Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH0549371B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH0549371B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0549371B2
JPH0549371B2 JP60296210A JP29621085A JPH0549371B2 JP H0549371 B2 JPH0549371 B2 JP H0549371B2 JP 60296210 A JP60296210 A JP 60296210A JP 29621085 A JP29621085 A JP 29621085A JP H0549371 B2 JPH0549371 B2 JP H0549371B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
mesh member
die
mold
press
actual
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP60296210A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS62156028A (en
Inventor
Takeshi Abe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nissan Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Priority to JP60296210A priority Critical patent/JPS62156028A/en
Publication of JPS62156028A publication Critical patent/JPS62156028A/en
Publication of JPH0549371B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0549371B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Shaping Metal By Deep-Drawing, Or The Like (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 (産業上の利用分野) 本発明は絞り加工するためのプレス型が確実に
鋼板を塑成加工し得るか否かを、予め検討するた
めのプレスにおける成形性評価方法に関する。
Detailed Description of the Invention (Field of Industrial Application) The present invention is a method for evaluating formability in a press to examine in advance whether or not a press die for drawing can reliably form a steel plate. Regarding.

(従来の技術) 鋼板をプレスを用いて所定の形状に絞り加工す
る際には、被加工物である鋼板の基本的な成形特
性を知るために、引張試験、曲げ試験、及びエリ
クセン試験等を行なっている。ところが、被加工
物が自動車車体用のパネルのように、複雑に湾曲
した三次元の形状をなしている場合には、所定の
形状に成形された金型を用いて鋼板を絞り加工し
て始めてその金型が適正な形状となっているか否
かを判定できる。つまり、最終的には実際に金型
を用いて鋼板を成形しなければ、その金型の形状
の良否を評価することができない。
(Prior art) When drawing a steel plate into a predetermined shape using a press, tensile tests, bending tests, Erichsen tests, etc. are carried out in order to know the basic forming characteristics of the steel plate that is the workpiece. I am doing it. However, when the workpiece has a complexly curved three-dimensional shape, such as a panel for an automobile body, it is necessary to draw the steel plate using a mold formed into a predetermined shape. It can be determined whether the mold has an appropriate shape. In other words, unless a steel plate is actually formed using a mold, it is not possible to evaluate the quality of the shape of the mold.

しかし、絞り加工するための金型が自動車車体
用のパネルのように大型のものを被加工物とする
場合には、特に、金型の製造を行なう前に、その
金型の形状で良いか否かを知る必要がある。
However, when the die for drawing is a large workpiece such as an automobile body panel, it is especially important to check whether the shape of the die is suitable before manufacturing the die. I need to know whether or not.

そのため従来は、第3図に示すように、検討用
の絞り型1を制作して、鋼板の成形性の評価を行
なっていた。第3図に示す検討用の絞り型1は、
下型となる雌側のモデルを示すものであり、石こ
うにより制作されている。この検討用モデル1に
は製品の外面に対応した本体部分Aと、この本体
部分Aで成形された部分に対して背面側に折り曲
げられる部分を成形するための余肉部分Bと、金
型のワーク支持面となるダイフエース部Cとが形
成されている。
Therefore, conventionally, as shown in FIG. 3, a drawing die 1 for examination was manufactured to evaluate the formability of the steel plate. The drawing die 1 for consideration shown in FIG.
This shows the female side model, which will be the lower mold, and is made of plaster. This study model 1 includes a main body part A that corresponds to the outer surface of the product, an extra wall part B for molding the part that is bent to the back side of the part molded with the main body part A, and a mold part B. A die face portion C serving as a work supporting surface is formed.

このようなモデル1を用いてプレスにおける成
形性を評価するには、このモデル1の上に鉄板や
アクリル板等の板材2を載置して行なつている。
これにより板材2と本体部分Aとの間隔、つまり
深さを測定したり、ダイフエース部Cに板材2を
接触させた状態において、板材2中央部がどの程
度たるむか等を検査している。これらの検討によ
つて、第3図に示す形状のモデル1と同一の形状
の金型で実際の被加工物を絞り加工した場合に最
適な加工ができるか否か、つまり絞り加工後の被
加工物にしわの発生や、割れが発生しないかどう
かの評価を行なつている。もしも、この形状では
適正な絞り加工ができないと評価された場合に
は、石こう製のモデル1を削り落す等して、ダイ
フエース部Cや余肉部分Bの角度や寸法等を調整
することによつて、円滑な絞り加工が達成される
べき実際のプレス型の形状を求めている。
In order to evaluate the formability in a press using such a model 1, a plate material 2 such as an iron plate or an acrylic plate is placed on top of the model 1.
This measures the distance between the plate material 2 and the main body portion A, that is, the depth, and inspects how much the center portion of the plate material 2 sags when the plate material 2 is in contact with the die face portion C. Through these studies, we determined whether or not optimal processing could be achieved when an actual workpiece was drawn using a mold with the same shape as model 1 shown in Figure 3, that is, whether or not the workpiece after drawing was drawn. We evaluate whether or not wrinkles or cracks occur in the workpiece. If it is determined that proper drawing cannot be performed with this shape, the angle and dimensions of the die face part C and extra wall part B may be adjusted by cutting off the model 1 made of plaster. Therefore, the shape of the actual press mold that should achieve smooth drawing processing is being sought.

(発明が解決しようとする問題点) しかしながら、このような従来の成形性評価方
法にあつては、板材2を実際の被加工物の形状に
成形することなく、板材2をモデル1の上に載置
した状態を目で見て経験によつて成形性を判断し
ている。このため、この成形性の評価により適正
な形状であると判断されたモデル1と同様の形状
に実際のプレス型をを成形し、これを用いてパネ
ルを成形した場合に、被加工物が成形不良を起す
ことがある。つまり、上記従来の成形性評価方法
では、厳密には実際の成形の状態を評価すること
はできず、最終的には本型パネルを成形してみな
いと、不具合が分らなかつた。したがつて、従来
は実際のプレス型を成形した後、これを修正する
作業が必要であり、実際のプレス型の修正に費用
と時間とが必要になるという問題点があつた。
(Problems to be Solved by the Invention) However, in such a conventional formability evaluation method, the plate material 2 is placed on the model 1 without being formed into the shape of the actual workpiece. The moldability is determined based on experience by visually observing the mounted state. Therefore, when an actual press mold is molded into a shape similar to Model 1, which was determined to be an appropriate shape by this moldability evaluation, and a panel is molded using this mold, the workpiece is May cause defects. In other words, the above-mentioned conventional moldability evaluation method cannot strictly evaluate the actual molding state, and defects cannot be found until the final panel is molded. Therefore, in the past, it was necessary to correct the actual press die after it was formed, and there was a problem in that it was costly and time consuming to correct the actual press die.

本発明は上記従来技術の問題点に鑑みてなされ
たものであり、より実際の成形に近い状態で成形
を行なうことにより成形性を評価し得るようにす
ることを目的とする。
The present invention has been made in view of the problems of the prior art described above, and an object of the present invention is to enable evaluation of moldability by performing molding under conditions closer to actual molding.

(問題点を解決するための手段) 上記目的を達成するための本発明は、検討用の
上下両絞り型の間に、金属製の網目状部材を設置
し、前記両絞り型を相互に接近させて前記網目状
部材を絞り成形し、前記網目状部材の格子の変位
でプレスの成形性を評価するようにしたプレスに
おける成形性評価方法である。
(Means for Solving the Problems) The present invention for achieving the above object includes installing a metal mesh member between the upper and lower drawing dies to be examined, and bringing the two drawing dies close together. This is a method for evaluating formability in a press, in which the mesh member is drawn and formed, and the formability of the press is evaluated based on the displacement of the lattice of the mesh member.

(作用) 実際にプレス加工すべきプレス型に対応した形
状に石こう等を用いて成形した絞り型を用いて、
金属製の網目状部材を成形すると、網目状部材つ
まりメッシユの格子の変位により実際のワークの
変形状態を観察することができ、容易に成形性を
評価することが可能となる。
(Function) Using a drawing die made of plaster etc. into a shape corresponding to the press die to be actually pressed,
When a metal mesh member is formed, the actual deformation state of the workpiece can be observed by the displacement of the mesh member, that is, the mesh lattice, and the formability can be easily evaluated.

(実施例) 以下、本発明の実施例について説明する。第1
図A,Bは、本発明の検討用の雌側の絞り型10
と、検討用の雄側の絞り型11とにより、網目状
部材12を絞り加工した状態を示す。
(Example) Examples of the present invention will be described below. 1st
Figures A and B show a drawing die 10 on the female side for consideration of the present invention.
This shows the state in which the mesh member 12 is drawn using the drawing die 11 on the male side for consideration.

この雌側の絞り型10は実際のプレス型の下
型、つまりダイに相当するものであり、第3図に
示した場合と同様に、本体部分Aと、余肉部分B
と、ダイフエース部分Cとからなる成形面を有し
ている。雄側絞り型11は前記雌側絞り型10と
凹凸関係が逆となつて形成されており、実際のプ
レス型の上型つまりポンチに相当する。また、雌
側絞り型10のダイフエース部分Cに対向する位
置に、実際のプレス型に対応させて、ブランクホ
ルダーに相当するブランクホルダー部13が位置
している。これらの雌側絞り型10、雄側絞り型
11、及びブランクホルダー部13は、石こう材
料からなり、表面に樹脂がコーテイングされてい
る。ただし、全体を樹脂で成形しても良く、砂と
樹脂の混合物を用いても良く、更にこれらの表面
に金属を溶射等によりコーテイングするようにし
ても良い。
This drawing die 10 on the female side corresponds to the lower die of the actual press mold, that is, the die, and as in the case shown in FIG.
and a die face portion C. The male drawing die 11 is formed with a concave-convex relationship opposite to that of the female drawing die 10, and corresponds to the upper die of an actual press die, that is, the punch. Furthermore, a blank holder portion 13 corresponding to a blank holder is located at a position facing the die face portion C of the female side drawing die 10, corresponding to an actual press die. These female side drawing die 10, male side drawing die 11, and blank holder part 13 are made of gypsum material, and their surfaces are coated with resin. However, the entire body may be molded with resin, a mixture of sand and resin may be used, and furthermore, these surfaces may be coated with metal by thermal spraying or the like.

網目状部材12としては、ステンレス、銅、黄
銅を用い、銅と黄銅については、焼鈍した場合と
しない場合との両方を用いた。それぞれの網目状
部材12の素材直径は0.47mmの太さであり、メツ
シユの大きさは2mmであつた。
Stainless steel, copper, and brass were used as the mesh member 12, and copper and brass were used both with and without annealing. The material diameter of each mesh member 12 was 0.47 mm, and the mesh size was 2 mm.

上述のような検討用の雌雄の絞り型10,11
と網目状部材12とを用いて、プレスの成形性を
評価するには、まず、下型側の検討用絞り型10
の表面に離型剤14と樹脂15とを塗り、これら
が乾燥する前に網目状部材12を絞り型10の上
に載置する。次いで、網目状部材12の上にブラ
ンクホルダー部13を置いて、雄側の絞り型11
により網目状部材12を成形する。このときの成
形用の圧力としては、重りまたは自重を用いる。
樹脂15が硬化した後に、雄側絞り型11とブラ
ツクホルダー部13とを外し、成形された網目状
部材12の成形状態を観察し、成形性を評価す
る。尚、網目状部材12の素材によつては、樹脂
15によつて成形後に形状を凍結させなくとも良
い。
Male and female drawing dies 10 and 11 for study as described above
In order to evaluate the formability of the press using the mesh member 12 and the mesh member 12, first, the drawing die 10
A mold release agent 14 and a resin 15 are applied to the surface of the mesh member 12, and the mesh member 12 is placed on the drawing die 10 before these are dried. Next, the blank holder part 13 is placed on the mesh member 12, and the male side drawing die 11 is placed on the mesh member 12.
The mesh member 12 is formed by the following steps. As the pressure for molding at this time, a weight or its own weight is used.
After the resin 15 is cured, the male drawing die 11 and the black holder part 13 are removed, and the molded state of the formed mesh member 12 is observed to evaluate the moldability. Note that, depending on the material of the mesh member 12, it is not necessary to freeze the shape after molding with the resin 15.

第2図Aは成形する前の状態の網目状部材12
であり、第2図Bは本発明の評価方法によつて典
型的な円筒形状に成形された状態の網目状部材1
2を示す。このようにして、網目状部材12のメ
ツシユないし格子の歪み、ズレ等を観察すること
により、実際のプレス加工の状態における素材の
流入量、伸び縮み等が分り、成形性を容易に評価
することができる。尚、本実施例において網目状
部材の素材直径0.47mm、メツシユの大きさを2mm
としたが、絞り深さ、絞るブランク材の厚さ等の
絞り条件により適宜選択すればよい。
FIG. 2A shows the mesh member 12 before being molded.
FIG. 2B shows the mesh member 1 formed into a typical cylindrical shape by the evaluation method of the present invention.
2 is shown. In this way, by observing the distortion, displacement, etc. of the mesh or lattice of the mesh member 12, the inflow amount of the material, expansion and contraction, etc. in the actual press working state can be determined, and the formability can be easily evaluated. I can do it. In this example, the material diameter of the mesh member is 0.47 mm, and the mesh size is 2 mm.
However, it may be selected as appropriate depending on the drawing conditions such as the drawing depth and the thickness of the blank material to be drawn.

(発明の効果) 以上のように、本発明によれば、検討用の上下
絞り型間に、金属製の網目状部材を設置し、前記
上下の絞り絞り型を相互に接近させて前記網目状
部材を絞り成形し、前記網目状部材の格子の変位
でプレスの成形性を評価するようにしたので、実
際のプレス型を制作することなく、容易に型修正
を行ない得る石こうや樹脂等からなり、金型に相
当する形状の絞り型を制作し、これを用いて網目
状部材を成形することとなり、実際の成形状態に
近い状態を良く再現することが可能となる。これ
により、簡単により確実に成形性を評価し得るこ
とから、実際の製造に用いるプレス型を簡単に制
作することが可能となり、型の制作工程の短縮と
費用の削減とを達成することができる。
(Effects of the Invention) As described above, according to the present invention, a metal mesh member is installed between the upper and lower drawing dies for examination, and the upper and lower drawing dies are brought close to each other to form the mesh member. The members were drawn and formed, and the press formability was evaluated based on the displacement of the lattice of the mesh member, so the mold can be easily corrected without creating an actual press mold. , a drawing mold with a shape corresponding to a metal mold is manufactured and used to mold the mesh member, making it possible to reproduce conditions close to the actual molding conditions. This makes it possible to easily and more reliably evaluate moldability, making it possible to easily produce press molds used in actual manufacturing, shortening the mold production process and reducing costs. .

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図Aは本発明のプレス型の成形性評価を行
なう為に網目状部材を成形している状態を示す断
面図、第1図Bは同図AにおけるI部拡大断面
図、第2図Aは網目状部材を示す斜視図、第2図
Bは成形終了後の網目状部材を示す斜視図、第3
図は従来の成形方法を示す断面図である。 10……雌側絞り型、11……雄側絞り型、1
2……網目状部材、13……ブランクホルダー
部、15……樹脂。
FIG. 1A is a sectional view showing a state in which a mesh member is being molded to evaluate the formability of the press die of the present invention, FIG. 1B is an enlarged sectional view of part I in FIG. A is a perspective view showing the mesh member, FIG. 2B is a perspective view showing the mesh member after molding, and FIG.
The figure is a sectional view showing a conventional molding method. 10... Female side drawing die, 11... Male side drawing die, 1
2...Mesh member, 13...Blank holder portion, 15...Resin.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1 検討用の上下両絞り型間に、金属製の網目状
部材を設置し、前記両絞り型を相互に接近させて
前記網目状部材を絞り成形し、前記網目状部材の
格子の変位でプレスの成形性を評価するようにし
たプルスにおける成形性評価方法。
1. A metal mesh member is installed between the upper and lower drawing dies for consideration, and the mesh member is drawn by bringing the drawing dies close to each other, and pressed by the displacement of the lattice of the mesh member. A moldability evaluation method for PULS that evaluates the moldability of.
JP60296210A 1985-12-27 1985-12-27 Formability estimating method in press Granted JPS62156028A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP60296210A JPS62156028A (en) 1985-12-27 1985-12-27 Formability estimating method in press

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP60296210A JPS62156028A (en) 1985-12-27 1985-12-27 Formability estimating method in press

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS62156028A JPS62156028A (en) 1987-07-11
JPH0549371B2 true JPH0549371B2 (en) 1993-07-26

Family

ID=17830598

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP60296210A Granted JPS62156028A (en) 1985-12-27 1985-12-27 Formability estimating method in press

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS62156028A (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008179181A (en) * 2007-01-23 2008-08-07 Nishikawa Rubber Co Ltd Rain rail weather strip
KR100931154B1 (en) * 2007-12-14 2009-12-10 주식회사 포스코 Specimen for manufacturing composite moldability, the method of forming a specimen using the same and the evaluation method of the specimen formed by the same
KR101203635B1 (en) 2009-12-23 2012-11-23 주식회사 포스코 Valuation method for forming character of ferrite stainless steel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS62156028A (en) 1987-07-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE69001890D1 (en) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MOLDING A SHEET CUT, IN PARTICULAR FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A MASK FOR A CATHODE RAY TUBE.
US3463035A (en) Method of preparing die plates
JPH0549371B2 (en)
US4865639A (en) Glass sheet bending mold
CN114433704B (en) A drawing slab clamping structure and slab shrinkage control optimization method
JP3210761B2 (en) Method of making a mold wide side wall for a thin slab casting apparatus and apparatus for performing this method
JP4120119B2 (en) Burring forming method and mold apparatus
WO1997002911A1 (en) Press die formed of cement-based composition and method of manufacturing the same
US3670546A (en) Fluid press
RU2124411C1 (en) Device for stamping by elastic medium
JP3007883B1 (en) Hydroform processing equipment
JPS60191621A (en) Method of press forming metallic plate
KR20100080586A (en) The press product die of car panel part
CN221657882U (en) Forging pulls out material quick forming's frock mould
JP2513078B2 (en) Press working method
CN104226766A (en) Method and device for evaluating sheet metal stamping imbalance flow springback characteristic
JPH0718446Y2 (en) Mold for closed forging
JPH01262029A (en) Press die using superplastic alloy and its manufacture
JP3443429B2 (en) Press working simulation apparatus and press die shape determining method using the same
SU804085A1 (en) Method of simulating sheet pressing processes with single-side contact of workpiece and tool
JPS62148026A (en) Two step forming method for forming article
CN115740318A (en) Manufacturing method of embedded part cylinder
JPS6257719A (en) Pess die device
SU1279735A1 (en) Method of producing plates for roller or sleeve-and-roller chain
JPS59215249A (en) Production of mold for continuous casting