JPH022528B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH022528B2 JPH022528B2 JP1447582A JP1447582A JPH022528B2 JP H022528 B2 JPH022528 B2 JP H022528B2 JP 1447582 A JP1447582 A JP 1447582A JP 1447582 A JP1447582 A JP 1447582A JP H022528 B2 JPH022528 B2 JP H022528B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- accident
- liquid
- time
- pressure
- pipe
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M3/00—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
- G01M3/02—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum
- G01M3/26—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors
- G01M3/28—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors for pipes, cables or tubes; for pipe joints or seals; for valves ; for welds
- G01M3/2807—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors for pipes, cables or tubes; for pipe joints or seals; for valves ; for welds for pipes
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Examining Or Testing Airtightness (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
この発明は、送液管路の事故検知方法に関する
ものである。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method for detecting an accident in a liquid delivery pipeline.
従来、この種の装置として第1図のものがあつ
た。(USP3851521号公報参照)同図において、
1は送液管、2は送液管1の破裂個所、31〜33
は送液管1の軸方向へ分散配置されて管中の圧力
が異常に下降したことを検出する複数個、たとえ
ば第1、第2および第3の3個の検知器、41〜
43は各検知器31〜33に対応して設けられて液
圧降下に応じて搬送波の中心周波数を移動させる
周波数移相送信器、5,6,7は第1、第2およ
び第3の検知装置であり、いずれも管路1の軸方
向の各測定器、つまり検知器3と周波数移相送信
器4で構成されている。8,9,10は前記第
1、第2および第3の検知装置5,6,7に対応
する信号伝送路、11は各周波数移相送信器41
〜43から送られた信号の受信器、12は受信器
11からの出力を時間の関数として表示する表示
手段、たとえばペンレコーダである。 Conventionally, there has been a device of this type as shown in FIG. (Refer to USP3851521) In the same figure,
1 is the liquid feed pipe, 2 is the rupture point of the liquid feed pipe 1, 3 1 to 3 3
are a plurality of detectors, for example, first, second, and third three detectors, which are distributed in the axial direction of the liquid feeding tube 1 and detect an abnormal drop in the pressure in the tube;
4 3 is a frequency phase shift transmitter that is provided corresponding to each of the detectors 3 1 to 3 3 and shifts the center frequency of the carrier wave according to the drop in hydraulic pressure; 5, 6, and 7 are first, second, and 3, each of which is composed of measuring devices in the axial direction of the conduit 1, that is, a detector 3 and a frequency phase shift transmitter 4. 8, 9, and 10 are signal transmission paths corresponding to the first, second, and third detection devices 5, 6, and 7, and 11 is each frequency phase shift transmitter 4 1
.about.4 3 , 12 is a display means, for example a pen recorder, for displaying the output from the receiver 11 as a function of time.
つぎに動作について説明する。 Next, the operation will be explained.
送液管1のある点2で破裂が生じると、瞬間的
な圧力降下が発生し、これが音速度で軸方向に伝
搬することは圧縮性流体の性質としてよく知られ
た事実である。いま、点2で発生した圧力降下の
流動伝搬は、まず第2の検知装置6、つぎに第3
の検知装置7、最後に第1の検知装置5に到達す
る。このとき、各検知器31〜33は送液管1の圧
力が正常値に比較して、降下したことを検知し、
各周波数移相送信器41〜43は、検知した下降圧
力に比例して搬送波の中心周波数を移動させて受
信器11に送る。受信器11はこれを受信する
と、ペンレコーダ12に出力を送出するため、ペ
ンレコーダ12では、第1、第2および第3の3
つの検知装置5,6,7に応じて、横軸を時間と
する圧力降下の瞬間を、表示する。このとき、圧
力降下する時間のずれτから送液管1の破裂点2
の標定がなされるもので、d=D−c・τ/2に
よつて破裂位置を決定する。ここに、Dは第2の
検知器32と第3の検知器33との間の距離、cは
音速度、dは第2の検知器32から点2までの距
離である。 It is a well-known fact as a property of compressible fluids that when a rupture occurs at a certain point 2 in the liquid pipe 1, an instantaneous pressure drop occurs and this propagates in the axial direction at the speed of sound. Now, the flow propagation of the pressure drop that has occurred at point 2 is first transmitted to the second detection device 6, then to the third detection device 6.
detection device 7 and finally reaches the first detection device 5. At this time, each of the detectors 3 1 to 3 3 detects that the pressure in the liquid pipe 1 has decreased compared to the normal value,
Each of the frequency phase shift transmitters 4 1 to 4 3 shifts the center frequency of a carrier wave in proportion to the detected falling pressure and sends the carrier wave to the receiver 11 . When the receiver 11 receives this, it sends the output to the pen recorder 12, so the pen recorder 12 outputs the first, second and third three
According to the three detection devices 5, 6, and 7, the moment of pressure drop with the horizontal axis as time is displayed. At this time, the rupture point 2 of the liquid sending pipe 1 is determined from the time difference τ of pressure drop.
The rupture position is determined by d=Dc·τ/2. Here, D is the distance between the second detector 3 2 and the third detector 3 3 , c is the speed of sound, and d is the distance from the second detector 3 2 to point 2.
従来の送液管路の事故検知方法は以上のように
構成されているから、送液管の圧潰の事故の場合
には、下流側で圧力降下をもたらし、上流側で圧
力上昇をもたらすため、下流側の検知器のみが作
動することになり、事故の状態を誤つて検知をす
る欠点があつた。また、送液管の破裂事故の場合
において、圧力降下は破裂点から上流および下流
の両方向に伝播するが、末端において再び反射し
て戻り伝播する現象があり、これらの波動が輻湊
して複雑な圧力変動が起る傾向にあるから、従来
の方法ではこれに対応できにくく、検知誤差を生
じ易い欠点もあつた。 Since the conventional method for detecting an accident in a liquid transfer pipe is configured as described above, in the case of an accident in which a liquid transfer pipe collapses, a pressure drop occurs on the downstream side and a pressure increase occurs on the upstream side. Only the detectors on the downstream side were activated, which had the disadvantage of erroneously detecting accident conditions. In addition, in the case of a rupture accident of a liquid pipe, the pressure drop propagates both upstream and downstream from the rupture point, but there is a phenomenon in which it is reflected again at the end and propagates back, and these waves converge and create a complex wave. Since pressure fluctuations tend to occur, conventional methods are difficult to deal with and have the disadvantage of being prone to detection errors.
この発明は上記のような従来のものの点を除去
するためになされたもので、圧力あるいは流量の
異常変動が液中を音速で伝播することから送液管
の両端の圧力あるいは流量の間に恒等的に成立す
る関係式に着目し、この関係式から導かれた判別
式を用いることにより、圧力降下とともに圧力上
昇も計測させて破裂事故のみならず、圧潰事故も
検知でき、しかも圧力あるいは流量変動の波動が
反射して複雑な圧力変動が発生してもこれに対応
して送液管の事故を正確に検知できる送液管路の
事故検知方法を提供することを目的としている。 This invention was made in order to eliminate the above-mentioned drawbacks of the conventional system, and since abnormal fluctuations in pressure or flow rate propagate through the liquid at the speed of sound, the pressure or flow rate at both ends of the liquid supply pipe must remain constant. By focusing on a relational expression that holds equally true and using a discriminant derived from this relational expression, it is possible to measure both pressure drop and pressure rise, and detect not only rupture accidents but also crushing accidents, and also detect pressure or flow rate. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for detecting an accident in a liquid sending pipe that can accurately detect an accident in a liquid sending pipe in response to complex pressure fluctuations that occur due to the reflection of fluctuation waves.
以下、この発明の一実施例を図面について説明
する。 An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
第2図はこの発明に係る送液管路の事故検知方
法に用いられる装置のブロツク図であり、第1図
と同一部所には同一符号を付して説明を省略す
る。 FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a device used in the method for detecting an accident in a liquid supply pipeline according to the present invention, and the same parts as in FIG.
同図において、131,132は送液管1の両端
にそれぞれ設置された第1および第2の圧力計1
301,1302からの信号、141,142は送液
管1の両端にそれぞれ設置された第1および第2
の流量計1401,1402からの信号、151,
152はこれら各信号を伝送する第1および第2
の送信装置、16は上記信号の受信器を兼ねたデ
ータ蓄積装置、17はデータ処理装置、18は処
理した結果を表示する表示装置で、この表示装置
18は、たとえば一例として図示のような表示を
行なうものである。つまり送液管路に破裂が生じ
た場合、その事故点の位置を事故確度とともに、
使用者に表示する。なお図中、AおよびBは計測
点の位置、Fは事故点の位置を示している。 In the figure, 13 1 and 13 2 are the first and second pressure gauges 1 installed at both ends of the liquid pipe 1, respectively.
Signals from 30 1 and 130 2 , 14 1 and 14 2 are the first and second signals installed at both ends of the liquid pipe 1, respectively.
Signals from flowmeters 140 1 , 140 2 , 15 1 ,
15 2 is the first and second transmitting signal.
16 is a data storage device which also serves as a receiver for the above-mentioned signal; 17 is a data processing device; and 18 is a display device for displaying the processed results. This is what we do. In other words, if a rupture occurs in the liquid delivery pipe, the location of the accident point, along with the accident accuracy, can be determined.
Display to user. In the figure, A and B indicate the positions of measurement points, and F indicates the position of the accident point.
つぎにこの発明の事故検知方法について説明す
る。 Next, the accident detection method of the present invention will be explained.
一般に、管路で圧送される液体は圧縮性流体と
して扱われるので、任意の距離x、任意の時間t
の圧力p(x、t)あるいは流量q(x、t)は、
周知のように次式で表わされる。 Generally, a liquid pumped through a pipe is treated as a compressible fluid, so any distance x, any time t
The pressure p(x, t) or flow rate q(x, t) is
As is well known, it is expressed by the following equation.
p(x、t)=F(t+x/c)+f(t−x/c)
……(1)
q(x、t)=−gD/c{F(t+x/c)−f(t
−
x/c)} ……(2)
ここに、F(t+x/c)は下流から上流に伝播す
る後進波成分、f(t−x/c)は上流から下流に伝
播する前進波成分、Dは管路を流れる液体の断面
積、gは重力加速度、cは波動の伝播速度で、液
体中を伝播する音速に等しい。第2図の送液管路
で、計測点Aを距離の原点0とし、計測点Bの距
離をlとすると、波動がこの2点A,B間を伝播
する時間τは、τ=l/cである。 p(x, t)=F(t+x/c)+f(t-x/c)...(1) q(x, t)=-gD/c{F(t+x/c)-f(t
- x/c)} ...(2) Here, F(t+x/c) is the backward wave component that propagates from downstream to upstream, f(t-x/c) is the forward wave component that propagates from upstream to downstream, D is the cross-sectional area of the liquid flowing through the pipe, g is the gravitational acceleration, and c is the wave propagation speed, which is equal to the speed of sound propagating in the liquid. In the liquid delivery pipe shown in Figure 2, if measurement point A is the origin of distance 0 and the distance between measurement point B is l, then the time τ for the wave to propagate between these two points A and B is τ = l/ It is c.
(1)、(2)式において、x=0あるいはx=lの値
を代入し、かつ、τ=l/cを考慮すれば、つぎ
の(3)、(4)式が得られる。 By substituting the value of x=0 or x=l in equations (1) and (2) and considering τ=l/c, the following equations (3) and (4) can be obtained.
pA(t−τ)+k・qA(t−τ)=pB(t)+k・qB
(t)……(3)
pA(t)−k・qA(t)=pB(t−τ)−k・qB(t
−τ)……(4)
ここに、距離0に対応して、添字Aを、距離l
に対応して添字Bで表わしている。また、kは定
数で、k=c/gDである。(3)式は、第2図の送
液管路における左方の計測点Aで計測された圧力
と流量の値の和、pA(t−τ)+k・qA(t−τ)
が、時間τ後に上記送液管路の右方の点Bで計測
された圧力と流量の値の和pB(t)+k・qB(t)
に等しいことを示している。(4)式も同様に点Aの
圧力と流量の差pA(t)−k・qA(t)が、時間τ
前に送液管路における右方の点Bで計測された圧
力と流量の差pB(t−τ)−k・qB(t−τ)に等
しいことを示している。 p A (t-τ)+k・q A (t-τ)=p B (t)+k・q B
(t)……(3) p A (t)−k・q A (t)=p B (t−τ)−k・q B (t
−τ)……(4) Here, corresponding to the distance 0, add the subscript A to the distance l
It is represented by the subscript B corresponding to . Further, k is a constant and k=c/gD. Equation (3) is the sum of the pressure and flow rate values measured at the left measurement point A in the liquid supply pipe in Figure 2, p A (t-τ) + k・q A (t-τ)
However, after time τ, the sum of the pressure and flow values measured at point B on the right side of the liquid sending pipe is p B (t) + k・q B (t)
It shows that it is equal to . Similarly, in equation (4), the difference between the pressure and flow rate at point A, p A (t) - k・q A (t), is determined by the time τ
This shows that the difference between the pressure and the flow rate previously measured at point B on the right side of the liquid sending pipe is equal to p B (t-τ) - k·q B (t-τ).
さて、この発明の方法では、上記(3)、(4)式を基
礎として、これらの式(3)、(4)から送液管路の状
態、すなわち、正常か事故かの判別をする判別式
を導き、これを用いて上記管路の事故を適確に検
知する方法を提供するものである。すなわち、
時々刻々収集した計測データならびにデータ蓄積
装置16に蓄積されたτ時間前のデータから
λ(t)=PA(t−τ)+k・qA(t−τ)−pB(t
)−k・qB(t)……(5)
μ(t)=pA(t)−k・qA(t)−pB(t−τ)+
k・qB(t−τ)……(6)
なる判別式λ(t)とμ(t)を計算してつぎの判
別を行なう。 Now, in the method of the present invention, based on the above equations (3) and (4), a determination is made to determine the state of the liquid supply pipe, that is, whether it is normal or an accident. The present invention provides a method of deriving a formula and using the formula to accurately detect accidents in the pipeline. That is,
From the measurement data collected moment by moment and the data accumulated τ hours ago in the data storage device 16, λ(t)=P A (t-τ)+k・q A (t-τ)-p B (t
)−k・q B (t)……(5) μ(t)=p A (t)−k・q A (t)−p B (t−τ)+
The following discrimination is performed by calculating the discriminants λ(t) and μ(t) as follows: k·q B (t−τ) (6).
() max{|λ(t)|、|μ(t)|}≦εならば
正常……(7)
() max{|λ(t)|、|μ(t)|}>εならば
事故有り、
たたし、その事故種別は
λ(t)−μ(t)<δ ならば圧潰事故 ……(8)
λ(t)−μ(t)≧δ ならば破裂事故 ……(9)
と判別する。() max{|λ(t)|, |μ(t)|}≦ε, then normal...(7) () max{|λ(t)|, |μ(t)|}>ε There is an accident, and if λ(t)-μ(t)<δ, then it is a crushing accident...(8) If λ(t)-μ(t)≧δ, it is a bursting accident...(9) ).
ここに、ε、δは対象とする管路、液体の性質
を考慮して決る定数である。 Here, ε and δ are constants determined in consideration of the properties of the target pipe and liquid.
()のλ(t)あるいはμ(t)がεより小さけ
れば、すなわち、上記(5)、(6)式では零であるが計
測誤差や摩擦圧力損失等を考慮してある許容範囲
を設定してその範囲ε内であれば、正常と判定
し、それ以外では上記()の事故有りと判定す
る。つぎに事故と判定した場合においては圧潰と
破裂の両者に分類し、前者では洩れがなく、後者
では洩れがある場合である。 If λ(t) or μ(t) in () is smaller than ε, that is, it is zero in equations (5) and (6) above, but a certain tolerance is set in consideration of measurement errors, frictional pressure loss, etc. If it is within the range ε, it is determined to be normal, and otherwise it is determined that there is an accident as described in () above. Next, if it is determined to be an accident, it is classified into both collapse and rupture, with the former being a case in which there is no leakage, and the latter being a case in which there is a leakage.
第3図に送液管路事故時の圧力あるいは流量の
波動伝播の様子を示す。管路のA点、B点に計測
点があり、計測点Aから距離dを存したF点で事
故があつたとする。また、横軸に距離を、縦軸に
時間をとり、実線19は液体の流れ方向に進む前
進波、20は流れ方向と逆方向に進む後進波を示
し、圧力あるいは流量の変動が速度cで伝播す
る。点AF間および点FB間においても、それぞれ
波動伝播の関係式(1)式と(2)式が成立することか
ら、つぎの(10)、(11)式を得る。いま時刻tnに着目
すると、F点を通つてB点に到達するにはτ2その
時間を要し、一方、時刻tnにF点を通過する後進
波はτ1の時間でA点に到達するとする。 Figure 3 shows the wave propagation of pressure or flow rate at the time of an accident in the liquid supply pipeline. Assume that there are measurement points at points A and B on a conduit, and an accident occurs at point F, which is a distance d from measurement point A. In addition, the horizontal axis represents distance and the vertical axis represents time. Solid line 19 represents a forward wave that travels in the direction of flow of the liquid, and 20 represents a backward wave that travels in the opposite direction to the flow direction. propagate. Since wave propagation relational expressions (1) and (2) also hold between points AF and between points FB, respectively, the following equations (10) and (11) are obtained. Focusing now on time tn, it takes τ 2 times to pass through point F and reach point B, while the backward wave passing through point F at time tn reaches point A in τ 1 time. do.
λ(tn+τ2)=ΔhF(tn)+kΔqF(tn) ……(10)
μ(tn+τ1)=ΔhF(tn)−kΔqF(tn) ……(11)
ここに、ΔhF(tn)は、事故点Fの直前の点と
直後の点の圧力差であり、ΔqF(tn)は事故点F
の直前の点と直後の点の流量差、すなわち破裂に
伴なう漏洩流量である。事故が圧潰で漏洩のない
ときには、ΔqF(tn)は零である。また、破裂事
故の場合には、上記ΔhFは圧潰事故に比較して小
である。事故のない正常の場合には、ΔhF(tn)=
0、ΔqF(tn)=0であるから、上記(10)および(11)
式はそれぞれ零である。さて、破裂事故の場合に
は、ΔhF(tn)=0として、λ(tn+τ2)=−μ(tn
+
τ1)であるから、t=to+τ1としてかきかえる
と、λ(t+τ2−τ1)=−μ(t)である。したが
つて、λと−μは時間送れ▽=τ2−τ1をもつて等
しい値をもつことが判る。この時間差▽=τ2−τ1
から、事故点Fの距離dはd=(l−c・▽)/
2で求められる。一方、圧潰事故の場合には、
ΔqF(tn)=0として、λ(tn+τ2)=μ(tn+τ1)
で
あるから、t=tn+τ1としてかきかえると、λ
(t+τ2−τ1)=μ(t)である。よつて、λとμ
は時間差▽=τ2−τ1で等しい値をもつことが判
る。この時間差▽=τ2−τ1から事故点Fの距離d
はd=(l−c・▽)/2で求められる。実施例
でλとμの時間差を求めるのは破裂事故、圧潰事
故の両方に適用できるようにそれらの絶対値|λ
|と|μ|の時系列データの比較によつて行なわ
れる。 λ(tn+τ 2 )=Δh F (tn)+kΔq F (tn) ……(10) μ(tn+τ 1 )=Δh F (tn)−kΔq F (tn) ……(11) Here, Δh F (tn ) is the pressure difference between the point immediately before and after the accident point F, and Δq F (tn) is the pressure difference between the point immediately before and after the accident point F.
This is the difference in flow rate between the point immediately before and the point immediately after, that is, the leakage flow rate due to rupture. When the accident is a collapse and there is no leakage, Δq F (tn) is zero. Furthermore, in the case of a bursting accident, the above Δh F is smaller than that in a crushing accident. In the normal case without any accidents, Δh F (tn)=
0, Δq F (tn) = 0, so the above (10) and (11)
Each expression is zero. Now, in the case of a bursting accident, assuming Δh F (tn) = 0, λ (tn + τ 2 ) = -μ (tn
+
τ 1 ), so if we replace it as t=t o +τ 1 , we get λ(t+τ 2 −τ 1 )=−μ(t). Therefore, it can be seen that λ and −μ have equal values with time advance ▽=τ 2 −τ 1 . This time difference ▽=τ 2 −τ 1
Therefore, the distance d of the accident point F is d=(l-c・▽)/
It is found by 2. On the other hand, in the case of a crushing accident,
Assuming Δq F (tn)=0, λ(tn+τ 2 )=μ(tn+τ 1 )
Therefore, if we replace it as t=tn+τ 1 , we get λ
(t+τ 2 −τ 1 )=μ(t). Therefore, λ and μ
It can be seen that they have equal values with a time difference ▽=τ 2 −τ 1 . Distance d from this time difference ▽ = τ 2 − τ 1 to the accident point F
is determined by d=(l-c・▽)/2. In the example, the time difference between λ and μ is calculated based on their absolute value |λ so that it can be applied to both bursting and crushing accidents.
This is done by comparing time series data of | and |μ|.
以上の説明をまとめて、この発明を実施する場
合の動作を第4図にしたがつて説明する。 Summarizing the above description, the operation when implementing the present invention will be explained with reference to FIG. 4.
計測点A(第3図)の圧力pA(t)、流量qA(t)
および第2図の計測点Bの圧力pB(t)、qB(t)
が周期Δτでデータ蓄積装置16に送られ、この
データ蓄積装置16では、それぞれの計測データ
時系列pA(t)、pA(t−Δτ)、…、qAt、qA(t−
Δτ)、…、pB(t)、pB(t−Δτ)、…、qB(t)
、qB
(t−Δτ)、…を順次記憶する(処理ステツプ
401)。つぎに、周期Δτごとに判別関数λ(t)、
μ(t)を計算し、このデータ時系列をλ(t)、
λ(t−Δτ)、λ(t−2Δτ)、…、λ(t−iΔτ
)、
…、λ(t−nΔτ)およびμ(t)、μ(t−Δτ)
、
μ(t−Δτ)、μ(t−2Δτ)、…、μ(t−iΔτ
)、
…、μ(t−nΔτ)とする(処理ステツプ402)。
すなわち、時刻tにおいて、λとμは現在時刻の
値λ(t)とμ(t)とともに、過去nΔτ分のデー
タを時系列として蓄積している。さて、処理の内
容は、始めにλ(t)あるいはμ(t)が小であれ
ば((7)式)、管路は正常と判定する(判断ステツ
プ403)。つぎに、(7)式を満足しなければ事故であ
り、(8)式(9)式にしたがつて事故種別すなわち、圧
潰事故あるいは破裂事故かを判定する(判断ステ
ツプ404)。このとき、2つの判別関数λとμの時
系列データのパターンから、両者の時間差▽=τ2
−τ1を求め、事故点Fの距離dを{l−c(τ2−
τ1)}/2で計算する(処理ステツプ405、406)。
破裂事故の場合には漏洩流量ΔqFを計算し(処理
ステツプ407)、圧潰事故の場合には圧力低下量
ΔhFを計算する(処理ステツプ408)。第5図に判
別式、λ、μのそれぞれの絶対値|λ|、|μ|
の時系列データの一例を示している。現在時刻t
から過去t−nΔτ時間前までのデータによつて判
別する。初期の頃は|λ|、|μ|の値が小さく、
管路は正常と判別するが、事故が発生すると、|
λ|、|μ|ともに変化するので、事故と判定さ
れる。事故が破裂であるか圧潰であるかは、λ
(t)−μ(t)〓δによつて判別される。つぎに、
|λ|と|μ|の時系列パターンの比較から、両
者の時間ずれ▽を求める。第5図に示す例では▽
=3Δτであり、事故点の距離はd=(l−3・
Δτ・c)/2として求められる。圧潰事故と判
定したときには、ΔhF=1/2{λ(t)+μ(t)}
として、圧力低下分が求められ、破裂事故と判定
したときには、ΔqF=1/2k{λ(t)−μ(t)}で
漏洩流量が求められる。 Pressure p A (t) and flow rate q A (t) at measurement point A (Fig. 3)
and the pressures p B (t), q B (t) at measurement point B in Figure 2.
is sent to the data storage device 16 at a period of Δτ, and in this data storage device 16, the measurement data time series p A (t), p A (t−Δτ), ..., q A t, q A (t−
Δτ),..., p B (t), p B (t-Δτ),..., q B (t)
,q B
(t-Δτ),... are stored sequentially (processing step
401). Next, for each period Δτ, the discriminant function λ(t),
μ(t) and convert this data time series into λ(t),
λ(t-Δτ), λ(t-2Δτ), ..., λ(t-iΔτ
),
..., λ(t-nΔτ) and μ(t), μ(t-Δτ)
,
μ(t-Δτ), μ(t-2Δτ), ..., μ(t-iΔτ
),
..., μ(t-nΔτ) (processing step 402).
That is, at time t, λ and μ have accumulated data for the past nΔτ as a time series, along with the values λ(t) and μ(t) at the current time. Now, the contents of the process are as follows: First, if λ(t) or μ(t) is small (equation (7)), it is determined that the conduit is normal (judgment step 403). Next, if equation (7) is not satisfied, it is an accident, and the type of accident, that is, whether it is a crushing accident or a bursting accident, is determined according to equations (8) and (9) (determination step 404). At this time, from the pattern of time series data of the two discriminant functions λ and μ, the time difference between the two ▽=τ2
−τ1, and the distance d of the accident point F is calculated by {l−c(τ2−
τ1)}/2 (processing steps 405, 406).
In the case of a bursting accident, the leakage flow rate Δq F is calculated (processing step 407), and in the case of a crushing accident, the pressure drop amount Δh F is calculated (processing step 408). Figure 5 shows the discriminant, the absolute values of λ and μ, |λ|, |μ|
An example of time series data is shown. Current time t
The determination is made based on data from t−nΔτ hours before. In the early stages, the values of |λ| and |μ| are small;
The pipeline is determined to be normal, but if an accident occurs, |
Since both λ| and |μ| change, it is determined that there is an accident. Whether the accident is a rupture or a crushing is determined by λ
It is determined by (t)-μ(t)=δ. next,
By comparing the time series patterns of |λ| and |μ|, the time shift ▽ between the two is determined. In the example shown in Figure 5, ▽
=3Δτ, and the distance to the accident point is d=(l-3・
It is obtained as Δτ・c)/2. When a crushing accident is determined, the pressure drop is calculated as Δh F = 1/2 {λ(t) + μ(t)}, and when a bursting accident is determined, Δq F = 1/2k {λ(t) −μ(t)}, the leakage flow rate is determined.
以上のように、この発明によれば2つの判別式
の時系列データを用いるように構成したので、圧
潰事故と破裂事故を区別でき、また、事故による
波動が反射して計測する圧力や流量の変動があつ
ても、これに対応して高精度で送液管路の事故を
検知できる効果がある。 As described above, according to the present invention, since the time series data of two discriminants are used, it is possible to distinguish between a crushing accident and a bursting accident, and the wave motion caused by the accident is reflected and the measured pressure and flow rate are Even if there are fluctuations, it is possible to detect accidents in the liquid supply pipeline with high accuracy.
第1図は従来の送液管路の事故検知方法に用い
る装置のブロツク図、第2図はこの発明の一実施
例による送液管路の事故検知方法に用いる装置の
ブロツク図、第3図はこの発明の一実施例による
送液管路の事故検知方法に用いる判別式を求める
波動伝播の説明図、第4図は、この発明の一実施
例による送液管路の事故検知方法における事故判
別の方法説明図、第5図はこの発明の一実施例に
よる送液管路の事故検知方法に用いる2つの判別
式の値の時系列データの説明図である。
1……送液管路、2……破裂点、131,132
……圧力計からの信号、141,142……流量計
からの信号、151,152……信号の送信装置、
16……データ蓄積装置、17……信号の受信お
よびデータ処理装置、18……データ処理結果の
表示装置、19……液体中を伝播する前進波成分
の軌跡、20……液体中を伝播する後進波の軌
跡、1301,1302……圧力計、1401,1
402……流量計。なお、図中同一符号は同一も
しくは相当部分を示す。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a device used in a conventional method for detecting an accident in a liquid supply pipeline, FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a device used in a method for detecting an accident in a liquid supply pipeline according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of wave propagation for determining the discriminant used in the method for detecting accidents in liquid pipe lines according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram of time-series data of the values of two discriminants used in the method of detecting an accident in a liquid supply pipeline according to an embodiment of the present invention. 1...Liquid feeding pipe line, 2...Rupture point, 13 1 , 13 2
... Signal from the pressure gauge, 14 1 , 14 2 ... Signal from the flow meter, 15 1 , 15 2 ... Signal transmitting device,
16... Data storage device, 17... Signal reception and data processing device, 18... Data processing result display device, 19... Locus of forward wave component propagating in liquid, 20... Propagating in liquid Trajectory of backward waves, 130 1 , 130 2 ... Pressure gauge, 140 1 , 1
40 2 ...Flowmeter. Note that the same reference numerals in the figures indicate the same or corresponding parts.
Claims (1)
ある周期で計測した圧力値と流量値をデータ記憶
装置に蓄積して、この記憶された計測データのう
ち、現在時刻の計測値と、送液管路の2位置の計
測点間を液動が伝播する時間だけ遡つた過去の時
刻の計測値から、2つの判別式の値を求め、その
判別式の値から送液管路が正常であるか否かを判
別し、さらに事故と判別したときにはその事故の
発生した位置を2つの判別式の時系列データの時
間ずれから標定してそれが管路の圧潰事故である
かあるいは被裂事故であるかの判別を行なうこと
を特徴とする送液管路の事故検知方法。1 Install a pressure gauge and a flow meter at both ends of the liquid supply pipe,
The pressure value and flow rate value measured in a certain period are stored in a data storage device, and among the stored measurement data, the measured value at the current time and the liquid movement between the measurement points at two positions in the liquid transfer pipe are calculated. The values of two discriminants are calculated from the measured values at the past time, which is the time of propagation, and the values of the discriminants are used to determine whether or not the liquid delivery pipeline is normal. Liquid delivery characterized by locating the location where the accident occurred based on the time lag of time series data of two discriminant formulas and determining whether it is a pipeline crushing accident or a pipe tearing accident. Accident detection method for pipelines.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1447582A JPS58131532A (en) | 1982-01-29 | 1982-01-29 | Detection of accident of liquid feeding pipe |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1447582A JPS58131532A (en) | 1982-01-29 | 1982-01-29 | Detection of accident of liquid feeding pipe |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS58131532A JPS58131532A (en) | 1983-08-05 |
| JPH022528B2 true JPH022528B2 (en) | 1990-01-18 |
Family
ID=11862081
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1447582A Granted JPS58131532A (en) | 1982-01-29 | 1982-01-29 | Detection of accident of liquid feeding pipe |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS58131532A (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT382464B (en) * | 1984-12-21 | 1987-02-25 | Voest Alpine Ag | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A LEAKAGE OF A HYDRAULIC PUMP OR A HYDRAULIC MOTOR PROPORTIONAL PUMP STATUS SIGNAL |
| JPH0692922B2 (en) * | 1986-07-24 | 1994-11-16 | 日本鋼管株式会社 | Gas line leak detector |
| US7418354B1 (en) * | 2004-03-23 | 2008-08-26 | Invensys Systems Inc. | System and method for leak detection based upon analysis of flow vectors |
-
1982
- 1982-01-29 JP JP1447582A patent/JPS58131532A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS58131532A (en) | 1983-08-05 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5548530A (en) | High-precision leak detector and locator | |
| US6442999B1 (en) | Leak locator for pipe systems | |
| US6550345B1 (en) | Technique for measurement of gas and liquid flow velocities, and liquid holdup in a pipe with stratified flow | |
| EP0598720B1 (en) | Nonintrusive flow sensing system | |
| EP2100103B1 (en) | Ultrasonic flow meter using simultaneous time-of-flight and doppler methods | |
| AU1436697A (en) | Ultrasonic measuring system and method of operation | |
| US20020078737A1 (en) | Detection of liquid in gas pipeline | |
| US10481036B2 (en) | Pipeline leak detection system | |
| JPH07151571A (en) | Method and device for judging characteristic of medium flow | |
| CN206281534U (en) | A kind of oblique angle reflectance ultrasound low | |
| JP2009085769A (en) | Apparatus for measuring fluid in pipe and clogging diagnosis system for pressure guiding pipe | |
| CN106768104A (en) | A kind of ultrasonic wave mass flowmenter | |
| JPH022528B2 (en) | ||
| CN206291930U (en) | A kind of ultrasonic wave mass flowmenter | |
| JP2001249039A (en) | Ultrasonic gas flow-velocity measuring method | |
| US11609110B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flowmeter, method for operating an ultrasonic flowmeter, measuring system and method for operating a measuring system | |
| JPH0763637A (en) | Pipeline leak detection method | |
| JPS596500A (en) | Leakage detection method of liquid transferring pipeline | |
| JPS6338087B2 (en) | ||
| JPH0451719B2 (en) | ||
| CN223138741U (en) | Gas-liquid two-phase flow ultrasonic flowmeter | |
| JPS58120143A (en) | Detecting method for point of bursting accident of fluid pipeline | |
| JPS5935126A (en) | Leak position detection for liquid transporting pipeline | |
| JPH0454892B2 (en) | ||
| JPH0621837B2 (en) | Gas leak detection method for gas lines |