomes larger, the simulation cost increases accordingly, and in practical terms, restrictions are placed on this cost, so it is not a good idea to make it too large.
また、汚泥増殖過程の微生物化学反応式として
のMonodの式の変形は(1)、(2)式に示したもの以
外にも多種公表されているが、これら他の式を用
いることも可能である。この場合、決定すべき係
数の個数が変ることもあるが、感度解析の結果、
指標((6)式)に対する感度の高い順に係数を決定
するという手順は全く同様である。 In addition, many variations of Monod's equation as a microbial chemical reaction equation in the sludge growth process have been published in addition to those shown in equations (1) and (2), and it is also possible to use these other equations. be. In this case, the number of coefficients to be determined may change, but as a result of sensitivity analysis,
The procedure of determining coefficients in descending order of sensitivity to the index (formula (6)) is exactly the same.
さらに適合度を示す指標は(6)、(7)式に示したも
の以外に、実測値と計算値との差の絶対値を用い
るなどしてもよい。 Furthermore, as an index indicating the degree of conformity, in addition to those shown in equations (6) and (7), the absolute value of the difference between the measured value and the calculated value may be used.
以上詳述したように、本発明によれば、日間変
動の大きな流入下水特性を考慮し合理的で且つ高
精度の指標値を得ることを可能とする下水処理施
設のシミユレーシヨン方法を提供することができ
る。 As described in detail above, according to the present invention, it is possible to provide a simulation method for a sewage treatment facility that makes it possible to obtain a rational and highly accurate index value in consideration of the characteristics of inflow sewage that vary greatly from day to day. can.
第1図は本発明方法の一実施例の適用される活
性汚泥法の下水処理施設の一例の概略構成を示す
概略構成図、第2図は同実施例における係数決定
アルゴリズムを示す流れ図、第3図a〜cは同実
施例を用いたシミユレーシヨン結果と実測値との
関係を示す図である。
1……曝気槽、2……沈殿池、3……処理水
(放流)、4……返送汚泥管路、5……余剰汚泥管
路、6……流入下水管路、7……曝気用空気管
路。
FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram showing a schematic configuration of an example of an activated sludge method sewage treatment facility to which an embodiment of the method of the present invention is applied, FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing the coefficient determination algorithm in the same embodiment, and FIG. Figures a to c are diagrams showing the relationship between simulation results and actually measured values using the same example. 1... Aeration tank, 2... Sedimentation tank, 3... Treated water (discharge), 4... Return sludge pipe, 5... Excess sludge pipe, 6... Inflow sewage pipe, 7... For aeration air duct.
Claims (1)
質濃度および溶存酸素濃度のうち少なくとも1つ
の濃度指標を求める方法において、 時間の経過によつて大きく変動する流入下水特
性について流入下水流量の範囲を高水量領域と低
水量領域とに分割すると共に予め定められた時間
ごとに流入下水流量が高水量領域か低水量領域か
を判断し、高水量領域の場合には単段完全混合モ
デルを用いて前記濃度指標を求め、前記低水量領
域の場合には押出流モデルを用いて前記濃度指標
を求めた後、これら濃度指標を重み係数により結
合してなる非定常モデルを用いて、シミユレーシ
ヨン作業を実行することを特徴とする下水処理施
設のシミユレーシヨン方法。 2 特許請求の範囲第1項記載の下水処理施設の
シミユレーシヨン方法において、重み係数を決定
するに当り、単段完全混合モデルと押出流モデル
について曝気槽出口側で計測した汚泥濃度のみの
データを用いて計算値と実測データとの適合性を
検討して列挙法により実測データに最も良く適合
するように決定することを特徴とする下水処理施
設のシミユレーシヨン方法。 3 特許請求の範囲第2項記載の下水処理施設の
シミユレーシヨン方法において、汚泥濃度と基質
濃度に関する単段完全混合モデルと押出流モデル
および溶存酸素モデルの少なくとも一方の係数を
決定するに当り、各係数の感度解析を行つて感度
の高い順に係数を決定するようにしたことを特徴
とする下水処理施設のシミユレーシヨン方法。[Claims] 1. In a method for determining at least one concentration index among sludge concentration, substrate concentration, and dissolved oxygen concentration in an aeration tank in a sewage treatment facility, the characteristics of inflow sewage that vary greatly over time are The flow rate range is divided into a high water flow area and a low water flow area, and at predetermined intervals, it is determined whether the inflow sewage flow rate is a high water flow area or a low water flow area, and if it is in a high water flow area, single-stage complete mixing is performed. The concentration index is determined using a model, and in the case of the low water flow region, the concentration index is determined using an extrusion flow model, and then, using an unsteady model in which these concentration indexes are combined by a weighting coefficient, A method for simulating a sewage treatment facility, the method comprising performing a simulation operation. 2. In the sewage treatment facility simulation method described in claim 1, when determining the weighting coefficient, data of only the sludge concentration measured at the aeration tank outlet side is used for the single-stage complete mixing model and the extrusion flow model. A method for simulating a sewage treatment facility, characterized in that the compatibility between calculated values and measured data is determined using an enumeration method to determine the best fit to the measured data. 3. In the sewage treatment facility simulation method described in claim 2, each coefficient is A method for simulating a sewage treatment facility, characterized in that a sensitivity analysis is performed to determine coefficients in descending order of sensitivity.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1708780A JPS56113395A (en) | 1980-02-14 | 1980-02-14 | Simulation of drainage disposer |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1708780A JPS56113395A (en) | 1980-02-14 | 1980-02-14 | Simulation of drainage disposer |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS56113395A JPS56113395A (en) | 1981-09-07 |
| JPS649077B2 true JPS649077B2 (en) | 1989-02-16 |
Family
ID=11934196
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1708780A Granted JPS56113395A (en) | 1980-02-14 | 1980-02-14 | Simulation of drainage disposer |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS56113395A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3030579U (en) * | 1996-04-24 | 1996-11-01 | 株式会社長谷幸製作所 | hammer |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4866333B2 (en) * | 2007-11-19 | 2012-02-01 | 住友化学株式会社 | Mixing stage number calculation device |
| JP7122486B1 (en) * | 2022-04-22 | 2022-08-19 | 株式会社 小川環境研究所 | Method for measuring BOD of treated water of activated sludge |
-
1980
- 1980-02-14 JP JP1708780A patent/JPS56113395A/en active Granted
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3030579U (en) * | 1996-04-24 | 1996-11-01 | 株式会社長谷幸製作所 | hammer |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS56113395A (en) | 1981-09-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Zaghloul et al. | Application of machine learning techniques to model a full-scale wastewater treatment plant with biological nutrient removal | |
| Sharafati et al. | The potential of new ensemble machine learning models for effluent quality parameters prediction and related uncertainty | |
| Olsson et al. | Wastewater treatment systems | |
| CN109205781B (en) | Control system and control method | |
| US6808630B2 (en) | System and method for AI controlling waste-water treatment by neural network and back-propagation algorithm | |
| Novotny et al. | Time series analysis models of activated sludge plants | |
| CN111762958A (en) | Deep well aeration process optimization method and device for sewage treatment plant based on ASM2D model | |
| Komulainen et al. | Estimation of effluent nutrients in municipal MBBR process | |
| JPS649077B2 (en) | ||
| JP7494669B2 (en) | Method and device for predicting parameter values of wastewater treatment simulator, and method and device for controlling sewage treatment plant | |
| Herbay et al. | Water quality management with time varying river flow and discharger control | |
| Raut et al. | Determination of wastewater quality index of municipal wastewater treatment plant using fuzzy rule base | |
| Lee et al. | Dynamic modelling and simulation of activated sludge process using orthogonal collocation approach | |
| CN120449402A (en) | Construction method of mechanism-data hybrid urban sewage treatment simulation model based on Modelica | |
| JP4038718B2 (en) | Sewage treatment process simulation method and sewage treatment process simulator | |
| Fiacco et al. | Sensitivity analysis of a nonlinear water pollution control model using an upper Hudson River data base | |
| Elshorbagy et al. | Development of an ASM1 dynamic simulation model for an activated sludge process in United Arab Emirates | |
| JP4016307B2 (en) | Sewage treatment process simulator | |
| WO2024121918A1 (en) | Water treatment facility operation assistance system and water treatment facility operation assistance method | |
| Holenda | Development of modelling, control and optimization tools for the activated sludge process | |
| JPH07106357B2 (en) | Water treatment equipment | |
| Tyagi et al. | Neural model for the operational control of activated sludge processes | |
| Lacroix et al. | Computer simulation of activated sludge plant operation | |
| CN113867233B (en) | Control method and system for granular sludge treatment based on pilot-scale research | |
| Rehm et al. | Relationship of Soil Texture to Sulfur Oxidation 1 |