Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH0422963B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH0422963B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0422963B2
JPH0422963B2 JP19998986A JP19998986A JPH0422963B2 JP H0422963 B2 JPH0422963 B2 JP H0422963B2 JP 19998986 A JP19998986 A JP 19998986A JP 19998986 A JP19998986 A JP 19998986A JP H0422963 B2 JPH0422963 B2 JP H0422963B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
gas
rate
ore
reduction
product
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP19998986A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS6357709A (en
Inventor
Kazuya Kunitomo
Yoichi Hayashi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP19998986A priority Critical patent/JPS6357709A/en
Publication of JPS6357709A publication Critical patent/JPS6357709A/en
Publication of JPH0422963B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0422963B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)

Description

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は本発明を実施する装置の一例を示す説
明図、第2図乃至第5図は本発明における制御条
件と成品還元率との関係を示す説明図である。
FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of an apparatus for implementing the present invention, and FIGS. 2 to 5 are explanatory diagrams showing the relationship between control conditions and product return rate in the present invention.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 反応塔から排出された排ガスに随伴する鉱石
を回収し、下降連結管を介して再度反応塔に装入
し反応させるようにした鉱石類の循環流動還元方
法において、成品還元率および出入口還元ガス組
成、反応塔の出入口圧力を測定し、予め定めた成
品還元率の目標値との差を補正するように成品抽
出速度、鉱石循環流量、還元ガス供給量、還元ガ
ス入口酸化度の少くとも1条件を制御することを
特徴とする鉱石類の循環流動還元方法。 ※説(産業上の利用分野) 本発明は、流動層反応装置による鉱石、特に鉄
鉱石の還元方法に関するものである。 (従来の技術) 鉄鉱石を還元して溶鉄を得る方法として、最も
普遍的な現用されているプロセスは高炉による方
法である。しかし、高炉製鉄法における安定した
操業を維持するためには、良質の塊成鉱やコーク
スを必要とし、これらを製造するためのコスト上
昇、および原料選択の制約などの問題点が指摘さ
れている。 これらの課題を解決するひとつの手段として、
鉄鉱石を、石炭の部分酸化熱により加熱・溶解し
ながら、還元する溶融還元プロセスが研究・開発
されてきた。たとえば、特願昭59−184056号にお
いて、流動層反応炉内に鉄鉱石、石炭、酸素含有
ガスを装入し、反応を進行せしめて、鉄鉱石およ
びチヤーを得、この予備還元鉱石およびチヤーな
らびに、別の系から供給される石炭とを混合、塊
成化して得られるブリケツトを、上底吹転炉型反
応器に装入し、前記予備還元鉱石を、溶融還元す
ることを特徴とする製鉄法が示されている。 また、予備還元工程については、たとえばベル
ギー特許第826521号公報において、循環流動層を
用いて、炭材を酸素との部分燃焼反応によりガス
化し、一部をチヤー化すると共に、その反応で発
生したガスによつて、鉄鉱石を還元するプロセス
が開示されている。また特開昭51−99671号公報
においては、反応器の形状を工夫して、酸化領域
における既還元鉱石粒子の再酸化を、抑制する方
法が示されている。 しかし、反応塔内のガス流速などについては、
Chemical Engineering Progress6、58−63
(1971)及び特開昭51−99671号公報では、単に粒
子の輸送という観点のみから、ガス流速が定めら
れており、反応塔に導入されたガスおよび炭素物
質と、O2との反応により生成したガスの還元に
利用される効率は、必ずしも保証されていない。 元来、流動層反応塔は、反応物質を希薄層にお
いて反応させるため、充填層型の反応塔に比較す
ると、容積当りの生産性が低く、またガスの利用
効率が悪い欠点がある。特に循環流動層は、通過
ガス量が多く、その傾向が顕著である。 このため循環型流動層においては、生産性を確
保するとともに、安定した還元率の成品を生産す
ることが重要なポイントとなり、そのための運転
方法の確立が課題となつている。 (発明が解決しようとする問題点) 本発明は、上記のような問題点を考慮し、循環
型流動層において、目標とする還元率の成品を安
定して得られる制御法を提供するものである。 (問題点を解決するための手段) 本発明は反応塔から排出された排ガスに随伴す
る鉱石を回収し、下降連結管を介して再度反応塔
に装入し反応させるようにした鉱石類の循環流動
還元方法において、成品還元率および出入口還元
ガス組成、反応塔の出入口圧力を測定し、予め定
めた成品還元率の目標値との差を補正するように
成品抽出速度、鉱石循環流量、還元ガス供給量、
還元ガス入口酸化度の少くとも1条件を制御する
ことを特徴とするものである。 以下図面により本発明について説明する。 第1図は本発明を実施するための装置の一例を
示す説明図で、反応塔2に供給された鉱石1は該
反応塔内の鉱石とともに、反応塔底部より、鉱石
1を上方に輸送するに充分な速度を持つ還元制ガ
ス7により、還元されながら上部に吹きあげら
れ、鉱石のみサイクロン3により捕集され、ホツ
パー4、下降連結管5、ニユーマチツクバルブ6
を経て再度反応塔へ戻る。 還元能力に見合つた速度で、成品10を抽出す
れば定常的に半還元鉱を取り出すことができ、一
般に、鉱石の循環質量速度は、成品の抽出質量速
度の十倍から百数十倍の範囲で運転される。反応
塔の下部及び上部において、圧力計11a,b、
ガス分析計12a,bにより、それぞれの値を檢
出し、炉内の状況を把握する。 すなわち圧力値及びその変動は、炉内において
粒子の上方への輸送が安定的に行なわれているか
どうかの指標となる。本発明者の得た研究結果に
よると、圧力計11aと圧力計11bとの圧力差
ΔPが、(1)式により求まるΔPmax以下に管理する
必要がある。 ΔPmax=0.15・ρs・L×10-4 (1) ΔPmax:許容最大差圧(Kg/cm2) ρs:鉱石密度(Kg/m3) L:反応塔高さ(m) ΔPがΔPmax以上の値を示すと、粒子層が濃厚
になり過ぎ安定的な循環流動が得られなくなり、
従つて、後述するような粒子層を濃厚にする制御
は行なえない。 また、圧力値が5秒以内に0.2Kg/cm2以上の変
動を示す時には、塔下部に粗い粒子が蓄積してい
ると推察され、ガス流速を増加させるか、粗粒を
集中的に抜き出す必要がある。 一方、ガス分析値は反応の進行状況の把握に有
効であり、特に還元反応が平衡に達しているかど
うかで、制御方法が異なるために重要である。 例えば鉄鉱石Fe2O3を、FeにCOガスもしくは
H2ガスにより還元する場合、(2)、(3)式に示す平
衡が律速段階となりうる。 FeO+CO←→Fe+CO2 (2) FeO+H2←→Fe+H2O (3) 例えば900℃での還元においては、平衡上COガ
ス還元ではCO:CO2≒7:3、H2ガス還元では
H2:H2O≒3:2以上の比にCO2もしくはH2O
を増加する反応は進行せず、還元反応は事実上終
了することが知られている。 従つて出口ガス組成が平衡に達していない場合
は、より平衡に近づく様に、また、平衡に達して
いる場合は、出口ガス利用率一定でも還元率を制
御できる手段を取らねばならない。 次に操業条件と成品還元率制御の関係について
述べる。 成品抽出速度は、反応塔内の粒子量や還元ガス
流速等に影響を与えることなく、成品の還元率を
変化させることができる。成品抽出速度と成品還
元率との関係は、種々の鉱石についての調査によ
り、第2図に示す様に、上に凸のグラフで表現で
きることがわかつた。 これから明らかな様に、比較的生産量の高い範
囲においては、有効な制御が可能であるが、低生
産率では還元率制御の効果は少なくなることに注
意を要する。 なお定常状態で操業している時には、成品の抽
出速度と鉱石の供給速度が等しく、抽出速度に合
せて供給速度も変化させる。 鉱石の循環流量は反応塔内の粒子ホールドアツ
プの制御に有効であり、循環量を増加させると、
ガスと粒子とのスリツプ速度はほぼ一定であるた
めに、空間率は減少し、反応塔内の粒子の量を増
加させることができる。 この制御は、塔上部でのガスの酸化度が平衡に
達していない時に有効であり、この範囲では第3
図に示す様に循環速度の増加により、成品の還元
率を上昇させることができる。なお、循環管をふ
やすとホールドアツプが増えるために、塔内に圧
力損失は上昇するため、(1)式に示すΔPmax以下
の圧損の時にのみ有効な制御が可能である。 還元ガス供給量の変更は、効果がやや複雑であ
るが、解析の結果次の事実が判明した。 すなわち炉頂でのガスの酸化度が平衡の組成に
達している時には、よりガス流速を上げる事によ
り、成品還元率を上昇させることができる。これ
は炉頂ガスの酸化度一定のもとで、還元ガスの絶
対量を添加させることに他ならず、還元は促進す
る。一方、炉頂でのガスの酸化度が平均に達して
いない時には、ガス流速の増加により、粒子層が
希薄になる効果が大となり、還元性は悪くなり、
かえつて成品の還元率は低下する。この様子を第
4図に示す。 還元性ガス入口の酸化度の変更は、供給ガスの
還元能力そのものの変更であり、効果は大きい
が、通常、供給ガスの酸化度は脱CO2、脱H2O設
備により、かなり下げて操業しているため、必ず
しも制御範囲は大きくない場合が多い。 しかしこれら脱CO2、脱H2Oにかかわるコスト
との関係において、有効な制御になり得るととも
に、出口ガス組成が平衡に達しても、有効な制御
手段である。効果は第5図の様になる。 以上述べたように、出入口還元ガス組成、及び
圧力の検出を行ない、それぞれの状況に応じて成
品抽出速度、鉱石循環流量、還元ガス供給量、還
元ガス入口酸化度の各条件のうち、少なくとも1
つ以上を制御することにより、成品の還元率を目
標値に近ずけることができる。 (実施例) 以上述べた制御方法を、実際の循環型鉱石還元
流動層において、適用した例について述べる。 標準的な操業条件は、目標還元率60%で、鉄分
68%の鉄鉱石10t/m2hrを炉内に装入し、入口の
ガス組成および温度がH2:15.0%、CO:82.5%、
H2O:0.5%、CO2:2.0%、900℃の条件で、
10.500Nm3/m2hrのガスを吹込んでいる。 この時の操業指標として、還元率が目標値より
も低い時に採用すべき制御手段の決定方法の例を
第1表に示す。 成品還元率は10分に1回測定し、目標値との差
が3%以上かつ20%以上その状態が継続した時に
は、第1表により必要なアクシヨンを判断し、操
業条件を変更した。変更幅は標準値の10%とし、
最高30%までの変更アクシヨンをとつた。 この結果、成品の92%が目標還元率±5%に収
まり、良好な制御性を得た。 なお第1表ではコストや生産性に比較的影響の
少ない循環速度や、ガス流速アクシヨンを、成品
抜取速度や入口ガスの酸化度変更より優先させ、
かつ基本的には1回に1つの条件のみを変更する
ものとしているが、アクシヨンの優先順位は、そ
の状況に応じて変更しても良く、また1回に変更
する条件もひとつに限るものではない。 【表】 【表】 −は比較不要を示す。
(発明の効果) 以上説明したように、本発明によれば鉱石の循
環流動還元において、成品の還元率を常に目標範
囲内の値に制御することができ、従つて常に安定
した品質の成品を得ることができる。
[Scope of Claims] 1. In a circulating flow reduction method for ores, in which ores accompanying exhaust gas discharged from a reaction tower are recovered and charged into the reaction tower again via a descending connecting pipe for reaction, The reduction rate, the reducing gas composition at the inlet and outlet, and the pressure at the inlet and outlet of the reaction tower are measured, and the product extraction rate, ore circulation flow rate, reducing gas supply amount, and reducing gas inlet are adjusted to correct the difference from the predetermined target value of the product reduction rate. 1. A method for circulating fluid reduction of ores, characterized by controlling at least one condition of degree of oxidation. *Theory (industrial application field) The present invention relates to a method for reducing ore, particularly iron ore, using a fluidized bed reactor. (Prior Art) As a method of reducing iron ore to obtain molten iron, the most widely used process is a method using a blast furnace. However, in order to maintain stable operations in the blast furnace steelmaking process, high-quality agglomerate ore and coke are required, and problems have been pointed out such as increased costs for producing these and restrictions on raw material selection. . As one means of solving these issues,
Research and development has been conducted on a smelting reduction process in which iron ore is reduced while being heated and melted using the heat of partial oxidation of coal. For example, in Japanese Patent Application No. 59-184056, iron ore, coal, and oxygen-containing gas are charged into a fluidized bed reactor, and the reaction is allowed to proceed to obtain iron ore and chir. , a steelmaking process characterized in that briquettes obtained by mixing and agglomerating coal supplied from another system are charged into a top-bottom blowing converter type reactor, and the pre-reduced ore is melted and reduced. The law is shown. Regarding the preliminary reduction process, for example, in Belgian Patent No. 826521, carbonaceous material is gasified by a partial combustion reaction with oxygen using a circulating fluidized bed, and a part of the carbon material is turned into a char. A process for reducing iron ore with gas is disclosed. Furthermore, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 51-99671 discloses a method of suppressing reoxidation of reduced ore particles in the oxidation region by devising the shape of the reactor. However, regarding the gas flow rate in the reaction tower,
Chemical Engineering Progress6, 58−63
(1971) and Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 51-99671, the gas flow rate is determined solely from the viewpoint of transporting particles, and the gas and carbon substances introduced into the reaction tower are generated by the reaction with O 2 . The efficiency with which this gas is utilized for reduction is not necessarily guaranteed. Originally, a fluidized bed reaction tower reacts reactants in a dilute bed, and therefore has the drawbacks of lower productivity per volume and poor gas utilization efficiency compared to a packed bed type reaction tower. In particular, the circulating fluidized bed has a large amount of gas passing through it, and this tendency is remarkable. For this reason, in a circulating fluidized bed, it is important to ensure productivity and produce products with a stable reduction rate, and establishing an operating method for this purpose is an issue. (Problems to be Solved by the Invention) The present invention takes the above-mentioned problems into consideration and provides a control method that can stably obtain a product with a target reduction rate in a circulating fluidized bed. be. (Means for Solving the Problems) The present invention provides ore circulation in which the ores accompanying the exhaust gas discharged from the reaction tower are recovered and charged into the reaction tower again through a descending connecting pipe for reaction. In the fluidized reduction method, the product reduction rate, the reducing gas composition at the inlet and outlet, and the pressure at the inlet and outlet of the reaction tower are measured, and the product extraction rate, ore circulation flow rate, and reducing gas are adjusted to correct the difference from the predetermined target value of the product reduction rate. supply amount,
This method is characterized by controlling at least one condition of the degree of oxidation at the inlet of the reducing gas. The present invention will be explained below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of an apparatus for implementing the present invention, in which ore 1 supplied to a reaction tower 2 is transported upward from the bottom of the reaction tower together with the ore in the reaction tower. The ore is blown upward while being reduced by the reducing gas 7 which has a sufficient velocity to reduce the ore, and only the ore is collected by the cyclone 3 and sent to the hopper 4, descending connecting pipe 5, and pneumatic valve 6.
After that, it returns to the reaction tower again. Semi-reduced ore can be extracted steadily by extracting the product 10 at a rate commensurate with the reducing capacity, and generally, the circulation mass rate of ore is in the range of 10 to 100 times the extraction mass rate of the product. It is driven by At the lower and upper parts of the reaction tower, pressure gauges 11a, b,
The gas analyzers 12a and 12b measure each value to understand the situation inside the furnace. In other words, the pressure value and its fluctuations are indicators of whether upward transport of particles is being carried out stably within the furnace. According to the research results obtained by the present inventor, the pressure difference ΔP between the pressure gauge 11a and the pressure gauge 11b needs to be controlled to be equal to or less than ΔPmax determined by equation (1). ΔPmax=0.15・ρs・L×10 -4 (1) ΔPmax: Allowable maximum differential pressure (Kg/cm 2 ) ρs: Ore density (Kg/m 3 ) L: Reaction tower height (m) When ΔP is greater than ΔPmax value, the particle layer becomes too thick and stable circulating flow cannot be obtained;
Therefore, it is not possible to control the concentration of the particle layer as described below. In addition, if the pressure value shows a fluctuation of 0.2 kg/cm 2 or more within 5 seconds, it is assumed that coarse particles have accumulated at the bottom of the column, and it is necessary to increase the gas flow rate or extract coarse particles intensively. There is. On the other hand, gas analysis values are effective in understanding the progress of the reaction, and are particularly important because the control method differs depending on whether the reduction reaction has reached equilibrium. For example, iron ore Fe 2 O 3 is converted into Fe with CO gas or
When reducing with H 2 gas, the equilibrium shown in equations (2) and (3) can be the rate-determining step. FeO+CO←→Fe+CO 2 (2) FeO+H 2 ←→Fe+H 2 O (3) For example, in reduction at 900℃, CO:CO 2 ≒7:3 in CO gas reduction, and CO:CO 2 ≒7:3 in H 2 gas reduction.
CO 2 or H 2 O in a ratio of H 2 :H 2 O≒3:2 or more
It is known that the reaction that increases the amount does not proceed and the reduction reaction virtually ends. Therefore, if the outlet gas composition has not reached equilibrium, measures must be taken to bring it closer to equilibrium, and if equilibrium has been reached, measures must be taken to control the reduction rate even if the outlet gas utilization rate is constant. Next, we will discuss the relationship between operating conditions and product return rate control. The product extraction rate can change the reduction rate of the product without affecting the amount of particles in the reaction tower, the flow rate of reducing gas, etc. Through research on various ores, it has been found that the relationship between product extraction rate and product reduction rate can be expressed by an upwardly convex graph as shown in FIG. As is clear from this, effective control is possible in a relatively high production range, but it must be noted that the effect of reduction rate control becomes less at low production rates. Note that when operating in a steady state, the extraction rate of finished products and the supply rate of ore are equal, and the supply rate is changed in accordance with the extraction rate. The circulating flow rate of ore is effective in controlling particle hold-up in the reaction tower, and increasing the circulating flow rate
Since the slip rate between gas and particles is approximately constant, the void fraction is reduced and the amount of particles in the reaction column can be increased. This control is effective when the degree of oxidation of the gas at the top of the column has not reached equilibrium;
As shown in the figure, the reduction rate of the product can be increased by increasing the circulation speed. Note that when the number of circulation pipes is increased, the hold-up increases and the pressure loss within the column increases, so effective control is possible only when the pressure loss is less than ΔPmax shown in equation (1). Although the effect of changing the reducing gas supply amount is somewhat complicated, the following facts were found as a result of analysis. That is, when the degree of oxidation of the gas at the top of the furnace has reached an equilibrium composition, the product reduction rate can be increased by increasing the gas flow rate. This is nothing but adding an absolute amount of reducing gas while the degree of oxidation of the furnace top gas is constant, and reduction is promoted. On the other hand, when the degree of oxidation of the gas at the top of the furnace has not reached the average level, the increase in gas flow rate has the effect of diluting the particle layer, resulting in poor reducibility.
On the contrary, the return rate for finished products will decrease. This situation is shown in FIG. Changing the oxidation degree of the reducing gas inlet is a change in the reducing ability of the supply gas itself, and has a large effect, but the oxidation degree of the supply gas is normally operated at a considerably lower level using CO 2 and H 2 O removal equipment. Therefore, the control range is not necessarily large in many cases. However, in relation to the cost involved in removing CO 2 and removing H 2 O, it can be an effective control, and even if the outlet gas composition reaches equilibrium, it is an effective control means. The effect is as shown in Figure 5. As described above, the reducing gas composition and pressure at the inlet and outlet are detected, and at least one of the following conditions is selected depending on each situation: product extraction rate, ore circulation flow rate, reducing gas supply amount, and degree of oxidation at the reducing gas inlet.
By controlling one or more of these factors, the return rate of the finished product can be brought closer to the target value. (Example) An example in which the control method described above is applied to an actual circulating ore reduction fluidized bed will be described. Standard operating conditions are a target reduction rate of 60% and iron content.
10t/ m2hr of 68% iron ore was charged into the furnace, and the gas composition and temperature at the inlet were H2 : 15.0%, CO: 82.5%,
Under the conditions of H2O : 0.5%, CO2 : 2.0%, 900℃,
Gas is injected at 10.500Nm 3 /m 2 hr. As an operating index at this time, Table 1 shows an example of a method for determining the control means to be adopted when the return rate is lower than the target value. The product return rate was measured once every 10 minutes, and when the difference from the target value was 3% or more and remained 20% or more, the necessary action was determined based on Table 1 and the operating conditions were changed. The change width is 10% of the standard value,
A change action of up to 30% was taken. As a result, 92% of the finished products fell within the target reduction rate of ±5%, and good controllability was obtained. In Table 1, the circulation speed and gas flow rate actions, which have relatively little impact on cost and productivity, are prioritized over changes in the product withdrawal speed and the oxidation degree of the inlet gas.
Basically, only one condition is changed at a time, but the priority of actions may be changed depending on the situation, and the number of conditions that can be changed at a time is not limited to one. do not have. [Table] [Table] - indicates that comparison is not necessary.
(Effects of the Invention) As explained above, according to the present invention, in the circulating flow reduction of ore, the reduction rate of the product can always be controlled to a value within the target range, and therefore the product of stable quality can always be produced. Obtainable.
JP19998986A 1986-08-28 1986-08-28 Circulating flow reduction method for ores Granted JPS6357709A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19998986A JPS6357709A (en) 1986-08-28 1986-08-28 Circulating flow reduction method for ores

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19998986A JPS6357709A (en) 1986-08-28 1986-08-28 Circulating flow reduction method for ores

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS6357709A JPS6357709A (en) 1988-03-12
JPH0422963B2 true JPH0422963B2 (en) 1992-04-21

Family

ID=16416940

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP19998986A Granted JPS6357709A (en) 1986-08-28 1986-08-28 Circulating flow reduction method for ores

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS6357709A (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01247520A (en) * 1988-03-29 1989-10-03 Nippon Steel Corp Outside circulating type fluidized bed furnace
US5183495A (en) * 1989-12-04 1993-02-02 Nkk Corporation Method for controlling a flow rate of gas for prereducing ore and apparatus therefor
JP2797939B2 (en) * 1993-12-22 1998-09-17 日本鋼管株式会社 A method for controlling the amount of circulating fine iron ore in the fluidized bed of a preliminary reduction furnace.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS6357709A (en) 1988-03-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4007034A (en) Method for making steel
US3936296A (en) Integrated fluidized reduction and melting of iron ores
US4054444A (en) Method for controlling the carbon content of directly reduced iron
US5618032A (en) Shaft furnace for production of iron carbide
TWI802162B (en) Operation method of reduction furnace
US5613997A (en) Metallurgical process
US5437708A (en) Iron carbide production in shaft furnace
CA1242077A (en) Process for the direct reduction of iron-oxide- containing materials
US3963483A (en) Direct reduction steelmaking process
US3303017A (en) Metal treating process
US4439233A (en) Direct reduction of iron
KR20240118115A (en) Method for reducing powdered iron ore
JPH0422963B2 (en)
US5069716A (en) Process for the production of liquid steel from iron containing metal oxides
CA2039940A1 (en) Process for the production of liquid steel from iron containing metal oxides
US3022156A (en) Process for reduction of iron orew
WO2023162389A1 (en) Method for reducing fine iron ore
US4236699A (en) Apparatus for wet-post treatment of metallized iron ore
Lubker et al. H-Iron Production by Alan Wood
Stelling Carbon monoxide reduction of iron ore
JPH06346126A (en) Metallurgic method and equipment
CA2566322C (en) Direct reduction process using a single fluidised bed
NZ551516A (en) A direct reduction process characterised by agglomeration of fine ore particles and increased retention time
JPS6357710A (en) Method and apparatus for circulating flow reduction of ores
GB2342360A (en) A method for the direct reduction of iron oxides in a shaft furnace
<