Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH0660926B2 - Fault location method for multi-terminal transmission system - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH0660926B2 - Fault location method for multi-terminal transmission system - Google Patents

Fault location method for multi-terminal transmission system

Info

Publication number
JPH0660926B2
JPH0660926B2 JP9307186A JP9307186A JPH0660926B2 JP H0660926 B2 JPH0660926 B2 JP H0660926B2 JP 9307186 A JP9307186 A JP 9307186A JP 9307186 A JP9307186 A JP 9307186A JP H0660926 B2 JPH0660926 B2 JP H0660926B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
point
fault
branch point
voltage
phase
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP9307186A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS62249079A (en
Inventor
昌也 尾崎
平二郎 高田
満雄 斉藤
茂 成田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Fuji Electric Co Ltd
Chubu Electric Power Co Inc
Original Assignee
Fuji Electric Co Ltd
Chubu Electric Power Co Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Fuji Electric Co Ltd, Chubu Electric Power Co Inc filed Critical Fuji Electric Co Ltd
Priority to JP9307186A priority Critical patent/JPH0660926B2/en
Publication of JPS62249079A publication Critical patent/JPS62249079A/en
Publication of JPH0660926B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0660926B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Locating Faults (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【発明の属する技術分野】TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

本発明は多端子より成る送電系統における故障点標定方
式に関するものであり、特に適用系統の1端が断もしく
は負荷端非接地で構成された系統を対象とし、この1端
以外の端子に端末装置を設置して各端末装置で測定され
た電気量を1ヵ所に集め、故障発生時の相電圧,相電流
値を用いて故障点までのインピーダンスを算出し、端末
装置を設置していない系統も含めて故障点までの距離を
標定することのできる故障点標定方式に関する。
The present invention relates to a fault point locating method in a power transmission system including multiple terminals, and particularly to a system in which one end of the applicable system is disconnected or the load end is not grounded, and a terminal device is provided at a terminal other than this one end. Installed at one place to collect the amount of electricity measured by each terminal device, calculate the impedance up to the failure point using the phase voltage and phase current value at the time of failure, and for systems without terminal device installed The present invention relates to a fault point locating method capable of locating a distance to a fault point.

【従来技術とその問題点】[Prior art and its problems]

送電系統において故障が発生した場合、端子から故障点
までの距離あるいは位置を知ることは、それに引き続く
故障箇所の修復作業等のために必要であり不可欠なもの
である。そのため、故障点の位置を計測できる装置が開
発されているが、これまでのものは、 (イ)故障発生とともに発生する進行波の伝播時間を測定
する。 (ロ)故障発生とともに人為的に進行波を印加し、その反
射波が受信されるまでの時間を計測する。 (ハ)故障発生時の電圧値、電流値を用いてインピーダン
スを算出し、故障点を標定する。 等の方式のものである。 しかし、(イ),(ロ)の方式は特殊な装置が必要であり、か
つ高抵抗接地系あるいは消弧リアクトル系では線路上に
発生する進行波が種々の要因で歪曲されるため適切な計
測ができ難いという欠点がある。一方、(ハ)の方式では
1端子のみの電気量で標定を行なっていたために系統が
分岐している場合には分岐点から先の故障の場合に本線
の故障なのか、分岐線の故障なのか区別ができないため
標定不可能であるという欠点がある。
When a failure occurs in the power transmission system, knowing the distance or position from the terminal to the failure point is necessary and indispensable for subsequent repair work of the failure point. Therefore, a device that can measure the position of the failure point has been developed, but up to now, (a) the propagation time of the traveling wave generated with the occurrence of the failure is measured. (B) A traveling wave is artificially applied as the failure occurs, and the time until the reflected wave is received is measured. (C) The impedance is calculated using the voltage value and current value when a failure occurs, and the failure point is located. Etc. However, the methods (a) and (b) require special equipment, and in a high-resistance grounding system or arc-extinguishing reactor system, the traveling wave generated on the line is distorted due to various factors, and therefore appropriate measurement is required. There is a drawback that it is difficult to do. On the other hand, in the method of (c), when the system is branched because the electric quantity of only one terminal is used for the localization, if there is a failure ahead of the branch point, the main line failure or the branch line failure does not occur. There is a drawback that it is impossible to orient because it cannot be distinguished.

【発明の目的】[Object of the Invention]

本発明は系統の1端が断または負荷端非接地であるよう
な多端子よりなる送電系統において、断または負荷端の
分岐系統も含めて故障点の標定が行なえるようにした故
障点標定方式を提供することを目的とする。
The present invention is a fault point locating method capable of locating a fault point in a multi-terminal transmission system in which one end of the system is disconnected or ungrounded at the load end, including a branch system at the disconnected or load end. The purpose is to provide.

【発明の要点】[Points of the Invention]

本発明の要点は、断または負荷端以外の端子の電圧、電
流量を測定して1ヵ所に集め、この集められた電圧、電
流量に基づいて所定の標定演算式により故障点が断また
は負荷端以外の端子と分岐点とで区別されるいずれの区
間あるいは分岐点に存在するかを判定し、分岐点でない
場合には判定された区間に応じた標定演算式により故障
点までの距離を求め、分岐点である場合にはこの分岐点
の電圧、電流量を演算し、この演算された電圧、電流量
による片端からの標定演算式により断または負荷端の分
岐系統の故障点までの距離を求めるようにしたことであ
る。
The main point of the present invention is to measure the voltage and current amount of terminals other than the disconnection or load end and collect them in one place, and to determine the failure point or load by a predetermined orientation calculation formula based on the collected voltage and current amount. Determine which section or branch point is distinguished by the terminal other than the end and the branch point, and if it is not the branch point, calculate the distance to the fault point by the orientation calculation formula according to the determined section. If it is a branch point, the voltage and current amount at this branch point are calculated, and the distance to the fault point of the branch system at the disconnection or load end is calculated by the orientation calculation formula from one end based on the calculated voltage and current amount. That's what I asked for.

【発明の実施例】Examples of the invention

以下においては、1回線送電系統を実施例にして説明す
る。 まず、故障点が端末装置が設けられた各端子と分岐点と
で区分されるいずれの区間あるいは分岐点に存在するか
の判定について説明する。 第1図は本発明を説明するための1回線3端子の送電系
統図である。第1図ではA,B端に系統の電圧,電流を
測定する端末装置A1,B1が設けられており、端末装
置A1,B1で測定されたデータは1ヵ所に集められて
故障点標定の演算が行なわれる。第1図では分岐点Pに
C端(非接地の負荷端)が接続されており、A端からB
端までの距離をLABとし、A端から分岐点P、B端から
分岐点P、C端から分岐点Pを区間AP,BP,CPと
呼び、各区間の距離をLAP,LBP,LCPとする。 ここで、C端を考えずにA,Bの2端子間の故障点標定
について考えてみる。各相の単位長さ当たりの自己イン
ピーダンスをZaa,Zbb,Zcc、ab相間、bc相間、ca
相間の単位長さ当たりの相互インピーダンスをZab,
Zbc,Zca、各相に流れる電流をIa,Ib,Icとすると、各相
の単位長さ当たりの電圧降下分はそれぞれ次式のように
示される。 ここで、a相1線地絡事故を想定し、故障点抵抗をR
とすると、その時の等価回路は第2図に示すようにな
る。但し、故障点FはA端よりαLABの距離とし、0<
a<1である。故障点Fにおける電圧Va Fは故障点抵抗
により、Va F=R(Ia A+Ia B)となるのでA端を測定
点とすると、 Va A−αLAB(ZaaIa A+ZabIb A+ZcaIc A) =RF(Ia A+Ia B) ……(2) B端を測定点とすると、 Va B-(1-α)LAB(ZaaIb B+ZabIb B+ZcaIc B) =RF(Ia A+Ia B) ……(3) となる。故障点抵抗Rは測定できないため(2)、(3)式
を用いてRを消去することで距離を求めると、C端を
考えない場合のA端子から故障点Fまでの距離(α
LAB)′を求めると、 となる。但し(4)式はa相に対する故障点標定式であ
る。 区間APでa相1線地絡故障が発生したとすると、まず
(4)式により標定を行なう。この標定結果(αLAB)′は
C端の電圧、電流値を考えていない値である。この(4)
式とC端の電圧、電流値が収拾できた場合の3端子の標
定演算式による正確な標定値との関係を次に説明する。 第3図は区間APでa相1線地絡故障が発生した場合の
回路図であり、図においては送電線の自己インピーダン
ス、相互インピーダンスはa相の故障点標定式に必要な
もののみが示されている。第3図に従ってC端の電圧、
電流値を考慮した関係式を考えると、故障点の電位をVa
Fとした場合、A端からみた故障点Fの電位は(2)式の左
辺にて示されているが、B端からみた故障点Fの電位は
C端から故障点Fへの電流の流入があるため次式にて示
される。 Va F=Va B-(1-α)LAB(ZaaIa B+ZabIb B+ZcaIc B)−{(1-
α)LAB-LBP}(ZaaIa C+ZabIb C+ZcaIc C) ……(5) (2),(5)式よりA端から故障点Fまでの距離αLABを求め
ると、 但し、A=ZaaIa A+ZabIb A+ZcaIc A B=ZaaIa B+ZabIb B+ZcaIc B C=ZaaIa C+ZabIb C+ZcaIc C である。(6)式を(4)式を使って表わすと、 となる。故障発生区間はAP間であるから、LAP≧αLAB
より、 が成立し、よって、 となる。(9)式の右辺の第2項でZ,Iはベクトル値で
あるためにC/(A+B)の項は大きさを表わし、 符号は{(1-α)LAB-LBP}が決定する。 (1-α)LAB-LBP=LAB-LBP-αLAB=LAP-αLAB≧0 …
…(10) となるので、よって、 となる。これにより(αLAB)′≦LAPが成立し、(4)式に
よる標定値はA端からみてP点を越えない。また等号は
故障が分岐点Pで発生した場合を示している。つまり、
C端を考えずにA,Bの2端子の標定式を用いて標定を
行えばAP間の故障は区間AP内の標定値を得ることが
できる。同様にしてBP間の故障についてもAB間の標
定を行えば区間BP内の標定値を得ることができる。 分岐点Pの故障は(8)式の{(1-α)LAB-LBP}=0の場
合であり、この場合にはC端の電圧、電流値は無関係と
なり、AB間の標定式で正しい標定が行なえる。このこ
とはCP間の故障についても同じであり、AB間の標定
式から見ればCP間の故障はすべて分岐点Pの故障と判
定される。 以上の様に、C端の電圧、電流値を考えずにA,Bの2
端子間の標定式を行なうことによって区間AP,BP,
CPの判定が可能である。 このようにして故障が発生した区間の判別が終了する
と、次に各区間内における故障点の標定を行なう。区間
APにおいてa相1線地絡故障が発生した場合の標定に
ついて第4図に示す説明図に基づいて説明する。 故障が1線地絡故障(a相とする)の時は故障点に流れ
込む故障電流は零相電流の和になるから分岐点Pより故
障点Fに流れる電流Ia Fは故障電流をIa Fとして、 となる。これより、 となる。健全相のb,c相はA端と分岐点Pでは電流値
は変わらないのでIb F=Ib A,Ic P=Ic Aとなる。分岐点P
での故障相電圧Va FはB端から分岐点Pまでの電圧降下
を考えて、 Va P=Va B-LBP(ZaaIa B+ZabIb B+ZcaIc B) ……(14) となる。以上により分岐点Pの電圧,電流が求められる
のでA,Pを2端子と考えて、(4)式と同様の標定演算
式を求めると次のようになる。 (15)式中には未知数がないので標定演算を行なうことが
できる。同様にして他相の1線地絡故障も標定すること
ができる。 2線短絡、地絡、3相短絡時には一般に1線地絡故障と
比べて故障電流が非常に大きいのでC端への分流は少な
く、そのため大きな誤差とはならないので(4)式の区間
判別に用いた値を標定演算結果として用いることができ
る。以上のように1線地絡の場合は(15)式を、他の故障
の場合には(4)式の結果を区間APにおけるA端から故
障点Fまでの距離とすることができる。 同様にして区間BPの間にa相1線地絡故障が発生した
場合も、第5図に示す説明図をもとに考えると分岐点P
より故障点Fに流れる電流Ia P′は(13)式と同様に、 Ia P′=3(Io A+Io B)-Ia B ……(16) となる。また健全相のb,c相はB端と分岐点Pでは電
流値は変わらないのでIb P′=Ib B,Ic P′=Ic Bとなる。
分岐点Pでの故障相電圧Va P′はA端から分岐点Pまで
の電圧降下を考えて、 Va P′=Va A-LAP(ZaaIa A+ZcaIc A) ……(17) となる。分岐点Pから故障点Fまでの距離βLBPを求め
る標定演算式は(15)式と同様に考えて次のようになる。 したがって、A端から故障点Fまでの距離はLAP+βLBP
により求めることができる。2線短絡、地絡、3相短絡
時は(4)式により求めることができる。このようにして
AB間の故障点標定を行なうことができる。なお、以上
の説明ではA端から故障点Fまでの距離を求めている
が、同様にしてB端から故障点Fまでの距離を求めるこ
とができる。 次に区間判別により分岐Pの故障と判別された場合の分
岐先の故障点標定について説明する。この場合、A端も
しくはB端からの分岐点Pまでの電圧降下分を考えるこ
とで分岐点Pの各相電圧を求めることができる。また、
分岐先へ流れ込む込む各相電流値はA端、B端電流の和
となる。各相の分岐点電圧Va P″,Vb P″,Vc P″、分岐
点電流Ia P″,Ib P″,Ic P″は次式にて表わされる。 以上のようにして分岐点Pにおける各相の電圧、電流値
を求めることができるため、分岐点Pを片端としてP端
のみのデータにより標定を行なうことができる。以下に
その標定演算式を説明する。区間CPにおいてa相1線
地絡故障が発生した場合の標定について第6図に示す説
明図に基づいて説明する。 a相1線地絡故障の場合、前述のように故障電流は零相
電流の和で得られることより、故障電流をIF″、故障点
抵抗を3Rgとすると、分岐点Pから故障点Fまでの電圧
降下を考えると次式がそれぞれ成立する。 Va P″−αLCP(ZaaIa P″+ZabIb P″+ZcaIc P″)−3RgI
F″=0 ……(25) IF″=Io A+Io B ……(26) (25)式より、 となる。この(27)式の虚数部lmをとることで純抵抗と仮
定する故障点抵抗Rgを消去すると、(27)式の右辺は、 より、次式が成立する。但し、IF*はIF″の共役複素で
ある。 lm〔Va P″・IF*〕= αLcp・lm〔ZaaIa P″+ZabIb P″+ZcaIc P″)・IF*
……(28) したがって、(26)式と(28)式より次の標定演算式が求め
られる。 (29)式には未知数が含まれていないので故障点抵抗の影
響を受けずに標定を行なうことができる。 次に2線短絡故障の場合について説明する。この場合に
は故障点抵抗R≪負荷と仮定することで近似的に故障
点FからC端に電流は流れないとする。ここで、b,c
の2相短絡を考えて対称座標法を用いて解くと等価回路
図は第7図に示すようになる。したがって、A端からみ
た場合に次式が成立する。 また前述の仮定より、 通常はZ≒Zとしてさしつかえないので、(30)式よ
り次式が成立する。 V1 A-V2 A-LAPZ1(I1 A-I2 A)= (αLcpZ1+RF){(I1 A-I2 A)+(I1 B-I2 B)} ……(32) これより、 となる。ここで(33)式を相で表示すると、 より次式のように表示される。 ここでリアクタンス分をとることで故障点抵抗を消去す
ると次式が成立する。 但し、θ=(分子の位相)−(分母の位相)、X1=Z1
リアクタンス分である。この(35)式により故障点までの
距離を求めることができる。同様にして2線地絡も3相
短絡も(35)式で標定できる。またB端から標定しても(1
9)〜(24)式に示す分岐点Pでの各電気量は変わらないた
めに同様の標定を行なうことができる。なお、(29)、(3
5)式の結果が分岐点Pを示せば(標定値がゼロ)分岐点
Pでの故障とする。 C端が負荷端ではなく断であれば区間CPには通常は電
流が流れなくなりC端の影響を受けなくなるため、(4)
式によるA、Bの2端子間の標定結果がそのまま標定値
となる。この場合、分岐点Pでの故障と判定されると、
区間CPでの故障点標定はC端への分流がなく全て故障
点に電流が流れ込むために故障点抵抗≪負荷とした近似
が必要なくなり、より高精度な標定を行なうことができ
る。 以上の実施例の説明では1回線送電系統について述べた
が、本発明は平行2回線送電系統等のように他回線が存
在する場合についても適用することができる。例えば、
平行2回線送電系統の場合には回線間相互インピーダン
スが存在するので(1)式に示される電圧降下分に回線間
相互インピーダンスによる電圧降下分を加算することに
より後は同様に取り扱うことができる。 なお、以上の実施例の説明では一端が断あるいは負荷端
非接地の3端子送電系統についてのべたが、本発明がそ
れ以上の多端子系統にも適用できることは勿論である。
In the following, a one-line power transmission system will be described as an example. First, a description will be given of determination of which section or branch point the fault point exists between each terminal provided with the terminal device and the branch point. FIG. 1 is a transmission line diagram of one line and three terminals for explaining the present invention. In FIG. 1, terminal devices A1 and B1 for measuring the voltage and current of the system are provided at the terminals A and B, and the data measured by the terminal devices A1 and B1 are collected in one place to calculate the fault point. Is performed. In FIG. 1, the C end (the ungrounded load end) is connected to the branch point P, and the A end to the B end.
The distance to the end is L AB , the branch point P from the A end, the branch point P from the B end, and the branch point P from the C end are called sections AP, BP, CP, and the distance of each section is L AP , L BP , L CP . Here, let us consider the fault location between the two terminals A and B without considering the C end. The self-impedance per unit length of each phase is calculated as Z aa , Z bb , Z cc , between ab phases, between bc phases, and ca.
The mutual impedance per unit length between the phases is Z ab ,
Letting Z bc and Z ca and the currents flowing in each phase be I a , I b and I c , the voltage drop per unit length of each phase is expressed by the following equations. Here, assuming a phase 1 line ground fault accident, the failure point resistance is R F
Then, the equivalent circuit at that time is as shown in FIG. However, the fault point F is set to the distance of αL AB from the A end, and 0 <
a <1. The voltage V a F at the fault point F is V a F = R F (I a A + I a B ) due to the fault point resistance R F , so if the A end is the measurement point, then V a A −αL AB (Z aa I a A + Z ab I b A + Z ca I c A ) = R F (I a A + I a B ) …… (2) Letting the B end be the measurement point, V a B- (1-α ) L AB (Z aa I b B + Z ab I b B + Z ca I c B ) = R F (I a A + I a B ) ... (3) Since the failure point resistance R F cannot be measured (2), the distance from the A terminal to the failure point F when the C end is not considered when the distance is obtained by deleting R F using the equation (3) (α
If we find L AB ) ′, Becomes However, equation (4) is a fault location formula for phase a. If a phase 1 line ground fault occurs in section AP, first
Orient according to equation (4). This orientation result (αL AB ) ′ is a value that does not consider the voltage and current values at the C end. This (4)
The relationship between the equation and the accurate orientation value by the orientation calculation equation of the three terminals when the voltage and current values at the C terminal can be collected will be described below. FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram in the case where an a-phase 1-line ground fault occurs in the section AP. In the figure, only the self-impedance and mutual impedance of the transmission line are shown for the a-phase fault location formula. Has been done. According to FIG. 3, the voltage at the C end,
Considering the relational expression considering the current value, the potential at the fault point is V a
When F is set, the potential of the fault point F seen from the A end is shown on the left side of the equation (2), but the potential of the fault point F seen from the B end is the inflow of current from the C end to the fault point F. Therefore, it is expressed by the following equation. V a F = V a B- (1-α) L AB (Z aa I a B + Z ab I b B + Z ca I c B ) − {(1-
α) L AB -L BP } (Z aa I a C + Z ab I b C + Z ca I c C ) …… (5) The distance from the A end to the fault point F from Eqs. (2) and (5) When we find α L AB , However, A = Z aa I a A + Z ab I b A + Z ca I c A B = Z aa I a B + Z ab I b B + Z ca I c B C = Z aa I a C + Z ab I b C + Z ca I c C. If equation (6) is expressed using equation (4), Becomes Since the fault occurrence section is between APs , L AP ≧ αL AB
Than, Holds, so Becomes In the second term on the right side of Eq. (9), Z and I are vector values, so the term C / (A + B) represents the magnitude and the sign is {(1-α) L AB -L BP }. Will be decided. (1-α) L AB -L BP = L AB -L BP -αL AB = L AP -αL AB ≥0 ...
... (10), so Becomes As a result, (α L AB ) ′ ≦ L AP is established, and the orientation value according to the equation (4) does not exceed the P point when viewed from the A end. Also, the equal sign indicates the case where the failure occurs at the branch point P. That is,
If the orientation is performed using the orientation formula of the two terminals A and B without considering the C end, the orientation value within the section AP can be obtained for the fault between the APs. Similarly, for faults between BPs as well, if orientations between ABs are performed, orientation values within the section BP can be obtained. The fault at the branch point P is the case of {(1-α) L AB -L BP } = 0 in the equation (8). In this case, the voltage and the current value at the C end become irrelevant, and the orientation formula between AB is determined. The correct orientation can be done with. This is the same for the faults between CPs. From the orientation formula between ABs, all faults between CPs are determined to be faults at the branch point P. As described above, 2 of A and B without considering the voltage and current value of the C end
By performing the orientation formula between the terminals, the intervals AP, BP,
CP can be determined. When the determination of the section in which the failure has occurred is completed in this way, then the failure point in each section is located. The orientation when the a-phase 1-line ground fault occurs in the section AP will be described with reference to the explanatory diagram shown in FIG. When the fault is a one-line ground fault (a phase), the fault current flowing into the fault point is the sum of zero-phase currents, so the current I a F flowing from the branch point P to the fault point F is the fault current I a. As F , Becomes Than this, Becomes Since the current values of the b and c phases of the sound phase do not change at the A end and the branch point P, I b F = I b A and I c P = I c A. Branch point P
Considering the voltage drop from the B end to the branch point P, the fault phase voltage V a F at V a P = V a B -L BP (Z aa I a B + Z ab I b B + Z ca I c B ) ... (14) From the above, the voltage and current at the branch point P can be obtained. Therefore, if A and P are considered as two terminals and the orientation calculation equation similar to the equation (4) is obtained, it becomes as follows. Since there are no unknowns in equation (15), orientation calculation can be performed. Similarly, the one-line ground fault of the other phase can be located. In the case of 2-wire short-circuit, ground fault, and 3-phase short-circuit, the fault current is generally much larger than that of the 1-line ground fault, so the shunt current to the C end is small, and therefore there is no large error. The value used can be used as the orientation calculation result. As described above, in the case of a one-line ground fault, the expression (15) can be used as the distance from the A end in the section AP to the failure point F in the case of other failures. Similarly, when an a-phase 1-line ground fault occurs during the section BP, the branch point P will be considered based on the explanatory diagram shown in FIG.
Therefore, the current I a P ′ flowing at the fault point F is I a P ′ = 3 (I o A + I o B ) −I a B (16), as in the equation (13). In addition, since the current values of the b and c phases of the sound phase do not change at the B end and the branch point P, I b P ′ = I b B and I c P ′ = I c B.
Considering the voltage drop from the A end to the branch point P, the fault phase voltage V a P ′ at the branch point P is V a P ′ = V a A -L AP (Z aa I a A + Z ca I c A ) …… (17) The orientation calculation formula for obtaining the distance β L BP from the branch point P to the fault point F is as follows, considering the same as the formula (15). Therefore, the distance from the end A to the failure point F is L AP + βL BP
Can be obtained by In the case of 2-wire short-circuit, ground fault, and 3-phase short-circuit, it can be calculated by equation (4). In this way, fault location between AB can be performed. Although the distance from the A end to the failure point F is obtained in the above description, the distance from the B end to the failure point F can be similarly obtained. Next, the fault location of the branch destination when the fault of the branch P is determined by the section determination will be described. In this case, each phase voltage at the branch point P can be obtained by considering the amount of voltage drop from the A terminal or the B terminal to the branch point P. Also,
The current value of each phase flowing into the branch destination is the sum of the A-terminal and B-terminal currents. The branch point voltages V a P ″, V b P ″, V c P ″, and the branch point currents I a P ″, I b P ″, and I c P ″ of each phase are expressed by the following equations. Since the voltage and current value of each phase at the branch point P can be obtained as described above, it is possible to perform the orientation based on the data of only the P end with the branch point P as one end. The orientation calculation formula will be described below. Orientation in the case where an a-phase 1-line ground fault has occurred in the section CP will be described with reference to the explanatory diagram shown in FIG. For a phase 1 line ground fault, than that obtained by the sum of the fault current is zero-phase current, as described above, the fault current I F ", when the fault point resistance and 3Rg, fault point F from the branch point P Considering the voltage drop up to, the following equations hold respectively: V a P ″ −αL CP (Z aa I a P ″ + Z ab I b P ″ + Z ca I c P ″) −3RgI
F ″ = 0 (25) I F ″ = I o A + I o B (26) From equation (25), Becomes Eliminating the fault point resistance Rg, which is assumed to be pure resistance by taking the imaginary part lm of equation (27), the right side of equation (27) becomes Therefore, the following equation is established. However, I F * is a conjugate complex of I F ″. Lm [V a P ″ · I F * ] = αL cp · lm [Z aa I a P ″ + Z ab I b P ″ + Z ca I c P ″ ) ・IF * ]
(28) Therefore, the following orientation calculation formula is obtained from the formulas (26) and (28). Since the unknowns are not included in Eq. (29), the orientation can be performed without being affected by the fault point resistance. Next, the case of a two-wire short circuit fault will be described. In this case, assuming that the fault point resistance R F << load, it is assumed that no current flows from the fault point F to the C terminal. Where b, c
If the two-phase short circuit of 1 is considered and solved using the symmetric coordinate method, the equivalent circuit diagram becomes as shown in FIG. Therefore, the following formula is established when viewed from the A end. Also, from the above assumption, Normally, it can be set as Z 1 ≈Z 2 , so the following formula is established from the formula (30). V 1 A -V 2 A -L AP Z 1 (I 1 A -I 2 A ) = (αL cp Z 1 + R F ) {(I 1 A -I 2 A ) + (I 1 B -I 2 B )} …… (32) From this, Becomes Here, when the equation (33) is displayed as a phase, It is displayed as the following equation. Here, if the fault resistance is eliminated by taking the reactance, the following equation holds. However, θ = (phase of numerator) − (phase of denominator), and the reactance component of X 1 = Z 1 . The distance to the failure point can be calculated by this equation (35). Similarly, both the 2-wire ground fault and the 3-phase short-circuit can be determined by the equation (35). Moreover, even if it is standardized from the B end (1
Since each electric quantity at the branch point P shown in the equations (9) to (24) does not change, similar orientation can be performed. Note that (29), (3
If the result of the equation (5) shows the branch point P (the orientation value is zero), it is judged as a failure at the branch point P. If the C end is not the load end but the disconnection, the current normally does not flow in the section CP and is not affected by the C end, so (4)
The orientation result between the two terminals A and B by the formula becomes the orientation value as it is. In this case, if it is determined that there is a failure at the branch point P,
In the fault point localization in the section CP, since there is no shunt to the C end and the current flows into all the fault points, approximation with the fault point resistance << load is not necessary, and more accurate localization can be performed. In the above description of the embodiments, the one-line power transmission system has been described, but the present invention can be applied to the case where another line exists such as a parallel two-line power transmission system. For example,
In the case of a parallel two-line power transmission system, there is mutual impedance between lines, and therefore the same can be handled later by adding the voltage drop due to the mutual impedance between lines to the voltage drop shown in Eq. (1). In the above description of the embodiments, a three-terminal power transmission system with one end disconnected or the load end not grounded has been described, but it goes without saying that the present invention can be applied to a multi-terminal system having more than that.

【発明の効果】【The invention's effect】

以上のように本発明によれば、まず端末装置が設置され
た端子間で標定を行なうことにより故障点が端末装置が
設置された端子と分岐点とにより区分されたいずれかの
区間あるいは分岐点に存在するかを判定し、いずれかの
区間であれば所定の標定演算式により標定値を求め、分
岐点に存在する場合には分岐点の電圧、電流量を求めて
片端からの標定演算式により標定値を求めるように構成
されているので、故障点を標定する系統の一端が断ある
いは負荷端非接地で端末装置のない分岐系統も含めて標
定を可能にすることができる。
As described above, according to the present invention, first, by performing the orientation between the terminals where the terminal device is installed, the failure point is divided into the terminal where the terminal device is installed and the branch point. If it exists in any of the sections, the orientation value is obtained by a predetermined orientation calculation formula, and if it exists at the branch point, the voltage and current amount at the branch point are obtained and the orientation calculation expression from one end is obtained. Since it is configured to obtain the orientation value, it is possible to perform the orientation including the branch system in which one end of the system for locating the fault point is disconnected or the load end is ungrounded and there is no terminal device.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

第1図は本発明を説明するための1回線3端子の送電系
統図、第2図はa相1線地絡故障時の等価回路図、第3
図は区間APでa相1線地絡故障が発生した場合の等価
回路図、第4図、第5図、第6図は各区間においてa相
1線地絡故障が発生した場合の本発明故障点標定方式の
説明図、第7図はb,c相短絡時の対称座標法による等
価回路図を示している。 A1,B1……端末装置、Zaa,Zbb,Zcc……各相の単位
長さ当たりの自己インピーダンス、Zab,Zbc,Zca……各
相間の単位長さ当たりの相互インピーダンス。
FIG. 1 is a transmission line diagram of 1 line 3 terminals for explaining the present invention, FIG. 2 is an equivalent circuit diagram at the time of a phase 1 line ground fault, and FIG.
The figures are equivalent circuit diagrams when an a-phase 1-line ground fault occurs in the section AP, and FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 show the present invention when an a-phase 1-line ground fault occurs in each section. FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram of the fault point locating system, and FIG. 7 shows an equivalent circuit diagram by the symmetric coordinate method when the b and c phases are short-circuited. A1, B1 ...... terminals, Z aa, Z bb, Z cc ...... self-impedance per unit length of each phase, Z ab, Z bc, the mutual impedance per unit length between Z ca ...... phases.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 斉藤 満雄 神奈川県川崎市川崎区田辺新田1番1号 富士電機株式会社内 (72)発明者 成田 茂 神奈川県川崎市川崎区田辺新田1番1号 富士電機株式会社内 (56)参考文献 特開 昭61−235767(JP,A) 特開 昭58−208675(JP,A) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (72) Mitsuo Saito, No. 1 Tanabe Nitta, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa Prefecture Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. No. 1 within Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. (56) Reference JP-A-61-235767 (JP, A) JP-A-58-208675 (JP, A)

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】一端が断または負荷端非接地で構成された
多端子よりなる送電系統の故障点標定方式において、断
または負荷端以外の端子に端末装置を設置し各端末装置
で測定された電圧、電流量を1ヵ所に集め、この集めら
れた電圧、電流量に基づいて所定の標定演算式により故
障点が前記端末装置が設けられた各端子と分岐点とで区
別されるいずれの区間あるいは分岐点に介在するかを判
定し、分岐点でない場合には判定された区間に応じた標
定演算式により故障点までの距離を求め、分岐点である
場合にはこの分岐点の電圧、電流量を演算し、この演算
された電圧、電流量による片端からの標定演算式により
断または負荷端の分岐系統の故障点までの距離を求める
ことを特徴とする多端子送電系統の故障点標定方式。
1. In a fault point locating system for a transmission system consisting of multiple terminals, one end of which is disconnected or the load end is not grounded, a terminal device is installed at a terminal other than the disconnection or load end and is measured by each terminal device. Any section where the voltage and the current amount are collected at one place, and the fault point is distinguished between each terminal provided with the terminal device and the branch point by a predetermined orientation calculation formula based on the collected voltage and current amount. Alternatively, if it is not a branch point, it is determined.If it is not a branch point, the distance to the fault point is calculated by the orientation calculation formula according to the determined section. If it is a branch point, the voltage and current at this branch point are determined. A fault location method for a multi-terminal transmission system characterized by calculating the amount of the voltage and calculating the distance to the fault point of the branch system at the disconnection or load end from the location calculation formula from one end based on the calculated voltage and current .
JP9307186A 1986-04-22 1986-04-22 Fault location method for multi-terminal transmission system Expired - Lifetime JPH0660926B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP9307186A JPH0660926B2 (en) 1986-04-22 1986-04-22 Fault location method for multi-terminal transmission system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP9307186A JPH0660926B2 (en) 1986-04-22 1986-04-22 Fault location method for multi-terminal transmission system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS62249079A JPS62249079A (en) 1987-10-30
JPH0660926B2 true JPH0660926B2 (en) 1994-08-10

Family

ID=14072281

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP9307186A Expired - Lifetime JPH0660926B2 (en) 1986-04-22 1986-04-22 Fault location method for multi-terminal transmission system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0660926B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104215881B (en) * 2014-09-09 2017-02-15 中国矿业大学 Voltage sag source locating method based on sequence disturbing active current direction
CN117388638B (en) * 2023-11-14 2024-09-20 国网宁夏电力有限公司营销服务中心(国网宁夏电力有限公司计量中心) A multi-terminal transmission line fault distance measurement method, medium and system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS62249079A (en) 1987-10-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5773980A (en) One-terminal fault location system that corrects for fault resistance effects
EP2829887A1 (en) Method and device for estimating angle of zero-sequence voltage in single-phase earth fault
CN109444657B (en) A method for locating high-resistance grounding fault sections in distribution network
EP1342095B1 (en) Fault location method and device
CN114002544A (en) Method for positioning and ranging multi-terminal line protection fault
JPH07122650B2 (en) Fault location method
JPH0660926B2 (en) Fault location method for multi-terminal transmission system
JPH06347503A (en) Ground fault position locating apparatus
JPH11142465A (en) Ground fault detection method
CN100463327C (en) A phase selection method for high-voltage transmission lines based on model recognition
JPH0758308B2 (en) Fault location method for 3-terminal transmission system
JPH10132890A (en) Fault location method and device
JPH0758305B2 (en) Fault location method
JP2984294B2 (en) Method of locating short-circuit fault point of three-terminal parallel two-circuit transmission line
JPH0373825B2 (en)
JP3319517B2 (en) Fault location device
JPH06300811A (en) Failure point locating device of electric power system
Eng et al. Single-ended traveling wave based fault location on two terminal transmission lines
JPH09166639A (en) Accident point locating system
JP2000227453A (en) Spotting of failure position in electric power transmission system
JP3873785B2 (en) Fault location method
JP2002139538A (en) Base point terminal selection method for multiple-port fault point locating device
JP3773020B2 (en) Fault location method using multi-terminal electric quantity
JP2895994B2 (en) Fault location method for three-phase cable
CN109347071A (en) Single-phase high-resistance grounding protection system and method based on voltage phasor plane

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term