JPH0772301B2 - Iron loss reduction method for grain-oriented silicon steel sheet - Google Patents
Iron loss reduction method for grain-oriented silicon steel sheetInfo
- Publication number
- JPH0772301B2 JPH0772301B2 JP60291848A JP29184885A JPH0772301B2 JP H0772301 B2 JPH0772301 B2 JP H0772301B2 JP 60291848 A JP60291848 A JP 60291848A JP 29184885 A JP29184885 A JP 29184885A JP H0772301 B2 JPH0772301 B2 JP H0772301B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- iron loss
- plasma flame
- grain
- nozzle
- steel sheet
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D8/00—Modifying the physical properties of ferrous metals or ferrous alloys by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
- C21D8/12—Modifying the physical properties of ferrous metals or ferrous alloys by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of articles with special electromagnetic properties
- C21D8/1294—Modifying the physical properties of ferrous metals or ferrous alloys by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of articles with special electromagnetic properties involving a localised treatment
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Manufacturing Of Steel Electrode Plates (AREA)
- Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】 (産業上の利用分野) この発明は、変圧器等に使用される方向性けい素鋼板の
鉄損を有利に低減させる方法に関するものである。Description: TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a method for advantageously reducing the iron loss of grain-oriented silicon steel sheets used for transformers and the like.
方向性けい素鋼板は、主として変圧器その他の電気機器
の鉄心として用いられ、その磁気特性が良好であること
が要求される。特に鉄心として使用した際のエネルギー
損失すなわち鉄損が低いことが重要であり、近年のエネ
ルギー事情の悪化から特に鉄損の低い方向性けい素鋼板
に対する要求は一段と高まりつつある。The grain-oriented silicon steel sheet is mainly used as an iron core for transformers and other electric devices, and is required to have good magnetic properties. In particular, it is important that the energy loss when used as an iron core, that is, the iron loss is low, and the demand for a grain-oriented silicon steel sheet having a particularly low iron loss is increasing more and more due to the deterioration of the energy situation in recent years.
これまでにも鉄損を減少させるために、結晶方位を(11
0)〔001〕方位により高度に揃えること、Si含有量を上
げることにより鋼板の電気抵抗を増加させること、さら
には不純物を低減させることなどが種々試みられてき
た。In order to reduce iron loss, the crystallographic orientation (11
0) Various attempts have been made to achieve a higher degree of alignment by the [001] orientation, increase the electrical resistance of the steel sheet by increasing the Si content, and further reduce impurities.
しかしながら、これらの治金学的な方法による鉄損の低
減は、近年の技術の向上によりほぼ限界に達している。However, the reduction of iron loss by these metallurgical methods has almost reached the limit due to the improvement of technology in recent years.
(従来の技術) そこで、治金学的な方法以外に鉄損を改善する方法が種
々提案されている。これらのなかで現在工業化されてい
るものは、特行昭57−2252号公報等に開示されているレ
ーザー照射による鉄線低減法である。この方法により、
鉄損の大幅な低減が可能とはなったが、装置が高価なこ
と、レーザー励起用ランプの寿命が短いこと等によるイ
ニシャルコスト及びランニングコストの増加が避げがた
い。また使用するレーザーは可視光でない場合が多く、
安全上の対策も欠かせない。(Prior Art) Various methods for improving iron loss have been proposed in addition to metallurgical methods. Among these, the one currently industrialized is the iron wire reduction method by laser irradiation disclosed in JP-B-57-2252. By this method,
Although it has become possible to significantly reduce iron loss, it is inevitable that the initial cost and running cost will increase due to the high cost of the device and the short life of the laser excitation lamp. Also, the laser used is often not visible light,
Safety measures are also essential.
(発明が解決しようとする問題点) ところで発明者らは先に、上記のような欠点がなく、生
産性、作業性、安全性およびコストの面でより有利な手
段で著しく鉄損を低減させ得る方法として、プラズマ炎
の放射による方向性けい素鋼板の鉄損低減方法を特願昭
60−236271号において提案した。(Problems to be Solved by the Invention) By the way, the inventors have previously reduced the iron loss by a more advantageous means in terms of productivity, workability, safety and cost without the above-mentioned drawbacks. As a method for obtaining it, a method for reducing iron loss in grain-oriented silicon steel sheets by radiation of plasma flame is applied.
Proposed in No. 60-236271.
この発明は、上記の方法の実用性をさらに押し進めたも
ので、かかるプラズマ炎放射による鉄損低減技術を実際
に工場生産ラインに適用した場合に、安定した鉄損改善
効果を得るための方法を提案することを目的とする。The present invention is a further advancement of the practicality of the above method, and a method for obtaining a stable iron loss improving effect when the iron loss reducing technology by plasma flame radiation is actually applied to a factory production line. The purpose is to propose.
(問題点を解決するための手段) さて発明者らは、特願昭60−236271号において、ノズル
穴径2.0mm以下のノズルから、プラズマ炎の出力電流及
びプラズマ炎と鋼板との相対速度を適切に選び、鋼板の
圧延方向とほぼ直角方向にプラズマ炎を放射することに
より大幅な鉄損の低減が得られることを開示した。(Means for Solving Problems) In Japanese Patent Application No. 60-236271, the inventors have determined the output current of the plasma flame and the relative velocity between the plasma flame and the steel plate from a nozzle having a nozzle hole diameter of 2.0 mm or less. It was disclosed that a significant reduction in iron loss can be obtained by appropriately selecting and radiating a plasma flame in a direction substantially perpendicular to the rolling direction of the steel sheet.
そこで発明者らはさらに、実操業においても安定した鉄
損の低減を図り得る条件を見出すべく、鋭意実験検討を
重ねた結果、プラズマ炎を放射するノズル先端と鋼板表
面との距離の変動をできるだけ小さくすることが、所期
した目的の達成に有効であることを新たに見出し、この
発明を完成するに至ったのである。Therefore, as a result of further intensive experiments and studies in order to find a condition capable of stably reducing iron loss even in actual operation, the inventors have made it possible to change the distance between the nozzle tip emitting the plasma flame and the steel plate surface as much as possible. The inventors have newly found that reducing the size is effective for achieving the intended purpose, and have completed the present invention.
すなわちこの発明は、仕上げ焼鈍済みの方向性けい素鋼
板に、連続的にプラズマ炎を放射するに際し、プラズマ
炎を放射するノズル先端と該鋼板表面との距離の変動を
3mm以下に抑制することから成る方向性けい素鋼板の鉄
損低減方法である。That is, the present invention, when continuously radiating the plasma flame to the grain-finished grain-oriented silicon steel sheet, the variation in the distance between the tip of the nozzle radiating the plasma flame and the steel sheet surface is suppressed.
This is a method of reducing the iron loss of grain-oriented silicon steel sheets by suppressing the thickness to 3 mm or less.
以下、この発明を由来した実験結果に基づき具体的に説
明する。The present invention will be specifically described below based on the experimental results.
板厚0.23m,0.30mmの仕上げ焼鈍済み方向性けい素鋼板の
表面に、ノズル穴径0.05〜2.0mmのトーチよりプラズマ
炎を放射した。プラズマ炎発生のためのガスはArを用
い、またプラズマ出力電流、ノズルと鋼板との相対速度
ならびにノズル先端と鋼板表面との距離を広範囲に変化
させた。なお、プラズマ炎の放射は鋼板の圧延方向とほ
ぼ直角な向きに連続な線状に放射し、圧延方向における
放射間隔は7.5mmとした。Plasma flame was radiated from the torch with a nozzle hole diameter of 0.05 to 2.0 mm onto the surface of grain-finished grain-oriented silicon steel sheets with a thickness of 0.23 m and 0.30 mm. Ar gas was used as the gas for generating the plasma flame, and the plasma output current, the relative velocity between the nozzle and the steel plate, and the distance between the nozzle tip and the steel plate surface were varied over a wide range. The plasma flame was radiated in a continuous linear shape in a direction substantially perpendicular to the rolling direction of the steel sheet, and the radiation interval in the rolling direction was 7.5 mm.
鋼板のプラズマ炎放射前後における磁束密度1.7テス
ラ、周波数50Hzでの鉄損W17/50を単板磁気測定装置によ
り測定し、プラズマ炎放射の効果を調べた。The effect of plasma flame radiation was investigated by measuring the iron loss W17 / 50 at a magnetic flux density of 1.7 Tesla and a frequency of 50 Hz before and after plasma flame radiation of a steel plate by a single-plate magnetometer.
上記した広範囲な実験結果から、プラズマ炎の出力電流
およびノズルと鋼板との相対速度を適切に選ぶことによ
って、大幅な鉄損低減が得られることが見出されたが、
発明者らはさらに考察をすすめたところ、鉄損低減効果
はノズル先端と鋼板面との距離にも依存し、最適距離か
らの変動が大き過ぎる場合には、十分な鉄損低減効果が
得られないことを新規に見出した。From the above wide range of experimental results, it was found that by appropriately selecting the output current of the plasma flame and the relative speed of the nozzle and the steel plate, a significant reduction in iron loss can be obtained.
As a result of further consideration by the inventors, the iron loss reduction effect also depends on the distance between the nozzle tip and the steel plate surface, and when the variation from the optimum distance is too large, a sufficient iron loss reduction effect can be obtained. Newly found that there is no.
第1図に、ノズル穴径、出力電流およびノズルと鋼板と
の相対速度は異なるけれども、ノズル先端と鋼板表面と
の距離が最適の場合に、鉄損低減分ΔW17/50が0.05w/kg
以上となる各場合について、ノズル先端と鋼板表面との
距離の変動分(Δl)が鉄損低減効果(ΔW17/50)に及
ぼす影響について調べた結果を示す。ここにΔlは最も
大きな鉄損低減効果の得られた距離を基準とし、この基
準点よりもノズルが鋼板に近づく場合は(−)符号で、
一方遠ざかる場合は(+)符号で表した。なおΔW17/50
はプラズマ炎放射前の鉄損ΔW17/50(1.7T,50Hzにおけ
る鉄損)と放射後の鉄損W17/50との差である。Fig. 1 shows that although the nozzle hole diameter, output current, and relative speed between the nozzle and the steel plate are different, when the distance between the nozzle tip and the steel plate surface is optimal, the iron loss reduction ΔW17 / 50 is 0.05 w / kg.
In each of the above cases, the results of examining the effect of the variation (Δl) in the distance between the nozzle tip and the steel plate surface on the iron loss reduction effect (ΔW17 / 50) are shown. Here, Δl is based on the distance at which the largest iron loss reduction effect is obtained, and is a (-) sign when the nozzle is closer to the steel plate than this reference point,
On the other hand, when moving away, it is represented by (+) sign. ΔW17 / 50
Is the difference between iron loss ΔW17 / 50 (1.7T, 50Hz iron loss) before plasma flame radiation and iron loss W17 / 50 after radiation.
鉄損低減効果が最大となる距離すなわち基準点は、プラ
ズマ放射に用いたノズルの穴径、出力電流およびノズル
と鋼板との相対速度により異なるけれども、第1図に示
したとおり、いずれの場合においても基準点からの距離
の変動が±3mm以内であればば0.02W/kg以上の鉄損低減
効果が得られることが判明した。The distance at which the iron loss reducing effect is maximum, that is, the reference point, varies depending on the hole diameter of the nozzle used for plasma radiation, the output current, and the relative speed between the nozzle and the steel plate, but as shown in FIG. It was also found that if the variation of the distance from the reference point is within ± 3 mm, an iron loss reduction effect of 0.02 W / kg or more can be obtained.
一般に工場生産ラインにおいてプラズマ炎放射を実現す
る場合、鋼板のばたつきのため、放射ノズルと鋼板表面
との距離がある程度変動することは避けられないが、安
定した鉄損低減効果を得るためには、上記の実験結果よ
り、この変動幅を3mm以下に抑制する必要がある。Generally, when plasma flame radiation is realized in a factory production line, it is unavoidable that the distance between the radiation nozzle and the steel plate surface fluctuates to some extent due to flapping of the steel plate, but in order to obtain a stable iron loss reduction effect, From the above experimental results, it is necessary to suppress this fluctuation width to 3 mm or less.
ここに変動幅を3mm以下に抑制するためには、鋼板の圧
延方向に引張応力、曲げ応力のいずれかの応力あるいは
これらの合成応力を加えながらプラズマ炎を放射する方
法が有効である。その他、鋼板とノズル間距離をレーザ
ー等のセンサーで検出し、その信号をフィードバックし
てノズルを適正位置に移動させ、鋼板とノズル間距離を
一定に保つ方法もある。In order to suppress the fluctuation width to 3 mm or less, it is effective to radiate a plasma flame while applying either tensile stress, bending stress or a combined stress thereof in the rolling direction of the steel sheet. In addition, there is also a method in which the distance between the steel plate and the nozzle is detected by a sensor such as a laser and the signal is fed back to move the nozzle to an appropriate position to keep the distance between the steel plate and the nozzle constant.
(作 用) プラズマ炎放射によって鉄損が低減する理由は、プラズ
マ炎が放射された部分が磁気的に硬質になり、それによ
って磁区が細分化されたためと考えられる。(Operation) The reason why the iron loss is reduced by the plasma flame radiation is considered to be that the part where the plasma flame is radiated becomes magnetically hard and the magnetic domains are subdivided by it.
この発明に用いる方向性けい素鋼板は、Mn S,Mn Se,AlN
及びSbなどをインヒビターとして含む熱延鋼板を、1回
または中間焼鈍をはさむ2回の冷間圧延により最終板厚
とした後、脱炭焼鈍を施し、次しでMg O主成分とする焼
鈍分離剤を塗布してから約1200℃の高温で仕上げ焼鈍を
施した鋼板であり、二次再結晶が完了している鋼板であ
る。The grain-oriented silicon steel sheet used in this invention is Mn S, Mn Se, AlN
Hot rolled steel sheet containing Sb and Sb as an inhibitor is cold-rolled once or twice with intermediate annealing to final thickness, then decarburization annealed, and then annealed and separated with MgO as a main component. It is a steel sheet that has been subjected to finish annealing at a high temperature of about 1200 ° C after applying the agent, and has completed secondary recrystallization.
通常、仕上げ焼鈍済みの鋼板はフォルステライト被膜で
覆われているが、この発明におけるプラズマ放射はかか
るフォルステライト被膜上からでもまたフォルステライ
ト被膜が無い状態、さらにはフォルステライト被膜上に
上塗りするりん酸塩を主成分とするコーチング被膜上か
ら行なっても良い。Normally, the steel sheet that has been finish-annealed is covered with a forsterite coating, but the plasma radiation in the present invention is such that the forsterite coating is not present and the forsterite coating is not present. You may perform it from the coating film which has a salt as a main component.
またプラズマ炎の放射は鋼板の圧延方向と直角は方向が
望ましいが、その方向に対し45゜以内であればずれてい
てもかまわない。さらに圧延方向における放射間隔は2m
m〜30mmが望ましく、それ以外では効果が小さいか、む
しろ鉄損の劣化をまねく場合がある。Further, the radiation of the plasma flame is preferably perpendicular to the rolling direction of the steel sheet, but may deviate within 45 ° with respect to that direction. Furthermore, the radial spacing in the rolling direction is 2 m
m to 30 mm is preferable, and other than that, the effect may be small, or rather may lead to deterioration of iron loss.
なおプラズマ炎を発生するためのガスとしては、Ar等の
不活性ガスを用いるのが一般的であるが、その他のガス
及び混合ガスを用いても構わない。プラズマ炎放射ノズ
ルのノズル穴径は2.0mm以下が好適である。An inert gas such as Ar is generally used as the gas for generating the plasma flame, but other gases and mixed gases may be used. The nozzle diameter of the plasma flame radiation nozzle is preferably 2.0 mm or less.
(実施例) 実施例1 板厚0.23mmの2つの仕上げ焼鈍済み方向性けい素鋼板コ
イル(A),(B)の鉄損を連続鉄損測定装置を用いて
10mごとに測定した。その後、コイル(A)について
は、半径100mmのロール上に添わせ、かつ鋼板の圧延方
向に5kg/mm2の引張応力を加えながら、このコイルヘプ
ラズマ炎をロール上で鋼板の圧延方向と直角な方向に線
状に放射した。この時、プラズマ炎放射ノズルと先端と
鋼板表面との距離の変動は最大0.8mmであった。(Example) Example 1 The iron loss of two finish-annealed grain-oriented silicon steel coils (A) and (B) having a sheet thickness of 0.23 mm was measured using a continuous iron loss measuring device.
It was measured every 10 m. After that, the coil (A) was placed on a roll with a radius of 100 mm, and while applying a tensile stress of 5 kg / mm 2 in the rolling direction of the steel sheet, a plasma flame was applied to this coil at a right angle to the rolling direction of the steel sheet on the roll. It radiated linearly in various directions. At this time, the variation of the distance between the plasma flame radiation nozzle, the tip and the steel plate surface was 0.8 mm at maximum.
プラズマトーチのノズル径は0.15mmであり、ガスはArを
使用した。プラズマ炎の出力電流は7A、電圧は30Vであ
った。また、ノズルの走査速度は200mm/s、圧延方向の
放射間隔は8mmとした。The nozzle diameter of the plasma torch was 0.15 mm, and the gas used was Ar. The output current of the plasma flame was 7A and the voltage was 30V. The scanning speed of the nozzle was 200 mm / s, and the radial interval in the rolling direction was 8 mm.
このようにしてプラズマ炎を放射したコイル(A)をさ
らに、連続鉄損測定装置にかけ、プラズマ炎放射炎前に
測定した位置と同一位置についての鉄損を測定した。The coil (A) thus radiated with the plasma flame was further applied to a continuous iron loss measuring device to measure the iron loss at the same position as the position measured before the plasma flame radiating flame.
プラズマ炎放射による鉄炎損減少分ΔW17/50(w/kg)の
最大値、最小値及び平均値を表1に示す。Table 1 shows the maximum value, the minimum value, and the average value of the decrease ΔW17 / 50 (w / kg) in iron flame loss due to plasma flame radiation.
一方、コイル(B)についても、コイル(A)と同様な
方法でプラズマ炎を放射したが、ロールの真円度が悪
く、ノズル先端と鋼板表面との距離の変動は最大4.5mm
であった。この時のΔW17/50を比較例として表1に合せ
て示す。On the other hand, with respect to the coil (B), a plasma flame was radiated in the same manner as the coil (A), but the roundness of the roll was poor, and the variation in the distance between the nozzle tip and the steel plate surface was 4.5 mm at maximum.
Met. ΔW17 / 50 at this time is also shown in Table 1 as a comparative example.
表1に示した通り、Δlmaxが4.5mmと大きい場合には、
場所によるプラズマ炎放射の鉄損減少分のバラツキが大
きく、鉄損が減少しない部分もあったのに対し、Δlmax
を0.8mmとした発明例の場合、プラズマ炎放射を施すこ
とにより、鉄損はどの位置でも0.09W/kg以上減少し、平
均値も0.14W/kgと大幅な鉄損減少を示した。 As shown in Table 1, when Δl max is as large as 4.5 mm,
There was a large variation in the iron loss reduction of plasma flame radiation depending on the location, and there was a portion where the iron loss did not decrease, while Δl max
In the case of the invention example with 0.8 mm, the iron loss was reduced by 0.09 W / kg or more at any position by applying the plasma flame radiation, and the average value was 0.14 W / kg, which was a large decrease.
実施例2 板厚0.23mmの2つの仕上げ焼鈍済み方向性けい素鋼板コ
イル(C),(D)の鉄損を連続鉄損測定装置により測
定したのち、鋼板に次のようにしてプラズマ炎の放射を
施した。放射は2台のロール間の平坦部で行なったが、
コイル(C)はレーザーセンサーを用いその信号をノズ
ル移動装置にフィードバックして鋼板表面とノズル先端
との距離を一定に保つようにした。この時の距離の変動
は最大0.5mmであった。Example 2 After the iron loss of two finish-annealed grain-oriented silicon steel coils (C) and (D) having a plate thickness of 0.23 mm was measured by a continuous iron loss measuring device, the steel plate was subjected to a plasma flame treatment as follows. Radiated. The radiation was done in the flat area between the two rolls,
The coil (C) uses a laser sensor and feeds back the signal to the nozzle moving device to keep the distance between the steel plate surface and the nozzle tip constant. The maximum distance variation at this time was 0.5 mm.
一方、コイル(D)はセンサーを用いずにノズルは固定
して放射を行った。その結果、ノズル先端と鋼板表面と
の距離の変動は最大5.3mmであった。On the other hand, the coil (D) radiated with the nozzle fixed without using a sensor. As a result, the maximum variation in the distance between the nozzle tip and the steel plate surface was 5.3 mm.
プラズマトーチのノズル径は0.15mmであり、ガスはArを
使用した。プラズマ炎の出力電流は7A,電圧は30Vであっ
た。また、ノズルの操作速度は200mm/s、圧延方向にお
ける放射間隔は8mmとした。The nozzle diameter of the plasma torch was 0.15 mm, and the gas used was Ar. The output current of the plasma flame was 7A and the voltage was 30V. The operation speed of the nozzle was 200 mm / s, and the radial interval in the rolling direction was 8 mm.
このようにしてプラズマ炎を放射したコイル(C),
(D)をさらに、連続鉄損測定装置にかけ、プラズマ炎
放射前の測定位置と同一位置の鉄損を測定した。In this way, the coil (C) that radiated the plasma flame,
Further, (D) was applied to a continuous iron loss measuring device to measure the iron loss at the same position as the measuring position before the plasma flame radiation.
プラズマ炎放射による鉄損減少分ΔW17/50(W/kg)の最
大値、最小値及び平均値を表2に示す。Table 2 shows the maximum value, minimum value and average value of the iron loss reduction ΔW17 / 50 (W / kg) due to plasma flame radiation.
表2に示した通り、Δlmaxが5.3mmと大きい場合には、
場所によるプラズマ炎放射の鉄損減少分のバラツキが大
きく鉄損が減少しない位置もあったのに対し、Δlmaxを
0.5mmとした発明例の場合は、プラズマ炎放射を施すこ
とにより鉄損はどの位置でも0.07W/kg以上減少し、平均
値も0.12W/kgと大幅な鉄損の低減が達成された。 As shown in Table 2, when Δl max is as large as 5.3 mm,
Although there was a large variation in the iron loss reduction of plasma flame radiation depending on the location, there was a position where iron loss did not decrease, while Δl max
In the case of the invention example of 0.5 mm, by applying plasma flame radiation, the iron loss was reduced by 0.07 W / kg or more at any position, and the average value was also significantly reduced to 0.12 W / kg.
(発明の効果) かくして発明によれば、実際の工場生産ラインにおいて
も方向性けい素板の鉄損を安定して低減させることがで
きる。(Effects of the Invention) Thus, according to the invention, the iron loss of the directional silicon plate can be stably reduced even in an actual factory production line.
第1図は、プラズマ炎放射ノズル先端と鋼板面との距離
の変動(Δ1)が鉄損低減効果(ΔW17/50)に及ぼす影
響を示したグラフである。FIG. 1 is a graph showing the influence of the variation (Δ1) in the distance between the tip of the plasma flame radiation nozzle and the steel plate surface on the iron loss reduction effect (ΔW17 / 50).
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 杉山 甫朋 千葉県千葉市川崎町1番地 川崎製鉄株式 会社技術研究本部内 (56)参考文献 特開 昭59−229419(JP,A) 特開 昭56−56605(JP,A) 特開 昭60−89523(JP,A) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (72) Inventor, Toho Sugiyama, 1 Kawasaki-cho, Chiba-shi, Chiba Kawasaki Steel Co., Ltd. Technical Research Division (56) Reference JP-A-59-229419 (JP, A) JP-A-SHO 56-56605 (JP, A) JP-A-60-89523 (JP, A)
Claims (1)
続的にプラズマ炎を放射するに際し、プラズマ炎を放射
するノズル先端と該鋼板表面との距離の変動を3mm以下
に抑制することを特徴とする方向性けい素鋼板の鉄損低
減方法。1. When continuously radiating a plasma flame to a grain-finished grain-oriented silicon steel sheet, it is possible to suppress the variation in the distance between the tip of the nozzle radiating the plasma flame and the surface of the steel sheet to 3 mm or less. A characteristic iron loss reduction method for grain-oriented silicon steel sheets.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP60291848A JPH0772301B2 (en) | 1985-12-26 | 1985-12-26 | Iron loss reduction method for grain-oriented silicon steel sheet |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP60291848A JPH0772301B2 (en) | 1985-12-26 | 1985-12-26 | Iron loss reduction method for grain-oriented silicon steel sheet |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS62151518A JPS62151518A (en) | 1987-07-06 |
| JPH0772301B2 true JPH0772301B2 (en) | 1995-08-02 |
Family
ID=17774198
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP60291848A Expired - Lifetime JPH0772301B2 (en) | 1985-12-26 | 1985-12-26 | Iron loss reduction method for grain-oriented silicon steel sheet |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH0772301B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH04307108A (en) * | 1991-04-04 | 1992-10-29 | Ebara Corp | Hydrodynamic bearing unit |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS5656605A (en) * | 1979-10-13 | 1981-05-18 | Inoue Japax Res Inc | Treatment of magnetic material |
| JPS59229419A (en) * | 1983-06-11 | 1984-12-22 | Nippon Steel Corp | Improvement of iron loss characteristic of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet |
| GB8324643D0 (en) * | 1983-09-14 | 1983-10-19 | British Steel Corp | Production of grain orientated steel |
-
1985
- 1985-12-26 JP JP60291848A patent/JPH0772301B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS62151518A (en) | 1987-07-06 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP0837148B1 (en) | Grain-oriented electromagnetic steel sheet | |
| EP3770282B1 (en) | Method for manufacturing grain-oriented electrical steel sheet and grain-oriented electrical steel sheet | |
| JPH0772300B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing low iron loss grain oriented silicon steel sheet | |
| US4545828A (en) | Local annealing treatment for cube-on-edge grain oriented silicon steel | |
| EP3733895A1 (en) | Low-iron-loss grain-oriented electrical steel sheet and production method for same | |
| KR910000009B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for improving iron loss of electromagnetic steel sheet or amorphous material | |
| JP3174451B2 (en) | Method for producing low iron loss oriented silicon steel sheet and plasma generator | |
| JP2022022490A (en) | Grain oriented electrical steel sheet | |
| KR100266550B1 (en) | Manufacturing method of non-oriented electrical steel sheet | |
| JPH0772301B2 (en) | Iron loss reduction method for grain-oriented silicon steel sheet | |
| JP2002294416A (en) | Low iron loss grain-oriented electrical steel sheet and its manufacturing method and manufacturing apparatus | |
| JP2023121125A (en) | Grain-oriented electromagnetic steel sheet | |
| JPH06228645A (en) | Manufacturing method of electrical steel sheet for small static device | |
| JP3914270B2 (en) | Oriented electrical steel sheet with low iron loss and method for producing the same | |
| JPH02277780A (en) | Grain-oriented silicon steel sheet having small iron loss and production thereof | |
| US4326899A (en) | Method of continuous annealing low-carbon electrical sheet steel and duplex product produced thereby | |
| JPH066745B2 (en) | Iron loss improvement method for grain-oriented silicon steel sheet | |
| EP0585956B1 (en) | Thick grain-oriented electrical steel sheet exhibiting excellent magnetic properties | |
| EP0287357A2 (en) | Method of reducing iron loss of grain oriented silicon steel sheet | |
| JPH06228644A (en) | Production of silicon steel sheet for compact stationary device | |
| JP4317305B2 (en) | Cold rolling method for obtaining a unidirectional electrical steel sheet with small fluctuation in magnetic properties in the cold rolling direction | |
| JPH0672265B2 (en) | Iron loss improvement method for grain-oriented silicon steel sheet | |
| JPH0699749B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of non-oriented electrical steel sheet with good magnetic properties | |
| EP0099617B1 (en) | Method for producing cube-on-edge oriented silicon steel | |
| KR100940721B1 (en) | Magnetic field heat treatment method of electrical steel |