JPH0663991B2 - Copper purity evaluation method - Google Patents
Copper purity evaluation methodInfo
- Publication number
- JPH0663991B2 JPH0663991B2 JP15603389A JP15603389A JPH0663991B2 JP H0663991 B2 JPH0663991 B2 JP H0663991B2 JP 15603389 A JP15603389 A JP 15603389A JP 15603389 A JP15603389 A JP 15603389A JP H0663991 B2 JPH0663991 B2 JP H0663991B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- purity
- copper
- rrr
- impurities
- evaluation method
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Electric Means (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】 [産業上の利用分野] 本発明は純度が99.999重量%(所謂5ナイン)以上の高
純度銅の純度の評価に好適の銅の純度評価方法に関す
る。The present invention relates to a copper purity evaluation method suitable for evaluating the purity of high-purity copper having a purity of 99.999% by weight (so-called 5 nines) or more.
[従来の技術] 近年、ボンディングワイヤ又はプリント回路基板用銅箔
等の電子材料、蒸着又はスパッタリング用の基材及び音
響用導体等の分野で使用される純銅材料は、使用分野に
おける高機能化に伴って更に一層の高純度化が要望され
ている。そして、この銅の高純度化の要求が高まるにつ
れて、純度の評価手段の煩雑性が問題となってきた。[Prior Art] In recent years, pure copper materials used in the fields of electronic materials such as bonding wires or copper foils for printed circuit boards, substrates for vapor deposition or sputtering, conductors for acoustics, etc. Along with this, further purification is demanded. As the demand for high purity copper has increased, the complexity of the means for evaluating purity has become a problem.
従来、所謂4ナイン程度の銅の純度は通常スパーク放電
等による発光分光質量分析法等により分析しており、こ
の方法により純度を迅速に分析することができる。しか
しながら、純度が99.999重量%以上の所謂5ナインの高
純度銅の純度を評価しようとすると、不純物元素を1元
素当り0.1ppm以下のオーダーの分析精度で分析すること
が必要とされるため、前述のスパーク放電等による発光
分光質量分析法によって純度を評価することは困難であ
る。Conventionally, the purity of so-called about 4 nines is usually analyzed by an emission spectroscopic mass spectrometry method using spark discharge or the like, and the purity can be rapidly analyzed by this method. However, when trying to evaluate the purity of so-called 5-nine high-purity copper with a purity of 99.999% by weight or more, it is necessary to analyze impurity elements with an analysis accuracy of the order of 0.1 ppm or less per element. It is difficult to evaluate the purity by the emission spectroscopic mass spectrometry method using the spark discharge or the like.
そこで、このような5ナイン以上の高純度銅の純度を測
定する場合には、従来、誘導結合プラズマ原子分光質量
分析法(ICP)又はグロー放電質量分析法(GDMS)等の
高度な質量分析方法が採用されている。Therefore, when measuring the purity of high-purity copper such as 5 nines or more, conventionally, an advanced mass spectrometry method such as inductively coupled plasma atomic spectroscopy mass spectrometry (ICP) or glow discharge mass spectrometry (GDMS) is used. Has been adopted.
[発明が解決しようとする課題] しかしながら、これらの質量分析法により純度評価を行
う場合には、24元素(Na,Mg,Si,P,S,Ca,Al,Cr,Fe,Ni,Z
n,As,Se,Ag,Cd,Sb,Te,Pb,Bi,Sn,In,B,Cl,O)以上という
大量の元素について含有量を測定する必要がある。しか
も、各元素について高精度の分析を行う必要がある。こ
のため、純度の測定に膨大な時間とコストが必要であ
り、この純度測定のために、高純度銅の製造コストが更
に一層高くなるという問題点がある。[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] However, when the purity is evaluated by these mass spectrometry methods, 24 elements (Na, Mg, Si, P, S, Ca, Al, Cr, Fe, Ni, Z
(n, As, Se, Ag, Cd, Sb, Te, Pb, Bi, Sn, In, B, Cl, O) It is necessary to measure the content of a large amount of elements. Moreover, it is necessary to analyze each element with high accuracy. Therefore, a huge amount of time and cost are required to measure the purity, and the production cost of high-purity copper is further increased due to this purity measurement.
本発明はかかる問題点に鑑みてなされたものであって、
高純度銅の純度を高精度で、迅速に且つ低コストで把握
することができる銅の純度評価方法を提供することを目
的とする。The present invention has been made in view of such problems,
An object of the present invention is to provide a copper purity evaluation method capable of grasping the purity of high-purity copper with high accuracy, quickly and at low cost.
[課題を解決するための手段] 本発明に係る銅の純度評価方法は、純度が99.999重量%
以上であって既知の銅の残留抵抗比を測定してこの残留
抵抗比と前記純度との間の検量線を予め作成しておき、
純度評価対象の銅の残留抵抗比を測定し、この測定結果
に基いて前記検量線を使用して前記銅の純度を評価する
ことを特徴とする。[Means for Solving the Problems] The copper purity evaluation method according to the present invention has a purity of 99.999% by weight.
The calibration curve between the residual resistance ratio and the purity is previously prepared by measuring the known residual resistance ratio of copper,
The residual resistance ratio of copper to be evaluated for purity is measured, and the purity of the copper is evaluated using the calibration curve based on the measurement result.
[作用] 本発明においては、高純度銅の残留抵抗比(Residual R
esistivity Ratio 以下RRRという)を測定し、このRRR
を純度の指標とする。不純物量とRRRとは密接な関係が
あり、RRRが大きい程、不純物濃度は低くなる。[Operation] In the present invention, the residual resistance ratio (Residual R
esistivity Ratio (hereinafter referred to as RRR)
Is used as an index of purity. There is a close relationship between the impurity amount and the RRR, and the larger the RRR, the lower the impurity concentration.
以下、残留抵抗比RRRについて説明する。銅の室温にお
ける電気抵抗ρ(室温)は、マティーセンの法則(Matt
hiessen' s Rule)により下記(1)式で表わされる。The residual resistance ratio RRR will be described below. The electrical resistance ρ (room temperature) of copper at room temperature is calculated according to Matthisen's law (Matt
It is expressed by the following formula (1) according to the Hiessen's Rule).
ρ(室温) =ρ(therm)+ρ(chem)+ρ(phys) …(1) 但し、ρ(therm)は結晶の熱振動による抵抗、ρ(che
m)は化学的不純物による抵抗、ρ(phys)は物知的欠
陥による抵抗である。ρ (room temperature) = ρ (therm) + ρ (chem) + ρ (phys) (1) where ρ (therm) is the resistance due to thermal vibration of the crystal, ρ (che
m) is resistance due to chemical impurities, and ρ (phys) is resistance due to intellectual defects.
一般にRRRは下記(2)式で定義される。Generally, RRR is defined by the following equation (2).
RRR=ρ(室温)/ρ4.2K …(2) ここでρ4.2Kは液体ヘリウム温度における電気抵抗であ
り、下記(3)式により表わされる。RRR = ρ (room temperature) / ρ 4.2K (2) Here, ρ 4.2K is the electrical resistance at the liquid helium temperature and is represented by the following equation (3).
ρ4.2K≒ρ(chem)+ρ(phys) …(3) この場合にρ(室温)≫ρ4.2Kであるから、下記(4)
式に示す近似式を得ることができる。 ρ 4.2K ≒ ρ (chem) + ρ (phys) ... (3) In this case [rho (room temperature) because »ρ is 4.2 K, the following (4)
An approximate expression shown in Expression can be obtained.
RRR≒[ρ(室温)−ρ4.2K]/ρ4.2K ≒ρ(therm)/[ρ(chem)+ρ(phys)] …(4) 従って、温度が一定の場合、残留抵抗比は化学的不純物
による抵抗ρ(chem)と、物理的欠陥による抵抗ρ(ph
ys)との和に対して反比例関係にある。そこで、結晶粒
界等の物理的な欠陥を焼鈍により消失させると、物理的
欠陥による抵抗ρ(phys)が近似的に0になる。これに
より、RRRは主として化学的不純物による抵抗ρ(phe
m)により決まり、化学的な不純物量と良く反応して、
その明確な指標となる。RRR ≒ [ρ (RT) -ρ 4.2K] / ρ 4.2K ≒ ρ (therm) / [ρ (chem) + ρ (phys)] ... (4) Therefore, when the temperature is constant, the residual resistance ratio of the chemical Resistance due to impurities ρ (chem) and resistance due to physical defects ρ (ph
ys) and is inversely proportional to the sum. Therefore, when physical defects such as crystal grain boundaries are eliminated by annealing, the resistance ρ (phys) due to the physical defects becomes approximately zero. As a result, the RRR has a resistance ρ (phe
m), reacts well with the amount of chemical impurities,
It will be a clear indicator.
従って、種々の純度の銅について、その純度を従来の他
の方法で測定し、その銅のRRRを測定して前記純度と前
記RRRとの間の検量線を作成しておき、純度未知の評価
対象の銅についてのRRRを測定することにより、前記検
量線を使用してその評価対象の銅の純度を把握すること
ができる。しかしながら、市販されている4ナイン−OF
C(純度が99.99重量%以上の無酸素銅)のRRRは100乃至
200と低いので、不純物量の差がRRRの差となって現われ
にくく、しかもRRRと不純物量との間にバラツキが大き
く、両者の相関性が悪いため、検量線を作成することが
できない。Therefore, for copper of various purities, the purity is measured by other conventional methods, and the RRR of the copper is measured to prepare a calibration curve between the purities and the RRRs, and the purity is unknown. By measuring the RRR of the target copper, it is possible to grasp the purity of the target copper by using the calibration curve. However, 4 nine-OF that is commercially available
RRR of C (purity of 99.99% by weight or more oxygen-free copper) is 100 to
Since it is as low as 200, the difference in the amount of impurities is unlikely to appear as a difference in RRR, and there is a large variation between the RRR and the amount of impurities, and the correlation between the two is poor, so a calibration curve cannot be created.
しかしながら、純度が5ナイン以上の高純度銅について
は、そのRRRが大きく、しかもRRRと純度との間の相関性
が高いため、両者の検量線を作成しておけば、純度未知
の銅についてRRRから高精度で純度を把握することがで
きる。このように、本発明によれば、純度が5ナイン以
上の高純度銅について、不純物量を化学的又は物理的に
直接分析することなく、極めて迅速に且つ高精度で純度
を把握することができる。However, for high-purity copper with a purity of 5 nines or more, the RRR is large and the correlation between RRR and purity is high. Therefore, if a calibration curve for both is prepared, RRR will be obtained for copper of unknown purity. Therefore, the purity can be grasped with high accuracy. As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to grasp the purity of high-purity copper having a purity of 5 nines or more extremely quickly and highly accurately without directly analyzing the amount of impurities chemically or physically. .
[実施例] 次に、本発明の実施例について添付の図面を参照し、そ
の比較例と比較して説明する。Example Next, an example of the present invention will be described in comparison with a comparative example with reference to the accompanying drawings.
先ず、4品種の市販電解銅板を夫々溶解し、伸線加工を
施して線径が1.5mmのワイヤを製作した。この各ワイヤ
を比較例1乃至6とした。First, four types of commercially available electrolytic copper plates were melted, respectively, and subjected to wire drawing to manufacture a wire having a wire diameter of 1.5 mm. The respective wires were designated as Comparative Examples 1 to 6.
次に、比較例4の製作に使用した鋼板と同品種の銅板を
出発原料とし、この出発原料に対して、再電解精製及び
帯溶融精製を単独で又は組み合わせて実施し、更にこれ
を繰り返し実施することにより、8種類の高純度銅を製
造した。Next, a copper plate of the same type as the steel plate used in the production of Comparative Example 4 was used as a starting material, and re-electrolytic refining and zone melting refining were performed on the starting material alone or in combination, and this was repeated. By doing so, eight types of high-purity copper were manufactured.
そして、これらの各高純度銅を伸線加工して直径が1.5m
mのワイヤを製作した。これらの純度が異なる高純度ワ
イヤを夫々実施例1乃至8とした。And each of these high-purity copper is drawn to have a diameter of 1.5m.
I made m wires. High-purity wires having different purities were set as Examples 1 to 8, respectively.
上述した実施例1乃至8及び比較例1乃至6の各ワイヤ
についてGDMS分析を行った。GDMS analysis was performed on each of the wires of Examples 1 to 8 and Comparative Examples 1 to 6 described above.
また、各ワイヤを真空度が10− 5Torrの真空雰囲気下で
500℃に6時間加熱して焼鈍処理した。その後、4端子
法により、液体ヘリウム温度における電気抵抗
(ρ4.2K)及び常温での電気抵抗(ρ2 9 8 K)を測定
した。これにより、実施例及び比較例の各ワイヤのRRR
(=ρ2 9 8 K/ρ4.2K)を求めた。Also, each wire vacuum of 10 - 5 Torr vacuum atmosphere in the
It was annealed by heating at 500 ° C. for 6 hours. After that, the electrical resistance at liquid helium temperature (ρ 4.2 K ) and the electrical resistance at room temperature (ρ 2 9 8 K ) were measured by the 4-terminal method. Thus, the RRR of each wire of the example and the comparative example
(= Ρ 2 9 8 K / ρ 4.2K ) was determined.
これらのRRRの測定結果をまとめて下記第1表に示す。
但し、表中のGDMS分析結果欄において、ブランク項目は
その元素を検出できなかったことを示す。また、第1図
は横軸にRRRをとり、縦軸に不純物の総量をとって、実
施例1乃至8及び比較例1乃至6に係るワイヤ中の残留
抵抗比RRRと不純物の総量との関係を示したグラフ図で
ある。The results of these RRR measurements are summarized in Table 1 below.
However, in the GDMS analysis result column in the table, blank items indicate that the element could not be detected. In addition, FIG. 1 shows the relationship between the residual resistance ratio RRR and the total amount of impurities in the wires according to Examples 1 to 8 and Comparative Examples 1 to 6, with the horizontal axis representing RRR and the vertical axis representing total amount of impurities. It is the graph figure which showed.
この第1表に示すように、比較例1乃至6の各ワイヤは
不純物の総量が10ppmを超えていて、純度が4ナイン以
下である。一方、実施例1乃至8の各ワイヤは不純物の
総量が10ppm以下であって、純度が5ナイン以上であ
る。As shown in Table 1, each wire of Comparative Examples 1 to 6 has a total amount of impurities exceeding 10 ppm and a purity of 4 nines or less. On the other hand, each wire of Examples 1 to 8 has a total amount of impurities of 10 ppm or less and a purity of 5 nines or more.
そして、第1図から明らかなように、RRRが400以上であ
り、不純物総量が10ppm以下の領域で、RRRと不純物総量
との間には極めて高い相関性が得られた。従って、5ナ
イン以上の高純度銅については、純度未知の高純度銅の
RRRを測定することにより、第1図に示す検量線からそ
の純度を評価することができる。一方、不純物総量が10
ppmを超える比較例1乃至6の場合はRRRが250以下であ
るため、RRRと純度との間には相関性が得られていな
い。 As is clear from FIG. 1, in the region where the RRR was 400 or more and the total impurity amount was 10 ppm or less, a very high correlation was obtained between the RRR and the total impurity amount. Therefore, for high purity copper with a purity of 5 nines or more,
By measuring the RRR, its purity can be evaluated from the calibration curve shown in FIG. On the other hand, the total amount of impurities is 10
In the case of Comparative Examples 1 to 6 in which the concentration exceeds ppm, the RRR is 250 or less, and thus the correlation between the RRR and the purity is not obtained.
なお、各実施例及び比較例の14個の試料を焼鈍し、RRR
を測定する迄の処理に約17.5時間を要した。これに対
し、GDMS分析法により前記14個の試料についてその不純
物総量を求めるために約112時間を要した。つまり、RRR
測定の場合は1試料当り約1.25時間で足りるのに対し、
GDMS分析の場合は、1試料当り約8時間を必要とした。
従って、本実施例によれば、従来のGDMS分析法によるよ
りも極めて短時間で銅の純度を測定することができる。
このため、測定に要するコストも低い。Incidentally, 14 samples of each Example and Comparative Example were annealed to obtain RRR.
It took about 17.5 hours to process the measurement. On the other hand, it took about 112 hours to obtain the total amount of impurities in the 14 samples by the GDMS analysis method. That is, RRR
In the case of measurement, it takes about 1.25 hours per sample,
GDMS analysis required about 8 hours per sample.
Therefore, according to this example, the purity of copper can be measured in an extremely short time as compared with the conventional GDMS analysis method.
Therefore, the cost required for measurement is low.
[発明の効果] 以上説明したように本発明によれば、純度が99.999重量
%以上の銅の純度とその残留抵抗比とが高い相関性を示
すことを利用して、残留抵抗比の測定により高純度銅の
純度評価を行うので、高精度で、迅速に且つ低コストで
高純度銅の純度を把握することができる。[Effects of the Invention] As described above, according to the present invention, by utilizing the fact that the purity of copper having a purity of 99.999% by weight or more and its residual resistance ratio show a high correlation, Since the purity of the high-purity copper is evaluated, the purity of the high-purity copper can be grasped with high accuracy, quickly and at low cost.
第1図は本発明の実施例及び比較例に係るワイヤ中の残
留抵抗比RRRと不純物総量との関係を示すグラフ図であ
る。FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship between the residual resistance ratio RRR and the total amount of impurities in the wires according to Examples and Comparative Examples of the present invention.
Claims (1)
の残留抵抗比を測定してこの残留抵抗比と前記純度との
間の検量線を予め作成しておき、純度評価対象の銅の残
留抵抗比を測定し、この測定結果に基いて前記検量線を
使用して前記銅の純度を評価することを特徴とする銅の
純度評価方法。1. A copper for which purity is to be evaluated by measuring a residual resistance ratio of known copper having a purity of 99.999% by weight or more and preparing a calibration curve between the residual resistance ratio and the purity in advance. Is measured, and the purity of the copper is evaluated by using the calibration curve based on the measurement result.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP15603389A JPH0663991B2 (en) | 1989-06-19 | 1989-06-19 | Copper purity evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP15603389A JPH0663991B2 (en) | 1989-06-19 | 1989-06-19 | Copper purity evaluation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH0320656A JPH0320656A (en) | 1991-01-29 |
| JPH0663991B2 true JPH0663991B2 (en) | 1994-08-22 |
Family
ID=15618849
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP15603389A Expired - Lifetime JPH0663991B2 (en) | 1989-06-19 | 1989-06-19 | Copper purity evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH0663991B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5152897B2 (en) * | 2006-11-21 | 2013-02-27 | タツタ電線株式会社 | Copper bonding wire |
| CN107741451A (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2018-02-27 | 江苏隆达超合金航材有限公司 | The assay method of trace impurity in a kind of pure rhenium |
| CN114325110B (en) * | 2021-12-30 | 2023-08-15 | 中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院 | A method for testing the residual resistivity of copper plating on composite materials |
-
1989
- 1989-06-19 JP JP15603389A patent/JPH0663991B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH0320656A (en) | 1991-01-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Garner et al. | Absolute isotopic abundance ratios and the atomic weight of a reference sample of potassium | |
| McNeil et al. | An experimental approach to examine fluid-melt interaction and mineralization in rare-metal pegmatites | |
| CN109239179A (en) | The measuring method of trace impurity in a kind of high purity aluminium oxide polycrystal material | |
| CN103278493A (en) | Method for analyzing and detecting thirty impurity elements in tantalum and tantalum-based compound | |
| US7755033B2 (en) | Method for analyzing minute amounts of Pd, Rh and Ru, and high frequency plasma mass spectroscope used for same | |
| JPH0663991B2 (en) | Copper purity evaluation method | |
| CN110412116B (en) | Method for testing content of sulfur element and application thereof | |
| Wilhartitz et al. | Classical analysis including trace-matrix separation versus solid state mass spectrometry: A comparative study for the analysis of high purity Mo, W and Cr | |
| CN119147349B (en) | Quality control sample for measuring impurity elements in silver and preparation method thereof | |
| Murray et al. | Preparation and characterization of pure metals | |
| Rayne | Heat Capacity of Palladium below 4.2° K | |
| CN117169319B (en) | Oxygen isotope measurement method | |
| Virag et al. | Multielement ultratrace analysis of molybdenum with high performance secondary ion mass spectrometry | |
| CN114577891B (en) | Determination method for scandium and niobium in dressing and smelting tailings | |
| Battagliarin et al. | An innovative sample preparation procedure for trace and ultra-trace analysis on non-conducting powders by direct current glow discharge mass spectrometry | |
| Guidoboni et al. | Glow discharge mass spectrometry—The newest tool for high purity materials analysis | |
| Held et al. | Determination of scandium in high-purity titanium using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and glow discharge mass spectrometry as part of its certification as a reference material | |
| CN115753277A (en) | Method for analyzing gold content in high-copper-content alloy gold | |
| Völkening et al. | Determination of heavy metal traces in metallic materials with IDMS: Part 1. Analysis of Cr, Ni, Zn, Cd, and Pb in pure copper | |
| JP4895481B2 (en) | Resistance thin film and sputtering target for forming the resistance thin film | |
| JP2006329687A (en) | Trace element analysis method in metal samples | |
| JP4042714B2 (en) | Metal resistor material, sputtering target and resistive thin film | |
| CN118777286A (en) | A method for determining the content of lead, antimony and bismuth in copper alloys by standard addition method | |
| SU1057825A1 (en) | Method of determination of impurity content in tin | |
| Swenters et al. | Analysis of tellurium by spark source mass spectrometry |