Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPH0827262B2 - Corrosion degradation determination method for double-layer metal wire - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPH0827262B2 - Corrosion degradation determination method for double-layer metal wire - Google Patents

Corrosion degradation determination method for double-layer metal wire

Info

Publication number
JPH0827262B2
JPH0827262B2 JP3072506A JP7250691A JPH0827262B2 JP H0827262 B2 JPH0827262 B2 JP H0827262B2 JP 3072506 A JP3072506 A JP 3072506A JP 7250691 A JP7250691 A JP 7250691A JP H0827262 B2 JPH0827262 B2 JP H0827262B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
metal
wire
corrosion
output
phase
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP3072506A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH04282451A (en
Inventor
健夫三 島田
正 小比田
五郎 横田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Railway Technical Research Institute
Original Assignee
Railway Technical Research Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Railway Technical Research Institute filed Critical Railway Technical Research Institute
Priority to JP3072506A priority Critical patent/JPH0827262B2/en
Publication of JPH04282451A publication Critical patent/JPH04282451A/en
Publication of JPH0827262B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0827262B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Magnetic Means (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、亜鉛めっき鋼より線の
ように芯線の周囲を異種金属で覆った二層金属線材の腐
食劣化判定法に関し、特に芯線と被覆層の腐食後の残存
量を個別に検出できるものを提供する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for determining corrosion deterioration of a two-layer metal wire rod such as a galvanized steel stranded wire in which the core wire is covered with a dissimilar metal. It is possible to individually detect

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】電気鉄道の電力供給用に敷設されている
図5に示すような電車線路1において、亜鉛めっき鋼よ
り線は、ちょう架線2、代用トロリ線3および支持物4
の支線等に幅広く利用されている。この亜鉛めっき鋼よ
り線は外気に晒されているので、腐食による断線事故防
止のため、定期的にまたは必要に応じて腐食の程度を検
査し、取替え時期を判断する必要がある。
2. Description of the Related Art In a railway line 1 as shown in FIG. 5, which is laid for supplying electric power to an electric railway, a galvanized steel stranded wire comprises a catenary wire 2, a substitute trolley wire 3 and a support 4.
Widely used for branch lines, etc. Since this galvanized steel stranded wire is exposed to the outside air, it is necessary to periodically or as needed inspect the degree of corrosion and determine the replacement time in order to prevent a wire disconnection accident due to corrosion.

【0003】金属線材の腐食劣化検査法として、渦流探
傷試験法(特開平2−54166)が知られている。し
かし、従来方法の検査対象は、線材がアルミのみ、或い
は銅のみといった単一の素材からできているものに限ら
れ、亜鉛めっき鋼より線のように、異種金属を積層した
ものには使用できなかった。
An eddy current flaw detection test method (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2-54166) is known as a method for inspecting corrosion deterioration of metal wires. However, the inspection object of the conventional method is limited to those made of a single material such as aluminum only or copper only, and it cannot be used for those in which dissimilar metals are laminated such as galvanized steel stranded wire. There wasn't.

【0004】このため、亜鉛めっき鋼より線の腐食劣化
の検査は、人がはしご、タワー、保守用車等に乗り、活
線状態あるいは停電状態の線に接近し目視して行ってい
た。
For this reason, a person who rides on a ladder, a tower, a maintenance vehicle, etc., visually inspects a galvanized steel stranded wire for corrosion and deterioration, visually approaches a line in a live or blackout state.

【0005】[0005]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】亜鉛めっき鋼より線の
取替え時期の推定は、腐食防止のために表面に施された
亜鉛めっき層の腐食量と、強度を保つ鋼より線部分の腐
食量から総合的に判断する必要がある。ところが目視に
よる検査方法は外観で判断するため、内部への腐食の進
行程度が把握し難く、取替時期の推定を誤り易い。例え
ば、表面の亜鉛めっき層が大部分残っていても一箇所の
腐食が内部に深く進み、亜鉛めっき鋼より線の強度が大
きく低下している場合もある。この誤認の結果として、
断線事故が発生したり、まだ十分使用可能な線の取替を
実施してしまう等の問題があった。このため、検査回数
を半年あるいは1年に1回と多くしているが、適切な管
理は困難であった。
The estimation of the replacement time of the galvanized steel stranded wire is based on the corrosion amount of the galvanized layer applied to the surface to prevent corrosion and the corrosion amount of the steel stranded wire portion which maintains the strength. It is necessary to make a comprehensive judgment. However, since the visual inspection method is judged by the external appearance, it is difficult to grasp the progress of corrosion to the inside, and it is easy to make an error in estimating the replacement time. For example, even if most of the galvanized layer on the surface remains, corrosion at one location goes deep inside, and the strength of the wire may be greatly reduced compared to galvanized steel. As a result of this misconception,
There were problems such as disconnection accidents and replacement of wires that were still fully usable. For this reason, the number of inspections has been increased to half a year or once a year, but proper management was difficult.

【0006】一方、この目視による検査作業は、高い位
置にある亜鉛めっき鋼より線に人が接近する必要のため
保守用車等に乗る高所作業であり、全面を検査するには
反対側からも見る必要があり手間がかかる。さらに、保
守用車の操作要員等も必要であり、この亜鉛めっき鋼よ
り線は鉄道沿線にかなりの距離に設置されていることか
ら、多数の人手を要し、作業コストは非常に高いものと
なっていた。
On the other hand, this visual inspection work is an aerial work for riding on a maintenance car or the like because it is necessary for a person to approach the galvanized steel stranded wire at a high position. It also takes time and effort to see. Furthermore, maintenance vehicle operators are also required, and since this galvanized steel stranded wire is installed at a considerable distance along the railway, it requires a lot of manpower and the work cost is very high. Was becoming.

【0007】そこで本発明は、亜鉛めっき鋼より線のよ
うな二層金属線材の腐食後の残存量を、簡便な作業によ
って各金属毎に区別して検出できる腐食劣化判定法を提
供することを目的とする。
Therefore, the object of the present invention is to provide a corrosion deterioration judging method capable of separately detecting the amount of remaining double-layer metal wire rod such as a galvanized steel wire after corrosion for each metal by a simple operation. And

【0008】[0008]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明が提供する二層金
属線材の腐食劣化判定法は、第1の金属の外周を第2の
金属で被覆した線材に沿って、渦流を発生させる励磁手
段とこの渦流による磁界変化の検出コイルを有する検出
器を移動させ、
The method for determining corrosion deterioration of a two-layer metal wire provided by the present invention is an exciting means for generating an eddy current along a wire in which the outer periphery of a first metal is covered with a second metal. And move the detector that has a detection coil for magnetic field change due to this eddy current,

【0009】この検出コイルに発生する誘導電圧に対し
最大出力が得られるように位相検波を行なった場合の出
力を、図1に示すように位相と振幅で表す2次元平面に
おいて、線材がない場合の出力を原点c、腐食のない線
材の出力を点a、外周の第2の金属を剥離した第1の金
属のみの線材の出力を点bとしたとき、
When there is no wire rod in the two-dimensional plane represented by the phase and the amplitude as shown in FIG. 1, the output when the phase detection is performed so that the maximum output is obtained with respect to the induced voltage generated in the detection coil. Is the origin c, the output of the wire rod without corrosion is point a, and the output of the wire rod of only the first metal from which the second metal on the outer periphery is peeled off is point b,

【0010】腐食検出対象の線材に対して、点aと点b
を結ぶ直線と直交する方向の成分(第1の金属に対応)
が得られる位相(図1内のベクトルEの位相角)と、上
記点bと原点cを結ぶ直線と直交する方向の成分(第2
の金属に対応)が得られる位相(図1内のベクトルFの
位相角)で、それぞれ位相検波し、
Points a and b for the wire to be detected for corrosion
Component in the direction orthogonal to the straight line connecting the two (corresponding to the first metal)
(The phase angle of the vector E in FIG. 1) and the component in the direction orthogonal to the straight line connecting the point b and the origin c (second
(Corresponding to the metal of), the phase is detected (the phase angle of the vector F in FIG. 1), and

【0011】各検波出力を、予じめ金属の残存量と出力
との関係を調べて得た、例えば図2に示すような既知の
参照データと比較して、第1および第2の金属の腐食量
を個別に算出・表示し、線材取替え時期の推定に供する
ことを特徴とする。
Each detected output is compared with known reference data obtained, for example, as shown in FIG. 2, which is obtained by investigating the relationship between the remaining amount of the preliminarily metal and the output. The feature is that the amount of corrosion is calculated and displayed individually and used to estimate the wire replacement time.

【0012】[0012]

【作用】本発明法は、金属の傷等を調べる渦流探傷試験
法の原理を応用している。この渦流探傷試験法は、試験
体に交流磁界を作用させて渦流を発生させ、この渦流の
大きさによって試験体のインピーダンスを知り、これか
ら傷の大きさ等を判断する。具体的には渦流によって検
出コイルに生じる誘導電圧を、信号成分のみを取り出す
ため所定の位相で位相検波して検知出力とする。この位
相検波は、作用磁界の周波数と同一の周波数で信号成分
が最大値になる所定の位相で、例えば半周期(180
°)毎に反転する正負のパルス信号により、FET(電
界効果トランジスタ)のゲートをオン・オフさせ、この
ゲートを通過する電圧の平均値を検知出力とする。な
お、この位相は検出体の素材に固有の値を持つ。
The method of the present invention applies the principle of the eddy current flaw detection test method for examining metal flaws and the like. In this eddy current flaw detection test method, an alternating magnetic field is applied to a test body to generate a vortex flow, the impedance of the test body is known from the size of the vortex flow, and the size of the scratch or the like is determined from this. Specifically, the induced voltage generated in the detection coil by the eddy current is phase-detected at a predetermined phase in order to extract only the signal component, and is used as a detection output. This phase detection is a predetermined phase in which the signal component has a maximum value at the same frequency as the frequency of the acting magnetic field, and for example, a half cycle (180
The gate of an FET (field effect transistor) is turned on / off by a positive / negative pulse signal which is inverted every (°), and the average value of the voltage passing through this gate is used as a detection output. This phase has a value peculiar to the material of the detector.

【0013】しかし、このような一般的な渦流探傷試験
法で、亜鉛めっき鋼より線のような二層金属線材を検査
すると、最大出力が得られる位相が腐食の進行とともに
変化し、かつ検知出力の振幅も腐食量と対応なく変化す
るので、使用できない。
However, when a double-layer metal wire rod such as a galvanized steel stranded wire is inspected by such a general eddy current flaw detection test method, the phase at which the maximum output is obtained changes with the progress of corrosion, and the detection output The amplitude of does not correspond to the amount of corrosion and cannot be used.

【0014】亜鉛めっき鋼より線の腐食の進行に伴っ
て、最大出力が得られる位相とその振幅が変化する様子
を、X軸とY軸で表わされる2次元平面内のベクトルと
して図1に表わす。
FIG. 1 shows, as a vector in a two-dimensional plane represented by the X-axis and the Y-axis, how the phase at which the maximum output is obtained and its amplitude change as the corrosion of the galvanized steel wire progresses. .

【0015】この図は亜鉛めっき鋼より線が存在しない
(空芯の)場合の出力をゼロ値のベクトルCとして原点
cにとり、亜鉛めっき鋼より線が新品の場合の位相検波
出力をX軸上にベクトルAで表わしている。同図の点線
a−b−cは、亜鉛めっき鋼より線の腐食が、始めに亜
鉛めっき部分のみに進行し、亜鉛めっき部分が完全にな
くなってから鋼より線部分に進行する場合に、位相検波
出力を示すベクトルDの先端が描く軌跡である。腐食に
より亜鉛めっき層が減少して行くと、位相検波出力のベ
クトルDの先端は、図中点aから点bに向かって移動す
る。そして亜鉛めっき層がなくなると点bに達する。さ
らに鋼より線部分も腐食により減少して行くと、ベクト
ルDの先端は原点である点cに向かって移動し、鋼より
線部分が全くなくなると原点cに到達する。
In this figure, the output when the galvanized steel wire does not exist (air core) is taken as the zero value vector C at the origin c, and the phase detection output when the galvanized steel wire is new is on the X-axis. Is represented by the vector A. The dotted line a-b-c in the figure indicates the phase when the corrosion of the galvanized steel wire progresses only to the galvanized portion first and progresses to the wire portion of the steel after the galvanized portion has completely disappeared. It is the locus drawn by the tip of the vector D indicating the detection output. As the zinc plating layer decreases due to corrosion, the tip of the vector D of the phase detection output moves from point a to point b in the figure. When the galvanized layer disappears, the point b is reached. Furthermore, when the wire portion of the steel also decreases due to corrosion, the tip of the vector D moves toward the point c, which is the origin, and reaches the origin c when the wire portion of the steel disappears at all.

【0016】上記関係から次の法則が成立していること
が解る。亜鉛めっき層のみが減少していくとき、べクト
ルDの先端は点aから点bに向かって直線的に変化し、
この変化方向と直交する方向の成分は変化しない。この
成分はボリュームが変化しない鋼より線に対応してい
る。そこで、この成分を表わすため、点aと点bを結ぶ
直線に原点cから垂線を引いて鉄軸Eとする。鋼より線
が減少していくとき、ベクトルDの先端は、点bから点
cに向かって直線的に変化する。これは、鋼より線の量
に対応しており、上記鉄軸EへのベクトルDの射影か
ら、この変化量を読み取れる。
From the above relation, it is understood that the following law is established. When only the galvanized layer decreases, the tip of the vector D changes linearly from point a to point b,
The component in the direction orthogonal to this changing direction does not change. This component corresponds to steel strands whose volume does not change. Therefore, in order to represent this component, a perpendicular line from the origin c to the straight line connecting the points a and b is set as the iron axis E. As the steel strand decreases, the tip of the vector D changes linearly from the point b to the point c. This corresponds to the amount of steel strands, and this amount of change can be read from the projection of the vector D on the iron axis E.

【0017】亜鉛めっき層のボリュームの減少に伴なっ
てベクトルDは点aから点bに向かって移動する。この
亜鉛めっき層の変化を読み取るため、鋼より線部分のボ
リューム変化に影響されないように点bと点cを結ぶ直
線と平行に、点aから直線を引き、この直線に原点から
垂線を引いて亜鉛軸Fとする。図1から解るように、ベ
クトルDの亜鉛軸Fへの射影が残留している亜鉛めっき
層の残存量を示している。
The vector D moves from the point a to the point b as the volume of the galvanized layer decreases. In order to read this change in the galvanized layer, draw a straight line from point a parallel to the straight line connecting points b and c so that it will not be affected by changes in the volume of the steel strand, and draw a perpendicular line from the origin to this straight line. Zinc axis F. As can be seen from FIG. 1, the projection of the vector D on the zinc axis F shows the remaining amount of the galvanized layer.

【0018】すなわち、亜鉛めっき鋼より線の位相検波
出力を示すベクトルDの亜鉛軸F方向の成分は、残存し
ている亜鉛量に比例し、ベクトルDの鉄軸E方向の成分
は残存している鋼より線量に比例している。これらの比
例関係はリニアなものではないが、一定の関係を有する
ものとして、例えば図2に示すようにデータ化できる。
That is, the component of the vector D indicating the phase detection output of the galvanized steel strand in the direction of the zinc axis F is proportional to the amount of zinc remaining, and the component of the vector D in the direction of the iron axis E remains. It is more proportional to the dose than steel. Although these proportional relationships are not linear, they can be converted into data as shown in FIG. 2 as having a certain relationship.

【0019】ベクトルDの鉄軸E方向の成分および亜鉛
軸F方向の成分を得るには、検出コイルに発生する誘導
電圧を、上記鉄軸Eの位相および亜鉛軸Fの位相で、そ
れぞれ位相検波すればよい。
In order to obtain the component of the vector D in the iron axis E direction and the component of the zinc axis F direction, the induced voltage generated in the detection coil is phase-detected with the phase of the iron axis E and the phase of the zinc axis F, respectively. do it.

【0020】そして、このように取り出された亜鉛軸方
向の成分と鉄軸方向の成分を、予じめ調べておいた検出
対象金属の存在量と検知出力との対応データ表と照し合
せて、亜鉛めっき層と鋼より線の残存量を個別に読みと
り、亜鉛めっき鋼より線の取り替え時期を過去の蓄積デ
ータ等に基づき、総合的に判断する。
Then, the zinc axial direction component and the iron axial direction component thus taken out are collated with the corresponding data table of the abundance of the detection target metal and the detection output, which has been previously investigated. , Read the remaining amount of the galvanized layer and the stranded steel wire individually, and make a comprehensive determination of the replacement time of the galvanized steel stranded wire based on past accumulated data.

【0021】亜鉛めっき層と鋼より線の腐食は、実際は
上述のように段階的に進行するとは限らず、同時に平行
して腐食することが多いので、上記ベクトルDの軌跡
は、実際上は、点a−b−cを結ぶ点線の付近を通るこ
とになる。この場合でも、各検知出力と両金属の残存量
の対応関係は、段階的に腐食が進む場合と同様であるこ
とが、多数の試験体での実験によって確認されている。
Corrosion of the galvanized layer and the steel stranded wire does not always progress stepwise as described above, but in many cases, the corrosion occurs in parallel at the same time. Therefore, the locus of the vector D is actually It will pass near the dotted line connecting the points abc. Even in this case, it has been confirmed by experiments with a large number of test bodies that the correspondence relationship between each detection output and the residual amounts of both metals is the same as in the case where corrosion progresses in stages.

【0022】以上の説明は、亜鉛めっき鋼より線につい
て行なっているが、本発明法は、他の種類の金属を組み
合せた線材であっても、被覆金属のみが減少するときの
位相検波出力、および内部金属のみが減少するときの位
相検波出力が、それぞれ位相と振幅を表わす2次元平面
上で直線的に変化するという法則性を持てば、同様に実
施可能である。
Although the above description has been made with respect to a galvanized steel stranded wire, the method of the present invention can detect the phase detection output when only the coated metal is reduced, even if the wire is a combination of other kinds of metals. Also, if there is a law that the phase detection output when only the internal metal is reduced changes linearly on a two-dimensional plane that represents the phase and the amplitude, respectively, it can be similarly implemented.

【0023】[0023]

【実施例】本発明法は、上述した原理に基づいて測定を
行うものであって、測定時に渦電流を生じさせるための
交流磁界を加える手段、および渦電流の変化を検出する
コイル構造、検出コイル出力の処理方法は、上記方法を
実施できる範囲で任意に選べる。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The method of the present invention is to perform measurement based on the above-mentioned principle. Means for applying an alternating magnetic field for generating an eddy current at the time of measurement, coil structure for detecting changes in eddy current, and detection The coil output processing method can be arbitrarily selected within a range in which the above method can be implemented.

【0024】次に、その具体例を説明する。図3は相互
誘導型コイルを使用した検出回路の一構成例を示す。こ
の回路において、L1 ,L2 は直列接続された一次コイ
ルで、検査対象の線材に応じて選択される所定周波数
(1KHz 〜250KHz )の励磁用交流電源eが接続
されている。L3 ,L4 は直列接続された2次側検出コ
イルで、それぞれ1次コイルのL1 とL2 に近接・配置
され、L1 とL3 およびL2 とL4 はそれぞれ別個の磁
気回路を構成する。2次検出コイルのL3 ,L4 は、2
個の抵抗R1 ,R2 およびバランス用の抵抗R3 とブリ
ッジ接続されている。このブリッジ回路5の出力は、2
次側検出コイルL3 ,L4 の中点とバランス用の抵抗R
3 の可動接点から取り出され、処理回路6に出力され
る。処理回路6は励磁用交流電源eから、図示しない移
相回路によって所定の位相信号を生成して位相検波を行
ない、この検波出力を表示器7に表示させる。
Next, a specific example will be described. FIG. 3 shows a configuration example of a detection circuit using a mutual induction type coil. In this circuit, L1 and L2 are primary coils connected in series, to which an exciting AC power source e of a predetermined frequency (1 KHz to 250 KHz) selected according to the wire to be inspected is connected. L3 and L4 are secondary-side detection coils connected in series and are arranged close to and located in the primary coils L1 and L2, respectively, and L1 and L3 and L2 and L4 form separate magnetic circuits. The secondary detection coils L3 and L4 are 2
It is bridge-connected to the resistors R1 and R2 and the balancing resistor R3. The output of this bridge circuit 5 is 2
Secondary detection coil L3, L4 midpoint and balancing resistor R
It is taken out from the movable contact 3 and output to the processing circuit 6. The processing circuit 6 generates a predetermined phase signal from the exciting AC power source e by a phase shift circuit (not shown), performs phase detection, and causes the display 7 to display the detection output.

【0025】この構成では、コイルL1 ,L3 の磁気回
路部分を常に空芯状態とし、他方のコイルL2 ,L4 を
亜鉛めっき鋼より線に対して近接状態で移動させて使用
する。ブリッジ回路5はゼロ点調整用のもので、コイル
L2 ,L4 が亜鉛めっき鋼より線に対向していないと
き、バランス用の抵抗R3 を調整してその出力をゼロと
する。これによって図1に示すような位相検波出力が得
られる。
In this structure, the magnetic circuit portions of the coils L1 and L3 are always in the air-core state, and the other coils L2 and L4 are used while being moved close to the galvanized steel stranded wire. The bridge circuit 5 is for adjusting the zero point, and when the coils L2 and L4 are not opposed to the stranded wire of galvanized steel, the balancing resistor R3 is adjusted to make its output zero. As a result, the phase detection output as shown in FIG. 1 is obtained.

【0026】ゼロ点調整後、コイルL2 ,L4 の部分に
亜鉛めっき鋼より線を挿通させると、その出力は図1に
示す条件に従って変化する。この出力は先に説明したよ
うに亜鉛軸F方向の成分(亜鉛の残存量を表わす)のみ
を取り出す位相と、鉄軸E方向の成分(鋼より線の残存
量を表わす)のみを取り出す位相で、それぞれ位相検波
される。各検波出力は、別個に取り出され表示器にて表
示される。この表示は、例えば亜鉛用と鋼より線用に専
用のメータを設け、0〜100%の表示(腐食がないと
き100%)をさせる。この表示は、位相検波出力を、
予じめ測定して得られた位相検波出力と残存量の対応デ
ータに基づき補正を加えて、実際の残存金属量を表示さ
せることもできる。亜鉛めっき鋼より線の交換時期の予
測は、試験された亜鉛めっき鋼より線の架線状況を勘案
しながら、過去のデータと照して判断する。
After adjusting the zero point, when a coil of galvanized steel is inserted through the coils L2 and L4, the output changes according to the conditions shown in FIG. As described above, this output is obtained in the phase in which only the component in the zinc axis F direction (representing the residual amount of zinc) is extracted and in the phase in which only the component in the iron axis E direction (representing the residual amount of steel strand) is extracted. , Respectively, phase detection is performed. Each detection output is taken out separately and displayed on the display. For this display, for example, a dedicated meter is provided for zinc and steel stranded wire to display 0-100% (100% when there is no corrosion). This display shows the phase detection output,
It is also possible to display the actual amount of the remaining metal by making a correction based on the corresponding data of the phase detection output and the remaining amount obtained by the preliminary measurement. The prediction of the replacement time of the galvanized steel stranded wire will be made in light of past data, taking into account the overhead wire condition of the tested galvanized steel stranded wire.

【0027】図4に、本発明法を実施する検出器の機械
的構成例を示す。7は検出器のセンサ部で、亜鉛めっき
鋼より線の上を走行する2個のガイドローラ8を持つボ
ックス型のケース9内に、一次コイルL1 ,L2 および
二次側検出コイルL3 ,L4 を内装している。このセン
サ部7は、検査員が持つ長い絶縁棒10で牽引され、亜
鉛めっき鋼より線の上を走行する。11は検査員が肩に
掛けて持ち運ぶことができる検出器本体で、励磁用交流
電源e、移送回路、位相検波回路、表示器等を持ち、伸
縮自在なスパイラル線12によりセンサ部7と接続され
ている。この構成によって作業性が極めて向上する。ま
た場所によっては、はしご、タワー、保守用車等を用い
ず、検査員が架線の下を歩くだけで腐食劣化検査を行う
ことも可能である。
FIG. 4 shows an example of the mechanical constitution of the detector for carrying out the method of the present invention. Reference numeral 7 denotes a sensor portion of the detector, in which the primary coils L1 and L2 and the secondary side detection coils L3 and L4 are provided in a box-shaped case 9 having two guide rollers 8 that run on a galvanized steel stranded wire. It is decorated. The sensor unit 7 is pulled by a long insulating rod 10 held by an inspector and runs on a galvanized steel stranded wire. Reference numeral 11 denotes a detector main body that an inspector can carry around by carrying it on his / her shoulder, and has an exciting AC power supply e, a transfer circuit, a phase detection circuit, a display, etc., and is connected to the sensor unit 7 by a retractable spiral wire 12. ing. This configuration greatly improves workability. Depending on the location, it is also possible for the inspector to carry out the corrosion deterioration inspection simply by walking under the overhead line without using a ladder, a tower, a maintenance car, or the like.

【0028】[0028]

【発明の効果】本発明によれば、亜鉛めっき鋼より線等
の二層金属線材の腐食状態の把握を、簡便な操作で、正
確に行えるようになる。したがって、亜鉛めっき鋼より
線の保全方法を、従来採用されていた目視検査による不
正確な時間基準保全から、設備診断機器を使用する正確
な状態保全基準に移行できる。そのため、検査周期が延
伸でき、毎年の亜鉛めっき鋼より線の検査要員を減少で
きるとともに、使用可能な亜鉛めっき鋼より線の取替を
行うこともなくなり、亜鉛めっき鋼より線の保守経費を
減らすことができる。
According to the present invention, the corrosion state of a two-layer metal wire rod such as a galvanized steel stranded wire can be accurately grasped by a simple operation. Therefore, the maintenance method of the galvanized steel stranded wire can be shifted from the inaccurate time base maintenance by visual inspection, which has been conventionally adopted, to the accurate condition maintenance standard using equipment diagnostic equipment. As a result, the inspection cycle can be extended, the number of personnel inspecting the wire for galvanized steel each year can be reduced, and replacement of usable galvanized steel wires is eliminated, which reduces maintenance costs for the wires. be able to.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】渦流試験の際に、腐食により二層金属線材の位
相検波出力が変化する状態を示す、本発明法の原理説明
FIG. 1 is an explanatory view of the principle of the method of the present invention showing a state in which the phase detection output of a double-layer metal wire changes due to corrosion during an eddy current test.

【図2】金属の残存量と検波出力との関係の一例を示す
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the relationship between the residual amount of metal and the detection output.

【図3】本発明法を実施する検出回路の一具体例を示す
回路図
FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram showing a specific example of a detection circuit for carrying out the method of the present invention.

【図4】本発明法を実施する一具体例の検出器の外観構
成図
FIG. 4 is an external configuration diagram of a detector of one specific example for carrying out the method of the present invention.

【図5】亜鉛めっき鋼より線が使用されている電気鉄道
の電車線路設備を示す斜視図
FIG. 5 is a perspective view showing a train track facility of an electric railway in which a galvanized steel stranded wire is used.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

A 腐食のない線材の位相検波出力を示すベクトル(先
端を点aとする) B 第1の金属のみの線材の位相検波出力を示すベクト
ル(先端を点bとする) C 線材がない場合の位相検波出力(原点cとする) D 腐食進行中の線材の位相検波出力を示すベクトル E 第1の金属の残存量が得られる位相を持つベクトル
(鉄軸) F 第2の金属の残存量が得られる位相を持つベクトル
(亜鉛軸) 5 検出器のセンサ部 L3,L4 検出コイル 6 位相検波回路(処理回路) 7 表示器
A Vector showing phase detection output of wire without corrosion (tip is point a) B Vector showing phase detection output of wire with only first metal (point is b) C Phase without wire Detection output (referred to as origin c) D Vector showing phase detection output of wire rod in progress of corrosion E Vector having phase to obtain remaining amount of first metal (iron axis) F Obtaining remaining amount of second metal Vector (Zinc axis) with a certain phase 5 Sensor part of the detector L3, L4 Detection coil 6 Phase detection circuit (processing circuit) 7 Indicator

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 横田 五郎 京都府京都市右京区山ノ内御堂殿町13番地 の1 株式会社 エレクトロニクス キョ ート内 (56)参考文献 特開 昭63−212804(JP,A) 特開 昭59−40287(JP,A) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (72) Goro Yokota, 1-13 13 Midodencho, Yamanouchi, Ukyo-ku, Kyoto Prefecture, Kyoto Electronics Co., Ltd. (56) Reference JP-A-63-212804 (JP, A) JP-A-59-40287 (JP, A)

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 第1の金属の外周を第2の金属で被覆し
た線材に沿って、各金属に渦流を発生させる励磁手段と
この渦流による磁界変化の検出コイルを有する検出器を
移動させ、 この検出コイルに発生する誘導電圧に対し最大出力が得
られるように位相検波を行なった場合の出力を位相と振
幅で表す2次元平面において、線材がない場合の出力を
原点c、腐食のない線材の出力を点a、外周の第2の金
属を剥離した第1の金属のみの線材の出力を点bとした
とき、 腐食検出対象の線材に対して、第2の金属に対応する出
力が排除される点aと点bを結ぶ直線と直交する方向の
成分(第1の金属に対応)が得られる位相と、第1の金
属に対応する出力が排除される上記点bと原点cを結ぶ
直線と直交する方向の成分(第2の金属に対応)が得ら
れる位相で、それぞれ、位相検波し、 各検波出力から第1および第2の金属の腐食量を個別に
算出することを特徴とする二層金属線材の腐食劣化判定
法。
1. A detector having an exciting means for generating an eddy current in each metal and a detector having a coil for detecting a magnetic field change caused by the eddy current is moved along a wire rod in which an outer circumference of the first metal is covered with the second metal, In the two-dimensional plane that represents the output when the phase detection is performed so as to obtain the maximum output for the induced voltage generated in the detection coil, the output when there is no wire is the origin c, and the wire without corrosion is the wire. output when the point a, the output of the first metal only wires of peeling the second metal of the outer periphery and a point b of, with respect to wire corrosion detected, out corresponding to the second metal
The phase at which the component (corresponding to the first metal) in the direction orthogonal to the straight line connecting the points a and b at which the force is removed is obtained, and the first gold
The phase detection is performed at the phase at which the component (corresponding to the second metal) in the direction orthogonal to the straight line connecting the point b and the origin c where the output corresponding to the genus is excluded is obtained, And a corrosion deterioration determination method for a two-layer metal wire rod, which comprises individually calculating the amount of corrosion of the second metal.
JP3072506A 1991-03-11 1991-03-11 Corrosion degradation determination method for double-layer metal wire Expired - Fee Related JPH0827262B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP3072506A JPH0827262B2 (en) 1991-03-11 1991-03-11 Corrosion degradation determination method for double-layer metal wire

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP3072506A JPH0827262B2 (en) 1991-03-11 1991-03-11 Corrosion degradation determination method for double-layer metal wire

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH04282451A JPH04282451A (en) 1992-10-07
JPH0827262B2 true JPH0827262B2 (en) 1996-03-21

Family

ID=13491300

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP3072506A Expired - Fee Related JPH0827262B2 (en) 1991-03-11 1991-03-11 Corrosion degradation determination method for double-layer metal wire

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0827262B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008139115A (en) * 2006-11-30 2008-06-19 Nippon Petroleum Refining Co Ltd Multi-layer non-destructive inspection method

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007271607A (en) * 2006-03-07 2007-10-18 Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc:The Anomaly detection device
JP2007271495A (en) * 2006-03-31 2007-10-18 Central Res Inst Of Electric Power Ind Corrosion evaluation method using eddy current flaw detection
JP7027927B2 (en) * 2018-02-07 2022-03-02 株式会社島津製作所 Magnetic material inspection equipment

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5940287A (en) * 1982-08-31 1984-03-05 Anritsu Corp Apparatus for detecting metal
JPS63212804A (en) * 1987-02-28 1988-09-05 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Measuring method of film thickness

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008139115A (en) * 2006-11-30 2008-06-19 Nippon Petroleum Refining Co Ltd Multi-layer non-destructive inspection method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH04282451A (en) 1992-10-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4809039B2 (en) Electromagnetic induction type inspection apparatus and electromagnetic induction type inspection method
US8536860B2 (en) Method and apparatus for non-destructive testing
CN101216460B (en) AC and DC composite magnetisation based leakage detection recognition method for inside and outside wall defect
US6400146B1 (en) Sensor head for ACFM based crack detection
KR100218653B1 (en) Electromagnetic Induction Tester
CA1221739A (en) Clad thickness measuring device
US4631688A (en) Method of and apparatus for testing a metal body by means of eddy currents
JPH03267754A (en) Method and device for eddy current flaw detection
JPH0827262B2 (en) Corrosion degradation determination method for double-layer metal wire
Aouf et al. Eddy Current Probe Configuration for Full Rail Top Surface Inspection
JP7374032B2 (en) How to create a master curve for thickness measurement using electromagnetic measurements and how to use it
JPH05126799A (en) Deciding method for corrosion deterioration of three-layer metal wire
EP1348952B1 (en) Mutual inductance bridge for detection of degradation in metallic components
CN116519747A (en) Paint thickness calculation and substrate material identification method
JP4367601B2 (en) Current measuring system, measuring apparatus and measuring method
KR200204290Y1 (en) Magnetic field producer of eddy current separator apparatus
JP2004184158A (en) Method and apparatus for judging the quality of connection of steel core aluminum stranded wire
JP4054888B2 (en) Method and apparatus for judging quality of connecting portion of steel core aluminum strand
JP3321648B2 (en) Method and apparatus for judging the quality of connection of steel core aluminum stranded wire
JPH0244019B2 (en)
JPH05264704A (en) Method and apparatus for measuring coercive force of steel plate
JPH0481653A (en) Eddy current flaw detection method
SU628437A1 (en) Stuck-on eddy-current differential transducer
Vernon The universal impedance diagram of the ferrite pot core eddy current transducer: IEEE transactions on magnetics, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 2639–2645 (May 1989)
JP2006058154A (en) Method and apparatus for measuring thickness of metal body

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080321

Year of fee payment: 12

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090321

Year of fee payment: 13

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090321

Year of fee payment: 13

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100321

Year of fee payment: 14

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees