JPH0459277B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0459277B2 JPH0459277B2 JP1224149A JP22414989A JPH0459277B2 JP H0459277 B2 JPH0459277 B2 JP H0459277B2 JP 1224149 A JP1224149 A JP 1224149A JP 22414989 A JP22414989 A JP 22414989A JP H0459277 B2 JPH0459277 B2 JP H0459277B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- bark
- cedar
- cypress
- blasting
- pressure
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C05—FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
- C05F—ORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C, e.g. FERTILISERS FROM WASTE OR REFUSE
- C05F11/00—Other organic fertilisers
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
- Y02W30/40—Bio-organic fraction processing; Production of fertilisers from the organic fraction of waste or refuse
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
- Disintegrating Or Milling (AREA)
- Soil Conditioners And Soil-Stabilizing Materials (AREA)
- Fertilizers (AREA)
Description
(産業上の利用分野)
この発明は、杉・桧の樹皮等を爆砕処理し、こ
れを醗酵させることにより、特殊肥料又は土壌改
良材を得ることを目的とした杉・檜樹皮等の爆砕
処理方法及び処理物に関する。
(従来の技術)
従来、杉・桧等の長繊維樹皮を処理するには、
円筒状の回転ドラムとカツターによつて粉砕処理
する方法が提案されている(特公昭62−8283号)。
(発明により解決すべき課題)
前記従来の方法によれば、長繊維を粉砕化する
ことはできるけれども、これに含まれたリグニン
を除去することができないのみならず、ヘミセル
ロースの可溶化などは困難である。従つて、前記
粉砕物に微生物又は酵素等を作用させても醗酵分
解が困難であり、分解される場合であつても極め
て長時間(例えば3年以上)を要する問題点があ
つた。
(課題を解決する為の手段)
然るにこの発明は、杉・桧の樹皮又は樹皮付着
の木質部の単独又は混合物を高圧・高温の飽和水
蒸気下で爆砕することにより、ヘミセルロース及
びリグニンがヘミセルロースのアセチル基から生
成する酢酸の触媒作用により、組織中のヘミセル
ロース及びリグニンが自己加水分解を受けて可溶
化すると共に、樹皮の組織が分離し、微生物又は
微生物及び酵素による分解が容易となり、短時間
(例えば3ケ月以内)の醗酵が容易となつたので
ある。
即ちこの発明は、杉・桧の樹皮又は樹皮付着の
木質部の単独又は混合物を密閉容器内に入れ、
224℃〜250℃の高温と、25Kg/cm2〜40Kg/cm2(ゲ
ージ圧)の高圧の飽和水蒸気下で爆砕する第1工
程と、第1工程で得た処理物に微生物、窒素化合
物又は酵素を加えて醗酵させる第2工程とを結合
させることを特徴とした杉・桧樹皮等の爆砕処理
方法である。
また、微生物を糸状菌、放線菌類とし、酵素を
セルラーゼとし、窒素化合物を硫酸アンモニア、
石灰窒素、尿素としたものである。
また他の発明は、杉・桧の樹皮又は樹皮付着の
木質部の単独又は混合物を密閉容器内に入れ、
224℃〜250℃の高温と、25Kg/cm2〜40Kg/cm2(ゲ
ージ圧)による高圧の飽和水蒸気下で爆砕する第
1工程と、第1工程で得た物に焼酎廃液を添加し
て醗酵させる第2工程とを結合することを特徴と
した杉・桧樹皮等の爆砕処理方法である。
更に他の発明は、杉・桧の樹皮又は樹皮付着の
木質部の単独又は混合物の224℃〜250℃の高温
と、25Kg/cm2〜40Kg/cm2(ゲージ圧)の高圧によ
る爆砕処理物を微生物又は酵素で醗酵処理したこ
とを特徴とする杉・桧樹皮等の爆砕処理物であ
る。
前記における杉・桧の樹皮等とは、杉・桧の樹
皮・樹皮付着の下枝・製材時の樹皮付着の廃材な
どを含むものである。
前記における爆砕圧力を25Kg/cm2より小さくす
ると逐次爆砕による繊維破砕力が低下し、20Kg/
cm2以下になると、微生物等の作用が困難になり目
的達成ができなくなる。また40Kg/cm2より大きく
しても効果は変らなくなるので、前記範囲とし
た。温度は圧力によつて定まる。
この発明により処理した樹皮等は、そのまま土
壌と混合することによつて特殊肥料、或いは土壌
改良材とすることもできる。
前記のように醗酵に際しては、窒素化合物、微
生物又は酵素を含む物質(例えば焼酎廃液、鶏
糞、糖蜜、米糠、腐葉土など)を加入し、又は酵
素剤を添加する場合もあり、製品の用途(特殊肥
料か、土壌改良材か)によつて添加物を選定する
ことが望ましい。
前記のようにこの発明によれば、従来処理に困
つていた産業廃棄物(杉・桧の樹皮等、焼酎廃
液)を有用化処理し、有用物とするもので、産業
上貢献度が高い技術である。
(作用)
この発明によれば、杉・桧の樹皮等を高温・高
圧下で爆砕処理するので、樹皮に含まれた不溶性
物質又は微生物等の繁殖を妨害する物質を可溶化
又は分解することができる。前記爆砕処理した物
に微生物又は酵素を添加することによつて容易に
醗酵し、植物の生長阻害物質を減少させ、肥料等
の有用物質に変化させることができる。
(実施例 1)
杉の樹皮15Kgを爆砕装置に入れてゲージ圧力25
Kg/cm2、蒸煮温度約220℃の飽和水蒸気で10分間
処理する。この爆砕処理により約20%(乾燥重
量)が蒸気側に分解され(揮発成分)、残りの処
理物12Kg(約80%)ができる。この処理物は樹皮
が綿のごとく繊維化して軟化しているのみなら
ず、リグニン及びセルローズが自己加水分解を受
けて可溶化している。
前記処理物50Kg(水分50%)に、乾燥鶏糞を5
Kg(20%乾物当り)加え、更に少量の尿素を加え
て炭素率(C/N比)を20に調整し、水20Kgを加
え(水分60%にする)均一に攪拌して、醗酵槽
(200)内に静置したところ、醗酵を開始した。
醗酵温度は徐々に上昇し、7日目に最高の62℃と
なつた。その後、切り返し90日間醗酵して得た処
理物を0.25〜1.5%混合土壌を用いて、小松菜及
び麦による発芽試験を実施したところ、阻害性も
認められず、比較区と比し、生育が良好となり土
壌改良材として好適と認められた。
(実施例 2)
杉の樹皮15Kgを爆砕装置に入れてゲージ圧力35
Kg/cm2、蒸煮温度約240℃の飽和水蒸気で10分間
処理する。この爆砕処理により、4.5Kg(約30%
重量)が蒸気側に分解され、残り10.5Kg(70%)
の処理物ができた。この処理物は樹皮が綿のごと
く繊維化して軟化しているのみならず、リグニン
及びセルローズが自己加水分解を受けて可溶化し
ていた。
前記処理物50Kg(水分50%)に乾燥鶏糞5Kg
(20%乾物当り)加え、更に少量の尿素を加えて、
炭素率(C/N比)を20に調整し、水20Kgを加え
て均一に攪拌して、醗酵槽(200)内に静置し
たところ、醗酵を開始した。醗酵温度は徐々に上
昇し、14日目に70℃まで上つた。その後、適宜切
り返しを行ない、90日間醗酵して得た処理物を用
い、実施例1と同じように発芽試験を実施したと
ころ、阻害性もなく、発育良好で土壌改良材とし
て好適と認められた。
(実施例 3)
桧の樹皮15Kgを爆砕装置に入れてゲージ圧力35
Kg/cm2、蒸煮温度約240℃の飽和水蒸気で5分間
処理する。爆砕処理により4.2Kg(約28%乾燥重
量)が蒸気側に分解され、10.8Kg(72%)の処理
物ができた。この処理物は樹皮が綿のごとく繊維
化して軟化しているのみならず、リグニン及びセ
ルローズが自己加水分解を受けて可溶化してい
る。
前記処理物40Kg(水分30%)に31Kgの焼酎廃液
(水分91%)と5.6Kgの乾燥鶏糞を添加し、少量の
尿素を添加して、C/N比を20に調整し、これに
水を15Kgを加えて均一に攪拌して、醗酵槽(200
)内に静置したところ、醗酵を開始した。醗酵
温度は徐々に上昇し、3日目に最高71℃に達し
た。その後、適宜切り返しを行ない90日間醗酵し
て処理物90Kgを得た。実施例1と同じように土壌
に0.25〜1.5%混合し、発芽試験を実施したとこ
ろ、阻害性も認められず良好な生育結果を得た。
(実施例 4)
杉の下枝(樹皮付)の細断物15Kgを爆砕装置に
入れてゲージ圧力35Kg/cm2、蒸煮温度約240℃の
飽和水蒸気で5分間処理する。爆砕処理により3
Kg蒸発し、12Kgの処理物ができた。この処理物は
木質部と樹皮共に綿のように繊維化して軟化して
いるのみならず、リグニン及びセルローズが自己
加水分解を受けて可溶化している。この処理物40
Kg(水分50%)に、腐葉土7Kg(水分70%)と乾
燥鶏糞4Kgを添加し、少量の尿素を加えて、C/
N比を20に調整し、水14Kgを入れて均一に攪拌し
て、醗酵槽(200)内に静置したところ、醗酵
を開始した。醗酵温度は徐々に上昇し、3日目に
最高70℃まで上がつた。その後、適宜切り返しを
行ない90日間醗酵して得た。処理物は実施例1と
同様にして発芽試験を実施したところ、阻害性は
認められず、良好な発芽状態を示した。この場合
における爆砕減量結果は表1の通りである。
(Field of Industrial Application) This invention is directed to the blasting treatment of cedar and cypress bark, etc. for the purpose of obtaining special fertilizers or soil improvement materials by blasting and fermenting the bark, etc. of cedar and cypress. This article relates to a method and a processed product. (Conventional technology) Conventionally, in order to treat long fiber bark such as cedar and cypress,
A method of crushing using a cylindrical rotating drum and a cutter has been proposed (Japanese Patent Publication No. 8283/1983). (Problems to be Solved by the Invention) According to the conventional method, although long fibers can be pulverized, it is not only impossible to remove the lignin contained therein, but also difficult to solubilize hemicellulose. It is. Therefore, even if microorganisms or enzymes are applied to the pulverized product, it is difficult to ferment and decompose it, and even if it is decomposed, it takes a very long time (for example, 3 years or more). (Means for Solving the Problems) However, in the present invention, hemicellulose and lignin are converted into acetyl groups of hemicellulose by blasting the bark of cedar or cypress or the woody parts attached to the bark alone or in a mixture under high pressure and high temperature saturated steam. Due to the catalytic action of acetic acid produced from Fermentation (within a few months) became easy. That is, this invention places cedar/cypress bark or woody parts attached to the bark alone or in a mixture in a closed container,
The first step is explosion at a high temperature of 224℃ to 250℃ and high pressure saturated steam of 25Kg/cm 2 to 40Kg/cm 2 (gauge pressure). This is a method for blasting cedar, cypress bark, etc., which is characterized by combining the second step of adding an enzyme and fermentation. In addition, the microorganisms are filamentous fungi and actinomycetes, the enzyme is cellulase, and the nitrogen compounds are ammonia sulfate,
It contains lime nitrogen and urea. In another invention, the bark of cedar or cypress or a woody part attached to the bark is placed alone or in a mixture in a closed container,
The first step is explosion at a high temperature of 224℃ to 250℃ and high pressure saturated steam of 25Kg/cm 2 to 40Kg/cm 2 (gauge pressure), and the addition of shochu waste liquid to the material obtained in the first step. This is a method for blasting cedar, cypress bark, etc., which is characterized by combining the second step of fermentation. Still another invention is to blast the bark of cedar or cypress, or the woody part attached to the bark, singly or in a mixture, at a high temperature of 224°C to 250°C and a high pressure of 25 kg/cm 2 to 40 kg/cm 2 (gauge pressure). This is a blasted product of cedar, cypress bark, etc., which is characterized by being fermented with microorganisms or enzymes. The bark of cedar and cypress mentioned above includes the bark of cedar and cypress, lower branches with bark attached, waste wood with bark attached during lumbering, etc. When the blasting pressure in the above is lower than 25Kg/ cm2 , the fiber crushing force due to sequential blasting decreases, and it becomes 20Kg/cm2.
If it is less than cm 2 , it becomes difficult for microorganisms to act and the purpose cannot be achieved. Furthermore, since the effect remains unchanged even if the weight is made larger than 40Kg/cm 2 , the above range was set. Temperature is determined by pressure. The bark etc. treated according to the present invention can also be used as a special fertilizer or soil improvement material by mixing with soil as is. As mentioned above, during fermentation, substances containing nitrogen compounds, microorganisms, or enzymes (for example, shochu waste liquid, chicken manure, molasses, rice bran, leaf mold, etc.) may be added, or enzyme agents may be added. It is desirable to select additives depending on whether they are fertilizers or soil conditioners. As mentioned above, according to this invention, industrial wastes (cedar and cypress bark, etc., shochu waste liquid), which had been difficult to dispose of, can be processed and made into useful materials, making a high contribution to industry. It's technology. (Function) According to this invention, since the bark of cedar and cypress is blasted under high temperature and high pressure, it is possible to solubilize or decompose insoluble substances contained in the bark or substances that interfere with the propagation of microorganisms. can. By adding microorganisms or enzymes to the blasted material, it can be easily fermented, reduce plant growth inhibiting substances, and convert into useful substances such as fertilizers. (Example 1) Put 15 kg of cedar bark into an explosion device and set the gauge pressure to 25.
Kg/cm 2 and saturated steam at a boiling temperature of about 220°C for 10 minutes. Through this blasting process, approximately 20% (dry weight) is decomposed into steam (volatile components), leaving 12 kg (approximately 80%) of the treated material. In this treated product, the bark not only becomes fibrous and softened like cotton, but also the lignin and cellulose undergo self-hydrolysis and become solubilized. Add 50 kg of dried chicken manure to 50 kg of the above-mentioned treated material (50% moisture).
Kg (per 20% dry matter), add a small amount of urea to adjust the carbon ratio (C/N ratio) to 20, add 20 kg of water (to make the moisture 60%), stir evenly, and add a small amount of urea to the fermentation tank ( 200), fermentation started.
The fermentation temperature gradually rose, reaching a maximum of 62°C on the seventh day. After that, we conducted a germination test with Komatsuna and wheat using soil mixed with 0.25 to 1.5% of the processed product obtained by fermentation for 90 days, and no inhibition was observed, and growth was better than in the comparison plot. Therefore, it was recognized as suitable as a soil improvement material. (Example 2) Put 15 kg of cedar bark into an explosion device and set the gauge pressure to 35.
Kg/cm 2 and saturated steam at a boiling temperature of about 240°C for 10 minutes. Through this blasting process, 4.5Kg (approximately 30%
weight) is decomposed into the steam side, remaining 10.5Kg (70%)
A processed product was created. In this treated product, not only did the bark become fibrous and softened like cotton, but also the lignin and cellulose were self-hydrolyzed and solubilized. 50 kg of the above-mentioned processed material (50% moisture) and 5 kg of dried chicken manure
(per 20% dry matter) and further add a small amount of urea,
The carbon ratio (C/N ratio) was adjusted to 20, 20 kg of water was added, the mixture was stirred uniformly, and the mixture was allowed to stand in the fermenter (200), and fermentation started. The fermentation temperature gradually rose to 70°C on the 14th day. After that, we conducted a germination test in the same manner as in Example 1 using the processed product obtained by cutting back as appropriate and fermenting for 90 days, and it was found that there was no inhibition, good growth, and that it was suitable as a soil improvement material. . (Example 3) Put 15 kg of cypress bark into an explosion device and set the gauge pressure to 35.
Kg/cm 2 and saturated steam at a boiling temperature of about 240°C for 5 minutes. Through the blasting process, 4.2Kg (approx. 28% dry weight) was decomposed into steam, yielding 10.8Kg (72%) of processed material. In this treated product, the bark not only becomes fibrous and softened like cotton, but also the lignin and cellulose undergo self-hydrolysis and become solubilized. Add 31 kg of shochu waste liquid (91% moisture) and 5.6 kg of dried chicken manure to 40 kg of the above treated material (30% moisture), add a small amount of urea, adjust the C/N ratio to 20, and add water to this. Add 15 kg of
), fermentation started. The fermentation temperature gradually increased and reached a maximum of 71°C on the third day. Thereafter, the mixture was fermented for 90 days by turning the mixture as appropriate to obtain 90 kg of the treated product. As in Example 1, when 0.25 to 1.5% of the product was mixed in soil and a germination test was conducted, no inhibition was observed and good growth results were obtained. (Example 4) 15 kg of shredded lower branches (with bark) of cedar are placed in an explosion device and treated with saturated steam at a gauge pressure of 35 kg/cm 2 and a steaming temperature of about 240° C. for 5 minutes. 3 due to blasting treatment
Kg was evaporated and 12Kg of processed material was created. In this treated product, not only the wood part and the bark have become fibrous and softened like cotton, but also the lignin and cellulose have undergone self-hydrolysis and become solubilized. This processed material 40
Kg (50% moisture), add 7 kg of humus (70% moisture) and 4 kg of dried chicken manure, add a small amount of urea, and add C/
The N ratio was adjusted to 20, 14 kg of water was added, the mixture was stirred uniformly, and the mixture was allowed to stand still in the fermentation tank (200), and fermentation started. The fermentation temperature gradually rose, reaching a maximum of 70°C on the third day. Thereafter, the mixture was fermented for 90 days with appropriate turning. When the treated product was subjected to a germination test in the same manner as in Example 1, no inhibition was observed and a good germination state was observed. The explosion loss results in this case are shown in Table 1.
【表】
(比較試験)
従来知られていた木質部等の爆砕処理と、この
発明の爆砕処理との比較試験を以下の通り行つ
て、その差異を明らかにした。
供試試料
杉および桧の樹皮を下記の条件で爆砕処理した
もの。
2Kg/cm2で15分処理 14Kg/cm2で5分処理
6Kg/cm2で15分処理 25Kg/cm2で10分処理
10Kg/cm2で5分処理 35Kg/cm2で10分処理
試験項目
熱水注出物量
水溶性フエノール類
発芽試験
粒度分布
堆積試験
土壌中における分解性試験
試験方法
熱水抽出量
各試料5gに対して、蒸溜水を100ml加え、60
℃で4時間温水抽出した後、120rpmで10分間遠
心分離を行ない、さらに上澄液を乾燥ろ過した。
このろ液50mlを蒸発皿にとり、100℃のウオータ
ー・バスで水分を蒸発させ、さらに105℃の乾燥
器で24時間乾燥させ重量を測定した。
水溶性フエノール類
風乾試料2gに蒸溜水20mlを加えて24時間室温
に静置し、遠心分離・乾燥ろ過を行ない、ろ液を
供試液とした。供試液5mlを50mlのメスフラスコ
にとり、フエノール試薬5ml、20%炭酸ナトリウ
ム溶液15mlを加え50mlに定容し、35℃で20分間加
熱し発色させた。フエノール類の測定は、520nm
の吸光度を分光光度計(島津UV−160A)で測定
し、フエノールを標準物質として試料溶液の全水
溶性フエノール類濃度を求めた。
発芽試験
各試料5gに対して、蒸溜水を100ml加え、60
℃で4時間温水抽出した。内径90mmのシヤーレに
ろ紙を2枚敷き、上記の温水抽出液を5ml加え、
そこにコマツナ種子を10粒室温で7日間栽培し
た。
粒度分布
各圧力で処理した樹皮を、乾燥し5.0mm、2.5
mm、1.0mm、0.5mm、0.25mmのふるいでふるい別し、
各ふるいに留まつた樹皮重量を測定した。
堆積試験
杉樹皮の6Kg/cm2−10min、25Kg/cm2−
10min、35Kg/cm2−10min、処理物および未処理
樹皮に鶏糞、尿素、水を添加しCN比を20、水分
を50%に調整した後堆積し、品温の変化を経時的
に測定した。
土壌中における分解性試験
原 理
好気的培養条件下における土壌中の有機物の最
終分解生産物はCO2ガスが考えられる。一般的に
土壌からのCO2ガスの発生作用は、土壌中の微生
物の作用による。そこで、供試樹皮を土壌と混合
し水分、温度を調整し樹皮を分解させる。このと
き発生するCO2ガスをアルカリ吸収剤(水酸化ナ
トリウム)に吸収させる。経時的にアルカリ吸収
剤を取り出し残存するアルカリを酸で滴定し、空
試験値との差から炭酸ガス量を算出する。
試験方法
試料3gを風乾土壌100gに混合し水分を最大
容水量の50%に調整後プラスチツク容器に充填し
た。容器中に0.2N NaOH 25mlを加えたビーカ
ーを吊るしておき、発生したCO2ガスを吸収させ
た。プラスチツク容器は30℃の恒温器中に静置し
た。毎日定時に0.2N NaOHの入つたビーカーを
取り出し、新しいものと交換した。取り出したビ
ーカーに3N BaCl2を3ml加えフエノールフタレ
ンを指示薬として0.2N HClで滴定した。
(注) 未処理樹皮、2Kg/cm2、6Kg/cm2処理樹
皮は長さ3〜4cmの小片であり、そのままでは
土壌との混合が難しいので5mm程度に裁断し
た。
結果および考案
熱水注出量および水溶性フエノール類
結果は表2に示した。杉、檜とも樹皮の熱水抽
出物量は爆砕処理により増加した。増加の程度は
圧力に比例して大きくなつた。水溶性フエノール
類も同様に爆砕処理により増加した。水溶性フエ
ノール類は植物の生育を阻害するため、爆砕物を
そのまま圃場に施用した場合、生育阻害を引き起
こす。前記における熱水抽出量、水溶性フエノー
ル類濃度は表2の通りである。[Table] (Comparative Test) A comparative test was conducted as follows between the conventionally known blasting treatment for woody parts, etc. and the blasting treatment of the present invention, and the differences between them were clarified. Test samples Cedar and cypress bark were blasted under the following conditions. 2Kg/cm 2 for 15 minutes 14Kg/cm 2 for 5 minutes 6Kg/cm 2 for 15 minutes 25Kg/cm 2 for 10 minutes 10Kg/cm 2 for 5 minutes 35Kg/cm 2 for 10 minutes Test items Amount of hot water extracted Water-soluble phenols Germination test Particle size distribution Sedimentation test Degradability test in soil Test method Amount of hot water extracted Add 100 ml of distilled water to 5 g of each sample,
After hot water extraction at ℃ for 4 hours, centrifugation was performed at 120 rpm for 10 minutes, and the supernatant was further dried and filtered.
50 ml of this filtrate was placed in an evaporating dish, water was evaporated in a water bath at 100°C, and the mixture was further dried in a dryer at 105°C for 24 hours and its weight was measured. Water-soluble phenols 20 ml of distilled water was added to 2 g of an air-dried sample, allowed to stand at room temperature for 24 hours, centrifuged and dry-filtered, and the filtrate was used as a test solution. 5 ml of the test solution was placed in a 50 ml volumetric flask, 5 ml of phenol reagent and 15 ml of 20% sodium carbonate solution were added to bring the volume to 50 ml, and the mixture was heated at 35° C. for 20 minutes to develop color. Measurement of phenols is at 520nm.
The absorbance of the sample was measured using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-160A), and the concentration of total water-soluble phenols in the sample solution was determined using phenol as a standard substance. Germination test Add 100ml of distilled water to 5g of each sample,
Hot water extraction was carried out at ℃ for 4 hours. Place two pieces of filter paper in a 90mm inner diameter shear dish, add 5ml of the above warm water extract,
Ten Komatsuna seeds were grown there at room temperature for 7 days. Particle size distribution The bark treated with each pressure was dried to 5.0 mm, 2.5 mm,
Sieve through mm, 1.0mm, 0.5mm, 0.25mm sieves,
The weight of bark retained on each sieve was measured. Deposition test Cedar bark 6Kg/cm 2 −10min, 25Kg/cm 2 −
For 10 min, 35 Kg/cm 2 -10 min, chicken manure, urea, and water were added to the treated and untreated bark to adjust the CN ratio to 20 and moisture to 50%, and then deposited, and changes in product temperature were measured over time. . Principle of degradability test in soil The final decomposition product of organic matter in soil under aerobic culture conditions is thought to be CO 2 gas. Generally, the generation of CO 2 gas from soil is due to the action of microorganisms in the soil. Therefore, the test bark is mixed with soil and the moisture and temperature are adjusted to allow the bark to decompose. The CO 2 gas generated at this time is absorbed by an alkaline absorbent (sodium hydroxide). The alkali absorbent is taken out over time, the remaining alkali is titrated with acid, and the amount of carbon dioxide gas is calculated from the difference from the blank test value. Test method: 3 g of sample was mixed with 100 g of air-dried soil, and after adjusting the water content to 50% of the maximum water capacity, the mixture was filled into a plastic container. A beaker containing 25 ml of 0.2N NaOH was suspended in the container to absorb the generated CO 2 gas. The plastic container was placed in a thermostat at 30°C. At a fixed time every day, the beaker containing 0.2N NaOH was removed and replaced with a new one. 3 ml of 3N BaCl 2 was added to the taken out beaker and titrated with 0.2N HCl using phenolphthalene as an indicator. (Note) The untreated bark, 2 kg/cm 2 and 6 kg/cm 2 treated bark were small pieces with a length of 3 to 4 cm, and since it was difficult to mix them with soil as they were, they were cut into pieces of about 5 mm. Results and Ideas Amount of hot water poured out and water-soluble phenols The results are shown in Table 2. The amount of hydrothermal extracts from the bark of both cedar and cypress increased with blasting treatment. The degree of increase was proportional to the pressure. Water-soluble phenols also increased due to the blasting treatment. Water-soluble phenols inhibit plant growth, so if the blasted material is applied directly to the field, it will cause growth inhibition. The amount of hot water extracted and the concentration of water-soluble phenols in the above are shown in Table 2.
【表】【table】
【表】
日間堆積した物である。
発芽試験
発芽試験結果を表3に示した。各区とも発芽率
は100%であつたが、対照(H2O)に比較して、
地下部の生育が悪かつた。生育阻害の程度はほぼ
圧力に比例して大きくなつた。これは、水溶性フ
エノール類濃度と相関関係にある。このことか
ら、爆砕物をそのまま耕地に施用することは危険
である。前記における発芽試験結果は表3の通り
である。[Table] Materials deposited over a period of days.
Germination test The germination test results are shown in Table 3. The germination rate was 100% in each plot, but compared to the control (H 2 O),
Growth underground was poor. The degree of growth inhibition increased almost in proportion to the pressure. This is correlated with the concentration of water-soluble phenols. For this reason, it is dangerous to apply explosive materials directly to cultivated land. The germination test results in the above are shown in Table 3.
【表】
た。
粒度分布
爆砕後、粒度を測定し、その結果を表4に示し
た。杉では2Kg/cm2から14Kg/cm2までの処理圧力
では5mm以上が38.5〜45.9%であり、未爆砕の
40.2%と比較して変化はなく、5mm以下の各粒度
においても未爆砕とほど同程度であり、処理によ
る効果は認められなかつた。一方、25Kg/cm2、35
Kg/cm2処理は5mm以上が2.8%と0.3%と大きく減
少し、変わつて0.25mm以下の粒分が31.8%と58.0
%に増加し、処理によつて樹皮は微粉砕された。
桧も杉と同様に2Kg/cm2から14Kg/cm2処理圧力
では、粒度の分布は未爆砕とほぼ同程度であつた
が、25Kg/cm2、35Kg/cm2処理は低粒度の粒分が増
加した。
以上のことから、杉および桧の樹皮の細胞構造
を爆砕処理により破壊するには、ゲージ圧で25
Kg/cm2程度の圧力が必要である。[Table]
Particle Size Distribution After blasting, the particle size was measured and the results are shown in Table 4. For cedar, at treatment pressures from 2Kg/cm 2 to 14Kg/cm 2 , 38.5% to 45.9% of cedars are 5 mm or more.
There was no change compared to 40.2%, and each particle size of 5 mm or less was at the same level as unexploded, so no effect of treatment was observed. On the other hand, 25Kg/cm 2 , 35
In the Kg/ cm2 treatment, particles of 5 mm or larger decreased significantly to 2.8% and 0.3%, and the proportion of particles smaller than 0.25 mm decreased to 31.8% and 58.0%.
%, and the bark was pulverized by the treatment. Similar to cedar, the particle size distribution of cypress was almost the same as that of unexploded at treatment pressures from 2Kg/cm 2 to 14Kg/cm 2 , but with 25Kg/cm 2 and 35Kg/cm 2 treatments, the particle size distribution was increased. From the above, in order to destroy the cell structure of cedar and cypress bark by blasting, it is necessary to use a gauge pressure of 25
A pressure of about Kg/ cm2 is required.
【表】
堆積試験
堆積期間中の品温の変化を図1,2に示した。
未処理樹皮は品温があまり上がらず最高で32℃で
あつた。6Kg/cm2処理は10日目に45℃まで昇温し
たが、品温の低下も早かつた。これに対して、高
温処理は25Kg/cm2処理が55℃、35Kg/cm2処理が70
℃まで昇温した。尚、未処理樹皮でも当初昇温す
るのは、添加物(鶏糞など)の発熱と判断され
る。経時的に一定間隔で昇温するのは、切りかえ
して、空気を入れ発酵させる為である。
土壌中における分解性試験
施用樹皮の炭素の分解率を図3に示した。樹皮
未施用土壌からCO2発生量をバツクグラウンドと
して差し引き、CO2をCに換算し施用樹皮のCに
対する分解率で表わした。未処理樹皮の分解は遅
く、20日で4%となつたが、以後の分解は殆ど見
られなかつた。2Kg/cm2処理は若干分解速度が早
くなつたが、30日間で未処理より僅かに0.5%多
く分解されたに留まつた。これに対して25Kg/
cm2、35Kg/cm2両処理は分解速度が早く、30日目に
の分解率は8.83%と8.42%であり、未処理、2
Kg/cm2処理を大きく上回つた。前記における30日
間のC分解率(%)は表5の通りである。[Table] Deposition test Changes in product temperature during the deposition period are shown in Figures 1 and 2.
The temperature of untreated bark did not rise much, reaching a maximum of 32°C. In the 6Kg/cm 2 treatment, the temperature rose to 45°C on the 10th day, but the product temperature also decreased quickly. On the other hand, high temperature treatment is 55℃ for 25Kg/cm 2 treatment and 70℃ for 35Kg/cm 2 treatment.
The temperature was raised to ℃. The initial temperature rise even in untreated bark is thought to be due to heat generated by additives (chicken manure, etc.). The reason why the temperature is raised at regular intervals over time is to allow air to enter and ferment. Degradability test in soil The decomposition rate of carbon in the applied bark is shown in Figure 3. The amount of CO 2 generated was subtracted from the soil to which bark had not been applied as a background, and the CO 2 was converted into C, which was expressed as the decomposition rate of the C in the applied bark. Decomposition of untreated bark was slow, reaching 4% in 20 days, but little decomposition was observed after that. Although the 2Kg/cm 2 treatment resulted in a slightly faster decomposition rate, it was only 0.5% more decomposed than the untreated material over 30 days. For this, 25Kg/
cm 2 and 35Kg/cm 2 treatments have a fast decomposition rate, and the decomposition rates on the 30th day were 8.83% and 8.42%.
Kg/ cm2 treatment was greatly exceeded. The C decomposition rate (%) for 30 days is shown in Table 5.
【表】
(発明の効果)
この発明によれば、杉・桧の樹皮又は樹皮付着
の木質部の単独又は混合物を高温・高圧の飽和水
蒸気下で爆砕処理したので、多量に含まれている
リグニン及びヘミセルロースなどを分解して可溶
性にすると共に、綿状に生成した。従つて、微生
物及び酵素などの急速な繁殖が可能となり、容易
に処理して有害物質を消失させ肥料又は土壌改良
材として好適な物にすることができる。
この発明によれば、従来簡単に処理ができなか
つた杉・桧の樹皮、下枝又は製材時の樹皮付着の
廃材などを処理して比較的短い日数の間に有用物
に代える効果がある。[Table] (Effects of the Invention) According to the present invention, the bark of cedar and cypress, or the woody parts attached to the bark, alone or as a mixture, is blasted under high-temperature, high-pressure saturated steam. It decomposes hemicellulose and other substances to make them soluble and forms a cotton-like substance. Therefore, rapid propagation of microorganisms, enzymes, etc. is possible, and harmful substances can be easily processed to disappear, making it suitable as a fertilizer or soil improvement material. According to the present invention, it is possible to process the bark of cedar and cypress, lower branches, and waste wood with bark attached to it during sawing, which could not be easily processed in the past, and convert it into useful materials in a relatively short period of time.
第1図は比較試験における杉爆砕処理期間中の
品温変化を示すグラフ。第2図は同じく桧爆砕処
理期間中の品温変化を示すグラフ。第3図は同じ
く分解率(%)の経時的変化を示すグラフ。
Figure 1 is a graph showing changes in product temperature during the cedar blasting treatment period in a comparative test. Figure 2 is a graph showing changes in product temperature during the cypress blasting treatment period. FIG. 3 is a graph showing the change in decomposition rate (%) over time.
Claims (1)
は混合物を密閉容器内に入れ、224℃〜250℃の高
温と、25Kg/cm2〜40Kg/cm2(ゲージ圧)の高圧の
飽和水蒸気下で爆砕する第1工程と、第1工程で
得た処理物に微生物、窒素化合物又は酵素を加え
て醗酵させる第2工程とを結合させることを特徴
とした杉・桧樹皮等の爆砕処理方法。 2 微生物を糸状菌、放線菌類とし、酵素をセル
ラーゼとし、窒素化合物を硫酸アンモニア、石灰
窒素、尿素とした請求項1記載の杉・桧樹皮等の
爆砕処理方法。 3 杉・桧の樹皮又は樹皮付着の木質部の単独又
は混合物を密閉容器内に入れ、224℃〜250℃の高
温と、25Kg/cm2〜40Kg/cm2(ゲージ圧)の高圧の
飽和水蒸気下で爆砕する第1工程と、第1工程で
得た物に焼酎廃液を添加して醗酵させる第2工程
とを結合することを特徴とした杉・桧樹皮等の爆
砕処理方法。 4 杉・桧の樹皮又は樹皮付着の木質部の単独又
は混合物の224℃〜250℃の高温と、25Kg/cm2〜40
Kg/cm2(ゲージ圧)の高圧による爆砕処理物を微
生物又は酵素で醗酵処理したことを特徴とする
杉・桧樹皮等の爆砕処理物。[Claims] 1. Cedar/cypress bark or woody parts attached to the bark, alone or in a mixture, are placed in a sealed container and heated to a high temperature of 224°C to 250°C and 25Kg/cm 2 to 40Kg/cm 2 (gauge pressure). Cedar/cypress bark characterized by combining the first step of blasting under high-pressure saturated steam, and the second step of adding microorganisms, nitrogen compounds, or enzymes to the treated product obtained in the first step and fermenting it. etc. blasting treatment methods. 2. The method for blasting cedar, cypress bark, etc. according to claim 1, wherein the microorganism is filamentous fungi or actinomycetes, the enzyme is cellulase, and the nitrogen compound is ammonia sulfate, lime nitrogen, or urea. 3 Place the bark of cedar or cypress, or the woody parts with the bark attached, alone or in a mixture in a sealed container, and place it at a high temperature of 224°C to 250°C and under saturated steam at a high pressure of 25 kg/cm 2 to 40 kg/cm 2 (gauge pressure). A method for blasting cedar, cypress bark, etc., characterized in that it combines a first step of blasting the bark with a method of blasting, and a second step of adding shochu waste liquid to the product obtained in the first step and fermenting it. 4 High temperature of 224℃ to 250℃ of cedar/cypress bark or woody parts attached to bark, alone or in combination, and 25Kg/cm 2 to 40
A blasted product of cedar, cypress bark, etc., which is obtained by fermenting the blasted product under high pressure of Kg/cm 2 (gauge pressure) with microorganisms or enzymes.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1224149A JPH02289481A (en) | 1988-09-02 | 1989-08-30 | Method for blasting cryptomeria bark, cypress bark or the like and its blasted material |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP22007388 | 1988-09-02 | ||
| JP63-220073 | 1988-09-02 | ||
| JP1224149A JPH02289481A (en) | 1988-09-02 | 1989-08-30 | Method for blasting cryptomeria bark, cypress bark or the like and its blasted material |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH02289481A JPH02289481A (en) | 1990-11-29 |
| JPH0459277B2 true JPH0459277B2 (en) | 1992-09-21 |
Family
ID=26523511
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP1224149A Granted JPH02289481A (en) | 1988-09-02 | 1989-08-30 | Method for blasting cryptomeria bark, cypress bark or the like and its blasted material |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH02289481A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2001031969A (en) * | 1999-07-22 | 2001-02-06 | Hokushin Kk | Soil modifying material and soil modifying method |
Families Citing this family (23)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH05294771A (en) * | 1992-04-13 | 1993-11-09 | Nippon Steel Corp | Manuring method for coffee residue |
| JPH05294772A (en) * | 1992-04-13 | 1993-11-09 | Nippon Steel Corp | Manuring method for coffee residue |
| JP2540419B2 (en) * | 1992-07-20 | 1996-10-02 | 株式会社鳥取セラミックス | Green and planting floor earthwork method |
| JPH1067589A (en) * | 1996-08-27 | 1998-03-10 | Taisei Corp | Composting method of felled timber |
| JPH1190402A (en) * | 1997-09-25 | 1999-04-06 | Unitika Ltd | Method for treating organic waste |
| JP3715119B2 (en) * | 1998-11-02 | 2005-11-09 | 日本原子力研究所 | Plant damage control / growth-promoting agent by degradation extract of fiber material |
| JP3801499B2 (en) * | 2001-07-19 | 2006-07-26 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Method and apparatus for treating organic waste |
| KR100513924B1 (en) * | 2001-11-28 | 2005-09-08 | (주)흥주농업회사법인 | Method for manufacturing of compost for ginseng seeds |
| JP2003246691A (en) * | 2002-02-26 | 2003-09-02 | Daiwa House Ind Co Ltd | Method for producing bark and compost using bark and dewatered sludge cake |
| JP2003250371A (en) * | 2002-02-26 | 2003-09-09 | Daiwa House Ind Co Ltd | Method for producing litter using bark and method for producing fertilizer |
| JP2004011391A (en) * | 2002-06-11 | 2004-01-15 | Public Works Research Institute | Method of manufacturing slope face spraying material and slope face spraying material |
| JP3694744B2 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2005-09-14 | 独立行政法人土木研究所 | Biogas resource recovery method |
| JP4056839B2 (en) * | 2002-09-25 | 2008-03-05 | 大和ハウス工業株式会社 | Method for treating used paper diapers containing polymer absorbers |
| US6730223B1 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2004-05-04 | Comprehensive Resources, Recovery & Reuse, Inc. | Apparatus, system and method for treating waste material |
| JP4025629B2 (en) * | 2002-11-20 | 2007-12-26 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Organic waste treatment methods |
| JP4133521B2 (en) * | 2003-04-07 | 2008-08-13 | 前田製管株式会社 | Method for producing artificial lightweight soil |
| JP5066829B2 (en) * | 2006-03-24 | 2012-11-07 | 地方独立行政法人北海道立総合研究機構 | Tree planting material and its manufacturing method |
| JP2009035457A (en) * | 2007-08-03 | 2009-02-19 | Shirane Rikuso Kk | Method for producing chicken manure |
| JP2009291190A (en) * | 2008-05-08 | 2009-12-17 | Shirane Rikuso Kk | Method for cultivating crop in heavy metal-containing soil |
| BR112018068079B1 (en) * | 2016-04-11 | 2023-04-25 | Kao Corporation | METHOD FOR GROWING A PLANT |
| JP6962696B2 (en) | 2016-04-11 | 2021-11-05 | 花王株式会社 | Soil conditioner |
| JP6885703B2 (en) * | 2016-10-25 | 2021-06-16 | 勇美 福永 | How to make organic fertilizer |
| EP3677684B1 (en) * | 2017-08-31 | 2026-04-29 | G-8 International Trading Co., Ltd. | Method for producing fulvic acid solution |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS5841810A (en) * | 1981-09-07 | 1983-03-11 | Tokuyama Soda Co Ltd | Composite reparative material |
-
1989
- 1989-08-30 JP JP1224149A patent/JPH02289481A/en active Granted
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2001031969A (en) * | 1999-07-22 | 2001-02-06 | Hokushin Kk | Soil modifying material and soil modifying method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH02289481A (en) | 1990-11-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JPH0459277B2 (en) | ||
| Palmowski et al. | Influence of the size reduction of organic waste on their anaerobic digestion | |
| Tropea et al. | Bioethanol production from pineapple wastes | |
| CN102372517A (en) | Preparation method and application method of seaweed industrial solid waste organic fertilizer | |
| PL123987B1 (en) | Process for preparing protein products | |
| Li et al. | Anaerobic digestion performance and mechanism of ammoniation pretreatment of corn stover | |
| CN105625073A (en) | Raw material pretreatment method for straw-based seedling raising pot, product and production method of seedling raising pot | |
| CN102475353A (en) | Tobacco stalk fiber substance and preparation method and application thereof | |
| CN109608248A (en) | A kind of biochar composite bentonite-based phosphorus and potassium slow-release fertilizer and preparation method thereof | |
| CN109197283A (en) | A kind of preparation method of degradable water conservation mulch | |
| Xu et al. | Brown sugar as a carbon source can make agricultural organic waste compost enter the secondary thermophilic stage and promote compost decomposition | |
| US20200305363A1 (en) | Preparation of plant growth substrates from sugar cane bagasse | |
| TW201429922A (en) | Methods and equipments for high-rate production and improvement of the quality organic fertilizers from organic wastes | |
| WO2024100602A1 (en) | Process for the production of biofertilizers obtained from organic waste | |
| RU2227130C2 (en) | Method for preparing humatized organic fertilizer | |
| CA1169794A (en) | Process for treating cellulosic material and products produced therefrom | |
| JPS60164494A (en) | Method for pretreatment of enzymic hydrolysis of cellulosic wood | |
| JPS6219920B2 (en) | ||
| JP2010136686A (en) | Method for saccharifying wood-based biomass | |
| CN114478105A (en) | A kind of hydrolysis method of agricultural and forestry waste mixed straw | |
| CN208327868U (en) | A kind of system that cow dung prepares soil conditioner | |
| CN116947550B (en) | A method for treating agricultural and forestry wastes by using microbial fermentation | |
| SU869742A2 (en) | Method of obtaining protein food | |
| CN112142523A (en) | Corn straw fiber-based water-retaining slow-release fertilizer capable of being completely degraded | |
| CN111187627A (en) | Low-cost and environment-friendly sand fixing agent and preparation method thereof |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080921 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |