JPH0225401B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0225401B2 JPH0225401B2 JP59118787A JP11878784A JPH0225401B2 JP H0225401 B2 JPH0225401 B2 JP H0225401B2 JP 59118787 A JP59118787 A JP 59118787A JP 11878784 A JP11878784 A JP 11878784A JP H0225401 B2 JPH0225401 B2 JP H0225401B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- iron powder
- powder
- iron
- less
- mesh
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Manufacture Of Metal Powder And Suspensions Thereof (AREA)
- Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
Description
この発明は、例えば使い捨て懐炉の如く、大気
中での酸化反応熱により緩やかに発熱させる用途
に使用される鉄粉、およびその製造方法に関する
ものである。
最近に至り、鉄粉を用いた使い捨て型の懐炉が
広く使用されるようになつている。この種の懐炉
は、大気中の水分存在下において鉄粉と酸素との
反応によつて生じる反応熱を利用したものであ
り、この種の懐炉には、発熱開始初期の立上がり
温度が高く、しかも長時間安定して発熱すること
(すなわち発熱持続時間が長いこと)が要求され
る。ここで、単に鉄粉と水だけでは発熱温度が充
分ではないことから、この種の懐炉においては一
般に食塩や活性炭等の各種の触媒を添加して発熱
温度および持続性を高めているのが通常である
が、もちろん鉄粉自体の特性としても、発熱温度
(特に初期の立上がり温度)が高くかつ持続性が
高いことが必要である。
ところでこの種の懐炉に使用される鉄粉の性状
としては、その粒子の比表面積が大きいほど、ま
た高純度あるいは高活性度のものほど反応が活発
に進行して発熱温度が上昇するとされている。そ
こでこの種の懐炉に使用される鉄粉としては、従
来例えば特開昭56−163201号公報に記載のものお
よび特開昭57−166155号公報に記載のものが提案
されている。
ここで、特開昭56−163201号公報の提案では、
水素含有雰囲気中において、600〜750℃で低温還
元処理した全鉄粉量が98wt%以上でかつ80メツ
シユ以下が98wt%以上の高純度・高活性のアト
マイズ鉄粉に、例えばミルスケール粉等を粗還元
した後に水素雰囲気中で850℃の高温仕上還元処
理を施した全鉄粉量が95wt%以上でかつ250メツ
シユ以下が80wt%以上の高純度鉄粉の還元鉄粉
を混合した懐炉用鉄粉が開示されている。
上述の特開昭6−163201号公報の提案の場合、
発熱初期の立ち上り温度を還元鉄粉によつて確保
し、発熱温度および持続時間をアトマイズ鉄粉で
確保することを図つている。しかしながら、この
提案で用いられている高温仕上還元した還元鉄粉
は、全鉄粉量が95wt%以上と高純度であり、250
メツシユ以下の微粉が80wt%以上と多いが、比
表面積が小さいうえに活性度が低下するという問
題点がある。さらにまた、低温仕上還元したアト
マイズ鉄粉は、全鉄粉量が98wt%以上と高純度
であり、かつ活性度も高いが、80メツシユ以下が
98wt%以下の各粒子は緻密であるという問題点
がある。したがつてこれらの問題のために、上記
提案で用いられている低温仕上還元したアトマイ
ズ鉄粉に高温仕上還元した還元鉄粉を混合した懐
炉用鉄粉は、立ち上り温度、最高温度、平均温度
および持続時間で総合評価すれば、立ち上り温度
および持続時間が充分に得られないのが実情であ
る。
また特開昭57−166155号公報の提案では、固体
炭材(コークス粉)により1200℃の高温度で粗還
元した還元ペレツト、水分が0.1wt%以下に乾燥
し、粉砕により100メツシユ以下として鉄粉粒子
の活性度を高め、全鉄粉量が65〜95wt%で、金
属鉄粉量がが60〜90wt%の低純度の懐炉用還元
鉄粉が開示されている。
このような特開昭57−166155号公報の提案の高
温粗還元低純度の100メツシユ以下の還元ペレツ
ト粉砕鉄粉は、高温還元と過剰な粉砕とにより、
その比表面積が小さくなるために、立ち上り温
度、最高温度、平均温度および持続時間で総合評
価すれば、持続時間が充分に得られないという問
題がある。
上述のように、従来の使い捨て型懐炉用の鉄粉
としては各種の還元鉄粉のほかダライ鉄粉砕粉な
どが使用されているが、これらの従来の鉄粉を用
いた懐炉においては、一般に発熱温度が高いもの
は持続時間が短かく、一方持続時間が長いものは
発熱温度が低くなる傾向にあるのが実情であり、
そこで発熱初期の立上がり温度が高くしかも長時
間安定して発熱し得る鉄粉の開発が強く要望され
ている。
この発明は以上の事情を背景としてなされたも
ので、初期の立上がり温度が高くしかも長時間安
定して発熱し得る、使い捨て型懐炉等に適した大
気中緩発熱用鉄粉およびその製造方法を提供する
ことを目的とするものである。
上述の目的を達成するべく本発明者等は鉄粉の
発熱特性に及ぼす鉄粉の各種性状について実験・
検討を重ねた結果、特定の粒度分布条件、比表面
積条件および純度条件を満足させることによつて
使い捨て型懐炉に適した優れた発熱特性を有する
鉄粉が得られることを見出し、さらにその場合、
特に海綿鉄の粉砕によつて活性度を高めて、特定
の粒度および粒度分布とし、かつ仕上還元熱処理
を施さずに磁選によつて特定の純度とすることに
よつて、低コストで工業的に優れた発熱特性を有
する鉄粉を製造し得ることを見出し、この発明を
なすに至つたのである。
具体的には、本願の第1発明の大気中緩発熱用
還元鉄粉は、金属鉄を75〜99重量%の範囲内で含
有し、かつ粒度が60メツシユ以下でしかも全粉末
中に占める200メツシユ以下の粉末の割合が40〜
80重量%の範囲内であり、比表面積が0.120m2/
g以上であることを特徴とするものである。
また第2発明の大気中緩発熱用還元鉄粉製造方
法は、酸化鉄を還元して得た海綿鉄を粉砕して、
粒度が60メツシユ以下でしかも全粉末中に占める
200メツシユ以下の粉末の割合が40〜80重量%の
範囲内である鉄粉を得る段階と、仕上還元せずに
磁選により金属鉄が75〜99重量%となるように純
化する段階とからなることを特徴とするものであ
る。
以下この発明の大気中緩発熱用還元鉄粉および
その製造方法について詳細に説明する。
一般に使い捨て型の懐炉に使用される鉄粉とし
ては、前述のように比表面積が大きいほど、また
高純度あるいは活性度の高い鉄粉ほど酸化反応が
活発に進行して発熱温度が上昇するため好ましい
とされており、特に発熱初期の立上がり温度を上
昇させるためには、比表面積の大きい活性な鉄粉
が要求される。そして一般に鉄粉粒子が不規則形
状であるほど、また同一形状の粒子では粒子が細
かいほど比表面積が大きくなり、また粉砕等によ
つて導入された加工歪が大きい鉄粉ほど活性であ
ると考えられており、したがつて懐炉用鉄粉とし
ては不規則形状に微粉砕したものが好ましいと考
えられる。このような観点から鉄粉の粒度および
粒度分布、比表面積について検討を加えた結果、
ミルスケール等の酸化鉄を還元して得た海綿鉄
を、60メツシユ以下に微粉砕した鉄粉であつて、
しかも粒度が一定ではなく、200メツシユ以下の
ものが40〜80重量%を占めるような粒度分布を有
し、かつ比表面積が0.120m2/g以上となるよう
な不規則形状の鉄粉が適当であることが判明し、
これらの粒度および粒度分布条件、比表面積条件
をこの発明において規定したのである。
上述のように鉄粉の粒度を60メツシユ以下と限
定した理由は次の通りである。すなわち使い捨て
型の懐炉に使用した場合の鉄粉粒子の酸化反応は
その粒子表面から順次粒子内部へ向つて進行する
が、ある深さまで酸化反応が進行すればそれ以上
は反応の進行が緩慢となり、特に60メツシユを越
えるような粗粉末では懐炉使用後においても粒子
内部に未反応の金属鉄が残留し、発熱効率が悪く
なることが判明した。したがつて鉄粉の粒度は60
メツシユ以下であることが必要である。
また鉄粉の粒度分布として、200メツシユ以下
のものが40〜80重量%を占めるように、換言すれ
ば60〜200メツシユのものが60〜20重量%を占め
るように規定した理由は次の通りである。すなわ
ち、発熱初期の立上がり温度を上昇させるために
は微粉粒子はできるだけ細かいことが好ましいと
考えられるが、200メツシユ以下の微細な粉末が
80%を越えるまで微粉砕すれば、微粉化のための
繰返し粉砕により粒子の不規則化が損なわれて球
状化し、また粒子内部の空孔も閉塞されてしまう
結果、立上がり温度が実際にはほとんど上昇しな
くなり、また粉砕に要する費用も嵩む。一方200
メツシユ以下のものが40%未満では微細化による
立上り温度の上昇効果が不充分で、充分な立上が
り温度が得られない。また発熱の持続性を高める
ため、すなわち酸化反応の持続時間を長くするた
めには、鉄粉の純度を高めることと同時に、粒度
もある程度大きくする必要があり、その観点か
ら、200メツシユ以下のものが80重量%を越えて
60〜200メツシユのものが20重量%未満となれば
発熱の持続性が充分ではなくなる。したがつて発
熱初期の立上り温度を充分に高めしかも発熱の持
続性を確保するためには、60メツシユ以下の粒度
の粉末のうちでも特に200メツシユ以下の粉末が
40〜80重量%を占めるような粒度分布とする必要
がある。
次に鉄粉の比表面積を0.120g/m2以上と限定
した理由は次の通りである。通常、鉄粉を利用し
た使い捨て懐炉は、外袋を開封後手で揉んで使用
することが多いが、これは鉄粉粒子表面を大気と
充分に接触させて酸化反応を促進させ、初期の立
上がり温度を上昇させるためであり、そのための
鉄粉としては反応面積すなわち比表面積の大きい
鉄粉であることが好ましく、本発明者等の実験に
よれば、鉄粉の比表面積が0.120m2/g未満では
反応面積が不足して充分な立上がり温度が得られ
ないことが判明した。したがつてこの発明では鉄
粉の比表面積を0.120m2/g以上とする必要があ
る。
さらにこの発明の鉄粉においては、上述のよう
な粒度および粒度分布条件、比表面積条件のほ
か、純度条件として、金属鉄分量が75〜99重量%
の範囲内である必要がある。その理由は次の通り
である。
すなわち、従来は、鉄粉の酸化反応熱を利用し
た懐炉では鉄粉の純度が低い(すなわち金属鉄分
量が少ない)場合には発熱量が少なくなり、充分
な発熱温度が得られないという考えから、できる
だけ高純度の鉄粉を用いることが好ましいとされ
ていたが、金属鉄分量を99%以上とするためには
水素を含む雰囲気中で800〜1000℃程度の温度で
高温還元処理を行なう必要があり、この高温還元
処理によつて鉄粉粒子が安定化して活性度が低下
し、また焼結解砕によつて鉄粉粒子の不規則化が
損なわれ、その結果発熱初期の充分な立上がり温
度が得られなくなるとともに、高温還元処理によ
つて製造コストも高くなるから、鉄粉の純度すな
わち金属鉄分量を99%よりも高めることは好まし
くない。一方金属鉄分量が75%未満では、充分な
発熱温度と充分な発熱持続時間が得られず、特に
発熱持続時間が不足となる。したがつてこの発明
においては鉄粉に含まれる金属鉄分量を75%以
上、99%以下とする必要がある。
次に上述のような鉄粉の製造方法について説明
する。
先ず出発原料の酸化鉄としては、鉄鉱石、ある
いは製鉄所の圧延工程で発生するミルスケールの
ほか、転炉ダストなど、種々のものを使用するこ
とができるが、使い捨て型懐炉の製造時あるいは
使用時にH2SあるいはNH3等の悪臭ガスを発生
させる不純物成分の少ない原料が好ましく、この
観点からミルスケールが最適である。
このようなミルスケール等の酸化鉄をコークス
等で還元処理して海綿鉄とする。この海綿鉄製造
方法は、従来公知の方法を適用すれば良い。例え
ば、16メツシユ以下に粉砕したミルスケール等の
酸化鉄と粉コークスとを耐火物容器(サガー)中
に同心円の層状に充填し、900〜1050℃の温度で
1〜20時間保持して粗還元し、金属鉄粉量を
75wt%未満とする公知方法を適用して、海綿鉄
を得れば良い。
得られた海綿鉄は、60メツシユ以下の不規則形
状の鉄粉粒子に粉砕し、粉末全体としての粒度は
60メツシユ以下でしかも200メツシユ以下の粒子
の占める割合が40〜80重量%、比表面積が0.120
m2/g以上の鉄粉とする。この場合、海綿鉄を先
ず粗粉砕機で数cmの大きさまで粗粉砕し、次に中
粉砕機で数mm程度の大きさまで中粉砕し、最後に
微粉砕機によつて60メツシユ以下に微粉砕するこ
とが望ましく、このように粉砕を段階的に行なう
ことによつて比較的不規則な形状を有する粒子を
得ることができる。またこの粉砕工程において
は、粒度分布が前述の範囲内に収まるように、す
なわち200メツシユ以下のものが40〜80重量%を
占めるように分級する工程を含んでも良いことは
勿論である。
上述のようにして粉砕した鉄粉は、水素を含む
雰囲気中での仕上還元処理を施すことなく、磁選
によつて純度を高め、金属鉄分量が75〜99重量%
の範囲内の純度の鉄粉とする。ここで磁選の具体
的手法は公知の手法を適用すれば良い。また磁選
は前述の粉砕工程と組合せて、適宜複数回行なつ
ても良いことは勿論であり、したがつて磁選工程
は粉砕工程の後のみに限られるものではない。こ
のように水素を含む雰囲気での仕上還元熱処理を
行なわずに磁選によつて純度を上げることによつ
て、水素を含む雰囲気で仕上還元熱処理を行なつ
た場合の如く鉄粉粒子の活性度が低下することが
防止され、また焼結解砕により粒子の不規則性が
損なわれることもなく、さらには処理コストも大
幅に低減される。
以下にこの発明の実施例および比較例について
説明する。
第1表に、この発明の大気中緩発熱用鉄粉(本
発明材)A〜Dおよび比較例の大気中緩発熱用鉄
粉(比較材)E〜Iについて、その製造時の原料
と製造条件およびその製造過程における各段階で
の化学組成を示す。なお第1表中においてT.Fe
は粉末中の鉄酸化物を含めた全鉄分量、または
M.Feは粉末中の金属鉄分量を示す。
第2表には、第1表に示す条件で製造した各鉄
粉A〜Iについて、その化学組成(T.Feおよび
M.Fe)、粉体特性および粒度分布を示す。
各鉄粉A〜Iの具体的な製造方法は次の通りで
ある。
鉄粉A〜Gは、製鉄所で発生したミルスケール
を原料として、粉コークスとともに耐火物容器
(サガー)の中に同心円の層状にそれぞれ充填し、
1000℃および1100℃で5時間保持して粗還元して
海綿鉄とした。次に、これらの海綿鉄をシングル
トツグルクラツシヤで粗粉砕し、インペラーブレ
ーカーで中粉砕し、ノボローターミルで微粉砕す
るという3段階の粉砕工程で60メツシユ以下に粉
砕した。続いて乾式ドラム型の磁選機で2〜7回
磁選を繰り返して純度を高め、篩分によつて粒度
調整をして製造した。なお、鉄粉Gは、前記と同
様に海綿鉄を粉砕・磁選後、さらに75vol%H2−
25vol%N2雰囲気中において、900℃で1時間保
持した後、その焼結ケーキをハンマーミルで解砕
し、60メツシユ以下に篩分して製造した。
鉄粉Hは、水アトマイズ鉄粉を原料とし、
75vol%H2−25vol%N2雰囲気中において700℃で
1時間保持して還元した後、その焼結ケーキをハ
ンマーミルで解砕し、磁選せずに60メツシユ以下
に篩分して製造した。
鉄粉Iは、鉄鉱石粉をペレツタイシグでペレツ
ト化し、5〜16mmに篩分したペレツトを粉コーク
スとともに、サガーの中に同心円の層状にそれぞ
れ充填し、1100℃で5時間保持して粗還元してペ
レツトがくつつき合つた海綿鉄とした。この海綿
鉄を前記と同様に3段階の粉砕工程で粉砕し、磁
選をせずに60メツシユ以下に篩分して製造した。
ここで、鉄粉A〜Dは本発明材であつて、その
うち鉄粉Aは200メツシユ以下の粒度の粉末が占
める割合がこの発明の範囲の上限値近傍のもの、
鉄粉Cは200メツシユ以下の粒度の粉末が占める
割合がこの発明の範囲の下限値近傍のもの、また
鉄粉Bは200メツシユ以下の粒度の粉末が占める
割合が鉄粉A、Cの中間のものである。さらに鉄
粉Dは純度(M.Fe)をこの発明の範囲内におい
て相対的に低くしたものである。なお鉄粉A〜D
の比表面積はいずれも0.13m2/g以上で、この発
明の範囲内となつている。
一方鉄粉E〜Iは比較材であつて、そのうち鉄
粉Eが、200メツシユ以下の粒度のものが26.9wt
%と低く、比表面積が0.11m2/gと低いこの発明
の範囲外のものであり、また鉄粉Fは、純度
(M.Fe)が52.6wt%と低いこの発明の範囲外のも
のであるる。また鉄粉Gは、200メツシユ以下の
粒度の割合が36.7wt%と低く、比表面積が0.11
m2/gと低いこの発明の範囲外のものであり、鉄
粉Hは(M.Fe)が99.2wt%と高く、比表面積が
0.09m2/gと低いこの発明の範囲外のものであ
り、鉄粉Iは純度(M.Fe)が67.7wt%と低い、
この発明の範囲外のものである。
第3表にこれらの各鉄粉A〜Iを懐炉として用
いた場合の発熱特性を示す。なお一般に鉄粉の酸
化反応熱を利用した懐炉においては、酸化反応の
促進および発熱持続性向上のために、鉄粉と水の
他に食塩、活性炭等の各種の触媒を添加すること
が行なわれているが、この実施例の場合もこのよ
うな最も一般的な方法で懐炉を製造して、発熱試
験を行なつた。すなわち懐炉としての発熱試験を
行なうための懐炉の配合組成および試験方法は次
の通りである。
鉄粉35g、水15.4g、食塩4.2g、活性炭粉10.5
gおよびパーライト粉4.9gをよく混合した後、
排通気性の厚い合成樹脂フイルム袋に密封封入し
た。そのまま1昼夜放置後、再度開封して袋の底
面中央に熱電対を貼け、懐炉全体を布で覆い、静
置状態で24時間温度測定して、立ち上り温度、最
高温度、平均温度および発熱持続時間を求めた。
なお立上がり温度は発熱開始から30分経過した時
の温度とし、また最高温度は発熱温度の最高値、
平均温度は15分間隔で24時間測温した値の平均
値、そして発熱持続時間は発熱開始から発熱温度
が40℃以下となるまでの経過時間でそれぞれ示
す。
第3表から明らかなように、本発明材の鉄粉A
〜Dは比較材の鉄粉E〜Iと比べて立上がり温
度、平均温度、発熱持続時間がいずれも高い値を
示し、使い捨て懐炉等の大気中緩発熱用の用途に
使用された鉄粉として優れた発熱特性を有するこ
とが明らかである。すなわち一般に鉄粉を利用し
た懐炉では使用感を与える意味から発熱初期の立
上がり温度が高く、かつ発熱持続時間が長いもの
ほど好ましいとされており、本発明材の鉄粉では
その両者の条件を兼ね備えていることが明らかで
ある。
さらに実施例の各鉄粉について詳細に検討する
と、本発明材の鉄粉Aは、金属鉄分量が97.1%と
純度が比較的高く、かつ200メツシユ以下が79.3
%と細粒粉が多く、比表面積も0.16m2/gと大き
いため、立上がり温度が最も高い値を示す。これ
に対し鉄粉Cは鉄粉Aと同様に金属鉄分量が96.9
%と純度が高いものの、200メツシユ以下が42.2
%と細粒径が少なく、かつ比表面積も0.13m2/g
と小さいため立上がり温度が若干低くなるが、発
熱持続時間は最も長い。また鉄粉Dは比表面積が
大きいものの、純度が低いため本発明材のうちで
は最も低い発熱特性を示すが、比較材のそれと比
べればいずれの特性も高く、本発明材が従来の懐
炉用鉄粉と比較して優れていることが判る。なお
鉄粉Bは、鉄粉Aと鉄粉Cとの中間的な特性を示
す。
一方比較材の鉄粉Eは、金属鉄分量が96.7%と
純度が高いものの、200メツシユ以下の細粒粉が
26.9%と少なく、かつ比表面積も0.11m2/gと小
さいため、立上がり温度をはじめとする発熱特性
がいずれも本発明材より劣る。また鉄粉Fは200
メツシユ以下の細粒粉がが54.2%と多く、比表面
積が6.13m2/gと著しく高いものの、金属鉄分量
が52.6%と低純度であるため、充分な発熱特性が
得られず、発熱温度および発熱持続時間が最も劣
る。また鉄粉Gは、金属鉄分量が98.7%と高いも
のの、純度を上げるために高温還元熱処理を施し
ているために鉄粉の活性度が低下し、また200メ
ツシユ以下の細粒粉が36.7%と少なく、比表面積
が0.11m2/gと低いため、立上がり温度があまり
上昇しない。
さらに、比較材の鉄粉HおよびIは従来提案さ
れている懐炉用鉄粉であつて、そのうち鉄粉Hは
前述の如くアトマイズ鉄粉を低温還元熱処理して
活性度を高めた高純度鉄粉であり、この場合金属
鉄分量が99.2%と高いものの、比表面積が0.09
m2/gと小さいため、立上がり温度があまり上昇
しない。また鉄粉Iは還元粒鉄を微粉砕して鉄粉
の活性度を高めたものであり、200メツシユ以下
の細粉粒が78.6%と多く、比表面積も3.86m2/g
と大きいものの、金属鉄粉量が67.7%と低純度で
あるため充分な発熱特性が得られず、発熱温度お
よび発熱持続時間の両面で劣る。
以上の実施例からも明らかなようにこの発明の
大気中緩発熱用鉄粉は、発熱初期の立上がり温度
が高く、しかも長時間安定して発熱して長い発熱
持続時間が得られるものであり、使い捨て懐炉等
の用途に適した優れた発熱特性を有するものであ
る。
またこの発明の鉄粉製造方法によれば、鉄粉の
純度および活性度を高めるために、低温あるいは
高温での仕上還元熱処理を施すことなく、粉砕お
よび磁選処理によつてそれらを向上させるもので
あるから、鉄粉製造コストが従来よりも大幅に低
減され、安価でしかも優れた特性を有する大気中
緩発熱用鉄粉を工業的に多量に供給することがで
きる。
The present invention relates to iron powder used in applications such as disposable hand warmers that generate heat slowly due to the heat of oxidation reaction in the atmosphere, and a method for producing the same. Recently, disposable hand warmers using iron powder have become widely used. This type of hand warmer utilizes the reaction heat generated by the reaction between iron powder and oxygen in the presence of moisture in the atmosphere. It is required to generate heat stably for a long period of time (that is, the duration of heat generation is long). However, since the heat generation temperature is not sufficient with just iron powder and water, in this type of hand warmer, various catalysts such as salt and activated carbon are generally added to increase the heat generation temperature and sustainability. However, as for the characteristics of the iron powder itself, it is necessary that the heat generation temperature (especially the initial rise temperature) is high and the durability is high. By the way, regarding the properties of the iron powder used in this type of hand warmer, it is said that the larger the specific surface area of the particles, and the higher the purity or activity, the more active the reaction will be, and the higher the exothermic temperature will be. . Therefore, iron powder used in this type of hand warmer has been proposed, for example, those described in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 163201/1982 and those described in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. 166155/1983. Here, in the proposal of JP-A-56-163201,
In a hydrogen-containing atmosphere, atomized iron powder with a total iron powder amount of 98 wt% or more and 80 mesh or less is 98 wt% or more, which has been subjected to low-temperature reduction treatment at 600 to 750 °C, is processed by adding mill scale powder, etc. Hand warmer iron mixed with reduced iron powder of high purity iron powder with a total iron powder amount of 95wt% or more and 80wt% or more of 250 mesh or less, which has been subjected to high temperature finishing reduction treatment at 850℃ in a hydrogen atmosphere after rough reduction. Powder is disclosed. In the case of the proposal of Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 6-163201 mentioned above,
The aim is to ensure the initial rise temperature of heat generation using reduced iron powder, and to ensure the temperature and duration of heat generation using atomized iron powder. However, the reduced iron powder used in this proposal, which has been reduced through high-temperature finishing, has a high purity with a total iron powder content of 95 wt% or more.
Although the amount of fine powder below mesh is often 80wt% or more, there are problems in that the specific surface area is small and the activity is reduced. Furthermore, atomized iron powder that has been reduced through low-temperature finishing has a high purity with a total iron powder amount of 98wt% or more, and has high activity, but less than 80 mesh
There is a problem that each particle of 98wt% or less is dense. Therefore, due to these problems, the iron powder for hand warmers used in the above proposal, which is a mixture of atomized iron powder that has been reduced to a low temperature finish and reduced iron powder that has been reduced to a high temperature finish, has a high rise temperature, maximum temperature, average temperature, and When comprehensively evaluated based on duration, the reality is that sufficient rise temperature and duration cannot be obtained. Furthermore, in the proposal of JP-A No. 57-166155, reduced pellets are coarsely reduced at a high temperature of 1200℃ using solid carbonaceous material (coke powder), dried to a moisture content of 0.1 wt% or less, and pulverized to produce 100 meshes or less. Disclosed is a low-purity reduced iron powder for hand warmers in which the activity of the powder particles is increased, the total amount of iron powder is 65 to 95 wt%, and the amount of metallic iron powder is 60 to 90 wt%. Such high-temperature rough reduction and low-purity reduced pellet pulverized iron powder of 100 mesh or less proposed in JP-A No. 57-166155, due to high-temperature reduction and excessive grinding,
Since the specific surface area becomes small, there is a problem that a sufficient duration cannot be obtained when comprehensively evaluated based on the rise temperature, maximum temperature, average temperature, and duration. As mentioned above, various types of reduced iron powder and pulverized dull iron powder are used as iron powder for conventional disposable hand warmers, but hand warmers using these conventional iron powders generally generate less heat. The reality is that things that have a high temperature tend to last for a short time, while things that last a long time tend to generate heat at a low temperature.
Therefore, there is a strong demand for the development of iron powder that has a high rise temperature in the initial stage of heat generation and can stably generate heat for a long period of time. This invention was made against the background of the above circumstances, and provides iron powder for slow heat generation in the atmosphere, which has a high initial temperature and can generate heat stably for a long period of time, and is suitable for disposable hand warmers, etc., and a method for producing the same. The purpose is to In order to achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the present inventors carried out experiments and experiments on various properties of iron powder that affect the heat generation properties of iron powder.
As a result of repeated studies, it was discovered that by satisfying specific particle size distribution conditions, specific surface area conditions, and purity conditions, iron powder with excellent heat generation properties suitable for disposable hand warmers can be obtained, and in that case,
In particular, by increasing the activity by pulverizing sponge iron to obtain a specific particle size and particle size distribution, and by achieving a specific purity by magnetic separation without final reduction heat treatment, it is possible to achieve low cost and industrial production. They discovered that it was possible to produce iron powder with excellent heat generation properties, and came up with this invention. Specifically, the reduced iron powder for slow heat generation in the atmosphere of the first invention of the present application contains metallic iron in the range of 75 to 99% by weight, has a particle size of 60 mesh or less, and accounts for 200 mesh in the total powder. The proportion of powder below mesh size is 40~
Within the range of 80% by weight, and the specific surface area is 0.120m 2 /
g or more. Further, the method for producing reduced iron powder for slow exotherm in the atmosphere according to the second invention includes pulverizing sponge iron obtained by reducing iron oxide,
The particle size is less than 60 mesh and accounts for the entire powder.
It consists of a stage of obtaining iron powder in which the proportion of powder of 200 mesh or less is within the range of 40 to 80% by weight, and a stage of purifying the metallic iron to a content of 75 to 99% by weight by magnetic separation without final reduction. It is characterized by this. The reduced iron powder for slow exotherm in the atmosphere and the method for producing the same according to the present invention will be explained in detail below. In general, iron powder used in disposable hand warmers is preferable as it has a larger specific surface area, and iron powder with higher purity or activity, as the oxidation reaction proceeds more actively and the heat generation temperature increases. Therefore, active iron powder with a large specific surface area is required, especially in order to increase the rising temperature at the initial stage of heat generation. In general, it is believed that the more irregularly shaped the iron powder particles are, the finer the particles of the same shape, the larger the specific surface area, and the greater the processing strain introduced by grinding etc., the more active the iron powder is. Therefore, it is considered preferable to use iron powder for hand warmers that has been finely ground into irregular shapes. As a result of considering the particle size, particle size distribution, and specific surface area of iron powder from this perspective,
It is iron powder obtained by finely pulverizing sponge iron obtained by reducing iron oxide such as mill scale to 60 mesh or less,
Moreover, the particle size is not constant, and iron powder of irregular shape with a particle size distribution in which 40 to 80% by weight is 200 mesh or less and a specific surface area of 0.120 m 2 /g or more is suitable. It turns out that
These particle size, particle size distribution conditions, and specific surface area conditions are defined in this invention. The reason why the particle size of the iron powder was limited to 60 mesh or less as described above is as follows. In other words, when used in a disposable hand warmer, the oxidation reaction of iron powder particles proceeds sequentially from the particle surface toward the inside of the particle, but once the oxidation reaction has progressed to a certain depth, the reaction progresses slowly beyond that point. In particular, it was found that with coarse powders exceeding 60 meshes, unreacted metallic iron remained inside the particles even after using the hand warmer, resulting in poor heat generation efficiency. Therefore, the particle size of iron powder is 60
It is necessary that the value is less than or equal to mesh. In addition, the reason why the particle size distribution of iron powder was specified so that 40 to 80% by weight should be 200 mesh or less, in other words, 60 to 20 weight % should be 60 to 200 mesh was as follows. It is. In other words, it is considered that it is preferable that the fine powder particles be as fine as possible in order to increase the rising temperature at the initial stage of heat generation.
If the powder is pulverized to more than 80%, the irregularity of the particles will be lost due to repeated pulverization for pulverization, and the particles will become spheroidal, and the pores inside the particles will also be closed, so that the rise temperature will actually be almost the same. The amount will not rise, and the cost required for crushing will also increase. while 200
If the content of the mesh or less is less than 40%, the effect of increasing the rise temperature due to refinement is insufficient, and a sufficient rise temperature cannot be obtained. In addition, in order to increase the sustainability of heat generation, that is, to lengthen the duration of the oxidation reaction, it is necessary to increase the purity of the iron powder and at the same time increase the particle size to a certain extent. exceeds 80% by weight
If the content of 60 to 200 meshes is less than 20% by weight, the sustainability of heat generation will not be sufficient. Therefore, in order to sufficiently increase the rising temperature at the initial stage of heat generation and ensure the sustainability of heat generation, it is necessary to use powders with a particle size of 200 mesh or less among powders with a particle size of 60 mesh or less.
It is necessary to have a particle size distribution that accounts for 40 to 80% by weight. Next, the reason why the specific surface area of the iron powder was limited to 0.120 g/m 2 or more is as follows. Normally, disposable hand warmers that use iron powder are often used after opening the outer bag and then kneading them by hand, but this brings the surface of the iron powder particles into sufficient contact with the atmosphere to accelerate the oxidation reaction, which increases the initial rise temperature. The purpose is to increase the iron powder, and for this purpose, it is preferable that the iron powder has a large reaction area, that is, a specific surface area.According to the experiments conducted by the present inventors, the specific surface area of the iron powder is less than 0.120 m 2 /g. It was found that a sufficient rise temperature could not be obtained due to insufficient reaction area. Therefore, in this invention, the specific surface area of the iron powder must be 0.120 m 2 /g or more. Furthermore, in the iron powder of the present invention, in addition to the particle size, particle size distribution conditions, and specific surface area conditions as described above, as purity conditions, the metallic iron content is 75 to 99% by weight.
Must be within the range. The reason is as follows. In other words, the conventional idea was that in hand warmers that utilized the heat of oxidation reaction of iron powder, if the purity of the iron powder was low (i.e., the amount of metallic iron was low), the amount of heat generated would be low, making it impossible to obtain sufficient heat generation temperature. It was said that it was preferable to use iron powder with the highest possible purity, but in order to increase the metallic iron content to 99% or more, it was necessary to perform high-temperature reduction treatment at a temperature of about 800 to 1000 degrees Celsius in an atmosphere containing hydrogen. This high-temperature reduction treatment stabilizes the iron powder particles and reduces their activity, and the sintering and crushing impairs the irregularity of the iron powder particles, resulting in a sufficient rise in the initial stage of heat generation. It is not preferable to increase the purity of the iron powder, that is, the amount of metallic iron above 99%, because the temperature cannot be obtained and the production cost increases due to the high-temperature reduction treatment. On the other hand, if the metallic iron content is less than 75%, a sufficient exothermic temperature and sufficient exothermic duration cannot be obtained, and in particular, the exothermic duration is insufficient. Therefore, in this invention, the amount of metallic iron contained in the iron powder must be 75% or more and 99% or less. Next, a method for producing iron powder as described above will be explained. First, as the starting material iron oxide, various materials can be used, such as iron ore, mill scale generated in the rolling process of steel mills, and converter dust. A raw material containing few impurity components that sometimes generate foul-smelling gases such as H 2 S or NH 3 is preferable, and from this point of view, mill scale is optimal. Iron oxide such as mill scale is reduced to sponge iron using coke or the like. A conventionally known method may be applied to this method for producing sponge iron. For example, iron oxide such as mill scale crushed to 16 mesh or less and coke powder are packed in concentric layers in a refractory container (sagger) and held at a temperature of 900 to 1050°C for 1 to 20 hours to achieve rough reduction. Then, the amount of metal iron powder is
Sponge iron may be obtained by applying a known method to reduce the content to less than 75 wt%. The obtained sponge iron is ground into irregularly shaped iron powder particles of 60 mesh or less, and the particle size of the powder as a whole is
The proportion of particles of 60 mesh or less and 200 mesh or less is 40 to 80% by weight, and the specific surface area is 0.120.
The iron powder should be m 2 /g or more. In this case, the sponge iron is first roughly pulverized to a size of several centimeters using a coarse pulverizer, then medium pulverized to a size of several mm using a medium pulverizer, and finally finely pulverized to a size of 60 mesh or less using a pulverizer. It is desirable to carry out the grinding stepwise in this way, so that particles having a relatively irregular shape can be obtained. Of course, this pulverization step may also include a step of classifying so that the particle size distribution falls within the above-mentioned range, that is, 40 to 80% by weight of the particles are 200 mesh or less. The iron powder pulverized as described above is purified by magnetic separation without undergoing final reduction treatment in an atmosphere containing hydrogen, and has a metallic iron content of 75 to 99% by weight.
The purity of iron powder must be within the range of . Here, a known method may be applied as a specific method of magnetic selection. Furthermore, it goes without saying that magnetic separation may be performed multiple times as appropriate in combination with the above-mentioned pulverization step, and therefore, the magnetic separation step is not limited to being performed only after the pulverization step. In this way, by increasing the purity through magnetic separation without performing a final reduction heat treatment in an atmosphere containing hydrogen, the activity of the iron powder particles can be improved as in the case of a final reduction heat treatment in an atmosphere containing hydrogen. Moreover, the irregularity of the particles is not impaired by sintering and crushing, and furthermore, the processing cost is significantly reduced. Examples and comparative examples of the present invention will be described below. Table 1 shows the raw materials and manufacturing methods for the iron powder for slow heat generation in the atmosphere (present invention material) A to D of the present invention and the iron powder for slow heat generation in the atmosphere (comparative material) E to I of the comparative examples. The conditions and chemical composition at each step in the manufacturing process are shown. In addition, in Table 1, T.Fe
is the total iron content including iron oxides in the powder, or
M.Fe indicates the amount of metallic iron in the powder. Table 2 shows the chemical composition (T.Fe and
M.Fe), powder properties and particle size distribution. The specific manufacturing method of each iron powder A to I is as follows. Iron powder A to G are made from mill scale generated at a steelworks, and are filled in concentric layers together with coke powder into a refractory container (sagger).
It was maintained at 1000°C and 1100°C for 5 hours and crudely reduced to obtain sponge iron. Next, these sponge irons were pulverized into 60 mesh or less through a three-step pulverization process: coarsely pulverized with a single toggle crusher, medium pulverized with an impeller breaker, and finely pulverized with a novolo rotor mill. Subsequently, magnetic separation was repeated 2 to 7 times using a dry drum type magnetic separator to increase purity, and the particle size was adjusted by sieving to produce the product. In addition, iron powder G is obtained by crushing and magnetically separating sponge iron in the same manner as above, and then adding 75 vol% H 2 −
After being held at 900° C. for 1 hour in a 25 vol% N 2 atmosphere, the sintered cake was crushed in a hammer mill and sieved to a size of 60 mesh or less to produce a product. Iron powder H uses water atomized iron powder as raw material,
After reducing by holding at 700℃ for 1 hour in a 75vol% H2 -25vol% N2 atmosphere, the sintered cake was crushed in a hammer mill and sieved to 60 mesh or less without magnetic separation. . Iron powder I is made by pelletizing iron ore powder using a pelletizing sig, sifting the pellets to 5 to 16 mm, filling them together with coke powder in concentric layers in a sagger, and holding the pellets at 1100°C for 5 hours for rough reduction. It was made of sponge iron made of pellets stuck together. This sponge iron was pulverized in the same three-step pulverization process as described above, and sieved to 60 mesh or less without magnetic separation to produce a product. Here, iron powders A to D are materials of the present invention, among which iron powder A is one in which the proportion of powder with a particle size of 200 mesh or less is near the upper limit of the range of the present invention;
For iron powder C, the ratio of powder with a particle size of 200 mesh or less is near the lower limit of the range of the present invention, and for iron powder B, the ratio of powder with a particle size of 200 mesh or less is between iron powders A and C. It is something. Further, the iron powder D has a relatively low purity (M.Fe) within the scope of the present invention. In addition, iron powder A to D
The specific surface area of each is 0.13 m 2 /g or more, which is within the scope of the present invention. On the other hand, iron powders E to I are comparative materials, of which iron powder E has a particle size of 200 mesh or less, which weighs 26.9wt.
%, and the specific surface area is as low as 0.11 m 2 /g, which is outside the scope of this invention. Iron powder F has a purity (M.Fe) as low as 52.6 wt%, which is outside the scope of this invention. There is. In addition, iron powder G has a low ratio of particle size of 200 mesh or less at 36.7wt%, and a specific surface area of 0.11.
m 2 /g, which is outside the scope of this invention, and iron powder H has a high (M.Fe) content of 99.2wt% and a specific surface area of
Iron powder I has a low purity (M.Fe) of 67.7wt%, which is outside the scope of this invention as low as 0.09m 2 /g.
It is outside the scope of this invention. Table 3 shows the heat generation characteristics when each of these iron powders A to I is used as a hand warmer. Generally, in hand warmers that utilize the heat of the oxidation reaction of iron powder, various catalysts such as salt and activated carbon are added in addition to the iron powder and water in order to accelerate the oxidation reaction and improve the sustainability of heat generation. However, in this example as well, a hand warmer was manufactured using the most common method and a heat generation test was conducted. That is, the composition of the hand warmer and the test method for conducting the heat generation test as a hand warmer are as follows. Iron powder 35g, water 15.4g, salt 4.2g, activated carbon powder 10.5g
After thoroughly mixing g and 4.9 g of perlite powder,
It was sealed in a thick synthetic resin film bag with ventilation permeability. After leaving it as it is for a day and night, open it again, attach a thermocouple to the center of the bottom of the bag, cover the entire pocket warmer with a cloth, and measure the temperature for 24 hours while it is standing still to determine the rise temperature, maximum temperature, average temperature, and duration of heat generation. I asked for time.
The rising temperature is the temperature 30 minutes after the start of heat generation, and the maximum temperature is the highest value of the heat generation temperature.
The average temperature is the average value of the values measured at 15-minute intervals for 24 hours, and the duration of fever is shown as the elapsed time from the start of fever until the fever temperature drops to 40°C or less. As is clear from Table 3, iron powder A of the present invention material
~D shows higher values in rise temperature, average temperature, and duration of heat generation than the comparative iron powders E~I, and is excellent as an iron powder used for slow heat generation in the atmosphere such as disposable hand warmers. It is clear that the material has excellent exothermic properties. In other words, in general, it is considered preferable for a pocket warmer using iron powder to have a high start-up temperature at the initial stage of heat generation and a long duration of heat generation in order to provide a pleasant feeling of use, and the iron powder of the present invention satisfies both of these conditions. It is clear that Furthermore, when examining each iron powder in the Examples in detail, it is found that the iron powder A of the present invention has a relatively high purity with a metallic iron content of 97.1%, and a purity of 200 mesh or less is 79.3%.
% and a large specific surface area of 0.16 m 2 /g, the rise temperature shows the highest value. On the other hand, iron powder C has a metallic iron content of 96.9, similar to iron powder A.
Although the purity is high at %, 42.2% is less than 200 mesh.
%, the particle size is small, and the specific surface area is 0.13m 2 /g.
Because it is small, the start-up temperature is slightly lower, but the duration of heat generation is the longest. Furthermore, although iron powder D has a large specific surface area, it has low purity and therefore exhibits the lowest heat generation properties among the materials of the present invention, but all properties are higher than those of the comparative materials, indicating that the present material is superior to the conventional iron for hand warmers. It can be seen that it is superior to powder. Note that iron powder B exhibits intermediate characteristics between iron powder A and iron powder C. On the other hand, iron powder E, which is a comparative material, has a high purity with a metallic iron content of 96.7%, but it has a fine powder of less than 200 mesh.
Since it has a small specific surface area of 26.9% and a small specific surface area of 0.11 m 2 /g, its heat generation properties including the rise temperature are inferior to the materials of the present invention. Also, iron powder F is 200
Although it contains a large amount of fine powder (54.2%), and has an extremely high specific surface area of 6.13 m 2 /g, it has a low purity metal iron content of 52.6%, so sufficient exothermic properties cannot be obtained, and the exothermic temperature and the duration of fever is the poorest. In addition, although iron powder G has a high metallic iron content of 98.7%, the activity of the iron powder decreases due to high-temperature reduction heat treatment to increase purity, and fine powder of 200 mesh or less is 36.7%. Since the specific surface area is as low as 0.11 m 2 /g, the rise temperature does not rise much. Furthermore, iron powders H and I, which are comparison materials, are iron powders for hand warmers that have been proposed in the past, and iron powder H is a high-purity iron powder that is made by subjecting atomized iron powder to low-temperature reduction heat treatment to increase its activity as described above. In this case, although the metallic iron content is high at 99.2%, the specific surface area is 0.09%.
Since it is as small as m 2 /g, the rise temperature does not rise much. In addition, Iron Powder I is made by finely pulverizing reduced iron particles to increase the activity of the iron powder, with 78.6% of the iron powder being 200 mesh or less in size, and a specific surface area of 3.86 m 2 /g.
Although it is large, the amount of metallic iron powder is 67.7%, which is a low purity, so sufficient heat generation characteristics cannot be obtained, and it is inferior in both heat generation temperature and heat generation duration. As is clear from the above examples, the iron powder for slow heat generation in the atmosphere of the present invention has a high rising temperature at the initial stage of heat generation, and also generates heat stably for a long time to obtain a long heat generation duration. It has excellent heat generation properties suitable for uses such as disposable hand warmers. Further, according to the method for producing iron powder of the present invention, in order to improve the purity and activity of iron powder, these can be improved by crushing and magnetic separation treatment without performing final reduction heat treatment at low or high temperatures. Therefore, the manufacturing cost of iron powder is significantly reduced compared to the conventional method, and it is possible to industrially supply a large amount of iron powder for slow heat generation in the atmosphere, which is inexpensive and has excellent properties.
【表】【table】
【表】【table】
【表】【table】
【表】【table】
Claims (1)
つ粉末全体の粒度が60メツシユ以下で、しかも全
粉末中に占める200メツシユ以下の粉末の割合が
40〜80重量%の範囲内にあり、比表面積が0.120
m2/g以上であることを特徴とする大気中緩発熱
用還元鉄粉。 2 酸化鉄を還元して得た海綿鉄を粉砕して、粒
度が60メツシユ以下でしかも全粉末中に占める
200メツシユ以下の粉末の割合が40〜80重量%の
範囲内にある鉄粉を得る段階と、仕上還元熱処理
を行なわずに磁選によつて金属鉄分量が75〜99重
量%の範囲内となるように純化する段階とからな
ることを特徴とする大気中緩発熱用還元鉄粉の製
造方法。[Scope of Claims] 1. Contains metallic iron in the range of 75 to 99% by weight, and the particle size of the entire powder is 60 mesh or less, and the proportion of the powder in the total powder is 200 mesh or less.
Within the range of 40-80% by weight, with a specific surface area of 0.120
Reduced iron powder for slow exotherm in the atmosphere, characterized by having a particle size of m 2 /g or more. 2. Pulverize the sponge iron obtained by reducing iron oxide to obtain particles with a particle size of 60 mesh or less and which account for a large proportion of the total powder.
A step of obtaining iron powder in which the proportion of powder of 200 mesh or less is within the range of 40 to 80% by weight, and a step in which the metallic iron content is within the range of 75 to 99% by weight by magnetic separation without final reduction heat treatment. 1. A method for producing reduced iron powder for slow exotherm in the atmosphere, comprising the steps of purification as follows.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP59118787A JPS60262901A (en) | 1984-06-09 | 1984-06-09 | Reduced iron powder for emitting heat slowly in atmosphere and its manufacture |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP59118787A JPS60262901A (en) | 1984-06-09 | 1984-06-09 | Reduced iron powder for emitting heat slowly in atmosphere and its manufacture |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS60262901A JPS60262901A (en) | 1985-12-26 |
| JPH0225401B2 true JPH0225401B2 (en) | 1990-06-04 |
Family
ID=14745076
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP59118787A Granted JPS60262901A (en) | 1984-06-09 | 1984-06-09 | Reduced iron powder for emitting heat slowly in atmosphere and its manufacture |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS60262901A (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWI743363B (en) * | 2017-05-18 | 2021-10-21 | 日商花王股份有限公司 | Iron powder for heating composition, method for producing the same, and method for producing heating composition and heating element using the iron powder |
| JP6472917B2 (en) * | 2017-05-18 | 2019-02-20 | 花王株式会社 | Exothermic composition and heating element |
| JP6472916B1 (en) * | 2017-12-25 | 2019-02-20 | 花王株式会社 | Method for producing iron powder for exothermic composition |
| JP6984628B2 (en) * | 2019-03-12 | 2021-12-22 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Manufacturing method of reduced iron powder |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS54155984A (en) * | 1978-05-30 | 1979-12-08 | Nitto Kasei Kk | Heating composition |
| JPS59542B2 (en) * | 1981-04-06 | 1984-01-07 | 川崎製鉄株式会社 | Iron powder for hand warmers made from reduced pellets |
-
1984
- 1984-06-09 JP JP59118787A patent/JPS60262901A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS60262901A (en) | 1985-12-26 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP3056476B1 (en) | Method for producing recycled W—Co raw material powder from cemented carbide scrap and method for producing tungsten-based sintered heavy alloy using the same | |
| JPS6171840A (en) | Oxide catalyst precursor composition and its production | |
| RU2126310C1 (en) | Powder of metallic cobalt as binding agent for manufacture of tools and/or wear-resistant coatings based on diamond and/or hard alloy and cermet article including the binding agent | |
| CA2546851A1 (en) | Iron powder, use as additive for foods, and method of preparation thereof | |
| JPH0225401B2 (en) | ||
| JP6984628B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of reduced iron powder | |
| US3623838A (en) | Process for the production of lead oxides | |
| KR19990021988A (en) | Cobalt Metal Aggregates and Methods of Making the Same and Uses thereof | |
| KR19990021987A (en) | Cobalt Metal Aggregates and Methods of Making the Same and Uses thereof | |
| JPS5939333A (en) | Granulation of fine powdery coke in high efficiency | |
| JP2005325373A (en) | Casting method of iron powder for magnetic materials | |
| CS273319B2 (en) | Method of ferrous powders production from fine loose powdered iron trioxide | |
| JPS58213617A (en) | Production of titanium carbonitride powder | |
| JP3721993B2 (en) | Method for producing sponge iron and reduced iron powder | |
| EP3947278B1 (en) | Method for preparing agglomerates comprising metallic silikon | |
| JPS62107001A (en) | Finish heat treatment method for reduced iron powder | |
| JP3266909B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of aluminum nitride | |
| US4407737A (en) | Catalysts for heterogeneous synthesis | |
| JPS587682B2 (en) | Method for producing reduced iron powder for powder metallurgy with excellent formability and compressibility | |
| JPH10251714A (en) | Method for producing silver powder for powder metallurgy | |
| JPS58213606A (en) | Preparation of titanium nitride powder | |
| US4415527A (en) | Desulfurization process for ferrous powder | |
| JPH0920512A (en) | Manufacturing method of iron disilicide | |
| JPWO1998029334A1 (en) | Aluminum nitride manufacturing method | |
| EP0719348B1 (en) | METHOD FOR PRODUCTION OF FeSi |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |