Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH0585700B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH0585700B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0585700B2
JPH0585700B2 JP9171282A JP9171282A JPH0585700B2 JP H0585700 B2 JPH0585700 B2 JP H0585700B2 JP 9171282 A JP9171282 A JP 9171282A JP 9171282 A JP9171282 A JP 9171282A JP H0585700 B2 JPH0585700 B2 JP H0585700B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
elastic plate
thickness
seismic isolation
elastic
isolation device
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP9171282A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS58207431A (en
Inventor
Hideyuki Tada
Shiro Tatara
Toshitaka Nishi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unitika Ltd
Original Assignee
Unitika Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Unitika Ltd filed Critical Unitika Ltd
Priority to JP9171282A priority Critical patent/JPS58207431A/en
Publication of JPS58207431A publication Critical patent/JPS58207431A/en
Publication of JPH0585700B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0585700B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
  • Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

本発明は構造物等の構造物に、その基礎から伝
達される振動エネルギーを減少させて、構造物を
地震等から保護する免震装置に関するものであ
る。 地震発生時に地盤から建造物に伝えられる地震
入力を減少することを目的として、建造物を載置
するように、弾性板と金属板の積層体(以下免震
装置と言う)を、基礎上に設置する免震工法が開
発されている。この免震装置は、第1図a,bに
示すように、一枚以上の弾性板1と複数の金属板
2を交互に積層し、それらを加硫接着等により固
着したものである。この構造により、この免震装
置3は大きな鉛直方向バネ係数Kvと小さな水平
方向バネ係数Khを持つている。そして建造物に
対する大きな載荷能力が確保され、且つ水平方向
に対する建造物の系全体の固有振動周期(以下単
に周期Tという)を大きくすることができる。 系の周期Tを大きくした場合の効果について説
明する。 一般的な地震入力の最大周期成分は0.1〜1.0秒
である。鉄筋コンクリート造建造物の持つ周期T
は、一般に一階層につき約0.1秒であり、例えば
3階建の場合に周期は約0.3秒であるから、上記
地震入力の最大周期成分の範囲内に入つている。
このため一般の鉄筋コンクリート造建造物は共振
現象等により、地震入力に対して数倍の加速度特
性を示し地震の被害を受け易い。 従つて上記免震装置によつて、系の周期Tを2
秒から4秒以上に変えることができれは、地震入
力の最大周期成分の範囲から外れて、地震に対し
て柔軟性のある構造となり免震が可能となる。 すなわち上記免震装置は、特に小さくした水平
バネ係数Khによつて建造物の系の周期Tを2秒
〜4秒以上に増大させて、地震入力に対する構造
物の加速度特性を減少させ、同時に構造物をほぼ
剛体に近い並進運動を行わせることにより、地震
の入力エネルギーを吸収させるようにしたもので
ある。 このように建造物の系の周期Tを大きくするに
は、弾性板1に、柔らかい素材(ゴム板等)を使
用する必要がある。しかし柔らかい弾性板を使用
すると大きな水平変位に対して水平方向の復元力
を失う座屈のおそれがある。 そこで本発明は、建造物の系の周期Tを、免震
に十分とされる2秒以上の値にできる弾性板素材
のせん断バネ係数Gの一般的範囲を定め、この場
合に座屈を起こさない弾性板1の形状寸法を定め
ることを目的とする。 初めに、弾性板素材のせん断バネ係数Gの一般
的範囲を定める。ここで、弾性板素材のせん断バ
ネ係数Gとは、弾性板が、この素材のみにより、
一様な材質のものとして製作されるので、弾性板
のせん断バネ係数Gというのと同義であり、以
下、この意味で用いる。 建造物の系の周期Tは、
The present invention relates to a seismic isolation device that protects a structure from earthquakes by reducing vibration energy transmitted to the structure from its foundation. In order to reduce the seismic input transmitted from the ground to a building in the event of an earthquake, a laminate of elastic plates and metal plates (hereinafter referred to as a seismic isolation device) is placed on the foundation, similar to when a building is placed. A seismic isolation construction method has been developed for installation. As shown in FIGS. 1a and 1b, this seismic isolation device consists of one or more elastic plates 1 and a plurality of metal plates 2 alternately laminated and fixed together by vulcanization adhesive or the like. Due to this structure, this seismic isolation device 3 has a large vertical spring coefficient K v and a small horizontal spring coefficient K h . A large loading capacity for the building is ensured, and the natural vibration period (hereinafter simply referred to as period T) of the entire system of the building in the horizontal direction can be increased. The effect of increasing the period T of the system will be explained. The maximum periodic component of a typical seismic input is 0.1 to 1.0 seconds. Period T of reinforced concrete buildings
is generally about 0.1 second per floor, and for example, in the case of a three-story building, the period is about 0.3 seconds, so it is within the range of the maximum periodic component of the earthquake input.
For this reason, general reinforced concrete buildings exhibit acceleration characteristics several times higher than earthquake input due to resonance phenomena and are susceptible to earthquake damage. Therefore, by using the above seismic isolation device, the period T of the system can be reduced to 2.
If the time can be changed from seconds to 4 seconds or more, the period will be outside the range of the maximum periodic component of earthquake input, and the structure will be flexible against earthquakes and seismic isolation will be possible. In other words, the seismic isolation device increases the period T of the building system to 2 seconds to 4 seconds or more by using a particularly small horizontal spring coefficient K h , thereby reducing the acceleration characteristics of the structure in response to earthquake input, and at the same time The structure is designed to absorb the input energy of an earthquake by making it perform a translational motion that is almost like a rigid body. In order to increase the period T of the building system in this way, it is necessary to use a soft material (such as a rubber plate) for the elastic plate 1. However, if a soft elastic plate is used, there is a risk of buckling due to loss of horizontal restoring force against large horizontal displacement. Therefore, the present invention defines a general range of the shear spring coefficient G of the elastic board material that can make the period T of the building system a value of 2 seconds or more, which is sufficient for seismic isolation, and in which buckling does not occur. The purpose is to determine the shape and dimensions of the elastic plate 1. First, the general range of the shear spring coefficient G of the elastic board material is determined. Here, the shear spring modulus G of the elastic board material means that the elastic board only has this material.
Since it is manufactured from a uniform material, it has the same meaning as the shear spring coefficient G of an elastic plate, and will be used in this sense hereinafter. The period T of the building system is

【式】と表される。 但し、M:建造物の質量 M=W(重量)/g(重量加速度) ΣKh:免震装置の総水平バネ係数 ΣKh=A・G/Lc A:全免震装置の弾性板の総受圧面積 G:弾性板素材のせん断バネ係数 Lc:弾性板の鉛直方向の総厚 である。 したがつて、周期TはIt is expressed as [Formula]. However, M: mass of the building M=W (weight)/g (weight acceleration) ΣK h : total horizontal spring coefficient of the seismic isolation device ΣK h = A・G/L c A: total horizontal spring coefficient of the seismic isolation device Total pressure-receiving area G: Shear spring coefficient of the elastic plate material Lc: Total thickness of the elastic plate in the vertical direction. Therefore, the period T is

【化】 で表わされる。 この式において、周期Tは、W/AとLcの
積を、Gで除した値に比例している。 したがつて、建造物一般に対して周期Tを2秒
以上にできるGの一般的条件を決めるには、W/
AとLcの一般的な組合わせを考え、これらに対
して周期Tを2秒以上とできるGを決定すればよ
いことによる。 ここで、W/A(単位面積当りの鉛直方向荷重)
は安定した鉛直方向支持能力を与えるため一般的
に30〜300Kg/cm2の範囲で使用される。 一方Lc(弾性板の鉛直方向の総厚)は、建造物
とその基礎との間の免震装置の設置スペース(上
下方向の間隔)で制約を受け、数cm乃至数10cmが
実用の範囲である。 そこで、代表値として、比較的小さい値である
W/A=30Kg/cm2、Lc=20cmを用い、上記式
に、T=2(秒)と共に代入すると、G=6Kg/
cm2が求められる。そこで、この値より小さいこと
をGの一般的条件とする。 なお、上述のG決定の意義は、構造物一般に使
用する免震装置に対して必要な周期Tを容易に与
えられる範囲を定めたことであつて、W/Aと
Lcの数値の組合わせは、無数に考えられる。例
えばG=6Kg/cm2で、W/A=90Kg/cm2、Lc=
6.6cmという組合わせ、G=3.0Kg/cm2として、
W/A=30Kg/cm2、Lc=10cmといつた組合わせ
等が任意に設計できる。 次に上記Gの一般的範囲を、実際の建造物の持
つ数値に当てはめ検証してみる。この数値例は、
免震が必要な建造物の中で、重量が比較的軽くて
周期Tを大きくし難い鉄筋コンクリート造2階建
又は3階建の建造物を採用する。 鉄筋コンクリート造2階建又は3階建の建造物
は、通常150〜360(TON)の重量を有している。
基礎梁の幅は250〜300mmであるから設置可能な免
震装置の直径は130mmφ〜300mmφである。また免
震装置の設置数は建造物の各柱下に一個ずつ設置
するものとする。 上記施工条件を考えて以下に設計例として三例
を挙げる。 重量150TONの建造物に直径130mmφの弾性板
よりなる27個の免震装置を設置した場合イ、重量
150TONの建造物に直径130mmφの弾性板よりな
る10個の免震装置を設置した場合ロ、重量
180TONの建造物に直径300mmφの弾性板よりな
る6個の免震装置を設置した場合ハの三例であ
る。 これらは、弾性板1に安定した鉛直方向支持能
力を与えるため、その単位面積当りの鉛直方向荷
重W/Aを40〜120Kg/cm2の範囲で決定し、建造
物とその基礎との間の設置スペースが比較的狭い
場合を想定し弾性板1の鉛直方向の総厚Lcを、
6cmと設定している。 この三例の夫々において、周期Tに2秒又は4
秒を与えるために必要な弾性板素材のせん断バネ
係数Gを、上記式に基いて、算出すると次表の
ようになる。
It is represented by [ ]. In this equation, the period T is proportional to the product of W/A and Lc divided by G. Therefore, in order to determine the general conditions for G that allow the period T to be 2 seconds or more for buildings in general, W/
This is because it is sufficient to consider general combinations of A and Lc and determine G that allows the period T to be 2 seconds or more for these combinations. Here, W/A (vertical load per unit area)
is generally used in the range of 30 to 300 Kg/cm 2 to provide stable vertical support capacity. On the other hand, Lc (the total vertical thickness of the elastic plate) is limited by the installation space (vertical spacing) of the seismic isolation device between the building and its foundation, and the practical range is from several centimeters to several tens of centimeters. be. Therefore, by using relatively small values W/A = 30Kg/cm 2 and Lc = 20cm as representative values and substituting them together with T = 2 (seconds) in the above formula, G = 6Kg/cm 2 and Lc = 20cm.
cm 2 is found. Therefore, the general condition for G is to be smaller than this value. The significance of the above-mentioned G determination is that it defines a range in which the necessary period T can be easily given to seismic isolation devices used in general structures, and W/A and
There are countless possible combinations of Lc values. For example, G=6Kg/cm 2 , W/A=90Kg/cm 2 , Lc=
Assuming a combination of 6.6cm and G=3.0Kg/cm 2 ,
Any combination such as W/A=30Kg/cm 2 and Lc=10cm can be designed. Next, we will apply the above general range of G to the numerical value of an actual building and verify it. This numerical example is
Among buildings that require seismic isolation, two- or three-story reinforced concrete buildings are used because they are relatively light in weight and it is difficult to increase the period T. A two- or three-story reinforced concrete building typically weighs between 150 and 360 tons.
Since the width of the foundation beam is 250 to 300 mm, the diameter of the seismic isolation device that can be installed is 130 mm to 300 mm. In addition, one seismic isolation device shall be installed under each pillar of the building. Considering the above construction conditions, three design examples are listed below. If 27 seismic isolation devices made of elastic plates with a diameter of 130 mmφ are installed in a building weighing 150 TON, the weight will be
If 10 seismic isolation devices made of elastic plates with a diameter of 130 mmφ are installed in a 150 TON building, the weight will be
The third example in C is when six seismic isolation devices made of elastic plates with a diameter of 300 mmφ are installed in a 180 TON building. In order to give the elastic plate 1 a stable vertical support capacity, the vertical load W/A per unit area is determined in the range of 40 to 120 kg/ cm2 , and the Assuming that the installation space is relatively narrow, the total vertical thickness Lc of the elastic plate 1 is
It is set to 6cm. In each of these three examples, the period T is either 2 seconds or 4 seconds.
The shear spring coefficient G of the elastic board material required to give the second speed is calculated based on the above formula as shown in the following table.

【表】 上記結果より免震装置に使用する弾性板素材の
せん断バネ係数Gを小さく(軟かいゴムを使用)
すれば、周期Tを必要に応じて大きくすることが
でき、免震効果を十分に挙げるには弾性板素材の
せん断バネ係数Gの値を6Kg/cm2以下にすればよ
いことがわかる。この値を与える弾性板素材とし
ては、天然ゴム、合成ゴム、或いはゴム弾性を有
するプラスチツクに補強剤、軟化剤、硬化剤、老
化防止剤等を配合したもの等が使用できる。而し
てJIS規格硬度50のゴムは、天然ゴム系でバネ係
数が7〜9Kg/cm2、合成ゴム系で6〜7Kg/cm2
あるから、弾性板に上記6Kg/cm2以下のせん断バ
ネ係数Gを与えるには、硬度50以下のゴムを使用
すればよいことになる。 しかし上記のようにせん断バネ係数Gが小さい
(軟かい)ゴムを使用すると、免震装置の垂直バ
ネ係数Kvも当然に低下し、建造物重量による圧
縮荷重で、免震装置が座屈する様な変形を起し使
用不能になる場合が生じる。これを防止する為に
せん断バネ係数Gを小さくする一方、バネ比(鉛
直バネ係数Kv/水平バネ係数Kh)をできるだけ
大きく(300〜400程度以上)する必要がある。 そこで本発明は上記事情に鑑み、この問題を解
決したものである。 すなわち本発明は免震装置の弾性板素材に上記
の如くせん断バネ係数が小さい(6Kg/cm2以下)
ものを使用する場合において、弾性板(ゴム板)
の厚みtを小さい値(6mm以下)に制限すること
(弾性板の直径Dに対する厚さtの比である形状
係数で評価して、D/t≧25によつて、十分に大
きいバネ比Kv/Khを得るようにしたものである。 以下弾性板の厚みtを上記値(6mm以下)に制
限した理由を実験データに基いて説明する。 第2図は免震装置の弾性板(150mmφ)の素材
にせん断バネ係数3.3Kg/cm2を与える硬度37のゴ
ムを用い、そのゴム厚tを10mm〜2.5mmの範囲で
変化させ、バネ比(鉛直方向バネ係数Kv/水平
方向バネ係数Kh)を測定した実験データを示す
ものである。なおこのバネ比Kv/Khの測定は第
3図に示すように31Kg重・cm2の鉛直方向の圧縮応
力(F)を加え、水平方向歪み(δ)を100%
(水平方向歪みδ/弾性板厚t=1)にして測定
したものである。またこの実験においては弾性板
(ゴム板)の総厚みを6cmと一定の条件にするよ
うに、弾性板の積層数を変え、例えば5mm厚の場
合は12層にし、6mm厚の場合は10層にしている。
なお、第2図における各点の表示、例えば150×
2.5−24は直径150mmφ、厚み2.5mmの弾性板(ゴ
ム板)24枚を金属板と交互に積層したことを示し
ている。この実施例からわかるように弾性板を一
枚当りの厚みtを6mmにすることによつて座屈を
起こさない条件であるバネ比Kv/Kh=270が得ら
れ、この厚み6mmの点が、この弾性板厚−バネ比
の特性の変曲点となり、厚みが6mmよりさらに小
さく、厚み5mmとなると急激に増加する。特に4
mm以下になると、その増大率は大きくなり、バネ
比Kv/Khに450以上のもの非常に良好な値が得ら
れる。 なお免震装置が取り付け作業上の制限等を受け
ず、その高さが小さくても良い場合は、上記弾性
板一枚の厚みtが6mm以下という条件の下に、弾
性板の積層板数を少なくできる。この一例として
弾性板を一枚のみ用い、その厚さを変化させた場
合のバネ比Kv/Khについて第4図に示す。これ
は弾性板の直径を150mmφとし、鉛直方向に
6TONの圧縮応力を加え、水平方向歪みが100%
(水平方向歪δ/弾性板厚みt=1)にした場合
のデータで、各点の表示、例えば150×5−1は
第2図の場合と同様に直径150mmφ、厚さ5mmの
弾性板(ゴム板)一層を表わす。()のデータ
はせん断バネ係数G=3.8Kg/cm2を与える硬度37
のゴムを用いた場合を示し、()のデータはせ
ん断バネ係数G=1.5Kg/cm2を与える硬度19のゴ
ムを用いた場合を示す。 この単層の弾性板を用いたデータも、複数層の
弾性板を用いた場合と同様のバネ比変化を示し、
弾性板の厚みtが6mmでバネ比Kv/Khは()
の場合290、()の場合250が得られ、厚みtが
小さくなるに従つてバネ比Kv/Khが急激に増加
していることがわかる。 つまり本発明の免震装置において必要とするバ
ネ比Kv/Kh(300〜400程度以上)を得るためには
弾性板の積層数にかかわらず、弾性板の厚みtを
6mm以下とすればよいことがわかる。 なお本発明の免震装置の上記制限範囲で、さら
に弾性板直径の大きい免震装置を試作したとこ
ろ、次のようにバネ比Kv/Khの非常に大きいも
のが得られた。 すなわち弾性板の直径が250mmφ、弾性板一枚
当りの厚さtが5mm、弾性板の積層数が12層、弾
性板の素材として天然ゴム100に対して、カーボ
ン10、老化防止剤3、加硫剤3を加えて、バネ係
数3.5Kg/cm2にしたものを用いた免震装置を製作
した所、バネ比Kv/Khは700という非常に大きい
ものであつた。 なお上記各実験データにおいて、必要なバネ比
Kv/Khが得られる条件として、弾性板一枚当り
の厚みtについて調べたが、これを第3図に示す
形状係数(弾性板の直径D/弾性板一枚当りの厚
みt)で考察すると次の条件で得られる。 すなわち第2図及び第4図に示した各点のデー
タにおける形状係数(D/t)は弾性板の直径が
夫々/50mmφであるから、弾性板の厚みtが10mm
〜2.5mmの範囲を変化すると形状係数(D/t)
は15〜60に変化する。ここでバネ比Kv/Khに300
〜400程度以上を与える免震装置の形状係数
(D/t)について考えると、厚み6mm以下に対
応して形状係数(D/t)は25以上と決定でき
る。この形状係数25の点が変曲点となつて、これ
より形状係数が大きくなるとバネ比Kv・Khが急
激に増大することは第4図から明らかである。な
お前記の直径250mmφ厚み5mmの弾性板を用いた
免震装置について形状係数(D/t)を算出する
と50であり、そのバネ比が前述の如く700であつ
たことを考え、これを第4図に示す弾性板の直径
150mmφのデータに当てはめて見るとバネ比700に
対しては形状係数がほぼ50程度であることが読み
取れ、弾性板1の厚さに加え、形状係数を基準と
すると、座屈しない条件(必要な大きさのバネ
比)をより確実に定められることがわかる。 また本発明は弾性板素材のせん断バネ係数を6
Kg/cm2以下に制限することにより、免震装置の水
平バネ係数Khを小さくし、弾性板素材の厚みを
6mm以下にし、かつその形状係数(D/t)を25
以上に制限することによりバネ比Kv/Khを所定
値より大きく確保したものであるが、建造物に所
定の周期Tを与えるのに必要な全免震装置の水平
バネ係数ΣKhは建造物を載置する全免震装置の弾
性板の総受圧面積Aに比例し、弾性板(ゴム板)
の鉛直方向総厚みLcに反比例するので、建造物の
規模及び免震装置の数に応じて弾性板(ゴム板)
の直径及び積層数を適宜に選定することにより、
建造物を適応した性能のものを得ることができ
る。 なお上記実施例では円形の弾性板が使用されて
いたが、弾性板は角形等任意の形状のものが使用
できる。この場合の形状係数は、その水平方向の
断面積と同一の断面積を持つ円形弾性板の直径D
を用いて算出される。 以上説明したように、本発明によれば、免震装
置の弾性板にせん断バネ係数が6Kg/cm以下で、
弾性板の厚みを6mm以下(かつ形状係数で評価し
てD/t≧25)のものを使用することにより、一
般の建造物を、座屈することなく安定に支持し得
るバネ比(鉛直方向バネ係数Kv/水平方向バネ
係数Kh)に300〜400程度以上を有し、且つその
小さな水平バネ係数Khによつて、免震に必要な
2秒以上の固有振動周期Tを建造物等に与える免
震装置を製造することができる。 なお、本発明で特定した弾性板(ゴム板)の厚
さ6mm以下は、従来使用例が見られないものであ
り、(一般に数cm以上という使用例又は研究報告
がされていたのみである)、本願発明は、特に、
このように弾性板(ゴム板)の薄い領域に実用的
価値を見出した所に、意義を有するものである。
[Table] Based on the above results, reduce the shear spring coefficient G of the elastic plate material used for the seismic isolation device (use soft rubber)
Therefore, it can be seen that the period T can be increased as necessary, and that the value of the shear spring coefficient G of the elastic board material should be 6 kg/cm 2 or less in order to obtain a sufficient seismic isolation effect. As the elastic board material that provides this value, natural rubber, synthetic rubber, or a plastic having rubber elasticity mixed with a reinforcing agent, a softening agent, a hardening agent, an anti-aging agent, etc. can be used. Rubber with a JIS standard hardness of 50 has a spring modulus of 7 to 9 Kg/cm 2 for natural rubber and 6 to 7 Kg/cm 2 for synthetic rubber . In order to give the spring coefficient G, it is sufficient to use rubber with a hardness of 50 or less. However, if a rubber with a small (soft) shear spring coefficient G is used as described above, the vertical spring coefficient Kv of the seismic isolation device will naturally decrease, and the seismic isolation device will likely buckle under the compressive load due to the weight of the building. It may cause severe deformation and become unusable. In order to prevent this, it is necessary to reduce the shear spring coefficient G while increasing the spring ratio (vertical spring coefficient Kv /horizontal spring coefficient Kh ) as large as possible (approximately 300 to 400 or more). In view of the above circumstances, the present invention solves this problem. In other words, the present invention uses an elastic plate material for the seismic isolation device that has a small shear spring coefficient (6 kg/cm 2 or less) as described above.
When using an elastic plate (rubber plate)
Limiting the thickness t of the elastic plate to a small value (6 mm or less) (Evaluated by the shape factor, which is the ratio of the thickness t to the diameter D of the elastic plate, D/t≧25, a sufficiently large spring ratio K v / K h . Below, the reason why the thickness t of the elastic plate was limited to the above value (6 mm or less) will be explained based on experimental data. Figure 2 shows the elastic plate ( Rubber with a hardness of 37 that gives a shear spring coefficient of 3.3 Kg/cm 2 is used for a material of 150 mmφ), and the rubber thickness t is varied in the range of 10 mm to 2.5 mm, and the spring ratio (vertical spring coefficient K v /horizontal spring This figure shows experimental data obtained by measuring the spring ratio K v /K h.The spring ratio K v /K h was measured by applying a vertical compressive stress (F) of 31 Kg/cm 2 as shown in Figure 3. , horizontal distortion (δ) 100%
(Horizontal strain δ/elastic plate thickness t=1). In addition, in this experiment, the number of layers of elastic plates was varied so that the total thickness of the elastic plates (rubber plates) was kept constant at 6 cm, for example, 12 layers for 5 mm thickness and 10 layers for 6 mm thickness. I have to.
In addition, the display of each point in Fig. 2, for example, 150×
2.5-24 indicates that 24 elastic plates (rubber plates) with a diameter of 150 mmφ and a thickness of 2.5 mm are laminated alternately with metal plates. As can be seen from this example, by setting the thickness t of each elastic plate to 6 mm, a spring ratio K v /K h = 270, which is a condition that does not cause buckling, can be obtained, and the point at this thickness of 6 mm is obtained. However, this becomes an inflection point in the characteristic of elastic plate thickness-spring ratio, and when the thickness becomes smaller than 6 mm, and becomes 5 mm, it increases rapidly. Especially 4
When the value is less than mm, the increase rate becomes large, and a spring ratio K v /K h of 450 or more gives a very good value. In addition, if the seismic isolation device is not subject to any restrictions on installation work, and its height may be small, the number of laminated elastic plates can be determined under the condition that the thickness t of one elastic plate is 6 mm or less. You can do less. As an example of this, FIG. 4 shows the spring ratio K v /K h when only one elastic plate is used and its thickness is varied. The diameter of the elastic plate is 150mmφ, and the vertical direction
Apply 6TON compressive stress and horizontal strain is 100%
(Horizontal strain δ/elastic plate thickness t = 1).The display of each point, for example 150 x 5-1, is the same as in the case of Fig. 2, where the elastic plate has a diameter of 150 mmφ and a thickness of 5 mm ( rubber plate) represents one layer. The data in parentheses is the hardness 37 which gives the shear spring coefficient G = 3.8Kg/cm 2
The data in parentheses shows the case when a rubber with a hardness of 19 giving a shear spring coefficient G=1.5 Kg/cm 2 is used. The data using this single-layer elastic plate also showed the same change in spring ratio as when using a multi-layer elastic plate,
When the thickness t of the elastic plate is 6 mm, the spring ratio K v /K h is ()
290 is obtained in the case of (), and 250 is obtained in the case of (), and it can be seen that the spring ratio K v /K h increases rapidly as the thickness t becomes smaller. In other words, in order to obtain the required spring ratio K v /K h (approximately 300 to 400 or more) in the seismic isolation device of the present invention, the thickness t of the elastic plates should be 6 mm or less, regardless of the number of layers of elastic plates. I know it's good. When a seismic isolation device with a larger elastic plate diameter was prototyped within the above-mentioned limit range of the seismic isolation device of the present invention, an extremely large spring ratio K v /K h was obtained as shown below. In other words, the diameter of the elastic plate is 250mmφ, the thickness t of each elastic plate is 5mm, the number of laminated layers of the elastic plate is 12, and the material of the elastic plate is 100% natural rubber, 10% carbon, 3% anti-aging agent, and 3% additive. When we manufactured a seismic isolation device using a device with a spring coefficient of 3.5 Kg/cm 2 by adding sulfurizing agent 3, the spring ratio K v /K h was extremely large at 700. In addition, in each of the above experimental data, the required spring ratio
As a condition for obtaining K v /K h , we investigated the thickness t per elastic plate, which can be calculated using the shape factor (diameter D of elastic plate/thickness t per elastic plate) shown in Figure 3. When considered, it can be obtained under the following conditions. In other words, the shape factor (D/t) in the data at each point shown in Figures 2 and 4 is that the diameter of the elastic plate is /50mmφ, so the thickness t of the elastic plate is 10mm.
Shape factor (D/t) when changing the range of ~2.5mm
varies from 15 to 60. Here the spring ratio K v /K h is 300
Considering the shape factor (D/t) of a seismic isolation device that gives about 400 or more, the shape factor (D/t) can be determined to be 25 or more corresponding to a thickness of 6 mm or less. It is clear from FIG. 4 that this point of shape factor 25 is an inflection point, and as the shape factor becomes larger than this point, the spring ratio K v ·K h increases rapidly. The shape factor (D/t) of the seismic isolation device using the elastic plate with a diameter of 250 mm and a thickness of 5 mm is calculated to be 50, and considering that the spring ratio was 700 as mentioned above, this was calculated as Diameter of the elastic plate shown in the figure
When applied to the data for 150mmφ, it can be seen that the shape factor is approximately 50 for a spring ratio of 700.If the shape factor is used as a standard in addition to the thickness of the elastic plate 1, the conditions for not buckling (the required It can be seen that the spring size ratio) can be determined more reliably. In addition, the present invention has a shear spring coefficient of 6 for the elastic plate material.
By limiting the horizontal spring coefficient K h of the seismic isolation device to Kg/cm 2 or less, the thickness of the elastic board material is 6 mm or less, and its shape factor (D/t) is 25
By limiting the above, the spring ratio K v /K h is ensured to be larger than the predetermined value. The elastic plate (rubber plate)
Since it is inversely proportional to the total vertical thickness L c , the elastic plate (rubber plate)
By appropriately selecting the diameter and number of layers,
It is possible to obtain a structure whose performance is adapted to the building. In the above embodiment, a circular elastic plate is used, but the elastic plate may have any shape such as a rectangular shape. In this case, the shape factor is the diameter D of a circular elastic plate with the same cross-sectional area as its horizontal cross-sectional area.
Calculated using As explained above, according to the present invention, the elastic plate of the seismic isolation device has a shear spring coefficient of 6 kg/cm or less,
By using an elastic plate with a thickness of 6 mm or less (and D/t≧25 when evaluated by shape factor), the spring ratio (vertical spring The coefficient K v /horizontal spring coefficient K h ) is approximately 300 to 400 or more, and the small horizontal spring coefficient K h allows buildings, etc. to have a natural vibration period T of 2 seconds or more necessary for seismic isolation. It is possible to manufacture seismic isolation devices that provide Note that the elastic plate (rubber plate) specified in the present invention with a thickness of 6 mm or less has not been used in the past (generally, there have been only use cases or research reports of a thickness of several cm or more). , the claimed invention particularly includes:
It is significant that practical value has been found in the thin region of the elastic plate (rubber plate).

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図aは免震装置の構造を示す側面図、第1
図bはその平面図、第2図は複数の弾性板を積層
した免震装置において、弾性板厚みtに対するバ
ネ比Kv/Khの変化を示す特性図、第3図はせん
断歪みを説明する側面図、第4図は単層型の免震
装置における弾性板厚みに対するバネ比Kv/Kh
の変化を示す特性図である。 1……弾性板、2……金属板、3……免震装
置、G……弾性板素材のせん断バネ係数、Kv
Kh……バネ比、T……固有振動周期、t……弾
性板の厚み。
Figure 1a is a side view showing the structure of the seismic isolation device;
Figure b is a plan view of the same, Figure 2 is a characteristic diagram showing the change in spring ratio K v /K h with respect to elastic plate thickness t in a seismic isolation device in which multiple elastic plates are laminated, and Figure 3 explains shear strain. Figure 4 shows the spring ratio K v /K h for the elastic plate thickness in a single-layer seismic isolation device.
FIG. 1... Elastic plate, 2... Metal plate, 3... Seismic isolation device, G... Shear spring coefficient of elastic plate material, K v /
K h ... Spring ratio, T... Natural vibration period, t... Thickness of elastic plate.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 少なく共一枚の弾性板と複数枚の金属板とを
交互に積層・固着して構成され、構造物とその基
礎との間に挟まれ、次式 【式】ΣKh=A・G/Lc 但し、 ΣKh:免震構造体の総水平バネ係数 M:建造物質量 A:全免震装置の弾性板(ゴム板)の総受圧面積 G:弾性板素材のせん断バネ係数 Lc:弾性板(ゴム板)の鉛直方向の総厚 で表される構造物の水平方向の固有振動周期T
が、2秒以上に設定される免震装置において、 弾性板素材のせん断バネ係数Gを6Kg/cm2以下
とし、弾性板の一枚当りの厚さtを6mm以下と
し、弾性板の直径Dに対する厚さtの比である形
状係数(D/t)を25以上としたことを特徴とす
る免震装置。
[Claims] 1. It is constructed by alternately laminating and fixing at least one elastic plate and a plurality of metal plates, and is sandwiched between the structure and its foundation, and has the following formula [Formula] ΣKh =A・G/Lc However, ΣKh: Total horizontal spring coefficient of the base isolation structure M: Amount of building material A: Total pressure receiving area of the elastic plates (rubber plates) of the total base isolation device G: Shear spring coefficient of the elastic plate material Lc: Natural vibration period T in the horizontal direction of the structure expressed by the total vertical thickness of the elastic plate (rubber plate)
However, in a seismic isolation device that is set for 2 seconds or more, the shear spring coefficient G of the elastic plate material should be 6 kg/cm 2 or less, the thickness t of each elastic plate should be 6 mm or less, and the diameter D of the elastic plate should be 6 mm or less. A seismic isolation device characterized in that the shape factor (D/t), which is the ratio of the thickness t to the thickness t, is 25 or more.
JP9171282A 1982-05-28 1982-05-28 Earthquake-proof apparatus Granted JPS58207431A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP9171282A JPS58207431A (en) 1982-05-28 1982-05-28 Earthquake-proof apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP9171282A JPS58207431A (en) 1982-05-28 1982-05-28 Earthquake-proof apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS58207431A JPS58207431A (en) 1983-12-02
JPH0585700B2 true JPH0585700B2 (en) 1993-12-08

Family

ID=14034121

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP9171282A Granted JPS58207431A (en) 1982-05-28 1982-05-28 Earthquake-proof apparatus

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS58207431A (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6114340A (en) * 1984-06-29 1986-01-22 株式会社ブリヂストン Earthquake-proof support apparatus
JPH0826590B2 (en) * 1986-08-20 1996-03-13 清水建設株式会社 Seismic isolation device manufacturing method
JP2570341B2 (en) * 1987-04-06 1997-01-08 株式会社ブリヂストン Seismic isolation structure
JPH0710264Y2 (en) * 1988-05-31 1995-03-08 株式会社寺岡精工 Weighing scale and its legs

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS58207431A (en) 1983-12-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Kelly Seismic isolation systems for developing countries
Deb Seismic base isolation–An overview
WO1997006372A1 (en) Vibration isolation device
US5904010A (en) Elastomeric seismic isolation bearing and method
Calabrese et al. Hysteresis models for response history analyses of recycled rubber–fiber reinforced bearings (RR-FRBs) base isolated buildings
US20150076755A1 (en) Elastomeric isolator
JPH0585700B2 (en)
JP4994338B2 (en) Seismic isolation structure and manufacturing method thereof
US5465945A (en) Laminated rubber support and method of designing the same
JP3039846B2 (en) Laminated rubber bearing
JPH09177367A (en) Base insulation structure
Isolators Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center
JPWO1993004301A1 (en) Laminated rubber bearing and its design method
JP6635327B2 (en) Seismic isolation structure of building and seismic isolation method
JP3463085B2 (en) Seismic building
Saha et al. Design of RC building with LRB isolator as per BNBC 2020 provisions
JPH09177368A (en) Vibration isolator
JP3021447U (en) Seismic isolation device
JPH0262668B2 (en)
JPS62224750A (en) Multistage type earthquakeproof and vibrationproof supporting device
JPH03204420A (en) Laminated rubber supporter
JP3016590B2 (en) Laminated rubber bearing and its design method
JP2000073482A (en) Damping floor
JPH08261281A (en) Seismic isolation device
JPH08326813A (en) Layered rubber support body