Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH0432884B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH0432884B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0432884B2
JPH0432884B2 JP59145524A JP14552484A JPH0432884B2 JP H0432884 B2 JPH0432884 B2 JP H0432884B2 JP 59145524 A JP59145524 A JP 59145524A JP 14552484 A JP14552484 A JP 14552484A JP H0432884 B2 JPH0432884 B2 JP H0432884B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
vibration
flow guide
guide plate
wind
corner
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP59145524A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS6124706A (en
Inventor
Tooru Toda
Sohei Oono
Kazuo Yamazaki
Kenichi Ando
Shinichiro Sano
Kazushi Ogawa
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kawasaki Motors Ltd
Original Assignee
Kawasaki Jukogyo KK
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kawasaki Jukogyo KK filed Critical Kawasaki Jukogyo KK
Priority to JP14552484A priority Critical patent/JPS6124706A/en
Publication of JPS6124706A publication Critical patent/JPS6124706A/en
Publication of JPH0432884B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0432884B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Bridges Or Land Bridges (AREA)
  • Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 [発明の利用技術分野] 本発明は、吊橋、斜張橋などの主塔や桁で長大
角状構造物の耐風防振装置に関する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Technical Field of Application of the Invention] The present invention relates to a windproof and vibration isolating device for long square structures such as main towers and girders such as suspension bridges and cable-stayed bridges.

[発明の技術的背景] 吊橋、斜張橋などの主塔や桁のような長大角状
構造物は、剛性が低く、風の作用の影響を受け易
い傾向にある。その上これらの構造物は、一般に
角状構造物であることから、角部から発生するカ
ルマン渦による渦励振や、角部からの気流の剥離
に起因したギヤロツピングといつた風の動的作用
に悩まされることが多い。
[Technical Background of the Invention] Long angular structures such as main towers and girders of suspension bridges, cable-stayed bridges, etc. have low rigidity and tend to be easily affected by wind action. Furthermore, since these structures are generally corner-shaped structures, they are susceptible to wind dynamic effects such as vortex excitation vibration due to Karman vortices generated from the corners and gear locking caused by separation of airflow from the corners. It often bothers me.

これら風の動的作用に対する方策としては、 (a) 構造物の剛性を高める (b) 構造物の減衰性能を高める (c) 構造物の形状を空力的に良好なものにする などがある。 Measures to deal with these dynamic effects of wind include: (a) Increase the rigidity of the structure (b) Improving the damping performance of structures (c) Make the shape of the structure aerodynamically good and so on.

(a)の構造物の剛性を高める手段は、それによつ
て渦励振やギヤロツピングの発現風速を向上させ
るものであるが、あまり剛性だけにこだわると、
鋼重が増えて不経済な結果となることもある。
The method of increasing the rigidity of the structure in (a) is to increase the wind speed at which vortex-excited vibrations and gearropping occur, but if we focus too much on rigidity,
The steel weight may increase, resulting in uneconomic results.

(b)の減衰性能を高める手段は、渦励振やギヤロ
ツピングといつた風の動的作用を制振させるのに
有効であるが、減衰装置の設置場所の確保や、長
時間使用する場合の信頼性や維持保守の面で問題
が残されている。
The means to improve damping performance (b) is effective for damping dynamic effects of wind such as vortex-excited vibration and gearropping, but it is important to secure a place to install the damping device and to ensure reliability when using it for a long time. Problems remain in terms of performance and maintenance.

(c)の空力的に良好な形状にする手段として、構
造物断面を流線形にすること、グレーチング(風
抜き)を設けること、導流板を付設すること、セ
ンターバリアを設けることなどが提案されてい
る。
As a means of achieving an aerodynamically favorable shape in (c), proposals include making the structure's cross section streamlined, installing gratings (ventilation), installing flow guide plates, and installing a center barrier. has been done.

特に、構造物断面の角部に導流板を付設する手
段は、構造物の基本断面の変更に依らないこと
や、グレーチングのように断面欠損を伴わないな
どの利点があり、有望な耐風対策として注目され
ている。
In particular, the method of attaching flow guide plates to the corners of a structure's cross section has the advantage that it does not depend on changing the basic cross section of the structure and does not cause cross-sectional defects like grating, and is a promising wind resistance measure. It is attracting attention as

角状構造物における渦励振やギヤロツピングと
いつた風の動的作用を防振することを目的とした
導流板は、すでに実公昭52−7071号公報、実公昭
58−53288号公報などにみられるように幾つか提
案されているが、これらのものは後述するように
必ずしも有効に作用するものではなく、特にギヤ
ロツピングの発生に対しては有効ではなく、ギヤ
ロツピングに対しては、上記(a)項で述べた構造物
の剛性を高める手段を併用している。
A flow guide plate for the purpose of isolating the dynamic effects of wind such as vortex-excited vibration and gearropping in a square structure has already been published in Publications No. 52-7071 and Publication No. 7071 of the Utility Model Publication.
Several proposals have been made, as seen in Publication No. 58-53288, but these methods do not necessarily work effectively, as will be explained later, and are not particularly effective against the occurrence of gear locking, and are effective against gear locking. To counter this, the measures to increase the rigidity of the structure described in section (a) above are also used.

角状構造物の一例として、第1図のような断面
を想定するとき、このような断面では、一般に角
部から発生するカルマン渦の周期と、構造物のも
つ固有振動数が一致したとき、構造物は風の方向
と直交する方向に共振、詳しくは、渦励振が発生
し、更に風速が増すと、角部からの気流の剥離に
起因するギヤロツピングが発生するという問題が
ある。
As an example of a corner structure, when assuming a cross section as shown in Figure 1, in such a cross section, when the period of the Karman vortex generated from the corner and the natural frequency of the structure match, The structure has a problem in that resonance, specifically vortex-excited vibration, occurs in a direction perpendicular to the direction of the wind, and as the wind speed further increases, gearlopping occurs due to separation of the airflow from the corners.

このことは、構造物用風洞実験結果により説明
する。第7図は第1図に示すような導流板を付設
してない角状構造物の耐風応答、即ち、V−A曲
線で、換算風速V/NηDに対する無次元振幅
A/Dの関係を示している。ここでは風速、Nη
は曲げ振動数、Dは構造物の見付幅、Aは構造物
の振幅である。
This will be explained using the results of wind tunnel experiments for structures. Figure 7 shows the wind resistance response of a rectangular structure without a flow guide plate as shown in Figure 1, that is, the V-A curve, which shows the relationship between the dimensionless amplitude A/D and the converted wind speed V/NηD. It shows. Here the wind speed, Nη
is the bending frequency, D is the width of the structure, and A is the amplitude of the structure.

第7図から明らかなように、換算風速V/
NηD=8〜9で無次元振幅A/D>0.17といつた
大振幅の渦励振を発生し、換算風速V/NηD≧
13の領域でギヤロツピングを発生して、応答振福
はやはりA/D>0.17とは空力的に不安定な挙動
を呈している。
As is clear from Figure 7, the converted wind speed V/
When NηD = 8 to 9, a large amplitude vortex excitation vibration with a dimensionless amplitude A/D > 0.17 is generated, and the converted wind speed V/NηD ≧
13, and the response vibration exhibits aerodynamically unstable behavior with A/D > 0.17.

第2図は、矢印で示す風の方向と平行な面の角
部に所要の間隙を介して平板状の導流板を配設し
た構造物であり、これに対応するV−A曲線を第
8図に示す。この構造物は第8図で示すように、
換算風速V/NηD=7.4近辺で無次元振幅A/D
>0.17といつた大振福の渦励振を発生し、換算風
速V/NηD≧33の領域で、ギヤロツピングによ
り応答振福A/D>0.17となつており、導流板を
付設していない第1図の構造物の振動の発生する
風速領域は減つているが、耐風防振装置としては
不充分である。
Figure 2 shows a structure in which flat flow guide plates are arranged at the corners of the plane parallel to the direction of the wind indicated by arrows with a required gap, and the corresponding V-A curve is shown as Shown in Figure 8. This structure, as shown in Figure 8,
Dimensionless amplitude A/D near converted wind speed V/NηD=7.4
>0.17 is generated, and in the region of converted wind speed V/NηD ≥ 33, the response amplitude A/D becomes >0.17 due to gearing, and the vortex excitation vibration with a large vibration amplitude of Although the wind speed range in which vibrations occur in the structure shown in Figure 1 has been reduced, it is still insufficient as a wind-resistant and vibration-proof device.

[従来技術とその課題] このような問題点を解消するために従来では、
上述のように実公昭52−7071号公報、実公昭58−
53288号公報などにみられるように、第3図に示
す角状構造物の角部に、風の方向と平行な2面と
平行で、他の2面に対して外方に拡開するような
断面形状がへ字形に屈折された導流板を配設した
ものが提案されている。
[Prior art and its problems] In order to solve these problems, in the past,
As mentioned above, Utility Model Publication No. 7071, Utility Model Publication No. 58-
As seen in Publication No. 53288, etc., the corner of the angular structure shown in Figure 3 has a structure that is parallel to two planes parallel to the direction of the wind and expands outward with respect to the other two planes. It has been proposed that a flow guide plate is provided with a rectangular cross-sectional shape.

第9図は第3図に示す構造物のV−A曲線であ
り、この構造物は第9図から明らかなように、第
7,8図に見られるような渦励振は消滅している
が、換算風速V/NηD≧22の領域でギヤロツピ
ングを発生し、無次元振幅A/D>0.17といつた
大振幅の振動となつており、耐風防振装置として
は不充分である。
Fig. 9 is the V-A curve of the structure shown in Fig. 3, and as is clear from Fig. 9, the vortex excitation vibration seen in Figs. 7 and 8 has disappeared. , gear locking occurs in the range of converted wind speed V/NηD≧22, resulting in large-amplitude vibration with dimensionless amplitude A/D>0.17, which is insufficient as a wind-resistant and vibration-proofing device.

本発明の目的は、このような実情に鑑みなされ
たもので、簡単な而も合理的手段によつて従来技
術の問題点を解消せしめ、吊橋、斜張橋の主塔や
桁などの角状構造物が使用しうるようになし、渦
励振の発生防止は勿論のこと、ギヤロツプ現象の
発生をも合理的に防止し、経済的効果の大きな耐
風防振装置を提供せんとするものである。
The purpose of the present invention was made in view of the above circumstances, and it is an object of the present invention to solve the problems of the prior art by simple yet rational means, and to solve the problems of the prior art by simple but rational means. It is an object of the present invention to provide a windproof and vibration isolating device that can be used in a structure, reasonably prevents not only vortex-excited vibration, but also the gallop phenomenon, and is highly economically effective.

[課題を解決するための手段] 従来技術の課題を解決する本発明の構成は、吊
橋や斜張橋の主塔や桁などの角状構造物の隅角部
長手方向に、所要の通風流路間隙を介して断面形
状が円弧状の導流板を配設した構造物の耐風防振
装置において、上記導流板の円弧の中心点を角状
構造物の隅角部中心角に対して偏心せしめ、一
方、導流板の一側端部の接線方向を上記角状構造
物の一側面1aと平行に、導流板の他側端部の接
線方向を鋭角θをもつて面1aを通る線に斜交さ
せたものである。
[Means for Solving the Problems] The configuration of the present invention that solves the problems of the prior art is to create a required ventilation flow in the longitudinal direction of the corner of a square structure such as the main tower or girder of a suspension bridge or cable-stayed bridge. In a wind and vibration isolation device for a structure in which a flow guide plate with an arcuate cross-sectional shape is arranged through a road gap, the center point of the arc of the flow guide plate is set relative to the central angle of the corner of the corner structure. On the other hand, the tangential direction of one end of the current guide plate is parallel to one side 1a of the square structure, and the tangential direction of the other end of the current guide plate is set at an acute angle θ so that the surface 1a is It is made by diagonally intersecting the line passing through it.

[実施例] 第4,5,6,10図について本発明の実施例
を説明する。第4図は斜張橋の正面図、第5図は
角状構造物である主塔の断面図、第6図は第5図
を説明するために示した参考図である。
[Embodiment] An embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. 4, 5, 6, and 10. FIG. 4 is a front view of the cable-stayed bridge, FIG. 5 is a sectional view of the main tower, which is a square structure, and FIG. 6 is a reference diagram shown for explaining FIG. 5.

第4図に例示せる1は対角が直角の角状構造物
からなる主塔、2は橋桁、3は斜張ケーブル、4
は橋脚である。第5図に示す耐風防振装置につい
て説明する。主塔1の全ての角部に、所定の間隙
を介して断面形状が円弧状の導流板5を付設した
ものである。そして、導流板5の円弧端部の接線
方向の一方は、矢印で示す気流方向の面1aに平
行であり、他の円弧端部の接線方向は、気流方向
の面1aに対して断面内側方向を向いている。
As shown in Fig. 4, 1 is a main tower consisting of an angular structure with right-angled diagonals, 2 is a bridge girder, 3 is a cable-stayed cable, and 4
is a pier. The windproof and anti-vibration device shown in FIG. 5 will be explained. Flow guide plates 5 having an arcuate cross-section are attached to all corners of the main tower 1 with predetermined gaps therebetween. One of the tangential directions of the arcuate end of the flow guide plate 5 is parallel to the plane 1a in the airflow direction indicated by the arrow, and the tangential direction of the other arcuate end is on the inner side of the cross section with respect to the plane 1a in the airflow direction. facing the direction.

そして円弧に対する円の中心点01は、第6図に
示すように、気流方向の面1aと気流直角方向の
面1bに対して対称な位置にとるのではなく、第
5図に示すように、気流直角方向の面1bの方に
少し偏心させて配置し、導流板5と主塔1との間
の風の通路が、断面角部において急減するのを避
けるようにする。また、円の中心点01を偏心させ
ることによつて、円弧状の導流板5が主塔1の断
面内側方向まで充分に伸び、しかも、円弧端部の
接線方向が第6図に示すように、気流方向の面1
aに直角になるのでなく、図で示すように、θ<
90°(鋭角)となつて導流板5が風を誘導し易いよ
うに配慮する。
The center point 0 1 of the circle relative to the arc is not located at a symmetrical position with respect to the plane 1a in the airflow direction and the plane 1b in the perpendicular direction to the airflow, as shown in Fig. 5, but as shown in Fig. 5. , are arranged slightly eccentrically toward the plane 1b in the direction perpendicular to the air flow, so that the air passage between the flow guide plate 5 and the main tower 1 is prevented from suddenly decreasing at the corner of the cross section. Furthermore, by making the center points 0 and 1 of the circle eccentric, the arc-shaped flow guide plate 5 can fully extend to the inner side of the cross section of the main tower 1, and the tangential direction of the arc end is as shown in FIG. So, plane 1 in the airflow direction
Instead of being perpendicular to a, as shown in the figure, θ<
Consideration is given to making it 90° (acute angle) so that the flow guide plate 5 can easily guide the wind.

第10図は、第5図は示すような本発明による
導流板を適用した場合の耐風応答図(V−A曲
線)である。この第10図から明らかなように、
換算風速0〜50の全額域で、上述した従来の導流
板の場合にみられるような渦励振とギヤロツピン
グの発生は全く認められず、空力的に安定な性状
を示している。また第10図は、迎角α=0°の場
合の応答図であるが、迎角α=5°、10°、20°の各
迎角においても空力的に安定であることは、風洞
実験により確認されている。
FIG. 10 is a wind resistance response diagram (VA curve) when the flow guide plate according to the present invention as shown in FIG. 5 is applied. As is clear from this Figure 10,
In the full range of equivalent wind speeds from 0 to 50, the occurrence of vortex excitation vibration and gearroping, which are observed in the case of the conventional flow guide plate described above, is not observed at all, indicating aerodynamically stable properties. Figure 10 is a response diagram when the angle of attack α = 0°, but wind tunnel tests have shown that it is aerodynamically stable at angles of attack α = 5°, 10°, and 20°. Confirmed by.

[発明の効果] 上述のように本発明の構成によれば、次のよう
な効果が得られる。
[Effects of the Invention] As described above, according to the configuration of the present invention, the following effects can be obtained.

(a) 第10図のV−A曲線図から明らかなよう
に、従来の耐風防振装置に比べてはるかに防振
効果があり、また、導流板の断面形状が円弧状
であることから、風向(迎角または水平偏角)
の変化に対しても幅広い範囲で有効に防振効果
を発揮することができる。
(a) As is clear from the V-A curve diagram in Figure 10, it has a far more vibration-proofing effect than conventional wind-resistant and vibration-proof devices, and because the cross-sectional shape of the flow guide plate is arc-shaped, , wind direction (angle of attack or horizontal declination)
The anti-vibration effect can be effectively exerted over a wide range of changes in vibration.

(b) さらに、形状が円の一部分(円弧)であるこ
とから、製作、施行管理のし易さがあり、経済
的効果も図れるなど優れた特長を有するもので
ある。尚本発明の導流板は、第4図に示すよう
に、主塔構造物1/3以上の範囲に付設すること
が望ましい。
(b) Furthermore, since the shape is a part of a circle (arc), it is easy to manufacture, implement and manage, and has excellent features such as being economically effective. As shown in FIG. 4, it is preferable that the flow guide plate of the present invention be attached to an area of 1/3 or more of the main tower structure.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は角状構造物の断面形状を示す説明図、
第2,3図は従来の耐風防振装置の断面図、第4
図は本発明の耐風防振装置の付設状態を示す斜張
橋の正面図、第5図は要部の断面図、第6図は第
5図に示した本発明装置を説明するために示す参
考説明図、第7図は第1図角状構造物の風洞実験
結果を示すV−A曲線図、第8図は第2図の角状
構造物に対応するV−A曲線図、第9図は第3図
の角状構造物に対応するV−A曲線図、第10図
は第5図に示す本発明角状構造物に対応するV−
A曲線図である。 1……主塔、1a……気流方向の主塔面、1b
……気流直角方向の主塔面、5……導流板。
FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing the cross-sectional shape of the angular structure;
Figures 2 and 3 are cross-sectional views of conventional wind and vibration isolators;
The figure is a front view of a cable-stayed bridge showing the installed state of the windproof and vibration isolating device of the present invention, FIG. 5 is a sectional view of the main part, and FIG. 6 is shown to explain the device of the present invention shown in FIG. Reference explanatory drawings, Fig. 7 is a V-A curve diagram showing the wind tunnel test results of the angular structure in Fig. 1, Fig. 8 is a V-A curve diagram corresponding to the angular structure in Fig. 2, and Fig. 9 The figure is a V-A curve diagram corresponding to the angular structure shown in FIG. 3, and FIG. 10 is a V-A curve diagram corresponding to the angular structure of the present invention shown in FIG.
It is an A curve diagram. 1... Main tower, 1a... Main tower surface in the airflow direction, 1b
...Main tower surface in the direction perpendicular to the airflow, 5...Difficult plate.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 吊橋や斜張橋の主塔や桁などの角状構造物の
隅角部長手方向に、所要の通風流路間隙を介して
断面形状が円弧状の導流板を配設した構造物の耐
風防振装置において、 上記導流板の円弧の中心点を角状構造物の隅角
部中心角に対して偏心せしめ、一方、導流板の一
側端部の接線方向を上記角状構造物の一側面1a
と平行に、導流板の他側端部の接線方向を鋭角θ
をもつて一側面1aを通る線に斜交させたことを
特徴とする構造物の耐風防振装置。 2 角状構造物長の約1/3以上の範囲に導流板を
配設することを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第1項
記載の構造物の耐風防振装置。
[Claims] 1. A flow guide plate having an arcuate cross-sectional shape is installed in the longitudinal direction of the corner of a corner structure such as the main tower or girder of a suspension bridge or cable-stayed bridge, with a required ventilation channel gap. In the wind and vibration isolation device for the installed structure, the center point of the arc of the flow guide plate is eccentric to the center angle of the corner of the square structure, while the tangent of one end of the flow guide plate is The direction is one side 1a of the above-mentioned angular structure.
Parallel to
1. A windproof and vibration-proof device for a structure, characterized in that the windproof and vibration-proofing device is made obliquely intersecting a line passing through one side surface 1a. 2. The wind and vibration isolating device for a structure according to claim 1, characterized in that a flow guide plate is disposed in a range of about 1/3 or more of the length of the angular structure.
JP14552484A 1984-07-12 1984-07-12 Wind resistant vibration-proof apparatus structure Granted JPS6124706A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP14552484A JPS6124706A (en) 1984-07-12 1984-07-12 Wind resistant vibration-proof apparatus structure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP14552484A JPS6124706A (en) 1984-07-12 1984-07-12 Wind resistant vibration-proof apparatus structure

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS6124706A JPS6124706A (en) 1986-02-03
JPH0432884B2 true JPH0432884B2 (en) 1992-06-01

Family

ID=15387212

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP14552484A Granted JPS6124706A (en) 1984-07-12 1984-07-12 Wind resistant vibration-proof apparatus structure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS6124706A (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005239422A (en) * 2004-01-29 2005-09-08 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Container crane
CN107034996B (en) * 2017-06-19 2019-04-16 湖北晶標建筑工程有限公司 Windproof movable plank house

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5935414U (en) * 1982-08-30 1984-03-05 三井造船株式会社 Bridge wind stabilization device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS6124706A (en) 1986-02-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Main et al. Evaluation of viscous dampers for stay-cable vibration mitigation
Scruton et al. Wind-Excited Oscillations of Structures.
Brancaleoni et al. The aerodynamic design of the Messina Straits Bridge
Mannini et al. Aeroelastic stability of two long-span arch structures: A collaborative experience in two wind tunnel facilities
CN103590323B (en) The square bridge tower wind-induced vibration of chamfering suppresses structure
JP2000008326A (en) Bridge girder structure
JPH0432884B2 (en)
CN116005538A (en) Novel split box girder structure capable of inhibiting vortex vibration
CN215802288U (en) Energy consumption strutting arrangement that attenuator warp and enlargies
CN211665548U (en) Tuyere structure for vortex vibration control of rectangular steel box girder bridge
Stansby Base pressure of oscillating circular cylinders
CN114481807A (en) A stay cable damper and combined damping device
CN103952974A (en) Wind-induced vibration suppression structure of square chamfered bridge tower
Yoshimura Aerodynamic stability of four medium span bridges in Kyushu district
CN216739200U (en) Shock attenuation steel box girder and bridge structure system
CN114016386A (en) A structure or component wind vibration control hollow cover device and design method
CN110886198A (en) Tuyere structure for vortex vibration control of rectangular steel box girder bridge
CN212641244U (en) Be used for reinforced (rfd) antidetonation device of old bridge
JP2777916B2 (en) Cable damper for cable stayed bridge
JP3663700B2 (en) Wind resistant structure
JPS59126875A (en) Vibration dampening apparatus of columnar structure
JPS5853288Y2 (en) Windproof vibration isolation device for square structures
JP2846589B2 (en) Cable-stayed bridge cable damping device
JP3734911B2 (en) Cable damping device for cable stayed bridge
JP4709554B2 (en) Bridge main tower and bridge equipped with the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term