JPH071269B2 - Blast furnace coke strength estimation method - Google Patents
Blast furnace coke strength estimation methodInfo
- Publication number
- JPH071269B2 JPH071269B2 JP63058350A JP5835088A JPH071269B2 JP H071269 B2 JPH071269 B2 JP H071269B2 JP 63058350 A JP63058350 A JP 63058350A JP 5835088 A JP5835088 A JP 5835088A JP H071269 B2 JPH071269 B2 JP H071269B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- coke
- strength
- coal
- por
- blast furnace
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Coke Industry (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】 〈産業上の利用分野〉 本発明はコークス炉で石炭を乾留して製造する際の高炉
用コークスの強度の推定および管理方法に関するもので
ある。TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a method for estimating and controlling the strength of blast furnace coke when carbonizing and producing coal in a coke oven.
〈従来の技術〉 高炉用コークスの粉化性は高炉操業に多大の影響を与え
る。粉化性が上昇すると炉内の通気抵抗が増加し装入物
の棚つりやスリップなどの装入物降下異常を招き、高炉
操業に悪影響を及ぼす。従ってコークス製造部門ではコ
ークス粉化特性管理が重要な業務になっている。<Prior Art> The pulverization property of blast furnace coke has a great influence on the operation of the blast furnace. If the pulverization property is increased, the ventilation resistance in the furnace is increased, which leads to an abnormal drop of the charge such as shelf hanging or slip of the charge, which adversely affects the operation of the blast furnace. Therefore, coke dusting property management is an important task in the coke manufacturing department.
コークス粉化特性評価方法の代表的なものの中にタンブ
ラー試験があり、JISにも規定されている。例えば塊コ
ークスをタンブラー試験機内へ入れ、400回転させた後
の+6mm歩留をもってTI6 400と称し、コークスの対摩耗
性を表す指数として使用している。該指数は高炉通気抵
抗係数との対応関係がよく重要視されている。The tumbler test is one of the typical methods for evaluating coke dusting characteristics, and it is specified in JIS. For example, a mass of coke is put in a tumbler tester, and a +6 mm yield after 400 rotations is referred to as TI 6 400 , which is used as an index indicating coke abrasion resistance. Correspondence between the index and the blast furnace ventilation resistance coefficient is often emphasized.
しかしながら、従来からコークス製造部門で広く実施さ
れている石灰性状値を所定の範囲内で管理し、タンブラ
ー強度指数を予測するというやり方では、高精度の予測
・制御ができなかった。これは、たとえ同一配合におい
てもコークスの炉の炉操業条件が変動しているのが現状
であることからして当然である。However, the method of predicting the tumbler strength index by controlling the lime property value widely used in the coke manufacturing department within a predetermined range has not been able to perform highly accurate prediction / control. This is natural because the coke oven furnace operating conditions are changing even under the same composition.
このため従来よりタンブラー強度指数と操業条件の関係
について重回帰分析などを用いてその予測を試みようと
しているが、石炭性状因子,コークス炉構造因子および
コークス炉操業因子の各要因効果を分離できないため、
日常データの解析のみでは予測精度は著しく低かった。For this reason, it has been attempted to predict the relationship between the tumbler strength index and operating conditions by using multiple regression analysis, etc., but the effect of each factor of coal property factor, coke oven structure factor and coke oven operation factor cannot be separated. ,
Prediction accuracy was remarkably low only by analyzing daily data.
ところでタンブラー強度指数、例えばTI6 400の構成要素
が気孔率と気孔壁強度にあることは周知の通りである。
従って気孔率と気孔壁強度について、それぞれ石炭性状
因子,コークス炉構造因子およびコークス炉操業因子と
の関係を定量化することによてTI6 400の予測精度向上が
期待できる。その場合、気孔率の測定は問題ないが、気
孔壁強度についてはこれを精度よく測定する方法がな
い。例えばマイクロ強度試験という方法が存在するが、
この方法はコークスを1〜2mmに粉砕整粒して内在亀裂
を除去し、粒子の摩耗強度を測定しようとするものであ
る。しかしながら、タンブラー試験後の−6mmの粒度構
成(表1)をみるとわかるように0.25mm以下の粒子が50
〜60%にも及び、粒径0.25mmの場合、平均気孔壁厚は0.
1〜0.2mmオーダーであり、マイクロ強度試験の供試コー
クス粒径1〜2mmでは気孔が内蔵された形となり気孔率
の影響を完全に分離することができない。このため、マ
イクロ強度指数(MSI)を気孔壁強度指数に採用した場
合、例えば気孔率が上昇し、かつ気孔壁強度が増加する
場合、両者でMSI値の変化は相殺され、見掛上気孔壁強
度の増加が小さくなる。また気孔率が低下し、気孔壁強
度が増加する場合はMSI値は気孔率低下による増加分も
カウントされるため、見掛上気孔壁強度は大幅に増加す
ることになる。従って、コークスのタンブラー強度指数
TIの推定式のパラメータとしてMSI値を採用する限りで
は気孔率と気孔壁強度の効果を分離できないため高い精
度でTI6 400を推定することは出来ない。Meanwhile tumbler strength index, for example, the components of the TI 6 400 is in the porosity and pore wall strength are well known in the art.
Thus the porosity and pore wall thickness, respectively coal properties factors, the prediction accuracy of the TI 6 400 Te by the quantifying the relationship between the coke oven structure factor and coke oven operation factor can be expected. In that case, there is no problem in measuring the porosity, but there is no method for accurately measuring the porosity wall strength. For example, there is a method called micro strength test,
In this method, coke is crushed to a particle size of 1 to 2 mm to remove internal cracks, and the wear strength of particles is measured. However, as can be seen from the particle size composition of -6 mm after the tumbler test (Table 1), there are 50 particles of 0.25 mm or less.
When the particle size is 0.25 mm, the average pore wall thickness is 0.
It is on the order of 1 to 0.2 mm, and the test coke grain size of 1 to 2 mm in the micro strength test has a form in which pores are built in, and the influence of porosity cannot be completely separated. Therefore, when the micro strength index (MSI) is adopted as the pore wall strength index, for example, when the porosity increases and the pore wall strength increases, the change in MSI value is canceled by both, and the apparent pore wall The increase in strength is small. In addition, when the porosity decreases and the pore wall strength increases, the increase in MSI value due to the decrease in porosity is also counted, so the apparent pore wall strength significantly increases. Therefore, the coke tumbler strength index
As long as the MSI value is used as the parameter of the TI estimation formula, the effect of porosity and pore wall strength cannot be separated, and therefore TI 6 400 cannot be estimated with high accuracy.
〈発明が解決しようとする課題〉 本発明はタンブラー強度指数TIに及ぼす気孔率と気孔壁
強度の効果を分離し、より精度の高い高炉用コークス強
度の推定方法を提供し、さらにコークス炉の操業条件の
調整を容易にする高炉用コークス強度管理方法を提供す
るものである。<Problems to be Solved by the Invention> The present invention separates the effects of porosity and pore wall strength on the tumbler strength index TI, and provides a more accurate estimation method of blast furnace coke strength, and further operation of the coke oven. It is intended to provide a coke strength control method for a blast furnace that facilitates adjustment of conditions.
〈課題を解決するための手段〉 本発明は、コークスのタンブラー強度指数(TI)を求め
るに際し、まずコークス炉の操業条件である少なくとも
装入炭の流動性(MF),乾留速度(HR)および嵩密度
(BD)からコークスの気孔壁脆化指数(Pai)を予め定
めた(1)式に従って推定し、またコークス炉の操業条
件である少なくとも装入炭の平均反射率(0)および
嵩密度(BD)からコークスの気孔率(Por)を予め定め
た(2)式に従って推定し、これら2つの値を用いて、
(3)式によりコークスのタンブラー強度指数(TI)を
推定する高炉用コークス強度の推定方法である。<Means for Solving the Problems> In the present invention, when determining the tumbler strength index (TI) of coke, first, the operating conditions of the coke oven are at least the fluidity (MF) of the charging coal, the carbonization rate (HR), and The pore wall embrittlement index (Pai) of coke was estimated from the bulk density (BD) according to a predetermined equation (1), and at least the average reflectance ( 0 ) and bulk density of the charging coal, which is the operating condition of the coke oven, were estimated. The coke porosity (Por) is estimated from (BD) according to a predetermined equation (2), and using these two values,
This is a method for estimating the blast furnace coke strength by estimating the tumbler strength index (TI) of the coke using the equation (3).
Pai=(a1・HR+a2)×MF+(a3・0 2+a4・0+
a5)×0+a6×BD+a7×HR+a8×DP+a9 ……(1) Por=(b1・HR+b2)×MF+(b3・0 2+b4・0+
a5)×0+b6×BD+b7×HR+b8×DP+b9 ……(2) (1),(2)式によりTIの推定式(3)が得られた。 Pai = (a 1 · HR + a 2) × MF + (a 3 · 0 2 + a 4 · 0 +
a 5) × 0 + a 6 × BD + a 7 × HR + a 8 × DP + a 9 ...... (1) Por = (b 1 · HR + b 2) × MF + (b 3 · 0 2 + b 4 · 0 +
a 5) × 0 + b 6 × BD + b 7 × HR + b 8 × DP + b 9 ...... (2) (1), (2) estimate equation of TI (3) was obtained by the equation.
TI=C1Pai+C2Por+C3 ……(3) ここでMF :ギスラー最大流動度の対数値 (ddpm) で定義した装入炭の流動性 0:配合炭の平均反射率(−) HR :乾留速度(mm/hr) BD :嵩密度(kg/m3) DP :配合炭粉砕粒度−3mm% a1〜a9,b1〜b9,C1,C2,C3は夫々定数である。TI = C 1 Pai + C 2 Por + C 3 (3) where MF: Fluidity of the charging coal defined by the logarithm of Gisler maximum fluidity (ddpm) 0 : Average reflectance of blended coal (-) HR: Carbonization Speed (mm / hr) BD: Bulk density (kg / m 3 ) DP: Grain size of blended coal −3 mm% a 1 to a 9 , b 1 to b 9 , C 1 , C 2 , C 3 are constants, respectively. .
さらに本発明は、コークス炉の操業条件にもとづいて推
定した(3)式によるタンブラー強度指数(TI)が所定
の目標管理値内に入るようにコークス炉の操業条件であ
る乾留速度(HR),装入炭の流動性(MF),嵩密度(B
D)および平均反射率(0)の一つ以上を調整する高
炉用コークスの強度管理方法である。Further, according to the present invention, the carbonization rate (HR), which is the operating condition of the coke oven, is set so that the tumbler strength index (TI) according to the equation (3) estimated based on the operating condition of the coke oven falls within a predetermined target control value. Flowability of charged coal (MF), bulk density (B
This is a method for controlling the strength of blast furnace coke by adjusting one or more of D) and the average reflectance ( 0 ).
〈作用〉 本発明は高炉操業にとって有用なコークスのタンブラー
強度指数、例えばTI6 400を高精度で予測・管理するた
め、TI6 400の構成要素であるコークスの気壁強度を高精
度に評価する方法を発見し、この気孔壁強度と気孔率を
とり込んだTIの予測式に、コークス炉の操業条件を関連
づけたものである。<Operation> The present invention tumbler strength index useful coke for blast furnace operation, for example, to predict and manage TI 6 400 with high accuracy, to assess the Kikabe strength of the coke which is a component of TI 6 400 with high precision A method was discovered, and the coke oven operating conditions were related to the TI prediction formula that incorporated the pore wall strength and porosity.
一般にコークスの気孔壁強度の評価方法としては、マイ
クロ強度試験法がよく知られているが、該方法では供試
コークス径1〜2mmを採用しているため表1に例を示す
ようにTI6 400測定時約50〜60%の効率で発生する0.25mm
粉の原因となる0.1〜0.2mmオーダーの気孔壁で構成され
る気孔の影響を分離できないため、気孔率の影響が混入
するので、気孔壁強度のパラメータとしては好ましくな
い。Generally, as a method for evaluating the pore wall strength of coke, a micro strength test method is well known. However, since the test coke diameter of 1 to 2 mm is used in this method, as shown in Table 1, TI 6 0.25mm generated at an efficiency of about 50-60% at 400 measurements
Since the effect of pores composed of pore walls of the order of 0.1 to 0.2 mm, which causes powder, cannot be separated, the effect of porosity is mixed in, which is not preferable as a parameter of pore wall strength.
一方、多孔質体としてのコークス強度を評価する方法と
して間接的引張強度試験法がある。当試験法は塊コーク
スから例えばDφ×tHのコアサンプルを切り出し、圧潰
試験により引張強度(σf)を計算で求める方法であ
る。 On the other hand, there is an indirect tensile strength test method as a method for evaluating the coke strength as a porous body. This test method is a method in which a core sample of, for example, D φ × t H is cut out from a lump coke and a tensile strength (σ f ) is calculated by a crushing test.
式は 但しWは破壊荷重である。本発明者らは、第2図のよう
にTI6 400とこの引張強度の対数値(logσf)に比較的良
好な相関があること、また、コークス炉から取り出した
塊コークスから10φ×5Hmmの複数のコアサンプルを切り
出し夫々コークスの気孔率Porと引張強度の対数値(log
σf)を測定した結果、第3図にように引張強度の対数
値logσfと気孔率Porはよい相関があること、また第4
図のように製造条件の異なるコークスでは気孔率Porの
変化に対応する引張強度の対数logσfの変化率即ち両者
の回帰線の勾配θが異なることを発見した。ceremony However, W is a breaking load. As shown in FIG. 2, the present inventors have a relatively good correlation between TI 6 400 and the logarithmic value (log σ f ) of this tensile strength, and 10 φ × 5 from the coke taken out from the coke oven. A plurality of core samples of H mm were cut out, and the coke porosity Por and the tensile strength logarithmic value (log
Results of measurement of sigma f), logarithm Logshiguma f and porosity Por tensile strength as in FIG. 3 is that there is a good correlation, and the fourth
As shown in the figure, it was discovered that in coke produced under different manufacturing conditions, the rate of change in logarithmic log σ f of tensile strength corresponding to the change in porosity Por, that is, the slope θ of both regression lines, was different.
そこで、高炉用塊コークスより求めた複数のコアサンプ
ルの気孔率(Por)と同じコアサンプルより圧潰試験に
より間接的に求めた引張り強度の対数値との回帰線の勾
配を気孔壁脆化指数Pai,即ちPai=−d(logσf)/d(P
or)と定義し、気孔率Porと合わせて1次式でタンブラ
ー強度指数TI6 400の推定を試みたところ、実測値と非常
に良好な対応が得られた。Therefore, the porosity (Por) of multiple core samples obtained from blast furnace coke and the slope of the regression line with the logarithmic value of the tensile strength indirectly obtained from the same core sample by the crushing test were used to determine the pore wall embrittlement index Pai. That is, Pai = −d (logσ f ) / d (P
or) and attempted to estimate the tumbler strength index TI 6 400 using a linear equation together with the porosity Por, and a very good correspondence with the measured value was obtained.
このことより塊コークスの気孔壁強度指数として、コー
クスの気孔率Porと引張強度の対数の関係より得られる
コークス気孔壁脆化指数Paiを求め、本指数とコークス
炉の操業条件である石炭性状因子,コークス炉構造因子
およびコークス炉操業因子との要因関係を事前に定量化
しておくことにより炉操業変動によるコークスTI6 400の
変動を高い精度で予測・管理できることが判明した。From this, the coke porosity wall embrittlement index Pai obtained from the relationship between the coke porosity Por and the logarithm of tensile strength was obtained as the porosity wall strength index of agglomerated coke. It was found that by quantifying the factor relationships with the coke oven structure factor and the coke oven operation factor in advance, it is possible to predict and manage the variation of coke TI 6 400 due to the oven operation variation with high accuracy.
即ち本発明者らはコークスの操業条件とPaiおよびPorの
関係を鋭意検討した結果、第7図に示すようなブロック
ダイヤグラムが得られ図中の印は特にPai,Porに対し
て有意のあるパラメータであることが判明した。次いで
これらの関係を所定のコークス炉に適用し、公知の統計
的手法により定量化し(1),(2)式を得た。That is, the present inventors diligently studied the relationship between the operating conditions of coke and Pai and Por, and as a result, a block diagram as shown in FIG. 7 was obtained, and the marks in the figure indicate significant parameters especially for Pai and Por. It turned out to be Next, these relationships were applied to a predetermined coke oven and quantified by a known statistical method to obtain equations (1) and (2).
Pai=(a1・HR+a2)×MF+(a3・0 2+a4・0+
a5)×0+a6×BD+a7×HR+a8×DP+a9 ……(1) Por=(b1・HR+b2)×MF+(b3・0 2+b4・0+
a5)×0+b6×BD+b7×HR+b8×DP+b9 ……(2) (1),(2)式によりTIの推定式(3)が得られた。 Pai = (a 1 · HR + a 2) × MF + (a 3 · 0 2 + a 4 · 0 +
a 5) × 0 + a 6 × BD + a 7 × HR + a 8 × DP + a 9 ...... (1) Por = (b 1 · HR + b 2) × MF + (b 3 · 0 2 + b 4 · 0 +
a 5) × 0 + b 6 × BD + b 7 × HR + b 8 × DP + b 9 ...... (2) (1), (2) estimate equation of TI (3) was obtained by the equation.
TI=C1Pai+C2Por+C3 ……(3) ここでMF :ギスラー最大流動度の対数値 (ddpm) で定義した装入炭の流動性 0:配合炭の平均反射率(−) HR :乾留速度(mm/hr) BD :嵩密度(kg/m3) DP :配合炭粉砕粒度−3mm% a1〜a9,b1〜b9,C1,C2,C3は夫々定数である。TI = C 1 Pai + C 2 Por + C 3 (3) where MF: Fluidity of the charging coal defined by the logarithm of Gisler maximum fluidity (ddpm) 0 : Average reflectance of blended coal (-) HR: Carbonization Speed (mm / hr) BD: Bulk density (kg / m 3 ) DP: Grain size of blended coal −3 mm% a 1 to a 9 , b 1 to b 9 , C 1 , C 2 , C 3 are constants, respectively. .
なお、PaiとPorの実験式のパラメータとして、いずれも
HR,MF,0,BD,DPを採用したが、これに限定されるもの
ではなく、少なくともPaiのパラメータとしてはHR,MF,B
Dを、またPorのパラメータとしては0,BDを採用すれ
ば、従来方式よりもTIを高精度に推定できることが確認
されている。As a parameter of the empirical formula of Pai and Por, both
HR, MF, 0 , BD, DP are adopted, but not limited to this, and at least HR, MF, B as parameters of Pai.
It has been confirmed that TI can be estimated with higher accuracy than in the conventional method by adopting D and 0 or BD as the parameter of Por.
〈実施例〉 表(2)に示すIからVの製造条件で供試炭を40kg装入
の室炉タイプの電気炉で乾留して塊コークスを得、該コ
ークスの平均的な特性を得るべくそのコークスを頭,
胴,足に3分割し各区分毎に20コのコアサンプル(10φ
×5Hmm)を採取して、気孔率と引張強度を測定した。同
時に残試料についてマイクロ強度試験とタンブラー試験
も実施した。表3に本発明による気孔壁脆化指数を含め
てこれらの結果をまとめて示した。表3の結果を用いて
TI6 400との対応関係を検討した結果を第5図と第6図に
示す。本発明法を採用した第5図ではTI6 400の計算値と
実測値は良好に一致している。しかしマイクロ強度と気
孔率をパラメータとした式(4)でTIを推定した場合、
第6図に示すようにケースIII,IV,Vに見られる気孔率の
影響が完全に分離しきれていないため(MSIが高い)気
孔壁強度が高目にカウントされTI6 400との対応が本発明
の第5図に比べ劣っている。<Examples> Under the production conditions of I to V shown in Table (2), the test coal was subjected to dry distillation in an electric furnace of a chamber furnace type of 40 kg to obtain agglomerated coke, and to obtain average characteristics of the coke. Head the coke,
The body and legs are divided into three parts, and 20 core samples (10 φ
X 5 H mm) was sampled and the porosity and tensile strength were measured. At the same time, a micro strength test and a tumbler test were performed on the remaining sample. Table 3 collectively shows these results including the pore wall embrittlement index according to the present invention. Using the results in Table 3
The results of examining the relationship between TI 6 400 shown in FIG. 5 and FIG. 6. In FIG. 5 in which the method of the present invention is adopted, the calculated value of TI 6 400 and the measured value are in good agreement. However, when TI is estimated by the equation (4) using micro strength and porosity as parameters,
As shown in Fig. 6, the effect of porosity seen in Cases III, IV, and V is not completely separated (high MSI), and the pore wall strength is counted as a high value, which corresponds to TI 6 400. It is inferior to FIG. 5 of the present invention.
TI=d1MSI+d2Por+d3 ……(4) 次に表4のIに示す製造条件で供試炭を12ton装入の実
炉で乾留して塊コークスを製造するに際して、TIの推定
式(1),(2),(3)を用いて製造されるコークス
のタンブラー強度指数を推定したところ、TIの目標管理
値より1.0低かったため、TIの推定値を目標管理値とな
るように表4のIIに示すように製造条件を変更してコー
クスを製造した。製造されたコークスのタンブラー試験
結果のTI6 400は目標管理値よりわずかに0.1高いだけで
あり実用上問題のないレベルであった。TI = d 1 MSI + d 2 Por + d 3 …… (4) Next, under the production conditions shown in Table 4 I, when producing agglomerated coke by dry-distilling the test coal in an actual furnace charged with 12 tons, the TI estimation formula ( When the tumbler strength index of the coke produced using 1), (2), and (3) was estimated, it was 1.0 lower than the target control value of TI. Therefore, the estimated value of TI should be the target control value. The coke was manufactured by changing the manufacturing conditions as shown in No. II. The tumbler test result of the coke produced, TI 6 400, was only 0.1 higher than the target control value, which was a level at which there was no practical problem.
さらに第1図はある特定工場のコークス炉の特定の炭化
室における12チャージのタンブラー強度TIの推定値と実
測値を示すものであり、実操業でかなりの精度で利用可
能なことが判明した。 Furthermore, Figure 1 shows the estimated and measured values of the 12-charge tumbler strength TI in a specific coking chamber of a coke oven at a specific factory, and it was found that it can be used with considerable accuracy in actual operation.
〈発明の効果〉 このように本発明により、高炉コークスのタンブラーTI
6 400を高精度に予測・管理可能となり高炉操業の安定に
寄与するばかりでなく、コークス炉配合側での自由度が
増え劣質炭の増配合が可能となり原料炭コストの低減に
大きく寄与できる。<Effect of the Invention> As described above, according to the present invention, the tumbler TI of the blast furnace coke is
6 400 not only stable contribute prediction-manageable and become blast furnace operation with high accuracy, can contribute significantly to the flexibility reduce coking coal costs enables increased formulation of increasing low-quality coal in a coke oven formulation side.
第1図は実操業コークス炉での本発明の効果を示す図、
第2図は引張り強度の対数とTI6 400との相関図、第3図
は気孔率と引張り強度の対数との相関図、第4図は気孔
壁脆化指数の根拠を示す気孔率と引張り強度の対数との
相関図、第5図はTI6 400の実測値と本発明による推定値
との比較を示すグラフ、第6図はTI6 400の実測値と従来
法による推定値との比較を示すグラフ、第7図はTIに影
響を及ぼすコークス炉操業条件のブロックダイヤグラム
である。FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the effect of the present invention in an actual operation coke oven,
Correlation diagram between logarithmic and TI 6 400 in FIG. 2 tensile strength, Fig. 3 is a correlation diagram between the logarithm of the tensile strength and porosity, Fig. 4 and tensile porosity showing the basis for the pore walls embrittlement index Correlation diagram with logarithm of intensity, FIG. 5 is a graph showing a comparison between the measured value of TI 6 400 and the estimated value according to the present invention, and FIG. 6 is a comparison between the measured value of TI 6 400 and the estimated value according to the conventional method. Fig. 7 is a block diagram of coke oven operating conditions affecting TI.
Claims (2)
定するに際し、コークス炉の操業条件である少なくとも
装入炭の流動性(MF)、乾留速度(HR)および嵩密度
(BD)からコークスの気孔壁脆化指数(Pai)を予め定
めた(1)式に従って推定し、またコークス炉の操業条
件である少なくとも装入炭の平均反射率(0)および
嵩密度(BD)からコークスの気孔率(Por)を予め定め
た(2)式に従って推定し、これら2つの値をもちいて
(3)式によりコークスのタンブラー強度指数(TI)を
推定することを特徴とする高炉用コークス強度の推定方
法。 Pai=(a1・HR+a2)×MF+(a3・0 2+a4・0+
a5)×0+a6×BD+a7×HR+a8×DP+a9 ……(1) Por=(b1・HR+b2)×MF+(b3・0 2+b4・0+
b5)×0+b6×BD+b7×HR+b8×DP+b9 ……(2) TI=C1Pai+C2Por+C3 ……(3) ここでMF :ギスラー最大流動度の対数値 (ddpm) で定義した装入炭の流動性 0:配合炭の平均反射率(−) HR :乾留速度(mm/hr) BD :嵩密度(kg/m3) DP :配合炭粉砕粒度−3mm% a1〜a9,b1〜b9,C1,C2,C3は夫々定数である。1. When estimating the tumbler strength index (TI) of coke, the coke flow rate (MF), carbonization rate (HR), and bulk density (BD), which are operating conditions of the coke oven, are used to estimate the coke. The pore wall embrittlement index (Pai) was estimated according to a predetermined equation (1), and the porosity of coke was calculated from at least the average reflectance ( 0 ) and bulk density (BD) of the charging coal, which are operating conditions of the coke oven. (Por) is estimated according to a predetermined equation (2), and the tumbler strength index (TI) of the coke is estimated by the equation (3) using these two values, and a method for estimating coke strength for a blast furnace is provided. . Pai = (a 1 · HR + a 2) × MF + (a 3 · 0 2 + a 4 · 0 +
a 5) × 0 + a 6 × BD + a 7 × HR + a 8 × DP + a 9 ...... (1) Por = (b 1 · HR + b 2) × MF + (b 3 · 0 2 + b 4 · 0 +
defined Gisura maximum fluidity of logarithm (ddpm): b 5) × 0 + b 6 × BD + b 7 × HR + b 8 × DP + b 9 ...... (2) TI = C 1 Pai + C 2 Por + C 3 ...... (3) where MF Fluidity of charged coal 0 : Average reflectance of blended coal (-) HR: Dry distillation rate (mm / hr) BD: Bulk density (kg / m 3 ) DP: Grained grain size of blended coal-3mm% a 1 ~ a 9, b 1 ~b 9, C 1, C 2, C 3 are respectively constant.
た請求項1のタンブラー強度指数(TI)が所定の目標管
理値内に入るようにコークス炉の操業条件である乾留速
度(HR),装入炭の流動性(MF),嵩密度(BD)および
平均反射率(0)の一つ以上を調整することを特徴と
する高炉用コークスの強度管理方法。2. The carbonization rate (HR), which is the operating condition of the coke oven, and the equipment so that the tumbler strength index (TI) of claim 1 estimated based on the operating condition of the coke oven falls within a predetermined target control value. A method for controlling the strength of blast furnace coke, which comprises adjusting at least one of the fluidity (MF), bulk density (BD) and average reflectance ( 0 ) of coal feeding.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63058350A JPH071269B2 (en) | 1988-03-14 | 1988-03-14 | Blast furnace coke strength estimation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63058350A JPH071269B2 (en) | 1988-03-14 | 1988-03-14 | Blast furnace coke strength estimation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH01234495A JPH01234495A (en) | 1989-09-19 |
| JPH071269B2 true JPH071269B2 (en) | 1995-01-11 |
Family
ID=13081868
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63058350A Expired - Lifetime JPH071269B2 (en) | 1988-03-14 | 1988-03-14 | Blast furnace coke strength estimation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH071269B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003041263A (en) * | 2001-07-30 | 2003-02-13 | Kawasaki Steel Corp | Estimation method of cold strength of metallurgical coke |
| CN104655818B (en) * | 2015-02-13 | 2016-04-13 | 武汉钢铁(集团)公司 | The Forecasting Methodology of coal-blending coking coke shatter strength |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS57175257A (en) * | 1981-04-22 | 1982-10-28 | Kawasaki Steel Corp | Estimating method for coke intensity |
| JPS5829883A (en) * | 1981-08-17 | 1983-02-22 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Method of controlling operation of coke oven |
| JPS59197489A (en) * | 1983-04-25 | 1984-11-09 | Mitsubishi Chem Ind Ltd | Coke manufacturing method |
| JPS6095354A (en) * | 1983-10-31 | 1985-05-28 | Nippon Steel Chem Co Ltd | Automatic analysis method of coal structure |
-
1988
- 1988-03-14 JP JP63058350A patent/JPH071269B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH01234495A (en) | 1989-09-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP2832822B1 (en) | Coal blending method for coke production, production method for coke | |
| CA2894555C (en) | Methods for determining green electrode electrical resistivity and methods for making electrodes | |
| WO2010103828A1 (en) | Method of determining dilatation of coal, method of estimating specific volume of coal, method of determining degree of space filling, and method of coal blending | |
| JP6308157B2 (en) | Method for preparing blended coal and method for producing coke | |
| JPH071269B2 (en) | Blast furnace coke strength estimation method | |
| JP4899326B2 (en) | Method for estimating coke shrinkage of blended coal and method for producing coke | |
| JP5846064B2 (en) | Method for estimating strength of formed coke | |
| KR20210079724A (en) | Prediction method for cold strength of coke | |
| KR100928539B1 (en) | Method for Measuring Compressive Strength of Coal for Coking | |
| JP2005350610A (en) | Coke oven operation method | |
| JP2002173687A (en) | Method for estimating coke extrusion load and operating coke oven to prevent clogging | |
| JP6079142B2 (en) | Coke production method | |
| JPH07244039A (en) | Coke strength estimation method | |
| JPH0214398B2 (en) | ||
| JPH02235989A (en) | Method for determining coefficient of horizontal shrinkage of charge in coke oven | |
| JP2004027076A (en) | Operating method of coke oven | |
| JP7839404B2 (en) | Method for evaluating the extrusion properties of coke cake and method for manufacturing coke cake | |
| JP2011046841A (en) | Method for estimating extrudability of coke cake | |
| JP7846374B2 (en) | Coke manufacturing method | |
| JPH07280751A (en) | Coal ash estimating method by fluorescent x-ray analysis | |
| JPH0155313B2 (en) | ||
| JP2025126957A (en) | Method for estimating coke strength and method for producing coke | |
| JP7338507B2 (en) | Analysis method of briquettes | |
| GB2116587A (en) | Production of carbon electrodes for electrolytic reduction cells | |
| JPH03239795A (en) | Evaluation method for bulk density improver properties for coke ovens |