Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH0726130B2 - Blast furnace operation method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH0726130B2 - Blast furnace operation method - Google Patents

Blast furnace operation method

Info

Publication number
JPH0726130B2
JPH0726130B2 JP1302499A JP30249989A JPH0726130B2 JP H0726130 B2 JPH0726130 B2 JP H0726130B2 JP 1302499 A JP1302499 A JP 1302499A JP 30249989 A JP30249989 A JP 30249989A JP H0726130 B2 JPH0726130 B2 JP H0726130B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
furnace
blast furnace
reduction
furnace wall
cooling
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP1302499A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH03162510A (en
Inventor
祐治 岩永
隆信 稲田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority to JP1302499A priority Critical patent/JPH0726130B2/en
Publication of JPH03162510A publication Critical patent/JPH03162510A/en
Publication of JPH0726130B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0726130B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 (産業上の利用分野) 本発明は高炉の炉壁周辺部における焼結鉱の粉化にとも
なう不活性帯の発生、成長を防止し、高炉の操業を安定
化する方法に関するものである。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION (Industrial field of application) The present invention stabilizes the operation of a blast furnace by preventing the generation and growth of an inert zone associated with the pulverization of sinter in the periphery of the furnace wall of the blast furnace. It is about the method.

(従来の技術) 高炉プロセスは、原料工程で事前処理された鉄鉱石(焼
結鉱など)とコークスを適正配合して高炉炉頂から装入
し、熱風炉で昇温された1200℃前後の高圧空気を炉体下
部の羽口から吹込むことによりコークスを燃焼させて鉄
鉱石の還元溶融を行い、生成した溶銑を炉体下部の出銑
口から間歇的に取り出すプロセスである。
(Prior art) In the blast furnace process, iron ore (sintered ore etc.) pretreated in the raw material process and coke are properly mixed and charged from the top of the blast furnace, and the temperature is raised in the hot blast stove to around 1200 ° C. This is a process in which high-pressure air is blown from the tuyere at the bottom of the furnace to burn coke to reduce and melt the iron ore, and the hot metal produced is intermittently taken out from the tap at the bottom of the furnace.

高炉内に装入された焼結鉱は550℃前後でヘマタイトか
らマグネタイトに還元される過程で体積膨張を起こすた
め急激に粉化する。これを一般に還元粉化と呼んでい
る。したがって、高炉内の間接還元帯に550℃前後の低
温の装入物層の領域が存在すると、この領域では焼結鉱
の粉化が助長され通気抵抗が大きくなり、炉下部から上
昇してくる還元ガスの流通が妨げられる。高炉は定常状
態では常に一定のガス量が供給されているので、局所的
にガス流量が低下すると固体とガスの熱交換状況の指標
である固体の熱容量とガスの熱容量との比(熱流比)が
局所的に上昇し、ガスから固体への熱交換が不良とな
り、その結果それより下部の温度が低下し、いわゆる不
活性帯が形成される。高炉の炉壁部にこのような不活性
帯が形成されると、通気抵抗が上昇することにより、炉
内装入物の荷下りが停滞して、いわゆる棚吊りが発生し
たり、荷下りの不連続化、スリップを伴うようになり、
炉況が不調となる。炉況が悪化すると連続プロセスであ
る高炉の安定操業は望めず、反応効率も低下して、大幅
な高炉の生産性の低下につながることになる。したがっ
て、炉内における還元粉化の防止は高炉操業上の重要な
管理目標となっている。
The sintered ore charged into the blast furnace rapidly expands into powder due to volume expansion during the process of reducing hematite to magnetite at around 550 ° C. This is generally called reduction powdering. Therefore, if there is a low-temperature charge layer area around 550 ° C in the indirect reduction zone in the blast furnace, sinter ore powder is promoted in this area to increase ventilation resistance and rise from the lower part of the furnace. The distribution of reducing gas is hindered. Since the blast furnace is always supplied with a constant amount of gas in the steady state, the ratio of the heat capacity of the solid to the heat capacity of the gas (heat flow ratio), which is an indicator of the heat exchange status of the solid and gas when the gas flow rate locally decreases Locally rises, resulting in poor heat exchange from gas to solid, resulting in a lower temperature below and a so-called inactive zone. When such an inactive zone is formed on the furnace wall of the blast furnace, the ventilation resistance increases, so that the unloading of the contents inside the furnace stagnates and so-called rack hanging occurs or the unloading failure occurs. It becomes continuous, slipping,
Reactor condition becomes poor. If the furnace condition deteriorates, stable operation of the blast furnace, which is a continuous process, cannot be expected, and the reaction efficiency also decreases, leading to a significant decrease in blast furnace productivity. Therefore, prevention of reduction and pulverization in the furnace is an important management target in blast furnace operation.

通常、焼結鉱の還元粉化はRDI指数(還元粉化率)で管
理されている。これは15〜20mmの焼結鉱を550℃に昇温
し、CO30%+N270%の混合ガスで30分間還元し、冷却後
小型タンブラで900回転したのち3mmの篩でふるい分け、
3mm以下の割合(重量%)をもって表されている。
Usually, the reduction and pulverization of sinter is controlled by the RDI index (reduction and pulverization rate). This is a sinter of 15 to 20 mm heated to 550 ℃, reduced with a mixed gas of CO 30% + N 2 70% for 30 minutes, cooled, rotated 900 times with a small tumbler, and then sieved with a 3 mm sieve,
It is expressed as a percentage (% by weight) of 3 mm or less.

高炉操業においては、上述したような高炉の炉況を判断
し、その炉況に応じて経験的に設定されたRDI指数の焼
結鉱を装入して、操業の安定化を図っている。このRDI
指数の変更基準を定量化する技術開発も進められて、例
えば特公昭63−61365号公報には、高炉内の圧力損失を
測定し、その実測値が理論値に対して予め定められた基
準値を超えて高くなる程度に応じてRDI指数の低い、す
なわち、還元粉化の少ない焼結鉱を装入する方法が開示
されている。この方法により高炉の不調を招く前に炉壁
不活性化対策を講じ、高炉の荷下りの安定化、ガス流通
の円滑化が図られるとしている。しかしながら、還元粉
化は装入する焼結鉱のRDI指数だけでなく、高炉内の温
度分布にも依存するので総合的な炉壁不活性化対策を確
立するには装入物の鉱石とコークスの重量比、あるいは
炉壁冷却条件のような炉内周辺部の温度に影響を及ぼす
操業因子を配慮する必要がある。
In the blast furnace operation, the furnace condition of the blast furnace as described above is judged, and the sinter having the RDI index set empirically according to the furnace condition is charged to stabilize the operation. This RDI
Technological development to quantify the change criterion of the index has also been advanced, for example, in Japanese Patent Publication No. 63-61365, the pressure loss in the blast furnace is measured, and the measured value is a predetermined reference value with respect to the theoretical value. Disclosed is a method of charging a sinter having a low RDI index, that is, a reduced reduction powder, depending on the degree to which the sinter becomes higher. According to this method, it is said that measures will be taken to inactivate the blast furnace wall before it causes a malfunction in the blast furnace, which will stabilize the unloading of the blast furnace and facilitate gas distribution. However, reduction pulverization depends not only on the RDI index of the sinter to be charged, but also on the temperature distribution in the blast furnace, so to establish a comprehensive furnace wall deactivation measure, the ore and coke of the charge should be established. It is necessary to consider operating factors that affect the temperature of the inside of the furnace, such as the weight ratio of the furnace or the cooling conditions of the furnace wall.

特開昭60−33305号公報には、高起内周辺部の温度分布
を測定して、炉壁不活性化を防止する方法が開示されて
いる。すなわち高炉で低燃料比操業やオールコークス操
業を実施すると高炉シャフト部の炉周辺部においては装
入物温度が十分に得られないため、シャフト上段で水分
凝縮、シャフト中・下段で酸化亜鉛沈着や焼結鉱の還元
粉化が起こり、このため通気性が悪化し、不活性帯が形
成される。これを防止するため、特開昭60−33305号公
報の方法では、測温値が基準値より低くなると炉内周辺
部の装入物に高温の部分燃焼ガスを吹き込んでいる。し
かしながら、この方法では焼結鉱のRDI指数や炉壁冷却
条件の管理基準が示されていない。
Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 60-33305 discloses a method of measuring the temperature distribution in the peripheral area of a high-rise interior to prevent furnace wall inactivation. That is, when low fuel ratio operation or all coke operation is performed in the blast furnace, the charge temperature cannot be sufficiently obtained in the furnace peripheral part of the blast furnace shaft, so that water condensation occurs in the upper stage of the shaft and zinc oxide deposition in the middle and lower stages of the shaft occurs. Reduction and pulverization of the sinter occurs, which deteriorates air permeability and forms an inert zone. In order to prevent this, according to the method disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 60-33305, when the temperature measurement value becomes lower than the reference value, a high temperature partial combustion gas is blown into the charge in the peripheral portion of the furnace. However, this method does not show the management criteria for the RDI index of sinter and the cooling conditions of the furnace wall.

特に近年の高炉においては、大型化、高圧化が進めら
れ、炉内ガスの漏洩防止、冷却効率等を考慮して、鋳鉄
でパイプを鋳包んだステーブを炉体鉄皮と炉内レンガの
間に挿入して冷却するステーブ方式が採用されている。
ところが、炉体が老朽化し高炉内部のレンガが侵食され
てくると、ステーブが炉内に露出し炉内を過度に冷却す
るようになる。特に破損ステーブを新しいステーブに交
換した場合には冷却状態が強くなる。ステーブによる冷
却が過大になると炉壁温度が低下し、装入物が十分昇温
されないままに炉下部に降下するので鉱石の還元が遅れ
ることになり、特に焼結鉱において粉化量の増大がみら
れる。
Particularly in recent blast furnaces, as the size and pressure have been increased, in consideration of gas leakage prevention in the furnace, cooling efficiency, etc., a stave in which the pipe is cast and wrapped with cast iron is placed between the furnace shell and the brick in the furnace. The stave method is used to insert and cool.
However, when the furnace body is deteriorated and the bricks inside the blast furnace are eroded, the stave is exposed inside the furnace and excessively cools the inside of the furnace. Especially when the damaged stave is replaced with a new stave, the cooling state becomes stronger. If the cooling by the stave becomes excessive, the temperature of the furnace wall will drop, and the charge will fall to the lower part of the furnace without being sufficiently heated, which will delay the reduction of the ore and increase the amount of pulverization especially in the sintered ore. Seen.

(発明が解決しようとする課題) 本発明の目的は、高炉の炉内における焼結鉱の還元粉化
を抑制して高炉の不調を事前に防止し、あるいは不調に
陥った高炉を迅速に元の炉況に回復させることのできる
高炉操業方法を提供することにある。
(Problems to be Solved by the Invention) An object of the present invention is to prevent reduction powdering of sinter in the furnace of a blast furnace to prevent a malfunction of the blast furnace in advance, or to promptly recover a malfunctioning blast furnace. It is to provide a method for operating a blast furnace capable of recovering the furnace conditions.

(課題を解決するための手段) 本発明は、『高炉シャフト部の間接還元帯に相当する炉
壁部に複数個の炉壁温度検出用温度計および熱流束計を
設置し、その測定値から算出される炉壁部の総括伝熱係
数を20kcal/m2・h・℃以下に調整することを特徴とす
る高炉操業方法』を要旨とする。
(Means for Solving the Problem) The present invention is to install a plurality of furnace wall temperature detecting thermometers and heat flux meters in a furnace wall portion corresponding to an indirect reduction zone of a blast furnace shaft portion, and The blast furnace operating method is characterized in that the calculated overall heat transfer coefficient of the furnace wall is adjusted to 20 kcal / m 2 · h · ° C or less ”.

上記の総括伝熱係数の調整は、ステーブ冷却式の高炉に
おいては、冷却方式を強制水冷方式から蒸発冷却方式に
切り替えることによって行うことができる。また、窒素
ガス冷却を採用して総括伝熱係数の調整を行うこともで
きる。
The above-mentioned adjustment of the overall heat transfer coefficient can be performed by switching the cooling system from the forced water cooling system to the evaporative cooling system in the stave cooling type blast furnace. Further, nitrogen gas cooling can be adopted to adjust the overall heat transfer coefficient.

本発明の基本思想は、高炉のシャフト部の冷却条件を適
切にして、間接還元帯における還元粉化の起こりやすい
温度域(550℃前後)をできるだけ少なくし、炉内の焼
結鉱の粒度を一定値以上に維持しようという点にある。
そのための手段として、炉壁部の総括伝熱係数の調整を
選ぶのである。
The basic idea of the present invention is to make the cooling conditions of the shaft part of the blast furnace appropriate, to reduce the temperature range (about 550 ° C) where reduction powdering is likely to occur in the indirect reduction zone as much as possible, and to reduce the particle size of the sintered ore in the furnace. The point is to keep it above a certain level.
As a means for this, adjustment of the overall heat transfer coefficient of the furnace wall is selected.

第1図は、総括伝熱係数αとそのαを用いて算出された
炉内還元率、温度分布から還元粉化速度式に従って計算
した高炉シャフト下部の炉壁周辺部における焼結鉱の粒
径と実測されたスリップ回数との関係を示すものであ
る。なお、総括伝熱係数の求め方と還元粉化速度式につ
いては後に詳述する。
Figure 1 shows the overall heat transfer coefficient α and the particle size of the sintered ore around the furnace wall under the blast furnace shaft calculated from the reduction rate and temperature distribution in the furnace calculated using that α according to the reduction powdering rate equation. And the number of slips actually measured. The method for obtaining the overall heat transfer coefficient and the reduction powdering rate formula will be described in detail later.

ここでスリップとは高炉内の装入物が不連続的に1m以上
の荷下りをする現象であり、炉内装入物高さを測定する
検尺棒によってその発生が実測できる。スリップが頻発
するということは、炉内装入物の荷下りが不安定で、炉
況が悪いことを示す。
Here, the slip is a phenomenon in which the charge in the blast furnace discontinuously unloads by 1 m or more, and its occurrence can be actually measured by a measuring rod for measuring the height of the furnace internal charge. The frequent occurrence of slips indicates that the unloading of the contents inside the furnace is unstable and the furnace conditions are poor.

第1図に示されるように、焼結鉱粒径が小さくなると共
にスリップ発生頻度が増加し、特に焼結鉱粒径が7〜8m
m以下になるとスリップが急増する。この結果から、高
炉シャフト部間接還元帯における炉壁周辺部での焼結鉱
粒径を所定の値以上、具体的には7〜8mm以上にすれば
スリップ頻度は激減して炉況が安定することになる。そ
こで、本発明では、炉壁部の総括伝熱係数を前記の値以
下に抑制することにより、炉内焼結鉱の7〜8mm以上と
いう粒度を確保するのである。
As shown in Fig. 1, the frequency of slip occurrence increases as the particle size of the sinter decreases, and especially the particle size of the sinter increases from 7 to 8 m.
Slip increases sharply when m or less. From this result, if the sintered ore grain size around the furnace wall in the indirect reduction zone of the blast furnace shaft is set to a predetermined value or more, specifically 7 to 8 mm or more, the slip frequency is drastically reduced and the furnace condition is stabilized. It will be. Therefore, in the present invention, the grain size of 7 to 8 mm or more of the sintered ore in the furnace is secured by suppressing the overall heat transfer coefficient of the furnace wall portion to the above value or less.

本発明方法を実施するには、高炉のシャフト部(間接還
元帯相当部分)の炉壁部に複数個の炉体温度計を設置
し、炉内温度Tiおよび鉄皮温度Twを計測しなければなら
ない。また、鉄皮表面に熱流計を設置して炉内から鉄皮
へ向かって流れる熱流束qを常時監視する。これらの検
出値から次に示す式から炉壁の総括伝熱係数αを算出す
る。
In order to carry out the method of the present invention, it is necessary to install a plurality of furnace body thermometers on the furnace wall portion of the shaft portion (corresponding to the indirect reduction zone) of the blast furnace and measure the furnace temperature Ti and the shell temperature Tw. I won't. Further, a heat flow meter is installed on the surface of the iron shell to constantly monitor the heat flux q flowing from the furnace toward the iron shell. From these detected values, the overall heat transfer coefficient α of the furnace wall is calculated from the following equation.

α=q/(Ti−Tw) 第2図は、上記のようにして求めた総括伝熱係数αと、
このαおよび炉内の還元率、温度、および焼結鉱のRDI
指数(ここでは32〜37%)とから還元粉化速度式を使用
して計算した炉内の焼結鉱の粒径との関係を示す図であ
る。同図に明らかなように、αが大きくなるにつれて炉
内焼結鉱粒度が小さくなっている。αが大きいというこ
とは、炉壁からの抜熱が大きいということであり、その
ため炉壁周辺部の温度が低下し、400℃〜600℃の還元粉
化を起こしやすい温度で焼結鉱が長時間滞留することに
なり粉化が顕著に進むのである。
α = q / (Ti-Tw) FIG. 2 shows the overall heat transfer coefficient α obtained as described above,
This α, the reduction rate in the furnace, the temperature, and the RDI of the sintered ore
It is a figure which shows the relationship with the particle size of the sintered ore in a furnace calculated from the index (here, 32 to 37%) using the reduction pulverization rate formula. As is clear from the figure, the grain size of the sintered ore in the furnace decreases as α increases. A large α means that the heat removal from the furnace wall is large, and therefore the temperature around the furnace wall decreases, and the sinter becomes long at a temperature of 400 ° C to 600 ° C that is likely to cause reduction powdering. The powder will stay for a long time, and the pulverization will proceed significantly.

先の第1図から、スリップを2回/日以下に抑えること
を管理目標とすれば、焼結鉱の粒度を約8mm以上に保つ
必要がある。第2図から、この粒度8mm以下を保つに
は、炉壁総括伝熱係数αを20kcal/m2・h・℃以下にす
る必要があることがわかる。通常使用される焼結鉱のRD
Iは32〜37であるから、αが20kcal/m2・h・℃以下にな
るように管理すれば、一般の高炉操業では焼結鉱の還元
粉化を抑えて安定な操業ができることになる。
From Fig. 1 above, if the control target is to suppress slipping to 2 times / day or less, it is necessary to keep the grain size of the sintered ore at about 8 mm or more. From Fig. 2 , it can be seen that the overall heat transfer coefficient α of the furnace wall must be set to 20 kcal / m 2 · h · ° C or less in order to maintain the grain size of 8 mm or less. RD of commonly used sinter
Since I is 32 to 37, if α is controlled to be 20 kcal / m 2 · h · ° C or less, it will be possible to suppress stable reduction of sinter ore in general blast furnace operation. .

ここで、還元粉化速度式を用いて炉内の焼結鉱の粒径を
算出する方法を説明する。なお、この算出方法としては
種々の高炉モデルが知られており、そのいずれを用いて
もよい。以下に説明するのは、本発明者らの提案する一
つの方法である。
Here, a method of calculating the particle size of the sintered ore in the furnace using the reduction pulverization rate formula will be described. Various blast furnace models are known as this calculation method, and any of them may be used. Described below is one method proposed by the present inventors.

まず、前記の式のαを用いて炉内の還元率と温度分布を
計算する。この計算方法は種々あるが、本発明の方法で
は特に炉壁周辺部の還元率と温度分布を知る必要がある
ので、以下に述べるように炉内の高さ方向はもとより半
径方向の温度分布、反応率分布もシミュレートできる数
式モデルを創案した。
First, the reduction rate and temperature distribution in the furnace are calculated using α in the above equation. Although there are various calculation methods, in the method of the present invention, since it is necessary to know the reduction rate and the temperature distribution in the peripheral portion of the furnace wall in particular, the temperature distribution in the radial direction as well as the height direction in the furnace as described below, We have created a mathematical model that can also simulate the reaction rate distribution.

即ち、高炉シャフト部の横断面を多重同心円で等断面積
に10分割し、各分割内の高さ方向の状態分布は周知の向
流移動層一次元数式モデル、例えば「鉄と鋼」68(198
2)P.2369,P.2377に紹介される下記(1)〜(4)式の
物質収支式、熱収支式に基づいて算出する。なお、この
モデルでは半径方向および高さ方向の熱伝導、さらに炉
壁周辺に近い最外殻分割では炉壁からの熱放散が考慮さ
れている。
That is, the cross section of the blast furnace shaft is divided into 10 equal cross-sectional areas by multiple concentric circles, and the state distribution in the height direction within each division is a well-known countercurrent moving bed one-dimensional mathematical model, for example, "iron and steel" 68 ( 198
2) Calculate based on the mass balance formula and heat balance formula of the following formulas (1) to (4) introduced on P.2369 and P.2377. This model takes into account heat conduction in the radial and height directions, and heat dissipation from the furnace wall in the outermost shell division near the furnace wall.

〔物質収支式〕[Material balance equation]

(ガス) (固体) 〔熱収支式〕 ここで、 Ζ:炉内の層頂(炉頂)を基準とした下向きの高さ方向
位置(m) r:炉内半径方向位置(m) Vg,ρg:ガスの流速(m/sec)、密度(kg/m3) ρs:固体の嵩密度(kg/m3) Xj,Yi:固体の重量率(−)、モル分率(−) Tg,Ts:ガス温度(℃)、固体温度(℃) C:熱容量(Kcal/Kmol・℃) m:モル分子量(kg/kmol) hp,ap:熱伝達率(Kcal/m2・sec・℃)、 比表面積(m2/m3) kz,kr:充填層の有効熱伝導率(Kcal/m・sec・℃)、 R,M:反応速度(Kmol/m3・sec)、化学量論係数 ΔH:反応熱(Kcal/Kmol) i:CO、CO2、H2、H2O、N2 j:Fe2O3、Fe3O4、FeO、Fe、C、脈石 l:CO還元、H2還元、炭素析出、シフト反応などの反応 α:炉壁伝熱係数(但し、最外殻分割に対してのみ考
慮)(kcal/m2・sec・℃) 次に高炉内における焼結鉱の粒径を求める方法について
説明する。焼結鉱は還元されながら炉内を降下するが、
この過程における粒径Ds mm)は装入粒径Ds(mm)、還
元温度T(゜K)、還元率fs(%)、RDI指数(%)を用
いて次の(5)〜(11)式のように表すことができる。
(gas) (solid) [Heat balance type] Where, Ζ: downward height position (m) relative to the bed top (furnace top) in the furnace, r: radial position in the furnace (m) Vg, ρg: gas flow velocity (m / sec), Density (kg / m 3 ) ρs: Solid bulk density (kg / m 3 ) Xj, Yi: Solid weight ratio (-), mole fraction (-) Tg, Ts: Gas temperature (° C), Solid temperature ( ℃) C: Heat capacity (Kcal / Kmol ・ ℃) m: Molar molecular weight (kg / kmol) hp, ap: Heat transfer coefficient (Kcal / m 2・ sec ・ ℃), Specific surface area (m 2 / m 3 ) kz, kr: Effective thermal conductivity of packed bed (Kcal / m · sec · ° C), R, M: Reaction rate (Kmol / m 3 · sec), stoichiometric coefficient ΔH: Reaction heat (Kcal / Kmol) i: CO , CO 2 , H 2 , H 2 O, N 2 j: Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 3 O 4 , FeO, Fe, C, gangue l: CO reduction, H 2 reduction, carbon deposition, shift reaction, etc. α: Heat transfer coefficient of furnace wall (however, only the outermost shell division is considered) (kcal / m 2 · sec · ° C) Next, a method of determining the particle size of the sintered ore in the blast furnace will be described. The sinter descends in the furnace while being reduced,
The particle size Ds (mm) in this process is calculated by using the charged particle size Ds (mm), the reduction temperature T (° K), the reduction rate fs (%), and the RDI index (%) below (5) to (11). It can be expressed as an expression.

ここで、 Ds:粉化後の粒径(mm) f:還元率(%) T:温度(゜K) RDI:RDI指数(%) γ,n:定数(=25、2.69) したがって、総括伝熱係数を(4)式に代入し、(1)
〜(11)式を連立させて炉の最上部から下方に向かって
逐次計算することにより粒径変化が求められる。高炉の
炉壁冷却がステーブ冷却式の場合は後述する実施例に示
すように、αは強制水冷方式の場合で30〜50kcal/m2
h・℃、蒸発冷却方式の場合で10〜15kcal/m2・h・℃
である。したがって、このような場合はステーブ冷却方
式を強制水冷から蒸発冷却に切り替えることによりαを
20kcal/m2・h・℃以下にすることができる。
here, Ds: Particle size after pulverization (mm) f: Reduction rate (%) T: Temperature (° K) RDI: RDI index (%) γ, n: Constant (= 25, 2.69) Therefore, the overall heat transfer coefficient is Substituting in equation (4), (1)
~ The particle size change can be obtained by making simultaneous equations (11) and calculating sequentially from the top of the furnace downward. When the furnace wall cooling of the blast furnace is a stave cooling type, α is 30 to 50 kcal / m 2 in the case of the forced water cooling method, as shown in the examples described later.
h ・ ° C, 10 to 15 kcal / m 2・ h ・ ° C in case of evaporative cooling
Is. Therefore, in such a case, by switching the stave cooling method from forced water cooling to evaporative cooling, α
It can be 20 kcal / m 2 · h · ° C or less.

(実施例) 以下、ステーブ冷却方式の2700m3の高炉における本発明
の実施例について述べる。
(Example) Hereinafter, an example of the present invention in a 2700 m 3 blast furnace of a stave cooling system will be described.

第1表に示す基本条件で6ヵ月の操業を行い、1日当た
りのスリップの発生頻度を1ヶ月単位でまとめたのが第
3図である。即ち、最初の3ヶ月はステーブ冷却を強制
水冷方式で行ったところ1日の平均スリップ回数は5〜
7回で、炉況が不安定であった。炉体温度計および熱流
計の検出値から計算したこの時の総括伝熱係数は30〜50
kcal/m2・h・℃であった。
Fig. 3 shows the operation frequency for 6 months under the basic conditions shown in Table 1, and shows the frequency of slip occurrence per day in units of one month. That is, when the stave cooling is performed by the forced water cooling method for the first 3 months, the average number of slips per day is 5 to 5.
After seven times, the furnace conditions were unstable. The overall heat transfer coefficient at this time calculated from the detected values of the furnace body thermometer and heat flow meter is 30 to 50.
It was kcal / m 2 · h · ° C.

次に、4〜6ヶ月の操業をステーブ冷却を蒸発冷却に変
えて実施した。第3図に示すように、4ヶ月目以降のス
リップ回数は1日当たり2回以下になっており、炉況は
きわめて安定した状態になった。この時の総括伝熱係数
は、10〜15kcal/m2・h・℃であった。
Next, the operation for 4 to 6 months was carried out by changing the stave cooling to the evaporative cooling. As shown in FIG. 3, the number of slips after the 4th month was 2 times or less per day, and the furnace conditions were extremely stable. The overall heat transfer coefficient at this time was 10 to 15 kcal / m 2 · h · ° C.

第4図は、第1表に示す焼結鉱のRDI指数と総括伝熱係
数(1ヶ月の平均値)を使用して還元粉変速度式(前記
(2)式)から求めた炉周辺部(相対半径0.85)におけ
る焼結鉱粒径の推移を示す。第3図に示したスリップ回
数の多い最初の3ヶ月は、第4図で見ると焼結鉱の粒径
が小さくなっており、還元粉化が原因で炉況が不安定に
なっていることがよくわかる。そして、4月目以降の粒
径をみれば、炉壁の冷却方式を変えて総括伝熱係数を下
げることにより、炉周辺部の還元粉化を抑えて焼結鉱粒
径を大きく維持することができ、炉況を安定化すること
ができることも明らかである。
Fig. 4 shows the furnace peripheral part obtained from the reduced powder variable velocity equation (Equation (2)) using the RDI index and overall heat transfer coefficient (average value for one month) of the sintered ore shown in Table 1. The transition of sintered ore grain size at (relative radius 0.85) is shown. In the first 3 months with many slips shown in Fig. 3, the particle size of the sintered ore is small as seen in Fig. 4, and the furnace condition becomes unstable due to reduction pulverization. Understand well. Looking at the particle size after April, change the cooling method of the furnace wall to lower the overall heat transfer coefficient to suppress reduction powdering in the peripheral area of the furnace and maintain a large sintered ore particle size. It is also clear that the reactor conditions can be stabilized.

(発明の効果) 本発明方法によれば、焼結鉱の性質(RDI指数)などを
変更しなくても、炉壁の冷却条件を適正化するだけで炉
内における焼結鉱の還元粉化を抑制し、高炉の炉況を安
定に維持して操業することができる。勿論、RDI指数の
小さい(還元粉化しにくい)焼結鉱に変更するといった
他の対策と併せて本発明方法を実施することも可能であ
る。
(Effects of the Invention) According to the method of the present invention, reduction powderization of the sintered ore in the furnace is achieved only by optimizing the cooling conditions of the furnace wall without changing the properties (RDI index) of the sintered ore. It is possible to operate by maintaining the stable furnace condition of the blast furnace. Of course, it is also possible to carry out the method of the present invention in combination with other measures such as changing to a sinter having a small RDI index (hard to be reduced into powder).

本発明は、高炉の炉況不調による生産性の低下、銑鉄製
造コストの上昇などを防止するという大きな経済的効果
をもたらすものである。
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention brings about a great economic effect of preventing a decrease in productivity and an increase in pig iron production cost due to a poor blast furnace condition.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

第1図は、高炉シャフト下部の炉壁周辺部における焼結
鉱粒径とスリップ発生頻度との関係を示す図である。 第2図は、高炉シャフト下部の炉壁周辺部における焼結
鉱粒径と炉壁総括伝熱係数との関係を示す図である。 第3図および第4図は、6ヶ月の高炉操業におけるスリ
ップ発生と炉内焼結鉱の粒度の変化を示す図で、後半の
4〜6ヶ月が本発明方法を適用した場合である。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a relationship between a sintered ore grain size and a slip occurrence frequency in a peripheral portion of a furnace wall below a blast furnace shaft. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the relationship between the sintered ore grain size and the overall furnace wall heat transfer coefficient in the periphery of the furnace wall below the shaft of the blast furnace. FIGS. 3 and 4 are diagrams showing the occurrence of slip and the change in the grain size of the in-furnace sintered ore in the blast furnace operation for 6 months, and the latter 4 to 6 months are the cases where the method of the present invention is applied.

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】高炉シャフト部の間接還元帯に相当する炉
壁部に複数個の炉壁温度検出用温度計および熱流束計を
設置し、その測定値から算出される炉壁部の総括伝熱係
数を20kcal/m2・h・℃以下に調整することを特徴とす
る高炉操業法。
1. A furnace wall temperature detection thermometer and a plurality of heat flux meters are installed in a furnace wall portion corresponding to an indirect reduction zone of a blast furnace shaft portion, and an overall transmission of the furnace wall portion calculated from the measured values is provided. A blast furnace operation method characterized by adjusting the thermal coefficient to 20 kcal / m 2 · h · ° C or less.
【請求項2】ステーブ冷却式の高炉において、冷却方式
を強制水冷方式から蒸発冷却方式に切り替えることによ
って総括伝熱係数を調整することを特徴とする請求項
(1)の高炉操業方法。
2. A blast furnace operating method according to claim 1, wherein in the stave cooling type blast furnace, the overall heat transfer coefficient is adjusted by switching the cooling method from the forced water cooling method to the evaporative cooling method.
JP1302499A 1989-11-21 1989-11-21 Blast furnace operation method Expired - Lifetime JPH0726130B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1302499A JPH0726130B2 (en) 1989-11-21 1989-11-21 Blast furnace operation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1302499A JPH0726130B2 (en) 1989-11-21 1989-11-21 Blast furnace operation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH03162510A JPH03162510A (en) 1991-07-12
JPH0726130B2 true JPH0726130B2 (en) 1995-03-22

Family

ID=17909698

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP1302499A Expired - Lifetime JPH0726130B2 (en) 1989-11-21 1989-11-21 Blast furnace operation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0726130B2 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH03162510A (en) 1991-07-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN110373508B (en) Reflow strip identification method and device and electronic equipment
Pandey et al. Blast furnace performance as influenced by burden distribution
Upadhyay et al. Drain rate and liquid level simulation in blast furnace hearth using plant data
JPS649373B2 (en)
JPH0726130B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
JPH0726131B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
JPH07278627A (en) Blast furnace bottom cooling pipe and blast furnace bottom cooling method
JPH06279818A (en) Blast furnace operation method
JP2000256712A (en) Method for controlling distribution of charged material in furnace opening part of blast furnace
RU2857135C1 (en) Method for forming protective skull in blast furnace
JPH07305103A (en) Blast furnace raw material charging method
JP4585075B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method using metallic iron-based raw materials
JP3887838B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
JP3385831B2 (en) Estimation method of hearth erosion line and hearth structure
JP3646674B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
JPH11269513A (en) How to charge the charge in the center of the blast furnace
JP3646361B2 (en) Blast furnace charge distribution control method
JPH0563522B2 (en)
JPS5910967B2 (en) Blast furnace operating method excellent in preventing slip occurrence
JP4276564B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
JPS5858204A (en) Operating method for blast furnace
JP2001073016A (en) Blast furnace operation method
JP2001335818A (en) Blast furnace bottom cooling method
JP2004059956A (en) Blast furnace brick wear prevention method
TOGINO et al. Blast Furnace Operation with Low Fuel Rate