Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH07108387B2 - Rotary separator for crusher - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH07108387B2 - Rotary separator for crusher - Google Patents

Rotary separator for crusher

Info

Publication number
JPH07108387B2
JPH07108387B2 JP63087227A JP8722788A JPH07108387B2 JP H07108387 B2 JPH07108387 B2 JP H07108387B2 JP 63087227 A JP63087227 A JP 63087227A JP 8722788 A JP8722788 A JP 8722788A JP H07108387 B2 JPH07108387 B2 JP H07108387B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
blade
flange
reinforcing ring
strength
rotary separator
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP63087227A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH01262973A (en
Inventor
英則 坂本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=13908984&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=JPH07108387(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd filed Critical Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority to JP63087227A priority Critical patent/JPH07108387B2/en
Priority to DE1989601995 priority patent/DE68901995T2/en
Priority to EP19890105831 priority patent/EP0337238B1/en
Publication of JPH01262973A publication Critical patent/JPH01262973A/en
Publication of JPH07108387B2 publication Critical patent/JPH07108387B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02CCRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C23/00Auxiliary methods or auxiliary devices or accessories specially adapted for crushing or disintegrating not provided for in preceding groups or not specially adapted to apparatus covered by a single preceding group
    • B02C23/18Adding fluid, other than for crushing or disintegrating by fluid energy
    • B02C23/24Passing gas through crushing or disintegrating zone
    • B02C23/32Passing gas through crushing or disintegrating zone with return of oversize material to crushing or disintegrating zone
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07BSEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
    • B07B7/00Selective separation of solid materials carried by, or dispersed in, gas currents
    • B07B7/08Selective separation of solid materials carried by, or dispersed in, gas currents using centrifugal force
    • B07B7/083Selective separation of solid materials carried by, or dispersed in, gas currents using centrifugal force generated by rotating vanes, discs, drums, or brushes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02CCRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C15/00Disintegrating by milling members in the form of rollers or balls co-operating with rings or discs
    • B02C2015/002Disintegrating by milling members in the form of rollers or balls co-operating with rings or discs combined with a classifier

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Combined Means For Separation Of Solids (AREA)
  • Disintegrating Or Milling (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は高微粉度石炭粉砕機その他の粉砕機のロータリ
ーセパレータに関する。
TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a rotary separator of a high fineness coal pulverizer and other pulverizers.

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

第4図はロータリーセパレータを備えた石炭粉砕機の縦
断面図で、第5図は第4図から取り出した従来のロータ
リーセパレータである。図に示すようにロータリーセパ
レータは多数のブレードが、回転中心廻りに囲設されて
おり、その回転によって生じる遠心力とそれに伴う気流
によって、バウルと粉砕ロールとによって粉砕された粉
体の粒度を分級する。ブレードは剛性を増す目的で、第
5図ないし第7図に示すようにアングル材等が用いられ
ている。或は図示を省略したアイ型材も用いられる。
FIG. 4 is a vertical sectional view of a coal crusher equipped with a rotary separator, and FIG. 5 is a conventional rotary separator taken out from FIG. As shown in the figure, the rotary separator has a large number of blades that are surrounded around the center of rotation, and the centrifugal force generated by the rotation and the accompanying airflow classify the particle size of the powder pulverized by the baul and pulverizing rolls. To do. An angle member or the like is used for the blade as shown in FIGS. 5 to 7 for the purpose of increasing rigidity. Alternatively, an eye-shaped material (not shown) may also be used.

〔発明が解決しようとする課題〕[Problems to be Solved by the Invention]

上記従来のロータリーセパレータには解決すべき次の課
題があった。
The conventional rotary separator has the following problems to be solved.

(1).ブレードの型材のフランジの広い幅がブレード
間の風の通過面積を狭め、微粉流の流れを阻害する。
(1). The wide width of the flange of the blade material narrows the air passage area between the blades and impedes the flow of fine powder.

(2).微粉流がフランジに衝突することによってブレ
ードに異常摩耗が生じ、性能の経時劣化を生じる。
(2). The impingement of the blade by the flow of fine powder on the flange causes abnormal deterioration of the performance.

(3).(2)と同様な理由によって強度が低下する。(3). The strength decreases for the same reason as (2).

〔課題を解決するための手段〕[Means for Solving the Problems]

本発明は上記課題の解決手段として、ほゞ鉛直な回転中
心の廻りに所要の半径を経てゝ、上端,下端を支持され
た多数のブレードが上下の方向に囲設された粉砕機のロ
ータリーセパレータにおいて、上記ブレードを上端,下
端間の少なくともほぼ中央部で回転中心の廻りに貫通連
結する断面が略円形の環体を具備してなることを特徴と
する粉砕機用ロータリーセパレータを提供しようとする
ものである。
As a solution to the above problems, the present invention provides a rotary separator of a crusher in which a large number of blades, whose upper and lower ends are supported, are vertically surrounded by a required radius around a vertical rotation center. In order to provide a rotary separator for a crusher, which comprises a ring body having a substantially circular cross section for penetrating and connecting the blade around an axis of rotation at least at a substantially central portion between the upper end and the lower end. It is a thing.

〔作 用〕[Work]

本発明は上記のように構成されるので次の作用を有す
る。即ち、従来のロータリーセパレータでは回転遠心力
によりブレードは外方向に変形する。その変形はあたか
も両端支持梁が等分布に近い荷重を受けた場合の様相を
呈する。スパンが極端に短かくない通常の梁では中央近
傍での撓みは一般に大きく、断面に曲げによる大きな表
皮応力を発生させ、破壊に至りやすい。ところが、本発
明の構成では各ブレードを連結する環体を備えているの
で、その撓みは環体にフープテンションを生じさせる。
フープテンションは環体の軸方向の単純引張応力に置換
されるので、充分に大きくでき、ブレードの遠心力によ
る荷重の殆どを分担可能なため、ブレードはフランジな
どを必要とせず、ブレード相互の間隙を十分に大きくと
ることができる。
Since the present invention is configured as described above, it has the following effects. That is, in the conventional rotary separator, the blade is deformed outward by the centrifugal force of rotation. The deformation appears as if the support beams at both ends were subjected to a load with a near-uniform distribution. In a normal beam with an extremely short span, the deflection in the vicinity of the center is generally large, and a large skin stress due to bending in the cross section is generated, which easily leads to destruction. However, since the configuration of the present invention includes the ring body that connects the blades, the bending thereof causes hoop tension in the ring body.
Since the hoop tension is replaced by simple tensile stress in the axial direction of the annulus, it can be made sufficiently large, and most of the load due to the centrifugal force of the blade can be shared, so the blade does not require a flange, etc. Can be large enough.

また、環体は断面が略円形をなすので、いわゆる丸棒を
環状に成形することによって容易に得られ、かつ、その
貫通穴も円形のため、ドリル等によってきわめて簡単、
迅速に加工できる。
Further, since the ring body has a substantially circular cross section, it can be easily obtained by forming a so-called round bar into an annular shape, and since the through hole is also circular, it is extremely simple by a drill or the like.
Can be processed quickly.

〔実施例〕〔Example〕

本発明の一実施例について第1図及び第2図により説明
する。両図において、ブレード1はローター7から片持
状に架設された下部コーン5及び上部スポーク6の周端
に、ブレード下部取付板3及びブレード上部取付板4を
介してほゞ上下の向きにローター7を囲繞する形で取付
けられている。ブレード1自身は従来のようにフランジ
を持たず、ローター7に対し、半径方向に平板の面が沿
う姿勢で、短棚状をなしている。各ブレード1の中央部
には補強リング2が水平に貫通して相互を連結してい
る。なお、貫通部は適宜に溶接され、ブレード1と補強
リング2とが一体化されている。
An embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. In both figures, the blade 1 is mounted on the peripheral end of a lower cone 5 and an upper spoke 6 that are cantilevered from a rotor 7, and is placed in a generally vertical direction via a blade lower mounting plate 3 and a blade upper mounting plate 4. It is attached so as to surround 7. The blade 1 itself does not have a flange as in the conventional case, and has a short shelf shape in which the flat plate surface extends in the radial direction with respect to the rotor 7. A reinforcing ring 2 horizontally penetrates through the central portion of each blade 1 to connect them to each other. The penetrating portion is appropriately welded so that the blade 1 and the reinforcing ring 2 are integrated.

以上のような構成をなしているのでローター7が回転
し、ブレード1が遠心力によって外方に荷重を受け、そ
の腹部、即ち、中央近傍が撓もうとしても補強リング2
が、あたかもたがを嵌めたように拘束するのでブレード
1は殆ど撓みを生じることがない。即ち、遠心力に対す
る強度は補強リング2が大きく負担するので、ブレード
1は補強や剛性維持のためのフランジを必要とせず、単
なる平板体でようことになり、従って分級のための粉体
の通過する方法の各ブレード1相互間の開口面積は充分
に大きくなり、流れを阻むものが著減するので分級性能
が飛躍的に向上する。又、従来は先述の通りブレードが
フランジを有していたが、フランジは粉体の流れに対
し、概ね垂直な向きをなしているので、その流れ方向の
フランジの量はフランジの厚さに該当することゝなり、
飛来する粉体粒子が最初最も大きな運動エネルギ状態で
フランジと衝突し、擦過する部位はその短かい距離即ち
厚さ方向の端面が担うことゝなるので端面の損耗は激し
く、粉流がほゞ平行に通過してゆくウエブの部分に比
し、フランジは著しく早く経時変化する。これに対し、
本実施例ではブレード1はフランジを有せず、たとえば
アイ型材のウエブ部分のみに相当する平板があるのみで
あるから、経時変化は殆ど生じない。ここに経時変化と
は単に損耗による形状変化のみを差すのではなく、たと
えばアイ型材はその上下端のフランジのために、そのフ
ランジがない場合に比し、著しく大きな断面係数を有し
ていて、非常に大きな曲げ強度を保てるが、その強度の
依存するフランジが損耗すると強度は大幅に低下する。
アイ型材断面の中央近傍の損耗に比し、上下の最外端部
の損耗は強度劣化への利きが著しいのである。この例は
アングル材に対しても該当し、ウエブがフランジを失う
意味は大きい。従って最初からフランジを有せずに設計
されたブレードに較べ、フランジ効果を期待して設計さ
れたブレードのフランジの経時変化は強度上非常に深刻
な意味を持つのである。本実施例ではそのようなフラン
ジを有しないのみか、強度は補強リング2に期待してい
るのであるから、強度上の経時変化は事実上、絶無に近
い。なお、補強リング2は流れの中に垂直に置かれた丸
棒に相当し、流れの前後でその丸味が整流効果を有する
こと、損耗を早める突出部を有しないこと、断面積は充
分に大きくでき、かつ、強度への利きは断面積に比例す
ること等から、損耗そのものが殆ど生ぜず、生じても後
述の通り、有効強度に影響を与える懸命は皆無に近い。
Since the rotor 7 rotates due to the above-described configuration, the blade 1 receives an outward load due to the centrifugal force, and even if the abdomen thereof, that is, the vicinity of the center thereof is bent, the reinforcing ring 2
However, since the blade 1 is restrained as if it were fitted, the blade 1 hardly bends. That is, since the reinforcing ring 2 bears a great deal of strength against centrifugal force, the blade 1 does not need a flange for reinforcing and maintaining rigidity, and is simply a flat plate body. In the method described above, the opening area between the blades 1 becomes sufficiently large, and the number of objects that obstruct the flow is significantly reduced, so that the classification performance is dramatically improved. Further, conventionally, the blade had a flange as described above, but since the flange is oriented almost perpendicular to the powder flow, the amount of the flange in the flow direction corresponds to the thickness of the flange. What you do
The flying powder particles first collide with the flange in the state of the largest kinetic energy, and the part that is abraded is the short distance, that is, the end face in the thickness direction bears, so the wear of the end face is severe and the powder flow is almost parallel. The flange ages significantly faster than the portion of the web passing through. In contrast,
In this embodiment, the blade 1 does not have a flange, and only a flat plate corresponding to, for example, only the web portion of the eye-shaped material is provided, so that there is almost no change over time. Here, the change with time does not merely mean a change in shape due to wear, and for example, the eye-shaped material has flanges at the upper and lower ends thereof, and has a significantly large cross-section coefficient as compared with the case without the flange, A very large bending strength can be maintained, but if the flange on which the strength depends is worn out, the strength will decrease significantly.
Compared to the wear near the center of the cross section of the eye-shaped material, the wear of the upper and lower outermost ends has a significant effect on the strength deterioration. This example also applies to angle materials, and it is significant that the web loses the flange. Therefore, as compared with a blade designed without a flange from the beginning, the change over time of the flange of a blade designed with the flange effect has a very serious meaning in terms of strength. In this embodiment, since the reinforcing ring 2 is expected not to have such a flange or to have the strength, the temporal change in the strength is practically almost complete. The reinforcing ring 2 corresponds to a round bar placed vertically in the flow, its roundness has a straightening effect before and after the flow, it does not have a protrusion that accelerates wear, and its cross-sectional area is sufficiently large. Since the strength is proportional to the cross-sectional area and the like, the wear itself hardly occurs, and even if it occurs, as will be described later, there is almost no hard work that affects the effective strength.

次に分級性能についてみると、従来のフランジを有する
ブレードの経時変化、即ちフランジ端部の摩耗はブレー
ド相互間の粉体流の通過面積を広げるので、最初設定し
た分級性能を変化させる。従って、最良の分級性能を永
い間維持できず、高い頻度で回転その他の仕様変更を迫
られるが、本実施例ではフランジがなく、ブレード1相
互間の間隔は事実上、常に一定で、放射方向の多少の摩
耗は分級性能に殆ど影響を与えない。従って強度のみな
らず、分級性能の面からも信頼性の高い、優れたロータ
リーセパレータが得られる。因みに強度について付言す
れば次の通りである。第1図においてローター7と共に
ブレード1が回転すると、ブレード1はブレード下部取
付板3及びブレード上部取付板4に上下両端を支持さ
れ、中央近傍が遠心力で外方に膨らむ。図ではローター
7中心からブレード1迄の半径は上端が大きく、下端が
小さいので、ブレード1が一様断面積、即ち、一様質量
を上下方向に有していれば、上方にゆくに従って遠心力
は大きくなり、水平方向に一様分布荷重ではなくなる
が、簡単のためそれを無視すると、ブレード1は両端を
支持され、等分布荷重を受ける梁と見做すことができ
る。ローター7が回転すればブレード1は一定半径上を
一律に回転するので、各ブレード1の生じる遠心力はす
べて等値で、しかも相互間の隣接距離は比較的短かく、
かつ一定であるから、半径上に遠心力が一様分布してい
ると見做すことができる。今、ローター7中心から補強
リング2迄の半径をrとし、平面に見た場合の中心に対
する微小角dθ上に分布する遠心力をpとすればロータ
ー7中心を通って補強リング2を横断する2つの断面に
働く遠心力の綜合分力Tは 従って1つの断面に働く力T/2は となる。
Next, regarding the classification performance, the change over time of the blade having the conventional flange, that is, the wear of the flange end widens the passage area of the powder flow between the blades, so that the classification performance initially set is changed. Therefore, the best classification performance cannot be maintained for a long time, and rotation and other specification changes are frequently required, but in this embodiment, there is no flange, and the interval between the blades 1 is practically always constant, and the radial direction is constant. The slight wear of the material hardly affects the classification performance. Therefore, an excellent rotary separator having high reliability in terms of not only strength but also classification performance can be obtained. The strength is as follows. When the blade 1 rotates together with the rotor 7 in FIG. 1, the blade 1 is supported by the blade lower attachment plate 3 and the blade upper attachment plate 4 at both upper and lower ends, and the vicinity of the center bulges outward due to centrifugal force. In the figure, the radius from the center of the rotor 7 to the blade 1 is large at the upper end and small at the lower end. Therefore, if the blade 1 has a uniform cross-sectional area, that is, a uniform mass in the vertical direction, centrifugal force increases as it goes upward. Becomes large and is not a uniformly distributed load in the horizontal direction, but if it is ignored for simplicity, the blade 1 can be regarded as a beam having both ends supported and subjected to an evenly distributed load. When the rotor 7 rotates, the blades 1 uniformly rotate on a fixed radius, so that the centrifugal forces generated by the blades 1 are all equal, and the adjacent distance between them is relatively short.
And since it is constant, it can be considered that the centrifugal force is uniformly distributed on the radius. Now, if the radius from the center of the rotor 7 to the reinforcing ring 2 is r, and the centrifugal force distributed on the small angle dθ with respect to the center when viewed in a plane is p, the reinforcing ring 2 is traversed through the center of the rotor 7. The total centrifugal force T acting on the two cross sections is Therefore, the force T / 2 acting on one cross section is Becomes

このことはローター7の中心を通って補強リング2を横
断するすべての断面について成立つから、補強リング2
はその接線方向にprの引張りをあらゆる断面で受けてお
り、フープテンションを形成している。材質は引張られ
ると必ず相応して伸びを生じるので補強リング2も伸
び、回転停止時に比して半径も少し伸びる。この伸びは
当然にその部位におけるブレード1の撓みに等しいから
その量を撓みδとしてブレード1と補強リング2との関
係を模式的に取出したのが第3図(a)である。
This is true for all cross-sections that pass through the center of the rotor 7 and cross the reinforcement ring 2.
Receives the pull of pr in its tangential direction at every cross section, forming a hoop tension. When the material is pulled, it will always stretch accordingly, so that the reinforcing ring 2 also stretches and the radius slightly stretches compared to when the rotation is stopped. Since this elongation is naturally equal to the bending of the blade 1 at that portion, the amount of bending is taken as the bending δ, and the relationship between the blade 1 and the reinforcing ring 2 is schematically extracted in FIG. 3 (a).

図においてA及びBはブレード1の上下両端の支持点、
lはブレード1の長さ、bは幅である。支持点A及びB
に対して補強リング2も支持点として作用するので梁は
不静定となる。従って、回転による撓みδを求めること
は、補強リング2の遠心力も考慮しなければならず、厄
介なので、不静定梁にあっても、なお、撓み曲線が疑似
円と見做せる程度の小さい撓みδを与えてブレード1及
び補強リング2の撓み曲線から各々の歪を求め、初期応
力比を見ることゝする。第3図(a)において撓みδを
生じたときのブレード1の撓み曲線(疑似円)の曲げ半
径をR、補強リング2の半径をrとすれば、第3図
(b)より 今、ロータリーセパレータの中型クラスをモデルに選ぶ
とすると比較的、実体に近い数値として、lは800mm、
bは70mm程度であるから、これに仮りに撓みδは2mmを
生じさせた場合の曲げ半径Rは 他方、仮りに、ブレード1の材質に鋼を当てた場合、鋼
の弾性限度内における、同一歪による圧縮応力、引張応
力は概ね同じであるから、曲げによるブレード1の幅b
方向の中立軸は内端又は外端からのb/2の位置に生じ
る。従って、たとえばその外端の歪率εは、 相応する表皮応力(引張応力)をσ、鋼のヤング係数
をE(=21000Kg/mm2)とすると、 σ=E・ε =21000Kg/mm2×8.8×10-4 ≒18Kg/mm2 となる。
In the figure, A and B are support points at the upper and lower ends of the blade 1,
l is the length of the blade 1 and b is the width. Support points A and B
On the other hand, since the reinforcing ring 2 also acts as a supporting point, the beam is statically indeterminate. Therefore, to obtain the deflection δ due to rotation, it is necessary to consider the centrifugal force of the reinforcing ring 2, which is troublesome. Therefore, even in the case of a statically indeterminate beam, the deflection curve is still small enough to be regarded as a pseudo circle. By giving the deflection δ, the respective strains are obtained from the deflection curves of the blade 1 and the reinforcing ring 2, and the initial stress ratio is observed. If the bending radius (pseudo-circle) of the blade 1 when the bending δ occurs in FIG. 3 (a) is R and the radius of the reinforcing ring 2 is r, then from FIG. 3 (b). Now, when choosing a medium class rotary separator as a model, as a numerical value that is relatively close to the substance, l is 800 mm,
Since b is about 70 mm, the bending radius R is assumed to be 2 mm for the bending δ. On the other hand, if steel is applied to the material of the blade 1, the compressive stress and the tensile stress due to the same strain are almost the same within the elastic limit of the steel.
The neutral axis of the direction occurs at b / 2 from the inner or outer end. Therefore, for example, the strain rate ε t at the outer end is If the corresponding skin stress (tensile stress) is σ t and Young's modulus of steel is E (= 21000 Kg / mm 2 ), σ t = E · ε t = 21000 Kg / mm 2 × 8.8 × 10 -4 ≈18 Kg / mm It becomes 2 .

これに対し、補強リング2に生じる引張応力σは、補
強リング2の半径rを900mmとすると、 となり、補強リング2の応力割合mは となってブレード1に比し、格段に大きい。従って補強
リング2に対し、ブレード1は強度上からも、変形
(歪)上からも常に安全側にある。即ち、補強リング2
はブレード1の強度に大きく寄与していることが分る。
因みに、応力に面積を乗じたものが力であるから、補強
リング2に生じるフープテンション、即ち、先に求めた
T/2=prをδで割れば、補強リング2の断面積が求ま
る。断面積を充分に与えれば力は相応して大きくなるの
で、ブレード1の幅bの許す範囲で、補強リング2の直
径を決め、撓みδをどのような数値内に収めるかも任意
に選択できる。その際、補強リング2の強度にさへ着目
しておけばブレード1の破壊を懸念する必要は全くな
い。
On the other hand, the tensile stress σ r generated in the reinforcing ring 2 is, assuming that the radius r of the reinforcing ring 2 is 900 mm, And the stress ratio m of the reinforcing ring 2 is Is much larger than the blade 1. Therefore, the blade 1 is always on the safe side with respect to the reinforcing ring 2 in terms of strength and deformation (distortion). That is, the reinforcing ring 2
It can be seen that contributes significantly to the strength of the blade 1.
By the way, since the force is the stress multiplied by the area, the hoop tension generated in the reinforcing ring 2, that is, it was previously obtained.
The sectional area of the reinforcing ring 2 is obtained by dividing T / 2 = pr by δ r . Since the force is correspondingly increased if the cross-sectional area is sufficiently given, the diameter of the reinforcing ring 2 can be determined within the range allowed by the width b of the blade 1, and the value of the deflection δ can be arbitrarily selected. At that time, if attention is paid to the strength of the reinforcing ring 2, there is no need to worry about the breakage of the blade 1.

上記実施例では補強リング2はブレード1の中間に1本
用いたのみであるが、必要に応じて複数本が用いられて
もよい。又、ブレード1も平板状に限定されるものでは
ない。補強リング2とブレード1とは溶接したが、異音
やこすれ等の問題がなければ、補強リング2は単にブレ
ード1を貫通しているのみであってもよい。
Although only one reinforcing ring 2 is used in the middle of the blade 1 in the above embodiment, a plurality of reinforcing rings 2 may be used if necessary. Also, the blade 1 is not limited to the flat plate shape. Although the reinforcing ring 2 and the blade 1 are welded, the reinforcing ring 2 may simply penetrate the blade 1 as long as there is no problem such as abnormal noise or rubbing.

本実施例は上記の通り、ブレード1に平板を用い、それ
らの中間を補強リング2を貫通、連結するので、ブレー
ド1の相互間を粉体が通過しやすく、粉体の流れを横断
するフランジ等の突出物がないので、摩耗も起きにく
い。従って、分級性能の経時劣化が生ぜず、強度の経時
劣化も殆ど生じない。又、補強リング2はブレード1の
強度に大きく寄与し、かつ、ブレード1の回転時の変形
を抑制するので、ブレード1の厚さや形状の選択範囲が
著しく広がるという利点も併せ有する。
As described above, in the present embodiment, since the flat plate is used for the blade 1 and the reinforcing ring 2 is penetrated and connected in the middle thereof, the powder easily passes between the blades 1 and the flange that crosses the flow of the powder. Since there are no such protrusions, abrasion is unlikely to occur. Therefore, the classification performance is not deteriorated with time, and the strength is hardly deteriorated with time. Further, since the reinforcing ring 2 greatly contributes to the strength of the blade 1 and suppresses the deformation of the blade 1 during rotation, it has an advantage that the selection range of the thickness and the shape of the blade 1 is significantly widened.

〔発明の効果〕〔The invention's effect〕

本発明は上記のように構成されるので次の効果を有す
る。
Since the present invention is configured as described above, it has the following effects.

(1) 回転遠心力に対し、ブレード強度はその殆どを
環体が負担するので、ブレード破壊の懸念がなくなり、
ブレードの形状、長さ等の自由度が飛躍的に高まる。
(1) The blade bears most of the strength of the blade against the rotating centrifugal force, so there is no concern about blade breakage,
The degree of freedom in terms of blade shape and length is dramatically increased.

(2) ブレードにフランジを設ける必要がなくなるの
でブレード間の隙間が広くなり、粉体流れが阻害されな
くなり、分級性能が向上する。
(2) Since it is not necessary to provide a flange on the blade, the gap between the blades is widened, the powder flow is not obstructed, and the classification performance is improved.

(3) ブレードに摩耗しやすいフランジを必要としな
いので、ブレード相互間の隙間の経時変化がなく、従っ
て分級性能が長期に亘って高く維持される。
(3) Since the blade does not require a flange that easily wears, the gap between the blades does not change with time, and thus the classification performance is maintained high for a long period of time.

(4) ブレードに摩耗しやすいフランジを必要とせ
ず、かつ、強度はその殆どを経時変化しにくい環体に依
存するので経時による強度劣化が生じない。
(4) The blade does not require a flange that easily wears out, and most of the strength depends on the ring body, which does not easily change with time, so that strength does not deteriorate with time.

(5) 環体はいわゆる市販品の丸棒を曲げて容易に得
られ、対応するブレード側の貫通穴は、複数枚を重ねて
ドリル等できわめて簡単、能率的に加工できる。
(5) The ring is easily obtained by bending a so-called commercially available round bar, and the corresponding through holes on the blade side can be machined very easily and efficiently by stacking a plurality of blades.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

第1図は本発明の一実施例の図で、(a)は平面図(但
し、一部省略して示す)、(b)は側断面図、第2図は
第1図のブレード1、補強リング2及びブレード下部取
付板3の一部を取り出して示した拡大斜視図、第3図は
上記実施例のブレード1と補強リング2の強度を説明す
るための図で、(a)はその斜視図、(b)は曲げ曲線
(円弧)から曲げ半径を求めるための説明図、第4図は
従来例を兼ねた一般石炭粉砕機の模式的縦断面図、第5
図は第1図に対応して示した従来例のロータリーセパレ
ータの図、第6図は従来例の第5図(a)のVI囲いの部
分拡大図、第7図は第5図(b)のVII−VII矢視拡大図
である。 1……ブレード,2……補強リング(環体), 3……ブレード下部取付板, 4……ブレード上部取付板, 5……下部コーン,6……上部スポーク, 7……ローター。
FIG. 1 is a diagram of an embodiment of the present invention, (a) is a plan view (however, a part thereof is omitted), (b) is a side sectional view, and FIG. 2 is a blade 1 of FIG. An enlarged perspective view showing a part of the reinforcing ring 2 and the blade lower mounting plate 3 is shown, and FIG. 3 is a view for explaining the strength of the blade 1 and the reinforcing ring 2 of the above-mentioned embodiment, and (a) is its FIG. 4B is a perspective view, FIG. 4B is an explanatory view for obtaining a bending radius from a bending curve (arc), and FIG. 4 is a schematic vertical sectional view of a general coal crusher that also serves as a conventional example.
The figure is a view of a conventional rotary separator shown in correspondence with FIG. 1, FIG. 6 is a partially enlarged view of the VI enclosure of FIG. 5 (a) of the conventional example, and FIG. 7 is FIG. 5 (b). FIG. 7 is an enlarged view of the arrow VII-VII. 1 …… Blade, 2 …… Reinforcement ring (ring body), 3 …… Blade lower mounting plate, 4 …… Blade upper mounting plate, 5 …… Lower cone, 6 …… Upper spoke, 7 …… Rotor.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】ほぼ鉛直な回転中心の廻りに所要の半径を
隔てて、上端,下端を支持された多数のブレードが上下
の方向に囲設された粉砕機のロータリーセパレータにお
いて、上記ブレードを上端,下端間の少なくともほぼ中
央部で回転中心の廻りに貫通連結する断面が略円形の環
体を具備してなることを特徴とする粉砕機用ロータリー
セパレータ。
1. A rotary separator of a crusher in which a large number of blades whose upper and lower ends are supported at a predetermined radius around a vertical center of rotation are surrounded in the vertical direction. A rotary separator for a crusher, characterized in that it comprises a ring body having a substantially circular cross section, which is connected to penetrate around a rotation center at least at a substantially central portion between the lower ends.
JP63087227A 1988-04-11 1988-04-11 Rotary separator for crusher Expired - Lifetime JPH07108387B2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP63087227A JPH07108387B2 (en) 1988-04-11 1988-04-11 Rotary separator for crusher
DE1989601995 DE68901995T2 (en) 1988-04-11 1989-04-03 CRUSHER WITH ROTATING CUTTER.
EP19890105831 EP0337238B1 (en) 1988-04-11 1989-04-03 Rotary separator for use in pulverizer

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP63087227A JPH07108387B2 (en) 1988-04-11 1988-04-11 Rotary separator for crusher

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH01262973A JPH01262973A (en) 1989-10-19
JPH07108387B2 true JPH07108387B2 (en) 1995-11-22

Family

ID=13908984

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP63087227A Expired - Lifetime JPH07108387B2 (en) 1988-04-11 1988-04-11 Rotary separator for crusher

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0337238B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH07108387B2 (en)
DE (1) DE68901995T2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102016015051B4 (en) * 2016-12-16 2019-01-31 Hosokawa Alpine Aktiengesellschaft Classifying wheel for a centrifugal air classifier
CN111468243B (en) * 2020-04-07 2022-07-12 五冶集团上海有限公司 Hoisting method of vertical mill cone
JP7693365B2 (en) * 2021-03-31 2025-06-17 三菱重工業株式会社 Classifier, power generation plant, and method for operating the classifier
CN119140440B (en) * 2024-11-15 2025-03-18 成都工业学院 An adjustable air ring device for powder classifier

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6150678A (en) * 1984-08-18 1986-03-12 川崎重工業株式会社 Classifier and controller thereof
JPS62191082A (en) * 1986-02-15 1987-08-21 川崎重工業株式会社 classifier
ES2024560B3 (en) * 1987-03-24 1992-03-01 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd ROLLER MILL.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE68901995D1 (en) 1992-08-13
EP0337238A3 (en) 1990-06-27
EP0337238B1 (en) 1992-07-08
EP0337238A2 (en) 1989-10-18
JPH01262973A (en) 1989-10-19
DE68901995T2 (en) 1993-02-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7140569B2 (en) Forged hammermill hammer
CN102189014B (en) Star support used for gyratory crusher and gyratory crusher
US7011490B2 (en) Compressor in a multi-stage axial form of construction
US20100025511A1 (en) Hammermill Hammer
CN108348920B (en) Processing device, and processing element and wall protection element for such a processing device
US4343438A (en) Ring hammer
JP3224445B2 (en) Rotor blade structure in vertical impact crusher
CA2613956A1 (en) Hammermill hammer
JPH07108387B2 (en) Rotary separator for crusher
US7028936B2 (en) Wear bars for impellers
US3000579A (en) Impeller shoe
US12508595B2 (en) Roller crusher and a method for operating the same
US6061908A (en) Energy-efficient grinding rolls for coal pulverizers
DE202019006202U1 (en) Centrifugal classifier with special classifier wheel
JP7668005B2 (en) Disk-type crusher and crushing method
US7025294B2 (en) Hammermill with stub shaft rotor apparatus and method
EP0978317B1 (en) Air-swept crushing machine with rotary impact rotor
WO1992011090A1 (en) A pulverizing chamber of a counterjet pulverizer
CA1132117A (en) Pulverizer roller loading
JPS5927621B2 (en) Impact crusher
CN209917989U (en) Crusher hammer
JPH0621555Y2 (en) Hammer crusher rotor structure
JP2786000B2 (en) Rotary shaft support device
CA2096272A1 (en) Refiner plate segments
CS215574B1 (en) Hammer for hammer crusher

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081122

Year of fee payment: 13

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081122

Year of fee payment: 13