Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH0230752B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH0230752B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0230752B2
JPH0230752B2 JP62141212A JP14121287A JPH0230752B2 JP H0230752 B2 JPH0230752 B2 JP H0230752B2 JP 62141212 A JP62141212 A JP 62141212A JP 14121287 A JP14121287 A JP 14121287A JP H0230752 B2 JPH0230752 B2 JP H0230752B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
dust
slaked lime
incineration
exhaust gas
storage tank
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP62141212A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS63305979A (en
Inventor
Akihiko Tamura
Chuichi Mizoguchi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kubota Kensetsu KK
Original Assignee
Kubota Kensetsu KK
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kubota Kensetsu KK filed Critical Kubota Kensetsu KK
Priority to JP62141212A priority Critical patent/JPS63305979A/en
Publication of JPS63305979A publication Critical patent/JPS63305979A/en
Publication of JPH0230752B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0230752B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
  • Glanulating (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

a 産業上の利用分野 本発明は都市ごみ、下水汚泥、し尿汚泥、産業
廃棄物等々の焼却に際して生ずる排ガス中の焼却
ダスト(飛灰)を無害化するため、この焼却ダス
トを乾式で高圧縮して造粒する方法に関する。 b 従来の技術 前記廃棄物を焼却した排ガス中の焼却ダストに
は各種塩類、重金属が濃縮されており、これは微
細、軽量で飛散し易く、環境を汚染する危険があ
つた。そのため、これら焼却ダストを捕集したあ
と、これを造粒固形化し、無害化して処分する方
法がとられている。 第7図はこのような焼却ダストを処理する従来
の造粒システムの説明図である。 すなわち、ごみ焼却施設において、まず焼却炉
aでごみを焼却したあと、ここで発生した焼却ダ
スト(以下、ダストと略記する)は排ガスととも
に、ガス冷却室bへ導かれて冷却され、さらに集
塵器cによつて捕集され、ここからコンベアによ
つてダスト貯留槽dに貯留される。ダストを捕集
したあとの排ガスは煙突sより放出される。貯留
槽dに貯留されたダストは、ダスト定量供給装置
eによつてその定量が集合シユートfを経て混練
装置gへ投入される。一方、別に設けたセメント
貯留槽hより定量のセメントがセメント定量供給
装置i、集合シユートfを経て同時に混練装置g
へ投入され、水槽jから供給された水とともにダ
スト、セメントが混練される。混練された混合物
は、コンベアkで造粒装置lへ送られ、ここで所
定形状に造粒される。造粒装置lで造粒された造
粒物は養生コンベアmへ投下され、養生コンベア
m上を移動しつつ養生され、最後に養生バンカn
へ投入され、ここで所定期間の養生が施されるよ
うになつている。なお、qは消石灰貯留槽であ
り、供給装置rによつて前記ガス冷却室bから集
塵器cの間の排ガス通路に消石灰を供給して排ガ
ス中のCHlを除去している。 c 発明が解決しようとする問題点 前記従来の方法には次のような問題点がある。
すなわち、 湿式であるためダスト中に含まれるアルミニ
ユームと水が反応し、H2ガスを発生し、爆発
の危険がある。 セメントと水を添加して造粒するため作業終
了時には固化しないうちに混練装置g、造粒装
置lをその都度清掃せねばならず、多大の労力
を必要とする。 セメントには速硬性がないため、造粒装置l
で造粒された造粒物は養生のために長い行程の
養生コンベアmや、養生バンカnが必要とな
る。 ダストに対し、セメント、水という添加物を
必要とし、そのため工程が複雑となつている。 セメント、水の添加率を一定にするため造粒
装置の運転に熟練を要する。 ダストに対し、セメント、水を添加して造粒
するため見掛密度が小さく(空隙率約39%)、
したがつて造粒物の体積が大きくなり、廃棄処
分上の費用がかさむ。 d 問題点を解決するための手段 本発明は前記事情に鑑み、その問題点を解消し
た造粒方法を提供しようとするものである。すな
わち本発明は、廃棄物の焼却によつて発生する排
ガスと焼却ダストに、消石灰を供給して排ガス中
のHClを除去し、さらに集塵器で補集した前記焼
却ダストにおいて、前記処理により、残存した消
石灰の含有率が少なくとも10%以上となつている
焼却ダストに、セメント、水などの添加物を加え
ずに、そのまま高圧縮造粒装置に送入し、2〜
4ton/cm2の高圧力をかけて、ダスト粒子間に消石
灰をマトリツクス状に入り込ませ、高密度(空〓
率5〜10%)で圧壊強度の高い造粒物を形成する
ことを特徴とする焼却ダストの造粒方法である。 一般に焼却炉型式の違い、また、各都市ごみに
よつてダストの性状が異なるが、公表されている
成分表と、発明者が採用した後述の試験用ダスト
の試験結果から次のように結論づけることができ
た。 まず、HCl除去用消石灰を加えない場合につい
て述べると、ダストにはSiO2、Al2O3が主として
含まれ、またNa2O、K2O、SO3および未燃の有
機物などの混入があるが、これらは焼却炉の形
式、都市ごみの性状によつて大幅に変化してい
る。そして一般にSiO2、Al2O3などの硬い無機物
は造粒に際して成形圧3〜4t/cm2以下の圧縮圧力
を加えても粒子の変形による粒子間の密着あるい
は接点での溶解、固着現象が発生せず、したがつ
て、この成形圧だけでは強い造粒物の製造は困難
であることが判明した。 一方、NO2O、K2O、SO3、未燃有機物などは
比較的柔かく、2〜3t/cm2の圧力で粒子が互いに
変形して密着し、また粒子表面が活性化している
ことから粒子間結合力が強い。すなわち、
Na2O、K2Oなどを25〜30%以上含有するダスト
は3〜4t/cm2程度の成形圧で結合し硬い造粒物が
えられる。しかしNa、Kなどの塩類は潮解性の
ある物質であることから水に浸漬すると崩壊する
ことがテストにより判明し、無害化が要求される
造粒物としては好ましくない。 よつて発明者は前記本発明の方法によつて前記
問題点を解消したものである。すなわち、前記ダ
ストに少なくとも10%以上の、好ましくは30%程
度の消石灰を含有せしめてなるダストを2〜4t/
cm2で成形すると硬いダスト粒子間に消石灰がマト
リツクス状に入り込んだ形で成形される。この消
石灰は柔かくダスト粒子が変形密着し、特に表面
活性度が高いことから粒子間引力(分子間引力)
が強い。さらに粒子表面に僅かな湿分がある場合
は、粒子接点では高圧力と摩擦熱によつて一部が
溶解・析出・固着する現象が起き、強い結束力が
できる。なお、成形圧力が4t/cm2以上となると、
設備費がかかりコスト的に好ましくない。また
2t/cm2以下では目的とする性質を完全に備えた造
粒物はえられない。そしてダスト中の他成分との
間で水和反応、水硬性反応が生じることも実験結
果より推定できる。すなわち造粒物中の消石灰
(Ca(OH)2)は、下式のように空気中のCO2と経
時的に反応しCaCO3に変化して、水封性の高い、
また結束力の大きい造粒物となる。すなわち経時
硬化する。 Ca(OH)2+CO2→CaCO3+H2O また、消石灰単体を高圧成形すると24〜48時間
経過後は、水中でもほとんど溶解しない程度に強
固になつている。したがつて消石灰添加のダスト
の高圧造粒物では消石灰がダスト粒子間にマトリ
ツクス状に入り粒子を包んで固結していることか
ら、ダスト粒子表面と水との接触を少なくし、ダ
ストの溶出を大幅に減少するものと考えられる。
しかし消石灰の添加が10%以下では前記硬化は少
ない。また消石灰の添加が30%以上でも同様な効
果がえられるが、経済性を考慮して30%位が最も
好ましい。 以下、本発明の実施例について図面を参照しな
がら詳細に説明する。 第1図において1は廃棄物の焼却炉、2はガス
冷却室、3はダストの集塵器、4は集塵器3で集
められたダストのダスト貯留槽、5はダスト貯留
槽4の下部に設けられたダストのフイーダ、6は
高圧縮造粒装置、7は分級装置、8は養生装置、
9は分級装置7からダスト貯留槽4に連結するリ
ターンコンベア、10は消石灰貯留槽、11は消
石灰貯留槽10から消石灰を前記ガス冷却室2と
前記集塵器3との間の排ガス通路に供給する供給
装置、12は排ガス供給用のフアン、13は排ガ
ス排出用の煙突である。 焼却炉1で廃棄物を焼却したあと、ここで発生
したダストは排ガスとともに、ガス冷却室2へ導
かれて冷却され、さらに集塵器3によつて捕集さ
れ、ここからコンベアによつてダスト貯留槽4に
貯留される。 一方、消石灰貯留槽10から供給装置11を経
て集塵器3の前工程に消石灰を吹き込み、排ガス
中に含まれるHClの除去もおこなう。よつて前記
ダスト貯留槽4に貯留されるダストには一部の消
石灰が含まれるようにしてある。 貯留されたダストはダスト貯留槽4からフイー
ダ5によつて高圧縮造粒装置6へ送入される。こ
の高圧縮造粒装置6は上部にたとえばコーン型の
堅型スクリユーからなるフイーダ6aを備えてダ
ストを下方のプレスロール6bの間に強制的に送
入する。プレスロール6bは、たとえば相対して
回動するロールの表面に造粒用の凹部すなわち母
型を備えており、これによつてダストに3〜4t/
cm2の圧力をかけて所定の形状に造粒物を形成す
る。 造粒物は分離装置7を経て養生装置8へ送られ
る。また造粒物の周辺などに発生したバリや細片
などは分級装置7で分離され、リターンコンベア
9によつてダスト貯留槽4へ還送され再利用され
る。 次に造粒物の成形において、加圧による減容効
果と、経時硬化について比較試験をおこなつた結
果を述べる。 () 減容比較試験 岩手県東盤衛生処理組合に設置した焼却炉か
ら発生したダスト(以下、試料Aとする)と、
神奈川県芽ケ崎美化センターの焼却炉から発生
したダスト(以下、試料Bとする)とについて
実施した。第2図は試験装置を示し、直径25mm
×深さ25mmのシリンダー31のなかに試料を充
填し、これをピストン32によつて圧力Pで加
圧しながら、各圧縮力に対するターブレツト3
3の厚みの変化を測定し、これによりターブレ
ツト33の見掛密度を算出し、見掛密度ρ−圧
縮力P曲線を作成した。なお、試料A1、B1は
ダストのみのもの、試料A2、B2は消石灰をそ
れぞれ30%添加したものである。第1表ならび
に第4図および第5図に試験結果を示す。
a. Industrial Application Fields The present invention is designed to detoxify the incineration dust (fly ash) in the exhaust gas generated when municipal waste, sewage sludge, human waste sludge, industrial waste, etc. are incinerated. The present invention relates to a method of granulation. b. Prior Art The incineration dust contained in the exhaust gas from incineration of the wastes is concentrated with various salts and heavy metals, which are fine and light and easily scattered, posing the risk of polluting the environment. Therefore, after collecting these incineration dusts, a method is used to granulate and solidify the incineration dust to render it harmless and dispose of it. FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram of a conventional granulation system for processing such incineration dust. In other words, in a waste incineration facility, after the waste is first incinerated in incinerator a, the incineration dust (hereinafter abbreviated as dust) generated here is guided along with the exhaust gas to gas cooling room b, where it is cooled and further collected. The dust is collected by a container c and stored in a dust storage tank d from there by a conveyor. After collecting the dust, the exhaust gas is released from the chimney s. A fixed amount of the dust stored in the storage tank d is fed into the kneading device g via the collection chute f by the dust quantitative supply device e. On the other hand, a fixed amount of cement is supplied from a separately provided cement storage tank h to a cement quantitative supply device i and a collection chute f, and simultaneously to a kneading device g.
The dust and cement are mixed together with water supplied from water tank j. The kneaded mixture is sent to a granulator l by a conveyor k, where it is granulated into a predetermined shape. The granulated material granulated by the granulator l is dropped onto a curing conveyor m, cured while moving on the curing conveyor m, and finally transferred to a curing bunker n.
The material is then put into a container where it is cured for a predetermined period of time. Note that q is a slaked lime storage tank, and a supply device r supplies slaked lime to the exhaust gas passage between the gas cooling chamber b and the dust collector c to remove CHl from the exhaust gas. c Problems to be Solved by the Invention The conventional method has the following problems.
In other words, since it is a wet process, the aluminum contained in the dust reacts with water, generating H 2 gas, which poses the risk of explosion. Since granulation is performed by adding cement and water, it is necessary to clean the kneading device g and the granulation device l each time the work is completed before solidification, which requires a great deal of labor. Since cement does not have quick hardening properties, granulation equipment is required.
The granulated material requires a long-stroke curing conveyor m and a curing bunker n for curing. The process is complicated because additives such as cement and water are required for the dust. Skill is required to operate the granulation equipment in order to maintain a constant addition rate of cement and water. Because the dust is granulated by adding cement and water, the apparent density is small (porosity approximately 39%).
Therefore, the volume of the granules becomes large, which increases disposal costs. d. Means for Solving the Problems In view of the above circumstances, the present invention aims to provide a granulation method that eliminates the problems. That is, the present invention supplies slaked lime to exhaust gas and incineration dust generated by incineration of waste to remove HCl in the exhaust gas, and further, in the incineration dust collected by a dust collector, by the treatment, Incineration dust containing at least 10% of residual slaked lime is sent as it is to a high compression granulation device without adding additives such as cement or water, and is
By applying a high pressure of 4ton/ cm2 , slaked lime is forced into a matrix between the dust particles, creating a highly dense (empty)
This is a method for granulating incineration dust, which is characterized by forming granules with high crushing strength at a ratio of 5 to 10%). Generally, the properties of dust differ depending on the type of incinerator and each type of municipal waste, but based on the published composition list and the test results of the test dust adopted by the inventor, which will be described later, we can conclude as follows. was completed. First, when slaked lime for HCl removal is not added, the dust mainly contains SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 , and is also contaminated with Na 2 O, K 2 O, SO 3 , and unburned organic matter. However, these vary greatly depending on the type of incinerator and the nature of the municipal waste. In general, hard inorganic substances such as SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 do not adhere to each other due to particle deformation, or dissolve or stick at contact points, even if a compression pressure of 3 to 4 t/cm 2 or less is applied during granulation. Therefore, it was found that it was difficult to produce strong granules using only this molding pressure. On the other hand, NO 2 O, K 2 O, SO 3 and unburned organic matter are relatively soft, and the particles deform and stick together under a pressure of 2 to 3 t/cm 2 , and the particle surfaces are activated. Strong interparticle bonding force. That is,
Dust containing 25 to 30% or more of Na 2 O, K 2 O, etc. can be combined under a molding pressure of about 3 to 4 t/cm 2 to obtain a hard granulated product. However, since salts such as Na and K are deliquescent substances, tests have shown that they disintegrate when immersed in water, making them undesirable as granules that are required to be rendered harmless. Therefore, the inventor has solved the above problems by using the method of the present invention. That is, 2 to 4 tons of the dust containing at least 10% or more, preferably about 30%, of slaked lime is mixed into the dust.
When molded in cm2 , slaked lime is formed between hard dust particles in a matrix shape. This slaked lime is soft and the dust particles deform and stick together, and because it has particularly high surface activity, it creates interparticle attraction (intermolecular attraction).
is strong. Furthermore, if there is a slight amount of moisture on the surface of the particles, high pressure and frictional heat will cause a portion of the particles to melt, precipitate, or stick together at the contact points, creating a strong cohesive force. In addition, when the molding pressure is 4t/ cm2 or more,
This is not desirable in terms of cost as it requires equipment costs. Also
If it is less than 2t/cm 2 , granules with the desired properties cannot be obtained. It can also be estimated from the experimental results that hydration reactions and hydraulic reactions occur with other components in the dust. In other words, slaked lime (Ca(OH) 2 ) in the granules reacts with CO 2 in the air over time and changes to CaCO 3 as shown in the equation below, resulting in highly water-sealing,
Moreover, it becomes a granulated material with a large cohesive force. That is, it hardens over time. Ca(OH) 2 +CO 2 →CaCO 3 +H 2 O Also, when slaked lime alone is molded under high pressure, it becomes so strong that it hardly dissolves even in water after 24 to 48 hours. Therefore, in high-pressure granules of dust containing slaked lime, the slaked lime enters between the dust particles in a matrix form, enveloping the particles and solidifying, which reduces the contact between the dust particle surface and water and prevents the elution of the dust. It is thought that this will significantly reduce the
However, if the addition of slaked lime is 10% or less, the hardening is small. A similar effect can be obtained even if the amount of slaked lime is 30% or more, but in consideration of economic efficiency, it is most preferable to add slaked lime to about 30%. Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. In Figure 1, 1 is a waste incinerator, 2 is a gas cooling room, 3 is a dust collector, 4 is a dust storage tank for the dust collected in the dust collector 3, and 5 is the lower part of the dust storage tank 4. 6 is a high compression granulation device, 7 is a classification device, 8 is a curing device,
9 is a return conveyor connected from the classification device 7 to the dust storage tank 4; 10 is a slaked lime storage tank; 11 is a slaked lime storage tank 10 that supplies slaked lime to the exhaust gas passage between the gas cooling chamber 2 and the dust collector 3; 12 is a fan for supplying exhaust gas, and 13 is a chimney for discharging exhaust gas. After the waste is incinerated in the incinerator 1, the dust generated here is guided along with the exhaust gas to the gas cooling chamber 2, where it is cooled, and further collected by the dust collector 3, from which the dust is collected by a conveyor. It is stored in the storage tank 4. On the other hand, slaked lime is blown from the slaked lime storage tank 10 through the supply device 11 into the pre-process of the dust collector 3 to remove HCl contained in the exhaust gas. Therefore, the dust stored in the dust storage tank 4 contains some slaked lime. The stored dust is sent from the dust storage tank 4 to a high compression granulation device 6 by a feeder 5. This high-compression granulation device 6 is provided with a feeder 6a consisting of, for example, a cone-shaped rigid screw in the upper part, and forcibly feeds the dust between press rolls 6b below. For example, the press rolls 6b are provided with recesses for granulation, that is, master molds, on the surfaces of the rolls that rotate relative to each other.
A pressure of cm 2 is applied to form granules into a predetermined shape. The granulated material is sent to a curing device 8 via a separator 7. Further, burrs and small pieces generated around the granules are separated by the classifier 7, and returned to the dust storage tank 4 by the return conveyor 9 for reuse. Next, we will discuss the results of a comparative test regarding the volume reduction effect due to pressurization and curing over time in the molding of granules. () Comparative volume reduction test Dust generated from an incinerator installed at Higashiban Sanitary Treatment Association in Iwate Prefecture (hereinafter referred to as Sample A),
The test was conducted on dust generated from an incinerator at the Megasaki Beautification Center in Kanagawa Prefecture (hereinafter referred to as Sample B). Figure 2 shows the test equipment, with a diameter of 25 mm.
A sample is filled into a cylinder 31 with a depth of 25 mm, and while it is pressurized by a piston 32 at a pressure P, the table 3 is measured for each compression force.
The change in thickness of Tablet 33 was measured, and the apparent density of Tablet 33 was calculated, and an apparent density ρ-compressive force P curve was created. Note that samples A1 and B1 contain only dust, and samples A2 and B2 each contain 30% slaked lime. The test results are shown in Table 1 and FIGS. 4 and 5.

【表】 圧縮後の体積
(注) 減容率=
[Table] Volume after compression
(Note) Volume reduction rate =

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1 廃棄物の焼却によつて発生する排ガスと焼却
ダストに、消石灰を供給して排ガス中のHClを除
去し、さらに集塵器で補集した前記焼却ダストに
おいて、前記処理により、残存した消石灰の含有
率が少なくとも10%以上となつている焼却ダスト
に、セメント、水などの添加物を加えずに、その
まま高圧縮造粒装置に送入し、2〜4ton/cm2の高
圧力をかけて、ダスト粒子間に消石灰をマトリツ
クス状に入り込ませ、高密度(空〓率5〜10%)
で圧壊強度の高い造粒物を形成することを特徴と
する焼却ダストの造粒方法。
1. Slaked lime is supplied to the exhaust gas and incineration dust generated by waste incineration to remove HCl in the exhaust gas, and the remaining slaked lime is removed from the incineration dust collected by the dust collector through the above treatment. Incineration dust with a content of at least 10% is sent as it is to a high compression granulation device without adding additives such as cement or water, and is subjected to high pressure of 2 to 4 tons/ cm2. , slaked lime is inserted between the dust particles in a matrix form to create a high density (5 to 10% void ratio)
A method for granulating incineration dust, characterized by forming granules with high crushing strength.
JP62141212A 1987-06-05 1987-06-05 Granulation of incinerated dust Granted JPS63305979A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP62141212A JPS63305979A (en) 1987-06-05 1987-06-05 Granulation of incinerated dust

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP62141212A JPS63305979A (en) 1987-06-05 1987-06-05 Granulation of incinerated dust

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS63305979A JPS63305979A (en) 1988-12-13
JPH0230752B2 true JPH0230752B2 (en) 1990-07-09

Family

ID=15286748

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP62141212A Granted JPS63305979A (en) 1987-06-05 1987-06-05 Granulation of incinerated dust

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS63305979A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04109668U (en) * 1991-03-12 1992-09-22 株式会社東海理化電機製作所 Safety device for air bag equipment

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH06343943A (en) * 1993-06-04 1994-12-20 Nippon Jiryoku Senko Kk Treatment method of incineration ash of combustible dust
CN103240781A (en) * 2013-05-14 2013-08-14 牧羊有限公司 Sawdust granulator

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS51129872A (en) * 1975-05-06 1976-11-11 Takuma Co Ltd A process for solidifying and coating collected dust
JPS54128477A (en) * 1978-03-29 1979-10-05 Ebara Infilco Co Ltd Treating method for waste incineration residue

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04109668U (en) * 1991-03-12 1992-09-22 株式会社東海理化電機製作所 Safety device for air bag equipment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS63305979A (en) 1988-12-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5860908A (en) Water insoluble heavy metal stabilization process
JPH01254285A (en) Garbage incinerated ash and preparation thereof
JPH0230752B2 (en)
JP4270235B2 (en) Fly ash treatment method
JPH0796263A (en) Waste incineration ash processing method and device
JP2005313032A (en) Method for producing hydrothermal solidified product of paper sludge incineration ash
JPH1029841A (en) Manufacturing method of artificial aggregate
JPH1199372A (en) Method and apparatus for solidifying and stabilizing molten fly ash
JPH08224557A (en) Granule of waste and manufacturing method thereof
KR200191246Y1 (en) Construction of soil covering materials for reclamation
JPS633674B2 (en)
JPS593235B2 (en) Dust treatment method in waste incineration treatment
JPS59105882A (en) Setting agent for dust or the like
JPS5851970A (en) Treatment for caking inflatable dust
JPS58139777A (en) Solidifying method of collected incinerator dust
JP2522717B2 (en) Heavy metal removal method
JPS607554B2 (en) Method for solidifying fine powder incineration residue
JPH0724434A (en) Solidification method of residue powder
JPH06106153A (en) Cement solidification method of incineration ash and cement solidification product of incineration ash
JPH07155724A (en) Solidification method of incineration ash
KR100334328B1 (en) Method for treating fly ash containing heavy metal and soil covering materials using solid materials produced by the method
JPH09150129A (en) Method and apparatus for treating incineration
JPS6191050A (en) Manufacture of aggregate based on ash
JPH0947741A (en) Treatment method of incineration ash
JPS5895575A (en) Forming and caking method for incineration residue of manicipal refuse