Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH0426439B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH0426439B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0426439B2
JPH0426439B2 JP59077313A JP7731384A JPH0426439B2 JP H0426439 B2 JPH0426439 B2 JP H0426439B2 JP 59077313 A JP59077313 A JP 59077313A JP 7731384 A JP7731384 A JP 7731384A JP H0426439 B2 JPH0426439 B2 JP H0426439B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
water
concentration
reactor
hydrogen
oxygen
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP59077313A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS60220898A (en
Inventor
Hidefumi Ibe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Ltd
Priority to JP59077313A priority Critical patent/JPS60220898A/en
Publication of JPS60220898A publication Critical patent/JPS60220898A/en
Publication of JPH0426439B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0426439B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E30/00Energy generation of nuclear origin
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E30/00Energy generation of nuclear origin
    • Y02E30/30Nuclear fission reactors

Landscapes

  • Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

〔発明の利用分野〕 本発明は、沸騰水型原子炉(以下BWRとい
う)及び新型転換炉(以下ATRという)等の原
子炉の熱により直接蒸気を発生し、タービンを駆
動して電力を発生する直接サイクル型軽水炉の水
質制御方法及び装置に関する。 〔発明の背景〕 従来のBWR一次系の構成を第1図に示す。 BWR一次系においては、高純度で中性の冷却
水が再循環ポンプ16より炉心部2に送り込ま
れ、一部は炉心部2における発熱により蒸気とな
り、主蒸気系12を経て、高圧タービン10と低
圧タービン11の駆動源となる。低圧タービン1
1には、コンデンサ9が結合しており、炉心2で
生成した蒸気は、ここで凝縮し、水となる。凝縮
水は、復水ポンプ8と復水脱塩器6を経た後、給
水ポンプ7により加圧され、加熱した後、再び圧
力容器1内に戻される。BWRにおいては、構造
材料の腐食抑制及び原子炉の核熱特性の劣化防止
のため冷却水の水質を中性とし、炉浄化系4と復
水脱塩器6で不純物を除去して純度を高く保つて
いる。冷却水中のガス成分、特に材料の腐食に大
きな影響をもたらす酸素等に対しては、我国の
BWRにおいては、原子炉の出力を上げる前に、
コンデンサ9を真空脱気運転して水中の酸素濃度
をあらかじめ数十ppb前後に低くしている。スウ
エーデンのBWRでは、同じく出力上昇以前に、
緊急炉心冷却系より窒素を吹き込み酸素濃度を低
く抑えている。このように、種々の方策を施した
結果、BWRの通常運転時の溶存酸素・水素濃度
は、それぞれ150〜250ppb、5〜10ppb前後にな
る。先に示した脱気運転時より高くなるのは、こ
れらの酸素・水素が、原子炉炉心部2で水が中性
子・ガンマ線によつて照射される結果生じる放射
線分解生成物だからである。炉心2で放射線分解
の結果生じる酸素、水素等の揮発生成分について
は大部分が主蒸気系12を経て、空気抽出器1
3、再結合器14、スタツク15等からなるオフ
ガス系に送り込まれる。炉心2で生成した分解生
成種のごくわずかの部分が液相にとどまり、前記
した濃度の酸素、水素濃度として炉外で検出され
る。BWRの温度と圧力条件(285℃、70MPa)
では、250ppbの酸素濃度は、構造材料の腐食抑
制という面から十分に低い値とされているが、近
年、材料の防食をさらに確実なものとするため
に、スウエーデン及び米国のBWRで、一次冷却
系への水素注入が実施され、注目を集めている。
水素注入は、水素を冷却水中に注入することによ
り、水の放射線分解そのものを抑制する効果があ
る。実際の例では、復水脱塩器6の下流から水素
を注入し、オフガス中及び再循環系の酸素・水素
濃度を実測することによりその効果をモニタして
いる。その結果、第2図に示す様に、酸素ガス放
出量については、大きな低減効果は見られないも
のの、再循環系の酸素濃度については比較的少な
い水素注入量で大きな低減効果があることが見出
された。 しかしながら、これらの一次冷却系のサンプリ
ング値に基づく知見には以下に示す様に、いくつ
かの点で問題がある。 () 冷却水をサンプリングし、冷却した後の手
分析による測定値は、数多くの水の放射線分解
生成物が、最終的に安定な酸素、水素になつた
結果の値であるため、サンプリング点での分解
生成物の濃度そのものは不明である。 () 炉心部で生成した、酸素、水素、過酸化水
素をはじめとする水の放射線分解生成種の濃度
は、一次系各領域における放射線量率あるい
は、炉心部からの経過時間等に対応して決ま
る。したがつて、仮りにサンプリング値が、サ
ンプリグ点での濃度を正しく与えるものであつ
てもそれから、一次系の他の領域における状況
を知ることはできない。 特に、近年は、再循環系以外の部位、例えば、
炉心上方の上昇管における酸素濃度を抑制する等
の要請もあり、一次系全体の水質を管理すること
が基本的な考え方になりつつある。しかしなが
ら、先に述べた問題点から明らかな様に、従来実
プラントで利用されてきた技術でこの様な要請に
応えることは、不可能である。そこで、発明者ら
は、こうした要請に応える手段を提供するため
に、 () 高温・高圧水用溶存酸素計 () BWR炉水の放射線分解の理論評価モデル を開発してきた。以下、上記()、()の技術
の概略を説明する。 () 高温・高圧水用溶存酸素計 第3図は高温高圧水用溶存酸素計の概略構造
図である。センサー本体18は容器17中の被
測定液28に浸漬される。被測定液28は、セ
ンサーの一端で、酸素に対して選択的な透過性
を持つテフロン膜23を介して、KClを溶かし
た内部電解液20に接している。テフロン膜の
機械的強度を保つため、膜の外側に金属性、例
えば、ステンレス鋼のフイルタ24、膜の内側
に陰極を兼ねた金の多孔板22を配してある。
内部電解液20内の一端には陽極21が配置さ
れる。耐熱構造とするために、センサー本体1
8は全てテフロン等の耐熱材料で形成し、側面
に、電解液の熱膨張を吸収するベローズ19を
設けてある。この様な構造、材料にすると、
BWR炉水条件(285℃、70MPa)での使用が
可能となる。炉水中の酸素は、テフロン膜を透
過し、金電極22上で、次の反応により環元さ
れる。 O2+2H2O+4e-→4OH- ……(1) 一方、この反応に伴い、Ag/AgCl電極上で Ag+Cl-→AgCl+e- ……(2) の反応が進行する結果、両電極間に電流が流れ
る。テフロン膜23を介して電解液20内に透
過してくる酸素の流入率は、被測定液の酸素濃
度にほぼ比例するために、電流計26で測定し
た電流値により、被測定液の酸素濃度を知るこ
とができる。 () BWR炉水の放射線分解の理論評価モデル 本手法は、BWR炉水の放射線分解生成物濃
度の時々刻々の変化を、一次冷却水の流体素片
に乗つて数値解析により求めるものである。モ
デルの内容は、この〔発明の背景〕の章末に示
した参考文献に詳しいので、ここでは、モデル
の概略と結果のみを示す。 水が、ガンマ線、中性子線等の放射線の照射
を受けると、一次生成物として次の分解生成種
が形成される。 これら一次生成物の生成率はg値(吸収エネル
ギー100eV当りの生成個数)と呼ばれ、高温水に
対しては、表1に示すような実測値が得られてい
る。
[Field of Application of the Invention] The present invention directly generates steam using the heat of a nuclear reactor such as a boiling water reactor (hereinafter referred to as BWR) or an advanced converter reactor (hereinafter referred to as ATR), and drives a turbine to generate electric power. The present invention relates to a water quality control method and device for a direct cycle light water reactor. [Background of the Invention] Figure 1 shows the configuration of a conventional BWR primary system. In the BWR primary system, high-purity, neutral cooling water is sent to the reactor core 2 from the recirculation pump 16, and part of it becomes steam due to heat generation in the reactor core 2, passes through the main steam system 12, and is connected to the high-pressure turbine 10. It serves as a driving source for the low pressure turbine 11. low pressure turbine 1
A condenser 9 is connected to the reactor core 1, and the steam generated in the reactor core 2 is condensed here and becomes water. The condensed water passes through a condensate pump 8 and a condensate demineralizer 6, is pressurized by a water supply pump 7, is heated, and is then returned to the pressure vessel 1. In a BWR, the quality of the cooling water is made neutral in order to suppress corrosion of structural materials and to prevent deterioration of the reactor's nuclear thermal properties, and the purity is increased by removing impurities in the reactor purification system 4 and condensate demineralizer 6. I'm keeping it. Gas components in cooling water, especially oxygen, which has a large effect on material corrosion, are
In BWR, before increasing the reactor output,
The condenser 9 is operated in a vacuum degassing operation to lower the oxygen concentration in the water to around several tens of ppb in advance. In Sweden's BWR, before the output increase,
Nitrogen is injected from the emergency core cooling system to keep the oxygen concentration low. As a result of taking various measures, the dissolved oxygen and hydrogen concentrations during normal operation of the BWR are approximately 150 to 250 ppb and 5 to 10 ppb, respectively. The reason why it is higher than during the degassing operation shown above is because these oxygen and hydrogen are radiolysis products produced as a result of water being irradiated with neutrons and gamma rays in the reactor core 2. Most of the volatile components such as oxygen and hydrogen generated as a result of radiolysis in the reactor core 2 pass through the main steam system 12 and are then transferred to the air extractor 1.
3, the gas is sent to an off-gas system consisting of a recombiner 14, a stack 15, etc. A very small portion of the decomposition product species generated in the reactor core 2 remains in the liquid phase and is detected outside the reactor as the oxygen and hydrogen concentrations described above. BWR temperature and pressure conditions (285℃, 70MPa)
The oxygen concentration of 250 ppb is considered to be a sufficiently low value from the perspective of inhibiting corrosion of structural materials. Hydrogen injection into the system has been carried out and is attracting attention.
Hydrogen injection has the effect of suppressing the radiolysis of water itself by injecting hydrogen into cooling water. In an actual example, hydrogen is injected from the downstream side of the condensate demineralizer 6, and its effectiveness is monitored by actually measuring the oxygen and hydrogen concentrations in the off-gas and in the recirculation system. As a result, as shown in Figure 2, although there was no significant reduction effect on the amount of oxygen gas released, it was found that a relatively small amount of hydrogen injection had a large reduction effect on the oxygen concentration in the recirculation system. Served. However, these findings based on sampling values of the primary cooling system have several problems, as described below. () The values measured by manual analysis after sampling and cooling the cooling water are the results of many radiolysis products of water eventually becoming stable oxygen and hydrogen, so it is difficult to estimate the value at the sampling point. The concentration of the decomposition products itself is unknown. () The concentration of radiolysis product species of water, including oxygen, hydrogen, and hydrogen peroxide, generated in the reactor core depends on the radiation dose rate in each region of the primary system or the elapsed time from the reactor core. It's decided. Therefore, even if the sampling value correctly gives the concentration at the sampling point, the situation in other areas of the primary system cannot be known from it. In particular, in recent years, sites other than the recirculation system, e.g.
There are also requests to suppress the oxygen concentration in the riser pipe above the core, and the basic idea is to control the water quality of the entire primary system. However, as is clear from the above-mentioned problems, it is impossible to meet such demands with the technology conventionally used in actual plants. Therefore, in order to provide a means to meet these demands, the inventors have developed () a dissolved oxygen meter for high-temperature and high-pressure water, and () a theoretical evaluation model for radiolysis of BWR reactor water. An outline of the techniques () and () above will be explained below. () Dissolved oxygen meter for high temperature and high pressure water Figure 3 is a schematic structural diagram of a dissolved oxygen meter for high temperature and high pressure water. The sensor body 18 is immersed in the liquid to be measured 28 in the container 17. The liquid to be measured 28 is in contact with an internal electrolyte 20 in which KCl is dissolved at one end of the sensor via a Teflon membrane 23 that is selectively permeable to oxygen. In order to maintain the mechanical strength of the Teflon membrane, a metal, for example, stainless steel filter 24 is placed on the outside of the membrane, and a gold porous plate 22 that also serves as a cathode is placed on the inside of the membrane.
An anode 21 is disposed at one end within the internal electrolyte 20 . In order to have a heat-resistant structure, the sensor body 1
8 are all made of a heat-resistant material such as Teflon, and a bellows 19 is provided on the side surface to absorb thermal expansion of the electrolyte. With this kind of structure and material,
It can be used under BWR reactor water conditions (285℃, 70MPa). Oxygen in the reactor water permeates through the Teflon membrane and is converted into a ring by the following reaction on the gold electrode 22. O 2 +2H 2 O+4e - →4OH - ...(1) On the other hand, as a result of this reaction, the reaction Ag+Cl - →AgCl+e - ...(2) progresses on the Ag/AgCl electrode, and as a result, a current flows between the two electrodes. flows. The inflow rate of oxygen that permeates into the electrolyte 20 through the Teflon membrane 23 is approximately proportional to the oxygen concentration of the liquid to be measured, so the current value measured by the ammeter 26 determines the oxygen concentration of the liquid to be measured. You can know. () Theoretical evaluation model for radiolysis of BWR reactor water This method determines moment-to-moment changes in the concentration of radiolysis products in BWR reactor water by numerical analysis using fluid fragments of primary cooling water. Since the content of the model is detailed in the references listed at the end of this [Background of the Invention] chapter, only an outline of the model and results will be shown here. When water is irradiated with radiation such as gamma rays and neutron rays, the following decomposition product species are formed as primary products. The production rate of these primary products is called the g value (the number of products produced per 100 eV of absorbed energy), and the actually measured values shown in Table 1 have been obtained for high temperature water.

【表】 一次生成物間の相互反応により、O2、H2O2
HO2、O2 -、HO2 -等の二次生成物が生成する。
これらの生成反応を含め、一次、二次生成物相互
には表2に示すような化学反応が進行するとされ
ている。
[Table] O 2 , H 2 O 2 ,
Secondary products such as HO 2 , O 2 - and HO 2 - are generated.
Including these production reactions, the chemical reactions shown in Table 2 are said to proceed between the primary and secondary products.

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

〔発明の目的〕[Purpose of the invention]

本発明の目的は、BWR一次系全体の簡便で高
信頼性の水質算定システムとこれに基づく水質制
御方法及び装置を提供することである。 〔発明の概要〕 本発明は、スウエーデン及び米国のBWRにお
いて為された水素注入実験及び理論評価モデルに
より見出された新しい知見に基づいている。先
ず、その内容を以下に示す。 (i) 実験から得られた知見 先ず、実効的注入水素濃度を次式によつて定
義する。 CH=GI/QC×109 ……(7) ここで、CH:実効的注入水素濃度(ppb) GI:水素注入率(g/s) QC:炉心流量(g/s) この時、BWR商用炉の酸素ガス放出率の低
減率及び再循環系中の酸素濃度は、第5図、第
6図に示すように次式によつて比較的良く実測
値と一致する値が得られる。 R=1.00exp(−0.00985CH) ……(8) CO=191.3exp(−0.0483CH) ……(9) ここで、R:酸素ガス放出率(−) CO:再循環系の酸素濃度(ppb) (ii) 理論解析モデルによる知見 理論解析モデルでは、特定のプラントについ
て、通常運転時又は水素注入時の分解生成種濃
度分布を求めることができる。しかしながら、
実際には各プラント毎、あるいは同じプラント
であつても、以下に示す様なパラメータの相違
によつて濃度分布は変わりうる。 (1) 炉心出力密度 (2) 炉心流量 (3) 給水流量 (4) エネルギー吸収率の炉心外の領域における
分布 (5) 冷却材の一次系領域における滞留時間 (6) ジエツトポンプの有無 そこで、これらのパラメータについて、現実的
に有り得る範囲で入力値を変えて解析した結果、
分解生成種の濃度相互間に数多くの線型関係が成
立つことが見出された。一例を第7図に示す。 第7図は炉心部における分解生成種間の濃度相
関を示したもので、図中の円又は三角形の印は、
各種条件における計算値を示している。図から、
条件によつて分解生成種の濃度は一定の幅で変動
するが、大部分は、相互に一定の関係を保ちなが
ら変動していることが判る。このことは、ある分
解生成種の濃度が判れば、自動的に他の分解生成
種濃度も高い確率で算定できることを意味する。
すなわち、同図Cでは、炉心の過酸化水素濃度が
判れば、同じく炉心の酸素、水素濃度も算定でき
ることになる。このような二変量の一次線型相関
の強さは、通常は相関係数rを用いて表わされ
る。第7図に示した例では、全て0.95以上であ
る。この様な相関は、BWR一次系の全ての位置
の分解生成種濃度間について求められる。これを
相関係数行列の上三角部として示したのが第8図
である。第8図では、相関係数行列の概略の様子
を示すために、要素の絶対値が0.9を越えるもの
について黒抜き(0.9以上)又は点を散布して示
してあり、各要素の縦・横に対応する位置の分解
生成種濃度間に高い相関が有り、互いに算定可能
であることを示す。 以上が本発明の基礎となる知見である。本発明
は、以上の知見に基づき、主蒸気系の酸素・水素
濃度及び再循環系の酸素濃度の測定値から、
BWR一次系全体の水質を算定し、この算定値に
より、水素注入装置の制御量を求め、BWRの水
質を制御することを骨子とする。 更に具体的には、第8図において、主蒸気系の
酸素、水素の濃度と炉心、セパレータ、ミキシン
グプレナム部の放射線分解生成種の濃度との間に
特に強い相関関係があること、及びダウンカマか
ら下部プレナム部内の放射線分解生成種の互いの
間にも強い相関関係があることに着目し、これら
の量間に成立する一次線型関係を利用して各濃度
を算定し、この算定値が目標とする濃度になるよ
うに系統への水素注入率を決めて、水質を制御す
るようにしたものである。 一方、具体的な制御量として挙げられるもの
は、 (i) 水素注入率(給水系) (ii) 再結合用酸素又は空気注入率(オフガス系) であつて、本発明によつてBWRの水質及び水素
注入装置を経済的、かつ適正に制御できる。 〔発明の実施例〕 ステンレス鋼の応力腐食割れ(SCC)を完全に
防ぐには現在、溶存酸素濃度を285℃で20〜
40ppb以下に抑制することが望ましいとされてい
る。発明者らの理論解析によれば、炉水中には、
酸素の他にも過酸化水素、O2 -なども含まれてお
り、これらの分解生成種の材料腐食への影響は、
必ずしも明らかにされておらず、今後の研究の進
展に伴つて、新たな拘束条件の付加あるいは溶存
酸素濃度の目標値の緩和がなされることが有り得
る。したがつて、制御の目標は、変わり得るが、
具体的に水質の制御方法を示すために、ここで
は、以下を仮の目標とする。 制御目標:ダウンカマ及び上昇管(セパレータ)
部における液相の酸素濃度を40ppb(9.3×
10-7mol/)、200ppb(4.64×10-6mol/)
以下にそれぞれ制御する。 先ず、以下の手順により、ダウンカマ及び上昇
管内の酸素農濃度が40ppbになつた時の主蒸気
系、再循環系の酸素濃度を算定する。 (i) 炉心部液相の酸素濃度を下記により算定す
る。 〔O2〕(上昇管)=0.94×〔O2〕(炉心) +1.04×10-7 ……(10) 例では、 208.1ppb(4.83×10-6mol/) となる。 (ii) 次に、この値から、蒸気中の酸素濃度を下記
により求める。 〔O2〕(炉心)=0.402×〔O2〕(蒸気) +1.68×10-6 ……(11) 例では、 7.1ppm(7.82×10-6mol/) となる。 (iii) 上で求めた値に主蒸気流量を掛けて、酸素の
放出率の低減率Rを求め、式(8)により、実効的
注入水素濃度CHを求める。 (iv) 一方、ダウンカマ部での酸素濃度が40ppb
(9.3×10-7mol/)になつた時の再循環系の
酸素濃度を下記により求める。 〔O2〕(ダウンカマ)=1.05×〔O2〕(再循環系) ……(12) 例では、 38ppb(8.9×10-7mol/) となる。 (v) 式(9)により、必要な実効的注入水素濃度を求
める。例では、33.5ppbとなる。 (vi) (iii)で求めたCHと上記の値を比較し、大きい
方を選び、安全係数を掛けて、これを実効的水
素濃度の目標値CHとする。 (vii) CHに炉心流量を掛けて、水素注入率GIを算
出し、水素注入装置の制御を行う。 (viii) 式(8)より、水素注入下の酸素ガス放出低減率
を求め、これに、主蒸気流量を掛けて、酸素ガ
ス体積放出率を求める。 (ix) 次式により、水素の過剰体積放出率を求め
る。 (水素の過剰体積放出率)=(水素体積注入率)
−2×(酸素ガス体積放出率)……(13) (x) 次式により、オフガス系に注入する酸素又は
空気の体積注入率を求め、安全係数を掛けて、
オフガス系への酸素注入率を決め、注入装置を
制御する。 (酸素体積注入率)=(水素の過剰体積放出率)/2 ……(14) 以上示した手順は、初期の制御量の設定法であ
つて、実際に、水素注入を開始してからの手順
は、以下による。 (i) 主蒸気中の酸素・水素濃度の実測値から、上
昇管の酸素濃度を式(10)、(11)により算定する。 (ii) 再循環系の酸素濃度の実測値から、ダウンカ
マ部での酸素法度を式(12)により算定する。 (iii) それぞれの推測値が目標値に一致するよう
に、水素注入率を増減する。 (iv) 主蒸気中の酸素・水素ガス濃度から、オフガ
ス系への酸素又は空気注入率を決める。 以上、示した例で、ダウンカマ内の濃度の算定
には、再循環系の実測値、上昇管内の濃度の算定
には主蒸気中濃度を用いたが、これは、第8図に
見られる様に、BWR一次系の放射線分解生成分
の挙動に、 (i) 主蒸気系、炉心、セパレータ、ミキシングプ
レナム、を一体とした領域、及び、 (ii) ダウンカマから、下部プレナムに至る領域の
二領域のそれぞれ内部で強い相関があるためで
ある。例では、酸素についてのみ示したが、各
領域における過酸化水素、水素他の分解生成種
濃度も同じ手順で算定できることは第8図から
明らかである。 第9図は、以上の算定制御法を実現するための
システム構成を示したもので、一次系水質算定制
御装置35には、入力信号として、蒸気中酸・水
素濃度、再循環系中の酸素濃度、水素注入率、オ
フガス酸素(空気)注入率、炉心流量、給水流
量、主蒸気流量等が必要である。これらの信号
は、抽気系29等に設けられた蒸気中成分計測装
置36、炉浄化系上流等に設けた高温高圧水用溶
存酸素計32、水素注入装置33、酸素注入装置
31、一般のプロセス計装系より、ケーブル34
により導かれる。 第10図は、算定制御装置の初期水素、酸素注
入率の設定のアルゴリズムを一般化してブロツク
図で示したもので、濃度の目標値の値や種類が異
なつても導じアルゴリズムで対応できる。 第11図は、同じく、水素注入中の制御法ブロ
ツク図を一般化して示したものである。 〔発明の効果〕 本発明は、これまで算定も実測も不可能であつ
たBWR一次系の水質の制御に初めて具体的な手
段を与えるものであり、本発明によれば、BWR
の安全性、健全性を大きく高めると共に、水素注
入によるBWRの水質改善を効率的かつ経済的に
行うことができる原子炉水質制御方法及び装置が
得られる。
An object of the present invention is to provide a simple and highly reliable water quality calculation system for the entire BWR primary system, and a water quality control method and device based thereon. [Summary of the Invention] The present invention is based on new findings discovered through hydrogen injection experiments and theoretical evaluation models conducted at BWRs in Sweden and the United States. First, the contents are shown below. (i) Knowledge obtained from experiments First, the effective injected hydrogen concentration is defined by the following equation. C H = G I /Q C ×10 9 ...(7) where, C H : Effective injection hydrogen concentration (ppb) G I : Hydrogen injection rate (g/s) Q C : Core flow rate (g/s ) At this time, the reduction rate of the oxygen gas release rate and the oxygen concentration in the recirculation system of the BWR commercial reactor are determined by the following formula, as shown in Figures 5 and 6, to values that are in relatively good agreement with the actual measured values. is obtained. R = 1.00exp (-0.00985C H ) ...(8) C O = 191.3exp (-0.0483C H ) ...(9) Here, R: Oxygen gas release rate (-) C O : Recirculation system Oxygen concentration (ppb) (ii) Findings from the theoretical analysis model The theoretical analysis model can determine the concentration distribution of decomposition product species during normal operation or hydrogen injection for a specific plant. however,
In reality, the concentration distribution can vary from plant to plant, or even within the same plant, due to differences in parameters as shown below. (1) Core power density (2) Core flow rate (3) Feed water flow rate (4) Distribution of energy absorption rate in the region outside the core (5) Residence time of coolant in the primary system region (6) Presence or absence of jet pumps As a result of analyzing the parameters by changing the input values within a realistic range,
A number of linear relationships were found to exist between the concentrations of decomposition product species. An example is shown in FIG. Figure 7 shows the concentration correlation between decomposition product species in the reactor core, and the circles or triangles in the figure are
Calculated values under various conditions are shown. From the figure,
It can be seen that the concentrations of decomposition product species vary within a certain range depending on the conditions, but for the most part they vary while maintaining a constant relationship with each other. This means that if the concentration of a certain decomposition product species is known, the concentrations of other decomposition product species can also be automatically calculated with high probability.
That is, in Figure C, if the hydrogen peroxide concentration in the core is known, the oxygen and hydrogen concentrations in the core can also be calculated. The strength of such bivariate linear linear correlation is usually expressed using a correlation coefficient r. In the example shown in FIG. 7, all values are 0.95 or more. Such a correlation is determined between the concentrations of decomposition product species at all locations in the BWR primary system. FIG. 8 shows this as the upper triangular part of the correlation coefficient matrix. In Figure 8, in order to show the outline of the correlation coefficient matrix, elements whose absolute values exceed 0.9 are shown with black outlines (0.9 or more) or scattered dots, and each element is shown vertically and horizontally. There is a high correlation between the concentrations of decomposition product species at the positions corresponding to , indicating that they can be calculated from each other. The above are the findings that form the basis of the present invention. Based on the above knowledge, the present invention is based on the measured values of oxygen and hydrogen concentration in the main steam system and oxygen concentration in the recirculation system.
The main idea is to calculate the water quality of the entire BWR primary system, use this calculated value to determine the control amount for the hydrogen injection device, and control the BWR water quality. More specifically, in Figure 8, there is a particularly strong correlation between the concentration of oxygen and hydrogen in the main steam system and the concentration of radiolysis products in the core, separator, and mixing plenum, and that Focusing on the strong correlation between the radiolyzed species in the lower plenum, we calculated each concentration using the linear relationship established between these quantities, and determined that this calculated value was the target. The water quality is controlled by determining the rate of hydrogen injection into the system to achieve the desired concentration. On the other hand, specific control variables include (i) hydrogen injection rate (water supply system), and (ii) oxygen or air injection rate for recombination (off-gas system). and hydrogen injection equipment can be controlled economically and appropriately. [Embodiment of the invention] Currently, to completely prevent stress corrosion cracking (SCC) in stainless steel, it is necessary to reduce the dissolved oxygen concentration to 20~20°C at 285°C.
It is said that it is desirable to suppress it to 40ppb or less. According to the inventors' theoretical analysis, in the reactor water,
In addition to oxygen, it also contains hydrogen peroxide, O 2 - , etc., and the effects of these decomposition products on material corrosion are as follows:
This has not necessarily been clarified, and as research progresses in the future, it is possible that new constraint conditions may be added or the target value of dissolved oxygen concentration may be relaxed. Therefore, although the control goals may vary,
In order to specifically show how to control water quality, here we set the following tentative goals. Control target: downcomer and riser (separator)
The oxygen concentration in the liquid phase at 40ppb (9.3×
10 -7 mol/), 200ppb (4.64×10 -6 mol/)
Each is controlled as follows. First, use the following procedure to calculate the oxygen concentration in the main steam system and recirculation system when the oxygen concentration in the downcomer and riser reaches 40 ppb. (i) Calculate the oxygen concentration in the liquid phase of the reactor core as follows. [O 2 ] (rise pipe) = 0.94 x [O 2 ] (core) + 1.04 x 10 -7 ... (10) In the example, it is 208.1 ppb (4.83 x 10 -6 mol/). (ii) Next, from this value, determine the oxygen concentration in the steam as follows. [O 2 ] (core) = 0.402 x [O 2 ] (steam) + 1.68 x 10 -6 ... (11) In the example, it is 7.1 ppm (7.82 x 10 -6 mol/). (iii) Multiply the value obtained above by the main steam flow rate to find the reduction rate R of the oxygen release rate, and use equation (8) to find the effective injected hydrogen concentration C H. (iv) On the other hand, the oxygen concentration in the downcomer part is 40ppb
(9.3×10 -7 mol/) Find the oxygen concentration in the recirculation system as follows. [O 2 ] (downcomer) = 1.05 x [O 2 ] (recirculation system) ... (12) In the example, it is 38 ppb (8.9 x 10 -7 mol/). (v) Calculate the required effective injection hydrogen concentration using equation (9). In the example, it is 33.5ppb. (vi) Compare the C H obtained in (iii) with the above value, choose the larger one, multiply it by the safety factor, and use this as the target value C H of the effective hydrogen concentration. (vii) Multiply C H by the core flow rate to calculate the hydrogen injection rate G I and control the hydrogen injection device. (viii) From equation (8), find the oxygen gas release reduction rate under hydrogen injection, and multiply this by the main steam flow rate to find the oxygen gas volumetric release rate. (ix) Calculate the excess volume release rate of hydrogen using the following formula. (Hydrogen excess volume release rate) = (Hydrogen volume injection rate)
−2×(oxygen gas volumetric release rate)……(13) (x) Find the volumetric injection rate of oxygen or air to be injected into the off-gas system using the following formula, multiply by the safety factor,
Decide the oxygen injection rate to the off-gas system and control the injection device. (Oxygen volume injection rate) = (Hydrogen excess volume release rate)/2 ... (14) The procedure shown above is a method for setting the initial control amount. The procedure is as follows. (i) Calculate the oxygen concentration in the riser pipe from the measured values of oxygen and hydrogen concentrations in the main steam using equations (10) and (11). (ii) From the measured value of oxygen concentration in the recirculation system, calculate the oxygen tolerance in the downcomer section using equation (12). (iii) Increase or decrease the hydrogen injection rate so that each estimated value matches the target value. (iv) Determine the oxygen or air injection rate into the off-gas system from the oxygen and hydrogen gas concentrations in the main steam. In the example shown above, the actual measurement value of the recirculation system was used to calculate the concentration in the downcomer, and the concentration in the main steam was used to calculate the concentration in the riser. In addition, the behavior of radiolysis products in the BWR primary system is divided into two regions: (i) the region that integrates the main steam system, core, separator, and mixing plenum, and (ii) the region from the downcomer to the lower plenum. This is because there is a strong correlation within each of them. In the example, only oxygen is shown, but it is clear from FIG. 8 that the concentrations of hydrogen peroxide, hydrogen, and other decomposition product species in each region can also be calculated using the same procedure. FIG. 9 shows the system configuration for realizing the above calculation control method. Concentration, hydrogen injection rate, off-gas oxygen (air) injection rate, core flow rate, feed water flow rate, main steam flow rate, etc. are required. These signals are transmitted from a steam component measuring device 36 installed in the bleed system 29, etc., a dissolved oxygen meter 32 for high-temperature and high-pressure water installed upstream of the furnace purification system, a hydrogen injection device 33, an oxygen injection device 31, and general process equipment. From the instrumentation system, cable 34
guided by. FIG. 10 is a generalized block diagram of the algorithm for setting the initial hydrogen and oxygen injection rates of the calculation control device, and even if the target concentration values and types are different, the guiding algorithm can be used. FIG. 11 similarly shows a generalized block diagram of the control method during hydrogen injection. [Effects of the Invention] The present invention provides a concrete means for the first time to control the water quality of the BWR primary system, which has hitherto been impossible to calculate or actually measure.
The present invention provides a reactor water quality control method and device that can significantly improve the safety and soundness of a BWR, and efficiently and economically improve the water quality of a BWR through hydrogen injection.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図はBWR一次系の概略構成を示す図、第
2図はスウエーデンのオスカーシヤム2号炉及び
米国のドレスデン2号炉における水素注入実験の
結果を、オフガス系への酸素、水素放出量及び再
循環系における酸素、水素濃度について示す図
(実線及び破線は、理論モデルによる解析値)、第
3図は従来の高温高圧水用溶存酸素計の概略構造
図、第4図は理論モデルによるBWR一次系の溶
存酸素濃度分布を水素注入率の関数として示す
図、第5図はBWRの水素注入下の酸素ガス放出
率の低減率を示す図、第6図は水素注入下の再循
環系の溶存酸素濃度を示す図、第7図は炉心部の
放射線分解生成種濃度相互の相関を示す図、第8
図はBWR一次系全領域の分解生成種濃度相互の
相関係数行列の上三角部の概略を示す図、第9図
は本発明のシステム構成を示す図、第10図は水
質推測制御装置の初期値設定のアルゴリズムを示
すブロツク図、第11図は同じく水素注入実施中
の制御のアルゴリズムを示すブロツク図である。 1……BWR圧力容器、2……炉心、3……再
循環系、4……炉浄化系、5……給水系、6……
復水脱塩器、7……給水ポンプ、8……復水ポン
プ、9……コンデンサ、10……高圧タービン、
11……低圧タービン、12……主蒸気配管、1
3……空気抽出器、14……酸・水素再結合装
置、15……スタツク、16……再循環ポンプ、
17……容器、18……センサ本体、19……ベ
ローズ、20……電解液(KCl溶液)、21……
銀電極、22……金電極、23……テフロン膜、
24……ステンレスフイルタ、25……注入ポン
プ、26……電流計、27……直流電源、28…
…被測定液、29……抽気系配管、31……酸素
注入装置、32……高温高圧水用溶存酸素濃度
計、33……水素注入装置、34……信号ケーブ
ル、35……BWR一次系水質算定制御装置、3
6……蒸気中濃度計測装置。
Figure 1 shows the schematic configuration of the BWR primary system, and Figure 2 shows the results of hydrogen injection experiments at the Oskarsjam No. 2 reactor in Sweden and the Dresden No. 2 reactor in the United States, showing the amount of oxygen and hydrogen released into the off-gas system, and the amount of hydrogen released into the off-gas system. Diagram showing oxygen and hydrogen concentrations in the circulation system (solid lines and broken lines are analytical values based on a theoretical model), Figure 3 is a schematic structural diagram of a conventional dissolved oxygen meter for high-temperature, high-pressure water, and Figure 4 is a primary BWR based on a theoretical model. A diagram showing the dissolved oxygen concentration distribution of the system as a function of hydrogen injection rate. Figure 5 shows the reduction rate of oxygen gas release rate under hydrogen injection in BWR. Figure 6 shows the dissolved oxygen concentration distribution in the recirculation system under hydrogen injection. Figure 7 shows the oxygen concentration; Figure 7 shows the correlation between the concentrations of radiolysis product species in the core; Figure 8
The figure shows an outline of the upper triangular part of the correlation coefficient matrix between decomposition product species concentrations in the entire area of the BWR primary system, Fig. 9 shows the system configuration of the present invention, and Fig. 10 shows the water quality estimation control device. FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing an algorithm for initial value setting, and FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing an algorithm for control during hydrogen injection. 1...BWR pressure vessel, 2...core, 3...recirculation system, 4...reactor purification system, 5...water supply system, 6...
Condensate demineralizer, 7...Water pump, 8...Condensate pump, 9...Condenser, 10...High pressure turbine,
11...Low pressure turbine, 12...Main steam piping, 1
3... Air extractor, 14... Acid/hydrogen recombination device, 15... Stack, 16... Recirculation pump,
17... Container, 18... Sensor body, 19... Bellows, 20... Electrolyte (KCl solution), 21...
Silver electrode, 22... Gold electrode, 23... Teflon membrane,
24... Stainless steel filter, 25... Infusion pump, 26... Ammeter, 27... DC power supply, 28...
...Liquid to be measured, 29...Breaking system piping, 31...Oxygen injection device, 32...Dissolved oxygen concentration meter for high temperature and high pressure water, 33...Hydrogen injection device, 34...Signal cable, 35...BWR primary system Water quality calculation control device, 3
6... Concentration measurement device in vapor.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 原子炉の一次冷却系に水素を注入して炉水の
水質を制御する原子炉の水質制御方法において、 前記原子炉で発生する主蒸気中の酸素濃度
X1及び水素濃度X2の少なくとも一方から、式
Y1=aX1(又はX2)+b(abは定数)によつて、
炉心から下流で且つ給水合流部上流の範囲の水
中の水の分解生成物の濃度Y1を算定し、 前記原子炉に冷却水を供給する再循環系の水
中の酸素濃度X3から上記以外の領域、即ち給
水合流部下流で且つ炉心入口上流の範囲の炉水
中の水の分解生成物の濃度Y2を、式Y2=cX3
+d(cdは定数)によつて算定し、 これらの算定値Y1、Y2が目標範囲に合致す
るように一次冷却系への水素注入率を決めるこ
とを特徴とする原子炉水質制御方法。 2 原子炉の一次冷却系に水素を圧入する水素注
入装置を有し、水素の注入率を変えて炉水の水質
を制御する原子炉の水質制御装置において、 前記原子炉で発生する主蒸気系及び該原子炉
に冷却水を供給する再循環系のそれぞれの酸素
濃度を、酸素に対して選択的な透過膜を介して
内部に電解液を有する耐熱センサによつて計測
する手段と、 前記主蒸気系の酸素濃度に基づいて、炉心、
セパレータ及びミキシングプレナムからなる領
域の放射線分解生成種の濃度を算定するととも
に、前記再循環系の酸素濃度に基づいて、ダウ
ンカマから下部プレナムに至る領域の放射線分
解生成種の濃度を算定する手段と、 前記主蒸気系及び再循環系における前記放射
線分解生成種の濃度の算定値が、目標濃度とな
るように前記水素注入装置を調節する一次系水
質算定制御手段と、 を備えたことを特徴とする原子炉水質制御装置。
[Scope of Claims] 1. A water quality control method for a nuclear reactor in which the water quality of the reactor water is controlled by injecting hydrogen into the primary cooling system of the nuclear reactor, comprising:
From at least one of X 1 and hydrogen concentration X 2 , the formula
By Y 1 = aX 1 (or X 2 ) + b (ab is a constant),
Calculate the concentration of water decomposition products Y1 in the range downstream from the reactor core and upstream of the water supply confluence, and calculate the concentration of oxygen in water in the recirculation system that supplies cooling water to the reactor X3 from The concentration Y 2 of water decomposition products in the reactor water in the area downstream of the feed water confluence and upstream of the core inlet is expressed by the formula Y 2 = cX 3
+d (cd is a constant), and determining the hydrogen injection rate to the primary cooling system so that these calculated values Y 1 and Y 2 match a target range. 2. In a water quality control device for a nuclear reactor that has a hydrogen injection device that injects hydrogen into the primary cooling system of the nuclear reactor and controls the water quality of the reactor water by changing the hydrogen injection rate, the main steam system generated in the reactor and a means for measuring the oxygen concentration in each of the recirculation systems that supply cooling water to the nuclear reactor, using a heat-resistant sensor having an electrolytic solution inside through a permeable membrane selective to oxygen; Based on the oxygen concentration in the steam system, the reactor core,
Means for calculating the concentration of radiolysis product species in the region consisting of the separator and the mixing plenum, and calculating the concentration of radiolysis product species in the region from the downcomer to the lower plenum based on the oxygen concentration of the recirculation system; A primary system water quality calculation control means for adjusting the hydrogen injection device so that the calculated concentration of the radiolysis product species in the main steam system and the recirculation system becomes a target concentration. Reactor water quality control equipment.
JP59077313A 1984-04-17 1984-04-17 Reactor water quality control method and device Granted JPS60220898A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP59077313A JPS60220898A (en) 1984-04-17 1984-04-17 Reactor water quality control method and device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP59077313A JPS60220898A (en) 1984-04-17 1984-04-17 Reactor water quality control method and device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS60220898A JPS60220898A (en) 1985-11-05
JPH0426439B2 true JPH0426439B2 (en) 1992-05-07

Family

ID=13630424

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP59077313A Granted JPS60220898A (en) 1984-04-17 1984-04-17 Reactor water quality control method and device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS60220898A (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0664185B2 (en) * 1985-11-27 1994-08-22 株式会社日立製作所 Reactor water quality control system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS60220898A (en) 1985-11-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4937038A (en) Solution quantitative analysis apparatus, quantitative analysis methods, and nuclear reactor water quality control system
Beghi et al. Experimental studies on retention of iodine in a wet scrubber
US20120263267A1 (en) Electrochemical corrosion potential device and method
JPH05100087A (en) Boiling water reactor primary cooling system
EP0328408A2 (en) Method and apparatus for obtaining a water sample from the core of a boiling water reactor
WO2026082186A1 (en) Method for determining annual emissions of airborne c-14 from pressurized water reactor nuclear power plant
JPH0426439B2 (en)
JPS58205893A (en) Method and device for controlling ph of pwr type reactor coolant
JP4340574B2 (en) Reducing nitrogen compound injection operation method for nuclear power plant
JPH02163699A (en) System for controlling ph of reactor coolant
US5186798A (en) Solution quantitative analysis apparatus, quantitative analysis methods, and nuclear reactor water quality control system
Coatsworth et al. Radical and molecular yields in acidified deuterium oxide
JP3483613B2 (en) Reactor bottom water quality measurement device
JPH055077B2 (en)
JP3400518B2 (en) Water quality control method for boiling water nuclear power plant
JPH0721554B2 (en) Control device for hydrogen injection into reactor
Kysela et al. Loop capabilities in Rez for water chemistry and corrosion control of cladding and in-core components
EP4465308A1 (en) Systemic decontamination method of heavy water reactor
Elliot et al. Coolant radiolysis studies in the high temperature, fuelled U-2 loop in the NRU reactor
JPS5953517B2 (en) Reactor coolant sampling device
JPWO2000058974A1 (en) Reactor operation method
Beeley et al. Determination of in-core power in low energy research reactors by measurement of 16 N and 18 F in the primary coolant
JP2025086769A (en) Method for mitigating corrosive environment in pressurized water reactor and pressurized water reactor nuclear power plant
JP2005003597A (en) Performance Evaluation Method for Strong Acid Cation Exchange Resin in Primary Cooling Water Mixed Bed Desalting Tower of Pressurized Water Nuclear Power Plant
JPH07134197A (en) Water quality control device for primary reactor cooling system and water quality control method for primary reactor cooling system