Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH037411B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH037411B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH037411B2
JPH037411B2 JP58071003A JP7100383A JPH037411B2 JP H037411 B2 JPH037411 B2 JP H037411B2 JP 58071003 A JP58071003 A JP 58071003A JP 7100383 A JP7100383 A JP 7100383A JP H037411 B2 JPH037411 B2 JP H037411B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
gas
exhaust gas
cleaning liquid
hole
orifice plate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP58071003A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS59196715A (en
Inventor
Shigeo Shimanaka
Hideo Sugyama
Hiroshi Sasai
Katsumi Yoshioka
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Seikow Chemical Engr and Machinery Ltd
Original Assignee
Seikow Chemical Engr and Machinery Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Seikow Chemical Engr and Machinery Ltd filed Critical Seikow Chemical Engr and Machinery Ltd
Priority to JP58071003A priority Critical patent/JPS59196715A/en
Publication of JPS59196715A publication Critical patent/JPS59196715A/en
Publication of JPH037411B2 publication Critical patent/JPH037411B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Gas Separation By Absorption (AREA)
  • Separation Of Particles Using Liquids (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

本発明は排ガス洗浄装置ならびにこの装置によ
る排ガス洗浄方法に関る。 従来、有害物質を含む排ガスは構造が比較的簡
単であり、ガス洗浄性能が安定しているというこ
とで多孔板塔が多用されてきた。 化学工学上に言う多孔板塔とは、ガスを細孔を
通して、洗浄液中に気泡として分散させ、気液接
触効果を上げようとするもので、孔径が大きくな
ると気泡径が大きくなり、気液接触面積の増大を
阻害する。又、開孔率がある限度以上を越えると
液層の破壊のために、気泡の生命期間(存在期
間)が短くなり気液接触性が低下する。このため
に、この種の多孔板としては一般に孔径3〜6
mm、開孔率5〜15%の範囲のものが用いられてい
る。 近接技術として特開昭51−105680号の除塵装置
は搭の最上段に供給した洗浄液は作動中、上段側
からダウンカマー(溢流管)を径て下段に流下
し、孔部においてはガスのみが下から上方に向つ
て流入し、孔部上で気液接触させるもので洗浄液
が孔部を伝つて流下しないように構成したもので
ある。 この除塵装置は半導体工場のエツチングその他
の製造工程からの排ガス処理によく用いられてい
るが、この排ガス中には塩化水素その他の有毒ガ
スの他にシリカSiO2のような粉塵を多量に同伴
含塵することが多い上、洗浄液として地下水を用
いることが多いことからシリカ結晶の成長や大量
の藻の発生がしばしば見られ、運転中に前記多孔
板の孔が閉塞するという点があつた。 この閉塞の対策として各多孔板の下に上向きに
スプレーノズルを配し、常時、多孔板下面を洗浄
する手段が構じられたが、多孔板裏面への付着は
防止できるが多孔板上面へのシリカや藻の堆積に
よる閉塞に対しては効果的ではなかつた。また、
多孔板塔の圧力損失は多孔板上の液層及び孔をガ
ス通過する際の抵抗に支配されるため、塔内風速
がある一定限度以上になると圧力損失が急激に増
大し、フラツデイングを生じるので、前記多孔板
のように孔経及び開孔率が小さい場合、動力損出
及び性能面より塔内風速を1〜2m/secの抑制
せざるを得ず、したがつて塔所要断面積も大きく
なり、設置スペースも広く要した。 本発明は上述の問題点に鑑み完成されたもの
で、多孔板塔式排ガス洗浄装置の多孔板の孔の目
詰りがおこらず、高塔内風速で動力損失が少な
く、除塵効果が高く、しかも設置スペースも少な
くすむ排ガス洗浄装置ならびに同装置を用いた排
ガス洗浄方法を提供しようというものである。 以下、本発明の構成を図面により説明する。 第1図は本発明排ガス洗浄装置の一実施例を示
す断面図、第2図は同装置に使用するオリフイス
板の一例を示す一部切欠平面図である。 図面において1は送風機であつて、これにより
排ガスがダクト2を通つて塔内に圧送分散されて
送入される。このダクトはガスが塔内に分散しや
すいように出口を下向にしておくことが望まし
い。3は十字孔4が多数穿設されたオリフイス板
であつて、塔内の上部と下部の間に少なくとも二
段以上配設されている。 又、5はポンプ6により圧送される洗浄液を塔
内のオリフイス板上へ流下させるパイプであり、
同パイプには適宜間隔を以つて洗浄液の送入口7
が設けられている。8はオリフイス板の十字孔を
通過したミストを除去するためのミストキヤツチ
ーで上記パイプの上方に配設されている。 尚、9はミストが除去され浄化されたガスを配
設するための排突であり、10はガス流出口、1
1はタンク仕切板12が取付けられたパイプであ
り、該パイプよりタンク13経て洗浄液は再循環
される。ここで十字孔は1個当りの孔面積は150
〜700mm、オリフイス板に対する開孔率が20〜40
%であることが必要で、オリフイス板の段間隔は
150〜300mmであり、これらの限定は次の理由によ
る。 まず、オリフイス板の孔形状を丸形状ではなく
十字形状とした理由は丸形孔のように整流的なガ
スの流れではなく、形状に基づくレイノズル数の
増大による乱流的なガスの流れ及び周長が長くと
れることによる気液接触面積の増大により気液接
触がきわめて効果的におこなわれることと共に丸
形孔くらべて液ガスの乱れが著しくなることから
孔周辺が強く洗い流されるため、粉塵の付着や反
応生成物の成長を防ぐことができ、孔を閉塞させ
ることなく運転が維持できるからである。 次に十字孔の1個当りの孔面積を150〜700mm2
した理由は孔面積が150mm2以下であると液流下が
少なくなり、フラツデイングが生じ、安定した運
転がきなくなり、また700mm2以上であると、オリ
フイス板上に液が保持されず、気液接触機能が保
たれなくなるからである。 また、オリフイス板に対する開孔率を20〜40%
とした理由はガス1m2に対し1の洗浄液を流し
有効ガス速度を2.5m/secとし、孔面積を500mm2
の条件に運転した場合、開孔率が20%以下になる
と、大巾に圧力損失が増加し、また、40%以上で
はオリフイス板上に洗浄液を保持できなくなるか
らである。 更にオリフイス板の段間隔を150〜300mmにする
理由は有効ガス速度を2.5m/secとしガス1m3
対し1の洗浄液を流し開孔率を30%とし、孔面
積を500m2とした条件にて運転した場合、段間隔
を150mm以下にした時は圧力損失が大巾に増加し、
300mm以上では洗浄効率が大巾に低下するため実
用上好ましくないからである。ところで本発明に
おいて有効ガス速度とは装置内に十字孔を有する
オリフイス板を配置する場合、本体内部にオリフ
イス板を支持するための補助板としてリング状受
を取り付けるため、このリング状受部分ではガス
が通過せずリング状受の内側のオリフイス板の全
面積を通過するガス速度を意味し、この有効ガス
速度が圧力損失や洗浄効率に影響を与える。 以上述べた通り構成される排ガス洗浄装置は塔
体上部より有効ガス速度2〜3m/secで排ガス
を送入し、塔体上部より排ガス1m2に対し0.5〜
1.5の割合で供給し、前記オリフイス板上で気
液接触させて排ガス洗浄をおこなう。 ここで有効ガス速度2〜3m/secで排ガスを
送入する理由はガス1m2に対し1の洗浄液を流
し、孔面積を500mm2とし、開孔率30%とした場合、
有効ガス速度が2m/sec以下では液流下が著し
くなりオリフイス板に洗浄液を保持できず、洗浄
効率が悪く、3m/sec以上では液を同伴上昇さ
せフラツデイングを生じ洗浄液がオリフイス板上
に多量に滞留するため圧力損失が増加するためで
ある。 また、排ガス1m2に対し0.5〜1.5の割合で洗
浄液を供給する理由は0.5以下であればオリフ
イス板上洗浄液の絶対保持量が少なくなり気液接
触が期待できず1.5以上であれば絶体保持量が
多くなりすぎて流下よりもオリフイス板上に滞留
液が増加する現象を生じるからである。 このように本発明排ガス洗浄装置を所定条件下
で用いると、塔体上部から供給された洗浄液はオ
リフイス板の表面上に保持されるが十字孔を伝つ
て流下するときに、塔体下部より送入されオリフ
イス板の十字孔通過時に10m/sec前後の超乱流
状態となる排ガスと接触し、激しい撹乱、すなな
わち、ベンチユリースクラバーに似た原理により
洗浄液は分散される。分散された洗浄液の一部オ
リフイス板上で排ガスの上昇気流に同伴上昇し混
流状態で激しく気液接触が行なわれる。他の一部
は孔周囲から液滴として下段に落下する。この場
合、排ガスに含まれる微粒粉塵、たとえばSiO2
のごときが混在していても凝集する前に洗浄液に
捕捉され洗浄液とともに流下し、塔底部に集積さ
れることになる。 次に本発明の実施例らびに比較例について説明
する。 実施例 排ガス洗浄装置の塔体本体の外径はφ600丸で
十字孔を設けたオリフイス板の開孔率30%とし、
孔面積(孔1ケ当り)500mm、オリフイス板の段
間隔200mmで配置し、下表に掲げた種類のガス1
m2に対し、同じく下表に掲げた種類の洗浄液を
1.0の割合で塔内に供給し、前記ガスを有効ガ
ス速度2.5m/secで流した場合、下表に示す結果
が得られた。
The present invention relates to an exhaust gas cleaning device and an exhaust gas cleaning method using this device. Conventionally, perforated plate towers have been widely used to treat exhaust gas containing harmful substances because of their relatively simple structure and stable gas cleaning performance. In chemical engineering terms, a perforated plate column is a device that aims to increase the gas-liquid contact effect by dispersing gas as bubbles in the cleaning liquid through fine pores.The larger the pore size, the larger the bubble diameter, which increases the gas-liquid contact effect. It inhibits the increase in area. Furthermore, when the porosity exceeds a certain limit, the life period (existence period) of the bubbles becomes short due to destruction of the liquid layer, and the gas-liquid contact property decreases. For this reason, this type of perforated plate generally has a hole diameter of 3 to 6.
mm, with a porosity in the range of 5 to 15%. As a related technology, in the dust removal device of JP-A No. 51-105680, the cleaning liquid supplied to the top of the tower flows down from the upper stage through a downcomer (overflow pipe) to the lower stage during operation, and only gas is produced in the hole. The cleaning liquid flows upward from the bottom and contacts the air and liquid above the holes, so that the cleaning liquid does not flow down through the holes. This dust removal equipment is often used to treat exhaust gas from etching and other manufacturing processes in semiconductor factories, but this exhaust gas contains a large amount of dust such as silica SiO 2 in addition to hydrogen chloride and other toxic gases. Not only is there a lot of dust, but because groundwater is often used as a cleaning solution, the growth of silica crystals and the growth of large amounts of algae are often observed, and the pores of the perforated plate become clogged during operation. As a countermeasure against this blockage, a spray nozzle was placed under each perforated plate facing upward to constantly clean the bottom surface of the perforated plate. However, although it was possible to prevent adhesion to the back side of the perforated plate, it was possible to avoid adhesion to the top surface of the perforated plate. It was not effective against blockages caused by silica and algae deposits. Also,
The pressure loss in a perforated plate tower is controlled by the liquid layer on the perforated plate and the resistance when gas passes through the pores, so when the wind speed inside the tower exceeds a certain limit, the pressure loss increases rapidly, causing flattening. If the hole diameter and porosity are small, such as the above-mentioned perforated plate, the wind speed inside the tower must be suppressed to 1 to 2 m/sec due to power loss and performance, and therefore the required cross-sectional area of the tower is also large. Therefore, a large installation space was required. The present invention was completed in view of the above-mentioned problems, and has the following features: does not cause clogging of the holes in the perforated plate of a perforated plate tower type exhaust gas cleaning device, has low power loss at high wind speeds in the tower, and has a high dust removal effect. The objective is to provide an exhaust gas cleaning device that requires less installation space and an exhaust gas cleaning method using the device. Hereinafter, the configuration of the present invention will be explained with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a sectional view showing an embodiment of the exhaust gas cleaning device of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a partially cutaway plan view showing an example of an orifice plate used in the device. In the drawings, reference numeral 1 denotes a blower by which exhaust gas is forced and dispersed into the tower through a duct 2. It is desirable that the outlet of this duct faces downward so that the gas can be easily dispersed within the column. Reference numeral 3 denotes an orifice plate having a large number of cross holes 4, which are arranged in at least two stages between the upper and lower parts of the tower. Further, 5 is a pipe that allows the cleaning liquid pumped by the pump 6 to flow down onto the orifice plate in the column.
The same pipe has cleaning liquid inlets 7 at appropriate intervals.
is provided. Reference numeral 8 denotes a mist catchy for removing the mist that has passed through the cross hole of the orifice plate, and is disposed above the pipe. In addition, 9 is an exhaust hole for arranging purified gas from which mist has been removed, 10 is a gas outlet, and 1
Reference numeral 1 denotes a pipe to which a tank partition plate 12 is attached, from which the cleaning liquid is recirculated via a tank 13. Here, the hole area of each cross hole is 150
~700mm, open area ratio for orifice plate is 20~40
%, and the step spacing of the orifice plate is
150 to 300 mm, and these limitations are due to the following reasons. First of all, the reason why the hole shape of the orifice plate is made cross-shaped instead of round is that the gas flow is not rectified like a round hole, but the turbulent gas flow due to the increase in the number of Ray nozzles based on the shape. The longer length increases the gas-liquid contact area, making gas-liquid contact extremely effective, and the turbulence of liquid gas becomes more pronounced compared to round holes, so the area around the hole is strongly washed away, reducing the adhesion of dust. This is because it is possible to prevent the growth of reaction products and to maintain operation without clogging the pores. Next, the reason why the hole area per cross hole is set to 150 to 700 mm2 is that if the hole area is less than 150 mm2 , the flow of liquid will decrease, causing flattening, and stable operation will not be possible. If so, the liquid will not be retained on the orifice plate and the gas-liquid contact function will not be maintained. In addition, the opening rate for the orifice plate is 20 to 40%.
The reason for this is that 1 part of the cleaning liquid is flowed for 1 m2 of gas, the effective gas velocity is 2.5 m/sec, and the hole area is 500 mm2 .
When operating under these conditions, if the open area ratio is less than 20%, the pressure loss will increase significantly, and if it is more than 40%, it will not be possible to hold the cleaning liquid on the orifice plate. Furthermore, the reason why the orifice plate step interval is set to 150 to 300 mm is that the effective gas velocity is 2.5 m/sec, 1 part cleaning solution is poured for 1 m3 of gas, the pore area is 30%, and the hole area is 500 m2 . If the stage interval is set to 150 mm or less, the pressure loss will increase significantly.
This is because if it is 300 mm or more, the cleaning efficiency will be greatly reduced, which is not practical. By the way, in the present invention, the effective gas velocity means that when an orifice plate with a cross hole is disposed in the device, a ring-shaped receiver is attached as an auxiliary plate to support the orifice plate inside the main body, so the gas velocity in this ring-shaped receiver part is refers to the gas velocity that passes through the entire area of the orifice plate inside the ring without passing through, and this effective gas velocity affects pressure loss and cleaning efficiency. The exhaust gas cleaning device configured as described above feeds exhaust gas from the upper part of the tower body at an effective gas velocity of 2 to 3 m/sec, and the rate of exhaust gas is 0.5 to 1 m2 per m2 of exhaust gas from the upper part of the tower body.
The gas is supplied at a ratio of 1.5%, and the gas is brought into gas-liquid contact on the orifice plate to clean the exhaust gas. Here, the reason why the exhaust gas is introduced at an effective gas velocity of 2 to 3 m/sec is that if 1 part cleaning liquid is poured for 1 m 2 of gas, the pore area is 500 mm 2 , and the porosity is 30%,
If the effective gas velocity is less than 2 m/sec, the liquid flow will drop significantly and the cleaning liquid cannot be retained on the orifice plate, resulting in poor cleaning efficiency. If the effective gas velocity is more than 3 m/sec, the liquid will rise along with it, causing flattening and a large amount of cleaning liquid will remain on the orifice plate. This is because pressure loss increases. Also, the reason why cleaning liquid is supplied at a ratio of 0.5 to 1.5 to 1 m 2 of exhaust gas is that if it is less than 0.5, the absolute amount of cleaning liquid retained on the orifice plate will be small and gas-liquid contact cannot be expected, and if it is more than 1.5, absolute retention will occur. This is because if the amount becomes too large, a phenomenon occurs in which the amount of liquid remaining on the orifice plate increases rather than flowing down. When the exhaust gas cleaning device of the present invention is used under specified conditions, the cleaning liquid supplied from the upper part of the column body is held on the surface of the orifice plate, but as it flows down through the cross hole, it is sent from the lower part of the column body. When the cleaning liquid passes through the cross hole of the orifice plate, it comes into contact with the exhaust gas, which becomes a super turbulent flow of around 10 m/sec, and is dispersed by violent turbulence, a principle similar to that of a ventilate scrubber. A portion of the dispersed cleaning liquid rises on the orifice plate along with the rising airflow of exhaust gas, and intense gas-liquid contact occurs in a mixed flow state. The other part falls from around the hole to the lower stage as droplets. In this case, fine dust contained in the exhaust gas, such as SiO 2
Even if such substances are mixed together, they will be captured by the cleaning liquid before coagulating, flow down together with the cleaning liquid, and be accumulated at the bottom of the tower. Next, examples of the present invention and comparative examples will be described. Example The outer diameter of the tower body of the exhaust gas cleaning device is φ600 round, and the orifice plate with a cross hole has a porosity of 30%.
The hole area (per hole) is 500 mm, the orifice plate is arranged with a step interval of 200 mm, and the gas type listed in the table below is 1.
m 2 , apply the same type of cleaning solution listed in the table below.
When the gas was supplied into the column at a ratio of 1.0 and the gas was allowed to flow at an effective gas velocity of 2.5 m/sec, the results shown in the table below were obtained.

【表】 上記の結果から明らかなようにHClなど有害な
ガスは処理前(入口濃度)に比べ処理後(出口濃
度)にはHClなどがきわめて効率よく洗浄除去さ
れており、本発明の排ガス洗浄効果が大きいこと
がわかる。 比較例 1 本発明排ガス洗浄装置を第1図に示すような型
(塔体本体の外径を600mmとする)とし、これに開
孔率20%、孔面積(孔1ケ当り)を314mm2とした
十字孔の穿設されたオリフイス板を2段(段間隔
200mm)配置したものを用意し、入口濃度50ppm
のガス(cl2ガスあるいはSO2ガス)を有効ガス速
度2m/secで塔内に送入し、洗浄液として5%
NaOHを用い、洗浄液/ガス比1.0/m2の条件
でガス除去効率を調べた。 また、上述装置において十字孔を設けたオリフ
イス板の代わりに、これと同開孔率、同孔面積の
丸孔(直径20mm)を設けた多孔板を用いて他は同
一条件としてガス除去効率を調べた。結果は下表
のとおりである。
[Table] As is clear from the above results, HCl and other harmful gases are very efficiently cleaned and removed after treatment (outlet concentration) compared to before treatment (inlet concentration). It can be seen that the effect is large. Comparative Example 1 The exhaust gas cleaning device of the present invention was made into the type shown in Fig. 1 (the outer diameter of the tower body is 600 mm), with a porosity of 20% and a pore area (per hole) of 314 mm 2 Orifice plate with cross holes drilled in two stages (stage interval)
200mm) with an inlet concentration of 50ppm.
of gas (Cl 2 gas or SO 2 gas) is fed into the tower at an effective gas velocity of 2 m/sec, and 5% of the cleaning liquid is
Gas removal efficiency was investigated using NaOH at a cleaning liquid/gas ratio of 1.0/m 2 . In addition, in place of the orifice plate with cross holes in the above-mentioned device, a perforated plate with round holes (diameter 20 mm) with the same porosity and the same hole area was used to evaluate the gas removal efficiency under the same conditions. Examined. The results are shown in the table below.

【表】 上記の結果から本発明装置において十字孔が設
けられたオリフイス板を用いれば、丸孔の多孔板
を用いる場合に比べてガス除去効率が優れている
ことがわかる。 比較例 2 本発明装置において開孔率30%、孔面積(孔1
ケ当り)500mm2の十字孔オリフイス板2段を用い、
ガス1m2に対し、1の洗浄液を流し、有効ガス
速度のみを0〜4m/secの範囲で変化させた場
合のオリフイス板2段の圧力損失の変化を測定し
た。比較として、上記装置において十字孔オリフ
イス板に代えて開孔率14%、孔面積7m2(孔径3
mm)の従来の溢流管を有する丸孔多孔板2段を用
いて同条件で圧力損失の変化を測定した。これら
の測定結果を第2図にグラフ化した。図において
Aは十字孔オリフイス板を用いた場合、Bは従来
の多孔板を用いた場合のそれぞれ圧力損失の変化
状態を示す。この結果から明らかなように十字孔
オリフイス板を用いた本発明装置の場合従来の多
孔板を用いた装置に比べ高風速域で圧力損失が低
い状態で運転可能、つまり、より迅速で能率的に
排ガスの洗浄除去をおこないうることが明らかで
ある。 以上のように本発明排ガス洗浄装置ならびに排
ガス洗浄方法によると、塔上部より装置内に供給
された洗浄液は塔内に水平に配置されたオリフイ
ス板に設けた十字孔より下部へ自然流下するよう
な構造にしたので、従来のこの種装置のようにダ
ウンカマー(溢流管)は必要ではなく、構造が簡
単で製作面でのメリツトが大きい。 また、オリフイス板に設けた十字孔の周囲は常
に洗浄液で洗い流されるため、孔周辺部へのガス
中の粉塵(SiO2など)の付着や反応生成物の成
長を防ぐことができ、十字孔が閉塞されることが
なく装置の運転に支障が生じることがない。また
前掲比較例1から明らかなように十字孔オリフイ
ス板を用いた場合は丸孔多孔板を用いた場合に比
べて有害ガス除去性能も高い。 更に前掲比較例2から明らかなように、塔内へ
の有効ガス速度が高くても圧力損失が少なくてす
むという特徴をもつので、少ない消費動力で安定
した高い排ガス洗浄除去効果が得られ、しかも設
置スペースも少なくて済む等の利点がある。
[Table] From the above results, it can be seen that when an orifice plate with cross holes is used in the apparatus of the present invention, gas removal efficiency is superior to when a perforated plate with round holes is used. Comparative Example 2 In the device of the present invention, the pore opening rate was 30%, the pore area (hole 1
Using two stages of 500 mm 2 cross-hole orifice plates,
A cleaning solution of 1 was flowed per 1 m 2 of gas, and changes in pressure loss across two stages of orifice plates were measured when only the effective gas velocity was varied in the range of 0 to 4 m/sec. For comparison, in the above device, instead of the cross-hole orifice plate, a hole area of 14% and a hole area of 7 m 2 (hole diameter of 3
Changes in pressure loss were measured under the same conditions using a two-stage round perforated plate with a conventional overflow tube of 1.5 mm). These measurement results are graphed in FIG. In the figure, A shows changes in pressure loss when a cross-hole orifice plate is used, and B shows changes in pressure loss when a conventional perforated plate is used. As is clear from these results, the device of the present invention using a cross-hole orifice plate can operate with lower pressure loss at high wind speeds than the device using a conventional perforated plate, which means that it can be operated more quickly and efficiently. It is clear that the exhaust gas can be cleaned and removed. As described above, according to the exhaust gas cleaning apparatus and exhaust gas cleaning method of the present invention, the cleaning liquid supplied into the apparatus from the upper part of the tower naturally flows down to the lower part through the cross hole provided in the orifice plate arranged horizontally in the tower. Because of this structure, there is no need for a downcomer (overflow pipe) as in conventional devices of this type, and the structure is simple, which has great advantages in terms of manufacturing. In addition, since the area around the cross hole provided in the orifice plate is constantly washed away with cleaning liquid, it is possible to prevent dust in the gas (such as SiO 2 ) from adhering to the area around the hole and the growth of reaction products. There will be no blockage and no hindrance to the operation of the device. Furthermore, as is clear from Comparative Example 1, when a cross-hole orifice plate is used, the harmful gas removal performance is higher than when a round-hole perforated plate is used. Furthermore, as is clear from Comparative Example 2, the pressure loss is small even when the effective gas velocity into the column is high, so a stable and high exhaust gas cleaning and removal effect can be obtained with low power consumption. It has advantages such as requiring less installation space.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は本発明排ガス洗浄装置の一実施例を示
す断面図、第2図は同装置に使用するオリフイス
板の一例を示す一部切欠平面図、第3図は本発明
装置による塔内の圧力損失の変化を示すグラフで
ある。 1……送風機、2……ダクト、3……オリフイ
ス板、4……十字孔、5……パイプ、6……ポン
プ、7……洗浄液の送入口、8……ミストキヤツ
チー、9……排突、10……ガス流出口、11…
…パイプ、12……タンク仕切板、13……タン
ク、A……十字孔オリフイス板2段を用いた場合
の塔内の圧力損失の変化を示す。B……従来の多
孔板2段を用いた場合の塔内の圧力損失の変化を
示す。
Fig. 1 is a sectional view showing an embodiment of the exhaust gas cleaning device of the present invention, Fig. 2 is a partially cutaway plan view showing an example of an orifice plate used in the device, and Fig. 3 is a cross-sectional view showing an example of the exhaust gas cleaning device of the present invention. It is a graph showing changes in pressure loss. 1...Blower, 2...Duct, 3...Orifice plate, 4...Cross hole, 5...Pipe, 6...Pump, 7...Cleaning liquid inlet, 8...Mist catchy, 9...Exhaust hole , 10... gas outlet, 11...
... Pipe, 12 ... Tank partition plate, 13 ... Tank, A ... Shows the change in pressure loss in the column when two stages of cross-hole orifice plates are used. B... shows the change in pressure loss inside the column when two conventional perforated plates are used.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 塔体の下部にガスの送入口と洗浄液の流出口
を設け、塔体の上部にガスの流出口と洗浄液の送
入口を設け、上部と下部の間に、1個当りの孔面
積を150〜700mm2とした開孔率20〜40%の十字孔を
有するオリフイス板を段間隔150〜300mmで2段以
上配設したことを特徴とする排ガス洗浄装置。 2 塔体の下部にガスの送入口と洗浄液の流出口
を設け、塔体の上部にガスの流出口と洗浄液の送
入口を設け、上部と下部の間に、1個当りの孔面
積を150〜700mm2とした開孔率20〜40%の十字孔を
有するオリフイス板を段間隔150〜300mmで2段以
上配設した排ガス洗浄装置を用い、塔体下部より
有効ガス速度2〜3m/secで排ガスを送入し、
塔体上部より排ガス1m3に対し0.5〜1.5の割合
で洗浄液を供給し、前記オリフイス板上で気液接
触させることを特徴とする排ガス洗浄装置。
[Claims] 1. A gas inlet and a cleaning liquid outlet are provided in the lower part of the column body, a gas outlet and a cleaning liquid inlet are provided in the upper part of the column body, and one inlet is provided between the upper part and the lower part. An exhaust gas cleaning device characterized in that two or more orifice plates having cross-shaped holes with a perforation area of 150 to 700 mm 2 and an aperture ratio of 20 to 40% are arranged at a stage interval of 150 to 300 mm. 2 A gas inlet and a cleaning liquid outlet are provided at the bottom of the column body, a gas outlet and a cleaning liquid inlet are provided at the top of the column body, and a hole area of 150 pores per piece is provided between the upper and lower parts. Using an exhaust gas cleaning device with two or more stages of orifice plates with cross holes with a pore size of ~700 mm2 and a porosity of 20 to 40%, with a stage interval of 150 to 300 mm, the effective gas velocity is 2 to 3 m/sec from the bottom of the tower body. Inject exhaust gas with
An exhaust gas cleaning device characterized in that a cleaning liquid is supplied from the upper part of the tower body at a ratio of 0.5 to 1.5 to 1 m 3 of exhaust gas, and brought into gas-liquid contact on the orifice plate.
JP58071003A 1983-04-21 1983-04-21 Exhaust gas scrubbing apparatus and method therefor Granted JPS59196715A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP58071003A JPS59196715A (en) 1983-04-21 1983-04-21 Exhaust gas scrubbing apparatus and method therefor

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP58071003A JPS59196715A (en) 1983-04-21 1983-04-21 Exhaust gas scrubbing apparatus and method therefor

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS59196715A JPS59196715A (en) 1984-11-08
JPH037411B2 true JPH037411B2 (en) 1991-02-01

Family

ID=13447888

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP58071003A Granted JPS59196715A (en) 1983-04-21 1983-04-21 Exhaust gas scrubbing apparatus and method therefor

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS59196715A (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS62250928A (en) * 1986-04-24 1987-10-31 Kemikooto:Kk Wet gas absorbing treatment device and method
CN107983099A (en) * 2017-12-30 2018-05-04 江苏永益环保科技有限公司 Efficient water scrubber

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS59196715A (en) 1984-11-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN1021020C (en) Method and apparatus for treatment of waste gas containing dusts and chemical contaminants
KR101172708B1 (en) wet type gas scrubber
CN205730730U (en) A kind of multitube Venturi
CN101522284A (en) Method and apparatus for improving gas/fluid contact
JPH0372913A (en) Exhaust gas treatment method and device
CN205386407U (en) Wet flue gas desulfurization's tympanic bulla tower carries out
JP2004533923A (en) Method and apparatus for separating sulfur dioxide from gas
US3745745A (en) Scrubbing apparatus and method
JP3668345B2 (en) Exhaust gas treatment apparatus and method
US3827216A (en) Scrubbing apparatus and method
KR200333254Y1 (en) Double Perforated Hole Type Sieve Plate Scrubber
JPH037411B2 (en)
CN212283495U (en) Inertia foam dust removal absorbing device
KR100837131B1 (en) Method for removing sulfuric acid mist and apparatus for removing the same
KR200307290Y1 (en) Wire Mesh Set on the Perforated Hole Type Sieve Plate Scrubber
JP2002153727A (en) Double chamber type wet flue gas desulfurization device
US4759884A (en) Apparatus for gas wet treatment
JP2002320815A (en) Gas absorption device using wet absorption method
JP4094694B2 (en) Jet bubbling reactor for flue gas desulfurization
JPH10249139A (en) Hazardous gas removal device and control method thereof
TWI918755B (en) A distribution plate for a wet scrubber
CN207980831U (en) A kind of exhaust-gas treatment oxidizing tower
RU2345819C1 (en) Acoustic scrubber
JP7805364B2 (en) Improved Wet Scrubber
JP4002080B2 (en) Sulfuric acid mist remover