JPH0637688B2 - Steel plate for DI can - Google Patents
Steel plate for DI canInfo
- Publication number
- JPH0637688B2 JPH0637688B2 JP63022762A JP2276288A JPH0637688B2 JP H0637688 B2 JPH0637688 B2 JP H0637688B2 JP 63022762 A JP63022762 A JP 63022762A JP 2276288 A JP2276288 A JP 2276288A JP H0637688 B2 JPH0637688 B2 JP H0637688B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- yield strength
- ironing
- flange
- thickness
- die
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims description 19
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 title claims description 19
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000010409 ironing Methods 0.000 description 40
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 16
- 239000005028 tinplate Substances 0.000 description 14
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000005482 strain hardening Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000001953 recrystallisation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000005728 strengthening Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 6
- ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tin Chemical compound [Sn] ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000005097 cold rolling Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000006104 solid solution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002791 soaking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910001369 Brass Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003483 aging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010951 brass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007429 general method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005098 hot rolling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000000396 iron Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000001050 lubricating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000465 moulding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007747 plating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006748 scratching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002393 scratching effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007779 soft material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009864 tensile test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004804 winding Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)
- Rigid Containers With Two Or More Constituent Elements (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】 (産業上の利用分野) 本発明は、しごき加工性、フランジ加工性に優れ、かつ
容器重量の軽量化に適したDI缶用鋼板に関する。TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a steel sheet for DI can which is excellent in ironing workability and flange workability and is suitable for reducing the weight of a container.
(従来の技術) 本願鋼板が対象とするDI缶は、錫めっきされた鋼板
(ぶりき板)から円板を打ち抜き後、絞り加工(Darwin
g)、しごき加工(Ironing)などの工程を経て製造さ
れ、その代表的な工程であるDarwing、およびIroningを
もってDI缶と称される。なお、しごき加工された缶
は、缶上部を縁切り後洗浄、塗装、さらにネックイン加
工、フランジ加工され、蓋を巻き締めうる状態とされ
る。ここでしごき加工においては、容器側壁部のみが薄
くされ、缶底の厚みは、加工前のぶりき板の厚みとほぼ
同じ厚みに保たれる。本願が対象とするDI缶用ぶりき
の一般的な板厚は、0.28〜0.33mmであり、その
厚みから、蓋が巻き締められる缶上部(フランジ部)
は、約0.16mmの厚みまで、缶上部を除く側壁部にお
いては、約0.10mmまで、しごき加工され薄くされ
る。このように、DI缶の側壁厚は、約0.10mmと薄
いため、缶内が負圧となるような状態、いわゆる減圧缶
としての利用はされておらず、炭酸飲料、ビール、ある
いは窒素を封入するなど、内圧が、数kg/cm2〜7kg/c
m2である状態で利用される。ここで内圧が負荷された場
合に問題になるのは、缶底の耐圧であり、耐圧を考慮し
て、ぶりき板の板厚とテンパー(降伏強度)の組み合せ
が選択される。種々の組み合せの中から、現在、板厚
は、0.28〜0.33mm、テンパーT−1〜T−2.
5(降伏強度20〜28kg/mm2)の組み合せが選択さ
れている。T−1〜T−2.5のような軟質材の方が、
絞り加工性、しごき加工性が優れ、さらにしごき加工後
のフランジ加工性も優れるという考えから、まずテパー
が定まり、そのテンパーで必要耐圧を確保するというこ
とから板厚が定まったものである。またDI缶用の鋼と
しては、Al脱酸の連鋳材が用いられ、通常のストリッ
プ工程に従い、熱間圧延、冷間圧延、箱型式による再結
晶焼鈍後、1〜2%の圧延率での調質圧延を経て、DI
用ぶりき原板とされる。この厚板に、主として、しごき
加工時の潤滑効果を得るため、通常2.8g/m2あるい
は5.6g/m2の錫がめっきされ、DI缶用ぶりきとさ
れている。なお、Al製DI缶との競合が激しくなって
いる最近においては、より経済的なDI缶を提供すると
いう観点から、ぶりき板の薄肉化、すなわち高降伏強度
化への取り組みがなされており、特開昭57−5783
5が開示されている。(Prior Art) The DI can for which the steel sheet of the present application is targeted is a steel plate (tin plate) plated with tin and then punched (Darwin).
g), ironing process (Ironing), and other processes, and the representative process, Darwing and Ironing, is called a DI can. The ironed can is trimmed at the top of the can, washed, painted, necked in, and flanged so that the lid can be tightened. In the ironing process, only the side wall of the container is thinned, and the thickness of the can bottom is kept substantially the same as the thickness of the tin plate before processing. The general thickness of the tin plate for a DI can, which is the subject of the present application, is 0.28 to 0.33 mm, and from this thickness, the upper part of the can (flange part) on which the lid is wound is fastened.
Is ironed to a thickness of about 0.16 mm, and is thinned to about 0.10 mm on the side wall portion excluding the can upper portion. In this way, the side wall thickness of the DI can is as thin as about 0.10 mm, so it is not used as a so-called depressurized can where the inside of the can has a negative pressure. The internal pressure is several kg / cm 2 to 7 kg / c, such as when enclosed.
It is used with m 2 . Here, when the internal pressure is applied, the problem is the pressure resistance of the bottom of the can. In consideration of the pressure resistance, the combination of the thickness of the tin plate and the temper (yield strength) is selected. Among various combinations, the plate thickness is currently 0.28 to 0.33 mm and the tempers T-1 to T-2.
A combination of 5 (yield strength 20 to 28 kg / mm 2 ) is selected. Soft materials such as T-1 to T-2.5
Based on the idea that drawing workability and ironing workability are excellent, and flange workability after ironing is also excellent, the teper is first determined, and the plate thickness is determined because the necessary pressure resistance is secured by the temper. Further, as a steel for DI can, a continuous cast material of Al deoxidization is used, and according to a normal strip process, after hot rolling, cold rolling, recrystallization annealing by a box type, at a rolling rate of 1 to 2%. After the temper rolling of
It is used as a tin plate. This plank, primarily, to obtain a lubricating effect during ironing, the tin usually 2.8 g / m 2 or 5.6 g / m 2 is plating, there is a tinplate for DI cans. In recent years, where competition with Al-made DI cans has become fierce, efforts have been made to reduce the thickness of the tin plate, that is, to increase the yield strength, from the viewpoint of providing more economical DI cans. JP-A-57-5783
5 is disclosed.
この発明の要旨は、冷間圧延後の再結晶焼鈍を連続焼鈍
とすることにより高降伏強度化を果すものであるが、し
ごき荷重が大きいこと、フランジ割れが起こり易いこ
と、また得られる降伏強度も40kg/mm2弱とそれほど
大きくないなど、本願の目的とする、しごき成形性、フ
ランジ成形性に優れ、板厚0.18〜0.25mmまでの
十分な薄肉化を果しうるぶりき板たり得ないものであ
る。なお、薄肉化を果すための高降伏強度化を果す一般
的な方法として、C、Mn、P、N等の強化元素の添加に
よる固溶強化、析出強化、時効硬化、結晶粒微細化によ
る強化等があり、またさらに圧延加工等の歪を付加する
歪強化があるが、これらの方法によるものもしごき荷重
の増大、フランジ割れ等の問題があり、本願の意図する
ような高降伏強度化、薄肉化が進んでいないのが実情で
ある。The gist of the present invention is to achieve high yield strength by making recrystallization annealing after cold rolling continuous annealing, but a large ironing load, easy occurrence of flange cracking, and yield strength obtained Is also less than 40 kg / mm 2, which is not so large, and is excellent in ironing formability and flange formability, which is the object of the present application, and can be sufficiently thinned to a plate thickness of 0.18 to 0.25 mm. It is impossible. In addition, as a general method for achieving high yield strength to achieve thinning, solid solution strengthening by addition of strengthening elements such as C, Mn, P, N, precipitation strengthening, age hardening, strengthening by crystal grain refinement Etc., and further, there is strain strengthening that adds strain such as rolling, but there is a problem such as an increase in ironing load, flange cracking, etc. by these methods, high yield strength as intended by the present application, The reality is that thinning has not progressed.
(発明が解決しようとする課題) 本願の目的は、DI缶を、軽量な、すなわち経済的なも
のとするために高降伏強度で薄肉のぶりき板を提供する
ことにあるが、前記のようにしごき荷重の増大、フラン
ジ割れの増加が、ぶりき板の高降伏強度化を阻害してい
る。フランジ割れが発生すれば缶としての用を成さない
し、しごき荷重の増大は、しごき加工時の缶外面の疵つ
き、缶の破断、ダイス摩耗の増大をきたす。高降伏強度
であって、かつ、しごき成形性、フランジ成形性に優れ
るぶりき板を得ることが本願の課題である。(Problems to be Solved by the Invention) An object of the present application is to provide a thin yielding plate with high yield strength in order to make a DI can lightweight, that is, economical. The increase in the ironing load and the increase in the flange cracks prevent the high yield strength of the brass plate. If a flange crack occurs, it cannot be used as a can, and an increase in ironing load causes a flaw on the outer surface of the can during ironing, a breakage of the can, and an increase in die wear. It is an object of the present application to obtain a tin plate having a high yield strength and excellent ironing formability and flange formability.
(課題を解決するための手段) 本願は、前記課題を達成するため鋼の材質面から多くの
研究を重ねた結果、高降伏強度化を果しつつ、しごき荷
重の低減、それに基づく、しごき加工時の缶外面の疵つ
き、ダイス摩耗の低減、およびフランジ成形性の改善等
を果しうることを知見したものである。以下に本願内容
を説明するにあたり、その理解を容易にするため、本願
が対象とするしごき荷重、フランジ成形性について説明
する。しごき加工は、間隔を置き連続的に配置された3
〜4個のダイスとポンチの組み合せにより実施するもの
で、ダイス内径とポンチ外径のすきま、すなわちクリア
ランスを段階的に小さくし、缶の側壁厚みを段階的に薄
くする加工である。ここで、しごき加工時、ポンチに負
荷される力をしごき荷重と称するが、その大小は、被加
工材料の変形抵抗、ポンチおよびダイスと被加工材料の
摩擦力、各ダイスにおける減厚率等に依存する。減厚率
を変えることなく、しごき荷重を下げるためには、材料
の変形抵抗、摩擦力を小さくすることが必要である。こ
こで、摩擦力は、めっき錫量を多くすることにより低減
し得るが、めっき錫量の増量は、薄肉化による経済的効
果を相殺するもので不適切である。それゆえ、しごき荷
重の低減は、変形抵抗を小さくするという観点から検討
すべきものとなる。変形抵抗は、絞り加工、しごき加工
が進むに従い加工硬化により増大し、しごき加工の最終
ダイスで最大となる。また、最終ダイスでは、それまで
のダイスでうけたしごき加工のため、缶側壁の単位面積
当りの付着錫量も最も少い状態となっており、最終ダイ
スにおける加工条件が最も過酷なものである。それゆ
え、しごき加工時の缶外面の傷つき、破断、金型摩耗
は、最終ダイスにおいて最も問題となる。以上述べたこ
とから明らかなように、耐圧の点からは、高い降伏強度
(変形抵抗)を有し、以後の加工による硬化ができうる
かぎり小さい材料、すなわち、変形抵抗増加の小さい材
料が本願の目的に適する材料である。また本願が対象と
するもう一つの特性であるフランジ加工性は、主として
材料の延性に依存し、しごき加工されたフランジ部の延
性が乏しいとフランジ割れが発生しやすくなる。なお、
鋼の強度と延性は、一般に逆相関を示し、ぶりき板の高
降伏強度化、および加工硬化はフランジ割れを、よりも
たらしやすくする。以上、しごき荷重とフランジ成形性
について述べたが、これら2つの特性の改善を、高降伏
強度化と同時に果すべく研究を行い、鋼材質等を以下の
ものとすることにより本願の目的を達成し得ることを知
見した。(Means for Solving the Problems) The present application has been made as a result of many studies from the viewpoint of the material properties of steel to achieve the above-mentioned problems, and as a result, while achieving high yield strength, reduction of the ironing load, and ironing It was discovered that the outer surface of the can can be scratched, die wear can be reduced, and flange formability can be improved. In describing the contents of the present application, the ironing load and the flange formability that are the subject of the present application will be described in order to facilitate the understanding thereof. The ironing process consists of three consecutively spaced irons.
It is carried out by combining four dies and punches, and is a process in which the clearance between the inner diameter of the die and the outer diameter of the punch, that is, the clearance, is gradually reduced and the side wall thickness of the can is gradually reduced. Here, the force applied to the punch during ironing is called the ironing load. The magnitude depends on the deformation resistance of the work material, the frictional force between the punch and the die and the work material, the thickness reduction rate of each die, etc. Dependent. In order to reduce the ironing load without changing the thickness reduction rate, it is necessary to reduce the deformation resistance and frictional force of the material. Here, the frictional force can be reduced by increasing the amount of plated tin, but the increase of the amount of plated tin cancels the economic effect due to the thinning and is inappropriate. Therefore, reduction of the ironing load should be considered from the viewpoint of reducing the deformation resistance. The deformation resistance increases due to work hardening as the drawing and ironing processes progress, and becomes maximum at the final die for ironing. In the final die, the amount of tin deposited per unit area of the side wall of the can is the smallest due to the ironing process performed by the previous die, and the processing conditions in the final die are the most severe. . Therefore, scratching, breaking, and die wear of the outer surface of the can during ironing are the most serious problems in the final die. As is clear from the above description, from the viewpoint of pressure resistance, a material having a high yield strength (deformation resistance) and being as small as possible so that it can be hardened by subsequent processing, that is, a material having a small increase in deformation resistance, It is a material suitable for the purpose. In addition, the flange workability, which is another characteristic of the present application, depends mainly on the ductility of the material, and if the ductility of the ironed flange portion is poor, flange cracking is likely to occur. In addition,
The strength and ductility of steel generally show an inverse correlation, and increasing the yield strength of a steel plate and work hardening make flange cracks more likely to occur. The ironing load and the flange formability have been described above, but research has been carried out to improve these two characteristics at the same time as increasing the yield strength, and the objects of the present application have been achieved by using the following steel materials. I found that I would get it.
すなわち組成が、C:0.008〜0.03%、Mn:
0.05〜0.25%、P:0.02%以下、Al:
0.01〜0.10%、残部が鉄および不可避的不純物
であり、降伏強度が40〜65kg/mm2であり、かつ2
00℃で1時間加熱による降伏強度上昇が1.5kg/mm
2以下であるぶりき板が、しごき加工性、フランジ成形
性にすぐれ、板厚を0.18〜0.25mmとしても必要
耐圧を確保でき、軽量DI缶用のぶりき板として優れて
いることを見い出した。That is, the composition is C: 0.008 to 0.03%, Mn:
0.05-0.25%, P: 0.02% or less, Al:
0.01 to 0.10%, the balance is iron and unavoidable impurities, the yield strength is 40 to 65 kg / mm 2 , and 2
Increase in yield strength by heating at 00 ℃ for 1 hour is 1.5kg / mm
A tin plate of 2 or less is excellent in ironing workability and flange formability, can secure a necessary pressure resistance even when the plate thickness is 0.18 to 0.25 mm, and is excellent as a tin plate for a lightweight DI can. Found out.
以下本発明の限定理由について説明する。The reasons for limitation of the present invention will be described below.
C量は、JIS規格においては、0.13%以下とさ
れ、製造者と使用者間の協定により通常0.03〜0.08
%のものが缶用材料として用いられている。そして高降
伏強度化を果すためには添加すべき元素であるが、C量
が多くなると絞り加工、しごき加工における加工硬化が
大きなものとなり、かつフランジ成形性も著しく悪化す
るため、通常の缶用鋼板の下限程度以下の0.03%以
下とすることが不可欠である。このように、加工硬化の
点からは、C量は少ない方が望ましいが、C量を0.0
08%以下に低減するのは、大きなコストアップとな
り、経済的でないばかりか、結晶粒も大きくなり、オレ
ンジピールと称する表面欠陥を生るなど好ましくなく、
下限を0.008%とする。Mn量は、JIS規格におい
て、0.6%以下と規定され、通常、協定により0.2〜
0.5%のものが使用されている。Mnについても、高降
伏強度化の点からは、添加すべき元素であるが、加工硬
化を著しく増大させ、フランジ成形性の点でも好ましく
ないため、可能な限り低減することが好ましく、よって
上限の0.25%とし、下限は不可避的に存在するSの
弊害を防止するため0.05%とした。Pも、加工硬化
の点から好ましくなく、その上限を0.02%とした。
Alは、脱酸に必要な0.01%を下限とし、多くなると
コスト高を招き、かつ介在物が多くなるため、その上限
を0.1%とした。また200℃で1時間加熱後の降伏
強度上昇を1.5kg/mm2以下としたのは、1.5kg/m
m2以上の降伏強度上昇を生じるものは、C、Mn、Pを前
記範囲としても、以後の加工による硬化が極めて大き
く、かつフランジ加工性に対しても好ましくないためで
ある。The C amount is 0.13% or less in the JIS standard, and is usually 0.03 to 0.08 depending on the agreement between the manufacturer and the user.
% Is used as a material for cans. Although it is an element that should be added to achieve high yield strength, if the C content increases, the work hardening in drawing and ironing becomes large, and the flange formability also deteriorates significantly. It is indispensable to set the content to 0.03% or less, which is less than or equal to the lower limit of the steel sheet. As described above, from the viewpoint of work hardening, it is desirable that the amount of C is small, but the amount of C is 0.0
It is not preferable to reduce the amount to 08% or less, which is not only economically expensive and not only economical, but also the size of crystal grains is large, resulting in surface defects called orange peel.
The lower limit is 0.008%. The Mn amount is specified by JIS standard to be 0.6% or less, and is usually 0.2 to
0.5% is used. Mn is also an element to be added from the viewpoint of increasing the yield strength, but it significantly increases work hardening and is not preferable in terms of flange formability, so it is preferable to reduce it as much as possible, and thus The lower limit is set to 0.25%, and the lower limit is set to 0.05% in order to prevent the adverse effect of S inevitably present. P is also not preferable from the viewpoint of work hardening, and its upper limit was set to 0.02%.
The lower limit of Al required for deoxidation is 0.01%, and if it increases, the cost increases and the amount of inclusions increases, so the upper limit was made 0.1%. The increase in yield strength after heating at 200 ° C for 1 hour was set to 1.5 kg / mm 2 or less because
The reason why the yield strength is increased by m 2 or more is that even if C, Mn, and P are in the above ranges, the hardening by the subsequent working is extremely large, and the flange workability is not preferable.
図面に降伏強度上昇値と加工硬化の関係を示す。図中X
−1、X−2は、C:0.02%、Mn:0.19%、
P:0.017%を含有し、Y−1、Y−2は、C:
0.045%、Mn:0.35%、P:0.018%を含
有する鋼板である。X−1、X−2、Y−1、Y−2
は、いずれも通常のストリップ工程における冷間圧延
後、箱型式再結晶焼鈍を行い、X−2、Y−2は、さら
に連続式焼鈍相当の急速加熱、急速冷却を行ったもので
ある。いずれもその後、降伏強度が40kg/mm2となる
ように調質圧延を施した。そして降伏強度40kg/mm2
を始点とし、40kg/mm2以降の加工硬化を比較した。
降伏強度40kg/mm2の状態のものを、200℃で1時
間加熱した時の降伏強度上昇値は、X−1:0.5kg/
mm2、Y−1:1.2kg/mm2、X−2:7.5kg/m
m2、Y−2:9.0kg/mm2であり、降伏強度上昇値の
大きなものは、著しく加工硬化が大きなものとなる。前
記4種の鋼板について、調質圧延により降伏強度を55
kg/mm2とした時、その時の加熱による降伏強度上昇値
と、以後の加工硬化の関係も、降伏強度が40kg/mm2
の場合と同じ傾向を示す。なお、加熱による降伏強度上
昇値の大小は、転位密度と固溶C、固溶N量により定ま
るものと考えられるが、再結晶温度、時間の適正化によ
る焼鈍時の吸Nの抑制、再結晶焼鈍後の冷却速度を緩慢
なものとすることによる固溶Cの低減などにより、加熱
による降伏強度上昇値を低いものとすることができる。
次に降伏強度、板厚の限定理由について述べる。板厚、
降伏強度いずれも缶底の耐圧と関連を有し、板厚を薄肉
化すればするほど、降伏強度は高くすることが必要とな
る。より経済的なDI缶を製造するという点からは、ぶ
りき板の厚みは薄い方が良いが、薄肉化、高降伏強度化
いずれもが、絞り加工での破断、缶底成形時のしわ発生
といった不良現象につながる。この点から板厚の下限を
0.18mmとし、経済的効果の点から0.25mmを上限
とした。降伏強度については、板厚との関連で定め、板
厚の下限値における絞り成形性、耐圧を考慮して降伏強
度の上限値を定め、板厚の上限値における耐圧を考慮し
て降伏強度の下限値を定めた。以上のように、本願は、
C、Mn量が通常缶用鋼板の下限程度以下と低いこと、2
00℃で1時間加熱による降伏強度上昇値が1.5kg/
mm2であることを必須要件とし、同時に高降伏強度、薄
肉であることを特徴とする軽量DI缶用鋼板である。こ
こで高降伏強度化を果す方法としては、種々の強化方法
のうち、圧延加工によるものが経済的である。従来、し
ごき成形性、フランジ成形性の点で好ましくないとされ
ていた圧延による強化も、本願の必須要件確保により加
工硬化因子の低減、すなわち歪の蓄積する因子の低減が
果され、しごき成形性、フランジ成形性を阻害すること
なく適用しうるものである。The drawing shows the relationship between the increase in yield strength and work hardening. X in the figure
-1, X-2, C: 0.02%, Mn: 0.19%,
P: 0.017% is contained, and Y-1 and Y-2 are C:
It is a steel plate containing 0.045%, Mn: 0.35%, and P: 0.018%. X-1, X-2, Y-1, Y-2
In both cases, box-type recrystallization annealing was performed after cold rolling in a normal strip process, and X-2 and Y-2 were further subjected to rapid heating and rapid cooling corresponding to continuous annealing. After that, temper rolling was performed so that the yield strength was 40 kg / mm 2 . And yield strength 40 kg / mm 2
As a starting point, the work hardening after 40 kg / mm 2 was compared.
When the yield strength of 40 kg / mm 2 is heated at 200 ° C for 1 hour, the yield strength increase value is X-1: 0.5 kg /
mm 2 , Y-1: 1.2 kg / mm 2 , X-2: 7.5 kg / m
m 2 and Y-2: 9.0 kg / mm 2 , and those having a large yield strength increase value have significantly large work hardening. The yield strength of the four types of steel sheets was 55 by temper rolling.
when a kg / mm 2, and the yield strength increase value due to heating at the time, the relationship of subsequent work hardening, yield strength 40 kg / mm 2
The same tendency as in the case of. It is considered that the magnitude of the yield strength increase value due to heating is determined by the dislocation density, the solid solution C, and the amount of solid solution N, but the suppression of the absorbed N during annealing and the recrystallization by optimizing the recrystallization temperature and time. The increase in yield strength due to heating can be made low by reducing the solid solution C by making the cooling rate slow after annealing.
Next, the reasons for limiting the yield strength and the plate thickness will be described. Plate thickness,
The yield strength is related to the pressure resistance of the bottom of the can, and the thinner the plate thickness, the higher the yield strength is required. From the standpoint of producing a more economical DI can, it is better to have a thinner tin plate, but both thinning and higher yield strength result in breakage during drawing and wrinkling during can bottom molding. It leads to such a defective phenomenon. From this point of view, the lower limit of the plate thickness was set to 0.18 mm, and from the viewpoint of economic effect, the upper limit was set to 0.25 mm. The yield strength is determined in relation to the plate thickness, the draw strength at the lower limit of the plate thickness and the upper limit of the yield strength are set in consideration of the pressure resistance, and the yield strength of the upper limit of the plate thickness is taken into consideration. The lower limit was set. As described above, the present application is
The amount of C and Mn is low, which is less than the lower limit of the steel plate for cans. 2
Yield strength increase by heating at 00 ℃ for 1 hour is 1.5kg /
It is a steel sheet for lightweight DI cans, which has an essential requirement of being mm 2 and at the same time has a high yield strength and a thin wall. Among the various strengthening methods, rolling is economical as a method for achieving high yield strength. Conventionally, strengthening by rolling, which has been considered unfavorable in terms of ironing formability and flange formability, also reduces work hardening factors, that is, reduction of strain accumulation factors, by ensuring the essential requirements of the present application. It can be applied without impairing the flange formability.
(実施例) 以下本発明の実施例について説明する。(Examples) Examples of the present invention will be described below.
第1表に示す化学成分の鋼を転炉にて溶製し、連続鋳造
によりスラブとした。該スラブを通常のストリップ工程
に従い板厚2.0mmまで熱間圧延し、熱延後、酸洗、1
次冷間圧延、再結晶焼鈍、2次冷間圧延し、第2表に示
す降伏強度、板厚のぶりき原板とした。第2表におい
て、再結晶焼鈍方法を示す記号BAFは、均熱温度60
0℃で8時間加熱し、15℃/hrの冷却速度で冷却する
箱型焼鈍を示し、記号CALは、均熱温度700℃で1
分間加熱後、20℃/sec の冷却速度で冷却する連続焼
鈍を示す。再結晶焼鈍後、第2表中に示す圧延率で圧延
し、表中の板厚に仕上げ、そののち、両面1.2g/m2
の錫めっきをし、ぶりき板とした。Steel having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 was melted in a converter and continuously cast into a slab. The slab is hot-rolled to a plate thickness of 2.0 mm according to a normal stripping process, hot-rolled, pickled, and
Subsequent cold rolling, recrystallization annealing and secondary cold rolling were carried out to obtain a tin plate having the yield strength and plate thickness shown in Table 2. In Table 2, the symbol BAF indicating the recrystallization annealing method is a soaking temperature of 60.
Box-type annealing in which heating is performed at 0 ° C. for 8 hours and cooling is performed at a cooling rate of 15 ° C./hr, the symbol CAL indicates 1 at a soaking temperature of 700 ° C.
Continuous annealing is shown in which after heating for 1 minute, cooling is performed at a cooling rate of 20 ° C./sec. After recrystallization annealing, rolled at the rolling rate shown in Table 2 to finish the plate thickness in the table, and then 1.2g / m 2 on both sides
Was tin-plated to obtain a tin plate.
該ぶりき板を、直径53mmの絞り缶とし、さらに直径5
2.7mmのポンチと、クリアランスが0.20mm(No.
1ダイス)、0.15mm(No.2ダイス)、0.095m
m(No.3ダイス)となるダイスを用いてしごき加工を行
い、以下の評価試験を行った。しごき荷重の評価は、N
o.1、No.2、No.3ダイスの順にしごき加工を3工程行
い、No.3ダイスでのしごき荷重の最大値をもって評価
し、しごき缶の外面の疵つき性についても、しごき荷重
と同様、しごき加工を3工程行い、No.3ダイス後の缶
外面で評価した。またフランジ成形性については、しご
き加工後の缶の開口端を縁切り後、スピンフランジ 加工を行い、割れを生じることなく張り出し得る最大の
フランジ巾をもって、フランジ成形性の優劣を評価し
た。なお、巻き締めに必要なフランジ巾は2.4mmであ
り、フランジ巾2.5mm以上を優れる範囲とした。ま
た、しごき荷重に影響すると先に述べた変形抵抗につい
ては、3工程しごき後の缶の側壁から切り出した引張り
試片により比較した。 The tin plate is a squeeze can with a diameter of 53 mm and a diameter of 5 mm.
2.7mm punch and 0.20mm clearance (No.
1 die), 0.15mm (No.2 die), 0.095m
Ironing was performed using a die that is m (No. 3 die), and the following evaluation test was performed. Evaluation of ironing load is N
o. 1, No. 2 and No. 3 dies are subjected to 3 steps of ironing in order and evaluated with the maximum value of the ironing load with No. 3 die. Similarly, the ironing process was performed in three steps, and the outer surface of the can after the No. 3 die was evaluated. For flange formability, spin flange after cutting the open end of the can after ironing The workability was evaluated, and the superiority and inferiority of the flange formability was evaluated with the maximum flange width that can be projected without cracking. The flange width required for winding and tightening was 2.4 mm, and a flange width of 2.5 mm or more was set as an excellent range. Further, the deformation resistance described above that affects the ironing load was compared by a tensile test piece cut out from the side wall of the can after three-step ironing.
(発明の効果) 本発明鋼板は、鋼材質に特徴を有し、しごき加工性、フ
ランジ加工性に優れた高降伏強度薄鋼板であり、経済的
なDI缶を製造するに適するものである。(Effects of the Invention) The steel sheet of the present invention is a high yield strength thin steel sheet having a characteristic steel material and excellent in ironing workability and flange workability, and is suitable for producing an economical DI can.
図面は、200℃で1時間加熱による降伏強度上昇値と
加工硬化の関係を示した線図である。The drawing is a diagram showing the relationship between the yield strength increase value due to heating at 200 ° C. for 1 hour and work hardening.
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 近藤 嘉一 山口県下松市幸町775番地の1 (56)参考文献 特開 昭61−69928(JP,A) 特開 昭62−294136(JP,A) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (72) Inventor Kaichi Kondo 1 775, Sachimachi, Shimomatsu City, Yamaguchi Prefecture (56) References JP 61-69928 (JP, A) JP 62-294136 (JP, A)
Claims (1)
05〜0.25%、P:0.02%以下、Al:0.0
1〜0.10%、残部が鉄および不可避的不純物からな
り、降伏強度が40〜65kg/mm2、200゜Cで
1時間加熱による降伏強度上昇が1.5kg/mm2以
下である板厚0.18〜0.25mmのDI缶用鋼板。1. C: 0.008 to 0.03%, Mn: 0.
05-0.25%, P: 0.02% or less, Al: 0.0
From 1 to 0.10%, the balance being iron and unavoidable impurities, thickness yield strength increase yield strength by 1 hour heating at 40~65kg / mm 2, 200 ° C is 1.5 kg / mm 2 or less Steel plate for DI can of 0.18 to 0.25 mm.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63022762A JPH0637688B2 (en) | 1988-02-04 | 1988-02-04 | Steel plate for DI can |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63022762A JPH0637688B2 (en) | 1988-02-04 | 1988-02-04 | Steel plate for DI can |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH01198445A JPH01198445A (en) | 1989-08-10 |
| JPH0637688B2 true JPH0637688B2 (en) | 1994-05-18 |
Family
ID=12091691
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63022762A Expired - Fee Related JPH0637688B2 (en) | 1988-02-04 | 1988-02-04 | Steel plate for DI can |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH0637688B2 (en) |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS5149116A (en) * | 1974-10-26 | 1976-04-28 | Nippon Steel Corp | HYOMENSHORIKOHANYOGENBANNO SEIZOHO |
| JPS6024327A (en) * | 1983-07-20 | 1985-02-07 | Nippon Steel Corp | Manufacture of very thin steel sheet for welded can with superior flanging workability |
| JPS6045690A (en) * | 1983-08-22 | 1985-03-12 | 東洋インキ製造株式会社 | Liquid colorant for molded polyester resin |
| JPS6169928A (en) * | 1984-09-12 | 1986-04-10 | Kawasaki Steel Corp | Manufacture of steel plate for ironing by continuous annealing |
| JPS62294136A (en) * | 1986-06-13 | 1987-12-21 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Manufacture of extra thin cold-rolled soft steel sheet excellent in ductility and deep drawability by box annealing at low temperature |
-
1988
- 1988-02-04 JP JP63022762A patent/JPH0637688B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH01198445A (en) | 1989-08-10 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP2001335888A (en) | Lightweight two-piece steel plate for cans and method for producing the same | |
| JPS6045690B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of ultra-thin steel sheet for cans with small in-plane anisotropy | |
| JPH0676618B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of steel plate for DI can with excellent stretch flange formability | |
| WO2003069010A1 (en) | Steel sheet for container excellent in formability and properties at weld, and method for producing the same | |
| JP3593235B2 (en) | Method of manufacturing high strength ultra-thin welded steel sheet with excellent formability | |
| WO1995004166A1 (en) | Steel sheet of high stress-corrosion-cracking resistance for cans and method of manufacturing the same | |
| JPH0637688B2 (en) | Steel plate for DI can | |
| JPS6330969B2 (en) | ||
| JPS63134645A (en) | Steel sheet for di can excellent in stretch-flange formability | |
| JPS58141364A (en) | Extremely-thin cold-rolled steel plate with superior workability into can | |
| JP2010007138A (en) | Steel sheet forming less ear to be deep-drawn, and method of manufacturing therefor | |
| JPH086143B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of steel plate for ultra-thin welding can with excellent stripping property | |
| JP3108615B2 (en) | Method for producing steel sheet for welded can with excellent flanging and neck formability | |
| JP3471483B2 (en) | Steel plate for DI can excellent in pressure resistance and neck workability and method for producing the same | |
| JPH08127816A (en) | Method for producing container original plate having excellent wrinkle resistance | |
| JP3164853B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of thin steel plate for food cans | |
| JPH08283863A (en) | Manufacturing method of steel plate for hard can with excellent material uniformity | |
| JP5803510B2 (en) | High-strength, high-formability steel plate for cans and method for producing the same | |
| JP2816358B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of steel sheet for DI can | |
| JP3224265B2 (en) | Non-aging steel plate for container with excellent necked-in workability | |
| JP2714994B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of steel plate for welding can with excellent stripping property | |
| JPH0892695A (en) | Steel plate for two-piece can, which is excellent in can forming workability and flange workability, and its manufacturing method | |
| JP3474647B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of steel sheet for thin containers | |
| JPH0881715A (en) | Manufacturing method of steel plate for can | |
| JPH05345925A (en) | Manufacturing method of ultra-thin steel sheet for DWI can with excellent flange formability |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |