JPH0525320B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0525320B2 JPH0525320B2 JP61275651A JP27565186A JPH0525320B2 JP H0525320 B2 JPH0525320 B2 JP H0525320B2 JP 61275651 A JP61275651 A JP 61275651A JP 27565186 A JP27565186 A JP 27565186A JP H0525320 B2 JPH0525320 B2 JP H0525320B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- rate ratio
- nuclear fuel
- count rate
- subcriticality
- effective
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E30/00—Energy generation of nuclear origin
- Y02E30/30—Nuclear fission reactors
Landscapes
- Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)
Description
本発明は、核燃料の装荷または貯蔵する核燃料
設備の核燃料配置状態における未臨界度を測定す
る核燃料設備の未臨界度測定方法に関する。
The present invention relates to a method for measuring the degree of subcriticality of nuclear fuel equipment, which measures the degree of subcriticality in the state of arrangement of nuclear fuel in nuclear fuel equipment in which nuclear fuel is loaded or stored.
核燃料を集合して置かれている集合領域、例え
ば核燃料を貯蔵する核燃料設備では臨界にならぬ
ように臨界安全管理される。この場合未臨界度
(未臨界状態における実効増倍率)を把握して安
全管理が行なわれる必要がある。
未臨界度を測定する方法として従来パルス状の
中性子を入射して行なうパルス中性子法や中性子
密度のゆらぎの成分を2個の検出器で測定して求
める炉雑音解析法や中性子源を挿入して中性子増
倍の匂配から求める中性子源増倍法等があるが、
これらにはパルス状の中性子を発生させるような
特殊な中性子源発生装置や、2個の検出器の検出
を同期させる同期回路等の特殊な回路等を必要と
し、さらに臨界近傍で反応度較正実験を必要と
し、複雑な装置や手間を要するという欠点があ
る。
In a collection area where nuclear fuel is collected, for example, a nuclear fuel facility that stores nuclear fuel, criticality safety management is carried out to prevent it from becoming critical. In this case, it is necessary to understand the degree of subcriticality (effective multiplication factor in a subcritical state) and perform safety management. Conventional methods for measuring subcriticality include the pulsed neutron method, which involves injecting pulsed neutrons, the reactor noise analysis method, which measures the fluctuation components of neutron density with two detectors, and the method that uses a neutron source. There are methods such as neutron source multiplication method that calculates from the scent of neutron multiplication.
These require special neutron source generators that generate pulsed neutrons, special circuits such as synchronization circuits that synchronize the detection of two detectors, and reactivity calibration experiments near criticality. The disadvantage is that it requires complicated equipment and time.
本発明は、前述のような点に鑑み臨界近傍での
反応度較正実験を必要とせず、通常の中性子計数
手段を用いて中性子数を測定し、核燃料設備の核
燃料配置状態における未臨界度を決定および予測
する核燃料設備の未臨界度測定方法を提供するこ
とを目的とする。
In view of the above-mentioned points, the present invention does not require a reactivity calibration experiment in the vicinity of criticality, but measures the number of neutrons using a normal neutron counting means, and determines the degree of subcriticality in the nuclear fuel arrangement state of nuclear fuel equipment. The purpose of this study is to provide a method for measuring the subcriticality of nuclear fuel equipment and predicting the degree of subcriticality.
上記の目的は、本発明によれば核燃料の集合領
域と該領域の周辺領域との少なくとも一方の領域
にて中性子源より増倍する中性子のエネルギー分
布に対して一方は熱中性子エネルギーに対して高
感度を有する検出器と、他方は速中性子エネルギ
ーに対してより高感度を有する検出器からなる対
検出器により中性子の計数率比を測定し、この計
数率比から前記核燃料設備の未臨界度に対応する
実効計数率比を求め、この実効計数率比と前記未
臨界度との関数式による回帰解析を行い、回帰解
析結果から計数率比を測定したときの未臨界度を
決定するとともに、前記実効計数率比の値を反応
度較正することにより燃料装荷時における未臨界
度を予測することにより達成される。
According to the present invention, the energy distribution of neutrons multiplied from the neutron source in at least one of the nuclear fuel collection area and the surrounding area of the area is such that one area has a high energy distribution with respect to thermal neutron energy. The neutron count rate ratio is measured by a pair of detectors consisting of a sensitive detector and a detector more sensitive to fast neutron energy, and the subcriticality of the nuclear fuel equipment is determined from this count rate ratio. Find the corresponding effective count rate ratio, perform regression analysis using a functional formula between this effective count rate ratio and the degree of subcriticality, determine the degree of subcriticality when the count rate ratio is measured from the regression analysis result, and This is achieved by predicting the degree of subcriticality at the time of fuel loading by reactivity calibration of the value of the effective count rate ratio.
以下図面を用いて本発明の実施例について説明
する。第1図、第2図は本発明に係る未臨界度測
定時の中性子を計数する2個の検出器からなる対
検出器を配した配置図である。第1図は核燃料が
集合された集合領域1内に複数の対検出器2が配
され、第2図は第1図の集合領域の周辺領域3に
前述と同様に複数の対検出器2を配したものであ
り、対検出器2を集合領域1と周辺領域3との少
なくとも一方の領域に配して中性子数を測定し、
核燃料設備の未臨界度(未臨界状態の実効増倍
率)を決定および予測する。
対検出器2は中性子エネルギー分布に対して相
異なる計数応答を示す2個の検出器、例えば235U
核分裂計数管と238U核分裂計数管、10B計数管と
237Np核分裂計数管、235U核分裂計数管と237Np核
分裂計数管等との組み合わせからなつている。こ
の組み合わせは一方(前記組み合わせでは前者)
は熱中性子エネルギーに対して高感度を有し、他
方(後者)は速中性子エネルギー(約1MeV以
上)に対してより高感度を有する検出器からな
り、核燃料設備ごとにこの組み合わせを適宜選択
する。
核燃料設備の核燃料の集合領域1または周辺領
域3に配される通常の中性子源発生装置による外
部中性子源または核燃料自身に含まれる同位元素
の自発核分裂中性子による内部中性子源からの中
性子により核燃料設備に中性子を増倍させ、対検
出器2により計数率比Rを測定する。
つぎにこの計数率比Rから未臨界度を求める方
法について説明する。
未臨界状態の体系における中性子のふるまい
は、通常中性子束分布関数φ(γ、E)で記述さ
れる。ここでφは、空間座標γとエネルギーEに
依存する分布関数であり、公知のボルツマン方程
式で表わされ、演算子を用いて表わされる下記の
ボルツマン方程式
Hφ=S ……(1)
を解くことにより求められる。ここでHはボルツ
マン演算子であり、Sは外部中性子源による線源
項である。
また中性子束分布関数φは、一般的に(3)式に対
応する下記の固有値方程式
H0φ0o=0 ……(2)
を解いて求まる固有関数φ0o(n=0、1、2、…
…)の1次結合で表わされる。すなわちaoを任意
の系数とすると、中性子束分布関数φは
φ=
〓n
aoφ0o ……(3)
となる。
(2)式の正の固有値のうち最小固有値に属する固
有関数をφ0で表わすと、臨界状態では最小固有
値状態φ0のみが実現されており、この時(2)式は
臨界方程式と呼ばれる。そしてさらに(1)式と(2)式
は等価となり
φ=φ0(臨界状態) ……(4)
である。
ところで、対検出器2の二つの検出器の応答関
数をそれぞれΣ1および〓2とすると、対検出器2
で計数された中性子の計数率比Rはそれぞれの検
出器による計数率<〓1φ>と<〓2φ>との比と
なる。すなわち
R=<〓2φ>/<〓1φ> ……(5)
ここで記号<>はγおよびEによる位相空間に
わたる積分量であることを表わす。
(5)式の計数率比Rは未臨界状態で測定可能な量
であり、通常スペクトル・インデツクスと呼ばれ
ている。一方、この量を臨界状態に結びつけるた
めに固有値方程式(2)の解である最小固有値状態
φ0を用いて(5)式と全く同様に
R0=<〓2φ0>/<〓1φ0> ……(6)
で定義される固有計数率比R0を考える。ここで
この固有計数率比R0を用いて
R′=R/R0 ……(7)
である新たな量R′を導入する。なおR′を実効計
数率比と呼ぶ。したがつて実効計数率比R1は実
効増倍率k=1の時の臨界状態では(4)式の関係
(φ=φ0)を(5)、(6)式に適用すると
R′=1 ……(8)
となる。したがつて実効計数率比R′は実効増倍
率kに対応する。
上記の関数より実効計数率比R′は一般的に任
意の関数形F(x)を用いて次式のように表わされ
る。
R′=C0−F(1−k) ……(9)
ここでC0は定数、kは実効増倍率である。
ただしF(0)=0であり、理論的に臨界状態k
=1のときで(8)式より
C0=1 ……(10)
となる。
すなわち、一般的に一組の対検出器と燃料設備
内での核燃料の配置を決めた上で、核燃料装荷に
よる臨界近接手順により核燃料設備を臨界状態に
持つていくときの関係は(9)式のうちの一つの曲線
で表わされ、(9)式は実効計数率比R′と実効増倍
率k(反応度は(k−1)/kである)との基本
関係式となる。
したがつて核燃料設備の未臨界状態の実効増倍
率kは(9)式に基づいて実効計数率比R′を介して
得られる。ここでR′は(7)式に示すように計数率
比の比という形であることにより、検出決計数効
率が直接的には関係しないので計算誤差の入り難
い量であるが、さらにR′の値の評価精度を向上
するために、計数率比Rの測定データと計算値と
がよく一致するようにボルツマン方程式における
中性子断面積等の入力データを修正する。この入
力データの修正は実効増倍率kの計算値をも同時
に修正することになる。
このように調整して得られた(R′、k)の値
の組は計数率比を測定した核燃料の装荷状態の体
系の数だけ得られることになり、この値の組を(9)
式に適用するとC0をはじめとする関数形F(1−
k)の計数パラメータを決定することができる。
この時上述の調整の確からしさを保障するのは(10)
式のk=のときのC0=1の条件である。なお上
記の係数パラメータを決定する際、中性子断面積
の他にもう一つのパラメータとして計数率比規格
化定数CRをとつて通常の回帰解析の手順が行な
われ、(9)式の計数パラメータを確定する。なお、
上記の計数率比規格定数CRは次式のように定義
される。
CR=Rc/Re ……(11)
ここでReは対検出器の計数率比に対する測定
値であり、Rcは計算値である。
上記の回帰解析の手順が、いわば反応度較正と
いうもので臨界近傍の測定データが含まれなくて
もよい。
上記のように本発明によれば核燃料設備の未臨
界状態における実効増倍率kは実効計数率比
R′を主要概念として用いながら、中性子断面積
と計数率比規格化定数CRとをパラメータとして
(9)式と(10)式とを用いた回帰解析、すなわち反応度
較正により求められる。
なお、求められたR′はきわめて精度が良いの
で、来るべき核燃料装荷状態に対するR′の値も
精度よく予測することができる。このR′の値を
反応度較正手段により較正した(9)式に適用すると
kの値の予測値が得られる。
なお、対検出器ごとに(9)式の曲線が一つだけ決
まるので、多数組の対検出器があれば、最終的な
k値の検定値および予測値は、それらの平均をと
つたものとなり、その数が多ければ多いほど、そ
の精度は良くなる。
第3図は対検出器の計数率比測定データを用
い、反応度較正の手順終了後の(9)式の曲線を示す
グラフであり、縦軸に実効計数率比R′を、横軸
に実効増倍率kをとつて示している。図におい
て、実線の曲線Pが測定データの存在する部分で
あり、また破線の曲線Qがつぎの核燃料追加ステ
ツプによりプロツトされると予測される部分であ
り、修正後の中性子断面積および計数率比規格化
定数を用いてつぎの核燃料装荷ステツプの実効計
数率比R′の値を予測すれば、曲線Qから実効増
倍率kの予測値を読み取ることができる。
Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIGS. 1 and 2 are layout diagrams in which a paired detector consisting of two detectors for counting neutrons during subcriticality measurement according to the present invention is arranged. In FIG. 1, a plurality of paired detectors 2 are arranged in an accumulation area 1 where nuclear fuel is collected, and in FIG. 2, a plurality of paired detectors 2 are arranged in a peripheral area 3 of the accumulation area in FIG. The paired detector 2 is placed in at least one of the collection area 1 and the peripheral area 3 to measure the number of neutrons,
Determine and predict the subcriticality (effective multiplication factor of subcritical state) of nuclear fuel equipment. Pair detector 2 consists of two detectors that exhibit different counting responses to the neutron energy distribution, e.g. 235 U
Fission counter and 238 U fission counter, 10 B counter and
It consists of a combination of a 237 Np fission counter, a 235 U fission counter, a 237 Np fission counter, etc. This combination is one (the former in the above combination)
has a high sensitivity to thermal neutron energy, and the other (latter) consists of a detector that has a higher sensitivity to fast neutron energy (approximately 1 MeV or more), and this combination is selected appropriately for each nuclear fuel facility. Neutrons are generated into nuclear fuel equipment by neutrons from an external neutron source by a normal neutron source generator disposed in the nuclear fuel collection area 1 or peripheral area 3 of the nuclear fuel equipment, or by neutrons from an internal neutron source by spontaneous fission neutrons of isotopes contained in the nuclear fuel itself. is multiplied, and the counting rate ratio R is measured by the paired detector 2. Next, a method for determining the degree of subcriticality from this count rate ratio R will be explained. The behavior of neutrons in a subcritical state system is usually described by a neutron flux distribution function φ(γ, E). Here, φ is a distribution function that depends on the spatial coordinate γ and the energy E, and is expressed by the well-known Boltzmann equation. Solving the following Boltzmann equation Hφ=S ...(1), which is expressed using operators. It is determined by Here, H is the Boltzmann operator and S is the source term due to the external neutron source. In addition, the neutron flux distribution function φ is generally found by solving the following eigenvalue equation H 0 φ 0o =0 ...(2) corresponding to equation ( 3). …
...) is expressed as a linear combination of That is, if a o is an arbitrary system number, the neutron flux distribution function φ becomes φ= 〓 n a o φ 0o ……(3). If the eigenfunction belonging to the minimum eigenvalue among the positive eigenvalues in equation (2) is represented by φ 0 , only the minimum eigenvalue state φ 0 is realized in the critical state, and in this case, equation (2) is called a critical equation. Furthermore, equations (1) and (2) are equivalent, and φ=φ 0 (critical state)...(4). By the way, if the response functions of the two detectors of paired detector 2 are Σ 1 and 〓 2 , respectively, then paired detector 2
The counting rate ratio R of the neutrons counted is the ratio of the counting rate <〓 1 φ> and <〓 2 φ> by each detector. That is, R=<〓 2 φ>/<〓 1 φ> (5) Here, the symbol <> represents an integral quantity over the phase space by γ and E. The count rate ratio R in equation (5) is a quantity that can be measured in a subcritical state and is usually called a spectral index. On the other hand, in order to connect this quantity to the critical state, we use the minimum eigenvalue state φ 0 , which is the solution to eigenvalue equation (2), and write R 0 =<〓 2 φ 0 >/<〓 1 φ in exactly the same way as in equation (5). Consider the unique count rate ratio R 0 defined by 0 > ...(6). Here, using this unique count rate ratio R 0 , a new quantity R' is introduced as follows: R'=R/R 0 (7). Note that R' is called the effective count rate ratio. Therefore, in the critical state when the effective multiplication factor k=1, the effective count rate ratio R 1 becomes R′=1 by applying the relationship (φ=φ 0 ) of equation (4) to equations (5) and (6). ...(8) becomes. Therefore, the effective count rate ratio R' corresponds to the effective multiplication factor k. From the above function, the effective count rate ratio R' is generally expressed as follows using an arbitrary function form F(x). R'=C 0 -F(1-k)...(9) Here, C 0 is a constant and k is an effective multiplication factor. However, F(0) = 0, and theoretically the critical state k
When =1, from equation (8), C 0 =1...(10). In other words, in general, after determining the arrangement of a pair of detectors and the nuclear fuel within the fuel equipment, the relationship when bringing the nuclear fuel equipment to a critical state by the near-criticality procedure by loading nuclear fuel is expressed by equation (9). Equation (9) is a basic relational expression between the effective count rate ratio R' and the effective multiplication factor k (the reactivity is (k-1)/k). Therefore, the effective multiplication factor k in the subcritical state of the nuclear fuel equipment can be obtained via the effective counting rate ratio R' based on equation (9). Here, R' is in the form of a ratio of counting rate ratios as shown in equation (7), so it is not directly related to the detection counting efficiency, so it is difficult to include calculation error, but R' In order to improve the evaluation accuracy of the value of R, input data such as the neutron cross section in the Boltzmann equation is corrected so that the measured data and the calculated value of the count rate ratio R match well. This modification of the input data also modifies the calculated value of the effective multiplication factor k at the same time. As many sets of (R′, k) values as are obtained by adjusting in this way are obtained for the number of nuclear fuel loading state systems for which the count rate ratio was measured, and this set of values can be expressed as (9)
When applied to the equation, the functional form F( 1-
k) counting parameters can be determined.
In this case, (10) guarantees the certainty of the above adjustment.
This is the condition of C 0 =1 when k= in the equation. When determining the above coefficient parameters, the normal regression analysis procedure is performed using the count rate ratio normalization constant C R as another parameter in addition to the neutron cross section, and the count parameters in equation (9) are Determine. In addition,
The count rate ratio standard constant C R mentioned above is defined as the following equation. C R =R c /R e (11) where R e is the measured value for the count rate ratio of the detector to the detector, and R c is the calculated value. The above regression analysis procedure is what is called reactivity calibration and does not need to include measurement data near the critical level. As described above, according to the present invention, the effective multiplication factor k in the subcritical state of nuclear fuel equipment is the effective count rate ratio
Using R′ as the main concept, we use the neutron cross section and the count rate ratio normalization constant C R as parameters.
It is determined by regression analysis using equations (9) and (10), that is, reactivity calibration. Note that since the obtained R' is extremely accurate, the value of R' for the upcoming nuclear fuel loading state can also be predicted with high accuracy. When this value of R' is applied to equation (9) calibrated by the reactivity calibration means, a predicted value of k can be obtained. Note that only one curve of equation (9) is determined for each pair of detectors, so if there are many pairs of detectors, the final test value and predicted value of the k value will be the average of them. Therefore, the greater the number, the better the accuracy. Figure 3 is a graph showing the curve of equation (9) after the reactivity calibration procedure is completed using the count rate ratio measurement data of paired detectors, with the effective count rate ratio R' on the vertical axis and the horizontal axis. The effective multiplication factor k is calculated and shown. In the figure, the solid line curve P is the part where measurement data exists, and the broken line curve Q is the part predicted to be plotted by the next nuclear fuel addition step, and the neutron cross section and count rate ratio after correction. If the value of the effective count rate ratio R' of the next nuclear fuel loading step is predicted using the normalization constant, the predicted value of the effective multiplication factor k can be read from the curve Q.
以上の説明から明らかなように中性子を計数す
る対検出器で測定された中性子の形数率比から、
反応度較正を行なつて計数パラメータを決定した
実効計数率比を未臨界状態の実効増倍率との関係
式に基づいて未臨界状態の実効増倍率(未臨界
度)を求めるようにしたことにより、従来極めて
困難であつた深い未臨界状態での反応度較正が可
能となるため、よりきびしい臨界管理が要求され
る臨界状態での反応度較正実験を行なわずに未臨
界状態の実効増倍率を求めることができる。また
深い未臨界状態から臨界にいたる実効計数率比と
実効増倍率との関係が求められるので、臨界に近
い状態の実効増倍率も予測できる。さらに中性子
の計数にあたり、中性子源は通常の原子炉起動用
中性子源か、核燃料自身に含まれる同位元素の自
発分裂中性子を利用すればよく、また計数する検
出器も通常の検出器と計数回路により行なうこと
ができるので、コストが安く、かつ保守が簡単に
なるという効果もある。
As is clear from the above explanation, from the shape rate ratio of neutrons measured by the neutron counting detector,
By calculating the effective multiplication factor in the subcritical state (degree of subcriticality) based on the relational expression between the effective multiplication factor in the subcritical state and the effective counting rate ratio whose counting parameters were determined by performing reactivity calibration. , it becomes possible to calibrate the reactivity in a deep subcritical state, which was extremely difficult in the past, so it is possible to calculate the effective multiplication factor in the subcritical state without conducting reactivity calibration experiments in the critical state, which requires stricter criticality control. You can ask for it. Furthermore, since the relationship between the effective count rate ratio and the effective multiplication factor from a deep subcritical state to the critical state is determined, the effective multiplication factor in a state close to the critical state can also be predicted. Furthermore, when counting neutrons, the neutron source can be a normal nuclear reactor startup neutron source or the spontaneous fission neutrons of isotopes contained in the nuclear fuel itself, and the counting detector can be a normal detector and counting circuit. This has the advantage of lower costs and easier maintenance.
第1図は本発明に係る対検出器の配置を示す配
置図、第2図は第1図の対検出器の異なる配置を
示す配置図、第3図は本発明による実効計数率比
と実効増倍率との関係を示すグラフである。
1:核燃料の集合領域、2:対検出器、3:核
燃料の周辺領域。
FIG. 1 is a layout diagram showing the arrangement of paired detectors according to the present invention, FIG. 2 is a layout diagram showing a different layout of the paired detectors in FIG. 1, and FIG. 3 is an effective count rate ratio and effective count rate ratio according to the present invention. It is a graph showing the relationship with the multiplication factor. 1: Nuclear fuel collection area, 2: Detector counter, 3: Nuclear fuel surrounding area.
Claims (1)
域の周辺領域との少なくとも一方の領域にて中性
子源より増倍する中性子のエネルギー分布に対し
て、一方は熱中性子エネルギーに対して高感度を
有する検出器と、他方は速中性子エネルギーに対
してより高感度を有する検出器からなる対検出器
により中性子の計数率比を測定し、この計数率比
から前記核燃料設備の未臨界度に対応する実効計
数率比を求め、この実効計数率比と前記未臨界度
との関係式による回帰解析を行い、回帰解析結果
から計数率比を測定したときの未臨界度を決定す
るとともに、前記実効計数率比の値を反応度較正
することにより燃料装荷時における未臨界度を予
測することを特徴とする核燃料設備の未臨界度測
定方法。1. Detection with high sensitivity to the energy distribution of neutrons multiplied from the neutron source in at least one of the nuclear fuel collection area of the nuclear fuel facility and the surrounding area of this collection area, while the other is highly sensitive to thermal neutron energy. The count rate ratio of neutrons is measured by a pair of detectors consisting of one detector and a detector more sensitive to fast neutron energy, and from this count rate ratio, an effective count corresponding to the subcriticality of the nuclear fuel equipment is determined. Find the rate ratio, perform regression analysis using the relational expression between this effective count rate ratio and the above-mentioned subcriticality, determine the subcriticality when the count rate ratio is measured from the regression analysis result, and calculate the above-mentioned effective count rate ratio. A method for measuring subcriticality of nuclear fuel equipment, characterized by predicting subcriticality at the time of fuel loading by calibrating the value of reactivity.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP61275651A JPS63128291A (en) | 1986-11-19 | 1986-11-19 | Non-critical degree measuring method of nuclear fuel facility |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP61275651A JPS63128291A (en) | 1986-11-19 | 1986-11-19 | Non-critical degree measuring method of nuclear fuel facility |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS63128291A JPS63128291A (en) | 1988-05-31 |
| JPH0525320B2 true JPH0525320B2 (en) | 1993-04-12 |
Family
ID=17558427
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP61275651A Granted JPS63128291A (en) | 1986-11-19 | 1986-11-19 | Non-critical degree measuring method of nuclear fuel facility |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS63128291A (en) |
-
1986
- 1986-11-19 JP JP61275651A patent/JPS63128291A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS63128291A (en) | 1988-05-31 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6181759B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining nearness to criticality of a nuclear fueled electric power generating unit | |
| JPH0515240B2 (en) | ||
| US4588547A (en) | Method and apparatus for determining the nearness to criticality of a nuclear reactor | |
| EP0326267B1 (en) | Core reactivity validation computer and method | |
| JPH07119827B2 (en) | Measuring device of reactor power distribution | |
| Khoshahval et al. | Analysis and comparison of direct inversion and Kalman filter methods for self-powered neutron detector compensation | |
| JP5491879B2 (en) | Neutron multiplication system subcriticality determination device and subcriticality determination program | |
| Sasamoto et al. | An analysis method of gamma-ray pulse-height distributions obtained with a Ge (Li) detector | |
| Dos Santos et al. | A new experimental approach for subcritical reactivity determination of multiplying systems | |
| Filliatre et al. | Joint estimation of the fast and thermal components of a high neutron flux with a two on-line detector system | |
| JPH09264984A (en) | Reactor out-of-reactor instrumentation apparatus and method | |
| Badgley et al. | Power-spectral-density measurements in a subcritical nuclear reactor | |
| JPH0525320B2 (en) | ||
| CN111505703A (en) | Method, apparatus, device and medium for measuring plutonium quality of plutonium substance | |
| RU2231145C2 (en) | Method for evaluating effective intensity of nuclear power plant neutron source | |
| CN114169164B (en) | Method and device for determining core power of critical device | |
| WO2016007094A1 (en) | Method for measuring reactivity in a light water reactor | |
| JPH0525319B2 (en) | ||
| CN111312417A (en) | Method for measuring reactivity | |
| KR950001735B1 (en) | Method of correcting isotope burn-in effects in fission neutron dosimeters | |
| KR20230127410A (en) | Method of calculating radioactivity concentration in radioactive waste | |
| JP3137569B2 (en) | Method for evaluating neutron source intensity and gamma ray intensity of reactor | |
| JP2647573B2 (en) | Core power distribution monitoring device, reactor protection device, reactor core detector device, and reactor core monitoring method | |
| RU2754993C1 (en) | Reactimeter counting channel calibration method | |
| EP4481444A1 (en) | Method for calculating concentration of radioactivity in radioactive waste |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |