JPH069752B2 - Fatigue strength assurance method for independent rectangular tank welds of liquefied gas tankers - Google Patents
Fatigue strength assurance method for independent rectangular tank welds of liquefied gas tankersInfo
- Publication number
- JPH069752B2 JPH069752B2 JP11463490A JP11463490A JPH069752B2 JP H069752 B2 JPH069752 B2 JP H069752B2 JP 11463490 A JP11463490 A JP 11463490A JP 11463490 A JP11463490 A JP 11463490A JP H069752 B2 JPH069752 B2 JP H069752B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- toe
- stress
- welded
- joint
- fatigue strength
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 9
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 229910000838 Al alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 13
- 210000001503 joint Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 5
- XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Argon Chemical compound [Ar] XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052786 argon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000008602 contraction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009661 fatigue test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000001307 helium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052734 helium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium atom Chemical compound [He] SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000945 filler Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Arc Welding In General (AREA)
- Butt Welding And Welding Of Specific Article (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】 [産業上の利用分野] 本発明はLNG,LPGなどを積荷する液化ガスタンカ
ー内に設けられる独立方形タンク溶接部の疲労強度保証
方法に関するものである。TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a method for guaranteeing fatigue strength of an independent rectangular tank welded portion provided in a liquefied gas tanker for loading LNG, LPG and the like.
[従来の技術] 液化ガスタンカーは、第1図に示すように船殻1内に独
立方形タンク2がローリングチョック3及びサポート4
にて殻1内面と隙間をもって支持され、独立方形タンク
2内にLNG,LPGなどを積荷した際に低温による収
縮移動を許容できるようになっている。低温液体を収容
する独立方形タンク2は収縮時の変形応力に対して十分
な強度を有するような構造となっている。[Prior Art] A liquefied gas tanker includes a rolling chock 3 and a support 4 in which an independent rectangular tank 2 is provided in a hull 1 as shown in FIG.
Is supported by the inner surface of the shell 1 with a gap, and when the LNG, LPG, etc. are loaded in the independent rectangular tank 2, contraction movement due to low temperature can be allowed. The independent rectangular tank 2 containing the low temperature liquid has a structure having sufficient strength against the deformation stress at the time of contraction.
この独立方形タンク2はアルミニウム合金からなり例え
ば第2図に示すように、タンク2内にブラケットやリ
ブ、型材、スキンプレートなど多数のタンク部材5を骨
組し各タンク部材5の継目を溶接して構築している。と
ころでこの種の液化ガスタンカーでIMO Codeにお
けるTypeBに属するタンカーはIMO Codeによって
詳細な疲労強度解析を行なうことを義務づけられてい
る。このBタイプタンクの定義はタンクの安全性が正確
な解析と実験で確認され、一時にタンクの大破壊が生じ
ることのないタンクであり、そのため疲労解析、破壊解
析に重点がおかれている。独立方形タンクはその内部が
多数のタンク部材が溶接された骨付き構造で不静定次数
が高いので完全な解析は困難であったが、最近コンピュ
ータにより比較的簡単に解析できるようになっている。This independent rectangular tank 2 is made of an aluminum alloy, for example, as shown in FIG. 2, a large number of tank members 5 such as brackets, ribs, mold members and skin plates are framed in the tank 2 and the joints of the tank members 5 are welded together. I'm building. By the way, in this type of liquefied gas tanker, the tanker belonging to Type B in the IMO Code is obliged to perform a detailed fatigue strength analysis by the IMO Code. The definition of this B-type tank is a tank in which the safety of the tank has been confirmed by accurate analysis and experiments, and a major tank failure does not occur at one time. Therefore, emphasis is placed on fatigue analysis and failure analysis. An independent rectangular tank has a bone structure in which many tank members are welded and has a high static indeterminate order, so complete analysis has been difficult, but recently it has become relatively easy to analyze by computer. .
[発明が解決しようとする課題] しかしながら骨付き構造には必然的に隅肉溶接などが多
用されており、溶接形状が不規則なためこの溶接部につ
いては個々に疲労試験を行う必要がある。従来この溶接
部の疲労強度解析は部材に発生する公称応力を基礎に行
っており各溶接継手の種類毎に、応力が繰り返しかかっ
た場合に、疲労し破壊する回数とその応力との関係を示
したS−N曲線を実験により求めそれを基に公称応力に
対する溶接継手の耐疲労強度を求めている。しかしなが
ら部材の形状や継手形状、或いは溶接ビードの形状によ
り耐疲労強度が相違するため各種のS−N曲線を必要と
するので多くの試験が必要である。事実上、独立方形タ
ンクに表れるすべての継手を各々の試験で求めたS−N
曲線でカバーすることは不可能である。[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] However, fillet welding or the like is inevitably used in the structure with bones, and the welded shape is irregular, so that it is necessary to individually perform a fatigue test on the welded portions. Conventionally, the fatigue strength analysis of this weld is based on the nominal stress generated in the member, and shows the relationship between the number of times fatigue and fracture occur and the stress when stress is repeatedly applied for each type of welded joint. The SN curve is experimentally obtained, and the fatigue resistance strength of the welded joint to the nominal stress is obtained based on the SN curve. However, since various fatigue resistances differ depending on the shape of the member, the shape of the joint, or the shape of the weld bead, various SN curves are required, so many tests are required. Virtually all the joints appearing in the independent rectangular tank were tested by SN
It is impossible to cover with curves.
本発明者らは溶接継手部材の疲労強度は溶接部の継手形
状や冶金的特性、残留応力等の影響因子のうち、溶接継
手部材の疲労強度にもっとも影響を与えるのは、溶接継
手形状に起因する疲労亀裂発生部の応力集中係数、特に
溶接止端端部の応力集中係数であることを見い出し本発
明に至ったものである。Among the influential factors such as the joint shape and metallurgical characteristics of the welded portion and the residual stress, the fatigue strength of the welded joint member has the greatest effect on the fatigue strength of the welded joint member due to the welded joint shape. The present invention has been completed by finding out that the stress concentration factor at the fatigue crack occurrence portion, in particular, the stress concentration factor at the weld toe end portion.
本発明の目的は、上述した独立方形タンクの各種溶接継
手の疲労解析が容易に行え、しかも、各種タンク部材の
耐疲労設計が容易に行える液化ガスタンカーの独立方形
タンクの溶接部の疲労強度保証方法である。An object of the present invention is to ensure fatigue strength of welds of independent rectangular tanks of liquefied gas tankers that facilitates fatigue analysis of various welded joints of the above-mentioned independent rectangular tanks and facilitates fatigue resistance design of various tank members. Is the way.
[課題を解決するための手段及び作用] 多数のアルミ合金製のタンク部材から構成し、かつその
部材相互の継ぎ目を溶接した液化ガスタンカーの独立方
形タンク溶接継手部の疲労強度保証方法において、上記
部材相互の溶接継手部の板材に発生する公称応力に対し
て、溶接止端部での応力集中係数Ktをフランク角θと
止端半径ρおよびビード高さhの関数から求め、その応
力集中係数Ktより溶接止端部での局部応力を求めると
共にその局部応力を基にした疲労破壊曲線を作製し、そ
の疲労破壊曲線から各溶接継手部の許容局部応力を求め
ると共に応力集中係数Ktが所定値以下となるように上
記フランク角θと止端半径ρおよびビード高さhを制御
して溶接することを特徴とする液化ガスタンカーの独立
方形タンク溶接部の疲労強度保証方法にある。[Means and Actions for Solving the Problems] In the method for guaranteeing fatigue strength of an independent rectangular tank welded joint portion of a liquefied gas tanker that is composed of a large number of aluminum alloy tank members, and the joints of the members are welded, The stress concentration factor Kt at the weld toe is calculated from the functions of the flank angle θ, the toe radius ρ, and the bead height h with respect to the nominal stress generated in the plate material of the welded joint between the members, and the stress concentration factor is obtained. The local stress at the weld toe is obtained from Kt, and a fatigue fracture curve based on the local stress is prepared. From the fatigue fracture curve, the allowable local stress of each weld joint is obtained and the stress concentration coefficient Kt is a predetermined value. Fatigue strength assurance method for an independent rectangular tank weld of a liquefied gas tanker, characterized in that the flank angle θ, the toe radius ρ, and the bead height h are controlled to perform welding as follows. Located in.
以上により、溶接継手部は母材を含めた一本のS−N曲
線(疲労破壊曲線)ですべての溶接継手部の耐疲労強度
の保証が行える。As described above, in the welded joint portion, the fatigue resistance strength of all the welded joint portions can be guaranteed with one SN curve (fatigue fracture curve) including the base material.
[実施例] 以下本発明の好適一実施例を添付図面に基づいて説明す
る。[Embodiment] A preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
先ず、第3図の十字溶接継手を例に応力集中係数Ktを
説明する。First, the stress concentration coefficient Kt will be described by taking the cross welded joint of FIG. 3 as an example.
第3図において、6は縦板、7は横板で、その縦板6と
横板7に隅肉溶接8がされていたとする。この場合、溶
接8の余盛角(以下フランク角という)をθ、ビード高
さをh、溶接8の止端部9のヒード止端半径をρ、横板
7の板厚をtとする。In FIG. 3, 6 is a vertical plate, 7 is a horizontal plate, and fillet welding 8 is performed on the vertical plate 6 and the horizontal plate 7. In this case, the excess embankment angle (hereinafter referred to as the flank angle) of the weld 8 is θ, the bead height is h, the bead toe radius of the toe 9 of the weld 8 is ρ, and the plate thickness of the lateral plate 7 is t.
今横板7に公称応力σNがかかったとすると、その応力
分布は10で示すように、溶接の施されていない横板7
で公称応力σNのままであるが止端部9に近づくにつれ
て応力集中が起り、止端部9で略最大の局部応力σLが
作用する。従ってこの止端部9における集中係数をKt
とすると、Ktは下式で表される。Assuming that the lateral plate 7 is now subjected to the nominal stress σ N , the stress distribution is 10 as shown in FIG.
Although the nominal stress σ N remains the same, stress concentration occurs as it approaches the toe portion 9, and a substantially maximum local stress σ L acts at the toe portion 9. Therefore, the concentration factor at the toe 9 is set to Kt.
Then, Kt is represented by the following equation.
また、このKtは、上述したフランク角θ、止端半径
ρ、ビードの高さhの関数で下式で表される。 Further, this Kt is a function of the above-described flank angle θ, toe radius ρ, and bead height h, and is represented by the following equation.
Kt=〔1+f(θ){g(ρ)−1}〕C(a/t) ………(2) ここで、f(θ)はフランク角の影響、g(ρ)は溶接
止端半径の影響、C(a/t)は未溶着部の存在の影響
による関数であり夫々下式で表される。 Kt = [1 + f (θ) {g (ρ) −1}] C (a / t)… (2) where f (θ) is the influence of flank angle and g (ρ) is the weld toe. The influence of the radius, C (a / t), is a function due to the influence of the presence of the unwelded portion and is represented by the following equations, respectively.
フランク角; 止端半径; g(ρ)=αt・gt(ρ)+αb・gb(ρ) ……(4) ここでgt(ρ)は引張荷重の場合で次式で与えられ
る。Flank angle; Toe radius; g (ρ) = α t · g t (ρ) + α b · g b (ρ) (4) where gt (ρ) is given by the following equation in the case of tensile load.
ここでβtは溶接継手形状に応じて次の値をとる。十字
継手2.2、突合せ継手2.0、T継手1.0。 Here, βt takes the following values according to the weld joint shape. Cross joint 2.2, butt joint 2.0, T joint 1.0.
また、曲げ荷重の場合のgb(ρ)は継手形状とは無関
係に次式で与えられる。Further, gb (ρ) in the case of bending load is given by the following equation regardless of the joint shape.
ここでβbは溶接継手形状に応じて次の値をとる。突合
せ継手=1.5、T継手=1.9、その他の継手=1.
0。 Here, βb takes the following values according to the welded joint shape. Butt joint = 1.5, T joint = 1.9, other joints = 1.
0.
未溶着部; ここで(3),(5)式中のWは溶接継手形式により次のよう
に使い分ける。Unwelded part; Here, W in Eqs. (3) and (5) is used as follows depending on the weld joint type.
但し、(2)〜(8)式中、θはフランク角、ρは止端半径、
tは負荷する部材の板厚、tpは負荷を受けない部材の板
厚、hはビード高さ(脚長)、hpは溶接脚長、aは未
溶着部の長さ、αtは止端部での引張応力係数(引張荷
重の場合=1、曲げ荷重の場合=0)、αbは止端部で
の曲げ応力係数(曲げ荷重の場合=1、引張荷重の場合
=0)である。 However, in equations (2) to (8), θ is the flank angle, ρ is the toe radius,
t is the thickness of the member to be loaded, tp is the thickness of the member not to be loaded, h is the bead height (leg length), hp is the weld leg length, a is the length of the unwelded portion, and αt is the toe. The tensile stress coefficient (in the case of tensile load = 1, in the case of bending load = 0), αb is the bending stress coefficient at the toe (in the case of bending load = 1, in the case of tensile load = 0).
上記(2)〜(8)式から求められるKtとフランク角θ、止
端半径ρ及び高さhをパラメータに各種継手における応
力集中係数Ktをみた結果、フランク角θ及びビード高
さhによる影響は比較的小さく、主に止端半径ρの大き
さにより応力集中係数Ktが変化することが判った。こ
の結果をT字継手の場合と、十字継手の場合を例に第4
図、第5図に示す。As a result of looking at the stress concentration coefficient Kt in various joints with Kt and flank angle θ, toe radius ρ and height h obtained from the above formulas (2) to (8) as parameters, the effect of flank angle θ and bead height h Was relatively small, and it was found that the stress concentration coefficient Kt mainly changes depending on the size of the toe radius ρ. The result of the T-shaped joint and the case of the cross joint are taken as an example
Shown in FIG.
第4図はT字継手における止端半径/板厚と応力集中係
数との関係を示している。FIG. 4 shows the relationship between the toe radius / plate thickness and the stress concentration factor in the T-shaped joint.
この第4図のグラフにより板厚tが一定とすれば止端半
径ρが小さくなるほど応力集中係数Ktが上昇すること
が判る。止端半径ρが小さい場合においてクランク角θ
(100〜170゜)による応力集中係数の変化が大き
くなり、フランク角θが大きくなればその変化は少なく
なることが判る。It can be seen from the graph of FIG. 4 that the stress concentration coefficient Kt increases as the toe radius ρ decreases when the plate thickness t is constant. Crank angle θ when the toe radius ρ is small
It can be seen that the change in stress concentration factor due to (100 to 170 °) becomes large, and the change becomes smaller as the flank angle θ increases.
また第5図のグラフも同様、板厚tを一定とすれば止端
半径ρが小さければ応力集中係数が増加することが判
る。Similarly, in the graph of FIG. 5, it can be seen that if the plate thickness t is constant, the stress concentration factor increases if the toe radius ρ is small.
以上において、応力集中係数Ktを求めることにより、
上記(1)式より止端部9における局部応力σLが判る。
すなわち局部応力σLは下式より求まる。In the above, by obtaining the stress concentration coefficient Kt,
From the above equation (1), the local stress σ L at the toe 9 can be known.
That is, the local stress σ L is obtained by the following equation.
σL=Kt・σN 従って今、例えば第3図に示した十字継手部の横板7に
公称応力σNを破壊するまで繰り返し作用させた場合の
S−N曲線を作成する場合、公称応力σNでなく局部応
力σLにてS−N曲線を作図すれば、統一的なS−N線
図ができる。このS−N線図を第6図に示した。図にお
いて縦軸は応力範囲で止端部での曲応力σLを示し、そ
の各応力を繰り返しかけた場合に突合せ継手、十字継
手、T字継手が破壊した点をプロットしたもので、グラ
フを示した直線は試験個数中の生存確率を示したもので
ある。[sigma] L = Kt * [sigma] N Therefore, for example, when creating the SN curve when the nominal stress [sigma] N is repeatedly applied to the lateral plate 7 of the cross joint portion shown in FIG. If a SN curve is drawn with the local stress σ L instead of σ N , a unified SN diagram can be obtained. This SN diagram is shown in FIG. In the figure, the vertical axis represents the bending stress σ L at the toe within the stress range, and the points at which the butt joint, cross joint, and T-joint were broken when each stress was repeatedly applied were plotted. The straight line shown shows the survival probability in the number of tests.
このS−N曲線は局部応力σLをベースに作図してある
ため各継手部の疲労強度は容易に求めることが可能とな
る。Since this SN curve is drawn based on the local stress σ L , the fatigue strength of each joint can be easily obtained.
応力集中係数Ktは通常無制御に溶接を行えば広い範囲
に分布する。このため例えばKt値7.0の場合、止端
部にかかる局部応力σLは公称応力σNに対して7倍と
なり、大きくなって耐疲労強度が落ちる。従って耐疲労
強度を高くするためには板厚を大きく断面積を大きくし
て板にかかる全体の応力を小さく設計する必要がある。
すなわち継手部の溶接において、溶接を無制限に行え
ば、その溶接コストは低くなるが反面Kt値が大きくな
り易いため板厚の厚いものを使用しなければならずその
材料値が増加する。従って第9図に示すグラフのように
Kt値の増加に応じて材料費が増加し、反面Ktの増加
に応じて溶接コストが下がる関係となる。この場合Kt
が所定値以下、本例では3.0以下であればトータルコ
ストが低く押えることが可能となり、継手部の溶接が極
めて経済的に行うことができる。The stress concentration factor Kt is normally distributed over a wide range when welding is performed uncontrollably. Therefore, for example, when the Kt value is 7.0, the local stress σ L applied to the toe portion becomes 7 times as large as the nominal stress σ N , and the fatigue strength decreases as the stress increases. Therefore, in order to increase the fatigue strength, it is necessary to design the plate thickness to be large and the cross-sectional area to be large to reduce the total stress applied to the plate.
That is, in the welding of the joint portion, if the welding is carried out indefinitely, the welding cost will be low, but on the other hand, the Kt value tends to be large, so that a thick plate must be used and the material value thereof increases. Therefore, as shown in the graph of FIG. 9, the material cost increases as the Kt value increases and the welding cost decreases as the Kt increases. In this case Kt
Is less than a predetermined value, in this example 3.0 or less, the total cost can be kept low, and the welding of the joint portion can be performed extremely economically.
本発明はこの止端部の応力集中係数を所定値以内、好ま
しくは3.0以内に押えながら各継手部を溶接するもの
である。The present invention welds each joint while holding the stress concentration factor at the toe within a predetermined value, preferably within 3.0.
しかしながら、溶接条件を制御してもKt値の分布は第
7図に示すような分布となる。第7図は同一条件のもと
でT字継手を溶接した場合のKt値の分布を示したもの
で各Kt値における頻度数を表わしている。従って応力
集中係数ktを3.0以内に押える場合第7図に示した
Kt値の分布中、Kt値の最大値(2.38)を3.0
以下となるよう制御する必要がある。However, even if the welding conditions are controlled, the distribution of Kt values becomes the distribution shown in FIG. FIG. 7 shows the distribution of Kt values when a T-joint is welded under the same conditions, and shows the frequency at each Kt value. Therefore, when the stress concentration factor kt is suppressed within 3.0, the maximum Kt value (2.38) in the distribution of Kt values shown in FIG. 7 is 3.0.
It is necessary to control it as follows.
第8図はKt値の分布曲線をKtの最大値から最小値ま
でを各Ktの値ごとに積分したグラフを示し、図中lは
無制御に溶接した場合のKt値の分布曲線を積分した線
を示し、曲線mは本発明により溶接を制御した場合の想
定曲線を示し、またnは無制御に溶接を行った場合の平
均Kt値を、oは制御した場合の平均Kt値を示してお
り、制御しない場合、線lのごとくKt値が最大から最
小値まで広い範囲に分布するが、制御を行うことにより
曲線mのようにKt値のmaxを3.0以内に押えること
ができる。FIG. 8 shows a graph obtained by integrating the distribution curve of the Kt value from the maximum value to the minimum value of Kt for each value of Kt. In the figure, 1 is the distribution curve of the Kt value in the case of uncontrolled welding. A line is shown, a curve m is an assumed curve when welding is controlled according to the present invention, n is an average Kt value when uncontrolled welding is performed, and o is an average Kt value when controlled. When the control is not performed, the Kt value is distributed in a wide range from the maximum value to the minimum value as shown by the line l, but the Kt value max can be suppressed within 3.0 as shown by the curve m by performing the control.
次に応力集中係数Ktを3.0以内に制御する溶接方法
を説明する。第10図はT字形継手部を溶接する例を示
したもので図において、11は下板、12は立板で、そ
の下板11と立板12との継目13をトーチノズル14
でMIG溶接する場合を示している。この場合、トーチ
ノズル14の先端の電極15のネライ位置を継目13に
向け、かつそのトーチ角度θtを一定値(例えば45
゜)に保つ。この状態からトーチノズル14を左右にオ
シレートさせる。このオシレート幅は立板12と下板1
1の板厚に応じて十分な溶接強度が得られるような振幅
(通常±4mm)とする。Next, a welding method for controlling the stress concentration coefficient Kt within 3.0 will be described. FIG. 10 shows an example in which a T-shaped joint is welded. In the figure, 11 is a lower plate, 12 is a standing plate, and the joint 13 between the lower plate 11 and the standing plate 12 is a torch nozzle 14.
Shows the case of MIG welding. In this case, the Nerai position of the electrode 15 at the tip of the torch nozzle 14 is directed to the seam 13, and the torch angle θt is set to a constant value (for example, 45).
゜) keep it. From this state, the torch nozzle 14 is oscillated to the left and right. This oscillating width is the vertical plate 12 and the lower plate 1
The amplitude (usually ± 4 mm) is set so that sufficient welding strength can be obtained according to the plate thickness of 1.
通常MIG溶接におけるオシレート数は70〜80回/
分であるが、このオシレート数では応力集中係数を制御
することができない。本発明はオシレート数を150〜
250回/分で行うことにより止端部の応力集中係数K
tを3.0以下に制御することを可能にしたものであ
る。この場合オシレート数が多くなることにより止端部
での止端半径ρを大きくすることが可能となり、例えば
止端半径ρを1.0mm以上とすることが可能となる。The number of oscillations in normal MIG welding is 70-80 times /
However, the stress concentration factor cannot be controlled with this number of oscillating materials. The present invention has an oscillating number of 150 to
The stress concentration factor K of the toe part is increased by performing 250 times / min.
This makes it possible to control t to be 3.0 or less. In this case, as the number of oscillates increases, the toe radius ρ at the toe portion can be increased, and for example, the toe radius ρ can be 1.0 mm or more.
また、オシレート数を制御する代りにトーチノズル14
からのアルゴンのシールドガス中にヘリウムガスを50
%以上混合することでも応力集中係数Ktを3.0以下
にすることができる。すなわち、ヘリウムガスはアルゴ
ンガスより熱伝導率が高く、そのため溶加材の溶け込み
がよくなり、Kt値を低くすることが可能となる。Also, instead of controlling the number of oscillates, the torch nozzle 14
50 helium gas in the argon shielding gas from
The stress concentration coefficient Kt can also be set to 3.0 or less by mixing at least%. That is, helium gas has a higher thermal conductivity than argon gas, so that the penetration of the filler material is improved and the Kt value can be lowered.
この溶接はすべて自動溶接材により行い、第1図、第2
図に示した独立方形タンク2内のタンク部材5の相互の
継目をその溶接止端部の応力集中係数3.0以下で溶接
することが可能となる。従って各タンク部材5はKt値
が3.0以下に押えることができるため、その板厚応力
に見合った経済的な板厚とし、かつその疲労強度も充分
なものとすることができる。All of this welding is performed using automatic welding materials, and
It becomes possible to weld the mutual joints of the tank members 5 in the independent rectangular tank 2 shown in the figure with a stress concentration factor of 3.0 or less at the weld toe. Therefore, since the Kt value of each tank member 5 can be suppressed to 3.0 or less, the plate thickness can be economically matched with the plate thickness stress, and the fatigue strength can be sufficient.
[発明の効果] 以上、詳述してきたことから明らかなように本発明によ
れば次のごとき効果を発揮する。[Effects of the Invention] As is clear from the above description, according to the present invention, the following effects are exhibited.
(1) 応力集中率Ktは計算によって求めることができ
S−N曲線は一本でよいので、各継手部の疲労試験を大
幅に簡略化できる。(1) Since the stress concentration rate Kt can be obtained by calculation and only one SN curve is required, the fatigue test of each joint can be greatly simplified.
(2) 応力集中係数Ktは実際の構造物の溶接形状を測
定することで、その値を確認することができ、実際に仕
上った構造物の疲労強度に対する信頼性が高い疲労強度
保証が行える。(2) The stress concentration factor Kt can be confirmed by measuring the actual welded shape of the structure, and the fatigue strength guarantee with high reliability against the fatigue strength of the actually finished structure can be performed.
(3) 応力集中係数Ktは測定によって統計的に把握で
きるので真の意味での信頼性解析が可能となる。(3) Since the stress concentration factor Kt can be statistically grasped by measurement, it is possible to perform a true reliability analysis.
第1図は本発明に係る液化ガスタンカーの独立方形タン
クを示す断面図、第2図は独立方形タンクを示す斜視
図、第3図は本発明に係る液化ガスタンカー独立方形タ
ンク溶接部の疲労強度保証方法における止端部の応力集
中係数を説明するための十字継手の断面図、第4図は本
発明でのT字継手部における止端半径と応力集中係数の
関係を示すグラフ、第5図は本発明での十字継手部にお
ける止端半径と応力集中係数の関係を示すグラフ、第6
図は本発明におけるS−N曲線を示すグラフ、第7図は
本発明における応力集中係数の分布を示すグラフ、第8
図は本発明における応力集中係数の分布を積分した場合
のグラフ、第9図は応力集中係数とコストの関係を示す
グラフ、第10図は本発明に係る液化ガスタンカーの独
立方形タンク溶接部の疲労強度保証方法において各継手
部を溶接する例を示す斜視図である。 図中、2は独立方形タンク、3,5はタンク部材であ
る。1 is a sectional view showing an independent rectangular tank of a liquefied gas tanker according to the present invention, FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing an independent rectangular tank, and FIG. 3 is fatigue of a liquefied gas tanker independent rectangular tank welded portion according to the present invention. Sectional drawing of the cross joint for explaining the stress concentration factor of a toe part in a strength guarantee method, FIG. 4 is a graph which shows the relationship between a toe radius and a stress concentration factor in a T-shaped joint part in this invention, 5th FIG. 6 is a graph showing the relationship between the toe radius and the stress concentration factor in the cross joint portion according to the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a graph showing an S-N curve in the present invention, FIG. 7 is a graph showing a distribution of stress concentration factors in the present invention, and FIG.
FIG. 10 is a graph in the case of integrating the distribution of stress concentration factors according to the present invention, FIG. 9 is a graph showing the relationship between stress concentration factors and costs, and FIG. 10 is an independent rectangular tank weld of a liquefied gas tanker according to the present invention. It is a perspective view which shows the example which welds each joint part in a fatigue strength guarantee method. In the figure, 2 is an independent rectangular tank, and 3 and 5 are tank members.
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 北川 正樹 東京都江東区豊洲3丁目1番15号 石川島 播磨重工業株式会社技術研究所内 (72)発明者 蓑田 和之 神奈川県横浜市磯子区新中原町1番地 石 川島播磨重工業株式会社技術研究所内 (72)発明者 入澤 敏夫 神奈川県横浜市磯子区新中原町1番地 石 川島播磨重工業株式会社技術研究所内 (72)発明者 後川 理 神奈川県横浜市磯子区新中原町1番地 石 川島播磨重工業株式会社技術研究所内 (72)発明者 天野 秀信 広島県呉市昭和町2番1号 石川島播磨重 工業株式会社呉第一工場内 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (72) Masaki Kitagawa Masaki Kitagawa 3-1-15-1 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries Ltd. Technical Research Institute (72) Inventor Kazuyuki Shimoda Shin-Nakahara-cho, Isogo-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture No. 1 Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. Technical Research Institute (72) Inventor Toshio Irisawa No. 1 Shin-Nakahara-cho, Isogo-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. Technical Research Institute (72) Inventor Gogawa Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Hidenobu Amano 2-1, Showa-cho, Kure-shi, Hiroshima Prefecture Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.
Claims (1)
し、かつその部材相互の継ぎ目を溶接した液化ガスタン
カーの独立方形タンク溶接継手部の疲労強度保証方法に
おいて、上記部材相互の溶接継手部の板材に発生する公
称応力に対して、溶接止端部での応力集中係数Ktをフ
ランク角θと止端半径ρおよびビード高さhの関数から
求め、その応力集中係数Ktより溶接止端部での局部応
力を求めると共にその局部応力を基にした疲労破壊曲線
を作製し、その疲労破壊曲線から各溶接継手部の許容局
部応力を求めると共に応力集中係数Ktが所定値以下と
なるように上記フランク角θと止端半径ρおよびビード
高さhを制御して溶接することを特徴とする液化ガスタ
ンカーの独立方形タンク溶接部の疲労強度保証方法。1. A method for guaranteeing fatigue strength of an independent rectangular tank welded joint of a liquefied gas tanker, which comprises a number of aluminum alloy tank members and welds the joints between the members, wherein the welded joints of the members are mutually joined. The stress concentration factor Kt at the weld toe is determined from the function of the flank angle θ, the toe radius ρ, and the bead height h with respect to the nominal stress generated in the plate to be welded toe from the weld toe. In addition to obtaining the local stress in the above, a fatigue fracture curve based on the local stress is prepared, and the allowable local stress of each welded joint is obtained from the fatigue fracture curve, and the stress concentration coefficient Kt is set to a predetermined value or less. A method for guaranteeing fatigue strength of an independent rectangular tank welded part of a liquefied gas tanker, which comprises welding by controlling a flank angle θ, a toe radius ρ, and a bead height h.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP11463490A JPH069752B2 (en) | 1990-04-27 | 1990-04-27 | Fatigue strength assurance method for independent rectangular tank welds of liquefied gas tankers |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP11463490A JPH069752B2 (en) | 1990-04-27 | 1990-04-27 | Fatigue strength assurance method for independent rectangular tank welds of liquefied gas tankers |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP19103783A Division JPS6082495A (en) | 1983-10-14 | 1983-10-14 | Independent square tank for liquefied gas tanker |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH03207595A JPH03207595A (en) | 1991-09-10 |
| JPH069752B2 true JPH069752B2 (en) | 1994-02-09 |
Family
ID=14642741
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP11463490A Expired - Lifetime JPH069752B2 (en) | 1990-04-27 | 1990-04-27 | Fatigue strength assurance method for independent rectangular tank welds of liquefied gas tankers |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH069752B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR101657955B1 (en) | 2007-04-26 | 2016-09-20 | 엑손모빌 업스트림 리서치 캄파니 | Independent corrugated lng tank |
-
1990
- 1990-04-27 JP JP11463490A patent/JPH069752B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH03207595A (en) | 1991-09-10 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5233149A (en) | Reprocessing weld and method | |
| US4916281A (en) | Gas back-purging during welding of pipe | |
| Thomas | Analyzing the failure of welded steel components in construction systems | |
| CZ9904554A3 (en) | Cryogenic welds exhibiting ultra high strength | |
| Campagnolo et al. | Fatigue strength assessment of as-welded and HFMI treated welded joints according to structural and local approaches | |
| JPH069752B2 (en) | Fatigue strength assurance method for independent rectangular tank welds of liquefied gas tankers | |
| JPH0333557B2 (en) | ||
| Song et al. | Comprehensive fatigue assessment for different types of aluminum fillet welded joints by local approaches | |
| JPS6084496A (en) | Independent rectangular tank of liquefied gas tanker | |
| JPS6083784A (en) | Welding method for welded joints | |
| JPH0957477A (en) | Laser welding method of aluminum or aluminum alloy material | |
| JP6973159B2 (en) | Welding repair method and container | |
| GAMBRELL et al. | Use of photostress and strain gages to analyze behavior of weldments and use of photostress and strain gages to analyze behavior of an aft skirt test specimen(Semiannual Report, 26 Dec. 1992- 26 Jul. 1993) | |
| Stewart et al. | Fractography of Weldments | |
| US5435206A (en) | Method of testing welding filler materials | |
| Wohlfahrt et al. | Possibilities for the improvement of the fatigue strength of butt welded joints of high strength structural steels | |
| JPS5951388B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing welded joints with non-welded parts | |
| JPH069740Y2 (en) | Difficult-to-weld metal container | |
| Grigor'yants et al. | Raising the Quality of Welded Construction Made by Laser Welding.(Retroactive Coverage) | |
| JP3037530B2 (en) | Prevention method of breakage of root toe end of Uranami bead in multi-groove groove welding | |
| JPS5825893A (en) | Production of thin walled can body of aluminum or aluminum alloy | |
| JPH0633256Y2 (en) | Stays for jackets of hard-to-weld metal containers | |
| Zinke et al. | Properties of welded joints of new nickel-based high-temperature alloys | |
| Dickerson | Quality control in aluminum arc welding | |
| JPH0519084U (en) | End structure of hull members |