JPH0240095B2 - UNMOJUTENNETSUKASOSEIJUSHISOSEIBUTSU - Google Patents
UNMOJUTENNETSUKASOSEIJUSHISOSEIBUTSUInfo
- Publication number
- JPH0240095B2 JPH0240095B2 JP5691183A JP5691183A JPH0240095B2 JP H0240095 B2 JPH0240095 B2 JP H0240095B2 JP 5691183 A JP5691183 A JP 5691183A JP 5691183 A JP5691183 A JP 5691183A JP H0240095 B2 JPH0240095 B2 JP H0240095B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- mica
- shape factor
- flakes
- average
- strength
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Compositions Of Macromolecular Compounds (AREA)
Description
本発明は、優れた引張強度、曲げ強度等の機械
的強度とともに高いウエルド強度を有する熱可塑
性樹脂組成物に関する。
最近、雲母を補強材とする雲母配合熱可塑性樹
脂組成物が、ガラス繊維、炭酸カルシウム等の充
填材で補強された組成物にくらべて、高剛性、無
リン性、高電気絶縁性等に優れているため広く使
用されている。しかしながら、このような雲母充
填成形物をとくに射出成形法によつて成形する
と、成形物中にいわゆるウエルドが生じることが
ある。成形物にかかるウエルドが生じると、この
部分の強度は無補強の樹脂の強度よりもむしろ低
下してしまうという欠点があり、この欠点を防止
するために従来より金型の設計に注意が払われて
きた。しかしながら、ウエルドを防止するために
は金型の設計に注意を払うだけではウエルドの発
生を完全に防止することは不可能であり、樹脂組
成物の面からも検討する必要がある。雲母を配合
した熱可塑性樹脂のウエルド部分の強度は雲母の
フレーク径により変化し、フレーク径が小さい
程、ウエルド部分の強度が向上することが知られ
ている。しかしながら、ウエルド部分の強度を上
げるために雲母のフレーク径を小さくするとアス
ペクト比も低下してしまい、そのために逆に補強
効果が低下するという問題がある。また、雲母の
フレーク径を小さくするための粉砕経費も著しく
高騰する。
本発明者らは、上記欠点のない高ウエルド強度
を有する雲母充填樹脂組成物を得るべく鋭意検討
した結果、特定の形状を有する雲母を熱可塑性樹
脂に配合することによつて補強効果を犠牲にする
ことなく高ウエルド強度を有する樹脂組成物を得
ることができることを見出し、本発明に到つた。
すなわち、本発明は形状係数が平均値で0.76以
上の雲母フレーク10〜80重量%と熱可塑性樹脂90
〜20重量%からなる樹脂組成物である。
本発明における形状係数は、雲母フレークの上
部からの投影図から求められる面積(s)に4π
を乗じた値を同じく該投影図から求められる周長
(l)の二乗で除した4πs/l2で表わされる値である。
ちなみにこの値は円では1、正方形では0.785、
正三角形では0.605である。該雲母フレーク投影
図の面積および周長は次の方法で求めることがで
きる。まず、雲母フレークを走査型電子顕微鏡写
真をとり投影図とする。ついで該投影図の画像に
沿つてセンサーでなぞり、周長およびその周で囲
まれた部分の面積を測定する。第1図および第2
図は雲母フレークの走査型電子顕微鏡写真(倍率
190倍)である。このような方法により測定した
面積および周長から個々の雲母フレークの形状係
数を算出し、第3図のように、形状係数の累積頻
度曲線を描く。個数の累積が測定個数の半数に達
した点すなわち平均値の形状係数をもつてその雲
母フレークの形状係数とする。本発明の樹脂組成
物は、粒径が2000μm以下、アスペクト比が10以
上の形状係数が平均値0.76以上(好ましくは0.79
以上)の雲母フレークを熱可塑性樹脂に配合して
得られる。また、該雲母フレーク100個中に占め
る形状係数が0.70以下のものは20個以下(好まし
くは15個以下)であることが好ましい。
通常、雲母は例えばジエツトミル型粉砕機のよ
うに、雲母に強力な衝撃エネルギーを与える粉砕
方法で粉砕されるが、このような従来の粉砕方法
では得られる雲母フレークの形状は第2図に示し
たように非常に不規則であり、従つて、形状係数
が平均値0.65〜0.73程度のものしか得られない。
しかしながら、本発明においては、雲母を弱い衝
撃エネルギーで粉砕し、かつ鋭い角をなめらかに
する例えばフアインミクロン型粉砕機で粉砕する
ため第1図に示すように形状係数が平均値0.76以
上のものを得ることができるのである。本発明に
用いられる雲母フレークは上述のフアインミクロ
ン型粉砕機を使用すれば効率よく形状係数が平均
値0.76以上のものを得ることができるが、上述の
粉砕機を使用することに限定されるものではな
く、上述の特定形状の雲母フレークを生ずるもの
であればいかなる粉砕法によつてもよい。
本発明において用いられる雲母としては白雲
母、金雲母、黒雲母、合成雲母等を挙げることが
できる。
また、本発明に用いられる熱可塑性樹脂として
はポリエチレン、ポリプロピレン等のポリオレフ
イン、ナイロン6、ナイロン66等のポリアミド、
ポリエチレンテレフタレート、ポリブチレンテレ
フタレート等のポリエステルが用いられる。
また、本発明の樹脂組成物は熱可塑性樹脂90〜
20重量%に、形状係数が0.76以上の雲母フレーク
10〜80重量%を配合して実施される。雲母フレー
クの量が10重量%より少ないと本発明の効果は低
く、また80重量%よりも多いと成形が困難とな
る。
また、本発明を実施するにあたり、雲母の表面
処理剤としてアルキルシラン化合物を用いたり、
雲母の分散を助ける助剤としてチタン化合物を用
いてもよい。また、ガラス繊維、炭素繊維、タル
ク、炭酸カルシウム、ワラストナイト等各種の強
化材、充填材を使用することができる。とくに、
少量のガラス繊維、炭素繊維の併用は、強度、衝
撃強度、熱変形温度等の改良に有効である。その
他、着色剤、滑剤、安定剤、可塑剤、帯電防止剤
等公知の添加物を加えることは何らさしつかえな
い。
本発明の組成物は、通常の射出成形機により、
構造部品、機械部品、電機部品等に成形される
が、他の押出成形、圧縮成形、カレンダー成形等
の成形法を採用しても何らさしつかえない。以下
に実施例をあげて本発明を具体的に説明するが、
本発明はこれらの実施例により何ら制限されるも
のではない。
実施例1および比較例1
金雲母をフアインミクロン型粉砕機((株)ホソカ
ワミクロン製)で粉砕し、空気分級により微粉部
分を10%カツトして、平均フレーク径が40μm、
形状係数が平均値で0.80、アスペクト比が30の金
雲母フレークを得た(第1図)。また、この雲母
フレーク100個中に占める形状係数が0.70以下の
ものは7個であつた。雲母の形状係数は、雲母の
走査型電子顕微鏡写真に画像解析システム(英弘
精機産業(株)MOP―モジユラーシステム)を使用
し、面積および周長を測定して求めた。これらの
形状係数の累積頻度曲線を第3図に示す。また、
熱可塑性樹脂としてアイソタクチツクポリプロピ
レン4、カルボキシル変性ポリプロピレン1を混
合したものを用いた。雲母と樹脂の比率は重量比
で40/60とし、この混合物を一軸押出機に供給し
て230℃で溶融、混練を行ない、得られたペレツ
トを射出成形することにより、引張強度、曲げ強
度およびウエルド部の引張強度を測定する試験片
を得た。なお、引張強度、曲げ強度測定用の試験
片の形状はそれぞれASTM D638、ASTM
D790により、またウエルド部引張強度測定用試
験片の形状は高分子論文集(高分子学会編)、38、
209(1981)によつた。これらの試験片の物性を測
定して表1に示した(実施例1)。
また、実施例1と同じ樹脂を用い、これと平均
フレーク径38μm、アスペクト比28、形状係数が
平均値0.70のジエツトミルにより粉砕された金雲
母を実施例1と同様の方法で混合し試験片を作製
し、物性を測定して同じく表1に示した(比較例
1)。但し、該雲母中のフレーク100個中に占める
形状係数が0.70以下のものは50個であつた。形状
係数の累積頻度曲線を第3図に示す。この結果に
より、引張強度、曲げ強度はほぼ同等であるが、
ウエルド強度が大巾に向上していることが明らか
である。
実施例2および比較例2
実施例1で用いた粉砕機で金雲母を粉砕し、更
に空気分級して微粉部分を5%、粗粉部分を30%
カツトして、平均フレーク径20μm、アスペクト
比30、形状係数が平均値0.78である金雲母フレー
クを得た。形状係数の測定は実施例1と同様の方
法で行なつた。なお、フレーク100個中に占める
形状係数が0.70以下のものは11個であつた。この
雲母フレーク40重量部を実施例1で用いた樹脂60
重量部に混合し、実施例1と同様の方法で試験片
を作製し、物性を測定して表1に示した(実施例
2)。
また、実施例2と同じ樹脂を用い、これと平均
フレーク径20μm、アスペクト比31、形状係数が
平均値0.68のローラーミルで粉砕した金雲母を実
施例2と同様の方法で混合し試験片を作製した。
この物性値を測定して表1に示した(比較例2)。
但し、該雲母100個中に占める形状係数が0.70以
下のものは55個であつた。この結果により、引張
強度、曲げ強度はほぼ同等であるが、ウエルド強
度が大巾に向上していることが明らかである。
実施例3および比較例3
熱可塑性樹脂として相対粘度2.6のナイロン640
重量部に、実施例1で用いた粉砕機で粉砕後、空
気分級して微粉部分を10%カツトして得た平均フ
レーク径45μm、アスペクト比45、形状係数が平
均値0.78の白雲母60重量部を加えて混合した。形
状係数の測定は実施例と同様にして行なつた。該
白雲母フレーク100個中に占める形状係数が0.70
以下のものは15個であつた。この混合物を一軸押
出機に供給して260℃で溶融、混練を行ないペレ
ツトを得た。このペレツトを実施例1と同様の方
法で試験片とし、絶乾して物性を測定し結果を表
1に示した(実施例3)。
実施例3で用いた同じ樹脂に、ジエツトミルで
粉砕した平均フレーク径43μm、アスペクト比
47、形状係数が平均値0.65の白雲母を実施例3と
同様に混合した。該白雲母フレーク100個中に占
める形状係数が0.70以下のものは60個であつた。
この混合物を実施例3と同様の方法でペレツト化
し、試験片にして物性を測定し、表1に示した
(比較例3)。この結果により、引張強度、曲げ強
度はほぼ同等であるが、ウエルド強度が大巾に向
上していることが明らかである。
実施例4および比較例4
実施例1で用いた粉砕機で金雲母を粉砕し、更
に空気分級して微粉部分を20%カツトとして平均
フレーク径60μm、アスペクト比33、形状係数が
平均値0.81である金雲母フレークを得た。形状係
数の測定は実施例1と同様にして行なつた。な
お、フレーク100個中に占める形状係数が0.70以
下のものは7個であつた。この雲母フレーク40重
量部とメルトフローレート12g/10分のポリブチ
レンテレフタレート60重量部とを混合し、実施例
1と同様の方法で試験片を作製し、物性を測定し
て表1に示した(実施例4)。
また、実施例4で用いた同じ樹脂60重量部と、
デイスパミル((株)ホソカワミクロン製)で粉砕し
た平均フレーク径57μm、アスペクト比33、形状
係数が平均値0.70の金雲母フレーク40重量部とを
混合し、実施例4と同様の方法で試験片を作製
し、物性を測定し、表1に示した(比較例4)。
なお、この場合の雲母フレークの形状係数は0.70
であつた。実施例4と比較例4とを比較してみる
と、引張強度、曲げ強度はほぼ同等であるが、ウ
エルド強度が大巾に向上していることが明らかで
ある。
実施例5および比較例5
金雲母を実施例1で用いた粉砕機で粉砕し、空
気分級により微粉部分を10%カツトし、平均フレ
ーク径80μm、アスペクト比50、形状係数が平均
値で0.82の雲母フレークを得た。該雲母フレーク
と実施例1で用いた樹脂とを重量比で20/80の割
合で混合し、実施例1と同様の方法で試験片を作
製し、物性を測定して表1に示した(実施例5)。
また、この雲母フレーク100個中に占める形状係
数が0.70以下のものは5個であつた。
また、実施例1と同じ樹脂を用い、これと平均
フレーク径80μm、アスペクト比53、形状係数が
平均値で0.69のジエツトミルで粉砕した金雲母を
実施例5と同様の方法で混合し、試験片を作製し
た。この物性値を測定して表1に示した(比較例
5)。但し、該雲母100個中に占める形状係数が
0.70以下のものは52個であつた。この結果によ
り、引張強度、曲げ強度はほぼ同等であるが、ウ
エルド強度が大巾に向上していることが明らかで
ある。
The present invention relates to a thermoplastic resin composition having excellent mechanical strength such as tensile strength and bending strength as well as high weld strength. Recently, mica-containing thermoplastic resin compositions that use mica as a reinforcing material have been found to have superior rigidity, phosphorus-free properties, and high electrical insulation properties compared to compositions reinforced with fillers such as glass fiber and calcium carbonate. It is widely used because of its However, when such a mica-filled molded product is molded, particularly by injection molding, so-called welds may occur in the molded product. When a weld occurs in a molded product, the strength of this part is lower than the strength of unreinforced resin, which is a disadvantage, and in order to prevent this disadvantage, attention has traditionally been paid to the design of molds. It's here. However, in order to prevent welding, it is impossible to completely prevent welding by simply paying attention to the design of the mold, and it is necessary to consider the resin composition as well. It is known that the strength of the weld portion of a thermoplastic resin containing mica varies depending on the mica flake diameter, and the smaller the flake diameter, the better the strength of the weld portion. However, if the diameter of the mica flakes is reduced in order to increase the strength of the weld portion, the aspect ratio also decreases, which causes a problem in that the reinforcing effect decreases. Furthermore, the cost of crushing to reduce the diameter of mica flakes increases significantly. As a result of intensive studies to obtain a mica-filled resin composition with high weld strength without the above-mentioned drawbacks, the present inventors found that by blending mica with a specific shape into a thermoplastic resin, the reinforcing effect could be sacrificed. We have discovered that it is possible to obtain a resin composition having high weld strength without any process, and have arrived at the present invention. That is, the present invention uses 10 to 80% by weight of mica flakes with an average shape factor of 0.76 or more and 90% by weight of thermoplastic resin.
It is a resin composition consisting of ~20% by weight. The shape factor in the present invention is calculated by adding 4π to the area (s) obtained from the projection view from the top of the mica flake.
The value multiplied by the circumference obtained from the projection diagram
It is a value expressed as 4πs/l 2 divided by the square of (l).
By the way, this value is 1 for a circle, 0.785 for a square,
For an equilateral triangle, it is 0.605. The area and circumference of the mica flake projection can be determined by the following method. First, a scanning electron micrograph of the mica flakes is taken and a projected image is taken. Next, a sensor is traced along the image of the projection to measure the circumference and the area of the area surrounded by the circumference. Figures 1 and 2
The figure shows a scanning electron micrograph of mica flakes (magnification
190 times). The shape factor of each mica flake is calculated from the area and circumference measured by such a method, and a cumulative frequency curve of the shape factor is drawn as shown in FIG. The point at which the cumulative number of flakes reaches half of the measured number, that is, the shape coefficient of the average value, is taken as the shape coefficient of that mica flake. The resin composition of the present invention has a particle size of 2000 μm or less, an aspect ratio of 10 or more, and an average shape factor of 0.76 or more (preferably 0.79).
It is obtained by blending the above mica flakes into a thermoplastic resin. Further, it is preferable that the number of mica flakes having a shape factor of 0.70 or less in 100 pieces is 20 or less (preferably 15 or less). Usually, mica is crushed using a crushing method that applies strong impact energy to the mica, such as in a jet mill type crusher, but the shape of mica flakes obtained by such conventional crushing methods is shown in Figure 2. Therefore, the average value of the shape factor is only about 0.65 to 0.73.
However, in the present invention, in order to crush mica with weak impact energy and to smooth sharp edges, for example, using a fine micron type crusher, mica is crushed with a shape factor of 0.76 or more as shown in Figure 1. can be obtained. Mica flakes used in the present invention can be efficiently obtained with a shape factor of 0.76 or more by using the above-mentioned fine micron type crusher, but the use of the above-mentioned crusher is limited. Any pulverization method may be used as long as it produces mica flakes having the above-mentioned specific shape. Examples of mica used in the present invention include muscovite, phlogopite, biotite, and synthetic mica. In addition, thermoplastic resins used in the present invention include polyolefins such as polyethylene and polypropylene, polyamides such as nylon 6 and nylon 66,
Polyesters such as polyethylene terephthalate and polybutylene terephthalate are used. Furthermore, the resin composition of the present invention is a thermoplastic resin of 90 to
20% by weight of mica flakes with a shape factor of 0.76 or more
It is carried out by blending 10 to 80% by weight. When the amount of mica flakes is less than 10% by weight, the effect of the present invention is low, and when it is more than 80% by weight, molding becomes difficult. In carrying out the present invention, it is also possible to use an alkylsilane compound as a surface treatment agent for mica,
A titanium compound may be used as an auxiliary agent to help disperse the mica. Further, various reinforcing materials and fillers such as glass fiber, carbon fiber, talc, calcium carbonate, and wollastonite can be used. especially,
The combined use of small amounts of glass fiber and carbon fiber is effective in improving strength, impact strength, heat distortion temperature, etc. In addition, known additives such as colorants, lubricants, stabilizers, plasticizers, and antistatic agents may be added. The composition of the present invention can be manufactured using a conventional injection molding machine.
Although it is molded into structural parts, mechanical parts, electrical parts, etc., other molding methods such as extrusion molding, compression molding, and calender molding may also be employed. The present invention will be specifically explained below with reference to Examples.
The present invention is not limited in any way by these Examples. Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 Phlogopite was pulverized using a fine micron type pulverizer (manufactured by Hosokawa Micron Co., Ltd.), and 10% of the fine powder portion was cut off by air classification, resulting in an average flake diameter of 40 μm.
Phlogopite flakes with an average shape factor of 0.80 and an aspect ratio of 30 were obtained (Figure 1). Furthermore, out of 100 mica flakes, there were 7 flakes with a shape factor of 0.70 or less. The shape factor of mica was determined by measuring the area and circumference using a scanning electron micrograph of mica using an image analysis system (MOP-Modular System, manufactured by Hideko Seiki Sangyo Co., Ltd.). The cumulative frequency curve of these shape factors is shown in FIG. Also,
A mixture of isotactic polypropylene 4 and carboxyl-modified polypropylene 1 was used as the thermoplastic resin. The ratio of mica and resin is 40/60 by weight, and this mixture is fed to a single screw extruder, melted and kneaded at 230°C, and the resulting pellets are injection molded to improve tensile strength, bending strength, and A test piece was obtained for measuring the tensile strength of the weld part. The shapes of the test pieces for measuring tensile strength and bending strength are ASTM D638 and ASTM
D790, and the shape of the test piece for measuring the tensile strength of the weld part was determined by Kobunshi Papers (edited by the Society of Polymer Science and Technology), 38 ,
209 (1981). The physical properties of these test pieces were measured and shown in Table 1 (Example 1). In addition, using the same resin as in Example 1, phlogopite pulverized by a jet mill with an average flake diameter of 38 μm, an aspect ratio of 28, and an average shape factor of 0.70 was mixed in the same manner as in Example 1 to prepare a test piece. It was prepared and its physical properties were measured and are also shown in Table 1 (Comparative Example 1). However, out of 100 flakes in the mica, 50 flakes had a shape factor of 0.70 or less. The cumulative frequency curve of the shape factor is shown in FIG. From this result, the tensile strength and bending strength are almost the same, but
It is clear that the weld strength has been greatly improved. Example 2 and Comparative Example 2 Phlogopite was pulverized using the pulverizer used in Example 1, and further air classified to reduce the fine powder to 5% and the coarse powder to 30%.
Phlogopite flakes having an average flake diameter of 20 μm, an aspect ratio of 30, and a shape factor of 0.78 were obtained by cutting. The shape factor was measured in the same manner as in Example 1. In addition, out of 100 flakes, there were 11 flakes with a shape factor of 0.70 or less. 40 parts by weight of this mica flake was used in the resin 60 used in Example 1.
A test piece was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, and the physical properties were measured and shown in Table 1 (Example 2). In addition, using the same resin as in Example 2, this was mixed with phlogopite crushed by a roller mill with an average flake diameter of 20 μm, an aspect ratio of 31, and an average shape factor of 0.68 in the same manner as in Example 2, and a test piece was prepared. Created.
The physical property values were measured and shown in Table 1 (Comparative Example 2).
However, out of 100 mica, 55 had a shape factor of 0.70 or less. From this result, it is clear that the tensile strength and bending strength are almost the same, but the weld strength is greatly improved. Example 3 and Comparative Example 3 Nylon 640 with relative viscosity 2.6 as thermoplastic resin
The weight part contains 60 parts by weight of muscovite having an average diameter of 45 μm, an aspect ratio of 45, and an average shape factor of 0.78, which were obtained by pulverizing with the pulverizer used in Example 1, air classifying, and cutting off 10% of the fine powder part. part and mixed. The shape factor was measured in the same manner as in the examples. The shape factor of 100 muscovite flakes is 0.70.
There were 15 of the following items. This mixture was fed to a single screw extruder, melted and kneaded at 260°C to obtain pellets. This pellet was made into a test piece in the same manner as in Example 1, dried completely, and its physical properties were measured, and the results are shown in Table 1 (Example 3). The same resin used in Example 3 was crushed with a jet mill, with an average flake diameter of 43 μm and an aspect ratio.
47, muscovite having an average shape factor of 0.65 was mixed in the same manner as in Example 3. Among the 100 muscovite flakes, 60 had a shape factor of 0.70 or less.
This mixture was pelletized in the same manner as in Example 3, and the physical properties were measured using test pieces as shown in Table 1 (Comparative Example 3). From this result, it is clear that the tensile strength and bending strength are almost the same, but the weld strength is greatly improved. Example 4 and Comparative Example 4 Phlogopite was crushed using the crusher used in Example 1, and then air classified to cut 20% of the fine powder into flakes with an average diameter of 60 μm, an aspect ratio of 33, and an average shape factor of 0.81. Obtained some phlogopite flakes. The shape factor was measured in the same manner as in Example 1. In addition, out of 100 flakes, there were 7 flakes with a shape factor of 0.70 or less. 40 parts by weight of this mica flake and 60 parts by weight of polybutylene terephthalate with a melt flow rate of 12 g/10 min were mixed, a test piece was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, and the physical properties were measured and shown in Table 1. (Example 4). In addition, 60 parts by weight of the same resin used in Example 4,
A test piece was prepared in the same manner as in Example 4 by mixing with 40 parts by weight of phlogopite flakes having an average flake diameter of 57 μm, an aspect ratio of 33, and an average shape factor of 0.70, which were crushed with a Dispa Mill (manufactured by Hosokawa Micron Co., Ltd.). The physical properties were measured and shown in Table 1 (Comparative Example 4).
In addition, the shape factor of mica flakes in this case is 0.70
It was hot. Comparing Example 4 and Comparative Example 4, it is clear that the tensile strength and bending strength are almost the same, but the weld strength is significantly improved. Example 5 and Comparative Example 5 Phlogopite was pulverized using the pulverizer used in Example 1, and 10% of the fine powder portion was cut off by air classification, and the average flake diameter was 80 μm, the aspect ratio was 50, and the average shape factor was 0.82. Mica flakes were obtained. The mica flakes and the resin used in Example 1 were mixed at a weight ratio of 20/80, a test piece was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, and the physical properties were measured and shown in Table 1. Example 5).
Further, out of 100 mica flakes, there were 5 flakes with a shape factor of 0.70 or less. In addition, using the same resin as in Example 1, phlogopite pulverized with a jet mill having an average flake diameter of 80 μm, an aspect ratio of 53, and an average shape factor of 0.69 was mixed in the same manner as in Example 5, and a test piece was prepared. was created. The physical property values were measured and shown in Table 1 (Comparative Example 5). However, the shape factor of the 100 mica is
There were 52 items below 0.70. From this result, it is clear that the tensile strength and bending strength are almost the same, but the weld strength is greatly improved.
【表】【table】
第1図は実施例1で使用した形状係数が平均値
で0.80の雲母フレークの走査型電子顕微鏡写真で
あり、第2図は比較例1で使用した形状係数が平
均値0.70の雲母フレークの走査型電子顕微鏡写真
である。第3図は、実施例1および比較例1で使
用した雲母フレークの累積頻度曲線であり、1は
実施例1で使用した雲母フレークの、2は比較例
1で使用した雲母フレークの累積頻度曲線であ
る。
Figure 1 is a scanning electron micrograph of mica flakes with an average shape factor of 0.80 used in Example 1, and Figure 2 is a scanning electron micrograph of mica flakes with an average shape factor of 0.70 used in Comparative Example 1. This is an electron micrograph. Figure 3 shows the cumulative frequency curves of the mica flakes used in Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, where 1 is the cumulative frequency curve of the mica flakes used in Example 1, and 2 is the cumulative frequency curve of the mica flakes used in Comparative Example 1. It is.
Claims (1)
10〜80重量%と熱可塑性樹脂90〜20重量%からな
る樹脂組成物。 2 該雲母フレークは形状係数が0.70以下のもの
が100個中、20個以下である特許請求の範囲第1
項に記載の樹脂組成物。[Claims] 1. Mica flakes with an average shape factor of 0.76 or more
A resin composition consisting of 10 to 80% by weight and 90 to 20% by weight of a thermoplastic resin. 2. Claim 1, in which the number of mica flakes having a shape factor of 0.70 or less is 20 or less out of 100.
The resin composition described in .
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5691183A JPH0240095B2 (en) | 1983-03-31 | 1983-03-31 | UNMOJUTENNETSUKASOSEIJUSHISOSEIBUTSU |
| US06/589,337 US4560715A (en) | 1983-03-31 | 1984-03-14 | Mica flake mass and resin composition with the same incorporated therein |
| CA000450568A CA1249390A (en) | 1983-03-31 | 1984-03-27 | Mica flake mass and resin composition with the same incorporated therein |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5691183A JPH0240095B2 (en) | 1983-03-31 | 1983-03-31 | UNMOJUTENNETSUKASOSEIJUSHISOSEIBUTSU |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS59179639A JPS59179639A (en) | 1984-10-12 |
| JPH0240095B2 true JPH0240095B2 (en) | 1990-09-10 |
Family
ID=13040637
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5691183A Expired - Lifetime JPH0240095B2 (en) | 1983-03-31 | 1983-03-31 | UNMOJUTENNETSUKASOSEIJUSHISOSEIBUTSU |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH0240095B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS62132962A (en) * | 1985-12-04 | 1987-06-16 | Polyplastics Co | Thermoplastic resin composition for molding |
| KR100382119B1 (en) * | 1999-11-15 | 2003-05-01 | 서재균 | The manufacturing process of a tooth brush. |
| JP6545351B1 (en) * | 2018-11-29 | 2019-07-17 | トピー工業株式会社 | Powder and cosmetics |
-
1983
- 1983-03-31 JP JP5691183A patent/JPH0240095B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS59179639A (en) | 1984-10-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Ismail et al. | Oil palm wood flour reinforced epoxidized natural rubber composites: The effect of filler content and size | |
| JP4598303B2 (en) | Granular inorganic filler, process for producing the same, and resin composition comprising the granular inorganic filler | |
| Khait et al. | Solid-state shear pulverization of plastics: a green recycling process | |
| CN103270117B (en) | resin composition | |
| JP4680000B2 (en) | PAPER-CONTAINING RESIN COMPOSITION, MOLDED ARTICLE THEREOF, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THEM | |
| JP2011074131A (en) | Resin composition containing talc powder | |
| CA1249390A (en) | Mica flake mass and resin composition with the same incorporated therein | |
| JP2011073902A (en) | Talc powder and method for manufacturing the same | |
| JP2018104702A (en) | Resin composition | |
| EP0165662B1 (en) | Moldable polypropylene resin composition | |
| JP2778696B2 (en) | Modified thermoplastic container lid | |
| US20080004381A1 (en) | Polmer Blend of Non-Compatible Polymers | |
| JPH0240095B2 (en) | UNMOJUTENNETSUKASOSEIJUSHISOSEIBUTSU | |
| WO2018123959A1 (en) | Method for producing low crystallinity cellulose, and resin composition | |
| JP3079180B2 (en) | Talc and thermoplastic resin composition using the same | |
| EP2428597B1 (en) | All-polymer fibrillar nanocomposites and method for manufacture thereof | |
| JPH10265630A (en) | Reinforced polypropylene composition | |
| JP4536269B2 (en) | Pencil or pencil-type cosmetics using polyethylene terephthalate resin | |
| JPH06102744B2 (en) | Polypropylene composite reinforced with granular form fibrous magnesium oxysulfate | |
| JPH06248155A (en) | Propylene resin composition | |
| JPH07712B2 (en) | Inorganic filler-containing polyolefin resin composition | |
| JPS63120758A (en) | Thermoplastic resin composition | |
| JP2008075014A (en) | Paper-containing resin composition, molded product thereof, and production method | |
| JP2593902B2 (en) | Plastic sheet filled with mica powder and method for producing the same | |
| JP3810982B2 (en) | Plastic film laminated paper shredded product, method for producing the same, and synthetic resin composition containing the shredded product |