Hussain et al., 2016 - Google Patents
Robust fault detection using subspace aided data driven designHussain et al., 2016
View PDF- Document ID
- 2786005075654111685
- Author
- Hussain A
- Khan A
- Abid M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Asian Journal of Control
External Links
Snippet
The paper deals with the design of robust fault detection system using subspace aided data driven techniques. Because of unavailability of system matrices for the complex processes, a new algorithm has been proposed to identify a robust parity vector directly from the process …
- 238000001514 detection method 0 title abstract description 26
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
- G05B23/0243—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B15/00—Systems controlled by a computer
- G05B15/02—Systems controlled by a computer electric
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS], computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
- G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G06N99/005—Learning machines, i.e. computer in which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the machine itself during a complete run
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Harrou et al. | Statistical process monitoring using advanced data-driven and deep learning approaches: theory and practical applications | |
| Ding | Data-driven design of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control systems | |
| Jiao et al. | A quality-related fault detection approach based on dynamic least squares for process monitoring | |
| Li et al. | Fuzzy observer-based fault detection design approach for nonlinear processes | |
| Chen et al. | Cointegration testing method for monitoring nonstationary processes | |
| Pourasghar et al. | Interval observer versus set‐membership approaches for fault detection in uncertain systems using zonotopes | |
| Li et al. | A fault detection approach for nonlinear systems based on data-driven realizations of fuzzy kernel representations | |
| Khan et al. | Threshold computation for fault detection in a class of discrete‐time nonlinear systems | |
| Zhang et al. | On fault detection in linear discrete‐time, periodic, and sampled‐data systems | |
| Tadić et al. | Particle filtering for sensor fault diagnosis and identification in nonlinear plants | |
| Hussain et al. | Robust fault detection using subspace aided data driven design | |
| Huang | Detection of abrupt changes of total least squares models and application in fault detection | |
| Ding | Data-driven design of model-based fault diagnosis systems | |
| Yan et al. | Multivariate control performance assessment and control system monitoring via hypothesis test on output covariance matrices | |
| Lindner et al. | Data-driven fault detection with process topology for fault identification | |
| Samantaray et al. | Sensitivity bond graph approach to multiple fault isolation through parameter estimation | |
| Du et al. | Active fault isolation of nonlinear process systems | |
| Martins et al. | Hybrid methods for detection and identification of faults in dynamic systems | |
| Shang et al. | Change‐point detection in phase I for profiles with binary data and random predictors | |
| Wang et al. | Fault‐tolerant control of linear multivariable controllers using iterative feedback tuning | |
| Elloumi et al. | Design of self‐tuning regulator for large‐scale interconnected Hammerstein systems | |
| Chen et al. | Study on small multiplicative fault detection using canonical correlation analysis with the local approach | |
| Wang et al. | H∞ fault detection for two‐dimensional T‐S fuzzy systems in FM second model | |
| Zhou et al. | Effects of model accuracy on residual control charts | |
| Yang et al. | Identification of LTI Time‐Delay Systems with Missing Output Data Using GEM Algorithm |