Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH0516495B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH0516495B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0516495B2
JPH0516495B2 JP60166361A JP16636185A JPH0516495B2 JP H0516495 B2 JPH0516495 B2 JP H0516495B2 JP 60166361 A JP60166361 A JP 60166361A JP 16636185 A JP16636185 A JP 16636185A JP H0516495 B2 JPH0516495 B2 JP H0516495B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
injection
ground
soil
instant
construction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP60166361A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS6225610A (en
Inventor
Kyoshi Matsumura
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
OOSAKA BOSUI KENSETSUSHA KK
Original Assignee
OOSAKA BOSUI KENSETSUSHA KK
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by OOSAKA BOSUI KENSETSUSHA KK filed Critical OOSAKA BOSUI KENSETSUSHA KK
Priority to JP16636185A priority Critical patent/JPS6225610A/en
Publication of JPS6225610A publication Critical patent/JPS6225610A/en
Publication of JPH0516495B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0516495B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Consolidation Of Soil By Introduction Of Solidifying Substances Into Soil (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

産業上の利用分野 本発明は薬液注入工法、詳しくは、2重管ロツ
ドを用いて、瞬結性薬液の注入を行なうような薬
液注入工法に関する。 従来の技術 従来、薬液注入工法として、例えば2重管ロツ
ドを用いて、瞬結性薬液の注入を行う、所謂2重
管ロツド瞬結注入工法が提案され、実施されてい
る。2重管ロツド瞬結注入工法の原理は次の通り
である。即ち極めて短かいゲルタイムの瞬結性薬
液を地盤内に注入すると、初めは2重管ロツドの
先端より放射状に浸透して球体となつてゲル化を
始める。ところが注入は引続き行なわれ、薬液は
次々と吐出されるため、最初にできたゲルの球体
が充分に強度を得ないうちに球体の内部が破壊さ
れて何本かの流路ができる。そしてこの流路を通
つて未注入部分の地盤に顔を出した薬液が、ここ
から放射状に浸透し、そこで半球状に固化し、こ
のようにして最初にできた球体の周囲に固化物が
成長して行く。以上の全工程が繰り返されること
により球状の固結体が得られる。このような瞬結
性薬液の浸透状況を模式的に示すと、第1図の通
りである。 発明が解決しようとする問題点 ところが実際の施工の場では、大部分の地盤は
複雑な多層地盤であり、2重管ロツドの先端より
注入された瞬結性薬液は、ロツド廻りの空隙、層
境その他の弱い所を逸走し、ロツドから離れた注
入予定範囲外で固結し、一方注入予定範囲内では
未固結の部分が残るなど、極めて不均質な浸透状
態となり、第1図に模式的に示されるような固結
体の形成は極めて困難である。また注入予定範囲
外への逸走は、薬液の注入ロスを招くのみならず
地盤隆起の原因となり、好ましくない。 本発明はこのような従来の問題点を一掃するこ
とを目的としてなされたものである。 問題点を解決するための手段 本発明者等は、上記従来の問題を一掃するべく
鋭意研究を重ねた結果、瞬結性薬液の注入を断続
的に行い、注入の途中に、先に注入された薬液の
ゲル化に必要な注入停止時間帯を設けるときは、
瞬結性薬液の浸透状態が著しく改善されることを
見出し、茲に本発明を完成するに至つたものであ
る。 即ち本発明は、2重管ロツドを用い、瞬結性薬
液を地盤内に注入するに際し、各段階での薬液注
入を、吐出量10〜20/min、吐出時間1〜5分
間の連続注入の繰返しにより行ない、連続注入後
には、それぞれ上記薬液のゲル化に必要な注入停
止時間帯を設けることを特徴とする薬液注入工法
に係る。 本発明工法に於て用いられる瞬結性薬液は、常
法通りA液とB液からなり、2重管ロツドの先端
部で混合されながら目的地盤内に注入される。瞬
結性薬液のゲル化タイム及び吐出量は常法通りで
あり、例えばゲル化タイム0〜15秒程度、また吐
出量は10〜20/分である。 地盤内への瞬結性薬液の注入は、常法通り深層
部から上方に向けて多段階的に行なわれ、各段階
での薬液注入時間は、吐出量、土質状態及び改良
規模などにも左右されるが、通常は3〜15分程度
である。 本発明は、このような各段階で薬液注入工程を
断続的に行なり、注入工程の途中に、少なくとも
一回の薬液ゲル化に必要な注入停止時間帯を設け
ることを特徴としている。 注入停止時間帯は、先に注入された薬液が充分
にゲル化し得る程度の長さがあればよく、通常薬
液のゲル化タイムと略々等しいか、或はこれより
多少長ければ充分であり、ゲル化タイムを遥かに
超えるような長い注入停止は、作業の遅延を招き
好ましくない。 薬液の連続注入時間は、これがあまり長いと、
従来工法と同様に注入予定範囲外への薬液の逸走
を招く虞れがあるので、このような逸走を招かな
い範囲に止どめるべきであり、1〜5分間の範囲
から、土質状態によつて適宜選択決定する。 本発明に於ては、このような連続注入に引続
き、先の注入停止時間帯をとり、再び連続注入を
行ない、以下必要に応じこれを繰り返す。このよ
うな連続注入と、注入停止を繰返すことにより、
浸透状態の改良に加え、地盤隆起、薬液ロスを防
止できる。 このような効果が得られる理由は定かでない
が、注入停止時間帯をとることにより、先に注入
された薬液がこの時間帯の間にゲル化し、パツカ
ーとして機能し得る程度の強度を持ち、その結果
再開後に注入された薬液の逸走傾向は、このパツ
カー効果により抑制されることに加え、薬液の浸
透が注入予定範囲内の未固結部分へ向うよう案内
されるなどの理由によるものと考えられる。 本発明工法は、2重管ロツド瞬結注入工法に加
え、瞬結性薬液の一次注入と、緩結性薬液の2次
注入を組合せるような、2重管ロツド複合注入工
法の第一次注入にも適用できる。 実施例 以下本発明の実施例を掲げ、本発明の特徴とす
る所を更に一層明らかにする。 実施例 1 1) 使用薬液 溶液型水ガラス系(瞬結型) ゲル化タイム 10see 2) 注入作業条件
INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION FIELD The present invention relates to a chemical liquid injection method, and more particularly, to a chemical liquid injection method in which an instant-setting chemical liquid is injected using a double pipe rod. BACKGROUND ART Conventionally, as a chemical injection method, a so-called double-pipe rod instant-setting injection method has been proposed and implemented, in which, for example, a double-pipe rod is used to inject an instant-setting chemical. The principle of the double pipe rod instant connection injection method is as follows. That is, when an instant-setting chemical solution with an extremely short gel time is injected into the ground, it initially penetrates radially from the tip of the double-tube rod, forms a sphere, and begins to gel. However, since the injection continues and the chemical liquid is discharged one after another, the inside of the initially formed gel sphere is destroyed before it gains sufficient strength, creating several channels. The chemical solution that emerges from the uninjected part of the ground through this channel penetrates radially from here, solidifies into a hemispherical shape, and solidified matter grows around the initially formed sphere. I'll go. A spherical solid body is obtained by repeating all the above steps. The penetration state of such an instant-setting chemical solution is schematically shown in FIG. 1. Problems to be Solved by the Invention However, in actual construction sites, most of the ground is complex and multi-layered, and the instant-setting chemical solution injected from the tip of the double-pipe rod can damage the voids and layers around the rod. The penetration state was extremely non-uniform, with the material escaping the boundaries and other weak spots and solidifying outside the planned injection area, away from the rod, while leaving unconsolidated areas within the planned injection area. It is extremely difficult to form a solid as shown in the figure. Further, escaping outside the planned injection range not only causes injection loss of the chemical solution but also causes ground upheaval, which is undesirable. The present invention has been made with the aim of eliminating such conventional problems. Means for Solving the Problems As a result of extensive research to eliminate the above-mentioned conventional problems, the present inventors have intermittently injected an instant-setting drug solution, and in the middle of the injection, there are cases where the previous injection occurs. When establishing an infusion stop period necessary for gelation of the drug solution,
It was discovered that the permeation state of instant-setting chemical liquids was significantly improved, and this led to the completion of the present invention. That is, the present invention uses a double pipe rod to inject an instant-setting chemical into the ground, and the chemical is continuously injected at each stage with a discharge rate of 10 to 20/min and a discharge time of 1 to 5 minutes. The present invention relates to a chemical liquid injection method that is carried out repeatedly and is characterized in that after each continuous injection, an injection stop period necessary for gelation of the chemical liquid is provided. The instant-setting chemical liquid used in the construction method of the present invention consists of liquids A and B as usual, and is injected into the target ground while being mixed at the tip of the double pipe rod. The gelation time and discharge rate of the instant-setting chemical solution are as per conventional methods, for example, the gelation time is about 0 to 15 seconds, and the discharge rate is 10 to 20 minutes. The instant-setting chemical solution is injected into the ground in multiple stages from the deep layer upwards as usual, and the injection time at each stage depends on the discharge amount, soil condition, improvement scale, etc. However, it usually takes about 3 to 15 minutes. The present invention is characterized in that the drug solution injection process is performed intermittently at each of these stages, and that an injection stop period necessary for at least one gelation of the drug solution is provided in the middle of the injection process. The injection stop time period only needs to be long enough to allow the previously injected drug solution to gel sufficiently, and it is sufficient if it is approximately equal to the gelation time of the normal drug solution, or slightly longer than this, Stopping the injection for a long time that far exceeds the gelation time is undesirable because it causes a delay in the work. If the continuous injection time of the drug solution is too long,
As with the conventional method, there is a risk of the chemical solution escaping outside the planned injection area, so it should be kept within a range that does not cause such escaping. Therefore, make an appropriate selection. In the present invention, following such continuous injection, the previous injection stop period is taken, continuous injection is performed again, and this is repeated as necessary. By repeating such continuous injection and stopping the injection,
In addition to improving infiltration conditions, it can prevent ground uplift and chemical loss. The reason for this effect is not clear, but by stopping the injection, the drug solution injected earlier becomes a gel during this period and becomes strong enough to function as a packer. The tendency of the injected chemical solution to escape after restarting is thought to be due to reasons such as being suppressed by this Packer effect and guiding the penetration of the chemical solution toward the unconsolidated area within the planned injection area. . In addition to the double pipe rod instant setting injection method, the method of the present invention is the first stage of the double pipe rod composite injection method, which combines the primary injection of an instant setting chemical solution and the secondary injection of a slow setting chemical solution. It can also be applied to injections. Examples Examples of the present invention will be given below to further clarify the characteristics of the present invention. Example 1 1) Chemical solution used Solution type water glass type (instant setting type) Gelation time 10see 2) Injection work conditions

【表】 3) 土質条件 施工対象地盤は、非常に軟弱なる砂質シルト
を主体としており、含水比も大きく、自然含水
比をすでに液性限界を上まわつていることが予
測され、わずかの外圧変化で容易に流動化する
ことを考えられた。 又、施工対象地盤上部に接する形にφ1800mm
埋設管(3条)が斜めに横断しており、その周
囲は埋戻し土(発生土による埋戻し:細砂)で
あつた。 4) 施工状況 従来工法 軟弱なる微細砂層である為、瞬結のみの施工
は圧力の変化がみられなかつた。(注入速度は
18/minの一定であり、圧力の上昇はなかつ
た。)これは、注入材が注入範囲外に逸走して
いる傾向を示しており、固結土は連続性が不足
し、不連続部分からの湧水に伴う土砂の流動が
生じ、固結部分は見掛上圧縮(圧密)状態を示
しているが、一様に浸透はしておらず、未改良
部分が残存し、崩壊の原因となつた。 又、注入材が逸走する為、地盤隆起の原因と
もなり、二次障害発生の恐れも出てきた。 インターバル施工時 注入時には、圧力がインターバル毎に少しず
つ上昇する傾向を示し、注入材が改良範囲内に
均一に広がり、浸透していく状態を示し、固結
土は不連続部がなく一体固結化しており、地盤
隆起もみられなかつた。又、固結土は非常に高
い強度を有しており、ピツクにて掘削を行なう
程であり、遮水性も非常に良好であつた。 5) 目視観察結果 従来工法 切羽状況は、高い強度を有する固結体が部分
的にみられるのであるが、固結体と固結体との
間に未改良部を残していた。その未改良部は、
地下水の浸透により、地砂の流出から切羽崩壊
に至る原因となつていた。又、層境に注入材が
集中しており、その上下には注入材が全くみら
れない個所もみられた。 インターバル施工時 切羽は、全体的に均一に改良されており、湧
水もほとんどみられず、非常にい強度の固結度
合であつた。グラウト脈は細かく縦横に走つて
おり、特に層境の上下にも注入剤の存在がみら
れ、圧密されたゲルにより、改良土は非常に固
く円滑なる推進工事が施工出来た。 実施例 2 1) 使用薬液 溶液型水ガラス系(瞬結型)
ゲル化タイム 10sec 半懸濁液型水ガラス系(瞬結型)
ゲル化タイム 10sec 2) 注入作業条件
[Table] 3) Soil Conditions The ground to be constructed is mainly composed of very soft sandy silt, and has a high water content.It is predicted that the natural water content ratio has already exceeded the liquid limit, and it is expected that the ground will be constructed under a slight external pressure. It was thought that it could be easily fluidized by change. Also, φ1800mm in contact with the upper part of the ground to be constructed.
Three buried pipes crossed diagonally, and the surrounding area was filled with backfilling soil (backfilling with generated soil: fine sand). 4) Construction status: Conventional method Because the sand layer is soft and fine, no change in pressure was observed during construction using only instant setting. (The injection rate is
The pressure was constant at 18/min, and there was no increase in pressure. ) This indicates a tendency for the injected material to escape outside the injection range, and the consolidated soil lacks continuity, causing sediment flow due to spring water from the discontinuous area, and the consolidated area Although it appears to be in a compressed state, the infiltration was not uniform and unimproved areas remained, which caused the collapse. Furthermore, as the injection material escapes, it may cause ground upheaval, raising the possibility of secondary failures. During interval construction When pouring, the pressure tends to rise little by little at each interval, indicating that the injection material spreads uniformly within the improved area and permeates, and compacted soil is consolidated as one piece without any discontinuities. There was no evidence of ground upheaval. In addition, the compacted soil had such high strength that it could be excavated with a pick, and its water-blocking properties were also very good. 5) Visual observation results of conventional construction face The condition of the face shows that compacts with high strength can be seen in some parts, but unimproved areas remained between the compacts. The unimproved part is
The infiltration of groundwater caused the sand to flow out and cause the face to collapse. In addition, the injection material was concentrated at the layer boundaries, and there were places above and below where no injection material was seen at all. During interval construction, the face was uniformly improved as a whole, there were almost no springs, and the degree of consolidation was extremely strong. The grout veins ran finely in all directions, and the presence of the injection agent was especially visible above and below the layer boundaries, and the consolidated gel made the improved soil extremely hard and allowed for smooth propulsion work. Example 2 1) Chemical solution used Solution type water glass type (instant setting type)
Gelation time 10sec Semi-suspension type water glass type (instant setting type)
Gelation time 10sec 2) Injection working conditions

【表】 3) 土質条件 注入対象地盤は、上部から非常に軟弱な粘性
土(N=0〜1程度)・砂質土となつており、
粘性土に鉱滓層を挾む個所もあり、全般的には
埋戻し土(干拓地)である。粘性土は軟弱なる
シルトが主体で、局部的に砂分を多く混入した
互層状態を程していた。 4) 施工状況 従来工法 非常にゆるい粘性土である為、注入材が逸走
し、上記道路(アスフアルト舗装)を持ち上げ
る傾向がみられ、立坑付近の施工においては、
シートパイルに沿つて注入材が溢出したきた
為、注入速度20/minから16/min(半懸
濁液型及び溶液型)に減じて施工を行なつた。 インターバル施工時 ロツド周囲のパツカー効果が大きくなり、溢
出はみられず、道路の隆起は減少した。粘性土
は局部圧密がなされ、注入範囲の粘着力が増加
し、推進切羽は安定し、湧水によるトラブルは
無かつた。 半懸濁液型注入材のホモゲル強度は、0.8〜
1.0Kgf/cm2であり、溶液型に比べて非常に高
い。粘度は、4.5cps/20℃程度であり、溶液型
(1.2cps/20℃程度)の3〜4倍である為、逸
走する距離は溶液型よりも少いが、ゲル強度が
大なるので地盤隆起等の原因になり易いのであ
るが、インターバル実施により地盤隆起はほと
んどみられなかつた。 5) 目視観察結果 従来工法 粘性土には、注入材が太い脈状でみられるの
であるが、地盤を圧密するにまでは至つておら
ず、改良度合が悪く、推進時には未改良部から
の土砂の流出があり、推進困難となつた。 インターバル施工時 切羽の状態は、細いグラウト脈が縦横に走つ
ており、均一なる改良効果がみられた。特に湧
水に伴う土砂の流出もなく、従来工法にみられ
た地盤隆起も制御することが出来た。 実施例 3 1) 使用薬液 溶液型水ガラス系(瞬結型)
ゲル化タイム 10sec 2) 注入作業条件
[Table] 3) Soil conditions The ground targeted for injection consists of very soft clay soil (N = 0 to 1) and sandy soil from the top.
There are places where the clayey soil is intercalated with a slag layer, and the area is generally backfilled soil (polder land). The clay soil was mainly composed of soft silt, with alternating layers locally mixed with a large amount of sand. 4) Construction status Conventional method Since the soil is very loose and cohesive, there is a tendency for the injection material to run away and lift the road (asphalt pavement) mentioned above.
Because the injection material overflowed along the sheet pile, the injection speed was reduced from 20/min to 16/min (semi-suspension type and solution type). During interval construction, the patch car effect around the road became larger, no overflow was observed, and road upheavals were reduced. The clay soil was locally consolidated, the adhesive force in the injection area increased, the propulsion face was stabilized, and there were no problems caused by spring water. The homogel strength of semi-suspension type injection material is 0.8~
It is 1.0Kgf/cm 2 , which is much higher than that of the solution type. The viscosity is approximately 4.5 cps/20℃, which is 3 to 4 times that of the solution type (approximately 1.2cps/20℃), so the distance traveled is less than that of the solution type, but the gel strength is greater, so it is difficult to maintain the ground. This is likely to cause upheaval, but because of the interval implementation, almost no ground upheaval was observed. 5) Visual observation results of conventional construction method The injection material can be seen in thick veins in the clayey soil, but the soil has not been consolidated and the degree of improvement is poor. There was an outflow of water, making it difficult to proceed. During interval construction, the condition of the face was such that thin grout veins ran in all directions, and a uniform improvement effect was observed. In particular, there was no runoff of earth and sand caused by spring water, and it was possible to control the ground upheaval seen with conventional construction methods. Example 3 1) Chemical solution used Solution type water glass type (instant setting type)
Gelation time 10sec 2) Injection working conditions

【表】 3) 土質条件 洪積層と沖積層との境であり、多様な互層状
態を呈しており、粘性土を挾んだ土層はN値を
低く、全体的に含水の多い多層地盤である。 4 施工状況 従来工法 二重管ロツド式瞬結注入工法にて施工を行な
つたのではあるが、地盤隆起が著しく、注入材
もほとんど受けつけない状態であつた。従つ
て、管推進時には、切羽の崩壊や湧水が大で、
推進工事の障害となつた。 インターバル施工時 インターバルにて施工した結果、地盤隆起も
ほとんどなく、インターバル毎に注入圧力も上
昇していくのが確認された。推進時の状況にお
いても、ほとんどトラブルもなく、順調に推進
が出来た。 5) 目視観察結果 従来工法 本施工対象地盤は、非常に複雑なる互層状態で
あり、注入材は注入孔周囲に沿つて逸走し、改良
範囲内には注入材はほとんどみられなかつた。 従つて、管推進時には、湧水・切羽の崩壊の繰
り返しであり、推進工事は非常に難行した。 インターバル施工時 切羽の状況は、各層境に注入材が脈状に走り、
圧密された粘性土と脱水された砂質土がみられ
た。特に、粘性土は細いグラウト脈が走つてお
り、層境を走る注入材がインターバルにより制御
された後に、他の軟弱部分に走つたものと考えら
れる。 実施例 4 1) 使用薬液 溶液型水ガラス系(瞬結型)
ゲル化タイム 15sec 2) 注入作業条件
[Table] 3) Soil conditions It is a boundary between a diluvial layer and an alluvial layer, and exhibits a variety of alternating layers.The soil layer sandwiching clayey soil has a low N value, and the soil is a multilayered ground with a high moisture content overall. be. 4 Construction status Conventional method Construction was carried out using the double pipe rod type instant injection method, but the ground was so heavily raised that it was almost impossible to accept the injection material. Therefore, when the pipe is propelled, collapse of the face and spring water are serious,
This became an obstacle to the promotion work. During interval construction As a result of interval construction, it was confirmed that there was almost no ground upheaval and the injection pressure increased with each interval. Even under the conditions of propulsion, it was possible to proceed smoothly with almost no problems. 5) Visual observation results of conventional construction method The ground targeted for this construction had very complex alternating layers, and the injection material escaped along the periphery of the injection hole, and almost no injection material could be seen within the improved area. Therefore, during pipe propulsion, spring water and the face collapsed repeatedly, making the propulsion work extremely difficult. During interval construction, the condition of the face is that the injection material runs in veins at the boundaries of each layer.
Consolidated clay soil and dewatered sandy soil were observed. In particular, the clay soil has thin grout veins running through it, and it is thought that the injection material running along the layer boundaries was controlled by the interval and then ran to other soft areas. Example 4 1) Chemical solution used Solution type water glass type (instant setting type)
Gelation time 15sec 2) Injection working conditions

【表】 3) 土質条件 No.1 改良範囲は上部よりシルト混り中砂〜粗砂、
浮石混り中砂及びシルト層から成り、N値も低
い互層である。 No.2 改良範囲は上部より、粗砂、シルト質細砂、
粘土及び細砂層と互層になつており、N値もバ
ラツキがある。 施工対象地盤は、中位〜ゆるい砂質土と軟弱
なる粘性土であり、地下水位も比較的高く、湧
水に伴う土砂の流出も懸念される地盤である。
又、砂質土は細粒分の含有も多く、地盤改良の
難しい地盤であるといえる。 4) 施工状況 従来工法 二重管ロツド式瞬結注入工法にて設計がなさ
れており、施工を行なつた結果、道路地盤の隆
起が生じ、流量を18/minから12/minに
減ずるも、予定量の1/2程度しか注入出来なか
つた。(地盤隆起が著しく、中入施工を中断) 改良範囲は、未改良部分が多く、発進部の鏡
切断も可能であつた。 インターバル施工時 地盤隆起はほとんど無く、改良土も連続した
状態となつており、ピツクを使用して推進を行
なつた。 5) 目視観察結果 従来工法 注入材は層境に集中しており、均一なる改良
は出来ていなかつた。特に注入材はロツド周辺
を伝わり上部層境にまで逸脱しており、地盤隆
起の原因ともなつていた。 インターバル施工時 注入材は、層境のみでなく全体に細かいグラ
ウト脈を形成しており、均一な地盤改良が成さ
れていた。 又、掘削時にはピツクを使用する程の強度発
現がみられた。 実施例 5 1) 使用薬液 溶液型水ガラス系(瞬結型)
ゲル化タイム 10sec 〃 (緩結型)
ゲル化タイム 3〜10min 2) 注入作業条件
[Table] 3) Soil condition No. 1 The improvement range is silt-mixed medium sand to coarse sand from the upper part,
It consists of sand and silt layers mixed with floating stones, and is an alternating layer with a low N value. No. 2 The improvement range is from the top: coarse sand, silty fine sand,
It consists of alternating layers of clay and fine sand, and the N value also varies. The ground to be constructed is medium to loose sandy soil and soft clay soil, the groundwater level is relatively high, and there are concerns about soil runoff due to spring water.
In addition, sandy soil contains a large amount of fine particles, making it difficult to improve the ground. 4) Construction status Conventional construction method The design was based on the double pipe rod type instant injection method, and as a result of construction, the road ground was raised and the flow rate was reduced from 18/min to 12/min. Only about 1/2 of the planned amount could be injected. (Due to significant ground upheaval, construction work was suspended.) Many of the areas to be improved were unimproved, and mirror cutting of the starting area was also possible. During interval construction, there was almost no ground upheaval, and the improved soil was in a continuous state, so picks were used to promote the work. 5) Visual observation results of conventional construction method: The injection material was concentrated at the layer boundaries, and uniform improvement was not possible. In particular, the injection material traveled around the rod and deviated to the boundary of the upper layer, causing ground upheaval. During interval construction, the grouting material formed fine grout veins not only at the layer boundaries but also throughout the area, and uniform ground improvement was achieved. In addition, the strength developed to the extent that a pick was used during excavation. Example 5 1) Chemical solution used Solution type water glass type (instant setting type)
Gel time 10sec〃 (slow setting type)
Gelation time 3-10min 2) Injection work conditions

【表】 3) 土質条件 本工事施工対象地盤は、上部より埋戻し土、
シルト質砂、中細砂、粗砂(玉砂利層も有り)
と変化しており、特に最上部の埋戻し土には多
くの埋設管が布設されており、推進時の影響が
懸念された。又、到達部は河川に接しており、
高い地下水位とともに下部層からの地下水の流
入が推進工事の障害となることが予測された。 4) 施工状況 従来工法 二重管ロツド式複合注入工法にて施工した結
果、埋戻し土が異常に隆起し、既埋設管
(φ400mm上水φ800mm工水、電々管…etc)を破
損する恐れが発生した為、注入を一時中断し、
インターバルの併用を行なつた。 インターバル施工時 インターバルを併用した結果、地盤隆起もお
さまり、注入状況も良好であつた。特に瞬結か
ら緩結への切換時のインターバルは非常に有効
と考えられ、ロツド周囲に沿つて溢出する注入
材の制御に貢献し、地盤隆起を押えたものと考
えられる。 5) 目視観察結果 従来工法 切羽上部の状況は良好であり、エアーピツク
を使用するほどの強度であつた。但し、切羽下
部においては湧水量が多く、砂の細粒分を流出
させるとともに、ボツクス推進時の障害となつ
た。(ヒユーム管等の円型の推進の場合には問
題にならないと判断される。)又、埋設管周囲
や層境に注入材が集中していた。 インターバル施工時 切羽状況は、均一な改良が成されており、グ
ラウト脈はそれほど確認されないのであるが、
固結体は連続性を有しており、非常に高い強度
を発現していた。又、切羽下部においても、止
水層の形成がなされており、湧水としては
BOX後方からのまわり込みの水がわずかであ
つた。 効 果 このように本発明工法によれば、薬液の浸透状
態の改善と、逸出を防止でき、地盤改良の信頼性
向上と、薬液ロスの軽減化を計り得る特徴を有す
る。
[Table] 3) Soil conditions The ground for this construction work will be filled with backfill soil from the top.
Silty sand, medium-fine sand, coarse sand (including gravel layer)
In particular, there were many buried pipes installed in the backfill soil at the top, and there were concerns about their impact during propulsion. In addition, the reaching part is in contact with a river,
It was predicted that the high groundwater level and the inflow of groundwater from the lower layer would become obstacles to the promotion work. 4) Construction status Conventional construction method As a result of construction using the double pipe rod type composite injection method, the backfill soil rose abnormally and there was a risk of damaging the existing buried pipes (φ400mm water supply, φ800mm public water, electrical pipes, etc.) Due to this occurrence, injection was temporarily suspended.
A combination of intervals was used. During interval construction As a result of using interval construction, ground upheaval subsided and the injection conditions were good. In particular, the interval when switching from instant setting to slow setting is considered to be very effective, contributing to controlling the overflowing of the injection material around the rod, and suppressing ground upheaval. 5) Visual observation results of conventional construction method The upper part of the face was in good condition and was strong enough to use an air pick. However, the amount of spring water at the lower part of the face was large, causing fine sand particles to flow out and becoming an obstacle during box propulsion. (It is judged that this will not be a problem in the case of circular propulsion such as Huyum pipes.) In addition, the injection material was concentrated around the buried pipes and at the layer boundaries. During interval construction, the face condition has been uniformly improved, and grout veins are not so visible.
The solids had continuity and exhibited extremely high strength. In addition, a water stop layer has been formed at the bottom of the face, and the water is not as good as spring water.
There was only a small amount of water coming in from behind the box. Effects As described above, the construction method of the present invention has the characteristics of improving the penetration state of the chemical solution and preventing its escape, improving the reliability of ground improvement, and reducing the loss of the chemical solution.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は、2重管ロツド瞬結注入工法の原理説
明図である。
FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of the principle of the double pipe rod instant connection injection method.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1 2重管ロツドを用い、瞬結性薬液を地盤内に
注入するに際し、各段階での薬液注入を、吐出量
10〜20/min、吐出時間1〜5分間の連続注入
の繰返しにより行ない、連続注入後には、それぞ
れ上記薬液のゲル化に必要な注入停止時間帯を設
けることを特徴とする薬液注入工法。
1 When injecting instant-setting chemical liquid into the ground using a double pipe rod, the chemical liquid injection at each stage is controlled by the discharge amount.
A chemical liquid injection method, which is carried out by repeating continuous injection at 10 to 20/min and a discharge time of 1 to 5 minutes, and after each continuous injection, an injection stop period necessary for gelation of the chemical liquid is provided.
JP16636185A 1985-07-26 1985-07-26 Chemical grout injection work Granted JPS6225610A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP16636185A JPS6225610A (en) 1985-07-26 1985-07-26 Chemical grout injection work

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP16636185A JPS6225610A (en) 1985-07-26 1985-07-26 Chemical grout injection work

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS6225610A JPS6225610A (en) 1987-02-03
JPH0516495B2 true JPH0516495B2 (en) 1993-03-04

Family

ID=15829964

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP16636185A Granted JPS6225610A (en) 1985-07-26 1985-07-26 Chemical grout injection work

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS6225610A (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0660085A (en) * 1992-08-12 1994-03-04 Nec Corp Materials requirement plan forming system
JP5168206B2 (en) * 2009-03-30 2013-03-21 平成テクノス株式会社 Ground improvement method
JP5552307B2 (en) * 2009-12-16 2014-07-16 裕治 金子 Method for repairing inclined structures

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6040412A (en) * 1983-08-11 1985-03-02 Yamaguchi Kikai Kogyo Kk Method and apparatus for injection of chemical grout

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS6225610A (en) 1987-02-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104863113A (en) Method for curing in-situ soil in situ and stirring device
US3371712A (en) Composition and method of agglomerating and stabilizing particulate matter by chemical treatment
JP3342000B2 (en) Liquefaction prevention method for sandy ground by injection method
CN109440757A (en) A kind of foundation reinforcement method for karst region
CN216130073U (en) Earth and rockfill dam
CN102174818A (en) Controlled impermeable leaking stoppage grout-extruding water-stopping technology of strong water permeable stratum of quaternary system
CN107724364B (en) A kind of construction technology of soft soil foundation
CN104790282B (en) A kind of road surface with soft subgrade whitewashing processing means
JPH0516495B2 (en)
RU2763752C1 (en) Method for restoring the geophysical stability of an emergency ground dam on a weak foundation
JPH09100524A (en) How to create a fill dam
US2809118A (en) Process for compacting and the plastic stiffening of natural and artificial soils
CN113047236A (en) Deep soft soil treatment method for earth-rock dam foundation and earth-rock dam
CN209429158U (en) Dam composite foundation structure
US3368356A (en) Soil stabilization method
CN108625864A (en) A kind of shield construction method for wearing shallow embedding waters tunnel
CN206090581U (en) A cubic metre of earth backfill structure for in narrow and small space
CN105133621B (en) The construction method and foundation pit enclosure system of foundation pit enclosure system
CN212064807U (en) A Soil Erosion Control System in Rocky Desertification Areas
CN115726377A (en) Composite support structure, construction method and construction device for deep and large foundation pit in Huze silt area
CN220768014U (en) Soft soil site reinforcing apparatus
JPS61196025A (en) Lining method for cut off of structure buried in ground
JP2855158B2 (en) Ground improvement material and its application
JPH11140881A (en) Penetration method for caisson foundation
JPH0160619B2 (en)