JPH0521370B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0521370B2 JPH0521370B2 JP163684A JP163684A JPH0521370B2 JP H0521370 B2 JPH0521370 B2 JP H0521370B2 JP 163684 A JP163684 A JP 163684A JP 163684 A JP163684 A JP 163684A JP H0521370 B2 JPH0521370 B2 JP H0521370B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- station
- allocation
- channel
- delay
- traffic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 12
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/14—Relay systems
- H04B7/15—Active relay systems
- H04B7/204—Multiple access
- H04B7/212—Time-division multiple access [TDMA]
- H04B7/2121—Channels assignment to the different stations
- H04B7/2123—Variable assignment, e.g. demand assignment
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Time-Division Multiplex Systems (AREA)
- Radio Relay Systems (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
(産業上の利用分野)
本発明は1つの衛星チヤネルを複数の局で共有
してパケツト通信を行なうマルチアクセス方法に
関する。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION (Field of Industrial Application) The present invention relates to a multi-access method in which one satellite channel is shared by a plurality of stations to perform packet communication.
(従来技術とその問題点)
衛星パケツト通信網におけるアクセス方式とし
て、TDMA,FDMA等の固定割当方式、純アロ
ハ,スロツト付アロハ等のランダムアクセス方
式、およびランダム予約方式、順次予約方式等の
パケツト予約方式が提案されている。たとえば、
エル・クラインロツク(K.Kleinrock)により、
アイ・イー・イー・イーコミユニケーシヨンズマ
ガジン第17巻1979年1月号(IEEE
Communications magazine Vol.17.No.1,
1979.)に「オン リソースシエアリング イン
ア デイストリビユーテイド コミユニケーシ
ヨン エンバイロンメント(On Resource
Sharing in a Distributed Communication
Environment)」と題して発表された論文におい
ては、これらの方式の比較検討も行われ、軽負荷
の場合、ランダムアクセス方式、中程度から比較
的高負荷の場合、パケツト予約方式、高負荷の場
合、固定割当方式が適すると報告されている。こ
のような報告を踏まえて、広範囲にわたる負荷の
変動に適するようにと、適応型あるいは組み合せ
型方式が提案されてきた。(Prior art and its problems) Access methods in satellite packet communication networks include fixed allocation methods such as TDMA and FDMA, random access methods such as pure Aloha and slotted Aloha, and packet reservation methods such as random reservation method and sequential reservation method. A method has been proposed. for example,
By K.Kleinrock,
IE Communications Magazine Volume 17, January 1979 issue (IEEE
Communications magazine Vol.17.No.1,
1979.) “On Resource Sharing in a Distributed Communication Environment.”
Sharing in a Distributed Communication
In the paper titled ``Environmental Environment'', a comparative study of these methods was conducted.In the case of light load, the random access method, in the case of medium to relatively high load, the packet reservation method, and in the case of high load. , it has been reported that a fixed allocation method is suitable. In light of these reports, adaptive or combinatory schemes have been proposed to be suitable for wide range load fluctuations.
ところで、多くの研究者によつてマルチアクセ
スの評価がなされてきたが、いずれも1局あたり
の伝送速度(伝送速度/局)は2Kbps以下であ
る。良く参照されるエス・エス・ラム(S.S.
Lam)により1977年にプロシーデイングス オ
ブ インターナシヨナル コンフアレンス オン
コミユニケーシヨンズ(Proceedings of
International Conference on
Communications)に発表された論文「サテライ
ト マルチアクセス スキームズ フオーデータ
トラフイツク(Satellite multiaccess
schemes for data traffic)」では伝送速度を
50Kbps、局数を50としており、伝送速度/局は
1Kbpsである。 Incidentally, many researchers have evaluated multi-access, but in all cases the transmission speed per station (transmission speed/station) is 2 Kbps or less. Often referred to as S.S.R.A.M.
Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications (1977)
International Conference on
A paper published in ``Satellite multiaccess schemes for tracking traffic'' was published in
schemes for data traffic)”
50Kbps, the number of stations is 50, and the transmission speed/station is
It is 1Kbps.
しかしながら、最近のデータ通信の動向は音声
イメージなどを取り入れ統合化する傾向にあり、
又LAN相互接続の要求も起つている。このよう
な状況において、伝送速度/局が数kbpsでの評
価は不適切だと言わざるをえない。 However, recent trends in data communication include the integration of audio images, etc.
There is also a demand for LAN interconnection. Under these circumstances, it must be said that it is inappropriate to evaluate the transmission speed/station at several kbps.
ここで伝送速度/局を変数として、アロハ方式
の遅延とTDMA方式の遅延を比較する。アロハ
方式の遅延DALOHAはエル・クラインロツク(L.
Kleinrock)により1975年12月にアイ・イー・イ
ー・イ トランザクシヨンズ オン コミユニケ
ーシヨンズ(IEEE Transactions on
Communications)の1400頁から1416頁に発表さ
れた論文「パケツト スイツチング イン ラジ
オ チヤネルズ(Packet Switching in
Radio Channels)」によれば、
DALOHA=(G/S−1)(τ0+T0+)
+τ0+T0 (1)′
但しτ0…伝搬遅延(秒)
T0…パケツト長(秒)
…ランダム再送する平均遅延(秒)
S…スループツト
G…チヤンネルトラヒツク
である。スループツトSとチヤネルトラヒツクの
関係は前記論文より、
S=G・exp(−G)
である。衛星通信の場合、パケツト長T0などに
比べて、伝搬遅延τ0が大きいので、(1)′式は
DALOHA=(G/S−1)τ0+τ0
=Gτ0/S (2)′
のように近似できる。一方TDMA方式の遅延は、
エス・エス・ラム(S.S.Lam)により、1976年ナ
シヨナル テレコミユニケーシヨンズ コンフア
レンスレコード(National
Telecommunications Conference Record)に、
発表された論文「デイレイ アナリシス オブ
ア パケツト−スイツチト テイー・デイー・エ
ム・エーシステム (Delay Analysis of a
Packet−Suitched TDMA System)」によれ
ば、
DTDMA=1/2NT0/(1−S)+τ0+T0(3)′
但しN…局数
T0…パケツト長(秒)
S…スループツト
である。パケツト長T0は
T0=l/C
但しl…パケツト長(ビツト)
C…伝送速度(ビツト/秒)
で表わされる。伝搬遅延τ0が大きい場合を考えて
いるので(3)′式も
DTDMA=1/2l/{(1−S)C/N}+τ0 (4)′
のように近似できる。(2)式および(4)式を用いて、
アロハ方式の遅延とTDMA方式の遅延を比較す
ると、第1図のようになる。但し、パケツト長l
は1000ビツト、伝搬遅延τ0は0.25秒である。横軸
は伝送速度/局である。図をみてわかるように、
軽負荷でも伝送速度/局が大きければ、TDMA
方式が有利となる。パケツト予約方式は少なくと
も0.5秒以上の平均遅延を持つため、比較になら
ない。したがつて例えば局数が100局で、伝送速
度が1Nbpsであれば、TDMA方式が他の方式に
比べて優れているといえる。ただしこの場合、割
当が適切に行なわれていることが必要である。 Here, the delay of the Aloha method and the delay of the TDMA method are compared using the transmission speed/station as a variable. Aloha style delay D ALOHA is El Kleinrock (L.
Kleinrock) in December 1975, IEEE Transactions on Communication
The paper “Packet Switching in Radio Channels” was published on pages 1400 to 1416 of
According to ``Radio Channels'', D ALOHA = (G/S-1) (τ 0 +T 0 +) +τ 0 +T 0 (1)' However, τ 0 ... Propagation delay (seconds) T 0 ... Packet length (seconds) ...Average delay (seconds) for random retransmission S...Throughput G...Channel traffic. According to the above paper, the relationship between throughput S and channel traffic is S=G·exp(−G). In the case of satellite communication, the propagation delay τ 0 is large compared to the packet length T 0 etc., so equation (1)′ is D ALOHA = (G/S-1) τ 0 + τ 0 = Gτ 0 /S (2) ′ can be approximated as On the other hand, the delay of TDMA method is
SSLam released the 1976 National Telecommunications Conference Record.
Telecommunications Conference Record)
Published paper “Delay Analysis of
Delay Analysis of a Packet Switch TDA System (Delay Analysis of a
According to the Packet-Switched TDMA System), D TDMA = 1/2NT 0 / (1-S) + τ 0 + T 0 (3)' where N... Number of stations T 0 ... Packet length (seconds) S... Throughput . The packet length T 0 is expressed as T 0 =l/C, where l...Packet length (bits) C...Transmission rate (bits/second). Since we are considering the case where the propagation delay τ 0 is large, equation (3)' can also be approximated as DTDMA = 1/2l/{(1-S)C/N}+τ 0 (4)'. Using equations (2) and (4),
A comparison of the delays in the Aloha method and the TDMA method is shown in Figure 1. However, the packet length l
is 1000 bits, and the propagation delay τ 0 is 0.25 seconds. The horizontal axis is transmission speed/station. As you can see from the figure,
Even if the load is light, if the transmission speed/station is large, TDMA
method is advantageous. The packet reservation method has an average delay of at least 0.5 seconds, so it cannot be compared. Therefore, for example, if the number of stations is 100 and the transmission speed is 1Nbps, it can be said that the TDMA method is superior to other methods. However, in this case, it is necessary that the allocation be done appropriately.
ところで、従来から電話を基本として考えられ
た割当方式があるが、これはパケツトが周期的に
到着する場合に有効である。しかし、通常のデー
タパケツトはいつ到着するかは確率的であり、こ
の場合、十分に処理できる回線容量を持つていて
も、待行列が生じ、遅延が発生する。したがつて
各局はより多くの割当を要求し、互いに競合を起
こす。すなわち、従来方式においては、回線容量
に余裕がある時であつても、すでに回線を確保し
た局がより多くの割当てを要求すると、各局に充
分な割当てを行えなくなるという欠点を有してい
た。 Incidentally, there is a conventional allocation method based on telephone calls, which is effective when packets arrive periodically. However, when normal data packets will arrive is stochastic, and in this case, even if there is enough line capacity to process them, queues will occur and delays will occur. Therefore, each station requests more allocations and competes with each other. That is, the conventional system has the drawback that even when there is sufficient line capacity, if a station that has already secured a line requests more allocation, it will not be possible to allocate a sufficient amount to each station.
(発明の目的)
本発明はこのような確率的に到着するトラヒツ
クに適合する割当方法を提供する。(Objective of the Invention) The present invention provides an allocation method that is compatible with such stochastically arriving traffic.
(発明の構成)
本発明によれば衛星チヤネルを複数の局で共有
してパケツト通信を行なうマルチアクセス方式に
おいて、衛星チヤネルを観測して各局のトラヒツ
クを推定し、該推定値と該推定値を各局に割り振
つた後に残るチヤンネル容量を前記推定値の平方
根に比例して配分した値とを加算して各局の新チ
ヤネル割当量を求め、該新チヤネル割当量と現在
の旧チヤネル割当量と比較し、異なつていれば前
記新チヤネル割当量になるように、割当変更を行
なうことを特徴とする衛星パケツト通信用割当方
式が得られる。(Structure of the Invention) According to the present invention, in a multi-access system in which a satellite channel is shared by a plurality of stations to perform packet communication, the satellite channel is observed, the traffic of each station is estimated, and the estimated value and the estimated value are The new channel allocation for each station is determined by adding the channel capacity remaining after allocation to each station and the value allocated in proportion to the square root of the estimated value, and the new channel allocation is compared with the current old channel allocation. However, if there is a difference, the allocation method for satellite packet communication is obtained, which is characterized in that the allocation is changed to the new channel allocation amount.
(実施例)
以下図面を用いて本発明について詳細に説明す
る。第2図に示すように、複数の局100と、割
当を制御するネツトワーク管理センタ101と、
データチヤネルと制御チヤネルを持つ衛星チヤネ
ル102からネツトワークは構成され、データチ
ヤネルは、第3図に示されるように時間を1パケ
ツトの伝送時間毎のスロツトに切られ、Lスロツ
トを1フレームとしている。Lは通常、局数Nよ
りも大きいとする。(Example) The present invention will be described in detail below using the drawings. As shown in FIG. 2, a plurality of stations 100, a network management center 101 that controls allocation,
The network is composed of a satellite channel 102 having a data channel and a control channel, and the data channel is divided into slots corresponding to the transmission time of one packet, with each L slot being one frame, as shown in FIG. . It is assumed that L is usually larger than the number of stations N.
ネツトワーク管理センタ101は第4図に示す
ように、各々の局と割当スロツトとの対応表であ
る割当テーブル103と、データチヤネルを観測
し、割当テーブルを参照して、各局の1フレーム
に送出しているパケツト数を数えるチヤネル観測
器104と、各局の1フレームに送出しているパ
ケツト数を平均して各局のトラヒツクを推定する
トラヒツク推定器105と、各局のトラヒツク推
定値から各局の割当スロツト数を計算する演算器
106と、割当テーブルを参照して、各局の現在
の割当スロツト数と前記演算器106によつて得
られた新らしい割当スロツト数を比較し、大きく
異なつたとき新割当スロツト数に近くなるよう
に、割当テーブルを書きかえる割当制御器107
と、割当テーブルを書きかえた結果、割当変更を
必要とする局に対して、制御チヤネルを通じてコ
マンドを送出するコマンド発生器108から成
る。 As shown in FIG. 4, the network management center 101 observes the allocation table 103, which is a correspondence table between each station and the allocated slot, and the data channel, refers to the allocation table, and transmits one frame to each station. a channel observation device 104 that counts the number of packets transmitted in one frame by each station; a traffic estimator 105 that estimates the traffic of each station by averaging the number of packets transmitted by each station in one frame; A calculation unit 106 that calculates the number of slots is compared with the new number of allocated slots obtained by the calculation unit 106 by referring to the allocation table. Allocation controller 107 that rewrites the allocation table so that it is close to the number
and a command generator 108 that sends a command through a control channel to a station that requires an allocation change as a result of rewriting the allocation table.
ここで、演算器106で用いる各局のトラヒツ
クから各局の割当スロツト数を求める演算式を導
出する。まず記号の説明から行なう。 Here, an arithmetic expression for calculating the number of slots allocated to each station is derived from the traffic of each station, which is used by the arithmetic unit 106. First, let's explain the symbols.
λi…局iにおけるパケツト到着率(個/秒)
T0…パケツト長(秒)
L…フレーム長(スロツト)
N…局数
ηi…局iの1フレームに割当られたスロツト数
τ0…伝搬遅延(秒)
Mi…局iのサブフレーム長(スロツト)
第3図では、フレーム長Lが16で、局iにスロ
ツト1とスロツト9が割当られて、スロツト数ηi
が2、サブフレーム長Miが8となつている。現
実には第3図のように割当られたスロツトが一定
周期で巡回するとは限らず、サブフレーム長Mi
が明確ではないが、ここでは計算を簡単化するた
めに、サブフレーム長Miを
Mi=L/ηi (1)
とし、割当られたスロツトが一定周期で巡回する
と仮定する。λi...Packet arrival rate at station i (pieces/second) T0 ...Packet length (seconds) L...Frame length (slots) N...Number of stations ηi...Number of slots assigned to one frame of station iτ0 ...Propagation delay (seconds) Mi...Subframe length (slot) of station i In Fig. 3, the frame length L is 16, slot 1 and slot 9 are assigned to station i, and the number of slots ηi
is 2, and the subframe length Mi is 8. In reality, the slots assigned as shown in Figure 3 do not necessarily rotate at a constant cycle, and the subframe length Mi
Although it is not clear, in order to simplify the calculation, it is assumed here that the subframe length Mi is Mi=L/ηi (1) and that the allocated slots circulate at a constant period.
以上の仮定の下で、局iに到着したパケツトが
宛先の局に受信されるまでの遅延時間Diは論文S.
S.Lam,“Delay Analysis of a Packet−
Switched TDMA System,“NTC 76 Conf.
Rec.,IEEE,New York,pp.16.3−1 to 16.3
−6.により
Di=1/2MiT0+1/2・λi(MiT0)2/
(1−λiMiT0)+T0+τ0 (2)
と表わされる。(2)式の第3項と第4項は割当とは
無関係なので以下省略する。 Under the above assumptions, the delay time Di until a packet arriving at station i is received by the destination station is calculated from Paper S.
S. Lam, “Delay Analysis of a Packet−
Switched TDMA System, “NTC 76 Conf.
Rec., IEEE, New York, pp.16.3−1 to 16.3
−6, it is expressed as Di=1/2MiT 0 +1/2·λi(MiT 0 ) 2 / (1−λiMiT 0 )+T 0 +τ 0 (2). The third and fourth terms in equation (2) have nothing to do with allocation, so they will be omitted below.
(2)式に(1)式を代入して変形すると遅延時間Di
は
Di=1/2LT0/(ηi−λiL T0) (3)
となる。 By substituting equation (1) into equation (2) and transforming it, we get the delay time Di.
is Di=1/2LT 0 /(ηi−λiL T 0 ) (3).
ここで、総平均遅延時間を最小にする演算式を
導く。 Here, we derive an arithmetic expression that minimizes the total average delay time.
(3)式から総平均遅延時間Dを求めると、
D=N
〓i=1
(λiDi/λ)=(1/2λ)N
〓i=1
{ρi/(ηi−ρi} (4)
但し λ=N
〓i=1
λi (5)
ρi=λiLT0 (6)
となる。ρiは(6)式よりわかるように、局iの1フ
レームに到着するパケツトの平均個数であり、定
常状態では局iの1フレーム中にデータチヤネル
へ送出したパケツトの平均個数と等しくなる。第
4図のトラヒツク推定器105で推定したトラヒ
ツクとはこの値を示す。 Calculating the total average delay time D from equation (3), D= N 〓 i=1 (λiDi/λ) = (1/2λ) N 〓 i=1 {ρi/(ηi−ρi} (4) where λ = N 〓 i=1 λi (5) ρi=λiLT 0 (6) As can be seen from equation (6), ρi is the average number of packets arriving in one frame at station i, and in a steady state, It is equal to the average number of packets sent to the data channel during one frame of i.The traffic estimated by the traffic estimator 105 in FIG. 4 indicates this value.
一方、フレーム長をLとしているので、 N 〓i=1 ηi=L (7) の拘束が付く。 On the other hand, since the frame length is set to L, the following constraint is applied: N 〓 i=1 ηi=L (7).
ここでラグランジユ定数法を用いて、(7)式の拘
束の下で(4)式のDを最小にする解を求める。 Here, the Lagrange constant method is used to find a solution that minimizes D in equation (4) under the constraints of equation (7).
新らたにQを
Q=D+α(N
〓i=1
ηi−L) (8)
と定義すると、解は
∂.Q/∂ηi=0,i=1〜N (9)
を満足する。但しαは定数である。(9)式に(8)を代
入して、変形すると、
ηi=ρi+√/(2λα),
i=1〜N (10)
となり、(7)式を用いると
ηi=ρi+(L−ρ)√/N
〓i=1
√ i=1〜N (11)
を得る。但し、 ρ=N
〓i=1
ρi
(11)式を見てわかるように、各局の割当スロツト
数ηiは四則演算で容易に求めることができる。 If Q is newly defined as Q=D+α( N 〓 i=1 ηi−L) (8), the solution satisfies ∂.Q/∂ηi=0, i=1~N (9). However, α is a constant. Substituting (8) into equation (9) and transforming it gives ηi=ρi+√/(2λα), i=1~N (10), and using equation (7), ηi=ρi+(L−ρ) √/ N 〓 i=1 √ i=1~N (11) is obtained. However, ρ= N 〓 i=1 ρi As can be seen from equation (11), the number of slots ηi allocated to each station can be easily determined by four arithmetic operations.
(11)は、局iのトラヒツクと等しいスロツト数ρi
に、そのスロツト数ρiを各局に割り振つた後に残
るスロツト数L−ρを
前記トラヒツクの平方根√に比例配分したスロ
ツト数
(L−ρ)・√/N
〓i=1
√
を加算したものである。 (11) is the number of slots ρi equal to the traffic of station i
The number of slots remaining after allocating the number of slots ρi to each station is the number of slots L-ρ, which is proportionally distributed to the square root of the traffic (L-ρ)・√/ N 〓 i=1 √. be.
(発明の効果)
第5図に従来の固定割当のTDMA方式と本発
明との総平均遅延の違いを示す。図において、N
=2,L=10,ρ1+ρ2=5とし、横軸は2局のト
ラヒツクの比、縦軸は総平均遅延時間で、パケツ
ト長T0で正規化している。固定割当では、各局
に均等にスロツトを割り振つた。図を見てわかる
ように、本発明は、各局のトラヒツクに従つて、
遅延が最小になるようにスロツトを各局に割り振
るので、非常に低い遅延を示している。(Effects of the Invention) FIG. 5 shows the difference in total average delay between the conventional fixed allocation TDMA system and the present invention. In the figure, N
=2, L=10, ρ 1 +ρ 2 =5, the horizontal axis is the traffic ratio of the two stations, and the vertical axis is the total average delay time, which is normalized by the packet length T 0 . In fixed allocation, slots were allocated equally to each station. As can be seen from the figure, according to the traffic of each station, the present invention
Slots are allocated to each station so that the delay is minimized, so the delay is extremely low.
以上の説明からわかるように、本発明は各局の
トラヒツクに適応して遅延を小さくなるように割
当変更を行なう。 As can be seen from the above description, the present invention changes the allocation to adapt to the traffic of each station so as to reduce the delay.
第1図は遅延と伝送速度の関係を示す図、第2
図はネツトワーク構成を示す図、第3図はデータ
チヤネルのフレームを示す図、第4図はネツトワ
ーク管理センタ101を示すブロツク図、第5図
は固定割当のTDMA方式と本発明の総平均遅延
を示す図である。
図において、100は複数の局、101はネツ
トワーク管理センタ、102は衛星チヤネル、1
03は割当テーブル、104はチヤネル観測器、
105はトラヒツク推定器、106は演算器、1
07は割当制御器、108はコマンド発生器であ
る。
Figure 1 shows the relationship between delay and transmission speed, Figure 2 shows the relationship between delay and transmission speed.
3 shows a data channel frame, FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the network management center 101, and FIG. 5 shows the fixed allocation TDMA method and the total average of the present invention. It is a figure showing a delay. In the figure, 100 is a plurality of stations, 101 is a network management center, 102 is a satellite channel, 1
03 is an allocation table, 104 is a channel observation device,
105 is a traffic estimator, 106 is an arithmetic unit, 1
07 is an assignment controller, and 108 is a command generator.
Claims (1)
通信を行なうマルチアクセス方式において、衛星
チヤネルを観測して各局のトラヒツクを推定し、
該推定値と該推定値を各局に割り振つた後に残る
チヤネル容量を前記推定値の平方根に比例して配
分した値とを加算して各局の新チヤネル割当量を
求め、該新チヤネル割当量と現在の旧チヤネル割
当量と比較し、異なつていれば前記新チヤネル割
当量になるように割当変更を行なうことを特徴と
する衛星パケツト通信用割当方式。1. In a multi-access system in which a satellite channel is shared by multiple stations for packet communication, the satellite channel is observed and the traffic of each station is estimated,
A new channel allocation amount for each station is obtained by adding the estimated value and a value obtained by allocating the remaining channel capacity after the estimated value is allocated to each station in proportion to the square root of the estimated value, and the new channel allocation amount and An allocation method for satellite packet communication, characterized in that the allocation is compared with the current old channel allocation, and if there is a difference, the allocation is changed to the new channel allocation.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP163684A JPS60145732A (en) | 1984-01-09 | 1984-01-09 | Satellite packet communication assigning system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP163684A JPS60145732A (en) | 1984-01-09 | 1984-01-09 | Satellite packet communication assigning system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS60145732A JPS60145732A (en) | 1985-08-01 |
| JPH0521370B2 true JPH0521370B2 (en) | 1993-03-24 |
Family
ID=11507013
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP163684A Granted JPS60145732A (en) | 1984-01-09 | 1984-01-09 | Satellite packet communication assigning system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS60145732A (en) |
-
1984
- 1984-01-09 JP JP163684A patent/JPS60145732A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS60145732A (en) | 1985-08-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP3881385B2 (en) | Medium access control (MAC) protocol for wireless ATM | |
| US6937580B2 (en) | Apportioning bandwidth capacity in communication switching systems | |
| JP2704667B2 (en) | Multi-channel bandwidth allocation method | |
| JPH0518495B2 (en) | ||
| Cicconetti et al. | Bandwidth balancing in multi-channel IEEE 802.16 wireless mesh networks | |
| US7370116B2 (en) | Approach to minimize worst-case queuing delay for a switching communication system with transmission constraints | |
| US6693887B2 (en) | Method for allocating fractional bandwidth in a fixed-frame communication system | |
| CN118827565A (en) | Deterministic forwarding method, device, electronic device, and storage medium for service flow | |
| Jacobs et al. | Cpoda-a demand assignment protocol for satnet | |
| Jacquet et al. | Data transfer for hiperlan | |
| Arfaoui et al. | Minimization of delays in multi-service cloud-RAN BBU pools | |
| JPH0521371B2 (en) | ||
| JPH0521370B2 (en) | ||
| Qiang et al. | MAC protocol enhancements for QoS guarantee and fairness over the IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs | |
| Scholl et al. | On a mixed mode multiple access scheme for packet-switched radio channels | |
| Lam | Satellite multiaccess schemes for data traffic | |
| CA2223868A1 (en) | Broadband telecommunications system | |
| Meisner et al. | Dual-mode slotted TDMA digital BUS | |
| Damodaran et al. | Scheduling in wireless networks with multiple transmission channels | |
| Gupta et al. | Traffic classification for round-robin scheduling schemes in ATM networks | |
| Baras et al. | Dynamic routing in hybrid networks with integrated voice and data traffic | |
| Baziana | Software-Defined Optical Local Area Network Architecture And Priority Traffic Performance Analysis | |
| CA2347592C (en) | Improvements in or relating to packet switches | |
| Hadjitheodosiou et al. | Dynamic bandwidth allocation for multimedia traffic in TDMA broadband satellite networks | |
| Yaprak et al. | Dynamic buffer allocation in an ATM switch |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |