JPH0423748B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0423748B2 JPH0423748B2 JP23354884A JP23354884A JPH0423748B2 JP H0423748 B2 JPH0423748 B2 JP H0423748B2 JP 23354884 A JP23354884 A JP 23354884A JP 23354884 A JP23354884 A JP 23354884A JP H0423748 B2 JPH0423748 B2 JP H0423748B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- frequency
- impedance
- corrosion
- boundary
- thickness
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 claims description 30
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 claims description 30
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000003487 electrochemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003014 reinforcing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002847 impedance measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Electric Means (AREA)
- Measurement Of Length, Angles, Or The Like Using Electric Or Magnetic Means (AREA)
Description
〔産業上の利用分野〕
本発明はガス管や水道管などの埋設管や地下に
埋設した鋼製タンクあるいはコンクリート中の鉄
筋などの腐食状況を探知する方法に関するもので
ある。
〔従来の技術〕
従来埋設管の腐食程度の検査は地面を掘り起こ
して行なつていたが、検査に要する労力や費用が
嵩むため簡便な検知方法の開発が望まれている。
この点に関し、埋設管に近接して同材質の金
属片を埋設し、これの腐食度を電気化学的に測定
して埋設管の腐食程度を推定する方法(特開昭56
−18744号公報)や埋設配管外周に導電性のワ
イヤを予め装着してこれの電気抵抗の変化を検知
する方法(特開昭50−10695号公報)がある。ま
た埋設部の土壌の性状によつて埋設管の腐食速
度に大きな差があることから、土壌の腐食性を電
気化学的に測定して埋設管の腐食速度を推定する
方法(例えば特開昭58−208654号公報、特開昭58
−37398号公報)がある。
〔発明が解決しようとする問題点〕
しかし、上記及びの場合は、配管布設時に
検知手段を施行しなければならず、既設のもので
は適用できない難点があり、の場合には、埋設
管が腐食しやすい環境にあるかどうかの判定であ
つて腐食の程度を検知するものではない。
本発明は上記の点に鑑み開発されたもので、地
面を掘削することなく簡便に埋設管等の腐食の状
態を検知する方法を提供するものである。
〔問題点を解決するための手段〕
本発明は上記の欠点を解決するため、埋設管等
の上方地表部に設けた測定用電極と当該配管との
間に交番電気信号を供給し、各周波数における交
流インピーダンスを測定し、各周波数のインピー
ダンスの応答の特徴を区分する境界の周波数求
め、高周波側の交流インピーダンスと周波数の関
係を解析して腐食層厚さを検知することを特徴と
するものである。
〔実施例〕
埋設管の腐食は土壌との間の電気化学的反応に
起因しており、また腐食層の存在やその性状によ
り電気化学的反応が規定され、この反応の速さや
大きさなどは電気的なインピーダンスに置きかえ
て説明できる。
発明者は多くの実験を行なつた結果、埋設管の
上方地表部に設けた測定用電極と当該配管等の間
に交番電気信号を周波数を順次変化させて供給し
て、各周波数における交流インピーダンスを計測
し、これを解析しインピーダンスの絶対値と周波
数、インピーダンスの位相差と周波数、インピー
ダンスの実数成分と周波数および複素数表示など
の線図に表示すると高周波側の応答と低周波数の
応答の2つの要素に大別でき、腐食層が厚くなる
とともにインピーダンスの絶対値−周波数、イン
ピーダンスの位相差−周波数、およびインピーダ
ンスの実数成分−周波数の線図でほぼ直線に近似
しうる高周波区間が増し、複素数表示図では高周
波側要素のインピーダンスが増すことがわかつ
た。
本発明はこの現象を利用して腐食層厚さを求め
るようにしたものである。
以下本発明の実施例を第1図乃至第9図に基づ
いて説明する。
第1図において、20は建屋で、10,11は
ガスあるいは水道管等の本管から引込んだ枝配管
である。
まず、ポテンシヨスタツト14に接続された測
定用電極12を埋設管10の上方地表部に設置す
るとともに当該配管部11とポテンシヨスタツト
14を接続する。ポテンシヨスタツト14は周波
数応答解析器16と接続され、周波数応答解析器
16は演算表示装置18に接続されている。
本測定装置により測定されるインピーダンスは
測定用電極12に最も近い配管10の近傍の平均
的な値であり、測定後は順次側定用電極12を移
動させ、配管10のある区間の腐食層の有無や腐
食層の厚さを測定する。
第2図はある周波数帯域でインピーダンスを測
定し、インピーダンスの絶対値|Z|と周波数
(f)の関係を図に示したものである。
この線図でインピーダンスの絶対値|Z|が周
波数に対して直線で近似する区間と曲線の区間が
あり、この境界の周波数(境界周波数fcorrと称
する)を演算して求める。
そして演算表示装置18に記憶されている予め
実験で求めた境界周波数fcorrに対する腐食層の
平均厚さ値と比較演算し、腐食層の平均厚さを求
め表示する。
境界周波数fcorrに対する腐食層の平均厚さ値
は第6図に示す。
実際の検知作業においては、周波数応答解析器
16により高周波数(例えば100kHz)から一定
間隔で周波数を減少させつつインピーダンスを測
定し、測定されたインピーダンスの絶対値|Z|
を演算表示装置18で直前の周波数に対する絶対
値|Z|と比較し、その差が予め定められた数値
より大きいとき高周波側要素である直線に近似す
る区間が終了したと判断してそのときの周波数を
境界周波数fcorrとして測定を終了してよい。
次に別の実施例としてインピーダンスの位相と
周波数の関係から腐食層の平均厚さを求める場合
について説明する。
第3図はある周波数帯域でインピーダンスを測
定し、インピーダンスの位相差(θ)と周波数
(f)の関係を図に示したものである。この線図
で位相差が周波数に対して直線で近似する区間と
曲線の区間があり、この境界の周波数(境界周波
数fcorrθ)を演算して求める。
そして演算表示装置18に記憶されている予め
実験で求めた境界周波数fcorrθに対する腐食層の
平均厚さ値と比較演算し、腐食層の平均厚さを求
め表示する。境界周波数fcorrθに対する腐食層の
平均厚さ値は第7図に示す如きものである。
実際の検知作業においては、上記の場合と同様
に位相差を演算表示装置18で直前の周波数に対
する位相差と比較し、その差が予め定められた数
値より大きいときに直線に近似する区間の終了と
判断して境界周波数fcorrθを求める。
さらに別の実施例としてインピーダンスの実数
成分と周波数の関係から腐食層の平均厚さを求め
る場合について説明する。
第4図はある周波数帯域でインピーダンスを測
定し、インピーダンスの実数成分(R)と周波数
(f)の関係を図に示したものである。この線図
で実数成分(R)が周波数に対して直線で近似す
る区間と曲線の区間があり、この境界の周波数
(境界周波数fcorrR)を演算して求める。そして
演算表示装置18に記憶されている予め実験で求
めた境界周波数fcorrRに対する腐食層の平均厚
さ値と比較演算し、腐食層の平均厚さを求め表示
する。境界周波数fcorrRに対する腐食層の平均
厚さ値は第8図に示す如きものである。
実際の検知作業で境界周波数fcorrRを求める
要領は上記の場合と同様である。
さらに別の実施例として高周波側の要素のイン
ピーダンス差Aにより腐食層厚さを求める場合に
ついて説明する。
第5図はある周波数帯域で測定したインピーダ
ンスを複素数表示したものである。この線図にお
けるインピーダンス差Aを演算表示装置18に記
憶されている予め実験で求めたインピーダンス差
Aに対する腐食層の平均厚さ値と比較演算し腐食
層の平均厚さを求め表示する。
インピーダンス差Aに対する腐食層の平均厚さ
値は第9図に示す如きものである。
実際の検知作業においては、周波数応答解析器
16により低周波領域で3点(例えば0.1Hz、
0.05Hz、0.01Hz)と高周波数(例えば10kHz)の
周波数におけるインピーダンスを測定し、実数成
分と虚数成分に分けて演算表示装置18へデータ
を伝送させる。
演算表示装置ではまず低周波側の3点のインピ
ーダンス値を複素数表示図上で円弧に近似し、そ
の高周波側における実軸との交点のインピーダン
ス値と高周波におけるインピーダンス測定値の実
数成分との差(A)を求める。
以上説明した4方法について、実測した結果と
埋設管断面を切断測定した結果を表1に示す。
[Industrial Application Field] The present invention relates to a method for detecting corrosion of buried pipes such as gas pipes and water pipes, underground steel tanks, or reinforcing bars in concrete. [Prior Art] Conventionally, the degree of corrosion of buried pipes has been inspected by digging up the ground, but the labor and cost required for inspection are high, so there is a desire to develop a simple detection method. Regarding this point, there is a method of estimating the degree of corrosion of buried pipes by burying metal pieces of the same material close to the buried pipes and electrochemically measuring the degree of corrosion of these metal pieces (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 56
There is a method (Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 10695/1983) in which a conductive wire is attached to the outer periphery of the buried pipe in advance and changes in the electrical resistance of the wire are detected. In addition, since there is a large difference in the corrosion rate of buried pipes depending on the nature of the soil in the buried part, there are methods to estimate the corrosion rate of buried pipes by electrochemically measuring the corrosivity of the soil (for example, JP-A-58 −208654 Publication, JP-A-58
-37398 Publication). [Problems to be solved by the invention] However, in the above cases, detection means must be installed at the time of piping installation, and there is a drawback that existing ones cannot be used. This is to determine whether the environment is conducive to corrosion, and not to detect the degree of corrosion. The present invention was developed in view of the above points, and provides a method for easily detecting the state of corrosion of buried pipes, etc., without excavating the ground. [Means for Solving the Problems] In order to solve the above-mentioned drawbacks, the present invention supplies an alternating electric signal between the measurement electrode provided above the ground surface of a buried pipe, etc. and the pipe concerned, and The method is characterized by measuring the AC impedance at each frequency, determining the boundary frequency that separates the characteristics of the impedance response at each frequency, and analyzing the relationship between the AC impedance and frequency on the high frequency side to detect the corrosion layer thickness. be. [Example] Corrosion of buried pipes is caused by electrochemical reactions with the soil, and the electrochemical reactions are determined by the presence and properties of the corroded layer, and the speed and magnitude of this reaction are This can be explained by replacing it with electrical impedance. As a result of many experiments, the inventor determined that the alternating current impedance at each frequency was determined by supplying an alternating electric signal with the frequency sequentially changed between the measurement electrode installed on the ground surface above the buried pipe and the pipe concerned. If you measure this, analyze it, and display it in a diagram such as the absolute value of impedance and frequency, the phase difference of impedance and frequency, the real component of impedance and frequency, and complex number representation, you will see two responses: a high-frequency response and a low-frequency response. As the corrosion layer thickens, the number of high-frequency sections that can be approximated as a straight line in the absolute value of impedance vs. frequency, the phase difference of impedance vs. frequency, and the real component of impedance vs. frequency increases, and the complex number representation increases. The figure shows that the impedance of the high-frequency side element increases. The present invention utilizes this phenomenon to determine the thickness of the corroded layer. Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS. 1 to 9. In FIG. 1, 20 is a building, and 10 and 11 are branch pipes led from the main pipe, such as gas or water pipes. First, the measuring electrode 12 connected to the potentiostat 14 is installed on the ground above the buried pipe 10, and the piping section 11 and the potentiostat 14 are connected. The potentiostat 14 is connected to a frequency response analyzer 16, and the frequency response analyzer 16 is connected to an arithmetic display device 18. The impedance measured by this measurement device is an average value near the pipe 10 closest to the measurement electrode 12. After measurement, the side electrode 12 is sequentially moved to detect the corrosion layer in a certain section of the pipe 10. Measure the presence or absence and thickness of the corroded layer. FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship between the absolute value of impedance |Z| and frequency (f) by measuring impedance in a certain frequency band. In this diagram, there are sections where the absolute value of impedance |Z| approximates the frequency with a straight line and sections where it is a curved line, and the frequency at this boundary (referred to as the boundary frequency fcorr) is calculated and determined. Then, the average thickness of the corroded layer is calculated and compared with the average thickness value of the corroded layer corresponding to the boundary frequency fcorr, which is stored in the calculation display device 18 and determined in advance through experiments, and the average thickness of the corroded layer is determined and displayed. The average thickness values of the corroded layer with respect to the boundary frequency fcorr are shown in FIG. In actual detection work, the impedance is measured by the frequency response analyzer 16 while decreasing the frequency at regular intervals from a high frequency (for example, 100 kHz), and the absolute value of the measured impedance |Z|
is compared with the absolute value |Z| for the immediately preceding frequency on the calculation display device 18, and when the difference is larger than a predetermined value, it is determined that the section approximating the straight line, which is the high frequency side element, has ended, and the current The measurement may be terminated by setting the frequency as the boundary frequency fcorr. Next, as another example, a case will be described in which the average thickness of the corroded layer is determined from the relationship between the phase and frequency of impedance. FIG. 3 shows the relationship between impedance phase difference (θ) and frequency (f) after measuring impedance in a certain frequency band. In this diagram, there are sections where the phase difference approximates the frequency as a straight line and sections that are curved, and the frequency at this boundary (boundary frequency fcorrθ) is calculated and found. Then, the average thickness of the corroded layer is calculated and compared with the average thickness value of the corroded layer corresponding to the boundary frequency fcorrθ, which is stored in the calculation display device 18 and determined in advance through experiments, and the average thickness of the corroded layer is determined and displayed. The average thickness of the corroded layer with respect to the boundary frequency fcorrθ is as shown in FIG. In actual detection work, similarly to the above case, the phase difference is compared with the phase difference for the previous frequency on the calculation display device 18, and when the difference is larger than a predetermined value, the section approximating to a straight line ends. Then, determine the boundary frequency fcorrθ. As yet another example, a case will be described in which the average thickness of the corroded layer is determined from the relationship between the real component of impedance and frequency. FIG. 4 shows the relationship between the real component (R) of the impedance and the frequency (f) by measuring impedance in a certain frequency band. In this diagram, there are sections where the real component (R) approximates the frequency with a straight line and sections where it is a curved line, and the frequency at this boundary (boundary frequency fcorrR) is calculated and determined. Then, the average thickness of the corroded layer is calculated and compared with the average thickness value of the corroded layer corresponding to the boundary frequency fcorrR, which is stored in the calculation display device 18 and determined in advance through experiments, and the average thickness of the corroded layer is determined and displayed. The average thickness of the corroded layer with respect to the boundary frequency fcorrR is as shown in FIG. The procedure for determining the boundary frequency fcorrR in actual detection work is the same as in the above case. As yet another example, a case will be described in which the corrosion layer thickness is determined by the impedance difference A of the elements on the high frequency side. FIG. 5 shows impedance measured in a certain frequency band expressed as a complex number. The impedance difference A in this diagram is compared with the average thickness value of the corroded layer with respect to the impedance difference A, which is stored in the calculation display device 18 and determined in advance through experiments, and the average thickness of the corroded layer is calculated and displayed. The average thickness value of the corroded layer with respect to the impedance difference A is as shown in FIG. In actual detection work, the frequency response analyzer 16 uses three points in the low frequency region (for example, 0.1Hz,
0.05 Hz, 0.01 Hz) and high frequency (for example, 10 kHz), and the data is transmitted to the arithmetic display device 18 after being separated into real and imaginary components. The arithmetic display device first approximates the impedance values at three points on the low frequency side to a circular arc on a complex number display diagram, and calculates the difference between the impedance value at the intersection with the real axis on the high frequency side and the real component of the impedance measurement value at the high frequency ( Find A). Table 1 shows the actual measurement results and the results of cutting and measuring the cross section of the buried pipe for the four methods described above.
本発明は上記説明したように埋設管等の上方地
表部に設けた測定用電極と当該配管との間に交番
電気信号を供給し、各周波数における交流インピ
ーダンスを測定し、各周波数のインピーダンスの
応答の特徴を区分する境界の周波数を求め高周波
側の交流インピーダンスと周波数の関係を解析し
て腐食層厚さを検知するようにしたので、埋設管
の腐食層厚さを掘削することなく正確にかつ簡便
に測定できる。さらに本発明は埋設管に限らず地
下貯蔵タンクやコンクリート中の鉄筋などの腐食
検知も可能である。
As explained above, the present invention supplies an alternating electric signal between the measuring electrode provided above the ground surface of a buried pipe and the pipe, measures the alternating current impedance at each frequency, and responds to the impedance at each frequency. The thickness of the corroded layer can be detected by finding the boundary frequency that separates the characteristics of the pipe and analyzing the relationship between AC impedance on the high frequency side and frequency. Easy to measure. Furthermore, the present invention is capable of detecting corrosion not only in buried pipes but also in underground storage tanks, reinforcing bars in concrete, and the like.
第1図は本発明に係る埋設鋼管等の腐食層厚さ
検知方法の実施例を示す全体図、第2図乃至第5
図まではそれぞれインピーダンスの絶対値と周波
数(|Z|−f)、位相差と周波数(θ−f)、イ
ンピーダンスの実数値と周波数(R−f)、イン
ピーダンス差(A)の測定線図、第6図はインピーダ
ンスの絶対値と周波数の関係から求めた境界周波
数fcorrから腐食層の平均厚さを評価する図、第
7図は同じく位相差と周波数の関係から求めた境
界周波数fcorrθと腐食層の平均厚さの評価図、第
8図はインピーダンスの実数成分(R)と周波数
の関係から求めた境界周波数fcorrRと腐食層の
平均厚さの評価図、第9図はインピーダンス差A
と腐食層の平均厚さの評価図である。
10……配管(埋設)、11……配管、12…
…測定用電極、14……ポテンシヨスタツト、1
6……周波数応答解析器、20……建屋。
FIG. 1 is an overall view showing an embodiment of the method for detecting the thickness of a corroded layer of a buried steel pipe, etc. according to the present invention, and FIGS.
The diagrams shown are measurement diagrams of absolute value of impedance and frequency (|Z|-f), phase difference and frequency (θ-f), real value of impedance and frequency (R-f), and impedance difference (A), respectively. Figure 6 is a diagram for evaluating the average thickness of the corrosion layer from the boundary frequency fcorr determined from the relationship between the absolute value of impedance and frequency, and Figure 7 is a graph showing the boundary frequency fcorrθ and the corrosion layer similarly determined from the relationship between phase difference and frequency. Figure 8 is an evaluation diagram of the average thickness of the corrosion layer and the boundary frequency fcorrR obtained from the relationship between the real component (R) of impedance and frequency. Figure 9 is an evaluation diagram of the average thickness of the corrosion layer.
and an evaluation diagram of the average thickness of the corroded layer. 10... Piping (buried), 11... Piping, 12...
... Measuring electrode, 14 ... Potentiostat, 1
6... Frequency response analyzer, 20... Building.
Claims (1)
当該配管との間に交番電気信号を供給し、各周波
数における交流インピーダンスを測定し、各周波
数のインピーダンスの応答の特徴を区分する境界
の周波数を求め、高周波側の交流インピーダンス
と周波数の関係を解析して腐食層厚さを検知する
ことを特徴とする埋設管等の腐食検知方法。 2 測定した交流インピーダンスの絶対値と周波
数の関係からインピーダンスの応答の特徴を区分
する境界の周波数を求め腐食厚さを検知すること
を特徴とする特許請求の範囲第1項記載の埋設管
等の腐食検知方法。 3 測定した交流インピーダンスの位相差と周波
数の関係からインピーダンスの応答の特徴を区分
する境界の周波数を求め腐食厚さを検知すること
を特徴とする特許請求の範囲第1項記載の埋設管
等の腐食検知方法。 4 測定した交流インピーダンスの実数成分と周
波数の関係からインピーダンスの応答の特徴を区
分する境界の周波数を求め腐食厚さを検知するこ
とを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第1項記載の埋設
管等の腐食検知方法。 5 測定したインピーダンスを低周波側の応答と
実軸との高周波側における交点の実数成分と周波
数を無限大に外挿した実数成分との差(A値)を
求め腐食厚さを検知することを特徴とする特許請
求の範囲第1項記載の埋設管等の腐食検知方法。[Scope of Claims] 1. An alternating electric signal is supplied between a measurement electrode provided above the ground surface of a buried pipe, etc. and the piping, AC impedance at each frequency is measured, and the response of the impedance at each frequency is determined. A method for detecting corrosion in buried pipes, etc., characterized in that the thickness of the corrosion layer is detected by determining the frequency of the boundary that separates the characteristics and analyzing the relationship between AC impedance and frequency on the high frequency side. 2. The method of detecting the corrosion thickness of buried pipes, etc. as set forth in claim 1, wherein the frequency of the boundary that distinguishes the characteristics of the impedance response is determined from the relationship between the absolute value of the measured AC impedance and the frequency. Corrosion detection method. 3. The method of detecting the corrosion thickness of buried pipes, etc. according to claim 1, wherein the frequency of the boundary that distinguishes the characteristics of the impedance response is determined from the relationship between the phase difference and the frequency of the measured AC impedance, and the corrosion thickness is detected. Corrosion detection method. 4. The buried pipe, etc. according to claim 1, characterized in that the corrosion thickness is detected by determining the frequency of the boundary that separates the characteristics of the impedance response from the relationship between the real number component of the measured AC impedance and the frequency. Corrosion detection method. 5 Find the difference (A value) between the real component at the intersection of the response on the low frequency side and the real axis on the high frequency side of the measured impedance and the real component obtained by extrapolating the frequency to infinity to detect the corrosion thickness. A method for detecting corrosion of buried pipes, etc., as set forth in claim 1.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP23354884A JPS61111401A (en) | 1984-11-06 | 1984-11-06 | Method for detecting corrosion of buried pipe or the like |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP23354884A JPS61111401A (en) | 1984-11-06 | 1984-11-06 | Method for detecting corrosion of buried pipe or the like |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS61111401A JPS61111401A (en) | 1986-05-29 |
| JPH0423748B2 true JPH0423748B2 (en) | 1992-04-23 |
Family
ID=16956782
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP23354884A Granted JPS61111401A (en) | 1984-11-06 | 1984-11-06 | Method for detecting corrosion of buried pipe or the like |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS61111401A (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH0814550B2 (en) * | 1987-11-27 | 1996-02-14 | 株式会社ナカボーテック | Concrete resistivity measurement method |
| JPH03160354A (en) * | 1989-11-17 | 1991-07-10 | Nippon Steel Chem Co Ltd | Corrosion monitoring method for tank bottom plate |
| JP3328181B2 (en) * | 1998-01-14 | 2002-09-24 | ライト工業株式会社 | Non-destructive corrosion diagnostic method for tensile steel in anchors |
| JP4599203B2 (en) * | 2004-03-26 | 2010-12-15 | 大阪瓦斯株式会社 | Embedded pipe corrosion diagnosis system and buried pipe corrosion diagnosis method |
| JP4632434B2 (en) * | 2005-05-09 | 2011-02-16 | 高圧ガス保安協会 | Piping diagnostic device |
| JP2007271540A (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2007-10-18 | Tokiko Techno Kk | Corrosion estimation apparatus and corrosion estimation method |
| JP6291295B2 (en) * | 2013-12-24 | 2018-03-14 | 株式会社ベンチャー・アカデミア | Inspection method of laying pipe |
| JP2015175612A (en) * | 2014-03-13 | 2015-10-05 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Corrosion measurement method |
-
1984
- 1984-11-06 JP JP23354884A patent/JPS61111401A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS61111401A (en) | 1986-05-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP1869437B1 (en) | Method for measuring the condition of steel structures | |
| US20100039127A1 (en) | System for assessing pipeline condition | |
| CN112430817B (en) | Buried metal pipeline corrosion parameter test probe split device and test method | |
| WO2002040959A1 (en) | Device and method for acoustic diagnosis and measurement by pulse electromagnetic force | |
| JPH0423748B2 (en) | ||
| JPH0387669A (en) | Method and apparatus for monitoring safety of metal structural body | |
| JP3448191B2 (en) | Rebar break detector and rebar break detection method | |
| JP2008196947A (en) | Abnormally low ground contact point detection method and detection system for buried metal pipeline | |
| Lim et al. | Mathematical modeling for quantitative estimation of geometric effects of nearby rebar in electrical resistivity measurement | |
| JP2685358B2 (en) | Corrosion diagnosis method for reinforcing bars in concrete | |
| JP5146360B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting rust in steel structures | |
| JP3105666B2 (en) | Diagnosis method for corrosion of buried metal | |
| JP2004198410A (en) | Method for inspecting defect in coated pipe, and method for diagnosing corrosion | |
| JPH0495867A (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring coat defect area of underground buried pipe | |
| JP2535177B2 (en) | Deterioration determination method for reinforced concrete structure | |
| RU2641794C1 (en) | Method for determination of technical state of underground pipeline insulating coating | |
| KR100508877B1 (en) | method for detecting the coating defect and corrosion points of the pipelines in soil using the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy | |
| JPH09133504A (en) | Piping corrosion detection method | |
| RU2781137C1 (en) | Method for determining the integrity of pipeline protective casings at intersections with roads and railways | |
| JP2791425B2 (en) | C / S macrocell corrosion measurement method and apparatus for metal piping | |
| JPS63149549A (en) | Method for diagnosing corrosion of reinforcing bar or piping in concrete | |
| SU998584A1 (en) | Method for determining degree of protection of pipelines | |
| CN115629036B (en) | A method for evaluating the detection area of in-situ sensors for metal soil corrosion | |
| JP2532038B2 (en) | Method for flaw detection on inner surface of pipeline | |
| JPS60111949A (en) | Method for detecting coating defect of coated embedded pipe |