JPH0364832B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0364832B2 JPH0364832B2 JP60041292A JP4129285A JPH0364832B2 JP H0364832 B2 JPH0364832 B2 JP H0364832B2 JP 60041292 A JP60041292 A JP 60041292A JP 4129285 A JP4129285 A JP 4129285A JP H0364832 B2 JPH0364832 B2 JP H0364832B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- peeling
- sound
- magnitude
- impact
- wall
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
- G01N2291/028—Material parameters
- G01N2291/02827—Elastic parameters, strength or force
Landscapes
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
[産業上の利用分野]
本発明は、建築物の壁面に取付けられたタイル
等の添着状態を検知し、剥離部はその深さを計測
する剥離状態計測方法法に関する。[Detailed Description of the Invention] [Industrial Application Field] The present invention relates to a peeling state measuring method for detecting the adhesion state of tiles etc. attached to the wall surface of a building and measuring the depth of the peeled part. .
[従来技術]
一定の運動量で壁面を打撃して、壁面タイル等
の剥離状態を検知する打撃音式剥離検知方法は、
本出願人により既に多数提案されている。[Prior art] A striking sound-type peeling detection method that detects the peeling state of wall tiles, etc. by hitting the wall with a certain amount of momentum is as follows:
Many proposals have already been made by the applicant.
ところで、従来の打撃音式剥離検知方法は、健
全部と剥離部の打撃音スペクトルの相違のみに着
目し、打撃音の時系列から周波数領域に変換して
判定していたが、この方法では以下の欠点があつ
た。すなわち、
(1) 打撃音データを時系列から周波数領域に変換
するのに長期間を要し、剥離判定処理時間の短
縮を図る上で問題があつた。 By the way, the conventional impact sound-based peeling detection method focuses only on the difference in the impact sound spectrum between the healthy part and the peeled part, and converts the time series of the impact sound into the frequency domain to make a determination. There were some shortcomings. That is, (1) It takes a long time to convert the impact sound data from time series to frequency domain, which poses a problem in reducing the peeling determination processing time.
(2) 時系列領域から周波数領域への変換の際に、
変換誤差が生じるため、健全部を剥離部に、ま
たはその逆の誤診断をすることがあつた。(2) When converting from the time series domain to the frequency domain,
Due to conversion errors, a healthy part was sometimes misdiagnosed as a peeled part, or vice versa.
(3) 打撃音のみでは、剥離の有無の判定はできる
が、補修工法の選定などに必要な剥離部の深さ
の判定をすることはできない。(3) Although it is possible to determine the presence or absence of peeling based only on the impact sound, it is not possible to judge the depth of the peeled part, which is necessary for selecting a repair method.
[発明が解決しようとする問題点]
本発明は、従来の打撃音式剥離検知方法の前記
問題点を解消すべくなされたもので、その目的と
するところは、剥離判定処理時間の短縮化を図る
ことができ、また誤診断を実質上なくして信頼性
の向上を図ることができ、さらに補修工法の選定
等に必要な剥離部の深さの判定も行うことができ
る壁面タイル等の剥離状態計測方法を提供するに
ある。[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] The present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems of the conventional impact sound type peeling detection method, and its purpose is to shorten the peeling judgment processing time. It is also possible to improve reliability by virtually eliminating misdiagnosis, and it is also possible to determine the depth of peeling parts necessary for selecting repair methods, etc. The condition of peeling of wall tiles etc. Provides a measurement method.
[問題を解決するための手段]
一定の運動量で壁面を打撃すると、健全部の打
撃音の場合、その時系列波形の大きさはある値を
超えないこと、また剥離部の場合、壁面からの反
発力は剥離部が深くなるほど大きくなる特性があ
り、本発明はこれらの原理に基づきなされたもの
である。[Means for solving the problem] When hitting a wall with a certain amount of momentum, the magnitude of the time-series waveform should not exceed a certain value in the case of a sound from a sound part, and in the case of a peeling part, the repulsion from the wall should be There is a characteristic that the force increases as the peeled portion becomes deeper, and the present invention has been made based on these principles.
本発明によれば、一定の運動量で壁面を打撃
し、受音器でとらえた打撃音の時系列波形の大き
さと、予め求めておいて打撃音の判定基準値との
大小を比較することにより剥離部の有無の判定を
行い、また打撃ハンマに取付けた荷重検出器でと
らえた壁面からの反発力の大きさと、予め求めて
おいた反発力の判定基準値との大小を比較するこ
とにより剥離部の深さを判定する。 According to the present invention, by striking a wall surface with a constant momentum and comparing the magnitude of the time-series waveform of the striking sound captured by the sound receiver with a previously determined criterion value for the striking sound. The presence or absence of peeling is determined, and peeling is detected by comparing the magnitude of the repulsive force from the wall detected by a load detector attached to the impact hammer with a predetermined criterion value for repulsive force. Determine the depth of the part.
本明細書において、「大きさ」とは波形の振幅
のピーク値を意味し、打撃音の時系列波形の大き
さとは、その波形の振幅の最大値をいい、反発力
の大きさとは荷重検出器が受ける反発力の波形の
最大振幅を意味するものである。 In this specification, "magnitude" refers to the peak value of the amplitude of the waveform, the magnitude of the time-series waveform of the impact sound refers to the maximum value of the amplitude of the waveform, and the magnitude of the repulsive force refers to the peak value of the amplitude of the waveform. It means the maximum amplitude of the waveform of the repulsive force that the vessel receives.
[発明の作用効果]
本発明の壁面タイル等の剥離状態計測方法によ
れば、次のような優れた作用効果が得られる。[Operations and Effects of the Invention] According to the method for measuring the peeling state of wall tiles, etc. of the present invention, the following excellent effects can be obtained.
(1) 打撃音データを周波数変換する必要がなくな
るため、一回の打診に要する剥離判定時間を従
来方法に比べ約1/30(6秒→0.2秒)と大幅に
短縮することが可能となる。(1) Since there is no need to frequency convert percussion sound data, it is possible to significantly shorten the time needed to determine detachment for one percussion to approximately 1/30 (from 6 seconds to 0.2 seconds) compared to conventional methods. .
(2) 時系列領域から周波数領域への変換を行わな
いので、これに伴う変換誤差が発生しなくな
り、誤診断がなくなるので信頼性が向上する。
またデータのバラツキが小さくなるのに伴い小
さな剥離部や深い剥離部も検知できるようにな
り、検知性能が向上する。(2) Since conversion from the time series domain to the frequency domain is not performed, conversion errors associated with this do not occur, and erroneous diagnosis is eliminated, improving reliability.
Furthermore, as the data variation becomes smaller, it becomes possible to detect small peeling parts and deep peeling parts, improving detection performance.
(3) 剥離部の場合、打撃時の壁面からの反発力に
より剥離部の深さの判定ができるようになるた
め、補修工法の選定等を適切に行うことができ
る。(3) In the case of a peeled part, the depth of the peeled part can be determined based on the repulsive force from the wall surface during impact, so it is possible to appropriately select a repair method.
[実施例]
以下図面を参照して本発明の実施の態様を説明
する。[Example] Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
第1図は壁面を打撃した場合は、剥離部は健全
部よりも高い打撃音音圧を示し、その音圧分布を
示したもので、横軸は打撃音音圧を示し、縦軸は
計測された音圧の発生頻度を示し、Nは計測回数
を示す。すなわち、健全部を90回、剥離部を212
回打撃し、その打撃音合計302回の打撃音音圧に
対する頻度分布を示したものである。なお、計測
対象の試験体は、健全部か剥離部かは試験者には
あらかじめ判つており、各打撃毎の打撃音音圧が
健全部のものか、剥離部のものかは当然ながら試
験者には判つており、第1図に示す頻度分布が得
られる。 Figure 1 shows the sound pressure distribution of the peeled part when hitting a wall surface, which is higher than that of the healthy part.The horizontal axis shows the sound pressure of the impact sound, and the vertical axis shows the measured sound pressure. N indicates the frequency of occurrence of the sound pressure, and N indicates the number of measurements. In other words, 90 times for the healthy part and 212 times for the peeled part.
This figure shows the frequency distribution of the sound pressure of a total of 302 hits. Note that the tester knows in advance whether the test piece to be measured is a healthy part or a peeling part, and it is natural for the tester to know whether the sound pressure of each blow is from a healthy part or a peeling part. The frequency distribution shown in FIG. 1 is obtained.
また、第1図に示す打撃音音圧に関する判定基
準値P0は、例えば健全部の打撃音音圧の平均値
をP0AVEとし、その標準偏差をP0δとすると、例
えば下式で求められ、P0より小さい場合は健全
部、P0より大きい場合は剥離部と判定すること
ができる。 Further, the judgment reference value P 0 regarding the sound pressure of impact sound shown in Fig. 1 can be calculated by, for example, the following formula, assuming that the average value of the sound pressure of impact sound in a healthy part is P 0 AVE, and its standard deviation is P 0 δ. If it is smaller than P 0 , it can be determined that it is a healthy part, and if it is larger than P 0 , it can be determined that it is a peeled part.
P0=P0AVE+3×P0δ
第2図は、タイル裏面の剥離部(浅い剥離)と
躯体上の剥離部(深い剥離)の2種類を対象に打
撃試験を行い、打撃ハンマに取付けた荷重変換器
でとらえた壁面からの反発力が、浅い剥離の場合
は小さく、深い剥離の場合は大きいことを示した
もので、横軸は、壁面からの反発力の大きさを示
し、縦軸は、計測された反発力の発生頻度を示
し、Nは計測回数を示す。すなわち、タイル裏面
の剥離部を104回、躯体上の剥離部を108回打撃
し、その打撃時の反発力合計212回の反発力の大
きさに対する発生頻度分布を示したものである。 P 0 = P 0 AVE + 3 x P 0 δ Figure 2 shows the impact test conducted on two types of peeling areas: the peeling area on the back of the tile (shallow peeling) and the peeling area on the building frame (deep peeling), and the two types were attached to a hammer. This shows that the repulsive force from the wall captured by the load converter is small in the case of shallow separation and large in the case of deep separation.The horizontal axis shows the magnitude of the repulsive force from the wall, and the vertical axis indicates the frequency of occurrence of the measured repulsive force, and N indicates the number of measurements. That is, the exfoliated area on the back of the tile was struck 104 times, and the exfoliated area on the frame was struck 108 times, and the repulsive force at the time of the impact was a total of 212 times, and the frequency distribution is shown in relation to the magnitude of the repulsive force.
なお、第2図に示す反発力の判定基準値F0は、
例えば第2図で、タイル裏の剥離と躯体上の剥離
の反発力の平均値及び標準偏差をそれぞれ
AVE1、AVE2及びδ1、δ2とすると、例えば下式
で求められる。 In addition, the criterion value F 0 of the repulsive force shown in Fig. 2 is:
For example, in Figure 2, the average value and standard deviation of the repulsion force for peeling on the back of the tile and peeling on the frame are shown.
Assuming AVE 1 , AVE 2 and δ 1 , δ 2 , they can be determined by the following formula, for example.
F0=AVE1+δ1×(AVE2-AVE1)/(δ1+δ2)
=AVE2−δ2×(AVE2-AVE1)/(δ1+δ2)
本発明はかかる知見により発明されたものであ
り、第3図は第1図及び第2図に示す特性を利用
して、壁面タイル等の剥離の有無と、その深さを
判定するフローチヤートの一例を示し、以下この
フローチヤートにしたがつて本発明の実施例につ
き説明する。 F 0 = AVE 1 + δ 1 × (AVE 2 - AVE 1 )/(δ 1 + δ 2 ) = AVE 2 − δ 2 × (AVE 2 - AVE 1 )/(δ 1 + δ 2 ) The present invention utilizes such knowledge. Figure 3 shows an example of a flowchart for determining the presence or absence of peeling of wall tiles, etc. and its depth, using the characteristics shown in Figures 1 and 2. Examples of the present invention will be explained according to this flowchart.
まず、コンピユータに壁面タイル等の仕上材材
質に応じた打撃音音圧P0と、反発力は0に関す
る判定基準値を予め入力しておく(ステツプ
S1)。次いで実際の打撃作業を行い、打撃音音圧
P1と反発力F1を、受音器および打撃ハンマに取
付けた荷重検出器で計測する(ステツプS2)。打
撃音音圧の判定基準値P0と計測した打撃音音圧
P1の時系列波形の大きさを比較し(ステツプ
S3)、計測した打撃音音圧P1の方が打撃音音圧の
判定基準値P0よりも小さい場合(NOすなわちP1
<P0)には、健全部と判定する(ステツプS4)。
剥離がある場合(YES)は、反発力の判定基準
値F0と計測した反発力の時系列波形の大きさF1
と比較する(ステツプS5)る計測した反発力F1
の方が反発力の判定基準値F0よりも小さい場合
(NOすなわちF1<F0)には、タイル裏面の剥離
部(浅い)と判定し(ステツプS6)、そうでない
場合(YESすなわちF0<F1)には、躯体上の剥
離部(深い)と判定する(ステツプS7)。 First, input into the computer in advance the impact sound pressure P0 corresponding to the finishing material such as wall tiles, and the judgment reference value regarding 0 repulsion force (Step 1).
S1). Next, the actual striking work is performed, and the sound pressure of the striking sound is measured.
P1 and repulsion force F1 are measured with a sound receiver and a load detector attached to the impact hammer (step S2). Criterion value P0 of impact sound sound pressure and measured impact sound sound pressure
Compare the size of the P1 time series waveform (step
S3), if the measured impact sound sound pressure P1 is smaller than the impact sound sound pressure judgment reference value P0 (NO, that is, P1
<P0), it is determined to be a healthy part (step S4).
If there is separation (YES), the repulsive force judgment reference value F0 and the measured repulsive force time series waveform size F1
The measured repulsion force F1 is compared with (step S5)
is smaller than the repulsion force judgment reference value F0 (NO, that is, F1<F0), it is judged that there is a peeling part (shallow) on the back side of the tile (step S6), otherwise (YES, that is, F0<F1) In this case, it is determined that there is a peeling part (deep) on the skeleton (step S7).
以上の一連の計測判定処理が終了すると、再び
前記のステツプS2の計測に戻り、次々に別のタ
イル面の計測作業を繰返す。 When the series of measurement and determination processes described above are completed, the process returns to the measurement in step S2, and the measurement work for different tile surfaces is repeated one after another.
第4図は前記の本発明の実施例に係る計測方法
による検知システムの機器構成を示すブロツク図
で、大別して打撃音受信部1と、吊下げ部2と、
剥離状態解析部3とにより構成されている。 FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the equipment configuration of a detection system using the measurement method according to the embodiment of the present invention, which is roughly divided into a striking sound receiving section 1, a hanging section 2,
It is composed of a peeling state analysis section 3.
打撃音受信部1は、打撃ハンマ11、打撃ハン
マ11に取付けられた荷重検出器12、受音器1
3、装置を壁面Aに押付けるための壁面押付用プ
ロペラ14等により構成されている。打撃ハンマ
11により壁面Aを打撃し、その時の打撃力と打
撃音を荷重検出器12と受音器13により検出す
る。 The striking sound receiving section 1 includes a striking hammer 11, a load detector 12 attached to the striking hammer 11, and a sound receiver 1.
3. It is composed of a wall pressing propeller 14 for pressing the device against the wall A. A wall surface A is struck by a striking hammer 11, and the striking force and sound at that time are detected by a load detector 12 and a sound receiver 13.
吊下げ部2は、打撃位置検出器21、操作ボツ
クス22等より構成されている。打撃音受信部1
を移動させ、その時の打撃位置を打撃位置検出器
21で検出する。 The hanging portion 2 includes a striking position detector 21, an operation box 22, and the like. Impact sound receiving section 1
is moved, and the striking position at that time is detected by the striking position detector 21.
剥離状態解析部3は、制御用コンピユータ3
1、打撃位置計測器32、打撃信号解析器33、
キーボード34、プリンタ35、CRT36、作
図器37等より構成されている。打撃音受信部1
の荷重検出器12からの打撃力信号および受音器
13からの打撃音信号が打撃信号解析器33に入
力されて、剥離状態(深さと大きさ)の解析を行
い、また吊下げ部2の打撃位置検出器21からの
打撃位置信号が打撃位置計測器32に入力され
て、打撃位置を計測する。制御用コンピユータ3
1は剥離状態解析部全体の制御をを行うものであ
り、打撃信号解析器33から、タイル等の添着状
態と、剥離部の深さに関する計測結果を受信する
と、打撃位置計測器32からの打撃位置と共にプ
リンタ35に出力し、また作図器37により壁面
図を作成する。 The peeling state analysis section 3 is controlled by a control computer 3.
1, impact position measuring device 32, impact signal analyzer 33,
It is composed of a keyboard 34, a printer 35, a CRT 36, a plotter 37, and the like. Impact sound receiving section 1
The impact force signal from the load detector 12 and the impact sound signal from the sound receiver 13 are input to the impact signal analyzer 33 to analyze the peeling state (depth and size). A striking position signal from the striking position detector 21 is input to a striking position measuring device 32 to measure the striking position. Control computer 3
1 controls the entire peeling state analysis unit, and upon receiving the measurement results regarding the adhesion state of tiles etc. and the depth of the peeled part from the blow signal analyzer 33, the blowing position measuring unit 32 controls the blowing state analyzer 32. It is output together with the position to the printer 35, and a wall drawing is created by the plotter 37.
[まとめ]
以上の如く本発明によれば、打撃音と壁面から
の反発力により、簡単に壁面タイル等の剥離の状
態を知ることができる。[Summary] As described above, according to the present invention, the state of peeling of wall tiles, etc. can be easily known from the impact sound and the repulsive force from the wall surface.
第1図は健全部と剥離部の打撃音音圧特性の一
例を示す図、第2図は剥離位置(深さ)による反
発力特性の一例を示す図、第3図は剥離の有無と
その深さを判定する本発明を実施した計測方法を
示すフローチヤートの図、第4図は本発明を実施
した計測方法による検知システムの機器構成を示
すブロツク図である。
1……打撃音受信部、11……打撃ハンマ、1
2……荷重検出器、13……受音器、14……壁
面押付用プロペラ、2……吊下げ部、21……打
撃位置検出器、22……操作ボツクス、3……剥
離状態解析部、31……制御用コンピユータ、3
2……打撃位置計測器、33……打撃信号解析
器、34……キーボード、35……プリンタ、3
6……CRT、37……作図器。
Figure 1 is a diagram showing an example of the impact sound pressure characteristics of a healthy part and a peeled part, Figure 2 is a diagram showing an example of repulsion force characteristics depending on the peeling position (depth), and Figure 3 is a diagram showing the presence or absence of peeling and its FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a measuring method according to the present invention for determining depth, and FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the equipment configuration of a detection system using the measuring method according to the present invention. 1...Blow sound receiving section, 11...Blow hammer, 1
2... Load detector, 13... Sound receiver, 14... Wall pressing propeller, 2... Hanging section, 21... Impact position detector, 22... Operation box, 3... Peeling state analysis section , 31...control computer, 3
2...Blow position measuring device, 33...Blow signal analyzer, 34...Keyboard, 35...Printer, 3
6...CRT, 37...Drawing device.
Claims (1)
その深さを計測するため、一定の運動量で壁面を
打撃し、受音器でとらえた打撃音の時系列波形の
大きさと、予め求めておいた打撃音の判定基準値
との大小を比較することにより剥離部の有無の判
定を行い、また打撃ハンマに取付けた荷重検出器
でとらえた壁面からの反発力の大きさと、予め求
めておいた反発力の判定基準値との大小を比較す
ることにより剥離部の深さを判定することを特徴
とする壁面タイル等の剥離状態計測方法。1. In order to detect the adhesion state of wall tiles, etc. and measure the depth of the peeled part, the wall is hit with a constant momentum, and the magnitude of the time-series waveform of the impact sound captured by the sound receiver is calculated in advance. The presence or absence of a peeled part is determined by comparing the magnitude of the impact sound with the judgment reference value, and the magnitude of the repulsive force from the wall detected by a load detector attached to the impact hammer is compared with the magnitude of the repulsive force determined in advance. A method for measuring the peeling state of wall tiles, etc., characterized in that the depth of the peeled part is determined by comparing the magnitude of the repulsive force with a judgment reference value.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP60041292A JPS61201158A (en) | 1985-03-04 | 1985-03-04 | Method for measuring peeling state of the wall tile or the like |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP60041292A JPS61201158A (en) | 1985-03-04 | 1985-03-04 | Method for measuring peeling state of the wall tile or the like |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS61201158A JPS61201158A (en) | 1986-09-05 |
| JPH0364832B2 true JPH0364832B2 (en) | 1991-10-08 |
Family
ID=12604372
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP60041292A Granted JPS61201158A (en) | 1985-03-04 | 1985-03-04 | Method for measuring peeling state of the wall tile or the like |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS61201158A (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2597070B2 (en) * | 1992-06-26 | 1997-04-02 | 鹿島建設株式会社 | Portable tile peeling detector |
| JPH0689758A (en) * | 1992-09-04 | 1994-03-29 | Daiki Kogyo Kk | Connector |
-
1985
- 1985-03-04 JP JP60041292A patent/JPS61201158A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS61201158A (en) | 1986-09-05 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Rausche et al. | Pile integrity testing and analysis | |
| US6640205B2 (en) | Method and device for investigating and identifying the nature of a material | |
| KR920704116A (en) | Method and apparatus for quantity measurement of roll hardness | |
| CN100420944C (en) | Damage Detection Method of Random Vibration Structure Based on Cross-correlation Function Amplitude Vector | |
| CN101320017B (en) | Method for detecting head wave of sound wave transmission method | |
| JP5666334B2 (en) | Quality diagnosis method for concrete structures | |
| JP7188686B2 (en) | Condition evaluation device for inspection objects | |
| JP5208625B2 (en) | How to determine the quality type of a structure | |
| JP3438525B2 (en) | Hammer judgment device | |
| JPH0254903B2 (en) | ||
| JP2018200217A (en) | Rattling sound inspection device and rattling sound inspection method | |
| JPH0364832B2 (en) | ||
| JPH0980033A (en) | Judgment method for exfoliation of wall tile from building | |
| JPS6358124A (en) | Impact type structural change detector | |
| KR20030019678A (en) | A non-destructive tap test system and its test method | |
| JPH05281082A (en) | Building's soundness judging apparatus | |
| JPH09257765A (en) | Wall separation diagnostic device | |
| JPS61161449A (en) | Method for measuring peeling state of wall tile of the like | |
| JP2004144586A (en) | Integrity diagnostic method of concrete-based structure | |
| JPH0616030B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for diagnosing deterioration of article | |
| CN118671187A (en) | Structural adhesive damage detection method and system based on remote laser and improved mode | |
| JP3523352B2 (en) | Impact detection device | |
| JP2734282B2 (en) | Percussion equipment for building finishing materials | |
| JP3834660B2 (en) | Crack detection device for structures | |
| JPH0658351B2 (en) | Cavity detection device for concrete structures |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |